Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2020

File:PK Kirthar NP asv2020-02 img04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 15:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Euphorbiaceae
Info A shrub of Euphorbia caducifolia in Kirthar National Park (Sindh, Pakistan) ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 15:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Euphorbiaceae

File:Site des Orgues 031.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 13:43:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#France
Info Cropped version of a previously nominated and withdrawn panorama according to the comments; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is the best crop of the 3 versions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This tight and focussed crop is IMO a much better photo than the panorama. Cmao20 (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, now it works. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 07:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I would be remiss if, having suggested this crop, I took my time supporting it for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Pyrénées-Orientales

File:Mohiniyattam at Kerala School Kalolsavam 2019 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 15:46:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info-Mohiniyattam, is one of the famous classical dances of India that developed and remained popular in the state of Kerala

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These are very nice pictures, but we already have 3 FPs of this performance. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a disqualification ? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not a formal one but we reviewers get oversaturated Poco a poco (talk) 18:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose little artistic merit with a trainee adorned with safety pins. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not as engaging as File:Mohiniyattam at Kerala state school kalothsavam 2019.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. There's something to be said for selecting the best photographs of a motif to nominate. I think we've featured enough photos in this category and probably shouldn't feature another unless it's more significantly different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natuurgebied Petgatten De Feanhoop. 19-10-2020. (actm.) 32.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 16:18:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. Detail of the American Herkules windmill in Petgatten de Feanhoop. Year of construction 1926.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't understand the reason for the crops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Thank you for your comment. I like this crop because it combines the curved lines with the clean horizontal and vertical lines. But it looks like I'm the only one! I have enough space on the right to show all vanes.----Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC) 11:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It might work, cut to the center of mill on rigth side. And add some left side...air. --Mile (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, i have tried, doesnt work. This one is more interesting interesting. --Mile (talk) 14:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. So could I nominate that photo?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agnes Monkelbaan i think its better than this. Give it a try, nothing to lose. --Mile (talk) 19:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes, please nominate that photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose crop and clouds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:49, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, Paris 3 August 2020.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 07:35:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Pierre Blaché (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be cropped a little closer on the bottom, but peaceful, spacious and atmospheric. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Still considering it, but my initial reaction is that the Ferris wheel in the background is sufficiently outside of the frame that it comes off as distractingly unbalanced IMO. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:59, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1. I think the image could get closer to being squared up and lose most of what's on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I actually quite enjoy the space on the right and the peaceful quality it adds to the composition Kingsif (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 07:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Вид на Эльбрус по пути в Джилы-Су.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 17:41:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Russia
Info A beautiful and stark landscape from the Caucasus, with the road used as an effective leading line. created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too much road. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not bad and ~~probably~~ QI, but still I don't think it does the beauty of this region enough justice. --A.Savin 20:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A very beautiful scene, but I would go for a more aggressive crop. For a road leading into the distance, the easiest way to make it work is to center the entire road, but if the near portion of the road is going to be off-center, then all of the road should be clearly off-center, i.e. some of the right side should be cropped out. Also, because the sky is relatively featureless I would make it take up about 1/4 of the vertical space as opposed to the usual rule of thirds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the featureless sky. Too much currently in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moderate support As a contributor here who has made a different roadscape work as an FP, I'm favorably disposed to this one. This is autumn, and the landscape is bleak because as the distant mountains are already telling us, winter is coming. Therefore the relatively empty sky complements that bleakness. I do agree with King, however, that not as much of it is needed. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the long sight line down the road, and this photo also appeals to my sense of vicariously being there. Sure, the sky could be cropped, but I support, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The more I look at it, the more the candidature seems valid as FP for me. Just weak s per my comment above -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfavorable light-situation on the mountains. --Milseburg (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Russia

File:National Opera of Lorraine in Nancy (2).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a beautiful picture in several ways, but the right crop is bugging me because the dark gray object is calling attention to itself and impeding my eye movement. I'm wondering what's to the right of that and whether you could crop a bit further to the right. Alternatively, it might work to crop just to the left of it, though I'd have to see the result. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very beautiful architecture but I find the light a little bit dull. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I have to confess that I like really :–). --Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's grown on me. What I objected to above is seeming trivial to me now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Fulcran cathedral of Lodeve 11.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:34:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and pretty organ. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why do you cut off the main part of the organ? --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- In this photo I would like make a focus to this part of pipe organs. Here you have other version. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per Uoaei. Quality is superb but I don’t get the composition. --Kreuz schnabel 20:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is very difficult to show only a part of the organ's prospect without the cut off pipes being disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 23:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regretful oppose per Kreuz, Ermell and Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Split Cathedral Bell Tower From The Vestibule - Split.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 11:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
Info created ₪ uploaded by Sumitsurai - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 20:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered Support: Sky is just a bit noisy but I really like the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice composition. Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Technically this is not 100% best quality but this is not QI. The perspective and the light levels are really striking for me. --Mosbatho (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia

File:Wroclaw - Muzeum Narodowe.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 09:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours and beautiful architecture. Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland

File:Puente Arslanagić, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 24.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 13:48:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Bosnia_and_Herzegovina
Info I will understand if you oppose because of the power lines, but for me they are not very noticeable and don't spoil a very well-composed and serene photo, with some lovely rich colours and sharp, clear reflections. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice catch, thank you! a while ago though I took the picture, so I exported again with the latest Lr version Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite beautiful with its long sight lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it's a fine image, but the scene lacks wow factor for me; it just looks like an ordinary set of houses.--Peulle (talk) 08:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Bosnia_and_Herzegovina

File:Corner tower of the Cone and Kimball Building in Red Bluff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 03:04:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 00:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lacks wow IMHO and the bottom crop is not convincing to me, sorry Frank Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good photo, but on the whole, I agree with Poco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp photo and has wow-factor for me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco and Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 20:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States

File:หอระฆัง พระบรมมหาราชวัง กรุงเทพมหานคร ประเทศไทย.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 03:07:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A spire with a nice bottom crop Kingsif (talk) 06:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support though a little more space at the top couldn't hurt. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:45, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:42, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand

File:Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000 (chainring 50-34, length 172.5mm, 11 speed).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:28:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
Info Bicycle crankset Shimano 105 R7000. This one made me work. The number of photos stacked is actually not so important, if you have a "twilight zone" on the subject, like here. 8, shots and hours.
Support -- Mile (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support it looks pretty cool--Andrei (talk) 12:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The white background is too bright and having no frame doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp I think there are wannabe rules to avoid watermarks and borders. Beside check the image on the article, the border is always added. Who will want to print outside can add it, the main cause is to represent crankset on Wikipedia. And it represents very well. --Mile (talk) 11:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is sharp, but you could have chosen a different background. Image description is misleading. You show a lot more than the crankset. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The subject holds no appeal for me, but I can appreciate the effort that went into it, and it's easily the best and most interesting photo of this motif. Cmao20 (talk) 22:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles ... it's a very busy composition, the attempt at simplicity notwithstanding. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Forgive me if this sounds really dumb, but isn't the crankset the part buried behind the nice smooth chainguard? As far as bicycle mechanisms go, it's a nice image, but it looks like the image here is of a branded chainguard Kingsif (talk) 06:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kingsif road bicycles normaly don't have chainguard. "Silver" part above is front derailleur. --Mile (talk) 07:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, the black bit. The circle. The guard covering the chain and thus crankset. As I said, that looks like the main focus - the derailleur is in the corner, if you were wanting that to be the focus then it's very badly cropped - since it appears to be covering up the crankset. I was asking if said chainguard is supposed to be considered part of the crankset. Kingsif (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added notations, that is bidon halter in the back. Chainguard - yes and no. On professional bicycles no, on city bikes yes. This is a Pro bike from Giant. Nothing is covering 1st chainring, while front derailleur is set on 2nd chainset (small one). Back of them is plastic bidon holder, mounted on frame. If there some else put notation. --Mile (talk) 15:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't appear to have understood me at all, or are deliberately ignoring the point. Is the bidon the black circle in the middle of the image? No, so I clearly wasn't referring to it. Kingsif (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Son Kingsif. Do you own a road bike or something similar. "black circle in the middle of the image" are two chainrings, part of crankset. I would ask Admins to check "puppet status" of newkinder. You dont know to put notation beside what is bothering you. Don't wanna learn you here about bikes etc. It's about the picture. --Mile (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC) p.S. Does anyone get what is his question, Ikan Kekek !?[reply]

Who, me? I've ridden bikes, of course, but I'm hardly an expert on the names of bike parts. So no, I don't know what he means. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Charles and Daniel. Kingsif (talk) 02:18, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Kingsif Asking again, put NOTE on picture where is problem !? I think you mixed chainset with a chainguard. --Mile (talk) 13:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PetarM: You don't have to ping me demanding an answer to something twice when I haven't edited since before the first one, that's harassment. I'm also far from "newkinder" (newcomer?), I just only appear in FPC once a year or so because I mostly edit Wikipedia. Of course I own a bike, and I fix it up myself. Besides that, I'm afraid I cannot understand literally anything you typed because you clearly don't speak English, which I have to assume is why you don't understand my very simple question. My oppose is based on the composition, and my understanding that I can't see the crankset behind the guard. If you want to dispute that, answer my question rather than talk about other random mechanisms then use allcaps and exclamation points at me. Kingsif (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kingsif "Forgive me if this sounds really dumb", your words. Maybe just to skip my nominations, OK !? --Mile (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's going too far. Don't tell people how to vote. --Peulle (talk) 21:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Peulle it already went too far. Kingsif jest called me dick-dickish on my discusion. And where do you see i ask how to vote. Putting minus because he dont understand the picture is a big difference. --Mile (talk) 08:54, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The vote is valid. Telling people to skip your nominations is not proper form. For conflict resolution between users, I recommend following the procedure at COM:ANU. --Peulle (talk) 09:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mile, I only left user warnings after your incredibly inappropriate behavior. After you took it too far, read the diffs. Kingsif (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Without pedals it looks to me like uncompleted otherwise good job Poco a poco (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:Museo di Santa Giulia Coro delle Monache Deposizione Paolo da Caylina Brescia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 11:02:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful fresco and capture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:43, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning motif captured in sharp detail. Cmao20 (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity

File:Point Reyes Lighthouse Trail December 2016 017.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 05:26:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Setting isn´t outstanding enough for me. Too much haze. The view over the sea is too diffuse. --Milseburg (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question and tilted? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so? The railing is inherently crooked so it's hard to tell from that. The horizon is naturally curved as I explained here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really see the horizon here and therefore no tilt. With the small heights and distances of ordinary landscape photographs, a curved horizon cannot be attributed to the curvature of the earth. Otherwise the earth would be much smaller. --Milseburg (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Milseburg: Actually, on second thought I think it's not mainly height that matters, but focal length. A perfectly rectilinear lens is designed to preserve straight lines, no matter what angle they are viewed from. So a hypothetical horizon that went on in both directions forever should appear as a straight line when photographed from any direction. Suppose our viewpoint is just 1 m off the ground. Then the horizon would appear to be 3.57 km away in all directions (source). If our lens has a 90-degree field of view, then we would expect a straight line 3.57 km away at its nearest point to be

3.57{\sqrt {2}}\approx 5.05

km away at the two sides of our frame. But the actual horizon is still only 3.57 km away at the two sides, so it will appear curved. Now, height still does matter to some extent. While the ratio between the actual horizon and the ideal horizon may always be

{\sqrt {2}}

, the vertical angle of approach determines how much the difference is magnified in angular terms. If the camera is at A, the ground below the camera is B, the actual horizon at the center of the frame is C, the actual horizon at the (wlog) left edge of the frame is D, and the ideal horizon at the left edge of the frame is E (i.e. the place where the tangent line at C intersects the plane that defines the left edge of the frame), then increasing

\angle ADB

will increase

\angle DAE

, assuming that the ratio

BD:DE

is fixed. And increasing height will increase the vertical angle of approach, because the distance to the horizon increases slower than distance to the ground (namely, at the rate of the square root of height). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I can really follow the discussion in English. I know how to calculate visibility. I just meant that you can't push a horizon bent in the ordinary photo onto the curvature of the earth's surface. Anyway, as I said, I can't see this problem here. --Milseburg (talk) 12:54, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Colours and light are very good, I really feel like walking on that path. --Aristeas (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas, I really like the composition. The light doesn't seem outstanding at first but I think the soft, subtle pastel colours are actually very nice. Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg --Fischer.H (talk) 17:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice image but besides being sharp and with nice lighting, it doesn't shout to me as anything special that anyone on this trail couldn't have taken quickly. The colors and focus seem like a simple auto setting to me (not that this can't be good, but in this case, there are lots of green spots all over the world and if anyone could whip out a point-and-shoot and achieve something like this there's nothing special, if that makes sense), and the whites over in the top right mute the image. I wasn't going to leave an oppose until I looked at the composition of the trail: it's not center, and it's not hitting the right third, it's just sort of off-center. As a really personal preference, I would have preferred a lower camera angle and a little more of the mound on the left. I can appreciate the positioning of the shadows over the trail, though. Kingsif (talk) 06:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did spend quite a bit of time experimenting with this composition; you'll notice that in my series there are no fewer than 6 shots of this scene, each with slightly different framing and lighting, and I thought that this one was the best. The original crop included more of the mound at the left, but for me the extra bit at the far left was superfluous so I cropped it out. Anyways, thanks for the feedback. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was hard to oppose because it's nice, especially the lighting, so I thought I'd explain thoroughly. I agree it's probably the best of the images of that part of the trail, but I love the photo of the utility buildings :) Kingsif (talk) 02:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like it as it is. The only thing that puzzles me a bit is the aircraft in flight. Is there a specific reason it was left on the sky and have you considered cloning it out? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've experienced many views like this on the coast of California and don't find this one unusually outstanding. It's definitely a nice photo, to be sure, but it's not blowing me away. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California

File:Male northern pintail at Llano Seco.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 19:48:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Anas
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but dust spots (see notes). The dark spot next to the duck's face is almost certainly dust, but I also marked some that I wasn't sure of, and you can take a look to see if they're dust or not. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I uploaded a new version. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very sharp and beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very good light. This candidature would fit also nicely into the gallery Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but "Ducks" is still the most appropriate place. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective choice in my view, though I completely respect the current one -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support good shot --Mile (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support with congratulations to the author. --Cayambe (talk) 18:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support with congratulations to the author. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 02:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd like to see the stripy patterns even more clearly, but I didn't see any as clear in an off-site image search, and the head, beak and composition are more than sufficient to feature this photo, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Good detail for a far subject but I do miss something more here Poco a poco (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Anas

File:Anthidiellum strigatum (male).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 12:35:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Megachilidae (Leafcutting Bees)
Info created & uploaded by Sebastián J.L - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think the bee is "en su posición de descanso para pasar la noche" for the position is unnatural. The legs are contracted and don't touch the twig, and the sting is protruded. I think rather it is a dead animal, captured and impaled on a thorn by a Red-backed shrike. This a the normal behaviour of this bird, see here or even with larger animals --Llez (talk) 17:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)][reply]
- @Llez: wow, that's super cool! We should probably fix the caption with your explanation, preceded by "probably the bee was impaled...". This could also be an explanation why the focus stacking was made possible. Tomer T (talk) 18:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Llez explanation is plausible. It is certainly dead but could have placed there by a human. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment But except for what looks like a bit of a halo effect on part of the twig, this is a great photo of the bee, so would you all support if it the description is changed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I'd support with a better description, and, at any rate, the locality should be given, where the photo was taken. --Llez (talk) 07:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment True. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral, pending resolution of the bee's situation. Daniel Case (talk) 04:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination info probably suffers from inaccuracies. Tomer T (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herbst 2020 IMG 8158.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 10:51:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture # Germany/Rhineland-Palatinate
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 10:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I quite like this composition. I hadn't thought of this before, but after the nomination period is over, it would be good to change the name of the photo to include some location information, such as Hambacher Schloß. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The pillar gives a first impression that the picture was taken somewhere else. Very well done! --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice implied converging lines. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive and dramatic. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but change name per Ikan. (Maybe "Herbstlandschaft, Rheinland Pfalz" or something to that effect?) Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Will change the name of the photo after the nomination deadline. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kiril and Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:23, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

File:Mamoru Shigemitsu signs the Instrument of Surrender, officially ending the Second World War.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Army Signal Corps photographer LT. Stephen E. Korpanty - uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by TheFreeWorld 25 November 2020 09:49 (UTC) -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question It's one of the most important events in history the past hundred years, but what can you tell us of the image quality? It seems quite unsharp and I'm wondering if it's been upscaled.--Peulle (talk) 15:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peulle: Source is straight from the US Navy, so this is almost certainly the best available.Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question But is it upscaled from the original print size? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: It's possibly at the higher end of dpi, but the question is kind of meaningless because there's no standard dpi.It's at a level that gets all extant detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assume there are existing prints? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, this is a scan of one. It's not an inverse of the negative. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So what's the size of the print that was scanned? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Navy doesn't deign to say, alas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Oh well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support An immensely historic and important photo, whatever the technical shortcomings. Cmao20 (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20, ultimately. Still interested in the answer to my question, but it pales in importance to this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:22, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:La Croix du Mont Saint-Clair.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 20:25:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info created - uploaded - nominated by me -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: graffiti ruins it for me, will support if it's removed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 15:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks like The New Pope intro. But will strongly oppose if the graffiti is removed. That should be done only by the Sète City Council. --Andrei (talk) 07:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light and composition - Benh (talk) 14:40, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe some crop on the rigth side, but good compo. --Mile (talk) 15:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Andrei. --Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials

File:Pupa de coccinélido, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-06-27, DD 285-298 FS.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 15:01:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Order_:_Coleoptera_(Beetles)
Info Coccinellidae Pupa, Hartelholz, Munich, Germany. Note: I had to take the shot several times as from time to time the future ladybug in the pupa was moving. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Needs a restack as problems all round the edges. See note. Also, transition on leaf from focus to 100% blur does not appear natural. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Will update tomorrow a new version Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
New version uploaded. There are still some spots with less sharpness than others (or even blurry) but please, bear in mind that I'm offering 43 MPx of a extreme focus stacked image of a living animal of tiny size (about 1 cm) Poco a poco (talk) 10:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the point above is important, 43mpx detail of a very small living creature. Imperfections can be forgiven IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support - Sharp at 40% of full size, but considering how small the subject is, that's still pretty good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Much improved at the top, but still needs work on the underside. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp: I've made additional small adjustments in the underside Poco a poco (talk) 11:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

still blurred areas which shouldn't be blurred. Also, for FP must identify species. This appears to be Harmonia axyridis. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment imho it's too unsharp and the leaf has many stacking errors. --Ivar (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 12:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bargerveen 23-08-2019. (d.j.b). 21.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 16:25:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Netherlands Restoring bog.
Info Bargerveen Meerstalblok. Peat lake with growing peat bog. Successful recovery of bog in Bargerveen, province of Drenthe on the German border. A project in collaboration with Germany.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful photo, but no great composition to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe not the most obvious wow-factor but I like the composition, it's the kind of photo that grows on you after a while Cmao20 (talk) 22:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not special enough in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kekek --Fischer.H (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative, another version[edit]

Weak Oppose Both these photos have a very interesting midground and background, but their common flaw is the foreground, which at best fails to draw the viewer in and at worst distracts from the image. Such a shame, because the patterns in the water are really nice. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition in this version works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This alternative seems invalid to me. The guidelines say "Alternatives are for different crops or post-processing of the original image, if they are suggested by voters". There is much more water in this version, and it's too different IMO. But in any case Oppose as not special enough in my view, like the previous one -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:16, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiesa di Santa Maria della Pace altare Presentazione al tempio Batoni Brescia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 18:30:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautifully spotlit, among other things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Magnificent image. Cmao20 (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fabulous image.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really stunning. --Aristeas (talk) 19:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy

File:Mask used on folk ritual Kamentsa on Chaquiras indigenous people of Colombia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 16:59:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info Mask used in folk ritual of Chaquiras indigenous people of Colombia. It was used in spiritual rituals related to abundance and sexuality and in medicinal rituals in which the ayahuasca plant is used. All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 16:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The amount of black space on both sides is slightly imbalanced. I would just go for a square crop here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but please correct the description: ayahuasca is not a plant --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like this and I'll probably support, but I wish it were more pinpoint sharp. I realize that's hard to do with 3-dimensional objects. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please, let me know what do you think and thanks for the feedback --Wilfredor (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Meiræ 21:46, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I actually think the sharpness is really good Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive mask, good photo. --Aristeas (talk) 19:51, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support And it protects against COVID-19!!! Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:Museo di Santa Giulia Santa Maria in Solario croce di Desiderio fronte Brescia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 13:22:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info created by User:Moroder - uploaded by User:Moroder - nominated by Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but as stunning as the motif is, I'm not sure the quality is quite there at full size. The reflections are a bit distracting and the sharpness is on the low side. Cmao20 (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmao20: For your concern of full size and quality, can we use an alternative image?--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Distracting background. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:A girl set fire to cook breakfast by using a coal-filled clay pot; July 2014.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 23:19:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
Info created by Gumilang Aryo Sahadewo - uploaded by Rachmat04 - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please add {{PR}} in the file page for every pictures displaying recognizable people. Nice image but I think too noisy for FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Thanks! ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality so-so, a bit tight left crop, but the moment is there. --Mile (talk) 08:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I like this a lot. I wonder about the front of her hair, though. It appears to be more than noise -- is it a light spot caused by steam? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhododendrites I think so too. Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Mile. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The left crop is a bit tight but the picture is absolutely fantastic. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A small file, but a great image.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mile. --Aristeas (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People_at_work

File:Proses Nembok, Salah Satu Tahapan Membatik Tulis.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2020 at 23:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
Info created by Prajnaparamita Sarasvati - uploaded by Prajnaparamita Sarasvati - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:30, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it could be better cropped in more tightly on the hand, assuming it would still be large enough. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I disagree, for me seeing this much of the fabric and the work in progress is part of what makes it Wow. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I tend to agree with you. Also, this photo is pretty interesting and I think it merits a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Labdajiwa (talk) 01:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Others

File:The child and the castle - The past and the future in one photo – Populonia Castle.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 13:02:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications>]]
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by [[User:{{subst:PROPOLI87}}|]] -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 13:02, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Though it’s a nice idea, the pic as such is not that overwhelming IMHO, and the quality really low. Sorry. --Kreuz schnabel 14:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As we've said before, you have a good artistic sensibility, but this photo is small, not very sharp, and the light is mediocre. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC) :* CommentThanks, the problem is always the low-level equipment, but it was too particular not to try.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Cart has a number of FPs to her credit, though she has said her equipment is not high-end. You might consider having a discussion with her about how to get the best use out of your equipment, though I should add, I don't know just how good or bad your equipment is. We have featured a couple of cellphone pics, though (very rare, but I believe I remember 2). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CommentOk thanks, I wrote that it depends on the camera, because from the various comments in all this time I realized that it does not have a good sensor, in fact fp4 is the minimum it requires. If I shoot facing down the photos are good, but if I point towards the sky the shot is hardly good. Also I have verified that the image is produced only in jpg and does not have the option in Raw. What I shoot with the phone I have never allowed myself to put them in either IQ or FP.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PROPOLI87, since Ikan Kekek was kind enough to remember me here, let me give you some tips. Yes, it will be hard for you to get FPs with that camera, but not impossible. My first FP was actually made with an even simpler camera, you only need to know the limitations of the camera and work with that. Your camera will make its best shots of things/scenes/object at a distance between 1 and 5 meters. [1] [2] [3] Trying to do panoramas of scenes with a lot of detail, like this castle, will not work for FP.

However, scenes with something in the foreground and not a lot of detail in the background, like water or snow, will work. You are also depending on having a very, very good light to get enough micro-contrast in the photo (light slightly from the side is best). This is because your camera only do photos in JPEG format and not RAW. With RAW, you can correct the light in post-processing and that is very hard to do with just JPEG. A short, very simple, non-technical way of describing the difference between those two photo formats, is that RAW has much more information about the photo, more "nuances", that you can use when you edit it.

You could also think about getting a tripod so that you can take longer exposure photos. That way you can get more light on the sensor. [4] Use the timer on the camera for that so you don't shake the camera when you press the button. You can also think more about the photo's composition and photograph really interesting things, that way the artistic impression will make it easier for the photo to be appreciated. [5] [6] [7]

My last tip is to take very graphic photos and convert them to black-and-white. [8] [9] That way you are not depending so much on capturing color nuances. I hope these suggestions can help you in some way. Be well! --Cart (talk) 13:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 – though it’s usually a good idea to get a better system, this is not necessary to take FP-worthy shots. And the best camera for you will always be the one you can most easily handle. Regarding the composition here, in my opinion the child is just too far, making it too small in the frame. To get the contrast of young human versus old building, you should have been 2 or 3 times closer to the kid and have him (looks boyish to me) maybe look up towards the towering castle, startled or fascinated by it. That would be more impressive. Easier said than done, of course :) This is by no means a bad picture, it’s just missing the threshold to be elected among our very best ones. --Kreuz schnabel 15:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC):*Thank you(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi W.carterThank you so much for your suggestions, and also confirmations of what I was already starting to understand using my camera. I will follow your advice on time. Thanks again for your availability.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison de Benoit in Rodez (4).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2020 at 10:37:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Other
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The grate and metal bars on the right distract me. I've suggested a crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don’t get what’s supposed to be shown here. On three sides, objects are cut off. Dull light, looks a bit – sorry – uninspired. The building might be fascinating but this is probably not the best shot of it. --Kreuz schnabel 13:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lauffen a.N. - die Regiswindiskirche auf ihrem Felsen über dem Neckar 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 20:52:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info A sharp, colourful image of an attractive church reflected in a river. created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for nominating and all of you for your support! --Aristeas (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Neue Burg, Hofburg, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 143-145 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 14:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info Neue Burg, Hofburg, Vienna, Austria. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, good quality for a night shot. Cmao20 (talk) 16:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria

File:Exterior facade of Residence Bassac at blue hour, town of Champasak, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 03:09:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It should be possible to remove the small white dots in the sky and on the roof --Llez (talk) 15:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the hint -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- And on the roof (see note). --Llez (talk) 16:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I missed three pixels. Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK now --Llez (talk) 06:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 19:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos

File:Reza Abbasi - Two Lovers (1630).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 23:17:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Others
Info created by Reza Abbasi - uploaded by Crisco 1492 - nominated by Hanooz -- Hanooz 23:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 23:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. The frame looks like it's cut off in a funny way, but if so, that's the fault of the museum and doesn't affect the reproduction of the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Persian miniature at its best. --Gnosis (talk) 06:03, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Gnosis. Cmao20 (talk) 17:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Others#Others

File:Филип Велковски.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2020 at 22:00:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info created by Хак Фин - uploaded by Хак Фин - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How is he notable? --A.Savin 02:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He's a painter and visual artist with frequent exhibitions here and there in the recent period (normally, mostly before the pandemic). See this news article (in Macedonian).--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:50, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If the man is the focus, a tighter crop and some more background blurring of the very busy wall would improve the image greatly Kingsif (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the idea of a painter getting lost in his painting. But would like to see a category and at least a wikidata item connected to it. --Andrei (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done I've created a Wikidata item and connected it to this image.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:46, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Somewhat concerned about lack of FOP for 2D works in North Macedonia. The selection of the artist's own work, combined with framing that places more attention on it than on a typical background, means the work is intended to be part of the image rather than just de minimis background. Apart from that, I do think it's a good portrait (if a bit small). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- too busy Seven Pandas (talk) 00:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry, not convinced; neither of notability (not a single one Wikipedia entry), nor of any other special feature of the picture itself, and/or "wow effect". --A.Savin 01:21, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Savin: I've been regularly participating in the promotion of FPs and I can't remember that we've ever discussed notability to be considered a necessary criterion. Take a look at the other FPs of people and you can notice that, in most cases, the name of the person photographed is unknown.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a criterion on Commons FPC. But if I neither see notability nor anything special about the picture itself, I may oppose of course. --A.Savin 13:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My issue is that I don't understand why he was looking up when he was photographed, and I'm pretty nonplussed by that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colors, and potentially an interesting portrait, but per Ikan his expression suggests he's only allowing himself to be photographed with great reluctance and doesn't really enjoy the experience. Plus the art behind him is unsharp. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others and my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prospect Park (94199p).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 00:21:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
Info Just a nice autumn scene in Prospect Park (Brooklyn, New York). 15-frame panorama. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 00:21, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yup, the Hi-Res feature on the newer OM-Ds is impressive, but I do miss some wow. Just a straightforward autumnal scene to me. --Kreuzschnabel 06:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know what Hi-Res is (apparently I should check). This is manual. The wow to me comes in part from the autumnal colors/light, but especially the scope. I wanted to get some detail of the people on the ground, and a span from the tip of green grass to brush/forest, but it's really about the trees for me. The height I wanted was just too tall for even a wide lens (and the one I tried created too much distortion in the trees), so I had a go at a panorama and was really happy with the results (a lucky moment without wind). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment The E-M5 Mk II was the first Olympus body to introduce the internal high resolution (hi-res) mode. In this mode, the camera takes 4 shots within a short span of time using the electronic shutter, moving the 16 MP sensor by ½ pixel between shots. This gives a 64 MP RAW file of which a 40 MP JPG is destilled. --Kreuz schnabel 16:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just wanted to ask, how come Hi-Res can be on unstatic subjects. But i saw 9000+ px length - can Hi-Res do that Kreuz ? talk so is it pana made - more shots stiched ? But it is very sharp, normal Pana stitch deosnt make so sharp photos. So in doubt, how was it made ? --Mile (talk) 15:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Just 15 overlapping individual frames, but it's 3 wide by 5 high. So there's quite a bit of overlap to get several points of focus (some sharpening in post, too). Like I said, it was mainly about the trees for me. Then I let Lightroom stitch them together. I took enough for several panoramas, and this was the one that worked best IMO. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- 9,000+ pixels in width is technically possible – the OM-D sensor records a frame of 4,640×3,472 in RAW mode, with twice the linear resolution in hi-res mode. --Kreuz schnabel 16:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even so. Well quality is perfect. Wondering why we lack Hi-Res shots, some people have it. At least to evade "Bayer filter" and get real colors, just downsize it back to some 16 Mpx. --Mile (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Very high-quality and atmospheric, but no great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp and beautiful. I agreed about the composition at first, but it is growing on me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment New version uploaded. Just a minor touch-up for compositional reasons (saturation on the right edge because the similarity of saturation on the edges is one of the things I liked about it in-person, but the first version didn't capture that; and a selective shadows adjustment that's hopefully not too much of a liberty at the very bottom). Unlikely to change any minds but FYI pings @Cmao20, Ikan Kekek, Kreuzschnabel, and PetarM: — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What's special here? Sorry, I really don't get the composition and subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Yes, that was an unusually warm day for this time of year and it shows in the photo, and it's nice to see people in the picture wearing masks and/or keeping their six-foot distance. It must have felt very special, but this didn't come through. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Rhododendrites I would still looking for some beter composition. For this, i would not put people od the dge of photo, but more to third rule or middle. But quality ig very good. Some different photo in this IQ migth pass. Also i would not mix shadow and sun part.--Mile (talk) 10:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination meh. it's discouraging to get exactly the shot I wanted and be certain it's an FP but hear it's a dud, but oh well. probably won't be the last time. onward. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 05:11, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:20181206-FS-APACHE-SITGREAVES-LSC-0241 (33334016438) (cropped).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 07:38:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service/Lance Cheung - uploaded by Kingsif - nominated by Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose composition with digger behind his head Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. The composition does not work for me either. --Cayambe (talk) 12:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, and too much noise --Llez (talk) 15:10, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Its a great American portrait with a great story behind it. It's not really staged, not cleaned to perfection, and this is the kind of photo I would like to have more on this website. --Andrei (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Andrei. Imperfect, but it tells a story. Cmao20 (talk) 22:07, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lots of noise, and I don't really see what's so special about it.--Peulle (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Funny idea with the excavator arm but nothing that stunning indeed. --Kreuz schnabel 11:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. The framing with the arm doesn't work for me. Daniel Case (talk) 16:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Comet NEOWISE (50155614036).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2020 at 05:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by Deborah Lee Soltesz - uploaded by Kingsif - nominated by Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 05:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 05:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too noisy. Tomer T (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very beautiful but I do think it's a bit too noisy. Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others with a bit of reluctance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support: certainly noisy, but other factors outweigh it for me --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per The Cosmonaut --Tesla - 💬 13:28, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A beautiful image of one of the "little souvenirs / Of a horrible year / That make me smile inside". All the same ... we've gotten much better, more technically accomplished pictures of similar sights. Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac de Roy 10.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2020 at 10:34:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably would have supported even if it had been half this resolution. I think the colours could do with being a little more saturated though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mountain scenery for me. There is probably a dark spot in the sky. left of center. The colors are a bit undersaturated (Comment from Cmao20)--Famberhorst (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Remove dust spots. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:03, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 04:19, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good image. It is presumably a panorama from 4 or more Nikon D3300 images, pl. add suitable categories. --Tagooty (talk) 06:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Clouds have a reddish or magenta cast, could you get the colours straight? --Kreuz schnabel 13:45, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:38, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie

File:Altenstein Burgkapelle -20200106-RM-161824.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 21:47:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info Ruin of the castle chapel Altenstein. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That sunset glow is too good not to support. Cmao20 (talk) 17:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A view romantic and accurate at the same time. --Aristeas (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany

File:Nieuw blad van Cyclamen hederifolium tussen herfstbladeren. 13-11-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2020 at 05:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Primulaceae
Info New leaves of Cyclamen hederifolium between fallen autumn leaves. Focus stack of 24 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment see notes for stacking errors. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: sorry, I don't see any errors. Only some dark discoloration of wet spots.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment imo the foreground blurry part was a bit out of focus (or camera moved) and the second one is cloning mark of the stacking program, which shouldn't be very hard to fix. --Ivar (talk) 19:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for your comments. I have checked the edits of the photo. Nowhere have I used the clone brand..--Famberhorst (talk) 06:06, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose What apppears to be a stacking error still there. I would be surprised if the shadow is there on every individual image. Will remove oppose if it is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Thanks for checking Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: I have reviewed all 24 photos and all photos have that dark discoloration. The plants are in all weathers. That's just nature.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks fine to me. I don't see obvious focus stacking errors -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the brown leaf. The edge is blurred when it shouldn't be. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem here for me. The other note disappeared -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The contrast of colours is very nice. --Aristeas (talk) 18:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Primulaceae

File:View from Shashur Monastery , Keylong.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2020 at 10:34:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created by Navneetsharmaiit - uploaded by Navneetsharmaiit - nominated by Navneetsharmaiit -- Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love the beautiful mountain scenery. But the photo seems over-edited. Has too many dark areas in the foreground. and supersaturated colors.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love the composition, but the photo seems too red in places such as the snow in the near left corner and the trees on the left-hand hillside in the middleground, particularly in shadow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The white balance seems wrong, harsh light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, fine but looks overdone. --Kreuz schnabel 13:33, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A stunning view, but, per Basile, are the colours really natural? Cmao20 (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for all your views. I agree with you all that the colors shown are too unnatural.I will re-edit the image and nominate it after some while. Thank you -- User:Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 06:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dendrobates tinctorius var. azureus - Karlsruhe Zoo 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 07:09:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Family : Dendrobatidae (Poison Dart Frogs)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love it, a blue frog! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of few when flash can help. --Mile (talk) 14:48, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ zoo, but nice. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I missed that we already have three FPs, the existing one from the same zoo is better. Try for something new! Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:56, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I agree with Charles, the shot is good and the subject is unusual, but indeed we have already 3 FPs of this species (all from zoos, I believe) and one even of the same frog and photographer. I also believe that this one is of higher quality and detail than this candidate Poco a poco (talk) 15:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 21:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support H -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians#Family : Dendrobatidae (Poison Dart Frogs)

File:PeruRail EMD GT42AC 801 and 814 between Matarani and La Joya.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 06:19:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple and beautiful. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:26, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shot at the right time, excellent viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:34, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose rock blocks part of the train. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp --Milseburg (talk) 14:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but per above Poco a poco (talk) 11:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk)
Support ! -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Kalarivaathukkal Bhagavathi Theyyam.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2020 at 15:51:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info-Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of dance worship in Kerala, India. There are many different forms of Theyyam. Each Theyyam has different costumes, headgears, and rituals. This is a headgear of Kalarivathukkal Bhagavathi (Goddess of martial arts) which considered as tallest headgear among Theyyam.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems that post-processing has created a halo effect. Can you make sure that clarity is not too high? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:52, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Could you please help me to improve? -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think this picture needs more description on the file page. What is this structure and what is its significance? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:18, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question King of ♥, where's the halo effect? I'm not seeing it and would support this nomination if you hadn't said anything, but maybe you could show me where to find it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The parts of the sky immediately around the object are slightly lighter than other parts of the sky. It is often a sign of oversharpening, too much clarity, too much shadow recovery, or bad HDR (only the original editor will know what happened here). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some changes. Is it acceptable? --Shagil Kannur (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Image quality not perfect but IMO still worth featuring as an image of an interesting cultural phenomenon Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but the halo all around is very disturbing, as something really strange -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Now I understand. I've removed some shadows from the objects. It was a late, cloudy afternoon and the light was very low. And i couldn't repair as original file is missing. Sorry.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the post-processing looks quite artificial unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's a little magenta CA right near the top of the structure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose CA is fixable, but I'm not wowed by this one. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piran Portorož Tunnel Valetta-8031.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2020 at 20:02:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Slovenia
Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 04:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:49, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support E -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course, a very nice find. Cmao20 (talk) 01:05, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --panda kekok 9 02:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danu Widjajanto (talk) 12:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Slovenia

File:Wroclaw- Dworzec, perony.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2020 at 09:10:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:10, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 13:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I like the composition and the network of railway tracks and overhead lines. —Bruce1ee^talk 07:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn't think much of this in thumbnail, but at full size it's a really good photo. Cmao20 (talk) 01:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, special light, interesting viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Bruce and Cmao. --panda kekok 9 02:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A busy composition that works because of that. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --18:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations

File:Top View of Sissu , Lahaul.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2020 at 09:03:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created by Navneetsharmaiit - uploaded by Navneetsharmaiit - nominated by Navneetsharmaiit -- Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 09:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 09:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the composition, but I was waiting to see if anyone had any thoughts about the white balance. What do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is not clear to me what is to be shown here. The view from above alone does not make an FP.--Ermell (talk) 07:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ermell. Unclear subject. It might show a spot within Sissu but it does not show Sissu as such, so the title is misleading. As for image quality, this is rather soft and noisy. The unusual perspective alone does not raise much wow to me. --Kreuz schnabel 13:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per above. It's quite interesting but the image quality is less than perfect and I don't find the composition too outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 01:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ermell. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for all your views and criticism.-- User:Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 04:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redmond's Pond1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 02:29:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
Info: Sifton Bog; one of the most southerly acidic bogs in Canada. All by --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful panorama but there is a stitching error in the bottom right corner. Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, will fix later today. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done: error fixed Cmao20 --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I really like the colours in this panorama. Cmao20 (talk) 20:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice, but I'd like to see more of the pond to the left and maybe the near shore. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak support Nice scene but seems a tad oversharpened. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed, slightly over-processed. But I think the recording is special enough to support.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the photograph, but there are too much halos and details are missing. --XRay 💬 14:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This photo has very nice, peaceful elements but doesn't feel like a complete composition to me. I particularly feel like it's cut off on the left and front. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Natuurgebied Petgatten De Feanhoop. 19-10-2020. (actm.) 29.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 05:34:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info Nature reserve Petgatten De Feanhoop. American Herkules windmill in Petgatten de Feanhoop. Year of construction 1926.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The centered composition isn't quite sitting well with me. I would crop off either the left or right, but I can't decide which one looks better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Besides of strong noise, a reddish cast in the clouds, and maybe a bit too much sharpening applied: I don’t think this is the best point of view for a shot of this windmill. The foreground is too dominating and entirely uninteresting, covering part of the object. The centered composition is too static for me, too straightforward, in other words: no wow :) Try to get closer with a wide-angle lens, that might work better. --Kreuz schnabel 11:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine with both. --Mile (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 15:10, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cropped too close to be balanced on the left, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 03:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support To me the cropped version is better. Cmao20 (talk) 07:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#The Netherlands

The chosen alternative is: File:Natuurgebied Petgatten De Feanhoop. 19-10-2020. (actm.) 29a.jpg

File:Himalayan salt (coarse).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 13:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info All by Ivar (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:05, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun photo, and also may be a good COM:VIC nominee if it's best in scope (I didn't check all its possible competitors). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-executed photo. Cmao20 (talk) 07:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Quality is good but not crispy --Poco a poco (talk) 11:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 19:49, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Salt with bokeh ... who'd've thought? Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

File:Schloss Johannisberg (Aschaffenburg) II.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2020 at 14:29:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info Johannisburg Castle in Aschaffenburg, seen from the northwest. All by me.--Milseburg (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:29, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:45, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice but needs more space at the top. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: agree with the above --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support either way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per King of Hearts. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:25, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per KoH. Too tight on the top side. --Kreuz schnabel 14:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above, not a FP to me like this, will take the vote back if fixed Poco a poco (talk) 11:02, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit tight at the top but FP to me anyway. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aquila heliaca vs. Eudorcas thomsonii.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 00:44:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Unsorted
Info created and uploaded by Cmocho, nominated by Amakuha. --Amakuha (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I understand that the picture doesn't have 40+ MP and is not technically impeccable, but I think the scene is incredibly dramatic and rare. I use it as a wallpaper on my 17 inch display and the quality looks sufficiently good to me. Moreover, there seem to be very few featured pictures of eagles in general. --Amakuha (talk) 00:44, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A very impressive scene, but having nothing sharp at 4 MP is just too much even for a wildlife action shot. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree, but I think this would be a good valued image, so please nominate in the appropriate scope at COM:VIC. Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per KoH. Impressive but that doesn’t quite excuse the lack of quality here. --Kreuz schnabel 06:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 09:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lovely action shot with plenty of wow, but the quality is just a little too low for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the most beautiful images I have seen in a long time.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically awkward, thus not a FP, but definitely a valuable document, per KoH and Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others ... I don't need to look at it at full-res to see the technical issues. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this is a good example of why we allow 2 megapixels photos at FPC. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karst peaks with sea of clouds at sunrise, South view from the top of Mount Nam Xay, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2020 at 04:07:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fog
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:28, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:14, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 18:22, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Y -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support J'en ai vu qqunes comme ça du Laos sur les réseaux sociaux. C'est magnifique ! - Benh (talk) 16:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Doesn't really need my vote, but deserves it anyway -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Urara Haru 麗春 02:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fog

File:F-22 Raptor - 100702-F-4815G-217.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 10:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by Senior Airman Gustavo Gonzalez - uploaded by DeffiSK~commonswiki - nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 10:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 10:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It looks very nice, but the low resolution bothers me. It's already a 10 year old photo, so ... --Peulle (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For compact camera resolution would be OK, but not for newer DSLR. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

File:Viaduc - arches (Chaumont).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 10:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 10:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support But cables interfere. -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 10:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like it, but I've never seen weak support from the photographer who nominated their own work, and I don't know how to react to that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, so I fully support (I wanted to be realistic, the cables can disturb). Gzen92 ^[discuter] 13:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 14:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The cables are an eyesore but the geometry is remarkable :) - Benh (talk) 14:38, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried to erase them, but too complex. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 14:51, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm OK with the cables; the only thing that bothers me is some unsharpness in the upper foreground. But I love the view through the arches. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That wiring is not a plus but the perspective is really nice --Poco a poco (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a Infinity mirror --Wilfredor (talk) 13:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cables don't really bother me so much. Lovely photo. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:16, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The wirings are not OK for me.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 13:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cant those wires be solved !? --Mile (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please, don’t! Such a large part is not easily cloned out, and that would be a serious alteration to reality and still look awful, I fear. Sure this is a matter of taste but the cables don’t spoil this image in my eyes, in fact it would be boring without them, too perfect to be real somehow. --Kreuz schnabel 19:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kreuz you might be correct, if they would be in central line it would work somehow. Let's give a try. I would not be so sure until i compare them. Is size original Gzen92. You can mail me if in RAW format. --Mile (talk) 21:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- No RAW sorry. Removing the cables on the ground would be feasible (in the dark it's more complicated), but we must recreate the shadow of the barrier. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 07:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well send jpeg. What is drawn at the end of hall ? Seems un-original. --Mile (talk) 08:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The version of September 11, 2020, 2:02 PM is the original, no retouche. Greetings Gzen92 ^[discuter] 09:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Wonderful composition, but disturbing elements and details missing. It looks like a little bit oversharpened too. --XRay 💬 14:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Trango Towers 2.jpg (delist), delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 15:00:08

Info Original nomination
Delist Nice view, but for today's standards still not particularly exciting, low resolution, and rather low quality. It's similar as this recently delisted picture. --A.Savin 15:00, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For 2004 this was the top image, made on top. Anyway, the author should be noted - pinged. --Mile (talk) 19:34, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a much better composition than the other photo you link to, the quality is not that low, and I again say I don't think we should be delisting photos merely because they're below the current size requirements, unless their status as FPs is really glaring, or otherwise, I'd repeat that we should save time and deputize a bot to remove the FP status of all photos below 2MP. I'd support that in lieu of spending time on one delist nomination of an old FP after another, but I know I won't win that argument so soon after losing it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I choose delist suggestions carefully, and I'm against delisting purely on size basis. --A.Savin 21:57, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK, I appreciate that. But I don't think the quality is poor enough to be glaring for an old FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delist Too small, over-sharpening halo visible at thumbnail size, vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Below 2 MP with no mitigating factors. Again, we're not delisting photos because they're below current size requirements (which are really more like 10 MP for landscapes), but because they're well below current size requirements. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Per nom --Poco a poco (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist It's a very similar case to the other one. Very small and lacking anything truly outstanding to make up for it. Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful delist Beautiful scene that is nevertheless not an FP anymore due to small size and oversharpening, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist It looks pretty good at first glance, but it's too small, doesn't contain a lot of details.--Urara Haru 麗春 02:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 delist, 2 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 00:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dörzbach - Hohebach - Jüdischer Friedhof - Ansicht 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 07:42:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A bit too chaotic for me, and the shadow on the lower left is distracting. Maybe move 5 metres forward and pan the camera to the left to have the tombstones stand in rows would be finer. --Kreuz schnabel 14:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, it looks very natural and still has a WoW for me --Kritzolina (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Good quality photo but I kind of agree with Kreuzschnabel a little, the composition is not as good as some of Aristeas' photos Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, Andrei, for nominating and all of you for your comments! --Aristeas (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know what was further left, but I'm not loving the left crop though I like the rest of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I've decided the left crop is OK, and the rest of the photo is certainly worth it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:30, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thank you! I have taken your remark about the crop really seriously, and have tried for an hour or two to find a better solution. But is really difficult – every crop will cut two or more gravestones in an unfortunate manner. This is why I did not respond … --Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I understand. I really like the way the light hits the gravestones. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:55, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Germany

File:Istanbul asv2020-02 img55 View of Beşiktaş.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2020 at 15:09:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info Oil tanker "Aegean Harmony" (IMO 9338917) on the Bosphorus in Istanbul, with a view of Beşiktaş in the background --- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 15:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work. Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Your note giving a link to a view of the same motif without the ship encompasses the entire frame, so that I can no longer view the photo at full size. Please edit that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. --A.Savin 11:20, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Still undecided. The view of the ship against the scenery is impressive, but the sky and skyline aren't very interesting, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Wow. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:06, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view. --Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh ship! Drab sky actually works in the image's favor as it makes the ship's bright red pop out more. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships

File:Vexillum obeliscus 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 07:59:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Costellariidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Especially wowing since it's only 2.5 cm. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well photographed -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 12:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 23:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good one. Cmao20 (talk) 01:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 14:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Costellariidae

File:Isla de Corbera, Santander, España, 2019-08-15, DD 68 orig.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2020 at 15:51:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Cantabria (new section)
Info created & uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool finding :) thank you for the nom! Poco a poco (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ very nice composition (would have been epic with a wider view showing the height of the cliffs?) - Benh (talk) 16:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

moved support to much better alternative. - Benh (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- too narrow, top chopped off, diver too low in composition.Seven Pandas (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, I don't feel like this composition has a lot of wow factor either. --Peulle (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. --Ivar (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Gnosis (talk) 08:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alt[edit]

Comment Ok, I offer with permission of Tomer T a new version with a wider crop on top and bottom. Pinging @Benh, Cmao20, Seven Pandas, Peulle, Iifar, and Fischer.H: Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's remarkable. Much improved. Almost too much room at the bottom (but I'm nitpicking). If I may, you could selectively reduce the contrast of the big bubbles which draw our eyes on them, and slightly make the diver stands out. Even the water pattern on top would benefit from an emphasis. But these are my two cents only. Epic view IMO. - Benh (talk) 20:40, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benh: Done, thanks for the hints! Poco a poco (talk) 15:27, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Benh, the new crop turns a very good photo into a great one. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 08:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tagooty (talk) 12:00, 4 Decembe r 2020 (UTC)
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 13:51, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 15:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! Tomer T (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support much better Seven Pandas (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 12 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Spain#Cantabria

The chosen alternative is: File:Isla de Corbera, Santander, España, 2019-08-15, DD 68.jpg

File:Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics (Ravenna).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 17:29:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Italy
Info Mausoleum of Galla Placidia mosaics, UNESCO World heritage site, Ravenna.
Info It is almost a renomination of the delisted image, due to puppet vote. But now I used photo stack and some spaces are much more clear and sharp. This time in "landscape" format. All by --Mile (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 17:29, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extremely beautiful mosaics. Cmao20 (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 01:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:22, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful detail of the great Ravenna mosaics. --Aristeas (talk) 18:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:49, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Italy

File:Mistletoebird - Round Hill Nature Reserve.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2020 at 00:59:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Dicaeidae_(Flowerpeckers)
Info JJ Harrison is really on form with this sharp photo of a beautiful bird. As a bonus, there are not yet any FPs of birds from this family. created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanooz (talk • contribs)
Question JJ Harrison, Cmao20 is that pink shade real ? It covers much of birds body - head, wings. --Mile (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mile, have a look at other pictures of this bird in the category. The colours look right to me. Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did. They have more shiny top, but i think it over a bit. Saw huge focal with multiplier used. I saw this, Fuji brings more natural color. Up to author. --Mile (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 12:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, considering that this bird only grows to be 9–10 cm long, and it's quite beautiful, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 14:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support though maybe a little too much horizontal space. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Dicaeidae_(Flowerpeckers)

File:Sunset , Explored on 2016.05.13 , Thank you all - Flickr - Pásztor András.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2020 at 08:14:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info created by Pásztor András - uploaded by Red panda bot - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose At thumbnail size it's pretty. But the details are washed out. -- -donald- (talk) 09:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Totally out of topic description -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not fixed after 4 days -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Colors are off, sorry, this does not work for me --Kritzolina (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very pretty, but resolution is not very high and the detail is quite smudgy. Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20, Basile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; it's time to withdraw this nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Downy woodpecker (62923).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 21:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Piciformes_(Woodpeckers_and_Relatives)
Info Downy woodpecker around golden hour in Prospect Park, Brooklyn. I would've liked her to get just a little lower, but I think the light/sharpness compensates. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO a little bit dark, but still, beautiful bird and very sharp photo. Cmao20 (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To much of tree. --Mile (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A good, but not exceptional recording, no wow apparent. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition. Bird hidden behind the branch. Overall not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Global Power Bomber CTF conducts B-1B external captive carry demonstration (201120-F-JG201-9095).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 02:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by Staff Sgt. Sean Carnes - uploaded by & nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 02:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --ToprakM ^✉ 02:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Striking. I'm glad the filename will be changed, though the change should be done after the nomination is over. I think it needs at least one more category, for the desert scenery below, and probably one for aerial photography (though would that be redundant?). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Added Category:B-1 Lancer in flight over desert and Category:Rockwell B-1 Lancer at Edwards Air Force Base --ToprakM ^✉ 20:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info File renamed to File:Global Power Bomber CTF conducts B-1B external captive carry demonstration (201120-F-JG201-9095).jpg. --ToprakM ^✉ 23:30, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support background is imo very good. --Ivar (talk) 06:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Frightening transport --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 04:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice piece of technology well captured. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 09:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport

File:June16protestTreefong16.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 03:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

2 million Hongkongers participated in the June 16 demonstration in 2019.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by hf9631 - uploaded by hf9631 - nominated by Hf9631 -- Hf9631 (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hf9631 (talk) 03:29, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, there is nothing sharp. -- -donald- (talk) 06:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per donald. Too bad; it looks good as a thumbnail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Thanks for the comments. What if it is intentionally blurred the faces of the crowd, for the sake of preventing the ascertainment from the government and the despotism? --Hf9631 (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I doubt that would work (you really think the Chinese authorities are stymied that easily?), but the reason for the blurring doesn't bear on the quality of the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see your point. Thanks again for the evaluation. (We are just striving in agony. Nobody is safe in our city these days.) --Hf9631 (talk) 23:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You have my full sympathy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regretful oppose It would be easy to blur just the faces in the foreground and leave everything else sharp if the understandable need to protect protesters' identities were the issue. However, not only is everything unsharp, there's a lot of noise in the back. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khusraw, accompagné par un homme à moustache, s'avance vers le château de Shîrîn, 1er quart 19e s.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2020 at 04:04:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Others
Info created by an unknown painter - uploaded and nominated by Hanooz -- Hanooz 04:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hanooz 04:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP to me, nice artwork and good reproduction. I guess this has had little interest so far because the frame takes up so much of the image. Still good, though. Cmao20 (talk) 01:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't quite seem up to the standards of our other FPs of paintings. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 21:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Windows
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo but I think it should be cropped so it's a bit more centered. Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting line in the foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 05:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eiger-Nordwand IMG 9984.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 14:47:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural # Switzerland/Bern
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best lighting, washed-out mountain face. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No great composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wroclaw - Katedra Jana Chrzciciela w nocy.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 08:03:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 13:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks overprocessed --Llez (talk) 10:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are some posterization lines in the sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Llez. Sometimes this is inevitable with long exposures but I don't think it had to be this way here (The contrast between the static church and the moving water and clouds above and below it is also a little jarring). Daniel Case (talk) 00:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurry sky due to the long exposure, and per Llez, Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Andrei (talk) 11:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catedral de San Martín, Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 75-77 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2020 at 12:30:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Slovakia
Info St. Martin's Cathedral, Bratislava, Slovakia. The Roman Catholic cathedral, the largest in the country, is located in the western border of the historical city center below Bratislava Castle. The construction began in 1311 over a church from 1204 and continued as long as in the 16th century, but the consecration and inauguration was in 1452. The cathedral, one of the landmarks of the city, is especially known for being the coronation church of the Kingdom of Hungary between 1563 and 1830. Slovakia is btw underrepresented in FP, if it succeeds it would be the first church interior in Slovakia with FP status. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment very nice light and composition but unfortunately the arch up front has a simmetry issue --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's the way this old church looks like, I was centered, look at the altar Poco a poco (talk) 13:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Andrei (talk) 12:53, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would support if CA removed (marked), while I think there are not symmetry problems, it's just a Gothic, saw a similar "problem" here. --Mile (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mile: the CA is gone Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If so. --Mile (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, high-resolution church interior with a number of interesting architectural features Cmao20 (talk) 01:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly a nice interior, but we've had much sharper church interiors nominated by several photographers for the last several years. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I miss in your comment, Ikan Kekek, some kind of appreciation for the fact that we had, until now, no quality content of the most important church in the country. There are marvelous churches in the city where I live. Guess why I don't take any pictures of them although I could probably get a special permission for tripod and at a time when there are no visitors. The answer is easy, those churchs are already overrepresented (and no, not by works of mine). I feel like getting good material of this kind of places, in spite of the additional effort and mostly more challenging conditions, is worth it. Poco a poco (talk) 21:11, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It absolutely is worth it! That would be an excellent argument at COM:VIC. I can't get a search for VIs in this category to work at the moment, but this photo and one other one by you look like the best in scope, this one for "altar" and File:Catedral de San Martín, Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 72-74 HDR.jpg for some scope like "nave, looking toward altar". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Slovakia

File:גלישת עננים למכתש רמון.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 11:56:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Israel or Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fog
Info created & uploaded by Giladtop - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Andrei (talk) 13:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 19:02, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support big wooow... - Benh (talk) 19:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. if I remember this spot correctly, this would have to be a drone shot (out over the makhtesh) -- probably worth noting in the cats/description. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and unique. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wonderful. I'll support it. But: The image is leaning out. Please have a look to the upper left. --XRay 💬 06:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:58, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking.--Peulle (talk) 11:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, perfect timing. But please, per XRay fix the tilt/perspective Poco a poco (talk) 19:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if someone can help with the tilt I'd be glad. Tomer T (talk) 05:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per X-ray --Ermell (talk) 07:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Breathtaking, wow -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! Impressive lights. --Mosbatho (talk) 21:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not perfect technically but great wow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:31, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 19:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fog

File:Гора Говерла після заходу сонця.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 13:12:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created by Khoroshkov - uploaded by Khoroshkov - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support like something out of a video game — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:11, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:07, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:17, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 13:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 21:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 22:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks almost like a logo ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hanooz 12:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, this is marvelous. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

Raspberry, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 13:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Raspberry
Halved raspberry
Many raspberries

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Ivar Very strange-artificial DOF gradience, seems like Heaviside function. There are also some mistakes, which I can't add since I don't see "Add a note" button. ISO 500 is for...? I would put just 1st photo, corrected. --Mile (talk) 14:26, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What is the question? Honestly, I didn't understand most of Your comment. --Ivar (talk) 14:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This has been composed by focus stacking, which of course is not a bad thing as such, but I think the steps should have been narrower. --Kreuz schnabel 14:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Kreuz explained in more understadable words, also asking why ISO 500 - it wasn't handsfree, so. --Mile (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kreuzschnabel: if the stacking step is too wide, you'll see a blurry sector across the photo (especially visible on the base). Do You actually see that? All frames with DOF are overlapping and that with the help of stacking programs remote-control. Mile: with modern DSLR cameras ISO 500 has no impact on photos quality, if You are referring to that. --Ivar (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ivar, to create a smoother transition from in-focus to out-of-focus areas, I often find it useful to add a few extra frames to the end of the stack, taken with the lens progressively stopped down. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support All three pics seem like FPs to me. Cmao20 (talk) 23:48, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. I'm impressed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- -donald- (talk) 07:10, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the transition from sharp to unsharp is a little bit steep on the underground only, but the fruits seem impeccable, appetizing, astonishing … --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If there are defects I am quite unable to find them. But i never did focus stacking. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:28, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very appetizing level of detail :-) Basile Morin (talk) 10:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can practically taste these ... Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Llez (talk) 09:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Wildsee - Kaltenbronn 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2020 at 07:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 18:33, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I fail to see what is so special here. —kallerna (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Me too. It's nice, but that's all. --Peulle (talk) 08:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kallerna and Peulle. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Nothing really wrong with this shot, it’s just not that outstanding IMHO. Funnily, I just digitized my slides of the very same lake taken in 1995 when I was living nearby. --Kreuz schnabel 16:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow Assumption Church at Putinki asv2019-09.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 14:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Russia
Info Interior of the Church of St. Mary's Assumption at Putinki* (pronounced with accent on the 2nd syllable), built in 1676, in Moscow ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice shot, but not sharp enough for a FP.--Alexander-93 (talk) 21:40, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alexander. Great color, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very beautiful but I agree with the above that you have presented sharper photos here. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 09:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Peninsula Paris, 23 June 2014.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 07:12:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created and uploaded by PPR 19 - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 07:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! Tomer T (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really good, but please remove magenta and green CAs first. --XRay 💬 14:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really nice, but 2 dust spots should be removed: 1 is just above and a hair to the left of the antenna in the center/right; the other one is further up in the sky, among the clouds above the decoration on the left side of the roof that's on top of the middle row of windows on that side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thank Ikan Kekek!--Paris 16 (talk) 04:06, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose For now, per XRay Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 21:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France

File:Weihnachten, Schriftzug "MERRY XMAS" -- 2020 -- 3710.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2020 at 06:03:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 06:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merry XMas to you, too (in 15 days)! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I find croped version much better. --Mile (talk) 17:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Thank you for your suggestion, but I prefer the current version with more space around. --XRay 💬 05:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
🎄 Amazing, to discover who's hidden behind Santa Claus, just swap the order of these nine letters: MR XRAY'S ME 🎅 :-) Now trying to decipher the symmetrical words below, but the message gets a bit WEIRD, XWAY :-) Basile Morin (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

:-) Your comment is a highlight. We should think about "featured comments" ... --XRay 💬 11:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inspiring concept :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clever. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice idea Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:Band playing for the day Jesus of Mercy 3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 17:59:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 17:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I feel sure someone will quibble with the crops, but it won't be me. I find this interesting to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good shot and deservedly QI – but the tight crop spoils it for me. Just to satisfy the comment above :) --Kreuz schnabel 19:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per kreuz Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kreuzschnabel.--Peulle (talk) 07:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Ikan that this is an interesting picture, I quite like the crop. --Kritzolina (talk) 13:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose mostly because of the background --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Uoaei1. I could forgive the top crop—and only that one—were it not for the background. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jomblang Cave - Indonesia 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 13:12:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Indonesia
Info created by Snowmanstudios - uploaded by Snowmanstudios - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of litter all aroud unfortunately, but impressive. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:50, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose All perfect, till I met plastic dump. Often i collect garbage around my home. I i would be there, i would collect plastic, throw it in the garbage and make a shot. --Mile (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Uoaei1 @PetarM Plastic pollution is an unfortunate reality in Indonesia... :( Danu Widjajanto (talk) 18:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. Personally I would clone out the litter but it's OK if you don't want to Cmao20 (talk) 01:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. -- -donald- (talk) 09:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:48, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Garbage is unfortunate but it is a part of the reality of this place. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alexander-93 (talk) 21:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Indonesia

File:Piaynemo Raja Ampat.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 13:18:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Indonesia
Info created by Rolandandika - uploaded by Rolandandika - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ha ha -Killarnee (C•T•U) 14:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rolandandika (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC+7)
Weak oppose Pretty but I don't find the composition really outstanding and the image quality is not quite perfect. It's a good landscape and deserves QI but I'm not sure it's FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In the middle of the picture on the right, remove the red object. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and also crop it on every side, there are white pixels from the rotation. -- -donald- (talk) 10:46, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Even if the above-noted white areas were cropped out (and they should be in any event), this is one of this pictures that had the potential to be an FP, but not at this particular moment. The reflection of the big sheet cloud waters (ahem) down what should be a lovely aqua in the foreground. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goat neonato.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 02:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Useful picture, but I don't think it works that well for FPC with its face in shadow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan; the hooves at the left are also sort of distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia del Santo Cristo, Praia da Vitória, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-24, DD 56.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2020 at 22:20:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info Christ's Church, Praia da Vitória, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal. The original temple dates from 1521 but it was completely destroyed by a fire in 1921 and rebuilt 3 years later, as you can see in the facade. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive photo of a beautiful motif. Minor compressions/distortions are forgiveable seeing you were probably standing as far back as you could to get it in the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Certainly beautiful, but the top isn't very sharp and of course this photo has a lot of competition from other photos of church facades. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Exceptional colors. Axel ^(talk) 12:07, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 18:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good light conditions, but low wow effect, lack of sharpness and distortion at top ~~and unfortunate bottom crop~~. --Ivar (talk) 19:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar, Ikan Kekek New version uploaded I've improved the distortion on the top (to my defense I've to say that there was no further room at the back to minimize that distortion), the sharpening and the bottom crop --Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the improvement. I'm still not supporting, but it looks like most others feel that it meets the standard for an FP of a church facade. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Quite honestly, I think this is a very good photo but not one of the greatest on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This vote feels lile a punch in the face. Ikan Kekek I regret now having "invested"my time to improve the image Poco a poco (talk) 21:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way. Nothing personal on my part. You're one of the great photographers on this site, and you would certainly remember how many of your photos I've voted for and nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Bottom crop is now better, but other disadvantages are still there. I agree with Ikan, it's not one of the finest church images on Commons. --Ivar (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Generally fine, a bit oversharpened IMHO but that might be a matter of taste. What really doesn’t please me is the heavy distortion of the bell in the upper right. --Kreuz schnabel 14:23, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A great effort, but unfortunately it doesn't overcome the distortion and unsharpness at the top. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal

File:Münster, Schlossplatz, Frühjahrssend -- 2019 -- 4150.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2020 at 01:00:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Machines
Info One of those photos where the composition is everything, for me. created by XRay - uploaded by XRay - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 01:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition looks a bit haphazard to me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 07:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some more space of left and above would be even better, but compo work. The circle is in a nice mood. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Angle and crop make me see the Ferris wheel in a new way. --Aristeas (talk) 18:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Don't mind the composition, but it's a little too soft in too many places for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you, Cmao20, for nomination. -- @Daniel Case: I just improved the sharpness a little bit. --XRay 💬 05:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:Muraqqa-e Golshan (Page 118).png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2020 at 07:10:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Others
Info created by Mir Ali Heravi - uploaded and nominated by Hanooz -- Hanooz 07:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info more details: https://www.reed.edu/persian-calligraphy/en/mir-ali-al-kateb-heravi/1/index.html. Hanooz 07:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hanooz 07:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How big is it? Also, it looks to me like part of the composition is cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~ 40 x 25 per Iranica [10]. I'm not sure about the composition. These are other pages of the Golshan album. Hanooz 12:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It looks like 40 x 25 is for the entire page. If we're considering the composition to be only the smaller rectangle, I'm trying to figure out how big that is. I feel like the reproduction could be sharper and more detailed, but I also haven't seen the work in person. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support It's a bit small, but I find it very beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Restanten voormalige rioolwaterzuiveringsinstallatie in Broek bij Joure. 01-06-2020 (d.j.b.) 06.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 16:00:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Other building.
Info Remnants of the former sewage water treatment plant on the Tramwei at the Trambrug in Broek near Joure. Photographed in the warm light of the early morning sun.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but this concrete structure is more unattractive than awesome in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. One of those "I can see what you might have been thinking but it just isn't happening" candidates. Daniel Case (talk) 07:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I love this kind of photos of past glory. But I'm probably the only one! (You must be an exception to something).--Famberhorst (talk) 18:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose per Daniel, I definitely see what you thought here and I agree about the idea of 'past glory', but I miss an outstanding composition somehow. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Thank you for your comment. Is this composition better? --Famberhorst (talk) 06:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Steam locomotive.svg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 13:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Engineering
Info created by Jooja - uploaded by Jooja - nominated by Jooja -- Jooja (talk) 13:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question How is a diagram (or two diagrams) with numbers but no key an FP? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In addition to Ikan's perhaps not so rhetorical question, the use of a photo texture for the coal makes me giggle, something I don't think was intended. Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kefermarkter Altar Flügelreliefs, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 13:08:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Annunciation
Nativity of Christ
Adoration of the Magi
Death and Assumption of Mary

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Reliefs at the wings of the Kefermarkt Altarpiece showing scenes from the life of Virgin Mary. Anonymous master (called Master of the Kefermarkt Altarpiece), around 1497. All by me. For the Nativity of Christ, there is an older and less sharp FP, Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg, also by me. If this nomination is successful, I would start a delist request for it. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Fine moment for Christmas. But I find colors/light much better on the older photo, just it is not so sharp. --Mile (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely work by the altarpiece-maker and by you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:31, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 10:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very 3D. Almost pop out the screen - Benh (talk) 17:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Incredible art. --Gnosis (talk) 01:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, Benh. --Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs

File:A Boeing B-52H Stratofortress in flight over the Persian Gulf (190521-F-XN348-9173).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 01:44:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by Senior Airman Keifer Bowes - uploaded & nominated by ToprakM -- --ToprakM ^✉ 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An amazing photo Support --ToprakM ^✉ 01:44, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It does look very good - the file name should be better, though.--Peulle (talk) 08:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scaring enough. I guess the filename is not an issue for FPC --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The filename definitely is an issue, though, and should be changed after the nomination is over. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Renamed to File:A Boeing B-52H Stratofortress in flight over the Persian Gulf (190521-F-XN348-9173).jpg --ToprakM ^✉ 23:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder if this will do well at POTY Cmao20 (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very nice but that tilt is kind of annoying Poco a poco (talk) 19:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional support on correcting the tilt. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Radomianin (talk) 10:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We have lots of photos like these, and I do not love the symmetry here, the tilt is too distracting. —kallerna (talk) 21:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport

File:Multiple rows of golden statues of the Buddha seated with flowers, at Wat Phou Salao, Pakse, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 00:13:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Great perspective but abruptly cropped at the left, why that? --Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The goal was to create a feeling of infinity, like in this one or that one -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Well-done as always but I think it would look even better under a blue sky. Unless there's no good angle possible with the sun out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're certainly right, though I was there another day, and the flowers were not so beautiful. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light due cloudy sky. —kallerna (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overall, the composition is a mess, sorry --Andrei (talk) 10:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:53, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures

File:2017, cuba, jardines aggressor, los indios, nassau grouper maw (36883128693).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 06:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)
Info created by q phia - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 18:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose just small part is enlighted --Mile (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant underwater photography. Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Critically endangered fish, and I really like the way its head is spotlit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:27, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)

File:Pieris brassicae caterpillar-20201107-RM-090913.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 07:13:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
Info Caterpillars of the large cabbage white with hoar frost. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 07:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 07:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks like time stopped with the freezing weather. --Ivar (talk) 10:50, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Do they do well in freezing temperatures? 14:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikan Kekek (talk • contribs)

Comment Caterpillars probably survive short time of freezing, but they have to overwinter as pupae. Anyone, who doesn't make it to puppae stage is gonna die. --Ivar (talk) 16:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 🐛 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 03:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Case (talk • contribs)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good photo Cmao20 (talk) 01:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)

File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 11:54:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 11:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kudos! Very inventive still life. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice idea! --Wilfredor (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good idea and realisation.--Ermell (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish they were stacks of golden coins :-) Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of those images that makes you stop scrolling. I do wish the screws looked more realistic, through, but perhaps there was nothing that could be done about that given that the stacking does keep them all in focus. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What kind of surface is that? Poco a poco (talk) 12:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a glass pane. I bought it for experiments. --XRay 💬 13:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 08:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others

File:WLM - 2020 - Minoritenkirche im Winter.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 20:16:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info The Minoritenkirche, a C14th church in the old town of Vienna. I know the foreground is a tiny bit blurry, but still I think this is an excellent atmospheric photo that gets me in the winter mood. created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the foreground above the manhole cover should be cropped off.--Ermell (talk) 21:59, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I disagree, this would totally ruin the overall composition. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:23, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much foreground. —kallerna (talk) 21:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would still work with a crop, though. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm OK with respecting the artist's choice on the amount of foreground and could see it either way but like the photo as presented. We see the desolation and emptiness of the streets along with the oddly green church. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would crop it (like Ermell), but that’s a matter of taste … --Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per kallerna, and if you would remove all the superfluous ground, this would end up in a rather low resolution, I'm afraid. --A.Savin 19:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Milseburg (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination I still like this photo but it's not got the reception I was hoping for. Cmao20 (talk) 17:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 17:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Western tanager in Chelsea (75305)2-2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2020 at 21:35:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)
Info Western tanager (Piranga ludoviciana) in Manhattan, NY. It was particularly exciting not just because it's a beautiful bird but it's also far outside it's usual range (the western half of the continent). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and reminds me of Japanese prints and paintings. Please add a category for this tree or its berries. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:50, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support cool --A.Savin 03:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good colors and rendering. Probably that bush dissipated light so nice. I wish birds here go more to this kind of color and not shot on high noon - harsh colors, then you even don't know are they real. You could skip that numbers in title. --Mile (talk) 11:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for this. As for the number, nearly all of my uploads have this -- it's to help me to track/find/index and corresponds to Lightroom information and raw filenames. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:09, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, 'Japanese print' was just what I thought . Cmao20 (talk) 23:42, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Megs (talk) 00:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting story https://twitter.com/warrenleightTV/status/1336817738342412289 -- Muhammad (talk) 08:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for linking! I was wondering why it got some extra attention on twitter last night. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice, but I noticed a strange spot on two berries (see notes). To me they look a little bit too harsh to be shadows. Mind having another look? --Lynxbiru (talk) 11:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- They do look a little odd because it's not clear how the shadow is cast (and why there aren't similar shadows elsewhere). They're definitely in the original, though. An alternative guess is that maybe that's how the fruit starts the ripen? It's typically quite hard but the bird was finding lots of soft spots to bite out -- maybe like that? I'm not at all certain, but I don't think it's a camera error or the like. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lynxbiru, the spots are shadows cast by the berries to the right of those two. They happen to line up with the direction of the light. --Cart (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not thought of that, but you are probably right. Sorry for the trouble. Support --Lynxbiru (talk) 15:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC) The interplay of bird, berries and blue sky is indeed beautiful.[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 08:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It would have been even nicer cropped more to the center, but then it would probably have been too small for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The crop should be tighter. —kallerna (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cardinalidae_(Cardinals,_Grosbeaks,_Saltators_and_Allies)

File:Annunciazione Santuario del Carmine San Felice del Benaco.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 11:41:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:41, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 14:38, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting annunciation fresco. --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:41, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity

File:Igreja da Penha by Diego Baravelli I.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2020 at 16:36:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Diego Baravelli - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Too poor description IMO --Llez (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light, the main subject gets lost in the background, oversharpened. —kallerna (talk) 21:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The haze and noise in the background are drawbacks, but the view is really striking and the composition is good. I don't know whether I should consider this one of the best photos on the site, and the description does indeed need improvement to encompass the whole scene, but I'd at least say that this photo deserves more love. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree, the view is great and the item wowing, I'd have tried though to take a lower f-number to get the background blurry and so the church could stand out more from the rest Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agreed to the view being stunning, but the image as such is hopelessly oversharpened (see the horizon and the sharpened noise in the sky, even worse in the remote buildings). Also, contrast is rather harsh and many small white areas blown. Is it possible to take a lower viewpoint to make the church stand out more? --Kreuz schnabel 15:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kallerna -- Karelj (talk) 22:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. Daniel Case (talk) 02:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see why you thought it was FP, it's beautiful and well composed, but it is also way oversharpened. Cmao20 (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ascom eXANTO Stuposiany.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2020 at 02:43:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info created by Ad maiorem Dei gloriam - uploaded by Ad maiorem Dei gloriam - nominated by SPUTNIK 1 -- Sputnik (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sputnik (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown highlights, mediocre sharpness, and where is the wow factor? Is this a famous phone booth or something? Why should this be considered one of the best images on Commons, among millions of others? --Peulle (talk) 08:09, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. This is somewhat funny but not that outstanding --Kreuz schnabel 13:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Hoc est unum ultimorum telephonicorum automatorum in Polonia. Photographia facta est anno 2016 et in anno 2017 omnia reliqua automata liquidata sunt. Ergo est hoc imago de historico valore. Sputnik (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Without prejudice to the rest of the nomination, that's some quality Latin prose. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes, and clearly understandable to a 1-year student of Latin like me, but it does contain anachronisms. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. OK, it has historical value and some interest but that doesn't convert it automatically in an excellent image, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose More suited to the back cover, inside or outside, of 2600. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Historically valuable and may well be VI if you can find the right scope, but not outstanding enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former bishopric in Rodez 29.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2020 at 21:29:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unique angle and well-composed. Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose; light is rather harsh and the composition somewhat busy. Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Unfortunately the left part of the stairs is cropped --Llez (talk) 10:00, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh light. —kallerna (talk) 21:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:43, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Notning extra for FP nomination. - -Karelj (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silver Star et train (Rust) (2).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2020 at 12:17:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 12:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 12:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again, I can see what you were hoping for but it doesn't come through. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old City Walls and Tower of David in Jerusalem (2019) 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2020 at 18:23:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Israel
Info all nominated by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 07:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good one --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:05, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:49, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Israel

File:Verlassener Bahnhof 20201121 DSC6246.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2020 at 19:24:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unsharpness in the corners at the bottom left and right. I propose to crop the (about) lower 20% of the picture as alternative --Llez (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, crop added :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wrong picture title, the picture is not recognizable as an abandoned train station, more reminiscent of an abandoned warehouse, still no wow is recognizable. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info It is part of the train station. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:42, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wikiolo (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

The chosen alternative is: File:Verlassener Bahnhof 20201121 DSC6246 crop.jpg

File:Saussurea alpina esthonica flowers detail - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2020 at 06:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Carduoideae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 06:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Carduoideae

File:Thuringia Eisenach asv2020-07 img23 Wartburg Castle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2020 at 09:38:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany
Info Outside view of the Wartburg Castle (World Heritage Site), Eisenach/Thuringia ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 09:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful and I appreciate how you have not made it too saturated. Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:16, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot. Is it possible to introduce some perspective improvements? the tower is leaning to the left and at the wall on the right there is some barrel distortion Poco a poco (talk) 11:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany

Wiener Werkstätte, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2020 at 11:00:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Printed#Other
Info created by Wiener Werkstätte - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko. Perhaps, the most unusual nomination I've ever done. Low chances to succeed but those colors are just awesome. One of the most interesting pieces in the collection, a set of modernist New Year cards produced by Wiener Werkstätte. They have slightly different dimensions, contradicting the museum information. -- Andrei (talk) 11:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 11:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special in each of these 8 cards IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose really! what is so special? --Gnosis (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow.--Peulle (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Maybe a smaller set? Better explanation of why these might be historically important? Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd support the last 4 and maybe the 3rd. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaztelugache, Bermeo, País Vasco, España, 2019-08-13, DD 02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2020 at 16:47:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: *Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info Gaztelugatxe, Bermeo, Basque Country, Spain. Gaztelugatxe (meaning in Basque "Rock Castle") is an islet belonging to the municipality of Bermeo, Basque Country, Spain. The hermitage on the top of the islet, dedicated to John the Baptist, dates from the 9th or 10th century. The location became very popular after some scenes for season 7 of the fantasy series Game of Thrones were filmed there. Note there is already one FP of this subject. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but I do not love the bottom crop. Also, too similar to existing FP, maybe a sunset light would make more special. —kallerna (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, kallerna but then the site is closed. Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Excellent photo but a bit too similar to the other FP to me, and the composition is not quite as good. Cmao20 (talk) 17:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The other FP is flat-out better, IMO, much more striking composition. If I had looked at this photo in a vacuum, I would have supported, but as it is, I'll oppose if necessary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like all the tourists going up the stairs. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kallerna and Ikan. --Ivar (talk) 07:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macaca fascicularis looking up to the sky - side view and contre-jour portrait with smooth bokeh.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2020 at 00:08:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Anthropomorphic dreamy facial expression -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the same reason you do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality image that also has emotional properties.--Peulle (talk) 09:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Radomianin (talk) 06:13, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)

File:Milky way seen from bolivian high altiplano 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 22:37:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created & uploaded by Snowmanstudios - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 22:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 22:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light trails are unfortunate, and could have been avoided with a larger-aperture lens (since ISO can't really go much higher), but overall still FP to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a combination of two pictures - one of the sky and one of the ground? I like this photo, so I'm not asking in order to criticize, just to know. I'm doubting the Milky Way would appear so clearly if there were strong enough moonlight to illuminate the ground so much. I looked at the sky almost every night except in the monsoon season when I used to live in rural Malaysia in the 1970s, and I remember that the Milky Way was not clearly visible on nights with a full moon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At least something is off here. The timestamp is for 06:02:54 on 3 Feb 2017. On that day and location the sunrise was at 06:12. The moon, a waxing cresent didn't rise until 12:22 PM. The camera settings could be off, the stones could be lit by a torchlight or the rising sun but the sky hardly looked like this ten minutes before sunrise. --Cart (talk) 23:25, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. At the very least, an explanation would be helpful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a common trick to lit the ground (I do the same here and it's actually two friends lightpainting me with head torches). I also checked the sky and it looks like one could have shot this from Bolivia at that date. And it was before sunrise from my checkings. Nothing suspicious in my view. - Benh (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Ikan and Cart. Daniel Case (talk) 07:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral IMO the NR is pushed a bit too far. - Benh (talk) 17:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sadly I agree with Benh, also I think there is too much sky and not enough ground. I know it sounds odd to say when considering a photo of the night sky, but I think the composition would look more balanced if there were a bit more foreground. Cmao20 (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I cannot help but it looks a bit overdone in my eyes, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 18:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hard case. On the one hand wonderful, on the other hand some issues (too long exposure (look at the stars), some weird light rays, ...). But no contra for me --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:34, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah. I think I would support the photo if it weren't for those strange rays. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 5 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Sky

File:Redmond's Pond.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2020 at 23:52:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
Info: Sifton Bog; one of the most southerly acidic bogs in Canada. Wider field of view compared to the previous nomination. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The extra foreground makes a difference. Not the sharpest at pixel level, but OK for 42 MP. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:08, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree that it makes a big difference, but the far left corner is a little glary and looks oversharpened, somehow. It might be better to crop some of the left side out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done - cropped a bit --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support This looks good unless I look at it at anything close to full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:25, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really do not understand these bog photos - what is so special here? Also, very similar to previous one. —kallerna (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:28, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special, per Kallerna. -- Karelj (talk) 22:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The colours make it special, but the image quality was better at full size in the other nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carolina Chickadee1 by Dan Pancamo.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2020 at 12:41:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paridae (Tits)
Info created by Snowmanradio~commonswiki - uploaded by Snowmanradio~commonswiki - nominated by Seven Pandas -- Seven Pandas (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much noise, parts are not so detailed, ghost effects on the upper right, the down left corner is a bit too narrow --15:07, 19 December 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PantheraLeo1359531 (talk • contribs)
Oppose Noisy, unsharp, the head seems slightly out of focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:00, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically deficient, per others, and even notwithstanding that is not exceptional among our many bird pictures. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Seven Pandas (talk) 12:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forrest Gump Point Monument Valley November 2018[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 00:02:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Monument Valley at dawn
Monument Valley shortly after sunrise

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Utah
Info First I want to thank Tomer T for nominating the second image in this set last month. I initially preferred the first one (which I chose as my October Photo Challenge submission), but now comparing them I think both have unique features: the first one shows the detail of the landscape better under the soft pastel colors of dawn, while the second one is more dramatic with its layers of light and shadow. All by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why we have to choose two practically identical images?, IMHO the brightness of the sunset view is better. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilfredor: Sets of images of the same scene from different times of day are quite common, e.g. 1 2 3. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see how to compare with sets you gave, since there is an urban area, at night filled with lights. It would be different to have one by night (with stars) and one by daylight. Here we have two daylight. You can make other with sliders. --Mile (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Both pictures are of very good quality but I like the second one more because the sun effect makes it more vivid and the colours in the first one look a bit washed-out.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't agree with the reactions to this nomination so far. Sure, if forced to pick, I'd prefer the second one because it's simply more relaxing to look at, but both views are perfectly valid to me, and the first view seems equally well captured, so then it's just down to your taste in views. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as a set but I can support a nomination for the first image. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I liked them both as separate noms. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! Tomer T (talk) 11:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Christian and per Mile Poco a poco (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine as a set to me. Cmao20 (talk) 01:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would support the second one. --Ivar (talk) 08:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as a set. --Milseburg (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination See Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forrest Gump Point Monument Valley November 2018 001.jpg. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egon Schiele - Portrait of Wally Neuzil - Google Art Project.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2020 at 07:17:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
Info created by Egon Schiele - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn't like this painting at first but I am starting to see the merit in it. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 07:08, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings

File:Old peasant with dagger and long smoking pipe, Mestia, Svanetia, Georgia (Republic).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 23:01:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info Unknown photographer, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Georgia was part of the Russian Empire then, I think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

en:Georgia within the Russian Empire should cover that. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, "Georgia (Republic)" is not historically accurate unless "current-day" is added. But do what you think best. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:21, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Library of Congress title. Agreed, but not so inaccurate to be worth changing, I'd imagine. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to suggest changing the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The Russian Empire divisions of Georgia are a little confusing, so I just went with Russian Empire (modern Georgia).Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well, I like it. It's good to have documentation of traditional clothing and apparels. :) --Peulle (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Radomianin (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 07:50, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 14:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Sitting_people

File:Stadtschloss Fulda (Südwestansicht).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2020 at 09:59:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info Castle-Palace in Fulda, Hesse, Germany seen from the southwest. All by me --Milseburg (talk) 09:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 09:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and delicate lighting combo. - Benh (talk) 14:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent motif and very relaxing composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect timing Poco a poco (talk) 11:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:58, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:29, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 14:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

File:Bergtocht van Lavin door Val Lavinuoz naar Alp dÍmmez (2025m.) 11-09-2019. (actm.) 06.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 18:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland
Info Mountain tour from Lavin through Val Lavinuoz to Alp d'Immez (2025m.) View from Alp d'Immez on the closing mountains in the back of the valley.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. You could smooth out the sky, but I think that's unnecessary. It looks like the Dutch label translates to "Impressive erosion field". Shall we add that? (No reason to get rid of the Dutch, of course!) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:42, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --XRay 💬 07:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agnes=Flachlandtirolerin ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but I think our stardards for mountain photos like this are higher. There should be something extra, the light is quite dull. —kallerna (talk) 21:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 14:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:11, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per above. Ordinary mountain-shot. Apart from the noisy sky, good quality, but the motif is not outstanding. --Milseburg (talk) 09:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)

File:Постріл сонцем.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2020 at 17:26:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Ukraine
Info A beautiful composition showing the fortress guns in the Ukrainian city of Chernihiv. The sunset light makes it special and the image quality seems good. created by Alex Arendar - uploaded by Alex Arendar - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite pleasant and atmospheric. At least slightly undercategorized, though: it should have a category for sunsets. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek, done. Cmao20 (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 07:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:22, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like the sun is a projectile :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Ukraine

Image:Miami Beach Federal Building.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 20:28:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info The photo was taken in Miami Beach in 2018. The tower was designed as a federal building and completed in 1956. created by Radomianin - uploaded by Radomianin - nominated by Radomianin -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral As the author, I abstain from supporting. Radomianin (talk) 10:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's a QI, sure, but I don't see anything particularly awesome here.--Peulle (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for your honest opinion. The photo may not be spectacular enough for the WOW effect but in my opinion it is still balanced and interesting enough to please the viewer.--Radomianin (talk) 20:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd like to support, but the purple fringing on the trees near the sides needs to be fixed. Support now. Daniel Case (talk) 06:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you for your helpful hint. I have removed the purple and blue chromatic aberration in the outer left area. --Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Peulle -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:09, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's striking and nice. Cmao20 (talk) 17:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per others. Interesting but not IMO extraordinary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle -- Karelj (talk) 11:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramaria flaccida, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2020-11-21, DD 651-714 FS.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2020 at 21:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Order_:_Gomphales
Info Ramaria flaccida, Hartelholz, Munich, Germany. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bit of a halo around some of the plant, and doesn't really wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case I've made some adjustments (some slight halos, brightness, crop, sharpening). Btw, this image is the result of overlapping 3,24 Gigapixel (74 frames, 50,6 MPx each) --Poco a poco (talk) 12:23, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For a focus stacking picture I expect all parts of the fungus being sharp --Llez (talk) 10:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Poco but I don't think this is one of your best photos. It doesn't seem sharp to me, as if the frames are not quite perfectly aligned. I have seen better focus stacks, including from you, here. Cmao20 (talk) 17:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The subject itself is very interesting, but other opposers have already pointed out reasons, why this photo is not at the FP level. The tripod wasn't probably steady enough (some of the frames are not correctly aligned); first focus point didn't catch the closest part of the fungi and stacking program made "halos" around the fungi. I can add to the cons list a bright midday sunlight, which makes the whole composition somehow uninteresting. --Ivar (talk) 18:45, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Ok, thanks for your feedback. Will keep trying. Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michelau im Steigerwald Prüssberg-20201115-RM-155521.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2020 at 22:29:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info View of Michelau in the Steigerwald from Falkenberg. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Everything is sharp --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:18, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 15:06, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The sky looks unnatural due over adjusting of the highlights. Not sure about the saturation, slightly messy composition. —kallerna (talk) 21:07, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition, per Kallerna, and I would the big vine at left is distracting. I just don't see anything exceptional about this image. It has a nice sense "after even the Trockenbeerenauslese have been harvested", if that's what's been produced here, but that's about it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Very beautiful image but I agree with Kallerna about the sky looking unnatural. Cmao20 (talk) 17:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demo Teams A Special Formation Flight 201120-F-VA182-9002.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2020 at 09:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by 1st Lt. Sam Eckholm - uploadedand nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 09:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 09:19, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sputnik (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one has wow factor; it's not easy capturing a fighter jet from the front in flight. I wish the resolution had been even higher, but I guess we can't have everything. The description should be changed a little, to be less subjective.--Peulle (talk) 08:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good image without a doubt but there are some more impressive images in this category.--Ermell (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ermell and resolution could be higher. --Ivar (talk) 08:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a FP standard. Background first.--Mile (talk) 09:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Resolution is a bit low but I like it. The angle of the fighter is good and it's very sharp. Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ivar -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NSB El 18 2252 Haugastøl - Finse.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2020 at 11:14:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 11:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:22, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great vista! Some rail companies really should be using Kabelleger's photos in their promotional literature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan, They are. :-) --Cart (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment License violation? --A.Savin 12:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --A.Savin 22:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:49, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, beautiful reflection 🚂 -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wonderful.--Rocky Masum (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Really good composition. I would support the version without compression (and without JPEG artifacts). --XRay 💬 18:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice image for the office --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:59, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for the nomination! XRay: I've uploaded a new RAW export with less JPEG compression. I don't see much difference though. --Kabelleger (talk) 15:45, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would cut a part of the top to get complete symmetry --Llez (talk) 10:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Berkenzwam (Piptoporus betulinus) (d.j.b.) 10.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2020 at 16:16:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Fomitopsidaceae
Info The top of a weathered Birch mushroom (Piptoporus betulinus) on a broken dead birch branch between fallen leaves in beautiful evening light.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 01:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 02:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Basile. Shouldn't work for me, but it does. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:39, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light and colours. --Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Fomitopsidaceae

File:Parque Nacional da Tijuca by Diego Baravelli 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2020 at 16:15:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created by and uploaded by Diego Baravelli - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 16:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support High noise (ISO 4000) in the lower part, but great atmosphere. -- -donald- (talk) 14:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose OK, great atmosphere but not that special regarding the technical issues. --Basotxerri (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose I love "light in the forest" type shots like this. I love them in tropical forests. I love them in fog. I should love this, and I want to.
But not with all this noise, especially evident at the bottom; it also looks like the processor tried too hard up top. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice, but resolution is quite low and noise level at bottom is imo too high. --Ivar (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Lovely atmosphere and beautiful composition. But quite a lot of noise is visible even at this low resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:White-crowned sparrow perched at Llano Seco.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2020 at 18:15:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Sparrows)
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Seven Pandas (talk) 18:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sputnik (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The unsharp parts are too prominent, imo. --Peulle (talk) 08:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Peulle; there is noticeable purple CA on the feathertips in the unsharp parts. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 08:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The focus could be better and I would also request the removal of some of that purple CA. But the composition and colours are still enough for FP in my book. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao; the overall impression (composition, colours, light) is very nice. --Aristeas (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas --GRDN711 (talk) 21:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info Uploaded a new version that addresses the CA issue mentioned above. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Passeridae_(Sparrows)

File:Avenue des Champs-Elysées, Paris 12 December 2020.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2020 at 03:52:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#France
Info created by Pierre Blaché (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 03:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 03:52, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and fascinating. There should be some category related to puddles, reflections or rain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:25, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done My ears were burning on that one. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:13, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:05, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:53, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty Poco a poco (talk) 12:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm going to have to be the party pooper here. I find it compositionally crowded and awkwardly cropped. Good idea though. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop --Mile (talk) 09:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I actually think this might be the most beautiful photo on this page at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. —kallerna (talk) 17:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 08:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#France

File:Green rice sheaves planted in a paddy field with long shadows at golden hour in Don Det Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 04:24:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Kritzolina (talk) 09:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 21:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe it's just an optical illusion but the image appears to be tilted to the left. Don't find this picture very interesting anyway --User:Henrysz Henrysz (talk) 23:32, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ivar (talk) 10:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Laos

File:Rapanui Rock during sunset, Sumner, Christchurch, New Zealand.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 02:46:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#New Zealand
Info created & uploaded by User:Podzemnik - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Podzemnik takes a lot of beautiful photos of New Zealand, but this one is IMO particularly special, and the "danger" sign on the rocks doesn't succeed in sapping the romance from the scene. Also, anticipating that someone will complain about the clouds through which the sun is shining being blown: They should be blown. Any exposure that would unblow them would either make everything else too dark or sap the photo of its dynamic range. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. A very beautiful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 02:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination Ikan. Yup, I like the photo a lot. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You bet! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The blown highlights could be better with HDR technique but this issue is minor enough not to constitute an obstacle in my view. Very good mood, the bottom left corner is particularly successful -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Compositionally cluttered but, as Ikan points out, the overall winter-seaside-sunset mood more than makes up for that. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:28, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 07:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#New Zealand

File:Chestnut-tailed starling - কাঠ শালিক.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 08:59:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info created & uploaded by Touhid Biplob - nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support absolutely stunning --Kritzolina (talk) 09:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some distracting blur below and overlapping with the wing of the parent bird, but the the photographer did what they had to do to get the shot. Question: Is this a parent with young or some kind of dominance move by the bird on the left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 14:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another one from WLE Bangladesh, but this time it's excellent. Minor flaws can be forgiven in the context of a great action photo. Cmao20 (talk) 21:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great action photo. --Gnosis (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SupportSeven Pandas (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 08:58, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)

File: Cimitero monumentale Vantiniano gruppo Pietà di Ermenegildo Luppi lato Ovest 2 Brescia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 08:14:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Superb resolution and interesting motif but the composition is a bit cluttered and unsatisfying for me. Cmao20 (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao; background is very competitive with the apparent subject. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's the monumental cemetery of Brescia, the perfect background to a pietà --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Silla soon after sunset.tif, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 15:14:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by Acagastya - uploaded by Acagastya - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wonderful in small view, but I have to download the TIFF file and in detail there is too much noise. The verticals of the buildings are not vertical and the movement (yes, they are fixed - the movement of the earth) of the stars is visible. --XRay 💬 18:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per XRay. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prypeć - Newir (lubieszowski) 2019.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2020 at 22:59:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by SPUTNIK 1 - uploaded by SPUTNIK 1 - nominated by SPUTNIK 1 -- Sputnik (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sputnik (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice image, but there is missing quality. -- -donald- (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Saturatio deminorata + claritas — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPUTNIK 1 (talk • contribs)

~~Oppose~~ It's slightly worse now I'm afraid -- Basile Morin (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Saturatio adhuc deminorata. Nunc?— Preceding unsigned comment added by SPUTNIK 1 (talk • contribs)

Acceptable saturation now but the wow factor is low to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support I actually think this is quite a beautiful landscape. The resolution could be higher but still enough for FP. Could we have an English description please? (am I right to think the Pripyat in question is the one made famous by its proximity to Chernobyl?) Cmao20 (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't know English, translation thanks to Google Translator. It is the upper Pripyat in the Volyn Polesie region, in the region of Lubieszów. Pripyat flows into the artificial Kiev reservoir, and you are right - the city of Chernobyl and the city of Pripyat named after the river, which were evacuated after the disaster at the power plant, are nearby. Fortunately, Pripyat is quite a long river and this charming place near its source is far from these sad places. Thank you for your support!

Oppose It's kind of soft all around, and frankly doesn't stand out from other pictures of rivers in landscapes at sunset. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sydney Opera House and Harbour Bridge Dusk (3) 2019-06-21.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2020 at 21:10:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Australia or Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Australia
Info created & uploaded by Benh - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:10, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info I appreciate the nom, thanks, but you might be interested to know there are two other alternatives... (on the file page). The blue version seems to be the most used. (that one isn't at all). - Benh (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I saw those, preferred this version personally. Tomer T (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:37, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 09:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The colors are a reason for me to decline. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Why, if that's something you can explain and not just a matter of taste in colors? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Australia

File:Qutang Gorge on Changjiang.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2020 at 12:56:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#China
Info created by Tan Wei Liang Byorn - uploaded by Byorntanwl95 - nominated by IN (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice light but that is really not a sharp image. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basotxerri. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree. Very striking, but because it's not sharp, it can't be one of the finest images on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A beautiful scene not so beautifully done. Even if it were sharp, I'd still find the color in the background wanting due to the haze. Looks more like a scanned print, really. Daniel Case (talk) 06:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sadly per above. A beautiful place but not quite sharp and the sky is a bit washed-out. Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oberwaldsee Karlsruhe 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2020 at 15:29:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't stand out to me from our many other pictures of placid summertime ponds. Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Império Do Divino Espírito Santo da Caridade, Praia da Vitória, isla de Terceira, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-24, DD 55.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2020 at 12:02:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info Império Do Divino Espírito Santo (Empire of the Holy Spirit) da Caridade, Praia da Vitória, Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The direction of light is not ideal. I think a partially backlit scene (i.e. the Sun is closer to the background than the viewer, but not directly in the frame) works well primarily when there is foliage to be illuminated (e.g. File:Four dogs running at golden hour in the countryside of Don Det Laos.jpg) or there is a facade to catch the beautiful light (e.g. File:Musee d'Orsay and Pont Royal, North-West view 140402 1.jpg). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An unusual place and very well captured. Could do with being a little darker for me, the colours look a bit washed out. Excellent resolution and sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Poco a poco (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forrest Gump Point Monument Valley November 2018 001.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2020 at 06:14:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Utah
Info This is the famous spot where Forrest Gump stops his cross-country run. I understand that the community is fairly divided on which version they prefer, so I'll stick to my original favorite (and the Photo Challenge winner). All I ask is that you make your decision based on whether the nominated image merits the FP star, rather than whether it is better than the other one or not. All by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is also my preferred version. I ignored it in the competition because no distance is given and the far view doesn't seem outstanding to me there. But it doesn't matter here. --Milseburg (talk) 18:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the distance is a little over 6 mi (10 km). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I suggested the subject of the competition, I thought of motifs with a multiple of these distance and was amazed at how different it was perceived. I'm still looking for the right translation for the German word "Fernsicht". --Milseburg (talk) 12:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long-distance views. I think that if you wanted views only of things, say, 30 km away or more, that would have had to be in the description. However, it does say "no astronomical views", yet someone submitted a photo of the moon, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 11:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:35, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#Utah

File:Odd Fellows Building in Red Bluff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2020 at 03:54:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Classic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:31, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. Cmao20 (talk) 17:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States

File:Westhafen, Frankfurt, Southwest view 20170516 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2020 at 17:24:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info I think this photo deserves a lot of credit for making this urban focal point, which could have been quite bland, look beautiful. The strong image quality of this 110mpx panorama also helps elevate it to FP level for me. created by DXR - uploaded by DXR - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and lots of pixels of course, but just not special enough IMO. —kallerna (talk) 17:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not my favorite styles of architecture, but a very satisfying form. A few wispy or other clouds in the upper right corner would further improve the photo, but one can't always have everything in life. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No one else wants to vote on this? I'm surprised, I guess it isn't the most interesting motif but the photo has a lot of wow for me nonetheless. Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Cmao20: Could you explain where you find the wow? I'm interested to hear your thoughts. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination There aren't going to be three more votes for this by tomorrow. Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 87-89 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2020 at 16:45:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info Upper Belvedere Palace (garden view) during the blue hour, Vienna, Austria. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful soft lighting. Cmao20 (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is coming from behind, the whole building is in shade. Sunrise could be better. —kallerna (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Existing FP, could be good to mention when nominating another one from a set. —kallerna (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:54, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it's quite nice to see such a good picture of a beautiful building in the half-darkness of twilight with some electric light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 07:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria

File:Paris quadrifolia fruit - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2020 at 13:05:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Melanthiaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 13:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive magnification. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Megamind or Jack Skellington in The Nightmare Before Christmas? :-) Basile Morin (talk) 23:55, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Melanthiaceae

File:Ontluikende bloemknoppen van een Hosta 'June'. 21-07-2020 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 03:42:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae
Info created & uploaded by User:Famberhorst - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like this photo because I imagine it as nature's homage to Beaux Arts lamps and glass (of course, it's rather the reverse). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's really nice, but imho white balance is way off, please compare first and second version of this image. --Ivar (talk) 06:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I couldn't address that. User:Famberhorst, your comments on this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. WB. adjusted. Thank you for your nomination.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sure thing. So almost the same as the original. What do you think, Ivar? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I wasn't expecting resolution loss by adjusting the WB. And background color is not very appealing to me. --Ivar (talk) 08:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful subtle colours, really reminds one of Beaux Arts lamps/glass. --Aristeas (talk) 13:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Oversharpened IMHO, but still very nice. Cmao20 (talk) 17:47, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp focus to the main object --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost an abstraction ... interesting juxtaposition of colors. Would make a great album cover. Daniel Case (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crystal flower -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family : Asparagaceae

File:Aeropuerto, Gibraltar, 2015-12-09, DD 01.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2021 at 19:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Airports
Info Gibraltar airport and the Rock of Gibraltar in the back. With only one 1,525 metres (5,003 ft) long runway it's the only airport in the world that is crossed by a highway when there is no air traffic, and it's considered the second most dangerous in Europa after Madeira's (this one for the strong wind). In the back, the Rock of Gibraltar, with a peak of 426 metres (1,398 ft) above the sea level, occupies with its natural park aprox. 40% of the whole surface of Gibraltar. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Do you have any similar photos that aren't in such gray light? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much empty sky at the top, too tight at the bottom. Also per Ikan. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not always opposed to gray light in an FP nom, but it really saps wow from this sight, IMO, because the gray, near-featurless sky is boring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan and King. Daniel Case (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Poco a poco (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 19:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kefermarkt Kirche Flügelaltar Geburt 01.jpg (delist), delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2020 at 08:29:17

Info A set of four images has been featured recently, showing all four reliefs of this altar piece (see set nomination). Therefore I request to delist this image, because for me the newly featured image is preferable to this one, and this one is not part of a FP set. All these images are created by myself (Original nomination). --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:29, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom, as the photo in the featured set is larger and sharper, but I think there will be some disagreement on this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --A.Savin 22:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Ivar (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 13:15, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mulu Pinnacles.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 11:38:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
Info created by Gurazuru - uploaded by Gurazuru - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite an amazing sight. Geocoordinates would be welcome. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty amazing. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A wow composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Relatively low sharpness for a middling resolution (9.8 MP) image. The wow factor is FP level, but not so exceptional that I'd be willing to compromise on technical concerns. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An otherworldly scene you'd expect to see in fantasy or sci-fi. Daniel Case (talk) 01:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:47, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per KoH Poco a poco (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Malaysia

File:Sandy Hook Lighthouse October 2020 002.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 16:16:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Left facet of the tower is over-exposed, can you do sth about it? --A.Savin 00:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@A.Savin: It's not overexposed; it's supposed to be very bright, so I pushed it as far as it could go without clipping. The RGB values are around 250, comfortably under the 255 threshold. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 07:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't like the crop of the tree on the right, but I won't oppose for that reason and I'm glad you took and uploaded this photo. Presuming this photo is best in scope for the lighthouse (I haven't checked, but I would think it is), please nominate to VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I see no problem with the right crop Poco a poco (talk) 13:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 17:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#United States

File:Wroclaw- kosciol ewangelicki Opatrznosci Bozej.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 15:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:01, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful focus to the main object --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:24, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It took quite a while for this to grow on me. Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Poland

File:Prinses Juliana bij uitreiking Four Freedoms Awards in Middelburg Simone Veil, Bestanddeelnr 933-0124 - Restoration.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 08:02:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Rob Croes / Anefo - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 08:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very unflattering portrait (she seems kind of peeved to me), and the Dutch-language description is confusing because it mentions Princess Juliana and Simone Veil, but the photo is of only one person. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. --Gnosis (talk) 05:37, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Doesn't seem to have any chance of getting the votes over Christmas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Al quartiere latino, bozzetto di Adolf Hohenstein per La Bohème (1896) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000086 - Restoration.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2020 at 09:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
Info created by Adolfo Hohenstein - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, historically important and an excellent restoration. I sure hope people support this nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very happy to support this interesting artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 01:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 17:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent example for a set design of that time in excellent restauration. --Aristeas (talk) 14:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

File:রহস্যে ঘেরা জলাবন.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2020 at 08:48:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created & uploaded by Nawas Sharif - nominated by RockyMasum -- Rocky Masum (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rocky Masum (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 09:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sun rays make it special --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Attractive, but I believe I'm detecting chromatic aberration where the light shines through the leaves, especially on the right, and I'd also like to know whether the green might be oversaturated (I don't know, so that's a question). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't buy it. These are photoshoped in rays, or I'm damned. - Benh (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --A.Savin 15:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong Ca's. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much CAs. And sun rays without any haze? Please give an explanation for the sun rays. --XRay 💬 18:14, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I came across this picture when I was judging WLE Bangladesh a couple of months ago. It didn't really impress me that much then - it's very beautiful but the image quality is so-so, there's a lot of CA, and per Benh the rays look too perfect to be real. Cmao20 (talk) 21:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh, Fisher.H, XRay. Also too noisy -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose @Benh: nice catch! --Gnosis (talk) 05:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Time to withdraw this per mounting opposes and questions about authenticity. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The rays, indeed, look too perfect to be real. --Cayambe (talk) 09:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Far from QI and of course of FP, I concur with Benh assessment. The rays are too perfect and endless as they don't vanish (or get deviated) when meeting the water. I left a note in WLE 2020 discussion page as given the poor quality of the image, I can only imagine that it became 3rd worlwide due to the fake rays, so the organizers should think twice before granting the author with an expensive Amazon voucher Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Complete fake. How come the trees are sunlit on their opposite side than where the rays allegedly come from? --Kreuz schnabel 09:07, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I join the o-wagon. I could be so nice image of the swamp without adjusting. --Mile (talk) 09:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 12 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arrow blenny (Lucayablennius zingaro) by q phia - Cuba 2017.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2020 at 14:06:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaenopsidae
Info created by q phia - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Ivar (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Did you see in the Wikipedia article how small these fish are? Great details! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaenopsidae

File:Korean art-Donggwoldo-Changdeokgung and Changgyeonggung-Dong-A University-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2020 at 14:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1800-1850
Info created by Ryuch - uploaded by 사도바울 - nominated by 사도바울 -- 사도바울 (talk) 14:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 사도바울 (talk) 14:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A digital restoration would be welcome, but I find this impressive, interesting and pretty enough to support, regardless. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 12:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 12:33, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1800-1850

File:Thyssenkrupp Testturm - Aufzugschacht2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2020 at 15:22:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info all by Taxiarchos228 -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 15:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose F-value too much too low --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

too much or too low? --Alabasterstein (talk) 06:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A much higher f-value is necessary --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Agree with Michielverbeek, why f/4.5, we should see much as possible here. Not a portrait. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Michielverbeek --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 12:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info As you can see: in spite of the usage of f4,5 the exposure time is with 1/125 sec not very high and at the limit of that you can make a sharp image without using a tripod. The scenery is similar to a closed room. Indeed the seen shaft in this image is ober 100 meters (!) deep and the LED light streep does not help much. So we have here very complicated conditions and we have nevertheless a very good quality. More f-value doesn't bring more of interessting details because of the homogeneous concrete. But as not seldom here at FPC: many users doen't look at the image but at the EXIF only count pixels. Nothing new for me. --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I did check the equipment. You hold some 5.000 eur while shooting. It was FF, on 24mm@FF. I do not know why owners of FF are afraid to put high ISO, what could go wrong with 1600 at f/8, if you want same Tv ? --Mile (talk) 09:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:37, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Test Bench at the Fraunhofer LBF for active vibration control.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 10:20:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created & uploaded by RomanKraus lbf - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 10:20, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 10:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much unsharpness, and the composition doesn't wow me. Daniel Case (talk) 00:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel, but I think it's a valuable photo, so consider nominating to Com:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File: Fuchsie Blue Sahrah-20201027-RM-112411.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2021 at 09:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Onagraceae
Info Fuchsia flower Blue Sahrah. Focus stack of 10 frames. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture! The colors have come out to be really nice --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 09:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose Mistakes on borders, anoted. --Mile (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for the hint and all the reviews.--Ermell (talk) 11:54, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it can be fixed.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, now that errors have been fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really pretty. How big are the flowers? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info about 5cm long.--Ermell (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's impressive. You might want to add that information to the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:11, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 17:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Onagraceae

File:Lathraea clandestina in Aveyron 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2021 at 20:18:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Lamiales
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:18, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Stunted flower, I find the light unappealing and blurry foreground distracting -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm distracted by the blurry foreground leaves, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southwell Minster Choir, Nottinghamshire, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2021 at 19:08:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#United Kingdom
Info The choir of Southwell Minster, a cathedral in Nottinghamshire, England. It is one of the 23 medieval cathedrals of England, and was constructed between 1108 and c.1300; there are no FPs of it so far on Commons, but this one seems very good, high-resolution and extremely sharp. created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:34, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:30, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:57, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:17, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:04, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#United Kingdom

File:Castillo de Petrela, Petrela, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 07.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2021 at 12:18:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Albania
Info Way up to the Petrelë Castle, near Tirana, central Albania. The castle, located 329 metres (1,079 ft) above sea level is one of the main touristic attractions in the Tirana area. The present building dates from the 15th century but the tower was built in the 6th century. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't stand out for me. Daniel Case (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice motif, but again, a gray sky kills it, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. --Peulle (talk) 19:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SL Badulla asv2020-01 img01 Railway station.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2020 at 21:50:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info Badulla railway station in Badulla, Sri Lanka ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 21:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 21:50, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking, when I was on site I was less lucky with the weather. --Mosbatho (talk) 23:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question No way to have the top of the tree on the left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:29, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry... --A.Savin 18:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Softer in the background than one would like, but then again it's hazy there. I'm not bothered by the crop at top since the eye is not drawn to it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andhika bayu nugraha-taman nasional bromo tengger semeru.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 11:28:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Indonesia
Info created by Andhika bayu nugraha - uploaded by Andhika bayu nugraha - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Very beautiful and ominous with plenty of wow-factor, but the image quality (blurriness, colour noise) is IMO not there. Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately per Cmao --Michielverbeek (talk) 18:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it has very big wow effect, but sadly the quality is insufficient. --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bad IQ but nice. --Mile (talk) 09:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavy color noise -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much noise to be one of the site's finest images per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lovely almost extraterrestrial feel, but so ... much ... noise. Daniel Case (talk) 01:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bohumil Kubišta - Svatý Šebestián (1912).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 10:23:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity
Info created by Bohumil Kubišta - uploaded by Dominikmatus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting style of art. Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting modern interpretation of Saint Sebastian in good reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others, with the caveat that since I've never seen this work in person and am unfamiliar with this painter's oeuvre, I wouldn't know if something non-obvious were off in this reproduction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:49, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Religion#Christianity

File:Grandma and grandpa with stuffed bunny.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 10:40:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Other
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think the low point of view is great for the bunny, which is looking straight at the camera, but not ideal for the grandma and grandpa. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There was no chance to get a higher position for it was a small terrace without acces atop of a wall of 2 m, for the house is situated on a steep slope. --Llez (talk) 05:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally this kind of decoration is not my cup of tea ;–), but it is an excellent example and a good photo. --Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pteropus alecto on a branch.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2021 at 05:49:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)
Info created & uploaded by Merops - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 05:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 05:49, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:17, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 04:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool snout Poco a poco (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 01:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Pteropodidae (Megabats)

File:Midtown Manhattan from Jersey City September 2020 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2021 at 20:03:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pretty blatant stitching error (see note). Daniel Case (talk) Never mind. 21:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's not possible as there's only a single frame involved (different exposures, yes, but no stitching went into the making of this image). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:28, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But all the same you'd be forgiven for thinking, from the thumbnail, that some mistake had been made. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Agree. I had the same impression, and it took me a while to spot the breaking part of the bridge possibly causing these discontinuous shadows in the water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Dreamy feeling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the 3 tapering spire buildings in a row: the Empire State Building, Chrysler Building, and One Vanderbilt! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 17:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:12, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Percival. --Aristeas (talk) 17:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

File:Rügen - Jagdschloss Granitz - Wendeltreppe im Mittelturm (Treppe 6207).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2020 at 17:34:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info One of the most striking images from WLM 2020 - to me this really has the wow-factor for FP. created by T meltzer - uploaded by T meltzer - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not enough sharpness: just so-so for QI. --A.Savin 00:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good enough sharpness for me + wow factor push it over the top. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Halo around the deer head, very visible, maybe due to over-sharpening -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 08:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 12:13, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Rocky Masum (talk) 13:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love it but that halo around the antlers should be addressed. Daniel Case (talk) 23:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I would be happy to change my vote, too -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per King. --Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree with the issues mentioned but in a case like this the overall results overweights the quality issues Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:22, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

File:Row of five red wooden bungalows on stilts with terraces and steep roofs Otherside guesthouse Vang Vieng Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2021 at 02:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support though perhaps a slightly wider aspect ratio (5:3 or 16:9) will help bring out the horizontal lines even more. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 17:10, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Laos

File:Fujifilm SUPERIA 200 (ISO 200-24°).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2020 at 08:49:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others 2
Info Fujifilm SUPERIA 200, 135 cartridge. My work. -- Mile (talk) 08:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:49, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very good quality and certainly VI, but as for FP, I do miss some wow. Of course this is a straightforward matter-of-fact shot with nothing extraordinary in itself, however, perhaps a more inspired lighting could do some good. Therefore Weak oppose for FPC. Oh, and maybe the focus steps should be narrower, the top side of the box shows the typical "waves" of sharp and not-so-sharp areas. --Kreuz schnabel 08:57, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 07:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically well done but agree with Kreuzschnabel, not enough wow for FP for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:40, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per above and I miss here the retouched template Poco a poco (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Poco a poco i might forgot, but what was retouched here ? --Mile (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I may be wrong, as I misunderstood the description, is it a focus stacking image? Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
True, it is stacked. That should be obvious. --Mile (talk) 08:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mile: it's not obvious for many commons users and they might think, that You have some kind of super camera . Please add a template "Focus stacked image". --Ivar (talk) 11:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 10:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kumquat from Spain.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2021 at 10:28:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appetizing 🍊 -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 17:09, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 01:51, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:14, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 15:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 17:31, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:21, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yum :) -- Angry Red Hammer Guy (talk) 02:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)

File:Table fructose.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2021 at 13:15:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Sweet_food
Info all by Ivar (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question What's producing the balls at the top of the picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek that's an intentional bokeh – reflection from crystalline fructose, which are out of focal plane. --Ivar (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks a little strange to me because they seem to hover well above the surface of the table. I like the fructose crystals, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek focal plane is only some 3–4 cm wide and there is much room behind it. --Ivar (talk) 18:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree that the bokeh is a bit distracting here. Have left a crop suggestion that I would vote for. Cmao20 (talk) 19:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 20:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]