User talk:Юкатан

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright Image:HP template.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Peter17 11:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Metro_Mustakilliq_Maydoni.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

sk (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Герб Сдерота[edit]

Здравствуй Юкатан! Спасибо за более понятную версию герба города Сдерот! К сожалению, рисунок ни по каким параметрам не подразумевается в параграфе закона авторских прав 2007-ого года, говорящем, вообще, о фотографиях произведений исскуства, на которые действительны авторские права, на более генеральном фоне. Т.е., например, фотография журнала не будет свободно, но, когда этот-же журнал находится на фотографии ветрины с 50-ю журналами, то фотография может быть свободной. Пожалуйста, укажи правильные разрешения на файл (хотя, скорее всего он "фэйр юс", т.к. автор—муниципалитет Сдерота, или министерство внутренних дел). С уважением, Ynhockey (talk) 11:54, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуй, Ян. К сожалению, я не силён в лицензировании изображений. Когда я загрузил этот герб, мне исправили лицензию на эту (см. History). Поэтому я думал, что она правильная, и как попка нашлёпал на все остальные мною воспроизведённые гербы израильских городов. Если хочешь обсудить эту ситуацию подробнее, мой телефон: 052-4515127. Юкатан (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
В прочем, это не так срочно. Хотя закон подразумевает совсем другое, Дрор К. (тот, кто со всем этим начал) прав, что из самово текста закона, можно понять и то, что разрешается рисовать, фотографировать и копировать гербы городов, если они выставленны в публичном месте. То есть, можешь продолжать "как попка" употреблять эту лицензию :) -- Ynhockey (talk) 12:34, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Т. З.[edit]

Если честно, не уверен. Есть страны (например, США), где госуларственные работы впадают автоматически в общественное достояние. В Израиле, это не так, но для каждого произведения есть свои правило, и не понятно, когда оно в общественном достоянии, а когда нет. Пользователь Harel в еврейской Википедие может это знать, а пока можно закачать файл в саму Википедию под "Фэйр юс". -- Ynhockey (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ну, собс-на вот... Юкатан (talk) 18:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'm happy you added this COA and others. The one you uploaded is different than the one used on the Hebrew Wiki. Can you give me some more details on yours and on the one used on the Hebrew Wiki? as Bnei Brak does not have a webpage it's hard to find information on the internet. Thanks in advance. You can answer in Hebrew as well. --kippi70 (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

לא יודע, ראיתי פעם סמל כזה. הורדתי מאינטרנט ושחזרטי בפריהנד-9. ועכשיו לא יכול למצוא.--Юкатан (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Юкатан!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, забыл. Но теперь уже ✓ Done. Юкатан (talk) 12:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Диаграмма кольцевого солнечного затмения[edit]

Хорошая диаграмма, но второй конус тени (тот который меньше, вершиной в сторону от Земли), не должен быть закрашен темно-серым, если темно-серым отмечена зона полной тени. Sergei Gutnikov (talk) 21:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ОК, исправлю. Юкатан (talk) 09:19, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Юкатан (talk) 09:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Fountain_in_Athens01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iconoclast (talk) 17:16, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shrine of the Báb[edit]

File talk:Bahai Terraces.jpg -- 78.55.131.44 19:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

COA of Yeruham[edit]

Hi, could you create a better version of this COA? File:Yeruham COA.jpg let me know. Many thanks in advance! --kippi70 (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try on my freetime.Юкатан (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, i'll wait. Best Regards --kippi70 (talk) 10:32, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. Here. Юкатан (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Many thanks! רב תודות! Best Regards --kippi70 (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Pob_1side.JPG[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pob_1side.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pob_1side.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Rubin16 (talk) 15:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

COA of Ofakim[edit]

Hi, Many thanks for the new COA! Best Regards --kippi70 (talk) 20:28, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Юкатан (talk) 20:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gorskii_21369u.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely Artem Karimov (talk) 06:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Юкатан, please add the name of the sculptor and the date (year) of creation/installation of the sculpture to the description. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is your name Yucatan?[edit]

Is your name Yucatan? I can read Cyrillic, but I'm rubbish at Russian. I know Nyet (no) and that's it. JJhashisreasons (talk) 21:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not. I'm Юрий Катанов (read Cyrillic), and my nick in Latinic is "yukatan" (with "K"). And it's "Are you", not "Is you". Юкатан (talk) 22:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Prospect Pobedy Kazan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi there! I gather you're from Uzbekistan! That's awesome! Are you interested in contributing to the Uzbek Wikipedia? At least by adding your cool photos to appropriate articles? Look forward to hearing back from you. Nataev (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я не говорю по-узбекски, несмотря на то, что родом из Узбекистана. :):):) Поэтому вряд ли могу привнести ощутимый вклад в узбекоязычную Википедию. Но если Вы найдёте мои картинки и фотографии интересными для узбекской Вики, то я буду только рад. Извините, что не отвечаю Вам по-английски, но верю, что вы понимаете и по-русски. Удачи. Юкатан (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

по поводу статистики[edit]

МассаПланетСолнечнойСистемы

На этой вот картинке вы используете трёхмерную секторную диаграмму, хотя они все ужасно лживые. Здесь, например, видимая площадь сектора Юпитера несправедливо раздута. Прошу вас, поменяйте её на двухмерную диаграмму. А если вам лень, так я и сам могу.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Melikamp (talk • contribs)

А я вас прошу оставить картинку в покое. Пусть будет, какая есть. Юкатан (talk) 08:11, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
И подписывайтесь. Юкатан (talk) 08:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Оставлю, оставлю :) Я вас просто убедить хотел, что употребление трёхмерных диаграмм вредно для статистики в целом. Подумайте, зачем добавлять ненужное измерение, зачем наклонять, если это искажает воспринимаемую площадь? Площадь и так тяжело на глаз оценить. Melikamp (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Это субъективное суждение. Зависит от индивидуального восприятия. Юкатан (talk) 15:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aeroflot Tu-134A CCCP-65854 ZRH Jun 1977.png[edit]

Given that you modified the original image I uploaded twice (1, 2), it's basic courtesy to provide an explanation for each revert you made.--Jetstreamer (talk) 14:15, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question[edit]

Hello, Privet. May I ask something? Please do not mind my question. I guess you are a Russian Jew but yes or not it is not important. I just wonder that you use the fictional flag for the Union of Islamic Soviet Republics. This is a Commons file, of course, you are free to use it. I just wonder why you are interested especially in that flag (and the Baath Resistance flag)? In every case I wish you a nice day. Best regards --Roxanna (talk) 05:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Roxanna. There are no nations in project Wiki. There is only one nation - user of Wiki, that is my opinion. I have nothing against Islam, it's peasy religion. But I have a lots against the terrorism, how some people make enormous money on a death of citizens. Roxanna, I am graphics operator, and if you make a picture of flag (true or fictional it is not important) please make it already in SVG format. Юкатан (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. I am happy to see we agree. I am also against nationalism and terrorism, whether it come from underground groups or from goverments, states or nations. About graphics, honestly spoken, I do not like vector formats, but maybe the next flag I will create as png or gif file? Best regards --Roxanna (talk) 07:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Юкатан,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

хрусталик повредил глазную сетчатку[edit]

как выглядит поврежденный глазбкак можно вылечмть_

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Alan Liefting (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
Can you please explain yourself? Why did you undo my change? As I mentioned in my last edit of the template, in this case, the PNG is "transparent" while the SVG is not (so the PNG is better). Ldorfman (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now svg is transparent. restart page. Юкатан (talk) 09:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks. Now, the duplicated file (the PNG) should be deleted. Ldorfman (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Coat of arms of Yavne.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ldorfman (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WhatsApp logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images of Israeli shekel on Commons[edit]

,Юкатан שלום

I'm writing this message to you to let you know of a discussion about photographs of Israeli shekel banknotes and coins on Commons.

As I can see you were involved in creating the template {{Money-IL}}, I wanted to invite you to comment.

It is being held here: Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Israeli_currency.

Cheers,
Sebastian

seb26 (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Statue of archibishop Damaskinos in Athens.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 23:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Qalansawe COA.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:Qalansawe COA.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Qalansawe COA.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monomakh hat.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Bauhaus architecture in Tel Aviv has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 23:35, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of Arms of Arad.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.11.1 (Road sign).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 12:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.11.2 (Road sign).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 13:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.21 Russian road sign (2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1.12.2 (Road sign).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 15:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shin-script.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

KittenBroEeev (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Official Donetsk People's Republic coat of arms.svg have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Piotr Bart (talk) 17:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:RU road sign 7.18.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pramitha[edit]

Pramitha 175.157.163.188 15:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nikolaev_ec06ffa5 (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agios Nectarios church01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agios Nectarios church02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:RU road sign 1.11.1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brianriceca (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]