User talk:Bourrichon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Salut ô wikimédien, si tu veux me parler choisis donc de le faire ici : Bourrichonpédia

Image:Davidia_involucrata.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand

Image:Fin_d'article_sur_la_négation.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 19:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Privatifs_et_négatifs.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 19:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:Hussard.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hussard.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 00:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Tableau aspects.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tableau aspects.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gundulich.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Blasons[edit]

Bonjour. Pour les blasons je suis en général les conventions du projet:Blasons. Le choix de la forme de l'écu n'a pas d'importance du point de vue héraldique. ce qui importe c'est de suivre le blasonnement, la difficulté étant souvent de savoir quel est le blasonnement exact. Je préfère personnellement l'écu classique que que je trouve plus élégant que l'écu en accolade. Toutefois j'emploie ce dernier pour les écartelés pour des raisons de « logeabilité ». En ce qui concerne les lisérés, le projet blasons recommande de mettre un trait de 3px autour des pièces et des meubles (à réduire pour les dessins très fins). Il n'est pas forcément recommandé de suivre à la lettre les dessins des communes, ne serait-ce que pour des raisons de droits d'auteur. Bonne continuation. Spedona 19:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Essonne législatives 1988p.svg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Bassin de l'Authie.svg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be delated and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections si tu peux[edit]

Sur Image:Antarctic expedition map (Nimrod)-fr.svg et la série sur l'expédition Nimrod, je viens de voir une petite coquille. « Cap Adare » est intitulé « Cap Adaire » Je te confirme le nom Cap Adare. Désolé de le remarquer si tard. Like tears in rain {-_-} 18:24, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Je te remercie. Tes cartes ne seront pas inutilisés, l'expédition Nimrod est dans mon collimateur pour le wikiconcours :) Like tears in rain {-_-} 05:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Transverse Mercator meridian stripes 10deg.jpg[edit]

Thank you for adding the French description. :-) Would you like to add a French description to my other images, too? It would be very nice. --RokerHRO (talk) 18:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expeditions in Antarctica map[edit]

Hi! I translated and modified your nice map to create File:Expeditions in Antarctica before 1897.svg. In a discussion Apcbg focused my attention on the 1840-41 expedition of James Ross. In your map he sailed through the Ross Ice Shelf which is certainly impossible. In any case his route should not extend beyond about 78° S. If I understand correctly you used a book (Le grand défi des pôles) to draw the expedition routes. Is there a map in this book showing the routes or you drew them based on descriptions/coordinates? There is also [1] which shows somewhat different routes. Best regards. bamse (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Bourrichon!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Tutorial translate a map.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tutorial translate a map.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--  ■ MMXXtalk  22:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bourrichon, Gimp and Inkscape are free softwares but Windows XP is not free, in order to keep this image on commons please crop out the parts of image showing Windows XP, regrds.   ■ MMXXtalk  22:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reproduction de carte d'histoire[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai constaté que tu avais réalisé plusieurs cartes à partir de modèle prise dans des livres d'histoire notamment pour les articles en français de Hugues Capet et Robert le pieux. Comment as-tu fais pour les reproduire ? Je voudrais insérer une carte présente dans un livre que je possède mais les droits d'auteur m'en empêche. Il m'est également impossible d'en faire la demande auprès de l'atelier graphique puisqu'ils ont besoin de modèle de carte que je ne peux pas leur fournir à cause de ces fameux droits d'auteur. Peux-tu m'en dire plus sur la reproduction de carte ? Romain0 (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Je peux aisément changé le style de la carte vu que la présentation est très rudimentaire voire austère mais aucun modèle de carte sur wikipédia n'y correspond. En fait, mon problème vient du fait que je ne sais pas utiliser Inkspace. J'aurai besoin de tracer des frontières délimitant certains territoire de la Gaule (c'est pour un article d'histoire) donc je ne peux pas partir de données textuelles. Le tutorial de l'atelier graphique dit que l'on peu décalquer des cartes mais il ne dit pas comment. Je ne sais donc pas utiliser les calques ou même décalquer un bout de carte existante sur une carte vierge. Peux-tu me dire comment as-tu fait pour calquer tes cartes ?
Romain0 (talk) 22:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai réussi à décalquer ! Mais j'ai un autre problème : mes cartes ne sont pas aux mêmes dimensions. Ainsi, lorsque je trace des frontières, je me retrouve en mer ou en décallage avec le territoire voulu, de plus mes tracés sont miniaturisés par rapport aux cartes vierges fournis. En réalité, il faudrait que ma carte (que j'ai scanné) soit transparante (comme un vrai calque) afin que je puisse superposer les frontières des deux cartes au mieux (en redimensionnant la carte) et éviter de me retrouver à tracer des traits n'importe où. Existe-t-il, à ta connaissance, un moyen de voir "à travers" une image ? Par ailleurs, le trait du crayon est trop fin. En l'épaississant, on épaissit tous les tracés de la carte (côtes, cours d'eau, frontières...), sais-tu comment réduire/épaissir le trait que l'on trace sans pour autant modifier la taille de tous les tracés (je précise que le tracé calligraphique est trop gros à mon goût) ?Romain0 (talk) 20:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

image[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tsar_Bomba_Paris.png

Why you create this? Are you sick? It is not cool.

Hello
No, I'm not sick :) This image makes a comparison in order to understand the range of this bomb. (PS. I live in Paris) Bourrichon (talk) 17:13, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ta carte de Liechtenstein[edit]

Salut, je te veut seulement informer q'un travail dérivative de tes cartes est en candidature pour image excellente au Wikipédia allemande. Chumwa (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While translating your map of Liechtenstein some Swiss users identified some mistakes: it's Schaanwald, not Schaanwal; Saxerriet isn't a village, it's just a prison; Wartau is the name of a municipality, the name of the village you named Wartau is Trübbach; there is a tunnel between Triesenberg and Malbun; Castle of Vaduz lies more to the North; boundaries and railway looks different in map and legend. Regards, NNW (talk) 19:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Composition_ethnique_de_Bosnie-Herzégovine.svg[edit]

File:Composition_ethnique_de_Bosnie-Herzégovine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ta carte du Caucase[edit]

Salut, sur ta carte de Caucase ([2]), il y a quelques erreurs de traduction. Pourrais-tu corriger STP. Merci 1. Arménie et pas Arménia 2. Oblast d'Astrakhan au lieu d'Astrakhan Merci.--atilin (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Island ist kein Beitrittskandidat[edit]

Hallo Bourrichon, du hast die EU-Karte schon einmal überschrieben und behauptet, dass Island und Albanien Beitrittskandidaten sind. Das ist falsch! Bitte informiere dich. Das ist Grundwissen, das man einfach in Wikipedia nachschlagen kann. --Kolja21 (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Topographic maps[edit]

Hello! I used your map of the caucasus to create maps like this one. Now I am asked to make such maps about Siam, but I cannot find a topographic map I could use. Can you make a topographic map of south-east Asia, that I can use then? From Kunming in the north to Sumatra would be enought, maybe Borneo an Java too. Greetings --Don-kun (talk) 18:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

La légende des couleurs...[edit]

Salut Bourrichon,

J'ai vu passer fugacement ton message sur le bistrot un peu plus tôt, et même si tu as trouvé une solution pour cette nouvelle superbe carte, voici ce que je te propose : regarde sur File:Cold War Map 1959.svg. L'avantage, c'est que ça permet d'ajouter de nouvelles langues sans alourdir le bloc d'informations. À toi de voir.

Sémhur (talk) 18:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

par ailleurs, tu n'es pas obligé de citer mon nom, ni même que tu utilises le symbole Image:Scale_kilometres_miles_svg.svg, vu que je l'ai mis dans le domaine public. En plus ça me hérisse à chaque fois de voir le "_svg.svg", je m'étais trompé dans le nom en la déposant (mais ça ne vaut pas la peine de demander un changement)

Problems with File:Oregon Country map-fr.svg[edit]

I like the map a lot, especially the topographic background which I'd like to find out where you got it, for other local-mapping uses, but it has various problems. Primarily the location of "Columbia district" [sic] WAY too far north, and the absence of a label for Nouvelle-Caledonie, which should be in approximately the same place, or a bit north of that, actually (most of N-C was above 54-40). The usage "Columbia District" (there was an official French name "District de Columbia" btw) more properly should be on top of the Columbia basin, where most of the forts and trading activity; but because you've shown the main disputed areas on this map, there's no room to put it there; Oregon Country and Columbia District are alternative names for essentially the same region, and in HBC terms the dominant meaning was SOUTH of New Caledonia and the Thompson Country (Fort Thompson, for example, was part of the Columbia Department administration, but the Columbia District as a territory did not include the Thompson basin (see the M.S. Wade citation on the Thompson Country article in English Wikipedia); it was only in the "last days", so to speak, that New Caledonia was submerged into the Columbia District/Department administration; and from 1846 to 1858 the usage "New Caledonia" became extended to mean everything north of the 49th Parallel, i.e. on teh mainland, though originally it was the Nechako basin and other areas north of Fort Alexandria (and there were many more forts, though most north of 54-40). I also don't think it's necessary for a map on the Columbia District page to show the disputed area; that's an Oregon boundary dispute issue; I know, the English-language page has the same or similar map, but the disputed area as shown was really only "defined" in the 1840s and is inapplicable to a description of the fur district. For now, the main problem is where the Columbia District label is; better would be to have it at the same place as Oregon Country, maybe in the form Columbia District/Oregon Country w9th a line break, or Columbia District (Oregon Country), with a vice-versa on the Oregon Country page; the difference is the boundaries; the British usage did not include, originally, areas from Fort Thompson northwards, the US version was always all the way to 54-40. Also "Nouvelle Espagne" below the 42nd parallel should more properly be "Mexique", as the Columbia District wasn't really formed until 1821, and for most of 1821-1846 that region was Mexico, not New Spain.....Also is Terre de Rupert really the HBC's own French usage for Rupert's Land?Skookum1 (talk) 14:29, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je te traduis un peu (il me reprendra si besoin) :
  • Il aime la carte, notamment le fond topographique, mais il y trouve quelques corrections à faire.
  • Le texte « Columbia District » est trop au nord pour lui.
  • Il manque un texte « Nouvelle-Calédonie », qui justement se trouverait un peu au nord de « Columbia District » (en grande partie au-dessus de 54'40 selon lui).
  • Il signale que « District de Columbia » est la traduction (cela redirige sur Washington DC sur la wikipédia :fr, j'avais testé).
  • Ce texte devrait être au nord du bassin du Columbia (où il y a le plus d'activité de traite de fourrure) mais il comprend qu'en montrant la zone disputée il n'y a plus de place pour cela.
  • Il précise qu'« Oregon Country » et « Columbia District » sont des termes désignant un peu la même chose.
  • Selon les termes principaux de la Compagnie de la Baie d'Hudson, c'est sud de la « Nouvelle-Calédonie » et le « Thompson Country » (Il donne l'exemple de Fort Thompson qui faisait partie du département administratif Columbia, mais le Columbia District comme territoire n'incluait pas le bassin de Thompson)
  • Ce n'est que récemment historiquement que la « Nouvelle-Calédonie » a été incluse dans le « Columbia District » et de 1846 à 1858, « Nouvelle-Calédonie » désignait tous au dessus du 49e parallèle.
  • Il pense que cette carte avec la zone disputée n'a pas vraiment d'importance sur l'article du « Columbia District » (ça on n'y peut rien, j'y fais comme :en, et il le sait).
  • Il pense donc que le placement du texte est problématique et propose « Columbia District/Oregon Country ».
  • Enfin, il indique que « Mexique » serait plus approprié que « Nouvelle-Espagne » et note la traduction de la Terre de Rupert qu'il ne connaissait pas.
Note : fr:User:Skookum1 existe et intervient déjà sur la Wikipédia française, avec un peu de mal dans la langue de Molière mais je pense qu'il réside dans la région de Colombie-Britannique. Je ne sais pas ce que vaut ses remarques, d'autant que cette carte ne peut mutualiser tous les souhaits pour chaque article, mais je fais un point demain sur cela en cherchant des cartes sur le sujet. Ça sera plus clair. Like tears in rain {-_-} 18:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mount Adams topographic map-fr.svg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Gorge_of_Columbia_NASA_view.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gorge_of_Columbia_NASA_view.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Portland_NASA_view.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Portland_NASA_view.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Portland_NASA_view.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 11:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Senegal drainage map[edit]

Hello,

The city of Bafoulabe is probably mislocated instead of BAKEL

Best regard

http://www.eaudela.org/pages/print-menu-Eau-s_menu--test-1-lien-etudesenegalgeneralites.html

Carte des Alpilles[edit]

Bonjour Bourrichon,

Tu avais fait il y a quelques temps une carte géniale pour le Luberon : Fichier:Luberon topographic map-fr.png

Sans vouloir abuser, te serait-il possible de faire de même avec les Alpilles ? Nous allons travailler à la fois les communes (désébauche) et la page traitant du massif. Idem si tu sais comment faire pour la carte de Cassini. Merci par avance. --Jmrosier (dit Ampon) (talk) 08:09, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of traditionnal provinces of Libye-en.svg[edit]

hi Bourrichon,

thank you for editing this image here File:Map of traditionnal provinces of Libye-en.svg. Can you change the colours again back? Fezzan should be in this light red/pink that Cyrenaica has at the moment, and Cyrenaica should be in a light grey, in order to reflect the traditional colours of the regions correctly. User:Hellerick just changed the image, the added international borders are fine, but the colours should be corrected. Merci. Gryffindor (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you![edit]

merci pour les magnifiques scan de cartes de Paris Sebculture (talk) 12:42, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Carte Guerre punique[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai modifier - mal apparement, désolé car je n'ai pas la maitrise des animations, et de plus je ne l'avais pas vu sur mon PC - mais la carte File:Punic wars-fr.gif contient une erreur pour la domination de la plaine du Po : elle est hors du controle romain jusqu'en -220 envieron, juste avant la 2e guerre punique. La figurer ainsi en 264 et 241 n'est pas exact. Pouvez vous rectifiez ? De mon coté, j'importe la carte applicable pour 264 sous un autre nom. Cordialement Ursus (talk) 19:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, à tout fins utiles, la carte rectifiée pour -264 est sous le nom File:Punic war 264-fr.gif. Cordialement Ursus (talk) 13:13, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scale wrong in File:Madeira topographic map-fr.svg[edit]

Hello,

I noticed that the scale (km/miles) in image File:Madeira topographic map-fr.svg is clearly wrong. The length of the island is about 57 km, but the scale says that it is much longer. Would it be difficult to fix the scale symbol? --Ryhanen (talk) 07:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia's conventions on Sharemap.org[edit]

Hello, Bourrichon. You have new messages at ShareMap's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:SRTM file cover.jpg[edit]

File:SRTM file cover.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help Request[edit]

Hello, can you please help out here? its been a while since these maps and a few others have been posted. Thank you--باسم (talk) 14:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Carte Besançon[edit]

Bonjour Bourrichon ! N'ayant pas mis les pieds sur Commons depuis un petit moment, je découvre ton message sur ma pdd seulement aujourd'hui. Donc pour répondre à ta question, en effet j'ai wikifié ma carte des transports de Besançon à l'aide d'Inkscape, ce qui est un travail assez long fastidieux mais qui avec mes connaissances limitées en informatique me permet tout de même d'obtenir des résultats assez satisfaisants. J'ai également créer cette carte selon le même procédé : . Si tu as des conseils d'amélioration, je suis preneur ! Cordialement, --Wikipedro (talk) 14:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piemonte location map.svg[edit]

Hello! France and Switzerland have to be in dark grey and the rest of Italy in light grey. :o) NNW (talk) 13:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately Western Pomerania is a bit bigger than the merged Szczecin and Koszalin Voivodeship. NNW (talk) 13:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello NNW, these (former ?) boundaries come from vmap0. Do you think the boundaries of Pomerania in osm are up-to-date ? Danke, Bourrichon (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
VMAP is unfortunately completely outdated. OSM's boundaries seem to be a quite imprecise compared to File:Zachodniopomorskie mapa administracyjna.png but at least it is the complete voivodeship. I don't know if there is a better source somewhere. Perhaps User:Aotearoa is able to provide vector data for you. NNW (talk) 18:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moselle department location map.svg[edit]

Hello! Could you please add the boundary between Luxembourg and Germany? Thank you, NNW (talk) 15:26, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merci! NNW (talk) 15:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Abidjan location map-2.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abidjan location map-2.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Abidjan location map.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abidjan location map.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 18:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gabon[edit]

Hello, in doing work in rivers in Gabon I noticed a mistake in the otherwise excellent File:Bassin versant de l'Ogooué-fr.svg. The drainage boundary is omitting the drainage of the Aïna or Ayina river which runs along the Cameroon/Gabon border and then into the Ivindo (easily seen on File:Gabon_Map.jpg - the basin should extend into Cameroon. Thanks. Kmusser (talk) 05:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Rade de Lorient topographic map-fr.svg[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rade de Lorient topographic map-fr.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 16:46, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maps template-fr.svg[edit]

Bonjour,

Depuis quelques temps, je me suis familiariser avec le format SVG et son optimisation. Je modifie fichiers par fichiers (cf. Special:ListFiles/VIGNERON) et je me suis dit qu'il pourrait être utile de corriger le fichier File:Maps template-fr.svg vu qu'il sert de base aux autres. Justement parce qu'il sert de base, je ne voudrais pas faire n’importe quoi, n’importe comment. Qu'en penses-tu, dois-je donc plutôt travailler sur un fichier doublon temporaire, discuter sur l'atelier graphique, un peu des deux, autre chose ?

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concernant: File:Étapes de création de carte avec QGIS.svg[edit]

Pouvez vous traduire ou faire l'image Étapes de création de carte avec QGIS.svg en anglais. Je ne comprends pas les mots de la texte. Citypeek (talk) 17:13, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Tibesti.gif[edit]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tibesti.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Composition ethnique de Bosnie-Herzégovine.png[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Composition ethnique de Bosnie-Herzégovine.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Praxis Icosahedron (talk) 02:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Praxis Icosahedron (talk) 02:27, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Taille d'un mouchoir en 1783.gif[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Taille d'un mouchoir en 1783.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Taille d'un mouchoir en 1783.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quatrième guerre russo-turque[edit]

Bonjour ! Sur votre carte en svg (que je ne peux pas modifier car mon Inkskape est obsolète) [3] il y a quelques petites rectifications à faire :

  • Empire d'Autriche en 1711 oui, Autriche-Hongrie non (la "double-monarchie" débute en 1867),
  • Le fleuve le plus à l'est est le Dniestr, pas le Dniepr (qui est hors de cette carte),
  • Suczawa est l'orthographe polonaise de Suceava, nom moldave,
  • Falsi (avec cédille sous le s) veut dire "faux" au pluriel (dans le sens d'erroné), le nom correct est Falciu,
  • Ibrail est l'orthographe turque de Braila, nom valaque,
  • Ce serait bien que la Pologne et l'Empire Ottoman n'aient pas la même couleur.

Bien cordialement, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 20:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Spiridon Ion Cepleanu, à part pour la couleur, c'est fait. "Mieux vaut tard que jamais" Bourrichon (talk) 20:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

caucasus map[edit]

Dear friend! can you modify map of caucasus adding northern teritory such as basin of the river Kuban? I wish view caucasus topo map like this. There are all caucasus rivers in this map. so please modify it. :-) Sincarely--Surprizi (talk) 06:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tsar Bomba Paris.png[edit]

File:Tsar Bomba Paris.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Danikayser84 (talk) 02:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected: 

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bourrichonさんの作品を使わせていただきました[edit]

はじめまして。 [[4]]を元に[[5]]を作成させていただきました。何か不手際があるようでしたらどうぞお知らせください。よろしくお願いします。--Ocdp (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

どういたしましてOcdpさん。何も不手際がありませんでした。遅い答えごめんなさい。 Bourrichon (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carte topographique du Japon-fr.jpg[edit]

Hi! Thanks for this great map (which I am currently translating to English). I noticed one mistake: "Hachinone" (city) should be "Hachinohe". bamse (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing. As far as I know there is no mountain called "Mount Koya" (Koya-san) in Japan. There is a temple town by that name, and I believe also the mountains around it are called "Koyasan", but there should not be a single mountain by that name. bamse (talk) 12:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And another mountain. "Monts Daisetsu 2090 m" should have an altitude of 2,290 m, the height of Asahidake, the highest mountain in that range. bamse (talk) 13:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Awashimaura (in the island layer) is the name of a village and should be replaced with Awashima, which is the name of that island. bamse (talk) 19:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Udonejima -> Udone-shima
  • Niishima -> Nii-jima
  • Shikine -> Shikine-jima
  • Ōnohara -> Ōnohara-jima
  • Inanba -> Inamba-jima (unless it is spelled with "n" in French)
  • Kojima (the one next to Hachijōjima) -> Hachijō-Kojima
  • Îles Unji -> Îles Uji
  • Kubajima -> Kubashima
  • Miyagusuku -> Miyagi
  • Torishima (the one next to Amami Islands) -> Iwo Tori-shima
  • Amami -> Amami Ōshima
  • Kannone -> Kaminone-jima
  • Cap Shiriazaki -> Cap Shiriyazaki
  • Kure (Hiroshima Prefecture) and Sasebo (Nagasaki Prefecture are now, since 2016, core cities)
Hello bamse, it's done ("Mieux vaut tard que jamais", french proverb) Bourrichon (talk) 20:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

報告と御礼　[edit]

Bonjour, and Thank you.

あなたのFile:Miyagi-ken géolocalisation relief.svgをもとにFile:江合川下流域地形図.pngとFile:江合川源流域地形図.pngを作成しました。そのご報告とお礼です。ありがとうございます。--㭍月例祭 (talk) 07:16, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

どういたしまして㭍月例祭. Bourrichon (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia Estuary Map[edit]

Hey man I just wanted to send you a quick thanks for making this map. Its the highest quality image of the area I could find and I appreciate the resolution for a Historical Reconstruction essay I'm using it in. You're a live saver bro.

Have a good one, Matt

You're welcome :) -- Note : there are an administrative map and a physical map, too : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Columbia_estuary_administrative_map-fr.svg.
Bourrichon (talk) 15:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rivages de la Mer du Nord[edit]

Bonjour Bourrichon, pourriez-vous je vous prie, modifier la carte [6] en dessinant le rivage tel qu'il était à l'époque, avant les grandes inondations qui ont séparé les îles frisonnes du rivage ? Voici une source : [7]. Merci à vous, --Julieta39 (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caucasus mountain range map-fr.svg[edit]

File:Caucasus mountain range map-fr.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

212.156.71.218 13:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rivages de la mer du Nord[edit]

Super, merci. A ma connaissance, d'après les cartes paléogéographiques, pas de changement depuis 2000 ans en Pologne. Les cordons littoraux de Hel et du Friesches Haff étaient déjà en place. Merci, --Julieta39 (talk) 10:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Geographical features maps of Japan[edit]

Hello, Bourrichon.

I made geographical features maps of Japan, as derivative work of your works. I really appreciate it.

If there are any problems about license or other, please let me know.--Peka (talk) 06:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

この二つの地図ありがとうございました. Bourrichon (talk) 20:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Araignée1.JPG[edit]

File:Araignée1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Brunei (talk) 08:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martin Schongauer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Granada Sun, 29 Apr 2018 11:46:08 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parc national de Port Cros[edit]

Bonjour Bourrichon ! Je n'ai pas les applis permettant de travailler en .svg, alors pourriez-vous SVP actualiser votre carte [8] en entourant de vert aussi l'île de Porquerolles, qui fait partie du Parc depuis le décret du 4 mai 2012 (Journal officiel n° DEVL1130604D, Décret n° 2012-649 du 4 mai 2012 portant modification du décret n° 2009-449 du 22 avril 2009 pris pour l'adaptation de la délimitation et de la réglementation du parc national de Port-Cros aux dispositions du code de l'environnement issues de la loi n° 2006-436 du 14 avril 2006) ? Merci ! --Museedesfossilesdetourtour (talk) 07:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Super, très précis et soigné, bravo et merci ! --Museedesfossilesdetourtour (talk) 17:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

感謝[edit]

Bonjour,

あなたが作成されたFile:Hokkaidō géolocalisation.svg, File:Hokkaidō géolocalisation relief.svgを基にして、File:Hokkaidō géolocalisation 000.svg, File:Hokkaidō géolocalisation relief 000.svgを作らせて頂きました。あなたが素晴らしい地図を作成されていることに敬意を表し、感謝申し上げます。どうも有難うございます。

Je vous prie d’agréer, @Bourrichon: , l’expression de mes sentiments les plus respectueux.

--Krorokeroro (talk) 06:15, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A propos de l'image "Neuchâtel.svg"[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu votre image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Neuchâtel.svg qui est utilisée sur la page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuchâtel . Je ne pense pas que la tranchée des terreaux était remplie d'eau: la pente à cet endroit ne s'y prête pas.

Meilleures salutations, MAC (talk) 19:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgian states (830-1020)-fr.svg[edit]

File:Georgian states (830-1020)-fr.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

107.242.117.49 04:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use File:Kabylie topographic map-fr.svg[edit]

Dear Editor, I ask your permission to use the topographic map of Kabylie "File:Kabylie topographic map-fr.svg" in a scientific publication in the journal "Revue Suisse de Zoologie"

Sincerely

Bonjour, ce fichier est sous licence "Creative Commons Attribution – Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 3.0". Vous êtes libre de copier, distribuer et transmettre cette carte. Vous devez donner les informations appropriées concernant l'auteur, fournir un lien vers la licence et indiquer si des modifications ont été faites. Bien à vous Bourrichon (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mouchoirs japonais en papier.jpg[edit]

File:Mouchoirs japonais en papier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Solomon203 (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hyères topographic blank map.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Bourrichon, est-ce que vous connaissez les (quatre) coordonnées de bords de carte pour votre fichier cité ci-dessus ? C'est dans l'optique ici de pouvoir l'utiliser pour le modèle:Géolocalisation/Îles d'Hyères, que j'ai créé l'année dernière. Ellicrum {bablute [...]} 18:50, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Bonsoir Ellicrum, j'ai fouillé dans mes archives et j'ai retrouvé ces limites :
ymin="42.96" xmin="6.06" ymax="43.13" xmax="6.55"
Cela semble vraisemblable mais si ça ne fonctionne pas je ne pourrai pas t'aider plus...
Sinon j'ai un deuxième fichier de config qui indique des coordonnées concernant Lambert 93, je pense que j'avais dû reprojeté la carte dans cette projection :
ymin="6213403" xmin="949187" ymax="6230507" xmax="989038"
Bien à toi
Bourrichon (talk) 20:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai essayé avec les premières limites données et tout à l'air de bien fonctionner. Parfois, le point de géolocalisation manque de précision, comme c'est le cas avec l'île du Grand Ribaud, mais rien de très flagrant et rédhibitoire. Merci à vous toi ! --Ellicrum {bablute [...]} 18:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Tant mieux ! Pour les lieux précis comme cette île, il y aura un décalage, sans doute à cause de la projection... N'y a-t-il pas moyen de tenir compte de la projection Lambert 93 [9] ? Bourrichon (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai soupçonné effectivement que ça venait du système de projection. La plupart des modèles de géoloc utilisent le paramètre « | projection = Projection équirectangulaire », ce qui je suppose n'est pas le plus optimal dans le cas présent. Je ne m'y connais pas très bien, mais il doit y avoir sûrement des alternatives dans la page Aide:Systèmes de projection (je verrai ça, en cherchant le « bon » Lambert). --Ellicrum {bablute [...]} 14:39, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

utilisation de la carte ile du Levant pour illustrer un document scientifique[edit]

Bonjour, Je sollicite votre accord pour utiliser votre carte sur l'île du Levant dans le cadre d'un rapport technique scientifique pour le Parc national de Port-Cros sur la base militaire du Levant. La carte ne sera pas modifiée. Vous seriez bien entendu cité comme source (quelles sont les données exactes à mentionner). Cordialement, Michel Bertrand réponse à : bertrand.mic@wanadoo.fr 2A01:CB1C:B3A:CC00:455A:1549:6180:B47F 07:35, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, vous pouvez utiliser la carte en mentionnant "Auteur : Bourrichon (pour Wikipédia)". Bonne semaine, Bourrichon (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PS : dans la même veine vous avez Port-Cros https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Port-Cros_topographic_map-fr.svg
et Porquerolles https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porquerolles_topographic_map-fr.svg
ainsi que l'archipel https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%8Eles_d%27Hy%C3%A8res_topographic_map-fr.svg
Bourrichon (talk) 20:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bourrichon&oldid=773482537"