User talk:Art-top/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:GeorgLindemann.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:GeorgLindemann.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kam Solusar 03:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Priorat palace 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Although rather small, this is good enough for QI. But where is the Exif file? -- MJJR 20:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC) Some crop, rotation (about 1°) and save without EXIF sorry for bad english :( --Art-top 05:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ptichnick.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The lighting is a little bit unfortunate: the picture could be better if taken on another (probably earlier) moment of the day. Nevertheless even now acceptable quality. -- MJJR 16:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Niobium picture

Hi,

your [1] picture is very nice. [2] Is it possible to buy some other crystals from you ? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

That's a pity. Are you an element collector ? I'm stll searching a producer for this nice material. You can look for my collection here: [3], please click inside in the photo ! Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:20, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm not element collector, I have other hobby :) Your collection very nice for me! But I may propose you only photos of niobium... --Art-top (talk) 19:56, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Who people have this photographed Niobium sample ? Can I buy it ??? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

PD-World Wind

Please do not nominate images of NASA World Wind for speedy deletion because no source has been given. The template PD-WorldWind tells all about the copyrightstatus and source, namely that it is taken from the NASA-program World Wind of which all images are placed in the public domain. --Hardscarf (talk) 10:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Master Yoda.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Master Yoda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--A.J. (talk) 13:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

File:Trinity Blood2.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Trinity Blood2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--AnimeFan (talk) 03:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Art-top!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 07:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Scaned by Art-top

Hallo, I think, the correct orthography is scanned. See. Please check it. --R. Engelhardt (talk) 00:08, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Signal Tower of Gatchina Palace. Winter, 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments interesting view, could be a bit crisper --Mbdortmund 18:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Иллюстрации к описанию видовых особенностей строения члена у различных животных

Сударь, да вы членоненавистник. В интернете, конечно нет такой ерунды, как страница с заявлением об отказе от авторских прав на эти фото Поповым. Ничего не могу сделать. Но фото нужные. --UeArtemis (talk) 22:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Заявление про "членоненавистника" принимаю за шутку :) На самом деле, мне всё равно, что изображено на этих фотографиях, если они нарушают правила. --Art-top (talk) 22:09, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Superseded images policy

Please read the policy, images needed for attribution should not be deleted. I have put in an undeletion request for File:Gymnastics (aerobic) pictogram.png, and removed the duplicate tag from File:Ufibeamup2.png.--Svgalbertian (talk) 07:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

A PNG cannot be a "duplicate" of an SVG within the Wikimedia commons meaning of the "duplicate" template

AnonMoos (talk) 13:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Your Niobium image

Hello, do you saw this: your niobium image and here? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Error

Can you tell me what was my mistake?, I chose the wrong license? JGabriel ar (talk) 16:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Album covers are copyrighted of their authors and owners (musicians, designers, distributors, etc.). Can you provide evidence of dissemination of the content under a free license? --Art-top (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Жемчужина тихвин.jpg

Hello, I write you about the file above, In the original file is said that it was released by the author into the public domain, so I supposed that Life-art, the uploader was the author or had the information about its rights. That's the reason why I succesfully transferred the file by the CommonsHelper, so it may be an error also in the original file. Please, notice me in you finally delete it. Thanks for cooperation.--Bagratun (talk) 11:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Dynamo Kyiv logo.jpg, ...

Привет, Не понимаю почему не могут эти файлы с логотипами клубов на вики. Они же есть и в английской и украинской вики. Кроме того, в категории Category:Association football logos of Ukraine уже были файлы с такими же лицензиями. Если что-то не так, прошу подсказать, что надо переделать. Bogic (talk) 23:20, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Привет. Все логотипы (за малым исключением) защищены авторским правом. На Викисклад можно загружать только свободные изображения - собственные фотографии, старые фотографии, некоторые другие типы файлов, но логотипы нельзя точно. Их можно загружать в языковые разделы Википедии (англ-вики, укр-вики, ру-вики и пр.), оформляя согласно правилам конкретного раздела, поскольку они могут отличаться. Логотипы футбольных клубов не подходят ни под одно определение {{PD-UA}}, это ведь не государственные символы. Если на Викискладе и есть другие логотипы, то значит их пока просто не заметили и не удалили. --Art-top (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


File:Gulag.jpg

3gpacBbime,

Where is the problem with the Gulag map ? Why am I a bad author ? (I draw this map with Photoshop, since many other russian maps - it's a synthesis). Why are bad the researches of the team of the "Memorial" foudation ? Do you think they are wrong about the camps & the deportation ? I can re-draw my work with another name & reintroduce, if you prefer. I'm expecting your opinion,--Mitica-Misha (talk) 17:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi,
  • If you are the author of this map, please explain:
    • why your map has the following inscription:
  1. "Russian in China, № 17" ("Русские в Китае № 17") - what is it? number of the issue? - Yes
  2. "Reason for implementation: Journal 'Map', Ryazan Memorial, Memorial Ekaterinburg, 127051, Moscow, Maly coach lane, 12" ("Основание для выполнения: Журнал "Карта" Рязанский мемориал, Екатеринбургский мемориал 127051, Москва, Малый каретный переулок, д. 12") - why the address of the organization? What is this reason? - Because they are one of my sources.
  3. "Project Leader: J.Z. Raczynski, A.B. Roginsky, V.A. Krahotin, A.Yu. Daniel, N.G. Okhotin, E.B. Zhemkova, N.B. Mirza" ("Руководитель проекта: Я. З. Рачинский, А. Б. Рогинский, В. А. Крахотин, А. Ю. Даниель, Н. Г. Охотин, Е. Б. Жемкова, Н. Б. Мирза") - the leaders of the project? Project Wikipedia? - No: the project to realise a compilation of the camps & their geographic repartition, if my sources are right : you can verify this easier as me, if you live in Russia. If my sources are wrong, I can modify the original map.
    • Why are some inscriptions in Russian, part English? - My idea, for russians and others people.
    • Why use the logo of the site "The victims of political terror in the USSR" ("Жертвы политического террора в СССР")? - Because they work around this question, & realise some maps of the Gulag.
    • Why did the author maps indicated Spiridon MANOLIU, not you? - Миша/Mitica is one of my students, and you can contact me on cepleanu@orange.fr for more explanations and i can send to you my original map. See you later, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 19:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gatchina. Pavilion Venery 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Jebulon 22:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amphitheatre in Gatchina 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Some CA, acceptable. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Мост в Гатчинском парке около Холодной ванны.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Jovianeye 15:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Russli kiss serbka

Извините, но точный адрес к этому файлу я потерял, но точно знаю, что автор умер более 100 лет назад.--Дмитрий Федюкин (talk) 16:16, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Template:User reviewer

I would like to suggest that simple templates like these that require only one line of translation should be kept with the format that it had before. Creating many individual subpages for each is less convenient in my opinion. --ZooFari 06:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

  • I have several reasons for using such a scheme.
  1. It is convenient for the user who is used to press the button
  2. I use a template that offers translation, if translation is not (it can only be used for autotranslation templates). This is very helpful. Only for 14 and 15 May has appeared more than 10 translations of different templates, using my scheme, created by different users except me (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). See how templates look like, without translation, you can look at my page with the included rarely translated language.
English: It’t easy to press a button to create, but not to edit or view.
Esperanto: Estas facile premi butonon por kreo, sed ne por redakto aŭ rigardo.
Русский: Нажимать кнопку для создания легко, а вот для изменения и просмотра — трудно.
В Template:User win/en написано «This user contributes using Microsoft Windows.», а в Template:User win/ru — другое: «Этот участник использует Microsoft Windows.» Если бы всё было на одной странице, было бы легко сравнить.
--AVRS (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
С одной стороны, да, сравнивать труднее, хотя описание шаблона на английском языке можно поместить и на страницу документации. Но с другой стороны до моего "вмешательства" у шаблона вообще не было переводов, что для многоязычного проекта не очень хорошо.
Как вариант могу предложить подождать некоторое время (месяц, два) для появления приличного количества переводов, а потом вернуть простые шаблоны к одностраничному варианту. Переводы начали появляться постоянно, с момента, когда я писал сообщение ZooFari, появилось ещё три перевода.
По поводу формулировки: сравните w:ru:Участник:Box/Пользователь Windows и w:en:User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User MS Windows, связанные между собой интервиками, или, например, w:ru:Участник:Box/Пользователь Linux и w:en:Template:User Linux. Я пробовал переформулировать, но другие конструкции на русском мне показались громоздкими, а данный перевод выражает суть, практически не искажая смысла и оставаясь при этом компактным. --Art-top (talk) 19:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
I have requested opinions at the Commons:Village pump. Sorry we don't speak the same language. --ZooFari 04:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pitsunda beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. Difficult crop below, but good. I hope we should have now a QI of a landscape from Abkhazia, we don't have so much !--Jebulon 21:35, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

File:HubSL.ru.png

Hi, please don't tag files with 'no source' or 'no permission' if {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Jcb (talk) 21:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Иллюстрация

[4] - если не ошибаюсь, её загружал из русского раздела я. Тогда мне показалось, что фото фотографии сделанной до войны неходится в ОД. Если она действительно нарушала АП, как её восстановить для внесения на основании КДИ в РуВП?--Cemenarist (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

  • 1) Вы перефотографировали чужую фотографию и указали собственное авторство. Перефотографирование/сканирование чужих изображений не создаёт нового авторского права, т. е. необходимо было указать автора оригинальной фотографии. 2) Анонимные фотографии до 1940 года находятся в ОД. Поэтому необходимо привести источник, доказывающий, что автор фотографии неизвестен. 3) В РуВики фотографии умерших персон допустимы согласно КДИ, однако КДИ требует указание авторства.
  • Процедуру восстановления фотографии на Викискладе не знаю, однако, если Вы готовы решить вопрос с авторством фотографии, то можно обратиться к русскоговорящему администратору Викисклада, например, к Rubin16 или Butko (если Вы владеете английским языком - то к любому). --Art-top (talk) 03:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Собственного авторства я не указывал, была автоматическая вставка того, что я перенёс его на склад. С остальным согласен. --Cemenarist (talk) 04:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Hayat-02.JPG

We had similar discussion in July 2006. That's the reason for the mentioned sentence: > Thomas Falk (Uzbekistan) wrote on August 11, 2006: „Ich, Thomas Falk, habe am 26. Juni 2006 alle Rechte (Copyright) an diesem Foto Hayat-02.jpg an Sigismund von Dobschütz abgetreten.“ < --Seeteufel (talk) 16:52, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Могила адмирала.jpeg

Уважаемый Art-top! Вы выразили сомнение в авторстве этой фотографии. Каким способом я ещё могу подтвердить своё авторство? Поиску этой забытой могилы я посвятил полжизни. Если претензии к могильной плите, то так можно и пиджак запретить фотографировать. Не так ли? С уважением. mr. Анатолий (talk) 17:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Здравствуйте. Объясняю ситуацию. Если я выйду из-под своего логина, зарегистрируюсь как, например, User:И.В.Пашкевич, и загружу эту фотографию как свою собственную, это будет правильно? Нет. Мы все здесь анонимны, можем зарегистрироваться под любыми никами и спокойно можно загружать только фотографии, которые ещё нигде не публиковались. Если фотография была опубликована ранее, то необходимо подтвердить, что именно Вы являетесь её автором и подтверждаете указанную в описании свободную лицензию. Для таких случаев и существует служба OTRS, на которую Вам уже указывали на форуме. Как обратиться в службу и какого рода разрешение требуется, на русском языке можно почитать здесь: ru:Википедия:Получение разрешений. --Art-top (talk) 17:44, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Template:User since

i have revert you, there was a problem.--Lilyu (talk) 05:25, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it works perfectly fine stating 10 years and 8 months for everyone using it (joke : while Commons exist only since 2004), and you don't even notice it --Lilyu (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I revert back template. Please, give me links to broken use of this template. On this pages (for example) it works: User:Art-top, User:Steschke, User:Irate, User:Ikiwaner, User:~Pyb. --Art-top (talk) 05:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Template:technique/ru

Hi, I am planning to deploy a new version of template:Technique that should make translations easier. I think it would make sense to merge {{Technique/ru/list}} and {{Technique/ru/list/gender}} I have tested it with some words the first words of {{Technique/sandbox/ru}}. Is that okay ?--Zolo (talk) 16:16, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

{{Rotate/ru}}

Спасибо за исправление опечаток! Юкатан (talk) 20:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-03-06 Башня Большого Гатчинского дворца.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice image composition! Good Quality. --NorbertNagel 21:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-03-06 Бастион ограждения площади Большого Гатчинского дворца.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 04:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Priorat palace 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Гатчина. Табличка на кресте, установленном на месте Харлампиева монастыря.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Interesting. --Jkadavoor 10:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality images candidates

Please see this discussion again. Uncertain situation. --Art-top (talk) 08:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello Art-top. Like Jebulon and Lmbuga I prefere the new crop. Please, replace the old image with a new one, and I think, it will promoted. I would vote for you. --Moonik (talk) 08:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
I followed your advice, thank you very much. --Art-top (talk) 10:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-07-15 Парк Сильвия. Гатчина (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 06:44, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-04-05 Гатчина. Чесменский обелиск (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:11, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

New Template

Hello Артём Игоревич Топчий.

I've I create a new template, is Google Chrome. Please, Can you repair this template, to become the template such as Flickr and others. Good luck in your life. Best Regards. --MyCanon (talk) 03:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your service. I wish you success in your life. Best Regards. --MyCanon (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Not at all :) --Art-top (talk) 04:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Проблемы с копирайтом

Почему вы думаете, что те фото, которые я добавлял-не мои? И на что надо изменить лицензию? --Valerikpunk 22:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Перефотографирование/сканирование чужих двумерных произведений (обложек, постеров и т. п.) не порождает нового авторского права. Публикация таких изображений возможна только с разрешения их настоящего автора. Исключения делаются только для совсем тривиальных изображений (например, обложек, содержащих только название книги, лицензия {{PD-ineligible}}, {{PD-text}}) или если их автор (художник) умер более 70 лет назад ({{PD-old}}, {{PD-art}}). Если есть желание уточнить нюансы, можно обратиться на местный форум: Commons:Форум. --Art-top (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-08 Гатчина, памятник Павлу I (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 08:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-17 Гатчина. Карпин мост (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 18:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Гатчина. Карпин мост - 2011.09.04 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 15:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Новый Свет (Крым). Вид на посёлок, бухту и гору Сокол.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 07:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-05 Светильник.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 16:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-15 Гатчина. Карпин мост (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, QI for me --Moroder 17:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-19 Гатчина. Коннетабль.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs maybe a crop below (to avoid the shadow on the ground), but still very good with a good light, sharpness and exposure.--Jebulon 16:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 Comment I remove the shadow in Photoshop and some crop image. --Art-top 17:27, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-03 Памятник Павлу I в Гатчине (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 10:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Art-top/Info

Привет, Артём! А можно ли этот шаблон как-нибудь так изменить, чтобы не засорялась категория 2012 in Russia, так как все файлы попадают, как я понял, и в Category:2012 in Gatchina, которая, в свою очередь, является её логической подкатегорией. - A.Savin 20:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Добрый день! Убрать-то недолго, но ситуация не совсем такая, как ты пишешь. Фотографии помещаются в категории "<Месяц> <год> in Russia" и "<год> in Gatchina". Если бы существовали категории "<Месяц> <год> in Gatchina", подобное дублирование было бы однозначно лишним, но таких категорий не существует (для России подобное видел только для Москвы, для нашего маленького городка создавать временнЫе категории по месяцу-году, наверное, излишне), фотографии будут некатегоризированы по месяцу. Конечно, ничего страшного, хотя я стараюсь максимально категоризировать свои файлы. --Art-top (talk) 02:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Я это в связи с файлом 2012-05-03 Памятник Павлу I в Гатчине (1).jpg затронул, который вчера почему-то был в "2012 in Gatchina" и "2012 in Russia" (без месяца). Так, как сейчас, в порядке. - A.Savin 08:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
А, понятно! Категория "May 2012 in Russia" была создана позже загрузки файла, движок коммонз просто не успел обновить категорию на основании расчётов User:Art-top/Info. По логике такая ситуация всё равно не должна возникать, я поправлю свой шаблон. --Art-top (talk) 14:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

File talk:Hasselblad H3D 31.jpg

I opened a discussion on a missing evidence of permission warning added by you at File talk:Hasselblad H3D 31.jpg#Missing evidence of permission warning. You may want to participate the discussion. ––Apalsola t • c 17:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-05-31 Большой Гатчинский дворец. Мемориальная доска.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Bgag 16:45, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Renames and redirects

Regarding File:DSC06016.jpg and other similar files, when a file is moved (renamed) a redirect is left behind so that anyone looking for the file, under the old name, can still find it. Those files have been here for many years under the old name and may be referenced in page historys or offsite links. Please leave the redirects as they were, thanks :-). --Tony Wills (talk) 11:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-08 Одуванчик лекарственный.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good oduvanchik. --Florstein 16:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token a7b96bc64023d74d4e31f617e6173863

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-08 Гатчина, памятник Павлу I (6) (cut).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2008-04-05 Гатчина. Руины Лесной оранжереи.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-04-25 Кряква в Гатчинском парке (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Nomination at COM:FPC

Hi Art-top,

I took the liberty of nominating one of your photo as featured picture. -- Slaunger (talk) 18:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Best wishes from Denmark,

--Slaunger (talk) 18:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-06-21 Гатчинский Павловский собор.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

???

Hi again Art-top; IT IS VERY SERIOUSLY FOR YOU

IT IS FOR A DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH OF AN UNIVERSITY SERIOUSLY WE ARE AN UNIVERSITY; IF YOU DELETE THIS IMAGE I GO FOR YOU WITH RESPONSE, OK? so YOU LET KNOW IT, IN PEACE AND QUICK IT IS EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE FILE:IMAGE ; UNLESS YOU DONT LET it IN THE POLICE COURT

Yes Sorry! precisely there are ART-magazines I have them, that it´s my manage; sorries but it´s all educational, before you delete it take please advise on LAWYER eh! paying! I am waisting time on it and I am getting tired of you yet.

You let it know , please!!! sorry what´s joke of you mind insulting me, Thx you art-top!!!, for User talk:Skapheandros

TXs — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.230.223.227 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 23 June 2012‎ (UTC)

COM:SCOPE

YOUR RESPONSE of any Legal threats, for invention of intimidatory, File:Ciberalgoritmo.jpg

Hi again Art-top;

IT IS A DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH OF AN UNIVERSITY SO IT IS SERIOUSLY; IF YOU DELETE THIS IMAGE:FILE I GO FOR YOU IN RESPONSE, OK? so YOU LET KNOW IT, YOU GET IN PEACE AND QUICK WITH ME CAUSE IT IS EDUCATIONAL OBJETIVE AND INTENTION FILES:IMAGES ; UNLESS YOU DONT LET it KNOW YOU CAN BE DEMANDED IN THE POLICE COURT, BECAUSE IT IS ENOUGHT, IT IS LIKE A JOKE.

again: Sorry! there are ART-MAGAZINES for these educational files objetive-intention precisely, we have them here for editing all so receive all my apologize that it can be cause you while I can not understand the reasonable questionament. I can say they are all educational, they are find here before you delete them , it must be take in cares to advise you on a LAWYER eh! paying! I am waisting time on it and I am getting tired of you yet.

You must let know it , please!!! sorry what´s joke of your mind!!

Note your anonymous message of legal threats for nominating is without any grounds or seriousness.It´s not happening anything for what I see an invention of intimidatory of all your mind.

images labeled with

Español: userpageimage

are in COM:SCOPE --Skapheandros (talk) 14:50, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Thx you, art-top, for User talk:Skapheandros Título del enlace

sobre la buena corrección / over good correction

Muy amable gracias por su consejo.Estuve mirando los temas de ayuda de nuevo. Recibo un ataque masivo hace algun tiempo,sobre la importancia de las imágenes aunque en Wiki commons aun bien podría ser que también lo haya percibido .Parece que aunque el inglés no es una barrera de comunicación, tampoco es que sea mi lengua materna, tampoco llega a ser la que utilizo al escribir, pero es comprensible en mi caso.En cualquier caso espero que se comprenda que la incursión es ajena y masiva, y que quite el bloqueo de borrado finalmente si no habrá que pedir otro; No estoy enfadado con nadie aun crea dar esa impresión.Por favor revisar en Skapheandros (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Gracias por todo una vez más.

Thank you very much for your advise.I was seeing help topics again.I get a massive attack long time ago over the importance of images in Wiki Commons even though it could be that also it has been received by anonymous identity.It seems that although English is not a communication barrier, if it's not my native language, not comes to be the one used for writing, but understandable in my case seems to be the same or perhaps well seemed. Anyway I hope you understand that the incursion is alienating and massive, and finally remove the block but here will be to ask another, I'm not even angry with anyone for any posible impression.Please a new

check in Skapheandros (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Thanks for everything again.

  • Once again urge not to write here. I do not delete files. Contact the administrators. Speak out on the pages of the discussion of specific files. Do not delete messages from talk pages - is prohibited by the rules. --Art-top (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Question about the DRs of unused, private files

Hello Art-top, my question is about the DRs as this that you opened. ¿Is necesary to open a DR for these kind of files or should be deleted through {{Speedy}}? Because I tag these kind of files with {{Speedy}} ¿is these correct? Thanks for clearing my doubts. Amitie 10g (talk) 00:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I have {{User:Amitie 10g/Templates/Promotional}} that is based in {{Speedy}}, to be applied on files used in promotional articles tagged for Speedy deletion at Wikipedia, so I think than the files used must be deleted through Speedy, too. This is my preffered way and is only a suggestion; I'll ask in the Village pump. Amitie 10g (talk) 22:50, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Deleted (& soon 2B deleted?) files

Hi, Art-top. Regarding the two Jane-Speed related files, esp. "WHO-DUN-IT." The author, a frequent EQMM contributor btw 1963 & 1980, is my mother, deceased as of 3/5/1991. So I'm not exactly sure what u require in the way of authorization, or how I could secure it, but whatever it is, please let me know. The LAST thing I wish 2 do is cause any legal difficulties for the valuable institution that is Wikipedia. As 4 the already deleted "Jane Speed Anthologized" file, which, of course, is not an image of her work, but merely the cover of a long out-of-print EQMM anthology including one of those works, on which her name is prominently displayed, I must again ask your advice. If there's anything I can do 2 make this 'kosher' (e.g. contact EQMM, perhaps, & secure the appropriate authorization), please instruct me. Thanks in advance --DavidESpeed (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Unfortunately, I speak bad English. I understand that you are the copyright owner of downloaded files. I'll take warning from these two files. But, in order to avoid similar problems in the future, would recommend that you finally clarify the situation here: Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Art-top (talk) 18:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Администратор?

Заметил, сколько усилий Вы приглашаете по патрулированию свежих загрузок... Думаю, что статус администратора только бы помог в этом деле и Вам и проекту. Как Вы относитесь к тому, чтобы быть номинированным в администраторы? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

  • EugeneZelenko, спасибо за поддержку. Возможно, я принес бы пользу проекту в этом качестве, в ру-вики, когда был администратором, как раз занимался в основном изображениями. Останавливает знание английского языка (имею небольшой словарный запас и помощь GoogleTranslate) и, отсюда, не совсем полное понимание правил (точнее их нюансов), поскольку в основном они имеют англоязычное описание. Т. е. задействовать инструментарий администратора смог бы только в явных случаях (копивио, явно не тривиальные логотипы, неиспользуемые частные фотографии). --Art-top (talk) 19:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Думаю, что даже с явными случаями помощь была бы существенной. Если есть сомнения, можно создавать запросы на удаление, которые будут обрабатываться более знающими участниками. Хотя английский бы очень не помешал, так как вопросы задаются нередко. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Обдумал ситуацию, решил пока не номинироваться. Но если всё-таки решусь, могу я расчитывать на Вашу помощь при номинации? --Art-top (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
Непременно! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

re: Wikimedia Commons page User talk:Tdreyer has been changed by Art-top

Art-top -- You have just marked a number of images that I have posted to Wikipedia pages as subject to deletion. These are all images that I own the rights to and have granted permission for use or are in the public domain. I thought I had followed the correct procedure and don't understand why all this work is suddenly being tagged. Would you please tell me the best way to handle this and how long I have to get it done? Thanks. -Tdreyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tdreyer (talk • contribs)

Thanks. But, if I own the image -- or it is legitimate public domain -- what is the best way for me to establish permission? Thanks -- Tdreyer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.16.142 (talk • contribs)

Art-top -- Thanks for your help on this, but I have been on a major deadline today and haven't had time to provide the documentation yet. But I just discovered that -- despite the fact that I was only notified about this problem yesterday -- the File:Narum SC lbj cover.jpg image has been removed. I was the publisher of Space City! and own the image, and there is no copyright violation there. Will I be able to put it back up after I send in the documentaion? And are items normally removed that quickly? I'll try to deal with all the images tonight or tomorrow. Tdreyer

Art-top -- Emails have been sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with copyright information for all the images you have listed above, including the one that has been deleted. Again, thanks for your assistance. Tdreyer 17 July 2012

File:Imm Graduate School of marketing Logo.jpg

Hi Art-top,

I've posted the original IMM logo to the relevant wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMM_Graduate_School_of_Marketing Please explain why you have marked the logo for deletion. I do not understand why you have market it for deletion though I am sure that you have good reason to have done so. I would like to avoid such situations in future. You will have noticed that I added two new images I have taken this afternoon to the gallery section of that article - should you think that the logo should go please replace it with one of those.

Another question: In the article I wrote about Antionette Pienaar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antoinette_Pienaar, there were two images donated by her for use on Wikipedia. These were deleted but I don't understand why.

Kind regards,

Bertus Bertus Esterhuysen (talk) 15:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

  • On Commons can be free to upload only their own work. On other people's work you must have permission of the real author/copyrightholder. Permission can be sent through the service COM:OTRS. As for the logo, I felt that he was not trivial, that is, has the wrong license. Maybe I'm wrong. Voice your opinion on the page of nomination. --Art-top (talk) 15:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Прошу помочь советом

Здравствуйте, Артем! По поводу файлов, выставленных (Art-top (talk) 13:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC) на удаление, - не посоветуете ли как быть:

  • File:Экслибрис Иосифа Бродского.jpg - отсканирован с экслибриса отпечатанного в начале 90-х для Бродского в Венеции. Он был уже опубликован мною в "Независимой"
  • File:Проект колористического паспорта 1997 г..JPG - мой рисунок из статьи, опубликованной в 1997 г. в журнале " Приборы и системы управления"
  • File:Сборник стихотворений "Земли открытое окно".jpg - макет переплета разработан моим сыном (указано в выходных данных)
    • File:Введение в программирование.jpeg.jpg
    • File:Программирование в содержательных обозначениях.jpeg.jpg
    • File:Алгол.jpeg.jpg
    • File:Журнал Агрохимия №1.jpg
    • File:Cover A.Brudno.JPG - это все очень простенькие переплеты, конечно, не имеющие художественной ценности, но интересные

(за давностью лет!) с исторической точки зрения.

Я попробовал внести понятные мне правки в описания. Посмотрите, пожалуйста.

Не может ли помочь ГК РФ:

"Статья 1274. Свободное использование произведения в информационных, научных, учебных или культурных целях

1. Допускается без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения, но с обязательным указанием имени автора, произведение которого используется, и источника заимствования: 1) цитирование в оригинале и в переводе в научных, полемических, критических или информационных целях правомерно обнародованных произведений в объеме, оправданном целью цитирования, включая воспроизведение отрывков из газетных и журнальных статей в форме обзоров печати; 2) использование правомерно обнародованных произведений и отрывков из них в качестве иллюстраций в изданиях, радио- и телепередачах, звуко- и видеозаписях учебного характера в объеме, оправданном поставленной целью и т.д."

С уважением Висарик 08:17, 20 июля 2012 (UTC)

Попробую ответить.
  • Спасибо за быстрый ответ и доброжелательные советыВисарик

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-12 Гатчина. Покровский собор.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI now Poco a poco 20:07, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Посоветуйте что делать

Доброго времени суток! Мне пришло от Вас уведомление о возможном удалении моих фото-файлов. Подвергаются сомнению авторские права. Но это фотографии моих отца и прадеда (с их изображениями) принадлежащие к архиву моей семьи, хранителем которого я являюсь. Что требуется добавить в описание файла, чтобы сохранить фотографии? С уважением,, --Бачурина Ирина 12:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arinin den (talk • contribs)

--Бачурина Ирина 13:03, 22 July 2012 (UTC) Простите за непонятливость - я новичок в проекте! Мне следует изложить все то, что я Вам здесь написала в письме по адресу - permissions-commons@wikimedia.org? Не совсем понимаю как воспользоваться шаблоном.. Arinin den — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arinin den (talk • contribs)

Не совсем. Со страницы ru:ВП:ДОБРО (из раздела «Шаблонные разрешения») следует взять текст письма, подставить в него ссылки на нужные файлы, указать имя и дату. После чего отправить на указанный адрес электронной почты: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (или может быть лучше сразу на русскоязычный: permissions-ru@wikimedia.org). Если что-то будет не так, Вам объяснят, но, скорее всего, всё будет нормально. На загруженные Вами файлы я проставлю специальные шаблоны, чтобы они не были преждевременно удалены. --Art-top (talk) 13:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Подписывайтесь, пожалуйста, на страницах обсуждения. Для этого надо либо нажать изображение карандаша над окном редактирования текста, либо вручную вписать после Вашего сообщения конструкцию --~~~~. --Art-top (talk) 13:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Большое спасибо за разъяснения и подсказки! Письмо по образцу со ссылками отправила. Кроме репродукции папиной картины (файл - http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%22%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5%22.jpg) Тут не знаю как поступить.. ну если что удаляйте. Это просто скан из каталога. Ещё раз - спасибо за содействие! User:Arinin den

Если Вы являетесь владельцем авторских прав на картину Вашего отца, то разрешение можно отправить и на репродукцию. Простое сканирование/перефотографирование или другое воспроизведение двумерной работы не порождает нового авторского права, поэтому если Вы владелец авторских прав на картину - Вы же владелец авторских прав и на репродукцию. --Art-top (talk) 14:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Нет, авторские права принадлежат отцу, но он не против публикации репродукции. Если это сложно оформить, то можно удалить эту картинку и оставить только ссылку на его сайт. User:Arinin den

Если он не против - то схема та же самая - разрешение от него через OTRS. Только смотрите, все лицензии Викисклада подразумевают также разрешение на изготовление производных работ и использование в коммерческих целях. Если против - то изображение без разрешения и так будет удалено, только через достаточно длительный срок, примерно через месяц. Можно это ускорить, при желании. --Art-top (talk) 18:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Спасибо! Я обговорю это с отцом. А в случае с кадром из фильма 1924 (авторские права не установлены) мне надо действовать по той же схеме? User:Arinin den

Мне кажется, если автор неизвестен, достаточно правильно описать файл. В графе автор поставить "неизвестен", в графе источник указать, откуда взята киноплёнка, в графе дата, соответственно, 1924 год. Лицензия в таком случае будет {{PD-old}}. --Art-top (talk) 18:44, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Не баньте меня, плиз!!!

Приветствую!!

Да, было дело. Жду по некоторым файлам разрешения. И кстати, имеется вопрос: если файлы (загруженные по неопытности еще тогда) прежде были удалены, но теперь на них имеется разрешение от правообладателя и otrs, но система их все равно не пропускает как ранее удаленные. Как быть в этой ситуации??

И еще один вопрос касается фото из личного архива, которые были предоставлены человеком непосредственно из рук в руки в бумажном или отсканированном виде и размещены на викимедии с его устного согласия, естественно. Пример таковых: File:Fedor_Bondarchuk_child.jpg, File:Stalingrad_Ozerov.jpg

Каким образом нужно подтвердить это разрешение? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekaterina Rybakova (talk • contribs)

  • Здравствуйте, Ekaterina. Просто так Вас банить никто не будет, только при продолжении заливки явно чужих работ без разрешения реальных правообладателей. В описании тех файлов, которые ожидают разрешения, поставьте, пожалуйста, в графе "permission" текст {{subst:OP}}, это убережет их от быстрого удаления. По поводу удаленных файлов - обратитесь к любому русскоговорящему администратору, например, к EugeneZelenko (с которым Вы уже начали диалог) с просьбой восстановить файлы, поскольку на них уже получено разрешение. Насчет устного разрешения на использование файлов от правообладателя - это, к сожалению, не пойдет. Ему нужно отправить разрешение в OTRS. Если у него нет интернета, то слышал, что можно получить письменное разрешение, отсканировать/перефотографировать его и также отправить в OTRS. Честно говоря, с таким не сталкивался и для контроля могу предложить обратиться на форум по авторскому праву в русскоязычном разделе Википедии: ru:Википедия:Форум/Авторское право, либо сюда: ru:Википедия:Запросы, связанные с OTRS, либо на местный русскоязычный форум Commons:Форум. --Art-top (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Подписывайтесь, пожалуйста. Для этого надо нажать на картинку с "подписывающим карандашом" над экраном редактирования текста или вручную добавить после текста конструкцию --~~~~. --Art-top (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Разрешения

Приветствую, коллега. От вас поступило сообщения на СО, что файл File:Sc-mus.jpg, автором которого являюсь я сам, требует дополнительного разрешения через почту. Однако, в ru:ВП:Добро говорится, что никаких дополнительных разрешений не нужно, если фото ранее не публиковалось. Уточните, пожалуйста. --Укко 10:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

  • День добрый. Вопрос - Dmitry Grishin это Вы или нет? --Art-top (talk) 10:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
    Так точно. Как попроще это показать? Написать в поле автор "Dmitry Grishin aka User:Ukko"? --Укко 06:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
    Да, такой вариант пойдёт. Можно ещё указать фамилию/имя на личной странице. Или просто подписывать User:Ukko (только на уже загруженных файлах, где указаны фамилия/имя поправить на приведённый Вами вариант). Шаблон сейчас сниму. --Art-top (talk) 06:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
    Спасибо! --Укко 12:52, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-07-11 Гатчинский Павловский собор.jpg

Hi Art-Top, Noticed this stitch in your upload stream. Like the light and colors a lot. Noticed some geometric distortions on the right hand side. Maybe you want to address that (or I could have a go at stitching it in PTGui, I see you have uploaded the source images) Is the aspect ratio correct? The building looks quite flat to me. On the other hand I am not familiar with the architecture around these places, so maybe it is truthful representation of the subject. --Slaunger (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment! Perhaps you're right. This image from a similar angle looks more natural, but the camera angle was located farther. Unless it is difficult, mark the nomination as a Discuss, I'll try to rebuild the image of the evening. If not, then ask for help to you. --Art-top (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, I had not even noticed it was nominated at QIC. I will go comment there. --Slaunger (talk) 06:09, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
I thought the remark about the nomination :) --Art-top (talk) 06:47, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Лагатып кампаніі «Справаводства па-беларуску!».png

Я - автор этого изображения и загрузил его под свободной лицензией в вики. В чём проблема? Мне что, присылать подтверждения разрешения от самого себя? :) --Vasyl` Babych (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Насколько я понимаю из описания, это логотип организации. Кто его рисовал - абсолютно не важно, важно кто обладает авторскими правами на оригинальное изображение логотипа. В данном случае это с вероятностью 99,9% руководство компании «Справаводства па-беларуску!». Значит руководство должно подтвердить, что оно разрешает использование своего логотипа под указанной свободной лицензией. Разрешение нужно передать через службу OTRS (что это можно прочитать здесь (на русском языке): ru:ВП:OTRS, "шаблонное" разрешение можно найти тут: ru:ВП:ДОБРО). --Art-top (talk) 19:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Я обладаю авторскими правами на это изображение, так как я его создатель и авторских прав на него никому не передавал (кроме копилэфта в викихранилище, сдесь). Руководитель кампании "деловодство по-белорусски!" Игорь Случак не являеться собственником этого изображения, поэтому не вижу смысла в OTRS в данном случае. --Vasyl` Babych (talk) 19:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
    Прошу прощения за задержку с ответом. Допустим, я Вам верю и уберу шаблон, но никакой гарантии, что этот файл будет оставлен в покое, нет. На Викискладе ежедневно удаляются десятки (если не сотни) неправомерно загруженных логотипов, причём по умолчанию они подлежат быстрому удалению (т. е. через минимальное время после обнаружения). Я бы всё-таки порекомендовал Вам выслать разрешение через службу OTRS для исключения проблем с этим изображением в будущем. Разрешение через эту службу необходимо высылать на любую ранее опубликованную работу, в том числе и если загрузивший является её автором. Надеюсь на понимание. --Art-top (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Something wrong with deletion requests

There is something wrong with deletion requests. See Category:Deletion requests Июль 2012. --Foroa (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I know this, quietly corrected (there were about 100 files). This error is a utility VisualFileChange.js, has already been fixed by my request. --Art-top (talk) 09:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
This category also formed because of this error. --Art-top (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Great, thank you. With such a tool, errors are spreading quickly. --Foroa (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Art-top/Archive_1&oldid=75649277"