User talk:ClemRutter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ver' nice, mon ami, ver' nice! :-) JackyR 21:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Files "London_dial.svg" and "Derby_Sundial_5811.jpg"[edit]

If you don't mind I would like to show the two images during a presentation before an audience of sun dial friends organized in the Deutsche Chronographische Gesellschaft in Mai 2016. Of course I would cite the sources in the references of the lecture. Its title is "Horizontal sun dial with arachne scale and noon gap".Hoping for your kind approval. --Modalanalytiker (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gerne- bin ich stolz. --ClemRutter (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guildhall Museum Paintings Collection 3330gpc.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia Primary School Logo 2.png[edit]

Thank you very much for your help. Very nice from you to propose the SVG version and the new free font. We really appreciate it. However for the blackboard background it's something we really care, as it is a distinguished feature of our project. As you can see we have used the same style also on this related image: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:140610_Wikipedia_Scientist_Journal_-_Issue_Zero.pdf . My question is: may you help us to build a good svg if I provide you the image of the blackboard?--Marta.pucciarelli (talk) 09:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Marta.pucciarelli: Yes I can have a go. If you contact me by email you can attach the file. I am happy to proofread and translate from International English into Native Speaker English if that is any help.
You may be interested in these sheets from my former life [1] I have put them on a cc-by-sa-nc as I haven't had time to check that all the images are copyright free. When that is done we can switch them over to CC-BY-SA --ClemRutter (talk) 13:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:2005 MillauPéage0416.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loreleil (talk) 22:10, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Millau7641.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.63.161.96 10:36, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cèze Pont St André 9164.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robin Chubret (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cèze Pont St André 9165.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robin Chubret (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cèze Pont St André 9166.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robin Chubret (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cèze Pont St André 9168.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Robin Chubret (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSicon uABZdrl2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me
08:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:BadElster MarienQuelle 4562(c).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: no fop in germany
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:BadElster MarienQuelle Fenster4562.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: no fop in germany
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nudist picnic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jesse Boot Bird .png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:19, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thameslink[edit]

Just FYI, Category:Thameslink (train operating company) is for the TOC operating from 1997 to 2006. You want Category:Govia Thameslink Railway. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Matt. Looking at the reduced timetable I don't think I want it at all. :!
Category discussion warning

People's Vote March, 23 June 2018 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


LG02 (talk) 12:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Parking[edit]

Lammas Green, Sydenham

ClemRutter (talk) 20:08, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Ouse Burn has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Andy Dingley (talk) 09:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brexit party logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

kashmīrī 08:23, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:London March Euro Demo Jo Cox banner 2934.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Cable cars in Switzerland has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Oh this is you Clem. Great work today. Respect. Victuallers (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Dump Trump Buck House face of coal 1836.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brexit party logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 13:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Oak[edit]

Just to say thanks for the new photos! I've added a couple of them to en:Royal Oak, Frindsbury now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amendment needed in track drawing[edit]

Hello Clem,
I noticed a typo in the drawing you created – File:GaugeStandardMetreCentre.svg – namely 1,000 mm (3'-6") on the green, narrow-gauge label, which ought to be 1,000 mm (3'–338").

I don't do .svg imaging, or I would have been happy to simply fix it. Are you in a position to do the correction? If you aren't, I can do it as a .png in the style of the drawing captioned "Configuration of Australian dual-gauge (1600 mm and 1435 mm) track", above yours (without the dimensioning of course).

Looking forward to hearing from you. Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 09:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been blocked on English Wiki- so didn't see your message until today. File:GaugeStandardMetreCentre.svg is on Commons where I still roam free so no hassle, I will do it in the next few days. svg is an easy skill to learn- you need to download Inkscape- possibly we need to link to a tutorial. Email direct Simon- clemrutter@bcs.org.uk ClemRutter (talk) 07:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. ClemRutter (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contact[edit]

Are you the Clem Ritter who used to live in Manchester and worked at Abraham Moss Center and was married to Alison. I just wanted to say hi. Send me an email at sinhar54@gmail.com. Rashmi 108.28.90.159 23:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dual Gauge tracks[edit]

Hi, your drawing GaugeStandardMetreCentre.svg doesn't seem to make sense - I would have expected to see more than two rails in order to accommodate different gauges. Am I missing something? Perhaps an explanation in the caption would help... Regards, Janke | Talk Janke (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your chimney sweeps illustration[edit]

Hello Clem Cutter,

Your illustration of the stuck vs. unstuck chimney sweeps would be really useful for the book I am writing on childhood poverty in Victorian London, to be published in 2024 by Pen and Sword. May I use this image, crediting "Clem Cutter" in my book? The publisher doesn't give me an images budget, so I have to ask for this as a courtesy.

You can reply here or at treehugginpenforhire@yahoo.com.

Literature girl Literaturegirl (talk) 21:44, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Maidstone has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]