User talk:Espandero

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archives

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sex de Marinda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrage de Moiry en hiver.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espace Weisshorn depuis le sud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 21:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weisshorn depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 21:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Diablons depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Laitche 21:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restaurant de Sorebois et télécabine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:21, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Val d'Anniviers depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espace Weisshorn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 11:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aiguilles Rouges d'Arolla depuis Sorebois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Vouvry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Joseph de Schmitten - Vue de l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe de Tsevalire et Becs de Bosson.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support In full resolution there are some spots which aren't as sharp as others, but given the large resolution IMHO it is good enough for QI. --C messier 20:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monorail de vigne - gorges de la Morge (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branson depuis Grand Champ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Nuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gorges de la Morge de Conthey (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Chillon - Façade ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Châtelet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Could get a bit more NR but still good. --Plozessor 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église paroissiale de Saint-Léonard - Chœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This is a) a bit noisy, b) the sunlit spots are burned out and c) the right side is too dark. Would accept each of those, but probably not the combination. Any chance to improve it with better raw conversion? --Plozessor 05:37, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: I tried uploading a new version. Is it any better? - Espandero 22:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Borderline sharpness but ok! --Plozessor 07:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Maya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Laurent de Riddes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very good image. Slight CW tilt. Blurred spot in the sky to the right of the steeple could be cloned out. Useful to add the cemetery in the Summary/Description. --Tagooty 02:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tagooty: ✓ Done - Espandero 22:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embouchure Baye de Montreux-Léman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Folklore 2024 has started, Join us![edit]

Hello Espandero,

Greetings from the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team! Wiki Loves Folklore is an international photography contest hosted on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from around the world, such as folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, folktales, folk games, folk religion, mythology, and many more.

The campaign invites participants to document photographs, videos, and audios linked to folk culture and fit within the contest's theme. Through this campaign, you may become a part of a community dedicated to preserving our intangible culture, which has been brought and passed down for thousands of years.

How can I Contribute?

The dates for the submission in the photography contest on Wikimedia Commons are from 1 February 2024 through 31 March 2024. Probably you are wondering how you can take part. It’s simple: grab a camera, record an image, video or audio under the folklore theme and start uploading or Click on Upload Now Icon which is available on right side of Wiki Loves Folklore 2024. To learn more about the rules, check out our Project page on Wikimedia Commons.

Here are the exciting prizes which you can win internationally.

International Prizes

  • 1st prize: 400 USD
  • 2nd prize: 300 USD
  • 3rd prize: 100 USD
  • Top 10 consolation prizes: 40 USD (each)
  • Best Video prize and best Audio prize: 50 USD (each)
  • Top uploader prize for images: First Prize: 300 USD, Second prize: 150 USD
  • Wiki Loves Folklore Postcards to top 100 Uploaders
  • Certificates and postcards to Local Organizers.

(Disclaimer : The above prizes will only be disbursed in the form of gift card or voucher format only) You can win both International prizes and your local Prizes simultaneously !

If you are interested in participating in the photography campaign, start photographing and collecting media of your local culture and get ready for the photo campaign happening on Wikimedia Commons. For more information about rules and prizes of the contest, refer here. For any questions, email us or join our telegram group here

Warm regards,

Gaurav and Issac

#WeTogether

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Portalet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 22:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aiguille du Glacier Rond.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Kurmanbek 20:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours d'Aï et de Mayen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morcles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus aucuparia in Grimentz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tours d'Aï, de Mayen et de Famelon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Didier de Collombey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe des Mossettes - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pointe de Chésery - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Boudry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pas de Chavanette - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 10:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clocher de l'ancienne église de Vionnaz et cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:55, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Lucens - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Vufflens et vignes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice, but it needs a perspective correction and I'd reduce the noise in the sky --Poco a poco 14:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: ✓ Done - Espandero 16:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collège de Chardonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avoriaz - 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monastère de Collombey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Трифонов Андрей 15:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Col du Mont d'Orzeires enneigé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 12:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Lieu et dent de Vaulion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 12:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise du Pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pégase du Pont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support There is some violet fringing, but not critical IMO. Good. Nice subject. --LexKurochkin 17:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riviera, Chablais et Léman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 12:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de commune de Collombey-Muraz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dent de Vaulion enneigée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Barberini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sergio Aguero statue at the City of Manchester Stadium by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vincent Kompany statue at the City of Manchester Stadium by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Silva statue at the City of Manchester Stadium by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pas de Chavanette ski slope from the East..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pointe des Mossettes in Winter from the south-east..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Laurent church in Riddes, Switzerland, and its cemetery..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Plafond 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Weisshorn from the west in Winter..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Léonard (Valais), general overview.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de la Soie, seen from the northeast (castle and hill).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Tribune de l'orgue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But it could use a lttle tilt (like 1-2 dgrees CCW) --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Bernard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue du bienheureux Nicolas de Flüe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église paroissiale Saint-Gall de Chalais from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veysonnaz from the west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lac des Toules from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Sainte-Cécile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs PC --Tagooty 02:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tagooty: ✓ Done --Espandero 18:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Émile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs PC --Tagooty 02:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tagooty: ✓ Done --Espandero 18:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Sainte-Catherine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Jean.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Vièze à Monthey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embouchure Gryonne-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 22:06, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embouchure Vièze-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embouchure Vièze-Rhône (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Mangettes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gryonne à Bex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Massongex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
tilted cw --Ezarate 22:04, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ezarate ✓ Done. --Espandero 19:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 19:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Monthey - Statue de Saint-Maurice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embouchure Vièze-Rhône (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhône depuis le pont gazoduc - Aval.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lorax 04:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Embouchure Avançon-Rhône.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste de Massongex - Dédicace de Sextus Varennus Priscus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is ok, please use English description here on the nomination page. --Plozessor 04:27, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Autels et chœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Autels et chœur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 21:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Médaillon chantourné - Dieu le Père.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 20:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Médaillon chantourné - Baptême de l'empereur Constantin par saint Sylvestre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église de Choëx - Médaillon chantourné - Annonciation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Corbières depuis le pont de Corbières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 21:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrage de Rossens depuis l'ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de l’Assomption de La Roche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de la Nativité de Corbières.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]