User talk:TwoWings/Archives

This is my archived talks.

Français : Bienvenue sur Commons, TwoWings/Archives!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, cela donne : `Image:Foo.jpg` Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : `{{bad name\|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}}` Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

Catégories[edit]

Salut Jraf,

J'ai créé les catégories Actress by nationality ainsi que Actress from France qui n'existaient pas. Ensuite, le gros problème de Commons, c'est que les catégories sont gérées un peu n'importe comment. Bizarrement, on y applique pas les mêmes principes que Wikipédia, à savoir créer des articles et catégoriser ces derniers, plutôt que les photos elles-mêmes. Personnellement, je trouve que c'est quand même mieux d'avoir Bertille Noël-Bruneau et Marie-Josée Croze avec toutes les photos de l'une et l'autre rassemblées (là il n'y en a qu'une, mais il aurait très bien pu y en avoir une dizaine) plutôt qu'une unique catégorie avec plusieurs centaines de photos pas forcément bien nommées. En faisant ainsi, je trouve que c'est beaucoup plus rapide et facile de trouver toutes les photos d'une personne donnée. Okki 18:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Cosmos05.gif[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cosmos05.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Fil nik 18:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The site, if it's the author of the photo, must say explicitly under what license are the images released. You cannot do anything if you know only that the image "is free". --Filnik 18:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jraf and his TwoWings ghost.JPG[edit]

Bonjour. Avec la restriction que tu as indiquée, cette image n'est pas libre, et donc pas acceptable sur Commons. Cette restriction est contradictoire avec la licence Creative Commons que tu as choisie. Si tu ne lèves pas la restriction d'usage, je devrai supprimer l'image. guillom 15:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Par ailleurs, je trouve ça un peu bizzare de mettre sur toutes tes images : "If you use this picture, could you just inform me here? Thanks. The author." Ca semble difficile de te contacter à chaque fois qu'on utilise une de tes images dans un article, non ?--Bapti 15:38, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Il y a toujours une restriction, puisque tu demandes qu'on te contacte avant d'utiliser la photo. Il vaut mieux que tu supprimes cette phrase très ambigue et que tu apposes un {{Personality rights}} dessus. guillom 17:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Une image est libre si tout le monde peut l'utiliser pour tout usage. C'est dans la définition. La GFDL n'empêche aucunement une quelconque utilisation : si quelqu'un veut passer à la télé une video sous GFDL, il peut tout à fait faire défiler la GFDL sur l'écran à la fin de la séquence, même si ce n'est pas pratique. De la même façon, tu peux aussi importer ton image sur les projets où tu souhaites l'afficher. Mais les images sous licence libre sur Commons doivent être utilisables pour tout usage. Par exemple, si quelqu'un aime la couleur rouge de ta photo et souhaite l'utiliser dans un blog, ou un magazine papier, ou quoi que ce soit, il en a le droit. Par contre, pour une publicité il n'aura pas le droit car cela impliquerait que tu soutiens le produit en question. À ce moment on n'est plus dans le domaine du droit d'auteur, mais dans celui du droit à l'image. La phrase que tu as laissée n'est certes pas contraignante, mais les gens peuvent entièrement l'ignorer s'ils le veulent. Si quelqu'un veut utiliser l'image, rien ne le force à te contacter auparavant. Il faut juste que tu en sois conscient.guillom 18:42, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message sur mes photos...[edit]

Certes tu as raison sur un point mais en fait tout vient du fait que je devrais reformuler ma phrase! En effet, j'ai seulement envie de savoir quand quelqu'un l'utilise ailleurs que sur un projet Wikimedia (puisqu'il y a un outil pour connaître les utilisations wikimediennes!). Et puis ce n'est pas si contraignant que ça ni une obligation (c'est juste demandé poliment!). Je m'en vais modifier la phrase sur toutes mes photos pour que ce soit plus compréhensible (et restreindre cela aux photos CC-BY-SA seulement). J'attends juste un peu avant de me lancer dans ces modif au cas où tu aies un commentaire intéressant à ce sujet! Merci pour ta remarque. --TwoWings (jraf) * Wanna talk? ;-) 16:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Salut,

Avec ton explication, je comprends mieux le sens du message :p

En fait, je te conseille de créer une sous-page perso, genre User:Jraf/Note et de faire afficher ce modèle sur toutes tes images avec {{User:Jraf/Note}} (exemple de présentation). Je pense que tu peux demander à un bot de remplacer les occurences de "If you use this picture, could you just inform me here? Thanks. The author." par {{User:Jraf/Note}}.

Bonne continuation.--Bapti 19:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ton image perso[edit]

Salut,

Dans ce contexte, "should" a valeur d'obligation (je sais, c'est subtil, mais ici il faut justement éviter les ambiguités). Soyons clairs : si tu veux que cette image ne soit utilisée que sur tes pages perso, importes-la sur chaque projet avec une mention restreignant l'usage. Sur Commons, ça n'est pas possible : soit tu autorises la diffusion de l'image, soit non, mais une mention de ce genre n'est pas acceptable ; Commons ne sert pas à mettre les images perso.

Merci de ta compréhension, le Korrigan →bla 09:51, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Si je peux me permettre, pour vivre en Angleterre depuis plus de 4 ans, je pense saisir un minimum les subtilités de la langue. "Should" a une valeur contraignante, et s'oppose très clairement à la licence qui dit que l'image peut être librement réutilisée. Si tu veux restreindre l'utilisation d'une image, Commons n'est pas le bon endroit pour ça. Sans action de ta part, cette image devra être supprimée d'ici. Relis COM:APL qui détaille très bien les conditions d'inclusion d'un fichier. le Korrigan →bla 10:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, à présent c'est bon. C'est vrai que d'un côté il pourrait y avoir une règle spéciale pour ça, mais quand on voit le genre d'abus que génère les images "personnelles" sur WP, on se dit que c'est déjà ça de gagné si on les évite sur Commons. Et Commons est peuplé par des intégristes du libre :-) le Korrigan →bla 20:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Besoin d'aide d'un bot.[edit]

On m'a indiqué cette page pour demander à remplacer les occurences de "If you use this picture, could you just inform me here? Thanks. The author." par {{User:Jraf/Note}}. Est-ce possible? Merci d'avance. --TwoWings (jraf) * Wanna talk? ;-) 07:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, voilà c'est fait. Cordialement, Educa33^e 06:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image: port de pêche[edit]

Salut Jraf, J'ai trouvé une autre image pour le port de pêche qui me semble plus intéressante, il ne faut pas qu'il y ait deux photos du port de pêche. Oui, je suis bien l'auteur des images. Karel leermans 12:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Tu as incoporé sur commons l'image: "Image:Cosmos05.gif" mais je pense que je ne pourrais pas l'utiliser parce que c'est près du porno (?!). Karel leermans 15:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Exhibition Ron Mueck Edinburgh.JPG[edit]

Hello, I am considering marking this photograph for deletion with Template:Derivative, because its subject appears to be copyrighted banners. An original photograph of a copyrighted work is a derivative work, and derivative works cannot be freely licensed; the rights of the photographer are subject to the rights of the author whose work the photograph depicts. Please let me know if there is any other explanation here. Thanks, Postdlf 01:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Innapropriate pictures[edit]

Image:0-big8.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:0-big8.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Pumpmeup 06:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:0-big3.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:0-big3.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Pumpmeup 06:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message here. It would seem to me that you have actually taken measures to defraud on the license - by cropping out copyright website addresses. I hope you take note of this. Regards --Pumpmeup 07:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks - no hard feelings :-) --Pumpmeup 07:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage volontaire[edit]

Merci Jastrow (puisque tu suis ma page!). Je n'ai pas de remords. Le seul que je pourrais avoir c'est de n'avoir demandé que 15 jours alors que j'en ai demandé 132 sur Wikipedia (fr+en), Wikiquote et Wikisource! Mais je me laisse une chance de m'auto-réguler sur Commons après un break strict de 15 jours. Si je n'y arrive pas, je demanderai alors un autre blocage. On verra. En attendant, je vais m'atteler à mes révisions pendant ces 15 jours sans Wikimedia! Merci encore... --TwoWings (jraf) * Wanna talk? ;-) 16:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tss, à peine débloqué... Révise, feignasse ! ;-) Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong country[edit]

Regarding this edit Buenos Aires is the capital of Argentina :) Barcex 21:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Piracy.jpg[edit]

OK. I'm not sure but there are tags that stated:

zarautz 
paisvasco 
basquecountry 
pais 
vasco 
basque 
country 
pirata 
dc 
malecon 
inmigracion 
immigration 
shrektercero 
shrek3 
shrek 
top 
manta 
peliculas Basque and Manta

I supposed it is the Basque Country in Spain. Maybe I'm wrong... Regards :) Elektron 09:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the "Forgery" is a larger group than the "Product piracy" (and it is a subgroup of "forgery"). I don't think that if you forge money you can be colled "a (product) pirate" ;)... See here; piracy (at the end of the article). Elektron 09:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your Image:Caledonian Canal (Corpach).JPG[edit]

Hi TwoWings, my decline is based on the high level of noise that you can see in your image at full resolution looking at sky or water comparing with this one. In my opinion, high level of noise is acceptable only if there are strong mitigating circumstances like in that one, where the author needed high speed to freeze the action and high speed means high ISO and high noise. In landscape photography you don't need high speed and you have time to select the lowest possible ISO value to reduce noise. In other images like this one, noise is not disturbing because focus in on rough surfaces like the oxidized car and ruins and not on blue sky and water. --LucaG 22:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Car in Oradour-sur-Glane.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Copyvio énigmatique[edit]

Bonjour ! J'ai enlevé le bandeau {{Copyvio}} de l'image Image:Mandriva portugues.png car tu n'avais pas donné de raison et que de mon côté je n'en ai trouvé aucune, même pas pour un effacement classique. Tu peux évidemment réverter mon action en indiquant cette fois la raison et en n'oubliant pas de prévenir l'uploader, comme précisé sur le bandeau. On peut aussi en discuter ici au préalable. — Xavier, 19:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tout d'abord je suis désolé de ne pas suivre les recommandations! Je ne suis pas encore familier des outils de ce genre. Je penserais la prochaine fois à prévenir l'uploader et à donner ma raison. Venons-en à l'explication: il me semblait que cette photo était un cas de derivated work... Mais je ne suis pas un expert. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de soucis, il n'y a pas eu mort d'homme. Cette image est effectivement une œuvre dérivée... mais de logiciels libres (Mandriva, Firefox, KDE) et Firefox affiche un site libre, donc il n'y a pas de violation des droits d'auteurs (en tout cas à première vue). Cependant, je n'étais pas 100% certain vu que Mandriva commercialise des distributions Linux qui ne sont pas 100% libres, donc je me suis dit que peut-être que tu avais repéré que le fond d'écran ne l'était pas, ou qq chose d'autre qui m'aurait échappé. Cordialement. — Xavier, 17:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Je sais que ce sont des logiciels libres mais ça n'empêche pas leurs interfaces et leurs logos d'être des marques déposées non? Comme je l'ai dit je ne suis pas un expert mais bon je m'interroge en me basant sur ce qui est indiqué sur cette image. Wikipedia est certes un site libre mais son logo n'est pas libre. Donc dans le cas de l'image qui me "dérangeait" je me dis qu'il y a peut-être un problème - ou en tout cas que la licence de l'image devrait peut-être être différente. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui, les logos, je n'y avais pas pensé. Dans ce cas, je te propose de faire un {{Delete}} classique plutôt qu'un {{Copyvio}} car ce n'est pas la première image qui contient un logo : la moitié des photos de voitures contiennent le logo du constructeur quelque part sur le capot. Je pense qu'ensuite, les questions qui se posent sont l'importance du logo par rapport au reste de l'image, quel est le sujet principal, etc. Et commme la décision d'effacer est très subjective, elle se discute. Note que sur Commons, tu ne trouveras pas le logo d'Ubuntu mais il y a pas mal de copies d'écran qui contiennent le logo quelque part dans un coin. Cela dit, peut-être méritent-elles elles aussi d'être effacées ? Je pense que non mais bon... — Xavier, 18:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A la réflexion tu as raison et je me demande même pourquoi je chipote, moi qui suis d'habitude très ouvert à ce genre de détournement de copyright en réinterprétant le panorama freedom (il n'y a qu'à voir certaines de mes contributions avec des statues dans le champ!). Bref, je ne poursuivrai donc pas ce que j'ai engagé... Par contre, après lecture de ta réponse, je me pose des questions sur ceci... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sysresccdlogo.png est "tagguée" GPL. Personnellement, je n'en sais rien mais je n'ai pas de raisons d'en douter a priori. Est-ce un logo déposé comme celui de WP ? De toute façon, pour les droits d'auteur, un logo comme celui-ci va être difficile à défendre vu qu'il s'agit de la superposition rudimentaire de dessins libres ou dans le domaine public. Au pire, si le logo est déposé, son utilisation est restreinte (comme celui de Coca-Cola) mais ça n'empêche pas le logo d'avoir sa place ici. — Xavier, 18:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skye photo[edit]

Salut TwoWings, regarding your Image:Bench-Kilt Rock.JPG (now moved to consensual review) I think COM:QIC should not be about sunshine only. Hence I submitted an autumn photo of mine to Quality image candidates as well. -- Klaus with K 17:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brigade de surveillance des blocages volontaires :)[edit]

Salut, je réalise tout juste que tu es Jraf !
Tu n'es pas censé être bloqué à ta demande pour préparer un concours ? :o)
Bien cordialement,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 13:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nude deletion[edit]

Hi, I supported the deletion of 2 of the images simply because I didn't think they were terribly useful. We do have a lot of nude photographs already, so we're not exactly desperate and these 2 are particularly badly lit. You mentioned that they're both non-white: I didn't notice and thanks to the lighting I can't really appreciate their coloring even now; nothing in the descriptions gives their ethnicity. There is quite a bias in the depiction of mainly white nudes, but this is mainly caused by the presence of such a lot of historic photos (photography having been developed in Europe whose population was at the time almost completely light skinned). --Simonxag 20:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lewd redemption[edit]

I so wish that this wasn't a publicly readable document and that I could pepper this with cuss words (for flavor and cadence and stuff).

You really are a pain in the ass. Where the hell did you come from and when the hell are you going to go back?

First, I think you supported some images I felt strongly about, maybe mine. Next, you did some things that were a little creepy to me but I can't remember them now. After that, I was watching the new uploads when you were managing the dark flesh vs white flesh ratio in the nudes category. A grueling task, probably. Now, there are ~~two~~ three images sitting there which will feel like I am pushing the button and nuking some things, both good and bad, if I give up my comment only campaign and show my great love for by supporting them.

I think I am going to reread the rules and let those images stew there in the list of candidates. My problem with that is that I am only one person and support in a discussion seems to be a kiss of death for images that I really really like, love or have other very strong feelings for.

I had this strange conversation tonight at a restaurant. The waiter was explaining about how sensitive the green tea he was serving was to the person who ordered it. I heard a little of that exchange and asked the busboy who brought my coffee how sensitive that warmed beverage was. This poor lad, he was faced with that question after my efforts for an hour or more to get him to say 'cheese cracker' for me. Your images, they are so much like this and more. Pain in the ass. -- carol 12:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has been continued here. I actually have some questions about how things work here. I understand that I write (and communicate in real life) very natively with my language which is modern American English. My question is this, since the entry right below this one is about getting help with French, does it really mean that you are getting help from another person to understand what I wrote?

It is my opinion that whoever has been uploading images as User:TwoWings should be able to ask questions about the things I wrote where I wrote them without assistance.

I am sorry about the length of my text, I am sorry about showing who I am when I author it. Before these days, there were more than two decades where I saw a lot of people every week; as a waitress and then as a cashier in a grocery store, I was communicating with hundreds of people a week and I enjoyed it. After a lot of hard work in 2002 and 2003 in both my real life and my online life, all I seemed to have done was join a 'mating pool' or something like that as that work removed me from where I wanted to be and step logically up from and put me into a completely different world where I was given exactly the same opportunities only I was supposed to start over without acknowledgement of years of accomplishment previously. Not years of perfect accomplishment -- I did not say that. To go from experiencing so many people all the time to a cruel to me world where I see less than 10 or so people a week and communicate with perhaps 3 in real life and time -- now, the world is cruel and judgemental and my text is long.

User:TwoWings seems to have a good sense of humor in the online personification. I was writing to this 'category' of person and I appreciate the opportunity. -- carol 23:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Bistro[edit]

If you need help in French I think you can get an answer faster if you use Commons:Bistro, the French version of the Village pump. /90.229.135.58 19:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blasón de Sástago.svg[edit]

I'm sorry, this is the correct image [1]--Anuskafm 22:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:No pussy (nude).jpg[edit]

May I suggest you don't respond to every delete argument? It makes it a lot more difficult for a closing administrator, and rarely improves your position. We already know you want the image kept... Giggy\^Talk 06:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plaques[edit]

Those plaques that you requested for deletion are copyright free and in the public domain becuase they are works of the Australian Government, Just like the images on the plaques that have an expired copyright and they are the only references that I have for the articles that I have createdAdam.J.W.C. 12:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just need to work out what tag appliesAdam.J.W.C. 12:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need to come back to this tomorrow as I need to leave my computerAdam.J.W.C. 12:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Border-Giurgiu.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Border-Giurgiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Blocage[edit]

C'est fait, bonnes révisions ! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bench-Kilt Rock.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Mr. H[edit]

Hi, you asked me about Mr. Herrick, but this is a long story, too long and too difficult to tell it in English. Let´s wait and see what´s happening. Maybe he is peaceful as a lamb in future, beginning with this day. Greetings Mutter Erde 14:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

btw.: what about to translate the nl:Peter Klashorst article into English, so that the other interwikis have a chance to introduce him too? Mutter Erde 15:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to but I don't speak Dutch and I'm also blocked on WP en (on my demand)! If you're able to do such a translation I could create the article after March 15 only (end of my block) since IP can't create new articles on WP en. Then I'd also translate it in French (where I'm also blocked until March 15 on my demand). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't speak Dutch either. But this might be not a real problem. We can try it, why not here? :-) Maybe we get some help? First try: Mutter Erde 16:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good start. But as I said I won't be able to transfer that on WP before mid-March! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That´s too late. This article should accompany the deletion requests. But you or me can think about a new nick. You may choose some nice pics for a gallery, but don´t forget: The majority of the readers live not in the United Kingdom, but in America, the Land of the Free and the Home of the Demoralized :-) Mutter Erde 18:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest I'm quite confident about the consequences of those deletion requests. I think only the "Gaming" one could be deleted but even the current 9vd/7vk ratio might suffice to save it. As for the article, I might be able to make a French translation but I have to wait a little bit since I need another computer than mine to do it! Indeed both my account and my IP are blocked there on my demand so I need another IP if I want change something there (hopefully it's not like WP en: IP can create new articles). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I also think that all requests will end as keep, no consense. So let´s see whether a Dutch speaking guy will take notice of the article and translates a bit until March or so. Greetings Mutter Erde 11:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Klashorst[edit]

Peter Klashorst (real name Peter van de Klashorst, born February 11 1957, Santpoort) is a Dutch painter and photographer.

From 1976 to 1981 he visited the nl:Gerrit Rietveld Academie in Amsterdam. In the 1980ies he was a member of the en:Junge Wilde. His paintings were awarded in 1983 with the Koninklijke Subsidie voor de Vrije Schilderkunst.

In 1987 Klashorst met the Czech artist de:Jiri Georg Dokoupil het in Amsterdam gevestigde kunstenaarscollectief nl:After Nature, dat zich afzette tegen het heersende abstract expressionisme. They get wellknown (and disputed)/ Bekend en berucht because of their performances on the streets and their art manifestations. In 1995 viel de After Nature groep weer uiteen. In de tussentijd had deze groep ook het nl:Amsterdams Instituut voor de Schilderkunst (AIS) opgericht, waar zij open schilderworkshops organiseerden.

Klashorst surprised the public constantly with a new style of painting maar haalde ook regelmatig het landelijke nieuws met zijn losbandige levensstijl. Hij schilderde en fotografeerde in Afrika verschillende jonge vrouwen (bij wie hij drie kinderen heeft verwekt). In 2000 belandde hij in het overwegend islamitische Senegal in een politiecel. Hij werd verdacht van het gelegenheid geven tot prostitutie, het aanzetten tot losbandigheid en het vervaardigen van obscene afbeeldingen omdat hij lokale vrouwen naakt had geschilderd. Door het omkopen van ambtenaren wist hij zich op borgtocht vrij te kopen, en in stilte via Gambia het land te ontvluchten. Later verbleef hij met regelmaat in Nairobi, Mombasa (Kenia) en Bangkok (Thailand).

In 2005 verscheen "King Klashorst", een geautoriseerde biografie door Robert Vuijsje. Ter gelegenheid van het 25-jarig jubileum van Peter Klashorst als kunstschilder zal in 2007 een uitgebreide biografie verschijnen over zijn kunst, ideeën en leven. Dan zal ook een overzichtstentoonstelling worden ingericht, van zijn schilderijen, tekeningen, foto’s en objecten.

Awards

Publications

Steef Davidson, red., Peter Klashorst, tekeningen: Poëzie explosie : 23-5, 30-5, 6-6 1979, Amsterdam, 1979
Peter Klashorst; samenst. Timo van der Eng, Theo van der Hoeven; red.: Marleen Buddemeijer: Schilderen met acryl, Utrecht, 1997, ISBN 9065334351

Literature

Mieke Rijnders, Geurt Imanse: Over schilderkunst; Pieter Holstein, René Daniels, Peter Klashorst, 1983.
Paul Groot et al: After nature, Amsterdam, 1989, catalogus uitgegeven ter gelegenheid van de tentoonstellingen van Bart Domburg, Jurriaan van Hall en Peter Klashorst in de galerieën Jurka, Hans Gieles en Torch te Amsterdam.
Robert Vuijsje: King Klashorst, Amsterdam, 2005, ISBN 9050004288

Links

Some of your uploads[edit]

Hi, I have closed the deletion nominations as a keep but rename. I'd like you to reupload this image with more descriptive names.

I also would like to ask you to participate in discussions in a less confrontation manner. No one is the enemy. Thanks.

-- Cat ^ちぃ？ 17:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins-Botiza.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Congratulations on your ~~first~~fifth Quality Image promotion :-) --Tony Wills 10:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Making a request[edit]

The Bikini waxing article on the English Wikipedia could surely use some images the depict American waxing or French waxing, as currently it carries mostly images of Brazilian waxing. Can you help? Aditya Kabir 07:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Simca1100-Gura.JPG[edit]

Hello,

Your picture Image:Simca1100-Gura.JPG does not depict a Simca 1100, it's probably a Renault 8.

Cheers, Brinkie 01:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have answered on my talk page. --Brinkie 09:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grande Arche[edit]

Hello, you are the author of one of the images in the category Grande Arche. This category has been recently proposed for deletion under the pretext that there is no FOP in France. I believe not all the images in this category deserve to be deleted, some of them do not present copyright issues. You can express your opinion on this page Commons:Deletion_requests/Category:Grande_Arche if you believe the category should stay. I noticed this deletion request after one of my images (also featured picture) belonging to this category has been proposed for deletion here. Best Regards. --Atoma 16:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Expirimental.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Expirimental.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Mywood 16:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Blonde Woman and Man Having Sexual Intercourse.jpg[edit]

Um...? giggy _(:O) 08:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I only noticed the comment on the other DR afterwards. M'bad. Cheers, giggy _(:O) 09:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Halfautomatic Consolationmachine[edit]

This sculpture is in the public domain. In a park actually. it deserves its place in Wikipedia. What do I do to stop it from being deleted? GreetingsCrapai 14:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Muenster Tor ProjektVierTore 7117.jpg[edit]

this artwork is permanently installed and I am on public ground while taking the picture. Panorama freedom in Germany allows for taking pictures in public places. -- Rüdiger Wölk 16:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Copyright violations[edit]

Thank you for the message; I have deleted the images. Please in the future also inform the user who reviewed the images (found beneath the information box). -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know. The bot is however commanded by somebody else, and it might be good to inform the user who commanded, so that they won't make the same mistake again. Regards, -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that it was a little bit unclear and put a box on the bot's talk page. Let me know if it's still unclear. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Masturbating Amy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for your response (rather than blindly reverting). I've never uploaded a new version of the same file on any project. Is there any way you could be of some assistance? Hmwith 18:55, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Bots/Requests#Miss_World_2007[edit]

This was done. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

petite question sur "attribution"[edit]

Bonjour. Je me permets cette incursion pour vous poser une question.. suite à votre intervention récente (et bienvenue) dans le bistrot au sujet d'une affaire bien regrettable.. Vous semblez avoir plus d'expérience que moi sur les us et coutumes de Wikipédia donc, que penseriez vous de l'usage de "{{attribution|User:Someuser|Eric Fabre|text=Required attribution text: by Eric Fabre, available from (http://v-images.com).}}" pour le problème qui me concerne... Quels seront les conséquence ? Faut il ajouter cette ligne sous les licences ou remplacer les licences par cette ligne.. ? Es-ce que cela conduira à l'affichage de la signature sous les photos ? ... Merci de votre réponse. Cordialement. Picturit 12:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lyon Trompe l'oeil velo'v.jpg[edit]

Erm, you deleted this. Sorry I didn't get the note, I don't really check my commons messages. Would you mind undeleting - I took the photo myself. My apologies if the licensing information was insufficient. Stevage 05:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Please don't change categories like that![edit]

Hmm, well you could argue that "monument" is more precise, as a "monument" has a function (commemmorating David Hume, in this case), as opposed to a "sculpture", a piece of art with no clear purpose other than aesthetic. I suppose, on reflection, that the best term would be "statue", which implies a bit of both, but where does a statue become a sculpture, and vice versa...? Thank you for your time, Jonathan Oldenbuck 17:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notice[edit]

Template:Use sub-categories/es OK, Thanks for notice us, Saludos Shooke 15:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gymnasiums[edit]

Please go to the talk page and share with us the purpose of this category. Thx --X-Weinzar 20:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need help[edit]

Hi, in the English Wiki article on w:buttocks we can't find a good image of the female buttocks to put in the main box. Youn think you can find one? Thank you. Bobisbob 02:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Film poster[edit]

Yes, it could be. That's why I didn't insist on deleting it. But he put the poster on fr:Cinéma... :-( Not our problem as Commons' admins, I guess. Regards. --Dodo 12:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour [2] ! Stef48 16:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey: let's assume good faith. ;-) I just told him what it looked his uploading to me. Maybe I was a little bit too harsh... I don't really know. It's always hard to get a good understanding between two non-native English speakers, or something.

Regards. --Dodo 12:20, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Life in Manastirea Humorului.jpg and Image:Goose in Manastirea Humorului.jpg[edit]

The picture of a cow and some goose are not representative for agriculture. It's not enoght to show some pictures of some animals. We must see the way their are reared. This is agriculture. I don't see any farm or cowshed in the picture. --Olahus 15:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TwoWings, they are two farmers in a cart who might return home from their work. Nothing more. Hmmm, let's formulate the question somehow different: does e picture with some steelworker coming back home match to the [Category: Industry in ... ] ??? I tink not. Such pictures may match to categories about social aspects. --Olahus 08:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm tired about this discussion. Do what you want. --Olahus 18:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Petit conseil[edit]

Hello dear TwoWings, how are you, in this long week end ?

J'arrête l'anglais, j'aurais plus simple à m'exprimer en français ... (J'ai pas encore vu ton message sur wikipédia, j'espère qu'il est sympatoche au moins :p ).

Oui, c'est vrai que je mets rarement des catégories à mes images, bien que j'en mette de temps en temps tout de même. Promis, j'essayerais de faire des efforts, et merci pour ta méthode. J'ai apprit qu'il y avait aussi le truc WikiSense, un truc comme ça. Pour hotcats, je connaissais, mais pour Wikipédia, je savais pas qu'il était également sur Commons, à vrai dire, je n'ai aucune préférence / liste de suivi sur Commons, j'y contribue assez rarement ... Du moins, je n'y fait pas (peu) de maintenance, je me suis maintenu à deux ou trois speedy deletion pour le fair use sur des affiches de films.

Et merci pour avoir vérifié mes images téléchargées ;) Bon week end (moi pour cinq jours, ouf) Stef48 18:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lut, beh écoutes, j'ai essayé à deux reprises de l'uploader, ça n'a pas marché ... Dommage, l'image était belle ... Et, je ne connais pas le WP:SI de wikipédia ici, je ne connais que {{Speedy deletion}} ... Je peux toujours l'apposer remarques. Stef48 07:39, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disons que j'ai trouvé ce que je voulais grâce à toi (discuter:cinéma) ;) et que cette image ne m'intéresse désormais plus... Stef48 07:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion[edit]

I have proposed at least one image you uploaded for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Images of skyscrapers in France. Jackaranga 22:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut[edit]

Juste une petite question: ce diff [3] tu sais qui c'est? D'ailleurs la catégorie devrait s'appeler Sport-boules. Cordialement, Otourly 13:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oui tu as raison enfin je dois dire que on a pas trop respecté l'anglais dans les catégories de Lyon :p mais c'est pas incompréhensible je pense non? Otourly 19:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All your images with regognisable people[edit]

Image deletion warning

All your images with regognisable people have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these images, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Camera templates[edit]

I agree, more camera templates would be a good thing. But I've kept mine in userspace because I'm not sure what other people would think about it. If you have any good ideas as to how this could be implemented, I'm all ears. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, thanks for the compliments on the photos. That's one of my favourites too. I love that camera. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A little HOT[edit]

Two wings I can fonded some pornographic images on the Category:fellatio but I don't know how to make a delection request:Please,can you help me with it?Thank you. vicond

Thank you[edit]

Thank you Twowings.So the Category:oral sex is INFECTED!! with real fellatio images of an User that I suppost is from Spanish desent.So I haven't very much time to dedicate to commons but I will try to do something. vicond

Image:Spilled juice (by Peter Klashorst).jpg[edit]

Image:Spilled juice (by Peter Klashorst).jpg - are you shure that foto is not a fake ? Look at throat and chest. And specially to collar-bone line. PMG 15:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Their quality is quite similar so it would be non neutral (=contrary to Commons rules) to choose one and not the other. - so i I add another image of that shot ou will leave or delete ? For encyclopedia they are the same - same age, same color, same point of view. For encyclopedia they are not diffrent. For photographer - maybe. Not for editor. PMG 15:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DR?[edit]

I'm sorry I don't know what means DR.Could you explain me please? vicond

Idiom[edit]

I can speak also in Spanish that is my real languish but then you meaby will not speak with me because I read that you have a basic level so if you want to try I'm not problems with it.So,thank you for loose your time with me. vicond For me is incredible because in my country materials like that are "strictly prohibited" and this page can enter here very easy.So,now I'm nothing to say.Thank you for your help.

PD:This girl Image:SG 02.jpg today is considered one of the "best suckers around the world" and for instans she was a commons and wikipedia user. She never doesn't have to put any of her self-fellatio images for her promotion.So,for me,images like that are absolutely unnecesary on commons. vicond

Yes, I live in Cuba! vicond

Cuba is free yes, but, not for that kind of things. So,that means that the problem here wasn't porn?

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Woman Engaging In Oral Sex.jpg

So,I suppost that in a future commons will have a lot of this kind of matter because if the pornography is allowed them, all matters, could be allowed and for example I can say that hadcore images can be good to show any particular thing of this matter.So, them all can be relative. For me is enough.Thank you TwoWings.Regards too.

vicond

Version floutée[edit]

Oui, je veux bien ! J'avais pas pensé qu'il restait une copie de la version originale ... Merci beaucoup pour ton attention. Je préfère me méfier, sait-on jamais. Amicalement Stef48 17:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Image:Affiche de Qui est-il?.png[edit]

The old revision has been deleted. :) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here to serve. ;) Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps; I know you'll make a good admin, but then if you're not going to be here... :\ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 17:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

go accept. Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 18:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hard to get this exactly right[edit]

So PLEASE take a while to think about what I am saying & forgive me for the posting...

I really do think you do good work here. However you rightly expect us to listen to your opinion & that is fine. You seem reluctant to allow others their opinions it seems to me. You keep coming back to the RfA page with comments like I see what some opposed votes mean. And I can understand it & Would that mean that you have to abandon your own values and opinions when you become an admin?!!! Do we have to become robots with no feelings?! & an admin has no right to force his views upon the Commons and that's clearly not my purpose.

To me I am not sure that this shows respect for my views on Commons & what happens here. I'm left with the feeling that you are still trying to get us to accept your views no matter what we say. You do come over as somewhat aggressive in this maybe (or that is how it feels to me). I am probably wrong however that is the effect that this is having on me. Maybe take some time & think about the views of others & your approach to them & how they might be feeling. This really is intended as friendly advice & I would be very happy if you would accept it as such (please :)) Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ENTIRELY normal :) Believe me I have opposed people far more than you by saying far less. I am saying more because I genuinely think you could be a commons admin & a good one. However I think you need to be able to step back & show us that you can & do do that. Give yourself 24 hours - go do some of the grunt work that always needs doing on Commons - think & reflect. Please do not loose the spirit but gain a sense of when you need to step back & be seen to be stepping back? --Herby ^{talk thyme} 14:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing just what I told you not to :)

Me - I don't believe it should have been undeleted because it was basically you & Mutter who were arguing that it should be undeleted while a few folk felt the deletion was OK due to project scope.

As to your comment on the DR - yes it is fine. I really do not like censorship myself (maybe not a strong views as yours). In the end I am fairly indifferent to that picture. However there are & have been ones where I think the licensing is questionable at best (yes a number of the Klashorst pictures among others). I feel as strongly about the protection of, & respect for, the individual as you do about censorship and I hope that Commons will get a discussion going about such things soon.

Stick with principles - definitely. Decide which was (battles/discussion whatever) are really worth winning. However people will judge you by the stances that you take & you must respect the fact that they do not agree with you & not keep nagging at them if you want to be part of a constructive working atmosphere here. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use sub-categories[edit]

Oui, tu as effectivement raison, mais j'ai rencontré ces photos "en vrac" dans la catégorie :Geology, ce qui était encore plus criticable. Il est plaisant pour un prof de math de recevoir des leçons de logique !! Cordialement --Fagairolles 34 * 11 June 2008

Your RfA[edit]

Hi TwoWings, I've closed your RfA as unsuccessful. Please do take on board the advice given there, and continue your helpful work around the project. Good luck, giggy _(:O) 10:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:/ I'm sorry, dude. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 12:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ce n'est pas grave ... L'administration n'est pas forcément toujours une bonne chose sur WP... Je ne connais pas trop commons, mais j'imagine que c'est à peu près la même chose. Quoiqu'il en soit, tu méritais le poste, et j'espère que dans le futur l'on reconnaîtra ton implication dans le projet ! Je crois que tu n'as plus internet, alors, si l'on ne se "revoit" plus d'ici là, bon séjour ! Amicalement Stef48 (talk) 12:23, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your disruptive DRs[edit]

Please do not disrupt commons to make a point. If you have a problem with policy, bring it up on COM:VP. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's do discuss this on VP if needed. I don't see these DRs as disruptive. TwoWings, you found some other images that have the same problems of permissions, if you find more, please keep bringing them up. ++Lar: t/c 15:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/French architects[edit]

We once had a discussion once of work by Buren. You might want to take a look at a major request of French architecture here and give your input Commons:Deletion requests/French architects. Gryffindor (talk) 06:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lyon[edit]

Je pense fusionner les catégories Category:Monuments de Lyon et Category:Buildings in Lyon pour garder que Category:Buildings in Lyon afin de mieux internationaliser nos catégories, mais d'un coté, un monument n'est pas un bâtiment quelconque c'est pour ça que jusqu'à maintenant je n'y ai pas touché. Mais je m'aperçoit d'une chose, cette catégories n'a pas que des monument comme on pourrait l'imaginer. Bref, car ça commence à ne plus être très clair ce que j'écris, tu crois que je devrais faire la fusion? Otourly (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai déjà fusionné et puis ils n'y avait pas de choses choquantes lors de la fusion. Otourly (talk) 12:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vulgar images on Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Please do not mistake my intentions of creating this category. I created this to allow administrators to IDENTIFY vulgar images which should be removed on Wikipedia. Some users have created disgusting vulgar images which I hope will be removed and perhaps the users banned. I am personally disgusted with the images which I have tagged. I would like to know if Wikipedia has somewhere to report vulgar images such as these. I support the deletion of these images so that such a category is not needed to keep track of them.--R-41 (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, but I am going to remove these images from categories where they have no purpose or where they are highly offensive. I personally don't think that Wikipedia is a place for the depiction of pornography and demeaning material. If this is becoming a reality, I believe that serious attention must be given to changing rules on Wikimedia Commons to prevent this.--R-41 (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template Transration has been done.[edit]

As you requested at Japanese Village Pump, the translation of this template has been done. --SantaClaus (talk) 10:57, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lecture_at_Output.jpg[edit]

Hello, Can you help me a bit. I'm not very experienced with Commons. Could you please put back the picture Lecture at Output.jpg involved Yuri Landman on wikipedia? This request is nonsense. There are no rights on the pic shown on the screen at all. I've no understanding of all your GNY Free etc etc, but I took the photo's of the guitars myself and they are totally right free to use for your websites. Thank you very much. I will try upload it myself again also. Best wishes, Yuri Landman

Image:Masturbating_Amy.jpg[edit]

~~It doesn't look like anyone ever notified you that this image is up for deletion here.~~--User:Doug^{(talk • contribs)} 04:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I see that you removed the message.--User:Doug^{(talk • contribs)} 23:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fontaine Stravinski.JPG German WP[edit]

Hi! If your image "Fontaine Stravinski.JPG" will be deleted, could you please upload it to the german Wikipedia (de.wikipedia.org) where FOP still exists? --Theredmonkey (talk) 15:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nudity in some photos[edit]

Would it be possible to replace the photos listed below with versions that blur out any unnecessary nudity..I understand that some of it is necessary but removing any of the unnecessary ones would make the pictures more child/family friendly

File:Amy with dildo.jpg
File:Eve (nude with apple).jpg
File:Icecreamlicker.jpg
File:Tartan (nude).jpg
File:Inside Deep Throat Party.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Coldflaym (talk • contribs) 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalta Minor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice colours and details --Mbdortmund 01:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Klashorst's images[edit]

Hi. I deleted this image because it has been removed from Flickr (author is still alive, so I though that it was a copyvio, here and on Flickr). Now I see that there are several images in the same condition. Peter Klashorst is no longer active on Flickr. So, what do you think about? Should we delete all images or we should consider that images are permanently released under free license? In this case I'll undelete the first image, of course. Thank you--Trixt (talk) 00:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I made an error. Thank you--Trixt (talk) 13:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where?[edit]

I'm missing around 90 pics of so called underaged people in Category:Peter Klashorst. Have you the correct number? It's for my archive. See also: Deletion request de:Peter Klashorst with shrill statements. Regards User:Mutter Erde 78.50.204.24 22:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am surprised to see that there have been deleted without any debate! At least, if there was any, why wasn't I contacted since I uploaded some of those pictures? As for the answer you need, I don't really know the correct number but at least you can find all the names of the pictures I personnally uploaded in the history of User:TwoWings/Uploads (not self-made). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an action of the same Germans you find here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg and in the de:Peter Klashorst deletion request. It's funny: Among them is a underaged 15 years old boy. But even Jimbo doesn't care, see [4]

Regards: Mutter Erde 78.49.219.245 17:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of deletions by Cecil

from http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=Cecil&page=&year=&month=-1

15:07, 23 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Rainbow2ff.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:34, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Young mother (Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ebony lady.jpg)
21:34, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Young farmer (by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ebony lady.jpg)
21:34, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Werkpauze (photo by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ebony lady.jpg)
21:31, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Expirimental.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ebony lady.jpg; minor, no release by parents)
21:29, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Too hot.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:29, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Wounded nude.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:29, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Vulva Dettol.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:29, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Vulva 2.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:29, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Vertical clit hood piercing.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Tribute vagina.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Towel (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:The thinker.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:The secret phonecall.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:The naked chef.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:The friend (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:28, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Tender is the night.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Tartan (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Sweet dreamer (nude by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Sweater (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Standing Nude.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Still standing.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Stockings (Asian nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Stripes (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:27, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Sucker for art (photo and painting by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Spread (Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Sperm on female buttocks.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Smoking nude model.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Sleepers.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Sleepers (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Skirt (upskirt photo by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Showtime! (nude photo by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:25, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Shavevulva.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Shadow (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Room (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Relaxing.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Reclining with cigarette.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Reading (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Pregnant.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Pose.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Poofon.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Playing (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Pizzagirl.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Pink (1).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:24, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Painting for Tin Green (art by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:23, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Muslimgirl3.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:23, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Mons venus.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:23, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Morningmassage .jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:23, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Natural sculpture (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:22, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Nude jockey girl.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:22, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:On Bed.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:22, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Orange baby.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:21, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Nude back.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:20, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:No pussy (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:20, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Lighten.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:20, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Malewich.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:20, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Mask (nude by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:20, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Modern Green.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:20, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Modern sex (nude photo by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Library woman.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Klashorst 02.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Klashorst 01.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Killing fu3425ing me (photo by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Kamaka swing.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:In the studio (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Icecreamlicker.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Hee!.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:19, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Horny (nude by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Hand (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Godess (nude by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Girl from Ivory Coast.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Gesluierd3.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Gerard Wessels.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Femalebody bottom nude.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:16, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Eve (nude with apple).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:15, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Ebony Modi.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:15, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Bedpeace2.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:15, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Busy girl (Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:15, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Can you lick it ! (Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Cola bottle and vulva.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Couch.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Cowgirl 2.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Crusifix (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Doggystyle.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Double fun.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Down Under.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:14, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Bottomless (nude photo by artist Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:13, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black nude.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black nude standing.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black genitalia.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black genitalia 2.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black butt.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black breasts.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Black beauty.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Big smile .jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Bedsheets (nude by Peter Klashorst).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:12, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Bondage (Asian).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:11, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Bed Supperclub.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:11, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Ballerina (nude).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:11, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Backwater2.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:11, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Backwater.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:11, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Backtowel3.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:11, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Backtowel.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:10, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Back Side.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:09, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Asian woman (transparent).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:09, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Aphrodite (genitalia).jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:09, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Amazone woman.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:09, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Amazone woman 2.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:09, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Aktmodell.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)
21:08, 20 January 2009 Cecil (Talk contribs) deleted "File:Ebony lady.jpg" ? (per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Ebony_lady.jpg)

I launched a discussion about that at the village pump here and it looks like everyone disagrees with such a mass deletion without any debate nor DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, I gave them a note and offered my help (translation, links, old DRs and so on). Regards. Mutter Erde 78.50.200.155 17:28, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allys a rubbin (1421413596).jpg[edit]

File:Allys a rubbin (1421413596).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Clayoquot (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Nomination[edit]

Hey mate, one of your photos caught my eye, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status.

Cheers, Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 00:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amy?[edit]

I think about a few month ago on the masturbation article I saw Amy, just who is this Amy? --Adorkable16 (talk) 17:00, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah she is hott, is she your fiancee or wife or something. --Adorkable16 (talk) 15:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong place[edit]

I reverted this. The approriate thing is to label it with {{Disputed}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:11, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, a stranger!*[edit]

I didn't forget : w:fr:Wikipédia:Pastiches/Saint-Pouilleux-sur-Binouze. This page is engraved in my heart forever.

Please make sure, for the sake of myself, that it remains on-line:

I like to come and read it from time to time, it reminds me all the good time I had on Wikipédia.

Best regards. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 17:05, 13 October 2009 (UTC) T'was funny to use this login after so long a time — Cheers[reply]

Template:Use sub-categories/da[edit]

Hi! I finally translated this. What was it with Category:Internationalised message templates? Feel free to fix anything missing :-) --MGA73 (talk) 18:31, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le Temps retrouvé (film).jpg[edit]

En quoi y-a-t'il violation d'une oeuvre dont je suis l'auteur ? User:Airair 12 novembre 2009 21:49

Je suis à la fois l’auteur de l’illustration (graphite, aquarelle et pastel) et du scan. J’ai catégorisé ce travail, à l’origine, dans les enluminures en utilisant un détail (voir ma page). --Airair (talk) 08:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vicond(Nationality)[edit]

So,Here we go!

How you can say these two girls File:Two girls under an umbrella.jpg are from China?! When I was talking with you I'm cuban.In a wiki,encyclopedic and neutral point of view I can't remark the girl is from Cuba specifically.Could be from Venezuela or maybe another latinoamerican country even an emigrant but I now that the uploader is Cuban and a young people.That means this photo have a very short range of possibilities to taken outside of Cuba. It's sound like an user's schoolfriend.And in that specific point for several reasons, including social aspects specifically from my country, that you can't understand,exist a very short range of posibilities this girl wasn't of Cuba. I'm 90% sure.I know my girls!!Bye and regards

Vicond (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but even it could be a NOT verifiable information.For example this photo File:Estudiantes_de_Medicina_de_la_Elam_26_Andhy.JPG have several students that I can recognize in an easy way that are not from Cuba specifically....and is categorized on people of Cuba.I think Wikipedia now don't have any particular policy that could determinate this absolutely.So I dared to put here then. Bye for now and Happy new year!!!

Vicond (talk) 05:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the deletion reason thing[edit]

G'day TwoWings - and thanks for your note - unfortunately, on my screen, the deletion reason is still missing? thought I should let you know.. Privatemusings (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

doh! no it's not! - I just expected it to appear in the (reason here) bit, and it's below! Sorry 'bout that, and I'm clearly an idiot! cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bunny[edit]

Hey mate, I only add Category:BDSM when I have the feeling there are more subcategories appropriate to the image and I don't want to forget that it's one that "isn't fully categorised yet". I routinely go through Category:BDSM and clean up, moving things to all their proper subcats. Thanks for your help though, it is much appreciated. Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 20:47, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipédia:Pastiches/Saint-Pouilleux-sur-Binouze[edit]

Je ne suis (du verbe suivre, hein, je ne suis pas cette page, du verbe être...) pas cette page, non. Mais l'ayant citée sur un blog récemment, je l'ai relue, et je suis obligé d'admettre que les modifications apportées ces dernières années sont rigolotes.

Tu es encore là ?

Amitiés. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 20:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ben moi je suis expulsé de wp:fr pour le temps qu'il faudra pour pour que tous les admins actuels soient morts de mort naturelle, et je ne comprends toujours pas pourquoi (et au fond je m'en fiche, ce qui n'implique aucun mépris, juste un désintérêt profond). Pour ta culture, je suis pour longtemps le 2e plus gros contributeur du Wiktionnaire hors bots. Mais j'ai tout plaqué à cause de Wikipédia : une preuve de plus du pouvoir de nuisance de ceux qui s'y prennent pour des chefs. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 19:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative works[edit]

OK. But the country where I took the picture, i.e. The Netherlands, permits freedom of panorama. Cheers. Meursault2004 (talk) 18:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I read this line limited to works that were originally made for being placed permanently in a public place too. That picture is actually is a crop of the other one. But it is also covered here. Thanks for your additional information. Cheers. Meursault2004 (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second life images[edit]

Do we really need so many images (often somewhat redundant or low-quality, as in File:Afterglow Second Life.jpg, where the leg of one figure passes right through the leg of the other figure!!)? Anyway, you didn't use the correct template, Template:Second Life... AnonMoos (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, some of them (like File:Topless dance with bubbles.png) are kind of fun, but the majority strike me as kind of dreary or low-quality (not to mention that the women all kind of have a uniform and somewhat unrealistic Barbie-like body type), so that the legitimate Wikipedia articles uses would seem to be rather limited... AnonMoos (talk) 11:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QI nomination.[edit]

Hi, TwoWings!
Your nomination File:Kalta Minor.jpg already is QI awarded.
I remove it from QI nominations
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject[edit]

Greetings, I know we've bumped into each other in the past - especially in conversations and work surrounding "erotic works" on Commons. To help us focus and keep others abreast of what we feel needs doing in the future - I was thinking we should form a Wikiproject:Erotica. I'd invite you to sign up, and take a leading role in building the project, and helping decide on the directions we should take to ensure that Commons can host historically important, simply beautiful, or otherwise notable pieces of erotic art - without extending ourselves to the level of "encouraging usres to grab a webcam and drop their trousers". Thanks! Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 15:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the sake of legality (especially across different jurisdictions), it seemed wiser to say "under 21" or "under 24" - if a girl looks 19, she could be 16 - we should still be trying to get age verification for "young" models whenever we can. At least that's my view. Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 16:19, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big rusty boat in Moynaq.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Dust spot at top right, tiny correction need --George Chernilevsky 15:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dustspot removed ;-) --Berthold Werner 10:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good now! --George Chernilevsky 11:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion proposal[edit]

Hello!

Can you please explain this? Thank you. --High Contrast (talk) 13:39, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Bob Bobster on Flickr[edit]

Hi TwoWings! Bob Bobster (bobster855) on Flickr is known to upload files created by others, marking them with licenses that he has no legal right to release them under, and failing to credit the actual authors. The account is therefore listed as an unreliable source at Commons:Questionable Flickr images.

I have initiated a review of all files taken from this Flickr user that I could find. Since you uploaded one or more of those files to Commons, you may wish to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Bob Bobster on Flickr. It is possible that some of the files should be kept, but even most of the ones that may be okay to keep need to have their authorship, licensing and other information corrected. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your message. Could you tell me which pictures of "his" I uploaded? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:29, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Drunk.jpg. One of the least problematic, probably. Should not be {{Cc-by-2.0}}, but should be fine to keep as {{PD-art}}, I guess. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

I am confused by your vote to delete Birthday_Facial given that it has a logged OTRS (which should also be evidence that my eMail pasted in the DR on BW is valid), it seems like the fact there is a logged OTRS, pasted contents of the eMail with the model indicating consent...all point to the images being kept, not deleted. Would you mind clarifying your position? Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 16:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Headgear[edit]

Ah ben non, le lien que tu as mentionné sur le wiktionnaire n'est pas vraiment ce que je demandais. (ou alors je n'ai pas compris ton message?). Bon à part ça, je tente actuellement d'être admin sur WP. Kirtap tente de me charcuter ;-)

A bientôt très cher ami. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non je te remerciais parce que tu m'as incité à créer l'article sur wikt (je ne connaissais pas le mot). Va falloir que je me penche sur les mots en -gear (headgear, switchgear...).
Oui j'avais vu. Bonne chance.

--GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 13:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pour que ce soit clair entre nous : j'aurais voté pour toi si j'en eu avais le droit. Mais ce n'est pas le cas (je n'en ai pas le droit) et en fait j'en suis heureux (de ne pas avoir le droit) : quand je lis ce qui se passe actuellement sur Wikipédia (par exemple la façon dont on traite Poulpy) je me dis que Wikipédia est tombée très bas. Très très bas. Terrifiant. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 21:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis désolé d'utiliser ta page de Commons pour répandre mon fiel sur Wikipédia. Ce n'est pas bien de ma part. Mais en fait je n'en ai rien à foutre de la vase dans laquelle s'enfonce petit à petit (l'oiseau fait son nid) Wikipédia. Je vais donc m'abstenir de mettre des liens vers les pires pages en question, tu te débrouilles toi-même pour les trouver. --GaAs¹¹⁶⁷¹ 21:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karneval der Kulturen3 - Mutter Erde fec.jpg[edit]

What does "Leona Johansson (supposed)" mean?? If we say that we have a nude photo of X, and it turns out not to be of X, then that opens the door to lots of potential problems, legal and otherwise. If an identification is not certain, leave it out! AnonMoos (talk) 12:40, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't really feel like going to external sites and making my own comparisons which would (necessarily) also be somewhat subjective. The only reason I commented originally was that in the U.S. truth is a strong defense against libel, but making assertions without specific evidence to back them up can leave you exposed (as tabloid newspapers have found out on several occasions). AnonMoos (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi folks, congrats to the sharp eyes of TwoWings. He's right - this is Leona. Please tell me, when you see somewhere her first article in an interwiki. Regards Mutter Erde, currently in exile here or here. I will come back, but first I have to decimate the fakers on commons, the antisemits, all that crap 78.55.110.105 00:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Netstep icon[edit]

No es ninguna violación al Copyright, es una imagen creada por mi persona, y lo cedo bajo licencia GNU Free Documentation License.).--Sidcc (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TwoWings/Uploads (not self-made)[edit]

I am a bit confused. What is the reason for your request? All of the files appear to be properly licensed and most if not all also appear to be used on Wikimedia projects. We do not delete perfectly good and licensed images simply per "uploader request." You would need to open a COM:DR for that. Tiptoety ^talk 00:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page, and left a message for the user in question. Just wanted to stop by to say that the edit summary for this revert was probably unnecessary. I do not think this users intentions were malicious and I ask that you assume good faith. Thanks, Tiptoety ^talk 19:13, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

typo?[edit]

You're sort of contradicting yourself here, did you mean "...reason of deletion"? Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 11:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Images of author Cuirjean@flickr[edit]

I replied to your request. - Stillwaterising (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cats[edit]

I think there's definitely potential uses for new categories, I honestly don't think any of the ancient art belongs under there but feared stirring controversy by simply removing it, would feel more confident replacing it with a more appropriately named category. I don't think 'underage' would be good though, namely because it would be nearly impossible to evaluate. Even if we could somehow tell the age of people in ancient drawings, a term like that would depend upon not only the country we're talking about, but also the era. Like for example, the image you're talking about I think was painted in France. There it's 15 now but was 13 from 1942-45, I'm not sure what it was earlier to that period (or if they even had one) since I can't find the historical data, but basically while that might depict someone who could be underage today, it may not have been underage when the image was drawn. Not to mention, when we simply say 'underage' we don't know if we're talking about the age of majority (where one is not considered a minor, a relevant issue for image law) or the age of government-recognized legal consent to sexual acts. I expect you mean the latter, and in that case it brings additional complications like different numbers for different genders (like higher ages for homosexual acts) or different actions (sodomy, etc) or even for different relationships (in some cases is lower if couple are legally married).

If I had to choose a word to fill the void left... well to me it seems like the people pictured may be somewhere in the process of puberty so perhaps 'pubescent sexuality'? I do not think the removed category should be a subcategory of that though. It correctly belongs under the paraphilias... I could see 'hebephilia' or 'ephebophilia' being a subcategory, but pedophilia does not describe pubescent/adolescent sexuality. I expect which to place an image under is something that could be disputed, but in the least it's something people could argue solely on the case of neotenic appearances.

Also, about this reversion, I don't think that's correct. That's child exploitation, sure, but not pedophilia. Consider this analogy: if one sold the Cretan Bull to Pasiphaë so she could lay with it, does that make the bull-seller a zoophile? No, perhaps Pasiphaë could be, but not the seller, he's just turning a profit through an immoral way. You could call him an accessory to the crime and jail him for that, but one has to keep the correct label. As for her being a prostitute, that's another issue of contention, I should have removed that category. This sculpture is titled 'white slave statue'. Not all slaves are sex slaves. Slaves were mistreated and often nude regardless of what people intended for them. Albeit, this was probably the leading purpose slaveholders would have for someone looking like that as she could probably not perform a lot of physical labour, but it is possible that someone could buy her and clothe her and have her be a maid or something instead. TY© (talk) 13:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this coversation and wished to comment. I'm unsure why there is any need to draw the conclusion that there is sexual element to this statue. What I see is a man with a young nude female slave. Nudity alone does not imply sexuality unless there is sexual posing etc. Again, I like to refer to the Copine Scale (original 10 point is more descriptive) to help make a decision as to whether this is simple nudity, or a sexual depiction. Of course, the aspect of "serious historical, artistic, or educational purpose" also weighs into the decision to keep or reject an image. Obviously, there is no "victim" because this is just a statue. - Stillwaterising (talk) 14:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Buren's trials[edit]

Hi. On Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests, I've seen you repeatedly claiming that Daniel Buren "won trials". I have searched through google news archives for any possible references to copyright trials or lawsuits involving Daniel Buren, but have not found anything. Neither the English nor the French Wikipedia article about him mention anything of the sort. Would you be so kind as to provide some links about those trials? I find it quite difficult to trust such a claim when there do not seem to be any sources to back it up. — Tetromino (talk) 01:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake was searching in English. In French, I finally found some information about Buren's trial. However, (1) that trial is completely irrelevant to the undeletion discussion (the trial was about non-trivial 3D sculptures, while the discussion is about a trivial 2D painting); and (2) Buren lost. — Tetromino (talk) 01:28, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Onbehalf of[edit]

That user did a very messy and improper file deletion, so I cleaned it up for him. Since I cannot "forge" his signature, I added the phrase on behalf of. --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 07:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I DID mention the user. I wrote on behalf of User: so and so. --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 09:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rape[edit]

I accept your reasoning on the other picture, but not for File:Martin van Maele - Francion 09.jpg. The woman is bending over a lot and is still above the boy. I've put a justification in the image's talk page where further discussion should take place, so that future editors can see it. --Simonxag (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nude woman?[edit]

Is a woman nude if she have a thickly skirt?haabet 20:54, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

nude?
nude?
nude?
nude?
nude?

Concentration[edit]

Hi TwoWings, the idea of category "Concentration" it's simply brilliant. I will hunt for pictures in order to fill it. Thank you for this great piece of creativity. It's Commons 2.0. --Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 08:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have already started to fill the category. Check the add-ons and tell me what do you think about them. Because, trough the pics selection, we have to arrive to graphically describe what really "concentration" is. At the moment, all the games are still open. --Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 01:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping[edit]

Photos like File:ErosPyramide20090221_439a.jpg could stand to be tightly cropped before upload, just a note, to improve useability. Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 02:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ethnographic nude women[edit]

Category:Ethnographic nude women has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

I think we need to just work on sorting them by country, for example we have Category:Women of Algeria which is better-suited. Even "Nude photographs of African women" or something would probably work better to help us sort the "French postcard" collection. --Max Rebo Band^{"almost suspiciously excellent"} 16:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Quelques explications[edit]

Bonjour, J'ai bien pris en note tes remarques. En revanche, je crois que je peux me donner raison sur un point :

Pour les catégories de clubs, il est préférable de reprendre le nom complet officiel tel qu'il est mentionné dans l'article Wikipédia du club (donc par exemple Union sportive bressane Pays de l'Ain et non Us Bressanne]]).

Sur le modèle français de wikipédia, les noms complets des club sont indiqués (Association sportive montferrandaise Clermont Auvergne) mais pas sur le modèle anglophone (ASM Clermont Auvergne). Etant donné que Commons est anglophone, notamment dans le nom des catégories, il me semble plus pertinent de reprendre les appellations non complètes des clubs, conformément à wikipédia.en

Qu'en pense-tu ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zegreg63 (talk • contribs) 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Playas del Caribe.jpg[edit]

Hi TwoWings.

Please take the abuse part back. I am not abusing the DR if I have a concern about the file. Also the quality of the file is very low and we have good handbras like here, here and here which are all much more attractive than that image and 10x more likely to be used for an article. cheers, Amada44 ^{talk to me} 20:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Encore quelques remarques à propos des catégories...[edit]

Tout à fait d'accord. En fait, cela fait un moment que je songe à la création des catégories type Category:Players of ASM Clermont Auvergne (ce qui ce fait déjà sur Commons du côté du foot). Le problème est qu'aujourd'hui, les catégories de joueurs de rugby à XV doit flirter avec les 200 et la mise en place des catégories type Category:Players of ASM Clermont Auvergne prendrait donc beaucoup de temps... Enfin, cela veut pas dire que je ne le ferais pas. Quant je m'en serais occupé, fait moi savoir si le résultat te semble satisfaisant.

Faut-il également prévoir des catégories types Category:Matches of ASM Clermont Auvergne? Zegreg63 (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pornographic_shows[edit]

Category discussion notification

Category:Pornographic_shows has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

188.52.50.144 13:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorisation rugby[edit]

Bonjour, La création des catégories Players of avance bien. En revanche je te soumet un autre problème : depuis que je systématise la création des catégories de joueur, je me contentais de classer les photos uniquement dans la catégorie du joueur (et éventuellement la compétition). C'est le cas des deux photos suivantes :

Plus le temps passe, plus je pense que finalement ces photos devraient être en plus catégorisés dans la catégorie de leur club (ou de leur sélection). Mais les catégories de clubs et de sélections seraient alors absolument débordées. La solution viendrait de la création de catégorie type Matches of ASM Clermont Auvegne, Matches of France national rugby union team. De plus, cela permetterait de préciser le Stade du match (qui n'est pour l'instant quasiment jamais indiqué)

En résumé, on obtiendrait donc des catégorie du type suivant

Category:ASM Clermont Auvergne

Matches of ASM Clermont Auvergne
- ASM Clermont Auvergne-CA Brive, 28 august 2010
  - File:Brock James

Players of ASM Clermont Auvergne
- Brock James
  - File:Brock James

Stade Marcel Michelin
- Matches in Stade Marcel Michelin
  - ASM Clermont Auvergne-CA Brive, 28 august 2010
    - File:Brock James

Bref, cela vise à la création des catégories de match, qui seront elle même catégoriser par stade de la rencontre, club participant et bien sur compétition. J'attend ton avis, notamment concernant le nom exact que devraient adopter les catégories de Matches (Date (28 august 2010) ? Journée (Third day of Top 14 2010-2011) ? Club (ASM Clermont Auvergne-CA Brive) ? ) ainsi que celles des matches par stade (Category:Matches in Stade Marcel-Michelin) ?

J'espère que j'ai été a peu près clair. Bon week-end !

Zegreg63 (talk) 12:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

D'accord pour les catégories. Tu as raison, il y aurait trop de mini-catégories. Par contre, je parlerais plutôt de ASM Clermont Auvergne en 2008-2009 puis ASM Clermont Auvergne en 2009-2010 pour respecter les saisons de l'hémisphère Nord (et donc Crusaders en 2009 pour les franchises sudistes).

French language...[edit]

Merci d'avoir trouvé la bonne catégorie ! J'ai commencé en effet à faire un peu de ménage dans la catégorie en question, mais tout n'est pas encore parfait :-) Amicalement, Mu (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Public pictures[edit]

You better hope there aren't any CC licensed pictures of you or your children around the web, or else someone could be tempted to legally add some material to them, and then post them here under a suitable license and on Flickr. They could claim it's all in the name of freedom. Aberforth (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Himba photos[edit]

All I was doing was categorizing them so that they fit what exactly they were. They are photos in line with ethnic identification and should not be mixed with adult/pornographic content in the categories. A lot of those categories that they had been under were largely associated with sexuality and these images are not anywhere's near such categorizeation. Since we are talking about categories it is important to categorize things apporpirately and this means that a category should not include the combination of adult/pornographic content with natural geographic content. My main reason for this is that it misrepresents those such as Himba females as lesswer beings/prostitutes... because they are being put along side such women in the West in the categories. I hope you understand my thinking... (Let me know on my talk page). Maps & Lucy (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, TwoWings![edit]

Thanks for your comments about Niñopa photo and categorization!! Saludos from Mexico City. Gustavo Sandoval Kingwergs.--Correogsk (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C. Kennedy Garrett[edit]

How are you authorized to publish and distribute these photographs from C. Kennedy Garrett? The nine prints listed under your User name should be deleted from general distribution. From the original flickr site, all photographs of C. Kennedy Garrett's are blocked from private use- copying, saving, distribution and printing. You do not have the license to include these images in your downloads, and making them available for others to download as well directly impedes her rights as an artist. Please remove them from your posts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.33.83.107 (talk • contribs)

Hi TwoWings,

I just wanted to notify you that an IP has tagged quite some uploads from Flickr that had been initiated by you, for alleged copyvio. However, all file that I checked were still under the original CC-BY license. Any idea what's going on here? --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licences were checked by a bot and licences are not revokable. So there's no problem. The IP is just unaware of licence rules. I reverted him. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All of the pictures uploaded through this link are originally protected under the Flickr Pro account held by C Kennedy Garrett. Keep in mind as well that she is underage and was when these pictures were taken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elizmac (talk • contribs)

Which "link" are you talking about and what do you mean by "originally protected under the Flickr Pro account". As for her age, I don't see any problem but you may develop. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I can recall, but i'm not sure. If you find one I did, just come say me. Béria Lima ^msg 12:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Относно заглавие (name)[edit]

File:Pink-House-Kopriv.JPG . Name is "Complex Doganov,s house" .--Luxferuer (talk) 12:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Bulgarian name :"Комплекс "Доганови къщи".--Luxferuer (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Относно заглавие (name) 2[edit]

File:Green-House-Kopriv.JPG Name is : Forestry house .--Luxferuer (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Bulgarian name is : Лесничейство гр.Копривщица .--Luxferuer (talk) 13:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Относно заглавие (name) 3[edit]

File:Blue house-Koprivshtitsa.JPG Name is :"Kantardjiev,s house".Bulgarian name is : "Кантарджиева къща".--Luxferuer (talk) 14:04, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

TwoWings, thank you for your help in categorization of my pictures (Category:2011 Davis Cup - Croatia vs. Germany). --Roberta F. (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid personal attacks[edit]

Pas d'attaque personnelle, s'il vous plaît.[5] It is uncivil to call another editor a hypocrite. Please base your comments on Commons policies and guidelines and avoid discussing others. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pathe Spui The Hague (Sideview).jpg[edit]

Hallo TwoWings, maybe you want to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pathe Spui The Hague (Sideview).jpg since you said it "may be accepted because of de minimis rule" (here). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cats and subcats[edit]

So, I guess you would say the same kind of thing should be done to Category:Studies of the Human Form (Shufeldt)? - dcljr (talk) 12:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dame au chaton.jpg[edit]

Tu devrais faire attention : la licence mise était illégale selon la Fondation. Voir le message que j'ai mis à l'uploader. --Aʁsenjyʁdəgaljɔm¹¹⁶⁷¹ 19:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can you assist me with something?[edit]

Can you either quit making "Women with" categories or at least cease until the men are all located into similar categories?

Or, perhaps, you have become confused with the differences between Flickr tags and Commons categorization. I can see this happening, in particular if one is playing "both" and not with the ability to always know where they are at.

Meanwhile, it would also be nice if you would consider to file some of your topics into "1300s mentality" or whatever relevant era best depicts the backward nature of these "tags".

You are capable of understanding the differences between "tags" and a "category tree"? Perhaps the understanding of the differences should acquired before undertaking the task of categorizing.

I do admire your consistency throughout the years. If you could allow the sarcasm in the above statement to do what it was intended to do, I wouldn't mind reasons to communicate without the sarcasm. Honest. -- Queeg (talk) 10:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One step further. There are people at commons I missed for their personality. -- Queeg (talk) 11:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be sure about this. This is not you? -- Queeg (talk) 13:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What about your holiday? -- Queeg (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for finding the right cats for this image I was spending more of my time trying not to put things into diagrams or charts.

It is very very nice to have exchanged thoughts and observations with you today. -- Queeg (talk) 14:07, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Cat vs CatALot[edit]

I notice that you just moved a number, maybe all, of the male French politicians using HotCat. I suggest you take a look at Cat-a-lot. Among other things, it allows you to move selected files from one category to another with one click, rather than having to go to each file separately. It's much faster than HotCat for the sort of recat you just did. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bathing females/women in art[edit]

Hi, I saw you were doing the rounds on the nudey photos recently, and I came across these two categories:

The latter is a subcat of the former, but I can't work out what the difference is meant to be. Figured you probably know more about this category structure than I do, and would know which was correct. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	This edit made my day [6] :-D. I truly appreciate you helping to categorize nudes and sexually provocative images so that people can find images specific to their search without being exposed to images that they would not anticipate. FloNight ♥♥♥ 15:20, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hero Kids-Chapter 01.png[edit]

Hello TwoWings, I've asked Túrelio to restore File:Hero Kids-Chapter 01.png and I've replaced the template {{Copyvio}} with {{Npd}}, because that user has arranged OTRS permission before (see my message at Túrelio) and he might be able to do that for this upload as well. I hope you don't mind. Kind regards, Mathonius (talk) 10:17, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Late discussion in CFD[edit]

Please see Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/07/Category:Female breasts of humans. - dcljr (talk) 08:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid watermarked pictures[edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ +/−

The image File:Parc Angrignon Water Battle.jpg you uploaded contain(s) watermarks. The usage of watermarks is discouraged according to policy. If a non-watermarked version of the image is available, please upload it under the same file name. After removing the watermark, ensure that the removed information is present in the EXIF tags, the image description page, or both. Thank you for understanding.

_→AzaToth 17:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adolescence[edit]

Took out the cat- because I had emptied it of false entries. Not one of the 6 images showed a girl who was in adolescence- as far as know we don't have a single image in that age group- and are unlikely to, with the current draconian laws. If you want it back, I suggest you put a link to it on one of the photographers pages- I believe that we have one of Jock Sturges images but can't find it File:Robert Wilson Shufeldt 18.jpg may be useful or File:Sudanese Dancing Girls (1906) - TIMEA.jpg and File:Sudanese Women (1906) - TIMEA.jpg if we extend the definition of nude. --ClemRutter (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not important to me- I am relieved that you are monitoring the situation. I was just tidying up. Nude men are all in a subcategory of Nude men- there were far to many bicycles and body paint for me. I am sure some of the images were of women in any case! The image of woman in cap I assume to be the mother of the tiny arm you can see behind her, and daughter to the older womewn behind. I was not judging by age as in your definition but by development stage (I worked with youngsters of this age for decades). The critical factor for me was the breast sag which looked as if the woman had be breastfeeding and had given up- the arm behind was probably on formula -- plus it says in the caption in In FKK-Anlage, and it would be extremely unlikely that you would be allowed to take a photo of anyone less than twenty on a German *Naturist site*. If I recall all the others had a description that said Frauen and not Mädchen.--ClemRutter (talk) 17:37, 26 October

2011 (UTC)

See my page --ClemRutter (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Word added for clarity.

The most important thing I have said is 'I am relieved that you are monitoring the situation' I know from your previous edits on en:Naturism that you are pulling in the right direction. If this is the way you want to play it - please take the lead- but do examine my upload record, and edit record before adding personal comments- just saying we are doing it this way now is quite sufficient. A lot has changed since 2004. If you wish to think that a German mother of about 22 is less than 18, I am sure she would be flattered. But enough of this distraction and back to work :-)--ClemRutter (talk) 22:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_or_partially_nude_people_with_electric_toothbrushes[edit]

Nude or partially nude people with electric toothbrushes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 17:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erotic image of woman in bed playing with toys.jpg[edit]

Is that a muppet? Sorry, I thought it was something out of He-Man. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deeper![edit]

	Never give up
	Hello TwoWings, you do a good job and a fine work. Never want to make you tired to do your job. Stay and relax. :-) AtelierMonpli (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heurtoir Pérouges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Censorship_Kills_-_2.jpg[edit]

File:Censorship_Kills_-_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sridhar1000 (talk) 15:06, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Notification about possible deletion[edit]

why are you sending me this notice? Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_or_partially_nude_women[edit]

Nude or partially nude women has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.187.97.88 10:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good at staying mellow[edit]

Hi TwoWings,

I just read the interesting discussion here. I would just like to say that I enjoyed reading it, as, although finding the right solution is difficult, the discussion there is very good because in particular you, but also other serious editors there - by and large - has managed to stay mellow in that discussion, and stick to the topic instead of being personal or too idealistic crusaders of a particular POV. It has been a quite eye-opening discussion to me, although it is not the kind of topics I usually work with here on Commons. I think you have some very good and pragmatic points there. --Slaunger (talk) 16:53, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

noindex on user gallery[edit]

Hi, I have added __NOINDEX__ to User:TwoWings/Uploads (not self-made) in order to see whether this pushes File:Drinking urine.jpg lower on search results for Special:Search/all:drinking. I hope you'll agree that this is not the most important photograph for "drinking" and shouldnt be the first item on the search results. It also has a high pageview count, so I am not sure whether the NOINDEX will have any effect. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Images uploaded from Magazine Café Flickr account[edit]

One or more pictures that were uploaded by you from the Magazine Café Flickr account have been nominated for deletion due to concerns about their copyright status. If you would like to participate in the discussion, it is at Commons:Deletion requests/Café Magazine. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 08:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black_genitalia.jpg[edit]

File:Black_genitalia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naked_in_train.jpg[edit]

File:Naked_in_train.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 20:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_or_partially_nude_women_with_hats[edit]

Category:Nude_or_partially_nude_women_with_hats has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 18:43, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_skateboarding[edit]

Nude skateboarding has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 18:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_people_with_Coca-Cola_bottles[edit]

Nude people with Coca-Cola bottles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Saibo (Δ) 18:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tasting_a_condom.jpg[edit]

File:Tasting_a_condom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pluschow[edit]

Because I needed a category for portraits of girls, separate from that of nude girls. I noticed they did not fit together --User:G.dallorto (talk) 14:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serie Sexy.jpg[edit]

File:Serie Sexy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 11:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metro Tachkent MM.jpg[edit]

File:Metro Tachkent MM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Liliana-60 (talk) 21:49, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tasting a condom.jpg[edit]

File:Tasting a condom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 08:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lesbic use of nipple clamps and strap-on dildo.jpg[edit]

File:Lesbic use of nipple clamps and strap-on dildo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 11:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo supprimée[edit]

Bonsoir,

J'ai supprimé File:Ticky Holgado's tomb.JPG. Le sculpteur du buste est probablement toujours en vie. ~Pyb (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Horse-transport-sign.JPG[edit]

Hi. Please understand that adding Category:Horse transport is an unneeded double-categorizing as Category:Horse-related road signs is directly contained in Category:Horse transport :). We aim at being as specific as possible in selecting categories, if you take a look at the tree of Category:Horse transport (or any other) you'll notice the relations between the subcats and your selections will be much more refined next time. (similarly applies to Category:Videos_of_nudity) Regardz! Orrlingtalk 18:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Horse-related road signs[edit]

Hi. :) The way things work with the categories has been explained to you, including emphasis on the rationale behind why horse-related road signs are also related to horse-transport. You may call for arbitration if you're unhappy with it, but please don't engage in edit-fights, which only harms our readers (and leads to little point). - The prevalent classification method here is based much on CommonSense, triple-meaning. Regards, Orrlingtalk 21:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did explain to YOU why the categorizing is not right for that matter. Don't try to tell me you want to teach me how categorizing works (I'm older than you as a Commons user and I've fixed many categorizing and overcategorizing problems). Instead of asking me not to engage in edit-fight you should at least try to think and start with an answer/comment considering the example I mentionned to you. This file is a road sign showing a horse that has nothing to do with horse transport, and there are other examples such as File:Attention chevaux 1.jpg, File:CH-Gefahrensignal-Tiere (2).svg, File:Trnová, pozor přechod pro koně.jpg or File:Singapore Road Signs - Warning Sign - Animals.svg (those road signs warn that you can meet animals - and mainly horses - ahead and that yo have to be careful, but they don't say if these horses are used as a transport mean - it can also be, for instance, horses bred for meat). Therefore [:Category:Horse-related road signs]] also concerns signs that are not dealing with horse transport, so it cannot be a subcat of Category:Horse transport. QED. So now please try to build a more logical category tree (as I suggested above) instead of reverting me. Thanks in advance. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cat is watching you.[edit]

A cat.

The Fly 21:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Forez-info[edit]

Salut
J'ai finalement fait une page groupée, ici Commons:Deletion requests/Wikijoe upload Forez-info, devant le nombre ! Tu peux y donner ton avis. Celui laissé sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Musée de la mine.jpg‎ ne sera pas lu, la page est désormais orpheline. ----MGuf (d) 18:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

ilove you

Hazem jridi (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Bonjour TwoWings, J'aimerais utiliser ta photo "Big rusty boat in Moynaq" pour la couverture d'un roman traitant de l'assèchement de la mer d'Aral. Quelles sont les mentions à insérer? Merci! Maki71 (talk) 08:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much[edit]

Thanks very much for your categorization help for images related to Category:South Park (cartoon), much appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 22:59, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

©[edit]

Bonjour. Je ne suis pas sûr que votre demande de citer votre nom avec le sigle "©" (qui signifie "copyright") soit compatible avec les licences de type "Creative Commons"... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je vous remercie de vous inquiéter pour moi. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Du[edit]

Bonjour. I have some questions on the page: Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Wang Du, World Markets 2004. MAC Lyon. 1.jpg . Kind regards. Ismoon (talk) 14:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made an appointement with the "iconographe" at the Musée d'Art Contemporain de Lyon, tomorrow, for asking if a license is possible in the case of the work of Wang Du, in front of the museum but in the park. Ismoon (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abu Ghraib 70.jpg[edit]

I have removed 2 categories from that image, as their addition is frankly in bad taste. Flashing ones breasts is an entirely different concept to being forced to lift ones top to show their breasts; in fact it's a vile disgusting act on the part of the perpetrators of the abuse in Abu Ghraib, and we shouldn't be mixing this up with the exhibitionist act. I've also remove the prostitute category, as it is entirely heresay, and even if she was a prostitute, it isn't relevant to this particular photo. I'm not attacking you at all, but I would ask that we use a little common sense with such images. russavia (talk) 13:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opéra de Lyon et Place Pradel - Guignol.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

ce fichier a déjà fait l'objet d'une délation en 2011 ... et conservé ... Dois-je espérer une nouvelle requête tous les 2 ans ?

Cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GO69 (talk • contribs)

"Délation". Les grands mots. Tu n'as pas l'impression d'exagérer un peu ?

Bref, passons sur ta réaction désagréable et disproportionnée.

Il se trouve tout d'abord que je ne connaissais pas la précédente demande. Ensuite, il se trouve aussi qu'il s'agissait d'une demande de suppression groupée et ce style de demande produit souvent quelques ratés pour certains fichiers.

Cette photo en particulier pose doublement problème car elle se focalise sur une sculpture trop récente pour être libre de droits et l'arrière-plan est essentiellement composé de la partie récente de l'Opéra de Lyon, donc une architecture qu'on ne peut pas utiliser librement de cette façon. Les plans larges de l'Opéra sont acceptables car il est quasi impossible de photographier la partie ancienne sans montrer la partie moderne, donc on peut considéré que la partie récente est alors de minimis, ce qui n'est pas le cas quand une photo montre majoritairement la partie moderne. Bref, je sais que c'est frustrant de voir disparaître des photos qu'on a prises et chargées sur Commons (je connais ça...), mais il faut savoir accepter les règles et contraintes d'un projet quand on y participe. Désolé, donc, mais ta photo risque fortement d'être supprimée. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monsieur,

visiblement nous ne partageons pas les mêmes règles élémentaires de politesse et de courtoisie, mais peut-être sont-elles proscrites sur Commons à moins que vous ne vous croyez autorisé à vous en affranchir ... En tête, formule de politesse, salutation, vouvoiement ... Passons.

Où je réponds de manière concise, un tantinet espièglement, ne parlant que d'un fichier, vous vous pensez autorisé à porter des jugements de valeur sur une personne vous étant parfaitement étrangère (réaction désagréable, disproportionnée ...), mais peut-être ne souffrez-vous pas la contradiction ?

Guignol au premier plan: le fragment d'une sculpture beaucoup plus importante qui, combiné avec le premier étage de Chenavard et Pollet, avec le toit de Nouvel, permettait un travail intéressant sur les obliques ... Passons, intrinsèquement les fichier chargés sur Commons ne sauraient à priori avoir de valeur artistique, si minime soit-elle.

Peu me chaut que ce fichier soit supprimé. En revanche, je trouve parfaitement inacceptable que vous sous-entendiez que quiconque ose vous faire remarquer que votre requête a déjà un précédent méconnaît sciemment les règles fondamentales de commons ("il faut savoir accepter les règles et contraintes d'un projet quand on y participe"), s'en affranchit délibérément et soit de-facto un mauvais-joueur. Vous ne faîtes guère crédit à votre interlocuteur de désintéressement et de désir de partage libre des connaissances. Sachez que Wikipédia n'est pour moi ni un blog pour polémiquer ni une encyclopédie propre à satisfaire mon égo.

Quant à la précédente demande en suppression, il ne tenait qu'à vous de vous en enquérir avant de la renouveler.

Si deletion est un faux-ami de la langue anglaise, ce que je sais à présent grâce à vous et ce dont je vous remercie, il me semble que les intentions qui conduisent à proposer à la suppression des fichiers ne sont pas forcément toujours amicales.

Je crois qu'il eut été beaucoup plus simple de me laisser un message un rien plus cordial, un peu moins invectivant, tout en conservant l'argumentaire technique de deuxième partie au demeurant très intéressant.

J'espère que vous comprendrez que se retrancher derrière l'application subjective et draconienne de lois et règlements, dont tout un chacun ne peut avoir qu'une lecture particulière et univoque, ou s'ériger en donneur de leçon n'est pas de nature à encourager la contribution et la coopération du plus grand nombre. Je ne crois pas d'ailleurs que l'on puisse faire montre de véritable pédagogie en qualifiant d'entrée de jeu ses interlocuteurs de désagréables et en les suspectant de mauvaise foi.

Espérant vous rencontrer à l'avenir sur Commons ou Wikipédia dans un climat plus serein, je vous renouvelle mes cordiales salutations. --GO69 (talk) 16:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne vais pas trop perdre mon temps avec quelqu'un qui semble avoir une haute estime de lui-même et s'amuse à donner des leçons sans observer ses propres torts. Mais je voudrais quand même réagir rapidement à certains aspects de votre message car j'aimerais que vous compreniez :

1) que c'est culotté de donner des leçons de savoir-vivre quand on accuse quelqu'un avec des mots aussi disproportionnés que "délation" ; c'est donc aussi une contradiction, pour reprendre votre propos : on n'utilise pas ce genre de mot si on souhaite lancer une discussion cordiale ! (et surtout on ne se plaint pas de la réaction après coup !)

2) que, lorsqu'on prétend ne pas être touché par l'éventuelle suppression d'un fichier et ne pas vouloir utiliser Wikimedia comme un outil de polémique, on ne laisse pas ce genre de message et on se focalise sur les faits et le sujet concerné (en l'occurrence : est-ce que la photo proposée à la suppression le mérite ou non ?... avec des arguments, etc.)

3) vous trouverez finalement peu de contributeurs qui passeront du temps à expliquer leur démarche, surtout après de tels messages, donc merci de ne plus me donner de leçon de "pédagogie"

4) je n'ai jamais remis en cause ni la qualité du cliché ni son utilité, mais seulement le non-respect des règles de Wikimedia Commons (et accessoirement des lois)

5) Chaque utilisateur des projets Wikimedia est le garant du respect des règles, des objectifs et du bon fonctionnement de ces mêmes projets. Or, le non-respect des copyright et autres droits d'auteur est une chose sur laquelle il faut veiller constamment et surtout pas attendre d'éventuelles "plaintes" ! Imaginez si on vous prend au mot et au pied de la lettre : on n'a qu'à importer n'importe quelle œuvre (des Picasso, des extraits de film de Spielberg, des caricatures de Plantu, des romans in extenso de Stephen King, que sais-je encore...) et les garder jusqu'à ce que quelqu'un s'en plaigne ? Non. Cela ne fonctionne pas comme ça ici. Le risque de cette dérive, d'ailleurs, serait d'avoir très facilement des plaintes des artistes les plus connus alors que des artistes qui n'auraient pas les mêmes moyens ni les mêmes "fan-clubs" verraient leurs œuvres "pillées" allègrement et utilisées de façon illégale sous prétexte que personne ne s'en plaint ! Inacceptable. Il faut vous souvenir d'une chose essentielle : le pourquoi de ces différentes règles. Les projets de Wikimedia doivent proposer un contenu librement utilisable y compris commercialement (n'importe qui peut donc essayer de vendre des images de Commons ou des articles de Wikipédia, tant qu'il mentionne correctement les auteurs et les licences qui vont avec). Ce qui veut dire que quelqu'un peut se croire libre de vendre la reproduction d'une œuvre qu'il trouve sur Commons s'il fait confiance aveuglément au fait que sa présence sur ce site fait de cette œuvre une œuvre librement utilisable (vous me suivez ?). Conséquence : Wikimedia et, surtout, les utilisateurs qui importent ces fichiers, se rendent complices (involontairement ou volontairement selon les cas) d'un trafic illégal et d'un détournement du droit d'auteur. J'espère que vous comprends désormais qu'il ne s'agit donc pas de zèle de ma part ou d'une quelconque animosité envers vous, mais simplement de sérieux vis-à-vis des projets auxquels je (on) participe.

Cordialement. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Monsieur,

dans la mesure où vous vous honorez des messages épidermiques dont vous avez bien voulu me gratifier, il paraît plus que légitime qu'ils figurent sur votre page utilisateur. Tout un chacun pourra être à même d'apprécier la douceur de vos propos totalement dénués d'animosité et de mépris. Définitivement, je ne partage pas votre conception très particulière de la bienveillance et de la courtoisie dont devraient visiblement être empreints selon vous les échanges entre contributeurs. Inutile de perdre votre précieux temps à me répondre, en votre nom et celui si appropriable de l'ensemble des contributeurs. Encore et toujours cordialement.--GO69 (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

a heads-up[edit]

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ethnographic_topless_adolescent_girls[edit]

Ethnographic topless adolescent girls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 00:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fellation Tracy and Rick-3.jpg[edit]

File:Fellation Tracy and Rick-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Scott • talk 13:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, TwoWings. You have new messages at Nicoli Maege's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Demande de suppression de plusieurs photographies concernant la ville de Brest dont je suis l'auteur[edit]

Je suis l'auteur de plusieurs photos d'architecture récente concernant Brest dont File:ESC Brest.JPG ; File:017 L'église de Bellevue.jpg ; etc.. Ces bâtiments sont des bâtiments publics ou accessibles au public, visibles par tous ; je ne comprend pas qu'on ne puisse pas les mattre sur wikimedia commons sous prétexte qu'ils sont récents. Amicalement.

Henri MOREAU 04:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

humans by chronological age[edit]

thanks for all your work! it is good to finally have somebody else working on this project

Lx 121 (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mais pourquoi diable ?[edit]

Salut,
Pourquoi proposes-tu cette image à la suppression File:Avant match - vue de Gerland depuis le virage sud.jpg pour le motif discutable que l'architecte n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans (alors même que le bâtiment lui-même et son architecture sont peu identifiables) et pas celle-ci qui dévoile autant (ou aussi peu) du bâtiment File:Stade-Gerland-RWC2007.JPG. On se demande ... --Aga (d) 09:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit fight[edit]

Before repeating for the fourth time making unsustainable modifications in Category:Sex and Category:Sexuality, you'll need to have editors consensing with your proposal, and as long as your proposal is rejected, you should not try to carry it out notwithstanding. This is how it works here on Wiki Commons. Orrlingtalk 15:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Before giving lessons to someone, you have to follow the same lessons yourself.

If you read Category talk:Sex in advertising, your point of view seems quite isolated.
The Wikipedia categories about the same topics existed before the Commons categories (and the meanings of these words preexisted to WP cats !). So please apply the same logic... and if you're not happy with that, start a discussion about it on WP. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a message at the village pump in order to have other opinions because at present the discussion between us can't lead anywhere. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate this. I'll participate, as long as you maintain a decent and collegiative tone of speech. Thank you. Orrlingtalk 17:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Try to maintain that too ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The important thing to remember is that whenever sex is involved, ensure you get consent. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jean_skirts[edit]

Jean skirts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ 00:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metro-Tashkent.jpg[edit]

Hi TwoWings. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 13:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Renommer ? dans Commons[edit]

Bonjour,

Je suppose que tu n'es pas spécialiste, mais à tout hasard : Le dossier Category:Pottery of ancient China me semble trop flou, certains y ont déposé des images relevant d'époques sans relation aucune avec les autres. La majorité se rapporte au néolithique de la Chine. Ne pourrait-on pas le renommer : Category:Neolithic Pottery of China ? et dans ce cas comment faire ? Je me charge alors de reclasser les images qui n'entreraient plus dans ce dossier. Ismoon (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bon, j'ai trouvé une solution simple et pratique. Forget it. Ismoon (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Chartreuse-fake-2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Jacquet aux César 2014[edit]

Salut. Dis-moi, tu n'aurais pas pris en photo Luc Jacquet lors des César 2014, par hasard ? Parce qu'on n'a aucune photo de lui sur Commons... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hé non, aucun des deux. Désolé. JJ Georges (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Heu, pardon, j'ai eu la berlue... C'est parce que j'avais demandé au photographe s'il avait une photo de quelqu'un d'autre, et du coup j'ai mélangé la demande au sujet de Luc Jacquet et ma propre demande. (La fatigue... En tout cas, il n'avait pas de photo de Luc Jacquet, ni de la personne dont je cherchais une image, voilà !) JJ Georges (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:1 - Un électeur vote pour Ali Benflis 2014.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, il y a quoi comme problème avec cette photo ?? je l`es pris moi même, et elle est normalement légale sur commons.--Vikoula5 (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Je vous comprend mais il y a une catégorie avec les bulletins de vote avec des photos de politiciens.--Vikoula5 (talk) 12:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Je veux dire que, cette photo et la photo d`un bulletin de vote tout comme dans la catégorie Category:Ballot_papers dans la quelle il y a des photos de bulletins de vote avec les photos des politiciens tout comme celle de Benflis. Et si on les supprime autant de faire ça avec les autres bulletins. --Vikoula5 (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sepia version[edit]

My intention was to increase an encyclopedic value of the image. Former 'sepia' version is not an original one as this 'sepia' visual effect was digitally created using color bands digital shifting. That is why an originally black&white photo was reverted to the original b&w scheme. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sepia (orange) version is a result of the erroneous automatic white balance. The same effect is at your selfie you've located at your own page here. Your camera shifted the colours, not you. But original colours were b&w as it is a b&w photo. But I can just revert the image to the 'camera' orange version. I've uploaded a new color version with white balance correction, this version is closer the original, I guess. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You tell the orange color is 'sepia'? No, this intensive color is present when the automatic white balance fails. Your selfie File:TwoWings_and_his_ghost.JPG demonstrates erroneous automatic white balance. Or your face really has this orange colour. So does new image version satisfies you? If not I can revert the orange version. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now we know the orange version origins. But does current colour (a new, not b&w) version better? Or it is not sepia enough yet? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But Lybian image is not an original 'sepia', I guess. It is much more natural version with better resolution here. Generally too intensive 'sepia' is usually an electronic/digital effect. Sepia is not a 'natural' colour of the original b&w photos but was generated using chemical processing of the original b&w copy. But 'sepia' processed copies were more stable that is why these copies survived, I guess [7]. Current colour version post white balance correction looks like sepia toned. But if you (or me) would increase color saturation - will this saturated version be more close to the original museum photo colour? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded better version of the Lybian image (from ebay). The reason of converting 'orange' image was to make ancient picture more clear as contrasted b&w version reflects original b&w nature of the Baku city picture. You, me, everybody can revert to 'orange' erroneous white balance version. I'm not sure this 'orange' version encyclopedic values for the Wikipedia are better then b&w version, as we don't need preserve artistic colouring (as it was with your selfie where colour distortion is making funny effect and so it is an artistic trick) but we need a picture of Baku - not less not more. We are storing imagery at Commons with the purpose to use these files in Wikipedia, isn't it? So I'm not sure we need a "raw" image with colour distortions. You could make colour corrections before image uploading, but I've done this for you. Your reaction was emotional, but nothing personal - just Wikipedia. Colour adjustments of the images is my routine job at Commons. And I will continue this work. But if you personally want reversion all my corrections - you can do that. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are missing being an uploader and an author. Original photo of Baku city is not your nor mine, you've made a photocopy (thank you for that activity, yes, thank you), this photocopy of the plain image has no artistic values, isn't it? And your photocamera (not you, but it) made this photocopy with significant colour distortions. I've corrected colour balance and contrast of this photocopy.

Your topic with your own artistic photopicture is very different as you are an artist, the author of this artistic picture. That is why you've uploaded your piece of art with the special licensing. But the photo of Baku made in 1870 has its author, but this author is unknown and died (may be) a century ago. That is why the license is completely free, you see. So everybody at Commons and everywhere can do everything with the image you uploaded. But I've done the colour and contrast corrections with the aim to make this image more clear. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You, me, everybody anytime can process b&w paper copy of a photograph to the 'sepia' colors, so your opinion abut unknown author will to make a paper copy of a photoimage of the street being processed to 'sepia' color is possible. But 'sepia' was not an artistic trick, but this was a routine technology with the aim to protect paper photocopy from the time destroying. That is why 'sepia' images better survived. It was a routine standard processing, not an art. It was no intentions to add any new artistic values. But now 'sepia' processing is an artistic trick. But the street image originally was b&w as it was the only type of photography at this period, you see. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The postcard we are discussing abut is not a piece of art but just a photograph of the street. This postcard is interesting for as a depicture of the XIX century Baku city. But your photocamera significantly changed color, you see. What we need more: a false 'orange' colored digital photocopy or a colour-corrected digital photo? Just now this photo is present at the colour corrected form, not b&w colour scheme. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here the alternative issue of the same photo at a post card. And we know the author К.Г.Папамоскич (K.G. Papamoskich). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We are sure now with not 'sepia' nature of the colour at both postcards - this yellow colorization is an effect of the paper ageing, not any 'sepia'. Old paper becomes yellow, you see. And Papamoskich, I've checked in the net, is an publishing house owner, not photographer.

And with replacing of the old ('your') photo with a 'new' one. The second one has full extend (we can see a dog at the bottom edge) and that is why it is preferable. But if we need just an old picture of the same spot of Baku - we can use this postcard with better quality image and shot from higher point. But we have a lot of old photos of Baku here and here, and here and here and here and here and here (real photos). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A postcard cannot be a 'sepia' colored as this kind of images were made using regular printing technologies. So if colors look 'sepia' they are not 'sepia' as 'sepia' is a technology of a photoimage processing, you see. Photoimage in a chemical sense - created using silver. But if we see a brownish print at the regular paper it can be an effect of the ageing or the brown ink was used.

I why you are not assuming a good faith? When I'm emphasizing that a paper can change a colour? I can not understand this, so I'm so sad. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:SquawManPoster.jpg[edit]

File:SquawManPoster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Racconish^✉ 10:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg[edit]

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vera ^(talk) 20:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg[edit]

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Women in the revolution.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 12:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chrono Guerre Froide Dirigeants.jpg : emploi du terme "empire" ou "bloc"[edit]

Bonjour. Afin de respecter la neutralité dans l'usage de File:Chrono Guerre Froide Dirigeants.jpg sur WP, pourrais-tu remplacer le terme "Empire" par "Bloc", qui est plus neutre. Merci. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je me suis longuement posé la question lors de la création de cette frise qui a fait partie d'un travail de revue en profondeur de l'article relatif à la guerre froide. Cette notion d'empire, comme celle de bloc, apparaît dans de nombreux ouvrages des historiens américains ou français consacrés à la guerre froide (listés pour les plus "classiques" d'entre eux dans cet article) et représente sans doute mieux le caractère hégémonique et plus ou moins subi de la domination des États-Unis et de l'Union soviétique sur les pays dans leur mouvance. La discussion me semble donc légitime, mais le choix final entre les deux termes pas évident. Ce serait intéressant de recueillir d'autres avis. Concernant la neutralité, elle me semble respectée dès lors que le même terme "empire" est utilisé tant pour les États-Unis que pour l'Union soviétique. Concernant l'orthographe, la majuscule ne s'impose pas pour ce terme "empire", et je me propose donc de la remplacer par une minuscule sans précipiter une décision sur le changement de terme. Denis-Paul Bourg (talk) 07:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Attention, je ne dis pas que l'utilisation du mot "empire" est illégitime, et je ne suis pas non plus en train de dénigrer le travail des spécialistes qui emploient ce mot. Ceci dit, ces mêmes spécialistes ne sont pas forcément guidés/contraints par la même nécessité de neutralité que nous le sommes sur WP. De même, il me semble (mais je peux me tromper) que les USA et l'URSS employaient le terme "empire"... pour désigner l'ennemi et non pour désigner eux-mêmes. Dans tous les cas, le mot "empire" est trop connoté et porte en lui un jugement et/ou un positionnement idéologique. Inversement, je ne vois pas en quoi le terme "bloc" induit un problème de neutralité. Il est donc largement préférable dans le cadre d'une encyclopédie qui chercher à respecter au mieux la neutralité (je dis bien "au mieux" car la neutralité stricte et totale n'est pas toujours possible, notamment quand il s'agit d'Histoire ou de géopolitique !). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai procédé à la modification que vous souhaitiez, moins pour des raisons de neutralité - car l'emploi symétrique du terme "empire" respecte cette notion - ou de réalité historique - car les historiens utilisent volontiers ce terme qui décrit mieux la manière dont les États-Unis et l'Union soviétique ont agi pendant cette période - que pour des raisons d'usage, le terme "bloc" étant en effet consacré dans le langage courant. Denis-Paul Bourg (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Merci. Je pense que c'est effectivement plus raisonnable au moins d'un point de vue de l'usage (cf principe de moindre surprise sur WP).

Je persiste toutefois à penser que l'emploi du mot "empire" est connoté et donc moins neutre que "bloc" - rappelons qu'il y avait aussi des pays dits "non alignés" et l'emploi par eux du terme "empire" prend justement un aspect idéologique qui n'est pas présent dans le mot "bloc".

De la même manière, même si je ne conteste aucunement la pertinence de l'utilisation du terme "empire" par les historiens, je ne pense pas que tous les historiens utilisent ce terme et je pense que c'est réducteur d'analyser la Guerre froide avec une telle interprétation (tout comme il serait naïf de nier le côté effectivement impérial des deux pays). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Euh... Pourquoi ne vois-je aucun changement sur le fichier qui indique toujours "Empire" ?!... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Internal_structure_of_the_Statue_of_Liberty[edit]

Internal structure of the Statue of Liberty has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jmabel ! talk 06:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loic Varraut 2003.jpg[edit]

File:Loic Varraut 2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elfix 11:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

François Hollande ???[edit]

Thanks for your comment. At the time, I was mainly attempting to identify the 'aircraft', during which it seemed evidently some sort of political protest or demonstration. The face depiction looked likely to be someone such as Hollande with earlier hair cut and minus spectacles. You are welcome to remove his name, and/or replace it with a more likely candidate :-).PeterWD (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avenue-de-France.jpg[edit]

Hi,
Before nominating an image for deletion, please go to the discussion page of the image. If you look to File talk:Avenue-de-France.jpg, you see that there was already a nomination for deletion on 12 april 2013 and that the decision was kept.
I agree that no-FoP in France is a very ennoying problem (I am French). But go rather to Category:Skyscrapers in La Defense, Category:20th-century sculptures in France, Category:21st-century sculptures in France. You will find some work to to. I did a few.
Regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Youna Dufournet GP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heurtoir Pérouges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I wish it was a bit more symmetrical, but that may well be the door's fault. Otherwise QI for me. --El Grafo 12:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gilles Muller London 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Not too sharp but sufficient quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine Bartholdi - Glace 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Billy69150 14:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition charlie publicites.jpg[edit]

Bonjour. Je ne comprends rien à la motivation de cette suppression. Il me semble qu'il n'y a pas eu de débat, si ? Jean-no (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jean-no: La motivation est la suivante : l'image se focalisait avant tout sur des oeuvres qui ne sont pas libres de droit. Voir Commons:Œuvre dérivée, Commons:De minimis/fr et Commons:Freedom of panorama/fr. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonnard[edit]

Merci. --Coyau (talk) 17:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Une petite question[edit]

Bonjour TwoWings,

Comme tu as l'air plus au courant que moi des lois et règlements, j'ai une petite question. Voilà, j'ai quelques photos de parties de caisses de vin en bois (un des six côtés de la caisse), avec par exemple cette inscription bien visible: Château Haut-Bailly, Cru exceptionnel, Grand Cru classé de Graves, 12 B Léognan G de 1973, puis-je poster ces photos, est-ce légal ? Je n'ai trouvé aucune photo de ce genre sur Commons, de là mon doute !

D'avance merci de ta réponse, cordialement --Jamain (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamain: tout dépend de la présence d'un logo, de sa complexité graphique et de son importance en termes de proportion de l'image. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Je viens d'en poster une avec un logo (si les deux lions au milieu sont considérés comme un logo) [8], qu'en penses-tu ? En fonction de cette photo (elle passe ou pas), j'aurai une idée pour la suite. J'en ai d'autres sans aucun logo, et certaines avec un logo un peu plus important ! Merci,--Jamain (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne suis pas suffisamment spécialiste pour le certifier mais je pense que c'est acceptable. Surtout quand un vignoble est si ancien, ce qui laisse supposer que le logo/blason a de fortes chances d'être suffisamment ancien lui aussi. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Je te remercie pour la rapidité et la clarté de ta réponse. --Jamain (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fw.:Category:Categories by posture[edit]

Its a flat list.--Allforrous 18:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Men_named_James[edit]

Category:Men_named_James has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Men_named_Raphael[edit]

Category:Men_named_Raphael has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Auntof6 (talk) 07:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Étienne-Rue Philippon-SA01-20140127.jpg, etc.[edit]

When you nominate for deletion more than two or three closely related files, particularly if they are by the same uploader, please use a mass deletion request. COM:VFC makes this very easy -- certainly faster than placing 13 separate nominations. Also, it is easier to have a discussion in one place rather than 13, and easier for the closing Admin, as well. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: : sorry... and thanks for the advice. I'll read COM:VFC later (and before lauching any other DR, I promise). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ballgirl rolling the ball-RG2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments weak Support . Great motionpicture --Hubertl 06:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanovic-Shvedova-Lenglen-RG2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 09:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dustin Brown 12, 2015 Wimbledon Qualifying - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Hi TwoWings. You added the category 'Unidentified tennis players' to this image. Why do you think they're unidentified? It's clearly Dustin Brown on the right. Or are you referring to the other player in the photo? I'll update the information to identify both players and remove the category. Diliff (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Diliff: Of course I was referring to the other player ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Morts plus morts...[edit]

Merci !

Si tu savais comment c'est, de vivre avec sa parano jour et nuit et d'avoir à la maîtriser en permanence... mais bon, y'a pire ! Les schizophrénies collectives de l'humanité ou de tel ou tel groupe, c'est une autre paire de manches, et ça pourrait bien compromettre la survie de l'espèce... Au fait, des caricatures de cette série, j'en ai bien d'autres (jamais passées sur le net), et si j'en télécharge une, je te préviens. Bonne continuation, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses (2).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Brodeuses tournage.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brodeuses tournage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:E-Faucher-Brodeuses.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:E-Faucher-Brodeuses.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next revert = block[edit]

I'm getting pissed by your actions. There is nothing to debate as the situation is clear. --Denniss (talk) 11:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boomerang!--Elvey (talk) 01:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Elvey: ???? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Hello TwoWings/Archives, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses (2).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content[edit]

Hi, Please explain this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marvin_snorre_pointing.jpg

Originally uploaded to my English wiki user page, now its gone. I want it back.

-Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Snorre: I can't recall what this picture was about (and I don't have access to it, not being an admin). But I happened to think it was a derivative work and it was deleted for that reason. If you think it was a wrong decision, I suggest you ask the user who took the decision to delete it (INeverCry) or request its undeletion here. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an administrator anymore, so I can't see this deleted image either, or answer any question about it. INeverCry 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masturbating Amy.jpg[edit]

File:Masturbating Amy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RasabJacek (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danielle upskirt.jpg[edit]

File:Danielle upskirt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ijon (talk) 12:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ejaculation after footjob.jpg

Yours sincerely, —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 379.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 379.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 637.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 637.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 344.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 344.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 034.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 034.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 442.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 442.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 445.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 445.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 440.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 440.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 435.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 435.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 434.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 434.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20110218 0112 Beky Stevens.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20110218 0112 Beky Stevens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lap dance024 079.jpg[edit]

File:Lap dance024 079.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 426.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 426.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masturbation on stage024 064.jpg[edit]

File:Masturbation on stage024 064.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 422.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 422.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woman masturbated by man024 059.jpg[edit]

File:Woman masturbated by man024 059.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20091024 352.jpg[edit]

File:ErosPyramide20091024 352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fixpol (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20091024 169.jpg[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate Fixpol (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nude man-erotic show024 106.jpg[edit]

File:Nude man-erotic show024 106.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Template:Idw/lang

Fixpol (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20091024 202.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Fixpol (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20110218 1098 Christina Bella & Mya Diamond.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Fixpol ([[User talk:Fixpol|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20091024 161.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Fixpol ([[User talk:Fixpol|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anal_balls_in_use[edit]

Template:Autotranslate 63.143.116.182 05:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Logs[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jmabel ! talk 15:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Playing (nude).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Toni Müller ([[User talk:Toni Müller|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:World_Artistic_Gymnastics_Championships[edit]

Template:Autotranslate SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 22:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

my uploads[edit]

Can I get your opinion on my uploads I took? Thanks;) Chick1555 ([[User talk:Chick1555|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source[edit]

Hi,

could you tell me, what was a source of this image? Thx.--Juandev ([[User talk:Juandev|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notif I have no clue. Why are you asking that to me ? I wasn't the uploader, was I ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And seemingly you are not admin, so you cannot have a look. --Juandev ([[User talk:Juandev|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notif Exactly. I remember that file, but I can't help you. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Nelson Mandela painted portrait P1040890.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG[edit]

Greetings,

you have put a "No Permission" tag on File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG, which I authored and licensed. I suppose that the underlying assumption is that the poster needs to be licensed, which I believe is debatable. I have taken the liberty to put up a deletion discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG to debate it.

Thank you. Rama ([[User talk:Rama|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend[edit]

I don't not if you can remeber me.Mtr. I was a problem here in commons.Some user (with not very good intentions I believe make me in the pass a deletion request of alllll my drawings.Subsequently and in injust way an admin Jcb (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Delf deleted all, withoug any consensus.Do you have any idea that what can I do for resque my works?? It's was very absurd and injustice, so if you can help me take any recommendation I will be gratefull.Thank you very mutch.

Vicond (talk)

Commons:Illustrating Women, Filling the Gaps[edit]

Bonjour, Merci pour l'ajout de photos. Je suggère que l'on ne garde que les X dernières images de chaque catégorie, X étant à déterminer pour avoir un affichage optimal pour tout le monde. Qu'en penses-tu ? Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mais je ne sais pas comment retrouver les X dernières images. Une idée ? Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aucune idée. En revanche, je préconise qu'on en discute sur la pdd du Wikiprojet que tu as créée et qu'on le fasse en anglais, afin de gagner en visibilité vis-à-vis d'autres contributeurs-trices intéressé-e-s. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, très bien. Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disabled artists[edit]

Hi TwoWings; please help me find a cat for an artist (painter/photographer) who is hearing and speech impaired. Thanks. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notif Apparently there's none. It has to be created. If you need help for that, please give me some details about what you need and give me a link of the files you want to categorize. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, TwoWings, I cooked this pudding for you. Do you think we can "invent" a cat for butterfly-shaped food or food decoration, something? --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I couldn't find it. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Usine Claude et Duval[edit]

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous avez proposé la suppression de mes photos des terrasses de l'Usine Claude-et-Duval. C'est un travail personnel réalisé lors d'une visite guidée du bâtiment durant laquelle la prise de vue était expressément autorisée par le propriétaire des lieux. Cordialement. Jihelpé

Template:Notif Vous confondez plusieurs choses : 1) le fait que vous êtes l'auteur des photos ; 2) l'autorisation de prendre des photos sur les lieux ; 3) le droit d'exploiter librement des clichés (même personnels) d'un tel lieu - c'est ce point que vous oubliez ou méconnaissez.

Le bâtiment dont il est question est une architecture récente (=auteur vivant ou mort depuis moins de 70 ans) et donc, très probablement, protégée par un droit d'auteur (le-s architecte-s), au même titre que n'importe quelle oeuvre d'esprit. Ainsi, vous ne pouvez pas en exploiter librement l'image car votre photo est ce qu'on appelle une "oeuvre dérivée" (pour les expressions entre guillemets, voir les liens proposés à la fin de mon message pour des explications détaillées). Pour qu'elle soit acceptable sur Commons, vous devez donc apporter la preuve soit qu'il n'y a pas de protection pour le bâtiment concerné, soit que vous avez obtenu le droit d'exploiter librement votre photo auprès des ayants droits (ce qui n'est généralement pas facile !). D'autre part, il faut tenir compte du pays dans lequel la photo est prise : en l'occurrence, il n'existe pas, en France, de "droit de panorama" (=droit d'exploiter librement une photo personnelle d'une oeuvre visible depuis l'espace public) et on ne peut donc conserver une photo d'un tel bâtiment que s'il est "de minimis" (=il apparaît sur un cliché dont il n'est pas le sujet principal) ou si l'on peut raisonnablement considérer que le "seuil d'originalité" n'est pas franchi (ce qui peut malheureusement être un peu subjectif !).

Pour plus d'explications, je vous conseille donc vivement, afin de mieux contribuer à Wikimedia Commons, de lire les pages suivantes :

Commons:À propos des licences
Commons:Œuvre dérivée
Commons:Freedom of panorama/fr
Commons:De minimis/fr
Commons:Threshold of originality (page non traduite en français : voir aussi l'article francophone de Wikipédia : Seuil d'originalité)
et éventuellement Commons:Copyright rules by territory (page non traduite en français)

Cordialement --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour TwoWings, Merci pour vos precisions. Je crains qu'il ne faille dans ces conditions faire disparaître de Wiki toutes les autres photos des bâtiments de Le Corbusier. Bon courage. Bien cordialement Jihelpé

Template:Notif Non, pas toutes. Car, comme dit plus haut, cela dépend des pays. Or, des pays comme l'Allemagne, la Suisse ou l'Inde (où il existe des oeuvres de Le Corbusier) autorisent la liberté de panorama (NB : c'est le sens de "FoP" - pour "Freedom of panorama" - que j'avais indiqué dans les procédures de suppression de vos photos). Donc des photos de ces bâtiments peuvent être proposées sur Commons. Mais pas les oeuvres présentes en France, sauf dans les cas limites indiqués plus haut. Par exemple, cette photo est acceptable car la structure en elle-même ne représente qu'une partie minoritaire de la photo. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Panoramio bot operator[edit]

I opened a complaint about User:Shizhao and his Panoramio uploads at the Administrators' noticeboard. You are invited to share your personal experience and opinion about this user and his abuse of his bot operator rights. Thanks, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas ([[User talk:Cccefalon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Saadbl ([[User talk:Saadbl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Saadbl ([[User talk:Saadbl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Saadbl ([[User talk:Saadbl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:LBourgoin2-Le Petit Nicolas-Avant Première.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Olybrius ([[User talk:Olybrius|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:BNoël-Bruneau and MJCroze 2004.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, AntonierCH ^(d) 21:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amália Rodrigues - Metro station Aeroporto (Lisboa).jpg[edit]

I marked this as a copyvio because I was seemingly confused (or just not up to date) about FoP cases in my own country. I’m glad it was undeleted. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Final Straw- Food, Earth, Happiness' tour poster.jpg[edit]

Hi! I'm the author of the work, and copyright holder.

I've released the poster (and many other images) on the film's website under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license here: http://www.finalstraw.org/kit/.

Also, I've sent a release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Will this be enough? Thank you!

-Patrick Template:Unsigned2

File:Female Avatar by Tucia (not from the movie).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:16, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Up at the 66th Mostra.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate AntonierCH ^(d) 23:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images de Furies 2017[edit]

Bonjour TwoWings, merci d'avoir attire mon attention sur ces trois eversements de File:J'écris comme on se venge 14871.jpg. J'ai mal utilisé le logiciel WIzard et Martin zeiller est toujours décédé depuis 1661, je n'aurais pas eu son autorisation écrite. Cordialement Garitan ([[User talk:Garitan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notif Pas de problème. L'important, c'est que tu corriges cela. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catégories DR[edit]

Salut,

Quand tu ajoutes des catégories dans des DR, il faut aussi penser à ajouter les balises <noinclude></noinclude> autour de la catégorie sinon ça catégorise aussi les pages où la DR est inclus.

Cordialement. --Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:44, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notif Désolé. Comme j'ajoute directement avec HotCat, je ne m'en étais pas rendu compte. C'est d'ailleurs dommage qu'il n'y ait pas un ajout automatique de "noinclude" pour des pages comme ça. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 22:11, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis d'accord, je vais faire la proposition sur la pdd du gadget. --Thibaut120094 ([[User talk:Thibaut120094|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NotifTu pourrais me tenir au courant si ça aboutit à quelque changement ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

User:Daphne Lantier is an indef blocked user, so can't help with your request on her talk page. You will have to try someone else or start a deletion nomination. Ww2censor ([[User talk:Ww2censor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert for what ?[edit]

Is there a reason to remove the cat Sex_in_advertising from Sex ? Please exeplain. Thanks Basile Morin ([[User talk:Basile Morin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:07, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notif as written in the revert, I thought it was a case of COM:SURCAT. But I do realize that "sexuality" is not a subcat of "sex" but the contrary. There have been several debates about the order of this hierarchy, so I have to admit I'm sometimes a bit confused and lost ! But the other thing is (and I've already tried to discuss about that once) : these ads are not really about sex, but more about nudity and eroticism. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nineteenth-century erotic alphabet (Apoux)[edit]

I don't think that any whipping is going on in any of them. Rather, in some of the images, one of the persons holds a small symbolic flogger to show who's in charge. In the majority of these, the flogger is far from (not directly menacing) the other person or persons. Even when that's not the case (as in "D", "P, and "Q") it sure doesn't seem like there's any actual whipping going on. Also, in "J", a parasol is not necessarily the same as an umbrella. Sometimes an umbrella can serve as a parasol, but that probably would have been considered inelegant in most contexts in 1880. And I'm not sure what the relevance of the "Mutual masturbation in art" category is to "L": the lower two are doing a form of inter-crural sex. 03:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC) Template:Unsigned

Template:Notif Let's be organized.

Topic 1 : the whips. No matter if the characters are "menacing" the others with whips. Let's face it : when there's a whip in a sexual activity, I can't see how it can be something else : it is about BDSM whipping. I agree they are not always clearly in a whipping action, but there's no doubt the whip is for that.

Topic 2 : parasols/umbrellas. A parasol is a type of umbrella (or sometimes just the way you use an umbrella). When there's no clear evidence/clue about how the umbrella is used, there's no pertinent reason to categorize a file in the categories concerning parasols.

Topic 3 : mutual masturbation. I have to admit I didn't know the expression "intercrural sex". It's indeed a good illustration of that. Since we seem to have no file about that topic, I'm going to create the category. But when I read the description of what intercrural sex is, I would say it's a special form of mutual masturbation, therefore this new category should be a subcat of that topic. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nude sunshiner.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jörg Haffke ([[User talk:Jörg Haffke|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move categories[edit]

Please do not move the Australian Paralympic Committee image categories. Hawkeye7 ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Please just respect COM:OVERCAT. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atheist badges.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those people are nude[edit]

Or almost nude. They can be categorized by headgear though. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping I agree that only this file shows more than a headgear. But when I look at Category:Islamic female dress, it seems that, in that example, "dress" means "item of clothing". Therefore Category:Nude or partially nude women wearing Islamic clothing is correctly categorized. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Then you also noticed that I opened that "new" cat to discussion. I hope to see your constructive comments at that discussion. Bye. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Nope. Where ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here. --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to contribute to Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/03/Category:Photographs of men with glasses as you reverted me... (I will not say "unjustly", but I feel so. :) --E4024 ([[User talk:E4024|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:17, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plan Challe (guerre d'Algérie).jpg[edit]

Bonjour TwoWings La cartographie Plan Challe est un travail personnel que j'ai réalisé moi meme à l'aide du logiciel cartographique ARTCTIQUE je comprends pas pourquoi on supprime un travail personnel, avec ce procédé de suppression vous décourager les wikipédiens a contribuer à l'heure où les contributeurs se font de plus en plus rares Cordialement

--Saber68 ([[User talk:Saber68|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Je te conseille d'aller défendre ton illustration ici. J'y explique que l'apparence esthétique me paraît étrange et ressemble plus au scan d'une publication. Je peux me tromper mais je trouvais la texture et les métadata suffisamment louches... Ce n'est néanmoins pas à moi de trancher et la démarche ne signifie pas que j'ai raison (ni que je prétende avoir raison). Je te remercie simplement d'être totalement honnête pour expliquer la façon dont tu aurais créé cette carte (et d'autres du même type). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Females_with_white_background[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Kürschner ([[User talk:Kürschner|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Women_with_white_background[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Kürschner ([[User talk:Kürschner|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blonde woman sitting on toilet.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Дима Г ([[User talk:Дима Г|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:28, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

File:Annulation Affiche Nuit des Musées La Demeure du Chaos.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Es-tu sûr que le compte Flickr est l'auteur des affiches ? Cordialement, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Je suis à peu près certain qu'il s'agit bien du compte de thierry ehrmann. Vu son activité, je ne le vous guère se planter dans la licence des illustrations qu'il propose donc sur son compte Flickr. Mais si tu veux vérifier cela, vas-y ! Cela permettra d'être plus certains et de valider cela par OTRS. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

En fait, ma question est plutôt, es-tu certain que Thierry Ehrmann est l'auteur des affiches ? Cordialement, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Ça non. Mais comme je l'ai déjà écrit, j'ai du mal à croire que cette personne puisse faire n'importe quoi en attribuant une licence à ce qu'il propose sur son compte Flickr. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:34, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On a vu des gens plus raisonnables faire des choses plus bizarres... File:Annulation Affiche Nuit des Musées La Demeure du Chaos.jpg indique "courtesy of Organ Museum. ©2012 www.AbodeofChaos.org", j'ai donc des sérieux doutes. J'ai enlevé l'avertissement pour l'autre, mais j'aimerais un troisième avis. Template:Ping Qu'en pensez-vous ? Cordialement, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tu peux toujours essayer de joindre thierry ehrmann sur son compte Flickr... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, j'ai lu en détails les articles le concernant. En fait, toutes ces structures sont gérées par la même personne. Cordialement, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:17, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, il ne me semble pas douteux que le compte Flickr d'Ehrmann est le compte officiel de la Demeure du chaos. Voir par exemple ici. Cordialement, — Racconish ^💬 08:31, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Journées Européennes du Patrimoine 100 4116.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate B dash ([[User talk:B dash|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:35, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Regions_by_country[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Auntof6 ([[User talk:Auntof6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:15, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amy with dildo.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:A99C:FCE8:5FE4:7174 04:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nudity_or_partial_nudity[edit]

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_or_partially_nude_people_with_lions[edit]

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zoophilia_with_dogs[edit]

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Zoophilia_with_bears[edit]

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your "Zoophilia with (animal)" categories[edit]

It appears that you created all of the "Zoophilia with (animal)" categories. All of them should be renamed to add "in art". Rather than nominate each one for discussion individually, I'm just going to wait until the existing discussions are finished. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping "Talking" with you seems to be exhausting... I explained it here and it's the same case. It's not constructive to launch various talks about the same "problem". TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kiyoshi_Kurosawa[edit]

Template:Autotranslate 2409:4071:209A:6020:9107:3FFF:1282:CCC1 19:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black_and_white_photographs_of_nude_boys[edit]

Template:Autotranslate 49.183.50.82 06:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Condom in the rain.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Madness ^Darkness 20:41, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Met-art-logo-2004.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate --Krdbot 05:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musée Miniature et Cinéma - Gremlins 2 (2).jpg[edit]

Hi, this figure/character is likely copyrighted by the movie company. --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping I have to admit I find it very confusing when it comes to film props/costumes/sets. There are many on Commons and I can't figure out which ones can be accepted and which ones can't. If you think you know/understand those topics better than me, be my guest to determine which files in Category:Musée Miniature et Cinéma and its subcategories may deserve a deletion request (NB : most are from me, but not all). I will probably trust and follow you. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:46, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Collections of the Musée Miniature et Cinéma[edit]

Are these images allowed, since there is no freedom of panorama in France? Template:Ping World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping see my answer to Túrelio above. If you think some of those pictures may be deleted, feel free to launch a DR and to develop your arguments. I may agree with them. But I don't think there's a problem for all of them. For instance I don't think there is any problem with File:Musée Miniature et Cinéma - Chaplin.jpg (per COM:TOO) or with File:Atelier, Musée du cinéma de Lyon.jpg (per COM:DM). So just be careful not to include everything in a possible mass DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:23, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unrecognized_or_largely_unrecognized_states[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Themightyquill ([[User talk:Themightyquill|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Musée Miniature et Cinéma - Gremlins 2 (1).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ubcule ([[User talk:Ubcule|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:"Slave".jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shannon Miller 1992.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:40, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping This Flickr account is supposed to be Claudia Applebe's account, and we have one file with OTRS approval from this photographer, so I tend to think she knows what she owns and how she can license it on Flickr. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Floco 2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license #ifexist:File:USA Beijing 2008 Olympic gymnastic team.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:1995 Super gymnast Barbie.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel ([[User talk:Patrick Rogel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:34, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Incheon AsianGames Closing Ceremony 04.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image Joan Sims[edit]

Pour info, l'image je l'avais trouvé grâce à flinfo qui m'avait autorisé à la publier sur wikicommons.. Bref. Datsofelija ([[User talk:Datsofelija|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

lock evasion[edit]

See [9] locked in infinity for being a sock on two Wikis. User Lusouser is recreating all deleted images from Wiknick (blocked publisher). O revolucionário aliado ([[User talk:O revolucionário aliado|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:사진 100.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, CptViraj (📧) 04:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People_with_medals[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Auntof6 ([[User talk:Auntof6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Musée Miniature et Cinéma - Star Wars.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

suppression de fichiers sur Commons[edit]

Bonjour TwoWIngs, il se trouve que de nombreuses demandes arrivent sur ma page de discussion qui me laissent perplexes. Il y a des photos de tableaux vieux de plusieurs siècles par exemple . D'autre comme File:Reims à l'eau forte 1009475.jpg sont supprimés alors que plusieurs dixaines ont étées téléchargées de la même manière, pourquoi la 75 et pas la 74 ou la 76 ? Je me suis contenté de suivre la procédure proposée par Uploadwizard qui me propose : se fichier est votre propre travail ou pas de votre propre travail. La photo l'est mais pas forcement l'objet photographié. SI je prend l'option propre travail l'image finie par être supprimée. Si je prend pas propre travail car le tableau, par exemple est du XVIIIe siècle et en plus d'un auteur inconnu. Alors les cases suivante ne proposent pas provient d'un musée, ne propose rien si c'est d'un auteur inconnu. je vois que c'est le plus souvent PD-art ou old qui conviens en général. J'ai pour le moment et en général pour une option qui dérange, parfois mais pas tout le temps quelques patrouilleurs. Merci de m'aider pour cette procédure qui ne m'est, apparemment, pas intuitive. Cordialement Gérald Garitan ([[User talk:Gérald Garitan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_girls_by_posture[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Heavy dock ([[User talk:Heavy dock|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:59, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nude_children_by_posture[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Heavy dock ([[User talk:Heavy dock|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:00, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Heavy_dock. --Fæ ([[User talk:Fæ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:34, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ejaculation after footjob.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate LuiCJ ([[User talk:LuiCJ|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

this revert[edit]

Hi TwoWings, noticing your revert, I was wondering if you read the translated text in the image: Filthy blood pound? What age are we living in? This is even worse then racisme if you ask me. I would prefer this image to be deleted. Thank you for your time. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:35, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IFor your information: in the meantime, I took a look at the Template:W which states: The best-known attraction in Haw Par Villa is the Ten Courts of Hell, which features gruesome depictions of Hell in Chinese mythology and Buddhism. This attraction used to be set inside a 60-metre long trail of a Chinese dragon but the dragon has been demolished, so the attraction is now covered by grey stone walls.

Template:Ping I really don't get it. Having a picture about that doesn't mean that we agree with the ideology behind it. Could you clarify your opinion? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 22:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hidden ping Since (as per the article on Wikipedia), the attraction is now covered by grey stone walls, this should imo be in another category Category:Demolished attractions in Haw Par Villa, also the title name of the file is totally wrong, this is NOT Prostitutes boiled in menstrual blood, this is a a figure representing a prostitute boiled in menstrual blood, or something similar. (that is, if the translation from the Chinese language is correct. :-) It is very hard to try being politically correct nowadays. Thank you for your time. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping So this is not a "Luncheon on the Grass" but a "Painting of a Luncheon on the Grass"? Come on, don't be silly!

As for the attraction being covered by grey stone walls, I don't see the problem either. Should we delete all files about demolished or defunct subjects? Come on!

There is absolutely no reason to delete that file. It's actually important to show the way some people see women (here the way they consider prostitues and menstrual blood).

The only clever comment you make it that, indeed, we're not sure that the translation and the interpretation of this figure are correct. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prostitutes boiled in menstrual blood.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:38, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Musée Miniature et Cinéma - Beetlejuice (1).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic ([[User talk:Yuraily Lic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eisenstein Potemkin 2.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, VLu ([[User talk:VLu|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:TwoWings/Archives

Catégories[edit]

Image Tagging Image:Cosmos05.gif[edit]

Image:Jraf and his TwoWings ghost.JPG[edit]

Message sur mes photos...[edit]

Ton image perso[edit]

Besoin d'aide d'un bot.[edit]

Image: port de pêche[edit]

Image:Exhibition Ron Mueck Edinburgh.JPG[edit]

Innapropriate pictures[edit]

Image:0-big8.jpg[edit]

Image:0-big3.jpg[edit]

Blocage volontaire[edit]

Wrong country[edit]

Image:Piracy.jpg[edit]

your Image:Caledonian Canal (Corpach).JPG[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Copyvio énigmatique[edit]

Skye photo[edit]

Brigade de surveillance des blocages volontaires :)[edit]

Nude deletion[edit]

Lewd redemption[edit]

Commons:Bistro[edit]

Image:Blasón de Sástago.svg[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:No pussy (nude).jpg[edit]

Plaques[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blocage[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mr. H[edit]

Peter Klashorst[edit]

Some of your uploads[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Making a request[edit]

Image:Simca1100-Gura.JPG[edit]

Category:Grande Arche[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Blonde Woman and Man Having Sexual Intercourse.jpg[edit]

Halfautomatic Consolationmachine[edit]

Image:Muenster Tor ProjektVierTore 7117.jpg[edit]

Re: Copyright violations[edit]

Re: Image:Masturbating Amy.jpg[edit]

Commons:Bots/Requests#Miss_World_2007[edit]

petite question sur "attribution"[edit]

Image:Lyon Trompe l'oeil velo'v.jpg[edit]

Re: Please don't change categories like that![edit]

Thanks for notice[edit]

Category:Gymnasiums[edit]

See also[edit]

Need help[edit]

Film poster[edit]

Re: Image:Life in Manastirea Humorului.jpg and Image:Goose in Manastirea Humorului.jpg[edit]

Re : Petit conseil[edit]

Deletion discussion[edit]

Salut[edit]

All your images with regognisable people[edit]

Camera templates[edit]

A little HOT[edit]

Thank you[edit]

Image:Spilled juice (by Peter Klashorst).jpg[edit]

DR?[edit]

Idiom[edit]

Version floutée[edit]

Regarding Image:Affiche de Qui est-il?.png[edit]

Hard to get this exactly right[edit]

Please use sub-categories[edit]

Your RfA[edit]

Your disruptive DRs[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/French architects[edit]

Category:Lyon[edit]

Vulgar images on Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Template Transration has been done.[edit]

Lecture_at_Output.jpg[edit]

Image:Masturbating_Amy.jpg[edit]

Fontaine Stravinski.JPG German WP[edit]

Nudity in some photos[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Peter Klashorst's images[edit]

Where?[edit]

File:Allys a rubbin (1421413596).jpg[edit]