Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Bea Kyle Standing Fire Engine and Pickle 1924, edited.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2016 at 13:12:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
A 1924 photo. Edited from File:Bea Kyle Standing Fire Engine and Pickle 1924.jpg -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Anna Palm - A game of L'hombre in Brøndum's Hotel - Google Art Project.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2016 at 18:56:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A game of L'hombre in Brøndum's Hotel by Swedish artist Anna Palm de Rosa
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 05:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Genre scene

File:Commuting by bicycle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2016 at 18:31:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Commuting by bicycle
  • @Daniel Case: I tried central, but i moved left from ceneter of circle. I needed some more centimeters to see cycler, so went into thirds option - hence i even put some more material on left side. --Mile (talk) 05:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Kreuzschnabel 05:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Black and white

File:Daniel Craig McCallum by The Brady National Photographic Art Gallery.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2016 at 00:26:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Daniel Craig McCallum
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Kreuzschnabel 06:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Duomo di Città di Castello - Intern.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2016 at 20:35:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Duomo di Città di Castello - Intern.jpg
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Kreuzschnabel 06:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Newman University Church Interior 360x180, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2016 at 12:03:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Kreuzschnabel 06:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Hong Kong Railway Route Map ring.pdf, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2016 at 09:20:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Concentric MTR diagram
I myself have created much more complex images that this and have had no problems with mediawiki rendering. If the SVG is validated, I see no inconvenience and I think you should try to import this in Inkscape and get a clean SVG. --The Photographer (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Kreuzschnabel 19:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flamencos andinos (Phoenicoparrus andinus), Laguna Hedionda, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 61.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2016 at 13:14:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Andean flamingos (Phoenicoparrus andinus) in the Laguna Hedionda, Nor Lípez Province southwestern Bolivia.
  •  Neutral excellent quality and featurable scene - I can't really come to terms with the rather tight, vertically oriented composition though. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I agree with Daniel Case. Natural scene in almost 1:2 size doesnt work (in this case), upper half is defocused, so i would cut to bottom half into pano mode, with that grass on right corner away. But i have feeling you did some shots of flamingos also. --Mile (talk) 06:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Guys, I have uploaded tons of panoramas of this area, you seem to like them, but are portrait versions that bad? I find this composition balanced and pleasant to my eyes with enough elements to guide my eyes around. The other day I also got the feedback from Colin that for a picture with lots of horizontal lines a portrait version the best of all is. Poco2 12:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think the reason I liked the portrait File:Mina de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 121.JPG was that portrait emphasised the depth/height and the the crop at the sides left it feeling endless rather than the nomination image which fully encapsulated the whole quarry. It was more abstract, which also appeals to me. But that image might also have worked in square or landscape format provided the lines ran to the edge of the frame and appeared endless -- you just didn't have an identical image that was in those formats. I haven't looked at this one in detail yet, but I see the grass on the bottom right as distracting, and the asymmetrical crop of the mountain is unusual but possibly interesting. If I crop the grass out, it's much more pleasing. I'll have a look again tonight. -- Colin (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:05, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Lillehammer 2016 - Women hockey - Sweden vs Switzerland 31.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2016 at 20:22:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saskia Maurer of Switzerland during the Sweden - Switzerland game at the YOG2016
Alt version

Saskia Maurer of Switzerland during the Sweden - Switzerland game at the YOG2016

Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sea Monster.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2016 at 15:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Natrix natrix in Tallinn, Estonia
  • Well, first I though it might be the lens, but the "Bigma" used here is actually quite well-regarded not only for its sharpness. There are some halos along some of the sharper borders (e.g. tongue, chin), which suggests comparably strong processing. --El Grafo (talk) 11:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think that seems like a good example of destructive processing --The Photographer (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:04, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victoria amazonica.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 May 2016 at 06:34:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Flower from the Giant Amazon Water Lilly (Victoria amazonica) at the Adelaide Botanic Garden."

Alt 1[edit]


Original photo by Bilby, edited by Kreuzschnabel

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Owl Rozarka Strix nebulosa, Prague.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2016 at 11:50:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it is too small, at only 750K pixels Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:CheHigh.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2016 at 22:53:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The popularised version of Guerrillero Heroico.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monasterio de Santa María de Huerta, Santa María de Huerta Soria, España, 2015-12-28, DD 18-20 HDR.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2016 at 20:49:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Well, this is an organ of more than five centuries, clearly is in the process of deterioration and IMHO what you call asymmetry is a visual effect created by the railing on the left side. --The Photographer (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per the asymmetry noted by Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Agree - composition is out. --Mile (talk) 10:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Difficult shot but asymmetric. KKnoefler247 (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)*[reply]
  •  Oppose Agree with Kreuz. ~ Moheen (talk) 20:10, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment can sonebody explain me what is rhe opposing reason? Is it the elements on the left that are no existing on the rifht? I cannot help there then Poco2 20:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support As Poco a Poco says, we can't put anything on the right side Ezarateesteban 00:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  CommentThat’s why I suggested to take a pic from a more angular view. While we cannot build another railing to symmetrize the scenery, we still can choose our point of view for a balanced composition. --Kreuzschnabel 07:04, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - The composition looks OK to me. You folks so often object to centered compositions that are symmetrical. I really don't understand what your objection to this composition is. And angled composition sounds to me like the photo by A.Savin that got so much opposition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment Not sure if I am included in "you folks" but I’ll still try to answer that. As for me, there is no general bias for or against symmetrical compositions. It depends on what’s in the pic. A heavy, immobile structure as this is well served by a symmetric composition, while a fast moving object or creature isn’t. Imagine the camera moved 1 or 2 metres to the right here. Would make the composition perfect in my eyes, but might ruin it entirely in yours. Matter of taste, and personal reception of images. – Which Savin shot do you refer to? The "Palace of Winds"? I opposed that for busy foreground, not for angled view. Generally, please trust in anyone here to consider their votings as carefully as you do yours. Sometimes, we just cannot explain why the one image works while the other doesn’t. So, "does not wow me" is a plausible reason in here to oppose while it’s hard to put in words why. --Kreuzschnabel 07:20, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Spurzem (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Poco2 19:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:27, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefano Tofanelli Family.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 07:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stefano Tofanelli Family
BTW, FP size requeriment is 2 MP, about color saturation and WB is another problem --The Photographer (talk) 11:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm well aware of that, and if you can find a 2MP painting that has passed PF in the last several years, I'd be amazed. That it is 9MP isn't a fail, but it isn't anything in it's merit either. -- Colin (talk) 12:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Currently there are established requirements, I agree that the picture is taken at the highest possible resolution of the camera, however, you can not demand a higher size for a camera that can not do that, because you're forced to buy new cameras and that's money. Size is important, however, is not everything. I can show you a big quantity 6 MB painting already FP and yes you could use another personal requeriment, however, IMHO epithets arguments should not exceed the FP requeriments pre-established. I respect your opinion, however, it is your opinion and when you use "we" in your arguments is a clear lack of consideration for those who not think the same way. --The Photographer (talk) 13:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You have misunderstood my point about the size. As I said in my reply above, the 9MP comment isn't a reason for my oppose, but isn't something to get excited about either -- it isn't going to be the thing that helps an otherwise average image become stellar. You know that judging is a balance of good and bad aspects, and the resolution here is "meh". You are well aware that we have many many very high resolution images of paintings, taken professionally, with hopefully professional standards of colour/brightness accuracy. Our amateur efforts have to compete with that, because that's what "finest" means. The only "we" in my comment is about this forum not featuring all paintings on Commons, so "we" isn't absolutely correct and "I" would be inappropriate. Of course it is only my opinion, and I would appreciate you striking out the nasty comment about "clear lack of consideration for those who not think the same way". The 2MP is not a "requirement" in the sense that once passed then no complaints can be made about resolution, and I'm surprised that someone here for as long as you choose to argue about that because you know full well it doesn't and never has worked that way. It's a lower limit to give nominators a clear idea of what is likely to generate an FPX. That's all. I don't "demand a higher size". Please don't put words in my mouth. If this image had accurate colours, was noise-free, was sharp and the artwork passed our criteria for FP (which this doesn't) then I wouldn't have opposed. Anyway, the camera used is 6000x4000 and this image is 3400x2665 so this is only 60% size and not even sharp. -- Colin (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is your minimum image size recomendation/requeriment. ? --The Photographer (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no rule "If an image is X MP then that is acceptable for FP" and nor should there be. So I don't have a minimum. And please, I have now for the third time had to state that the 9MP is not a reason for my oppose. Can we take this somewhere else, as it is irrelevant to this image. -- Colin (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Only if the nominator show his RAW file we could imagine the "original colors". --The Photographer (talk) 14:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A raw file is not calibrated neutral either. It contains no information about the colour temperature of the lighting -- this must either be guessed by the software/camera or set by the user using their own judgement. It also contains no information about the correct brightness and contrast, so the image may be under-exposed for example. The only way to be sure is to use ColorChecker and ideally to have control over the lighting, which is what professionals do. Failing that, we can use other copies of the image as a reference. -- Colin (talk) 15:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I generally use a rudimentary ColorChecker Passport created by myself, however, it will be a photographer interpretation or camera representation based on internal algorithm of revelation, printer settings, camera LCD configuration, PC monitor setting and quality....A person who lived his entire life in the Caribbean may have less sensitivity to light than another person from certain Scandinavian countries. Some populations of completely separate cultures, and unrelated, living in high relief, such as Nepal and Bolivia, using live similar colors in their daily attire. --The Photographer (talk) 17:38, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Colors seem off to me ... honestly, I never thought I'd be faulting a painting for CA (look at the main subject's nose) and while I was going to wait to see if this was the way it was, I couldn't find too many other versions online to compare. I was going to go with a neutral, but per the concerns of Colin and Kreuzschnabel above I don't think I need to defer. Daniel Case (talk) 18:24, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination it's only a pic....--LivioAndronico (talk) 18:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Верхнее Шавлинское озеро на фоне Северо-Чуйского хребта.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2016 at 10:38:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shavlinsky reserve: Kosh-Agach, Altai
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •  Info created and uploaded by N 3 14 15 92 65 - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - N 3 14 15 92 65 has been posting some very interesting landscape pictures in Quality Image Candidates. I think this is probably the best I've seen from this photographer so far. It's a composition that presents a variety of colors, textures and forms with a good dramatic sky - perhaps just a bit blown out where clouds are in front of the sun, but I really think that's not bad and the photo is worthy of a feature. I don't know whether some of you might find the rocks in the foreground unattractive, but to me, they're interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --XRay talk 14:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose It's a very beautiful place but the image doesn't fit for an FP to me. The rocks at the bottom cover more than a third of the image and also marginilise the lake, which seems to appear as a minor detail in the whole composition. There are also technical issues: the colours seem pretty washed off; the sky is blown and the part where the clouds are in front of the sun is overexposed, while the cliffs to the immediate right are underexposed because of the lack of lighting, thus making a striking transition; some areas of the image are unsharp. I'd prefer an image with more vivid colours taken from a better angle.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Considering this is a shot against the sun the tones are simply amazing, colors reflect what high(er) alpine scenery can look like (not everything is an oversaturated chocolate ad with purple cows). Maybe the composition could be improved a bit but I'm not sold on the idea. KennyOMG (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I suggest to change the format at least in 16:9 even a bit more in order to crop the too dominant appearing pieces of rock below. --Hockei (talk) 16:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild  Support -- Nice scenery! Should slightly more panoramic though, and per the user above, you should crop the image in order to remove the chunks of gigantic rocks. Target360YT (talk) 14:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:58, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaipur 03-2016 27 Hawa Mahal - Palace of the Winds.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2016 at 22:48:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hawa Mahal (Palace of the Winds) in Jaipur, India
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
  •  Info created and uploaded by A.Savin - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support This is another photo from Alexander's trip to Jaipur. It presents an interesting oblique view of the gorgeous Hawa Mahal, along with a bit of a slice of life below. I'm shocked to discover that we don't have any FP of the Hawa Mahal yet. Our one other Quality Image so far is not as good a photo as this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support INeverCry 01:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  OpposeThe category contains numerous images of a more interesting viewing angle and lighting, albeit not in that quality. This nomination offers high quality but the composition, viewpoint and lighting don’t look very special to me. Without wanting to personally insult the author I’d call this a high-quality tourist shot. Fine image, definitely QI and maybe VI, but not special enough to feature IMHO. Maybe the foreground is just too dominant. --Kreuzschnabel 08:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. --Jebulon (talk) 11:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I'm surprised by the level of opposition to this photo. Alexander, I hope I haven't unintentionally embarrassed you by nominating this photo. No offense to anyone for saying this, I hope, nor any disrespect for your views, but at the time I nominated this photo, it seemed obviously excellent to me; otherwise, I wouldn't have nominated it without checking with Alexander first for his thoughts on it. I don't see any reason to change my opinion, either, except inasmuch as I can't consider its excellence a consensus opinion. But let me say this: Canaletto did excellent tourist paintings of Venice. He was merely one of the greatest of many painters who painted typical picturesque scenes for tourists who wanted a picture to reminisce on their trip. Do you think that makes Canaletto's work not excellent? I wouldn't argue that this is on the level of Canaletto, but it's a digital photo, not an oil on canvas, so the medium is not subject to a one-to-one comparison. But to the extent the analogy holds, I think that an excellent tourist shot, if that's what this is, deserves a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, @Ikan Kekek: Thanks, no offence taken of course. I like the photo, but I also know that with a busy foreground like this, it will be difficult in FPC. --A.Savin 14:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment After all, that’s the educational value of FPC for nominators in my eyes. As it is, I consider all of my nominations featurable, however my latest ones have been severely opposed. While some see this as a personal insult, I rather see it as a chance to learn which images do wow others and which don’t. That’s why I vote about others’ images how I honestly feel about them (assuming others are willing to learn the same way as myself). Sometimes I have been quite surprised by the outcoming too. --Kreuzschnabel 13:46, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I totally agree. The whole FPC process has a very strong educational component with value added for all.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:54, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Launch of Falcon 9 carrying ORBCOMM OG2-M1 (16601442698).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 20:25:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket launched the ORBCOMM OG2 Mission 1 on July 14, 2014.
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as per above comments. Yann (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:31, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Four Falcon 9 first stages under construction.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 20:24:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Four Falcon 9 first stages under construction at SpaceX headquarters in Hawthorne, CA.
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as per above comments. Yann (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sant'Ivo alla Sapienza (Rome) , Dome.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 19:02:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sant'Ivo alla Sapienza (Rome) , Dome
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camera view of a beam of lazer light.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 12:08:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as per above comments. Yann (talk) 19:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tucano de bico verde (Ramphastos dicolorus).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 15:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A green-billed toucan (Ramphastos dicolorus), Tapiraí, São Paulo state, Brazil
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common clownfish.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 13:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

English: Common Clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris) in their Sea Anemone (Heteractis magnifica) home on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia.
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of the reasons already given --Kreuzschnabel 19:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:20101020 Sheep shepherd at Vistonida lake Glikoneri Rhodope Prefecture Thrace Greece.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2016 at 00:21:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sheep-goats shephered
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Already Feautered Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Водосховище на Тетереві біля с. Тригір'я.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2016 at 21:02:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Teteriv river
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as noted, images with signatures or watermarks are ineligible for FPC Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koenigssee - St. Bartholomew's Church 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 14:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Bartholomew's Church (St. Bartholomä), Königssee, and the East Face of Mount Watzmann, Bavaria - part of Berchtesgaden National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:29, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings

File:Taricha torosa, Napa County, CA.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2016 at 12:22:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vineyards - Yaiza - 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2016 at 12:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vineyard walls near Uga, Lanzarote
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ONERA MEUDON soufflerie S1b.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2016 at 15:40:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

S1 old wind tunnel of ONERA, Meudon (near Paris), France
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agrell, Johan.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2016 at 10:37:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of Johan Agrell
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brazilians butterfly collection, Zoology Museum, University of São Paulo.jpg

File:Mary Martin in The Sound of Music by Toni Frissell.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2016 at 00:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mary Martin in The Sound of Music by Toni Frissell
Excellent analisis, thanks --The Photographer (talk) 15:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Warszawa - synagoga z Gwoźdźca 2.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2016 at 21:32:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Museum of the History of Polish Jews in Warsaw. Reconstruction of the synagogue in Gwoździec (part)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:2013 Cogden Bridge.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2016 at 11:12:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cogden Bridge, North Yorkshire
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#United_Kingdom.E2.80.8E

File:Cappadocia Chimneys - DWiW.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2016 at 06:53:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Chimneys rock formation, nearby Gorëme, in Cappadocia, central Turkey"
I think, with only a day to go for this nomination, adding an alternative is unlikely to gain enough support, or be a fair review. While the contrast/dark shadows of this image vs the lighter shadows of Benh's version are a matter of taste, there's no getting away from that posterised sky, which isn't really acceptable at FP, and that this one is downsized compared to the other. -- Colin (talk) 08:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 18:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Turkey

File:Hexenbuche mit Kreuzberg.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2016 at 20:10:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Winter on Himmeldunkberg (888m) in the Rhön Mountains
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:20160602-Wikicup 2015 5754-short Version.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 18:30:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wiki Cup 2015 for the german speaking Wikipedia
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Buste de Capoue de Hannibal au Musée National du Bardo 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 11:56:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cette statue, surnommée buste de Capoue, est passée dans une première étape par le Palais Présidentiel de Carthage. L’œuvre date de la 2ème moitié du XVIème siècle. Elle est conservée actuellement à la Galleria dei Busti du Palais du Quirinal à Rome et a été adoptée comme image de référence pour la figure d’Hannibal ... Ce Buste est exposé au musée National du Bardo exceptionnellement du 27/05/2016 au 10/06/2016
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:29, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 69-71 HDR.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 19:21:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 15-21 PAN.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 19:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of the Miscanti lake, altiplano of the Antofagasta Region, northern Chile.
  • Mile: I really like it the way it is. To me it looks balanced the way it is, still, if other reviewers request it, I can offer an alternative where the road is cropped in both sides Poco2 20:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mile, would you be so kind and enter notes for the stitching errors? I just looked for any and couldn't find anything. Also nobody else of those who reviewed the image seem to have found any. Thank you. Poco2 09:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Poc i put two notes. Left is more problematic, but right one could be solved. Problem with left - when doing panoramas, especially wider, never put Auto WB, set temperature manually. Or later correct it in RAW into one temperature. --Mile (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, thanks for those notes, Mile. I've uploaded a new version. The issue on the left was rather a cloning problem than a WB problem. I checked the WB of all frames and they were very similar, just the last one on the right was a bit colder. Please, let me know what do you think about the last version Poco2 14:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Something better. Removed o. At least you improved mistakes. Some dont. --Mile (talk) 14:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:The Great Buddha of Kamakura.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 17:45:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Great Buddha of Kamakura
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Нижня польська брама.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2016 at 10:45:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

File:Сергей Трофимович Алексеев.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2016 at 15:17:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bemoste, geteisterde boomstronken aan voetpad naar vogelkijkhut De Schollevaar. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 07.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 16:12:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaipur 03-2016 39 Jal Mahal - Water Palace.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2016 at 14:26:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jaipur/India: The Water Palace at evening
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#India

File:Peilstein 20160507 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2016 at 08:15:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliffs of Peilstein mountain, Lower Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Kreuzschnabel 14:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Austria

Image:MastinLeones.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2016 at 06:40:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An individual of spanish mastiff.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Kreuzschnabel 14:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariramba-de-cauda-ruiva (cropped).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2016 at 21:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rufous-tailed jacamar (Galbula ruficauda rufoviridis) at Parque das Nações Indígenas (Indigenous Nations Park), Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Kreuzschnabel 05:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Kamchatka Brown Bear near Dvuhyurtochnoe on 2015-07-23.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2016 at 12:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kamchatka Brown Bear
I did not noticed he removed the categories since I had put the image in my favorites, and I'm sorry too to learn the sad news Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora

File:Weißrückengeier Gyps africanus HP L2043.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2016 at 06:41:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vultures in their habitat
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:2016.05.21.-08-L76b-Gernsbach-Kaltenbronn--Blick auf Gernsbach.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2016 at 19:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of Gernsbach. Taken by the side of the the L76b in Kaltenbronn (Gernsbach), Black Forest, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandma's room.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2016 at 00:05:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grandma's room
I can not remove the remote control, it is very common in Brazilian favelas (in 99% of cases) have a system of cable television, is an identifying symbol of the favelas have an antenna outside and this control is part of it. Nothing in this photo is old. btw, it was taken by a 50mm (FF) I literally had to take this photo from another room --The Photographer (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Favelas do not use conventional engineering styles, I used the vertical present on different objects in the room and the window to correct the tilt. Please, let me know if it's ok for you, thank you very much. --The Photographer (talk) 17:47, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Wilparting Church 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2016 at 13:59:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Marinus und Anian, Wilparting (Irschenberg), Bavaria, as seen from the north
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:17-Callicore sorana.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2016 at 11:08:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

80 (Callicore sorana) at João Monlevade, MG, Brazil
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prambanan Temple Yogyakarta Indonesia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2016 at 05:23:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lorenzo di Magnifico visits king Ferdinand of Aragon in Naples (Palazzo Vecchio, Florence).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2016 at 17:22:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fresco Lorenzo di Magnifico visits king Ferdinand of Aragon in Naples, Florence
You could try use neat noise reduction --The Photographer (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - I don't remember what this looks like in real life, so I'm giving you the benefit of any doubt that the colors look like that. My feeling is that those in the lunette are a bit faded in most of the picture frame, but the oval-shaped portrait below looks true, so I think all that means is that at least part of the lunette is unrestored (not a bad thing, in my opinion). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Per The Photpgrapher's oppose and Ikan's support. Could someone link to another picture of this (I can't seem to find one here on Commons) so we can better judge how accurately this has been rendered? Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Interior

File:Piraeus from ferry to Aegina, Greece.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2016 at 16:46:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

On ferry to Aegina, Greece
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Chien-Shiung Wu (1912-1997) in 1963 - Restoration.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 08:12:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chien-Shiung Wu
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Kreuzschnabel 21:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - Dome HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 06:28:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sant'Andrea delle Fratte - Dome HDR

✓ Done Thanks --LivioAndronico (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Kreuzschnabel 21:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Taraxacum officinale side makro.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 09:26:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Taraxacum officinale side makro
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Kreuzschnabel 21:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Asteraceae

File:Северное окончание Нижнего Шавлинского озера (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 17:58:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lower Shavlinskoe Lake at Altai Mountains, Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Kreuzschnabel 21:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Russia

File:Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 73.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2016 at 21:01:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pobiti Kamani, Varna province, Bulgaria.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Kreuzschnabel 06:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Buntspecht ♀ Dendrocopos major beim Füttern.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2016 at 22:01:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Buntspecht
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Kreuzschnabel 05:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:Canário-rasteiro.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2016 at 00:22:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Cicalis citrina (Stripe-tailed Yellow-finch) at Serra do Cipó, MG, Brazil

Alternative[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
The chosen alternative is: File:Canário-rasteiro (cropped).jpg
 Comment - The bot is (was) wrong. There was a clear vote to feature the alternative. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caracas building.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2016 at 17:01:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Building in Caracas downtown, Venezuela
Thanks for your comment and question Tuxyso. It was "Instituto Universitario de Caracas" today a indoctrination University of Venezuela dictatorship UNEFA, and these offices are occupied by military personnel, possibly obsessed with order. --The Photographer (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:14, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
 
Delisted in January 20, 2024 with 17 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral. See Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Caracas building.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dome of Duomo di Città di Castello.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 21:36:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

File:Dome of Duomo di Città di Castello
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Fra Københavns Børs.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 16:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Hipp hipp hurra! Konstnärsfest på Skagen - Peder Severin Krøyer.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2016 at 00:43:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Hipp hipp hurra! Konstnärsfest på Skagen", an 1888 painting by Peder Severin Krøyer. This artwork is currently held in the Gothenburg Museum of Art.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Passeio de Buggy nas dunas de Genipabu 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 23:34:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Buggy ride at Genipabu dunes with Natal in the background - RN, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Brazil
  •  Info created by Jjunoo - uploaded by Jjunoo - nominated by DarwIn -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - This is a beautiful view, but I don't find the composition as good as in the other dune buggy picture below. In the other picture, the ground is more nearly level and its color contrasts beautifully at right angles with the blue sky and with the ocean in the background. Here, we have a great view, but the single dune buggy and the large amount of nearly featureless sand seems incongruous with a middleground of pastel-colored buildings, a very active sky and a background of an arcing elevated highway, city skyline and green coastal hills. I would actually like this photo better if there were no dune buggy, no people, and much less sand. Also, whatever the parallel lined structure to the left of the dune buggy is, I find it distracting. So, to sum up: Interesting, good picture with great middleground and background but problematic foreground, and therefore, to me, questionable for a feature. I haven't decided whether to oppose yet, however. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral It’s certainly nice yet I tend to oppose mostly per Ikan. Colour balance is off IMHO, the sky is too blueish. Colours of car and village look more like a painting, a bit washed-out and channel-blown (the red top of the lady in the car). Many white areas look blown. All in all this is rather a work of art than an educational image of informative character for encyclopedial use. I wonder if it’s stronger when all the featureless parts are cropped out (see annotation), the framing strikes me a bit "too tall". --Kreuzschnabel 05:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Ikan and Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 19:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:19, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:"Broke, baby sick, and car trouble!" - Dorothea Lange's photo of a Missouri family of five in the vicinity of Tracy, California.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 14:52:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Broke, baby sick, and car trouble!"
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Escagnès (hameau), Roquebrun 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2016 at 15:20:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Escagnès (hamlet), Roquebrun, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Passeio de Buggy no Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN - 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 09:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jeeps riding at Parque das Dunas de Genipabu, RN, Brazil

*  Neutral The horizon needs to be corrected --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Falbisoner: ✓ Tilted horizon corrected. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! clearly  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles

File:Sergelgatan May 2016 02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 06:55:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

South view of Sergelgatan Street in Stockholm.
  •  Comment. My first thought looking at this is that it's a shame that it's not more symmetrical. The view is looking slightly diagonally across the scene, and this has the effect of tilting the horizontal lines. The most obvious effect is the street lights hanging at the bottom of the frame, which have been tilted by the perspective. It could be corrected in post, but would have been better if the photographer aligned it better to begin with IMO. Diliff (talk) 15:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for nomination and comments! The street is not straight, perhaps you can say that it is a symmetrical photo of a nonsymmetrical scene. I think the camera is pointing in the same direction as the left and right buildings in the foreground, and it also gives a balance between left and right side. As you can see from the map, there are only one footbridge above the street that it is possible to shoot from. I also like this urban "canyon", so I don't wont to move the camera more to the left. Furthermore, I don't think the street lights is parallel to the street in the first place. To summarize; although they are somewhat unfortunate I don't think the street lights is a big problem and I think there are stronger reasons to choose this composition. Regards--ArildV (talk) 15:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vaca rubia galega, Cervo, Lugo 01.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 20:04:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rubia galician cow at municipality of Cervo, Lugo (Spain).
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viagem inaugural do VLT carioca 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2016 at 17:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Window reflection from Rio de Janeiro's light rail tram.
  •  Comment - The answer would be that it's an interesting composition that's pretty and sufficiently well executed for a feature, but obviously you don't see it that way; no wow for you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I recognize that it's quite a creative composition, but for featurability on Commons (albeit, no idea how handled in local FPC's on wikipedia), minimal educational value should be there, which I fail to see here. --A.Savin 14:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Any good photo has educational value per se. This is a photography site, not just an adjunct to an encyclopedia. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
+1 -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose sorry, but I can't do anything with it. Too narrow, strong distortion, not a very creative composition. It's a funny idea either but the very dark reflecting surface doesn't expand the image impression. The vanishing point is not set optimal too. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 17:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:Catedral de la Dormición de la Madre de Dios, Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 112-114 HDR.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2016 at 21:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dormition of the Theotokos Cathedral, Varna, Bulgaria
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Orthetrum cancellatum svk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2016 at 19:28:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A black-tailed skimmer with some different insect positioned downside a leaf
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Astropecten lorioli.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 03:24:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

File:Isla del Pescado, Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia, 2016-02-04, DD 42.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 07:14:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Isla Incahuasi, Salt flat of Uyuni, Bolivia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaipur 03-2016 02 Amber Fort.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 22:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jaipur, India: Amber Fort, with Maota Lake in the foreground
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#India

File:Laguna Miscanti, Chile, 2016-02-08, DD 32.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 07:06:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Miscanti lake, Chile
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Loopbrug naar vogelkijkhut Zeearend. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 08.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 04:45:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Nikitski monastery in Pereslavl-Zalessky.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 17:01:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:53, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vueling the World Full Reverse (26900824443).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 18:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thrust reverse deployed on the CFM56 engine of an Airbus A320-214 of Vueling Airlines.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:56, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Invictus Games, US Wheelchair Basketball Team plays UK for gold 160512-D-BB251-004.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 15:34:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

2016 Invictus Games, wheelchair basketball.
Roger Wollenberg came back to me by email last night, and has seen the discussion here (so be kindly with technical comments please! :-)). His original image is 3,500 x 2,549, the same as this file and with the same EXIF data. He explains that the photograph is in focus but could not be made sharper due to the speed of the game and necessary shutter speed. As the event was indoors, there needed to be a high ISO and as this was a real sports event rather than a composition, options such as using high powered lights were impossible. As the photograph has not been post-processed there is no alternative original. --Fæ (talk) 09:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Thanks for asking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have cropped out the white line on the sports floor. If anyone think this is not an improvement, I'll happily revert to the original. --Fæ (talk) 09:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. The white line didn't bother me, but as for the rest, even if I look at the photo at full-page size, in which the subjects are clear enough, the fact that they're in shadow makes this less than one of the most outstanding pictures on the site, in my opinion, even though it's still a good picture. Also, for my taste, the crowd is too blurred, but that didn't even have to figure in my decision. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 13:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fine Art, War and peace (Honorable Mention) 141202-F-PO994-001.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 15:16:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

War and peace in acrylic paint.
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Mantis religiosa, immature female, Sète 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 17:09:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mantis religiosa
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Canion Fortaleza, Cambará do Sul - Brasil 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 22:49:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Canion Fortaleza in a sea of clouds at Parque Nacional de Aparados da Serra, Brazil
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Veado-campeiro no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 19:33:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pampas deer (Ozotoceros bezoarticus) at Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, MG, Brazil
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bacurauzinho.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2016 at 08:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Least nighthawk (Chordeiles pusillus) at Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
  •  Info created and uploaded by Nortondefeis - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - This is properly a Valued Image, and also a Quality Image. If I had my druthers, I wouldn't feature this kind of photo, in which part of a bird is inordinately blurred, not for sound compositional reasons, but for technical reasons having to do with the tradeoffs one currently still may have to make when taking a closeup picture. Nor do I really like this kind of close-in bokeh, though it certainly could be worse. Most of the bird is quite sharp and beautiful, but that's not enough for me to support a feature. The only reason I'm not opposing is that if everyone else unanimously agrees the photo should be featured, I have no interest in slowing down its progress. Also, while I've said my piece here, I certainly don't oppose this photo as much as previous nominees in which a much larger percentage of the subject was inordinately blurred or the bokeh was vertiginous. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:53, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Ikan. The unsharpness is distracting, and the bird's coloration works well to protect it from predators but, alas, also makes it stand out less in its environment, and thus this photograph. Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Per others. INeverCry 19:47, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Панорама на Лазарополе (3).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 10:37:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Lazaropole, Macedonia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marsh-Belgrad-Forest2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 15:07:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This beautiful and relaxing view was taken at Belgrad Forest near Istanbul city in Turkey.
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: watermark in center, bright parts overexposed, colour bleeding, unsharp --Kreuzschnabel 16:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calanque Sormiou Wikimedia Commons.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 14:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment - You have the right to withdraw the nomination as photographer, if you like. As I posted above, I like this photo, but I certainly wouldn't stand in your way (nor would I really have the right to do so) if you wanted to withdraw this nomination and nominate a photo you like better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Promena na godisni vreminja vo Jasen.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2016 at 09:19:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seasonal change in Reserve Jasen, Macedonia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hommik metsas.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 13:05:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meenikunno Nature Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabameeleolu.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2016 at 11:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Endla Nature Reserve
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mountains-1412683.svg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 02:42:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Illustration of a mountainous landscape
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of the technical issues noted above Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Brama Wodna w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 08:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wodna Gate in Bystrzyca Kłodzka
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabindranath Tagore.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 22:14:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rabindranath Tagore
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koenigssee - Hirschau Peninsula 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2016 at 09:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Historical building on Hirschau peninsula, Königssee, Bavaria

* Support I was wondering if landscape would work better. Good anyway. --Mile (talk) 18:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

* Support INeverCry 19:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Nice scenery but the leftmost third is entirely unsharp. Snow fields blown, green on fellside lacks detail. The house is crisp sharp but that does not make the shot outstanding in my eyes, that would require crisp sharp mountains too. Rather focus on the background, the house is still within DoF at f/8 or f/11. Is this 12 mpix frame cropped or downscaled? I’d prefer a landscape framing as well, in case of crop perhaps thats possible. --Kreuzschnabel 06:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment A couple of good questions: 1) I chose to take this shot in portrait orientation. This may have been a mistake but I hoped to avoid perspective correction in post processing. Holding my camera perpendicular and still catching a good portion of the sky at the same time was impossible with landscape framing. 2) Why isn't everything crisp? Honestly, I don't know. At f/8, 20mm pretty much everything should be sharp in theory, no matter where the focus actually is (I did focus on the house here). Maybe it was the polarizer? I can't offer any explanation. Still, background sharpness isn't an overly crucial factor here, imo. I still like the picture the way it is. 3). So yes, the picture is a crop, based on a raw file taken in portrait mode. I never ever downscale my pics. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany

File:Bloem van Iris sibirica 'Alba'. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 16:02:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

✓ Done. Faded twig.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:National Carillion, ACT - Rectilinear projection.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 03:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment I am not a fan of 100% rectilinear projections. In this case like many others, the impression arises that the top of the tower is wider than the base, which most probably isn't the case. In my opinion, pictures in Wikipedia should accurately represent the actual geometry of a building.--Hendric Stattmann (talk) 10:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the comment. In reality the top is exactly the same width as the base, and the picture shows the same, so there's no vertical distortion. Think of the rectilinear projection as a fancy way of saying "perspective correction", as used in countless featured architecture pictures here on Commons. See [1] to get an idea of the structure. -- Thennicke (talk) 11:32, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

File:Theriosuchus guimarotae PB01-ATOP0001 A1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2016 at 15:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Theriosuchus guimarotae

Note : … And YES! I'm aware that printing is not a criteria defined by present regulations, but nevertheless my option is to create the best work for this fantastic community --Carlos Natário (talk) 14:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

File:Volksgarten 6652-Pano groß 80.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2016 at 19:53:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rose garden in the Volksgarten, Vienna
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Wall street of the tombs sacred way Kerameikos Athens.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 17:35:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

wall of the "Sacred Way" in Athens, Greece
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
  •  Info all by me -- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support One can see this ancient athenian wall in the "Street of the Tombs" of the Kerameikos. This is the beginning of the Sacred Way (Ἱερὰ Ὁδός), from Athens to Eleusis, used for processions and ceremonies.-- Jebulon (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - Thanks for noticing this as a good motif for photography, taking the photograph and posting it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Amazing how precise the cuts of the stones are considering the age of the wall. INeverCry 20:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Appears a bit underexposed (Sujet fascinant au passage, il se trouve que je lis ce livre et que je viens de passer le chapitre sur la culture grecque) - Benh (talk) 07:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you Benh, you are right. I have enhanced the light, contrast and colors. It is more real and less greyish like this (see the plant). I hope previous (and further !) reviewers will agree. Bonne idée de se cultiver. La culture gréco-latine est fascinante, et je m'y laisse facilement prendre si tu regardes mon parcours photographique ces temps-ci (malgré une incursion danoise chez Slaunger)... La Grèce est un pays merveilleux qu'on ne doit pas laisser tomber.--Jebulon (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • Gros hors sujet (d'avance, je vais rester neutre à cause de la nature du sujet, mais le contraste est peut être poussé, regarde les parties claires). J'avais bien remarqué ton penchant pour la Grèce ;) Oui, je suis fasciné pour la beauté de l'art grecque, et par le génie civil romain. Et oui, je réalise qu'on doit beaucoup aux grecs (et aux romains). Mais bizarrement, j'ai commencé à lire ce livre après avoir vu un très bon documentaire sur la fin de l'empire Ottoman sur Arte (Partie 1 et partie 2, je te recommande), qui m'a fait comprendre que les anglais et français sont un peu pour quelque chose dans la situation chaotique au moyen orient et sur les attentats et que tous nos discours me paraissent un peu hypocrites. Bref fin du hors sujet. - Benh (talk) 22:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        • Tu parles des Accords Sykes-Picot, alors que les Anglais avaient promis monts et merveilles aux Arabes s'ils se soulevaient contre les Turcs, via Lawrence d'Arabie, qui du coup en a mangé son keffieh. Et pendant ce temps-là, ils promettaient aussi un pays aux Juifs en Palestine Déclaration Balfour de 1917. Duplicité so british, mais on n'a pas été très "clean" non plus... Résultat: le boxon. Et De Gaulle en rajoute en 44 ("Je volais vers l'Orient compliqué avec des idées simples"), surtout que le Levant français était pro-Vichy, et que des soldats français se sont tirés dessus mutuellement en Syrie... Rien de nouveau sous le soleil.--Jebulon (talk) 14:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done According to Benh's very relevant request, I've corrected the exposure and the contrast. Hope it is good now.--Jebulon (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Bruno Ganz 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 04:33:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

German actor Bruno Ganz
And for The American Friend, Circle of Deceit, Wings of Desire and so many other memorable films. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Isn't "most valuable" for Valued Images? I think we need something more for FP, and 2011 is hardly old enough for us to consider this by the standards of historical pictures from the analog era. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
COM:VI is dead. Yes there are quality issues, but not so dramatic. IMO. The valuability is essential here --A.Savin 11:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dead? Huh? I don't understand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome) - Cappella Paolina.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 10:37:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of Santa Maria Maggiore (Rome) - Cappella Paolina
  • good or valid explanation? because is this? What i can answer if you tell (for example) that the sky is green? Cupola is this,this are the colours...don't like? Ok. But don't ask me because a Cupola have this colors. Danke p.s. and let's finish with these low-quality photos of google, those are not realistic --LivioAndronico (talk) 08:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metabolic Metro Map.svg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 09:14:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Metro-style Map of Metabolism
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Хераклеја Линкестис 4.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 09:26:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heraclea Lyncestis near Bitola, Macedonia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giraffe Mikumi National Park.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 08:20:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barn swallow at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2016 II.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 15:29:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn swallow at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow Wagtail (Motacilla flava), Laskowiec-Zajki meadows, Polska (4664765120).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 23:17:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Motacilla flava in Trzcianne, Mońki, Poland.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:30, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesias rupestres de Ivanovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 14.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 21:14:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rock-hewn Churches of Ivanovo, Bulgaria.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:32, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galite-Galiton.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 11:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galite island Tunisia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maresuke Nogi, 近世名士写真 其1 - Photo only.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 15:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

乃木希典
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:A big male Addax showing as the power of his horns.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 14:45:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

An Addax in the station of acclimatization Safia near the Morocco-Mauritania Borders, south of Dakhla.
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla

File:Regnitz-Baum-1012073.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 17:57:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tree at the banks of the river Regnitz, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:13, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Ardeaalba-Floripa-ene2015.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 23:07:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2016 at 21:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunset on the Bacino di San Marco

(talk) 21:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think the alternative still has too much sky. My suggestion is to do a horizontal crop quite close to the top of the campanile, probably not as far above it as the distance from the beginning of the conical part to the top (I hope it's clear what I mean - the crop still should be above the top of the campanile!). I think if you do that, the composition will really work. But if you prefer, do see what other people think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places
The chosen alternative is: File:Tramonto su San Marco Venezia 2.jpg

File:Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome) - Intern.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 08:30:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Santa Maria in Vallicella (Rome) - Intern
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:PAK FA Prandtl Glauert singularity.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2016 at 18:45:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sukhoi PAK FA (T-50) fighter aircraft
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 21:16, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Early road to Lake Peipus.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 15:12:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bridge over Mustvee port in Estonia
I'm unable to notice any tilt. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've seen similar colors so often that there isn't anything irrealistic to me. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kevadhommik Meenikunno rabas.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2016 at 15:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meenikunno Bog
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montaña del Selado - Caldera del Corazoncillo - Lanzarote.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 05:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from the Ruta de los Volcanes on the Montaña del Selado (black, left, altitude 507 m) and the Caldera del Corazoncillo (altitude 251 m), Timanfaya National Park, Lanzarote
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:De handelsloge van de VOC in Hougly in Bengalen Rijksmuseum SK-A-4282.jpeg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 19:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lodge of the East India Company
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:59, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Emmeline Pankhurst, seated (1913).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2016 at 18:49:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Emmeline Pankhurst
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Footbridge at Gill Force in Eskdale, Cumbria.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 10:55:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Footbridge at Gill Force in Eskdale, western Lake District National Park, Cumbria, England
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:58, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarnica, Bieszczady (by Pudelek).JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 10:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tarnica, Bieszczady mountains, Poland
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Torreparedones - 15.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2016 at 16:08:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle in ruins (Spain)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:55, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista de Iquique, Chile, 2016-02-11, DD 20.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2016 at 09:44:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the Dragon Dune in the foreground and the city of Iquique in the background, northern Chile.
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Barn swallow (feeding) at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2016.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 13:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barn swallow(feeding) at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:Blockmeer Schafstein Nord.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 11:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone run ohn Schafstein n the Rhön Mountains, lokking to the north
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Evening columns Zeus temple Athens.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2016 at 19:12:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Temple of Zeus, Athens.
@-donald-: An answer for you...--Jebulon (talk) 09:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For me there is still missing the ground with other buildings, people or trees to imagine the height. From this original picture I do not know if I see the top quarter of the pillars or 7/8 of it or whatever. -- -donald- (talk) 06:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Hemerocallis fulva 2016 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 19:06:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orange Daylily
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales

File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2016 at 22:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Opernpassage in Vienna, a pedestrian underpass of the most busy crossroads of the city near the opera house, was built in 1955 and opened on 4 November 1955, one day before the reopening of the Vienna State Opera after World War II. Planned by Adolf Hoch it has been a symbol for a modern spirit in architecture and urban planning. Cooperating with the Federal Office for the Protection of Monuments in Austria the City of Vienna undertook a complete restoration of the structure, which was reopened on 17 September 2013. It shows the original design of the round columns, the curved glass of the shop windows, and the chequerboard pattern of the floor.
Not necessarily true for rectillinear projection. Very wide FOVs have far less quality at the edges because more stretching takes place there. That's why I always downsize to 50MP even though center quality could also do 100 or so. --DXR (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Volcán Paniri, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 23.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 18:48:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View of the San Pedro river with the Paniri volcano in the background, El Loa Province, Antofagasta Region, northern Chile, close to the Bolivian border. Parini is a 5,960 metres (19,550 ft) high stratovolcano with a prominence of 1,653 metres (5,423 ft).
Pensaba que el agua era bajita. Nunca imaginaría que hubiese sido un pote plastico debido a la zona --The Photographer (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:White-cheeked Starling at Tennōji Park in Osaka, June 2016.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 16:59:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White-cheeked Starling at Tennōji Park in Osaka.
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:Wloclawek - kosciol Witalisa.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 11:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Vitalis church in Włocławek
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Поперечный срез стебля Ginkgo biloba.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2016 at 11:24:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Oppose I think Kruusamägi below is right: looks very pixelated at full resolution. I'd guess it was upscaled for processing and then accidentally not downscaled again afterwards. Currently, it can't hold up with similar pictures quality-wise, so it fails the "one of our finest" criterion. --El Grafo (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 01:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:2016 Invictus Games, US Wheelchair Basketball Team plays UK for gold 160512-D-BB251-005 (cropped).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 11:04:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

McDaniel looks to steal. Wheelchair basketball at Invictus Games 2016.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People Events (Arts, concerts, shows...)
  •  Info created by Roger Wollenberg - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Fæ -- Fæ (talk) 11:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Email correspondence this month with Roger Wollenberg clarified that the photograph is in focus, but could not be made sharper due to the speed of the game and necessary shutter speed. As the event was indoors, there needed to be a high ISO and as this was a real sports event rather than a composition, options such as using high powered lights were impossible. This version has a slight crop, removing a top shadowy border in the background, some of the yellow foreground, and helps to focus on the central portrait. At the current time I can find no existing FPs for wheelchair sports. -- Fæ (talk) 11:04, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support This is a great action shot, and the noise doesn't bother me considering the circumstances -- Thennicke (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Apart from softness and noise it’s just too busy for me. If it wasn’t for the men in the background, but as it is, the main subjects do not stand out clearly enough to make the picture special. The circumstances do not excuse for drawbacks here IMHO. We look for the very finest images, not for the best possible ones. Sometimes you simply cannot take a featurable shot. --Kreuzschnabel 16:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Option we had before was much better, but noise. Now this one is out. --Mile (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support INeverCry 18:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I find this a more exciting and better-lit scene than the other one, but is it really impossible to sharpen the photo a bit more? I don't really want to oppose a feature for this photo. I think it's good enough at full-page size, but the degree of graininess at full size bothers me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:55, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chicoreus axicornis 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 17:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Five views of a shell of an Axicornis Murex
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

File:Church st. Arhangel Mihail in Radozda.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 00:17:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old cave Church of Archangel Michael in Radožda, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:00, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Immature Western Gull in flight at Bodega Head.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 19:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

"Immature Western Gull (Larus occidentalis occidentalis) in flight at Bodega Head, California"
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Ontluikende bloemknop van schijnpapaver (Meconopsis cambrica). Vaste plant. Zaait zichzelf uit. Locatie, Tuinreservaat Jonkervallei 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2016 at 17:49:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roof tiles packed in crate 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 12:08:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Packed clay rooftiles
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Sphinx at Universitetskaya Embankment (img1).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 13:28:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Petersburg, Russia: Sphinx at Universitetskaya Embankment (Quay with Sphinxes)
 Comment The noise is better done at RAW stadium, so pinging @Florstein: . (For me, however, the sky is OK.) --A.Savin 23:45, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's the most slightest noice I ever dealt with. And I see no reason to reduce it even more. Especially after "perjebulonists" invasion. :) --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - Excuse me, Alex, it's not so slight to me. And now I found a spot to the right of the sphinx's hat. Do you know what it is? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jacek Halicki: Tilt corrected. ;) --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:00, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should I delete the pigeon? --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would say no, I like the pigeon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Thanks, I'll look forward to that. And User:Florstein, I've noticed that other photos that have been nominated here have been less noisy in the sky without blurring the rest of the picture. This is, after all, Featured Picture Candidates, where we're supposed to judge whether nominees are among the most outstanding pictures on the site. I think there's room for doubt with your picture the way it currently is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Much appreciated, but I regret to say that I'm not really noticing the difference. Did you definitely save the right file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quod erat demonstrandum. Alas, Ikan Kekek simply likes to get on nerves. Doesn't matter, is there noise or not - he sees it. @A.Savin: большое спасибо за работу, Саш, но теперь сфинкс и правда кренится немного влево. :) --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:26, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • You really shouldn't take this personally. Do you seriously think I have something against you? Why would I? Yet you took any opposition or even criticism personally right away, the better to dismiss it ad hominem. And you haven't succeeded in trying to goad me into opposing a feature for your picture, which I would certainly do if all I really cared about was the way you reacted to my request, and then my change from support to neutrality. Have a nice day. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I don't know about the tilt, but the noise is definitely lesser. Try to purge your cache. --A.Savin 11:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say anything about a tilt. I also don't understand why it took a purge of my cache for me to be able to see a difference between the two files after opening both. All that said, I do see a difference now, thank you, and will now  Support a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:59, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculptures

File:Titanacris.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 11:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Parnassius mnemosyne - Dumanlı apollo 12.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 20:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parnassius mnemosyne
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Meister der Manessischen Liederhandschrift 004.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 09:07:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Otto IV of Brandenburg playing chess with a woman, 1305 to 1340
 Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: its pixel size is way below minimum --Kreuzschnabel 17:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016 Radmor 5102 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 16:13:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Groep bomen in verruigd biotoop. Locatie, Oostvaardersplassen 05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2016 at 15:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  •  Comment - By the way, it's totally fine for you to take a vacation from here if you like, but I hope it's not too long because I appreciate the views you express here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  CommentSee en:Demosaicing. I put an annotation on the nomination site, there’s a clearly visible green-and-purple pattern in the grass caused by interference of these details and the sensor matrix. Won’t look nice when printed. --Kreuzschnabel 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Kreuzschnabel: You're not seeing ghosts, it's there. But you have to look for it at 100% zoom, so that alone probably wouldn't be enough for an oppose for me. However, I'm not really wowed by it either, tending towards a  weak oppose --El Grafo (talk) 13:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I applied a color luminance correction. I think, it´s ok now. (you can make it either with the camera raw filter from Photoshop or with Lightroom, I did it with Photoshop. But I think it may be same procedure and algorithm. --Hubertl 06:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Hubertl and Hubertl: . Thank you for your correction.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dolphin Anatomy.svg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 12:06:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dolphin Anatomy
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scarlet skimmer at Keitakuen in Osaka, June 2016 IV.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 16:19:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scarlet skimmer at Keitakuen in Osaka.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schammelsdorf-war-memorial-6117014.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2016 at 13:09:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

War memorial in Schammelsdorf
  •  Comment - A disagreement about what good light for this subject consists of is a matter of taste, but if you would, please elaborate on what you mean by "too much going on". I enjoy moving my eyes around this composition. Do you feel that the hedges distract inordinately from the memorial? If so, that's just another disagreement as a matter of taste, as I consider the photo to be about the combination of vegetation and a memorial with village houses in the background, not just the memorial. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's mainly the wooden house on the right side of the background and the cut part of the roof at the left side. Together it makes the picture look unbalanced (the foreground is symmetrical while the background is not). The hedge itself is completely ok for me. I can imagine why you thought this could be FP but I'm sorry that I can't really agree. The light is too dull for my taste, maybe I'd give it a pro if the memorial was lit by the warm light of a rising sun or something like that. Of course, it's all a matter of taste. --Code (talk) 11:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meenikunnu Suur Suujärv 2009.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2016 at 08:32:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Meenikunno Nature Park, Estonia
  •  Comment - If the picture is awesome, who cares about such "rules", which are really more general guidelines than actual rules? This is the 21st century. We experienced over 100 years of avant gardism, and now all of a sudden, we're supposed to have inflexible rules of composition? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The rule of third is one possible, but not the only one. With a symmetric or near symmetric composition, a centered horizon makes sense. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Purpuricène.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 10:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Sugarloaf Sunrise 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2016 at 16:28:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sunrise in Rio de Janeiro with Sugarloaf Mountain, seen from Tijuca Park.

Alternative[edit]

Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena
The chosen alternative is: File:Sugarloaf_Sunrise_2.jpg

File:Aegina sunset.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 21:15:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aegina sunset
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Carlo Tessarini.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2016 at 09:57:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

 Oppose Per Jebulon. --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mattie Edwards Hewitt - half-length photo by Frances Benjamin Johnston.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 17:26:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mattie Edwards Hewitt
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Peterborough Cathedral Nave, Cambridgeshire, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2016 at 22:46:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Peterborough Cathedral)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2016 at 23:15:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

San Silvestro in Capite (Rome) - Ceiling
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Log/June_2016&oldid=239685773"