User:Omotecho/sandbox/Commons:価値ある写真の候補

画像の推薦へ移動

最も価値のある講評へ移動

組写真の推薦へ移動

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques. Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria. A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope. The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules. An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR. If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links: Main VI page Valued image candidates Valued image criteria Valued image scope Valued image value Nomination procedure Review procedure Most Valued Review Promotion rules Valued image closure How to nominate an image for VI status Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review. Adding a new nomination (image) Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button. Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage. Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section: |My-image-filename.jpg so that it looks like this: {{VICs ... |My-image-filename.jpg }} and save the candidate list. Renomination Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review. Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination. Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination. Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in |date={{subst:VI-time}} Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review). Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with |nominator=~~~ Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure. Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}") replace the review parameter with |review= {{subst:VIC-archive}} }} Save the page. There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews. Save the previous reviews archive page Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list. How to open a Most Valued Review There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: === Scope === {{VICs |candidate1.jpg |candidate2.jpg }} where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR. The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing. How to review the candidates How to review an image Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it). Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion. Review procedure On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters. Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six. Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination. Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries. If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued. If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR. Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows: You type You get When *{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~  Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment. *{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~  Info My information. -- Example You have information. *{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote. *{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria. *{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~  Question My question. -- Example You have a question. *{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria. If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template. Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page. How to update the status Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate: status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border). status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border). status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border). status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border). Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized. Changes in scope during the review period The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

54,877 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			49,326 (89.9%)
Undecided			3,066 (5.6%)
Declined			2,485 (4.5%)

New valued image nominations

View promotion Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-04-26 17:52 (UTC) Scope: Mark Hansen  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-04-29 21:47 (UTC) Scope: Platysteira cyanea (Brown-throated wattle-eye), male  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-30 05:02 (UTC) Scope: Fragment of a funerary stele inv.294 - Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice)  Support Best in scope, --Pierre André (talk) 22:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-30 05:03 (UTC) Scope: Symphoricarpos albus - Fruits and foliage  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 21:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-30 05:05 (UTC) Scope: Tour de l'ancienne abbaye bénédictine - clocher de la Cathédrale Saint-Benoît  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 14:42 (UTC) Scope: Only available complete image of Royal Enfield Cruiser  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)  Comment Have no problem with this image being VI but IMHO the scope needs to be improved. Suggest a scope of "Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650" (with same scope link) with the VI value statement being that this is the best image (and therefore most valuable) of this particular motorcycle model. That seems a more appropriate scope to me. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 14:55 (UTC) Scope: Karakavalasa railway bridge on Kothavalasa–Kirandul line  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:01 (UTC) Scope: Machilipatnam Lighthouse  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:06 (UTC) Scope: Sri Amaralingeswara Swamy Rath Yatra  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:10 (UTC) Scope: SCI Yamuna (ship, 2012), front view and portside, (Mumbai)  Comment According to COM:VICR (6) a diagram of a process or an object, (like flight control surfaces) must be specified as indicated in this diagramy File:Aft (PSF).jpg, --Pierre André (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC) @Pierre André Leclercq: done, please review again. --iMahesh (talk) 05:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment iMahesh Suggest "front view and portside" as sub-scope, --Pierre André (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC) @Pierre André Leclercq:  Done --iMahesh (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Perfect for me, best in scope --Pierre André (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)  Oppose IMHO this is a credible VI nomination and agree in general with Pierre's comments. However, the scope, as written, still seems overly descriptive. The fact that this ship is in located in Mumbai is good information to be recorded in the ship description, but the city is not on display and is superfluous to the scope. Suggest a simpler, more focused scope such as: '''|scope=[[:Category:SCI Yamuna (ship, 2012) | ''SCI Yamuna'' - IMO 9575618]] – port view''' with a scope link to the ship category, would work better here. The ship name and IMO # uniquely identify this ship matching what is shown on the bow. While the sub-scope could be "front port view", IMO the image appears to be more port side than front. The value statement becomes that this image represents is the best port view of this ship-by-name, irrespective of where it is docked. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:41 (UTC) Scope: Detail of the Chastè e baselgia, Ardez East side. Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-04-30 16:43 (UTC) Scope: Monument dedicated to King Albert 1st, in the municipal park of Mouscron (Be)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-04-30 19:23 (UTC) Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Rubchenky  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-01 04:42 (UTC) Scope: Insegna dell'arte dei Mureri (bricklayers) - Correr Museum  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-01 04:45 (UTC) Scope: Jardin de l'Évêché de Castres vu du Musée Goya  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-01 04:57 (UTC) Scope: Self-portrait with hat by Marcel Briguiboul Goya Museum‎ Castres France  Support Useful & used. --Giles Laurent (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-01 05:11 (UTC) Scope: Iphigenia brasiliensis (Giant False Donax), right valve  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-01 09:10 (UTC) Scope: Migration by Francis Buyse - Mouscron, view from Av. des Seigneurs de Mouscron  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-01 09:58 (UTC) Scope: Pan troglodytes (Chimpanzee), alpha male, walking  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-01 09:58 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorial in Rachky  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-05-01 16:44 (UTC) Scope: Panorama of Visakhapatnam Port  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 2 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: done. --iMahesh (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC) on 2024-05-01 18:10 (UTC) Scope: Seal of Theosophical Society, SVG version Used in: en:Theosophical Society, es:Esoterismo, es:Teosofía, fi:Esoteerisuus, it:Società Teosofica Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Espandero (talk) on 2024-05-01 20:51 (UTC) Scope: Sex de Marinda from the East in winter.  Comment It would be good to put the view orientation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Archaeodontosaurus  Done, thanks. --Espandero (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-02 04:33 (UTC) Scope: Main entrance of the Reformierte Kirche Vnà South side. Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)  Done. Stupid mistake. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)  Best in Scope Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-02 04:59 (UTC) Scope: Figures and stories of Saints - Lorenzo Veneziano - Museo Correr  Support Useful & used. --Giles Laurent (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-02 05:00 (UTC) Scope: Apocheima hispidaria f. obscura – mounted specimen Male ventral  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-02 05:02 (UTC) Scope: Autoportrait au haut de forme et à la pipe by Marcel Briguiboul Musée Goya‎ Castres France  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-02 05:14 (UTC) Scope: Iphigenia brasiliensis (Giant False Donax), left valve  Support Best in scope --Pierre André (talk) 08:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-02 06:52 (UTC) Scope: Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor in Rachky  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-02 08:22 (UTC) Scope: Opel Diplomat A Coupé - right front view Used in: de:Opel Kapitän/Admiral/Diplomat A, sv:KAD (bilar) Support Best in scope, used. --Thi (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-02 12:11 (UTC) Scope: Valère Basilica, aerial view from south west side  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: ShaanSenguptaTalk on 2024-03-15 17:33 (UTC) Scope: Atal Bihari Vajpayee Reason: Best picture and most in use across Wikiprojects. -- ShaanSenguptaTalk  Support Best in scope and used.--Rocky Masum (talk) 14:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Rocky Masum (talk) on 2024-05-02 14:07 (UTC) Scope: Main Entrance of SUST  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-05-02 16:09 (UTC) Scope: Pilot boat, Sea Haven - MMSI 235060142 – port view Reason: There are many images of the Sea Haven but most are pictured with other, larger ships. This image is focused on this pilot boat and represents the best port view of this vessel by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-02 19:29 (UTC) Scope: BAIC X75 - left front view Used in: de:Beijing (Automarke), de:Beijing X7 Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-02 19:55 (UTC) Scope: Peugeot 208 B facelift - left rear view Used in: de:Peugeot 208 II  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-02 20:10 (UTC) Scope: Panthera leo (lion), Snyggve  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-03 04:13 (UTC) Scope: Christ gives the keys to Saint Peter by Lorenzo Veneziano - Museo Correr  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-03 04:15 (UTC) Scope: Apocheima hispidaria f. obscura – mounted specimen Male dorsal  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-03 04:16 (UTC) Scope: San Peter by Pedro Gracia de Benabarre - Musée Goya‎ Castres France  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-03 04:42 (UTC) Scope: Hotel Engiadina (Scuol) South side.  Support Best in scope --Pierre André (talk) 09:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-03 05:30 (UTC) Scope: Cerithium punctatum (Channeled Cerith), shell juvenile  Support Useful and used --Pierre André (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-03 07:40 (UTC) Scope: BAIC X75 - left rear view Used in: de:Beijing X7 Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-03 07:41 (UTC) Scope: Ford Mustang VII Convertible - right front view Used in: de:Ford Mustang Support Used in article. --Thi (talk) 11:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-03 07:42 (UTC) Scope: Ford Tourneo Custom (2023) - right rear view Used in: de:Ford Transit Custom Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-03 07:58 (UTC) Scope: Monument to the victims of Holodomor in Marmuliivka  Support Useful & used. --Giles Laurent (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2024-05-03 09:39 (UTC) Scope: Sunkarametta Church  Comment There is a problem because since the day of the photograph the church has been restored and repainted, it no longer has the same appearance. The scope must be reduced by specifying this point.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-03 11:13 (UTC) Scope: Panthera leo (lion), Tryggve portrait  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-05-03 12:07 (UTC) Scope: Sigil of Lucifer Used in: en:Lucifer, en:Satanism, en:List of occult symbols, es:Sigilo de Lucifer, fr:Satanisme théiste, fr:Liste de symboles religieux Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: GRDN711 (talk) on 2024-05-03 14:42 (UTC) Scope: Arklow Faith - IMO 9361718 – port view Reason: Best port view of this coastal cargo ship by name. -- GRDN711 (talk)  Support Best in scope --Pierre André (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-03 14:55 (UTC) Scope: Pigeonnier de la ferme d'Aigremont (Ennevelin), view from Rue de la Reine  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-03 15:37 (UTC) Scope: Début du tronçon du secteur pavé de Pont-Thibaut, view from rue du Pont Thibaut, Ennevelin. Used in: Global usage  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-05-04 00:34 (UTC) Scope: Kobus kob thomasi (Ugandan kob), male seduction attempt  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-05 00:34 (UTC) Scope: Entrance to the Zollkran (Trier) North side.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-04 05:04 (UTC) Scope: Bittium semigranosum, shell  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-04 04:56 (UTC) Scope: Basil of Caesarea - Museo Correr Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-04 04:57 (UTC) Scope: Carduus pycnocephalus - immature inflorescence and foliage Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-04 05:10 (UTC) Scope: Anthony the Great by Pedro Gracia de Benabarre - Musée Goya‎ Castres France Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-04 06:07 (UTC) Scope: Daewoo Kalos - left front view Used in: de:Kleinwagen, de:Chevrolet Kalos Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-04 06:09 (UTC) Scope: Ford Tourneo Custom (2023) - right front view Used in: de:Ford Transit Custom Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-04 06:10 (UTC) Scope: Citroën Berlingo III - left front view Used in: de:Citroën Berlingo, de:Hochdachkombi, en:Citroën Berlingo Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

Portrait of Vicente Guerrero

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) on 2021-01-21 17:47 (UTC) Scope: Retrato Vicente Guerrero por Anacleto Escutia en Palacio Nacional (Mexico) (Portrait of Vicente Guerrero by Anacleto Escutia in Palacio Nacional (Mexico)) Previous reviews  Comment Good image, good caption, but the scope is too imprecise (it can be improved) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done the scope has changed--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk)  Support Ok now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: ErickTErick (talk) on 2023-10-31 21:45 (UTC) Scope: Retrato póstumo del presidente Vicente Guerrero en el Museo Nacional de Historia, Ciudad de México (Posthumous portrait of President Vicente Guerrero in the National Museum of History, Mexico City) Reason: The version of this image which currently considered the most valuable within its scope is of much lower quality than this newer version. In addition, the name given to the scope is factually wrong about the location of the painting (it is not within Palacio Nacional) and Mexico's Spanish name is misspelled (it's México, not Mexico). -- ErickTErick (talk)  Comment There is already an image promoted in VI: you have to go to Pending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2023 (UTC)  Done Started MVR ErickTErick (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:02 (UTC) Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach  Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC) I am doing it according this reccomendation Ezarateesteban 23:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Ezarateesteban on 2023-11-26 22:00 (UTC) Scope: El Aficionado by Antonio Casanova y Estorach  Comment The original file is the .tiff : File:El Aficionado - Antonio Casanova y Estorach.tiff. Everypeople can create a better processed image from this file. So what are we suposed to do ? --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Anciens bains municipaux de Colmar

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 [discuter] on 2018-01-22 12:21 (UTC) Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Gzen92 (talk) on 2023-12-29 07:22 (UTC) Scope: Exterior of anciens bains municipaux (Colmar)  Comment The light on the cable is a bit distracting. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Support The cable is distracing in the current VI too. The people are distracing here, but light and crop are superior. --Milseburg (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)  Support per @Milseburg: . --Contributers2020Talk to me here! 07:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

African chaffinch taxonomy change

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charles (talk) on 2019-03-31 18:20 (UTC) Scope: Fringilla coelebs africana (African Chaffinch) male  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --BoothSift 04:05, 5 April 2019 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2024-04-11 10:28 (UTC) Scope: Fringilla spodiogenys (African Chaffinch) male  Question @Charlesjsharp: Both images are looking equal. Is "Pending Most Valued Review Candidates" really the right place? --Milseburg (talk) 20:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC) They are the same image. There has been a taxonomy change since it was promoted and Archaeodontosaurus suggested I do MVR. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Same image but nomination with different scopes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London Used in: en:Bertrand Russell, de, es  Comment This is the most valuable image in scope, but only if the scope does not include the base. If the scope includes the base, we have to consider whether the dark File:Bust of Bernard Russell in Red Lion Square (01).jpg is better than File:I feel I almost know this guy - geograph.org.uk - 1656321.jpg, which is fenced off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London  Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: iMahesh (talk) on 2020-12-16 02:34 (UTC) Scope: Mavathuru lake at Kotagiri, Karnataka Used in: Kotagiri  Question This is an Instagram picture. Do we know that it has a Creative Commons Copyleft? If so, how do we know? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: It was was written in Instagram post description that Available on Wikimedia commons under CC BY-SA 4.0. The watermarked version was reviewed by User:MB-one for the same license on 8 May 2020, link for original version is available at Other versions.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)  Support OK. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Tagooty (talk) on 2024-04-19 04:34 (UTC) Scope: Mavathoor Kere (lake) near Kanakapura, Karnataka Used in: wikidata:Q124841427 Reason: In 2020, this image was wrongly labelled as being in Kotagiri (Tamil Nadu), it did not have a geotag, and it was promoted to VI based on this incorrect information. The lake is actually in the neighbouring state of Karnataka. The file name and description have been corrected, and geotag added. I am nominating it for the correct scope, to replace the wrong VI scope. --Tagooty (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC) -- Tagooty (talk) The bad appointment must be invalidated. You have to go throughPending Most valued review candidates --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Moving to MVR --Tagooty (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Ok for this correction of scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.

[[Category:Valued image candidates| ]] [[Category:Valued images|{{PAGENAME}}]]