User talk:Leonardorejorge

Image upload model

Categories

Hi Leonardorejorge, putting the images into Category:Unknown XY is correct, don't put them in Category:XY. Then it is clear that they are only identified to a certain level and not to the species. Regards and welcome to Commons, --Hsuepfle 22:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC) PS: I have moved some of the unknown butterflies or unidentifiable by myself from Category:Lepidoptera to Unknown butterflies. Maybe you can help to clean up this category if you know the familily or species.

Thanks for making contact

I'm very open to how we organize this section of images. I'm sure there are several good ways of doing it.

One very helpful thing for us is that, unlike scientific classification, user-friendliness classification allows multiple non-exclusive superset memberships. Sorry for that garbled jargon, what I mean is clearer by example. The illustrations from the voyage of the Navarra fit into several categories. They are useful for historians—national, linguistic and biographical—artists and librarians as well as for entomologists or other biological sciences. They are also just plain beautiful and potentially useful in all sorts of places.

So, there's nothing to stop us, and everything to encourage us, to provide multiple categories as much as possible. We don't need to exclude categories, or images from categories, we will probably generally serve best by multiply indexing images.

The way I think of it, we need a system that allows non-specialists to add and find images quickly. I think that means making maximum use of the ordinary language words butterfly, moth and caterpillar.

I'll think some more and try to make some specific recommendations. At the moment, I think the main problems are: 1. Lepidoptera doesn't mean butterfly, but that's where all butterfly images have been ending up by default; and 2. the Lepidoptera category is crowded because there are so many families of moths. Ultimately, I think we're going to end up with a crowded category at "Moth families", whatever we call that (currently it is Lepidoptera), but I'm keen for butterflies to be handled so non specialists can donate and find images of butterflies as easily as possible, and all that needs is separating them from all the moth families. Alastair Haines (talk) 04:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Categories on Commons

Hi Leonardo, thanks for letting me know why you are deleting these categories, I was under the impression that adding them increased the chances of someone finding the images and was baffled why you and others kept deleting them. I'm still not 100% sure that it is the 'correct-policy' or just your 'point-of-view' but at least I now know why and will endeavour to find out more. Aviceda (talk) 04:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Schmetterling 7074.JPG...

Hello Leonardo, I thank You for specification. Many greetings --Hedwig Storch (talk) 11:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliconius erato caterpillar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great image.--Mbz1 22:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bixa orellana fruit open.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and valuable, DOF is not ideal but acceptable for such a close-up shut -- H005 23:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora capsularis flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me - Darius Baužys 09:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bixa orellana (achiote), seeds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• I think I would prefer this one. Kersti (talk) 02:17, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

• 

•  Comment In this one, the fruit is not mature, so it is not possible to see the arils so clearly. Besides, the seeds are not sharp enough at 100% (although the higher resolution), and the background is a bit distracting. The best opponent, in my opinion, is this image. Leonardo (talk) 03:55, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support While a slower f-ratio with more depth of field may have been helpful, it looks fine at the review size and I think it satisfies all six criteria. Moreover, it is geocoded. Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:33, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with Walter Siegmund. - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 16:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passiflora capsularis, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Corresponds to all criteria. Good quality and rare -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Kersti (talk) 02:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconius erato (Red Postman), catterpillar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

 Support Kersti (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Rastaman3000 (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pollinating bee covered with pollen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 15:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Your watchlist

Perhaps you could ad this page to your watchlist. --Mbdortmund (talk) 11:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Diptera

Hi Leonardorejorge; Thank you.[1] I wonder if you might have a look at File:Grindelia_integrifolia_2782.JPG, please? Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.[2] Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I wonder if you would be kind enough to check File:Tenthredo sp. 6587.JPG, please? Also, I wonder if categories might be added to or the description improved for the following files?

• File:Senecio triangularis 0609.JPG
• File:Senecio_integerrimus_7466.JPG
• File:Claytonia sibirica 6775.JPG
• File:Viola glabella 6629.JPG
• File:Maianthemum racemosum 4932.JPG
• File:Clintonia uniflora 4915.JPG
• File:Salix sitchensis 39230.JPG
• File:Corallorhiza_maculata_0912.JPG

Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Wsiegmund, Nevermind, it was a pleasure to be able to put these images in the proper categories. I've tried to classify them as specifically as I could. Let's hope some specialist sees them now, so a better classification is achieved.Leonardo (talk) 00:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Leonardorejorge, you are too kind. You cleared out my backlog of uncategorized insects. You didn't comment on File:Tenthredo sp. 6587.JPG, so I'm assuming that it is correctly categorized. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. About the file File:Tenthredo sp. 6587.JPG, I can't say whether it is correct (I don't think I have ever seen a sawfly, they are surprisingly rare in the tropics), but if the identification is correct, you categorized properly. Best regards,Leonardo (talk) 02:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll leave it be. I don't think it is grossly wrong. We have 10,000 species of insects in our region and I'm finding it a challenge to learn 1000+ vascular plants. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Identification of Diptera

Dear Leonardorejorge, I'm unable to identify all families in Diptera but it seems to be that your knowledge isn't better. The image File:Kelsterbach fg01.jpg shows a Bombyliidae - this family is easy to identify for all Dipterists and completely different from Syrphidae. Please do not change indentifications without having the experience. Thank you. --Dysmachus (talk) 19:58, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The image File:Picture 062 cropped.jpg doesn't show a robber fly (legs and antenna is quite different). --Dysmachus (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:1 - Hernyó 1.jpg

Hi Leonardorejorge,

Could this caterpillar be a Morpho peleides? Because I think this was the only representativ of the Morpho genus at that exhibition. DenesFeri (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, than. DenesFeri (talk) 13:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

This is a Caligo memnon larva File:Caligo memnon larve 001.JPG. There were also Caligo memnon butterflies as well. DenesFeri (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

And this is Morpho peleides File:Morpho peleides catepillar.jpg. My pictures look like Caligo memnon larva. No? DenesFeri (talk) 13:38, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

bugguide.net

Hi Leonardorejorge,

I uploaded some pictures on the bugguide.net, but they wasn't happy, because my bugs are not from North-America. They were so kind to identify some butterflies. Could you tell me a site which identify european bugs? Thanks. DenesFeri (talk) 15:07, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, thank you! Another thing; I don't have only butterflies, but also other insects, like odonata, brachycera and others. Probably the uk butterflies won't be happy if I upload others than butterflies. DenesFeri (talk) 15:28, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

Someone on buggide.net give me this site www.whatsthatbug.com . This site accept all the bugs. Whats your opinion about this site? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 07:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Caligo memnon 6.jpg

Hi, are you sure that the butterfly on the right side is Papilio nireus? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm just not sure. DenesFeri (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

OK, I will. Thanks. DenesFeri (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

christmas

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! DenesFeri (talk) 09:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Bombyliid ID

Hi. I hope you can help me with an ID. Is this fly a Bombylius? Are there other possibilities? Thank you. Gidip (talk) 21:56, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Do you know of any other Dipteran experts in Commons? Thank you. Gidip (talk) 12:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Easter

I wish you Happy Easter! DenesFeri (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with categorizing media files

Hi Leonardo, thanks for improving the categorization of some of the files in Category:Uploaded with Open Access Media Importer. With a smile, -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 13:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for all the nice images you make. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! Leonardo (talk) 14:52, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomoplagia dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Aphididae or Psocoptera?

Hello Leonardorejorge, thank you for categorising some photos of mine last week (File:Unidentified german insect 01.jpg, File:Unidentified german insect 02.jpg, File:Unidentified german insect 03.jpg, File:Unidentified german insect 04.jpg, File:Unidentified german insect 05.jpg), taken in january inside a flat in the city. I asked in german Wikipedia for identification just after the upload and was told, the photos showed some Psocoptera, but they were not able to say which ones. Do you think they could really be Psocoptera or are they rather Aphididae, as you meant first? --Biodehio (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello Biodehio, They do look a lot like aphids, but you are right, it could also be Psocoptera. I am not an actual specialist in any of the groups, so if you have a different categorization maybe it is better to either be conservative and keep them as unidentified insects, or follow the suggestion from the german wikipedia that might be checked by a higher number of people. Sorry for the mistake. Leonardo (talk) 13:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. As I'm not only no specialist, but don't know anything about these at all, I think I should better be "conservative" in this point. Even reading in wikipedia doesn't make me a specialist here, and I still don't know e.g. whether or not aphids should be eggs in january or adults or whether or not they are living in human buildings sometimes. I'll keep them as unidentified insects now, but if they will be categorized as Aphididae once more, I think I won't change it again. Unfortunately there ist no Category:Unidentified Paraneoptera or something like that. And the quality of the photos is too low to invest much time except for a deletion request. But as I don't know whether there are better images of the same species, perhaps it is difficult to get them deleted too. --Biodehio (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Reta final - Concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015

Bem vindo ao Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Natural

Olá Leonardorejorge,

Já estamos chegando à reta final do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015 - Patrimônio Natural!

Você ainda poderá submeter mais fotos até o dia 31 de maio e ampliar suas chances na premiação de até R$2.000,00!

Estamos premiando 2 categorias, categoria melhor foto onde premiaremos as 3 melhores fotos do concurso e a categoria melhores contribuições onde premiaremos os usuários que mandarem a maior quantidade de fotos úteis. Até o momento os 3 participantes que enviaram mais fotografias enviaram respectivamente 356, 297 e 93 fotografias.

Além da premiação em dinheiro, as melhores fotografias serão publicadas na edição de Agosto da revista impressa Fotografe Melhor da Editora Europa.

Agradecemos a sua participação desde já, obrigado pelas fotos enviadas, elas serão usadas em vários dos nossos projetos.

Para melhorar suas chances envie mais fotos para o concurso. acesse o site do concurso e submeta mais fotografias!

Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.

Em breve anunciaremos novidades sobre os vencedores e a exposição das melhores fotografias do concurso.

Atenciosamente,

Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2015

Grupo Wikimedia Brasileiro de Educação e Pesquisa, Rodrigo Padula (talk). message left by IlyaBot.

Convite

CONVITE - CONCURSO FOTOGRÁFICO Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 Patrimônio Histórico

Olá Leonardorejorge,

Obrigado por ter participado do concurso Wiki Loves Earth Brasil 2014/2015.

Ao longo destas duas edições contamos com a participação de quase 3.000 fotógrafos e recebemos ao todo mais de 20.000 imagens que estão sendo usadas para ilustrar artigos da Wikipédia e enriquecendo o nosso repositório de imagens aqui no Wikimedia Commons. Devido ao grande sucesso das duas edições do WLE, decidimos trazer para o Brasil o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo, que será realizado de 1 a 30 de setembro de 2015.

O Wiki Loves Monuments é organizado em vários países do mundo e é considerado desde 2011 pelo Livro dos Recordes como maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Estamos aqui para te convidar a fazer parte da historia e do maior concurso fotográfico já realizado!

Acesse o site do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015 - Patrimônio Histórico confira nossa lista de monumentos a serem fotografados e submeta suas imagens para concorrer a premiação de R$6.000 em dinheiro.

Contribua também divulgando para seus amigos, contatos e curtindo nossa página no Facebook e seguindo nossa conta no Twitter.

Atenciosamente,

Comitê organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2015

Grupo Wikimedia Brasileiro de Educação e Pesquisa, Rodrigo Padula (talk). 16:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil

Saudações. Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque, em outro ano, participou da competição fotográfica Wiki Loves Monuments. Escrevo em nome do grupo organizador do Wiki Loves Monuments deste ano para convidá-lo/convidá-la a participar de novo!

O Wiki Loves Monuments é o maior concurso fotográfico do mundo. Permite ampliar o conhecimento global sobre o Brasil, mostrando a riqueza cultural e histórica do país. Neste ano, ampliamos enormemente as listas de monumentos a serem registrados e isso ajuda na difusão da diversidade brasileira.

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 - Brasil e ganhe prêmios! Serão premiadas as melhores fotografias e também aqueles e aquelas que mais contribuirem com registros fotográficos diversos do patrimônio cultural e histórico brasileiro. Leia as instruções com cuidado!

De novo, obrigado por participar do Wiki Loves Monuments e melhorar o conhecimento livre disponível na internet! Se tiver dúvidas, não hesite em entrar em contato!—Teles «Talk to me ˱_{C L @ S}˲»21:59, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Participe do Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil 2022!

Olá! O maior concurso fotográfico do mundo está de volta! Que tal participar mais uma vez (ou pela primeira vez!) do Wiki Loves Monuments? A etapa nacional da competição, que este ano está com novidades na faixa de premiação, ocorrerá de 01 a 30 de setembro.

Este ano, teremos novamente três categorias de premiação e um aumento na faixa de prêmios:

• Melhores Imagens, com prêmios de até R$2.500
• Maiores Contribuidores(as), com prêmios de R$200
• Melhor Imagem do Estado do Espírito Santo, com prêmio de R$2.500

Ficou animado(a)? Acesse aqui os mais de 15 mil monumentos listados para a competição deste ano! Fotografe-os e publique suas imagens no Wikimedia Commons durante o mês de setembro.

Ano passado o Brasil ficou em primeiro lugar na etapa internacional do Wiki Loves Monuments com a foto do Real Gabinete Português de Leitura, no Rio de Janeiro, tirada pelo fotógrafo lituano Donatas Dabravolskas. É a nossa chance de repetir este feito!

Para mais informações, confira a página do concurso!

Abraços, --EPorto (WMB) (discussão) 22:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Você recebeu esta mensagem pois já participou do Wiki Loves Monuments ou do Wiki Loves Earth anteriormente. Caso não queira mais receber essas comunicações, deixe uma mensagem em minha página de discussão ou envie um e-mail para eder.portowmnobrasil.org.