User talk:Peulle

File:GrazASKÖStadionEggenberg2.jpg

Thank you for your comment to this photo. I know that the sky is not good in this photo - it is as it is when taking a picture against the sun. Have you a hint what I can do with this photo or what I can do next time when making a photo under same conditions? --TheRunnerUp (talk) 19:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

@TheRunnerUp: It is indeed hard shooting towards the light; what I try to do in those circumstances is manipulate the shutter and/or aperture settings. For instance, the faster the shutter speed, the less light you let in on the sensor. I would just experiment with the settings until you find something that fits. For instance, when you take a photo, choose one setting first, then change it, shoot another photo and so on. Then you can look at the photos later and see which one is best. Good luck. :) --Peulle (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

OK, thank you. --TheRunnerUp (talk) 21:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Disruptive vulgarity

Hello Peulle, your poop-edit on my nomination is not appreciated. I may delete it right now per COM:TALK Keep the discussion readable, but you may also choose to fix it by yourself, to stay in line with the local policies. This scatological-oriented review may have been written with a humorous intention, unfortunately the impact is more harmful for the community than funny / constructive. If you want to oppose a FPC for the pleasure to become the first dissident, just state {{Oppose}}, explaining your reasoning. No need of inflammatory provocations that will only create out-of-topic discussions and counter-productive animosity. We had enough tensions last days on FPC due to such misconducts. Greetings -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, Basile Morin; there seems to have been a misunderstanding based on differences in language. My comment was not related to scatology, rather it is a comment frequently used in America where a so-called party pooper means someone "who declines to participate with enthusiasm", i.e. someone "ruining the party". In this context, what I meant was that despite the enthusiastic supports from other voters, I felt I had to oppose due to the lighting and thus added the note as a way of saying "sorry to be the one spoiling the party". I have seen it done here before so I didn't think any further about it. Apologies for the misunderstanding.--Peulle (talk) 09:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Total misunderstanding yes so thank you for the explanation with this correction on the page. I never heard about that expression before, and searching on Google the results were closer to a repulsive idea than a funny joke. Unfortunately in this context, with some humans cleaning the yard, the words were too ambiguous. Fine now, I'm grateful for your kind reply. Wish we can have fun together in a clearer manner in the future -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Absolutely, no hostile feelings from me. Have a nice day. :) --Peulle (talk) 10:45, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Perfect. You too -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Peulle, how are you? What are the good light conditions for a FP?, I taked the last at 4PM. Regards!! Ezarateesteban 11:37, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Ooh that's a difficult question, one that doesn't have a specific answer. The thing is, FPs are about excitement and "wow factor". Light conditions are part of that; especially if the subject itself is not particularly exciting, having great lighting can help. A grey sky might look boring, normal daytime light as well. Mostly, I think photos taken during the morning or evening have the most impressive light.--Peulle (talk) 15:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

No space between lines in QIC

Hi Peulle, to you question, I guess that the reason is that in the meanwhile many people use this tool and don't need to look in the wikicode for the nominee. Have you tried it out? Since I use it I can review images much quicker, it is a great help Poco² 18:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll take a look later.--Peulle (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Interested in meeting Italian photographers?

Hi! a local Tuscan photographers I am in contact on Facebook said he's looking for someone to share a travel to Norway late 2018-spring 2019. I have suggested to put him in contact to some local wikimedians in the area during the discussion. Would you be interested to share your contact with him? He's not a commons user yet but he promised he will upload some images too, so as a wiki volunteers I saw the opportunity to create some connections. I am basically searching for some good Norwegian commons photographers who would like to be around one afternoon. He did not decide the exact trip yet, so your area whatever it is is probably fine. Thank you in advance.--Alexmar983 (talk) 12:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Well if they're planning a trip to Drammen and want to see some of the local attractions, let me know.--Peulle (talk) 07:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments

Thank you for your comments, even if they are partly negative. Unfortunately, I'm not a good photographer, so I'm happy for your hints. Greetings from Austria: --GT1976 (talk) 12:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Keep working, I'm sure you can get some good pictures. :) --Peulle (talk) 19:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Peulle,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Workshop in Oslo?

I'm in August at the Baltic Sea Parlimentary Conference as photographer, be there from 22.-30. August. I'm there with a drone, we can have a Workshop of drone-photography, if there are interestet photographers? --Ralf Roletschek 22:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, @Ralf Roletschek, I am in the process of getting a puppy, so I will be unavailable for most projects for the next couple of months.--Peulle (talk) 20:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

FP delist

Doesn't seem that the community agrees with the FP delist idea! Charles (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

• Never mind Colin - he's still got his nickers in a twist after the discussion about delisting procedures. I still maintain he's wrong about the procedures. Whether the particular images should be delisted, though, is a matter for the voters to decide in each case.--Peulle (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Peulle,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

• Wow, that was a loooong survey... --Peulle (talk) 08:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Meine Probleme mit QI-Nominierungen

Da Du offenbar besser deutsch verstehst als ich englisch, schreibe ich auf deutsch.

Deine Aufforderung, ich möge keine Fotos mehr für QI nominieren, kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Und da Du offenbar meine Nominierungen ganz genau verfolgst, solltest Du auch die ganze Geschichte kennen:

In den letzten Jahren wurden mehr als 900 meiner Fotos als QI qualifiziert, als in letzter Zeit plötzlich angebliche Sensorprobleme auffielen. Daraufhin ließ ich meine Kamera von Nikon-Service überprüfen und bekam sie vor wenigen Tagen mit dem Befund zurück, daß die Kamera und insbesondere der Sensor in einwandfreiem Zustand sind. Einige Kollegen bemühen sich gemeinsam mit mir, der Sache auf den Grund zu gehen, weil wir es sonderbar finden, daß nicht nur ich sondern offenbar auch viele andere Benutzer diese Fehler nicht erkennen. Etliche Fotos waren nämlich bereits als QI promoted und wurden nachher disqualifiziert. Ich versuche nun, die beanstandeten Fotos dahingehend zu überprüfen, ob es vielleicht an einer zu hohen ISO-Einstellung lag, die ein Bildrauschen verursacht hat. Weil ich selber ja den behaupteten Fehler nicht sehen kann ist es notwendig, möglichst viele Fotos zu analysieren um die Ursache eingrenzen zu können. Und da wäre es absolut kontraproduktiv, Deiner Aufforderung Folge zu leisten.

Allerdings ist mir bei den heute nominierten Fotos aufgefallen, daß Du nach der Diskussion bei “File:Mannersdorf Rochusberg 55.jpg” um 6:31 Uhr in nur 1 Minute, nämlich bereits um 6:32 Uhr vier weitere Fotos nicht nur begutachtet sondern auch mit einer ausführlichen Begründung und mit einem “Decline” versehen hast. Kannst Du mir verraten, wie Du das in so kurzer Zeit schaffst? Ich möchte Dir nämlich nicht unterstellen, daß Du die Fotos gar nicht angesehen hast.

Wenn ich also keine Fotos mehr nominieren soll, wie soll ich dann herausfinden, warum manche Fotos in Ordnung sind und andere nicht und warum außer mir offenbar auch andere Benutzer die Fehler nicht sehen???

Mit freundlichen Grüßen--M@nfred (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

• @M@nfred: My written German is atrocious, so I will answer in English. Let's go point by point:
• 1) I believe that images with obvious technical problems should not be nominated for QI. It fills up QIC and just takes up space, wasting the reviewers' time. My opinion is that when you see that most of the nominated images of the Mannersdorf series have the same problems (stripes in the sky) and that they are all declined after CR, this means that clearly none of these images should be nominated in the first place. I do the same thing with my own images: if the feedback from the community is that a certain level is too low to be promoted to QI, I will not nominate such images at QIC when I see that the quality level will be too low. If you feel like you want to keep nominating them anyway, despite the community (through CR) telling you they are not of high enough quality, you are free to do so. And we are free to decline any images we feel are not QIs.
• 2) I am not arguing your ability, nor challenging the quality of your 900 photos. I am simply saying that recently, your images have had the problem with stripes in the sky, and in general, the community agrees. That some images have managed to slip through the net is unfortunate if they have this problem, and I disagree with your assessment that lots of people cannot see the problems. When sent to CR, the images have pretty much all been declined. That means we can see the problems and we do find them big enough to warrant a decline.
• 3) You point out (if my understanding of the German is correct) that I review images quickly. This is achieved in two ways: a) I open several images in different tabs and look at them first, then I write the reviews. b) Sometimes, I know exactly what to look for. It only takes a few seconds to check if the image has the ruined sky, and I simply copy+paste the text from one review onto the other, saving time.
• 4) I am encouraging you to check your images before nominating them. When uploading images to Commons, I myself often find that an image that may have seemed good in the camera viewer, doesn't quite reach QI levels. Then I change my mind and choose not to nominate them. If I were you, I would look at each image, check if the sky has the problems people have pointed out, and nominate them only if they do not. About other users not seeing them: I disagree. We do, if we look thoroughly. That's why they keep being declined at CR.

WBR, --Peulle (talk) 08:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

@Peulle: Once again (how often?):

It is and it has never been my intention to block the community's progress!

My photos have been OK for QI since May 6, 2012. For 2 years, these errors have occurred, first case by case, then more often. And since I can not see these same errors on my display, I am also unable to cancel them before the nomination.

Based on the camera data of the offending photos, I would like to investigate the cause, after it has become clear that this is NO SENSOR PROBLEM.

So what should I do in concrete terms?

Friendly greetings--M@nfred (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

(Translated with Google translator)

@Manfred Kuzel: If you cannot see these errors on your monitor, perhaps that is where the problem lies. I can understand why you keep nominating them if that is the case, but I can see them clearly on all three of my computers. I therefore feel I must continue to oppose their promotion if they have these errors. As you can see from the results at CR, most other reviewers agree. As for how the problem can be fixed, I'm afraid I don't know. Perhaps some of the other reviewers have more expertise, or perhaps someone at the Nikon support forums can help.

WBR, --Peulle (talk) 10:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

@Peulle: In the Nikon support forum certainly not, because the camera was indeed for review at Nikon and she is absolutely fine!--M@nfred (talk) 11:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, Peulle! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Using a picture

In connection with our discovery of the Viking king Harald Bluetooth's grave in Poland, I will publish a book about the Viking Age and also about this unique and important archaeological find. See more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curmsun_Disc I would therefore like to ask you if I can freely use the following image that you posted on Wikimedia Common without violating a copyright, then of course entering your signature or name to the picture: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Osebergskipet_2016.jpg --Sven Rosborn (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, you are certainly free to use the images I have uploaded to Commons; they are all copyright free. :) --Peulle (talk) 12:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Peulle! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New year 2021

		* Happy New year 2021" Peulle! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! --Pierre André (talk) 11:06, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

FPX

Hi Peulle, FPXs are usually archived by the bot 24 hours after the last comment, but if removed manually, the nomination should also be archived, as far as I know -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Ah, thanks, I thought the archiving was also done automatically. :) --Peulle (talk) 12:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Schloss_Achleiten_bei_Limbach_01_-_DJI_0067.jpg

Hi Peulle, thank you for your review on QIC! I'v sharpened my photo. Please see if it's okay now. Greetings from Austria, -- Hans Koberger (talk) 07:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Peulle! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality image candidate A 6 mm long shelt of a Mangeliid, Eucithara coronata

Hello Peulle I don't think anyone could do better than Zell and I put a note on the image candidates spage.It is tiny shell. Best Regards Notafly (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

QIC

Because it always annoys me: I really don't know how to deal with Steindy's toxic, passive-aggressive writing. Is there any contributor on QIC who has never come into conflict with him or at least received a snotty comment? --Smial (talk) 12:30, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Smial: I have posted a note over at COM:ANU, but no response yet. Feel free to participate in the discussion if you like.-Peulle (talk) 22:23, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Hi

Hi!

Thank you for commenting on my photos in the Quality Images candidate list! I am relatively new here and don't have any knowledge in photography (only taking photos with my iphone), and am happy to learn more from you to improve my skills. For "Perspective correction needed" does that mean the object in the photo is slightly tilted? For "insufficient quality", the photos are around 4000*3000 pixels (similar to other quality images). Is there any way I could possibly improve the quality? Finally the one with "oversaturated color" I adjusted the photo on my iphone indeed (as it was too dark before). Is it something I should not do in the future? Thank you again and have a nice day! --Suiren2022 (talk) 04:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

@Suiren2022: Hi and welcome to Commons! :)

While your images are a valuable part of the Commons project, documenting events and places, you may find it difficult to succeed at QIC with an iPhone. The requirements for Quality Images are about technical quality, and mobile phones are rarely able to capture the kind of quality needed for that. I suggest you take a look at the Guidelines. They show examples of the perspective issue as well as many other things. There are also suggestions for how you can improve images there. :)

Another thing you can do is take a closer look at the Valued Images page. If, for example, your image of a building is the only one that exists on Commons, you could probably succeed at a nomination there. Peulle (talk) 06:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Bruke bilde

Prøver igjen, vet ikke hvor spm fra meg ble av :) Jeg ønsker å bruke et bilde fra Risør som du har tatt. Dette er et kommersielt prosjekt og jeg ønsker å kjøpe linsens og sikre at rettigheter og bruk er ok. Jeg vil også tro at du ønsker kreditering med navn. Hvordan kan jeg komme i kontakt med deg for å diskutere detaljer? Dissington (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Heisann, @Dissington: ! :) Bilder som er lagt ut på Commons er allerede mulig å bruke ut fra lisensen som bildet er lagt ut under. Hvis du går inn på bildet du ønsker og trykker på "use this file" kan du se hvordan man krediterer opphavsmannen. Hvilket bilde er det du tenker på å bruke? --Peulle (talk) 20:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Hei igjen @Peulle og takk for svar, dette er en spennende utgivelse og jeg tror at du har lyst til å bli kreditert med navn. Kan ikke fortelle om prosjektet her, men send gjerne en epost til strofe0@gmail.com Dissington (talk) 07:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Peulle! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 01:20, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Peulle! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2023. Pierre André ^(talk) 17:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Match Cup Norway 2018 88.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Match Cup Norway 2018 88.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotions

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial to the battle at Lyngør in 1812..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
«Bakken», the childhood home of author Dikken Zwilgmeyer..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:44, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
M32 sailing boats racing in Match Cup Norway 2018, part of the World Match Racing Tour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I trust you to choose the image but it would be good if there is only one category of reference in the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

• I see your point. Which do you think fits better? On the one hand, the WMRT category could contain other types of images, not just boats racing. On the other hand, the "M32" category might be better represented by an image showing a single boat. Would perhaps "M32 boats racing" be the best scope?--Peulle (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

I will only keep World Match Racing Tour it gives a historical side to the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Done :) --Peulle (talk) 08:54, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Øisang ferry..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bust of August Strindberg in Stockholm..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good pic and best there is of the bust -- Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:21, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acropolis of Athens at night seen from the north..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Neutral: Given the extraordinary importance of the Acropolis, I think that both "Acropolis at night" and "Acropolis seen from the north" would justify their own scope, but I consider a combination of both as too narrow. --Reinhard Müller (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree with Reinhard above. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

• I thought about it for a minute and while RM has a point, I don't think I agree in this case: the Athenian Acropolis is one of the most photographed sites in the world, so I think that there should be room for both night and day scopes for several directions. No presedence set for other locations, though.--Peulle (talk) 12:32, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skoger old church - southern view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bragernes church (southern view)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skoger church, rear/side view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:20, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skoger church front view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Front facade of the Hat museum in Lindenberg, Germany..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Aquarium in Risør..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Quality Hotel River Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and unusually interesting architecture for a Quality Hotel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tangen church in Drammen, seen from the north..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

 Comment The picture is too dark and has too little contrast. I can imagine that the church would be better photographed early in the morning in summer. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:49, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holmestrand train station, main entrance..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Tagooty (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotions

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bakken (Prestegata 11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The facade of the house seems to me too bright and with too little contrast. -- Spurzem 18:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)  Support There's a small horizontal tilt, but I think not significant enough to oppose. Good quality --Basile Morin 02:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good stuff, Peulle --Podzemnik 01:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --GT1976 19:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --GT1976 19:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --GT1976 19:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --GT1976 19:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --GT1976 19:34, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:32, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:04, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:50, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:00, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 00:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 00:52, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 01:31, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:47, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Seems like people are starting to ignore your noms too like mine now because of the mass. ;D Some motion blurring but still GQ imo. --GerifalteDelSabana 04:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Well, the images are subtly different, but I shot 125 of them; I'll be posting these for weeks. ;-D --Peulle 00:07, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 14:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Lmbuga 04:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Lmbuga 04:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good job with focusing here --Podzemnik 01:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:53, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 07:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:11, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of motion blur on the hands but Good quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice; Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:59, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality -- Sixflashphoto 01:57, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus to main part of the photo is well done --Michielverbeek 06:47, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:00, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Agnes Monkelbaan 16:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:00, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 15:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality --Michielverbeek 10:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Heya, good quality --Michielverbeek 15:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Llez 20:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Llez 20:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Llez 20:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but I would have prefer a photo from the other side. But I realize this is probably impossible --Michielverbeek 07:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC) I have photos from the other side too, but I couldn't get both sides in a single shot. :) Thanks for your review. --Peulle 07:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:53, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC) Good quality, Tournasol7 07:31, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 07:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo is slightly cut out at the top right. But good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:22, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:24, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 04:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 06:56, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sikkerhetsbøye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MF «Øisang» juli 2018 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MF «Øisang» juli 2018 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pioner Multi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If the boat but did not get into trance. Good quality for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 118.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MF «Øisang» juli 2018 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hytte i Risør.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stangholmbåten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:05, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flisvika i Risør.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Match Cup Norway 2018 116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems a little overexposed ... boat wake is blown, for one thing --Daniel Case 04:42, 1 September 2018 (UTC) Done Thanks for taking a look - I did some fixing on the curves.--Peulle 18:07, 1 September 2018 (UTC)  Support Probably not ideal, but better now --Daniel Case 06:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stormskyer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strindberg-byste i Stockholm (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strindberg-byste i Stockholm (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger gamle kirke (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger gamle kirke (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 13:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger gamle kirke (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 13:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger gamle kirke (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger gamle kirke (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 13:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konnerud gamle kirke (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konnerud gamle kirke (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konnerud gamle kirke (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konnerud gamle kirke (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 07:28, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esso bensinskilt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It might be not the most intersting phoito, but IMO this is a Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konnerud gamle kirke (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engene 43-45 under riving i 2018 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bragernes kirke fra sør 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 10:37, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger landskap.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger kirke 2018 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger kirke 2018 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger kirke 2018 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger kirke 2018 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engene 43-45 under riving i 2018 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 12:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammens teater 2018 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Amarok ambulanse (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 12:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skoger kirke 2018 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:52, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rundballer i Skoger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engene 43-45 under riving i 2018 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2vk minnesmerke Konnerud gamle kirke (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2vk minnesmerke Skoger kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 October 2018 (UTC)@

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Braunvieh in Bavaria (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geigersthal view Heimenkirch 2018 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geigersthal view Heimenkirch 2018 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Untertor Ravensburg 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church door Stadtpfarrkirche Lindenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 12:15, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutsches Hutmuseum Lindenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 12:16, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade Stadtpfarrkirche Lindenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nadenberg Turm stairs (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nadenberg Turm stairs (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geigersthal view Heimenkirch 2018 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel Lindenberg Nadenberg street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Nymphenburg north wing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:15, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Nymphenburg stone lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Nymphenburg Steinerner Saal Apollo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Pfarrkirche St. Jodok Ravensburg 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Nymphenburg main entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Nymphenburg main building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienlyst sett fra Nordbykollen 10.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmen Drammen Nordbykollen 10.18 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Nymphenburg palace gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmen Drammen Nordbykollen 10.18 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen fra Nordbykollen 2018 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deutsches Hutmuseum Lindenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop above the chimney is a little bit tight. Can you correct this? Greetings --Dirtsc 08:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC) Sadly no, there's no room. I shot two images; one with a wider crop and then this one with a very tight one. It was by design.--Peulle 09:50, 2 November 2018 (UTC)  Support Thanks for the explanation. Technical quality is overall very good. --Dirtsc 13:12, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nadenberg Turm stairs (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geigersthal view Heimenkirch 2018 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greylag goose Nymphenburg gardens (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Greylag goose Nymphenburg gardens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, although I think you could have cropped in more closely ... you don't need all that green lawn. --Daniel Case 04:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kjørbo gård 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kjørbo gård 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy house Drammen 02.19 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy house Drammen 02.19 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy road Drammen 02.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowed-down car in Drammen 02.19 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy walking path Drammen 02.19 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lifebuoy by the Drammen river 02.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowed-down car in Drammen 02.19 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Happy shoveling! --PtrQs 20:45, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmen Risør mars 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden sett fra Lier (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniv Alfagear (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniv Vegårshei (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine --Eatcha 17:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniv Alfagear (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GOOD QUALITY --Eatcha 17:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 19:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniv Alfagear (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiet Drammen inngang 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kniv Alfagear (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 18:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 16:33, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusblomst (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 14:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusblomst (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusblomst (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:59, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spirende krokus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmen Risør april 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 13:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmen Risør april 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risør april 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risør hotel april 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risør akvarium april 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Propellaksling Pontana (1911).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusblomst (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokusblomst (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risør april 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice picture. --GT1976 07:06, 23 April 2019 (UTC) Verticals on the right side need fixing. --Ermell 11:28, 23 April 2019 (UTC) @Ermell:  Done, thanks for reviewing.--Peulle 06:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 13:57, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roe deer Norway May 2019 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:09, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Takeuchi TB260 Compact Excavator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:09, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:54, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torget Drammen 17. mai 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vulphere 06:46, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour of Norway 2019 Drammen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Åssiden kapell (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Åssiden kapell (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:17, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Åssiden kapell (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Åssiden kapell (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 11:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Åssiden kapell (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The steeple looks tilted, but I don't think it's your fault ;-) --Moroder 07:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site Tomineborgveien (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vögele Super 1303-3i paver and asphalt roller (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site Tomineborgveien (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Poor description but good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 19:24, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flying scarecrow (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vögele Super 1303-3i paver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site Tomineborgveien (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm HD10 roller (left side) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm HD10 roller (front).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hamm HD10 roller (left side) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:50, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site Tomineborgveien (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Construction site Tomineborgveien (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vögele Super 1303-3i paver and asphalt roller (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi A3 SportBack 2017 (front right side).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asphalt crew Drammen 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 09:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asphalt crew Drammen 2019 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asphalt crew Drammen 2019 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi A3 SportBack 2017 (rear right side).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 23:02, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asphalt crew Drammen 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asphalt crew Drammen 2019 (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asphalt crew Drammen 2019 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elveparken 2019 svaner 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 13:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elveparken 2019 svaner 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensbruene sett fra Kloptjernveien (natt) september 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern september 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern september 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern bro september 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern demning september 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern demning september 2019 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern demning september 2019 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overexposed sky but imo irrelevant --Moroder 13:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern demning september 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloptjern demning september 2019 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjellheim skole vinduer (2b).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjellheim skole søppelkasse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensbrua sett fra Løkkebergparken september 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjellheim skole fasade september 2019 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjellheim skole søppelkasser.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:30, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjellheim skole september 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensbrua sett fra Løkkebergparken september 2019 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments /> Support Good quality considering the weather conditions --Michielverbeek 08:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensbruene sett fra Kloptjernveien september 2019 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tupungato 08:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensbruene sett fra Kloptjernveien september 2019 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tupungato 08:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quality Hotel River Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Historical and interesting moment --PantheraLeo1359531 12:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image seems tilted, or am I wrong? --PantheraLeo1359531 12:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC) @PantheraLeo1359531: You were not entirely wrong; the bridges are curved, so there is a bit of an optical illusion going on, but looking at the building (silo) behind them, a little improvement in the perspective/tilt has now been  Done. Please take a look now. Thanks. :) --Peulle 13:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC) Thank you, now the case is clear :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:40, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen flom februar 2020 (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's tilted to the left. --T.Bednarz 15:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC) Done--Peulle 07:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)  Support IMO OK. --XRay 05:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiralen cafe Drammen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 11:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiralen cafe Drammen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hus fra Hallingdal Drammen Friluftsmuseum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Øvre Sund Bru sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Øvre Sund Bru sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen sykehus sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:45, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Øvre Sund Bru sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bragernes kirke sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 08:19, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen Bybro nordfra mars 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:50, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Drammen hospital building site march 2020 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Drammen hospital building site march 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Drammen hospital building site march 2020 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Drammen hospital building site march 2020 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen sett fra Hamborgstrømskogen mars 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienlyst stadion nordfra mars 2020 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 22:35, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ypsilon bru nordfra april 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 22:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quality Hotel River Station nordfra mars 2020 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jernbanehangar i Drammen april 2020 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienlyst stadion nordfra april 2020 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marienlyst stadion nordfra april 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:04, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humle på Selje (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humle på Selje (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:08, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strømsgodset kirke nordfra april 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:06, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundland nordfra april 2020 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humle på Selje (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humle på Selje (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bølgebryter i Fjordparken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebherr 550 kran Holmen Drammen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 08:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC) Done Thank you.--Peulle 09:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)  Support Looks better, still a slight tilt IMHO there, but close enough --Poco a poco 19:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Humle på Selje (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiet Drammen lounge (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiet Drammen lounge (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiet Drammen lounge (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Akademiet Drammen lounge (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjordparken steinmolo okt.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden okt.20 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjordparken okt.20 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lønneblad gule Drammen okt.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gjerpenkollen hoppbakke sep.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:01, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen havn illuminated crane (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. --JiriMatejicek 14:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjordparken okt.20 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lahell okt.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Slight vignetting can be fixed --Moroder 05:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjordparken okt.20 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hahaha, I hope with a good glass of Südtiroler Wein --Moroder 04:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden okt.20 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammen havn illuminated crane (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 19:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Seems to slightly lean clockwise. --Ximonic 19:30, 7 April 2021 (UTC) Done Perspective corrected. Thank you. --Peulle 09:07, 9 April 2021 (UTC) Nice foreground/background work --Discostu 21:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:32, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drammensfjorden ice 2021 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solbergelva sett fra Spiralen januar 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Randviklåven restaurering feb.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Maybe a little bit soft, but that could be changed easily by applying more sharpening in post and that’s IMHO a matter of taste. --Aristeas 09:39, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawa restaurant Drammen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 07:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risør brann 24.2.21 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kawa restaurant Drammen 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CAs on the left side, otherwise good quality --Domob 07:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC) Done Thanks. :) --Peulle 13:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Much better, thanks for the fix! --Domob 13:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Risør brann 24.2.21 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 22:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden stairs Løkkebergveien (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elsparkesykkel Voi Drammen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wooden stairs Løkkebergveien (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Drammen hospital building site June 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 11:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC) Are you sure? I can't see anything when I look at the cranes. Where do you see it?--Peulle 11:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)  Support I still believe that a 1,5-2 degrees tilt would help, but I believe it's good enough. --Poco a poco 07:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmen Risør juli 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 12:13, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi A3 silver Drammen 9.9.2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elsparkesykkel Tier Drammen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elsparkesykkel Tier Drammen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontene Engene-Ilebergveien 09.2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barnetrehjulssykkel i Drammen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gang- og sykkevei Nedre Strandgate Drammen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 07:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmestrand stasjon hovedinngang (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmestrand stasjon hovedinngang (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmestrand stasjon inngang heis (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmestrand småbåthavn dec.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy hill Risør dec.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy walking path Holmestrand feb.23 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy walking path Holmestrand feb.23 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy walking path Holmestrand feb.23 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmestrand dec.22 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also tilted --Poco a poco 20:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC) Done, thank you. :) --Peulle 07:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy walking path Holmestrand feb.23 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:21, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bassengparken Holmestrand feb.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support the mood has been captured nicely --Virtual-Pano 15:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snowy field Risør dec.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 14:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MF Gjemnes Holmestrand dec.22 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MF Gjemnes Holmestrand dec.22 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question What is that dark spot on the water above the roof of the ferry? Fixable? --Augustgeyler 19:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Done Seems like some dust on the lens. Will clean it. I think I managed to fix the image, though. Thanks for your review. :) --Peulle 17:38, 23 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Acropolis museum seen from Acropolis 2017.jpg

File:Acropolis museum seen from Acropolis 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmestrand dec.22 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Johan Halvorsen statue (2).jpg

File:Johan Halvorsen statue (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Johan Halvorsen statue (1).jpg

File:Johan Halvorsen statue (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)