User talk:Pudelek

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1 (to January 2009)
Archive 2 (to November 2009)
Archive 3 (to December 2010)
Archive 4 (to May 2011)
Archive 5 (to March 2012)
Archive 6 (to August 2013)
Archive 7 (to June 2014)
Archive 8 (to May 2015)
Archive 9 (to August 2016)
Archive 10 (to September 2017)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Helfštýn (by Pudelek) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Helfštýn (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrad Helfštýn (by Pudelek) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezernický viadukt (2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pustevny - Maměnka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Embassy of Austria-Hungary In Cetinje, Montenegro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bar Aqueduct (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NP Lovćen (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archeoskanzen Modrá (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 21:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of your photo titled "Ateneul Român (Romanian Athenaeum) in the evening, Bucharest"[edit]

Hi,

We would like to use your photo to promote Bucharest as a travel destination. We will be using it on www.jetwaysholidays.com . In case, you would not like it to be published on our website, kindly do let us know at the earliest.

Regards, IT Team, JetwaysHolidays.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.123.36.107 (talk) 07:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former Austrian-Hungarian Embassy In Cetinje 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balaton. View from Balatonföldvár.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice composition. --KaiBorgeest 21:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Trinita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NP Lovćen (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NP Lovćen (by Pudelek) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mała Babia Góra, Beskid Żywiecki 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mała Babia Góra, Beskid Żywiecki 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mała Babia Góra, Beskid Żywiecki 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hofkirche[edit]

Zgodnie z prośbą piszę, ponieważ użyłam Pańskiego zdjęcia Hoffkirche w Poczdamie, oczywiście wszystko oznaczone imieniem i nazwiskiem oraz licencją. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.11.189.94 (talk) 18:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mędralowa - szałas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szlak Babia Góra-Markowe Szczawiny 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szlak Babia Góra-Markowe Szczawiny 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diablak z Tabakowego Siodła.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Սարո Հովհաննիսյան 12:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mała Babia Góra, Beskid Żywiecki 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 23:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dworzec Główny Opole (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dworzec Główny Opole (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mędralowa - szałas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:45, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasmo Mędralowej, szlak graniczny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 12:22, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szlak z Rycerki Kolonii na Wielką Raczę.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Widok z Pilska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilsko - szlak z Hali Miziowej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Żywiecki. Widok z Małej Raczy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 13:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mat river, Albania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:37, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Shkopeti, Albania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudawy Janowickie, widok z Sokolika 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudawy Janowickie, widok z Sokolika 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bar Aqueduct (by Pudelek).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar Aqueduct (by Pudelek).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th[edit]

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. In Africa two weeks later.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

Poland is probably closed, but if you have anything related to science of neighboring country, please upload them. Categories are not based on the nationality of the uploader, if the wildlife or the scientist is from a country X, it is suggested to upload under country X, but there is no strict rule, it's mainly good sense. If you have an images related to science to one of the countries that are still open, please upload. It would be nice to have good finalists specifically form countries without national juries and lower upload. In Italy we will probably print them in a public exposition.--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Ohrid near city Ohrid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Ulza, Albania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ohrid, Macedonia (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transfăgărășan road (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition, but where in Romania? --Michielverbeek 15:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Info Here en:Transfăgărășan :) --Pudelek 10:11, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transfăgărășan road (by Pudelek) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unfortunately, the heavy shadows interfere with the picture a bit. But for me good image quality.--Famberhorst 16:37, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transfăgărășan road (by Pudelek) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Funny composition, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chróścina Opolska (Reisern). Newag Impuls 36WEa-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 13:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael Romanesque Bazilica in Cisnădioara (Michelsberg) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael Romanesque Bazilica in Cisnădioara (Michelsberg) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strehaia Monastery, Romania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 17:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fields near Komprachcice (Comprachtschütz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Škoda 935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:45, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transfăgărășan road (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2018, Pudelek! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   [reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transfăgărășan road (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transfăgărășan road (by Pudelek) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:07, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Buchlovice (Buchlowitz) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Buchlovice (Buchlowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Buchlovice (Buchlowitz) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zámek Kačina (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your photo of Palace of Culture[edit]

https://www.ncronline.org/node/159166

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Škoda 706 RTO, Luhačovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A pity for the rain drops and the white balance might perhaps be a bit yellowish. Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uherský Brod (Ungarisch Brod) - train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silnice Blatnice pod Svatým Antonínkem - Ostrožská Lhota.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You could add some traffic sign-related category. Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:09, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luhačovice (Bad Luhatschowitz) - pramen Vincentka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurkovičův dům v Luhačovicich 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 18:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Společenský dům in Luhačovice (Bad Luhatschowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 18:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurkovičův dům v Luhačovicich 02 - details.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurkovičův dům v Luhačovicich 03 - detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Palace, Luhačovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 21:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dacia 1300 in Luhačovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battlefield in Tovačov - monument 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:St Michael Romanesque Bazilica in Cisnădioara (Michelsberg) 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Michael Romanesque Bazilica in Cisnădioara (Michelsberg) 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesioniki - widok z polskiego Śląska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battlefield in Tovačov - monument 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Battlefield in Tovačov - monument 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olomouc - Dolní náměstí (2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olomouc, Horní náměstí (2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:54, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uherský Ostroh (Ungarisch Ostra) - bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prusinowice, Silesia and Jesioniki mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of the Visitation of the Virgin Mary in Olomouc - dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Lights a little bit overexposed. --XRay 18:02, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Třemešná (Röwersdorf) v zimě 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Třemešná (Röwersdorf) v zimě 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:39, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schiedlow (Goldmoor, Szydłow) - Dachsteinfabrik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from observation tower Hráběcí.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Falkenberg (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dust spot to the right of the tower. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road 45 near Bruntál, Czech Republic (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 15:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Dormition, Argeș monastery (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:55, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Dormition, Argeș monastery (by Pudelek) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:01, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Dormition, Argeș monastery (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Main object is quiet sharp, but a little deformed. Quality is for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Falkenberg (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 19:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St. John at Kaneo, Ohrid 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Dormition, Argeș monastery (by Pudelek) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 21:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fruska gora - Novo Hopovo monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Army monument in Mikolin (Nikoline) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Army monument in Mikolin (Nikoline) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Army monument in Mikolin (Nikoline) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St. John at Kaneo, Ohrid 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 12:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:25, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) - view from Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 15:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Třemešná (Röwersdorf) v zimě 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Třemešná (Röwersdorf) v zimě 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrova bouda - únor 2018 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przełęcz Karkonoska (Slezské sedlo) 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:43, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrova bouda - únor 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:44, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrova bouda - únor 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Buildings are tilted to the right little bit (see the note). --Halavar 22:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
poprawiłem --Pudelek 13:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 09:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżne Kotły (Snežné jámy, Schneegruben), Krkonoše mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrova bouda - únor 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wielki Szyszak (Vysoké Kolo, Hohe Rand), Krkonoše mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wielki Szyszak (Vysoké Kolo, Hohe Rand), Krkonoše mountains 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wielki Szyszak (Vysoké Kolo, Hohe Rand), Krkonoše mountains 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen) in the winter 2018 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) - view from Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) - view from Słonecznik (Mittagstein, Polední kámen).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mountain hut "Kamieńczyk", Krkonoše mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:16, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przełęcz Karkonoska (Slezské sedlo, Spindlerpass) - view from Odrodzenie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:34, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains - view from Szrenica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trzy Świnki (Sausteine, Svinské kameny), Krkonoše mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trzy Świnki (Sausteine, Svinské kameny), Krkonoše mountains 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:45, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżne Kotły (Snežné jámy, Schneegruben), Krkonoše mountains 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PJDespa 10:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżne Kotły (Snežné jámy, Schneegruben), Krkonoše mountains 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PJDespa 10:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains in winter 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains in winter 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains in winter 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:51, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains in winter 2018 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mělník - náměstí Míru (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mělník hill, Mělník, Czech Republic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesia Star, Katowice (Kattowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:00, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains in winter 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krkonoše mountains in winter 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A nice sphere, but photo might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 20:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Śnieżne Kotły (Snežné jámy, Schneegruben), Krkonoše mountains 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżne Kotły (Snežné jámy, Schneegruben), Krkonoše mountains 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vraňany - Hořín Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice scene --Daniel Case 05:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silesian Museum in Katowice (Kattowitz) - shaft "Warszawa".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Btw the main subjects look like out of place - tall building, coal mine, nicely looking historical building, parking lot full of cars --Podzemnik 13:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malá Fatra - view from Reváň.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 13:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Kľak, Malá Fatra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Credits[edit]

Hi! I took the liberty to move your User:Pudelek/Template:Credits to User:Pudelek/Credits, as it is simpler to type {{User:Pudelek/Credits}}, and the "Template:" prefix should be avoided outside of the template namespace. I also made some changes to the text, I hope you like them. Kind regards, —capmo (talk) 14:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Kľak, Malá Fatra 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset from Kľak, Malá Fatra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bacówka na Rycerzowej[edit]

Niestety plik dodany przez Ciebie oznaczony "Bacówka na Rycerzowej" jest tak na prawdę bacówką na Krawcowym wierchu :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiffnet (talk • contribs) 12:01, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nie, w obu przypadkach jest to bacówka na Rycerzowej --Pudelek (talk) 09:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proszę porównać te dwa zdjęcia:

i przyjrzeć się szczegółom począwszy od kamieni na podmurówce, drzwi i drzew w tle. Poza tym robiąc zdjęcie bacówki na Rycerzowej z tej perspektywy w tle było by widać bardziej stromy stok Małej Rycerzowej. Teraz zauważyłem, że są dwa zdjęcia. To z 2005 roku jest ok.--Jiffnet (talk) 20:53, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, racja, przeoczyłem to zdjęcie i to faktycznie będzie z Krawców! --Pudelek (talk) 22:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kľak, Malá Fatra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. To have a geocode would be fine --Moroder 09:34, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kľak, Malá Fatra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.To have a geocode would be fine --Moroder 09:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Kľak, Malá Fatra 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suchá dolina - valley in Malá Fatra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:33, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suchá dolina - valley in Malá Fatra 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Pudelek,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Red Army monument in Mikolin (Nikoline) 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red Army monument in Mikolin (Nikoline) 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodný mlyn Kolárovo (Gútai Vizimalom) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodný mlyn Kolárovo (Gútai Vizimalom) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gliwice coal mine (Gleiwitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breslau CoA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (but I forgot to sign immediately) --Michielverbeek 06:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breslau Hauptbahnhof - Wrocław Main Station (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 06:08, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stained glass windows in Gödöllő castle, Hungary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:15, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esztergom by night 02 - Széchenyi tér.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit noised sky, but good quality for QI --George Chernilevsky 22:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esztergom by night 01 - Simor János utca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Esztergom by night 01 - Simor János utca.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Esztergom by night 01 - Simor János utca.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esztergom by night 03 - Széchenyi tér.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esztergom, old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. But: You must improve the categorization. It's inside a building. And what kind of room? What kind of door? --XRay 17:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manor in Galanta (Galánta).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bøvra river in Lom[edit]

Hi, Pudelek

I am planning to use your photo of the Bøvra river in Lom as an illustration of an article about hydro power.

Thanks for sharing!

Best regards

Knut O. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.95.241.148 (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Monostor, Komárom - interiors 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Architas 12:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort Monostor, Komárom - interiors 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 13:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old house - Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Street, Esztergom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice colours --Podzemnik 13:03, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esztergom Basilica by night 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica in Esztergom, Hungary 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica in Esztergom, Hungary 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:23, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Demoted FP[edit]

Sadly one of your FP nominations was demoted to 'not featured' due to a sock double vote. However, you are welcome to re-nominated if you like. The nom is: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Smogorówka Dolistowska - rainbow.JPG. --Cart (talk) 22:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Demoted FP[edit]

Sadly one of your FP nominations was demoted to 'not featured' due to a sock double vote. However, you are welcome to re-nominated if you like. The nom is: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Copper Mine Museum in Falun.JPG. --Cart (talk) 19:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Picture of Sedlec Ossuary[edit]

Hi Pudelek, My name is Pamela, and I am in a school project which collects information about great art pieces,architecture, sculptures etc. for our students to refer to. I am putting down the information for the Sedlec Ossuary, and I really like your photo of the interior of the Sedlec Ossuary. Can I please use the photo for the school project, and if so, what do you prefer to be called on the copyright section? Thank you and I am looking forward to your reply, Pamela — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamelaxi (talk • contribs) 23:27, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of your image[edit]

Hello i´ve just used your photo on our blog: http://paramag.eu/hora-krizu-v-litve/ your nickname is on the bootom of article. Is this ok?

Image Use[edit]

Hello! My company is studying southern Poland coal mining communities using a ground deformation detection system. I'm interested in using your coal mining image in some of case materials with credit of course. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.50.210.237 (talk) 08:01, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria-Valeria-Brücke, Esztergom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria-Valeria-Brücke, Esztergom 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria-Valeria-Brücke, Esztergom 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortified Area of Silesia (bunker nr 34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 13:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čechy pod Kosířem lookout tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But this would have been better if you stood so that the trees on the left weren't in the way. --Seven Pandas 20:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostelec na Hané (Kosteletz in der Hanna) - town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 13:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use[edit]

Hi there, I would like to use your Berat Mosque interior picture in a classroom lesson handout on teaching about the masjid to little children. I will credit it like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Berat_-_King_Mosque_(interior).jpg. I understand this is a free image and my handout is not being prepared for commercial purpose, so I am assuming it is ok to use. Kindly contact me if any objection.

Thanks and regards, Lisha — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.100.172.183 (talk) 05:22, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort XXII Černovír 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort XXII Černovír 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fort XXII Černovír 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:30, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niedzica Castle (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise in Pieniny, Poland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:06, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise in Pieniny, Poland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very nice. Try one of sunset pictures as FP candidate, i will support --George Chernilevsky 19:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise in Pieniny, Poland 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:25, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Obrazek Lednice[edit]

Ahoj,

narazila jsem na Tvoji fotku zámku Lednice a moc ráda bych ji použila jako referenci do mé e-knihy - anglického průvodce Českou republikou. Samozřejmě tě uvedu jako autora. Je to tak v pořádku?

Díky, Lucka — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.108.107.193 (talk) 12:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bude to v pořádku :) --Pudelek (talk) 20:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2019! ;)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Pudelek! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 08:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Pudelek! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten! Glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- Johann Jaritz talk 04:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Happy Holidays 2019, Pudelek! * Joyeux Noël et tous mes vœux de bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a happy 2019! ;-)[edit]

* Merry Christmas and all the best for 2019, Pudelek! *
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • ... :)

Ermell (talk) 16:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry mountains - view from Łapszanka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cattle and Tatry mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cattle in Łapszanka, Poland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry mountains - view from Łapszanka 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 03 - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 02 - old house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 01 - old houses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:03, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 07 - Church from Rosolin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 05 - Greek Catholic church from Ropki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethnographic Park of Sanok 06 - Church from Rosolin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sunrise in Pieniny, Poland 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise in Pieniny, Poland 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Mały Mountains (PL).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 17:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saints Cosmas and Damian church in Bartne (Бортне).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Transfiguration in Czerteż (Чертеж).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Beskid Mały Mountains (PL).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beskid Mały Mountains (PL).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Demetrius Catholic church in Bodaki (Бодаки).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veľká Fatra 01 - Frčkov and Ostredok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veľká Fatra 02 - Frčkov and Ostredok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veľká Fatra 03 - Frčkov and Krížna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veľká Fatra 05 - Suchý vrch, Ploská, Rakytov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:48, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veľká Fatra 04 - Borišov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veľká Fatra 06 - Suchý vrch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Usage of your Wikimedia image "Ferry Ram-Stara Palanka, Danube, Serbia[edit]

Hello,

Thank you for offering your image "Ferry Ram-Stara Palanka, Danube, Serbia" on WikiMedia Commons! I have been using it in a story on my blog where I write about crossing the Danube today versus 100 years ago.

Kind regards from Austria, G. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.132.56.133 (talk) 14:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soviet military cemetery in Katowice (Kattowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! German Military Cemetery Laurahütte (Siemianowice Śląskie) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice. Geo tag would be useful --Podzemnik 19:44, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! German Military Cemetery Laurahütte (Siemianowice Śląskie) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Narok (Norok), Silesia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Supportbr />Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! German Military Cemetery Laurahütte (Siemianowice Śląskie) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SA134-009 in Komprachcice (Comprachtschütz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dark areas would benefit from denoising --MB-one 15:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --SH6188 08:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Česká poštovna na Sněžce.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:19, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Saint Lawrence, Śnieżka (Schneekoppe, Sněžka).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments wow --Moroder 08:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obří důl v zimě.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spalona Strażnica, Karkonosze mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Musicaline 20:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morning fog in Upper Silesia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:39, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Równia pod Śnieżką (2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Chapel of Saint Lawrence, Śnieżka (Schneekoppe, Sněžka).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chapel of Saint Lawrence, Śnieżka (Schneekoppe, Sněžka).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vodní tvrz Jeseník (Freiwaldau).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeroport Lwiw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 13:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasyno Szlacheckie we Lwowie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kasyno Szlacheckie we Lwowie (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cemetery of the Defenders of Lwów (2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:13, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! French Soldiers Monument and Catacombs at the Lwów Defenders Cemetery in Lviv (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:30, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Morning fog in Upper Silesia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morning fog in Upper Silesia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main building of Lviv University, Ukraine (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:09, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019[edit]


Hallo Pudelek,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Równia pod Śnieżką (2019).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Równia pod Śnieżką (2019).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sicz Riflemen Monument on Yanivsky cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American Aviatars Monument in Lviv (Lwów).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ukrainian military cemetery at Lychakiv Cemetery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ukrainian military cemetery at Lychakiv Cemetery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019![edit]

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jezioro Wigry (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sejm Krajowy Galicji (budynek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WLS40, WKW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śluza Rudziniec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but left crop is not very sharp --Michielverbeek 22:41, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, but the object in the left corner should be cuttet.. --Steindy 23:16, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steam engine in Karchowice (Karchowitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Possible FB. Great atmosphere --Podzemnik 00:47, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GKW - Industriada 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Smolnik (Смільник).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mesi Bridge (Ura e Mesit).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kasyno Szlacheckie we Lwowie (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kasyno Szlacheckie we Lwowie (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chatka na Końcu Świata (Łupków).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sněžka (Śnieżka, Schneekoppe), Krkonoše mountains 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spots on the sky --George Chernilevsky 11:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected --Pudelek 14:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Luční bouda (Wiesenbaude).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sněžka (Śnieżka, Schneekoppe), Krkonoše mountains 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sněžka (Śnieżka, Schneekoppe), Krkonoše mountains 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Demetrius church in Radoszyce (Радошицї).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veles Memorial Ossuary, Macedonia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skansen Kultury Łemkowskiej w Zyndranowej 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 11:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road M18 in Bosnia and Hercegovina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Đakovo, Croatia (interior).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, good quality --Michielverbeek 19:06, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road in Bílá Voda (Weißwasser).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Pudelek,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Athanasius Church, Prilep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old house in Kališta (Калишта, Kalisht).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Pudelek,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020, Pudelek! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Varoš Monastery, Prilep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 14:21, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Macedonia Square, Skopje, NMK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The equestrian statue is dark, but it was obviously just before a big cloudburst, so that's how it looked. Good quality to me and dramatic photo. -- Ikan Kekek 09:28, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Government Headquarters in Skopje by night 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Government Headquarters in Skopje by night 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:26, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pivsko jezero (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pivsko jezero (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Government Headquarters in Skopje by night 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Government Headquarters in Skopje by night 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 10:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flying Bulls Aerobatics Team in Zamardi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 14:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains (by Pudelek) 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lead Mosque, Shkodër.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hrubý Jeseník in December 2019 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 11:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flying Bulls Aerobatics Team in Zamardi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flying Bulls Aerobatics Team in Zamardi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любіць Зямлю-2020» у Беларусі пачалося![edit]

Вітаем! Мы радыя абвясьціць, што фотаспаборніцтва «Вікі любіць Зямлю-2020» у Беларусі ўжо пачалося. Ваш удзел дапаможа нам задакумэнтаваць прыроду Беларусі і паказаць яе сьвету праз Вікіпэдыю і іншыя праекты.

Калі ласка, перайдзіце на старонку спаборніцтва, каб прачытаць правілы: Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Belarus. Там Вы зможаце таксама высьветліць, як узяць удзел у спаборніцтве. Калі ласка, зьвяжыцеся з намі, калі маеце ўсялякія пытаньні: User talk:W.

Дзякуем,
арганізацыйны камітэт «Вікі любіць Зямлю-2020» у Беларусі 14:57, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Вы атрымліваеце гэтае паведамленьне, бо ўдзельнічалі ў спаборніцтве раней

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bethlehem gas station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
You'll need at least one more cat --Poco a poco 18:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. (Added category). I like it. --Bernard Ladenthin 19:41, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Karpniki (Fischbach).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wapienica (Lobnitz) - niemiecki napis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:56, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba o dodanie zdjęcia[edit]

Witam, mógłbyś może przesłać na Commons zdjęcie szkoły w Białej które dodałeś na Fotopolskę https://fotopolska.eu/1579962,foto.html ? Od jakiegoś czasu rozbudowuje hasło o Białej na Wikipedii i zdjęcie szkoły byłoby do niego fajnym dodatkiem. Oprócz tego kościół ewangelicki po remoncie też mógłby się przydać, ale na szkole zależy mi bardziej. Pozdrawiam --ElCet (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020![edit]

Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Lomnitz (2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zgorzelec (Görlitz) - ulica Daszyńskiego 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zgorzelec (Görlitz) - Daszyńskiego street (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 18:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Schildau (2019).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and very nice! --Aristeas 09:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Culture House in Zgorzelec (Görlitz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2020[edit]

Drogi Wikimedianinie,

piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Dziękuję za Twoje zaangażowanie w tej oraz w poprzednich edycjach konkursu oraz zachęcam do przesyłania kolejnych fotografii :)

Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie - Paulina Studniczka (WMPL) (talk) 08:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Jaffa in the evening.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I quite like this. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good composition, lighting --Tagooty 10:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good; interesting composition. -- Ikan Kekek 10:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting scene. No skiers because not enough snow? -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, too little snow and strong wind --Pudelek 08:09, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo of Slavic castle Raddusch[edit]

Hello Marcin, I would like to let you know that I put your picture on my website with credit to you. I hope this is fine with you. It is a great photo and fits the text perfectly. Here the link: www.wittenburg.net/en/etymology/ Best, WolfWit

Hi Marcin,

which software did you use in order to get the Tyndall effect this good done? I really like this photo! Thanks for putting it under a free license on Wikipedia. Greetings, Pim

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old City Walls and Tower of David in Jerusalem (2019) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old City Walls and Tower of David in Jerusalem (2019) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old City Walls and Tower of David in Jerusalem (2019) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Pudelek,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Old City Walls and Tower of David in Jerusalem (2019) 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old City Walls and Tower of David in Jerusalem (2019) 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2020/2021![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Pudelek! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camp Lamsdorf - old cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleuschnitz (Klucznik) - old stable.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, but if it was a stable, you should presumably add a category for stables, and maybe one for ruins. -- Ikan Kekek 21:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camp Lamsdorf - monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bacówka "Jaworzec" w Jaworcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Który z polskich aktów normatywnych stanowi, że te pieczęcie są urzędowe? Wg mnie całkowicie nieuzasadniony szablon licencji. Ankry (talk) 11:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kobylá nad Vidnavkou (Jungferndorf) - cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernartice (Barzdorf) - parish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The shadows are very dark. But the picture is good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Camp Lamsdorf - old cemetery.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camp Lamsdorf - old cemetery.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chyrowa, cerkiew.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Assumption in Zadąbrowie (PL) .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vidnava (Weidenau) - old houses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greek Catholic church of Saint Paraskevi in Daliowa - interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchtenstein castle, Burgenland, Austria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forchtenstein castle, Burgenland, Austria 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Kind of dark and forboding, such as you might see in a movie in which some act of violence is committed in the palace. -- Ikan Kekek 04:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haydnsaal, Eisenstadt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvrđa, Osijek 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvrđa, Osijek 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvrđa, Osijek 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 11:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Regasterios (talk) 05:37, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba o przesłanie[edit]

Witam, chciałbym poprosić o przesłanie na Commons tego zdjęcia zamku w Łące Prudnickiej, żeby użyć go na Wikipedii. Obecnie wszystkie jego zdjęcia tutaj są albo słabej jakości, albo drzewa wszystko zasłaniają. To Twoje jest idealne. --ElCet (talk) 14:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvrđa, Osijek 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archaeological Museum Osijek (WLM2020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvrđa, Osijek 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Kasyno Szlacheckie we Lwowie (1).jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brandtaucher Image[edit]

Great image! Using it in my dissertation on early submarines.

Many Thanks, Rich — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUBVETPIPER (talk • contribs) 18:48, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

about using your photo(Maruzen publishing, Tokyo)[edit]

Hello, I'm Akira Oe, an editorial staff of Maruzen Publishing. I'm writing this message by the check of your photo. We are editing "the Encyclopedia of Central and Eastern European Culture" and editrial board would like to use your photo of "Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Sofia, Bulgaria" and "Rila Monastery (Рилски манастир) - fresco 3.JPG" in a book jacket design(about 1/32size on the A5 size). The book will be published by the september, 2021 in Japan. We will add appropriate attribution(credit) as the recommendation from CC BY-SA 3.0.

Best Regard.

Akira Oe — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 153.153.151.104 (talk) 07:32, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evening in the Balatonszemes, HUN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manor Eltz, Vukovar, Croatia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Kościerzyce (Gross Neudorf), Silesia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Buszyce (Buchitz), Silesia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oppeln - Młynówka chanel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opole (Oppeln) - Młynówka chanel in winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 10:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road near Lądek-Zdrój (Bad Landeck), Poland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 10:43, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road near Lądek-Zdrój (Bad Landeck), Poland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Oppeln - Młynówka chanel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oppeln - Młynówka chanel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image-Stained glass in Katowice (Kattowitz)2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 20:11, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opole Village Museum - Radłów.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opole Village Museum - Nowe Karmonki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gliwice (Glewitz) - town hall by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMHO, a bit underexposed. Can you raise the shadows so as the facade to the right aren't black? --C messier 06:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. I checked the shadows in GIMP and I couldn't find any all black. A difficult but to me well exposed image. It gives the feeling of darkness, night. --Goran tek-en 18:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Noisy but good quality overall. By night it's not easy with this 10-year old Nikon D3100. --Sebring12Hrs 21:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Opole Village Museum - Nowe Karmonki.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opole Village Museum - Nowe Karmonki.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Statue of Saints Cyril and Methodius on Radhošť.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czarnowąsy (Czarnowanz) - panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of St. Nicholas in Wyżłów (Вижлів).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cemetery in Myców (Миців).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nieszawa ferry, Vistula (2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicolaus Copernicus Monument in Toruń (Thorn).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 17:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Niski, szlak na Rotundę.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Using this photo of a snowy lanscape[edit]

I will be using this photo, along with others, to show an artist what kind of snowy landscape I want her to draw for me. It will not be a copy of the photo but another work of art inspired from many photos and from real life.

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Pudelek! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paraskevi of Iconium church in Kwiatoń (Квятонь).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NATO Days Ostrava 2021 - para.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozhledna Velký Javorník.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velký Javorník - turistická útulna a rozhledna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:47, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Stephen I of Hungary in Debrecen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:18, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalimilova rozhledna (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting. I hope there will follow shots from the top. --Milseburg 14:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramzovské sedlo, Czech Republic - small wooden hut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Maybe a bit oversharpened, but that’s a matter of taste, of course. --Aristeas 08:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Pilsko (2021) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:11, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station Jeseník - October 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Forest near Pilsko, Beskid Żywiecki.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Beautiful, good quality. --Steindy 18:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunrise in Shkorpilovtsi, Bulgaria 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Pilsko (2021) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good but I miss any cats about the clouds --Poco a poco 13:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)  Support I added a cat. QI in my eyes. I suggest spending a bit light too the dark part in the lower left corner. --Milseburg 18:35, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurel Vlaicu, Hunedoara (ROM).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heckelovy skály - view point.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wikibusters 14:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sokołów Dobromilski (Falkenberg) - kościół św. Wendelina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, geocoding would be nice. --Palauenc05 16:19, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mănăstirea Lainici (by Pudelek).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 08:20, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 04 (Odeon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of Wrocław train station, Silesia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompeii 2021 - 07 - Amphitheatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit soft, but ok. --Sebring12Hrs 09:51, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Súľov-Hradná and Súľovské skaly, Slovakia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feste Boyen, Lötzen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, and it's nice to see your username here again. -- Ikan Kekek 10:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thx ;) --Pudelek 18:37, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feste Boyen - Werkstatt des Waffenmeisters.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feste Boyen, Lötzen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:42, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Republic - landscape near Koryčany (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crnojevića river near Rijeka Crnojevića, MNE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czech Republic - landscape near Koryčany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

use of picture[edit]

I have used one of your pictures in my Art Nouveau database. I think I've put correctly that the picture is from you

https://www.arquitecturamodernista.cat/obres/pl/gliwice/tots/casa

(vitpons@gmail.com) 79.153.119.219 18:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sedlec Ossuary Interior photo, Kuntà Hora[edit]

Thank you for the use of this photo! Your work is appreciated and credited in the video clip and in the video description. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charpan (talk • contribs) 15:07, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Đurđevi stupovi, Berane, MNE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 19:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road M-5 in Montenegro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road P-16 in Montenegro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Czech Republic - landscape near Koryčany.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Czech Republic - landscape near Koryčany.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2022/2023![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Marcin! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 01:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)   [reply]

File:Manastir Visoki Dečani (Манастир Високи Дечани) - by Pudelek..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ahmet Q. (talk) 13:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A-1 motorway in Montenegro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 01:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open-air Museum Vysočina (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using one of your photos[edit]

I am using one of your pictures for a school presentation.

Thank you very much! DerDachDecker (talk) 12:51, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Open-air Museum Vysočina (by Pudelek) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stone bridge in Jezdovice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jewish cemetery in Dřevíkov.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:38, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia - Felix Romuliana[edit]

Zdravo Pudelek, we have one ongoing issue at Serbia page (en.wiki); several editors have been adding some amateur random photo of Felix Romuliana on the page, as well as other photos of dubious quality. Could you please intervene and add one of your quality images of Felix Romuliana? Thanks. — Sadko (words are wind) 20:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johannes Honterus - Denkmal in Kronstadt.JPG[edit]

We will 193.197.80.40 13:15, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We will use this picture in a Publication of Pädagogische Hochschule Karlsruhe. Contact is Kirsten Buttgereit
https://www.ph-karlsruhe.de/personen/detail?tx_kwpeople_p1%5Bcontroller%5D=Address&tx_kwpeople_p1%5Buser%5D=231&cHash=70e3e24e15153011147aa7dfcf468281 193.197.80.40 13:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "Trading ship in Dubrovnik.JPG"[edit]

We are currently building a website that publishes free materials for history teachers in Germany (www.qvid.uni-bonn.de). I would like to use your picture "Trading ship in Dubrovnik.JPG" on our website. HistorikerAusLeidenschaft23 (talk) 09:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Festung Neisse plan 1741.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fut.Perf. 14:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image re-use[edit]

Hello Pudelek,

this carrack image came in very handy for a school homework of my son. Thank you for it! Of course, we took care of making a proper attribution to you (something that is sadly often neglected by school pupils). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:56, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Open-air Museum Vysočina (by Pudelek) 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Open-air Museum Vysočina (by Pudelek) 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 01:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christmas Market in Katowice 2022 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christmas Market in Katowice 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hiking trail to Magaro, North Macedonia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nazwa sali do korekty[edit]

To jest sala Michałowskiego a nie MichałKowskiego jak błędnie podano w tytule. 45.90.2.225 18:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 01:15, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christmas Market in Katowice 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn in Hrubý Jeseník mountains, Czech Republic 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn in Hrubý Jeseník mountains, Czech Republic 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autumn in Hrubý Jeseník mountains, Czech Republic 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Curtea Veche in Bucharest 2009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hasiakowa Skała, Bieszczady mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winter in Beskid Śląski mountains, Ochodzita, Silesia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely. Thanks for noticing that motif. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winter in Beskid Śląski mountains, Ochodzita, Silesia 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park in Telč, Czech Republic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Nice composition & good quality. --AFBorchert 06:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telč, Czech Republic.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bieszczady mountains in winter 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Thanks --Imehling 16:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Winter in Beskid Śląski mountains, Ochodzita, Silesia 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winter in Beskid Śląski mountains, Ochodzita, Silesia 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Use of 'Brandtaucher' picture on Wikimedia Commons for a work on YouTube.[edit]

Hello, Thank you very much for the photo of the submarine. I have used your work for a YouTube video. Attribution given. Thanks again... Seagoer86 (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morning in Łupków, Poland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments }Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:49, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morning in Łupków, Poland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

  * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]