User talk:Ursus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Italian Ancient Peoples.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 05:56, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Villa-Hadriana-map.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Ursus!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Ursus (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Central Italy Map[edit]

File:Italian Ancient Peoples.jpg

Your map is full of spelling mistakes. This is partly because you have used the Spanish equivalents of the names. But for the English Wikipedia, you should use the correct Latin names:

  • VEII
  • FIDENAE
  • AURUNCI
  • MARSI
  • VOLSCI
  • AEQUI
  • ROMA

In addition, I must say the presentation of this map is very poor quality. The template is fuzzy, unclear and lacking in geographical detail. There is no scale and doubts about the geographical accuracy of the locations. You should use different colours to better distinguish between city-names and tribe-names, or at least put one in capitals the other in smal letters. For an idea of a clearer and better template see:

In my article Latins (Italic tribe), I have replaced your map with Volsci.jpg, as it is a better map angd gives many more city locations. regards 81.101.136.108 10:33, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Banasa[edit]

Hi,

I changed your North Africa map (Africae_romanae_Urbes.jpg) because Banasa was not in the correct place.

--Agamemnus (talk) 01:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Punic wars-fr.gif[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai annulé votre modification sur la carte File:Punic wars-fr.gif.

Il s'agit en effet d'un gif animé, bien que l'animation n'apparaisse pas sur la page. Si vous cliquez sur l'image vous verrez le gif animé en action. Votre correction a transformé le gif animé en gif inanimé (si je puis dire).

Pour corriger un gif animé, il faut télécharger le fichier contenant tous les calques de l'animation créés avec fr:The GIMP. Hélas, je ne l'ai pas mis en ligne et je l'ai perdu au cours d'une mauvaise manip sur mon ordi...

Pouvez-vous me dire quelles sont les dates exactes de domination romaine sur le Pô (avec une source, ce serait mieux) et je referai la carte animée de zéro.

Enfin, d'une manière générale, il vaut mieux corriger la version .svg et non .gif. (nous avons la chance d'avoir en effet une version svg, File:Punic wars-fr.svg). En effet, on voit un peu les traces de la correction que vous avez faite (traces floues rouges sur le bord des fleuves bleus) même si ce n'est pas si mal. Corriger la version svg avec un logiciel comme fr:Inkscape est beaucoup plus facile que ce que vous avez fait, et ne laisse aucune trace. À partir du svg vous pouvez aussi ensuite créer un fichier bitmap (gif, jpeg, png...) équivalent. Pour toute question n'hésitez pas. Cordialement Bourrichon (talk) 19:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai modifier - mal apparement, désolé car je n'ai pas la maitrise des animations, et de plus je ne l'avais pas vu sur mon PC - mais la carte File:Punic wars-fr.gif contient une erreur pour la domination de la plaine du Po : elle est hors du controle romain jusqu'en -220 envieron, juste avant la 2e guerre punique. La figurer ainsi en 264 et 241 n'est pas exact. Pouvez vous rectifiez ? De mon coté, j'importe la carte applicable pour 264 sous un autre nom. Cordialement Ursus (talk) 19:51, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merci, je modifie l'animation dès que j'ai un moment. Vous pouvez aussi modifier vous-même File:Punic wars-fr.svg, qui n'est pas une animation. Cordialement Bourrichon (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grand Lyon Villeurbanne.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 17:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of Roman ship mosaic from Ostia[edit]

Hi. Did you take also a picture of this mosaic from the Category:Piazzale delle Corporazioni (Ostia Antica)? Gun Powder Ma (talk) 11:41, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I couldn't - too dead leaves laying on this mosaic when I took pictures. Ursus (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Cette image est intéressante, mais la source est manquante. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: c'est une photo personnelle, prise par mon défunt beau-père. Donc sans plus de precisions Ursus (talk) 11:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Il serait préférable que vous envoyez un mail à COM:OTRS/fr pour préciser cela. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hannibal[edit]

Salut. Juste un mot pour te signaler qu'une de tes images est utilisée dans un article de l'Obs. :) --FreCha (talk) 06:29, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:South Italia Pyrrhus war.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Africae romanae Urbes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Background map is a Google Earth screenshot.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

NNW 18:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cette carte m'a pris des heures à rédiger et elle est en usage sur de nombreuses wiki pendant 14 ans, pour être soudainement remplacée par une quasi identique File:Karte Römische Städte in Nordafrika.svg. Même relief, qu'est-ce qui prouve qu'elle n'est pas dérivée indirectement de Google map avec quelques retouches de couleur ? Un fond avec une forte valeur ajoutée (mention de toutes ces villes) est-il vraiment une copyvio ? Ursus (talk) 09:47, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Africae romanae Urbes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 04:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MBA bronze coulé-Semis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Archie02 (talk) 11:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]