User talk:Giorgiomonteforti

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 12:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Giorgiomonteforti!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

--GeorgHH 10:16, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re :Help for translation[edit]

Dear Giorgio, I'm sorry for my late reply because I don't open Commons regularly. However, I want to ask you if this diploma or award or whatever is written in Arabic? Because of the font, I couldn't recognize whether it is Arabic or Persian (Both use same characters). The only thing I could extract from this image is two words "الرتبة الثانية" which can be translated into "Second Degree" or "Second Class" (Arabic and Persian have some common words as I think). Im' really want to help but the font is very difficult to read. --AhmadSherif 16:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind and if you wanted anything about Arabic don't hesitate :)--AhmadSherif 21:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Images[edit]

Please do not tag images with {{PD}}. This Tag is obsolete. Please use one of the tags which are shown there. I think {{PD-old}} is the correct one. --Wuzur (talk) 10:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pending permission for images[edit]

Hello. On the images listed at User:Rjd0060/sandbox#User:Giorgiomonteforti, you added the {{Otrs pending}} template. Unfortunately, after conducting a search, I could not locate the tickets containing the permission to use the images. Please respond on my talk page if you have the ticket numbers, or if you would like to send me the permission. Please note that if you do not respond, the images will be deleted. Thanks! Rjd0060 (talk) 22:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible for you to send the permission again, right now, to the address and following the instructions at Commons:Email templates? If you do it now, I can take care of it right away. Please let me know. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for getting back to me. I'll make sure that the images are tagged accordingly. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I needed further information, so I've replied to the e-mail. Just thought I'd let you know here too. Thanks, - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent. I have now tagged all of the images. Thank you for your help with getting this resolved. - Rjd0060 (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ernesto Burzagli[edit]

Whenever it is convenient, please consider taking a look at en:Ernesto Burzagli and en:Russo-Japanese War. Little by little, I am working to improve these articles and others related to the Western observers during the Meiji 37-38 War. One of the small tidbits of inspiration for this work was the Burzagli material which you posted. I hope you will be pleased to discover that your contributions to Wikipedia have produced unexpected consequences. --98.14.235.98 22:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

peek[edit]

i thought you may be interested to see this --Mardetanha talk 17:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagini.[edit]

Hai cancellato alcuni immagini che ho chiesto permesso all'autore. Ed immagini molto interessanti come il tram di Santos. Grazie per il "contributo". Edho trovato i vari avvisi solo dopo che sono stati cancellati,questo perche nessuno mi ha scritto nella wikipedia in portoghese. --Santista1982 (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Anaglifo.jpeg

That is my image, and I decided to change de CC license to Public domain.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Creación_de_anaglifos.jpg

That is my image, and The CC license works fine, because my name is in the top-right.

Re: Help in translation[edit]

Hello Giorgiomonteforti. Regarding Image:Rusaw.jpg - this is a letter from Russian emperor Nicholas II. It is written in old Russian, so I'll try to do my best to translate it. I had some difficulties with military ranks and old fashion official form of addressing.



With God's Mercy

We, Nicholas the Second,

Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias,

Czar of Poland, Grate Duke of Finland,

Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

To Mister Lieutenant of the Italian service E. Burzagli.

Due to your high stance in favor with Us,
In the all-merciful [fashion], by the Order of 6th day of September 1904, We honor you as the Knight of the Order of Saint Anna of the 3rd Degree.

We willed the Russian Imperial Chapter of Monastic Orders this Formal Document to be signed, witnessed, officially stamped and delivered with the Order Sign [Ribbon] to you.
Issued in Saint-Petersburg on the 11th day of September 1904.

The Manager of the Chapter of Monastic Orders [sign]
The Office Secretary of the Chapter of Monastic Orders [sign].



Hope that helps. --Kimsə (talk) 07:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Hi, Giorgio. It' s ok, I'll help you. I'll send you. Regards.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:36, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Cinema_guido_guerra_montevarchi_blueprints.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

-Nard the Bard 19:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Immagini della serie Araldiz Manno[edit]

Ho visto che sei intervenuto su alcune immagini che erano state, erroneamente, segnalate come non categorizzate e hai introdotto la categoria heraldry (peraltro corretta, almeno come prima attribuzione). In realtà tutte quelle immagini (sono circa 400) sono corredate del template PD-DAUI che, oltre a inserire la segnalazione di pubblico dominio attribuisce anche la categoria Dizionario Araldico Ufficiale Italiano, che è quella corretta e che rientra, a sua volta, in quella dei dizionari araldici. Forse sarebbe necessario far presente all'autore del bot che introduce la segnalazione di mancanza di categoria che deve correggerlo in modo tale che, oltre a verificare la mancanza di categoria espressa dalle doppie quadre, vada anche a verificare i vari template presenti nella pagina per controllare se qualche template introduce una categoria, altrimenti saremo sempre tutti costretti a correre dietro al suo bot per eliminare la segnalazione errata ed essendo costretti, per l'inefficienza del bot, a introdurre categorie espresse con doppie quadre, anche se, come nel caso del tuo, peraltro utile, intervento, troppo generiche e comunque inutili. Io non sono capace di esprimere il concetto in inglese corretto e quindi ti pregherei di valutare l'opportunità di fare tu la segnalazione. Grazie ancora per l'intervento. Ciao Massimop (talk) 22:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tua richiesta[edit]

La correttezza della tua correzione :-) è palese. Correggi senz'altro. :-) --User:G.dallorto (talk) 21:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgio, the image is now restored. But, look, when you uploaded the painting, you uploaded this. There's no way of knowing, by just reading the information you gave that the author of the pictures is not Frank Fox and he's only the author of the text of the book. By reading your {{Information}} tag, appears to be that Frank Fox is the author of that painting, and {{PD-old}} does not apply because the supposed author died in 1960. That's because I've deleted the file. The painting in this case is anonymous, and therefore, {{Anonymous-EU}} applies. Please, take a look at the differences between the version you uploaded and the version I've edited. Cheers, KveD (talk) 15:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, you haven't created any mess. No one is born knowing about copyright laws and licenses, and is not an easy thing to learn. Take it easy, ask me (or any other admin) if you have doubts or need help, and everything is going to be just fine. Cheers, KveD (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images of OTRS ticket 2008102310044037 (Cinema Guido Guerra Montevarchi)[edit]

Hi Giorgiomonteforti, unfortunately this ticket was never closed successfully after it was opened in October 2008. Because of this I had to delete the whole collection. Please feel free to contact the OTRS team regarding this ticket or me directly in case of remaining questions. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Granada Suburban Park HM.jpg may be deleted[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−


The File:Granada Suburban Park HM.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot(talk) 20:19, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villino Suore Montevarchi.jpg may be deleted[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−


The File:Villino Suore Montevarchi.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot(talk) 20:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cofradía de la Oración de Nuestro Señor en el Huerto de los Olivos y María Santísima de la Amargura, Granada, Semana Santa 2009.JPG may be deleted[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−
Cofradía de la Oración de Nuestro Señor en el Huerto de los Olivos y María Santísima de la Amargura, Granada, Semana Santa 2009.JPG which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Cofradía de la Oración de Nuestro Señor en el Huerto de los Olivos y María Santísima de la Amargura, Granada, Semana Santa 2009.JPG") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Real, Venerable e Ilustre Cofradía de Nuestro Padre Jesús del Perdón y María Santísima de la Aurora, Granada, Semana Santa 2009 (38).JPG may be deleted[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−
Real, Venerable e Ilustre Cofradía de Nuestro Padre Jesús del Perdón y María Santísima de la Aurora, Granada, Semana Santa 2009 (38).JPG which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("Real, Venerable e Ilustre Cofradía de Nuestro Padre Jesús del Perdón y María Santísima de la Aurora, Granada, Semana Santa 2009 (38).JPG") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 15:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Unknown_Montefortis'_relative_at_Follonica_on_1947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 11:12, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Hello Giorgio, thanks for your nice comment on my talk page, see [1] - I have answered it on my page (I am still not sure, what is the usual way here: to answer on the own page or on the other). Now I can also see the reason for your interest in the "disputed" image of the D'angelis family - you have added parts of the archive of your family to the commons. Quite nice documents! - as most of them are black and white you can add a category "black and white photography" or similar. Are you too active on facebook? - I saw a page with your name there. Best wishes to Poland Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


do you have an idea...[edit]

what and where this File:Splügavensc.jpg can be?? - it has an italian description. (I did not try google) Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your help - also a very unusual name, at first I thought of a misspelling or a joke. Cholo Aleman (talk) 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:D’Angelis Family has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--80.187.103.254 16:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, puoi confermare questa autorizzazione tramite una mail al ns sistema OTRS? Grazie, --Elitre (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC) L'avviso si riferisce anche ad altri eventuali permessi da te rilasciati o ottenuti e sprovvisti di ticket OTRS.[reply]

Su OTRS ci sono ticket riconducibili a te ma relativi ad immagini. A noi serve che ribadisci di essere stato il proprietario di quel dominio, anche se fosse scaduto, vuoto ecc., e di confermare la cessione di testi con doppia licenza GFDL + CC-BY-SA (vedi it:WP:CONCEDI). Grazie, --Elitre (talk) 10:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, adesso mi fai commuovere :) Grazie, --Elitre (talk) 18:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Since"[edit]

If I may make a minor suggestion to improve your otherwise excellent English?

"File:Juliencaras.jpg Personal picture. Low quality. Unused since January Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 17:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)"

"Unused since January" implies that it was in use before that. I'd probably say, "Never used", or, if I wanted to be very complete, "Uploaded in January, never used". Since you are on my mental list of "reasonable people", I would accept "never used" without looking at the image. But "since January" meant that I wanted to look to see where it was used and of course you can't do that.       Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since you said you wanted to help me to fill it... ;-) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you for your kind compliments. I'm really touched by that ! Your additions are great. And yes I suppose there are many other pictures to add ! What a great job to do ! Cheers. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • +1 - my friend Giorgio has done a great job! a very useful new category - sometimes it can be difficult to differentiate between "thinking" and "concentration" - "The Thinker", the famous sculpture of Rodin can be included too (many images of this are in the commons) Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 09:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Best Wishes! Billy Rebel www.billyrebel.com www.myspace.com/billyrebel The photo in question is an actual photo of me. Thanks!

Billy Rebel

Thanks![edit]

Ciao Giorgiomonteforti! - thanks for the categorization of my pictures of the pic ! I had no idea what fits. Grazie Mille - --Nienetwiler (talk) 07:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Francesco Pesce[edit]

Hi! Do you have further information Italian photographer Francesco Pesce? I saw that you uploaded File:Burzagli giovane.jpg and I need at least his date of death so that I can add a photograph he took of Emperor Pedro II of Brazil. Thanks! --Lecen (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You were more helpful than you can imagine, my friend. Thank you very much! Cheers, --Lecen (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Hello Giorgio, still active here ?! Great, nice to see you! - I am just switching between the German Wikipedia and the commons. I have a question, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Gualtiero-roberto-carraro-corriere-della-sera.jpg - this user uploaded some images that should proof something for second reality or something of this. Obviously he is Italian, like you, something to do with the corriere della sera. Perhaps you have an idea about it. Where are you living now ? - today in the morning I looked at your blog and I found a link to pages of Stacy Reed in the US, very interesting. Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 10:06, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GIORGIO BOTONAZO

your comment at DR for File:Grashoppsangare-070512.jpg[edit]

Hi Giorgiomonteforti, your comment at the DR for File:Grashoppsangare-070512.jpg about "mafia" was highly inappropriate and did actually offend the uploader. I have striked it through. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, refrain from such grossly inappropriate sexist remarks about living persons. Such comments may be very offensive to the person, are harmful for Commons atmosphere and they simply don't help being absolutely not relevant to the policies of Commons. Trycatch (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crystal City, TX, welcome sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gazebo (talk) 06:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Italy by Frank Fox (59).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hchc2009 (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki Spiderman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain...[edit]

You started Category:Hut kitchens. Okay, what is a "Hut kitchens"?

Could you leave a hatnote on the category, giving other people a hint as to what does, and doesn't belong? Geo Swan (talk) 02:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Fennagh has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


109.76.67.102 21:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Cagayan de Oro has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]