User talk:ElBute

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ElBute!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:01, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estacion de Valchillon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estacion de Valchillon 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The perspective should be corrected. --A.Savin 17:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC) Comment Fixed. Thanks. --ElBute 20:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 20:25, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estacion de Valchillon 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anamorphic words in Maruanas 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice idea, well made! --Hubertl 18:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:00, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. Please have a look to the buildings in the background. --XRay 11:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Fixed. Thanks --ElBute 14:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Support Thanks. IMO it's OK now. --XRay 15:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. Please have a look to the buildings in the background. --XRay 11:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment I am sorry but I cannot identify the buildings in the background you are referring to. If a perspective correction is needed, I cannot find a guiding element to carry it out. --ElBute 14:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC) Weak  Support It's acceptable, yes. There are lamp posts in the back ground. But you're right, it's only a minor problem. --XRay 15:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the image needs perspective correction. Please have a look to the buildings in the background. --XRay 11:36, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Fixed. Thanks --ElBute 14:16, 20 March 2016 (UTC)  Support Thanks. IMO it's OK now. --XRay 15:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

RE: Invitación a participar en OpenShot Córdoba

Hola ElBute. ¿En qué consiste el proyecto? Podría estar interesado. Saludos. --Hameryko (talk) 13:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Ram-Man 16:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition. Ram-Man 02:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardines de Vallellano 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:11, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque de la Asomadilla 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's extremely boring, but the quality is fine. Ram-Man 02:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)  Comment Ha ha, thanks but, from my POV, this is my favourite image of the series as it is simple and clean, no disturbing elements in sight. Clearly, the most artistic photo of the series (for me). --ElBute 16:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cordoba Center Hotel in Cordoba, Spain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardines de Vallellano 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tone curve is not really convincing. It lacks darks and contrast imo. Can be improved. --Cccefalon 11:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Contrast increased. Tone curve adjusted. Thanks. --ElBute 18:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procesión del Calvario en Córdoba, España (2016) - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good focus to main persons, good composition, sharp and not over-or underexposed --Michielverbeek 08:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok though maybe a bit too sharpened --Christian Ferrer 16:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers of Alamilllo in Luque, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procesión del Calvario en Córdoba, España (2016) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procesión del Calvario en Córdoba, España (2016) - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice pic, creates atmosphere, please add description in english -Knöre 15:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Done, although most of the description is the name of the procession which has been preserved in the original language. --ElBute 18:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Thanks!-Knöre 21:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procesión del Calvario en Córdoba, España (2016) - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good but the top crop is too tight, can you expand it? Poco a poco 09:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment You're right but there is no more room in the original image. --ElBute 11:16, 17 April 2016 (UTC) *  Comment what is the referrer to wikidata good for? --Hubertl 14:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Used for Wiki Loves Folk, a photo contest organised by Wikimedia Spain --ElBute 15:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Hubertl 13:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in the first edition of Wiki Loves Folk! Dear ElBute, On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia Spain, organizer of the first edition (and first season in 2016) of Wiki Loves Folk, we want to say thank you for your participation, and especially for contributing your pictures to the free knowledge. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest has gathered hundred of pictures of folklore festivals from Spain. We'll say thank you twice if you're a new member of the community. Welcome and enjoy!!! You can find all your uploaded pictures in here, and you are of course very welcome to keep uploading images (even if this season of WLF has almost come to an end) and hence help to develop Wikimedia Commons. Commons community meets in the Village Pump. If you want to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. If you're fluent in Spanish, you can go directly to the lists of festivals of tourist interest in Spain and write avout the Spanish festivals, inserting images in appropriate articles. Feel free to translate into English or other languages. Our license encourages it!!!. You are more than welcome to leave us a comment, suggestion or question. You can post them here. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Folk team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, do you have pictures of that landscape without the bunker? --Poco a poco 19:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Sorry. I went there just to capture the bunkers. But, if you need a specific photo, let me know and I'll try to take it for you. Thanks. --ElBute 09:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Image has good quality and focus. The perspective is weird (it's not exactly the view I expect from "inside of bunker"), but artistic. I like. --Peulle 10:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)  Comment Right. In fact, I wanted it to be more artistic. Hence the weird perspective. Thanks. --ElBute 18:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Lugares de la Guerra Civil Española

B25es (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Procesión del Calvario en Córdoba, España (2016) - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 15:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers of Alamilllo in Luque, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. --C messier 18:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cordoba Center Hotel in Cordoba, Spain.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cordoba Center Hotel in Cordoba, Spain.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers of Alamilllo in Luque, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers of Alamilllo in Luque, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkeres del Aceitunillo en Luque, Córdoba, España (2016) - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Maybe too much tone mapping (see the darker parts of the trees in font of the sky), but a QI for me. More opinions appreciated. --C messier 18:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment You're right. Problem fixed. Thanks. --ElBute 13:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)  Support It is better now. --C messier 10:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically not a "portrait" but the photo is of good quality. --Peulle 17:51, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Quality just good enough for a Q1photo, but you might reduce highlights a bit --Michielverbeek 19:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Highlights reduced. Thanks. --ElBute 09:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers of Alamilllo in Luque, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 00:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sky needs denoise. --C messier 15:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Done. Thanks. --ElBute 18:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --C messier 14:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 06:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torreparedones - 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oye stave church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very good work! --Hubertl 12:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalla de las flores 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalla de las flores 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gudvangen summer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Without the yellow buses, could have been a really great view --A.Savin 15:24, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalla de las flores 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 22:34, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bunker of Albendin in Albendin, Cordoba, Spain (2016) - 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oye stave church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oye stave church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feria de Cordoba (2016) 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campos de Hernan Perea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:55, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva del Agua en Tiscar 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments weak  Support. some high exposed areas, with very little contrast --Hubertl 17:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laguna de Valdeazores.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. The rest (sharpness, balance) is improveable. --Hubertl 14:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacimiento del Guadalquivir 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:07, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacimiento del Guadalquivir 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:57, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacimiento del Guadalquivir 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments F8 might have been better, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva del Agua en Tiscar 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cueva del Agua en Tiscar 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. --C messier 11:48, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:05, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Papeletas electorales

B25es (talk) 15:19, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo (alt1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Embalse de Puente Nuevo in Cordoba.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Playmobil. Camping out.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playmobil. Camping out.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Famberhorst 15:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel in the Grossglockner Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice view. Please fix the halos from sharpening. IMO it's oversharpened. --XRay 17:28, 5 July 2016 (UTC)  Done Sharpening and halos have been reduced. --ElBute 13:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. --XRay 17:51, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Riopar Viejo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight tilt in ccw direction Poco a poco 17:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Done. --ElBute 15:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water fountain in Riopar Viejo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments o.k. --Ermell 12:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Riopar Viejo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. W.carter 08:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cemetery of Riopar Viejo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some perspective adjustment, nice and sharp otherwise. W.carter 08:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks. --ElBute 10:53, 6 August 2016 (UTC) Nice! Good quality. W.carter 10:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker under the Milky Way.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Night shot with long exposure so a bit of noise is acceptable. QI. W.carter 09:05, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water fountain in Riopar Viejo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit poorly/wrongly described, there is no spouting water here, it is more "Reflection of sky in small pool". Also needs better categories. W.carter 12:40, 7 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment Description updated. Categories added. Thanks. --ElBute 12:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC) Very nice. Good quality. W.carter 15:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parish church of Riopar Viejo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The tree to the left is full of red/purple CAs. Fixable. W.carter 12:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)  Done Fixed now. Thanks. --ElBute 12:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC) You missed a spot! There is still some red. ;) Sorry for being picky. W.carter 15:46, 7 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment Can't believe it! Ha, ha! Check now, please. Thanks again. --ElBute 18:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Good enough now. QI. W.carter 19:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santa Lucia Festival in Yeste, Albacete. Spain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can't complain about the light here! ;D Awsome! And good quality, added a cat though. W.carter 13:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)  Comment Ha, ha. Thanks ;). --ElBute 14:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harbour of Castro Urdiales.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bunker under the Milky Way.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bunker under the Milky Way.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

---

Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming! Dear ElBute, As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again. We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. We look forward to your free images! Sincerely, The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Church of the Saint Andrew in Cordoba (Spain) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:21, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Graciosa from Mirador del Rio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Saint Andrew in Cordoba (Spain) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of the Church of the Saint Andrew in Cordoba (Spain) - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Playing with the ratio (if required) has a similar effect. QI --Poco a poco 19:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ornamental pool in Jameos del Agua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Rosario. Peñarroya, Cordoba (Spain) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top crop a bit thigh but overall QI to me --Poco a poco 17:27, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Rosario. Peñarroya, Cordoba (Spain) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.I would have pushed the dumpster outside the image. --Milseburg 15:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Parroquial de San Antonio Abad. Obejo, Cordoba (Spain) - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction at the left; white facade is a bit too bright --A.Savin 11:22, 23 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Fixed. --ElBute 09:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC) OK now --A.Savin 11:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Parroquial de San Antonio Abad. Obejo, Cordoba (Spain) - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentThe image needs perspective correction. And CAs top right. --XRay 12:45, 23 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Fixed. --ElBute 09:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment CAs fixed, but IMO the image is leaning out at the right. --XRay 05:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Way too subtle, but fixed now. --ElBute 17:05, 25 September 2016 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 15:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Parroquial de San Antonio Abad. Obejo, Cordoba (Spain) - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casas colgantes de Cuenca iluminadas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra de los Molinos 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lentokonefani 18:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra de los Molinos 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 15:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra de los Molinos 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sierra de los Molinos 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callejones de las majadas 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 15:12, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callejones de las majadas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casas colgantes de Cuenca iluminadas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuenca de noche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador del Tio Cogote 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacimiento del Rio Tajo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the sculptures are interesting, so please identify the sculptor (and possibly the names of the sculptures) and list his/her name (and possibly the names of the sculptures) among the categories. -- Ikan Kekek 13:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)  Comment I'll try to find out the information. Thanks. --ElBute 15:31, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callejones de las majadas 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callejones de las majadas 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:04, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sendero botanico Hoz de Beteta 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la constitucion en Puerto Lapice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sendero botanico Hoz de Beteta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Parroquial de la Inmaculada Concepcion. Aldeaquintana, Cordoba. Spain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 16:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Logo OpenShot Córdoba

Buenas Edmundo

Veo que solicitaste hace un año el borrado de File:Logo OpenShot Cordoba (negro).jpg indicando “This is an old version of the logo, not used in any other page/gallery.” (no sé por qué Taivo usó ese mensaje de borrado, posiblemente se confundiera). El caso es que este se utilizaba en https://www.wikimedia.es/wiki/OpenShot y https://wiki.wikimedia.es/wiki/OpenShot_C%C3%B3rdoba ¿Podrías mirar con qué imagen se deberían reemplazar?

Un saludo

Platonides (talk) 22:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Hola, Platónides. La verdad es que las páginas que indicas en el dominio wikimedia.es están abandonadas, puesto que los grupos OpenShot tienen ya página en el espacio de Commons. En cualquier caso, la imagen que sustituyó a esa es la que se encuentra en https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_Espa%C3%B1a/OpenShot_C%C3%B3rdoba#/media/File:Logo_OpenShot_Cordoba_(negro).png.

Saludos.

--ElBute (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Playmobil. Camping out.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth Spain 2018 has started!

---

Dear ElBute, As every year, Wiki Loves Earth in Spain, an international photographic contest about natural heritage sites in the Spanish territory, started on May 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2018 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again to document biodiversity. If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here. You can review the rules of the contest in it official site (Spanish). We look forward to your free images! We take also the opportunity to invite you to Wiki Loves 2017 awards ceremony, which will take place on June 16th at 17:00 in the Medialab-Prado auditorium, in Madrid. Open entry until filled to capacity. Sincerely, The team of the Wiki Loves Earth edition in Spain

--Rubén Ojeda (WMES) (talk) 09:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 ya ha comenzado!

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España, nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2019 acaba de empezar. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre. Además, este año organizamos el concurso de fotografía en colaboración con Wikimedia Portugal, por lo tanto también puedes subir imágenes del país vecino.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactar con nuestro coordinador de programas: Rubén Ojeda (WMES).

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2019 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --19:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

¡Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado!

¡Hola! Nos alegra anunciar que Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar la naturaleza de España y mostrarla al mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos. Por favor, consulta primero las bases del concurso en su página oficial. En ella también puedes conocer cómo participar. Si tienes alguna pregunta, sugerencia o comentario, por favor, no dudes en ponerte en contacto con nosotros.

Gracias,
el comité organizador de Wiki Loves Earth 2020 en España - 09:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Estás recibiendo este mensaje porque ya participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores.

¡La edición española de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado!

Amanecer en la Bahía del Fangar

¡Hola! Desde Wikimedia España nos complace anunciar que la edición de Wiki Loves Earth 2022 ya ha comenzado. Tu participación nos ayudará a documentar espacios naturales protegidos y compartirlos con el mundo a través de Wikipedia y otros proyectos de conocimiento libre.

Accede a la página del concurso para leer las bases: https://www.wikilovesearth.es/. Allí también podrás descubrir detalles sobre cómo participar y cuáles son los premios de esta edición. Si tienes cualquier duda, no dudes en contactarnos.

¡Muchas gracias y suerte! El equipo organizador de WLE 2022 en España

"Recibes este mensaje porque participaste en el concurso en ediciones anteriores" --03:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)