User talk:MatthiasKabel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

For old discussions look at User_talk:MatthiasKabel/archiv

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Gyps fulvus at zoo Salzburg-0001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gyps fulvus at zoo Salzburg-0001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weiternutzung deiner Bilder[edit]

Jemandem ist die nicht lizensmäßige Weiternutzung deiner Bilder aufgefallen. Siehe Village Pump. --Martin H. (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ An image you created has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palais du Louvre.
review

It is an edited version that has been promoted, but you are the author of the original work! Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 00:54, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Galley model meta info[edit]

Nice work.

Hello, Matthias.

I'm currently working on improving the article on galleys over at English Wikipedia (here's my current sandbox). I came across a picture of your's that I believe is one of the best photos of a galley model that I've seen so far. The angle is very nice, the background is very neutral and the editing on it makes it very well-suited for encyclopedic purposes.

I'm wondering if there might be any more meta info on it, though. Is it supposed to represent any typical period or style of trireme? Any additional information would be excellent.

sincerely,
Peter Isotalo 12:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind message. I'm sorry, I photogrphed the model in "Deutsches Museum" Munich. If I remeber correctly there was no additional info at this model. I've scaned my directory from this afternoon, but unfortunatley there was no photo with the description in the museum. Perhaps I can ask in the german wikipedia if somebody can have a look in Munich. MatthiasKabel (talk) 20:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Would you? It would be most helpful if there was more information available about the model.
Peter Isotalo 07:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 22:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright question[edit]

Hello Matthias, I am developing a website and am not too familiar with all the copyright jargon. I was wondering if I am able to use your photo of the match igniting, I would be making it very small and incorporating it into a logo.

No problem, put a small notice, for example in the alternativ text, as me as author and everything is ok. MatthiasKabel (talk) 19:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright again =[edit]

Matthias I would like to use your photos of Pilum from Legio XV in my RPG game book "Codex Martialis", may I use them if I credit you as the photographer? As usual, no problem. MatthiasKabel (talk) 18:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woher?[edit]

Weißt Du noch, wo Du diese Bilder gemacht hast? Ich denke, eine Angabe wäre sehr sinnvoll. So ist das ganze nicht ganz verständlich, finde ich. Sind das Modelle der Künstler selbst? Oder gekaufte moderne Modelle nach den Original-Skulpturen der Künstler? (Museumsshop-Ware). Vielen Dank --Helvetiker (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fotografiert im Salzburger Barockmuseum, es handelt sich um Ausstellungsstücke, also vermutlich Originale. (In den Bildbeschreibungen nachgetragen) MatthiasKabel (talk) 07:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Herzlichen Dank. Da sind die Bilder doch gleich viel brauchbarer :-) --Helvetiker (talk) 12:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loeb[edit]

Hallo,

There is already a category for "Sammlung Loeb", see Category:Loeb Collection.

Since this collection is just a part of the regular Staatliche Antikensammlungen collection, it is appropriate to use Museum:Staatliche Antikensammlungen. As for the title, it seems to me that inventory numbers for the Sammlung Loeb in Munich use the form "SL Number", for instance "SL 474"; and I would precise the museum name in the title, since there can be a confusion (other museums display parts of Sammlung Loeb, perhaps with a different numbering...).

So I would advise you using something like what is done in File:Oidipous Sphinx Staatliche Antikensammlungen SL474.jpg: title, page description and categories are clear and complete.

Best, Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 23:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As currently there are just 8 images in Category:Loeb Collection, creating a subcat does not seem necessary... but you can do so if you wish.
There are some pictures in Staatliche Antikensammlungen, which belong to Loeb collection but are exhibited in the cellar (e.g.File:Ancient Greek jewelry Pontika (Ukraina) 300 bC.jpg). Also I will upload some new pictures in the next days.
OK. On the category name, I would append an article before the museum name, like it was done before (see Category:Greek antiquities in the Staatliche Antikensammlungen).
Is there really a first floor in the Staatliche Antikensammlungen? It's new? I can't figure out how it can be since my last visit... Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 11:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a complete floor, but you have to go up a staircase to a wide platform, which is smaller than the basement. File:Roman bronze elephant Staatliche Antikensammlungen SL 50 2.jpg MatthiasKabel (talk) 12:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. Perhaps I missed it when I was there. (I advise you to use the {{Artwork}} template instead of {{Description}}, since it contains several relevant fields.) Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 14:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trevi fountain[edit]

Is it possible to get a very high res file of this image of the trevi fountain?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trevi_fountain_at_night.jpg#file

I've been searching for a nice wide view of the Trevi Fountain and this image is incredible. I love the wide view with the people in the foreground.

My husband proposed to me there about 10 years ago and I was hoping to print a large image of the fountain and frame it.

Please let me know if this is possible. I can be reached at cwivell@yahoo.com.

Thank you, Colleen

Hi Colleen, I'm afraid I have no higher resolution of this picture. I could send you the picture without perspective correction, that would be 4368x2912 px. I'm just uploading a higher resolution, but at daytime, so it's not that romantic. File:Trevi fountain 2008 overview.jpg MatthiasKabel (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Versailles[edit]

Hi Matthias,

I've heard about this project, since there has been quite a good promotion in the Wikimedia French-speaking community. In fact, there is currently a good job which is done by a few people, and as they have much more knowledge than me on the subject and period, I let them manage Versailles. Museums are enough for me ;)

But it's kind to think to me.

Best. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:32, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Airpower11[edit]

Hi Matthias, very nice pictures! Several images suggest you were flying as well, am I correct? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:00, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is a hill behind the runway, so when a plane turns low it looks loke that. Stay tuned, it will take some days to sort all the pictures and load them up. MatthiasKabel (talk) 20:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marina_Poplavskaya06.jpg[edit]

File:Marina_Poplavskaya06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Off2riorob (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roman milestone St Margarethen Austria 201 aC.jpg[edit]

Hi, File:Roman milestone St Margarethen Austria 201 aC.jpg, seems to be the same as [1] though I see no mention of the source in the latter. Did you take the photo yourself ?--Zolo (talk) 06:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will write them for the false copyright on this site. Thanks for your message. MatthiasKabel (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added templates with your name and "own" in the source, so that it is clearer that you are the author.--Zolo (talk) 01:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Loggia dei Lanzi 360 view big.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Loggia dei Lanzi 360 view big.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaisbergrennen 2009 Bergfahrt 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tatars_in_Kazan_1885.jpg[edit]

File:Tatars_in_Kazan_1885.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Qdinar (talk) 06:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(old report/topic, that was incorrect: " http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tatars_in_Kazan_1885.jpg

" Source=Own work |Date=1885 |Author=User:MatthiasKabel |Permission=Own work, attribution required "

i have reported this file for no source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2011_October_27#Tatars_in_Kazan_1885.jpg

Qdinar (talk) 16:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC) ")[reply]

Image permission request - academic teaching video[edit]

Hi Matthias

We would very much like to include your photograph of the dome of the Pantheon in Rome in a e-learning video on Roman history (this is the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pantheon_cupola.jpg).

Please could you contact me so I can tell you more about the project and request your permission to include your photograph?

Many thanks, Pauline (p.hubner@thameshudson.co.uk) (on behalf of Thames and Hudson Ltd, London)

Location?[edit]

Hi Matthias - could you add a location for File:Kleebluete.jpg please? Also any other unlocated plant photos of yours, too ;-) Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I use some of your photos[edit]

Hi Matthias!

I have use some photos of Gulo gulo from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)

You can see directy in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next") one and one again:

http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=33132

If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Matthias%20Kabel

This is my "contributor card", for example: http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn


In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón --Fernando.lison (talk)

Using one of your pictures in a textbook[edit]

Matthias,

I would like to include your picture of the Munich diatretum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Roman_diatretglas.jpg) in a textbook. It would show at about 5 cm high and be credited in the legend immediately below. This being print, I wanted to confirm that is OK with you and ask if you would like to be credited in any special way (like name/location, whatever). I can be contacted at thechabon aaaat hotmail doooooot com.

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 19:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using some of your media[edit]

Hello! I really like your video "Furcifer pardalis moving eyes" and I included it in one of my creative commons videos https://vimeo.com/45003210. Just thought I would let you know! Dominik Martinez (talk) 16:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

Hello:

One of your work is a FPC at Commons:Featured_picture_candidates#Featured_picture_candidates but with insufficient info. Could you update the file description? Regards, Jee. Jkadavoor (talk) 06:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow![edit]

The Photo Mosaic Appreciation Kitten Award
Hey Matthias, I've just seen your photo mosaic from the Florence Baptistery. I was there two weeks ago, so I can only wonder how you managed to take all the pics so they could be stitched together. You must have had one heck of a crick in the neck! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:28, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casa di Fauno Pompeii 02.jpg[edit]

Hallo MatthiasKabel, kannst du den Bildhauer der Statue herausfinden? In Italien besteht nämlich keine Panoramafreiheit, weshalb das Original nicht mehr geschützt sein darf. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das Ding wurde beim Ausbruch des vesuvs verschüttet, da sollte jegliches Urheberrecht abgelaufen sein. MatthiasKabel (talk) 10:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Publication of your photo of the dome of the Pantheon[edit]

Hello

I am an archaeologist working in northern England and have just completed a new book entitled ‘Hadrian and his Wall’. The first part is a biography of Hadrian, and in this I would very much like to use your splendid photo of the interior of the dome of the Pantheon. Given that you have placed the image on Wikimedia, I hope this will be okay, and by way of thanks I would like to send you a copy of the book when it is published. If you would like a copy of the book please let me know the address I should send it to.

The image will be credited as ‘Photo: MatthiasKabel/Wikimedia’, unless you advise me otherwise.

To ensure I get it promptly, I would be very grateful if you could please copy any reply to paulfrodsham@hotmail.com .

Thank you very much.

Best wishes

Paul Frodsham

Location?[edit]

Hello Matthias - could you add locations to File:Ciconia ciconia in morning sun 03.jpg and other related files, please? This would increase their value greatly. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done
Danke! - MPF (talk) 22:15, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Apulian Amphora 350BC Staatliche Antikensammlungen Basement Corridor 01.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Apulian Amphora 350BC Staatliche Antikensammlungen Basement Corridor 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 09:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Apulian Lutrophe 330BC Staatliche antikensammlungen Basement Corridor 01.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Apulian Lutrophe 330BC Staatliche antikensammlungen Basement Corridor 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 09:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Apulian Lutrophore 350BC Staatliche Antikensammlungen Basement corridor 00.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Apulian Lutrophore 350BC Staatliche Antikensammlungen Basement corridor 00.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

–⁠moogsi (blah) 09:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re File:Bentley 45 1928 Tourer at Gaisbergrennen 2011 01.jpg[edit]

Hi Matthias, I know it is a couple of years since you made these pictures but I wonder if you might be able to supply any more information about the Bentley in the nine photographs - the first in the subject line above. I have been trying to find that car in this online catalogue without any luck:
history by chassis
Any help you can provide would be most gratefully received. With kind regards, Eddaido (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eddaido, I'm sorry but I don't have any additional information about the car. But Gaisbergrenne is organized by "Salzburg Ralley Club" http://www.src.co.at/index.php?page=gaisberg . I#m pretty sure they have more information or even contact data of the owner. 12:05, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Oktopus opening a container with screw cap 01.jpg[edit]

Dear Matthias I would like to use your fabulous picture of the octopus opening a jar in a book we are publishing on the origins of people. We will obviously credit you in full, but I would also be very happy to send you a copy when it is printed. I can send you details by email if you would like to contact me at cathy(at)cathybaxter(dot)com. Kind regards, Cathy Baxter

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 14:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harlem Globetrotters mascot globie big jumping on head.jpg[edit]

File:Harlem Globetrotters mascot globie big jumping on head.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 13:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harlem Globetrotters mascot Globie 02.jpg[edit]

File:Harlem Globetrotters mascot Globie 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 13:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harlem Globetrotters mascot Globie 01.jpg[edit]

File:Harlem Globetrotters mascot Globie 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 13:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use your photo of Krampus[edit]

Dear Matthias, Would you being willing to contact me about permission to use your Krampus photo in a television show? I appreciate that you license under CC, but I still like to reach out to owners. Please email me at JEN(at)COMMITTEEFILMS.COM if you can. Thank you so much for your time and photography. Photo here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krampus_Morzger_Pass_Salzburg_2008_10.jpg --76.17.196.71 18:52, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply] 

No problem, perhaps you can give me some information abaut the show? (Country, what kind of show) But this is not an obligation, feel free to use it. 09:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Venus_of_Willendorf[edit]

Dear Matthias Kabel,

I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Venus_of_Willendorf_frontview_retouched_2.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’

Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 12:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for the information, feel free to use it MatthiasKabel (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Matthias,

I thank you very much for letting me use the image. But I want also to apologize for late reply since I had to change my assistent who was in charge of correspondence. I still am working on the layout of the book. Now I might use the picture in the link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Venus_von_Willendorf_01.jpg) , would that be o.k with you?

Yours Sincerely
Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mustidede (talk • contribs) 15:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lecce Santa Croce.jpg[edit]

File:Lecce Santa Croce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 01:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Featured video UserBox[edit]

Hi MatthiasKabel,

If you wish you can use the new userbox for FV which shows

This user has uploaded featured media to Wikimedia Commons.

. -- Eatcha (talk) 09:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent: Request for high res image of "Papal Tiara with silver gems pearls.jpg"[edit]

Dear Matthias,

I would like to use your image "Papal Tiara with silver gems pearls.jpg" for educational purposes (with your GNU license credit attribution) and am wondering if there is a 300 dpi version of this image available? Here is the link to the image on your Wikipedia page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Papal_Tiara_with_silver_gems_pearls.jpg

Best Regards, Reid Farnsworth Research Assistant u University of Virginia School of Architecture — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfarns1 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Removal Candidate Notification[edit]

Hello. The featured picture Untersberg panoramic view winter.jpg, which was produced, uploaded, or nominated by you, has been nominated for delisting and/or replacement. Please view that page to vote or comment on the discussion. --Milseburg (talk) 19:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria sopra minerva Rome main vault.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthiasKabel&oldid=731110440"