Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/October 2011

File:Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-104B at Arlanda, July 1972.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2011 at 13:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lars Söderström - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo never fails to amaze me everytime I look at it. For a photo which is now nearly 40 years old, the quality is absolutely AMAZING! It has often been said that it looks like a computer generated image, but low and behold, it is absolutely real, and is quite probably the most amazing photo of this vintage Soviet aircraft that I have seen -- russavia (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- It is a nice and historically interesting photo . But I see nothing special justitying the FP status, either in the subject or in the image quality. The tight crop and cut-off tail is a strong minus in the framing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:02, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Something I don't understand with Commons, is if one looks at airliners.net the overwhelming majority of photos are tightly cropped, because the subject is the actual aircraft, not the tarmac it is on, nor the buildings around it, but the aircraft. I don't understand why Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles and Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods, etc are full of tightly-cropped photos, whilst aircraft are supposed to be so wide in nature, that the actual subject is lost. As to the right horizontal stabiliser (tailplane), the crop on that is so minimal that it is almost unnoticeable and does not detract from the amazing quality and historical significance of such a photo. russavia (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to show an example. If this photo was cropped as tight, it wouldn't be suitable, because one wants to see what is in the background, and it is cropped enough that both the subject isn't lost, nor is the background (this photo isn't featured, but is one I am going to get a larger size of to bring thru the process). This photo is also cropped about right, because the subject is the aircraft beginning its take-off run (another photo I will try to get larger for FP). This photo is also cropped right, because the subject is the contrails left by the aircraft, and also the expanse of the sky above the actual aircraft. But the subject of this photo, is more akin to a lizard sitting on a rock, or an insect on a flower or branch - the actual subject of this is the aircraft - the sleek lines, the jet engines, the glazed navigators nose -- in other words the actual aircraft, not what it is doing. And the quality, I must say, is absolutely flawless, hence why it is FP quality. russavia (talk) 19:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I think the crop is perceived as "too tight" because the tailplane is cut off. Lupo 12:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment And the tip of the plane is within about 2% of the image edge. That's not the case in any of the reptiles I can see. Head shots are a totally different type of photo. --99of9 (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent picture. Lazyhawk (talk) 22:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alvesgaspar + the crop is too tight. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree that is an interesting picture, but the crop really hurts. --ELEKHH^T 05:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Cut off tail, and cropped too tight at right. --Avenue (talk) 05:48, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. As you all know, I support tight cropping of airplane photos, but having part of the image cropped off like that is a total no-no. One can crop off a significant part of the wings or rotor (in helicopters) so as to emphasise the fuselage, and that's OK, but this is not. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:55, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shihan.jpg[edit]

Info created by aptup - uploaded by Fgdcvd - nominated by Fgdcvd

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Low resolution, tilted, blurry, JPEG artifacts as well as invalid nomination _→AzaToth 18:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Squirrell.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2011 at 19:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by kevenlaw - uploaded by AA - nominated by AA -- AHURA♠ 19:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 19:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Steven Walling • talk 20:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While the framing is nice, I feel it's too blurry on the subject and chromatic noise mixed with jpeg artifacts are somewhat visible in the background. _→AzaToth 20:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Cute, but blurry and noisy. Image quality is too poor for FP. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:12, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Si-o-se-Pol.jpg, not delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2011 at 22:46:32

Info Too poor image quality: blown highlights, little detail. Please compare with these two other night FPs: File:Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin Mosque 02.jpg and File:Arc Triomphe.jpg. I never nominate pictures for delisting but this time I believe it was an obvious judgement mistake. (Original nomination here)
Delist -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the other two examples are not night shots.. but evening shots. this image is not so bad IMO. Ggia (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and there is no change in the circumstances. Tomer T (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep good FP for me, 2011 promotion -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Not bad. --Karelj (talk) 19:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --sfu (talk) 09:16, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 delist, 4 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blick auf den Grimselsee und den Raeterichsbodensee 0981.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2011 at 22:47:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ein besonderer Ort * Support--Böhringer (talk) 10:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cecil (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info a new version is uploaded with eliminated errors: posterisation. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 14:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty good actually. Perhaps higher resolution; You still got 70MB left to go :), Regarding the red dots, I think now that they actually is part of the scenery, but I can't still understand what they are for. _→AzaToth 15:47, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info The "red dots" are ballons at the "overhead power lines". --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Saluting the Flag.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2011 at 21:06:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Israel Defense Forces decide to this week to release all of their pictures in CC-BY-SA license.
created by Israel Defense Forces - uploaded by Matanya - nominated by Itzike -- Itzike (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Itzike (talk) 21:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Srtong photo. Itzuvit (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Itzuvit wrote Hanay (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice, but: "saluting the Flag". I'm missing the Flag! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amirki (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Both non neutral subject and national canvassing. + quality of the picture not outstanding. --Jebulon (talk) 20:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support If you lack the flag, let's just call it saluting. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Alchemist. --Karelj (talk) 16:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong photo, but the background lights seem too overpowering. It makes me want to squint. The blue light spots in the foreground are also distracting. --Avenue (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In parts of the image the back-lighting is very striking, but in other parts (particularly to the left) I agree with Avenue, the lights overpower some of the subjects. --99of9 (talk) 05:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gießen neue Uniklinik01 2011-08-22.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 08:53:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by, uploaded and nominated by KlausFoehl -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KlausFoehl (talk) 08:53, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Loved the vivid colors Itzuvit (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Correct quality (probably a QI) and composition. But nothing extraordinary justifying the FP status. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:37, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition could be more interesting if less central and there was more emphasis on the entrance. --ELEKHH^T 00:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panurus biarmicus male portrait 01 (MK).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 16:10:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info My first try with birds. This one shows a portrait of a Bearded Reedling (Panurus biarmicus). c/u/n by me mathias K 16:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Support -- mathias K 16:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wow. Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 04:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MyCanon (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avenue (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 10:37, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:18, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question How did you get so close so as to be able to portrait such a small bird with a 90mm ? - Benh (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Bird in hand? --Muhammad (talk) 02:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Info Hi Benh, I was waiting for that question and Muhammad already gave the right answer. :) The picture was taken during a bird ringing event. So it is a wild bird hold in hand by a ornithologists. Regards mathias K 07:27, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support omg --The Photographer (talk) 12:43, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:24, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous. --99of9 (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:TYTANE P.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 13:17:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dimitri Parant, uploaded and nominated by Falcom -- FALCOM (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FALCOM (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australian Magpie closed eyes.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 14:01:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nom. -- 99of9 (talk) 14:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 16:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhow Indian Ocean.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 16:12:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Muhammad Mahdi Karim - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose image has too low resolution and it feels over-processed. The ship should be more centered as well. _→AzaToth 21:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no resolution problem, according to the guidelines. Tomer T (talk) 21:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The resolution is fine and centring the boat would, IMO, spoil the composition. --Jovian Eye _storm 22:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Here I personally feel that the image should have had higher resolution, it's not the minimum regulations I cited. _→AzaToth 22:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Composition and framing are very good, imo. But not the lighting (the subject is underexposed) and the detail. Yes, it looks like the result of an agressive de-noising process. Those are probably the reasons for Muhammad not having nominated the picture himself... Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Link. Tomer T (talk) 16:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks Tomer --Muhammad (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small for me. พ.s. 22:41, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support could be larger but composition is great --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mont Blanc 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 14:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by kristoferb - uploaded by kristoferb - nominated by kristoferb -- Kristoferb (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kristoferb (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (Formerly FPXed) High degree of JPEG artifacts — Preceding unsigned comment added by AzaToth (talk • contribs)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:55, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow Bellied Slider Basking.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 10:14:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye -- Jovian Eye _storm 10:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 10:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit noisy, but an awesome picture nonetheless. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:26, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good quality of a nice subject, but the leaf on his/her neck is a bit annoying, and the white sky reflection across the shell also detracts from the subject. --99of9 (talk) 13:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MyCanon (talk) 17:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per 99of9. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:2011-09-03 10-11-49-fort-lomont.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 18:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--FALCOM (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-09-18 16-05-35-fort-arches.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2011 at 18:44:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the placidness of the scene, but it's a bit noisy and a lot of CA. Thus, I am on the fence. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the theme and framing, but am not sure about picture quality (to greenish, dark?). Also on the fence.--Celia Ascenso (talk) 10:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can't see much noise at all. This image has a great mood, and I think the greenish colour is probably correct given the vegetation. --99of9 (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--FALCOM (talk) 11:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 11:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This has grown on me. --Avenue (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:25, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalta Minor.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 17:36:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by TwoWings - uploaded by TwoWings - nominated by TwoWings -- TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can I support my own picture ? I suppose not... -- TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes you can! Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The building on the right cuts o the subject in a bad way, also the subject is getting a bit blurry on the top. _→AzaToth 15:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your POV but I just want to comment something : if you knew that place, you'll know that it's quite impossible to take a picture of Kalta Minor from that street without the building on the right cutting off the bottom of Kalta Minor. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pardalotus punctatus male with nesting material - Risdon Brook.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 18:44:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute --Schnobby (talk) 08:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 09:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MyCanon (talk) 03:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support David C. S.
Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 08:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dabit100 (talk) 00:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Patrouille de France Radom 3 1.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 14:50:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vive la Fhrrrance! Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes "vive la France". Amazing how well the planes are aligned. - Benh (talk) 15:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 20:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MyCanon (talk) 03:56, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 01:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even if I prefered when they were nine...--Jebulon (talk) 15:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Avenue (talk) 12:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 12:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quan (talk) 15:26, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 22:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Berlin Landwehrkanal Houseboats 20080429.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 20:25:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sir James - uploaded by Sir James - nominated by Sir James -- Sir James (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sir James (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deva statue in Wat Phra Kaew, Bangkok, Thailand.jpg

File:Cervus elaphus Luc Viatour 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 16:11:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by ] -- Luc Viatour (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 16:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 21:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:34, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MyCanon (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quan (talk) 12:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}} ( Pro),--KarleHorn (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Does capture the attention of the viewer quite well. --ELEKHH^T 02:18, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very visually captivating, but it is a bit noisy and a little too tightly cropped on the left and right IMO. --The High Fin Sperm Whale
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gomada (talk) 13:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Egretta novaehollandiae - Austins Ferry.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 20:33:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A dandy. -- Citron (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A bit too dark. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 10:20, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MyCanon (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The white face is accentuated nicely by the dark background. --Avenue (talk) 12:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harrison49 (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:22, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Kronborg night.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 20:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by DanNav - uploaded by DanNav - nominated by DanNav -- DanNav (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DanNav (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the right side is unfortunately overexposed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}} ( Support)--KarleHorn (talk) 21:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Oppose Overexposure, sorry. --99of9 (talk) 23:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait de l'artiste avec un ami, by Raffaello Sanzio, from C2RMF retouched.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2011 at 15:10:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Raffaello Sanzio - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 00:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 02:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spitfire Formation.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 20:34:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gareth Davies - uploaded by Harrison49 - nominated by Harrison49 -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is below the minimum size set by the rules (2MPx).

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:San Pietro 2011-09-20.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 12:47:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Francesco Mocellin - uploaded by Francesco Mocellin - nominated by Francesco Mocellin -- inquieto (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}} -- inquieto (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Oppose massive perspective distortion is unappealing, right side blurred and relatively low resolution for landscape. --ELEKHH^T 02:06, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Elekhh. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zitronenfalter ♂ Gonepteryx rhamni .JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 10:09:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Gonepteryx rhamni all by -- Böhringer (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--FALCOM (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clean and clear. --99of9 (talk) 23:19, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support David C. S.
Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tight crop. พ.s. 06:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Pha That Luang Vientiane Laos Wikimedia Commons.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2011 at 15:06:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Benh - nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jebulon (talk) 15:06, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent picture--FALCOM (talk) 15:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --sfu (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- why not?? Roh^G??· 11:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support not without flaws, but until someone comes up with a better one of Laos and Vientiane (and thanks for the nomination) - Benh (talk) 12:51, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As it was nominated as QI candidate, I recognized "the" style when checking, before seeing the signature. Souvent imité, jamais égalé !--Jebulon (talk) 10:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much of these red road stones --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Berthold Werner. พ.s. 06:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 12:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:MiG-29 2547.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 11:14:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info everything by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically good, clean image, from a good angle, with just the right amount of space :). What is the bright white patch on the side just behind the nose cone? --99of9 (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This might be a sun glare in one of the glass elements covering some antenna. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Freedom to share (talk) 19:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC) Good image, quite difficult to capture correctly as well.[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aeroflot Airbus A330 Kustov.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 13:02:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sergey Kustov (User:bushman787) - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Should definitely be cropped top and bottom to balance the frame. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- - It is unbalanced, but I think the cloud gives it more charm than being suspended in blank blueness. --Avenue (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, which is why I nominated it. The cloud takes away the "blue screen" effect, the photo would otherwise have. Charming, nice word for such a photo. russavia (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Moreover, Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. You should probably withdraw this nomination and re-nominate in a few days. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
FPD - Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:22, 27 September 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]
Support as nominator. I give my limit of nominations to this picture. Nice photo, let this is my nomination -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:12, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think the crop is well chosen. Not only because of the lack of headroom, but also because for such a high aspect ratio object, the aspect ratio of the picture is fairly square. E.g. why include the half-cloud? --99of9 (talk) 01:30, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I will provide my opinio on your question. The actual subject of the photo is the aircraft, not the cloud. A more detailed view would provide either much more fluffy white cloud and/or empty blue space. By including the fluff of cloud it is an actual visual reminder that the aircraft is inflight, and is in such ratio that the aircraft, and not the empty space around it, is the core subject of the photo. If the cloud was say the top of a building, I would agree with you, as it would be clear from such a view that it is the aircraft AND the buildings which are the subject of the photo, and such a view should be of the panoramo of the city and the aircraft flying over top. This is obviously not the case here. russavia (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support because I still don't like the crop. But otherwise the photo is flawless. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 06:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My proposal is to retouch the clouds away to have a unitary blue background. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 20:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Alexi Laiho - Ilosaarirock 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 18:56:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tuomas Vitikainen - uploaded by Tuomas Vitikainen - nominated by Cecil -- Cecil (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cecil (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overprocessed and JPEG artifacts _→AzaToth 19:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and good expression, it's a pity that his mouth is hidden. --Vassil (talk) 21:02, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Odontoptera carrenoi MHNT global.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2011 at 09:35:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and nominated by --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MatthiasKabel (talk) 12:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support but "1cm" is not too visible Przykuta → [edit] 17:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It wanted. The scale is low visibility so as not to interfere with the subject.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- I don't like the proportions of this image. An obvious improvement would be a crop on the left but I would prefer the two smaller pictures to the rotated 90 degress. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried this solution. In fact the side view is inabituelle for entomology. But here she brings a infomations on the "nose" very special, of this species. I put the two images, wings closed, effectively 90 ° as is usual. But I found that the profile was more natural if I put it horizontal. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo 13:46, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Qantas Boeing 747-400 VH-OJU over Starbeyevo Kustov.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 10:46:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sergey Kustov (User:bushman787) - uploaded by Russavia| - nominated by Russavia -- russavia (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Lazyhawk (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Zooro-Patriot (talk) 11:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support _→AzaToth 11:51, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sergey will be viewing this request, and others I am doing for his photos, and will be available to address any reasonable concerns and the like. I will also encourage him to sign up on Commons. russavia (talk) 12:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unneccessary colour modifications that detract from it's educational value. --99of9 (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Apart from the curiosity of being taken from a long distance, I see nothing featurable in this image. Extreme crop, underexposed and not sharp enough. It would be nice to have the Exif information. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- My friend, most humbly on my knee I beg you not to call this crop extreme. According to the most up to date standards this crop is quite acceptable, a bit too tight perhaps, but far from extreme. Many aviation photographers would call this crop too loose/wide, although the Commons population seems to favor such compositions. I have no problem with that, I simply believe that some of us are being too harsh on the issue of empty space when in comes to airplanes. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 19:06, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, tighter crop is possible, so this one is not the most extreme. Nevertheless Oppose as aeroplane caged within a too tight framing, according to my (non-aviation, but simply aesthetic) standards, sorry. --ELEKHH^T 11:05, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree entirely. It is the fact that it is taken whilst flying overhead at 11,000 metres and the aircraft is in perfect view, along with one of the features one sees when an aircraft is flying at altitude; the contrails. One would not the contrails when flying at low altitude; at least not this visible. russavia (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sven.petersen (talk) 12:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Elekhh. พ.s. 06:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 21:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Richmond Parkkk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 14:04:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by kevenlaw - uploaded by AA - nominated by AA -- AHURA♠ 14:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 14:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quan (talk) 12:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not a fan of the lighting changes sorry. --99of9 (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too overexposed areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As above. -- -donald- (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Solvay conference 1927.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 16:21:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Benjamin Couprie - uploaded by JdH - nominated by Ladsgroup -- Amir (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support High encyclopedic value -- Amir (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AHURA♠ 16:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of the quality and resolution. I think it's a better candidate for "Valued Images" --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a historical image and I think we can make exception for historical images. resolution of image is satisfying. 17 people of this image are noble laureates Amir (talk) 17:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's why we also have "Valued Images" : for those historical images that are indeed of great value but that are (objectively) not of great photographic quality. Nominate it as Valued Image and I'll support it. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but I don't think so because this or this are featured but they (and major of these images) have not "quality and resolution"Amir (talk) 20:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 19:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The technical quality is not the only criterium for a FP. It may be. Old images, even with a non perfect quality, can be promotted as FP. We have many examples. FPC are not to be technically better than QI. VI was not created for historical images. Even if it may concern historical images. Please read the guidelines (both for QI, VI and FP) carefully.--Jebulon (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't meaning that VI was created for historical pictures. I meant that its purpose was (partly) to award some label to pictures that could be of great value without being of great photographic quality. I agree that some historical pictures can be FP even with not so great quality or resolution (especially because we have to consider the technology of that time). But for that particular picture I think FP is a bit too much for two main reasons : 1) I think we can expect a better resolution and focus for that period (and that 1925 picture is an example of what I mean - you can actually see that the photographic conditions were not as good as the 1927 Sovay one, which makes the latter, by comparison, not so good) ; 2) I don't think the composition is of great quality (at least not enough for FP). So yes, I understand the guidelines and yes I stay with my opinion. Sorry. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to be sorry, I think we agree together regarding your first part. Anyway, discussion is always interesting.--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If "especially considering the technology of that time" the very analogue image used for digitisation provides more detail and contrast than many modern high end DSLR images could provide. It's the scanning that limits the quality you get displayed in the digital file. Resolution of a digital file is not connected to the period of an alogue image. It's the original image's size and the scanning method used to digitise the image that determine the resolution you can see. The only thing that is "not so good" is the idea of comparing two digitised analogue images from the same period without any technical intel. We don't have any information on the cameras, lenses, photographic film and paper nor any intel on the darkroom processing. The beauty and quality of the 1925 may be higher - yet your argumentation falls short for the aforementioned reasons. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding historic value and uniqueness. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment PD for 70 years after publication does not comply with Belgian copyright law. Unless Benjamin Couprie is dead for 70 years (i.e. complies with PD for 70 years pma), or the image is provided by his legal successors, this image is still under copyright. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 08:46, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
hmm. Do you know when Benjamin Couprie died? I think he must died before 1941 because he was in the 1911 conference [1]. I googled his name but I can't find his date deathAmir (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As Here he has been died since 1933 thus this image PDAmir (talk) 12:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That says he died after 1933 (and was born before 1911), which we know because of pictures he took at the First and Seventh Solvay Conferences, in 1911 and 1933 respectively. This doesn't seem like very conclusive evidence that he died by 1940 (as required for it to be PD in Belgium under the 70 years pma rule). --Avenue (talk) 13:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, regardless of whether this is currently PD in Belgium, it doesn't seem to be PD in the US because it was published after 1922 and was not PD in Belgium on 1 January 1996 (see w:Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights for why that date is important). It was created by someone still alive in 1926, and Belgium had the 70 year pma rule in 1996 (their current law was passed in 1994). I hope I'm missing something, but I think all his photos post-1922 are unfortunately still under copyright in the U.S., and so should be deleted. --Avenue (talk) 13:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding value and uniqueness, I agree. No need to be a specialist of physics to understand that the meeting on a same picture (even if not technically perfect) of so world famous scientists is absolutely extraordinary. Typical for FP in my poor opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality. พ.s. 22:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, still under copyright. --Avenue (talk) 13:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Question--Jebulon (talk) 09:05, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support considering the age of the photo Ggia (talk) 20:47, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Imehling (talk) 10:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As Avenue wrote it, there could be a problem with Benjamin Couprie's photographs. I'm trying to find some informations about his date of death but I haven't found anything yet. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Volcán Chimborazo, "El Taita Chimborazo".jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 03:55:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dabit100 - uploaded by Dabit100 - nominated by Dabit100 -- Dabit100 (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dabit100 (talk) 03:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blown highlight, bad pixels, lack of focus, boring colors, generally low quality, possible chromatic aberration. _→AzaToth 15:38, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition, too much sky. --Karelj (talk) 14:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support David C. S. 18:55 30 sep 2011 (UTC)

*{{Support}} It's ok...--Bryanpvz (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

*{{Support}}--Jhalvico (talk) 23:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{Support}} --Minishow (talk) 03:02, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Oppose. Mediocre picture with bad composition and part of votestacking and campaigning on es.WP. For those not speaking spanish: David C. S. has posted to several people asking them to support the image, including explaining which template to use when doing it. The nominator is all for it. -- Cecil (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info Ask ComputerHotline his opinion is more important than yours considering the experience that he has. I did not ask him or anybody to vote for my picture, and if you think my picture is mediocre is just your opinion, I think you are impolite and disrespectful with my work Cecil --Dabit100 (talk) 01:08, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you are so sure about your work then why did you participate in cheating? You could have stopped David or at least expressed your disagreement with his behaviour. Instead you voted for the other two pictures (one of them tilted, the other one missing a part on the left side). And I am obviously not the only one who thinks that this picture here is not FP-material (which for me equals mediocre). Oh, and Karelj is here pretty much as long as ComputerHotline. Only he does not list up all his achievements for this project. -- Cecil (talk) 05:50, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe I made a mistake voting for those pictures, but I'm here just to colaborate not to argue, and for respect to my picture I will not going to continue with this argument, I respect your opinion and I will continue working, I'm not a professional but I like taking pictures and I really thought that this picture could be a good FP. At least I had ComputerHotline support that for me is great considering his experience --Dabit100 (talk) 11:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The campaign for this and other images is completely allowed, also here in my beautiful country, Ecuador, when someone proposes something that benefits the country to join us and support the initiative. Además sabía que este es el lugar mas cercano al espacio exterior, en ningún lugar en el mundo va a poder ver lo mismo. Finallye madiocre is an insult in Ecuador, so I think you have disrespected the author of the picture. David C. S.

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zwiefalten 28 04 2011 Angels 04.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2011 at 22:57:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Vassil - uploaded by Vassil - nominated by Vassil -- Vassil (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the crop on the right cuts of the sword. _→AzaToth 15:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:47, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Penélope Cruz - Huile.jpg

File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Israeli Apache helicopter overlooks the Greek hills.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 11:20:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Israel Defense Forces - nominated by Marokwitz -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice, but to much vignetting and to low dimensions --Slick (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: while the photo per se is great, the resolution is too small (the required resolution is 2MPx).

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Heliport Ferry Finnmaid Baltic Sea 20100917.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 20:42:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sir James - uploaded by Sir James - nominated by Sir James -- Sir James (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ; now rotated. Sir James (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request the sea horizon need a correction: it is tilted, otherwise nice. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:14, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:32, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice blue. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:53, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not bad at all and like the non-centred composition, but the big white cloud in the middle is a bad background for the white parts of the ship. --ELEKHH^T 02:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support real blue --Mbdortmund (talk) 03:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The horizon is not straight (barrell distortion IMO), little CAs, but I like the "blue" composition--Miguel Bugallo 13:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Imehling (talk) 20:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Iglesia de San Juan Bautista.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 13:31:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and nominated by me, reworked by User:Saibo -- Felix König ✉ 13:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 13:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the perspective seems to be off as the left tower grows higher than the right one. _→AzaToth 15:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How do you know that it is a perspectival and not a constructional problem? I surely know that I stood exactly in the center, and if you look at the retouched versions with "corrected" perspective, you will see that it looks unnatural. -- Felix König ✉ 16:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
perpective is good IMO but the image is noisy --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lycogala epidendrum 2011 G1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Oct 2011 at 18:52:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info Wolf's milk slime mould (Lycogala epidendrum). Not a fungi, it is an Amoebozoa. This form of life is capable to movement. Largest bubble on this photo ~5 mm.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Difficult subject --Llez (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:31, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral For now. Image has a lot of potential, but it is slightly lacking in sharpness. However, my major concern is the strange streak which I have annotated. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:42, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same lines is visible on the original unprocessed photo. Possibly, it is a trace left by an axe or a knife. It is an old trace when the tree wasn't rotten. See another trace (annotated by me). -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we're looking at the same thing. What I am looking at is a ring around the slime mold that I annotated. It looks like everything outside the ring is blurred. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Ah, yes, I see that too. It looks like a region boundary used for some kind of post-processing. --99of9 (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral wb: too blue - look on the small "drops" Przykuta → [edit] 18:03, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Golden retriever welpe meer.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 15:51:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by vorderstrasse - uploaded by vorderstrasse - nominated by vorderstrasse -- Dirk Vorderstraße (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dirk Vorderstraße (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'm getting a bit suspect about this way even resolution of 3000x2000, smells re-sampled. There's a log of image grain, but at least it's not chromatic noise. _→AzaToth 16:00, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe to the "all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing" should be added that all pets are cute. --ELEKHH^T 08:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Şahlûr.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 20:18:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dûrzan cîrano - uploaded by Dûrzan cîrano - nominated by Gomada -- Gomada (talk) 20:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gomada (talk) 21:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: A realy nice image, but the resolution is to small, it must be minimum 2MP. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

- FYI, I think this is a European Bee-eater (Merops apiaster). JJ Harrison (talk) 22:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, it is European bee-eater, but the photo was taken in a kurdish village. Btw , what should i do now? i should delete it from list of candidates? --Gomada (talk) 09:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Hello Gomada, if possible then upload please a higher resolution of your photo. Otherwise you don't need to do something. Regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fuchsia (guharok).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 11:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gomada - uploaded by Gomada - nominated by Gomada -- Gomada (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gomada (talk) 13:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blown light is distracting, also way too tight crop on the left. As well no perfect focus and highly visible noise decreases the overall value sadly. _→AzaToth 13:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice flowers, but wrong light --Slick (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thunderbirds 05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2011 at 05:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by DanNav - uploaded by DanNav - nominated by DanNav -- DanNav (talk) 05:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DanNav (talk) 05:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}} ( Support)--KarleHorn (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

As in the case of one of the nominations below: too much empty space top and bottom. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Now cropped a little. --DanNav (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd like to support it, but I find it cropped a little to tightly. I preferred the second version. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Extreme crop -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Let the poor thing breathe, right? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:02, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tried different crops - i guess I like this one best my self. --DanNav (talk) 20:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the crop now but see my anotation. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- For some reason the anotator box is gone, but there is a smudge or something on the middle left of the picture. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GKN pano2 2010.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 18:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and nominated by me, stitched and reworked by Alchemist-hp -- Felix König ✉ 18:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -- Felix König ✉ 18:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice image but lacking sharpness or artefacts --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp image, block details including JPEG artifacts in complex areas. _→AzaToth 13:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination This nomination can be withdrawn. -- Felix König ✉ 20:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colvin Run Mill.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Oct 2011 at 23:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 23:13, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Engloch 249 Alberschwende Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 10:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Bregenzerwälderhof im Vorderen Bregenzerwald all by -- Böhringer (talk) 10:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This media shows the protected monument with the number 21634 in Austria. (Commons, de, Wikidata)

Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:45, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dabit100 (talk) 11:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One major and one minor stitch error should be fixed, Support if fixed. _→AzaToth 13:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stitch error

Done --Böhringer (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harrison49 (talk) 20:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Die rechte Hauskante kippt nach links. Kann man das noch fixen? -- -donald- (talk) 09:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

das wäre dann verzerrt; perspektivisch ist die Kante so richtig --Böhringer (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 01:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Very nice. There's something weird with the perspective in the house's walls though. Verticality seems a bit off. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful --High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Yeading Brook - Ruislip Gardens.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 20:41:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Harrison49 - uploaded by Harrison49 - nominated by Harrison49 -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Chaotic composition. --Citron (talk) 22:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy. Gamaliel (talk) 22:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per user Citron and user Gamaliel. Also plenty of overexposed spots. --JRff (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-10-02 15-39-22-fort-mt-bart.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 05:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The blown light and the useless filename should be adjusted. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cervus elaphus Luc Viatour 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 10:36:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slick (talk) 06:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice scene --mathias K 11:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 14:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent family composition. --ELEKHH^T 19:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd like to know what he tells his wife... --Schnobby (talk) 14:23, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! -- SteveStrummer (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support J'imagine que c'est la période du brame du cerf. J'aimerai me procurer un télé et faire ça aussi une fois ! - Benh (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:F-16 Demo Team 2722.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 07:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Out of all the photos I took this summer, this one is my favourite. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:36, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 22:25, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Capt. Tobias "Hitec" Schutte is probably very happy ! And the heraldic lion of Orange-Nassau is fantastic !--Jebulon (talk) 08:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 20:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice livery! --Jovian Eye _storm 01:21, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slick (talk) 06:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Quan (talk) 10:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 10:53, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 16:47, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's many planes, but I'm always impressed. I like the deco pattern and the "don't know how to call them" flows of air on the sides - Benh (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Sunset Palm Tree, DSM, TZ.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 18:42:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 18:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 18:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cliché. Done a thousand times already and better. The sunset needs to fill the picture -- this one has too much grey sky. The palm needs to be closer to the sun. The bird is distracting. -- Colin (talk) 19:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Cliché

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:2011 - El Golfo - Charco de los Clicos -Lanzarote - G07.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 01:43:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 01:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo 01:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 18:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slick (talk) 06:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have been there a few years ago and I like both - the Golfo and the photo --Schnobby (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JRff (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:13, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:FregataMagnificens-Couple.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 20:28:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magnificent frigate birds (Fregata magnificens) in processions of conquest

Info created by Balabiot - uploaded by Balabiot - nominated by David C. S. -- David C. S. 20:28 30 sep 2011 (UTC)
Support -- David C. S. 20:28 30 sep 2011

*{{Support}}--Jhalvico (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

*{{Support}} It's ok...--Bryanpvz (talk) 23:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Support --Dabit100 (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:40, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - wb: rocks are too blue. Przykuta → [edit] 17:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alfonfin (talk)
Oppose - Bad composition: one of the birds has part of his wing cut off, the other one is not sharp, and a third one is partly visible. -- Cecil (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info: part of votestacking and campaigning on es.WP by the nominator. For those not speaking spanish: the nominator has posted to several people asking them to support the image, including explaining which template to use when doing it. -- Cecil (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

InfoThe campaign for this and other images is completely allowed, also here in my beautiful country, Ecuador, when someone proposes something that benefits the country to join us and support the initiative. Also know that this is a unique place in the world, for nowhere will be able to do the same. Galapagos is endemic fauna and flora, is the First World Heritage Site by UNESCO. I think a place like this deserves a prominent image. Finallye madiocre is an insult in Ecuador, so I think you have disrespected the author of the picture.David C. S.

Oppose as Cecil. พ.s. 06:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cecil. --Cayambe (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}}--Guerrero de la Noche (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2011 (UTC)¡Viva el Ecuador![reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Oppose -- Lighting doesn`t look like one of a FP. Framing is weird, there're disturbing objects in the way. Weird WB. In my opinion, overall really not FP, sorry. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Petersburg, Mariinskiy Palace 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 01:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by DmitriyGuryanov - uploaded by DmitriyGuryanov - nominated by DmitriyGuryanov -- DmitriyGuryanov (talk) 01:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DmitriyGuryanov (talk) 01:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but the left part is unsharp, stitching errors. -- -donald- (talk) 10:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per -donald-. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info I've replaced bad image, where it was possibly (almost everywhere) --DmitriyGuryanov (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is better, but not good. On the left side there are still double parts, like the rail on the roof and the lamps. Adjust your stitching software or use another one. -- -donald- (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There was 1 blurred photo :( There no problems with stitching software. May be crop slightly from left and right ? --DmitriyGuryanov (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The image tilts to the right. It is not fully centered. Blurry sides. The resolution is a bit low for a stitched panorama imo. _→AzaToth 00:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Timoleague Friary.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Oct 2011 at 10:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by imehling - uploaded by imehling - nominated by imehling -- Imehling (talk) 10:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Imehling (talk) 10:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 22:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virgen de Quito.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 20:10:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Prissantenbär - uploaded by Prissantenbär - nominated by David C. S. -- David C. S. 20:08 30 sep 2011 (UTC)
Support -- David C. S. 20:08 30 sep 2011 (UTC)
Comment Feels tilted somehow. _→AzaToth 20:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}} --DeSanJose (talk) 22:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

*{{Support}} It's ok...--Bryanpvz (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

*{{Support}}--Jhalvico (talk) 23:10, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Support --Dabit100 (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:42, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*{{Support}}--Guerrero de la Noche (talk) 14:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

¡Viva el Ecuador! Y felicitaciones por la iniciativa[reply]

Vote is not valid as accounts must have at least 10 days and 50 edits to be allowed to vote.

Oppose. I was unsure about what the actual target of this picture was: the somehow tilted hill, a overview of the city or something else. Somehow nothing really stands out. I could not see anything to support it. It looked like a rather mediocre picture of a city where the photographer was not sure what to actually fotograph (=> no special composition). Then I noticed that with this pictures it is quite often used on discussion pages on es.WP. Babel-pic? No. Votestacking and Campaigning ([2]). And not only for this but two other mediocre pictures currently up for discussion which explains why they have a rather unusually high amount of FPXvotes and share the same 5 users. If you would have put up your message on a few boards and portals, this would have been more ok, but by picking a few es.Users this is partisan-canvassing. And that you actually explained to them how to support (but not how to oppose) makes it even worse. This is non-neutral advertisement. So I decided not to refrain from voting as originally intended. -- Cecil (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

InfoThe campaign for this and other images is completely allowed, also here in my beautiful country, Ecuador, when someone proposes something that benefits the country to join us and support the initiative. Also elsewhere you will see such a place as Histrórico Center of Quito, the largest and best preserved in Latin America by the UNESCO. Finallye madiocre is an insult in Ecuador, so I think you have disrespected the author of the picture.David C. S.

- Comment David, mediocre is not an insult. It doesn´t matter which country you are from. Others user cannot know everything about every culture in the world. That's why we have to use english as a universal language. But anyways, look up for the word mediocre in a dictionary (even in spanish), and you'll find out it does apply perfectly to a picture that does not stand out for a user's opinion. You should not take it personally. This is a page where you put your pictures out to the public eye and get opinions. If you do not like negative opinions, this is not the place for you. You surely are already getting annoyed by this comment, I know. But remember we have to be as neutral as we can. I do think that voting campaigning is really unethic and wrong. Why should you get your selected pictures to be featured and not another guy that may have spent 3 days to take a perfect shot of a spot, only because you told some users to vote you positively? You may say it is totally allowed, but take a while to ask yourself if you truly think you are doing the right thing. I think you maybe acting out of proud and patriotism. (I think... maybe I'm wrong). This is a big and a really serious community, we have to be the best persons we can, and be "muy responsables". Buena suerte hermano. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 16:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cecil. No actual composition, and by the way totally unleveled. abf «Cabale!» 22:23, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Loggia dei Lanzi 360 view big.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Oct 2011 at 19:43:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

360°	View in 360° panoramic viewer

Info created by User:MatthiasKabel - uploaded by User:MatthiasKabel - nominated by User:MatthiasKabel -- MatthiasKabel (talk)
Warning, image size is: 35.626 × 13.619 if your browser is not able to display this image in full resolution there are smaller versions:
Image:Loggia dei Lanzi 360 view middle.jpg or
Image:Loggia dei Lanzi 360 view small.jpg
19:43, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Support --PAULOGARCIA2005 (talk) 02:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 12:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose extreme distortion, very confusing. --ELEKHH^T 19:08, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extreme distortion is always at en:equirectangular projection pictures present. -- -donald- (talk) 21:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, but the question is whether is a good choice to represent this particular subject in this way. I think not. --ELEKHH^T 22:14, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:25, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Elekhh. I was there recently, it does not look so in real. The choice of such a distortion is maybe artistic, but it does not give a good idea of the place for those who don't know Florence, IMO. --Jebulon (talk) 23:37, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you map an 360° view in a plane it must have distortion, I've added a panoramic viewer for the small version, so you can have a more natural view to look around. MatthiasKabel (talk) 07:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support nice work. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Supportinteresting perspective--Imehling (talk) 17:26, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Barca afundida no Carril- Vilagarcía de Arousa- Galicia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 08:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jebulon (talk) 08:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would be great for the cover of some horror novel. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice one :) _→AzaToth 18:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. ■ MMXX ^talk 21:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice mysterious picture. I think the image has a dust spot, see image note. --Jovian Eye _storm 01:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In the evening, I will upload a new version, now I cannot--Miguel Bugallo 08:19, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Done--Miguel Bugallo 13:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Miguel Bugallo 13:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simply beautiful. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, what a find! :) --Ximonic (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb quality. --Cayambe (talk) 08:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Place de la Concorde à Paris 8e.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 13:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moonik - uploaded by Moonik - nominated by Moonik -- Moonik (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moonik (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snowy Åreskutan Ski lift.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 00:17:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Anders Carlsson - uploaded by AzaToth - nominated by AzaToth -- _→AzaToth 00:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- _→AzaToth 00:17, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- like it, but missing something (dont know) --Slick (talk) 06:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the new idea and the quality!--Llorenzi (talk) 09:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ WB seems to be off (way too yellow imo) --mathias K 10:58, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Could be because the sun is shining down onto the clouds bellow. I can see later if an normalized image looks better. _→AzaToth 14:11, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Neutral after the rework. Thanks for that. --mathias K 19:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original subject -- Olivier Jaulent (talk) 12:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment uploaded new version with whitepoint adjusted. _→AzaToth 20:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot:) The clouds in the background give the image a mystic atmosphere. --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Man, I wish we had scenes like this in Australia. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Up, up and away... --Schnobby (talk) 14:19, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Does not seem too yellow to me, atleast not now. In the north the light is usually somewhat different than for example in the mountains of Central Europe, especially during winter. --Ximonic (talk) 14:59, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:49, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just when you thought there was no new way to represent "winter" in one image. Makes me shiver just looking at it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 08:36, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - very interesting look. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 16:18, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

File:Mexican graves.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 17:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:17, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support พ.s. 06:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not special with average quality --Wladyslaw (talk) 06:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Wladyslaw. --Karelj (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I do like it, but the perspective distortion on the left makes it look like falling to the right. --ELEKHH^T 08:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just like Elekhh. Tomer T (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clitoria Ternatea Front and back sides.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 11:06:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Ranemanoj, nominated by 61.16.182.2 11:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 61.16.182.2 11:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Please log in to vote. Yann (talk) 13:40, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It appears fairly soft: not in focus? Also, the white balance might be somewhat off. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Flower images demands extra high level of quality, this image lacks focus and good framing which will make it impossible for the image to gain FP status

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Fulgoraria rupestris 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 09:36:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:52, 3 October 2011 (UTC) P.S. you still need a 1cm³ shell cube as a scale ;-)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 12:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:14, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo 14:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dorieo (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:Gulfstream G550 flight deck in 2011.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 09:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by waerfelu - uploaded by waerfelu - nominated by waerfelu -- Waerfelu (talk) 09:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Waerfelu (talk) 09:36, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: very low resolution, overexposure, poor description (location, date).--ELEKHH^T 11:56, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Tic-tac-toe.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 19:39:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Wanwa (talk) 19:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wanwa (talk) 19:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, this is clearly not one of our most valuable images. --99of9 (talk) 10:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Calanque du Petit Canereit-Massif de l'Esterel.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Oct 2011 at 21:36:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tobi 87 -- Tobi 87 (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tobi 87 (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 22:42, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JRff (talk) 13:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--SteveStrummer (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:15, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 01:04:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Comment This was taken on a weekday to minimize people. Crowds can get as large as this or this. --Jovian Eye _storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Marokwitz (talk) 11:30, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nice lighting and the people provide a reference of scale. --ELEKHH^T 18:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JRff (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- SteveStrummer (talk) 05:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 11:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am closing this manually since more than 5 days have passed. The bot is not closing this because of my own neutral vote below --Jovian Eye _storm 14:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Comment This shot has even fewer people but the lighting is quite different. --Jovian Eye _storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Jovian Eye _storm 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye _storm 14:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

The chosen alternative is: File:Jefferson Memorial At Dusk 1.jpg

File:Ickenham Hall - April 2011.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 20:08:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Harrison49 - uploaded by Harrison49 - nominated by Harrison49 -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:08, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: high JPEG compression ratio with blurry details; building cropped off on right side. _→AzaToth 20:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:2011-10-02 15-49-37-fort-mt-bart.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 05:57:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 22:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am not convinced, the strange filename, the lights and the composition. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Příbram, Bytíz, pohled z haldy na sever.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 19:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Aktron -- Aktron (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aktron (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Some frames are really blurry including shows stitch errors. _→AzaToth 20:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Eustache.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Oct 2011 at 15:02:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Benh - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:02, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Though the modern buildings in the left background are ugly :) _→AzaToth
Support -- Quan (talk) 15:34, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice picture indeed. But I know this church very well, and it does not look so in real. We miss here, due to the bushes, all the lower part (ie: something like the first floor) of the building, therefore, as parisian, I cannot support and have to oppose, even if I feel very sorry for that.--Jebulon (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special here, really. And per above. - Benh (talk) 17:44, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Postcard style composition, with lost encyclopaedic value. --ELEKHH^T 08:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:20110102 Ice House (exterior) Meybod Iran.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 18:48:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support it is an Ice house building in Meybod, Iran. -- Ggia (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong CA. พ.s. 14:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:20110106 Vank Cathedral Isfahan Iran Panoramic View.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 19:46:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vank Cathedral (Armenian church) in Isfahan, Iran. -- Ggia (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose There are some distracting dust spots in the sky, and a strange artifact on one wall that looks like a burn mark. _→AzaToth 19:55, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info I cleaned the dust spots - the image is updated. Ggia (talk) 20:10, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support *like* --Don-kun (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:28, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ara ararauna 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 08:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Razvan Socol (talk) 11:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just out of curiosity: what is that yellow background? A yellow painted wall? Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Info This bird lives in the court of the Casa de Colón and is not in a cage. While the photo was taken, it was sitting in front of a wall of uniform yellow colour. --Llez (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: I presume that this parrot is put in a cage or aviary overnight to protect it. Snowmanradio (talk) 14:51, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a nice coindicence! --Schnobby (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dabit100 (talk) 03:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 02:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very striking image. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Calanque des Pierres-Tombées-Cassis.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 22:43:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tobi 87 --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- This image is quite unsharp, imo. The badly cropped tree is kind of disturbing too. It is also just a bit oversaturated. But the view, colors and lighting are very nice. It also looks like there was no spot to take the picture without the tree being in the way. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I find the lighting somewhat harsh; the cliff on the left seems to have lost texture and details. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The rock in front looks overexposed. --Karelj (talk) 21:46, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:29, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vicuña - Chimborazo, Ecuador.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 20:07:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dabit100 - uploaded by Dabit100 - nominated by Dabit100 -- Dabit100 (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dabit100 (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely image! --Tobi 87 (talk) 22:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- David C. S.
Support JJ Harrison (talk) 22:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- Looks too saturated too me. There's noticeable halo around the edges of the top of the mountain. It also looks more sharp at the bottom than at the front (animal is unsharp). IMO it should be the otherwise. Besides that, very nice image. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JRff (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Dabit100 (talk) 04:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

=

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. --Dabit100 (talk) 04:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Putbus Park 5.jpg, delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2011 at 16:39:58

Info Resolution of 1,289 × 966 is sadly way below current standards (Original nomination)
Delist -- _→AzaToth 16:39, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Agreed. --99of9 (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist It also lacks contrast and is kind of misty I think. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Per above. And I don't understand what was featured here...--Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delist~~ -218.152.129.186 00:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC) - Unsigned vote -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Not so good image quality and very small file size. --Cayambe (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:52, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I generell simply don't like removal processes. That image was FP in 2006 not today! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:14, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I like the pic, but rules are rules. Tomer T (talk) 14:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delist —kallerna™ 15:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kujaku Myoo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 00:22:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by unknown - uploaded by bamse - nominated by bamse -- bamse (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- bamse (talk) 00:22, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb quality and interesting scroll. _→AzaToth 00:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad scan work: the image need a curve correction! Please take a look at the image histogram. The original artwork can be featured, but not the scan. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I still don't understand your argument. This is a scan of the original. How could the original be featured here, if commons only allows to upload "png, gif, jpg, jpeg, xcf, mid, ogg, ogv, svg, djvu, tiff, tif, oga" and not hanging scrolls? Also, could you be more specific of what you mean by curve correction? bamse (talk) 22:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is simple the scan work is bad. I think the scanner wasn't calibrated. The colors are not right for me, too yellowish. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see the original? bamse (talk) 22:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, but I think can read a histogram. The RGB chanels can't be real. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the white balance is also a problem. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, if you haven't seen the original, you can't claim that it is too yellow or that the WB is off IMHO. bamse (talk) 23:33, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course he can, or what do you think a thing like a histogram is made for?! Regards mathias K 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, if you look at a histogram of a picture of a yellow wall, you will also claim that it is too yellow? bamse (talk) 00:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, why should I? But I could say that the type of yellow is correct or not. --mathias K 08:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Without having seen the wall in real? bamse (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely could say if there's any colour cast. And thats the case in your candidate. The rest is nitpicking imo. --mathias K 17:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am looking and looking at the histogram, but can't see anything. Could you tell me what to look for? bamse (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dit you compare your candidate and the alternate? I think there should be a difference between them when you're looking at the histogram. --mathias K 13:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. The ALT-version has a bit wider peaks (=higher contrast) which is fine with me. The ALT-version also has the peaks of all colors coincide (=highlights are white) while in the original version, the peaks of the red and green channels are to the right of the blue channel peak (=slight yellow cast, which I believe is inherent in the artwork). Anything else I should have noticed? I believe that the original is closer to what the piece actually looks due to aging. The ALT version is probably more pleasing to the eye, but neither represents todayy's state of the artwork nor the state when it was painted in the 12th century. In my opinion, with reproductions of artwork it is important to be as close to what the artwork looks in reality and that's why I prefer the original version. bamse (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Unsurprising if the color is wrong, it's aged. It's still a good scan of what the thing probably looks like now Alchemist, do you think you could digitally restore the color? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 18:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alchemist --mathias K 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better than above. Yann (talk) 08:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 17:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. Tomer T (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 08:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gavin Collins (talk) 09:07, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:23, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

The chosen alternative is: File:Kujaku Myoo edit.jpg

File:Moers, Christoph 9, 2011-09 CN-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 13:32:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. An Eurocopter EC-135 T2i as the German rescue helicopter «Christoph 9» starts in Moers (North Rhine-Westphalia). As some competition for Airwolf ;-)
Abstain (for now) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shadow at the bottom is a bit harsh, but otherwise I really like it. <joke>Take 25 more, and you'll be proper competition. </joke> Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, IMO it would be better if you crop a little from the bottom though. ■ MMXX ^talk 21:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose don't like the crop. (Abstain for now? Sorry but this is pretty embarrassing imo.) --mathias K 10:32, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 1. how I vote is only my decision. 2. cropping shouldn't be a problem, but I don't like both suggestions, because they are really too tight - please let the poor thing breathe I remember some famous quote here. But I think I will try something by myself. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

please let the poor thing breathe. Thats the point! I breathe in the area around my head, your crop goes exactly in the other direction. If you know what I mean... --mathias K 16:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you mean. I uploaded a new version in the file history. Your opinion? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:20, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would support the change. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thats the right direction, but I would crop it even more at the bottom and the ~~left~~ right side. Now it is still too centered for my taste. --mathias K 09:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

und nu? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nun ist schnibbeln angesagt :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:49, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

noch mehr :-/ ? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:50, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MDH-Hughes 369 E.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 20:25:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:25, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice quality. The bottom part of the heli looks a bit dark, but this could be cause its black... ;-) --mathias K 10:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rathaus Saalfelden 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Oct 2011 at 19:42:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. -- Felix König ✉ 19:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 19:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Umnik (talk) 17:16, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the framing is not FP. If the subject is the square than I would like to see more of the pavement and the church, if the subject is the town hall, I would like to see the entry. --ELEKHH^T 19:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:26, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop church tower is disturbing. Yann (talk) 05:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fachwerkhaus, Gelsdorf, Bonner Strasse 23.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 11:57:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Slick - uploaded by Slick - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are much prettier half-timbered houses in Franconia, for example --Schnobby (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman Baths in Bath Spa, England - July 2006.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 18:43:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Diliff - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:43, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Despite the distortions at the left: really excellent image, and of great encyclopedic value -- MJJR (talk) 19:51, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support good foto --Mile (talk) 15:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:St. Petersburg, Saint Isaac's Cathedral.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2011 at 13:26:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by DmitriyGuryanov - uploaded by DmitriyGuryanov - nominated by Claus
Support -- Claus (talk) 13:26, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:36, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cruceiro en Padrón. Galiza.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 18:44:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 18:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo 18:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Cool looking statue, but the lack of distinguishable sky in the background makes it a bit dull to look at sadly. _→AzaToth 19:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination OK --Miguel Bugallo 23:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Running reindeer in Jämtland.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 19:32:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by lilhelen - uploaded by AzaToth - nominated by AzaToth -- _→AzaToth 19:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- _→AzaToth 19:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow here. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 19:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject is not in focus. --Jovian Eye _storm 02:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination _→AzaToth 22:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:360° Schesaplana Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 21:25:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Schesaplana is the highest mountain in the Rätikon mountain range at the border between Vorarlberg, Austria and Graubuenden, Switzerland. It has an elevation of 2,964.3 m (9,725 ft). c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:25, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The lighting is great (in my opinion of course) but I wonder if it's necessary to have it 360°. Maybe a proper crop, focusing more on the left part, would be better, but I'm not sure... - Benh (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, maybe I'll nominate one FP to the neck, which you have proposed. Here I think is well documented how easy it is to climb this mountain is high and why so many people make a pilgrimage here. Sorry for my English :-) Google --Böhringer (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Dabit100 (talk) 21:45, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 09:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--alex.vonbun (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the original crop! --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:13, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:23, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Royal Air Force Recruitment Poster 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 20:51:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Royal Air Force - uploaded by Alexzabbey| - nominated by Harrison49 -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Harrison49 (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just propaganda. Poor image quality, low encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 23:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dirty scan, with crease marks on left edge (by the wing) and a fold mark under nose of plane. Techtri (talk) 22:27, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saluzzo a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2011 at 16:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Alessandro Molin Brosa - uploaded by Massimocicc - nominated by Yann (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yann (talk) 16:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of details (too high compression settings perhaps), the sky shows clear artifacts of compression. _→AzaToth 17:30, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Český Krumlov (Krummau) - panorama - old city.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 11:38:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Nice view, but the picture is very shadowy. Besides that, if this was a stitched panorama (there's no metadata), Wikimedia standards are very high. This picture is only 3,64 Mb.Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
and so what that only 3,64? this is not a determinant --Pudelek (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It might be too compressed.--G Furtado (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With 4MP, 3.64 MB is not too small in general, if only file size is considered. But in this case user G Furtado is right: Details are washed out by noise reduction artifacts and compression, even at the obviously downscaled resolution of 4 MP. --JRff (talk) 12:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is just my advice for you, don't take it the wrong way... but answering "so what? This is not determinant" to a users comment is not going to get you many positive votes. That doesn't sound too kind. There're other ways to discuss opinions. Good luck with that. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:21, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark for me. --Karelj (talk) 14:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capri Centre Belvedere.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2012 at 04:28:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Panoramic image. Second nomination. Last time it was quickly withdrawn because of geotag problems, now solved. All by --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - A.Savin 10:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! Jujutacular (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the detail. Great picture. --Colin (talk) 22:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why the warning on top "Downsampled image!|This image has been downsampled, and is not eligible for Featured Picture status" ? -- Jkadavoor (talk) 04:59, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There used to be a rule downsampled images were not eligible for FP, since everyone would try to use Commons to upload mid or low-sized images and then try to sell high-res versions or something like that. Only full-size versions should be nominated for FP. This one has the tag because the robot recognizes it as a downsampled image, since it is a stitched panorama and has been cropped and resized while stitching. I think the tag is not taken into consideration anymore, but I'm not sure. --Paolo Costa (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Knossos in Black and White.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 14:38:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Danbu14 - uploaded by Danbu14 - nominated by Danbu14 -- Danbu14 (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danbu14 (talk) 14:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much overblown areas. -- -donald- (talk) 10:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I agree with -donald-, also I don't care for the black and white. Tiptoety ^talk 03:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It is nice, but black and white is not appropriate for this picture. -- Scottthezzombie (talk) 10:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:22, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krefeld, St. Matthias, 2011-08 CN-04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 21:48:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. Panoramic view of the Catholic Church St. Matthias in Krefeld (North Rhine-Westphalia). It's a vestige of the former municipality Hohenbudberg, which is ousted by a huge and still growing chemical park. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 11:39, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 05:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 00:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support— M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 08:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Image:2011-08-28 Basteibrücke.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 17:33:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Je-str - uploaded by Je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Je-str (talk) 17:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. _→AzaToth 17:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2011-09-24 Schloss Wackerbarth.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 17:18:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Je-str - uploaded by Je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Je-str (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very sharp and lively. Unfortunately tilted counter-clockwise. Could use a recrop, imho (for instance, why not trim the tree shadows at the bottom, as well as some of the sky ?) --MAURILBERT (discuter) 02:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adi Holzer Werksverzeichnis 957 Mozart Engel.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 15:33:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info Serigraphy Mozart Engel by Adi Holzer 2006 in the size 500 x 500 mm. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question: The top of the picture appears cropped (the top of the triangle and head). Is this in the original or have we lost a few mm? Colin (talk) 06:39, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Answer: Thanks for your interest. Adi Holzer made this crop in his original serigraphy. He gave me the OK in his E-mail from Friday, September 30, 2011 11:37 AM: Lieber Herr Gäbler, danke für die exzellente Wiedergabe des Mozart Engels in Wikipedia! --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is there a set of guidelines for judging photos of artworks for FP? The copyright folk regard this as "slavish copying" that "lacks originality". The artwork appears to be well photographed, though I've no idea if the original is that vivid. I guess I'm concerned someone could knock out a dozen FPs in an afternoon given the right setup and a supply of artworks to snap. Or is that concern not important if the result is a good image? Colin (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support though I am slightly concerned for the cropped out part. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 20:41, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support— M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sayornis phoebe -Owen Conservation Park, Madison, Wisconsin, USA-8.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 21:18:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by John Benson - uploaded by Snowmanradio - nominated by Snowmanradio -- Snowmanradio (talk) 21:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Snowmanradio (talk) 21:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:47, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tamba52 (talk) 13:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Siddhartha Ghai (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sharpness is amazing... I've photographed some ringed birds and despite having them hold not being able to make this sharp images. Fantastic! Calandrella (talk) 13:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Alexandronikos (talk) 17:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Washington D.C. Temple At Dusk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 09:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 09:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Probably the towers are not bent in reality. Can you correct for barrel distortion? --JRff (talk) 12:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Distortion of -2 was applied for focal length of 24mm. Vertical perspective also has been corrected with the vertical lines near the door as reference. ~~The outer walls of this church are not perpendicular to the ground. See here.~~ --Jovian Eye _storm 12:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment The page you linked to talks about pincushion distortion at 24 mm, but I see barrel distortion. So the correction was probably too strong? And the other photograph on that web site has probably uncorrected perspective. So I cannot actually see how the building looks like in reality. I can only say that statics would be difficult for the architect if the top were really that slanted ... I will stay neutral. --JRff (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment After doing some web searching about the architecture and design I was unable to find any thing about the tilt. I guess, I was wrong about that. I have uploaded a corrected version. --Jovian Eye _storm 02:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Support The corrected version is very good. --JRff (talk) 18:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 21:24, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:West coast Ellenbogen, Sylt, Germany.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 15:05:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great perspective and color. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is it tilted? --Dodo (talk) 07:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really nice but, the image looks and is tilted. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The water is not tilted. -- -donald- (talk) 07:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. --Vassil (talk) 15:45, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tracy Caldwell Dyson in Cupola ISS.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2011 at 23:24:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tracy Caldwell Dyson - uploaded by Colds7ream - nominated by Ras67 (talk) 23:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ras67 (talk) 23:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, I wish I could take a picture like this. --Lošmi (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 05:33, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've got the whole world, in my hands... Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 20:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support— M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support many people would like to be in your place on this pic, Tracy. Thanks for this --Tyrael 28 (talk) 15:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Normaly I look for naturepics but I saw this one and think: What for a fantastic composition--H. Krisp (talk) 15:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration

File:Hallig Hooge, Ockenswarft.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 13:19:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Sternidae - uploaded by Sternidae - nominated by Sternidae -- 91.40.68.147 13:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 91.40.68.147 13:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Please log in to vote. Yann (talk) 15:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 04:58, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krma-winter.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Oct 2011 at 20:16:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Krma-winter.jpg

Info created by User:Matijap - uploaded by User:Matijap - nominated by User:Smihael -- Miha (talk) 20:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miha (talk) 20:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support But needs some chromatic aberration removal especially on the left side but maybe also on the right. --Ximonic (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support — M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 11:54, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:LaDefense pl.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2011 at 06:42:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Matism - uploaded by Matism - nominated by Claus
Support -- Claus (talk) 06:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A vertical resolution of 1500 pixels for a 180° panorama over a city is too low as you can't make out any practical details. As well as the river is cropped out due to the limited vertical field of view demands an oppose from my side. _→AzaToth 11:59, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm ok with the level of detail for a panorama, but I am not fully convinced of the bottom crop. I would have liked to see the continuity of the river. --ELEKHH^T 14:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support gute Arbeit --Böhringer (talk) 21:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know it is a "panorama", but it does not show how it is. The curve of the Seine river is exactly the contrary in real.--Jebulon (talk) 09:00, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe this needn't be this wide. Noticeable CA, some stitching errors right in the middle, and overall little wow (but I'm biased here since I've seen this hundreds times). - Benh (talk) 11:23, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Agree with Benh regarding the stitching errors and the noticeable CA. + some perspective distortions. --Jebulon (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support— M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bunnyfrosch (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BMCFalcon.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Oct 2011 at 07:12:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

BMC Falcon in old livery in Front of Mellieha Bay, Malta.

Info created by Mieguy - uploaded by Mieguy - nominated by Mieguy -- Mieguy (talk) 07:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mieguy (talk) 07:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely not one of Commons' finest pictures, quality-wise, and I don't see a mitigating factor such as historical or educationnal interest.--MAURILBERT (discuter) 05:08, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as above. Quality is not exactly the best. I can't recognize the main subject of the picture at first glance. I see vignetting and uninteresting lighting/colors here too, sorry. Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I do like the composition, it's just really unsharp. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:12, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edersee, Ufer, 2011-08 CN-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2011 at 12:12:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. Panorama over the bank and the lake Edersee (Hesse). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Female Giraffe Mikumi National Park.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2011 at 08:45:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there's something wrong in the upper left corner (see annotation). --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Uploaded edit. Thanks --Muhammad (talk) 10:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose many errors on the background --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Archaeodontosaurus... also on the neck and the belly of the animal. --Cayambe (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)--Cayambe (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others - sorry, but the background isn't the best quality --Trachemys (talk) 14:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Will fix and re-nominate --Muhammad (talk) 19:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sorghum field in Mexico.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2011 at 11:51:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 11:51, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Me = puzzled. I take for granted that the DOF and vignetting are intentionnal and part of the artistic interest of this picture, yet... I'm not convinced. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 12:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Vigneting is disturbing, noisy (why ISO400?) and DOF. -- -donald- (talk) 13:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colors and motif, but the darkish edges and the relative blurriness unfortunately makes this non-awesome. Still, a good image! Calandrella (talk) 13:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cotton candy seller.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2011 at 13:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Typically alla Tomascatelazo, and therefore nice. But technically very noisy, + strong chromatic aberration, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dear Jebulon, thanks for the compliment! However... Noise? Yes, so? Where is it written that noise is bad? Noise can be the result of processing done to correct a photograph due to a number of conditions. Those conditions can be unavoidable external factors and the possibilities presented can be reduced to picture or no picture. Well, most of the time I choose picture. An image is better than no image. In photography one has to take the attitude of making the best of a bad situation, and have the technical expertise of making the bad look not so bad... What matters at the end is the image, the content with an adequate amount of quality, of visual and content value, and you cannot pass absolute judgement on issues that are not necessarily trascendental. Like the old saying goes, you cannot judge a book by its cover... for good or bad. In the good old days, film companies strived to make grainless film, and we photographers sometimes processed film to counteract grainless looks, at will. Good photography, while it demands good technical values, depends more on qualitative values, and brings the technical aspects into line to support its content and aesthetical values, and not the other way around. One designs the cart according to the horse one has... CA? me no see it... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 11:17, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 14:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Personally I don't like the composition and the colors... --Llorenzi (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am very ok with this oppose. The image does not appeal to you and that is just that. Thank you! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support— M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 12:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversatured, more overexposed areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Would you care to sustantiate your evaluation? One thing is to say that you don´t like the colors, another is to say that there is a wrong rendition of colors. While one is a response to personal aethetic preferences, the other is not. On your personal preferences there is nothing to say, but when you make a cuantitative evaluation, like oversaturated and overexposed, then surely you must have said so based on numerical values. So is the oppose vote based on objective and measurable criteria or based on personal preference? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:02, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danaus Plexippus Monarch Butterfly.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 07:07:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created uploaded and nominated by Paolostefano1412 (talk) 07:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 07:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Atardecer en Salobreña (Granada) por parpadeo 4.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 22:07:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Parpadeo - uploaded by parpadeo - nominated by parpadeo -- Parpadeo (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Parpadeo (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh, a sunset. I'm speechless. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 01:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted. -- -donald- (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: poor image quality, nothing special justifying FP status -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:Cape Vulture-001.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 11:40:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NJR ZA - uploaded by NJR ZA - nominated by NJR ZA -- NJR_ZA (talk) 11:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jovian Eye _storm 02:15, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 00:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:00, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tyrael 28 (talk) 15:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice --Trachemys (talk) 14:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but the actual vulture is only approx 1M pixel image. Colin (talk) 18:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Leaping Lechwe.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 03:42:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Steve Jurvetson - uploaded and nominated by me -- Quan (talk) 03:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quan (talk) 03:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:50, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:34, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2011-10-02 Schloss Blankenhain.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Oct 2011 at 17:29:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Je-str - uploaded by Je-str - nominated by Je-str -- Je-str (talk) 17:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Je-str (talk) 17:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much lossy compression _→AzaToth 19:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, same opinion as AzaToth on compression. - Tourbillon 14:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opatovice nad Labem kruhový objezd from air K2 -1.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 21:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created , uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 21:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 21:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very nice view but sadly lacking sharpness --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: unsharp images are seldom viable for FP status _→AzaToth 14:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Weil am Rhein - Schlaichturm13.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2011 at 07:20:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 07:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Problems: stitching errors (see notes)--Miguel Bugallo 12:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: severe stitching errors

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Heizkraftwerk Pforzheim 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2011 at 18:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by me -- Felix König ✉ 18:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 18:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, unattractive composition, IMO not an FP. ■ MMXX ^talk 15:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing special → valid argument? Unattractive composition → Why do you think so? What should be made better? -- Felix König ✉ 16:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is not FP. Lots of pavement and a tree in the middle disrupting the continuity of the subject. Ambiguous centre of composition. --ELEKHH^T 10:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kim Herold @ YBF.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2011 at 13:17:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 13:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 13:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For me the guy is in good quality, but the composition is just so random. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What is special in this picture?--Llorenzi (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kuvaaja ja YBF panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2011 at 13:14:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 13:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support —kallerna™ 13:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:MPK1-426 Sykes Picot Agreement Map signed 8 May 1916.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 17:25:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Not only is this map visually interesting as it is signed by Sykes and Picot a few days before the Sykes-Picot Agreement was ratified, but the map's historical implications are discussed more in the disertation "Cartographic constructions of the Middle East" By Karen Culcasi (see page 104).

Created by Royal Geographical Society - uploaded by Gavin Collins - nominated by Gavin Collins --Gavin Collins (talk) 21:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

im sorry to interrupt but, i would like to be sure. did you prepare this map by yourself? or did you take picture of an original map?--Gomada (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I took the liberty and corrected the "created" field. --ELEKHH^T 21:38, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ++. Very high historical value. Very useful. One of the basis or sources of the topical middle east problems. Should be known by everybody who try to understand what happens here (even now). Good technical quality. Thanks for uploading.--Jebulon (talk) 14:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Indeed high educational value: blue is mine, red is yours, when in power all you need is a basemap and a pencil ;). I added to the description, maybe a French version would be nice as well. Also I think the image could do with a crop on the left. --ELEKHH^T 21:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If anyone knows an editor with Arabic, French, Kurdish or Turkish language skills who can add descriptions, I would be most grateful if you could ask them to do so. --Gavin Collins (talk) 21:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Im Kurdish, i can help about description in kurdish. Btw, i asked question above, because mountains and rivers (in kurdistan) have written with arabic or turkish translation (dagh, jebel etc).--Gomada (talk) 21:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - I've corrected the french version. Sounds more "french" now. I'll manage to do the same for the french related article in WP, which is not very good...--Jebulon (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - because it's like I'm looking at the map in person. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tonchino 16:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC) Voting already closed. --ELEKHH^T 20:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 09:35, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfeniques of day of the dead.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 16:34:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slick (talk) 13:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tomascastelazo for ever !! I like this one very much, but the hen at right is disturbing the compo IMO, and needs therefore to be cropped out.--Jebulon (talk) 16:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lol @ Jebulon! Thanks Jebulon, but look at it this way... if it interferes with the image, whoever uses it can crop it out... for some it may be a useful element... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support No cropping needed for me, great picture --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 18:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support good and funny --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok, ok... Let's bear the hen...--Jebulon (talk) 21:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 15:21, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and significant as it is. --Myrabella (talk) 17:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image has been nominated for deletion with what I consider Uncommon Sense. Besides whatever fun, aesthetic or photographic value this image may have or not, it has a legitimate, encyclopaedic and informative value about a country´s cultural traditions. The nominator alleges copyright violation, which cannot possibly be, starting with the fact that these figures are so generic, and are an expression of a particular celebration. Please voice your opinion at the deletion request page at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Alfeniques_of_day_of_the_dead.jpg --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:39, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 12:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:An-124 RA-82028 in formation with Su-27 09-May-2010.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2011 at 17:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Bushman787 - uploaded by Bushman787 - nominated by Bushman787 -- Bushman787 (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bushman787 (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have introduced Sergey (Bushman787) to Commons and have assisted him through our processes. I can't find fault with this photo, it is magnificent. russavia (talk) 18:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, very good to me; but, with exactly 3000x2000 pixels, it seems downsampled--Miguel Bugallo 20:07, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

... or cropped. Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Karelj (talk) 22:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 07:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:28, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 23:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 18:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 01:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:10, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Edersee, Staumauer, 2011-08 CN-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 20:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Carschten. The Edersee Dam at the lake Edersee near Waldeck (Hesse) with the Waldeck Castle in the background. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent work. -- MJJR (talk) 21:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 23:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done--Dr.Haus (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good job, but there's a couple minor stitching errors that could be easily fixed. The left side is a bit disturbing and unbalances composition too, imo. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you! I tried to fix the stitching errors. Better now? I cannot see the note "My suggestion for a possible crop", but I don't crop at left side because the guardrail is an important part in my composition. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, that's good. Even though I'm not sure about the importance of the guardrail and the top left tree, but I think this is featurable now. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 15:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 07:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 12:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support 99of9 (talk) 10:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot. No need for a crop in my opinion. --High Contrast (talk) 10:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Knight-in-Shining-Armour.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 16:52:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Knight in a re-enactment of the Battle of Tewkesbury.

Info created & uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:52, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think the crop works. The Knight is too low down in frame and the eye is drawn to and above the helmet top. The only reason I can see for setting the Knight so low is so to not crop the poles in the background. If one crops off the top to form a square, the picture is improved IMO. The little white ribbon on his chest is a wee bit girly for a knight, perhaps. Colin (talk) 19:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:17, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The square crop should work too. The ribbon belongs to his lady, I guess. --Vassil (talk) 11:31, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop is ok for me, and this is a high detailed picture --Cesco77 (talk) 19:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slick (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 16:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support If was cropped differently someone would probably complain about cut off background objects. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, leave it like it is --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 18:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 12:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 15:18, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Panorama of United States Supreme Court Building at Dusk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2011 at 14:18:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 14:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tyrael 28 (talk) 14:35, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I was there and it looks really so. But the wooden gate is too soft IMO (no details), it seems that some denoising was a bit overdone...--Jebulon (talk) 23:49, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- This must have been hard to stitch with all the lines making any errors obvious. Unfortunately, there are two. Look at the front steps at the central line between the blocks of stone. There's a vertical jump just to the left of this line. If you look at the line to the right of this, there is a vertical jump to the right of that line. The trees on the LHS are indistinct -- was that a combination of long exposure and wind or too much noise removal as commented above? It's also not very high res for a panorama. Shame you couldn't get someone to turn on all the lights in the windows :-) -- Colin (talk) 18:37, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:There Are No Illegal Children!.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 11:00:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by & uploaded by Roi Boshi - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What is special in this picture?--Llorenzi (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- A good presentation of a demonstration. Tomer T (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically a bit unsharp in places. It's difficult to crop a crowd well, but I don't think this has really nailed it - both sides are a little unfortunate. I really like the central figure and the bike - good pose. Unfortunately not many of the people have "demonstrating" expressions. --99of9 (talk) 09:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:11, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Şahlûr-33.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 11:12:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A lovely family of european bee-eaters, (in northern Kurdistan)

Info created by Dûrzan cîrano - uploaded by Dûrzan cîrano - nominated by Gomada 11:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gomada 11:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice --Cesco77 (talk) 11:41, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 13:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment dust spot --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. ■ MMXX ^talk 23:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Zor spas bra ;) -- Gomada 22:45, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 23:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 18:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 18:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wow. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, rare and cute, but some technical flaws prevent me for a support vote (artefacts in a noisy background, some visible CA on the nest, nothing really in focus, some overexposed parts...)--Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dabit100 (talk) 23:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:12, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Maryana Pinchuk 007 - Wikimedia Foundation Oct11.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2011 at 00:07:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Guillaume Paumier - nominated by Mmxx -- ■ MMXX ^talk 00:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info Maryana Pinchuk
Support -- ■ MMXX ^talk 00:07, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Glasses look lopsided making the photograph look slightly distorted. I think that the photographer should have noticed this and selected another photo, or if one is not available perhaps another image can be created. Otherwise fine. Narrow depth of focus noted, which some might say is artistic and others might say that an opportunity was missed to show part of the Wikimedia offices (indoors or outdoors) in the background. Snowmanradio (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The photographer isn't the one who chose the picture; the subject is. Regarding the "missed opportunity" to show the Wikimedia office, it was simply not the subject of the picture. I have plenty of other photos of the office. guillom 12:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As the photographer, I want to thank Mmxx for nominating this picture, but I don't think it is Featured Picture material. Nothing to do with the subject, obviously, but there are many pictures (for example from my latest trip) that would probably be better candidates. guillom 12:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I believe it is a nice and feature-able portrait and it would be a good addition to our people category. (@Snowmanradio) a portrait should not, and doesn't need to have a large DOF to show all the stuff in the background. ■ MMXX ^talk 15:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the background is artistic; nevertheless, I think that a serious portrait should have a person's glasses on straight, and not accidentally lopsided. Snowmanradio (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose dislike it as a featured picture, can't explain... --Slick (talk) 06:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Nothing exceptional in this portrait imo. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe a Quality Image, not sure. Nothing special for FP IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wasp eating grape.ogv, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 07:30:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Francesco Canu - uploaded by Francesco Canu - nominated by Francesco Canu -- Cesco77 (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cesco77 (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Educational, but only somewhat interesting for me. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:05, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buteo jamaicensis (J. F. Gmelin, 1788).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 00:15:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info schade, den hätte ich gerne mit den Füssen gesehen. Ansonsten sehr schön --Böhringer (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- A shame that the whole aninal isn't shown. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sulzfluh Panorama 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 10:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info 360° Panorama. The Sulzfluh is a mountain in the Rätikon mountain range (in the Alps), located on the border between Austria and Switzerland. c/u/n by -- Böhringer (talk) 10:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 10:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it is a bit too cloudy for a panorama. I can't... see the panorama! -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Ugly rocky mass occupying a large part of the image. Not a beautiful picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- I find the colours somewhat monotonous and unimpressive. Furthermore there are already several Alpine panoramic images with generally the same content. - Tourbillon 09:56, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Böhringer (talk) 21:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /kaʁstn Disk/Cat 21:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Hartebeest (Alcelaphus caama) (2).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2011 at 10:32:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Frames-of-Mind - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- Bruce1ee^talk 10:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bruce1ee^talk 10:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Even though it looks too ~~noisy~~ de-noised, composition and color make a really pleasant view. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 12:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Excellent. -- Scottthezombie (talk) 17:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quan (talk) 09:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bunnyfrosch (talk) 13:52, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Hartebeest's are not red enough! --99of9 (talk) 04:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor light, quality and colors --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Carschten. Are those animals so "verticaly strait" in real ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as Carschten --Dabit100 (talk) 00:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I want to support, but I'm skeptical of the sepia tone. Why do it? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Atardecer en Salobreña (Granada) por parpadeo 4.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 22:07:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Parpadeo - uploaded by parpadeo - nominated by parpadeo -- Parpadeo (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Parpadeo (talk) 22:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh, a sunset. I'm speechless. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 01:59, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted. -- -donald- (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: poor image quality, nothing special justifying FP status -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Timanfaya- Lanzarote- Illas Canarias- Spain-T08.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2011 at 00:19:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 00:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo 00:19, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good realisation.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree.--Jebulon (talk) 23:32, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 04:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Timanfaya- Lanzarote- Illas Canarias- Spain-T20.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2011 at 23:10:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Lmbuga - uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Lmbuga -- Miguel Bugallo 23:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Miguel Bugallo 23:10, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question I have a doubt: Should I remove the noise of the image? (5,523 × 3,096 pixels)--Miguel Bugallo 23:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer the original version, because it kept the differences of textures and more details. --Vassil (talk) 11:44, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment what happens to the bus?? (see annotation) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:22, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New version. I don't know what happens with the bus, but new version because I think that you're right: Less CAs (there was CAs on the bus) and less edged and pixelating of bus --Miguel Bugallo 20:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice colors.--Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 18:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 19:54, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bom trabalho, Luís! If it weren't for the bus I would think this was taken on Mars... Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:27, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Request Great image. Please geocode. You can count this as a support once that is done :). --99of9 (talk) 09:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geocode added. I am almost sure, but not to the 100%. It can be approximated--Miguel Bugallo 12:27, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Second version[edit]

Info Second version (denoised)--Miguel Bugallo 23:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 23:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment overdone denoising with too much lost details IMHO. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:22, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question I want to withdrawn this second version, can I do it? How?--Miguel Bugallo 20:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By reading the text :-) or by adding {{withdraw|~~~~}}.-- -donald- (talk) 09:55, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Timanfaya- Lanzarote- Illas Canarias- Spain-T20.jpg

File:San carlos byn.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 19:08:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Really not sharp. Black and white for no good reason. No geolocation. Is "San carlos byn" the name of the mountain? -- Colin (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tomascastelazo (talk) 05:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:20101231 Yazd Iran Panorama (from Amir Chakmak Mosque).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2011 at 18:32:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ggia (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Poor lighting, unfortunate cropped foreground. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment no comment to your comments. Ggia (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the crop and the lighting, I don't like the red thing at the bottom, which is too prominent. I would be happy to support it, if someone were to desaturate those red parts. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 12:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info it is obvious that this image demostrate the skyline of that city.. and if you zoom you can find many encyclopedic things inside like Windcatchers, mud-brick traditional architecture. About the red thing.. I can desaturate this part, generally speaking I don't manipulate colors. The time of this image is sunset.. This image
is also shot from the same place - same time (inverse direction). Thanks for your comment. Ggia (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Because of the unfortunate crop in foreground mentioned by Alvesgaspar, very visible and distracting to me.--Jebulon (talk) 23:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Let me explain my previous assessment better despite the not-so-friendly reaction fromthe nominator. What I don't like about the light is the lack of it, not the quality, affecting contrast and detail. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:06, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bottom crop. --99of9 (talk) 11:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camponotus sp Tanaemyrmex.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2011 at 02:50:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Infoc/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Muhammad (talk) 02:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shallow DOF, legs are out of focus. ■ MMXX ^talk 15:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too many blurred areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Why am I supporting: I know the whole subject should be as focused as possible. But this picture is very educative, in my opinion. It also is pleasant to look at, quality is very high, and it has no major flaws besides the blurred areas. I was amazed by the detail in the eyes of the creature, and in general, the important parts of the body are pretty well focused. The picture of a lady in space was just featured, which in my opinion had relatively low quality, lighting, and detail. Sometimes rules can be broken, not to mention that, a picture of an ant, with such quality, with such a zoom, is impossible to take with no blurred areas, no matter what 'f' value you pick. Subject is just too close. -- Paolostefano1412 (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Macro shot, very good quality, blurred areas are normal in this case. --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 04:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine Macro shot and nice colors.--Vassil (talk) 12:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunětická Hora from air M1 -3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Oct 2011 at 20:53:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Btw, you dont have short description for picture ;) Gomada (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It's a nice image and I guess it wasn't easy to take it, but I don't really like the crop. ■ MMXX ^talk 15:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good overview, but the right tilt is disturbing. --ELEKHH^T 10:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Older mushrooms .jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2011 at 12:03:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by calliope - uploaded by ahura - nominated by ahura -- AHURA♠ 12:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 12:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Too tight crop, unbalanced composition, unidentified species. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- There's also disturbing objects all over the picture. A real pity since the image is really pleasant. Anyway, I think the most important detail is the tight crop. Don't you have another version? Paolostefano1412 (talk) 19:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama of Arlington National Cemetery - Section 54.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 11:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Comment This image seems tilted but it is not. The cemetery is located in a hilly area. --Jovian Eye _storm 11:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 11:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment we've such cemeteries here in Germany, too - interesting photo motives :-) But the lighting on your pic is very bad. A great many of the gravestones are blown out and lost completely details, and at some parts crossings between the stones are missing (see annotations for some parts that should illustrate it). So imho not featured. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:23, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Let me see if I can fix it from the RAW today evening. --Jovian Eye _storm 14:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm sure that won't be easy, so good luck! --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:58, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done First of all, I checked the camera for highlights and there are none (Nothing blinks!). It is just that some of gravestones are facing the sun. Even if the sun were at zenith I guess some gravestones would still be white. --Jovian Eye _storm 01:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 09:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'm a freak of symmetry and minimalism. But this composotion is too booring, sorry. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support All the detail I needed was there. Nice symmetry, I don't think it's boring. --99of9 (talk) 10:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Boring, but perfect. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even if it's not really tilted it looks like it is, which ruins the composition to me. --Lošmi (talk) 22:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't seem very fair. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 17:35, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm sorry if I'm not fair. But the composition which tends to look symmetrical, and appears not to be doesn't convince me. If I choose this angle, I'd rather cut the image in the way that graveyards make a horizontal line parallel with frame. My opinion, only. --Lošmi (talk) 01:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - You're right, it is "tilted", thouggh that could be from a natural elevation. note. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 10:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeNot only Lošmi's opinion I'm afraid. My opinion too.--Jebulon (talk) 14:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm afraid I agree with Lošmi and Jebulon: the horizon is not level and it throws the composition off for me enough that I have to vote in opposition. Also, although the 2nd version is better than the original upload, it could use a bit more to bring out the detail in the gravestones more. Nice effort, Joe. Earthsound (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina 3.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2011 at 21:46:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Große Ochsenauge, Maniola jurtina c/u/n -- Böhringer (talk) 21:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Sorry Böhringer, but not at the level of most our butterfly FP (even not mentioning Richard's ones. The problem is the lack of detail and sharpness. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Böhringer (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pilgrams - alte Wappen.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 15:00:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't mind the type of photos, but it's softer than I know you're capable of. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:38, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Firing Squad in Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 16:22:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by en:Jahangir Razmi - uploaded by Monfie - nominated by Monfie -- Monfie (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info The winner of Pulitzer Prize for Spot News Photography. 1980.[3]. This is the best available quality. Higher resolution may never be published.
Support -- Monfie (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info This image has only 600 × 380 pixels. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose to low dimensions, its just a good political picture - not a featured --Slick (talk) 05:56, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- But would it be possible to have a higher res? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 07:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This photograph is copyrighted and I've marked it for speedy deletion. Contrary to the reasoning given on the file's page, the photographer (and copyright holder) is still alive. Earthsound (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have denied the speedy deletion, as photographic works enter PD in Iran 30 years after publication. russavia (talk) 21:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vote changed to Support. Good catch, I forgot about that exception within Iran's law. I've also uploaded a larger version (640x430) without a border. Earthsound (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can anybody remove the border? Thanks in advance. --Dodo (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It has been already done by Earthsound. Please refresh your browser page.--Monfie (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing image, it is a pity that is in low resolution.. if we can make an exception to the image resolution I think that this image can be a good FP. Ggia (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Whilst looking at the lower resolution of the image here, it is featured quality, in that it is educational, it is a historic award winning photo. I am ignoring all rules here, and supporting thie for FP 100% russavia (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning photo, a pity though that the resolution is small. "Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken." --Jovian Eye _storm 17:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Imehling (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. Per Russavia. --Nikopol (talk) 11:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Gas mask MUA IMGP0157.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2011 at 09:07:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Nikodem Nijaki - nominated by Yarl -- Yarl ✉ 09:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yarl ✉ 09:07, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality & clean and clear. --99of9 (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 19:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --NJR_ZA (talk) 04:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 08:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well done. Looks Creepy. --Nikopol (talk) 10:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, quality image. I'd rather see a more frontal perspective, but that's a minor wish, not anything to keep me from supporting this. Earthsound (talk) 16:50, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Job well done! --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 08:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:28, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Hängebrücke am Berliner Höhenweg Nr 526, Zillertaler Alpen 2.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2011 at 21:57:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Suspension bridge at Berlin High Trail No. 526, Zillertal Alps. c/u/n by Böhringer (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 04:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vaishak Kallore | വൈശാഖ്‌ കല്ലൂര്‍ (talk) 05:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Myrabella (talk) 12:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 13:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the hight accurate, or is it merely an optical illusion due to cropping? _→AzaToth 16:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here the choice of the location of the bridge and the zoom key to the photographer. 2 feet below the bridge flows a steep mountain river in the valley. Another image from a different perspective, I invite to this vote on the Commons. Sorry for my english. :-( --Böhringer (talk) 21:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are forgiven for your English :) I were able to understand some of it at least. _→AzaToth 21:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ -- What is special about this picture: the sight, the people or the people in the sight (e.g. for scale)? The sightseing is superb, yes, but the people add nothing relevant to it because they are common people. Maybe if it were a clown, or a classic dancer or an equilibrist?... Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:30, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it's the way it makes you ask yourself "holy crap! where was the photographer standing?!" -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 08:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Neutral Yes, I was too extreme with my vote, considering the gorgeous sight. But the reason for not supporting remains... Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit different, very good. --99of9 (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 12:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 12:39, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning! —kallerna™ 13:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 19:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hallo Böhringer! Wo haben Sie bei der Aufnahme "gestanden"?Je-str (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two feet below the bridge, middle in the water --Böhringer (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Onno Zweers (talk) 11:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 16:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nikopol (talk) 10:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --alex.vonbun (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Oehoe2008.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 17:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dirk Van Esbroeck - uploaded by Dirk Van Esbroeck - nominated by Dirk Van Esbroeck -- Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment disturbing background to almost un trimmed, otherwise perfect --Böhringer (talk) 20:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 18:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Let the poor thing breathe! Also, too obvious noise on darker parts and background. Otherwise a very nice picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No! It's dying! D'= lol -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 01:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even well blurred, the background is clearly unnatural, which I think we can avoid for birds. --99of9 (talk) 10:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:R136 HST 2009-12-15.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 03:59:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by KFP - nominated by Tnt1984 -- Tnt1984 (talk) 03:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture look good. Big, clear and many color.-- Tnt1984 (talk) 03:59, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support for now -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 07:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- We have more than 20 FP of the sky, most ot them beautiful. Should we go on promoting the hundreds still waiting in the NASA and similar archives? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Alvesgaspar. I think the POTY 2010 is a shame, by the way...--Jebulon (talk) 23:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I consider them as they come, and this is certainly feature-worthy. We're in no danger of outnumbering insects with galaxies. --99of9 (talk) 10:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A really nice star cluster with a nebula! Good presentation. --Ximonic (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really agree with Ximonic. Jacopo Werther (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Earthsound (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Sunset silhouette of flying fortress, Langley Field, VA 1a35090u 1a35090u edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 06:25:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Alfred T. Palmer, restored, uploaded and nominated PETER WEIS TALK 06:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 16:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome due to immense size, good quality and sheer age (taken in 1942 it seems). Valuable as a good historical photo in itself. Freedom to share (talk) 21:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. (Though a bit unsharp, but with this size, who cares?) Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 11:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Large size is probably the effect of representing in 72 dpi an image scanned with a much larger definition. Nothing special, in my opinion, as most part of the picture is sky and the crop bellow is too tight. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Large size" was realised via the scanner (most likely the P-45 camera which is used for other Loc images). The original TIFF comes along with 9154x7458 px and 195,34mb of filesize. I'm not sure what you mean by "representing in 72 dpi". The LoC TIFF comes along with 1800 dpi - that's the amount of dots per inch I used for the jpg as well. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 15:22, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great example of Mr Palmer's work. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 01:49, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the general composition is not interesting.. I don't know if this image has high historical significance.. looking to Alfred T. Palmer's images.. this one looks very nice [4] and probably restoration-retouching in the shadows will enhance the image. Ggia (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 02:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkish Stars 2434.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Oct 2011 at 22:57:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 22:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 22:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 18:08, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Good composition and quality given the circumstances. Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo 12:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Alvesgaspar. Earthsound (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Tadorna ferruginea (Pallas 1764).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Oct 2011 at 18:20:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support great colors --Böhringer (talk) 20:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 18:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Not the best angle to capture the animal. The colors of the background aren't the best for this subject either. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vaishak Kallore | വൈശാഖ്‌ കല്ലൂര്‍ (talk) 05:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:13, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose same as Alvesgaspar --Dabit100 (talk) 00:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves, and perhaps a lower angle would be a better viewpoint? --99of9 (talk) 10:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves, but nice image--Miguel Bugallo 12:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves--Citron (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves.--Trachemys (talk) 10:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:17, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eglise Saint Eustache.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2011 at 22:47:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by jmhullot (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Not the best shooting position. Uninteresting foreground with harsh shadows. Too obvious geometric distortion of subject. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais du Luxembourg 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2011 at 22:47:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by jmhullot (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Uninteresting composition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I was there. The picture shows the flowers, and that's important. But I'm afraid that this is not the best angle for an encyclopedic shot of the Palais, with poor symmetry (not always necessary though), and objects in the way. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

File:Palais du Luxembourg 1.jpg

Info -- Sorry, this is not a valid alternative (according to the rules) and only two active nominations are allowed per user. Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indian Peacock.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 15:06:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by wwarby - uploaded by Trachemys - nominated by Bruce1ee -- Bruce1ee^talk 15:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bruce1ee^talk 15:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Not the best shooting position and exposure choice (too shallow dof), affecting the most interesting component: the feathers. Please take a look at our FP of the same subject ([5], especially this one. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Oppose, Per Alvesgaspar ! --Jebulon (talk) 15:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. Thanks for the feedback. Bruce1ee^talk 04:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:20111002 Kaggeles beach Rodhope West Thrace Greece Panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2011 at 18:36:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ggia - uploaded by ggia - nominated by ggia -- Ggia (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ggia (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info the color-cast (on the rocks and the beach) is due to the sunset. No manipulation of the colors (saturation) has been applied. Ggia (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice colors -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- I believe the coloring is not manipulated because the author said so. But did it really looked like this to our eyes when the shot was done? We all know how the white balance of our cameras can, and are, frequently fooled by anormal lighting. Yes, it is beautiful and I would prompltly support the nomination if this were an artsy contest. But it is not. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info if you assume bad faith I can give publish one of the NEF files (raw data) that this panorama is made off. Ggia (talk) 00:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Language is indeed tricky (and human brain even more). The first thing I said was precisely that I believed in the author's words! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not an arty contest. It has some encyclopedic information this image. Since you don't like it, why don't you oppose? If an image has poor lighting you don't like.. if it has a good lighting (like this one).. you don't like it because it is "arty". This image is not an minimal-abstract image for an arty contest. And as you know I never upload images without EV. I suggest to oppose this image and finish this discussion here. Ggia (talk) 13:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same beach different time of the year - lighting (April).
Another view of the rocks (April).

One NEF file (raw data from camera) the images that this panorama is made of is here - as you can see the colors are due to the lighting conditions (sunset - autumn colors etc). Ggia (talk) 14:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For three times in a row my assessments to Ggia nominations were commented using expressions and arguments that I consider displaced, inelegant or both. In the nomination below, the review was ignored in a way that can only be classified as bad manners; above, it was suggested that I have acted in bad faith even though I was careful enough to show that was not the case; and in the previous comment, I am suggested to finish the discussion because I’m not consistent in my reviews. In all these unfortunate comments nowhere the technical arguments and suggestions (for example, the one about the camera’s limitations) are addressed directly. Not a pleasant welcome for someone who has been way for some time... I’m always direct in my assessments, sometimes harsh, but I base them in a careful analysis of the images and never, ever, make comments about their nominators. Unfortunately the opposite is not always true. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:38, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lighting and colours look beautiful and reasonable to me. --99of9 (talk) 11:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 12:13, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As beautiful as the left 1/3 of the image is, the rest of it is not. Perhaps a panoramic view from offshore would've been more engaging to the eye as a whole. I love the richness of color on the cliffs, but too much of the photo is uninteresting. As for the value of this image, I'm wondering what it is. A circumspect opposition. Earthsound (talk) 18:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oxfam East Africa - Alice’s Shop.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2011 at 14:17:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Oxfam East Africa - uploaded by Flickr - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 14:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Slick (talk) 14:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh flash and shadows. --ELEKHH^T 14:54, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Unnatural expression, unfortunate backgroung -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 09:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oxfam Horn of Africa famine refugee.jpg

File:Willa „Oksza”, Zakopane, A-68 M 02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2011 at 18:00:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Piotrekwas - uploaded by Piotrekwas - nominated by Yarl -- Yarl ✉ 18:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yarl ✉ 18:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose while the photo looks nice, I dislike the reduced resolution to 1800x1200 _→AzaToth 18:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support // tsca (talk) 19:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OpposePlease consider providing a full resolution version. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 20:38, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- woods is showing great. ■ Milad_Mosapoor ^talk 3:11, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Neutral I like the photo. I dislike the reduced resolution. --Slick (talk) 06:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice. -- -donald- (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As above. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:48, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, tending to oppose, per Slick.--Jebulon (talk) 23:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, tending to neutral, per Slick. It's a stationary subject, so good res can easily be achieved. --99of9 (talk) 10:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would like a high resolution image + I don't like the foreground shadow. Ggia (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:11, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 07:58, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Into the Jaws of Death 23-0455M edit.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2011 at 20:35:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Robert F. Sargent, restored, uploaded and nominated by PETER WEIS TALK 20:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You are about to embark upon the Great Crusade. ... The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and progress of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you. -Eisenhower's message on the eve of D-day.

And yes, I am aware of the cookeyed horizon, which I won't "correct" due to my restorational intention.

Question - Didn't we recently promote an image like this? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}})
Oppose -- Among the many available documentary photos of the event this one isn't among the best, for sure. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ggia (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info this version already featured. Incorrect nomination -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:39, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this version has better quality. is it a good idea to nominate for delisting the previous version and replace the feature image with this one? Ggia (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment how is this nomination "incorrect"? the image you linked to has a wrong licence template, a insufficient description and is poor from a technical pov (posterisation, heavy artefacts). regards, PETER WEIS TALK 18:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is far superior to the current version that is featured. I agree with Ggia, the current FP should be delisted and replaced with this one. Great job with the restoration, Peter. Earthsound (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Arguably smoke, but this one is so dark on top. What makes it better than the other? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 06:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes, it is darker on top, and judging by how poorly the top 50% of the current FP version was (mal)adjusted to try to compensate for the darker shore/clouds (very noticeable in the blown out water on the right-hand side and the blown out patches of sky), I would bet that's closer to how it looked that day. A partial list of reasons why, IMO, the current FP image is worse: crushed blacks and whites (resulting in loss of detail in both shadows and highlights) over most of the photo, too many JPEG compression artifacts, numerous scratches/dust/flaws, a dark exposure problem (vertical) on the left edge, & possibly too much sharpen used. Two areas the current FP image is better: slightly better contrast for the water closest to the photographer in the middle of the picture giving it better detail there, better contrast/detail at the back top corners of the LCVP (especially the one on the right). If you compare the two at full size, I think these differences really stand out. Earthsound (talk) 11:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for pointing that out Earthsound. The overall quality regarding sharpness, level of detail and contrast of this NARA sourced restoration is better than the current featured picture. The current featured picture was developed differently, resulting in lighter skies, and a darker foreground. @IdLoveOne Please be sure you see the heavy posterisation in the right bottom corner. An indicator for an insufficient workover of the current featured picture. However, if you are unable to identify this posterisation please try to access this image with a calibrated display. This is the major flaw of this featured picture, amonst other issues, mentioned above. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 18:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better than the current FP. --Ximonic (talk) 01:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cesco77 (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better version then the current FP. It should be replaced. --Lošmi (talk) 22:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Slick (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Onno Zweers (talk) 11:50, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 02:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Gloriosa superba 8962.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2011 at 05:51:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Vaikoovery - uploaded by Vaikoovery - nominated by Vaikoovery -- Vaishak Kallore | വൈശാഖ്‌ കല്ലൂര്‍ (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Vaishak Kallore | വൈശാഖ്‌ കല്ലൂര്‍ (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - നല്ല ചിത്രം! Rajesh Odayanchal (talk) 05:57, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superba is super --Schnobby (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Poor crop, insufficient image quality. Browsing our FP gallery of flowers is instructive. Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that the crop is bad, but am also disappointed at the quality. Nice colors though. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 06:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --AHURA♠ 12:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- In this case the lack of image quality (unsharpness, noise, framing) is so obvious that I wonder in what kind of criteria are the supporters basing their evaluations! Careless reviews, in my humble opinion. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The framing is fine. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strongly per Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose top crop is too tight. --ELEKHH^T 04:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the centered composition,with too tight crop at the top. --Vassil (talk) 12:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jingangjing.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2011 at 18:50:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Wang Jie - uploaded by Earthsound - nominated by Earthsound -- Earthsound (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Earthsound (talk) 18:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support unique item with high historic value. levels could be slightly adjusted. sadly the scan features colour fringings. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 21:51, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 08:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Jovian Eye _storm 02:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained glass in Nysa cathedral.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2011 at 16:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by unknown, photoed and uploaded by Pudelek (talk · contribs), nominated by One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 16:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- Supposing that the stained-glass window is round and essentially two-dimensional, why not correcting the geometric distortion? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Supposing it is corrected, then the hostie will really look like an egg !!--Jebulon (talk) 22:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The egg of Christ? (no offense meant, of course) Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 16:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows behind spoil it for me, especially the vertical band on the left. I also agree that it should be geometrically corrected. --99of9 (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Seeing as it's backlit I'm not so sure the shadows were avoidable. -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 19:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Alves and 99of9 above. --ELEKHH^T 11:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Per above. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm author but I can voting (?) --Pudelek (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye _storm 02:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Baby Bell pepper Capsicum annuum 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Oct 2011 at 19:49:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by W.Rebel - uploaded by W.Rebel - nominated by W.Rebel -- W.Rebel (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- W.Rebel (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 04:56, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 13:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Grainy on the front side. I think we need high standards for stationary subjects. --99of9 (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors and details for the most important part, well done. --Vassil (talk) 12:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 21:29, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 05:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Front side is noisy and the white... reflections, dots... whatever they are below the pepper are totally unnecessary. Both things could probably be fixed without much effort. --Kabelleger (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:10, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 08:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink

File:Dornach - Goetheanum - Südtrakt.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 09:48:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's some sort of pixelization visible on flowers, window frames, and chairs. --Lošmi (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There are jaggies on straight lines typical of crude resizing or rotation. Not all the walls/doors are vertical. But ultimately, it is just a room. Don't see anything special here. Colin (talk) 12:47, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lycoperdon-umbrinum-bräunlicher-stäubling.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 23:19:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 23:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 23:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, could be improved by focus stacking. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. Looks 3D. The surrounding vegetation and lighting make an appealing pic. Colin (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 00:09, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done --Llez (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Nelumbo July 2011-2a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 12:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Second try, with the leaf center hidden behind the bud. It is instructive to read the arguments of Greeks (not centered enough) and Trojans (boringly centered) in the first nom. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again. Boring centered composition and color balance is unnatural IMO. Oversaturated green. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Info -- Color balance is similiar to most other photos of the species available in Commons. I don't like to oversaturate colors and no manipulation was made in this case. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the centered composition and give more space around the specie. Ggia (talk) 14:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if you want an advice by a greek (because you mentioned Greeks and Trojans).. a square crop here works better for a compositions like that. even centered.. giving space to the specie. Ggia (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- "Centered" is not a synonym for bad, and it's dumb to say a centered composition is bad when obviously the point is to utilize centering creatively, and continuing this run-on sentence centering IS the best choice of composition in some cases. However, my criticism is that I think there's too much room atop the bud. I have to kind of consciously look down at the bud. Also, I question the naturalness of the photo: Why do we seem to be looking at a upward-standing lily pad? -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 01:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty picture, but it's so abstracted that I doubt its usefulness for Wikipedia. Or as it says in the guidelines: "beautiful does not always mean valuable." -- Onno Zweers (talk) 11:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramaria-flaccida-fichtenkoralle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 23:18:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 23:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 23:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Slick (talk) 05:54, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, could be improved by focus stacking. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:23, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AHURA♠ 16:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:SMP August 2009-1a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2011 at 11:41:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The entrance of the the bay of São Martinho do Porto (St Martin-of-the-port), view from north. West coast of Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor lighting (dark colors), unfortunate cropped foreground Ggia (talk) 13:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice place, but I agree with Ggia. Poor lighting -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:53, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tryon Palace Gardens Panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2011 at 02:21:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by iempleh - uploaded by iempleh - nominated by iempleh -- kip (talk) 02:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- kip (talk) 02:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very harsh lighting causing the sky to blow out and a lack of detail on foliage and branches. Lots of stitching errors. Arguably, the water feature would be a better central point. The visitors spoil the image too. Colin (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Colin. Earthsound (talk) 21:35, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weil am Rhein - Schlaichturm2.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2011 at 00:25:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Wladyslaw - nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jebulon (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the tree disturbs the composition. --Jovian Eye _storm 03:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination, as the author himself, with no explanation, does not agree (and therefore makes me a bit ridiculous, thanks. That's the nice spirit of "Commons" FPC, probably...) --Jebulon (talk) 22:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Front View of George Washington Masonic National Memorial.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2011 at 12:40:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 12:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support .´. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 15:50, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hey Albertus teolog, it is a picture of a masonic monument you are supporting ;) !! Lol ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, I was here in 1985! Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't see any flaws, detailed, smooth, there's EV, it is pretty nice too, and sky was perfect, unless you did some cloning in there. Maybe I would 've preferred some tighter cropping at the bottom but just a bit. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Nothing has been done to the sky. It was a very sunny day! --Jovian Eye _storm 00:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo 16:36, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stryn (talk) 16:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AHURA♠ 16:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Grapess.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2011 at 12:03:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by eflon - uploaded by ahura - nominated by ahura -- AHURA♠ 12:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- AHURA♠ 12:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:36, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful colors and cut --Böhringer (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The artsy component is subjective by nature. And I don't like the composition and the too dark tones. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 18:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 04:02, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing colors! Calandrella (talk) 16:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 22:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support kip (talk) 02:36, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Love the presentation of autumnal colors, seems to be pretty rare.[reply]
Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 09:50, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for use in an encyclopedia the name of the grape variety should be given. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Monfie (talk) 23:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very nice -- Basvb (talk) 21:27, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Szopienice wieża ciśnień huty cynku.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2011 at 12:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Andrzej Stempa - nominated by Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 12:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info These are buildings of an old tin foundry in Szopienice, a district of Katowice. Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 12:44, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Łukasz Wolf Golowanow (talk) 12:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yarl ✉ 20:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:32, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, it is a nice composition and has a fairy good quality. But it is not special enought for reaching what should be the present FP bar. Come on guys, overall quality of nominations has reaised a lot in the last couple of years and the same should have happened with our standards! In my opinion most of my early FP should't have a chance now! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support nie jest idealne (a jakie jest?), ale kompozycja i temat piękny :) --Pudelek (talk) 00:41, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support An interesting example of medieval revival architecture. Is it possible to get a description in English in the file description ? --Vassil (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The dark shadow in the bottom is disturbing the whole composition. Ggia (talk) 15:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tamba52 (talk) 09:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and atmosphere / lighting. --Nikopol (talk) 10:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ggia. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, love this one from wlm. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 08:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:09, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Latiaxis mawae 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2011 at 16:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 16:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 16:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support ■ MMXX ^talk 22:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support As usual very nice --Schnobby (talk) 08:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well made --Cesco77 (talk) 09:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 14:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--AHURA♠ 16:31, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:30, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

File:ONCF DH 370 with a Casablanca - Oujda train at the Barrage Idriss 1er.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2011 at 21:43:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 21:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Info Morocco has a surprisingly developed railway, transporting 30 Mio. passengers annually (which is more than Amtrak!). The picture shows an ONCF passenger train ("train voyageurs") with an EMD (General Motors) diesel engine on its way from Fez to Oujda, following the Barrage Idriss 1er shoreline. The old line, now on the lake bed, had to be abandoned a few years ago, when the dam was built; thus the new concrete and steel bridge.
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 21:43, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the viewpoint very much and was about to support. But, unlike a lot of your other FPs here the subject is too small! --Jovian Eye _storm 00:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Try not to think of this picture as a "picture of a train", but rather a landscape picture that shows the railway line and its surrounding scenery, and "by accident" has a train in it ;)
  There's actually a story in that. For the third (?) time now we're doing an international (and a swiss) railway calendar, and it's main feature compared to most other railway calendars is that we're trying not to use "normal" train pictures, but instead pictures that combine trains with great landscapes (which works well for the international calendar and doesn't work so well for Switzerland, but we're trying). A colleague has put a preview of the next issue on his web site: See here. This put off some other railfans, who think that a railway picture is only good if you can read the road number of the locomotive... Since we didn't want to do a "normal" calendar, we turned that fact around: If you can read the number on a locomotive, then we should use a different picture instead in which the train is smaller ;) --Kabelleger (talk)
Support Subject is small, but I like the color contrast, the view and the curve of the tracks. --Nikopol (talk) 10:50, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The miles and miles (kilometres and kilometres) of train track are too small lol -- One, please. ( _{^{Thank you.}}) 18:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ -- Very nice composition and combination of colors. But image quality (sharpness, detail) in below par, in my opinion. Also a pity that the file is compressed, affecting the quality of printing -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I did a new RAW export using PS' highest JPEG quality, but it does not make a big difference. The sharpness is probably also limited by the heat haze (it was quite hot). --Kabelleger (talk) 18:34, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support now -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:50, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. It is not a train or a track, it is a railway at work. It is not a departure point or a destination, it is the bits in between, it is a journey. --NJR_ZA (talk) 15:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, excellent composition, great colours. --ELEKHH^T 11:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 08:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Galapagos.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2011 at 23:54:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galapagos Islands (Isla Bartolomé), Ecuador

Info created by Aonikenk - uploaded by Aonikenk - nominated by David C. S.
Support -- David C. S.

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: resolution is way too low, and the general quality of the image isn't good

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Homenaxe ó ciclista - Extramundi - Galiza-3.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2011 at 20:57:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by -- Tomer T (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 19:31, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry... but I don't see why this one should be a featured picture (one of the best of Wiki), with all those power lines in the background, poor lighting, cloudy skies, halos around edges of mountain, trees and houses, and a cropped building in the way. Don't see anything so special in here, correct me if I am wrong please... --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 06:16, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Way to go! Let's tear down all surface power lines. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 13:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Maybe another angle would've worked better, like getting closer and bending down a little to aim more at the sky. Or maybe it's just not possible to get a FP of this subject. Thing is, the background is very disturbing here. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 23:32, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special for me --Dirk Van Esbroeck (talk) 07:07, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Paolostefano1412. Not even a QI as the subject is so dark. Colin (talk) 12:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alta valle di Fossa.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 13:10:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by llorenzi - uploaded by llorenzi - nominated by llorenzi -- Llorenzi (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of focus and signs of compression in the sky. _→AzaToth 14:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Proprio un bel posticino! Bella foto, colori e composizione. Tuttavia sono presenti leggere aberrazioni cromatiche, il lato sinistro appare sfuocato, ed il cielo è sovraesposto in alcuni punti. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- It is true that image quality could be better but I would gladly ignore the imperfections (including the blown whites in the sky) if the composition were better. The feeling that something was missing in the foreground striked me when the picture was slowly downloading from top to bottom and suddenly stoped before the whole thing was shown... Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:55, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interior of St Andrew's Catholic Church in Roanoke, Virginia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 11:22:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Jovianeye
Support -- Jovian Eye _storm 11:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A nice church and a very good shot, considering that it is not a panorama. A pity that the background is not sharper but maybe that is asking too much, under the difficult conditions Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:20, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot, in many aspects. And I like it in general. Only minor flaw I see:distortion on the edges but that's ok with me. --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 14:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I did correct barrel distortion. I will give it another attempt today evening. --Jovian Eye _storm 14:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Info New version has been uploaded. There is some improvement. But, eliminating it 100% is not possible as I did try several different correction values. --Jovian Eye _storm 22:59, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vassil (talk) 08:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Kabelleger (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 09:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Pöide kirik.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2011 at 09:52:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Markopalm - uploaded by Markopalm - nominated by WikedKentaur -- WikedKentaur (talk) 09:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WikedKentaur (talk) 09:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- A nice atmosphere and composition but too poor image quality, with washed-out colors and chromatic noise. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Washed out. Gamaliel (talk) 18:19, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]