User talk:Giorgi Balakhadze

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments translations missing[edit]

Hi Giorgi Balakhadze, I noticed that some translations in Georgian are still missing for Wiki Loves Monuments. Can you provide them? See: Commons talk:Wiki Loves Monuments 2016/Upload campaigns. You can provide them on that page. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 17:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Borjomi Central Mineral Park[edit]

Hello! As you know, I'm contributing in WLM in Georgia. Could you tell me which park in Borjomi (on this list:LINK) is a Borjomi Central Mineral Park? The first one with number 478? Or maybe other park, with number 6307 or 6308? Borjomi Central Mineral Park is located here: 41° 50′ 8.44″ N, 43° 23′ 32.13″ E Thanks in advance for the help Halavar (talk) 14:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Halavar I think it is the first one (478). Thanks for your contribution there.--g. balaxaZe 19:29, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Georgian road signs[edit]

Hi Giorgi! Thank you for your talk! I'm sorry for mistakes in Georgian alphabet mistakes in making Georgian road signs...I can't understand a single character in your alphabet, so I used Google translate for making text in your alphabet... Thank you for correct for me Georgian road signs...if you can't do it please tell it to me! :) If you know if there are other signs to make please write to me and I'll make them! Thank you a lot!!! And feel free to write me! Thanks! --Gigillo83 (talk) 07:11, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gigillo83 here at the bottom ► http://sagency.ge/index.php?m=185 you can find list of all and official road signs unfortunately web-site is only in Georgia.--g. balaxaZe 07:32, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thank you for your answer...as I can see, signs I've put in the italian page wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segnaletica_stradale_in_Georgia (where are all Georgian signs)are quite all correct..is it? Thank you again! --Gigillo83 (talk) 13:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Gigillo83 Yes, signs are good but some texts still remain incorrect I'll fix them, don't worry.--g. balaxaZe 17:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong licence[edit]

Please do not change the copyright licence from the one on Flickr to a different one as you did with File:Port of Batumi, Georgia.jpg which has a cc-by-2.0 but you made it cc-by-sa-2.0. The copyright holder's licence must be respected, so please be more careful in future. The rest of your uploads I looked at seem ok but if you uploaded other images that might also now be wrong please go back to them and correct the copyright tags. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you changing maps like this?[edit]

Why did you change File:Europe religion map en.png and remove the Armenian majority population in Georgia? Armenians are the most common ethnicity there and so is the Armenian Orthodox religion. Also I looked at your other contributions and you change so many European maps of EU countries and remove the disputed parts except for Kosovo that you left with disputed border. You removed Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia , South Ossetia, Transnistria and Northern Cyprus. Some of them are even recognised by un members and you entirely removed them. You are Georgian and there is and obvious opinion that you have about those regions and you went and remove them from maps. That is not very neutral. Also you made maps of Eu-Georgia, EU-Moldova and EU-Ukraine but they are not members of the EU. You changed File:Georgia (orthographic projection with inset).svg too and changed those unrecognised parts of Georgia, but why? Change back all of the biased changes you did to the maps. I have never edited Wikipedia before and I don't know how to change any maps, I can only revert. --Gyumrilak (talk) 02:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Gyumrilak maybe because of your lack of knowledge of wiki policies you have those questions, first of all maps about EU were created without conflict regions so it is against policy to overwrite. Second it is free to create maps about EU Georgia or etc even if they are not members of it, sure it won't be used in articles at the moment but maybe some people find this useful for their presentations or etc. Third I edited File:Europe religion map en.png because its borders in Georgia were very incorrect, it shows all Samtskhe-Javakheti except Borjomi Municipality as Armenian majority that is not true (You can see this in our 2014 census). Now I'll try to highlight Ninotsminda and Akhalkalaki. If we want to be fear we must show true borders.--g. balaxaZe 07:44, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • And please assure good faith toward other users "because you are Georgian" means nothing in Wikipedia, when we change something we have explanations or policies and they have nothing with nationality.--g. balaxaZe 08:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WLM results[edit]

Hello Giorgi, I know that you probably had no influence in the decision of the jury of this year's contest of WLM in Georgia, but still I wanted to express my surprise and disappointment about the fact that this picture didn't make it among the top 10. I even believed that it could end up quite high in the international contest and the feedback it got here in the project was overwhelming (23 supporting votes in 5 days is something you don't see everyday). It is, in fact a crispy 47 MP wowing image of a very relevant georgian monument. Really a pity that it was not highlighted (or just hightlighted as favourite). I usually don't express my opinion in public but in this case I feel I had. I do of course respect the jury assessement and congratulate the winners, but cannot really share this decision. Best regards, Poco2 15:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Poc I really share your opinion, personally I'm very upset even now. I saw your photo and yes it should be among top-10 or even in top-3 but I don't know what to think I've asked several questions to international organizers about the voting tool and etc. I had no single touch with photos and that's why I've no idea for what people were voting. One I can say that I am disappointed maybe more than you :/--g. balaxaZe 16:11, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's funny. I had a problem in Poland 2 years ago. I couldn't get a prize because I didn't have a polish social security number! :( So, I just checked the rules again and didn't find anything in that direction. If you tell me you cannot undestand it, either, what should I say? Did the jury assess that image? maybe there was a clinch with the tool? Well, whatever, no clue, as said, disappointed, that's life. Poco2 16:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC) PD: Btw, you should crop the images with watermarks, as they will be discarded immediately by the international jury (I was part of it, I know what I say). Watermarks are not really welcome in Commons.[reply]
Thanks I will crop them. I asked "do we have a chance that after my protest something will be changed" but I received indirect answers that probably do not.--g. balaxaZe 16:40, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, ok, thanks anyhow, Girogi. Poco2 16:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Poc As for now it became clear that your photo was not included even in the first round so jurors simply didn't see it. Your photo is not an exception we have other missed photos as well. At the moment organizers are working on this issue. I hope for the best outcome.--g. balaxaZe 18:42, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In a WLM category we have 6,893 photos but in the first round 6,494 photos--g. balaxaZe 18:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Giorgi, I see, buf, that's suboptimal. I uploaded my pictures very late (sept 29th), maybe the last 2 days where not considered. The good thing is that the delta is not very big, only 400 images and that could be checked in a short time window, given that the international org is open to that. To me now all this makes sense. Thank you! Poco2 19:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I must say, that I was surprised also, when I didn't find any of my images in the final TOP 10. First I thought, that I can't be in the finals, because I'm not a Georgian citizen. But now I see, that there is a bigger technical problem. Nice detective work Giorgi - thanks! BTW, hope to see Diego Delso's image from Sioni Cathedral in the TOP 10:) --Halavar (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Здравствуйте! Присоединюсь к обсуждению (извините за русский язык - по-английски будет более коряво :) ) После просмотра раздела Favourites и Топ-10 мне, как минимум, показалось странным, что ни фото https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Uplistsikhe_-_Church_over_the_Hills.jpg , ни https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Svetitskhoveli_Cathedral_-_01.jpg , ни https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:"The_Wizard%27s_Mansion".jpg нигде не засветились (даже не были номинированы на Quality, Valued или Featured images). И хотелось бы знать - они вообще попали на рассмотрение жюри? Ввозможно они просто не соответствуют требованиям и значительно уступают другим в качестве, но смотря на Топ-10 вопрос для меня остается актуальным. Спасибо. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moahim (talk • contribs) 17:28, 02 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Moahim: привет! Ответ тот-же, выяснилось что механизм оценки с самого начала пропустил более 400 фото и многие из пропущенных были из категории хороших фото, сейчас наш жюри оценивает пропущенные фото. Я выяснил что ваши выше упомянутые фото были также в числе пропущенных.--g. balaxaZe 19:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Я перепроверил Моахим оказывается их оценили но они не прошли в топ.--g. balaxaZe 19:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за ответ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moahim (talk • contribs) 20:21, 02 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all. (ping Poco a poco) Just a quick update: because of this comment, and other signals, we have looked into Georgia more closely, and it seems that a number of images (around 500) was not included in the pool considered by the local jury originally, because of a combination of a human error of choosing the wrong category, and the fact that a number of images that were edited after the closing date were excluded. This has been addressed by running another selection by the local jury with only those skipped images, and then a second round where the top-10 of the original selection was compared with the top-10 of the skipped images. I have not seen the outcome of that final round yet, so I can't say anything whether the mentioned picture was finally included by the jury or not (which wasn't the point of the additional effort). I'd like to give special thanks to the jury for going through this last minute extra effort. Effeietsanders (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Giorgi, Effeietsanders, I really appreciate that last sprint of the jury to go for that extra mile, also the efforts or Giorgi to clarify the topic and last but not least the flexibility of the international organisation to accept those changes after the deadline. Inbetween the new finalists have been published, and I am a bit surprised about the result (by far not as when I decided to open this thread :) ). It's a pity not to see any of those nice pics of Halavar among the top 10 but now, and I think that it was the most important, the jury has assessed all participating pictures... Poco2 21:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Poc We took only top-10 from 500 pics. One of Halvar's photos was 13th (I liked his photos as well). This was first time for Georgia next time I am sure will be more settled and will win even more better photos.--g. balaxaZe 22:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, good luck to all those finalists from Georgia in the inernational contest! Poco2 22:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well good to know, that those 500 photos was added to the examination by the jury. Thank you all: Poco a poco, Giorgi and Effeietsanders for your great work and thanks for the nice words about my images and work here on Commons:) Well I must say, that I'm dissapointed that none of my photos was in the final TOP-10. Instead of fully participate in the Wiki Loves Monuments in Malaysia, I decided to spend lots of hours to participate in the Georgia's edition, identifying objects of cultural heritage in Georgia (that was not easy) and upload 289 images (see them all here: http://stats.wikilovesmonuments.cl/georgia?user=Halavar), whom most of them are now Quality images, and some of them also Valued images. Probably in the next year I'm gonna be in Georgia again (of course to travelling and taking lots of pictures) but I think I'm not gonna participate in the WLM 2017 in Georgia. With my work, in September I don't have lots of time, most time I'm not in home, so I think it's better to spend my time in other editions of WLM 2017. --Halavar (talk) 13:06, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Halavar This is what WLM 2016 jury decided don't be so disappointed this was first time for us and yes it was not all best. Next time we will take more time we will be more prepared and I am sure we will have more better photos (this is my personal opinion). I really appreciate your work and thanks once again for that!--g. balaxaZe 18:13, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Cliffs' Lake, Lagodekhi Protected Area, Georgia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mukhrani palace, Mukhrani, Georgia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mukhrani palace, Mukhrani, Georgia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Black Cliffs lake, Georgian-Dagestan border (3000 m)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Category discussion warning

Radisson Blu Hotel, Tbilisi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Halavar (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tbilisi, Radisson Blu Iveria Hotel (9723890772).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Halavar (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:FoP in Georgia[edit]

I thought that you did that 2 years ago. We all remember that mass deletion of my images... If you want to make massive deletion of images from Georgia, please do that not only with my images, but others too. Also, please add proper tags to the categories of copyrighted buildings, sculptures and other work of arts. I don't have a time to do that because I need to upload thousands of my images and I'm involved in the Quality images section. --Halavar (talk) 16:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Answer is there: User talk:Halavar#FoP--g. balaxaZe 16:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that soon Parliament of Georgia will gonna change that law. --Halavar (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Tbilisi, Georgia — Dinamo Arena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Canopus Grandiflora 13:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Giorgi Balakhadze, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

-- ~riley (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protected areas in Upper Svaneti?[edit]

Hi Giorgi Balakhadze, a friend of mine would like to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 by uploading a photo taken in the high mountains of Upper Svaneti, on the Georgian side of the en:Kabardino-Balkaria Nature Reserve. Is this a protected area in Georgia? Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Gnom: all protected areas of Georgia are listed here [1] also there is a map of the protected areas [2]. Unfortunately at the moment there is no protected area in Svaneti, but I know that it is planned to create it.--g. balaxaZe 17:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
გმადლობთ! --Gnom (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Participating Countries WLE 2017.svg[edit]

Hello! May you please add on this photo File:Participating Countries WLE 2017.svg some more countries: Croatia, Cameroon, Thailand please. I don't know how to do it by myself. Thanks in an advance! --Fraxinus (talk) 20:29, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done--g. balaxaZe 21:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Fraxinus (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLM 2016 Banner of Georgia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLM Georgia logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ვიკის უყვარს ძეგლები 2016 განივი ლოგო.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLM Georgia logo (right).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Wiki Loves Monuments in Georgia II.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Wiki Loves Monuments in Georgia I.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLM 2016 Banner of Georgia (2).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:საქართველოს დარეგისტრირებული ძეგლების სიმჭიდროვე მუნიციპალიტეტების მიხედვით (2016).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Registered monuments density in Georgia by municipalities.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:WLM Georgia 2016 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

flag map[edit]

[3] bye--Pierpao.lo (listening) 12:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

საქართველოს ისტორიული კუთხეების რუკები[edit]

გიორგი მოგესალმები, ძალიან მაგარი საქმე გაგიკეთებია ეს რუკები რომ გააკეთე, უფრო სწორად გაასწორე, რამდენი წელია ვგეგმავ გაკეთებას და ვერ მოვიცალე. აშკარად არ ასახავდა რეალობას ჩემი ნაუცბათევად გაკეთებული რუკები რაც იყო, თუმცა მაინც არის მცირე რაღაცეები გასასწორებელი.

მაგალითად გარეკახეთის ნაწილი რომელიც დღეს გარდაბნის რაიონს ეკუთვნის (მარტყოფი/ვაზიანი/სააკაძე/ნორიო/ზემო და ქვემო ქვიშიანი/ახალსოფელი/საცხენისი/მუხროვანი/მუღანლო/წალმიანი/სართიჭალა/მუღანლო) გადასატანია კახეთში, ასევე საჯავახოს მიმდებარე ტერიტორია, რომელიც დღეს სამტრედიის რაიონს ეკუთვნის (ქვაყუდე/გორმაღალი/ზემო და ქვემო ნოღა/ბუღნარი/ტოლები/ჭოგნარი/ვაზისუბანი/ნიგორზღვა/ზემო აბაშა/პატარა ოფეთი/დიდი ოფეთი/მტერჩვეული/ჭიაღუბანი) გადასატანია გურიაში. --Gaga.vaa (talk) 07:45, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gaga.vaa: ბოდიში ასე გვიან რომ გეხმიანები, იქნებ როგორმე რუკაზე მომიხაზო მაგ ტერიტორიების დაახლოებითი საზღვრები? ასე მარტო სახელებით რთულია განსაზღვრო კონკრეტულად რა ფართობი უნდა მივუერთო.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 06:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request[edit]

Greetings.

File:საქართველოს მუნიციპალიტეტების მოსახლეობის უმრავლესობა სქესის მიხედვით (2014).svg is a very interesting map.

Could you create the English language version of this map as well?

Regards.

Maphobbyist (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi your request is granted. ► File:Municipalities of Georgia by Population’s Predominant Gender (2014).svg.
Good luck. --g. balaxaZe 13:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your contribution! Maphobbyist (talk) 16:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgia (orthographic projection with inset).svg[edit]

Greetings.

Can you add South Sudan in File:Georgia (orthographic projection with inset).svg, File:EU on a globe.svg, File:EU27 on a globe.svg and in other similar international relations SVG maps where it is missing (every map should be with de-jure borders, unless specified otherwise in their titles)?

I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files on 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 640 maps, but there is a long way to go.

In File:Désintégration du califat abbasside.svg can you remove the de-facto borders within Moldova (Transnistria) and Georgia (Abkhazia and South Ossetia), and include only de-jure borders, just like Serbia, Western Sahara and Cyprus are shown in the same map?

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps myself, that is why I asked you.

Kindest regards.

Maphobbyist (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested and have the time, could you remove de-facto borders (unless specified otherwise in their titles) and add the de-jure South Sudan in these aforementioned maps? Kindest regards. Maphobbyist (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Maphobbyist, earlier I could't answer because my IP changed to globally blocked IP, now it's fixed. For sure I can remove de-facto borders but adding the South Sudan border is harder, because to do that we need GIS software, GIS shape and known projection used in a map. Unfortunately, I don't have GIS shapes for these maps and I don't know their projection. I think it will be better to ask their authors or co-authors to do that.--g. balaxaZe 06:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your updates! As I am a totally SVG illiterate person, I am happy with any change (and respect declines of users as well). If you have the time and interest, and stumble upon them, can you get rid of every de-facto border (.e.g. Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Crimea, Transnistria, Somaliland, Northern Cyprus, Nagorno-Karabakh, etc.) in maps where they are not required and over a very extended period? For instance, many SVG files that are linked to each other which appear at the bottom of the file pages like in File:EU on a globe.svg, File:EU27 on a globe.svg etc., have de-facto borders imposed, which are not required at all. Users with an agenda, like to upload or add de-facto borders on any map, even in historical and non-political maps. Kindest regards. Maphobbyist (talk) 15:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you also from my side for adding the borders of South Sudan. Could you also update the missing borders of Lebanon and Eritrea in File:EU on a globe.svg? --AdAstraPerScientiam (talk) 19:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Land cover map of Georgia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your own creations cannot replace our standard license templates. Every file must have one of our official templates. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: your actions remind me dual-standard attitude since other users use the similar templates for years ► File:Kosovo_rel_location_map.svg--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That template contains an inclusion of one of our official templates: {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-de}}. Jcb (talk) 19:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: Here in Wikimedia nothing is official or unofficial, templates are created by users based on what ever information. My template is based on the official website of CC, so you have no single reasonable argument to say that it is wrong or anything else. Prove to me that it is wrong and then I won't revert your removal.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 20:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we do have a list with accepted license templates. Any file without one of these template will be recognized by the system as having no valid license. That's how this file came to my attention. Don't remove the official license template again, I tell you this as an administrator. Jcb (talk) 20:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: Heh ok, what you'll say if my template will "contain an inclusion of one of our official templates" {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-ge}}? --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 20:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Then there is no problem at all. The system will recognize the file as properly licensed then. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Deal!--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 21:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map Making[edit]

Hi Giorgi Balakhadze I liked the map that you made on Death Penalty laws in Europe. I am just wondering can you make a European map of nations that have a burka ban and those that don't currently have a ban. QubecMan (talk) 12:19, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, why not.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 13:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi so can you do it.QubecMan (talk) 07:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
QubecMan voila ► File:Full-face veils ban in Europe.svg--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 14:34, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Man thank you very much. have a very good day. QubecMan (talk) 15:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good map, just wondering can you update Denmark in the National ban.[1] [2] and Norway for the Partial ban.[3] [4]
Thanks again. QubecMan (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 15:34, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Again Giorgi just wondering can you make a map of Europe showing the nations where parties of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alliance_for_Peace_and_Freedom are members of. thanks.QubecMan (talk) 13:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC) ??? QubecMan (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 21:06, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Actions of Giorgi Balakhadze. --Insider (talk) 09:03, 9 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 07:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Global Replace[edit]

Why did you entirely replace the map that was used before, which you earlier tried to change and later renamed to File:Location of the de facto Republic of Abkhazia in Eastern Europe.svg, with your new uploaded map, which is also the version you tried to push for on the first file File:Location of the region of Abkhazia in Eastern Europe.svg? You claim that the new map is "the NPOV version", but making Georgia dark grey isn't necessarily the only NPOV thing to do, depending on the context. In some cases different maps will be appropriate. For example, on w:Kosovo, the map of Kosovo does not depict Serbia as dark grey, neither does the map used on w:Republic of Artsakh depict Azerbaijan dark grey, nor the map used on w:Northern Cyprus depict the rest of the island as dark grey. Same can be said about the maps used on w:Taiwan in relation to China, w:Somaliland in relation to Somalia, and w:Transnistria in relation to Moldova. What makes you think that the only NPOV thing to do with the de facto independent Abkhazia is to depict it as a part of Georgia despite the fact that all of these other de facto independent regions do not do that? You cannot just push the map you are more comfortable with on other Wikipedia projects. --Relignments (talk) 20:51, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good that you mentioned those maps, some of them are very good examples how badly wikipedia handles such issues. If you aren't aware we have WikiProject_Maps' Conventions where clearly said (and shown) that disputed borders must be different. You just can't show Abkhazia in the same way as Germany or USA (but you were pushing that). I'll rework all of them to meet the convention criteria for usage on WikiProjects. --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 06:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you agree that disputed borders should be different then why do the majority of your maps of Georgia not include disputed borders of Abkhazia and South Ossetia? Also can you provide a link to the specific rule you are referring to? I also wanted to add that I wasn’t pushing for anything, I waned you to stop changing an existing map, as did many other users in the past, so don’t accuse me of that. --Relignments (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Maps can be with disputed borders or without them. If map contains disputed borders then they must be different then other ones. I've some maps with disputed borders and they are shown in proper way, not like you try to push. Also, I've explained that the map's current face under its title was misleading. Before in edit summary I wrote that It must be either renamed, replaced or changed (last is done), but you ignored it and just reverted my changes. After that my next step was renaming and replacing of it as I wrote earlier It must be either renamed, replaced or changed (last is done)--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 09:51, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Conventions are here ► en:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Maps/Conventions--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 09:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now I'm confused. You're contradicting yourself. If maps can be with or without disputed borders then what's wrong with the border shown on File:Location of the de facto Republic of Abkhazia in Eastern Europe.svg being shown as not disputed, because it is just like your maps of Georgia show the administrative border between Abkhazia and Georgia as not disputed despite the fact that it is. You can't just follow certain policies when they align with your political views and claim that it's not NPOV when they don't. In fact, that starts to seem a lot like POV pushing. Judging by the opinions you published on your user page, this is also the view that you clearly hold and it seems that you are trying to push that on Wikipedia and on the maps here on Commons. Also once again I want to point out that the problem on File:Location of the de facto Republic of Abkhazia in Eastern Europe.svg was not me pushing for use of the map, it was me being against you changing it completely just as Dag13, Chipmunkdavis, Maurice07, Insider and User:Fry1989 did. --Relignments (talk) 15:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is it so hard for you to understand difference between disputed border shown as INTERNATIONAL border and disputed border shown as DISPUTED border? Is it so hard for you to understand difference between these two? If it is, then I'm done here talking with you and wasting my time.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 16:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm confused by your "logic" that if one makes a map without disputed borders it equals(?!) to a map with disputed borders shown as international?? what a...
Maps can be with or without disputed borders, with or without administrative, municipal, regional and etc borders, the only border that stays is international border because international borders are the most important ones. But map cannot be with international borders + disputed borders shown as international borders. The End.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very disappointed that the course you chose to take with this discussion is your aggressive wording and outright refusal to continue the dialogue. Furthermore, as I am looking deeper into your upload history I am noticing a number of uploads and reverts that indicate you POV pushing on this platform. You changed the following files with the description "Rv of sockpuppet and per COM:OVERWRITE", however after reading w:Wikipedia:Sock puppetry I realize that nothing there indicates that you must revert all of the edits and uploads of users guilty of sockpuppetry. Plus, many of the maps that were not edited by sockpuppets before were still changed by you regardless, with the main, and sometimes only, changes being removing the disputed borders of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Also after reading COM:OVERWRITE I realize that the point of the guideline is to not substantially alter existing files and keep the file the same or closely similar to its original upload, with the exception of minor changes. However, the changes that you made on many of these maps look nothing like the original upload with the layout still being completely different, and all you did was remove the borders of all post-Soviet breakaway regions (both disputed and sovereign borders, depending on the map), including Abkhazia and South Ossetia, as well as disputed borders like Crimea, despite in most cases keeping Kosovo and the disputed borders of Palestine. If you claim that you made your changes under COM:OVERWRITE to keep the content the same rather than the visual representation and remove the addition of breakaway regions, which was done in later versions, then it still seems odd that you would choose to keep Kosovo despite it also not being present on the original version. It seems that your main goal was to eliminate the borders between Georgia and its disputed regions, as well as any similar conflicts that relate to the post-Soviet space. PLus if you really were following COM:OVERWRITE then your actions on File:Location of the de facto Republic of Abkhazia in Eastern Europe.svg are a violation of that policy, because you kept pushing for a version that was significantly different than the original. You cannot just hide behind policies for the sake of altering maps to fit your political views just to break those same policies when your political views don't align with the original map.

In my opinion, many of those maps on that list shouldn't have made the breakaway regions have sovereign borders as they are already in wide use on Wikipedia, but you removed the disputed regions entirely to fit your political views. So, when you say that maps can be with or without disputed borders then why is it that you often remove disputed borders on maps regardless, especially the ones in Georgia, your country of origin. Another interesting example is File:Europe Location Chechen Republic of Ichkeria.svg. This map shows the former breakaway region in Russia, similar to the situation in Abkhazia, however when you edited it, your main priority wasn't to colour Russia grey as you did with the Georgia-Abkhazia example, but instead to remove the border of Abkhazia shown on the map. This clearly shows that you edit maps in accordance with your political motivations rather than the Commons guidelines you claim to follow. There are also examples of maps where you tried to remove Abkhazia and South Ossetia, such as File:Europe-Georgia.svg, File:Caucasus locator map.png, File:United Ossetia.svg and File:Flag map of Georgia, without Abkhazia and South Ossetia.png, but you were reverted by other users, so I will not go too much in depth with them. This is clearly a long history of POV pushing that you have been doing here on Commons where you try and eliminate the disputed borders of Abkhazia and South Ossetia due to your political beliefs, as stated on your user page. Due to your refusal to continue the discussion, as well as the extent of the issue, I find it necessary to notify an administrator. --Relignments (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and one more, if you think that Russian occupation of the internationally recognized territories of Georgia is a "simply my opinion" then read this article and related materials en:Occupied territories of Georgia again and again, again and again. Unlike accounts like yours that appear only after some edits and are used (mostly by sockmasters) as single-purpose accounts. I've done a lot of contribution across different wikiprojects besides this change.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Now about your last loong comment, I will be very brief. You misrepresented facts, you didn't understand rules properly, you are making personal attack and false claims against me so be a little bit careful with your artifices. If you want to go deeper, be sure I won't stand back and will show up your every single defamation.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I said that it aligns with your political views based on the statements you made on your user page, which it absolutely does. The whole reason I made a Commons account was after I saw the map of Abkhazia change on en:List of sovereign states and dependent territories in Asia, and after looking into it I realized what has been going on. I have never made any personal attacks or false claims, and I thoroughly read the guidelines you cited prior to making this comment, so I would kindly ask you not to make threats like that. --Relignments (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Actions of Giorgi Balakhadze. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Relignments (talk) 17:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajuda[edit]

Carrega para eu esta imagem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bleeders-movie.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.Floriano (talk • contribs) 17:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

M.Floriano it is a non-free media. It'll be a violation of rules. --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the same name as another file, which already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

Also, please visibly link your signature to your user or user talk page.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move of[edit]

I'm unable to see any prior discussion of the move of File:Flag of Northern Ireland.svg to File:Ulster Banner.svg. The move has broken en:Template:Country data Northern Ireland. In case you're unaware, the requester's username, Snow Lion Fenian, indicates a bias in matters relating to Northern Ireland - en:Fenian. Please revert yourself. Cabayi (talk) 13:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: for that rename my decision mainly was based on the article Ulster Banner. It says that The Ulster Banner[1] (Irish: Meirge Uladh) is a heraldic banner taken from the former coat of arms of Northern Ireland. [...] It was the flag of the former Government of Northern Ireland and common flag of Northern Ireland from 1953 until that government was abolished in 1972. [...] Since 1972, the Ulster Banner has had no official status and is not used by the current Northern Ireland government or by the British government. So, a title Flag of Northern Ireland was misleading.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 14:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Delga-1 - STC Delta (Georgia).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:37, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard/User problems[edit]

You may edit your comments, but may not remove mine, especially if don’t comply with etiquette on other counts. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't, It seems that you saved after my edit.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 14:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Incnis Mrsi Ok, I've fixed, I pasted my comments and accidentally removed yours, now everything fixed.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 14:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russian map[edit]

Hey Giorgi,

I added the Donbass to your map File:Russian_language_status_and_proficiency_in_the_World.svg. Because it's shrunk down from a different scale in the Donbass War map, the stripe pattern used in the other disputed territories would also be shrunk, and wouldn't look like stripes. I used another pattern, but it isn't a great match. Maybe you could fix?

The border should be good enough. I needed to stretch and skew the territory from the inset in the Donbass War map, and didn't do a perfect job, but all of the borders in the Russian-language map are rather crude, so that shouldn't matter much. The border has also been stable for years now, so we don't need to worry about constant changes. Kwamikagami (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. FYI, you might be interested in this article en:Geographical distribution of Russian speakers and the map that it uses, File:Proportion_of_Russian_speakers_by_country_in_2014_(0-50%_gradation).svg. It might need updating as well. Kwamikagami (talk) 20:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

მცხეთა-მთიანეთის რუკა[edit]

გამარჯობა, commons ზე ვნახე, რომ რეგიონების რუკები, რომელსაც დასახლებების სტატიებში, ინფოდაფებში ვიყენებთ შენი ატვირთული ყოფილა და მგონი სწორად მოგმართავ. თუ შეგიძია მცხეთა-მთიანეთის ახალი რუკა გააკეთო, რომელზეც ახალგორის მუნიციპალიტეტი არ იქნება, რადგან არ შედის ამ მხარის შემადგენლობაში --M. (talk) 09:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

გამარჯობა, ახალგორი მის ოკუპაციამდე სწორედ მცხეთა-მთიანეთს ეკუთვნოდა და არაფერი შეცვლილა გარდა მისი ოკუპაციისა.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
გამარჯობა. ახლა ვნახე ეს პასუხი. კი, ოკუპაციამდე მცხეთა-მთიანეთის მხარეში შედიოდა, მაგრამ ოკუპაციის შემდეგ აღარ შედის არცერთ მხარეში. შეგიძია ეს იხილო ახალგორი აღარ იხსენიება [4] ვიკიში ახალგორს აღარ ვუთითებთ მცხეთა-მთიანეთში --M. (talk) 09:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@M.: საქსტატის მოსახლეობის ცხრილებში (ანუ უპირველეს ოფიციალურ წყაროში), ახალგორი მცხეთა-მთიანეთის შემადგენლობაშია ისევ. გთხოვ ამ განხილვაზე ნუღა დამახრჯინებ დროს. კარგად გადაამოწმე ოფიციალური წყაროები და შენითვე დაინახავ რომ მართალი ვარ.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ძალიან სამწუხაროა :( ნახვამდის! --M. (talk) 17:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:ჭანეთი აღმოსავლეთ ლაზეთი Lazeti Doğu Lazistan Лазети Лазистан.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 01:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tbilisi State University Subway Station(3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blank map[edit]

Hello! I'm supporting You not for politics but encyclopedic.

He lied (any hint about his origin but it's tradition for him). Before 17-09-2018 on this map any borders in Somalia, India, Georgia etc. Maked redirect alternative maps & gone plurals on his opinion not god further. Whatever good technical intentions he would have been guided. He must read rules and don't waste works of others users.--Dim Grits (talk) 13:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and encyclopedic approach must be the only approach. That's important to support each other when someone goes in wrong way, if not you he would revert again and again. Thanks.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 16:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Category:Small_arms,_rifles,_carbines_and_grenade_launchers_of_STC_Delta has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Sanandros (talk) 20:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abkhazia-Russia Locator.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked soon[edit]

বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  português  русский  slovenščina  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float
   This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Commons.

Stop editwarring. --Yann (talk) 05:16, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just to answer here, these loud accusations have my answer here ► Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Edit_war_at_File:BlankMap-World-Microstates.svg.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Le royaume des Francs sous Hugues Capet-ka.svg[edit]

გამარჯობა. File:Le royaume des Francs sous Hugues Capet-ka.svg — რაღაც პრობლემაა ტექსტთან დაკავშირებით (გადადის აქეთ-იქით 2 ადგილას) დაგამოსწორება შეგიძლიათ? დიდი მადლობა. გიო ოქრო (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings.

Can you add File:Russophone.svg to your watchlist and make sure that the de jure borders are kept in this map? Another user has corrected it, but it could always be reverted.

Kindest regards, Maphobbyist (talk) 17:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europe started here.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 02:18, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification request[edit]

Can you clarify in the description of this file the historical period for which the boundaries of historical-ethnographic regions indicated in it are relevant?--Yellow Horror (talk) 20:42, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yellow Horror: in Georgian Wiki article სამეგრელო there are various sources describing borders of historical Samegrelo, they mostly describe Samegrelo as region from Kodori river (west) to Rioni (south) and Tskhenistskali (east) rivers.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 09:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update request[edit]

Hello.

Can you remove the UK and also inside the world map in the upper corner of File:EU–Georgia.svg?

Can you remove the de-facto borders inside Georgia, Azerbaijan, Moldova and Ukraine from File:EU-France (without insert).svg and inside Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine from File:World-EU-France.svg?

Can you remove the UK and add the border of South Sudan inside the world map in the corner of File:EU-Ireland highlighted.svg and File:Europe location EU.svg?

Can you add the border of South Sudan inside the world map in the upper corner of File:EU-Cyprus highlighted.svg?

The updated File:EU-Sweden.svg or File:EU-Ukraine.svg can be used as a source.

I don't have any knowledege about SVG files, that is why I asked you.

Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Maphobbyist: hi, I've updated File:EU–Georgia.svg, File:EU-Ireland highlighted.svg, File:Europe location EU.svg (without Sudan border). Regarding File:World-EU-France.svg & File:EU-France (without insert).svg original uploads are with those "de facto borders" so overwriting them isn't allowed. Maybe you could ask their author if he/she is willing to correct the maps. Otherwise we must separately upload new versions of those two maps.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 09:32, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the updates! One small request: Can you also add the border of South Sudan in the lower right world map corner in File:Europe location EU.svg. It may sound trivial and a fuss, but it matters, because these maps can certainly be copied and uploaded with these obsolete borders and colorings. Thank you again for all your work. Maphobbyist (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Can you remove all the de-facto borders inside Georgia, Azerbaijan, Moldova and Cyprus in File:EU-France (without insert).svg? Thank you. Maphobbyist (talk) 10:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maphobbyist per COM:OVERWRITE rule it is not allowed.--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 19:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. However User:De728631 removed the UK from this map and other maps, after I requested it. If that change can be made, is there not the possibility at all to get rid of these internationally unrecognized borders, which are not relevant to this map at all? Maphobbyist (talk) 12:12, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is something else. Removing a lot of elements from an image practically always calls for a new upload as opposed to changing one or two things. Moreover, where there are disputed borders we should have several alternative maps for people to choose from. So a separate file is order if you would like to get rid of internal/disputed borders on international-scale maps. De728631 (talk) 12:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for explaining it in detail. I will create and upload a near-identical PNG version of this map with de jure borders in the near future, in case users wish to use one without de facto borders - which is also not relevant to the topic. Maphobbyist (talk) 15:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maphobbyist I will upload new SVG map. Regarding File:EU-France (without insert).svg at least we can request rename, because its title is misleading (not indicates disputed borders).--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 22:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maphobbyist upload ✓ Done File:EU-France (without inset).svg --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 12:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for creating the alternative map with de jure borders. Maphobbyist (talk) 19:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Democratic Republic of Georgia (en).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aram-van (talk) 02:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Georgian places renamed.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Randam.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Georgian places renamed.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Care to weigh in[edit]

I see you edit a lot of Georgia-related articles and photographs. Care to take a look at this request and provide your opinion? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Nikolay_Chkheidze

--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 17:48, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

გამარჯობა[edit]

კარგ დღეს გისურვებ. ვიპოვე ერთი ახალი წყარო საქართველოს ისტორიაზე ვიფიქრე რომ თქვენ მოგეწონოს. 2020 წლის წყაროა. წყარო : https://rustaveli.org.ge/geo/200916032318tsignebi/saqartvelo-VIII-saukuneshi-politikuri-istoria ძალიან ლამაზი ინფორმაციებია განსაკუთრებით მეფე არჩილის შესახებ. Meambokhe (talk) 09:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkey NATO.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nanahuatl (talk) 01:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update request for the removal of Russia from maps, after the withdrawal of foreign companies[edit]

Can you remove Russia from the maps, after the foreign companies withdrew from its market in:

Here is a list of foreign companies which have withdrawn from Russia since 24 February 2022, and are constantly updated:

https://www.investopedia.com/nearly-330-companies-have-withdrawn-from-russia-5221814

https://som.yale.edu/story/2022/over-300-companies-have-withdrawn-russia-some-remain

Can you remove Russia from the maps that are used and unused in Wikipedia, and which have no specific year label, when you have the time?

Yours sincerely, 31.200.20.40 17:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SVGs updated - ✅ --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 09:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the updates.
Can you remove Russia from the maps, after the foreign companies withdrew from its market?
I added news sources for each company as well as this comprehensive source: https://som.yale.edu/story/2022/over-300-companies-have-withdrawn-russia-some-remain
The withdrawals are semi-permanent, and not temporary/short-term.
Yours sincerely, 31.200.21.34 17:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you remove Russia from the maps where I added news sources? These companies have pulled out of Russia, and will not return to that country for years to come, unless the war ends, Russian troops leave and the sanctions are lifted. The sanctions are not short term. 31.200.13.130 16:06, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Russia has been removed from all these listed maps. Can you add the border of South Sudan in the maps where it is missing? De jure borders matter. 31.200.13.53 07:21, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tbilisi Districts[edit]

გამარჯობა! შეგიძლია შენი ამ რუკის მიხედვით ამის მსგავსი გააკეთო თბილისის უბნებზე? სახელები ინგლისურად.
P.S.აეროპორტის აღნიშვნა არაა საჭირო. მადლობა — Welaskesi (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

can you fix the Russian regions that use UTC+4 rather than +3 (Astrakhan, Saratov, and Ulyanovsk) LICA98 (talk) 20:11, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And in international law, Crimea is still part of Ukraine not Russia and its legal time is EET not Moscow time. Please correct. If you feel that you have to reflect the de facto situation, then use stripes or checker-board pattern. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Maynard Friedman hi, as you can see in the file history that edit was made by user Рагин1987, so I've reverted his disruptive edit on Crimea (p.s. Crimea is part of Ukraine and will be).--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 10:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. That was my first assumption but when I tried to find an earlier version to revert to, they all seemed to have the error? Maybe I misread it. Anyway, the version on Commons is now correct, thank you.
Have you any idea why https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwich_Mean_Time#/media/File:Time_Zones_of_Europe.svg is still showing the old version? (No worries if you can't see it immediately, I can ask at WP tech help.) --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:48, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Embarrassment time. Non-problem, I just needed to clear cache. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:52, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Giorgi Balakhadze: what about the UTC+4 regions though? they are still showing wrongly as +3... LICA98 (talk) 13:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

მესხეთი[edit]

გამარჯობა, ამ რუკის ინგლისური ვერია იქნებ გააკეთო, ძალიან საჭირო რუკაა(მესხეთისთვის, შავშეთის რუკისთვის და ა.შ., ზოგადად ძალიან კარგი რუკაა). Meskheti map of VIII-X centuries (ka).svg


პ.ს. ასევე თუ შეძლებ ქართლის(იბერიის) საერისმთავროს რუკაც გააკეთე. ამ საერისმთავროს არც ინგლიწურ ვიკიში და არც ქართულში არ აქვს რუკა. 5.152.72.140 18:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✅ ზემოაღნიშნული რუკა გაინგლისურებულია File:Meskheti map of VIII-X centuries (en).svg --Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 22:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update request[edit]

Hello.

Can you update your great File:Batumi-Tbilisi-Baku Railway Map.svg? The southeast railway line in Azerbaijan does not terminate at Lankaran, but extends to the town of Astara near the Iranian border (and actually terminates a few kilometers inside the Iranian border at the twin town which is also called Astara). The Lankaran-Astara railway line is operational.

Yours sincerely and Happy New Year, 31.200.17.120 13:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you have the time, can you update your map? It may sound trivial, but it is not, because this line is part of the North-South transport corridor. 31.200.17.120 05:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✅ Done, Happy New Year!--Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 11:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! 31.200.17.120 16:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello.
Can you also add the Lankaran-Astara railway line in your widely used maps File:Baku-Tbilisi-Kars Railway Map.svg, File:Poti-Tbilisi-Baku Railway Map.svg and File:Railways in the South Caucasus.svg?
In the Wikidata page of "Baku–Poti railway" (Q17310447), can you add the correct map File:Poti-Tbilisi-Baku Railway Map.svg?
Yours sincerely, 31.200.17.120 21:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! 31.200.17.120 17:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pizza Hut locations world map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:100C:A210:2BB2:25C1:12AD:4D2A:8F11 21:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tbilisi, Georgia — Tbilisi Public Service Hall Building from Mtkvari riverside.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tbilisi, Georgia — Tbilisi Public Service Hall Building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still have the GIS data of the boundary you used in this map?--Antemister (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COST Members[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for creating the map of COST Members back in April 2022. Armenia has since joined, would you be able to update the map? Not sure how to do it myself. Thank you, Archives908 (talk) 16:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Georgian boundaries has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

funplussmart (talk) 19:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]