User talk:Steinsplitter/Archive/2014

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Adding translation tags

When you mark pages for translation, could you please put the translate tags inside the section headers? For example, I am trying to edit a section from Commons:License review, at the Instructions for reviewers section, and it is returning "You tried to edit a section that does not exist. It may have been moved or deleted while you were viewing the page." I've noticed the error on this page and will fix it later, but if you've marked any other pages on Commons for translation, could you please go back and fix them? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:12, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

This seems to be ta bug... --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Example of how it should be done. Please go back to all the pages you marked for translation and do the same thing. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

No. This is a known bug... I can't find atm the Bugzilla link--Steinsplitter (talk) 12:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I will wait for you to find the bugzilla ticket and explain your actions. In the meantime, could you please not archive this section? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

bugzilla:58946 --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Pleas ask on COM:TN. I am busy atm. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Re: revert

It was not a editwar. I didn't know. Could you link me the guideline page or discussion about? Thanks. --Angelus^(talk) 12:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Moreover I uploaded a retouched version without border, separatly. --Angelus^(talk) 12:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

See Commons:Overwriting existing files, + unfortunately the retouched version is not used on a lot of wiki pages. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:27, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please see this:

Removing parts of historical images. For instance, historical engravings often have a border, and text describing the image under the image. If it was part of the original composition, and you want to remove it for some use on Wikimedia sites, upload it as a new file.

The text that you have cut falls in this category... --Angelus^(talk) 12:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

No, i have only removed the white border of the Bundesarchiv. The border is not historical. This was done by other Users on a lot of Bundesarchiv files to... --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The part you have removed is not a simple "white border", it contains a text that describe the image and it is important for historical purpose. The cropped image should be upload separatly! --Angelus^(talk) 12:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk page

Please see here. Best regards. --Angelus^(talk) 21:05, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Feels free to revert! ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Image on Murat Ses Wiki Page

Hi,

The photo you deleted is taken by my wife ÖpBe aka Nihal Ses.
If you want you can contact me at muratses@yahoo.com or her at nihalses@yahoo.com Also at 1-407-922-5757

Nicole Steans and/or Sven who put the image are our biographers and reviewers.

Pls check this matter soon since my page needs a pic of mine for sure.

Thanking in advance for your time

Murat Ses

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello steinsplitter

I'm trying to re-upload a Larry Dvoskin image to wikicommons and have forwarded permission appropriately but I am denied.

What is my correct path of action? Or please undo the change because I have permission.

Best regards Ian McGrady (talk) 19:24, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Jianhui67 is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 09:52, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Ich schließ mich mal an. Alles Gute für's neue Jahr, Steini! Vogone (talk) 03:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Thx :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alexander Tatarnikov

Hi, please see user talk:Eserasus. He uploaded some pictures from that cross wiki spamming painter and see also this page at the vi wiki. Maybe the sockpuppets are back. I hope not but the pictures came from this flickr account. Since you are the one who cleaned up those files the last time you migt want to know that part of these files where reuploaded. Natuur12 (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

hi, done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again. Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent granting of autopatrol

Hi Steinsplitter. I noticed the autopatrol right you granted to a user is redundant as he is already an OTRS member. Thanks. JianhuiMobile (talk) 13:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Oops did not see that sorry. :P JianhuiMobile (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Riksbot

Hi, I was under the impression that the botrun had been approved: Commons:Bots/Requests/Riksbot regards Profoss (talk) 20:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Approved but not flagged as bot. Sorry for blocking. See Commons:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#User:Riksbot, Have a nice evening. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

thank you !!!!!

thanx for visiting my wiki home

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Translation

Hello Steinsplitter, I read that you’re a translation administrator. I’ve just translated in Italian the Commons:Abuse filter page (here). Is that all or is there anything more that I should do (on regard to this topic, of course: there is always something to do here :) )? Thanks for information, best regards -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 09:37, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Sergio. Grazie per la traduzione :). Ci sono tantissime pagine da tradurre: Translation statistics for Italian. Tanti saluti --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Aha, e dillo che parli italiano :-) Ok, do' un'occhiata, dopo. :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 02:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Featured Pictures candidate

Hallo, habe dieses Foto für FP nominiert. Kannst du bitte die Nominierung bewerten?LG Ciao --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:52, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Wunderschönes Foto. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Danke --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Sobre la autorización y perfisos de imagenes de derechos de autor

Saludos Steinsplitter, mira, no hablo el inglés muy bien, espero que me entiendas bien lo que puedas el español, pero tengo una duda, mira, lo que pasa con varios wikipedistas hemos venido trabajando para el Wikiproyecto sobre Automovilismo, el cual nos enfocamos sobre el Campeonato de Monoplazas IndyCar Series y Champ Car World Series, pero resulta que tenemos mucho impedimento para obtener los permisos necesarios para subir a Wikimedia commons imagenes que obviamente tienen licencia protegida de derechos de autor, y en mirando los proyectos sobre GP2 Series, GP3 Series y GP2 Asia Series, NASCAR y Fórmula 1, ya tienen subido con su respecto licenciamiento en español de unas imágenes de los logos de cada artículo de las entidades de los que habla los artículos, pero se que ya intentaron subir varias veces (cosa que no puedo hacer y no lo hará para no infringir las normas de subida de imágenes que contengan protección de derechos de autor) es la imágen del logo de la IndyCar Series, sin embargo, me gustária saber como puedo buscar la autorización para subir un tipo de imágenes de esta o que requisitos se tiene con imágenes protegidas que han subido a Wikimedia commons pero que han sido normalmente autorizadas por sus autores originales, y respetando esas mismas las leyes establecdas sobre la protección de derechos de autor, igual, si pudiese subirla con o sin ella, de todas formas entiendo bien que no lo podría ser modo, pero estoy al tanto que han habido excepciones pero con sus respectivas autorizaciones.

Por otro lado en el caso de las imágenes para el Artículo Champ Car World Series, como es una serie de autos que ya no existe, y cuyos derechos de imágenes para el uso del logo ya no existen hasta donde tengo entendido, se ha buscado subir, pero no antes de buscar el estudio de poder subirlas, lo mismo es el caso con unas imágenes logo que ya no se usan de IndyCar Series.

Las siguientes imágenes ejemplo son las que necesitamos para el complemento de los artículos en mención, Los Logos que se que no sabremos si se podrán aprobrar la subida serian a menos que:

Champ Car World Series que también se llamó serie CART o IndyCar World Series:

En cuanto a las imágenes que me he dado cuenta que han borrado frecuentemente por la cuesitón de la protección sobre derechos de autor:

Indy Racing League Logo antiguo

O esta variante del mismo Logo: [1]

Esta variante del logo usado en 2008 a 2010: [2]

Logo Actual: [3]

Sin embargo, me gusta´ria saber cual de todos estas imágenes están con licencia protegida actualmente, y cuales de los que ya no se usan se pod´ria estudiar para una posible subida y que se pueda determinar la subida de la imagen sin ningún problema, si ninguna pasa el corte de ser subida entonces no las intentaremos subir jamás, sin embargo, quisiera que antes de verla comparar los ejemplos de los Logos utilizados para los articulo de Wikipedia de GP3 Series y GP2 Asia Series, NASCAR y Fórmula 1 para poder tener una respuesta en la cual podamos llegar a un acuerdo del entendimiento de si es posible o no, Gracias. --Tagheuher_Beta_(Colombia) (talk) 17:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I do not speak Spanish, sorry. Ping@Alan: Can you take a look at this? --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Pong @Steinsplitter

Hola Tagheuher, voy a ponerme al día con este asunto y saber de qué trata. En un momento te cuento algo. --Alan ^(talk) 13:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Vayamos por partes:

Todas imágenes que se alojan en Wikimedia Commons deben respetar de forma obligatoria unos tipos de licencias admitidas. Estas las puedes ver en Commons:Sobre las licencias.

Respecto a cómo conseguir que el titular lo autorice:

El titular de los derechos debe enviat un email al equipo OTRS siguiendo la plantilla que se detalla en Commons:Modelos de mensajes.
Lo que solemos hacer es buscar en la web algún email de contacto y enviarle un email solicitándolo. Aquí ya entra en juego las ganas y la disposición del propietario de los derechos. No es algo sencillo, pero se ha conseguido muchísimas veces.
Respecto a las empresas desaparecidas, la cosa se complica. Los derechos se mantienen durante un mínimo de 70 años tras la muerte del autor o tras la publicación en caso de obras anónimas o de empresas (Los años varían según el país). Ver Commons:Hirtle chart.

De todas formas, si quieres alguna aclaración en concreto sobre este tema, puedes contactar conmigo siempre que lo desees en mi página de discusión e intentaré ayudarte y solucionar tus dudas.

Un saludo, --Alan ^(talk) 13:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Veit mit Friedhof 3 - Prags.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:41, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Umais Bin Sajjad

Hi Steinsplitter. I've unblocked this user per our earlier suggestions that he come back in February with another unblock request. I'll keep an eye on him and reinstitute the block if needed. Hopefully he'll go good. INeverCry 02:06, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

FPC

Hallo Steinsplitter, darf ich dich nochmals bitten bei Features pictures candidates vorbeizuschauen. Es geht hart auf hart. LG Wolfgang

Moroder, it is a bad request, considering the status of Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfarrkiche Sankt Vigil in Kolfuschg mit Sellagruppe 2.jpg. Your works are good; but you need to learn and follow the rules. See en:WP:CANVASSING. J e e 09:49, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

I have voted on a similar version of this file time ago. I really like this photo and it is imho FP --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

I don't really believe my note is disruptive:

1) it is neutral (I hope the content in German is understood)

2) notifications to "Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics)" are considered appropriate. Stein splitter appreciated my similar FP candidate. In case you do not agree, I apologize.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Anton Hofreiter 1.jpg

File:Anton Hofreiter 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Xacyllum (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Obama Makes History

Hi, I know the post is copyrighted but aPkokB-aPkoJZ-aPkoWx-aPkoyX-5UqTjK-6nNbcU the poster on Flickr is a member of the post, I assume he knows what he was doing when posting the image with a free license on Flickr. TomT0m (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC) Hi, Restored and DR started --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/2014⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Rutgers University photos, dinosaurs

Hi when I was uploading about 15 or so photos that I took from Rutgers University, mostly in the Geology museum there, in the UploadWizard process somehow three photos didn't upload properly, such as this one; apparently the images went through, but without the descriptive information? So I re-added it. I took the photos with my camera, and I assign the photos to the public domain so they belong to everybody.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, it is a software bug. Okay, thx :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Regarding your deletion proposal

	Hello, Steinsplitter/Archive. You have new messages at AuFCL's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Panoramio Review bot

Sorry to disturb you but just to let you know that Commons likely needs a review bot for panoramio which is full of hundreds of unreviewed images. I have also told Zhuyifei1999 of the situation. Hopefully, someone can create such a bot in future. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Maybe Zhuyifei1999 has time to crate a clone of the Bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:50, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I hope this will happen in the future since many people upload images from panoramio as you likely know. Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Abuse Filter 122

You appear to be an editor who has updated Special:AbuseFilter/history/122 As I said at Commons talk:Abuse filter#Namespace not required for images, the filter reported "It appears that this gallery contains no images", which is mistaken, having just previewed the galleries before trying to save the page. Turns out the filter assumes a File: or Image: namespace is required for images, an invalid assumption. There's an easy workaround but since gallery syntax does not require images to include a namespace, I think the abuse filter should be changed. 72.244.204.17 23:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Connecting hands.png

I passed this image...as it has not been marked for 2 days. Its probably in Maryland. If there is any FOP problems here, please feel free to file a DR. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

It looks ok :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Seymore D. Fair page

Hello Steinsplitter,

You recently initiated the deletion request and deletion of all images used in the Seymore D. Fair page. Considering that these actions were taken at your direction, please kindly provide details as to what is required to have these images accepted for use in this article.

Thank you and we look forward to your anticipated rely.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddj001 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 3 March 2014‎ (UTC)

Hello, Pleas send a E-Mail to COM:OTRS. Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

CropTool

I saw that you had just done the same thing which I tried to do (i.e. making CropTool a Gadget). Any ideas on why it didn't work? /Lokal _Profil 13:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

No idea. unfortunately :/ --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

And magically it works? =) /Lokal _Profil 18:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes :), Cache problem ;)--Steinsplitter (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for feedback on my GSoC'14 proposal

Hi Steinsplitter,

I am planning to work on the project titled "Tools for mass migration of legacy translated wiki content" this summer under Google Summer of Code. I have drafted a proposal for the same over the past few weeks. This project is going to help the translation adminstrators like you in a great way, as it would completely automate the tedious manual task of preparing a page for translation and then importing the translations into the Translate extension. You can check the proposal page for detailed information on how I plan to accomplish this.

As you would be an end user of this tool, it would be great if you could go through the proposal and provide feedback/suggestions. Your feedback would definitely help me improve the proposal as well help in creating an even better tool. You can do the same on the discussion page of the proposal or reply here, whichever is convenient for you. I look forward to hearing from you! Thank you!

P.S: I need to submit the proposal to Google by March 19, 2014.

BPositive (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

This DR

If you have some time, please check this DR and try to make a reply. Perhaps I was mistaken in filing a DR here. I don't know. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Imho the DR is okay. Looks like Fliskrwashing to me. Mabye we schould blacklist the Flickr-Account. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

it-3

Hi, hab gesehen du kannst Italienisch... Kannst du bitte die beiden Tickets von File:Ilice di Carrinu.jpg und File:Monti Rossi da nord.jpg übernehmen? --McZusatz (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Du hast eine E-Mail. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:33, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Merci

Habs gerade gesehen, danke sehr! Viele Grüße --Itti (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

IB-Antrag gegen Perhelion

Hallo nach Südtirol - ich habe aufmerksam deine Kommentare und Wertungen in dieser Sache beobachtet. Als erfahrener Admin kannst du mir Frischling auf commons sicher kurz erläutern, wie du in diesem Fall zum Urteil AGF kamst, vor dem Hintergrund, dass der anfordernde Benutzer bereits persönliche Erfahrungen in der englischen WP mit IBs hatte und der beschuldigte Benutzer die Regeln eines IBs nicht kennen konnte, da sie in commons nicht fixiert sind, und auch selbst nicht gegen die Regeln wie in der en:wp beschrieben verstieß. Habe in AGF und IB bisher falsch verstanden? --Maxxl2 - talk 15:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Perhelion hat damals Fry gemeldet und jetzt umgekehrt daher noch kein Grund zu Sperren. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Achso - als Betroffener hat man also eine Retourkutsche frei, selbst wenn man genau weiß, dass der Vorwurf falsch ist. Ich würde das nicht für eine Aktion in gutem Glauben (AGF) halten, sondern eher böse Absicht vermuten. Tut mir Leid - aber meine Lebenserfahrung sagt mir das so. --Maxxl2 - talk 16:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

IB report

Are you serious in your claim that I violated my IB by reporting a possible violation to AN???? That would mean that I could never report a violation by another user I have an IB with no matter how serious the violation without also violating the IB myself! That makes no sense!! How is there supposed to be any oversight if the two users in an IB with each other can not even raise the issue of one possibly violating it? Are we to expect everyone else to know about the IB and be observant and make a report for us? Fry1989 ^eh? 17:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I can't see a violation... (per the enwiki IP guidlines), mabye i was too fast with commenting O_O... I suggest we close this topic and not wast our time :). If you have further question feel free to ask. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Bot edits through VFC

******new****** buy now!!!! click, blink, sparkle :)

mw.loader.using(['mediawiki.user', 'user.options'], function() {
	mw.user.options.set('com-libapi-prefs', {
		edit: {
			summary: {
				prepend: 'Bot: '
			},
			flagAsBotEdit: true
		}
	});
});

This has to be appended to the bot's common.js; adjust the edit summary as-you-like. -- Rillke^(q?) 15:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much!!! :):) --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Löschen von Weiterleitungen

Hallo Steinsplitter, Du hattest mir mitgeteilt, dass alle meine Weiterleitungen in den Kategorie-Namensraum gelöscht worden wären. Dies ist offenbar inzwischen auch wohl passiert. Meine Frage ist, warum funktionsgleiche Weiterleitungen anderer Autoren von dieser Maßname ausgenommen worden sind? Beispiele wären hier "Kevelaer" oder "Dudelange". Warum werden diese Weiterleitungen denn nicht auch gelöscht? Nach dem jetzigen Stand verbleibt bei mir das Gefühl, es handle sich um eine Maßname speziell gegen mich. Das kann doch so nicht gewollt sein. Ich bitte hierzu mal um eine Erklärung. Danke. --EisenHerz (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Bitte geht von guten Absichten auch. Dies ist keine Maßname speziell gegen dich. Solche Seiten darfst du gerne zum Schnellöschen nominieren. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hallo nochmal, es geht mir nicht darum, hier reihenweise Schnelllöschanträge zu stellen. Es ist für Dich als Administrator sicher auch technisch einfacher, derartige Weiterleitungen zu ermitteln, in meinem Fall war das ja auch möglich. Es würde mich allerdings mal folgendes interessieren: Du schreibst auf meiner Diskussionsseite, "... Solche Weiterleitungen sind nicht erwünscht...". Wo steht das eigentlich, dass das nicht erwünscht ist? Im Abschnitt Commons:Galerien steht ausdrücklich: "...Wenn es keine Galerie gibt, oder sie nur sehr klein ist, kann eine Galerie zur Kategorie weitergeleitet werden. Um sicherzustellen, dass die Weiterleitung nicht kategorisiert wird, sollte ein Doppelpunkt („:“) vor dem Ziel benutzt werden, z.B. #REDIRECT Category:Foobar...". Auch in der englischsprachigen Version dazu (Commons:Galleries) steht sinngemäß dasselbe: "...In the absence of a gallery, or if there is only a gallery with little or no content, a gallery title can be redirected to a corresponding category (a cross-namespace redirect). To make sure that the redirect isn't included in the category, the colon (":") should be used before the target, e.g. #REDIRECT Category:Foobar...". Ich kann in keiner der beiden Sprachversionen erkennen, dass dort etwas von "unerwünscht" steht. Habe ich dort vielleicht etwas übersehen? --EisenHerz (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Habe gerade meinen Adminkollegen gefragt, solche redirects werden gelöscht. Für mich ist das Thema damit erledigt. Weiterleitungen sind nur in besonderen fällen erlaubt. Nein, technisch nicht einfacher. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Für mich ist das Thema noch nicht erledigt. Ich möchte wissen, wo das geschrieben steht, dass solche Weiterleitungen gelöscht werden sollen. Gerne wüsste ich auch den Benutzernamen des Adminkollegen, den Du gefragt hast. Was sind denn die besonderen Fälle, von denen Du sprichst, in denen das erlaubt ist, und wo stehen die entsprechenden Regelungen, so dass auch für aussenstehende nachvollziehbar ist, wie die Bestimmungen im Einzelnen sind? Oder soll ich annehmen, dass es Wikimedia:Commons allein dem persönlichen Geschmack der Administratoren anheimstellt, was als "besonderer Fall" gelten kann und was nicht? Und was im Kapitel Commons:Galerien#Weiterleitungen unter "Weiterleitungen" steht, hat gegenüber dem persönlichen Geschmack der Administratoren zurückzustehen? Mir ist außerdem aufgefallen, dass dem Benutzer Bdx, seinerzeit Autor der Weiterleitung "Dudelange", die von Dir schnellgelöscht worden ist, keinerlei Benachrichtigung über den Schnelllöschvorgang bei dem von Ihm angelegten Redirect zugekommen ist, anders als bei mir. Soll das dem Benutzer:Bdx gegenüber verheimlicht werden? Darüber hinaus konnte ich auch nicht erkennen, dass weitere funktionsgleiche Weiterleitungen des Benutzers Bdx, die es auch noch gibt, wie in meinem Fall, im Kollektiv alle zusammen gelöscht wurden, obwohl dies ja in meinem Fall technisch möglich war. Im Falle des Benutzers Bdx blieben alle weiteren Weiterleitungen bestehen. Warum werden hier die ein Autoren sooo und die anderen anders behandelt? Vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. --EisenHerz (talk) 22:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 22:38, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

OTRS Ticket#2014042810014686

So, what happened here then? Ultra7 (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

License laundering --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

I guessed that. I wanted details. Ultra7 (talk) 19:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

I can't give details (foundation:Access to nonpublic data policy), Which details do you need exactly? :) The files are deleted on geograph.org.uk too. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

I would like to know what actually happened. Obviously the photos were scans of old prints - so has someone contacted Commons claiming they were the copyright holder, not the geograph uploader? If so, how did they prove it? Or was the ticket a communication from Geograph? Ultra7 (talk) 20:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

I can't give details, very sorry. If you don't trust me, you can ask for verification on COM:ON. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:19, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Of course you can give details. You don't have to tell me any private info like names or email addresses, but you can tell me what happened. Ultra7 (talk) 20:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

I don't like to say too much about this case. Sorry. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Why the hell not? Ultra7 (talk) 20:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Privacy, the files are COM:LL (imho without any doubt), i think this is enough. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

You are being utterly ridiculous. You could easily tell me exactly how you came to that decision, without telling me any private data whatsoever. This is frankly unacceptable. Ultra7 (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Ultra7. Seeing your complaint here, I have taken it seriously and now independently reviewed the correspondence. I can state that copyright was reviewed with a representative from Geograph, and on that basis OTRS volunteers have determined that there is significant doubt for the copyright release. Additional verification of copyright would be required to retain the images on Commons. If anyone wishes to undelete the images on Commons, we would need that additional verification. There is nothing about the correspondence that needs to be a secret, however to publish much more would mean we would have to send a courtesy request to the representative involved, as we have to assume they would wish their identity to remain confidential. I hope you will accept my review as sufficient to address your perfectly understandable demand that we remain as open as possible, while showing our correspondents basic respect for their confidentiality. I do not plan on replying to further questions here.

I would like to add that in my view the WMF non-public data policy was misapplied above. However this is a tangent, if anyone wishes to discuss the point, I suggest they ask on my talk page, though I may take a while to reply. --Fæ (talk) 23:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Dein Bild auf QIC

Hallo Steinsplitter, habe dein Bild gesehen und würde es gerne promoten aber nach den vorgeschlagenen Äderungen, falls es für dich schwierig sein sollte würde ich es gerne für dich tun.

Nun habe ich noch eine andere Frage an dich. Diese Datei hat Probleme , thumbnails zu erzeugen wie du siest. Kannst du was dafür tun oder kennst du einen computer guru der versteht was hier falsch läuft. LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:12, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Danke^^, habe eine neue Version hochgeladen. Wegen dem Bild: Gute Frage. Ich habe leider keine Ahnung. Es kann sein dass die Datei beschädigt ist oder ein MediaWiki bug. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear Steinsplitter/Archive,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Datei deutsche WP

Hallo, wie kann ich das Problem dieser Datei lösen? Ich bin Präsident des Museums, könnte ich u.A. die Datei auch auf Commons hochladen? LG --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Ich habe die Datei nach File:Bierjun.jpg übertragen, kannst du mir bitte eine Freigabe an permissions-commons-de

wikimedia.org senden? LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Und schrieb bitte dazu dass du als Präsident die nötigen Rechte besitzt diese Innenaufnahme zu veröffentlichen. Danke :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Gemacht, danke --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ostau-01.jpg

Hi there, I'm not sure what happened to "Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ostau-01.jpg". I nominated it for deletion, but a few moments later, my nomination request was deleted (along with the tag that says "Do not remove this tag until the deletion nomination is closed.") Then you wrote "deleted". But the picture is still there?

I also added my deletion request prematurely. I noticed the picture in the "Category:Laundromats" and didn't check to see what other pages it was used on. That was my error, as it is actually used on the photographers article. My only issue, I guess, is that it seems to add little value to the "laundromats" category. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

This file is in COM:SCOPE becous it is used on two articles. There is no need to delete such hig qualiti shots used on wikis. I have speedy-closed this DR as keept. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

I agree, and I'm not sure you read my comment above. Do you agree though, that the picture should be removed from "Category:Laundromats", or do you feel a half-naked women in fur has an educational purpose in that category? Thanks again. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Not sure. It is a wiki. Feel free... :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:21, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Main page

Hi, do you have a particular objection to the changes? if so, what is it? —Mono ^{how to reply} 16:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Sure. The translation dos not work and when logged in i see the "login, register" buttons. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:20, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Uploading Images

Hi How can i upload good image — Preceding unsigned comment added by AuburnDee (talk • contribs)

See Commons:Welcome & Commons:Licensing --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Moin! Wollte mich fix zurueckmelden. Danke fuer Deine email von damals. :-)) Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 13:18, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Why?..

Hey, man, what the... Why my uploaded pictures was removed? Wich of copyrights i did infringe?

/facepalm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evaderik (talk • contribs)

See User_talk:El_Grafo#Wha.3F ... --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

O'Kay! I'll do. Thanx!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Evaderik (talk • contribs)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

hi

hi you deleted a photo that i have uploaded. (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shah_Ahmad_Shafi&action=history) so i have a question. can i upload same photo for another time if i take picture of its from my mobile phone??? thanks, 109.149.79.231 17:52, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Pleas see Commons:Licensing --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fabrizialeopardi

Hello Steinsplitter, the uploader told me that on these pics there's an OTRS ticket. I don't want to undelete them because I don't like to rollback another admin, but please consider reviewing your judgment. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:35, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

There is no otrs ticket. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

There is. Pending but there is. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 07:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Feel free to restore :). I don't see a such ticket in the permission queue atm. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Thanks :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 11:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, I inserted the licence templates inside the "permission" field of File information template... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Images deleted franz krauspenhaar

Hi, I am Fabrizialeopardi. I have the images deleted by you while I was waiting for permission of OTRS . Wikicommons administrator Blackcat helped me to restore them because I sent him all the mails with the permission of the Author I addressed, before your delection, to wikipedia office. So I'm waiting for OTRS ticket and I'll sent you when I've got it. I bless you not to delete the images again untill OTRS answer .OTRS offices are full of requests and it takes a long time for an answer. Thanks for your help.--Fabrizialeopardi (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:LittleMix15.jpg

Hi - could you please undelete this and delete only the copyvio version? I tagged it, but perhaps wasn't clear... the original file was fine, only the version uploaded by TeeTeeBlack (talk · contribs) was a copyvio. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Oh, sure. Sorry :-] --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

That was quick... thanks! Storkk (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Khatia Tchkonia.png

Ähem, ich sehe auf Google aber keine externen Quellen, die älter wären als unser Upload. --Túrelio (talk) 09:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Nicht überall steht ein Datum dabei. Man sollte es schon wegen PCP löschen, Guck mal Special:DeletedContributions/Pandemonium... --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Sieht übrigens aus wie ein Bildausschnitt. Und die EXIF. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

O.k. zum Bildausschnitt; wir haben halt nur nicht das Vollbild. Die User-history find ich nicht so richtig überzeugend, jedenfalls nicht die Fastily-Löschungen. Beim Foto File:Idmanocagi Kadin Futbol Takimi 2011-2012 Kadrosu.jpg ist der lt. Google einzige minimal früher datierte hit auch nicht ganz überzeugend als Quelle anzusehen, weil es dort mehrere Wasserzeichen gibt und die Bildqualität schlechter ist. Ich würde das gern in eine DR umwandeln, damit wir eventuell etwas Beteiligung bzw. Aufklärung von :tr bekommen. O.k.? --Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Oops, File:Khatia Tchkonia.png ist ein Ausschnitt von File:Idmanocagi Kadin Futbol Takimi 2011-2012 Kadrosu.jpg. Das ist nun zumindest klar, hab ich aber auch nicht sofort gesehen. --Túrelio (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Erstaunlich, wir haben keinen einzigen :tr-Admin unter uns. --Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Danke^^. In DR umgewandelt. Mhja, leider :/ --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langkofel 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (Geocoding would be appreciated). --P e z i 21:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drei Zinnen 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:51, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:PrimeMinisterNawazSharif.jpg

OTRS 2014041110000043 received, which is credible. I see this was deleted twice in the same day, if there is some context that I am unaware of, do let me know before I validate the photo. Could you undelete please? --Fæ (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I had overlooked the ticket. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Guten Tag!

Warum löscht du das Mediakraft Logo? Das Logo ist frei verfügbar. Die Pressestelle von Mediakraft auf Wikipedia hat mir sogar dafür gedankt. Vielen Dank! Ich werde es immer wieder hochladen.--STX

Das Logo ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und es liegt keine Freigabe vor. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

CommonsDelinker

Seit dem 17.3. weren weder der Helper- noch der Delinker-Log aktualisiert - gibt's da ein Problem? --Denniss (talk) 19:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Scheint irgendwas im log-rotate kaputt zu sein :/ --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:120517 Dove Jane 0012.jpg

Can you undelete File:120517 Dove Jane 0012.jpg? OTRS permission has come in for the image from Sandy Nicholson (author) under ticket number 2013121010000522. Cheers, and thanks in advance. -- TLSuda (talk) 01:05, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

@TLSuda: . Steinsplitter hasn't made any edits in two days so I took the liberty to restore the file for you. Sorry Steinsplitter ;) Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of this for me. Cheers, -- TLSuda (talk) 16:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: File:Sphodrosomus monteithi.jpg

In this diff you reverted me and asked for the reason, so I am here to explain it. I and another user have been discussing this at User talk:TeleComNasSprVen#Special:Diff/121140747 and my reasons for the changes were basically, to simplify the source code so it would strain my eyes less, including spaces added to separate in a table form parameter versus argument and add 1= to ambiguous cases involving special characters, i.e. question marks or ampersands that might disrupt template code. Secondly, it was to supply an argument to the attribution= parameter of the CC license template to clearly mark who the copyright holder for a work was, to complement the data supplied in the {{information}} template. You can see I have begun doing that for some of my uploads. Should I ask others at the Commons:Village pump what they think of the changes? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

No need to including spaces... --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

DVDFab logo

Hello sir, I created page “DVDFab" in language Spanish and used a picture of DVDFab logo. Today I found that this picture was removed from the page. I'd like to say that I was authorized by DVDFab to upload and use this picture in the page. Would you please restore it? Thank you very much.

And another thing: what I want to creat is DVDFab,not Dvdfab. It es an error. Would you please help me to correct it?

Yours Sincerely Luna — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lunaloca1988 (talk • contribs)

Hello, Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Question about files deleted

Hello,

Sorry for my bad english. For some of these files here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_User:Tolliob , I had sent mails to 'permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org' saying that the picture is under Creative Commons CC-by-SA. Despite the fact I've sent the mails and put the OTRS Pending on the page of every files, you've erased these files and I don't understand why.

Did I do something wrong ?

Sincerely

--Tolliob (talk) 10:12, 17 April 2014 (UTC)Tolliob

I can't see a otrs pending template. I have restored your uploads for now. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Special:Diff/121677164

In my opinion, adding a colon before the filename preserves the redirect while preventing the redirect from accidentally appearing on the list at File:Wikiversity-logo-ka.png#filelinks which contains local usages of the file on Wikimedia Commons. MediaWiki thinks that the file the redirect is pointing to is simultaneously the target of the redirect and also "transcluded" onto the redirect page itself. Especially when text is added before the #REDIRECT [[Foo]] syntax, as in this previous revision, it has the potential to break how MediaWiki normally interprets the redirect. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Interesting. I have never seen such a special redirect. ;-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

GlobalReplace sign in

I do not know under what authority you think you are removing my sign-in but stop it. This is not a restricted user right, this is a free-use tool that any user may elect to use, and therefore you have no right to remove me from the list unless there is some sort of community agreement to ban me from using it. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Becous you have abused this tool (crosswiki abuse) --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of File:FalseFireDocumentaryGifState.gif

Dear Steinsplitter,

I am surprised that you deleted this file, as I send a mail to "permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org" last friday following a mail from the owner of the file (New Tang Dynasty) who allowed me to use this file. I also mentionned this in the comment of the file. Perhaps, as my comments were written in french, you did not understand it :-).

Can you check with the people in charge of "permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org" that this file can now be used freely and then restore it ? Thanks you in advance.

If needed, I can foward you by mail the agreement of New Tang Dynasty.

--Nibbler869 (talk) 08:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The French Speaking OTRS Team will look into this. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Wjd3photos.jpg and File:Cinq Exercises de Falun Dafa.jpg

Dear Steinsplitter,

I am surprised that you deleted these two files, as I used to add in the comments that the author "minghui.org" allowxs the use of these files according tho the mentions on the website. Perhaps, as my comments were written in french, you did not understand it :-).

So, I reproduced below the comments from the english wikimedia files that I translated for the french release of the two files :

As prominently displayed on photo library home page (http://package.minghui.org/mh/2003/01/17/photo-exhibition/web/index1.htm) "欢迎转载传阅本网所有内容，但请注明出处" English translation: you are free to carry and transmit all content, provided use its attributed.

You can check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wjd3photos.jpg and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Five_Exercises_of_Falun_Dafa.jpg for further details.

So, according to this mention, I think I can use freely these files on fr.wikipedia.org. If you agree, please restore these two files, thnaks you in advance !

--Nibbler869 (talk) 08:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Done, Pleas remove the wrong license template. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Great ! Thanks you for your help --Nibbler869 (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

My Photo of Brian Higgins

Thank you for keeping my photo of Brian Higgins. I am just offended that someone would think that I did not take this photo. I took this photo of him at SUNY Day in Albany in his office in 2000. It is a scanned, cropped upload of the original. Thanks again, Daniellagreen (talk) 22:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

QIC page

Hello Steinsplitter,

It seems that recently you worked on the QIC pages, in order to provide some translations.

Let me inform you that, since your intervention, the french version is altered, and sometimes (not always), the daily "modifier" facility is no more available. It means that it is impossible to add any nomination, nor to comment any candidacies. Do you think you could do something ? Thank you very much in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, The Nominations are located at Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:25, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Ah OK. I've just to change my own link. Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 14:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Malvinas-cartel.JPG

I tagged two images for speedy deletion [4] and File:Malvinas-cartel.JPG. User:Túrelio converted both to Deletion Reviews, however, you've deleted one of those [5]. Can I just check whether its the case you were aware of the DR or is it just you didn't see the need for the two identical files if there was a problem. Wee Curry Monster (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

This was likely just a coincidence, as I opened both files and it took a moment to write the rationale and paste it into both windows. --Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Converted to DR: 08:46 and Deleted: 08:46. Deleting files dos not schow editconflict. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

OK no worries and thanks for fixing it guys. FYI I checked the copyright status as a result of an FA review on En.Wikipedia en:Talk:Falkland Islands#FA Review. If it is acceptable there may be some editors quite pleased about that.

I also have a minor issue with an editor who blames me for their indef block on en.wikipedia en:User talk:Martinvl#October 2013 and their subsequent block on other wikis Simple:User talk:Martinvl#Block Appeal. I note that they've already followed me here and I just wanted to alert you in case they continued to be disruptive here. W C M_email 09:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malvinas cartel - Puerto Iguazú.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malvinas-cartel.JPG

Hi,

Don't know if you remember the above requests, these were originally nominated by me for speedy deletions due to the lack of copyright information. User:Túrelio converted these to a DRV and you restored one to allow a DRV.

They've been up for over a week now, with very little interest. The only real comment received, confirmed my concern that they do fall foul of copyright law in the US and Argentina. Should the DRV be left a little longer to see if there are other opinions? W C M_email 23:36, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

	Hello, Steinsplitter/Archive. You have new messages at David Levy's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

—David Levy 20:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Zierler Fotos

Hallo Steinsplitter,

Habe gesehen, dass du das Foto von Fr. Zierler gelöscht hast. Allerdings hat Fr. Zierler die Freigabe an Commons geschickt. Ich kopier hier mal den Text.

Foto Nr 1:

I hereby affirm that HPF Pusch (copyright holder's name) is the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of DSC 1510 (2)(4.)jpg(2MB)

I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Theresia Zierler MBA, 1190 Wien

HBF Pusch is the copyright holder

Vienna, 14.4.2014

With best regards

Theresia Zierler MBA www.zierler.at

Foto Nr.2:

I hereby affirm that I,Theresia Zierler MBA (copyright holder's name) is the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of theresia zierler mba (2).jpg.

I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Theresia Zierler MBA, 1190 Wien

I’am the copyright holder

Vienna, 14.4.2014

With best regards

Theresia Zierler MBA

Sie hat alle 2 Freigaben an Commons geschickt. Leider ist ein weiterer Upload nicht gestattet. Fehlermeldung: There's already a file with the same content. Wie geht es jetzt weiter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PTschetschonig (talk • contribs)

Nachdem die Freigabe bearbeitet wurde werden die Bilder wiederhergestellt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Self-promotion?

Hallo - sag mir bitte, was zu tun ist: da gibt es hier einen User mit vier Namen, der gleichzeitig in commons aktiv ist. Die Namen sind Retaux, MaverickSalta, Rolandoynigo und Rolandodeynigo. Mir ist das aufgefallen, weil der User sich plötzlich adelte, Wappen und Seiten für sich und seine Familie und Freunde anlegte. Dabei machte er immer wieder die gleichen Fehler der Überkategorisierung. Für keines seiner Familienwappen gibt es Quellen oder Verlinkungen. Mittlerweile hat er seine Privatwappen bei zweifelhaften Wappenregistern eingetragen. Für mich ist das ein Fall von self-promotion hier, die er in diversen sozialen Netzwerken fortsetzt. Für eine ganze Anzahl von Wappen, die out-of-scope sind, habe ich bereits Löschanträge gestellt. --Maxxl2 - talk 11:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Moin, Ist ein Fall für den CheckUser, du kannst hier einen Antrag öffnen. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Danke für den Tipp. Habe ich sofort gemacht. --Maxxl2 - talk 12:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Hatomim cover (source-Chabadpedia) 2014-04-16 22-00.jpg

Hello, the file I uploaded is from a wiki style site. I checked the site's permissions before uploading and their content is licensed to be shared under GNU docementation. The image in question is one of a scholarly journal from the 1930s. The image is used on that site under this policy. The site also maintains a strict policy on copyright permissions and this image was accepted by their administrators. I hope this suffices for this copyright query. Please remove the tag on the image I uploaded. Thank you. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

The file is copyrighted and not under a free license. We need OTRS permission. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Rillke/HideFilterBar.js

Das würde den Bot-Filter etwas freundlicher gestalten. -- Rillke^(q?) 15:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

2013-10-16-46jerrycolonna1.jpg

Hi there!

Just wondering how I can get a photo of Jerry Colonna, to update to his bio, the photo listed is allover the web and I am unsure what is the best way to get a photo onto wiki. Thanks! Radomirakc (talk) 07:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I also had full permission from him to update the wiki Radomirakc (talk) 07:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi :), Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS. Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

DahaviPha

pls inform why was the photo DahaviPha deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.19.20.14 (talk • contribs)

Copyright violation. Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Permisos enviados a OTRS

Hola Steinsplitter. Puede usted ayudarme con esto por favor. Se ha puesto una planilla de verificación de permiso en el archivo Jorge Giglio Mieres. Se envió un correo con este permiso el día 24 de marzo de 2014, cuyo asunto es: Jorge Giglio Mieres, Gran Maestro del Gran Oriente de Chile: CC BY SA-3.0.

Además se colocó una planilla de verificación de permiso en el archivo: Juan Cid Valencia. Se envió un correo con este permiso el día 24 de marzo de 2014, cuyo asunto es: Fotografía de Juan Cid Valencia. De antemano muchas gracias. Saludos.--Deucaleon (talk) 17:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Hola Deucaleon, Lo siento, no hablo español. Saludos.--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Theresia Zierler.jpg

Servus, so ganz klar ist mir Dein Edit leider nicht. Liegt da nun eine Freigabe vor oder nicht? Gute Grüße diba (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Ticket erhalten, war nicht ausreichend. Warte auf Antwort vom Rechteinhaber. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Ahh, Danke Dir für die schnelle Antwort. Grüße diba (talk) 20:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Gerónimo Rulli - Estudiantes de La Plata - Fecha 8 Torneo Final 2014.jpg

This image was deleted earlier in April due to no permission. We have an OTRS email under ticket 2014040910011634 but I wanted to first verify what the source was that was listed (lacking permission) before I requested the file's undeletion. I'm not 100% sure the ticket releases the image from the correct person. Cheers, -- TLSuda (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Restored :), If the permission is not ok, tag it as speedy. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:42, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, for this and my other requests. Cheers, -- TLSuda (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Disco de Hispavox Spain.jpeg

Please restore the image of mi page "Musica pop latinoamericana", is only a for sale product that get it on the page:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/V-A-Chicas-de-Hoy-Yuri-Pandora-Fandango-Tatiana-LP-VG-/271414098465— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tecnomilton (talk • contribs)

The file is copyrighted. Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: File:Bus ticket of Rome - Special Edition 04.jpg

Hello! I have one thing to ask! A few days ago I uploaded some pictures of something of tickets for public transport that they advertise the canonization of the two Popes, which took place a few days ago. Unfortunately, these files have been deleted, and I was accused of having taken those pictures on the internet and have them later on the Commons, but it is not so! Those tickets I bought and scanned, but I have not taken from the internet! Now I do not know if those tickets out there is or is not copyright, but I can guarantee you that it went as I told you! I salute you! Nicholas ;-) --Nicholas Gemini (talk) 09:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

This bus ticket is copyrighted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Yaacov Agam.JPG

Hello,

A. Why and where is the evidence of the copyright violation? No answers were given in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yaacov Agam.JPG as well.

B. There is another image of Agam available on commons, and you should have ordered de-linker bot to replace the deleted image with the other one.

Neukoln (talk) 07:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, ~~Permission was granted only for use on Wikimedia projects~~. :( --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I have leaved a note to the otrsmember to look into this. Thanks for notifying me. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Delinker reverted, You was too fast ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

(: am not sure what just happened. You restored the original file because the OTRS ticket was fine after all? or is it temporary till someone will take a look at the ticket? Neukoln (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Temporary ;), I have seen the ticket too late and deleted. The ticket owner needs too look in the ticket again. The permission is not 100% clear. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Very well. Please check all of the user's deleted files and otrs tickets (Special:Log/Edkaprov). He asked for the deletion of every image he uploaded to commons. Neukoln (talk) 08:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Samaritans marking Passover on Mount Gerizim, West Bank - 20060418.jpg

Hallo, lieber Steinsplitter, Du hast die obige Datei als Copyright violation gelöscht ohne die zugehörige Löschdiskussion abzuschließen. Könntest du uns bitte dort erläutern, was im OTRS-Ticket steht. Eigentlich kann Edkaprov seine 2010 erteilten freien Lizenzen {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} nicht zurückziehen. Selbiges gilt für Samaritans marking Sukkot on Mount Gerizim. Danke --Ras67 (talk) 15:03, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Oh. Sorry. Habe die Datei wiederhergestellt und den Benutzer revertiert. LG :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Pro git cover.jpg , which You delete.

The entire Pro Git book, written by Scott Chacon and published by Apress, is available here. All content is licensed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 license. Print versions of the book are available
on Amazon.com. (©)

From http://git-scm.com/book . Therefore I think, what this image is sharing by license "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0" as part of the book. I please, what You will return image (or willn`t delete). To my high regret don`t I to add files to wikibooks (especially https://uk.wikibooks.org/wiki/Pro_GIT ), therefore I add image here. Thanks.

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Pro git cover.jpg

File:Pro git cover.jpg , which You delete.

The entire Pro Git book, written by Scott Chacon and published by Apress, is available here. All content is licensed under 
the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 license. Print versions of the book are available
on Amazon.com. (©)

From http://git-scm.com/book . Therefore I think, what this image is sharing by license "Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0" as part of the book. I please, what You will return image (or willn`t delete). To my high regret don`t I to add files to wikibooks (especially https://uk.wikibooks.org/wiki/Pro_GIT ), therefore I add image here. Thanks. DEngine86 (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

CC-BY-SA-NC-3.0 is forbidden on commons. See Commons:Licensing --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

delited picture

Hello Steinsplitter! why did you delete my picture from wikicomons in 19.4.14? It was part of this page: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%AA_%D7%9B%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9C I had a permission from the owner of the picture. nirlahav 2.5.14 (ist)

Hi, Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS. Thank you --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for undelete a file

Hi Steinsplitter, Could you please undelete File:Juliestanton1938.jpg? i've got OTRS email under the Ticket#2014050310009683. Regards. ~ Nahid ^Talk 21:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure, done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

5 minutes, that was too close ;) Thank you. ~ Nahid ^Talk 22:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Cat a lot

Hi Steinsplitter, ich raff's irgendwie nicht. Wollte Bilder von alter Kat „German Dreiband (3-Cushion) Masters" zu „German Dreiband (3-Cushion) Masters 2013" verschieben. Laut Beschreibung kann ich die neue Kat auswählen. Stattdessen sind alle Bilder in „Category: 2013 in sports" gelandet. Rückgängig kann man auch nichts machen. Kannst du mir das mal kurz erklären? Dank im Voraus. Gruß aus Berlin. --LezFraniak (talk) 22:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Du musst den neuen CatNamen eingeben, Enter drücken, und dann auswählen. Gibt auch eine Hilfeseite auf en. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Da war ich ja. Wo soll ich den neuen Namen eingeben? --LezFraniak (talk) 22:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

In die Eingabebox. Das viereckige Ding. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hellhellgrau auf weißem Grund bei Funzelbeleuchtung. Hab ich echt nicht gesehen. Danke. --LezFraniak (talk) 23:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC):This section was archived on a request by: LezFraniak (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Steindy/not for german WP

Hallo Steinsplitter! Wie lässt es sich Ihrer Meinung nachvollziehen, dass ich in der deutschen Wikipedia gesperrt bin, meine nach meiner Sperre hochgelqadenen Fotos aber verwendet werden dürfen? Ich denke, dass ich mich in meiner Begründung unmissverständlich ausgedrückt habe und diese Begründung auch nachvolziehbar ist. Sollte Ihre Entscheidung endgültig sein, werde ich meinen Entschluss vom 2. Dezember 2013 beibehalten und keine Bilder mehr auf commons hochladen. Es liegt mir fern, via commons eine Sperrumgehung der deutschsprachigen ~~Wikipedia~~ Adminpedia zu begehen bzw. dieser Vorschub zu leisten. Da die Bilder meine Werke sind, für die ich auch keinen einzigen Cent Honorar oder Kostenersatz erhalte, ist es mein gutes Recht zu entscheiden, welchem Projekt ich meine Werke zur Verfügung stelle. Es ist ohnehin ein schlechter Witz, dass keine entsprechenden Lizenzen ausgewählt werden können.

Ehe Sie mir eine Antwort schreiben, können Sie ja noch nachsehen, wieviele meiner Bilder in wievielen Wikipedias Verwendung finden. Wollen Sie wirklich, dass anderen Sprachausgaben der Wikipedia hinkünftig diese Bilder nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen? Für mich selbst gibt es immerhin die Möglichkeit bei flickr mit einer entsprechenden Lizenz hochzuladen. --Steindy (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steindy, Mit einer Freien Lizenzierung erlaubst du jeden die Nutzung. Du kannst nicht sagen, auf dieser Webseite dürfen die Bilder nicht verwendet werden. Das haben CC-BY-SA Lizenzen so an sich. @Flickr: CC-BY-SA Bilder von Flicker können nach Commons übertragen werden. Ich würde es schade finden wenn du mit dem Spenden von Bildern aufhören würdest. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter! Ich werde ganz sicher mit dem Spenden von Bildern aufhören, wenn diese durch die Löschung dieses Bausteins in de-WP verwendet werden dürfen; eine Alternative wäre, diese Bilder nur mehr im Miniformat und/oder mit entsprechenden verunstaltenden Beschriftungen hochzuladen. Mir ist die Sache absolut ernst und darüber gibt es auch nichts mehr zu diskutieren!. Nicht ich habe diesen Missbrauch mit meiner infiniten Sperre wegen fehlendem Willen zur enzyklopädischen Mitarbeit begangen; dies war Ihr ehrenwerter Kollege Ne discere cessa! (der früher übrigens unter dem bemerkenswerten Benutzernamen Alleswissender signierte). Und obwohl mehrere(!) Admins diese Sperre als Missbrauch erkannten, zog er es vor, sich vorerst bis dato aus Wikipedia zu vertschüssen. Die anderen Admins, die diese Sperre offen wie selten zuvor als Missbrauch bezeichneten, sahen „selbstverständlich“ auch keinen Bedarf, den Missbrauch zu korrigieren. Ich werde den Deibel tun, meine Sperre etwa durch das SG aufheben zu lassen.

Ich war, wie schon die letzten Sperren zeigten, das Feindbild einiger Admins – hier vor allem von -jkb-, der mir schon zuvor „empfahl“ mich aus der de-WP zu schleichen – und mit dementsprechenden missbräuchlichen Sperren (etwa Editwar, den andere begangen haben, Missbrauch von VM, absichtliche Falschauslegung von Aussagen etc.) belegt. Nun hat man es in der Adminpedia geschafft, einen Benutzer mit rund 50.000 Bearbeitungen (abgesahen von den etwa 6.000 Bildern) innerhalb von 7,5 Jahren wegen „fehlendem Willen zur enzyklopädischen Mitarbeit“ loszuwerden. Einige Admins der de-WP wollten den Steindy loswerden und haben diesen solange gemobbt, bis sie ihn los wurden. Nun sind sie den Steindy endlich los geworden; dies aber mit allen Konsequenzen, wozu auch die Bildbeiträge zählen. Ich hätte trotz des Bausteins ohnehin nicht verhindern können, dass das eine oder andere Bild von mir in der de-WP eingebunden worden wäre, aber einen Freibrief wollte ich der de-WP keinenfalls geben. Ich hätte mir sogar vorbehalten, das eine oder andere Bild von mir zur Verwendung freizugeben, also den Baustein nicht zu setzen. Es ist ein Armutszeugnis, dass Sie als Admin von commons dieses Benutzermobbing zum Schaden aller Sprachversionen von Wikipedia hier auf commons fortsetzen.

Was flickr betrifft, gibt es sehr wohl Möglichkeiten, durch entsprechende Lizenzen die Übertragung von Bilder nach commons zu unterbinden. Meine Bilder werden dort ebenfalls gefunden werden und ich werde diese auch weiterhin gerne kostenlos für nicht-wikipedianische Projekte und Bücher zur Verfügung stellen; ich bekomme jährlich 25 und mehr diesbezügliche Anfragen, wie erst gestern wieder vom Landesamt für Geologie und Bergbau Rheinland-Pfalz.

	File:Kirchschlag in der Buckligen Welt - Burgruine (02, miniatur).jpg
Wollen Sie solche...	...solche...	...oder doch solche Bilder auf commons haben?
	File:Kirchschlag in der Buckligen Welt - Kalvarienbergkirche (02, miniatur).jpg
Möchten Sie solche...	...solche...	...oder doch solche Bilder auf commons haben?
File:Kirchschlag in der Buckligen Welt - Panorama (02, miniatur).jpg
Oder sind Ihnen solche Bilder...		...anstelle solcher Bilder auf commons lieber?

Die Entscheidung liegt also bei Ihnen. --Steindy (talk) 23:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Für mich erledigt. Jeder muss sich an Regeln halten... --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Martin Kusch

Hi, you deleted Martin Kusch Photo, but this photo is not copyrighted, it is on his academia.edu and I ask about the copyright myself. would you kindly undelete the photo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yolanda-saxony (talk • contribs) 10:57, 29 March 2014‎ (UTC)

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Steindy/not for german WP

Hallo Steinsplitter! Wie lässt es sich Ihrer Meinung nachvollziehen, dass ich in der deutschen Wikipedia gesperrt bin, meine nach meiner Sperre hochgelqadenen Fotos aber verwendet werden dürfen? Ich denke, dass ich mich in meiner Begründung unmissverständlich ausgedrückt habe und diese Begründung auch nachvolziehbar ist. Sollte Ihre Entscheidung endgültig sein, werde ich meinen Entschluss vom 2. Dezember 2013 beibehalten und keine Bilder mehr auf commons hochladen. Es liegt mir fern, via commons eine Sperrumgehung der deutschsprachigen ~~Wikipedia~~ Adminpedia zu begehen bzw. dieser Vorschub zu leisten. Da die Bilder meine Werke sind, für die ich auch keinen einzigen Cent Honorar oder Kostenersatz erhalte, ist es mein gutes Recht zu entscheiden, welchem Projekt ich meine Werke zur Verfügung stelle. Es ist ohnehin ein schlechter Witz, dass keine entsprechenden Lizenzen ausgewählt werden können.

Ehe Sie mir eine Antwort schreiben, können Sie ja noch nachsehen, wieviele meiner Bilder in wievielen Wikipedias Verwendung finden. Wollen Sie wirklich, dass anderen Sprachausgaben der Wikipedia hinkünftig diese Bilder nicht mehr zur Verfügung stehen? Für mich selbst gibt es immerhin die Möglichkeit bei flickr mit einer entsprechenden Lizenz hochzuladen. --Steindy (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steindy, Mit einer Freien Lizenzierung erlaubst du jeden die Nutzung. Du kannst nicht sagen, auf dieser Webseite dürfen die Bilder nicht verwendet werden. Das haben CC-BY-SA Lizenzen so an sich. @Flickr: CC-BY-SA Bilder von Flicker können nach Commons übertragen werden. Ich würde es schade finden wenn du mit dem Spenden von Bildern aufhören würdest. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter! Ich werde ganz sicher mit dem Spenden von Bildern aufhören, wenn diese durch die Löschung dieses Bausteins in de-WP verwendet werden dürfen; eine Alternative wäre, diese Bilder nur mehr im Miniformat und/oder mit entsprechenden verunstaltenden Beschriftungen hochzuladen. Mir ist die Sache absolut ernst und darüber gibt es auch nichts mehr zu diskutieren!. Nicht ich habe diesen Missbrauch mit meiner infiniten Sperre wegen fehlendem Willen zur enzyklopädischen Mitarbeit begangen; dies war Ihr ehrenwerter Kollege Ne discere cessa! (der früher übrigens unter dem bemerkenswerten Benutzernamen Alleswissender signierte). Und obwohl mehrere(!) Admins diese Sperre als Missbrauch erkannten, zog er es vor, sich vorerst bis dato aus Wikipedia zu vertschüssen. Die anderen Admins, die diese Sperre offen wie selten zuvor als Missbrauch bezeichneten, sahen „selbstverständlich“ auch keinen Bedarf, den Missbrauch zu korrigieren. Ich werde den Deibel tun, meine Sperre etwa durch das SG aufheben zu lassen.

Ich war, wie schon die letzten Sperren zeigten, das Feindbild einiger Admins – hier vor allem von -jkb-, der mir schon zuvor „empfahl“ mich aus der de-WP zu schleichen – und mit dementsprechenden missbräuchlichen Sperren (etwa Editwar, den andere begangen haben, Missbrauch von VM, absichtliche Falschauslegung von Aussagen etc.) belegt. Nun hat man es in der Adminpedia geschafft, einen Benutzer mit rund 50.000 Bearbeitungen (abgesahen von den etwa 6.000 Bildern) innerhalb von 7,5 Jahren wegen „fehlendem Willen zur enzyklopädischen Mitarbeit“ loszuwerden. Einige Admins der de-WP wollten den Steindy loswerden und haben diesen solange gemobbt, bis sie ihn los wurden. Nun sind sie den Steindy endlich los geworden; dies aber mit allen Konsequenzen, wozu auch die Bildbeiträge zählen. Ich hätte trotz des Bausteins ohnehin nicht verhindern können, dass das eine oder andere Bild von mir in der de-WP eingebunden worden wäre, aber einen Freibrief wollte ich der de-WP keinenfalls geben. Ich hätte mir sogar vorbehalten, das eine oder andere Bild von mir zur Verwendung freizugeben, also den Baustein nicht zu setzen. Es ist ein Armutszeugnis, dass Sie als Admin von commons dieses Benutzermobbing zum Schaden aller Sprachversionen von Wikipedia hier auf commons fortsetzen.

Was flickr betrifft, gibt es sehr wohl Möglichkeiten, durch entsprechende Lizenzen die Übertragung von Bilder nach commons zu unterbinden. Meine Bilder werden dort ebenfalls gefunden werden und ich werde diese auch weiterhin gerne kostenlos für nicht-wikipedianische Projekte und Bücher zur Verfügung stellen; ich bekomme jährlich 25 und mehr diesbezügliche Anfragen, wie erst gestern wieder vom Landesamt für Geologie und Bergbau Rheinland-Pfalz.

	File:Kirchschlag in der Buckligen Welt - Burgruine (02, miniatur).jpg
Wollen Sie solche...	...solche...	...oder doch solche Bilder auf commons haben?
	File:Kirchschlag in der Buckligen Welt - Kalvarienbergkirche (02, miniatur).jpg
Möchten Sie solche...	...solche...	...oder doch solche Bilder auf commons haben?
File:Kirchschlag in der Buckligen Welt - Panorama (02, miniatur).jpg
Oder sind Ihnen solche Bilder...		...anstelle solcher Bilder auf commons lieber?

Die Entscheidung liegt also bei Ihnen. --Steindy (talk) 23:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Für mich erledigt. Jeder muss sich an Regeln halten... --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Eine armselige, aber logische Antwort, wenn einem die Argumente ausgehen. --Steindy (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

About File:Smite generic logo.jpg

Why did you delete this file, even though we had everything set up to host it here? I contacted Magog the Ogre (who tagged it as "without permisson), and they admited that they acknoledged I was the one who made the file with materials from HiRez Studios and that they had been contacted by Hi-Rez about it, but that they never got their final message. I understand that searching for info about every single file that is hosted here is hard but, don't go on a deletion spree without even looking for the one that Might not deserve to be deleted (why do you think the file stood more that a week without being deleted?).--Malvodion (talk) 03:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I sent a permisson, and there is the answer to it. You would have known this if you had actually bothered to read it instead of just going ahead and deleting stuff for brownie points. "I don't care if it doesn't affect me in a negative way.", no?--Malvodion (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Search Result: No ticket data found. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

:This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Undelete request

Hello Steinsplitter, OTRS email is confirmed for this file. Regards! ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

And also if you undelete this file it would be appreciated. I left a message on Túrelio's talk page though but it seems he is busy. ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

PD-AR-PHOTO

File:ARA Belgrano sinking.jpg

Did I miss the meeting? I thought PD-AR images had been cleared for use on commons? W C M_email 11:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Der rote Button

Hallo Steinsplitter, Du hast den roten Button im Commons:Forum geposted. Hast Du auch einen Grünen? Ich habe nämlich auf den Roten geklickt und würde das gerne wieder rückgängig machen (die alte Schrift ist jetzt irgendwie kleiner als früher). mfG --Trzęsacz (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Grünen leider nicht. Du kannst es unter Einstellungen --> Gadgets/Helferlein wieder ausschalten (einfach Haken entfernen und speichern). LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Danke, jetzt ist wieder alles ok. --Trzęsacz (talk) 21:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Natasha Laws Mick Photo

Hi. You or someone has removed a photo of Natasha Laws Mick as having a violation? Perhaps you can help me to upload this photo sucessfully as I own it and grant my permission for its public use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miscbs2014 (talk • contribs)

Pleas see COM:L and COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I have just sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the correct information. Should I try to upload the photo once more? Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Miscbs2014 (talk • contribs)

If the permission is okay, the OTRS Team will restore the file. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Steinsplitter, Could you provide me the link where this (File:Natasha Laws Mick.jpg) file was originally published using your sysop power? I'm investigating this ticket. And also please undelete Lee Marshall NewYears.jpg & Lee Marshall Heenan 4crop.jpg, we've got permission via OTRS. Regards. ~ Nahid ^Talk 10:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

It is tagged as {{Own}} and reported as copyright violation because this, + You have a E-Mail with the pagecontent. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Permission Confirmed as Email address is associated with the site of the content ([6]). You can undelete the file now. Thank you for changing my user group :) Cheers. ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:19, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:First baptist church broadway side Columbia, Missouri 2.jpg

Did you make a mistake leaving a message on my talk page? The copyright status of the file does not appear to be in question. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

See log. It was a duplicate, it is deleted & redirected now. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Im glad you deleted the duplicate, but you left a message about the copyright status on my talk page. Go read it. Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:55, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I have seen after tagging as no license that this is a duplicate. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Images

Hello. Can i revert original images, removed by Dennis? Commons:OVERWRITE tell me that i should. But he tretened me, please look at this, help me, i dont understand, we must now overwrite images, i think? Help me to understand. --Anastan (talk) 18:28, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please, respond to me, what to do now? --Anastan (talk) 09:50, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Because i am not familiar enough with this case, i don't like to comment or taking actions. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

I will ask someone else then. --Anastan (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

What happen?

私はFile:木更津東ICをアップロードしました。その画像は私が今までアップロードした画像と同様〈クリエイティブ・コモンズ表示-継承 3.0 非移植ライセンス〉のもとに利用を許諾しました。しかし、File:木更津東ICが「使用許諾の証拠がない」というテンプレートを貼り付けられていました。この画像のどこが「使用許諾の証拠がない」のか全く理解できません。どこが不足しているのか教えてくださればありがたいです。

I uploaded File: Kisarazu East IC. Its images as well as image I ever uploaded q Creative Commons Attribution-alike 3.0 non-portable license q's has licensed use based on. However, the File: Kisarazu East IC was pasted the template there evidence of agreement. Where this image is "not proof of license ' can't understand at all. Please tell me where missing.

--銚電神 7 May 2014(JST) 9:56

Can you give me a link to the file? --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Bernd_Zorn_Stendal-Foto

Hallo Steinsplitter, mir ist beim Hochladen der Datei bzw. des Fotos wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen. Das Foto kann problemlos freigegeben werden. Allerdings weiß ich nun nicht, welche (korrekten) Schritte nach dem Löschen der Datei getan werden müssen. (Das erneute Hochladen scheiterte an der Meldung "Quelle, Autor und Lizenz eingeben", obwohl ich alles nach bestem Wissen eingegeben hatte.) Für deine Hilfe bedanke ich mich im Voraus. Beste Grüße. --7LEON7 (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Kannst du mir bitte einen genauen Link zu Foto geben? Kann es nicht finden. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:16, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine schnelle Rückmeldung. Meinst du diesen Link? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bernd-Zorn-Stendal.jpg --7LEON7 (talk) 14:50, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Das Bild wurde als Urheberrechtsverletzung gemeldet da von hier geklaut. Wenn du der Urheber bist, bitte eine Freigabe an COM:OTRS senden. Danke. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Ich bin tatsächlich der Urheber - geklaut ist also nichts. Mal sehen, ob das mit der Freigabe-Mail klappt. Danke nochmal.--7LEON7 (talk) 15:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

There is no sense in keeping the redirect files. Why are you reverting instead of deleting them? Musichistory2009

There are no files linking to the redirects. Besides, the names are inexact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musichistory2009 (talk • contribs)

Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Then, what's the method of deleting these redirects and replacing the links to them from InstantCommons?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Musichistory2009 (talk • contribs)

We don't delete such redirects and please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes at the end on talkpages.--Steinsplitter (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Beni1.jpg

Please check this my request: Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Beni1.jpg.
Thank you, --Igorp_lj (talk) 16:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

DRV Closure Request

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malvinas cartel - Puerto Iguazú.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Malvinas-cartel.JPG

You originally speedy deleted one of these but then converted to a DRV at my request following the intervention of another admin. Its been up for review for weeks now. Is there a chance you could sentence the DRV please? W C M_email 16:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

I let decide other if deletion is needed :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

About images

Thanks for advice me about the File:Cobq3.jpg File:Cobq4.jpg File:Cobq5.jpg situation. It happens that I had a problem when I uploaded this files, and I couldn't modify the summary or categories. Now I can and I'll do. Greetings and sorry if my English were bad. Xarucoponce (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC).

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

URGENTE! borrado de imagenes

hola, estoy un poco preocupada porque se han borrado imágenes del articulo de Ciro Gutierrez, no entiendo porque si el propio autor ha mando de su correo el permiso de sus obras, el correo esta con fecha 05/05/2014; por favor revisar el correo, hoy lo volví a reenviar para que lo revisen. gracias--190.42.35.143 14:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I only speak english, german and italian. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for undelete

Hi Steinsplitter, Could you undelete the following files? i tagged them for copyvio but these contents are under the terms of the Open Government Licence v2.0 [7]. I got an email from official site too & froward the communication to OTRS under ticket#2014050910011016 for archiving.

I can fix the author & license when the process is completed. Regards. ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:32, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque

Thanks. I just noticed a sub category contains 32 more files? J e e 14:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome. Starting a new DR? I think speedydeletion is in this case okay? --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I think they can be speedy deleted per the other DR. If not possible, let me know, so that I'll try another DR. :) J e e 14:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

To avoid complains i suggest to start a dr :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

OK; I will. :) J e e 14:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Done! J e e 15:05, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Hmmm; I just noticed that they are already nominated for deletion by Taivo earlier. ;( So you may close it too. J e e 15:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Roop Durgapal as Sanchi.JPG

Hello Steinsplitter, I noticed that you deleted File:Roop Durgapal as Sanchi.JPG with the summary Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. Would you please explain, as when I had checked yesterday, the image did not seem to have any licensing problems. --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Is this your own work? It seems to be stolen from other websites. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

It is not my work, and it was not uploaded by me. When I came across the image on Commons, I used Google Image Search to find other copies of it on other websites. All those web pages were either published after the upload date of this image (and some even credited Wikimedia Commons), or, where the date of publication was not easy to establish, the photos were of lower resolution and lacked the Exif metadata about the camera and the date that was present in the image uploaded to Commons.

If the uploader stole the image from other website, they would also have had to artificially increase the resolution and insert fake metadata into the file, and I thought that this was highly unlikely from an editor who does not seem have a history of uploading infringing images.

I am not very familiar with the rules on Commons, so I don't know if contributions from editors with less than a few dozen global edits are assumed to be stolen unless proven otherwise via identification, due to possibly heightened copyright concerns on this project, or whether the uploader has previously uploaded infringing content in the past under a different username; I assumed "no" to both questions at first, but I admit that that assumption may not be correct, as I don't know how things are usually done on Commons, and I am also unaware of the uploader having any other accounts.--Joshua Issac (talk) 21:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

The user has uploaded only this file, and i have found the same it on a lot of other pages (tineye search), it don't looks like own work to me. If you like i can restore it and start a regular Deletion Request. But i think we need COM:OTRS permission for this file. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I am not sure if we are searching with the same image. I get two results from TinEye: one from www.ebharat.in and the other from www.bollywoodlife.com, both dated after the file's upload date on Commons. The image I am using to search has the subject standing in front of a brown background...maybe a door or something. Am I using the correct image? --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

o_O okay. Restored. But it is used on hunderts of sites --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I shall "present my case" at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roop Durgapal as Sanchi.JPG. --Joshua Issac (talk) 11:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Media requiring renaming

Hey. Look at this. Something is wrong in this category. Rzuwig^► 18:36, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for reporting. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Image

I don´t like. You deleted images Abel Alves. I do not agree with you. Once the proper Abel Alves announced his image online, in his articles, so readers know who he is, the picture is public. Ana Gauna (talk) 21:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

The picture is public does not mean that it is published under a free license. Pleas read Commons:Licensing. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

And you deleted my pictures in gif I made years ago, and put it here. Ana Gauna (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

The giv's aer stolen from www too (it looks like). Please send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I do not understand what you mean. I have a few of these images stored there 15 years, since they were done, I took it and download it here. Ana Gauna (talk) 23:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I understood nothing. I do not know what that OTRS. This should already be translated into Portuguese language. Ana Gauna (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I used the automatic downloading of Commons and there appear questions about the image on the right picture, and I informed all right, and still want to delete the images. That's not logical. I answered the questions correctly. Ana Gauna (talk) 23:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Pleas read teh commons Policys. Thank you! --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I've read the policies. Asked to report the type of license the image, it was entered in the download of images. Ana Gauna (talk) 23:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Pleas read Commons:Licensing/pt. Pleas send permission to Commons:OTRS/pt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll read. I am Brazilian. Ana Gauna (talk) 00:08, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

My program used: Gif Animator = http://www.baixaki.com.br/download/easy-gif-animator.htm + Photoshop + Corel Draw Ana Gauna (Discussão) 20:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

My second program used = Microsoft Gif Animator = http://www.baixaki.com.br/download/microsoft-gif-animator.htm Ana Gauna (Discussão) 20:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Ping Túrelio, restoring or not^^? --Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Eher nicht; sie pflegt einen recht kreativen Umgang mit "my work", siehe z.B. File:Rosa-branca-2014.jpg.[8],[9],[10],[11]

Should go through COM:UR. --Túrelio (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Túrelio I'm bad with you all the Commons, to several months, just because they are deleting my pictures, all my flowers, and now my GIF. And I used the program Commons automatic download and correctly answered all questions that the program made me. Ana Gauna (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry the time, but here in Brazil are only 9:40 pm. Here, the time is -3:00 hours Ana Gauna (talk) 00:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Trauttmansdorff 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Frank Reinhold.jpg

Hi Steinsplitter, Could you delete all versions of this file except the current one? Uploader requested me via email. Many thanks for your work! ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:19, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

And also, Please undelete File:Alex Cheung 2012.jpg. OTRS Confirmed. Regards. ~ Nahid ^Talk 06:56, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

One more, File:Annick Girardin.jpg ~ Nahid ^Talk 08:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:16, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

Are you going to recreate all the deleted redirects? Musichistory2009

Yes. See COM:AN & Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop! I think there is a solution to delete these redirect. Musichistory

If a file has been renamed, the file has to be stucked with the old name forever? Even it is the wrong name?

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File redirects

Hello! I see you've reverted the deletions of the file redirects. More than 280 file redirects have been restored by you and other administrators. I have three short questions and a request. I hope that you give me the answers, for stilling my curiosity.

1. What happened with the file redirect that have been deleted, and in the meantime, other file had been uploaded or renamed, with the name of the old redirect. For example the file "Name_01" was moved at "Name_New_01", and the file "Name_02" had been moved or uploaded, being given the name "Name_01" (the redirect that was deleted before). What have you done in this case?

2. If a file is uploaded with a wrong name, has it to be stuck with the old name redirect forever? How can these redirects (which are useless at commons and other wikipedia projects) can be eliminated? Is there a right procedure?

3. In my notifications list appeared the message "Your edits on [[:[No page]]] have been reverted by Steinsplitter. [No page]". What does this mean? What happened with these No pages.

4. You've restored File:Masterminds.ro - Localizare Bucuresti2.png. This file is a duplicate of File:Bucharest in Romania 2.png. I would like you to delete File:Masterminds.ro - Localizare Bucuresti2.png and replace it with a redirect to the File:Bucharest in Romania 2.png.

Thank you in advance for your answers. --- Musichistory

No need to delete redirects. The software lives a redirect for a very good reason. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. And not all file usage was replaced for some files. @3: I don't know, seems to be a MW bug. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for your answers. Regarding the request (4), I've tagged File:Masterminds.ro - Localizare Bucuresti2.png for speedy deletion, because it is a duplicate. I've proposed a redirect. --- Musichistory

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:ADELI suit.jpg

Can you re-delete the original image, the permission seems to only be for the most recent image? Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 00:27, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure. Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! TLSuda (talk) 00:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Reatule del Roser - Sant Vicenç de Sarrià

Hello,
I just noticed that File:Reatule del Roser - Sant Vicenç de Sarrià got deleted because the license tags were missing. The uploader is a newbie and probably didn't understand the message left in his talk page, so I'm wondering if the file could be recovered and tagged CC BY SA, as it depicts an artwork from the 18th century and the picture was taken by the uploader himself. Thanks! --ESM (talk) 06:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, The photo seems to be stolen from here. I need OTRS Permission to restore the photo. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Dang, then you're right. Sorry for the inconvenience! --ESM (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyvio

Hi Steinspitter; I think File:Emreyetim.jpg has copyvio problems. But I am not sure. Could you check?--Ayrıntılı Bilgi (talk) 11:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Tagged the files as no permission. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Morten Helveg Petersen.jpg

Hi, could you undelete this file? OTRS email received plus image is already under "CC-BY-SA-2.0" license at party's official flicker account. Thank you :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 12:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure, Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:39, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! ~ Nahid ^Talk 12:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

complaint

Hello how are you? I have a complaint relating to the user:Ich Pilot and his Sock puppetry (user:B88, user:Khny ,user:Zwanzig 20) he mad many of new uploads, which are not based on sources or in which the selection of sources, I asked him (user:Ich Pilot) to debate before doing any change, and I brought a variety of sources in order to debate, but he refuses to debate and even attack me. here is example for one of his personal attacks: by user:B88 attack my personal page and puting pictures calling me fascists and anther picture as: If jesus came kill him again!. Thank you and have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 12:41, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Can you pleas post a Commons:Requests for checkuser^^ :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank for the respond :D.--Jobas (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I added here Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ich Pilot but no respond and user:B88 or user:Ich Pilot still doing Personal attack directed for me: using low level of word, using low level of word in my Arabic page which called Christians a Monkey!!! here you can also see some of his assaults on multiple articles as here, and here.--Jobas (talk) 00:07, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@links^^ I can't help you with problems on en & arwiki. Sorry. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Actually the problems is here not only in en and arwiki. here you have kind of example by user:B88 attack my personal page and putting pictures calling me fascists and another picture as: If Jesus came kill him again!. ad I thank that you deleted the attack.

user:Ich Pilot, user:Ich Pilot (create these accounts: (user:B88, user:Khny ,user:Zwanzig 20), which are his Sock puppetry because They have the same orientation, the same language in attacking, and more importantly, the same contributions ) had made many of new Contributions, which are not based on sources or selecting the sources that are compatible with his couches, I asked him (user:Ich Pilot) to discussed before making any changes to find a common solution (especially that there are many different Statistics which gives different data in the files you can see in the file Discussion page), and I brought a variety of sources in order to debate, and I asked him to debate before doing any modification until we get to the result of inappropriate but he refuses to debate and even attack me, I'll be grateful if you can stop that harassment, and Thank you and Have a nice day.

I open a discussion in these files: File:Christian Majority Countries-ar.png, File:Catholic Majority Countries.PNG and asking about the sources that he made, but user:B88 just keeping attacks and he never discuss. and he still create different accounts (user:B88, user:Khny ,user:Zwanzig 20) to uploads the same files without discussion the sources of his new file. --Jobas (talk) 16:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Bell-Glamour

An image you deleted earlier today has been re-uploaded under the name File:Crossdresser Belle-Glamour SNV12350.JPG. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:35, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Logo TEDDYBÄR TOTAL

In spite of my explanation you deleted the logo of TEDDYBÄR TOTAL. Again - I am the owner of brand and logo. There is no copyright violation. It is free for use in context with the show it is made for. Could you please be so kind to undo that?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Artbuero (talk • contribs)

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:46, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Victor Lledo

Hi, you deleted File:Willy-meyer.png, this photo is free of use under Creative Commons license. I did provided the address which is this http://www.saharalibre.es/datos/modules/Noticias/Lideres/willy-meyer.jpg. In the bottom of the main page www.saharalibre.es says very clearly "Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 3.0 Unported. Esta licencia afecta a toda la web de Saharalibre.es" Would you kindly undelete? Thank you Victor Lledo (talk) 23:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Restored. Pleas add the correct license. --Steinsplitter (talk) 00:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Mathewsonkindness.jpg

What was the problem with this? From the description at [12], it looks like a pretty clear PD-Art.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Restored. Pleas add the correct license tag. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

bonjour Steinsplitter, merci d'avoir effacé ma photos ou j avais effectivement fait une erreur, parcontre du coup toutes mes photos ont etaient suprimés, comment faire pour les recupérés et surtout, j ai essayé de les remettres mais je n ai pas pu,on me demande l auteur, alors que c est des photos de ma famille. merci . Cyril simonnot (baronfuzz) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baronfuzz (talk • contribs)

Sorry, I don't speak french --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Entartete-kunst nolde.png

Hallo Steinsplitter; du hattest diese Datei nach kurzer Diskussion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Entartete-kunst nolde.png gelöscht, "per nom". Dem Argument des Nominators Yellowcard hat allerdings Assayer eine Position entgegenhalten, die mir recht überzeugend vorkommt, und dazu auch auf einen Urheberrechtskommentar verwiesen. Die Datei wurde ausserdem in der deutschen Wikipedia ausführlich diskutiert. Auch ein weiterer Benutzer (de:Benutzer:Erzer, der sich auf seiner Benutzerseite als Volljurist bezeichnet), schreibt dort: Die Reichskammer der bildenden Künste war nach §§ 1, 2 Nr. 6 des Reichskulturkammergesetz vom 22. September 1933 eine Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (Deutschland). Wenn der Präsident der Kammer ein Mitglied ausschließt, so ist das eine Entscheidung einer öffentlichen Stelle nach § 5 UrHG - was denn sonst? Mir ist schleierhaft, warum hier überhaupt angezweifelt wird, es sei eine amtliche Entscheidung. Aus welchem Grund denn nicht? - diese Frage möchte ich hier weitergeben und mich erkundigen, ob du die Datei im Lichte dieser Diskussion nicht doch behalten d.h. wiederherstellen würdest. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, "Wenn ein erheblicher Zweifel an der Freiheit einer bestimmten Datei herrscht, sollte diese gelöscht werden. COM:PRP", deshalb wurde die Datei gelöscht. Wenn du der Meinung bist dass die Datei mit Commons kompatibel ist, habe ich nichts dagegen wenn du sie wiederherstellst. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Danke, ich habe die Datei wiederhergestellt und die natürlich falsche Lizenz durch {{PD-GermanGov}} ersetzt. Die Argumentation für "Amtliches Werk" scheint hier überzeugend. Sollte die Frage aufkommen, ob das Werk auch in den USA public domain ist, würde ich das ebenfalls bejahen: Als deutsches amtliches Werk von 1941 wurden natürlich die damaligen Formalitäten nicht eingehalten, um Copyright in den USA zu erlangen, es könnte also erst via URAA einen Schutz in den USA erhalten haben, wozu es jedoch am 1. Januar 1996 in Deutschland hätte geschützt sein müssen, was es, wenn wir hier von einem amtlichen Werk ausgehen, eben nicht war - der URAA kommt also m.E. auch nicht zur Anwendung, mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass wir diesen hier neuerdings ignorieren sollen (was ich auch sehr skeptisch sehe)... Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:JarekusSingleton live3 byMarilynStringer.jpg

Hi, another one to go. Permission from official address- Ticket:2014051410020505 Regards. ~ Nahid ^Talk 08:58, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

This DR

If you can give your views on this DR, please feel free to do so as I don't know if these images need OTRS permission or not. If I have made a mistake, please make a reply in the DR. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, After 7 days a admin will close this DR and decide. I have put it on my watchlist. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

OK. Thank You very much. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Frage (not allowed facebook vs. de-wp)

User:Steindy wurde von Deiner Seite nicht erlaubt, dass er untersagt, dass seine Fotos auf der DE-WP eingebunden werden: [13]. User:Alchemist-hp veröffentlicht seine Fotos so wie Steindy unter der Lizenz CC-BY-SA-3.0 und verbietet deren Einbindung auf Facebook: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2013-06-08_Highflyer_HP_L4729.JPG&oldid=124125700. Warum darf der eine und der andere nicht? LG Bwag (talk) 21:35, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Nach meinem Verständnis kann er es nicht verbieten wenn er ein Bild unter CC Lizenziert. Du kannst das gerne im Forum ansprechen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Mach's doch Du. Als Admin bist Du eine größere Autorität und es wird Dir doch ein Anliegen sein, dass beide über den gleichen Kamm geschert werden, oder? LG Bwag (talk) 21:51, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Wie gesagt, Kannst auch du als nicht Admin ansprechen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Alexxxos

Hi.

Watching the above DR, I noted the following files deleted by you without any community concensus:

¿These pictures apply FOP in Chile? If yes, regardless the "won work" text in the description, the files are in the Public Domain, and therefore there are no copyright violation. So, please restore them, or, at least, please participate in the DR. Amitie 10g (talk) 02:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

The files was tagged as speedy and it has looked like a copyright violation to me. Restored. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Cryptolocker.png copyright violation question.

This file (File:Cryptolocker.png) was removed on April 23. this is a screen shot of a ransom ware virus. Im just requesting a valid reason as to why this was deleted. Was it the text? Or one of the images on the screen shot or design? im not here to pester or cause trouble. I just would appreciate an answer.

Please reply Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realfintogive (talk • contribs)

Unfree screenshot (Commons:Screenshots) --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

copyright violation

hi i was wondering why my image that i uploaded was removed for copyright violation

19-5-14— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tezetek333 (talk • contribs)

It seems to be stolen from here. Pleas see COM:Licensing. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:04, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Are you sure, i checked the link and cant access the image you are reffering to.. Can you please re-check because i honestly dont believe that the picture i uploaded would even be on thay website. I am the owner of this image, if it is on the other site then it is without my permission.

Can you please check again whether it is on the link you provided because i think there might be a mistake. Thank you 20-05-14 14:16, 20 May 2014 --Tezetek333

It was removed from the site but on this webpage the photo is published too. Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Jane Farrow deleted File

You deleted File:Jane Farrow 2014.jpg and it has been restored. I can't find a source for this one but it still looks suspicious. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:43, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

No, Someone has uploaded a new version (0 google search results). You can nominate this File for deletion by klicking on the "Nominate for deletion" link. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Hola Steinsplitter

Perdon por dejar este mensaje pero con que licencia debo subir mis archivos? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Tinny (talk • contribs)

No hablo español. Lo siento. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Unneeded redirect is unneeded

This: not helpful. The file was uploaded by me via flickr2commons, one in a big batch. It didn’t register as a duplicate because meanwhile the older instance had been edited for better contrast (and rightly so). Within a couple days I noticed it was a familiar image, located the older one, tagged the new one as its duplicate, and it was speedy-deleted. There’s no reason to keep this redirect, and if a guideline for these cases says it should be kept, then the guideline needs to be reevaluated. -- Tuválkin ✉ 13:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. The Policy is Commons:Duplicate#Duplicates point 4. But imho very recent upload should be except. Feel free to bring up the issue on the relevant talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

The file "Trolley_museum,_Scranton,PA_%28201036538%29.jpg" only existed for one or two days, this is excepted explicitly through the phrase "implausible redirect". Why did you refus my speedy deletion? Why can’t I access the file history? Why are you wasting time with this? -- Tuválkin ✉ 18:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

You are wasting time with this, not i. Policy: "After deleting the duplicate, redirect the deleted filename unless it is misleading or a very recent upload. I don't do action against policy. If you disagree, start a regular DR. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

You are wasting your time and mine, by having refused the speedy deletion and now persisting on rething that. You, as an admin, and not me, are able to confirm that indeed between uploading and tagging as duplicate only a few days passed. By refusing to speedy delete a recent redirect created upon deletion of a duplicate you are going against policy. -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Reason for deleting موزه مردم شناسی لرستان.jpg image

hi , what is the reason for deleting this image , it is taken from a image in a museum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apiculate (talk • contribs)

From panoramio. Pleas see COM:L. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Deane Nesbitt Jr. in 2014 nesbittmusic.com website homepage.jpg

Hi, another one is good to go! ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

A file you deleted earlier

Hello and sorry to disturb you. Earlier today at 15:31 you deleted File:Corey French For Council 2014.jpg for copyright violation. Over on English Wikipedia, the same user has uploaded a new file called en:File:Election poster, Local gov 2014.jpg at 17:18. Is it the same image or is it different? Thanks in advance. Green Giant (talk) 17:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, No. It is not the same. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:07, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Gozio Amaretto.jpg

Another one please! ~ Nahid ^Talk 20:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Much obliged! ~ Nahid ^Talk 20:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Weird notification

I just saw a notification message that said "Your edits on [[:[No page]]] have been reverted by Steinsplitter. [No page]". The notification was from two hours ago. Any idea what happened? Sven Manguard Wha? 20:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

I have restored a speedydeletion request. Not sure why [[:[No page]]] --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: {{Speedy}}

I've started to fix the files that I loaded at the very beginning of my activity on the Wiki and would like to improve some filenames to the form, which is more affordable to other users (more readable, understandable). Leaving redirects to some selected old names seemed superfluous, because I do not think anyone anywhere has used them, even through InstantCommons. But of course I cannot be sure of that. Left behind redirects somewhat spoil the overall impression as to the image file, you know: is seen previous poor naming, and thus I wanted to remove them quickly. Have learned for the future not to use anymore the template {{Speedydelete}} against remaining redirects arising after changing the filename as to avoid undesired breaking of links from external re-users of images. Thank you. --Robsuper (talk) 10:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Da stimmt einiges nicht...

... und das gehört wohl auch in die Messinasockenbildersammlung: File:Heilbronn, Präsenzgasse-Schulgasse vor 1873.jpg Gruß --Xocolatl (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Socke gesperrt & Bild gelöscht. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Ähem ... Also dieses Bild mit der Begründung "Missing essential information such as license, permission or source" zu löschen ist doch wohl eine ziemliche Fehlleistung. OK, die Beschreibung ist Messina-typisch (leider) ziemlich unvollständig bis ärgerlich, aber das Wichtigste und Ausschlaggebende steht drin: Die Quelle ist File:Heilbronn-pfleghoefe.jpg, das ist einfach ein Ausschnitt daraus. Dort sieht man dann auch problemlos, dass es sich im Wesentlichen um eine Karte von 1834 handelt (nämlich File:Heilbronn Stadtplan 1834.jpg), die allemal gemeinfrei sein dürfte. Quelle ist also schon mal vorhanden, eine Genehmigung braucht es bei einer Karte von 1834 nicht, und die angegebene Lizenz {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}} ist zwar falsch (richtig wäre ein PD-Baustein), aber sie fehlte nicht und könnte nach einem Blick auf die Quelle problemlos korrigiert werden. Was genau also war noch einmal der Löschgrund? Diese schlampigen Dateibeschreibungen bei Messina-Uploads nerven mich auch unendlich, aber wenn sie wie hier das für die Rechtssituation Wesentliche enthalten und das auch stimmt, sind sie kein Löschgrund. Wer die Datei dann dennoch mit einer (wie oben ausgeführt) unzutreffenden Larifari-Begründung löscht, gibt nur den Vorwürfen Nahrung, Messina werde ungerecht behandelt. Ich bitte deswegen um rasche Wiederherstellung. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 21:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Da fällt mir nur WP:SNOWBALL ein. Bitte lies mal PCP und die CSD. Ich lösche nach Richtlinien und da gibst es für diese Messina keine Sonderbehandlung. Du hast selbst Adminrechte, sollte die Datei tatsächlich OK sein kannst du diese wiederherstellen. Ich werde auch eine Beschwerde auf Meta einreichen da das crosswiki-gesocke ein Grund ist, einen Account global zu locken. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Datei ist wieder da, muss noch von dir korrigiert werde. Habe die Datei entsprechend getaggt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:54, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Ist erledigt. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 22:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke. Gruß --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Ich bin dann raus, werde den Typen nur noch sperren ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 22:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Rights for Usergroep GWToolset user

Dear Steinsplitter, I am attending a workshop by Dan-nl. The workshop is our first introduction to the GLAMwiki Toolset. I am currently Wikipedian-in-Residence for the WSWB, a cooperative of GLAM Institutions in the Netherlands, including the library of the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam, the NIOD and others. Could you give me user rights for the GWToolset user Group on http://commons.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/. My username there is also Theobald Tiger. My home wiki is nl.wiki. Thanks in advance. Theobald Tiger (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Q - Nilgun Celebi

Hello Steinsplitter, I see you have deleted from Wikimedia Commons two photos of professor Nilgun Celebi explaining it with copyright violations, that is not true, the photos were donated by Celebi for use in Wikimedia Commons, you can contact Nilgun Celebi with this e-mail address to have this fact confirmed: nilguncelebi@gmail.com Omar HoftunOmar hoftun (talk) 14:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS. Thank you!--Steinsplitter (talk) 23:55, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

flag of sweden colours (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Sweden.svg)

can somone please change flag to the "21:21, 3 February 2009 version of this file" (current version is from 2010) per http://riksarkivet.se/sveriges-flagga and also per earlier consensus (can be found on File_talk:Flag_of_Sweden.svg#How_were_the_colours_decided.3F) Enbionycaar (talk) 00:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I am happy to temp unprotected the file if someone experienced with flags can confirm that this change is OK (Fry1989 for example). --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

i can ask AnonMoos Enbionycaar (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

the colours shall be exacly as per the flag in http://riksarkivet.se/sveriges-flagga Enbionycaar (talk) 17:53, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I would support using the colours set out by the Swedish Government. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

A dirty little secret is that flag colors are generally specified in official government documents using a device-independent color system (Pantone etc.), while computer RGB colors are inherently device-dependent, and these is no one single correct conversion between device-independent colors and device-dependent colors... AnonMoos (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

I would also support the colours by fry1989 they are exactly the same colours as in the first source but instead of interpreting them in some svg editor we must just copy and paste on yellow and blue boxes in Swedish Government, and AnonMoos points are irrelevant since if you live in sweden like me you will notice the physical flags flying all over sweden looks exactly like the government description Enbionycaar (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

can you update the flag now?

since fry1989 said it was ok as you required can you please update the flag of sweden now Enbionycaar (talk) 00:07, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft Surface 2 file

Greetings Steinsplitter! I've seen you've deleted File:Microsoft Surface 2 tablet computer.jpg under COM:COPYVIO. I've uploaded the image from Flickr which was licensed under a CC-BY-2.0, a compatible license with Wikimedia Commons. Best, --///EuroCarGT 14:10, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

It is a COM:DW of unfree content. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Alright, but I am allowed to upload images from Flickr if they have a compatible Creative Commons license per COM:F. May you please elaborate on the statement above. Thanks and best, --///EuroCarGT 15:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Pleas read COM:LL. Flickers uploads are not always 100% free. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Good read! Though wouldn't say that this was a copyrighted image, I did perform a Google Image Search and results came back as the original image. Si the photo is legit. Best, --///EuroCarGT 16:56, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft Products and the images in it are copyrighted. Go to COM:UNDEL. I see no need to undelete this file. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

hello?

please answer earlier thread Enbionycaar (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion question

I accepted the permission statement for File:Mohit Malhotra.jpg (originally uploaded to en.wiki, then transferred to Commons) which used the following license: "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5-India"

I made a note in the OTRS record that this license isn't worded exactly the same as "cc-by-2.5-in" but I assumed that "In" was short for "India" and assumed it was the same licensee.

According to:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/in/

they are the same.

I see that you deleted the file and linked to Commons:Licensing. Does this mean you think that the two licenses are different, or is there some other reason I missed?--Sphilbrick (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Ummn, This was a wrong deletion. Sorry. I don't have seen the OTRS template o_O. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll restore, but I didn't want to do so without checking to see if I missed something. I'll go ahead and restore.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

You beat me to it, thanks.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks guys! Appreciate all of your efforts. (Raasta123 (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC))

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:3tk5RqiRTE.jpg

Somehow file was not deleted. Please take a look. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Thx, Done :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:04, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

+ 1. Gunnex (talk) 19:18, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Danke. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

RE: Autopatrol given

I will make good use of it. Thank you.--Rhong Fu ^Talk 14:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your_Module:Fallback_changes

	Hello, Steinsplitter/Archive. You have new messages at Jarekt#Your_Module:Fallback_changes's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 15:07, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Packaging copyright problems meet the criteria for speedy deletion

You asserted "Don't meet the criteria for speedy deletion, pleas nominate for deletion" for several dozen images tagged {{Copyvio}} that I would consider to be clear violations, meeting Commons:SPEEDY#File "Apparent copyright violation".

According to COM:PACKAGING, product packaging carrying original printed designs cannot be uploaded to Commons, even if "you personally own the physical object and even if you took the photograph yourself." The "limited exceptions" are

Packaging which carries a printed design which is so insignificant as to be incidental.
Packaging which carries only a printed design which is so simple as to be ineligible for copyright protection.
Packaging which carries only a printed design which is old enough for the copyright to have expired.

This issue is serious enough that Category:Whisky_bottles, the category containing those images, has included this reminder for more than three years {{Packaging}} Before I bring this issue to a wider audience I am hoping you will reconsider. Thanks. 72.244.204.36 18:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Pleas start a regular deletion request, Pleas see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Whisky_bottles for example, some files was kept some time ago. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Soy novata!! Ayuda!!!

Hola! Un gusto poder contactarme! Soy muy novata. No comprendo todavía cómo se usa Wikipedia. He subido algunas fotos de mi propiedad y creo que me la han borrado o eliminado. Estoy teniendo problemas porque tengo el acceso denegado en wiki porque dicen he vandalizado! No entiendo nada! Te pido ayuda!File:Luis Ángel Díaz 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Te Agradezco de corazón si puedes darme una respuesta o puedes revisar mi caso. En estos momentos estoy bloqueada por vandalismo y no se cómo seguir! Yo no he cometido vandalismo! Pero no encuentro a nadie que me aclare mi situación. Sólo deseó contribuir honestamente con Wikipedia! Cordiales saludos!!--190.48.42.180 18:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

No hablo español. Lo siento. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Ramon Langa.jpg deleted

(I've rearranged the thread to ease the reading)

Hi there, In the source page you can read in Spanish "Puedes enviar la fotografía por email como postal, pulsando en Enviar foto." what means that can be redistributed. So, Why do you removed it?? Regards, Chanchus (talk) 15:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC).

You can send the photo as a postcard by email by clicking on Send picture. is not a valid license, pleas see COM:L --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, They aren't the owners of the image, just publishers. This don't mean anything? Chanchus (talk) 15:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC).

Pleas read COM:L, You can send the photo as a postcard by email by clicking on Send picture. is not a valid license --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Ansprache der Massenlöschungen auf englisch

Hallo Steinsplitter, ich werde die massenlöschung meiner Bilder auf der englischsprachigen Wikipediaseite Administrators' noticeboard ansprechen und den deutschen Text als obsolet kenzeichnen. Spricht etwas dagegen das Thema auf englisch anzusprechen oder muss dies zwingendermaßen auf deutsch erfolgenß Das Thema ist kein nationl deutsches Problem. Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 11:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

[TPS] Bitte frage dich vor einem Beitrag weniger "spricht etwas dagegen", sondern mehr "spricht etwas dafür". Und man muss schon arg an Verschwörungen glauben wenn man meint weiterer Krawall im AN führe zu einem anderen Ergebnis als dass du einfach Lizenzbestimmungen akzeptieren musst. FDMS 4 12:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Passfoto Hugo Josef Stark 1972.jpg

Guten Morgen, das Werbelogo dieses Werbeaccounts hast du gestern auch entsorgt. Ein Passbild des Betreibers ist enzyklopädisch auch nicht verwendbar. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Moin, Ist gelöscht. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Heinz-Josef Lücking

Moin! Entsperrung zur Diskussion moeglich? Schau mal hier: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Many Files deleted 2014-05-31 Ich hab zwei neue Versionen seiner Lizenz gebastelt. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Besser nicht, er hat ganz klar eine Editwar mit anderen Benutzern geführt. Eine Diskussion entschuldigt keine Editwar. Zudem läuft die Sperre eh bald ab, waren/sind ja nur drei Tage. Übrigens: du hast eine Mail mit Details über den Benutzer. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke Steiny! LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 15:05, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Kandidaten_für_Qualitätsbilder

Leider hast du weder auf meiner Benutzerdisk noch auf der Disk der Commons-Seite reagiert, sondern mich stumpf wegen Editwar gesperrt. In deiner Version ist es nämlich so, dass man ,wenn man die deutsche Seite [14] aufruft, a) einen unschönne Weiterleitunfshinweis oben links sieht, und b) amn die Seite nur mit dem Übersetzungstool bearbeiten kann, also keine KandidaIten nominieren, promoten oder ablehnen kann. In meiner Version war es so, dass man auf der deutschen Seite ganz normal die Kandidatenliste bearbeiten konnte, der obere Abschnitt mit den Regeln ist ja per Vorlage eingebunden (di emit dem Übersetzungszeug bearbeitet wrid). Soll nun wieder auf meine Version zurückgesetzt weren, damit es funktioniert? Mariofan13 (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Ich habe dich nicht gesperrt, war Yann. Bitte sprech das auf COM:TN an, ich sehe kein Problem mit dem Neuen per communety-consens genehmigten Tool. Und die Kandidaten befinden sich auf Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list. Ein "Kandidaten Bearbeiten" Link wäre technisch möglich. Soll ich so einen einbauen? lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Das mit.der Sperre sollte eh erledigt sein. Es geht nicht um.das Einbauen eines Links es geht darum, dass ich in anderen.Sprachversionen wie der englischen direkt auf der entspechenden Seite zu "Commons:Kandidaten für Qualitätsbilder" direkt den Kandidatenabschnitt bearbeiten kann ohne ihn gesondert aufrufen zu müssen. Auf der deutschen Seite wäre das in meiner Version möglich gewesen. In deiner Version, die derzeit aktuell ist, wird hingegen direkt auf die Vorlage für die Regeln zu Qualitätsbildern weitergeleitet, die aber klarwrweise nur per Übersetzungswrkzeug bearbeitet werden kann. Darum,und.weil ich keinen EW fortsetzen will, frage ich hier ob ich meine Version wiederherstellen soll (was an dieser falsch ist, hast du übrigens noch nicht erläutert) oder wie man das Problem.lösen soll.

Es gehz hier übrigens nicht darum das Übersetzungstool abzuschalten oder dass es selbst fehlerhaft sei.Mariofan13 (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Ist ein bug. Leider ist es technisch nicht möglich die [edit] links für andere Sprachen anzuzeigen, ich hoffe das wird in den nächsten Monaten behoben. Wenn die devs so weitermachen in dem Tempo kann das noch Jahre dauern. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Bei der Seite gab es schon Probleme mit dem Templates, die Seite hats wirklich in sich *seufz*. --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:04, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Okay... ich bin noch recht neu hier auf Commons, daher wusste ich nichts davon ;-) Jedenfallls nochnals Entschukldigung für den Editwar Mariofan13 (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Camera dei Deputati

The images have been released in CC-BY as part of the datasets of the Italian Chamber of Deputies. We uploaded the photo during the Hackathon Code4Italy@Montecitorio 2014, held last May at the Chamber itself. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 16:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Ciao Steinsplitter, ho sistemato la pagina di descrizione: ora dovrebbe essere a posto. Il sito camera.it non è rilasciato in cc-by, ma dati.camera.it sì, e la foto viene da lì. Penso si possa rimuovere l'avviso. --Jaqen (talk) 22:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Ciao, Si. Granzie mille^^ --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Löschung Smiderkal-Bild

Kannst du mich über den genauen Lizenzmangel im Smiderkal-File, das du gelöscht hast, bitte informieren. Roland Smiderkal hat explizit die freie Verwendung mit folgenden Worten erlaubt: "Dieser Inhalt ist unter einer Creative Commons-Lizenz lizenziert. Darüberhinaus ist eine Nutzung in der Wikipedia zu den dortigen Lizenzbedingungen ausdrücklich erlaubt." Für mich ist nicht zu ergründen, wo da ein Mangel liegen könnte! Ich habe auch nirgends eine Frage oder eine Diskussion dazu gesehen, nur jetzt die Löschungsmitteilung erhalten! Warst du da nicht gerade etwas übereifrig? -- Gürbetaler (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Die Lizenz sagt "Eine kommerzielle Nutzung ist untersagt", somit kann das Bild nicht auf Commons bleiben (COM:L). Siehe auch Commons:Forum#CC_BY-SA_3.0_AT_ohne_kommerzielle_Nutzung.3F. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Nein, wenn Smiderkal sagt "darüberhinaus", dann gibt er für alle Inhalte, die auf Wikipedia transferiert werden, eine andere Lizenz. Er verlinkt [15]. Er gibt als zwei verschiedene Lizenzen: CC-NC-SA für Inhalte, die direkt bei ihm abgeholt werden und GNU Freie Dokumentationslizenz für Inhalte, die auf Wikipedia transferiert werden!-- Gürbetaler (talk) 22:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Klingt für mich sehr dubios und es bleibt vorerst wegen COM:PCP gelöscht biss Smiderkal eine Schriftliche Freigabeerklärung an COM:OTRS gesendet hat (Standardprozedere). --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Removing...

Hi, I just noticed with this edit that your bot removes spaces, but maybe that with a little twist it could also remove final commas, as well... ;-) Greetings :-) --g (talk) 23:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi :)! We are removing currently only spaces to non break to much, i forward the suggestion to Zhuyifei1999 the bot operator. Maye we can fix this with a second bot run. Greetings --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:09, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Ein Problem...

gibt es zur Zeit mit dem Benutzer HHuby, der nach eigenem Gusto und ohne eine Ahnung von der Materie der k.u.k. Streikräfte zu haben (aus dem Sappeurleutnant hat er einfach einen Pionierleutnant gemacht, weil er dachte, das sei eh das gleiche und der Marcus Cyron stellt sich ihm als Handlanger willig zur Verfügung) ständig Namensänderungen für die Distinktionsabzeichen beantragt und auch sonst viel Unsinn anrichtet. (Fähnrich übersetzt er ins englische als “Fenrik” und Stabsoberjäger als “Staff-senior-jaeger”!) Sowohl der Kollege HHuby als auch der Admin Marcus Cyron reagieren nicht auf Ansprache. Kannst Du mir einen Rat geben? Servus, -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 11:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Habe den Benutzer vorhin angesprochen und er hat Mehrmals meinen Kommentar auf der Disk entfernt, deshalb hab ich den autopatrol flag vorerst entzogen und wenn er weitermacht mit den umstrittenen Umbenennungen muss er vermutlich gesperrt werden. Servus --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Danke Dir! -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 11:39, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

The Waste Land.jpg deletion

I wanted to upload again the file you deleted : The Waste Land.jpg by swedish artists... I choose the wrong parameter when I first upload it. I saw the band as a Flickr account with the appropriate license so I can upload it again from here : https://www.flickr.com/photos/125359897@N06/14395771924/

Thank you

Lordofmetal (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

I wanted to upload again the file you deleted : The Book of Eliot.jpg... I choose the wrong parameter when I first upload it. I saw the band as a Flickr account with the appropriate license so I can upload it again from here : https://www.flickr.com/photos/125359897@N06/14396850685/in/photostream/

Thank you

Lordofmetal (talk) 09:17, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Again? <<No file by this name exists, but you can upload it.>> ? --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Bot doing multiple rotations of same image

Could you please turn it off until its repaired? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

It is turned off atm. Normally it should be autokill if malfuntion, the api output is "200 OK", so the bot don't stopped. Sorry. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Looks like maybe it's not removing the rotation template after rotating? Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, exactly. And the api otput is "OK", so the bot think that the edit was successfully saved. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

My photos

I know this, I have loaded these files to the service of knowledge through the use of the files in Wikipedia, what's wrong in my files? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Commons is not Facebook, no need to upload a a lot of low-quality photos of the same baby. -I can not imagine how to use this photos in wikipedia. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry.'ll Start contributing again according to your instructions. Thanks for the alert and guidance.
But, what is the relationship between shadow and Facebook?!I upload files of the shadow, not of people
What about the hair, I have many pictures from the hair (without faces) (examples), can I upload it? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

You have uploaded private photos (+30 low quality photos of a baby...), Pleas see COM:SCOPE. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

what is the relationship between shadow and Facebook?!I upload files of the shadow, not of people
What about the hair, I have many pictures from the hair (without faces) --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:36, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your questions are answered in COM:SCOPE. I have only deleted your massuploads of babyfotos. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Can I upload Painted images? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

See COM:SCOPE --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:36, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

DR-Gadget

Du benutzt das DelReqHandler-Gadget um DRs zu schließen? (Weil bei mir hat dieses aufgehört zu funktionieren und ich habe keinen Schimmer wieso.) Sind dir länger anhaltende Probleme bezüglich des Gadgets in letzter Zeit aufgefallen? --McZusatz (talk) 15:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Ist mir auch schon passiert dass eine DR nicht geschlossen wurde oder eine Datei nicht gelöscht wurde :( --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Picture removal - May 14

Hi Steinsplitter,

I had uploaded a picture I owned but it has been removed by you. How can I prove to you I am the rightful rights owner so that it can be reinstated?

Thank you for your help! Will - Jun 13, 11.27 BST — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.215.134 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Which picture? Link pleas. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

The filename was Otmar_Szafnauer_Portrait.jpg and it was used in Wikipedia's page for Otmar Szafnauer. Thank you! -- Will 16.18, 13 June 2014

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you - however, in the page you linked, it says: "When contacting OTRS is unnecessary - I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.244.215.134 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 16 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Please send permission to OTRS & sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.--Steinsplitter (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Logo removal

Hi Steinsplitter,

You remove File:Sbu-logo-vector.svg the original logo of shahid beheshti university ? Now i have a question WHY?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.242.249.30 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 13 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Hi, Copyright violation, pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ds.jpg

Hi Steinsplitter! I hope you are well... Could you please restore this file which you deleted (and I had tagged)? The copyright violation was an intermediate revision of the file, and not the current or first version. I only meant to ask for the middle version to be revdeled, sorry if that was unclear, and sorry for the extra work! Cheers, Storkk (talk) 14:38, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Oh. sorry. Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

That was quick! Thank you. Best regards, Storkk (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Street sign in Kfar-Kama - odd 90° rotation

Hi,

SteinsplitterBot says that it rotated File:Street sign in Kfar-Kama.JPG by 90°, but this looks more like 180° to me... and idea what happened there? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, This is verry strange. I can't say why. The bot has sent a command to jpegtran to rotate 90° but jpegtran has rotatet it 180°. Thanks for letting me know. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Frage

Kannst Du diese Photo] "sperren", sodass es nicht mehr gedreht werden kann? LG Bwag (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Keine Ahnung wer von euch beiden recht hat, am besten das Foto nochmal Hochladen unter einem anderen Dateinamen und die Wikis entscheiden lassen welches verwendet werden soll. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:37, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Man braucht nur auf die Karabiner schauen, dann weiß man wie die Schwerkraft wirkt und daher wo unten beim Bild ist. LG Bwag (talk) 15:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Request for hidding old versions of some files

Plesase removed the old versions of File:Train Ticket Size Comparasion.JPG and File:Informatin Page of PRC Ordinary Passport (97-2 Version).jpg and only remain the latest version. This is because old versions of these files may contain personal information. Thanks! --Whisper of the heart (talk) 10:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! --Whisper of the heart (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Buttons

Moved to Talk:Main Page. —Mono (how to reply) 02:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi, let's talk about the buttons on the main page.

The change I made did a couple of things:

Fixed this layout problem
Added an intuitive contact us button. (Buttons are much better than links for demonstrating to new users that an action can be taken.)
Retained the upload button for logged in users

I was working on a way to only show the upload button to logged in users, meaning there would be 3 buttons at most visible at any time.

Does that sound like an acceptable solution to you?

Thanks, —Mono (how to reply) 19:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, There is a contact us link in the sidebar, i don't see the need to flood otrs with too much mail and i don't see the need to have two upload buttons on the mainpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

There are 22 links in the sidebar and they all look the same, not counting language links. We could definitely replace the upload button with a contact us button. However, it makes sense to me to have a upload button in the 'Participating' section because that is the most obvious way to participate in Commons. —Mono (how to reply) 20:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

One upload button on the Main Page is imho enough (users are not blind) and no need for a contact us button, why a such button? --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:06, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

There is a need, it's very difficult to find that page among the 22 links in the sidebar. Plus, buttons are much better than links for demonstrating to new users that an action can be taken. —Mono (how to reply) 18:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Imho no need ;) I suggest you start a discussion on Talk:Main page. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Moved to Talk:Main Page. —Mono (how to reply) 02:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Problems with File:Black Stone front and side.PNG

User:SteinsplitterBot/Rotatebot tries to rotate it, but the file keeps unchanged, remaining in the Category:Images requiring rotation by bot continuously.--Humatiel (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

It looks like the file need to be rotated by hand :( --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Portada Dentro de la Ley.jpg DELETION

Dear Steinsplitter, I see that https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Portada_Dentro_de_la_Ley.jpg picture has been removed by not indicating the proper permissions, but I sent them an email (OTRS) with a Written by the author of the file that gives me full rights to their free play, as you can see in my other uploads release.

The author of the file is the son of the person who wrote the book (Concha Ramos) which has recently died. As heir has all rights to images I'm uploading to wikimedia commons and are being used for article https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concha_Ramos

Please, I thank you not erase anything on article "Concha Ramos" as part of an investigation of his life and work and I have full rights to its use.

Please, could you undelete https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Portada_Dentro_de_la_Ley.jpg?

Thank you very much.

--Alexwp (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS for this file. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Upload images

Hello. I can not upload images, yesterday everything was normal. Can you help me? I now loaded with "agensia brazil". --Nоvа (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

re [16]

RotateLink isn't used much, do we really need it on for everyone? (many people may not know to/how to use it... —Mono (how to reply) 00:43, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

RotateLink is used a lot of times every day, i have checked it. Not sure about the other twos. --Steinsplitter (talk) 00:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Just saw your comment. Maybe it is used a lot, but the statistics from when it wasn't default didn't look too large. We can keep it as default though. For the other two, ExtraTabs is a catch-all gadget but it has some layout problems and functionality still using the Toolserver, functionality is not necessary for everyone. Improved Upload Form is from pre-upload wizard days; upload wizard is used 93% of the time for non-batch uploads so that's unnecessary imo. —Mono (how to reply) 00:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Left a comment on Mono's talk page. -- Rillke^(q?) 07:58, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File gelöscht: File:Aljoscha Pause.jpg

Hallo Steinsplitter,

von Dir wurde u.a. das o.a. Foto gelöscht. Die Rechte liegen bei mir. Könntest Du mir bitte erklären, was nötig ist, um es wieder einzustellen.

Besten Dank und viele Grüße TFB75

Hallo TFB75, Das Foto wurde auf Facebook veröffentlicht und deshalb brauchen wir von dir eine Schriftliche Freigabe ob das Foto wirklich von dir ist, siehe COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter, besten Dank. Ich habe die schriftliche Freigabe an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org gemailt. Ich hoffe, das passt so!? Besten Dank und viele Grüße, TFB75

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Picture deleted please help

Hi, could you please help me ? You have deleted a picture on the artile "Elizio" beacause of "copyright violation". I do have all rights to use this picture. How can I do to avoid it to be deleted anew please ? Thanks for helping. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizioriginal (talk • contribs) 21:23, 22 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Presentation of Samsung Galaxy S4 (2013-03-14) 02.jpg

Please explain the reason for removing this file. We discussed earlier and decided to leave it. And what about it? Why speedy deletion? --sasha (krassotkin) 04:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

I have not seen the DR. Anyway, imho not deminimis and therefore i don't restore the file. Fell free to start a discussion on COM:UNDEL --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Admiral Vinogradov banner 1990.jpg

File:Admiral Vinogradov banner 1990.jpg was cropped from File:Soviet Udaloy class destroyer Admiral Vinogradov (1990).JPEG; it's a U.S. Navy work and should not have been deleted. —innotata 17:50, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Restored. Pleas add a source. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:FC Nürnberg.svg

Hallo Steinsplitter, kann die Datei wohl wieder hergestellt werden? Im Logbuch [17] ist eine Quelle angegeben. War scheinbar zunächst auf deWp log. Habe bereits auf de:WP:Löschprüfung ebenfalls angefragt. --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎ 19:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Erl. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Ich danke Dir --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎ 19:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Brunno9106

Hi Steinsplitter! Könntest Du bitte noch aus obiger Löschdiskussion File:HugaFlame.jpg löschen? Diese Datei ist verschoben worden. Den redirect hast Du gelöscht, aber der batch task hat die aktuelle Datei ignoriert (ist aber von mir manuell zitiert worden). Danke. Gunnex (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Danke. Ist erledigt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

+1 --> Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kerwan = File:Mosaico Comillas.jpg. Danke Dir. Gunnex (talk) 15:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Danke. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

sortkey?

Hat das einen Grund, warum dein Bot komische sortkeys an die Kategorien anfuegt? --McZusatz (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh Danke. Das ist ja seltsam. Hatte es bissher nie gemacht o_O. Meinst du sollte man das revertieren oder machen die Nummern hinter der Cat etwas aus? --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Teilweise wurden auch die existierenden Sortkeys geloescht und folglich sind die Dateien wieder bunt gemischt, anstatt nach Dateinamen (oder altem sortkey) sortiert. --McZusatz (talk) 19:48, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Kopf --> Tisch - Überlege gerade wie ich das fixen soll, alle revertieren? So ein Mist. Sind leider einige betroffen:

MariaDB [commonswiki_p]> SELECT COUNT(rc_title) FROM recentchanges WHERE rc_user_text = "SteinsplitterBot" AND rc_comment LIKE "%following [[Templ%";
+-----------------+
| COUNT(rc_title) |
+-----------------+
|            3652 |
+-----------------+
1 row in set (1.77 sec)

--Steinsplitter (talk) 19:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Revertieren... --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Ja, ein primitives rollback ist wahrscheinlich am schnellsten und einfachsten. --McZusatz (talk) 08:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for rights/apc

Hallo Steinsplitter. Was hältst du davon, eine Spalte mit allfälligen Sperren einzufügen? Es wird wohl nicht oft vorkommen, aber gerade deshalb mag man's nicht manuell prüfen… --Leyo 00:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC) PS. Ein etwas sprechenderes Unterseitenlemma wäre auch nicht schlecht.

Hallo, Habe das eigentlich nur schnell und unsauber gebaut dass wir etwa haben. Bevor jemand rechte gibt guckt er sich sowieso Disk an ob dort was verdächtige ist ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 01:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Für die Vergabe von autopatrol sollte die Beurteilung möglichst rasch möglich sein, da es sich ja nicht um ein heikles Recht handelt.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Leyo (talk • contribs) 08:36, 25 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Sorry, Müsste dann das ganze Skript umschreiben und das will ich nicht. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

@Leyo: Habe es etwas umgebaut, nun wird auch Angezeigt ob jemand gesperrt war. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hello.I Was uploaded new pictures, Can I use you in Wikipedia or it is bad?If it is good,I will upload tens of images of living creatures --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

What is the meaning of 4c49c3884745202850524f56494e4345204f462042454c4749554d29 ?

In the Category Herve you changed [[Category:Liège (Province of Belgium)]] in [[Category:Liège Province|4c49c3884745202850524f56494e4345204f462042454c4749554d29]]. What is the meaning of that long 4c49c3884745202850524f56494e4345204f462042454c4749554d29 ? Wouter (talk) 08:21, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Boterror, will be reverted soon. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

It's LIÃˆGE (PROVINCE OF BELGIUM) in hex. -- Rillke^(q?) 12:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Websites/Webseiten

Greetings Steinsplitter,

Miss-Sophie from the German Wikipedia noticed that the Media Viewer interface used "Webseiten" instead of "Websites" and that this was an incorrect translation. I went and made the change on translatewiki and then I noticed that you had changed Websites to Webseiten. Seeing as how this is an issue between native German speakers, I am curious as to how to resolve this. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 02:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Webseiten would be correct Denglish. Websites is used a lot in German as well. The correct term would be Netzseiten or Internetseiten (Denglish again). As a DE-N I wouldn't mind either one. Oder um es mit Kurt zu sagen: Mir doch egal, Ferkel.

--Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:33, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia (or rather Wikidata) translates w:de:Webseite with w:Web page and w:de:Website with w:Website, so I guess "Website" would be the better choice for MV (unless it is referring to single web pages or HTML documents) ... FDMS 4 10:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Something busy

Hi Stein. For the moment I'm not spending much time on the commons and I have simply disappeared of IRC. Right now I am in Brazil looking for job. I got your email and I consider it important to write u. When everything is stable I give you fresh news --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I am so happy to hear that you are now in Brazil. Good luck. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

warum hast du mein bild löschen lassen?

Mein bild "hieß" magic light 'cover' Und ich frage dich warum du es hast löschen lassen?! ich hab ja nicht so viel ahnung von wikipedia aber das bild gehört mir ich hab es geschossen und bearbeitet...alsooo?

File:Magic light 'cover' 2014-04-17 11-15.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by SahinazS (talk • contribs) 23:32, 28 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Das Bild ist nicht im Projektrahmen, Steht im Löschantrag. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Your deletion of File:PubMed Health search for Wikipedia.png

What can I do in order for me to be able to upload this file in a way you will accept? I wrote on the talk page what I was willing to do in order to get rid of copyright problems, yet you just ignored that. I didn't use this page (http://alisha764.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/pubmed-health-2.jpg) to create that image. I created it all by myself by print screening the PubMed Health welcome page. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/. Fuse809 (talk) 07:50, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS, + this looks like out of COM:SCOPE for me. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Michel Clement.jpg

Hallo Steinsplitter ! Du hast das Bild zum Wikipedia-Personen-Artikel Michel Clement gelöscht. Vorher hatte allerdings Herr Michel Clement die Bildrechte an OTRS freigegeben per E-Mail. Ich würde Dir diese E-Mail gerne zukommen lassen, und Dich bitten, das Bild dann wieder herzustellen. Bitte nenne mir eine E-Mail-Adresse von Dir. Danke schön und viele Grüße. --Paddy2674 (talk) 11:47, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Sobald die OTRS Freigabe bearbeitet wird sollte die Datei wiederhergestellt werden. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:05, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erich Brill-030.jpg

Servus, Steinsplitter. Du hast die Diskussion beendet, bevor ich auf den URAA-Kommentar antworten konnte. Im Template:Not-PD-US-URAA heißt es nämlich auch: "Images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons. New files should not be uploaded with this tag, or they will be deleted." Die Bilder von Brill sind neu, daher auch meine Löschantrag. Der Hinweis, daß URAA kein alleiniger Löschgrund ist, gilt anscheinend nur für bereits vorhandene Dateien. De728631 (talk) 18:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Bitte lies mal Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, wo es genug Konsensus gibt die Dateien nicht zu löschen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, dann sollte man aber auch diesen Lizenzbaustein anpassen, wo es heisst, dass man keine neuen Dateien nach diesem Muster hochladen darf. Und auch {{PD-art}} verlangt ausdrücklich, dass das Werk im Ursprungsland und in den USA gemeinfrei ist. De728631 (talk) 19:07, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Ja, Aber das URAA Zeugs ist etwas Chaotisch - niemand weiß so recht wie. Biss man genaueres weiß wie vorgehen sollte nichts gelöscht werden. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Na gut, dann weiß ich bescheid für's nächste Mal. De728631 (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Graphic Recording Coding da Vinci

Hallo Steinsplitter! Darf ich fragen, wieso du das Graphic Recording von Coding da Vinci gelöscht hast? Liebe Grüße, Katja Ullrich (WMDE) (talk) 07:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Katja. Kollege Steinsplitter scheint gerade nicht hier zu sein, also mische ich mich mal ein. Sowohl Photograph als auch Zeichner sind Julian Kücklich, @playability, richtig? Der Upload wurde aber von Nina Schuiki durchgeführt. Da das Urheberrecht bekanntlich nur dem Urheber zusteht und wir davon ausgehen, dass dieser auch die Nutzungsrechte inne hat, würden wir bitten die Zustimmung des Urhebers, wie gefordert, an unser Support-Team zu senden, so dass sie dort archiviert werden kann oder Julian Kücklich, @playability könnte es mit Hilfe a) eines evtl. vorhandenen Commons Benutzerkontos oder b) auf einer evtl. vorhandenen persönlichen, öffentlich zugänglichen Website bestätigen, dass er mit der Lizenzierung so einverstanden ist. Sollte das eine Auftragsarbeit o.ä. sein, die vertraglich geregelt war, erbitten wir ebenfalls eine Kopie der relevanten Bestandteile an unser Support-Team. Ich habe die Datei wiederhergestellt. Leider ist das alles sehr bürokratisch auf Commons, aber bei Bildrechten hatten wir schon so oft Schiffbruch erlitten und der ist immer ziemlich teuer. Auch kommt es häufig vor, dass Autoren meinen eine CC-Lizenz gelte nur für Wikipedia o.ä., so dass wir hier immer auf Nummer sicher gehen. Liebe Grüße nach Berlin -- Rillke^(q?) 09:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Rillke! Danke für die Antwort. Du hast Recht, es handelt sich hier tatsächlich um eine Auftragsarbeit, über die ich sicher von unserem Veranstaltungspartner auch eine Aufzeichnung einholen kann. Was das Foto angeht: Nina Schuiki ist eine Mitarbeiterin von Wikimedia Deutschland, sie hat das Poster abfotografiert und hochgeladen. Julian Kücklich wurde allerdings als Urheber genannt, weil das reine, detailgetreue Foto m.M. keine Schöpfungshöhe hat. Liebe Grüße, Katja Ullrich (WMDE) (talk) 13:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Rillke hat schon alles gesagt :) (Rillke: Danke für's Antworten, sehr nett von dir). --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Katja, es wäre super, wenn Du vom Veranstaltungspartner eine Aufzeichnung einholen könntest. Ob Repro-Fotos tatsächlich keine Schöpfungshöhe haben und daher urheberrechtlich nicht geschützt sind, können die Juristen entscheiden :) Ich habe mal vermerkt, dass Nina das Foto gemacht hat. Vielen Dank, auch fürs Nachfragen. -- Rillke^(q?) 12:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Rillke und Steinsplitter! Wie mir eben auffiel, ist mitten im Bild in rot auch die Lizenz vom Urheber vermerkt worden. Wie praktisch. Ich hoffe, das genügt als Nachweis. ;) Bei der Fotografin mache ich mir keine Sorgen, sie hat es ja immerhin selbst hochgeladen. Vielen Dank für Eure Hinweise, Katja Ullrich (WMDE) (talk) 11:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Ich bin damit zufrieden. Wie meine Kollegen das sehen, weiß ich nicht, denn a) könnte es "zufällig" dort vermerkt sein, quasi als inhaltlicher Bestandteil b) die genaue Versionsnummer der Lizenz fehlt. -- Rillke^(q?) 14:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Allacher Lohe.JPG

Hallo, darf ich dich noch Mal um Hilfe bitte wegen WLE und einer Versionstrennung? Du hattest das neulich so schön erledigt :) und ist auch nur dieses eine Bild. Wobei, falls du noch Zeit für 2 weitere hättest: File:Schutzgebiet Taubergießen.JPG und File:Sperenberger Gipsbrüche - 1.Tiefbau.JPG sind auch aus dem Naturschutzgebietsumfeld von neuen Usern. Alle drei schon eine Weile mit "split" markiert. Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 20:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Erledigt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Undeletion request of "File:Hillelschmid2.png‏"

Hello Steinsplitter, my name is Bar. Yesterday I uploaded a file called "File:Hillelschmid2.png‏". This file was later on deleted by you, due to a marking of possible copyright violation. I would like to tell you that this file is not violating the copyrights policy. This file is actually a passport picture of a man I am writing an article on. This man (Hillel Schmid) is a relative of mine, and he gave me this picture knowing it will go on the internet, with his permission. Under these circumstances, I request you to undelete "File:Hillelschmid2.png‏" it will make me very happy if you will undelete the file. If you have any questions feel free to contact me (user:Barco123), I will be glad to reply. Yours, Bar.

The Passport photo is copyrighted, we need permission, see COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Bild Lingenberg-Rolf-1972.jpg

Hallo, Du hast das Bild Lingenberg-Rolf-1972.jpg gelöscht. Es stammt von mir, d.h. ich habe es aufgenommen, was ich auch beim Hochladen vermerkt habe. Was ist zu tun, um das Bild wieder herzustellen und zu verwenden ? Gruß ! --Ag2gaeh (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Bitte schicke eine Freigabe an COM:OTRS um sicher zu gehen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Habe ich gemacht und gebeten das Bild wieder herzustellen. Aber es tut sich nichts. Läuft da etwas falsch ? Es ist das erste Mal, dass es Probleme mit einem von mir hochgeladen Bild gibt. Gibt es dafür eine Begründung ? Grüße ! --Ag2gaeh (talk) 19:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Tut mir Leid. Kann auch etwas länger dauern. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Könntest Du mir bitte helfen, das Bild wieder herzustellen ? Grüße ! --Ag2gaeh (talk) 06:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Übersetzung Photo challenge Watchlist notice

Hallo Steinsplitter,
ich bin grad gefragt worden, ob ich die Watchlist notice für den Photo challenge übersetzten könnte - bzw. Übersetzungen in andere Sprachen organisieren. Kannst du mir helfen, wie ich da am Besten vorgehe? Deutsch und Französisch hätte ich mehr oder weniger bereit - ich würde es nur noch von jemanden überprüfen lassen.
Danke für die Hilfe, Anna reg (talk) 10:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Du kannst den Text auf MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice vorschlagen --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:54, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Ok, mach ich gleich. Anna reg (talk) 11:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

180 again

Hi,

Remember File:Street sign in Kfar-Kama.JPG? Back then your bot rotated it by 180 instead of the requested 90.

Now it did it again with File:Veradim street Hebrew Arabic Russian English.JPG.

And yes, I like multilingual street signs :) --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 17:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Something wrong with the exif orientation (Log: EXIF had major errors. Great parts of EXIF could be lost.). Which cam do you use? --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

It's my phone - Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

... And what should I do now to get it rotated correctly? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 17:33, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

You need to remove the exif-rotation tag from your phone before upload, or rotate your files two times with the bot. Sorry, I can do nothing :( --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:44, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Grübel grübel

Moin. Ist da was mit Kontozuordnung schiefgelaufen? Dieses hier eutet in eine bestimmte Richtung, auch waqs die globale Dateiverwendung betrifft. Wenn dieses aber stimmt, dann bin ich überfragt. Gruß -jkb- (talk) 07:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Ach. Kein SUL-Account. Alles klar. Nur, ich dachte, man kann auch so kein Konto mit dem Namen erstellen. Nun ja. -jkb- (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Moin. Ja seltsam. Mit der SUL Finalisierung wird das hoffentlich besser. Der Nutzer ist nicht blöd, habe den Eindruck er missbraucht Commons/WP als persönlichen Spielplatz. Messina (Hauptaccount) legt auch keinen SUL an weil er dann wegen Crosswiki abuse Global gesperrt werden könnte. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Ja, nicht nur nicht blöd, sondern da wird ein Aufwand betrieben. Du musst einen Account suchen, der Anno dazumal erstellt wurde, und seit irgendwann 2008/2009 oder offensichtlich so nicht mehr editierte (der Edit auf der grusinischen wiki fällt etwas aus dem Rahmen, war wohl nicht Messina). Der ist dann nicht "sulisiert", wie es aussieht, und die Software erlaubt die Erstellung eines Kontos auf einem weiteren Projekt (ich dachte, es geht nicht, aber wohl doch). Ich nehme an, wenn man mit dem Account jetzt auf dewiki editieren würde, könnte man es ohne CU auch nicht nachweisen. -jkb- (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Der Aufwand ist lächerlich, ist wie Kindergarten - Er/Sie weiß eben wie mach richtig trollt. Leider kann man uploaddescription mit Missbrauchsfilter nicht filtern, sonst hätte ich hier schon längst einen eingerichtet. Genau, Kein SUL - dann müsste man auf dewiki Checkusern (und das wird wohl nicht geschehen wie ich dewiki kenne). --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Sicherheitshalber [18], editierte in Messinas BNR-Artikel, woraufhin Messina SLA stellte - [19] -jkb- (talk) 22:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

+ Wolfe0ds, Gruß -jkb- (talk) 17:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Gesperrt. Nun hat er schon 214 bekannte Socken... lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Auch, Gruß -jkb- (talk) 18:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@-jkb-: Noch eine gefunden beim abarbeiten der SLA's, guck dir mal die SLA's an - das ist getrolle - den ganzen Seiteninhalt ersetzen wenn ein LD läuft. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Ich kommentiere nicht, du müsstest mich sperren :-) -jkb- (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File moves

Hi Steinsplitter, thanks for 'moving' the several files I had requested moves for. However you apparently overlooked one of them, so if there are no issues could you move this file ( File:2Reg Wash coil-2c.jpg ) when you get the chance? Thanx -- Gwillhickers (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:35, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Likely mass deletion for next week

Hi, as an uninvolved administrator and OTRS volunteer, you may wish to add Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Fellows_(auctioneers) to your watch-list. It involves deleting over 17,000 images (that I uploaded as a batch upload project). Thanks --Fæ (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Added. Thanks for letting me know. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

reply

Thanks for sharing this: User:Steinsplitter/wikitechml

I don't know much about the technical issues, but I do know that the plans presented last month, for an Upload Wizard update from the Multimedia Team at WMF, seem to ignore the main concerns most often expressed about the tool:

File:Upload Wizard Update - June 5 2014.pdf

I'm concerned about this -- please let me know if you'd like to discuss what can be done. -Pete F (talk) 01:39, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

@Pete F: If I may add my 2 rupees: I agree with Steinsplitter that there are a lot issues with the UploadWizard which remain unresolved for ages. Many users complain of uploads failed and other problems. See Commons:Upload Wizard feedback‎. This marketing document gives very little information about addressing these issues. Personally, I almost never use the UW. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

@Yann: Yes, it sounds like we all share more or less the same concerns. I've been watching Commons:UploadWizard feedback fill up and get archived, with virtually no discussion or acknowledgment, for many months. -Pete F (talk) 06:37, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

I have written a lot of Mails to WMF, some weeks (moths) ago Fabrice has mailed to me that the Multimedia Team is planning to improve Upload Wirzard. This is a first step. Swift (the Media Storage) Server is broken and need to be fixed, there are a lot of higprio unresolved bugs open since months. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Kingsley Podcast Logo

I created that picture. Don't be so quick to delete stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paragonpod (talk • contribs) 23:38, 6 July 2014‎ (UTC)

Pleas send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kreuz - Monte Piana 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:28, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Pic of All-in-one-PC

Hi Steinsplitter,

you deleted it before answering my opinion on it. Why ? There's nothing remarkable on that screen. Regards --KarleHorn (talk) 20:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi! The screen looks copyrighted. Feel free to request undeletion on COM:UNDEL --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Metzerlen-Mariastein, Klosterkirche Mariastein.jpg

Hallo Steinsplitter, das war kein "deletion war". Ich bin einfach in die Routine aus der Zeit zurückgefallen, als es noch "erlaubt" war, Redirects zu löschen – weil ich die Seite User:Leit/Löschkandidaten nicht aufgeräumt hatte. Das hätte natürlich nicht passieren sollen. Keineswegs plane ich, über dieses verhältnismäßig unbedeutende Thema Streitereien anzufangen. Dazu bin ich auf Commons admin-mäßig zu wenig aktiv bzw. weitgehend auf einfache Aufräumarbeiten ohne Nutzung irgendwelcher Entscheidungsspielräume beschränkt. Beste Grüße--Leit (talk) 20:50, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Kein Problem also. Ich dachte du hast den redirect absichtlich erneut gelöscht, weil das Gespräch auf deiner Talkpage klang nicht so als ob du einsehen würdest. Dann ist ja alles super. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:56, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Ich hatte einfach nicht mitbekommen, dass es der neue Konsens auf Commons ist, Weiterleitungen wegen der off-Commons-Nutzung bestehen zu lassen – mit der vage definierten Ausnahme, die Datei sei unmittelbar (eine Stunde, ein Tag?) nach ihrem Upload verschoben worden. Nicht zuletzt, weil dies weiterhin als Löschgrund angegeben ist, den man als Admin standardmäßig auswählen kann. Gruß--Leit (talk) 21:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Flag and coat arms of belarus

according to the sources only the thicker ornament pattern was changed there is no change of colours from the 1995 version, this https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/8/85/20120413125518%21Flag_of_Belarus.svg is the correct version can you please update the flag to that version and same aplies fo the coat of arms Enbionycaar (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Which flag exactly? Link pleas? --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Belarus.svg Enbionycaar (talk) 07:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Belarus.svg (the current version looks to bleak) Enbionycaar (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Pleas discuss this first on the relevant talkpage and use {{Editprotected}}. I am not experienced with flags. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpen-Grasnelke (Armeria alpina) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Comment Could you please ad geolocation? Thanks --Moroder 20:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

delete a file File:Tymoshenko 01.jpg

You have removed file File:Tymoshenko 01.jpg. In this file I have permission to copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megamario1 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 9 July 2014‎ (UTC)

Please send permission to COM:OTRS. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz

Hallo Steinsplitter,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weiße Silberwurz (Dryas octopetala) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments the blurry stone in the foreground is far too dominant. What about applying another crop? See my proposal. --Cccefalon 22:05, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
It is a mountain, The photo was taken on ~2000m --Steinsplitter 22:15, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Sure, but does the height above sealevel justifies photographic issues? --Cccefalon 22:30, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Uploaded a new version @ File:Weiße Silberwurz (Dryas_octopetala) 3.jpg :) --Steinsplitter 22:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
It's better; can pass as QI IMO --Cccefalon 06:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Eronda files, deleted

I am quite sorry about the deletion of the files I have uploaded about Eronda Mario De Donà. I have written to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org explaining my position of heir and copyright holder, but no response. I cannot understand what king of license you need to let my work going on. Thanks, dedox talcobiz.

You need to wait for OTRS reply. The OTRS Team will restore the file is the permission is OK. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Image annotator

We are again using version II. See MediaWiki:Common.js importScript('MediaWiki:Gadget-ImageAnnotator.js');. -- Rillke^(q?) 17:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Jasmin N Weidner.jpg

Hallo Steinsplitter, die Löschung ging aber schnell! Zu schnell, ich war im Kontakt mit dem uploader und so wies aussieht wurde ne Mail ans Support-Team geschickt... um es dem Neu-Wikipedianer nicht allzu schwer zu machen wäres es glaube ich gut wenn die Datei wiederhergestellt würde und mit {{OTRS pending|year=2014|month=July|day=14}} gekennzeichnet würde. Sie Disk User talk:TrashJaz. LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Danke, ich hoffe der uploader enttäuscht uns nicht... LG --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo. Ticket ist eingetroffen und wird gerade bearbeitet :) lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Supi... Gute Nacht noch... --1971markus (☠): ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 23:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drei Zinnen - 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 09:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:72MM 14 DominicJames 2550 (a).jpg

You restored this after my speedy with the comment "OTRS". Could you add the template with the ticket number to the file so that it doesn't just get deleted again? Thanks, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:40, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Somone (i cannot remember which user) has requested undeletion per otrs. I have redeleted it now because no OTRS template was added. Thanks --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Jmcasals

Hi Steinsplitter, the copyright holder have sent a permission to COM:OTRS. If it's correct, should I make a new request to undelete this Files uploaded by Jmcasals ? Thank you!, --Jmcasals (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, The OTRS volonteer will undelete the file if the permission is okay. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Photo téléversée par Ghislaine Brunelle

Bonjour. Vous avez supprimé la photo de Louis-José Houde que j'ai téléversée plus tôt. Nous sommes les représentants de cet artiste [www.louisjosehoude.com]. Nous détenons tous les droits d'utilisation de la photo téléversée. Cette photo est utilisée présentement pour la promotion de ses projets, dont son plus récent spectacle : les heures verticales. Auriez-vous l'amabilité de bien vouloir rétablir cette photo afin que je puisse la lier à son profit déjà présent sur Wikipedia. Merci.--Ghisbrunelle (talk) 16:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Ghislaine Brunelle

I don't speak fr. Only english, italian and german. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:72MM 14 DominicJames 2550 (a).jpg

Can you please undelete it one more time for me? I was out of town in between when I posted the request and when I came back to edit it. Sorry, TLSuda (talk) 17:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:41, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:MISC Cuja Mara Split.jpg

Hallo Steinsplitter,
warum wurde denn File:MISC Cuja Mara Split.jpg gelöscht? Erreicht eine Verpackung eines nur in Deutschland vertriebenen Produkts tatsächlich Schöpfungshöhe? Ist ja nicht so, als ob Produktabbildungen im Wikipedia-Universum etwas wirklich seltenes wären, vgl. Category:Coca-Cola bottles...
Viele Grüße,
Grueslayer (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo. Es ist imho eine URV. Diese Verpackung hat klar SH und ist desshalb geschützt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Wohlwend restore request

Hey—can you please restore File:Greg Wohlwend headshot full frame.jpg when you have a sec? The permission has been sent to OTRS czar ♔ 20:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:31, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello!!! I'm alive!!

Hi mate, in a few weeks I'll be active. We talk on the IRC. Alan ^(talk) 06:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Great to know :)) -- Rillke^(q?) 15:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

La Barbe

Dear Steinsplitter, I see three files (photos) have disappeared this morning in the french "La Barbe". I do not understand why. Several messages (évidences of permissions by the authors)have been sent to permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org - for each photo. We're waiting for the answers. Or is there something missing? Thank you for telling me what. Bests regards --Mocaya (talk) 08:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@Mocaya: I am looking at that. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your actions in deleting a couple of images that I had uploaded. In regard to one, I wasn't sure if it could be used or not. The other was one that I uploaded only as an example regarding the image and because it was requested for an administrative case that I had opened. Thanks again, Daniellagreen ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:42, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hullo. Could you tell me what the problem was with the images I uploaded? I'm sure copyright no longer applies to any of them.

Jodyrootes (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

See User talk:Jodyrootes#Sources_and_licenses --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:02, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Albionmoonlight

Greetings Steinsplitter: I thought you might like to see the magnitude of the problem of a particular Sock whom you have previously blocked. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for letting me know :). Maybe starting a CU request? --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

I think they recently did a CU (see the link on User:Ellin Beltz/Sock Drawer which I just updated with another whole pile of altnames. I don't know how to do a CU request, any suggestions? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh sorry, yes here Commons:Requests for checkuser#Albianmoonlight --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:13, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Right, but they missed a bunch, which is why I made my list. The category had a few, the CU had some more, and searching through the David Horvitz file history produced another one or two. Following every possible lead popped out another one. I made several deletion requests in the last two days, they're all linked up on that list. This is kinda nuts. I can see why socks drove INC crazy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

What a sockzoo. :/ :( --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Matt Klopot - 2014-04-25 - Iggy Azalea @ Danforth Music Hall 017 (14049980184).jpg

You deleted this file on 18 July - can you check the file history, there should have been an OTRS ticket (2014060110005812) attached to that image - regardless of the Flickr licence. I wouldn't have uploaded the image without having confirmed the permission via that ticket. Thanks. Nthep (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. Restored. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:00, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Not a problem, thanks for the fast response. Nthep (talk) 17:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

The problem with that image is that its respective image on flickr is "All Rights Reserved" and i figured the licensing was fake and secondly, it doesn't specify if thats the ONLY image from the stream which the OTRS agent has sought release for as i can't actually read the currently flawed OTRS system and thirdly, if someone releases their work freely, its the BEST interest for the wiki that the person that uploads the image to the wiki atleast makes an effort to upload the HIGHEST quality version of the image, i saw someone crop the poor quality version of this image and use it on enwiki, i'm not a fan of people cropping poor quality versions of an image which should have been uploaded in the highest possible quality in the first place..clarify please Nthep..--Stemoc (talk) 01:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Stemoc I have no reason to doubt that the release submitted to OTRS was from Matt Klopot hmself for the image on Flickr (and only that image) and that his release was under a CC-by-sa-3.0 licence. If the owner of the Flickr stream hasn't altered the licence there isn't the point - Wikimedia has a valid release under a Creative Commons licence thus allowing Wikimedia to use the image and for others to produce their own versions of the same image. On behalf of Matt and the user who made the original request to Matt for use of the photo I uploaded the image for which a licence was given. If you can get a higher quality image from that single Flickr image then feel free to upload it. Nthep (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

You uploaded the 'large' size of the image..when users put their images under the "ARR" licence on flickr, there is no option for downloading the original version.. i'll try to upload the higher quality over it even though I don't like doing it as somehow my PC only uploads at the speed of 0.02kbps to wikimedia...--Stemoc (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Licensed material of Bulthaup GmbH & Co. KG

Dear Steinsplitter,

I already sent the desired agreements for all my uploaded pictures to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org. Could you please restore the picture "Bulthaup b3 interior system.png", I will add the reference as soon as possible.

Best wishes, --B-social media (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo. Sobald die Freigabe bearbeitet wird, wird wer Support Team Mitarbeiter wird das Bild wiederherstellen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter,

schon geschehen, vielen Dank!

--B-social media (talk) 17:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Images deleted!

Hi, i saw that you deleted a lot of images of three diferent profiles.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Concepto

You deleted them just saying that is because they are from different brands of cameras, well, that's because they are from different motorsports photographers. We bought their photos and that's why we are the owners of the images.

For example, in www.concepto.mc.com you can see that Renault Sport Argentina is one of our clients, and Víctor Rosso and Leonardo Monti were members of that team. Fabián Yannantuoni is one of the 2014 drivers. You can found all the photos that you deleted in www.renaultsport.com.ar

What else we have to do to prove that are our photos? Please tell me how so i can follow the steps.

@Concepto: Your account is "you". Not "we". You edit here as a single individual. With your uploads you claimed that the photos are your personal work, entirely created by you yourself. It now turns out that this is not true. Its important to take the right steps when uploading files. Selecting the option "its my own work" in the upload wizard is the wrong step when something is not your work. --Martin H. (talk) 22:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

@Martin H.: Concepto is a company, but fine, if you want to talk us as an individual personal, it's fine, no problem. The thing is that the photographers that took all that pictures work in Concepto. So, what I have to do in that case? Upload again selecting another option?

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Now i will try to upload images just from 2 types of camera. That's possible, right?

File:Scott Weinrich - Wino.jpg

Hallo, Du hast eine Datei gelöscht, die ich erstellt habe und als Sockenpuppe zum Schutze meiner Privatsphäre hochgeladen habe. Nun haben zig andere es im Internet ohne Attribution genutzt, mit dem Resultat, dass mein Bild hier gelöscht wurde. Lesson learned: Spende in Zukunft keine Datei mehr Commons, da immer jemand kommen wird und sie nicht korrekt attribuieren wird, so dass letztendlich sie hier gelöscht wird. Zeig mir im Internet eine Verwendung, in der das Bild eine grössere Auflösung hat oder EXIF-Daten. Dann darfst mich gern global sperren. Das ist doch zum Verrücktwerden hier. Catfisheye (talk) 09:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo. Wiederhergestellt. Ein upload eines Benutzers wo das Foto sehr professionell wirkt und überall im web zu finden ist sieht ziemlich nach URV aus. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:08, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, und was hältst Du davon, den Benutzer einfach anzusprechen? Dann hättest nämlich auf dessen Disk den gleichen Sermon wie den hier gefunden. Dennoch danke für das Wiederherstellen. Du wirst verstehen, dass ich keine Lust habe, das Bild in die diversen Wikipedien wieder einzubinden. Gruss Catfisheye (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Ich habs an den meisten Stellen mal wieder rückgängig gemacht :) Aber hat Steinsplitter vielleicht eine Idee, ob man herausfinden kann, wo der Delinker-Bot die Datei alles entfernt hat? --Indeedous (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Ja --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Deleted picture

"Alexander_Brovko.jpg". deleted by Steinsplitter. "No license since 2014-05-11"

I'm new member, sorry. It was a photo of my close friend, I got it from his own profile here: https://vk.com/photo19802165_295818653 There is no licence violation. How can I upload it again?

Thank you

Please read COM:L. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Bilder Chiemgau Einschlag

Für die angemahnten Bilder ist das Mail angefordert, müsste heute im Laufe des Tages bei permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org eintreffen. Beim Bild File:Tüttensee-allein-historisch 1867.png da bin ich mir mit der Lizenz nicht sicher, die dargestellte Karte ist älter als 150 Jahre? Muss ich hier eine andere Lizenz verwenden? --PeterC2014 (talk) 10:53, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Okay. Die Karte sollte dann PD-old sein (=scheint so zu passen) --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Die Genehmigung der anderen Bilder wurde mit Ticket#2014072710006182 von KE erteilt. --PeterC2014 (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion - Poster for So Bright Is the View

Hello. Why did you delete the poster for So Bright Is the View from the Commons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marian1981 (talk • contribs) 08:34, 26 June 2014‎ (UTC)

Copyright violation, See COM:L & Commons:Deletion_requests/File:So_Bright_Is_the_View_-_Poster_(Romanian).jpg --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Radrennbahn Schöneberg 2005

Für das File:Radrennbahn Schöneberg 2005.jpg lag mir eine Genehmigung des Fotografen per E-Mail vor. Leider weiß ich nicht mehr, wer das war. Könntest Du mir bitte noch mal den Namen des Fotografen zugänglich machen, damit ich versuchen kann, ihn zu erreichen? Vielen Dank !--Uwca (talk) 04:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Lutz Roth --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Plötzliche Löschung

Hallo Steinsplitter, ohne Vorwarnung oder auch nur Mitteilung wurden diese Bilder von Dir gelöscht:

19:19, 14. Jul. 2014 Steinsplitter (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Moritz_Boerner.tiff (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) (global usage; delinker log) 19:18, 14. Jul. 2014 Steinsplitter (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Byron_Katie.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) (global usage; delinker log) 19:18, 14. Jul. 2014 Steinsplitter (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:Prof_Peter_Meinhardt.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) (global usage; delinker log) 19:18, 14. Jul. 2014 Steinsplitter (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte Seite File:M_Boerner.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing) (global usage; delinker log)

Bitte um Mitteilung, was da falsch gemacht wurde. (M Boerner.jpg z.B. war seit langer Zeit ohne jede Beanstandung auf der Wikipedia-Seite zu sehen.) Was muss ich tun, um die Bilder, deren Rechte ich besitze, zu reaktivieren? Danke! Nomistake --Nomistake (talk) 09:27, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Die Bilder scheinen von diversen Internetseiten geklaut zu sein (1, 2, ...) - Bitte sende eine Freigabe an COM:OTRS. Danke.

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Category scheme for translatable project pages

Hi! Please help me: I want to migrate to the new translation system for project pages such as Valued images, Featured pictures и Quality images. This requires the unification of the category name. Is there any (consensus) decision to this issue? I know two alternative ways - as in Wikidata (see d:Help:Contents/ru as example) and as in Meta/MediaWiki (see meta:Stewards as example). In any case, we will need to choose one of them. Perhaps the choice has already been made? --Kaganer (talk) 13:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Unfortunately we don't have consensus here :(. Imho it is not a good idea to touch Valued images and Featured pictures because they have a own management. greetings :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks :( --Kaganer (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Internet Relay Chat

Please could you add Italian, Spanish French and Portuguese languages or show me where to do so I can translate that page--Pierpao.lo (listening) 14:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for helping with translation! :) Klick here ans set Translate to English to italian or a other language! --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

JPG->jpg?

Hallo Steinsplitter, Sollten solche Dateien [20] umbenannt werden? Oder ist das egal? Gruß. --LezFraniak (talk) 11:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo :), Ich sehe keine Notwendigkeit. Da es eine "uploader request" war und erst vor kurzem hochgeladen wurde kann man dem hochlader den Wunsch von mir auch erfüllen. Bei älteren Dateien würde ich nicht umbenennen. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

OK. Danke. Da habe ich gleich noch eine Frage. Was ist mit extrem langen Namen, Wie [21]? Habe es genehmigt, weil es vorher nur Zahlen waren. Eigentlich finde ich es aber komisch die komplette Dateibeschreibung als Namen zu nehmen. Dürfte ich das (sinnvoll) kürzen? Gruß. --LezFraniak (talk) 14:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Leider gibt es keine Richtlinie die solche Dateinamen verbietet. Wenn es nach mir gige wäre sowas schon längst verboten. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

please undelete File:Isisecranaccueil.png

File:Isisecranaccueil.PNG

vue du logiciel Isis , logiciel de LOMACO (publiée par Fideciel Groupe - Maison mère de Lomaco)

Ce compte est un compte géré par la société FIDECIEL pour agrémenter les différentes pages Wikipedia liées au Groupe : - LOMACO -MK2i - ETI Informatique -LOMACO ANtilles-Guyanne-Océan Indien - FIDECIEL

Toutes les photos et tous les logos ou designs chargés via ce compte sont diffuses par FIDECIEL et ses filiales et sont leur propriété exclusive. Merci donc de ne pas les supprimer !

VOus pouvez nous contacter sur marketing@lomaco.Fr

This account is published by FIDECIEL Company (France) to upload pictures on Wikipedia pages linked to the company : - LOMACO -MK2i - ETI Informatique -LOMACO ANtilles-Guyanne-Océan Indien - FIDECIEL

All of the pictures , logotypes or designs uploaded from this account are shared by FIDECIEL and subsidiaries and they are property of FIDECIEL. Thanks a lot and do not delete them ! You can contact us on marketing@lomaco.fr — Preceding unsigned comment added by SoftyLomaco (talk • contribs) 14:50, 29 July 2014‎ (UTC)

Please send permission to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

PAs mess in Zusammenfassungszeilen bitte entfernen

Hallo Steinsplitter,

kannst Du bitte hier, hier, hier und hier die grundlosen PAs mess aus der Zusammenfassungszeile entfernen.

In der Sache, sind die Aussagen bis auf den falschen parameter location jetzt fast i.O., aber wie man sieht konnte ich nur mit großer Mühe die korrekte Beschreibung durchsetzen.

Es ging bei Cranach Hercules and Omphale um [22]

artwork parameter departement entsprechend tl artwork anstatt location
tl inscription, + für Signatur
Referenz von Cranach Digital Archiv, die leider jetzt unter der nichtssagenden Bezeichnnung lucascranach.org läuft
sortkey: Cranach, Lucas 1, Hercules and Omphale, National Museum in Warsaw, damit sämtliche Cranach Version auch zusammen bleiben

"mess" Löschen wier normal nicht. Kann auch jeder sehen was der user da von sich gibt.

Du kannst eine beschwerde gegen den Benutzer auf COM:AN/U öffnen. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Bei Cranach Hercules and Omphale (detail) ging es weiter noch um die deutschsprachige Titelversion. Die Referenz fehlt noch immer.

Von den Umgangsschwierigkeiten des Users zeugt seine disc, wie Du ja selbst festgestellt hast.

Ich belästige Dich ungern damit. Es ist schlimm genug, sachlich richtige edits mit solchen Schwierigkeiten durchsetzen zu müssen, namentliche PAs in der Versionsgeschichte möchte dafür nicht hinnehmen. Danke für Deine Hilfe und Gruß--Oursana (talk) 20:59, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

"Mess" glaube ich verstecken wier nicht. Habe Vert nun verwarnt. Du kannst dich aber auf COM:AN/U beschweren und dort eine sperre beantragen wenn er weitermacht. LG --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Surely when someone has no respect for my work and others, vandalising my work I can call it a mess, small comparison [23], [24] [25] and example [26]. Next time I will raise a problem in the mentioned noticeboard. Please use English when discussing such issues. Vert (talk) 22:01, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Danke Steinsplitter, es wird nur schlimmer, jetzt sind wir schon bei vandalism und Dir ergeht es auch nicht besser.--Oursana (talk) 22:25, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Israeli Air Force jets Fly-over Auschwitz concentration camp.jpg

Thank you for restoring the picture. But the problem in such cases is that there is no bot to fix mistakes, and it had to be done manually. See here. The permossion is already there. It was there when the picture was deleted. Hanay (talk) 00:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

You'r welcome :). And there is not automated process to restore delinks. It is a big problem. --Steinsplitter (talk) 00:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes I know, I myself restored pictures manually and it was a lot of work. That also why admin should be very careful before he delete a picture, It is not good idea to do massive deletion. Hanay (talk) 01:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@Hanay: it is certainly a good idea to check individual files. But should that check be done by those uploading the files or those deleting the files? There was a long deletion debate open; but you, nor anybody else, did not specify which files had specific permission via other means. It also has not been expressed in the OTRS ticket. I believe @Fastily: is right, to err on the side of complying with copyright law. If there are files mixed in that should not be deleted, I am sure he would be receptive to consulting a list of them -- but I do not think he is responsible to manually build such a list. That's the kind of work that is meant for the period when there is an open Deletion Review, and can/should be done by those who most strongly feel that the images have value and are freely licensed. -Pete F (talk) 01:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Wait, no -- I just looked at the file, and it looks like your claim "the permission is already there" is referring to the same OTRS ticket that was specifically discussed in the DR. That OTRS ticket is not adequate permission -- that is the conclusion @Fastily: drew from our discussion. These files should remain deleted, unless it can be clearly established that they have been legitimately released under a free license. -Pete F (talk) 02:12, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@Peteforsyth: . I am sorry but I realy do not understand what you are saying here. This is another permission. I sent the e-mail with the Wording that it is in ויקיפדיה:OTRS. The answer was that they approved what I wrote to them. where do you find a problem here?

The assumption that all the pictures in Category:Images taken by Israel Defense Force are from the same OTRS ticket is the wrong one Should we need to open a special category for each permission something like Category:Images taken by Israel Defense Force - ticket XXX so administrator in Commons will not do mistakes? Hanay (talk) 09:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@Hanay: I am very sorry -- I tried to be diligent before posting my last message, but even so, I can now see that I made a mistake. I thought the image linked to the same problematic OTRS ticket that we had been discussing in the DR. I must have gotten confused between multiple images open in different tabs, because I now see that it links to a different OTRS ticket:

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2013100310005973.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2013100310005973
Find other files from the same ticket:

I can't easily assess that ticket, since I don't read Hebrew. But I have struck my more recent comment above, and restored the original one. Very sorry for adding to the confusion. -Pete F (talk) 18:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Why did you delete a headshot?

I want to put Marc Holtzman's headshot on his Wikipedia page. He sent it to me personally and it already appears on the websites of the companies and non-profit organizations he works with. This picture is in the public domain. Can you please undelete it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MadLegs Media (talk • contribs) 09:14, 31 July 2014‎ (UTC)

Please send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Verschiebewünsche

Hallo Steinsplitter, Danke für meine neuen Rechte als Verschieber. Nachdem ich meinen "Saustall" mal aufgeräumt habe, möchte ich mich gerne auch an der Abarbeitung anderer Verschiebewünsche beteiligen. Irgendeine entsprechende "Wunschseite" habe ich hier noch nicht gefunden. Idee? Danke Gruss --Pelz (talk) 21:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, In Category:Media requiring renaming findet man Anträge von users die bearbeitet werden können. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:45, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Amitie 10g/Templates/ArcSoft Copyright status

Steinsplitter, as you deleted the template per Jim's DR, and for general discussion of the thread in the Village Pump, instead of requesting an UnDR, I want to create another, more general template to explain the ambiguities of the copyright status of the files and their EXIF metadata. I know than a new template need broad community consensus, but I'cc create in my userspace sandbox, expecting than neither other user nominates or deletes the page. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

PS: Thanks for adding me to Patroller and Rollback. I'll request the Filemover later. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Maye you should test templates in User:Amitie 10g/Sandbox, User:Amitie 10g/Templates/* sounds like template reedy for use. --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

You right. I'll move my Templates test ground inside the Sandbox. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Steinsplitter. Check your email—you've got mail!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Löschung von Fotodateien die nicht Urheberrechtlich geschützt waren

Hallo, ich wollte mal fragen warum ihr diese Dateien gelöscht habt: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Luke081515 Die waren alle nicht Urheberrechtlich geschützt. Gruß, --Luke081515 (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Wird es klar, wenn du Commons:Derivative works durchliest? --McZusatz (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Aber die Bilder stammen vom DLRG, ich bin dort Mitglied und habe die Zuständigen gefragt, die meinten das wäre in Ordnung. Also dürfte es doch keine Probleme wegen der Urheberrechtsrechte geben, oder? Zu der Angabe "Das Werk ist meine Arbeit": Ich habe die Fotos davon gemacht. Warum gibt es dann Probleme mit dem Urheberrecht? --Luke081515 (talk) 21:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

@Luke081515:. Falls du die Fotos wirklich selber gemacht hast, muesstest du eigentlich noch die vollen Aufloesungen ohne das Wasserzeichen (Copyright) haben. Dann lade bitte die hoch. Andernfalls benoetigen wir vom Rechteinhaber oder Autor (=Fotograf) das Einverstaendnis. (Bitte dann an com:OTRS schicken) Danke. --McZusatz (talk) 19:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Chiemgau-Einschlag Bildrechte

Hallo Steinsplitter, ich wende mich einfach mal an Dich. Die von Dir gekennzeichneten Bilder: Datei:Cirt-crater 004.jpg, File:Cirt-tuettensee-gravimetriemessung.JPG, File:2014-07-20-donnerloch-helming-prof2.png, File:Cirt-crooked-creek-und-tüttensee.jpg wurden per Mail mit Ticketbestätigung [Ticket#2014072710006182] an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org gesandt und leider bis heute noch nicht bearbeitet. Um eine Löschung zu vermeiden möchte ich Dich um Rat fragen ob ich noch etwas tun kann um den Vorgang zu beschleunigen. Danke --PeterC2014 (talk) 16:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Moin! Erstmal {{subst:OP}} in die Datei reinbappen, dann wird (normalerweise) nicht geloescht. LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 17:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Danke :-) done --PeterC2014 (talk) 18:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

comdel

Diesmal hat user:Blackcat comdel ertraenkt und nicht ich. ;) Kannst du den Bot neu starten, bitte? --McZusatz (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand German :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 10:44, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

User:CommonsDelinker/commands can not handle a large amount of requests in a short time when they are added one after another. Instead, requests should be bundled and User:CommonsDelinker/commands should only be edited once every ~5 minutes. --McZusatz (talk) 11:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Oh yes, now I understand. The fact is, a young and nice and willing girl from Venice uploaded a lot of photographs freely released from the public library of Mestre, but she ddn't rename them in a way they could be easily recognized; thus, apart of categorizing them, I had to move them to a more appropriate name. Hence the overload for Commons Delinker... Now I told her how to do, thus I am confident that there is no need for renamimg and replacing files in the future (at least from her). -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:54, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Done :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Problem mit upload neuer Version

Hallo Steinsplitter, ein User hat mich wegen eines Fehlers/Problems angeschrieben [27]. Weiß aber nicht wie das zu lösen ist und warum er die neue Versin nicht hochladen konnte. Kannst du mal schauen wie man das lösen könnte. Dank im Voraus und Gruß aus Berlin. --LezFraniak (talk) 10:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Verstehe das Problem des Nutzers nicht. Auf redirects soll man keine Dateien hochladen. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter, wir haben jetzt noch mal was versucht, ging aber auch nicht. Vielleicht hast du noch eine Idee. Schreib dann doch bitte direkt in die Disku. Dank im Voraus. Gruß aus Berlin. --LezFraniak (talk) 14:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Your assistance please

You deleted File:Two sailors try out the USCGC Charles Sexton's jet boat., 2014 01 28 -a.jpg, File:Two sailors try out the USCGC Charles Sexton's jet boat., 2014 01 28 -b.jpg. As I recall these images were the work of members of the USCG in performance of their duties.

Please restore. Geo Swan (talk) 05:47, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

This media file does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. Please add license etc. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:13, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:38, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kreuz - Monte Piana 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Makele-90 02:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Türkenbund (Lilium martagon) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! -- Der Wolf im Wald 06:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Piana 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Vassil 11:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Help over at itwp

I have nominated a number of files uploaded by Gambo7 for DR, one File:Pacific Logo.svg I have sent to DR as it is a clear attempt to sidestep copyright on the official logo seen here, however Gambo7 has now uploaded the file to itwp here making the same claim of "Own work", as I don't know the processes at itwp and do not speak Italian can you help me nominate it for deletion over there as a copyvio also ? LGA _talk^edits 09:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

I am not active there. But itwiki has a few special copyright rules - maybe it is PD there (like in dewp). I think you can use {{delete|resason}} there. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

The image is different than the official logo and has been designed by me. Every part of it is free. --Gambo7 (talk) 11:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Steinsplitter,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Kontrolleur

... danke! ;) Grüße, Yellowcard (talk) 17:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

comdel - #3

Entweder ist http://tools.wmflabs.org/delinker/index.php?replacer=1 seit Tagen stehen geblieben, oder der Bot ist wieder eingeschlafen. ;) --McZusatz (talk) 07:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Neu gestartet. Könntest du bitte die benötigten replacements der letzten tage erneut auf die delinker page hinzufügen? --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your help :) ~ Nahid ^Talk 23:11, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

?

Mr.

You erased a photo in one of my articles without my permission, since i am the legal owner of the rights of that picture. Therefore, i ask you to publish the image again. The article that i am referring to is this: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignacio_Cano_L%C3%B3pez_de_Mesa

I am very upset with your abusive behavior, because i sent all my personal information to Wikipedia in order to avoid this particular situation. If you need any legal information about the image you abusively erased, i will be glad to show it to you, once i asked my lawyers about this regard.

You can write me to this email address: samuel-cano@hotmail.com

Respectfully,

Samuel Cano Grandson of Mr. Ignacio Cano López de Mesa.

Please send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

You deserve a zen master dree for dealing so calmly with this kind of… contact. -- Tuválkin ✉ 18:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about writing on Peter's page. Kiefer.Wolfowitz (Discussion) 11:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment for the request of the right of translation

Sorry, a little bit difficult to evaluate a person with three edits. It was sufficient to ask me to have a page well formed for the translation to have a better evaluation. I am here since 2005 and I am not pretending to have something more than being an user. If I ask something it's only to facilitate my work (and your work). But at least I am pretending to be evaluated as an user having 9 years of experience and not only in Commons, so it means pretending a more detailed evaluation. Thank you. --Ilario (talk) 23:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

If you use it wrong = page broken. Pls read the documentation first, when the page fixed i mark it for you :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators

Hallo Steinsplitter, ich habe versucht, mit dieser Änderung die verschiedenen Sprachversionen einzubinden. Allerdings scheint das nur mit Vorlagen zu funktionieren, mit so einer Seite leider nicht. Hättest Du noch eine Idee, was man da machen kann? Außer den ausgelagerten Text wieder in die Seite aufzunehmen oder nur auf den Text zu verlinken fällt mir nichts mehr ein... Gruß, --Brackenheim (talk) 16:29, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

{{TNT|:Commons:Administrators/Howto}} sollte funktionieren. Imho is eine Verlinkung ausreichend ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Ich ändere es gleich in einem Link um. Sieht dann so am besten aus. Danke ;-) --Brackenheim (talk) 17:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Could you please take a look at this?

Hello Steinsplitter -

I've stumbled across something unusual and I am not sure how to proceed. I was looking at the Enwiki uploads of a user, and discovered that (a) the user had had quite a few uploads deleted because of copyright violation, and (b) two of his remaining uploads, which have been transferred to Commons, list himself as the creator of the work. The problem with the second part is that the user includes his "real name" and each of those images have a different "real name" on them. The images are as follows:

I'm not terribly familiar with how Commons would deal with a situation like this. Since you're one of the few German Commons admins whose name I know, and there seems to be a German element to this, I thought you might be in a good position to consider what needs to happen here. Thanks, Risker (talk) 03:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Risker, I think Steinsplitter is indeed probably better qualified to address this than me, they're likely asleep, and it caught my interest, so let me make a couple observations in the meantime.

The first one (Zyn-logo) might be public domain; though I am personally skeptical in the case of a highly stylized logo like this, many at Commons would argue that {{PD-textlogo}} applies. If it doesn't, we'd generally want to see an OTRS entry for something like this -- and that might be a good idea regardless (from an enwp perspective), to have some better assurance that it's a genuine logo of the publication.

The second one (Belfast pano) -- I don't think the uploader intended to include his name as the author in the license template, since he clearly distinguished in the "Author" field. I suspect this was confusion based on our tools, not willful deception. I'd be inclined to just ask him. -Pete F (talk) 06:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

This may be a matter inappropriate for discussion publicly on-wiki or potentially on OTRS, which is neither guaranteed to be secure or confidential. I am raising this with Steinsplitter on IRC. If anyone is playing political games here, please find something better to do with your time. --Fæ (talk) 07:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I'm not playing games, Fae; this is a genuine question. I took it to the talk page of an individual administrator, instead of a noticeboard, because I didn't want to turn this into a big scene, but instead perhaps a learning opportunity. For me. This sort of suspicion is why people don't like to come to Commons, and I'd really appreciate it if you would stop it and stick to helping me understand what happens on Commons when it appears a user is claiming self-attribution for media that probably isn't their creation.

Pete F, the user chose to upload at enwiki (he has a brief contribution history in May 2009 on dewiki), but also apparently had quite a few images removed for licensing problems, so I can't really tell whether this is a "templates didn't make sense to me" situation, or a situation where someone has deliberately claimed credit for something they don't own. Risker (talk) 11:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Steinsplitter, I emailed the person in question. They logged in with their account and changed the author name on the Belfast image, and I've revdelled the information (personal information). The logo I have just DRed. All sorted; nothing for you to worry about doing. russavia (talk) 22:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Pöbeleien werden demnach bei Commons toleriert, wenn der "richtige" sie macht

Hallo Steinsplitter,

dein Aufruf an mich, ich solle ruhig bleiben greift in Leere. Nicht ich habe die Frage an mattbuck gestellt, warum er sich von mir angepisst fühlt sondern er. Ich befinde mich in keinerlei Disput zu irgend einem Benutzer. Nur scheinbar kann es mattbuck nicht tolerieren, dass man die selben Bildbewertungsmaßstäbe an ihn setzt wie er an die anderen. mattbuck bewertet meine Bilder, ich seine. Dass man nicht alles nachvollziehen kann liegt in der Natur der Sache. Dass man sich mal "annervt" ebenso. Nur wenn man grundlagenfrei pöbelnd und aggressiv Hass und Rache unterstellt dann rechtfertigt das mindestens eine Ermahnug bei demjenigen, der sie äußert. Insofern hast du entweder den Sachverhalt nicht verstanden (sowieso ungewöhnlich, dass du dich hier einbringst wenn du nach Selbstauskunft Urlaub hast) oder dich wider Faktenlage einfach mal auf Seiten deines Adminkollegen gestellt. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ignoriert euch bitte einfach. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

(1) muss so eine Aufforderung an beide gehen (2) ändert es nichts an den aufgezeigten Widersprüchen und der Tolerierung von Pöbeleien weil ihm meine Kontra-Stimme nicht gepasst hat. Weiterhin schönen und erholsamen Urlaub. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:55, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Benachrichtigung der Dateihochladen

Hallo wegen der Löschung von File:Fräkband_6_mit_Logo.jpg und dem SLA auf File:Fräkband 6.jpg: Wir der Hochlader auf seiner Heimat-Disk nicht mehr informiert: de: Benutzer Diskussion:Bönteler? --Alpöhi (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Auf der Heimat-Disk informieren wir nicht. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Ich hatte das so in Erinnerung. Naja, ich hol das mal nach, denn ich glaube der Hochlader ist der Urherber und hätte können eine Freigabe machen. --Alpöhi (talk) 17:30, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

AGF

Well, this was surprising. -- Tuválkin ✉ 18:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I notify the blocking admin when i unblock someone ;) --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, as the rules prescribe. That’s not what surprised me. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

?, Maybe you understand something wrong? The next block (and i hope this will be never happen) will be longer than this one (is logically). Are you not happy that I have unlocked you :P ? --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I also hope it will never happen and yes I’m pleased that you unblocked me. :-) Not sure about the inevitably of a longer block, considering the policies and philosophy of blocking (preventive, not punitive, and all that). -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

(Edit conflict)

You assumed as a fact that there will be in the future a situation that will get me blocked and that this certain future situation will be such that an even longer block will be necessary. But you cannot be sure of that, of course. -- Tuválkin ✉ 19:46, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Past behavior is the best indicator of future behavior. Now as we all know, your track record is pretty lousy. Perhaps if you prove yourself capable of civil discourse for an extended period of time, we'll be more inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt :) -FASTILY 20:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanksverymuch, Fastily. If «past behavior is the best indicator of future behavior» then rehabilitation is a sham and I’m living on borrowed time — not sure if you really mean that.

Just to be on the safe side, I’ll take you as a role model. (Hmm, what does "lousy" actually mean? Oh — a human scalp parasite, indicative of poor hygiene — who knew? Well, not sure if you really mean that, either.)

Thankfully my track record, lousy or otherwise, is there for all to see. Shampoo for everybody is maybe in order. -- Tuválkin ✉ 20:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I've no comments about the block. But IMHO a boilerplate template for a simple file copyright warning with a block threat is not so good. Moreover, I don't like non-admins make block threats. See, that template can be used by newbies and even IPs; so threatening an established user who make a small mistake is very annoying. (I saw it even on the talk page of Erik too.) That template need to be re worded.

J e e 02:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Old photos

Most old photos in Wiki Commons have no recorded history of publishing. Deleting them all would destroy Wikipedia.--Ulamm (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Most old photos are obvious PD. @COM:UDEL: It is not obvious that the photo is in PD, therefore we don't restore this file. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:18, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Citation of the discussion page of "Kando_Kalman_mozdony.jpg": This photo was taken 1902, for example is here: http://100hires.hu/cikkek/ganz-gyar-altal-keszitett-valtellina-villamos-mozdony Copyright is surely expired. --PetrS. (talk) 17:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC).--Ulamm (talk) 11:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Ping: Jameslwoodward, what do you think^^? Restoring? Source seems ok. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Normally, I use 1885 as the cutoff date for assuming that an image's copyright has expired in pma 70 countries. That allows for a photographer who is 20 years old, born in 1865, and who lived to be 80. Obviously it is possible that even that date is too late (people take photos before age 20 and live beyond age 80), but it will do. Clearly 1902 is too late to make any assumptions. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

I have to admit that if a photo has been shot in 1902, in 2014 the likelihood that the author has died more than 70 years ago has just passed 50 or 60 %.

On the other hand, there are lots of current photos from the first decade of the 20th century, on which you can't ask anybody for a permission to use them. And except of very few prominent examples, nobody knows if one of these current photos has been shot by his grandfather.

In many coutries, because of several wars and partly of changes of economic systems, even the owners of well kept archives have changed.

Therefore, a liberal practice on this question is no danger for Wikimedia and Wikipedia, and it could be something like a democratic corrective of capitalist concentrations in the world of media.--Ulamm (talk) 07:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

That argument runs directly against points #1 and #4 of COM:PRP. It is unfortunate that there are Orphan works out there that we would like to have on Commons, but that does not make them permissible uploads. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

#1 and #4 are o.k., as long as the author is living.

With photos from the first decade of 20th century we can be sure that the author as the natural holder of the copyright has died.

Who shall research not only the name of th eauthor but the genealogy of his family – for a single photo?

Possibly, the original negative is lost and a dozen of people or museums incidentally have one of the copies.(I know a map printed in 17th century, Wikimedia Commons has photos of two different prints of, visible from the damages.)

With these circumstances, "holder of the rights unknown" isn't a feeble excuse.

That locomotive with three presenting persons in front of is no snapshot of a historical second (assassin attack or similar) and no great art.

Therefore, it is a typical static journal photo without creativity, and no "national heritage" of any communtity.--Ulamm (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Nonetheless, it is probably still under copyright and therefore cannot be kept on Commons. If you don't like the most basic and longstanding rules under which we work, I suggest you find something else to do with your time. Arguing against our most basic rules is a waste of your time and that of other people. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I looked again into it and i agree with Jameslwoodward, therefore the file remains deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Tiger Line bus W72 (L456 JCK), 15 December 2011 (1).jpg and File:Tiger Line bus W72 (L456 JCK), 15 December 2011 (2).jpg

I'm not sure I follow your deletion rationale, that these images were "copyright violations". As the file description page clearly stated, they were sourced from www.stockpholio.com, where they are being made available on Commons compatible licenses. Obviously, they got them from Flickr, but since that was clearly stated by www.stockpholio.com, that's doesn't make them a violation. The difference in licensing between the www.stockpholio.com and Flickr is explainable by the Flickr license being changed after they were uploaded by www.stockpholio.com, which obviously doesn't invalidate the license of www.stockpholio.com's versions. Just like Flickr transfers to Commons aren't invalidated if the license at Flickr subsequently changes. As www.stockpholio.com is not blacklisted, and doesn't otherwise appear to be unreliable, I didn't foresee any issue with using these images, so if there is something I have missed that otherwise justifies this deletion, can you please explain it? Ultra7 (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Here it is nd and here i can't see a license. And it was never reviewed positive here on commons and therefor is no proof that the Flickr license has been changed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

It says quite clearly on here that "License: Creative Commons - Attribution-Share Alike". Why would I have to have that positively reviewed here? Unless you are intending to claim that www.stockpholio.com is an unreliable source for Flickr licensing? Ultra7 (talk) 18:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the inconvenience, i haven't seen the CC-BY on stockpholio. Done. Please fix the file descriptionpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Now I can see the file pages again, I can see what happened - User:Leoboudv changed the source [28] before nominating for speedy deletion. Ultra7 (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File:2014-08-16 Demonstration Jesiden Eziden Aleviten Kurden in Hannover gegen die Terrorgruppe Islamischer Staat (IS), (337).JPG

Hallo Steinsplitter, ich hoffe es ist okay, dass ich auf Deutsch schreibe, das geht mir geschmeidiger von der Hand: Ich bin in der de:WP auf die Entfernung einer Commons-Bilddatei gestossen, die aus der Commons-Kategorie 2014-08-16 Demonstration in Hannover gegen IS-Terror stammte und deren Löschantrag ich leider nicht rechtzeitig mitbekommen hatte. Wenn ich den Sammel-Deletion Request richtig deute, haben die Bilder demnach gegen das Urheberrecht verstossen und sind nicht durch COM:FOP oder COM:DM abgedeckt gewesen. Für die mich interessierende Datei "2014-08-16 Demonstration Jesiden Eziden Aleviten Kurden in Hannover gegen die Terrorgruppe Islamischer Staat (IS), (332).JPG" überrascht mich das, zumal z. B. ein anderes gedrucktes Plakat oder Transparent mit Logo eines eingetragenen Vereins aus der Kategorie als Detailfoto nicht entfernt wurde. Kannst du noch mal ausdrücklich begründen, nach welchen Kriterien das Bild entfernt wurde? Wenn ich die Kriterien kenne und sie als URV einleuchten, kann ich mir die Arbeit mit "re-nominate" und "ask for it to be undeleted" sparen. Aber bisher erkenne ich nicht, nach welchen selektiven Kriterien entfernt wurde. Gruß,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Fotografie eines Plakates welches nicht permanent angebracht ist und somit laut COM:FOP##Germany geschützt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Darf ich noch nachfragen, ob sich dies auch auf Transparente und Schilder bezieht, also z. B. File:2014-08-16 Demonstration Jesiden Eziden Aleviten Kurden in Hannover gegen die Terrorgruppe Islamischer Staat (IS), (364).JPG oder File:2014-08-16 Demonstration Jesiden Eziden Aleviten Kurden in Hannover gegen die Terrorgruppe Islamischer Staat (IS), (340).JPG oder File:2014-08-16 Demonstration Jesiden Eziden Aleviten Kurden in Hannover gegen die Terrorgruppe Islamischer Staat (IS), (336).JPG? Gruß,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Wenn das Fotografierte SH hat muss es gelöscht werden. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Sorry für die Fehlformatierung, du hast schneller ausgebessert als ich es konnte. Auf Schöpfungshöhe bei Märytrerfotografien wäre ich nicht gekommen - muss man wissen. Danke für die Blitzantwort. Ist für mich damit erledigt. Gruß,--Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File : JP_Du_Plessis_entrainement.jpg

Hello, you have made a mistake by removing one of my photos (JP_Du_Plessis_entrainement.jpg) [29]. This photo is a personal work. This is the same series as this photo:[30] (with Fujifilm FinePix T300).

Thank you to fix this error ... --34 super héros (talk) 08:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. It looks like someone else restored it. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Preventing Edit-warring on 2014 Russo-ukrainian-conflict map.svg

Hi, to prevent editwarring on the map '2014 Russo-ukrainian-conflict map.svg' I started, I created grey and semi-transparant villages/places. On the talk-page it is decribed when thing should be grey:

The use of grey-colloured villages and semitransparant in this map is intended for

Villages/places with conflicting reports/sources/maps
Villages/places of wich the status is uncertain, or without any good info.
Villages/places that might be partly under control of both sides
Villages/places were there is close combat/fighting for control. (no far schelling)

Grey, semi-tranparent is the basic/original status of villages/places. You need evidence/multiple reliable sources without doubt that an entire village/place is under full uncontested control to change uncertain to certain. When there are conflicting sources it should be remain grey/semitransparant.

Note that in this conflict when the outskirds of villige/place are only merely attacked/shelled you will see already reports/sources coming up that claim it is completly conquered. From both sides.

This is needed because otherwise users will start editwarring, using conflicting sources and sourcemaps.

The problem is that this edit-warring-prevention measure is removed constantly. by users that seems to like editwarring... -- User:Niele

I don't care about the map, but i have zero tolerance for editwarring. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 17:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Kids power training.jpeg

thumb What did you do with the file? What for?! Does it look now better?Vshustov (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

You need to ask this user. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

New FPC tool

Hi Steinsplitter,

I like the new table, but I think it would be best to still transclude the candidate list after it - else users will need to click an extra time to get to the candidates from the FPC page.

But the candidate list also has a TOC, and then you have a redundant list of links to the candidate pages, which is not good - let's see, there is some magic way of getting rid of that, isn't there. I think that if that was done it would work fine.

What do you think?

The table could be made even cooler by parsing the noms for activity, like counting the sup, neutral, oppose votes to get a quick overview. But no hurry in that.

-- Slaunger (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi :), Feel free to change the page. My idea was to reduce the loadtime of the page with the FP policys because all FP's are stored on a subpage and if a user like to see all noms he can klick on the subpage. But feel free to change the page! Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:17, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Well, maybe that is a good argument for keeping it as it is, actually. Most active FPC contributors have the candidate list subpage on their wathlist anyhow. That's also why I came to ask, because maybe you had actually given it some thought:-) Maybe if there was a gallery size thumb of the nominated pic in the table, it would still be fast to load, yet increase the navigational value - if you want to revisit a nom, it is easier to recognise it from a thumb image then the file name. -- Slaunger (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Thumbs included. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:31, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

That was quick! Cool and thanks :-) -- Slaunger (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Beuvron-en-Auge 1.jpg

Thanks for the rotation but what about the thumbmail into my filelist ? Regards --Doalex (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Filerotations by bot are not shown in your filelist. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems (User:Karlfk)

The above discussion has stopped without a result. So I'm not sure how to go on. Should I use the script? What should I observe? Karlfk (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

You need consensus because the edits seems controversal. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Rincones de Belgrado 5.jpg

Hi Steinsplitter, weisst Du was bei dieser Datei mit Rotation via SteinsplitterBot los ist? Ich habe eine Rotation um 90° im Uhrzeigersinn angegeben, gemacht wurde dann 180°: Image rotated by 90° (EXIF-Orientation set from 6 to 0 - EXIF had major errors. Great parts of EXIF could be lost. - , rotated 180°) Was soll man da angeben, damit das passend rotiert wird? Betrifft auch weitere Dateien wie File:Rincones de Belgrado 7.jpg.--Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Ligt oft an beschädigten exif oder an der MediaWiki internen exifbasierten Drehfunktion (Bot hat keine Augen). Einfach nochmal das drehen Template einfügen :-). lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Danke, hat dann funktioniert.--Wdwd (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Dr. Markus Harzenetter.jpg

I noticed that you recently deleted this image. I want to let you know that permission has indeed been granted for this image through OTRS (#2014080410013545), under CC-BY-SA 3.0 DE. I tried uploading it again, but I was told that it was already uploaded and deleted, so I was hoping you could restore it. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 13:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Restored. Please add {{OTRS}} --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:46, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Patroller

Thanks for the upgrade. Ww2censor (talk) 20:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Hiding File Request

Please help me remove all old versions of File:Vehicle License of the People's Republic of China (Infomation Page).jpg because some personal information can be found at those versions. --Whisper of the heart (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:22, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

2 Bilder "mergen" möglich?

Hallo, ich hoff du kannst mal wieder helfen ohne dass ich mir auf Englisch einen abbrechen muss. Da gibts 2 Duplikate, bei denen es irgendwie blöd wär eins von beiden zu löschen, egal welches.

File:Ahrtal Weinberge Mayschoss.jpg ist das ältere (Erstupload 2006, hier 2011) mehrmals eingebundene Bild, aber durch Transfer vom Bot und nicht vom Autor hochgeladen
File:Weinberge Mayschoss Ahr.jpg ist das jüngere 2012 vom Autor selbst hochgeladene Bild mit ergänztem Exif und erweiterten Lizenzen (zusätzlich cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0), Bild aber (fast) ungenutzt

Die Bilder an sich sind identisch. Ists vielleicht möglich, die Datei 2. nach Datei 1. zu verschieben, so dass beide Bildversionen unter dem alten Filename sind, aber die jüngere Datei (mit den neuen vom Autor ergänzten Exifinfos) angezeigt wird? Gruß Holger1959 (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Bei so etwas löschen wir immer das schlechtere (in dem Fall das Bild ohne exif) und ersetzen die Einbindungen mit dem besseren. Ich habe das mal gemacht. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Flickr bot

I think the flickrbot stopped working again as there are 1,900+ images in the flickr backlog and it has not marked images for more than 1 day. Perhaps it is resting but if not, the bot has broken down again. Perhaps you know how to restart it?

Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Restarted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Comment: Unfortunately, the flickrbot stopped working again. You could try restarting it again....and if it malfunctions a second time within a day, then Zhuyifei (the bot operator) should be told about the situation. I don't know what is the problem. Unlike the panoramio or picasa bots, the flickr bot has to mark thousands of images within 1-2 days. What do you think? Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

The job don't kill self, not sure why (Error log: [Thu Oct 9 11:50:08 2014] there is a job named 'flr' already active). @Zhuyifei1999: . Restarted again. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for checking out the problem. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 17:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie

Hallo Steinsplitter,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.

Vom 6.-8. November findet erneut die Europäische Denkmalmesse in Leipzig statt. Mit Unterstützung von Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. werden wir zum zweiten Mal die Ergebnisse von Wiki Loves Monuments im Rahmen eines Standes sowie eines Workshops vorstellen.

WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Goldoni

http://www.carlogoldoni.it/carlogoldoni/img_ritratti.jsp --Driante70 (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, but please don't overwrite the original (bether ql) version, See Commons:OVERWRITE. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Goldoni 2

La foto che è stata messa è sgranata. Mi dispiace che tu non abbia capito che stavo mettendo una fonte autorevole. Quella che avevo inserito è più corretta anche se piccola --Driante70 (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Fake

Sorry, >this< wasn`t a very good idea: this >picture< is a FAKE. --Gordito1869 (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

War nur eine Einbindungskorrektur wegen dieser Dateiverschiebung: [31] --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Mag sein, das ändert nichts am Fake in einem >vielgelesenen Artikel<; Das Trugbild stellt eine massive Verbrauchertäuschung und imho eine Markenrechtsverletzung dar - und sollte deshalb unverzüglich adminstrativ gelöscht werden. MfG --Gordito1869 (talk) 18:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Gelöscht. Der uploader hat auf dewp Bearbeitungen, kannst du bitte prüfen ob diese problematisch sind? --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Hmmh, sorry, mit den >Artikel-Bearbeitungen< auf de.wp und en.wp des "Fake-Uploaders" kenne ich mich nicht aus. - Zweifel sind jedenfalls imho nunmehr angezeigt. - MfG --Gordito1869 (talk) 18:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Revert

You removed my revised comment from Yann's talk page about deleting the free content template I created. Why? I put back a re-revised variant. --Elvey (talk) 18:47, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Yann dos not like your comment. You should discuss this on the relevant talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:37, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Irreleitende Namen File:Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg ff

Was ist deine Ausrede Irreleitende Namen in den Commons behalten zu wollen? Willst du Leuten das leben schwer machen? Willst du erreichen das möglichst viele Bilder Namen haben die nichts mit ihrem Inhalt zu tun haben? Willst du dafür Sorgen das Leute die sich bemühen Inseekten richtig zu bestimmen und zu beschreiben den Commons den rücken kehren? Ich verstehe nichts von Menschen fürchte ich, aber mit Insekten kenne ich mich einigermaßen aus und einfache Regeln wie z.B. 3. Präzisierung irreführender Namen kann ich auch gerade noch verstehen. Warum der Revert??? Was bewegt einen Menschen dazu Diese einfache Commons Regel zu ignorieren? --Aiwok (talk) 14:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Man diskutiert so etwas mit dem Betroffenen Nutzer (auch auf der Dateidisk) aus, und beantragt erst dann Umbenennung wenn es Konsens gibt. Editwars sind nicht okay, erst recht nicht mit der editsummary "Are you fucking kidding me?. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hier liegt doch ein sonnenklarer Fall vor. Der Name ist definitiv Irreleitend und der rename request lässt dem file mover doch hinreichend viel Freiheit einen anderen besser geeigneten Namen zu wählen, wenn ihm der Vorschlag nicht ausreicht. Da ist doch kein revert zu rechtfertigen? Wenn ihm Cerceris rybyensis n.jpg zu kurz ist soll er halt weitere informationen die sich feststellen lassen ergänzen. Genauso hätte ich es von dir erwartet. 1. Prüfe ob der request begründet ist: Hier: Ja zweifelsfrei 2. Prüfe den neuen Namen (verbessere, wenn nötig) Hier: vielleicht zu kurz? oder was kann einem daran nicht geffallen? 3: rename. --Aiwok (talk) 14:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Kann da leider nicht für dich tun. Musst du an der entsprechenden Disk ansprechen. In dubio benennen wir eine Datei nicht um. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Was ist der Zweifel? Es sind 100%ig keine Polistes nimpha und keine Apis mellifera auf dem Bild zu sehen. Wenn man sich 2min. Zeit nimmt um zu googlen, wird auch ein Laie schnell erkennen können, das es tatsächlich andere Tiere sind. Wenn man dann noch Cerceris rybyensis googlet wird man außerdem schnell herausfinden, das es da unter den britischen Knotenwespen auch keine wirklichen Verwechslungskandidaten gibt. Wo bleibt also noch irgendein Zweifel, ob Cerceris rybyensis 1.jpg ein bessere Name für das Bild ist als Polistes nimpha killing an Apis mellifera-20140819-1.jpg. Findet sich leicht ein noch besserer Name, so kann der doch durch den File mover gewählt werden und findet sich tatsächlich jemand dem es gelingt die Schmalbiene zu identifizieren, so kann man den Namen doch dann noch einmal ergänzen. --Aiwok (talk) 14:51, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Ist das da oben ^ der offizielle Weg zu sagen Argumente sind mir doch egal - Ich wollte einfach nur die Bemühungen anderer durch reverts sabotieren? So kommt es zumindest an. Warum zur Hölle wird hier revertiert zu objektiv schlechteren Zuständen? Gibt es tatsächlich noch irgendwelche inhaltlichen Zweifel an dem rename request den du zurückgesetzt hast?

This section was archived on a request by: --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Wie siehst du das?

Hallo Steinsplitter! Wie stehst du zu Commons:Deletion requests/File:Veltnis Arena Luftaufnahme 2014.jpg? Luftaufnahme aus 600m Höhe verletzt das Urheberrecht das Architekten? Ich weiß nicht. Dann können ja die ganzen Fotoflug-Projekte dicht machen. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:41, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Das ganze Fotoflug-Projekt dich zu machen ist allein deswegen nicht notwendig weil aus den Fotoflügen generell ja auch Landschafts- und Stadtansichten entstehen, die rechtlich über jeden Zweifel erhaben sind. Historische Einzelbauwerke, wo der Architekt > 70 Jahre tot ist sind ebenfalls kein Problem. Angreifbar sind eben nur moderne Bauwerke weil man sich hier korrekter Weise auch nicht auf Panoramafreiheit berufen kann (generell nicht bei Luftbildern). Strittig bleibt bei modernen Bauwerken ob die Architekten hier Urheberrecht proklamieren können was bei Zweckbauten m.E. eben nicht der Fall ist. Ich kenne jedenfalls kein Gerichtsurteil, dass Alltagsbauwerke (und dazu gehören Stadien nun mal auch) ein derartiges Urheberrecht im Sinne des Kunstgesetzes einräumt. Dies wäre m.E. für Bauwerke gegeben, die schon zu Lebzeiten des Architekten (oder binnen 70 Jahren nach seinem Tod) zu Architekturikonen geworden sind. Das ist bei der Veltins-Arena sicherlich nicht der Fall. --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Danke Wladyslaw für die Antwort. @Tuxyso: Muss vermutlich gelöscht werden da Luftaufnahmen anscheinend nicht vom FOP gedeckt sind. Aber gleich das ganze Fotoflug-Projekte dicht machen ist betrieben. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Danke Wladyslaw und Steinsplitter für die Antworten. Nach momentanem Standard-Vorgehen auf Commons werden derartige Fotos wohl im Zweifelsfall gelöscht, zumal es einen ähnlich gelagerten Fall auch schon bei einem anderen Stadion gab. Gerade wenn man Fotoflüge über das Ruhrgebiet plant sind "Landschaftsaufnahmen" oder Stadtansichten relativ schnell erschöpft. Da geht es eher darum spannende Einzelbauwerke / Gebäudeformationen zu fotografieren, von denen es im Ruhrgebiet überraschend viele gibt. Bzgl. der Fotoflüge bin ich im Kontakt mit WMDE. Ich hatte dort u.a. vorgeschlagen von einem Fachanwalt für Urheberrecht die rechtliche Situation für Fotoflüge zu klären, da ja auch einige Fördergelder in die Projekte fließen und die Beteiligten sicher ein Interesse an Rechtssicherheit haben. Ich habe wenig Lust darauf, dass nachher die Hälfe der aufwendig bearbeitete Luftaufnahmen gelöscht wird. Irgendwann kommt dann noch jemand auf den Trichter, dass wir auch alle Fotos von älteren Gebäuden löschen müssen, weil sie ja z.T. aufwendig umgebaut wurden und demnach ein neuer Urheberrechtsanspruch des umbauenden Architekten entstanden ist. Da lobe ich mir doch die Österreicher :) --Tuxyso (talk) 06:57, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Das ist leider wirklich nicht sonderlich motivierend. Es wurden auch schon von mir Bilder gelöscht. In einem Fall (hier eine Abwandlung des Bildes File:Vitra Design Museum nachts1 - with result of DR.jpg) wo man das Plakat mit einer Fotografie eines Architekten sah, bestätigten mir zweite Anwälte, mit denen ich eng zusammenarbeite, dass die urheberrechtlich unbedenklich seien. Aber die "Rechtsexperten" von Commons sind natürlich oft schlauer ... ;-) --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hättest du seinerzeit nicht das Schreiben deines Anwalts an das OTRS-Team schicken können? Aus meiner Sicht braucht es eine Institution, gefördert von WMDE, die justiziabel Aussagen zu solchen Fragen machen kann. Einzelaktionen ändern ja nichts an dem generellen Problem, dass sich Leute zu Wort melden (mich eingeschlossen), die keine juristische Ausbildung haben und auch nur in Ratgebern, Urteilsbegründungen etc. nachschlagen können und so manche juristische Feinheit nicht vollends verstehen. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Xhamia e Mbretit....jpg

Mal im Ernst - was sollte diese Verschiebung? Hier wäre File:Xhamia e Mbretit (2).jpg oder Ähnliches die korrekte Anpassung gewesen. Das mit den drei Punkten - was soll das? Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:52, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Hatte die Punkte komplett übersehen, sind komplett nonsense. Habs korrigiert, Danke! --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Me Borraron una imagen

guao me borraron una imagen y de paso ni inlges se la volvere a subir traduci algo y me dice que debo colocar copefy o no si alguien me dice en español se lo agradeceria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oswaldo Weber (talk • contribs)

(Yo no hablo español) Plese sent permission to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:07, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Moni desuza (talk · contribs)

I think you could delete all images uploaded by the user above. All of them were copied from his Facebook profile, and they have no use at all (he tried to publish his biography at Spanish Wikipedia, but it has been deleted).

Yours, Yanguas (talk) 15:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

EunuelleT - Flickrblock

Was ist mit den Bildern die von diesem Flickraccount auf Commons existieren? Werden die noch gelöscht oder sind die sauber? --Denniss (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Gelöscht. Habe den Account indef. gesperrt da er anscheinend nur zum flickr-washing Zweck erstellt wurde. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:AIDS cases worldwide 1979-1995.png

Thanks for moving this but I was just about to add "but please do not update any pages using this file" - so that when a new file is uploaded they will already use it. The only exception would be if any news articles used File:AIDS cases worldwide.png. Delphi234 (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Too late now. It can be fixed by hand when a new file is uploaded. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

The new chart is slight different anyway. I added deaths, and the new data is "living with HIV" instead of "people with AIDS". Delphi234 (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Edit request

Hallo, ich benötige Admin-Hilfe für protected templates. Die drei updates können per einfachem copy/paste aus Sarang/T komplett übertragen werden. Alles wurde ausgiebig getestet. Machst du das bitte? Danke, sarang♥사랑 07:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Erledigt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Reversion on File:Maharaja of Patiala inspects 12 inch railway howitzer 1918 NLS 74301083.jpg

Hi - I was wondering why you reverted the suggested rename? This is part of preparations I'm trying to put in place to do a mass upload of 1500+ images from the same collection that this image has been taken from, so that they will be unified and will all display the correct metadata. Changing the name will help avoid unnecessary duplication of this image. Thanks ACrockford (talk) 12:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Nevermind! sorry - I didn't see that you were doing the renames, I was a little too focused. Thanks so much. ACrockford (talk) 12:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Photo von Dieter Schweiger

Servus Steinsplitter, warum hast du das Photo vom Dieter Schweiger gelöscht? [32] Ich habe sein Einverständnis für dieses Photo bekommen! Bitte mach das in Zukunft nicht mehr bzw. erkläre mir bitte den Grund! Aber m.E. gibt es keinen. Ich habe deswegen einen Antrag auf Wiederherstellung des Bildes eingereicht. MfG --MEK1984 (talk) 13:56, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Eine COM:OTRS Freigabe wird benötigt. Der Rest steht in der Löschdiskussion (kein exif, etc. - sieht nicht nach eigener Arbeit aus). --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Santa maria maggiore 051218-01.JPG

hi, sorry about that. i'm going through user:Lalupa's uploads adding information templates with VisualFileChange, as a part of the m:File metadata cleanup drive. i will try not to mess up the ones you did manually, but feel free to revert. cheers. Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 20:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

No problem, the file was on my watchlist :). Thanks for helping with the cleanup. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:00, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Filename change request

Hallo, guidelines include: "Correct misleading names into accurate ones": isn't a wrong date a misleading information? --Guarracino (talk) 07:43, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Moreover, about the copyright issue: the source is this, and explicitly states the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, please look at the bottom of the web page. Isn't it sufficient?--Guarracino (talk) 07:45, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

I refer to the following files: File:Campi-Flegrei-quota-1968-2013.jpg and File:Bradisismo-flegreo-rilevamenti-INGV.jpg.--Guarracino (talk) 07:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, "NonCommercial" and "NoDerivatives" licenses are not allowed on commons, See COM:L. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Ah, I see, sorry for the confusion. I suppose this also applies to this file File:Bradisismo-flegreo-rilevamenti-INGV.jpg? --Guarracino (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, yes. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:52, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

If this is the case, please go ahead and delete the images, sorry for misunderstanding the license rules.--Guarracino (talk) 07:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

192.169.217.105

Thanks for blocking the wikinger sock. It's an open web proxy though, as usual, so you might want to block for longer. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for one year. Thx. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Photo JPG2012Award.jpg

Bonjour,

vous avez annulé la photo JPG2012Award.jpg, cette photo a été donnée au Professeur Jean-Paul Galmiche lors des Lifetime Achievement Award. Cette photo donnée par UEG appartient à la famille.

Comment puis-je la restaurer?

Merci d'avance--GalmicheM (talk) 16:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I don't speak fr. COM:OTRS permission needed. EXIF data: (C) Jan Pauls Fotografie --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Fæ/Fry1989 revert analysis

It seems your "revert warning" filter is misfiring here. I know there was a revert but it is not by me. :) J e e 09:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting, strange o_O. hm... @Rillke: do you have an idea why? --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

They press the edit section link, resulting in an edit summary containing "revert" (/* User:Fæ/Fry1989 revert analysis */) which in turn triggers the filter. OTOH, it's possibly a good idea to keep it as it is. -- Rillke^(q?) 00:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

about : Allemans 24 Château du Meynard Tour-logis 2014b.jpg

Hi, Steinsplitter. A few minutes ago you modified the file : "ALlemans 24 Château du Meynard Tour-logis 2014b.jpg", as requested. Thanks. But you wrote : "File-Allemans 24 Château du Meynard Tour-logis 2014b.jpg". I think the word "File" in the beginning might cause somme errors. Would you be so kind as to suppress it, please ? Can you do it without any problem or do I have to ask for this new change ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 13:44, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Two times File: ;) . Fixed now. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The Structured Data Bee, vol. 1, issue 1

Greetings, thank you for signing up for the Structured Data newsletter and its first edition. With this newsletter, the Structured data team plans on keeping you informed of technical progress, events, and communications to talk about the project, and continued information on how you can participate. This newsletter will be sent approximately every two weeks, and future editions will be translatable prior to publication. If you're new to Wikidata and want more information about how it works in relation to Wikimedia Commons, you can read an introduction to Wikidata for Commons being drafted.

Tech and design

The software development for this process is still in the planning phases. The idea is to have some functional prototyping done for experimentation and feedback by the end of the year.
The initial roadmap for development has been posted on Commons. The roadmap is a rough outline and is open to iterations as the team learns where and when to focus its energies.
There is a page set up for design ideas about what structured data could potentially look like.
There are forthcoming requests for comment about the particulars of technical architecture on mediawiki.org. Keep an eye on the Commons:Structured data/Get involved page for notification of when the RfCs are posted.

Events and chats

There was a week-long meeting between the Wikimedia Foundation's Multimedia team, the Wikidata team, and community members, held in Berlin, Germany, at the office of Wikimedia Deutchland on October 6-10. You can read an overview of the event in on this page on Commons. There are also plenty of pictures available on Wikimedia Commons.

If you would like to read more detail about what was discussed, there are etherpads of notes taken for each day of the event.

The next IRC office hour to discuss the structured data project will be held on November 20, from 19:30 to 20:30 UTC.

The second IRC office hour (logs) was held on October 16, and the first (logs) on September 3.

Getting involved

Sign up for this newsletter!
While working prototypes are being developed, there is a drive to make all files contain machine-readable data on Wikimedia projects.

The information and sign-up page is located on Meta, at File metadata cleanup drive.
The MrMetadata tool on labs that will identify files on your wiki(s) that need information templates added.

A hub has been launched to facilitate communication and documentation for this work.

There is a frequently-asked questions page that is finishing drafting and will need translated. Keep an eye out for when it is ready if you are interested in translating.
There will be active organization of the Get involved page as community participation is further organized. There will be work groups, similar to specific Wikiprojects, dedicated to particular aspects of structured data like licensing presentation, design, API performance, and even helping out with this newsletter and other community communications.

There will be much more information and activities around the proposal to develop structured data on Wikimedia Commons. This project is a major undertaking and an important step as the chief provider, repository, and curator of media for Wikimedia projects.

Thank you for your participation in such an extensive project, let me know if you're interested in participating in this newsletter. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 04:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

--This message was sent using MassMessage. Was there an error? Report it!

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Pobeda (1900)

Guten Abend, Steinsplitter!
This is there in the picture the Russian battleship Pobeda with Russian jack on the Kronstadt roadstead in 1901. I guess the photo is the same. Ich glaube, dass es dasselbe Bild ist, nur in besserer Auflösung, viele Grüße bzw. regards,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 16:33, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Was wollen wir nun machen? Für Wiki könnte man diese Datei gebrauchen, gar nicht schlecht , thanks,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 16:45, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Habe die Datei umbenannt :). --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Super, besten Dank, sonst hätte ich einen anderen Kollegen (Mike1979) bitten müssen, guten Abend noch,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 18:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Smolarski vodopadi,Smolare,Strumica,Makedonija.JPG

File:Smolarski vodopadi,Smolare,Strumica,Makedonija.JPG Its not copy vio. First commons foto hat better resolution, and seccond on this pic are wooden stairs and on another fotos in google search are not. And pls rename the file. This is Kolešino Watterfall, not Smolari. Smolari are also watterfal, but in the neighbor village.--R ašo 17:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Removed speedydelete tag and renamed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Danke--R ašo

17:59, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Spamming

Hallo Steinsplitter, ich finde es nicht sehr hilfreich, wenn wir über Projekte gemeinsam mit WMAT versuchen, sowohl Fotografen als auch Autoren für Wikipedia an das Projekt heranzuführen und ihnen die Scheu vor dem mitmachen nehmen, du mir Spam vorwirfst. Genau über die Schiene der Regionalwikis habe ich schon weit mehr als 10.000 Fotos herangekarrt, die sonst nie dahergefunden hätten. Was ist den Internet ist doch weltweites Linkspamming. Ohne dem würde es ja nicht funktionieren. Wolen wir ernst genommen werden oder niocht - so nicht. --lg K@rl (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Naja... Wenn ich nicht LA gestellt hätte, dann hätte es vermutlich jemand anders gemacht. Viellicht sollte WMAT mit der WMF reden und dann so etwas mit den global usage links realisieren. Aber ein Template ist imho nicht die beste Idee. lg --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Das ganz ewird ein Projekt, nur das geht auch mit WMF ein paar Jahre dauern, außedem sind wir ja mit 3500 Artikel noch nicht gerade groß sondern eben am Anfang - aber mit dieser Philosophie noch ganz allein. Mit global usage links, das habe ich auch schon vr Jahren angeleiert, gleich wie sie mit der Weiterverwendung angefangen haben. Aber no reaction. --gruß K@rl (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Your revert on Template:Deletion requests/Archive

Hi. I undid this revert because the hyperlink you put back no longer works on deletion request archive pages.

Sorry if this causes any chaos.

DLindsley (My talk page) 12:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

This template works fine for me. You have removed the {{# template and please don't add {{Heavily used template}} because the template isn't a heavily used template. You have 538 edits global, if you don't know how templates are working please don't touch them. I have seen you was blocked previously for disruptive behaviour here on commons (and indef. on enwiki), please stop it. And please read Commons:Welcome. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Well, what I did on en.wiki was not done by me here on Commons thus far. But, the admins on that site are too overcontrolling with their policies, in my opinion. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:49, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Rotation failed

I tagged File:Bouwfragment - Buren - 20045273 - RCE.jpg for rotation by 180°. It is still the same way up after you "rotated" it! Mjroots (talk) 18:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I see it 180° rotated. You need to clear your browser cache. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Patroller

Thank you! --sasha (krassotkin) 09:10, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for profanity

Can a user get blocked for profanity? (e.g. a user typing the f word) 174.91.69.244 20:53, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@174.91.69.244: No, as noted by Fae and I on the discussion page I see you've been active on. OTOH, you can be blocked for sock puppetry.--Elvey (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

wgCopyUploadsDomains

Hi Steinsplitter, regarding Commons:Upload tools/wgCopyUploadsDomains, would it be okay to add "*.nasa.gov" to the whitelist? Is there a specific process for adding? — Huntster (t @ c) 22:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, A request on bugzilla is needed, but for this domain i directly uploaded https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/172204/ (pending review by wmf). --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Much obliged, as bugzilla is all Greek to me. That should make things much easier. — Huntster (t @ c) 08:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

@Huntster: the domain is now whitelisted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, thanks again! — Huntster (t @ c) 19:35, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Responded at Commons:Help_desk#Can.27t_log_in. 71.181.181.202 17:24, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Protecting

Hello, if that's not good I stop doing that. On it.wiki, when an user is blocked indefinitely, their talk page is emptied and a warning that's about a banned user is placed atop of it; plus the talk page is protected because of no longer use. As I said, if that's a problem here I won't do any longer. I just saw it as an useful thing to avoid worrying of these pages. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 17:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Ciao, We don't do this here on commons (only in case of abuse). --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok. As for your revert ... Sockpuppets is a redirect (not made by me). Maybe we should create a more specific category for sockpuppets such i.e. "Users with multiple accounts" or "Abuses of multiple accounts".... -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 17:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

It is Category:Sockpuppeteers --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I've put a warning in the category Sock puppets telling that that category is about the toys, not the multiple account abusers. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 18:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Photo "Affiche1988.jpg"

Hi,

You deleted the photo "Affiche1988.jpg". It is a poster for the 1988 edition of the Equinoxe, a well-known party which takes place every year in Paris. I uploaded a scanned version, and we, the association which organises it every year made the poster in 1988 agree to release it, so there is no copyright infringement. Please cancel the deletion. Thanks --Gaetan243 (talk) 09:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello, The copyright holder should send permission to COM:OTRS --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:43, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Deleted

File cuba e forre alcantara. hello, why you deleted may file about the river alcantara? greetings — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francescopapotto (talk • contribs)

Hi, link to the file please. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Archivebot

Okay, User:ArchiveBot isn't supposed to close RfCs, thanks. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, This was a bot error :D --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

The bot claims that its master is Fastily, I added pointers there. –Be..anyone (talk) 13:25, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Another edit request

Hallo Steinsplitter, nun würde ich noch eine einfache kleine Erweiterung brauchen, wie in Template talk:Created with#Another style expansion vermerkt. Nimmst du dich bitte dessen an? Danke sarang♥사랑 10:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Kannst du mir den neuen Vorlageninhalt in eine pastbin speichern, dann brauche ich nur copy&past. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Gerne - so?

<div class="mw-content-{{dir|{{int:lang}}}}">
{| cellspacing="0" style="color:#000;background:#DDD;border:1px solid #BBB;margin:.1em;width:{{{width|}}};{{{style|}}}" class="createdwithtemplate layouttemplate"
| style="width:1.2em;height:1.2em;padding:.2em;{{{style2|}}}" | {{#ifexist: File:{{{logo}}}| [[File:{{{logo}}}|{{#if: {{{iconsize|}}} | {{{iconsize}}} | 20px }} |link=|center]]| {{{logo|}}} }}
| style="font-size:.85em;padding:.2em;vertical-align:middle;{{{style3|}}}" |<!--
-->{{{text|empty}}}<!--
-->{{#if:{{{more|}}}|{{{more}}}}}
|}</div><!--
-->{{#ifeq: {{NAMESPACE}} | File | {{#if: {{{category|}}} | {{{category}}} | {{#if: {{{toolcat|}}} |<!--
-->[[Category:{{#ifeq:{{{err}}}|0|Valid SVG c|{{#switch:{{{w3c}}}|I=Invalid SVG c|N=PNG c|V=Valid SVG c|C}}}}reated with {{{toolcat}}}<!--
-->{{{sub|}}}|{{#if:{{{err|}}}|{{#iferror:{{#ifexpr:{{{err|1}}}}}|2222|{{padleft:{{#expr:1000*{{#expr:1/{{{err|}}} round 3}}}}|4|0}}}}|{{#ifeq:{{{w3c}}}|I|3333}}}}{{#if:{{{key|}}}|{{{key}}}|{{PAGENAME}}}}]] }} }} }}<noinclude>
{{documentation}}
</noinclude>

Super. Erl. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:14, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

To enable translate feature for a page

I have to ask one of you, right? I'd like to work on Help:Scanning. If you'd enable translation feature for that page, that'd be very welcome.--Natr (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

If i mark this page, a full migration of all languages if needed (= takes a lot of time), you can just create a subpage/ and starting with translation. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

But then I can't take advantage of the assistance and comfort the new translate feature provides - or what do you mean? (Why) Can't I do it myself?..--Natr (talk) 00:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Black Standard variant used by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Steinsplitter, I am sorry if I gave incomplete information on my request but I did not understand the proceedure and that the request would be to put a proposal in for review. I had originally placed a request for review of previous moves with proposed content on the page of a previously involved admin, Hedwig in Washington but, as this User has not been editing for a while, I thought I would try another channel. Here is a copy of content that I placed on Hedwig's page. Thank you. Wikipedia:User:Gregkaye (:Wikipedia:talk) 08:31, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Naming of the flag used by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Hi Hedwig,

I'd like to request some further checks regarding the move made File:Flag of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.svg to File:Flag of The Islamic State.svg as I don't think that you can have been given complete information regarding the full situation. The main article article at Wikipedia:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant even has a Moratorium on Requested Moves and reasonings related to this stance are clearly presented at: Wikipedia:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#"Islamic State", criticism of use of this name.

The article "Flag of the Islamic State" was created despite the fact that the main article had (still mistakenly) been created with a redlink to Wikipedia:Flag of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. This article is now listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of the Islamic State. The proposal for delete is almost unanimously supported with one of the few objections coming from an editor now banned for sock puppetry. The reason for the deletion of the article is that the flag is a version or the genuinely notable Wikipedia:Black Standard flag with this particular version being in use by a number of groups.

Can I suggest a name "Black Standard variant as adopted by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" or "Black Standard variant as adopted by ISIL" or any other appropriate option as chosen at your discretion.

Many thanks

:Wikipedia:Gregkaye (:Wikipedia:talk) 09:42, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

another file that I hope can be given similar treatment is File:Flag of The Islamic State of Iraq.jpg. thanks Gregkaye (talk) 22:00, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Please use the relevant talkpage to disuss. The request seems controversial. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

In the meanwhile is it possible to move the file to "Flag of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" as fitting with the name of the main article. Sad to say but I can only imagine that the file was moved from this title in the context of half truths. Gregkaye (talk) 08:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Feel free to request renaming again, but i don't go to rename it. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:22, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Rodrigo.Argenton

You might want to consider blocking this user. He just reverted my reverting of his removal of the note on his talk page, calling it a "non-warning" in his reverting, and became a little hostile towards me in that same reverting. This guy definitely needs to cool down. I've left him a note on his talk page. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

About your comment

Hi, I have read your comment but I didn't know which thread you meant in that comment. can u send the link to me? thank you --Ziad (talk) 13:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, here (above), also written on VP , VP/P, BN and a internal page on otrs wiki. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Database reports/Users by log action/Translation

Hallo Steinsplitter, könntest Du diesen Service auch auf anderen Projekten (z. B. Wikidata, Meta oder MediaWiki) anbieten? Wäre ganz interessant... Aber müsste ich nicht inzwischen mehr als 38 Einträge auf Commons haben? Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Seltsam, Muss ich mir Morgen mal genauer angucken. Vielteich hat die Datenbank Schluckauf. Auf tools hab ich auch ein tool dafür (link, nur pagetranslation). --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

MariaDB [commonswiki_p]> SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP() - UNIX_TIMESTAMP(MAX(rc_timestamp))AS lag  FROM recentchanges;
+----------------+
| lag            |
+----------------+
| 5475828.000000 |
+----------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

Herausgefunden, die Datenbank hat einen großen repicationslag. Müssen wir hoffen dass die WMF den Fehler bald behebt :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Brackenheim: funktioniert nun wieder :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Danke Dir ;-) Gruß, --Brackenheim (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Authority control

Hello Steinsplitter, wouldn't be the case of considering for Template:Authority control to use the values already migrated on Wikidata - when available - instead of manually filling its fields ? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 23:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Ciao, I have never used this new wikidata fiction. Maybe Jheald can help you. :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:32, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

@Blackcat: See d:Template:Authority control/wrapper for a proof-of-concept, and d:Template:Creator/wrapper/test for some test cases. The capability for this here automatically should be fully available early next year. In the meantime, the latter page can already be used to generate rough-and-ready wikitext that can be cut and pasted into Authority control and Creator templates, given a Wikidata Q-number. Jheald (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok Jheald thanks! -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:26, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikivoyage

Hallo , ich versuche einige Links zu unserem Reiseführer Wikivoyage zu setzen. Da ich dich hier aktiv sah ,möchte ich dich fragen ob du mir helfen kannst. Gibt es schon Möglichkeiten Wikivoyage wie die Wikipedia in der Sidebar erscheinen zu lassen? Oder gibt es eine Vorlage? Ich möchte natürlich nicht diese langen Links lassen, die ich grade 2 mal gesetzt habe. Du bist natürlich auch in Wikivoyage herzlich willkommen. Ich bin dort zur Zeit ziemlich aktiv als "Zaunkönig" . Gruß ins schöne Tirol --Simone (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Glaube das geht nur wenn die Seite mit wikidata verknüpft ist, sonst nicht. Und mit wikidata kenne ich mich leider nicht so genau aus. lg--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Renaming

Good dayǃ Please, return me renaming flag. --Matsievsky (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

You need to ask Billinghurst, he removed your flag. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

But Billinghurst doesn't answer 6 days: User talk:Billinghurst#Renaming. --Matsievsky (talk) 16:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

From Billinghurst there are no messages. --Matsievsky (talk) 10:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Closing a discussion in 1 hour and 14 minutes

It's really not very friendly to close a discussion so quickly. I don't live on the site, so I had to go hunting through the history of the page to even find the discussion and find out what happened to the discussion. Could you perhaps leave them open for a day or two to allow someone a chance to even comment? Sorry if I sound frustrated, but I'm not used to being treated so rudely. ···日本穣^{Talk to Nihonjoe} 05:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

This is a standard procedure. The page has a archive. Please send permission to COM:OTRS. We can't undelete this file without a OTRS permission. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

comdel

Sry fuer den ping, aber comdel ist seit november wieder down: http://tools.wmflabs.org/delinker/index.php?replacer=1 --McZusatz (talk) 07:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Bleibt dauernd hängen... :/ --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Danke

....vielen Dank. Grüße. Orchi (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Löschbenachrichtigungen

Wenn Du von diesen Dingern genervt wirst, dann liste Deinen Bot auf MediaWiki:Gadget-libCommons.js unter smallChangesBots: [. -- Rillke^(q?) 21:41, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Danke :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Urgent

Please check your page on outreach.wikimedia. --Rs chen 7754 13:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

IAC logo

IAC is only here, interacting with the community, as a token of our good faith. We don't want to be here. We simply want the continuous misuse of our copyrighted logo, uploaded by anonymous strangers, to promote impersonation of our organisation to stop. Insofar as User:/Admin Yann is concerned, he ought to have disclosed his COI before commenting about us. HRA1924 (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Are you asserting that this [33] is an India Against Corruption logo ? HRA1924 (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Translation of Template:Upload Help notice

At the bottom of this template there is a instruction about localisation, but page is protected, and I can't add translation for croatian language. Can you do it, please? Translation in croatian is: Ako imate pitanja o postavljanju datoteka, molimo posjetite Commons:Upload help.--MaGa 08:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Another request: can you change here [34] text: Fotografija s Flickra i neznam koja je licencija to Fotografija s Flickra i ne znam koja je licencija (blank between ne and znam)?--MaGa 09:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

What about the #if:? --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't understand #if:.--Ma

Ga 10:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

| en = Please visit '''[[Commons:Upload help]]''' if you need to ask questions about uploading files{{#if:{{{form|}}}| after reading [[Commons:First steps/Upload form]]}}.

The text in the if clause needs translation too. If you look &action=edit you see the if clause. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

First text is above, and the second is: after reading Commons:First steps/Upload form -> nakon što ste pročitali Commons:First steps/Upload form--Ma

Ga 14:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

The second thing done :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

@MaGa: sorry, but i don't get it. can you plese translate the complete text in the <code> above. Thx :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

No problem, here it is:

| hr = Ako imate pitanja o postavljanju datoteka, molimo posjetite '''[[Commons:Upload help]]''' {{#if:{{{form|}}}| nakon što ste pročitali [[Commons:First steps/Upload form]]}}.

--Ma

Ga 18:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thanks! :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much.--Ma

Ga 18:31, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ma

Ga 10:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Another neznam -> ne znam [35].--MaGa 13:25, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ma

Ga 13:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

DONT PROTECT WAR WITH ME MATE!"!!!!

I AM BLOCKING U!!!!!!

He he, sorry, jetzt sind mir mal die Pferde durchgegangen :P ~~ ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rillke (talk • contribs)

HA :D das war ein protectionconfict :D. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:55, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 21:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Carlos12345455gbg

Could you delete all of the user's uploads? All of them are from Wikipedia, and there copyrighted. 1989 20:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For everything including caring about User:CommonsDelinker/commands/filemovers, all your bot work, your Gerrit patches, the nice conversations in IRC and numerous things I currently cannot remember but you did! Rillke^(q?) 23:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much! :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Permission

You have indicated to four photos that I have no proof that I can use, but Jolande Geelhoed is my sister, so that it is proof enough!

FritsHG ^eh? 10:20, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Okay, Then we need permission from your sister. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Permission auf das GLAMwikiToolset

Hallo Steinsplitter. Ich brauche dringend die Rechte für das GLAMwikiToolset, da ich 230 Fotos > 100MB bis Montag hochladen muss. Die Erfahrung mit diesem Toolset ist vorhanden. Kannst du diesem Account deshalb die Rechte geben. Merci. ^MLR --Swiss Federal Archives (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo :), GWT können leider nur Bürokraten vergeben. Ping: @Dschwen: --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Merci. Ich habe ihm nun auch direkt auf die Diskussionsseite geschrieben, damit evtl. noch eine Mail ausgelöst wird. --Micha (talk) 12:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

		The Copyright inspector Barnstar
		Thanks for your scrutiny. You are a great example to me! I hope to learn a lot from you. You are really great! FritsHG ^eh? 17:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

O,- O

Nemesisearth (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Clearification

Hi Steinsplitter,

Thanks for your help am very grateful! There are some images I uploaded on facebook recently, I want to know if I can still upload them here provided they had not been previously used on other site. Thanks! Wikicology (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

If you are the copyright holder and if you like o publish them under a free license, yes. It is good to send permission to COM:OTRS in such cases. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Help for Mediawiki.Tar

Please, you can become trained or to pass some video of how to use the program mediawiki, in the Computer with windows8? it is that I don't have notion of as you use him/it

Jonasse102 (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

mw:Manual:Running MediaWiki on Windows --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

WondersHOOHA2014

Hey Steinsplitter.

Would you mind checking into User:WondersHOOHA2014? The guy has been constantly Flickr-washing, uploading images of Ryota Nakanishi, which are grabbed from Flickr, and licensing them as free licenses. However, he needs to email OTRS to do that, but he has failed to understand that we have the OTRS policy in place for stuff like this. I've left him notes, but to no avail. He even spams this when stuff doesn't get his way:

I hereby affirm that the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of my photos : 
* File:Roger Corman Photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:John A. Russo photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Benjamin Fulford and Kaoru Nakamaru Photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Kaoru Nakamaru Photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Benjamin Fulford Photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Sayo Saruta Photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Morton H. Halperin Photographed By Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Yuichi Kaido Photographed By Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Jiro Yamaguchi photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Mizuho Fukushima photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Richard Koshimizu photographed by Ryota Nakanishi.jpg
* File:Halperin.jpg
* File:Ryota Nakanishi photographed at UCLA.jpg

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.
I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.
I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Ryota Nakanishi
 Copy Right Holder 
December 19, 2014.

Please visit the site:https://www.flickr.com/photos/129126141@N06/ (his signature would be here, but I'm not signing comments with someone else's signature)

That is the spam, which he puts on pages, including the DR nomination page for his files. He even appears to have re-uploaded some of the deleted files. Like I said, I've left him notes but to no avail. The response I get from him is the above spam. You, as a sysop, may have better luck at him. DLindsley ^{Need something?} 21:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

The user has mailed OTRS (Ticket#2014120610010091) but the permission is not yet confirmed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Weimarer Republik

Hallo Steinsplitter, kannst Du bitte diese beiden Dateien im Namen tauschen?

File:De-Weimarer Republik-Teil-3-article.ogg muss File:De-Weimarer Republik-Teil-4-article.ogg heißen
File:De-Weimarer Republik-Teil-4-article.ogg muss File:De-Weimarer Republik-Teil-3-article.ogg heißen

Als Dateiverschieber kann ich das nicht. Der Autor hat sich wohl bei der Benennung vertan. Sonst stimmt die Reihenfolge nicht wie im Artikel de:Weimarer Republik. Danke --Knochen ﱢﻝﱢ‎ 17:19, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, Erledigt. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks.

Hi Steinsplitter, thanks for the autopatroller user right. ColonialGrid (talk) 12:11, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Stop ask for rename file:Blason àdessiner.svg

Hello can you stop the processus for change file on wikipedia fr from File:Blason à dessiner.svg to Unknow_escutcheon-fr.svg for two reasons :

Not same file : one in blue and not the other
Name in english not comprehensible for a part of people.

Thanks Olivier LPB (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Mars Express

Hello. Your bot turned this category into a category redirect to Category:Photos taken by Mars Express, with the only rationale being "-". Can I ask why, please? I've undone the change for now, as I think it's best if we have a category for the spacecraft as well as the category for imagery from the spacecraft. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: Hi,

I think it probably did it because I moved almost all pictures to the subcat: Category:Photos taken by Mars Express. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Ah, OK. I've moved a few back into the Mars Express category as they illustrate the spacecraft more than being images by the spacecraft, hope that's OK. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		You stop a lot of time in the Wikimedia Commons, so I think you deserve this barnstar! FritsHG ^Question? 06:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

paul evans photos

all of those photos are owned by my company paul evans llc and were taken by me on my own camera. what's the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.54.157.118 (talk • contribs)

Link to the file, please. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

		Season's Greetings and Good Wishes
		Best wishes for the season and the New Year. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:04, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks Ellin Beltz, you too! --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Files proposti per la cancellazione per sospetta violazione di copyright

Salve, mi hanno consigliato di rivolgermi a te per chiedere un parere sull'effetiva violazione di copyright. Grazie--Albertomos (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Files già cancellati:

File:1913-04-12-Coniugi-Garcia-Bravo-foto-Ballel-Maymi.jpg
File:Brotanil-Sevilla-1925-07-29-Mundo-Grafico.jpg
File:Vicenta-Verdier-1911-04-20-Nuevo-Mundo.jpg
File:Monza-corso-Milano-06b.jpg

File in cancellazione:

Saluti --Albertomos (talk) 11:45, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Ciao, Dopo una settimana i file verranno cancellati. In italia non c'è la libertà di panorama (COM:FOP). --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:52, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy 2015!

Thanks Alan! The same for you. Happy new year and a lot of good heat! :) --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:42, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Blancalu79

Hi Steinsplitter, could you give me a link to the CU investigation that prompted the block of this user? See also: Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Historiador1923. Thanks! Эlcobbola _talk 19:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

@Elcobbola: There was no cu, but exactly the same edit pattern. Diego Grez asked me to look into this & blocking the socks. The edit pattern has looked to me like socking (the cat work and only edits on commons). I haven't seen the CU request. Thanks for the link. Do you think that Blancalu79 is a

duck? If you think that the block is wrong feel free to remove, i don't have a

crystalball. In generally i don't revoke talkpage access, in this case i have done so because the main sock is recently blocked and has talkpage access revoked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Steinsplitter/Archive!

Happy New Year!

Steinsplitter/Archive,
Have a great 2015, and thanks for your contributions to Commons! INeverCry 22:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Steinsplitter (talk) 18:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)