Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2020

File:ManuelJoseGarcia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2020 at 21:00:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Portrait
Info created by H. Lesmadryl- scanned/uploaded/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I hope it's not too harsh to frankly say that this looks like an ordinary-quality photocopy to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose @Ikan Kekek: No, it isn't. 14:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A useful pic to illustrate him but IMO nothing outstanding for FP and I agree with Ikan, the quality of the photocopy is not that good. Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gletsjerpad naar de Morteratschgletsjer 12-09-2019. (d.j.b) 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 04:50:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland
Info View of the impressive Morteratsch glacier.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support excellent strong swooping feeling. Seven Pandas (talk) 20:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dissent. I don't think the rocks in the foreground are very interesting. I will suggest a crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. The most interesting part is in the background. --StellarHalo (talk) 04:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Otherworldly, as in "extraterrestrial". I almost expect to see Kirk, Spock and the obligatory not-long-for-this-world redshirt beam down. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's well composed, because we do find the most spectacular thing in the background. In my eyes it tells the story of shrinking glaciers. --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not just the shrinking glacier story, but it's also a great leading line into the background. Seven Pandas (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Not the best colors, but great composition. May actually work better in B&W. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Feeling of space here. But the clouds are dominating and steal the show from the spectacular background -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I actually think the current crop is great. Also, those are humans, wow. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Prefer this crop Buidhe (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel Case; the colours contribute much to that impression. – I prefer this crop. --Aristeas (talk) 08:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative, another version[edit]

Support--Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Support Could be sharper, particularly in the right middleground, but I like the gyrating movement and other rhythms in this composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak support see comment on first photo. the first one is far more interesting Seven Pandas (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The path is an important leading line, and without it the composition is unimpressive. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:05, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per KoH Poco a poco (talk) 11:29, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per KoH, the original composition is great and I don't think you need to mess with it. Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. / /Basile Morin (talk) 05:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland

The chosen alternative is: File:Gletsjerpad naar de Morteratschgletsjer 12-09-2019. (d.j.b) 01.jpg

File:Air Terjun Salodik.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2020 at 10:41:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Indonesia
Info created by Rony erge gunawan - uploaded by Rony erge gunawan - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:41, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small a file to wow me in 2020. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Looks nice, though.--Peulle (talk) 07:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but processing is a bit weird - blues are very saturated, there's some vignetting and bluriness, and a lot of uncorrected CA especially in the top left. Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Overprocessed per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Danu Widjajanto (talk) 06:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Convolvulus hawk-moth (Agrius convolvuli).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 13:45:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Sphingidae (Hawk Moths)
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like File:Convolvulus hawk-moth (Agrius convolvuli) 2.jpg better. The proboscis isn't cut off, the head is sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good find. I also had a clear impression of dejà-vu, but taking the trouble to mention an existing nomination of yours of the same subject Lol. Seems that Charles is not bound to follow his own recommendations :-) 🤨 Thanks, Ikan, for the research. I agree it's unsharp, proboscis cut off, and we already have a better FP of the same moth in flight taken 2 minutes later -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:17, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Basile's being unfair in his little dig at me. My comment was made in the days when we just specified the main category i.e. Lepidoptera. These days, it's hardly a 'good find'. It's obvious to anyone that there's another FP of this species. That one has the wings blocking the body. In this one, the wings are 'down'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After such a request, I really thought you would have warned us there is another FP of the same species. Anyone is free to oppose for this reason, right? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose due to cut off on the right -- missing key piece to the image. Renata3 (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel like too much of the subject is unsharp (difficult shot, I know), and part of the antenna is cut off.--Peulle (talk) 09:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Commons:Featured picture candidates/[reply]

File:Samsung WB350F front.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2020 at 23:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical devices
Info created by Samaung - uploaded by clpo13 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 23:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Probably a deserved VI but I don't think there is anything outstanding about it for FP. In 'studio conditions' photographing an inanimate object like this is not the most challenging thing, so I would want real perfection in composition and image quality. With this shot I like the gradient in the background, and the composition is OK although I'd kinda prefer a view at an angle rather than have the camera facing straight. But the image quality is not very high. Not terrible, but IMO too noisy for a 10.5mpx image. Cmao20 (talk) 01:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 07:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. --Peulle (talk) 08:07, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose way too noisy for a studio shot --El Grafo (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but an object photographed in a studio should look much more 3-dimensional and the white balance should be much better.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Augustgeyler (talk • contribs)
Oppose Blown highlights and too soft. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 08:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Área de Proteção Ambiental da Baleia Franca Claudio Seelig (01).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 00:24:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Ctseelig - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It has its faults, but overall I think this is a good example of long-exposure photography. The hazy atmosphere and the nice composition with the rocks adds the extra that makes this more than 'just another sunset.' Cmao20 (talk) 01:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not wowed by this. A foggy sunset is still just another generic sunset. --StellarHalo (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a sunrise actually (cf. timestamp and location). Daniel Case (talk) 14:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--shizhao (talk) 07:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Using long-exposure that way gives it a very straight concept of making everything warm, smooth and cloudy looking. --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Not the sharpest, but very nice mood. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think there's enough happening in the sky to make this a fully satisfying form. Something stronger in the upper right might have been enough. I feel like there's 3/4 of a good form here, and I wouldn't support on mood only. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood. Daniel Case (talk) 14:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- This is a good image but IMHO, not FP - agree with StellarHalo and Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 04:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I reckon the crop could be improved slightly, but I like the general composition. It's a good long-expo shot imho. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 08:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Brazil

File:Madain Saleh 2017 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2020 at 15:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created & uploaded by Alhasaam - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not the sharpest, but OK for a 36 MP image. Great colors and wow. The rock on the far left is distracting and should be cropped. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose IMO a bit too much 'clarity', there are some slight haloes around the horizon edges. The view is very dramatic and it deserves to be QI but I don't find the image quality outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question what about File:Mada'in Saleh 2017.jpg? --2A02:A310:45E:FA00:D28:41E1:8394:AFBA 20:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose should be sharper, and hill in background blurred. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Composition also takes in some distracting detail. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Andrei (talk) 21:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The choices of angle of view and strong side lighting show careful thought and have much appeal in this image made from nature's grandeur and man's invention.

@Tomer T: There was a previous suggestion to consider a second, similar image of this desert tomb by this same photographer - File:Mada'in Saleh 2017.jpg. This second image may overcome some of the current objections. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Opened Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mada'in Saleh 2017.jpg. Tomer T (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 08:28, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bald Eagle - Flickr - Andy Morffew.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 06:48:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Haliaeetus
Info created by Andy Morffew - uploaded by Red panda bot - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 06:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- shizhao (talk) 06:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's not perfect (wing is a bit clipped off at the bottom) but still a fantastic shot. Really dramatic and pretty impressive that this photographer is making his work available compatible with Commons, there are a few more on that Flickr page that look FP-worthy. Cmao20 (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A wider crop all round and noise reduction needed. Nice shot though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

̈*

Oppose without changes requested. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent! -- Spurzem (talk) 17:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:21, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I thought that cropping out part of a wing meant no FP and usually no QI? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It should do. I will oppose for sure, but am giving the nominator a chance to get the image changed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5 people so far disagree, though, which surprises me because it's different from how things have gone in the past. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Charles and Ikan. Also quite small. --StellarHalo (talk) 08:26, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Definitely impressive and I would support for FP if there was some noise reduction done per Charles. GRDN711 (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd consider supporting if, per Charles, the space to the left were cropped out and noise in the background reduced. Daniel Case (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Yes, small, but a bird in flight is not easy to shot, the main problem to me here is the bottom crop, a pice of the wing is gone Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful, but I think it's true that an arbitrary accidental crop of part of some of the bird's feathers makes it less than one of the best photos on the site and is a good reason why this nomination shouldn't be passing. So why is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Rather low resolution, wing cut off, too much space at the left, and despite the special light I also find the whole underexposed (the brightest parts could be white instead of grey) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wroclaw - Mlyny sw. Klary (cropped).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 08:50:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Sadly (or not) it was recently renovated (still under construction), and this photo is a part of history now. -- Andrei (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not sure the composition is outstanding but the light and image quality are FP level. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Poland

File:Лиса-огневка на фоне Вилючинского вулкана.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 11:13:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
Info created by NadezhdaKhaustova - uploaded by NadezhdaKhaustova - nominated by NadezhdaKhaustova -- NadezhdaKhaustova (talk) 10:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- NadezhdaKhaustova (talk) 10:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Absolutely yes, it looks like a studio photo --Wilfredor (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would crop out some of the blurry foreground, but nevertheless it's outstanding to me. --Ivar (talk) 13:16, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --KSK (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really want to vote for this, but it must be cropped in my view (see note). Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

̈*

Oppose only with current crop. Looks like others agree. I suggest an alternate is offered. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice photo, well-composed although I too would crop out a bit of the foreground. Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That picture as like a book. It's telling the lovely story of a little fox, trying to get some warm minutes in his could world. Technically perfect your picture does all a picture can do! But I won't mind if it would be cropped a little. --Augustgeyler (talk) 16:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per crop optimisers. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I, too, support and definitely prefer Charles' crop suggestion. NadezhdaKhaustova, would you be willing to add that version as an alternate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This crop version is the best for me.--Ermell (talk) 07:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I will support if the blurry part along the bottom edge of the foreground is cropped out --StellarHalo (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like this it definitely has that Yes-cover vibe ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:49, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)

File:Bakhshi Carvansarai in bazaar of Kashan, Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 17:16:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 17:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent dynamic range, great resolution, exceptional composition, natural representation of the place, we really need more non-western photos like this. شكرا اخي --Wilfredor (talk) 18:33, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous architectural picture. - Benh (talk) 20:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, this is a stunning photo. Cmao20 (talk) 21:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please add more specific categories --Andrei (talk) 21:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sure Mr Kurbiko. I finally didn't understand categories process.I will add tomorrow. --Amirpashaei (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'll await that, but I agree that this is a great photo, and I expected to see it here after I saw it at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:59, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'll support now, but isn't there a category for bazaars? User:Gnosis, you can start an article about this place if you feel impelled to do so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did start an article about it in Farsi language. (see fa:تیمچه و سرای بخشی) --Gnosis (talk) 04:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Gnosis.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 22:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's sad that architectural masterpeaces such as this don't even have their own article. --Gnosis (talk) 03:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wilfredor and Benh. --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some ringing in the windows at the rear, but that's such a small part of the whole picture. Daniel Case (talk) 14:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Dinkum (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 18:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 19:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Iran

File:Lissajous-Figur -- 2020 -- 7766.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2020 at 16:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info The light trails are not exact Lissajous figures, but based on this idea. It's a pendulum with a string of lights instead of a point of light. --XRay ^talk 16:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 16:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 17:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice form. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support effective. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Just for your information: I've seen more space at the top than at the botton. So I fixed the crop and adjusted the figure. Sorry for the late fix. --XRay ^talk 12:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good effort but it does not wow me. I would like to see your next creation when you take your light painting to the next level. GRDN711 (talk) 12:31, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice idea and well executed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 18:31, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Refreshing. --Aristeas (talk) 08:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:SJ Rc 6 Vassijaure.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 18:26:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this one very much, I think it might be one of Kabelleger's best. Cmao20 (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. I love the lines and planes in this photo. The fog really helps it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Too much sky. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the compo. Buidhe (talk) 18:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 03:30:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1850-1900
Info created by F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk)

03:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Info Why did Sherman stop marching when he reached the sea? Because he couldn't get it to catch fire. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:42, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing drawing and good restoration Cmao20 (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 10:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 18:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:31, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900

File:20200813 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03702 PtrQs.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2020 at 20:48:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Cactaceae
Info Blossoms of Echinopsis oxygona in the one night of blooming. Created by PtrQs - uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by PtrQs -- PtrQs (talk) 20:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PtrQs (talk) 20:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~Please look at the guidelines for selecting a gallery and see how others do it.~~ Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose crop on right. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not even going to look at this until the categorization is done. I'm tired of seeing uncategorized nominations.--Peulle (talk) 22:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, excellent composition -- Spurzem (talk) 09:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't mind the crop at all. Daniel Case (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do like the setting and there ist sharpness where it matters, the crop isn't unfortunate to me and I'm fine with the photographer's choice here Poco a poco (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support GRDN711 (talk) 17:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 08:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Cactaceae

File:Delleboersterheide, natuurgebied van het It Fryske Gea. 25-12-2019. (actm.) 10.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 15:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants# Family : Pinaceae
Info Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on an overgrown heathland. under dark clouds in winter light.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 19:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love the pine. The only reason I have hesitated so far is that the stump on the right distracts me. Without the stump, I'd be completely satisfied with the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It works for me like this. I like this stump :-) Please don't cut, as it also needs space at the right, in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Don't misunderstand me; I'm not suggesting for the stump to be cropped out, which I would consider an impractical suggestion and also a problematic one for another reason: it would crop out part of the nice pine tree in the background. And I am not considering opposing this nomination. The only question is whether I support or abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:22, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere --StellarHalo (talk) 15:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:14, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wish you could do something about that blue fringing on that one little bough on the right, though. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Do you want to mark the twig? then I know what you mean. Thanks for that.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants# Family : Pinaceae

File:Leptophyes punctatissima -20200629-RM-083405.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 20:05:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Phaneropteridae
Info Spotted Bush-cricket on a rose bunch. Focus stack from 35 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Truly amazing. Cmao20 (talk) 20:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Really top quality stack, but could you review the saturation, it's way over the top. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done You might be right. I reduced a bit. --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 09:47, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you please tell us where the image was taken? Or am I missing something here? --Cayambe (talk) 10:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Done, thanks. --Cayambe (talk) 08:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meiræ 13:39, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional image. I agree with Cayambe that location info (general location, if not GPS coordinates) would be helpful. GRDN711 (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support outstanding compo, but I'm not happy with choppy noise level. --Ivar (talk) 16:09, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dinkum (talk) 18:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 10:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can almost hear Ballade pour Adeline when I am looking at this photo. Btw, I hate Richard Clayderman --Wilfredor (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Phaneropteridae

File:Lothar Path - Black Forest National Park - Root plate 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 11:34:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice motif and good composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dinkum (talk) 18:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Somehow I'm not sure the sharpness is quite up to your usual, but it's OK for 24mpx. Cmao20 (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice motif: the roots look like a modern sculpture put mid into nature. --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 --StellarHalo (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Sharpness improved --Llez (talk) 17:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Pinaceae

File:Manneporte (sud-ouest).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2020 at 16:03:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Normandy
Info Natural arch Manneporte near Étretat, Normandy, France. View from the southwest. On the right side the source Pisseuses de Valaine -- All by me. Milseburg (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would be better with the tide in. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info Access to the beach and shooting location is only possible at low tide. --Milseburg (talk) 14:26, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good for me, though the white walls perhaps could be a little bit darker. -- Spurzem (talk) 19:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose way too washed out Seven Pandas (talk) 16:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some cliffs are supposed to look bright white. Cmao20 (talk) 19:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 04:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have no trouble with the portrayal of the cliffs themselves, but this photo is not beautiful to me and doesn't have a composition I find special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would crop at the bottom and add more in the upper part, so that the upper border of the cliff ends in the upper right edge --Llez (talk) 11:37, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there is no air left at the top of the source material.--Milseburg (talk) 11:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 15:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 21:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Je-str (talk) 16:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ponta de São Lourenço, Madeira, Portugal, 2019-05-28, DD 31.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 11:20:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info View of Ponta de São Lourenço, eastern of the island of Madeira, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 11:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice landscape, I like the light. Cmao20 (talk) 15:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dinkum (talk) 18:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 03:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and sharp at long range.--Peulle (talk) 09:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The seaspray is overexposed. Correctable? --Llez (talk) 09:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it's indeed correctable, will work on it this weekend, Llez Poco a poco (talk) 22:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a nice juicy gigantic steak in the ocean ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Portugal

File:Tenthredo scrophulariae larva - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 13:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Tenthredinidae (Sawflies)
Info created - uploaded by Ivar - nominated by Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 13:47, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one took a quite time to merge 28 images, but imho the result was worth it. --Ivar (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 15:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 🐛 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Dinkum (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 09:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gorgeous and terrifying. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Tenthredinidae (Sawflies)

File:Sole of foot of a two week old Asian infant on a white bed sheet, focus stacking.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 02:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info Something 🦶 different :-) Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, sorry --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Since we've got hands 🖐 and eyes 👁 already -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Wilfredor. Just a QI.--Peulle (talk) 06:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Square plot of a green paddy field, hut and karst mountains under colorful clouds at sunset, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2020 at 01:53:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:47, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose drab lighting nothing sharp Seven Pandas (talk) 16:53, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharpness seems fine to me? I get why you might think the lighting is a bit drab but I like the atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 19:55, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful contrast between the bright green paddy field and the dark mountains. --Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 20:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos

File:Kazerne Dossin -fotomuur.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 15:12:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1940-1950
Info created by Bob.vd - uploaded by Bob.vd - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright? It is clearly a derivative work. Renata3 (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Derivative work: needs licenses of underlying photographs (if just one is copyrighted, then probably de minimis, but not if most or all of them are). Also, Oppose on quality grounds, as I don't think this is an extroardinary photo or one of the best on Commons. Buidhe (talk) 18:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info So, there is COM:FOP Belgium, plus those photos were made before 1944 which applies Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure/en. --Andrei (talk) 21:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Buidhe. Of course this is a sad and moving photo, but it doesn't feel exceptional to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Andrei (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fin bathroom in Fin garden, Kashan, Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2020 at 07:09:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I bring here the comment I made in QIC about this picture, and which so far has got no answer: "Looks tilted to me, either that's the case or the building is tilted for real". Furthermore I consider that the wow factor here is rather low in comparsion to other of your shots, probably due to the poor lighting and no so rich detail of the decoration Poco a poco (talk) 21:38, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I answered in QIC but now it's gone. building is tilted for real because I saw that in all raw pictures I captured. yes, lighti was very poor, but I will work on it.--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dark, suboptimal lighting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: , @Poco a poco: , I improved the light.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:58, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extremely high resolution and good quality architectural photography. Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support All this space and no toilet ... . Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 03:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment So is the light unrealistic? Also, there is some red CA on the left side at the edges of some of the brighter tiles, where there are gray areas next to them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why unrealistic? I just made the whole picture a little brighter. I agree with CA at the tile, but do you think that's important? should I remove it?--Amirpashaei (talk) 05:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would certainly improve the photo to remove the CA, but that's up to you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CA removed dear Kekek. --Amirpashaei (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I still see CA, but I'll support, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per above, but please add categories or create them if needed. --Andrei (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dinkum (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:BNSF GE Dash-9 at Wishram.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 07:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 07:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mild oppose I'm not so sure about this one... It's nice, but a 9 year old landscape photo with not very high resolution...? I don't think it's sufficient to claim the title as one of the best images on the site. --Peulle (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the composition but it's a little bit washed out and the image quality is not as good as Kabelleger's newer photos, there is not a whole lot of detail at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 00:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 04:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarian Pasambahan Indonesia December 2019.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 06:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Myfirmann - uploaded by Myfirmann - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 06:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 06:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but that top crop bothers me. It would be better to crop the bottom a bit more since it's already cut.--Peulle (talk) 08:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle, composition/crop isn't outstanding --Milseburg (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered. Suboptimal crop (especially the sides) and shallow DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the colours and overall impression, but the crop is indeed questionable and the face of the first person should be in focus (it is only almost in focus, sorry). --Aristeas (talk) 07:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. The crops, in particular, make this less than a great photo of this terrific motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would have suggested cropping into just the upper body of the lead dancer, but even on her the focus is uneven (one side of her face is sharp and the other not, for instance). Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:56, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Versteende berkendoder (Piptoporus betulinus). 09-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 04:37:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Fomitopsidaceae
Info Bottom of one fossilized Piptoporus betulinus on a dead birch in disrepair. Focus stack of 9 photos. It almost looks like a monster. But it's a dead mushroom on a dead birch. Important in the cycle biotope of nature.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is the colour of the background from nature? Several areas are over-exposed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: The dead birch is surrounded by other trees. The background would therefore be very disturbing. This background is not disturbing to me. The color of the top of this petrified mushroom has more or less disappeared and is overly white! Dead birch also has little color. Death in this case is not very colorful.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose artificial background Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment doesn't look like natural to me and reminds background of this photo. --Ivar (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This artificial background doesn't look appealing to me. --Ivar (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of the unnatural background color --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 08:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Could work with a more reasonable color choice, but as it is, the cold blue background color just makes no sense to me – especially given the warm light on the subject. This kind of teal color just does not occur naturally, at least not on objects that are large enough to serve as a background here. If I saw this in reality I would assume that either there was a big man-made object behind the tree (maybe one of these) or I had stumbled into some kind of pop-art exhibition. --El Grafo (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Las Meninas, by Diego Velázquez, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 05:06:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
Info Las Meninas, a 1656 masterpiece by Spanish Golden Age painter Diego Velázquez and one of the most important paintings in the history of Western art. created by Diego Velázquez - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 05:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some of you might think that promoting a file that is already FP on Wikipedia is boring. However, this painting's immense historical value and the high resolution even for its large size mean that it would be strange and out of place if it is not FP on here as well. --StellarHalo (talk) 05:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 06:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One could almost ask if this is too big, but of course people can look at it in smaller sizes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support But why does the system not display a resolution between 1024px and 30,000? Who needs 480px and 768px? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp, you can actually force the system to display different resolutions. Just go to the URL of one of the smaller previews and change '890px' to something else. Here's one that I forced it to render at 4000px across, if it helps: 4000px Cmao20 (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Brilliant, very helpful Cmao20. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow, did not know that, this is indeed a very helpful hint – thank you very much, Cmao20! --Aristeas (talk) 07:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support classic Danu Widjajanto (talk) 06:52, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally I abstain if I can't see the full-size version, but in this case between all the other supports, the three Wikipedias that have made it an FP, its historic importance and what I can see in the 4000px version Cmao shared, I'll support. Daniel Case (talk) 15:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/People#Groups

File:Water reflection of karst mountains at golden hour in Vang Vieng Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2020 at 05:39:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite nice, but missing something in order to be called one of the finest images on Commons, imo.--Peulle (talk) 07:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice reflections, but I wish the sky was a bit less washed-out and featureless. It's good but I think there are better photos amongst your recent uploads. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but they fail too -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True :( I'm a bit sad about that one. Although one more support would still get it over the line. (Anyone?) Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Peulle and Cmao20. Certainly a striking sight and a good photo, but the composition feels relatively inert compared to a lot of the photos I vote for as FPs, including many of your others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Better; still considering whether or how to vote. How far do the hills extend to the right, and do they dip more somewhere? What about the water? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: the water is a rice field not yet planted. The rocks continue a bit at the right, but the nice light with reflection is in the center -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I like how this form gives a kind of relaxation on the left in this version, so I'd like something that has a similar function on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Ultimately, this form doesn't quite work for me, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:56, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:33, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The wider, panoramic crop and the better light mean that this one has everything I was missing in the other one. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 15:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

The chosen alternative is: File:Water reflection of karst mountains at golden hour in Vang Vieng Laos (panoramic).jpg

File:Kabli rannaniidu taimestik 2020 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 01:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info created & uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 01:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 01:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice picture of some flowers, but I don't see why this should be called one of the best images on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 06:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. The details are of high quality but the shot itself looks arbitrary and confuse to me. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition feels random to me except for the crosswise stems. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I agree with the above. A very pretty picture but I don't get a clear idea from the composition, the subject is not immediately obvious. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The subject there is biodiversity or more specifically a set of plants growing in one area (supprisinly there doesn't seem to be featured images that exhibit it!). Kruusamägi (talk) 18:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too many flowers are unsharp IMO --Llez (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharpness is the least of its issues when composition is so random. Just an unexceptional group of late summer flowers in a field. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 21:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pääsuke - Barclay de Tolly maja - ERM Fk349 144.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 23:02:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1910-1920
Info created by Johannes Pääsuke - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Barclay de Tolly house in 1914 in Tartu. The name comes from the fact that it belonged to the widow of Michael Andreas Barclay de Tolly. Today the building is used by Tartu Art Museum. Johannes Pääsuke was an important Estonian photographer and filmmaker.
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think anyone will dispute that this needs restoration. It's also unreasonably large, but that's a more workable problem. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To me, that big size seems more of an advantage than a problem to get rid of. Like you may look at the details of that Russial double-headed eagle or peoples clothing. And the defects there are on the image... they are rather small and don't obstruct the view. It seems like an image where you can enjoy the result even without a restoration. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now, per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 21:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saslonch Pizes de Cir Chedul Gherdeina.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 00:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a dust spot visible at thumbnail size, in the center -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Cleaned the DS. Thanks for the hint --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support You're welcome -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support In the "little details you only get to appreciate at full size" department, check out all the designs made with stones set in circles in the grass closer to the background. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:28, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support GRDN711 (talk) 15:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy

File:Blue stormy clouds at sunset with water reflection and a pirogue moored to the bank, in Don Det, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 08:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Tomer T, for the nomination! I love this picture :-) Basile Morin (talk) 09:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would benefit from a wider crop, something like 8:5, 5:3, or 16:9. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will be fine with a 8:5 format, cutting a bit of the bottom, although this would be a minor change in my view. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support This is one of the ones I was talking about when I mentioned a lot of your recent uploads seemed like FPs to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 15:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Bonn, Sterntor -- 2020 -- 6505.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 10:04:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 10:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info A shot without people due to COVID-19 pandemic. --XRay ^talk 10:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 10:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Digitalis purpurea - Panoramic trail - Northern Black Forest 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 10:17:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Plantaginaceae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have some pics of these myself but this is better than anything I've done. The bokeh is really nice and the shape of the plant, with the slight curve, is quite inviting to the eye. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 15:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A nice shot but spoilt by the blurry top, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:21, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support per Poco. Daniel Case (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 07:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Plantaginaceae

File:Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Pfarrhofgasse 2 Zum Augustin S-Fassade Fenster 23082020 9784.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 06:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You really have a splendid blue shirt with white flower patterns, Johann! -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment But I can't quite make out the make of watch Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Obviously, the reflection. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support FP-level quality and motif for me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:44, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Andrei (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sometimes it's just nice to focus in on the detail. Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose limited wow factor for me.--Peulle (talk) 09:06, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz 4 Stadttheater Inschrift mit Grimassenkopf 23082020 7668.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 06:53:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other
Info created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Johann Jaritz -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice QI, possibly VI, but lacking that special something that makes it an FP, imo.--Peulle (talk) 07:46, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, it's different from the usual FP motifs, fine quality, too. --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Palauenc05. Cmao20 (talk) 15:45, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Andrei (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Palauenc05. It's a very nice composition, and the scowling face makes it special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now that's an entablature ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 🙀 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Other

File:Charles-Antoine Cambon - Set design for the première of Rossini's Robert Bruce, Act III, Scene 3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 20:35:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera
Info created by Charles-Antoine Cambon - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is looking to be my 500th FP on en-wiki (it's due to close on Sunday and has the quorum). Not sure what my count is here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This might be the best set design pic you've posted. This is a really fine work of art per se as well as the design of an exciting scene. I wish Rossini's serious operas were performed more in the U.S. I've never heard of this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It's basically La donna del lago, remixed with some of his other opeeas because he was too ill to write a new one, but the subject is near to my Scottish heart. You'd probably need to scale the sets back a bit nowadays, or reuse bits, as it's definiteky from the spectacle era. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 16:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Managed to hide this from the list for a week using a tablet to edit and adding a <onlyinclude> pair. Whoops! Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should nominate it again to be honest Adam Cuerden. It's definitely FP, and because it wasn't visible owing to a mistake I don't think the usual conventions of waiting a while before a second nomination should really apply. Cmao20 (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eastern greenish black-tip (Euchloe penia) underside Macedonia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 20:25:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info I promised Charles I would nominate this a few weeks ago. I think it's a nice butterfly shot with excellent sharpness, and a beautiful butterfly. created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom. It's one of the rarest butterflies in Europe. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, could you remove that dark spot? IMO it looks a bit disturbing. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --StellarHalo (talk) 03:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. I like the colors --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 18:37, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That one spot left from the flower has disappeared, but there is one less noticeable one down from the flower and one up from the wings. Maybe they should go as well? Kruusamägi (talk) 21:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img12 Sirkeci Terminal.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2020 at 23:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info View of the Istanbul Railway Museum inside Sirkeci railway station ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 23:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 23:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One could quibble the projection (fair bit of distorted shapes in the near-right objects, say), but it's a strong image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose The image is nice apart from the bottom crop but in this kind of images I do enjoy looking at details and the image has both DoF and sharpness problems Poco a poco (talk) 11:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The corners are, understandably, less sharp than elsewhere, but the image is 38mpx and the quality is excellent when downsized a little. I like the colourful location and the light is quite good. Plus the off-centre composition is interesting. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. The truth is, I agree with him. I love the subject matter but think this could be greater and is thus not an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurred foreground Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao and Adam. Enough of the image is in focus, although certainly the unsharp parts could be cropped out more. Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations

File:Longsheng Rice Terraces November 2017 021.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 02:21:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#China
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment These are untended terraces which is not ideal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, there are more encyclopedic images if you just want to illustrate a rice terrace; for me, this image is more about lines and forms, and almost looks like an amphitheater. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lines appeal to me!--Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO good and interesting, I can see the amphitheatre comparison. Cmao20 (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the lines are great. --Aristeas (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Strong distortion --Wilfredor (talk) 12:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Distortion could be corrected or cropped, but it doesn't ruin the image. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 06:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#China

File:Rzeczpospolita voivodships.png (delist), delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 06:20:31

Info This file was recently overwritten in violation of COM:OVERWRITE but I will be commenting on the version uploaded by Dcoetzee: not in SVG; quite small for a digital map; the graphic quality is subpar with pixels visible everywhere; the parts where political boundaries follow the rivers are badly drawn; no border between Czernihów/Chernihiv Voivodeship and Kijów/Kiev/Kyiv Voivodeship; Kijów/Kiev/Kyiv Voivodeship has its southernmost edge excluded for no reason; the shapes of Estonia, Ingria, and Gulf of Finland are wrong (see here); the angle of Sweden's coastline is too slanted; the island of Saaremaa/Ösel is shown as part of Denmark but Blekinge and Gotland are not; the placement and size of labels are messy (Original nomination)
Delist File:Podział administracyjny I RP.png is a much better map that fulfills the same purpose -- StellarHalo (talk) 06:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. It's not a bad map at all, certainly one of the best we had in 2005. But it is much less clear than it could be (applies to both the featured version and the one uploaded recently). Some quick suggestions for simple tricks to clean this up considerably, if somebody wants to give it a try: There is not much reason for the surrounding countries to have different colors. That's only distracting from the color coding of the relevant areas. Just let them all have the same color and label them in the map, there's enough space for that. Sweden & Denmark can be separated by adding some border lines between the islands. Labels intersect with line features like rivers way more often than necessary, many of them could be moved to a better place. Addition of light halos to the label text can also help readability in areas where intersections with line features cannot be avoided. Rivers and those brownish-grey border lines are missing from the legend. The latter seem to belong together with the labels in all caps, but that's something you have to guess because the labels use a different color. The 2020 version's legend is pieced together, even using 2 different fonts. No info on the spatial reference (Map datum/projection/CRS) is given – depending on which projection was used, some of the shapes criticized above as being wrong/distorted might actually be correct, but we have no way of knowing that. --El Grafo (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom; too low resolution and too simple boundaries and coastlines.--Peulle (talk) 08:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Danu Widjajanto (talk) 16:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Ivar (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist A number of flaws and inaccuracies mean that this is no longer the best work on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 17:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom, others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others. Daniel Case (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 21:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Buidhe (talk) 07:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 18:29, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mada'in Saleh 2017.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 08:50:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info created & uploaded by Alhasaam - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as suggested at this nom. -- Tomer T (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 11:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I prefer this one to the previous nom, the motif in interesting and the lighting is nice, but there is no detail in either nom, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 11:34, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It could be the very first FP from Saudi Arabia --Andrei (talk) 15:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The composition is better than the other one but the image quality is still imperfect and the shadows look like they've been lifted too much. I wouldn't vote to delist it if it were already an FP, but I don't think I'm sure it should be promoted either. Cmao20 (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be sharper, but it´s OK for a 36MP foto. Je-str (talk) 16:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Beautiful light and colors. Meets our minimum standards for image quality, which is sufficient when there aren't a lot of similar images around. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. I wish it were sharper, but it has a poetry that is weakened but not destroyed by the ATV tracks. This would be the first FP from Saudi Arabia? If so, I'm shocked that there are no FPs from Mecca. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, you are right, I did not notice it. That file is from 2003 so we better not mention it here :) --Andrei (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support per KoH, Andrei and Je-str. Still a very nice picture -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support per KoH and others. --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality of the image is not good, I wouldn't have promoted it as QI, which also means I cannot support it for FP. --A.Savin 13:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Need to be sharper and more detailed. Sorry. --StellarHalo (talk) 03:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a little bit better, but technically it still has a curious blend of oversharpening on the monument's edges yet very soft detail, and compositionally there's still too much distracting detail elsewhere in the image. Daniel Case (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Actual details in this image are closer to 2mp. There were also some pretty destructive processing methods applied. -- KennyOMG (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fairly high resolution, but the quality is not convincing even when reduced. --Milseburg (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Savin. --Gnosis (talk) 15:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parque estatal Chugach, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 68.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 11:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Alaska
Info Moose (Alces alces) drinking water in a small lake in Chugach State Park, Alaska, United States. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've seen this picture before and have wondered if it would do well at FPC. The golden light is really nice, and I like how the moose gives a sense of scale. Cmao20 (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the small circular waves on the water made by the drinking moose (and the birds), combined with the reflection of the clouds. --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 13:41, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks like this is going to pass, but I don't find the top crop effective and will suggest another crop. I would have to see the result to decide how I'd vote on it, but I believe I'd prefer it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And Oppose as is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:40, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see how it ends up Ikan Kekek, I've added below an alt version but I don't see the difference so substantial to oppose one and support the other one, but ok, that's just my opinion. Poco a poco (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nice evening light, interesting angle, and the animal creating waves in the pond is a nice add-on at full size 🐃 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:20, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support The only thing detracting from this is the bright top left corner (a bad place to have something noticeably brighter than its surroundings), but I've played with various crops and haven't found one I was satisfied with. Overall the lighting and mood make this an FP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alt[edit]

Support I support either version Poco a poco (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I much prefer the other one. The composition of this one is too unbalanced, the smaller mini-lake is too close to the top. The original was nearly perfect for me. Cmao20 (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. I feel like the other composition is the one that's unbalanced. -- Ikan Kekek (talk)—Preceding comment was added at 00:04, 31 August 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop too tight at the top -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In both versions I just see a very static view of a small lake in a landscape. I'm not wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too tight. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United_States#Alaska

The chosen alternative is: File:Parque estatal Chugach, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 68.jpg

File:Édouard Baldus, Pont Royal and Louvre - NYPL Digital Collections.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2020 at 14:45:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1850-1900
Info created by Édouard Baldus - restored, uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 14:45, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why are you nominating two versions of this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is the alternative Édouard Baldus's work? No it isn't. {{Retouched}} compulsory. added -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But good question -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support as quite a good photo for that time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. It’s interesting to see that the verticals are leaning out a bit. Later, around 1900, most cityscape photographs carefully avoid leaning verticals (similar to what we usually request on Commons for new photographs as “perspective corection“ ;–), but it seems that this rule was not yet used in Baldus’ time. --Aristeas (talk) 09:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the historical value.--Peulle (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan Kekek and Peulle --Llez (talk) 09:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose only one image is displayed so I'll oppose both for crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info 16:9 aspect ratio.
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 14:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cropping a master's work like this is nonsense. In the content eliminated, is a cart of great importance. Overall the composition is definitely better originally with the line of the river starting at the bottom right angle -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree that it doesn't make sense to judge a historical photo except in its original composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose only one image is displayed so I'll oppose both for crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900

File:Castillo Mindelburg, Mindelheim, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 31.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 22:32:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
Info Bird's-eye view of the Mindelburg Castle, Mindelheim, Bavaria, Germany. The castle, dates from the 12th century but was renovated between 1650-1670 and is today's landmark of the town of Mindelheim. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Dramatic and striking shot but I think the distortions are a little bit too weird for me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't quite wow me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 06:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. A shame because of the wealth of crisp detail in the background. Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 08:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 08:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celiing of Chale c Ab anbar in Nushabad city near Kashan, Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 12:46:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 12:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 12:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Small point on the file description: I think it's just a cistern. I don't think there are cisterns for anything but water. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mr Kekek. yes, you're right. It was just water cistern. you can see another picture of this place here.--Amirpashaei (talk) 13:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying it's a cistern, period. I can't see saying it's a water cistern. Could a cistern be for any other kind of liquid? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. they just using for water cistern. because here is very hot and has very low level of precipitation. many water cisterns like this are in Iran but this is very huge and has good building.--Amirpashaei (talk) 14:17, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oil? Blood of enemies? --Andrei (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There are languages that work differently than English, where you have the water as part of the word cistern - translating from one of them leads to this kind of description. I took the water out. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kritzolina (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something I've not seen at FPC before. Cmao20 (talk) 00:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unconventional style brutalism like. Remember to add the categories to the images because it could be deleted if someone doesn't find a scope. --Wilfredor (talk) 03:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Quality is good but the ceiling not so interesting and rich like others you present here Poco a poco (talk) 13:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's a unique cistern monument Mr Silva. because of most cistern's architects didn't attention to the building and artistic aspects. because no one was supposed to see their architectures. but this monument is rare In its kind.--Amirpashaei (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:Ehrenbürg Pano-20190929-RM-174659.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 07:51:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
Info Panorama of the Ehrenbürg (Walberla) as seen from the south. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 07:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful landscape in great light. The hill with the combination of rocks, wood and the chapel looks like arranged by an artist. --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Ermell: Please select the correct format to ensure a properly sized thumbnail; see Template talk:FPCnom/Basic for more details. I have corrected it to "widepano" for you here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 00:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely light. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. The hill in light is lovely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria

File:When the moon is a star.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 07:56:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info the reflection of Langtang Lirung in a pond in moonlight. created by Ummidnp - uploaded by Ummidnp - nominated by Nirmal Dulal -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 07:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Does it look purple to anyone else, or just me? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 13:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm sure the colours are not natural, so I take it as an artistic image. Perhaps Nirmal Dulal the photographer could acknowledge this? Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The photographer being User:Ummidnp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Lack of sharpness. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I love this image at thumbnail size, but at full size there is really not much detail. I assume the noise reduction is very strong (ISO 1600 according to metadata), but it leaves very little texture, it looks almost computer-rendered. Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Striking at the image level, but I don't find it a great composition and don't love the dark purple sky and unsharp mountain. The filename isn't really Commons-style, incidentally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basotxerri -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OpposePer others --Llez (talk) 10:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, but Ikan especially. The filename sounds very Sly and the Family Stone. Daniel Case (talk) 15:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2016-11-13 01 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2020 at 19:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Unsorted
Info: Kjeungskjær Lighthouse, sometimes called The Red Sailor, in the sea off Ørlandet at Sør-Trøndelag, Norway. c/u/n by -- GRDN711 (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pic, I love the bright colours of the lighthouse. I think it is a tiny bit soft, but otherwise very good. Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, great compo, indeed the sharpness is not at FP level but still compensated by the wow. I suggest to apply some selective sharpening to the lighthouse Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough, and I don't get a wow from this. I feel like a little more space in front of the lighthouse could improve the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough, and more space at the top and bottom would help. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Much, much better. But given that it is not totally sharp at 3000px (5 MP), I still cannot support. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice picture, but I agree with Ikan Kekek and King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ that more space would improve it. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 15:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Better now but I prefer a sharper lighthouse --StellarHalo (talk) 09:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good motive but not sharp enough.--Ermell (talk) 21:36, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment When I took this image, I was on the Hurtigruten MS Lofoten, a ship with no stabilizers on an open sea with a brisk wind coming from the west. I was mostly trying to hang on…😊. In terms of composition, I was not thinking the way many of you are but I appreciate your perspectives. I have to go to work shortly. Give me a day to address the issues your raise and I will ping all of you when I have a new version uploaded.
Oppose per unsharpness. Daniel Case (talk) 01:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Cmao20: @Poco a poco: @Ikan Kekek: @King of Hearts: @Kestreltail: @Peulle: @Ermell: @StellarHalo: @Daniel Case:

I went with a horizontal crop to emphasize the inter-play of the man-made lighthouse surrounded by nature’s elements of land, sea and clouds. Ikan’s idea, supported by King of Hearts, of having more water and cloud space definitely helps. Have also incorporated selective sharpening of the lighthouse as mentioned by Poco and others. Overall, I like this version better.

Comment I like it a lot better, but it's still a bit soft, so though I like it now, I still doubt it's one of the very best photos on the site. That said, I have struck out my opposition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support now. --Ivar (talk) 16:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Still not very sharp but relatively high resolution, very good light, and the composition now is excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Colours, light, composition are very good now, it’s just a pitty that the lighthouse is somewhat soft. --Aristeas (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Morin. --Gnosis (talk) 17:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 21:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Unsorted

File:Beilstein-Kaisersbach - Oberäcker - Blick über die Landschaft im Januar (2).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 02:16:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info A really nice use of leading lines in composition - and the crepuscular rays add something too. Created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 02:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 02:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Splendid. Wonderful light, airy composition, catching leading path -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 06:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for nominating and all of you for your support! --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose main subject too far away and the patch on the road distracts me --Wilfredor (talk) 12:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for your review. If I am allowed to ask a very stupid question: What is the main subject which is too far away? I did not want to take a photo of the barn, etc., but of the whole view. — But maybe we could crop the whole image radically at the bottom; see image note. Would that help? And what do other people think: Would such a radical crop improve the photo or would it ruin it? Thank you all, --Aristeas (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment For whatever it's worth, I think it would help the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aristeas, I prefer it as it is but I'm happy if you want to add an alternative to the nomination with the different crop. I would support that one too, although I'm not personally convinced it's an improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this photograph there are several elements, and each person will have a different perception because we all have a different way of observing. For me, the barn is an important touch in the composition since otherwise it would be a common evening. The bottom cut allows a closer look at what really matters in this composition and eliminates the distraction of street repair, however, it would merit a horizontal cut to bring the composition back into balance. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you, Wilfredor for your explanation, and thank you, Ikan, Cmao20 and Palauenc05, for your hints! I will give it a try and see how a cropped version would look … (I will comment about results and maybe upload an alternative later.) --Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the main problem with the patch might be that it is the only thing that's even close to a visual anchor point in the entire foreground. Some kind of interesting foreground feature could be what's needed to bring this to the next level. I also wonder if a longer focal length shot from further back could have helped by compressing the mostly empty middle ground a bit and bringing the barn closer. --El Grafo (talk) 08:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry for the long delay. I have taken the time to experiment with various crops; this experiments taught me a lot. Some of the alternative crops were interesting, but none of them was (in my eyes) really better than the current image, so I have decided not to crop this photo. (Of course, if somebody would use it for anything, he/she is always free to crop to his/her taste.) You can put this as you want: either this photo is OK as it is, or it is just incorrigible bad ;–).

This does not mean that I do not want to take advise and to learn; on the contrary, I am always open for suggestions on my photos. Just in this case I am not convinced changing the photo would really improve it.

The barn and the trees, the wood in the left background, and the other features give the image some kind of balanced tension which I cannot explain, but which I like; there is even some kind of correspondence between the field and the sky with their different colours and warm/cold contrast; and if I change the image format too much, this balanced tension and this correspondence are lost. Therefore I do not apply the radical crop which I had considered in my comment above. Of course cropping the bottommost 400 to 500 pixels out is an option which actually may improve the image; but then, the patch from the street is placed in the bottom left corner and emphasized even more, so I guess this crop would not satisfy everybody ;–). I have also tried to clone out the patch from the street; I often clone out smaller irritating stuff from my photos, but somehow I hestiate to do so with that patch. This is a rural road, and call me stubborn but I feel that such patches are what makes the road real and distinguishes our photos from computer-generated graphics. ;–)

It is true that there is nothing specifically interesting in the foreground; and I know, every textbook on photography tells us that especially wide-angle photos need some point of interest in the foreground. This is not a wide-angle photo (taken at 55mm focal length on full-frame), but it certainly looks similar. But there was nothing in the foreground, and nevertheless this view appealed to me and, as the votes show, also to some other people. Sometimes it may be OK to leave the rules of the textbooks. As Basile put it (thank you!), this is an “airy composition”, its actual subject is not the barn or this or that tree, but the free airspace over the hills filled with warm light and the width of the view, hold together by the leading line of the rural road and the balanced tension between the darker points, and therefore it seems appropriate to me that there is some emptiness in this photo, even in the foreground.

Please excuse my wordiness! I do not want to praise myself or this photo (I actually think of me as a very defective photographer ;–)), I just want to justify, somewhat, why I prefer the photo as it is. Thank you all for your statements, hints and ideas, and all the best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:34, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your speech very loaded with motivating messages, they helped me a lot (or maybe it's an accidental translation from google translator). --Wilfredor (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, thanks for your "wordiness", Aristeas! I come here to learn and I'm always happy to see others share their thought process. The longer I look at it, the more I see that patch as a feature rather than a problem. Maybe it actually is that foreground feature that I thought was missing. And FWIW, I completely agree with not radically cropping the bottom. I've played around with it a bit myself, and I think personally I'd crop away a bit on the right, just to the left of that one tree on the ridge (I'll leave an annotation). It's a bit less airy like that, but it feels "right" to me. A bit more compact, pronounces both the patch and the barn more and seems to somehow balance it … I'd maybe also cut a bit of the sky, but I'm not so sure about that. Anyway: I like it! --El Grafo (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Such warmth --StellarHalo (talk) 15:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me it's fine the way it is. No crop necessary. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:33, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (And please do not crop the photograph.) --XRay ^talk 10:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 18:48, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A great atmospheric landscape in a situation where that possibility ordinarily would not suggest itself. Daniel Case (talk) 14:59, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support whoops, I thought I'd voted already …? --El Grafo (talk) 15:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 08:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

File:Long corridor with someone sitting on the floor in the distance at Marina Bay MRT Station Singapore.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 06:48:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Singapore
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What's the story behind this? Where are all the people? I'm also shocked to see such a spotless corridor, even though it's Singapore. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are a few spots on the baseboards :-) The story behind this is as simple as a huge corridor with a man sitting in the distance. Not a beggar, someone reading, with a drink. I have no idea why this guy landed there :-) He seemed quiet and focused, when I got closer. The travelers passed in already. Like all railway walkways, they're alternately crowded, then desert... I mean almost :-) Basile Morin (talk) 07:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You wouldn't see any deserted corridors at 17:34 in New York, except maybe during the Pause from mid-March to early June this year, but no time when I would have seen them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. In Paris, Champs Elysées (Charles de Gaulle) you can :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay ^talk 08:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Waiting for the vaccine --Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support special.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant minimalism. Cmao20 (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different and unexpected ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 16:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Singapore

File:Oberwaldsee Karlsruhe 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 06:58:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:58, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very peaceful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice reflections -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support though a little brighter would be optimal. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish it was close to where I live so I can take refuge in this majestic location. --Gnosis (talk) 05:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 01:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 18:47, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg

File:Silek Lanyah 12 Januari 2020.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 06:51:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
Info created by Myfirmann - uploaded by Myfirmann - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 06:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 06:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and dramatic. In this instance the vignetting doesn't bother me because it focusses the eye on the figures at the centre of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A bit confusing composition, subjects a bit far and centered, and an artificial vignetting that does not add value --Wilfredor (talk) 19:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per Wilfredor. Maybe you can find an adecuate crop and it could work. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Artificial vignetting and current framing is too large -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If the aim were to have an ideal photo of the silek, the crop should be much closer to the men, as others have stated. However, this is a nice scene with silek performers in the middle and works compositionally to me as such. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I do think the vignetting need not be quite so strong, though I sort of understand that its application seems to reduce the need for a crop. Per Ikan, normally I'd call for one, but something about the juxtaposition with the environment here, especially given the flying chunk of dirt and the dragonfly, makes the wide view of the surrounding landscape seem essential. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like the composition --Kritzolina (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile, please, no artificial vignetting Poco a poco (talk) 14:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose vignette Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual sports

File:Tari Piring Bergelut Kaca.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 10:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Erisonjkambari - uploaded by Erisonjkambari - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 10:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 07:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Poor back ground -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shocking scene. I feel like I'd like to also see what his face looks like after this, but having seen other events like this (e.g., people walking on burning coals on Thaipusam), he's probably completely uninjured. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 01:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support And Julian Schnabel gets more material for his paintings ... Daniel Case (talk) 15:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Fatima Masumeh Shrine2, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 13:31:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 13:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Two two comments about this picture, it's very hard to do photography in a mirrored room, the reflections of light has to be so perfect, the other thing is the photographer must have waited for hours to take a shot of an empty hallway as religious shrines such as this one are crowded with people 24/7. --Gnosis (talk) 21:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gnosis for your kindness, but this place and other holy shrines interior in Iran closed because covid-19. but exterior is open for public.--Amirpashaei (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Gnosis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is exceptional. Cmao20 (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please check your image. There are horizontal lines at the top and at the bottom, but they aren't horizontal. Or is it real? --XRay ^talk 08:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You're right Xray. That's my fault. I'll upload new one. --Amirpashaei (

talk) 14:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perspective corrected. Thanks for comment. --Amirpashaei (talk) 14:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ooooh, sparkly! Another one of these pictures that demonstrates Aldous HUxley's point. Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks dear Case. that's look like I photographed this after using LSD? hahaha :-)--Amirpashaei (talk) 09:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 06:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Firenze Panorama del Centro con il Duomo e Palazzo Vecchio.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 19:47:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Italy
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:47, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The path/railing is distracting: it doesn't really lead anywhere, and probably could have been avoided by moving the camera further out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the railing is an integral part of the path that leads to Piazzale Michelangelo, as I wrote. I integrated it in the photo just to highlight a photo of Florence taken from a particular point of the city, otherwise it would have been "the usual tourist photo" taken from Piazzale Michelangelo. This is the explanation. I respect your opinion and thanks anyway.PROPOLI87 (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your explanation. I respect your decision to include it, but maintain that it does not connect to the rest of the image from a compositional point of view. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough to be a great photo. I probably will oppose at QIC on that basis, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:46, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Also tilted cw, sorry, too many issues. --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:00, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 07:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ weak support on fixing the clockwise tilt, which is really obvious and needs fixing. I actually like the railing and I think it does help the composition by providing something else to look at in the foreground. The image quality is on the low side for FPC but it is a beautiful view and I have successfully nominated images with similar quality issues recently e.g. here. The colours in this image are nice, and it's unmistakeably Florence; the quality is good enough to use the image to illustrate the city. Overall I think this is on the borderline of FP for me, but only if the tilt is fixed. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected the tilt, slightly. Thank you. Florence is splendid, and the lesser known corners of the city are worth highlighting. Florence is full of lesser known monuments, and knowing their history you can breathe the air of antiquity, of Florentine art, of its artists and artisans who have lived it over time. I will try to illustrate the lesser known Florence. The secret Florence.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Surprised no one's mentioned the WB, which seems too warm even for Italy in the summertime. Also, the highlights on some of the houses in front are a little too strong and could have been toned down. Lastly, the sharpness issues, per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oligodon huahin, Hua Hin kukri snake - Kaeng Krachan National Park (32625377028).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 17:32:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids)
Info created by Rushenb - uploaded by Agathoclea - nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice quality; DoF is OK. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:33, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it! --Kritzolina (talk) 21:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a giant earthworm ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Colubridae_(Colubrids)

File:The Geography Lesson or "The Black Spot".jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 15:11:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical
Info created by Albert Bettannier - uploaded by Andrew J.Kurbiko - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution, nice painting -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fortunately, this is one of the instances where Google Arts and Culture (aka Google Art Project) does not disappoint --StellarHalo (talk) 22:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Also because of its historical relevance. MartinD (talk) 08:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support historically significant as it perfectly illustrates - certainly in an unintentionally amusing way from today's perspective - the predominant mental constitution of Europe's middle classes during the decades preceding World War I --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical

File:Wooden and bamboo facades of dwellings with sudare in a cobbled street of Gion, perspective effect with vanishing point, Kyoto, Japan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2020 at 04:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking. Cmao20 (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know how to judge whether this is one of the greatest photos on the site, but it's certainly very good, interesting and different from others, and that's enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan

File:Trampeltier - Flickr - Konrads Bilderwerkstatt.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 01:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
Info created by Konrads Bilderwerkstatt - uploaded by Red panda bot - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 01:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- shizhao (talk) 01:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice characterful shot but sorry, the quality isn't there at full size for me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20. It still looks bad at 60% of full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. It's a pity because it's a nice shot. --Basotxerri (talk) 05:57, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavily overprocessed. This wouldn't pass at QIC, let alone here.--Peulle (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the issues mentioned above.--Peulle (talk) 06:41, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Paul Renouard, (Répétition à l'Opéra) - NYPL.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2020 at 19:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Music and Opera
Info created by Paul Renouard - restored, uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 19:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 19:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know what to make of this. A lot of it is dark, and many faces, including the conductor's, are extremely simplified. I find it hard to imagine this dates all the way back to 1890, even though it's presumably a lithograph made from a sketch. It has some historic importance, but how much? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per resolution of issues Ikan raised. For both versions. Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info Cropped version
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 19:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again, I don't understand why you're nominating 2 versions. And if you wanted to crop out the frame, this isn't it: more than the frame is cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:38, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Paris 16 (talk) 06:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lavant St. Peter und Paul Innenraum 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2020 at 07:18:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior of the subsidiary church St. Peter and Paul in Lavant, East Tyrol, Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:12, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo. Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:16, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Image is superbly done but IMHO, this dead church does not have more value (or wow) than all the other dead church images currently rated FPs. Give me something else for distinction - the presence of people; a ceremony (weddings are good; deaths are somber); unusual lighting symbolic of the afterlife... will consider anything more. -- GRDN711 (talk) 13:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment GRDN711, what I want to capture ist the artistic value and the spirit of the place. For me, a ceremony or any add-on would distract from that. But that is a matter of taste. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great detail and very original ceiling that helps for a nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

File:Ringkirche, Wiesbaden, Nave view 20200613 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2020 at 15:07:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info An interior view of Ringkirche, Wiesbaden, Germany. c/u/n --DXR (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --DXR (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful church; thanks for the virtual visit. What does "missing SDC copyright license" mean, and is it important? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ikan Kekek, I think this only relates to structured data... not really relevant and of course the file has the same CC license as all my other pictures --DXR (talk) 21:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I’m afraid there is a disproportion of aspect ratio. Arches and circles are flat.--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another excellent German church photo from you. There are a few distortions but none unreasonable considering the technical challenges of a stitched church interior panorama. Cmao20 (talk) 02:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 08:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there (barrel) distortion? Doesn't look like like most church interiors. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, it might look different because the church has a square layout, rather than rectangular. You can have a look at the 360° Pano taken from right in the center to better see this. --DXR (talk) 11:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well done!--Aristeas (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very fine work! Maybe you should crop the unsharp part of the benches at the bottom. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the hint! --DXR (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition - Benh (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 01:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:Cathedral of Đakovo, Croatia (interior).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 10:31:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Croatia
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO quite an interesting church. Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning composition, with the tiles on the bottom and columns on the side, though quality is not the best. You may wish to reduce the color noise in the plastic chairs in the bottom corners. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop does not work for me, I want to see what is above. So the composition looks unbalanced. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, the bar for church interior FPs is very high and I'm afraid neither the lighting nor the composition wows me particularly.--Peulle (talk) 06:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The disorder in the upper part, lamp, organ and load crane as well as the cut off rosette are very disturbing--Ermell (talk) 11:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others --Wilfredor (talk) 12:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What's here is enough for me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Reluctantly. Composition is fine for me but the quality could be better. -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohiniyattam at Kerala state school kalothsavam 2019.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2020 at 10:55:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info-- Mohiniyattam is one of the famous classical dances of India that developed and remained popular in the state of Kerala.

created, uploaded by and nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like this picture, but please correct the COM:OVERCAT. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:21, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek Done. -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:04, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good capture. --Kritzolina (talk) 21:13, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 06:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the safety pins.--Ermell (talk) 10:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too staged. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Charlesjsharp, Pls explain.-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is an 'event', that's why I don't like it. It has no feeling. False stage smile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you expecting a realistic smile or feelings from a stage performance?! -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Nice but I miss the catch light these eyes here have -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Ebenthal Radsberg Pfarrkirche hl. Lambert mit Karner und Pfarrhof 12062019 6743.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 00:19:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria
Info There's a lot going on in this photo but I really enjoy the composition, I feel that Johann Jaritz has chosen the perfect angle to take the photograph from and has integrated all the different elements into a cohesive composition. See what you think. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. --XRay ^talk 08:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your vote, I appreciate it as I know you don't normally like church photos. Cmao20 (talk) 17:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see from my regular contributions, I almost always abstain from voting on church interiors. No wow, I just don't like the atmosphere inside. Too sinister for my taste, not original contents (we have tons already), and always empty places. I know it's not very fair for the diversity of opinions, but these red spots would quickly irritate the people, and be considered as disturbing after a while, in my opinion. Very rarely, I support a cathedral interior, which is, for some reason (colors, composition, or else), exceptional, or I oppose one that I find even worse than usual (but it's seldom, really I prefer ignoring simply). Landscapes with churches are totally different, and it's not rare I give my honest review. The reason is the environment, and the light. In this picture for example I like the path in the green field (like XRay maybe). The tree trunks evoke me a nice aspect of the countryside. The blue sky is appealing. Beautiful day -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Your comments are interesting to read; I personally like church interiors but I appreciate not all subjects are to all tastes. I often abstain on portrait photos for similar reasons, I just don't enjoy them that much unless they are really exceptional. I am grateful that you abstain on those pictures instead of opposing. Cmao20 (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your specific comments and reviews. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)-- 16:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support You have managed to find a good composition in a case in which I would think first: ‘What a beautiful place, but it will be hard to find an appealing composition.’ --Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also like that the colors are subdued. It would be an easy temptation here to go for brilliant blues and greens, but if this is the way the photographer saw it, and indeed sometimes scenes like this look that way. Daniel Case (talk) 13:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 08:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:31, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria

File:Agence Rol, 24.4.21, concours de machines - BnF.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 06:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1920-1930
Info created by Agence Rol - restored, uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice document. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the shoe/boot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1920-1930

File:Dülmen, St.-Viktor-Kirche, Innenansicht -- 2020 -- 6115.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 05:26:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info The interior is illuminated naturally only. It's done by candles and the altar is shown in the light of the setting sun. --XRay ^talk 05:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 05:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sunlight on the altar is wonderful. --Aristeas (talk) 08:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:02, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done, a good quality church interior with really nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The chandeliers seem somewhat distorted --Llez (talk) 05:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the prominent benches - Benh (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:Iglesia de San Sebastián, Ponta Delgada, isla de San Miguel, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-30, DD 88-90 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 13:41:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info Main altar the church of St Sebastian, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:41, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exquisite. The composition, framing, motif and image quality are all really good. Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Possibly one of the most beautiful church interiors I've seen only in a photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao and Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 08:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal

File:Lago di Chiusi vegetazione.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 11:47:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Image quality is borderline FP but I miss an outstanding composition to be honest. Cmao20 (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CommentThe photo represents an oasis of naturalistic peace. It is part of the monuments included in the Wiki Loves Monuments. There were several people present on the spot, walking, fishing, but I preferred to photograph only the wild nature in the lake. It gives me peace and tranquility.PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mohiniyattam at Kerala School Kalolsavam 2019 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 18:41:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#event
Info-- Mohiniyattam is one of the famous classical dances of India that developed and remained popular in the state of Kerala. Created, uploaded and nominated by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Love her lipstick 👄 💋 -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To me, this one doesn't feel as alive as the other one. In this shot, the woman looks more like a doll standing still than a dancer in the middle of a performance. Also, the right side should be cropped, imo.--Peulle (talk) 06:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Peulle,Mohiniyattam is, in fact, a form of dance with calm and quiet motions when compared to other Indian classical dances. The footwork is soft, sliding and synchronous with the musical beat and acting. The body movement is sometimes described in terms of calming images of nature as the swinging of the palm leaves, and the gentle undulating of ocean waves.

And right side cropped.-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Feels alive to me! Very intense facial expression. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree! -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose too staged. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Charlesjsharp, Please explain. Actually it is an event photography.Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, that's why I don't like it. It has no feeling. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, you dislike event photography? But it doesn't mean the image is neither good nor bad. -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am very happy with event photography if the nomination has merit. This is a stilted composition, poorly cropped, harsh lighting. Please respect my opinion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is only your misconceptions ~~and prejudice~~ about Indian classical dances. -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have no reason to accuse me of prejudice. Please remove your comment Shagil Kannur. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we have a classical cultural miscommuniction here. Charlesjsharp, what you call "too staged" or "stilted" is at the heart of many classical Indian dances. You have every right not to like the picture or to reject it because of the crop or lighting, but rejecting it for perfectly representing that which is depicts sounds indeed like bias against this form of dance and is understandably upsetting to the photographer. It sounds a bit like rejecting an image of a baroque building because of the use of forced perspective. And Shagil Kannur, I think calling Charlesjsharpes comment a misconception is probably on the point, but prejudice might indeed be too strong a word. Also - there will always be people who do not like your pictures for whatever reason. Trying to argue them out of it will not work - taste is not something we can reason with. --Kritzolina (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Peulle, the other one of the series is better Poco a poco (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pls read my reply to Peulle and reconsider your opinion.Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Very pretty woman, but I don't think opponents are going to "reconsider their votes", Shagil Kannur (by experience). For me this picture is better than the previous one (angle, more of the face is visible, DoF, physiognomy). But the reluctance might also come from the similarity between both. I believe there would be fewer obstacles if this one had been nominated primarily, because reviewers usually like diversity, and are less inclined to grant another {{s}} where singularity is a bit lacking. Whatever the result, keep shooting, learn from this, and continue sharing your bests! -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Basile Morin, Thanks for your valuable remarks.-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ranjithsiji (talk) 04:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 05:51, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The picture represents one of the classical dances of India and endorse this picture for the Featured picture candidates.-❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 07:15, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Having learned a tiny bit about Indian dances in recent years and how each pose has deep meaning, I support this even if there is already one nomination from the same dance and the same dancer running at the moment. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. But the other one is not the same dancer as you thought.-- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Kritzolina’s explanation. --Aristeas (talk) 10:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fancy piercing. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danu Widjajanto (talk) 16:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support after carefully considering all the above arguments. Not a perfect photo and there is an odd blue tinge to the background on the left, but it's striking enough and overall FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#event

File:Qatar Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner A7-BCO MUC 2015 02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 06:50:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Airliners
Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. One of the most popular contemporary airplanes, with no FP so far. -- Andrei (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Technically well photographed; definitely QI, possibly VI but IMHO not enough wow for FP. -- GRDN711 (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is good but I agree with GRDN711 nothing wild here Poco a poco (talk) 22:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The sharpness is really excellent, but maybe it's a bit low on 'wow', I think the light is a bit dull. Cmao20 (talk) 00:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per GRDN711, wow too lacking. StellarHalo (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Good QI but lacking something.--Peulle (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As an aviation enthusiast I would love to support this, but I simply am not wowed by this photo. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:55, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a good one. Deserves its QI badge, has potential for VI and maybe even FP at Wikipedia. But as far as "WOW" goes, this is just another typical plane spotter type shot. We have thousands of them, and this one does not stand out among the crowd. --El Grafo (talk) 09:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 16:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others – surely nice and good but too straightforward (not to say uninspired) to be featured IMHO. --Kreuz schnabel 17:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SL Badulla asv2020-01 img20 StMary Church.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 12:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Sri Lanka
Info Interior of St. Mary's Cathedral, Badulla --- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality photo and it's interesting to see a church from a part of the world we don't have much content from in Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I feel like it could be sharper in places, but that's because we've gotten spoiled by focus stacked interiors. The quality is good and I like the strong forward movement of the space, among other things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amirpashaei (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Sri Lanka

File:Stockholm August 2020 - Kastellet, Vasa Museum, and Nordic Museum.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 10:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden
Info Stockholm: Kastellet, Vasa Museum, and Nordic Museum - all by me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition is everything here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Sweden

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7772.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 08:10:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 08:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 08:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors. Amazing reflection. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An unusual photo that really works. Cmao20 (talk) 15:01, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Johann and Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany

File:Grey crowned crane (Balearica regulorum gibbericeps) head 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 21:13:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Gruidae (Cranes)
Info The national bird of Uganda. One existing portrait FP. Used in Issue 5 of A Sharp Eye on wildlife photography which has images from Uoaei1, Ivar, Cayambe. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support For some reason, I thought this was already an FP. I guess I saw it at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 23:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support due to the busy background. If it were a zoo photo I'd definitely oppose Poco a poco (talk) 10:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Makes me think of The Prisoner. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Gruidae (Cranes)

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 10.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 03:04:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice viewpoint. It should be convenient to live in this village :-) Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How many degrees of panorama are we seeing? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You can find it in the metadata: 131 degrees horizontal, 52 degrees vertical. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 09:06, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good quality, but for an outstanding landscape shot there is too much haze and in the distance details are lost. The light conditions and the cut on the left through the village are not ideal. --Milseburg (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Milseburg about the light, but viewing it in full size I really enjoy looking at all the detail. Cmao20 (talk) 01:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:10, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United States

File:Mrs. Constance B. Motley, first woman Senator, 21st Senatorial District, N.Y., raising hand in V sign.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2020 at 23:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Standing_people
Info Walter Albertin (World Telegram & Sun); restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully I won't manage to add <onlyinclude&gt: tags to this one and make it invisible for the first week of its run because I'm trying to edit on tablet. You know, like the other one I have open right now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support for historical importance. Good restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop of arm Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It was a news photo, you can't complain too much about the crop. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 07:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. Cmao20 (talk) 00:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good restore, but the cropped arms are annoying.--BevinKacon (talk) 14:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Good for a news photo (would be even better with other crop). --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spotted Quail-thrush male - Blackheath.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 05:04:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Ivar (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great detail on the bird, but I really don't like the intentional blurred foreground. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles Poco a poco (talk) 13:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info new crop with less foreground uploaded. --Ivar (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 16:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good sharpness on the bird. I agree the original had too much blurry foreground but this version is OK for me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:Regardant par la Manneporte.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 12:54:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Normandy
Info The special feature of this perspective is that it's possible to look through two natural arches of Étretat at the same time: the huge Manneporte in the foreground and the filigree Porte d'Aval in the background. The shooting location can only be reached at low tide. All by me -- Milseburg (talk) 12:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:54, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice idea. I would like it if the tide was in. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:29, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would clone out the tourists --Llez (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Support --Neptuul (talk) 22:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it would look better if you cropped out the rock on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support With tourists and rock on the left --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The perspective does make it special IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 01:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is fine as it is --StellarHalo (talk) 18:46, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Normandy

File:Six-banded armadillo (Euphractus sexcinctus).JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2020 at 09:02:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Chlamyphoridae (Armadillos)
Info These guys never stop. Extract form A Sharp Eye on wildlife photography: Armadillo means ‘little armoured one’ in Spanish. It is a fast mover, faster than the British Army’s Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank over rough terrain, approaching 30mph. The armour is keratin, the protein that gives strength to the rhino horn and is the main protein in human hair, nails, and the surface layer of the skin. We have no FPs of this order/family. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 11:09, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nicely done. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 17:24, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 18:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Chlamyphoridae (Armadillos)

File:Andinoacara rivulatus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2020 at 15:49:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp enough, IMO, for this pretty little fish. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 01:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some wider crop would be good. --Mile (talk) 08:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)

File:Ontluikende bloemknop van een Anemone 'Eugenie'. 30-08-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2020 at 17:32:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae
Info Budding flower bud of an Anemone 'Eugenie'. Focus stack of 12 photos. Diameter of the flower bud in this photo is ± 11 mm.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question I think you missed the focus at the nearest point? I'm not convinced that the background is ideal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wanted to nominate this, but in view of recent controversies about some of your nominations, I wasn't sure this was a natural bokeh, so you might want to address this. (I certainly think it is.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. But I don't quite understand your question. What do I need to change?--Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: is the background artificial? --Ivar (talk) 04:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does that science make the difference to Thee between promoting or not promoting this photo?--Famberhorst (talk) 08:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Imho it's only fair for Commons users to know, that the photo has been retouched. And we have a template ("retouched") for this kind of editing. --Ivar (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that moving a plant to a different background had a name! Because honesty is very important to me. I put it directly with the photo. In parentheses. You have not answered my question yet!

Thank You for adding a template. --Ivar (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I am in the camp that doesn't see a problem with an artificial background. Cmao20 (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In the opposing campǃ Some photographers do use painted blurred artifical background boards that look natural, but this one doesn't appeal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The main motif is crisp sharp. I'm not a camper, but I don't bother about that background anyway. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:58, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 23:05, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Good quality, but I would have preferred a natural background, because natural color combinations are usually more harmonious. Just not sure those two pinks are matching together. Check it out here or there :-) Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for Thy comments. According to an "expert", this is a good color combination. But that is of course a personal opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:16, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support the artificial background does not ruin the image for me in this case --StellarHalo (talk) 18:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahmad^talk 23:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The artificial background looks nice but looks too artificial and too homogene in comparison to a natural nice bokeh with different colors. Furthermore I'd expect more crispiness of a FS image like this Poco a poco (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae

File:Nicolaaskerk (Hemelum) 20-07-2020. (actm.) 11.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 04:37:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info Detail of the Nicolaaskerk (Hemelum) is a hall church built in 1668. This door handle in the door of the church from 1668 is completely worn out and partly rusted.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question The brickwork does not look 17th Century, does it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: View the history of the Church. Click here: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaaskerk_(Hemelum). The handle is in my view totally worn out!--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, so yes, 19th Century brickwork and (I guess) door and handle. Still well worn though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:04, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Question brickwork? Looks like painted wood to me. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: the door is made of wood.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... in a brick building. See image note. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- excellent. Looks like some photos by User:W.carter I have seen. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very Cart-like, per Seven Pandas. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 03:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've wrestled with this photo for what feels like a long time. At first glance, one might react "So what? It's part of a scuffed door with a damaged handle", but I see the same interesting colors, shapes and light you saw, it's interesting, and while it's hard to judge "wow", I think this is a worthy photo for people to look at, as an example of finding photographic interest and composition in motifs most people wouldn't think twice about or photograph at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 08:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

File:Sunrise Point Bryce Canyon November 2018 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 03:54:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Utah
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:54, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this scene in soft light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light in a special environment. --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:12, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:40, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support worth waking up for — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The left side is leaning in. It doesn't look natural. Poco a poco (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'd still appreciate it if you fix it King of Hearts, otherwise will have to hold the nom in the future Poco a poco (talk) 08:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 08:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#Utah

File:Дитинець літописного міста Чернігова 2014 Фото 006.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2020 at 15:51:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Ukraine
Info For me there is something really special about how all the elements of this composition add up. The autumnal colours, the line of the cannons leading far off into the distance, the church in the background, even the moon in the top left, create a scenic and painterly composition. created by Nomad0212 - uploaded by Nomad0212 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 00:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me the reflections and highlights on the golden coupolas are really disturbing, they look articfical, the composition does not work for me. --Kritzolina (talk) 11:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kritzolina. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Really nice idea but too harsh lighting, overexposing the background. --Kreuz schnabel 17:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, but even without their concerns the composition is way too busy. The shade on the right makes it feel very unbalanced. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Cmao20 (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Domestic horse at Suryachaur and the mountains in the back1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 16:08:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
Info I really like the composition of this photo, with the Nepalese mountain background. created by Shadow Ayush - uploaded by Shadow Ayush - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice background. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition and good capture of the horse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of one of our past POTYs ... wouldn't be surprised if this gets to be a finalist this year. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 08:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)

File:FCAB EMD-Clyde GL22C Cumbre.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 18:29:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:18, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very stark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me this one but different enough. Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple but stunning. Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit soft, but a special image for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I hate flat lighting but the composition is just top notch - Benh (talk) 06:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support just great (perfect wallpaper material) --Andrei (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a snake --Wilfredor (talk) 15:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but coords would be welcome. --A.Savin 23:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Famberhorst. --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 28 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Heavy flamethrower system "Solntsepyok" during the "Armiya 2020" exhibition (front view).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 16:48:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Kirill Borisenko - uploaded by Kirill Borisenko - nominated by Kirill Borisenko -- Kirill Borisenko (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kirill Borisenko (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose really difficult to get a decent shot at an exhibition. Far too busy background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, but probably a VI and would definitely have a chance at COM:QIC as well (I'd vote for it there, but some people might oppose on the same grounds as here). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hmm, sorry but I agree with Charles. Nice composition and nice subject but the background is just too busy for me. It also seems a little bit oversharpened to me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; just not that exceptional a composition. I think it's time for the nominator to withdraw it as I doubt it could overcome all these opposes. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tad Hang waterfalls, Tad Lo village, Bolaven Plateau, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 02:01:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great nature. Well captured. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:17, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Epic composition. Cmao20 (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 17:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 20:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Epic indeed. --Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:14, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting to see a waterfall shot in raking light ... and to have it work (Of course, this one had so much going for it to begin with). Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was 7am. Not sure it would have worked at twelve :-) Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:10, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 07:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 07:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great one, and I particularly like the "No photography" sign. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Kekek. They had forgotten writhe in "No photography" sign, this Sentence : "except Mr Pashaei" hahaha :-) --Amirpashaei (talk) 08:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Another masterpiece with the help of a super sensor --Wilfredor (talk) 15:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Cmao20 (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:11, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful again. --Aristeas (talk) 08:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:19, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The colors remind me of paintings by Klimt. --GRDN711 (talk) 22:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahmad^talk 05:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Белое отражение.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2020 at 06:06:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Ursidae_(Bears)
Info created and uploaded by Анастасия Игоревна Петухова - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KSK (talk) 06:06, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 08:46, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looking away. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:08, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He's leaving. He's not interested in the photographer.;)--KSK (talk) 04:36, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. If you look at Category:Ursus maritimus and search for featured pictures, you'll see some wonderful ones that this, although nice to see, doesn't measure up to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It has a message for me that it looks and goes away. Probably polar bears will disappear soon. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:18, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per Charles and Ikan Kekek, nice photo and I like the colours but the fact that it's looking away makes it less than great. Btw, polar bear populations are actually increasing ( see here.) They will still face severe threats in the future as climate change becomes more apparent in its effects, but for now at least, the polar bear is actually a success story of modern conservationism. Cmao20 (talk) 14:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the camauflage -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Living beings come with more than a side. Good to see them all here. - Benh (talk) 15:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 19:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looking away is not an issue. The image still connects with me. --GRDN711 (talk) 03:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Though it’s nice, there are better FPs of this species. Rather noisy too IMHO. --Kreuz schnabel 17:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support UV is strong up there. But good compo - storyteller. --Mile (talk) 08:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:African Wild Dog (50322083768).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 03:07:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
Info created by Andy Morffew - uploaded by Jarble - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 03:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- shizhao (talk) 03:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 07:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Should have gone to QI first where it would struggle. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: four opposes in a day, no support vote except nominator

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Vyazniki asv2019-05 img13 Klyazma River.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 12:47:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Central Federal District
Info View of Klyazma River at Vyazniki, Vladimir Oblast ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. Dull light, and horizon in the middle makes for a boring composition. - Benh (talk) 15:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great resolution and image quality but IMO the light is too dull. I think a wider panorama would have been better, I'd like to see the sweep of the river as it continues to the right. Cmao20 (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 13:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:1522 una panchina rossa per ricordare tutte le donne vittime di violenza. No alla violenza sulle donne.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 20:08:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Comment1522 The telephone number to help women who suffer violence. A red bench to remember all the women victims of violence, an initiative to raise awareness against violence against women, this initiative aimed at involving Italian municipalities. Photography is certainly not perfect, but with a high symbolic value. Red bench photographed in front of Palazzo Chigi Zondadari in San Quirico d’Orcia as part of the Wiki Loves Monuments. Thanks for your attention.
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This would be a natural to nominate at COM:VIC in the right scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think I agree with Ikan here. The sharpness is maybe not quite FP but I think it should be nominated at VIC, it's a very important subject. Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CommentI did, of course I did something technically wrong and I was grumbled. But now I think everything is ok. Indeed, if you experts could check it out, you would do me a favor. Thank you.PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a static image of a bench. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently just a bench, but I'll explain the meaning: a campaign to support the battle against the violence of women by inviting all municipalities to adopt a bench and paint it red to remember all the women victims of femicide. This bench not only has the particularity of the red color, but also bears the telephone number 1522, an emergency number for anyone who is a victim of violence, often within the family walls, and the wording to come out for anyone who is a victim of violence. And it doesn't seem like a small thing to me, even if on the surface it may seem just an insignificant bench ... but it is not.87.11.128.253 11:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)PORPOLI8787.11.128.253 11:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I don't see how this is special. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently just a bench, but I'll explain the meaning: a campaign to support the battle against the violence of women by inviting all municipalities to adopt a bench and paint it red to remember all the women victims of femicide. This bench not only has the particularity of the red color, but also bears the telephone number 1522, an emergency number for anyone who is a victim of violence, often within the family walls, and the wording to come out for anyone who is a victim of violence. And it doesn't seem like a small thing to me, even if on the surface it may seem just an insignificant bench ... but it is not.87.11.128.253 11:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI8787.11.128.253 11:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Are you suggesting that no matter how good or bad a photo is, if its subject matter is meaningful, it's ipso facto a great photo and one of the very best on the site? Because that's how your argument sounds, and repeating it every time someone votes against it isn't going to make it more convincing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)*:No, I absolutely don't want any favorable votes. I simply commented on what the bench represents, following comments which boiled down to "I don't see anything special" or "it's just a bench". No controversy on my part, but I reveal to you that I am a woman who seriously believes that violence against women (especially at home) must be defeated. I prefer that you comment "the photo really sucks and does not deserve it, but on that bench I see many battles to fight". I apologize if I did not write well, giving rise to possible misunderstandings.PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree about the crucial importance of the fight against misogyny and violence against women, but if I find myself emotionally unable to judge a photo, I don't vote on it. Emotionally charged content can inspire greatness in art, but the subject matter doesn't create greatness by itself. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that I find this a good photo and I've been unsure how or whether to vote on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It's okay with me whether you vote for or against. It is not a question of personal success, it is that I liked the idea of having a photo in the window, even for a single day, in order to bring an interesting topic to the window, that maybe some woman who suffers violence looking at it, would find the courage to denounce and as it says on the bench "rebuilding a future is possible". The Commons showcase is an important place, and I find it really reductive that you only post photos that are simply beautiful and well done. I think we could throw a positive message from time to time.Thank you so much for your moral support.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that there have been ugly photos that have been featured, but the point is that FPC isn't about just the message, no matter how important the message is, and I say that although I'm saddened by your correct statement that it could be helpful for this statement to be featured somehow on Commons. So a propos, please work on the VIC nomination a little, so that we can get this passed as a valued image in the right scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Podzemnik and Ikan Kekek. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others, which refers only to the image as such, of course, and not to the campaign it stands for. I expect a very good image to explain itself without having to write a paragraph on it. --Kreuz schnabel 17:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A noble cause for sure. But all in all, this doesn't strike me as a particularly interesting photograph. --El Grafo (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Himba-Mädchen-100.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2020 at 20:59:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created & uploaded by Hans Stieglitz - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good portrait, though I want to shoo those flies. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Same :-) Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too tight a crop, imo.--Peulle (talk) 07:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. Striking portrait and elegant traditional jewels around her neck, made with natural elements, that remind me some beauties of tribal art. Fascinating hair dressing as well :-) Basile Morin (talk) 08:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Slight inclination, very strong contrast in the neck and too attractive (bump on the left and fly on the right) breasts that distract the composition. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:00, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the crop. --Gnosis (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Danger of being exploitative as personality rights not clear. Do you have the girl's permission Hans Stieglitz to put this on Wikipedia? And would we have a nomination like this of a white woman? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I certainly don't disagree with your questions, but we should also acknowledge that your analogy is not exact, for the most part, because this is quite evidently how women of this tribe dress. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info Nudity (Wikipedia): "In sub-Saharan Africa, full nudity or nudity below the waist is the norm among some ethnic and family groups". -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I don't know who wrote that, but there is no reference quoted in the article. The reference quoted only talks about males fighting. It doesn't stop this image being exploitative. So * Oppose until personality rights stated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ per Charles. I do think it's faintly exploitative to be honest, the point that we wouldn't have a nomination like this of a white woman is IMO very valid. Daniel Case is right that it's a 'National Geographic' type photo, but unlike him I do not see this as entirely positive.. Cmao20 (talk) 01:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

💡 "We wouldn't have a nomination like this of a white woman": why not? 👩 👩🏻 👩🏼 👩🏽 👩🏾 👩🏿 We had this picture of the day and POTY finalist -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basile's link aside, the nude is a totally standard motif in painting, and I feel like there's a lot of prudery on this site. I understand the issue of National Geographic-style racism, but I also think that it's quite possible to have nude portraits of women and men that are not purely prurient. I know quite a few artists who've painted, drawn, sculpted, etched, engraved or done pastels like that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I don't feel like getting into this debate any further. Cmao20 (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No reference? There are so many ethnographic documentaries on Youtube attesting this statement, I'm very surprised it's considered doubtful to some 🤔. Cultural specificity, obviously. It's very visible from the photograph she feels natural in her dress code. Certainly like this (white) mother suckling. The wonderful necklaces of this Himba woman might be her priority, and it's all to her credit in my opinion. These spectacular jewels are regularly featured, isolated on museum backgrounds, for once we have the chance to admire them in situ, worn by a smiling native, sadly morality matters overwhelm the debate. Quite inappropriate reactions against a fair quote from the very trustful Wiki-encyclopedia, but whatever. If this comment is educative, that's good also -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Basile hasn't read my post correctly. I challenged his quote "In sub-Saharan Africa, full nudity or nudity below the waist is the norm among some ethnic and family groups" as having no reference. It doesn't. He now replies "No reference?" and points us to videos of naked Amazon tribes. In a different continent. If you Google Himba (the tribe of the young girl), you will find videos of the (African) tribe, but there is no 'nudity below the waist'. It is possible that whoever put the unsubstantiated claim about 'nudity below the waist', meant to write 'above the waist'. I am also surprised that none of the positive votes recognise that the girl may well be under age, in which case we would be talking about speedy deletion. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Such requests would obviously result in speedy kept consensus (for the same reason, probably, these documentaries linked above are not censored on Youtube)
There are such tribes in Africa too, for example the Surma people
Yes it is above the waist, not even below! Like this POTY finalist of 2018. The Himba live in the desert, where the weather is extremely hot -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really Basile, you haven't read what I wrote. Try again. What about some evidence that this girl is over 18 and has given her approval for the image to be spread around the world via Wikipedia. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Try again"?? 🙄
This woman appears in this picture with a man who might be her husband or her relative, and both seem perfectly comfortable in their clothes, as with the camera. The picture is used on 15 pages of Wikipedia.
Her nudity is a disgrace for some? Well, we might not have the same eyes. Personally I see this woman like a mother breastfeeding in a public space. I also find the cultural difference interesting, educative, and beautiful. Certainly not something to be hidden.
The author seems to be a respectful photographer, taking pictures of people (males or females), as well as animals, landscapes, architecture, flowers, etc. They got FPs nominated by the same nominator in the past. Per COM:AGF, I see no reason to suspect a failure in his approach for this project. Several of their photographs are FP level (1, 2, 3, 4, 5...) and yet not even QI promoted. Greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Another National Geographic-level photo. Daniel Case (talk) 13:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Cmao20, especially regarding personality rights - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, no wow for me. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 00:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, sorry. Shadows + crop are not good. --A.Savin 22:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Four ladies wearing a yukata in front of the North Gate of Kiyomizu-dera temple Kyoto Japan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2020 at 01:50:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support I wish the women were doing something other than looking at their phones, but otherwise great composition and atmosphere. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree! But maybe in a hundred years, we will find these phones as cute as their obis? Thanks for your vote -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 05:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Had the same reservation as KoH, but Basile’s answer is good ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (The crop at the left could be a little bit better.) --XRay ^talk 12:11, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Image slightly enlarged to fully include the stone column. Thanks for the tip! -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful in every way. --Gnosis (talk) 03:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment--such a traditional setting with 21st century phones in it is not so traditional. Seven Pandas (talk) 11:17, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tradition and modernism: 100% Japan -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Isiwal (talk) 15:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 08:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan

File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2020 at 14:31:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info View of the Upper Belvedere Palace during the blue hour, Vienna, Austria. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:38, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support outstanding! --Ivar (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:56, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Again, perfect. Beautiful reflections and noise very well controlled. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 19:42, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very classy. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support though maybe 1/4 stop too bright. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 22:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blue hour -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --Aristeas (talk) 09:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:20, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--shizhao (talk) 01:17, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very awesome picture but The light of Sculptures in the top overexposed. light is good except top of the building in center.--Amirpashaei (talk) 07:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Amirpashaei: You're really pushing the bar very high...I've reduced the highlights. FYI too, King of Hearts Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In this picture we can't see the dimension of Sculptures and their modes, even after reducing the highlights. In my opinion You should have taken it, in bracketing mode. --Amirpashaei (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did, and that's the reason why I add HDR to the file name. You feedback belongs to me in the category hairsplitting. Poco a poco (talk) 13:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you have good light in the brightest section at darkest picture you can recover brightest section in the photoshop. But in the top center of the building we can't see the pattern of Sculptures and texture of the wall because of overexposing.and that's noticeable area not hairsplitting --Amirpashaei (talk) 14:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As said, it's, considering that it's a night photo and the distance about 250 m. Poco a poco (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
While Amirpashaei is correct that the statues just left from center on the top are very slightly burnt (still) the rest are actually well defined - they are just blasted straight on with floodlights so of course there will be very few details visible due to lack of shadows. This is truly a photo loco, totally Support. -- KennyOMG (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I actually wanted to oppose for the same reasons as Amirpashaei. The flood lighting is far from great (and that's not the photographer's fault of course) with the very annoying shadows of the tree and the details which barely can be distinguished, especially on the top part. And I also agree that this can be mitigated in Ps (I guess it was already). It's not going to change the results of the votes, but just to share. - Benh (talk) 07:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Colors, correct temp, ~~crane in the back couldn't be removed~~ (not much of work for Featured picture ) ?! --Mile (talk) 08:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If somebody cares, the crane in the background is gone Poco a poco (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amirpashaei's concerns are valid, but I think that fussing over an almost undiscernible crane in the background seems a bit overboard. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support simple (so to speak) and effective — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:50, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria

File:Basílica, Ottobeuren, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 102.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 19:50:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info Exterior of the Ottobeuren Basilica, part of the Ottobeuren Abbey, Germany. The church was erected in 1766 but the abbey was founded in 764 by Blessed Toto, and dedicated to St. Alexander, the martyr. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Uninspiring to me because of the dull light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The photo is impressive and of very good quality, I would change my vote to support if the projection was corrected, because I think there is a problem with perspective, some type of vertical distortion --Wilfredor (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Its sharp, but resolution is like mine from 16 Mpx, did you resize it Poco a poco ? Also i dont like such perspective correction, i would use something in the middle, why should be all rectangular or paralel with border, etc...just destroying nice photo. --Mile (talk) 06:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 08:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 08:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Acavus haemastoma haemastoma 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2020 at 05:44:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Acavidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful shell and of course great shell photography. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent.--Peulle (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 10:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:33, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Die Fotos aus dieser Serie haben mir schon gefehlt --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 15:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~WTF this shit~~The image look like a 3d render --Wilfredor (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Wilfredor: I'd appreciate if you could use more civil language to express your admiration of a photo. Thanks. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Podzemnik: Thanks for your suggestion and I'm very sorry for use this language to express my admiration, I think that I let myself be carried away by emotions and I forgot where I was. This will not happen again, thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahmad^talk 05:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Acavidae

File:Fatima Masumeh Shrine4, Qom, Iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2020 at 14:47:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a little bit spoiled by the added walls, but what a gorgeous place and architecture shot. The small details are almost overwhelming. - Benh (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in touch with their media manager. they said if they will remove wooden wall, will call me to photographing again without wall. this wall separates men and women!!!--Amirpashaei (talk) 20:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Please, I beg you to do this and take a 360 degree pan if you have the equipment. He also asks them to remove the mobile libraries only temporarily to take the photo. This architecture is impressive and nothing we have seen here before --Wilfredor (talk) 18:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Wilfredor. I have 360 degree equipment and I asked before to do this . but yet they are not agree. I will ask again.--Amirpashaei (talk) 21:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh. So resplendent! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing photo. Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me, the temporary walls mean it cannot be FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- These 'temporary walls' are hardly ever removed, and if moved, only when the mosque is closed. If Amir can get private access, that would be great but it should not be the expectation --Muhammad (talk) 13:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Charles, that all that wooden walls spoil the magic of the place. This one is not as wowing as most of your other pictures. I'd have probably opted for more ceiling and less floor, as well. Poco a poco (talk) 14:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Iran

File:Chobe River Front, Botswana (2625496300).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2020 at 07:43:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Hippopotamidae (Hippopotamuses)
Info created by Joachim Huber, Flickr - uploaded by M.casanova - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support photo is old (2007), quality is not perfect, but composition is really great so I thought it is worth a try. -- Tomer T (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's an OK composition though the shore cutting through the head is not ideal, but way off for definition/sharpness today, limited by camera type. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The quality is certainly not perfect, but honestly I don't think it's too bad. And the wow makes up for it to me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fischer.H (talk) 17:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, Cmao20. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support White balance a bit warm, though these colors might very well be faithful at this time of the day. Striking -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support for wow. Sharpness is very good for a wildlife shot IMHO. --Kreuz schnabel 17:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Hippopotamidae (Hippopotamuses)

File:Crook Point Bascule Bridge (62351)a.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2020 at 22:46:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America
Info Landmark bridge in Providence, RI which has been stuck in the open position for almost 50 years. Now a graffiti hotspot. Impetus for nominating is learning that it's scheduled for demolition. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:46, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot. Cmao20 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Pity they won't fix the bridge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 11:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot Buidhe (talk) 08:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At the left the verticals are not vertical --Llez (talk) 10:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America

File:House wren in JBWR (50039).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2020 at 22:55:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Troglodytidae_(Wrens)
Info House wren ~~doing its best eel impression~~ defending its nest box in Queens, New York City. I was torn between nominating this one and this other version, but erred on the side of more pixels on the bird. I like this odd behavior, think the bokeh/DoF is pretty good, and noticed we don't have many FPs of this family. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sharpness on the bird and the definition in the feathers is very nice, and we don't have many FPs of birds in nest boxes. Cmao20 (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:06, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 00:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty bird, well photographed and a nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support} -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Troglodytidae_(Wrens)

File:Sea Ranch Chapel in March 2020-1378.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 04:20:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eccentric architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support reminds me a bit of one of the birds of paradise — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support And it still has a shake roof! Daniel Case (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States

File:Caci Dance.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 11:52:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Hendri Suhandi - uploaded by Hendri Suhandi - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:52, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Exciting but a bit grainy. I will insist on a full-size photo from this camera, which has 7,360 × 4,912 resolution, and I'm afraid the quality won't be good enough at full size, but downsampling in order to make the quality look passable is not OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Ikan Kekek, I don't believe that you can improve the quality to a FP level but the scene does definitely have wow Poco a poco (talk) 14:31, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 07:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The graininess is easily correctable with artificial intelligence using Topaz denoise --Wilfredor (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sadly per Ikan, very dramatic but IMO too grainy for this small size Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose But even notwithstanding the overprocessed look, I find the people watching in the background too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Puerta de Palmas, Badajoz, España, 2020-07-22, DD 82.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2020 at 21:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info Puerta de Palmas ("Palmas Gate"), Badajoz, Spain. It was one of the accesses to the city of Badajoz through the former city wall. The construction was finished in 1551 but the last restoration dates from 1960. It's one of the landmarks of the city. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO half a stop too bright, but a big, sharp, good-quality photo. I like how you can see straight through the gate and along the avenue into the distance. Cmao20 (talk) 23:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:24, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral High quality and great composition, but not the best lighting: the sky is too washed out and the statue is in shadow. Unfortunately, 2:25 PM on a summer day isn't really the optimal time to photograph. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:54, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: I've reduced brightness a bit, FYI Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 08:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Much better! The sky doesn't look washed-out anymore. Cmao20 (talk) 15:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but I maintain that morning would have been a better time to photograph this. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support May be contrast could be improved. --XRay ^talk 09:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
XRay: I've increased the contrast a bit Poco a poco (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ The sky has dark lines above the left tower.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:11, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you hold a grudge against Poco or something? - Benh (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful and speak politely. The sky has a problem that is caused by edit not naturally.I appreciate if you just talk about the picture. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 09:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't try to make it the other way round. We aren't stupid and you won't get nowhere playing it that way. And I don't infringe any rule so you'll have to bear with that. I don't see the problem. Or would u be kind to show it.- Benh (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Pashaei, I think Benh‘s point is that out of every picture on this page right now you have chosen to oppose only two, both of which are Poco’s photos. I respect your critique and for what it’s worth I actually don’t think this is one of Poco’s best pictures, although it continues at FP level to me. But it is a bit odd that all your votes are support votes except for two opposes both on Poco’s material, especially since there are some much, much worse photos than those two on this page at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed there is a visible pattern here, probably the price for voting what I believe is right (and opposing pictures often). It would be easy to become everybody's friend. But now let's get back to Benh's question, maybe we all oversaw something. Amir Pashaei What is wrong with the image? Poco a poco (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Benh: , @Cmao20: , @Poco a poco: I added a note in the picture. zoom your image in this section and shift picture to the left and right. you can see the lines.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 14:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20: , @Benh: , I most judge pictures those near to architectural photography or landscape, On the other hand, Benh and others agreed with me in the statues problem in the other Paco's picture. I supported couple days ago an interior church's picture by Paco, but I think this picture captured in bad time with high contrast. he has tried to improving it In editing process, but in my opinion the sky isn't proper for FP.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 15:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Pashaei how could I have managed those "lines" (to me the shape is rather that of a cloud) through (poor) editing? do you have at least a theory for that? or do you think that I just edit skies for fun or have no clue about editing tools? You don't need to answer that, I'll spare you a nonsense answer. The delta in the luminosity of some parts of the sky are due to clouds and the fact that the sun was above them and lit the sky/scene not uniformly. Your statement "he has tried to improving it In editing process" is just wrong andb if not viciousb disrespectful and unfair. Btw my nickname here is not Paco, nobody calls me that, please, call my by my real name or my nickname. Now coming back to your critique. I had to move the image left to right to see "anything" for which you are opposing. It's in fact that you are not applying the same criteria to judge my images as you do with those from others. But don't worry, you can expect from me also rigorous (but fair not this kind of bullshit) reviews. --Poco a poco (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You took the picture in bad time with high contrast. You could have taken this picture a few hours later. But in this situation You could have taken 5 or 7 pictures on 3pod to have more dynamic range and more control on the monument and the sky Simultaneous in Photoshop. strongest sensors have weak dynamic range Compared to the human eye. in a bright situation like this if you take one picture and in the Photoshop try to fix poor dynamic range by editing, you have this lines in the sky. or if you take a few pictures those close together in the light you can't recover the form of statues in the edit process. I learned a lot from you and other judges in FP from last year until now and this can be seen in my works. if you don't like I will not criticize your photos dear delso.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 19:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taking to you is like talking to a wall. There were clouds and there was a sun behind them that's why the sky is not plain, that has nothing to do with editing. The purpose of bracketing is increasing the dynamic range, which wasn't necessary here, as it isn't necessary in 99,9% of outdoors shots (building intereriors is of course a different animal) and not getting rid of deltas in the luminosity. Don't call me Paco, don't call me Silva (WTF?), call me "Poco a poco", is that so hard? Poco a poco (talk) 18:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We have some clouds in the picture but we don't see this pattern of shades under them. I didn't see this pattern in the sky in my pictures with Similar conditions.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Pashaei: I have some clounds in the picture and I see that due to the luminosity below them is lower and in areas where the rays of the sun find no obstacles. That's not just a fact, it does indeed make sense. To hopefully end this discussion I uploaded the sky of that image, see here. Poco a poco (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't like your sky. but I canceled my oppose.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think you've done the best of a bad lighting situation, however i feel a better picture could have been taken at a different time --Muhammad (talk) 12:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain

File:Nelly Martyl by Jean Reutlinger (Image 10715).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 03:01:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info created by Jean Reutlinger - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine portrait. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 15:40, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait

File:Zaaddoos van een goudsbloem (Calendula officinalis) 11-09-2020 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 04:48:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Seeds of a Calendula officinalis Focus stack of 16 images.
All by me -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support DoF could be a tad longer on the left, but overall, fantastic! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:54, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sharpness of the front and the subject are FP worthy to me, but there are some FS artifacts that needs to be fixed, I added a note Poco a poco (talk) 08:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ca’s removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 11:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether we understand each other. I don't talk about chromatic aberration but about focus stacking artifacts, that are the result of blurry (and "inflated") elements in the foreground when the focus is in the back. Anyways, the left part is now better, but on the right half of the note there is still room for improvement Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just for the record as it was already promoted. It was an improvement but some of the halos due to focus stacking shouldn't be there for FP IMHO. I've nominated images with some halos but it was extreme macro photography. In cases like here I believe that they shouldn't be visible at all. I also believe that some frames where missing inbetween to reach the needed sharpness everywhere. So, I'd recommend you to set the distance between the focus of the frames smaller. Poco a poco (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp, well done. Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support BeautifulBijay chaurasia (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO this is neither such a seedbox nor such a seedbox, this are simply the seeds of Calendula officinalis --Llez (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Text modified. Thanks for the improvement.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see an image capturing the beauty of a flower that's all earth tones. Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae

File:KlimtPanna.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 07:07:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
Info created by Gustav Klimt - uploaded by Jklamo - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Wouldn't File:KlimtDieJungfrau.jpg be better especially for such a large painting? --StellarHalo (talk) 12:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you manage to open it? It keeps crashing my browser and ZoomViewer. I downloaded it on my computer, but it also did not help --Andrei (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, I could not open it unfortunately. ZoomViewer is not working for me and the error message is always "No response from server iipsrv.fcg" regardless of file and browser. Also, my computer cannot handle that many pixels. --StellarHalo (talk) 12:48, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - So that is why i am nominating this version. I would like people to actually enjoy it, not to have technical difficulties. Also 200 mb is above the Commons standard upload limit, so i can not reupload it again. --Andrei (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - My browser gave up, but after downloading to my desktop, I could easily open the huge image with Gwenview (took some seconds but worked). Awesome at 100 percent. Large size should not be a reason to turn (nor vote) a file down (like punishing it for being too good!), just wait for better hardware :) --Kreuz schnabel 17:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
Info created by Gustav Klimt - uploaded by Aavindraa - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info this file is 219.66 MB --Andrei (talk) 19:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:45, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How do you upload files of more than 100 MB? I also tried it, but I didn't succeed --Llez (talk) 14:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- This can be done through the upload wizard. For some reason (probably an archaic policy), files uploaded over existing filenames cannot exceed 100MB. As a consequence, new files must be created for anything exceeding 100MB. Aavindraa (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Thanks for the informaton --Llez (talk) 11:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An incredible reproduction of an important painting. Cmao20 (talk) 15:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ZoomViewer isn't working for me either (hasn't in a while, either; sometimes the fixes are quick but not this time). So I'll support the large version based on the smaller one. Daniel Case (talk) 02:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Groups

The chosen alternative is: File:KlimtDieJungfrau.jpg

File:The Institute Winding Tower at Chatterley Whitfield Colliery.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 10:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Other
Info created by Paddyhalfmonkey - uploaded by Paddyhalfmonkey - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice picture. ~~Needs at least one more category: Sunrises. Also, if you'd call this a silhouette (I would), it should have that category.~~ [Categories were added.] -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Image quality not 100% perfect and I wish the silhouette were a bit more complete, rather than having the shadowy outline of rooves in the foreground. But the light is very good and the shape of the tower with the birds is quite special IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tree branches off to the right are distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support it makes for a really nice silhouette. Some will surely disagree with me, but I think the branches to the right are distracting enough and trivial enough that you may be able to get away with cloning them out. Sort of on the edge of acceptability IMO. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The branches help the composition. Look at the diagonal from them to the birds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:09, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fliegenpilz (Amanita muscaria) -20191027-RM-120138.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:44:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Amanitaceae
Info IMO another really nice focus stack. created by Ermell - uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support we do already have several FPs of this species, but this one does stand out. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, but I think a category should be added for the moss or whatever the green plant is that's in front of and below the mushroom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:08, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the cleanest, but that makes it work ... I can smell the woodsiness on this one. And the colors look sort of Christmas-y. Daniel Case (talk) 01:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:55, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The stem is pretty noisy but it's crispy sharp where it most matters Poco a poco (talk) 10:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 01:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Amanitaceae

File:Schloss Schildau (2019).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2020 at 15:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Poland
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice composition for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry – for me, the cut-off bridge and building on the right spoil the composition so much that I’m tempted to drag the frame by ⅓ with my mouse :) Rather blurry for a static object in best light. No Exif and no geodata. --Kreuz schnabel 17:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Kreuzschnabel, the composition isn't that great. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 19:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I would not call it blurry; I have reviewed this photo at QI, and still think that the image quality is OK. However, for a FP, the crop at the right is indeed a weak point. Either we should see more of the bridge, or a bit less, removing the croped building at the right margin entirely. --Aristeas (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Way too much competition for the great angle on the castle—the shadows of the trees, the bridge and its dark shadow, the cut-off branches, the pond and its reflected trees. I'd have shot this from the other side of the brook. Daniel Case (talk) 03:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 01:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colorful sky with orange clouds reflecting in the water of a paddy field, at sunset, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 02:33:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info Look at those colours! I think the reflections and the light make this a really extraordinary photo, and looking in the category Basile does not have any other FPs quite like it. created by Basile Morin - uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for the nomination. It was absolutely a fantastic evening! I'm really glad you, and others, like this picture, too -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Poco a poco (talk) 10:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 01:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:North Complex smoke in San Francisco - Bay Bridge partially illuminated, Yerba Buena Island, and Oakland.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 01:58:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United_States_of_America
Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Mxn - nominated by Shizhao -- shizhao (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- shizhao (talk) 01:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral While San Francisco on Mars is something I hope to see an FP of one day, I don't think this is it. It doesn't feel like a striking example of this important event. I'll let the experts judge if the actual image quality is FP-level though. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I kind of agree with Kestreltail's criticisms, there is surely a more striking way to show this event, and it is also a bit grainy. Nevertheless I think this could do quite well potentially at VIC - it seems like it might be a good contender for most valued image in the scope of the bridge during the wildfires. Cmao20 (talk) 02:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best composition, too much negative space in the center of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition; I feel like it should be moved to the right a bit more.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King, and besides I think the pictures of downtown make the point better. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emu 1 - Tidbinbilla.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 05:33:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Casuariiformes_(Cassowaries_and_Emu)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Ivar (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 10:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit different from the kinds of bird JJ usually photographs, but really nice. Cmao20 (talk) 16:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Casuariiformes_(Cassowaries_and_Emu)

File:Rural Winter Beauty - Flickr - Mark Spearman.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 12:51:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
Info created by Mark Spearman - uploaded by Red panda bot - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 12:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dramatic photo with nice colours (are they 100% natural?) My oppose is because of a number of technical flaws - tilted, not that sharp and a bit grainy at full size, also a black border in the bottom right. Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Overprocessed and perspective problem -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like a painting. But: Halos around the right house, perspective, the yellow thing is disturbing, not sharp enough, grainy... -- -donald- (talk) 05:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 06:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a pity that people so often ruin their photos by overprocessing, probably in order to cover minor technical glitches and to make a nice subject appear “great”. They act like a chef who first burns the food and then, to hide his mistake, pours ketchup over the whole meal ;–). On Flickr you even get applause for this ... --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very pedestrian view of decrepit farm buildings in winter, without even getting to the technical problems. It's time to withdraw this nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mill on the old bridge in Millau 13.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:39:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brooding light and nice colours. Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special building, nice mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you clone out the twigs on the left? --Basotxerri (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, it would have been better if you had managed to get rid of the wall at the bottom, but still FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 10:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Neither colorful nor the most striking composition, but here less is more ... it captures the mood of the winter evening so perfectly that (perhaps also as it is getting quite cold at night for the season, down below 5º C on this last weekend of summer) I can feel its chill upon my cheeks, interrupted by my warmer, visible exhalations). Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:PK Hyderabad asv2020-02 img24 Tomb of Mian Ghulam Kalhoro.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 13:13:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Pakistan
Info Exterior of the Tomb of Mian Ghulam Kalhoro in Hyderabad, Sindh ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very strong architectural photography. Cmao20 (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Solid FP --Wilfredor (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support the light is over on the part of dome. but this is harmless because we don't have any pattern or painting on it. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Crop seems a bit too tight at the top, is the scaffolding always there? --Muhammad (talk) 13:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Weak due to the top crop otherwise FP to me in spite of the scaffolding Poco a poco (talk) 10:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Pakistan

File:Hohenwerfen castle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 02:36:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Austria
Info created & uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 02:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The motif and composition are special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:45, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice picture --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Austria

File:Interior view of the Buddhist temple Hounen Jonin Gobyo with red wooden chest and round straw carpets Chion-in Kyoto Japan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 02:03:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I had a feeling I'd see this here. Nice one! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:14, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support the top of the image (the ceiling) is underexposed, and the foreground distracts a bit from the beauty of the other parts of the photo --Wilfredor (talk) 12:27, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot, is there a way to fix the bottom crop showing the whole chest? Poco a poco (talk) 10:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This chest is located exactly at an edge. There's a horizontal beam of a different color below. I cut it to make the composition simpler -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, understood, then Support like it's. --Poco a poco (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Japan

File:Westpolderbrêge. 12-08-2020. (actm.) 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2020 at 15:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
Info A bridge over the Broeresloot in beautiful morning light.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps I would crop a bit of the sky because of symmetry, but let's wait what others say --Llez (talk) 15:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fairly simple composition that's nice, and the warm light that Agnes mentions in the nomination really sells me on this as an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Optimal conditions. --A.Savin 21:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good light conditions. --Ivar (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It’s always the light ... --Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple clean composition. Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands

File:Broad Street Downtown Area in Nevada City, California.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 04:16:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming small-town main street with evergreens. Just oozes atmosphere and a pleasant mood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me the wow is insufficient, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition and light. It reminds me a lot of this FP, except while that one is quintessentially English, this is quintessentially Californian. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Cmao20 Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I have to agree with Peulle Poco a poco (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A very pleasant scene, but low on wow in my opinion. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see the idea, but while it makes a QI easily it just doesn't keep it together for FA. First, the light is a little harsh ... I know this may have been the only time of day you could get the buildings lit, but if that's so this is not the picture with taking for FA. Second, unlike the Diliff image that Cmao linked, the regularity of the buildings is not there in enough quantity to overcome all the distractions like the cars and the trees. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The parked cars on the right side serve no compositional purpose and should be cropped out (leaving sufficient space to the right of the moving cars). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per others. --Milseburg (talk) 15:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AfricanKingCapek.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 10:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
Info created by Joseph Capek - uploaded by Jklamo - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good reproduction of an exemplary painting. --Aristeas (talk) 13:03, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:California Academy of Sciences San Francisco December 2016 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 06:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info The Twilight Zone at twilight -- all by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I remember when people went to museums. I remember going to this museum ... it was a simpler time then. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Quality is good, wow factor low to me Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd suggest cropping out the sky and road (keep the sidewalk) but it's already very nice like this. - Benh (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the crop with the bands of road on the bottom and sky on the top. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 23:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please do not crop the sky. --Aristeas (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This will not affect the nomination but no wow for me. Good quality but not FP level visuals IMO --Muhammad (talk) 12:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States

File:Gymnadenia odoratissima - Niitvälja bog.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 05:11:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ahmad^talk 05:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nice subject, nice bokeh but we have been spoilt here with crispy sharper images than this one Poco a poco (talk) 08:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Could be sharper, its static. But main oppose is due to background. Its like drawing. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PetarM: it's a natural background. This smooth effect comes along with macro photography, if you shoot very close to the small subject. --Ivar (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support The photo could probably have been sharper. But I think it's a nice recording.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Poco and Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Poco. The bar for flower images has been set pretty high. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Poco --StellarHalo (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae

File:Iglesia de la Asunción de María, Kirchhaslach, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 48-50 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info Pipe organ, apostle statues and ceiling of the Baroque church of the Assumption of Mary, Kirchhaslach, Germany. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Muhammad (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice. Cmao20 (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking, sharp throughout, evenly lit, and rich with texture. --Bobulous (talk) 18:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 00:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany

File:Lengurbill beach 19.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 12:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created, uploaded & nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 12:30, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not sure how this nomination will fare here, but I enjoy the peacefulness of the beach with the boat in the middleground and in fact center of the picture frame, half on sand and half on tide, rather than the foreground, with the clouds providing another horizontal above it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject is interesting, but the composition boring (too centered) and ligthing and quality are not extraordinary, it's also tilted (see sea horizon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poco a poco (talk • contribs)
Support I like it a lot --Kritzolina (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The quality should be better. The sharpness is low and there are halos around some objects. --XRay ^talk 16:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per XRay, I like the composition though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would have been better more tightly focused on the boat and the two guys at either end. Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Passageway - Funchal 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love it --Wilfredor (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pic - finding beauty in decay. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Support Nice (it reminds me that composition) ~~but underexposed in my view. Even the background is not so bright~~ - Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't think it's comparable with that composition. The "dark" wall is not an external facade like in the other picture you mention but the back wall of a passage. This windowless passage is very dark. I had to brighten it up a bit, in the original shot the wall was even darker. The background is a narrow inner courtyard, surrounded by high walls with no direct light (and not a large park; it was a sunny day when the picture was taken). --Llez (talk) 01:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Both compositions are comparable. Not the same images, but two centered compositions with round door in the wall, and vegetation behind. (And this is the aspect I like).
Now of course I notice the camera is located in a darker room. Still, overall the image is divided into two parts: 1) One very dark foreground 2) One grey background. And just a tiny luminous area at the top of the stairs. 90% of the surface is too dark. You're saying there was no direct light in this narrow courtyard, due to tall walls, and yes, unfortunately that's visible: the exposure is not well set in my view. Sorry but same problem as here before it was fixed. You can increase quite a lot the light of the whole image and create a more appealing appearance -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Cmao20. I would try Basile’s hint, but I already like the photo as it is. --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Info I did my best. But I have put the original raw file online, perhaps someone tries to improve the picture even more, I didn't succeed. --Llez (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just add +0.6 exposure in Lightroom and that's done IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried it, but then is too much noise in the darker part. Could you try it and upload the result in the folder of the link? --Llez (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, Done You may want to adjust the noise level with the 2nd version (obtained with Topaz DeNoise AI) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I uploaded the version improved by you --Llez (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot but could you denoise the hall in the background a bit? Look at the flowerlike pattern on the wall, it doesn't look good Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Llez (talk) 11:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and good denoising. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Other

File:Śnieżka (Sněžka, Schneekoppe) in winter 2020, Karkonosze mountains 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 12:44:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A striking scene and mix of colour amid monochrome, with a beautiful mix of tones. --Bobulous (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Great idea with the multiple leading lines towards the top of the mountain. I do wish, however, that the closest pole on the right didn't intersect the mountain; a little forward (to get past it) or backward (to make it smaller in the frame) would do the trick. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and colour work really well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely, great light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Bobulous and KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I agree with King. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Poland

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:2020-07-20-Alversteen-8761.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:42:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Megalith site Alversteen, Fehmarn, Germany

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Superbass (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The difference in brightness is very difficult to manage here. The burnt-out lights are disturbing. --Ermell (talk) 07:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like a QI but lacks that certain something to impress me. --Peulle (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I dissent. The image quality is good and I like the light very much. Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the sharpness is good enough, but the harsh light in the background and composition don't quite work for me. I appreciate the idea of balancing the rocks with the tree, but it just feels like the rocks are "facing" left, where there could be more room. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Of course I was hoping for broad support, and of course I think I took the best possible photo under the conditions on site :-) But I am very satisfied with the respectful tone of the critical or rejecting voices. Even if the picture does not become a featured one, I will keep this in good memory. --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The blown highlights are not very well done. As Ermell says, it's difficult, but a successful trick is to underexpose - not only 1 EV, maybe 4 or 5 EV in that case. Example for comparison. Also mitigated wow factor in my view, but I could have remained neutral if the leaves were not burnt like now -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Nice idea, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical issues per Ermell, but even without them this is just a picture of rocks balanced on each other in the woods that doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of golden Iwan at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:03:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A tiny bit of blue CA on the top left though. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per KoH. This is great though, I love the gold. Cmao20 (talk) 00:10, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very large resolution, beautiful golden patterns, nice sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but please fix the CA per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. CA fixed.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, good crop, the item presented as it is... FP. Poco a poco (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Poco. --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support GRDN711 (talk) 04:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 00:59, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran

File: Swami Agnivesh (2019).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2020 at 17:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info Swami Agnivesh in 2019. Agnivesh recently died due to multiple organ failure. Created and uploaded by Mydreamsparrow - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 17:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A sad recent loss, but the quality is not up to FP level, unfortunately. Straight forward portrait that's rather low resolution/sharpness. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:27, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Sounds like a great person, though. Please nominate at VIC, as the photo seems best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites.--Peulle (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as creator - Thanks for the nomination Arion. - Mydreamsparrow (talk) 15:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites. He sounds like a tremendous person though, I hadn't heard of him before. Per Ikan would do well at VIC. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This looks like a great driver's license/ID photo. But that doesn't make it a featurable portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Latzfonser Kreuz mit Dolomiten.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 12:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
Info Place of pilgrimage above Klausen in the Sarntal Alps. In the background the Dolomites. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done, I think this is a really thoughtful and satisfying composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support My home --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:05, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Perhaps WB is just a little too green. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice scene, great background Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:26, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Otherworldly. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy

File:Patan Durbar Square-2644.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 17:45:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice photo that conveys the bustling atmosphere of the place. But I think I'd prefer it if the crop were less tight at the bottom. Cmao20 (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent to see this kind of non-western atmosphere. Seeing this image gives me human warmth and hospitality. --Wilfredor (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Reminds me of a great visit there with Nepalese Wikipedians, but the bottom crop is not good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:45, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp I agree with you, but I also think that there is no way to cut this photo since it is a composition that never ends at the bottom --Wilfredor (talk) 02:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Charles. A bottom crop that ends arbitrarily on the ground would be much preferable. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop, bottom and right.--Peulle (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me the buildings are what dominates the image, and they should ... I really am not bothered by the crop. Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Daniel Case, that looks like a support argument. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it was ... that's what I get for doing this that late. Changed Daniel Case (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's a vibrant scene, but there's no clear main subject, and if the subject is the street itself then the composition doesn't feel like it balances the various pieces. The light grey structure to the left is very much sidelined, and its outline fights with the buildings seen beyond it on both sides. The long building on the right is interesting but not very prominent in the scene, and the same holds for the tall pagoda in the distance beyond it. Additionally, to my eye the image needs to be rotated about two degrees clockwise. --Bobulous (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In this picture main subject is not just one building or street. This photo was taken from the terrace of small building as shown in this picture. And i think there is no way to crop this photo Here's some example: First Second from same photographer. Thank you Best regards -Bijay chaurasia (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm very much grateful to see such a beautiful holy photograph. I really don't see the crop or visitors as disturbing or not working. For me, it shows the beauty of the place and make me feels sacred. Additionally, top to mid view is really eye catching. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 07:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senden, Schloss Senden -- 2020 -- 0486-90.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 16:13:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 16:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very well executed --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely reflections and very good quality and light. Cmao20 (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there a way to get the tip of the tower in the reflexion? Poco a poco (talk) 20:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made some vertical adjustments. --XRay ^talk 04:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you offered now a bit more of image at the bottom, which made it IMHO worse, as now the missing piece is smaller. Sorry, but that spot spoils the nom to me. Oppose Poco a poco (talk) 10:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support nice composition — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Too bad the reflection of the tower isn't included, but quite pleasant, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:29, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 08:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 11:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good, but the incomplete reflection spoils it for me. --Milseburg (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ More than the reflection, the tight crop at the top bothers me --Muhammad (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Muhammad (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tight crop, yes, but that doesn't ruin this for me. Daniel Case (talk) 01:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Poco a poco and Muhammad Mahdi Karim: I just added some space at the top. --XRay ^talk 13:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

File:WLE - 2020 - Parque nacional de Ordesa y Monte Perdido - 04.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2020 at 14:17:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created/uploaded by Moahim nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Second place awarded in Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Spain -- Ezarateesteban 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question What are those lines (noted) in the foreground? They look too straight to be natural somehow. Cmao20 (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the note - it is straight waterline. --Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I didn't notice of it Ezarateesteban 18:10, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment These are just cracks in the rock.--Moahim (talk) 18:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK, fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nice scene that's pretty well done, but the light conditions aren't ideal. I wonder if a little post-processing work with the tones could help... — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix these problems. Check the new version.--Moahim (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Fine for me, maybe WB is slightly too blue and brightness could be raised a little. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too gray to be one of the best waterfall pictures on Commons, I think. I'd like to see this view in better light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the water, especially, is too gray -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan --StellarHalo (talk) 23:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruth Bader Ginsburg official SCOTUS portrait.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 00:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Steve Petteway uploaded by Gage - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 00:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Of course I see why you nominated this, with RBG having just passed away, but I think it's not an outstanding portrait in terms of image quality. There is quite a lot of colour noise and a large amount of JPEG artefacting which is a shame for a photo that is not especially large. For me it would be better to wait until emotions have died down a little over this sad event and see if there are better photos of Ms Ginsburg available. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose RIP RBG, but not a great portrait of her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not an outstanding portrait. --Gnosis (talk) 00:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Populonia Castle.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 15:06:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think it needs less sky and more space on the bottom. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC):Can I correct by cutting some sky?Can corrections be made?PROPOLI87 (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kestreltail and also I find the light a bit dull. Not your best composed photo IMO. The subject is good but the castle is far too low in the frame and the composition looks unbalanced. Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, and there are also no interestingly-shaped clouds that are well placed to help the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)ù[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I withdraw the candidacy of the photoPROPOLI87 (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
PROPOLI87, please use the {{withdraw}} template. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Capt. Della H. Raney, Army Nurse Corps, who now heads the nursing staff at the station hospital at Camp Beale, CA - NARA - 535942.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 09:16:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
Info Uncredited photographer - restored, uploaded, and - nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info That's not a caption, that's her wooden name plaque rather cleverly positioned Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a fairly gripping portrait. Her facial expression speaks for itself. Historically important, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 10:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Ikan --Isiwal (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

File:Iglesia de San Carlos Borromeo, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 164-166 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 10:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Night view of the facade of St. Charles Church (Karlskirche), Vienna, Austria. The baroque church is dedicated to Charles Borromeo and is one of the city's greatest buildings. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful, but a little noisy in the sky. Could you work on that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek: Done Poco a poco (talk) 14:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, much better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Nearly perfect for me. True, there is some sky noise, but it's still great for a night shot. The detail on the building and the light conditions are exceptional. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria

File:Russischer Bär Euplagia quadripunctaria-20190808-RM-171229.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 08:39:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae (Owlet Moths)
Info Jersey Tiger (Euplagia quadripunctaria) on the Friesener Warte. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose One wing out of focus. English name is Jersey Tiger. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think this is a borderline case, but Weak oppose per Charles. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:La chiesa di Santa Croce vista dalla Torre.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2020 at 10:46:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy>
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PROPOLI87 (talk) 10:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I just opposed this in QIC. Not sharp enough, land on the other side of the bay looks too blue. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but the image quality is not good per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I withdraw the candidacy of the photoPROPOLI87 (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of Tabatabaee mosque at Fatima Masumeh Shrine, qom, iran2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 16:51:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Because of hiding big part of ceiling behind the chandelier, I took another picture that shows hidden section.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Outstanding quality as ever but the crops disturb me a bit. I'd rather see the whole circle of the dome rather than have it cut off in various places. Also the crops aren't quite symmetrical which is a bit disturbing. Still, the very high resolution and beautiful details make it FP for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Cmao20. I didn't crop the picture. The picture merged from 5 frames (50mp) that form a square with(more 100mp). I tried to capture the ceiling symmetrical but the Chandelier wasn't in the center. I could locate the Chandelier in the center and correct the ceiling Symmetry in the Photoshop, but If I had done that, the circle would cut more than this. I need to 17mm TS-E canon to capture monuments like this.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop is poor (exterior circle cropped off), the angle looks randomed (I'd have looked for some symmetry on left/right or top/bottom), there are halos around the grid of the windows at the bottom (which doesn't happen at the top) and both corners at the bottom are pretty blurry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 05:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm reluctant to oppose because the resolution is so high, as usual, but I agree with the criticisms of the crops (and I understand they're not technically crops, but we use that term as a convenient short hand for bits of a circle being omitted). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad positioning, missed center. --Mile (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I said before Mr Mile, I located in the center of monument but the Chandelier wasn't in the center.--Amir Pashaei (talk) 07:16, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Given the circumstances, the technical limitations are less than they might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Iran

File:Mexican clay skulls.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 19:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. You should mention whether this is in a museum (and if so, which one), a private collection or something you photographed at a shop or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Request hate to be that guy, but please provide copyright and authorship information for your subjects. --El Grafo (talk) 08:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Done El Grafo --Wilfredor (talk) 15:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Surely El Grafo meant the copyright of the underlying artwork; see also COM:TOYS. --A.Savin 21:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm talking about the skulls here, not about the photo. See COM:DW. Don't know if they're supposed to be art, mass-produced decorative items or toys, but they are certainly not primarily utilitarian and above the threshold of originality. We can only keep them here if they're not subject to copyright for some reason, and in order for this to become FP this needs to be documented properly. --El Grafo (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Ikan Kekek & El Grafo There are unsigned pieces of a private collection in San Miguel Allende. As is almost always the case with Artesanías Mexicanas (Mexican curious) they are reinterpretations of very common cultural icons and I don´t think that they are truly original works. This type of figures can be found in just about any market in Mexico during Day of the Dead celebrations. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Cool. Please add that information to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Copyright information for the original work still not added to the file page, and I'm not convinced by the rationale given above. --El Grafo (talk) 07:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment El Grafo I suggest you read Mexican law. Between the Law and your opinion, I choose the Law. Under your rationale just about every picture of any object that depicts cultural ideas should be then be deleted. Mexican law refers to this type of work derivative work and it lacks enough originality to be granted copyright, on top of it not being signed. This is one of the millions of variants of skulls that relate to Mexican culture and death, day of the dead celebrations, etc. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Then please find the appropriate template in Category:PD Mexico license tags and add it to the file description page. Keep in mind that Mexican law alone is not enough for the file to remain, it also needs a template for the US (→ Category:PD US license tags). --El Grafo (talk) 07:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Palais de l'Isle in Annecy 11.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 15:44:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Solid QI but sorry, I think the composition pales in comparison to your other current nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special architecture, nice viewpoint, pleasant light. A bit shrunk at the left, compared to the right, but overall great image in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Striking scene, but is there any way the building on the left could be sharpened? I may vote against if it can't be. Realistically, that level of unsharpness would probably make the picture less than one of the very best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose IQ could be better, and weather too. Morning shot maybe. --Mile (talk) 07:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Morin. Meiræ 21:50, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per pros and cons above. There is FP potential here, but I'm not convinced by the compo. To me the palace buildings shouts for a wide angle shot (getting closer to it). Poco a poco (talk) 10:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --StellarHalo (talk) 23:51, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice picture, but it's a shame about the unsharp building on the left. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Bloem van gevlekt havikskruid (Hieracium maculatum). 02-09-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 04:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Flower of Hieracium maculatum. A rare species in the Netherlands. Focus stack of 11 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 01:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 23:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a bunch of yellow latex gloves making hello 🖐️ :-) Basile Morin (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tagooty (talk) 15:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae

File:The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2020 at 22:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1700-1800
Info: The Naval Battle Near Ecnomus (256 BC) by Gabriel de Saint-Aubin, circa 1763 – uploaded and nominated by Coffeeandcrumbs --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:01, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like it. :) --Peulle (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 00:22, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 00:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1700-1800

File:Rutherford Hill Wine Cave-1351.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 20:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice long-exposure shot -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Palauenc05 (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 22:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#United_States

File:St Mary le Strand Church from balcony, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 14:39:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#London
Info With its decorative Italianate interior inspired by the work of Roman sculptors such as Luigi Fontana, St Mary le Strand is one of London's most unusual and interesting churches (still more for being located in the middle of a traffic island). Constructed between 1714 and 1724, its Baroque styling and plastered ceiling were highly controversial for an English church. There is a more conventional pew-level view but I think this view from the balcony is better. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well balanced tones, given the range of lighting levels. Rich colours, and a very intricate and detailed venue. --Bobulous (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition, although the cutoff of the nearest chandelier is unfortunate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 02:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Ikan Kekek Poco a poco (talk) 16:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#London

File:360° panoramas Estonian University of Life Sciences, research.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 22:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded by Eesti Maaülikool - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 22:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support First class. There is only a stitching error at the yellow sticking tape at the roof, but this is minimal. -- -donald- (talk) 06:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very eye catching. Sharp throughout the central areas, and pleasingly smooth in the areas unavoidably distorted by the 180° view. Well exposed despite the variety of lighting, and rich with interesting textures. --Bobulous (talk) 19:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work --StellarHalo (talk) 23:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per your other nom, again great work. And you don't see this kind of thing too often at FPC Cmao20 (talk) 01:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the lighting and color ... it looks like a movie set. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:White and golden graves in a Buddhist cemetery at sunrise in Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 00:35:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To my eye, this looks like it needs to be rotated clockwise by somewhere between one and two degrees. --Bobulous (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting consideration, however, none of these graves are exactly vertical, and the ground itself is curved. At full size, it's visible some are leaning right, and some are leaning left. Rotating will increase the angle of the grave most at the right in the foreground, that is already slightly leaning CW. Currently the walls of the building in the background are vertical. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cmao20 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The quality is good and the item interesting but the light and compo are not at FP level to me, sorry. Probably golden hour light would work better here, about the compo, I'm not sure, maybe it somehow possible to take the top higher (raising your hand or stepping on something). Poco a poco (talk) 10:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Taken at 5:42am. Woke up at 4:45 am to reach this place before sunrise. Very subtle light IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the contrast between the artificial spires on the graves and the natural curves of the mountain ridgeline. Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Laos

File:Cala Rajada na Ferradura escultura Joan Bennàssar-1371.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 16:45:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I have nothing against the composition, but this sculpture is horrible and seems to be the product of another destructive restoration work --Wilfredor (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Wilfredor. Cmao20 (talk) 01:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as creator. BTW: Horrible? This is probably a matter of taste and I'm not sure if this is a category for recognized artworks. This is Joao Bennassar's style and not everyone likes it. Fortunately he has followers who buy his works :-) He can make a fine living from it. --Isiwal (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Nothing really wrong here technically, so certainly QI, but nothing special either – lacks wow. The dull mood doesn’t appeal to me. As for composition, I don’t like the horizon to cut through the figure’s breasts. --Kreuz schnabel 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crocifisso Giovanni Teutonico o Paolo Moerich Duomo di Salò.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 09:22:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Utterly beautiful. And something a bit new in the church-interior genre. Cmao20 (talk) 23:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light makes the sculpture appear very 3-dimensional, beautiful colour contrast between the warm tones of the wood and the bluish background. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very rich scene. It feels like the lens focus is behind the eyes very slightly, but the face is still sharp and even the nearest hand is clear enough when viewed pixel-for-pixel. The main object is nicely framed by the background, which is compelling and is blurred just enough to show detail without stealing the scene, helped by the good contrast in brightness between foreground and background. --Bobulous (talk) 18:59, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 20:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:58, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors

File:Smoking, Bo-Kaap, Cape Town (P1060001).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 09:03:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MB-one (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nothing special --Nexo20 (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image doesn't work for me, unfortunately. The scene is pedestrian, the lone figure looks a little out of focus well before getting to 100%, the shop behind them is largely obscured and fairly gloomy, and the block wall framing it all is not pleasing the eye. --Bobulous (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sadly per Bobulous, I see what you are going for but the composition doesn't quite work. Cmao20 (talk) 01:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I just don’t get the message here. --Kreuz schnabel 08:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary.--Peulle (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Bobulous. There's the potential for good street photography here. I think the guy alone might have worked, but the image would be too small if cropped from this one to meet our minimum size. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:59, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clapham Lodge.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 19:26:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info created by User:Bobulous - uploaded by User:Bobulous - nominated by Bobulous -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bobulous (talk) 19:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support good composition. --Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A 3/4 backlit shot can often be quite effective, but here the stone wall blocks the composition and casts an undesirable shadow on the foreground pavement. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:09, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Welcome to FPC (as far as I know, i haven't seen you nominate before). I like the shot but I think it is for me a bit more QI than FP. The subject is IMO not really that outstanding and for a building that isn't that naturally impressive I would only support a photo shot under excellent light or really outstanding composition. I actually like the composition, but I think the light is a little bit less than ideal - per KoH the shadows caused by the backlighting are not that attractive for me. There is also a little bit of blue chromatic aberration in the branches at the top, though this is easily fixable and not the reason for my oppose. Please, keep trying at FPC - this is not too far off the standard. Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @King of Hearts and Cmao20: Thank you for your reviews. The blurring of the branches at the very top of the image is not caused by CA, but by the extreme edge of a shifted lens (a Canon TS-E 24mm mk II, very possibly shifted to the maximum to give a 12mm rise). I don't believe that such loss of resolution can be fixed in post (but I am hoping Canon will soon release a newer model which exhibits this effect less severely). I did wonder if the backlighting would put off some people, but decided to nominate because my eye keeps getting caught by the soft glow of the building face even though it's in shade and competing with areas lit by direct sunlight. If anyone is interested, I could offer an alternative crop which removes most of the road, but I kept it originally because I liked the long shadows made by the gate in the low sun. --Bobulous (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I’m not at all sold on the composition, sorry. At least, I’d entirely crop out the foreground road. Then, I’d love to see more of the tree on the left, as a counterweight to the one on the right. --Kreuz schnabel 21:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King, Kreuzschnabel and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img71 Maçka Gondola.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 14:10:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
Info View of the Maçka Gondola in Istanbul, with Hilton Istanbul Bosphorus in the background ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The exposure has been well controlled, but the scene feels very cluttered to me, and the various lines all conflict with each other (the lines of the suspension cables, the lines of the buildings, and the lines of the trees bursting into the scene from all angles). --Bobulous (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but it's more in the 'QI but not quite FP' category to me. I think some more dramatic or interesting light would be the thing to knock it up into the FP category. Cmao20 (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, sorry – too cluttered, no clear subject, busy background, dull light. Might be carefully composed but doesn’t look like that. Sharpness is not overwhelming, looks as if you could easily downscale to 50 % without losing detail. --Kreuz schnabel 08:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That boring, wide Hilton ruins the composition for me, and the boring tower next to it doesn't help, either. I also agree that the vegetation comes across as cluttered, rather than really helping the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really wowed by this one, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cluttered composition; I'm not as bothered by the hotel as the wires running across the image and the buildings. Also, this might have had more of a chance if it had been shot in warmer weather with a nice green blanket below. Daniel Case (talk) 15:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacques Cartier 1851-1852.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2020 at 18:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by Théophile Hamel - uploaded and nominated by -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wilfredor (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice painting but IMO a little bit less sharp than many painting reproductions at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough for an FP reproduction of a painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. Quite small for a painting of that size and does not have the quality or the historical value to make up for it. --StellarHalo (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Max Schmitt in a Single Scull.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 22:37:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Marine
Info Max Schmitt in a Single Scull, one of the first works of American painter Thomas Eakins from 1871. An early example of realism in the United States long before the style became much more popular among American painters in the early twentieth century. created by Thomas Eakins - uploaded by Boo-Boo Baroo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 22:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know why no one has voted on this yet, but it seems fine to me. Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Whelp, since it fails to gain traction. Must have been because this one is too boring for most people's taste. StellarHalo (talk) 10:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calliteara pudibunda caterpillar - Keila1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 05:21:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Erebidae_(Erebid_Moths)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:23, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking macro image --Tagooty (talk) 14:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:52, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good macro photo, no obvious flaws. Cmao20 (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice haircut :-) Mohawk caterpillar? Basile Morin (talk) 02:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, Tournasol7 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like it's aspiring to be a dry fly. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Erebidae_(Erebid_Moths)

File:Basílica, Ottobeuren, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 126-128 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 16:27:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany
Info Interior of the Ottobeuren Basilica, part of the Ottobeuren Abbey, Germany. The church was erected in 1766 but the abbey was founded in 764 by Blessed Toto, and dedicated to St. Alexander, the martyr. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:51, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning Rococo interior decorative art --StellarHalo (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better. --Mile (talk) 09:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:51, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Germany

File:Bridge at Makhtesh Ramon (40582).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 16:54:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Israel
Info A bridge along a cliff path, looking out to Makhtesh Ramon in the Mitzpe Ramon desert. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 08:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not the nicest bridge I've ever seen but the scene, compo and light are nice Poco a poco (talk) 10:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support it looks like a apocalyptic scene --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I keep coming back to this image, but I just can't get it to work for me. The bridge and walkway invite the question: what are they there for, where do they go? And the image doesn't answer that. The shot is sharp and well exposed, but the scene just doesn't fit together for me. --Bobulous (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you're looking for an answer from the image, but I'll add an answer in text form anyway: this is along the Israel National Trail at the edge of Makhtesh Ramon. Basically a cliffside path. The bridge, if I recall correctly, only serves to take you to the little lookout area on the other side of it (the little area pictured). It was entirely optional, which I was glad for because it was old and missing planks and bowing in the middle and kind of scary. So the answers to "what is it there for" and "where does it go" are there... they're just not very interesting. :) Mainly I just liked the scene/composition. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral What a pity that the first pole is cut off (if the bridge is the main theme as the title says) --Llez (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Bobulous. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Israel

File:Eggs in basket 2020 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 20:10:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support However, I don't view the off-centered composition (a natural instinct of most of us photographers) as necessary; a centered square crop would work just as well or better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@George Chernilevsky: It seems that several people have spoken in favor of a square crop, with none against. Would you consider making the change? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Recreated from source and cropped a bit more -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I totally agree with King. However, I also want to say that I like the arrangement of eggs in the basket very much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. +1 for a centered square --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 = 4. Maybe after speedy promotion? -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

but per KoH and others. I like these baskets made by you in Category:Wicker baskets, although the tomatoes work better in my view, with a square crop and slightly a better light. The eggs here are very carefully arranged, it makes the subject a bit unnatural, but I respect that choice -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food

File:Garzweiler surface mine Bucket-wheel excavator 2019 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 19:58:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created & uploaded by Arne Müseler - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure how I feel about the photo, overall, but I'm definitely feeling like I want a wider crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dramatic photo although there is a bit of barrel distortion. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 08:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The subject is original and the composition good but the quality is clearly below FP level. It's too grainy (visiblem above all in the sky), lacks some sharpness and needs some perspective adjustments to get verticals vertical. I'd change my vote if the issues are successfully addressed Poco a poco (talk) 10:24, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks like a top-down view to me. Doesn't make sense to fix the verticals in that case (I got the same remark in this nomination). Looking at the machine at full size, it's really tack sharp. Shot with an Hasselblad at 100 ISO. Apart from a very very little noise in the sky, I really don't see why the quality would be "clearly below FP" -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, the image quality looks fine to me. The grain is pretty minimal and not a big deal. And the excavator itself is really sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was confused by this comment, thought it looked rather crappy for a high-class medium format camera – until I realized that that "Hasselblad" is the 1″ sensor on-board camera of the Mavic 2 Pro. Now it makes sense. Actually looks pretty good for a drone shot. --El Grafo (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I didn't like this shot the first several times I looked at its thumbnail. But on filling the screen with it, it does keep drawing the eye to the dozens of nested structures hidden within. And to my eye the detail on the main body of the machine is crispy even at 100%. The ancillary body to the right is softer but still offers enough detail to show off yet more structures within this beast of a machine. I like the parallel bands of colour, and the textures in the sandy layer. So I've changed my mind: this does feel like a striking image. --Bobulous (talk) 20:07, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MartinD (talk) 07:53, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to the detail visible, although I agree with Ikan's comment. Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Tight crop at the right, but impressive excavator at full size. Agree with Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:34, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:Squirrel watching over the coast in La Jolla (70350).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2020 at 14:41:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
Info Squirrel watching over the beach from a nearby cliff, making sure everybody's ok. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The squirrel is looking the other way. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only because I distracted him. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support We can see the squirrel's eye, so I think it's OK. Nice idea for a picture. Cmao20 (talk) 01:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:15, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 23:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Brown Trout (Salmo trutta).pdf, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 18:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Science
Info created by Alberto Molina Serrano - uploaded by Alberto Molina Serrano - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Theklan (talk) 18:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Are PDFs eligible? And how do we feel about the text on the bottom, speaking of the creator? --Peulle (talk) 21:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I would consider that the same as a watermark and therefore oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Rejecting because PDF is not an ideal format for conveying a single image, and because the image guidelines say "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image. Copyright/authorship information of all images should be located on the image's description page and should not interfere with content of the image." --Bobulous (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archangel Raphael Coptic Orthodox Church -- Houston Clear Lake City, Texas.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2020 at 18:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Religious buildings
Info created by Jim Evans - uploaded by Jim Evans - nominated by Jim Evans -- Jim Evans (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jim Evans (talk) 18:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fake sky (see history), pole removal not done cleanly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just so I understand. Pictures where the sky has been altered are not acceptable in featured pictures? Is that correct? Jim Evans (talk) 20:08, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per KoH. Jim Evans, it is not really stated explictly, but the rules for FP state that 'Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer' i.e. alterations are only acceptable to fix flaws in an image, remove distracting elements etc. I think altering the sky would count as 'cheating' a little - I'm not saying there is any deceptive intent, but I still think it's a bit too much of a change from reality as captured. Cmao20 (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, it is certainly discouraged. We had quite a stir about a fake sky back in October of last year. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your clarification. I haven't been following here but, in my opinion, enhancing the sky is more to create a pleasing image without altering the primary content. It's hard to see how this 'deceives' the viewer. That said, I withdraw my nomination. Jim Evans (talk) 00:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure the shadows of the clouds match the light of the building. Please in the template, mention all the modifications made, not only the poles but also the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alcedo atthis - Riserve naturali e aree contigue della fascia fluviale del Po.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 23:07:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Order : Coraciiformes (Kingfishers, Bee-eaters, Rollers, Motmots, and Todies)
Info created by Luca Casale - uploaded by Luca Casale - nominated by Rodrigo.Argenton -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 23:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton^m 23:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Irresistible action shot, but the red-linked category has to be fixed; this shouldn't be promoted with a red-linked category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a catch!!! --Tomascastelazo (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great action, striking -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Look at that sad face of the fish. --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Augustgeyler (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing --StellarHalo (talk) 01:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --Aristeas (talk) 11:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tagooty (talk) 04:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 21:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 31 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:56, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order : Coraciiformes (Kingfishers, Bee-eaters, Rollers, Motmots, and Todies)

Image:Kanadagans auf dem Raakmoorteich im Naturschutzgebiet Raakmoor.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2020 at 08:40:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info created by User:Käptn Klabauter - uploaded by Käptn Klabauter - nominated by Nexo20 -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nexo20 (talk) 08:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As much as I like the goose's pose, the rest of the composition is too distracting from the subject. --MB-one (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The green of the leaves looks somewhat unnatural to me, the saturation seems too high. What do other people think? --Aristeas (talk) 09:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, saturated colors and the blacks are too intense -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support, pending any edits per Aristeas' point above. I really like how the goose is framed by that filigree of foliage, a growing trunk or two, a fallen trunk and the reflections. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No changes were made, so I now oppose. Nominators can't just nominate and ignore comments if they want to maximize their chances of success. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Blown highlights (chest) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. A lovely scene and i like the composition but the blacks are too intense, plus the whites are blown out and the colours are too saturated. Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MB-one. Without even getting into the colors, the composition is just way too busy and the background too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moshe Ganbash - Shiviti - Google Art Project.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 16:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Judaism
Info created by Moshe Ganbash - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I would prefer if the resolution is higher for all the details. --StellarHalo (talk) 23:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Judaism

File:Reichstagsgebäude, Berlin-Mitte, 170402, ako.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2020 at 17:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info There are other FPs of the Reichstag building, but none from this angle. I like the early morning light and I think it's quite nice that both the German flags are blowing towards the camera. created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 00:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I want to see the dome.--Claus 05:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable, but my argument would be we already have good FPs where you can see the dome. I nominated this picture because it's something a little different. Cmao20 (talk) 16:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 07:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking contrast, colour, and texture. --Bobulous (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Bobulous --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Amir Pashaei (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Mohiniyattam at Kannur district school kalothsavam 2019 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2020 at 18:08:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info-Mohiniyattam is one of the famous classical dances of India that developed and remained popular in the state of Kerala. (Kindly ignore the white curtain at background as this was taken from a live stage performance)

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background line distracting. Horizontal aspect not appropriate -- vertical would have captured the whole dancer. -- Colin (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yeah, this one isn't great to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks overexposed to me, washed-out highlights, blueish red. Harsh stage lighting is not easy to handle. Framing not ideal per Colin. --Kreuz schnabel 05:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hasan Ashtiani's Tomb at Fatima Masumeh Shrine3, qom, iran.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2020 at 20:35:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Iran
Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Amir Pashaei (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:39, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 00:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:58, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 04:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 15:18, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Huge resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Iran

File:Qarah mountain in the -hofuf -saudi arabia. The entrance to the caves.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2020 at 14:22:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info created by marviikad - uploaded by احمد سامي - nominated by احمد سامي -- احمد سامي (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- احمد سامي (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice place but the quality is very poor. Noisy, some artifacts after heavy jpeg compression. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:57, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per George – something went terribly wrong here. The Alpha 57 can do much better. --Kreuz schnabel 17:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. I own an Alpha 57, it is a fine camera. I have no idea how you make it produce images of such poor quality - something has gone very wrong with the processing. Cmao20 (talk) 00:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, mine is an Alpha 58. Still, I can't imagine it's that much different. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose It would be nice to have an FP from Saudi Arabia (or at least another one; I can't remember if we've promoted one yet) but ... the crop, the shadows and the technical flaws. Daniel Case (talk) 01:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SOB Re 456 Weissenbachviadukt Degersheim.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2020 at 13:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:25, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow-y enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not for me, unfortunately. The train and bridge are a little small in the scene, the train seems somewhat overexposed, and the bare trees and straggly bits (fence posts?) in the bottom of the image keep distracting. Possibly a different crop and a tone curve adjustment would appease me, but let's see what others think. --Bobulous (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice bridge -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the idea of this as a winter landscape without any snow. Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought I've also uploaded the variant with snow but it looks like I didn't. Here it is. File:SOB Voralpenexpress Weissenbachviadukt Snow.jpg --Kabelleger (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles