User talk:MaGa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MaGa!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Ja sam imao slican probleme sa zastavom HOS-a pa sam pokušo na isti nacin riješit i taj problem ali kako vidiš nije mi uspjelo. Probat ću još nešto ako mi neuspije onda ništa. --Nanin7 (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HRM[edit]

Vidio sam, dobro je ispao --Ex13 (talk) 12:54, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crkva u Hrasnom[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kraljica_mira_-_Hrasno.JPG

Koje je to Hrasno?? od ovih tu?? http://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hrasno

Quahadi Añtó 11:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

mislin koja je to općina??Quahadi Añtó 12:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Kraljica mira - Hrasno.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spomenik don Stjepanu Batinovicu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 11:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spomenik zrtvama drugog svjetskog rata zupe Hrasno.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Surtsicna (talk) 13:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


FOP[edit]

http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=227216


Works Permanently Located in Public Places) (1) The free use of the works permanently located in squares, parks, streets or other places accessible by the public shall be permitted. (2) The works referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article shall not be reproduced in three-dimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work or used for gaining economic advantage. (3) In the case of the use referred to in paragraph (1) of this Article, the source and authorship must be indicated if they are indicated on the work used.

Poanta je da nema izraza kojim se zabranjuje 2d reprodukcija dijela. Zabranjuje se samo 3d (što ove fotografije nisu.

Predložak:Djela_na_javnim_mjestima_u_BiH. Predložak i na stranici za razgovor objašnjenje da više ne trošimo vrijeme uzalud. SpeedyGonsales (talk) 13:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Za majstora od grafike! Roberta F. (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zvizde[edit]

Špijo --Roberta F. (talk) 20:15, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear MaGa,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

your concerns[edit]

Hello. You were concerned regarding some maps which were up for deletion. As I understand, you are concerned because you feel that there are not appropriate replacements? Would you tell me which maps are of most importance to you, and I can see to it that replacements are produced? (Lilic (talk) 06:10, 20 September 2014 (UTC)). Hello again. I took a look at what is going on, and some of the maps are not so good, and it makes sense to delete some. But, I do feel that it would be very useful for some to be replaced by images which are appropriate. So, when you have the time do let me know which you feel are the most important, and I'll see what I can do to help. :) (Lilic (talk) 06:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

The thing is that he is right to nominate stuff. The maps are indeed violating copyright due to the borders. It's not a big deal, for me it is easy to make replacements, so the offer still stands if you're interested. (Lilic (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Mostar[edit]

Možda je malo "nezgdan" naziv, slažem se. Ista stvar je i sa Category:Villages in Doboj. Trebalo bi onda preimenovati u Category:Populated places in Mostar kao na Wikipediji, ili nešto slično. --Smooth_O (talk) 10:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Da to je najbolja opcija. --Smooth_O (talk) 10:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New level {{User VG-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MaGa, are you certain that the Arabian peninsula is in south east Asia? -- Ies (talk) 13:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translating the interface in your language, we need your help[edit]

Hello MaGa, thanks for working on this wiki in your language. We updated the list of priority translations and I write you to let you know. The language used by this wiki (or by you in your preferences) needs about 100 translations or less in the priority list. You're almost done!
To add or change translations for all wikis, please use translatewiki.net, the MediaWiki localisation project.

Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ante Juric.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kosovo map-hr.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kosovo map-hr.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 08:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slavic languages hr.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Good Humor
:D Roberta F. (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for noticing the change. To note that we are starting to set up wmania:Wikimania and it will be a permanent home for all the wikimanias. The hope is to have it as an ongoing wiki with translations, so I do hope that you will be able to assist there. I definitely want all the gadgets and sidebar messages to have available translations. Give us a week to get some more parts in place and then do please review what I have copied for HR.  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:20, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a start for pages that need system messages, you can find the page at wmania:Wikimania:Mediawiki pages with translations. Thanks for anything you can do, and nothing urgent.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Simply edit the talk page, it will do a little magic to identify it needs updating, and categorise for action. I will make a note to that effect in the templates.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! As the translator of File:Counties of Hungary 2006 HR.svg, I’d like to ask you to create an updated version of it—Csongrád County was renamed to Csongrád-Csanád County as of 4 June (see updated Hungarian version at File:Counties of Hungary 2020.png). I’d do this myself, but I don’t know how to “Croatianize” the new name (Csongrád-Csanád megye in Hungarian). Thanks in advance, —Tacsipacsi (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tacsipacsi: Done.-- MaGa 16:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, although I would have uploaded it under a new name (just like how the Hungarian version was updated)—overwriting existing files is generally discouraged as it causes inadvertent changes where the file is used (even outside of Wikimedia, which isn’t tracked in the usage section), and makes the previous versions impossible to use in articles (for example the Hungarian version is used in articles about previous elections, where usage of the new name would be inappropriate). If you agree with me, please upload the new version under a new name and revert this one to the 2006 state (as indicated by the file name). Anyways, thanks again for the update! —Tacsipacsi (talk) 16:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tacsipacsi: Understood and done. I rarely do that so I didn’t think about it.-- MaGa 16:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Čisto informativno...[edit]

Bok. Drago mi je da si primijetio. Svjestan sam tog problema od samog početka, smatrao sam da gradovi imaju istu razinu kao i druge općine, a sve pod županijom. Jasno Grad Zagreb je poseban slučaj jer ima status županije. Možemo popričati dalje o tome, baš me zanimaju i druga mišljenja. --Vhorvat (talk) 17:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gle, prije dvije godine sam počeo tražiti i cijelih godinu dana sam istraživao po drugim državama (de, uk, fr, it..), onda sam se prije godinu dana odlučio za: "Municipal status Settlements _dotične županije". Tako sam grupirao "settlements" iste razine, da, jednog "levela" ispod županije. Također sam stavio "pajp" # na ovu kategoriju, te na još jednu (Villages in _dotična županija), tako da su "leveli" 3 i 4 grupirani zajedno, na početku. Županija je "level" 2, pišem napamet, država Hrvatska je "level" 1, ako treba idem provjeravati. To sam najviše radio iz razloga što su kategirije županija bile dosta natrpane i zbog nepreglednosti ljudi su sela trpali malo vamo, malo tamo, iako su imali "Villages in...". Također sam negdje morao "Populated places in _dotična županija" prebaciti pod "Geography of _dotična županija", to mi je bilo jednostavno, tako rade i ostali. Možeš si misliti koliko je to sve zbunjivalo. Meni je bilo vrlo bitno da se stvori slika osnovnih kategorija i "tree" daljnjih podkategorija po jako sličnom principu kao i kod drugih država, nije to bez veze. Evo, što je sve ispod kultura ili zašto "Buildings" nisu u osnovnoj kategoriji nego pod arhitektura.
Prije dva, tri tjedna sam kod Commons/Germany negdje kod burgova ili crkava pod savezna država (Bavarska, Wirtenberg.. Berlin) naletio na podkategoriju "Municipalities" i ništa više, a unutar lijepo slažu grad1, grad2.. "gemajnde1" "gemajnde2" itd. Pošto ima jako puno crkava i burgova onda sam pogledao za Francusku i Italiju, te i oni imaju slično. Evo, sad dok si pišemo dobio sam ideju kakav opis pod ove pomalo nejasne kategorije (ima ih 20/21 kako se uzme) bih mogao dodati tako da se istakne ono bitno. Sada biram kako bi ljepše izgledalo. Btw. svi gradovi kao neki posebni status grada grupirani su pod Croatia. Kad bi grupirali pod određenom županijom bilo bi ih, tako otprilike, pet, šest. To nisam htio raditi kako ne bi bilo još jedno mjesto zbunjivanja više. --Vhorvat (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HR public domain[edit]

@MaGa, kad izvor već kaže da su slike javno dobro, mislim da ti je dovoljno staviti Template:PD-Croatia, uz poveznicu na izvor. Ponor (talk) 11:47, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponore, u njoj se spominje da se mora dodati i oznaka javnog vlasništva za SAD, pa sad nisam pametan. Ne bih htio zloupotrebljavati to što sam ovdje autopatrolirani, a cilj mi je da ih se ne pobriše zbog nekog banalnog razloga. MaGa 12:40, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@MaGa, ja bih još dodao Template:PD-1996 — nikad objavljene u USA, a 1996. već javno dobro u YU/HRV (to bi bile sve fotografije objavljene prije 1971.) i "without copyright notice". Ako je slika objavljena prije 1927. onda je svakako u PD (Template:PD-US-expired). Ja za bolje ne znam. Ponor (talk) 13:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponore, postavit ću jednu pa ću priupitati lokalnog administratora što on misli. Tebi veliko hvala. MaGa 14:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponore, ako želiš i ako imaš vremena, priključi se ovdje. Ipak dva čovika znaju više nego tovar (čitaj: ja). MaGa 10:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ponore, ispade velika komplikacija, ali... Nisam baš siguran oko ovog zadnjeg odgovora. Zapleo sam se kao pile u kučinu prava koje skoro ni ne razumijem. Ostaje kako sada stoji na slici ili...? U zadnjem pasusu spominje predložak vezan za instituciju odakle je preuzeto, pa zapravo ništa ne znam. MaGa 15:46, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Krd 07:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been instructed by @Ivi104 (please, see this talk) about permission adding. I have noticed him, so please do not delete until his answer.

Regarding File:Boljuni II (12).jpg, this is entirely my work, so, please remove deletion template. Thanks.-- MaGa 09:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MaGa: S obzirom da imaš pristup AWB-u na Commonsu (a ja nemam), bi li ti bio problem za svih ovih 240 datoteka zamijeniti {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-hr}} sa {{Croatian Ministry of Culture}}, da svi budu na jednoj hrpi? Nisam bio svjestan da je praksa raditi skupne predloške za masovne prijenose datoteka, mea culpa. Hvala! —Ivi104 14:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivi104, nema problema, ide odmah. MaGa 14:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. Što da napišem kao sažetak izmjene? MaGa 14:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.P.S Tek sam maloprije shvatio da sam kao wikinovak pisao tamo gdje nisam trebao. :D Što za ubuduće, jer, odokativno sam možda na 1/3 slika (ne znam što ću zateći u člancima na hr.wp)? Hoće li ubuduće biti problema? MaGa 15:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MaGa: Objasnio sam Krd-u situaciju, kad se ovo razriješi možeš dalje normalno dodavati slike, samo koristi novi predložak na mjestu licencije, i ne moraš više stavljati PermissionTicket jer je predložak uključen u ovaj novi. —Ivi104 16:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ivi104, ok, hvala ti. MaGa 16:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MaGa, samo da znaš File:Stari grad Sinj - 2011 - kulturnadobra.hr Z-5038.jpg — žurilo mi se ;) Ponor (talk) 15:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nadam se da je sad dobro. Bio sam kopirao s File:Francuska cesta na Biokovu.jpg, trebao sam s neke novije. Hvala! Ponor (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:47, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]