User talk:Hendric Stattmann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hallo Newsflash,
Ich habe zu deinem Photo Image:Burgruine moedling.jpg die "location possible"-Kategorie und den entsprechend template hinzugefügt. Da nicht genau ersichtlich ist, wo du das Photo aufgenommen hast, bitte ich dich, das mittels des {{location dec|Lat|Long|heading:XXX)-template hinzuzufügen. Danke, Hendric Stattmann (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't got any GPS, but I'll give it a try Hendric Stattmann (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The image is now geotagged.Hendric Stattmann (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elisabethkirche Schneeberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Schlaier 17:24, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hendric, ich werde mich gerne mal an der Bearbeitung Deines Bildes versuchen, aber erst kommende Woche werde ich Zeit dafür finde. Die momentane Kandidatur würde ich an Deiner Stelle aber abbrechen. So wie es jetzt ist hat es keinen Sinn. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Thank you for your feedback on the photograph. I have reworked the perspective and distortion. The new version has the perspective reduced slightly. Make sure to purge the cache of your web browser. --Jovian Eye talk 20:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Hendric, Danke für deinen hilfreichen Kommentar. Ich habe die Horizontlinie jetzt korrigiert und eine neue Version hochgeladen. Allerdings habe ich dabei nicht darüber nachgedacht, dass die aktualisierte Version automatisch auch in der Kandidatenliste auftaucht ... ich hätte die Kandidatur wohl besser abgebrochen und eine neue eingereicht. Nun ist es passiert ... aber für die nächste Kandidatur hab ich was dazu gelernt. Viele Grüße --Pe-sa (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to FPC (and to Commons, after a so long silence)! It's good to see one more attentive and knowlegeable voice in our forum. We hope you will soon start participating as an author! Greetings, Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Elisabethkirche Schneeberg color corr.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elisabethkirche Schneeberg color corr.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Canyon North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and a great view --Leviathan1983 10:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzensburg Schlosspark Laxenburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilgerkreuz Veitsch Nachtansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better, thanks! --Hubertl 18:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rumeli Feneri Castle - Halil Pasha Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Treffen in Mödling[edit]

hallo Hendric, hast keine Lust? Siehe hier --Hubertl 21:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Muh? --Hubertl 08:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Einladung, Hubertl! Ich werde sehen, ob ich früh genug aus der Arbeit komme und ob mich meine Chefin daheim lässt... --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 13:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Muh hilft ;-) - Würd´ mich jedenfalls freuen, Karl und ich haben schon gerätselt, ob du ein Phantom bist. --Hubertl 14:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
+1 :-) --K@rl (talk) 15:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QIC Review[edit]

Hallo Hendric, danke für die Beurteilung der Bilder vor 2 Tagen. Bei dem Fenster habe ich inzwischen die Perspektive korrigiert, es war wirklich ziemlich gestaucht. Danke für den Hinweis. Ist es Deiner Meinung nach jetzt in Ordnung? Zumindest wenn ich das Längen/Breiten-Verhältnis mit den anderen Bildern aus der Kirche vergleiche, auf denen das Fenster zu sehen ist, müssten die Proportionen jetzt stimmen. Viele Grüße --Llez (talk) 14:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QIC discuss reset[edit]

Hallo Hendric, ich habe mir erlaubt, zwei Reviews von "Discuss" auf "Nomination" zurückzusetzen. Der Grund ist, dass Bilder erst dann ins Consensual Review geschickt werden, wenn zwei unterschiedliche Meinungen zu einem Bild existieren. Du kannst also als Erst-Reviewer nur zwischen  Support und  Oppose wählen. Insbesondere ist es üblich, bei leicht zu behebenden Fehlern nur eine Bemerkung zu machen und dann dem Autor 5-7 Tage Zeit zur Verbesserung zu geben. Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:49, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, alles klar, CEphoto, Uwe Aranas! --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 06:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaupark irissee izd tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Hendric Stattmann,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stramberk castle - View from Kotouc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo of good quality. --Ermell 19:29, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]