|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review Page (edit) |
Nominated by:
iMahesh (talk) on 2024-04-30 15:10 (UTC) |
Scope:
SCI Yamuna (ship, 2012), front view and portside, (Mumbai) |
- Comment According to COM:VICR (6) a diagram of a process or an object, (like flight control surfaces) must be specified as indicated in this diagramy File:Aft (PSF).jpg, --Pierre André (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pierre André Leclercq: done, please review again. --iMahesh (talk) 05:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment iMahesh Suggest "front view and portside" as sub-scope, --Pierre André (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pierre André Leclercq: Done --iMahesh (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Perfect for me, best in scope --Pierre André (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose IMHO this is a credible VI nomination and agree in general with Pierre's comments. However, the scope, as written, still seems overly descriptive. The fact that this ship is in located in Mumbai is good information to be recorded in the ship description, but the city is not on display and is superfluous to the scope. Suggest a simpler, more focused scope such as:
'''|scope=[[:Category:SCI Yamuna (ship, 2012) | ''SCI Yamuna'' - IMO 9575618]] – port view''' with a scope link to the ship category, would work better here.
- The ship name and IMO # uniquely identify this ship matching what is shown on the bow. While the sub-scope could be "front port view", IMO the image appears to be more port side than front.
- The value statement becomes that this image represents is the best port view of this ship-by-name, irrespective of where it is docked. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
|
Open for review. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|