User talk:Rama/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

→

Copyright status: File:Bruce Schneier-signature.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bruce Schneier-signature.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Card Models

Per IRC Disscussion- Where to start ? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:06, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

we could start with a sub-page somewhere in user-space, such as User:ShakespeareFan00/Card_Models. Since had had the seminal idea, I suggest you do the honours? Cheers! Rama (talk) 07:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:ShakespeareFan00/Card_Models - Created a very basic page... I'd appreciate your input on what the primary focus should be. Drawing polyhedral nets is probably straightforawrd (and commons might already have a number of these!) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An Image of Yours was Used on a Major News Site Without Credit or SA-Licensing

Hello Rama:

Just wanted to give you a heads up that your photo, Canon Telelenses MG 0492

was used in this CP24 story (a Canadian TV news channel and web site claiming to reach "1.55 million viewers daily in Toronto") without either crediting you (instead, crediting "Wikimedia" which is, of course, absurd that any writer for a TV station would be so ignorant of basic copyright law) or complying with the copyleft provisions of the CC-BY-SA or CeCILL. Not sure if you want to sue the crap out of them, demand compensation, or just politely inform them of your error, but there you go. Best of luck!

WIDEnet (What I've been up to, Let's Chat) 02:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

thank you, I have sent a message to explain why correct credits are important for the world of Free culture, it usually works wonders.

CHeers! Rama (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ariane 5 (VA208) (8218854876).jpg

File:Ariane 5 (VA208) (8218854876).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Uwe W. (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your help with some photo sources

Greetings Rama: I'm clearing through the category Images without source and found a few of your older images are missing source. Would it be possible for you to fill it in for the following images?

Thanking you so very much in advance for your help! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

sorry, but this quite old and I do not remember from where this came. The files seem to exceed the resolution of the camera I had at the time, so it might either have been taken from another website, or scanned from a book. I'll let you know if I stumble upon the definitive answer, but for now I fear I an unable to tell you more than this, sorry.

Cheers! Rama (talk) 21:23, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If sources can't be found, I apologize, but the images may have to be nominated for deletion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No they do not. They are obviously in the public domain no matter what. Rama (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your 20,000 Leagues under the Sea Images

Hi Rama: Could you take a few minutes and go through your images from 20,000 Leagues under the Sea, which are lacking in source? I have resourced two, here's one for a guide File:20000 Nautilus engines.jpg. Thank you!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

thank you for the heads-up and for your work on the category. Should be sorted out now.

Cheers and good continuation! Rama (talk) 07:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown shipmodel

Can you remember if this modelship had a name? Alexpl (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is Hoche, I'll set up a proper description a bit later. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and good continuation! Rama (talk) 11:39, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thx. Alexpl (talk) 08:36, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Kamiyama-IMG 4148.jpg

File:Maria Kamiyama-IMG 4148.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

180.15.32.229 17:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Kamiyama-IMG 4147.jpg

File:Maria Kamiyama-IMG 4147.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

180.15.32.229 17:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Kamiyama-IMG 4145.jpg

File:Maria Kamiyama-IMG 4145.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

180.15.32.229 17:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C'était écrit sur le panneau.

Yo,

tout est dans le titre.

Ludo (talk) 13:56, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ludo

Salut, Que suggères-tu concernant Ludo ? cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Les Nutons du Condroz.jpg, Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Sysop abuse by Ludo29. Je comprends que Ludo ne soit pas content parce que sa version de sa photo a été supprimée. Néanmoins je trouve très exagéré de 1. faire une guerre d'édition, 2. tout plaqué pour cela. Je cherche un compromis, mais apparemment Ludo refuse de discuter (il a enlevé 2 fois le message que j'avais mis sur sa page). Je lui ai aussi mis un mot sur sa page sur Wikipédia. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 December

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hey salut adm Daviston2 (talk) 20:39, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your content in Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision museum exhibition

Good afternoon,

My name is Lotte Baltussen, and I work at the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision. We are the archive of Dutch public broadcasters and hold many other types of audiovisual heritage as well. We have recently opened our new exhibition "3FM Presents: Your Serious Radio", which looks back at the last 50 years of pop music on the radio.

One of the interactives of our exhibition is a videomapping installation that depicts a teen room. When visitors enter the exhibition, they provide information that builds up their profile: their year of birth, gender and the favourite radio show, song, musical genre from their teens. This information is used to recreate their teen room; a sparse white space with 25 different elements such as a white bed, desk, and couch that are projected upon when a visitor activates his or her profile. We've divided the teen room into 10 time periods: 1965-1969, 1970-1974 and so forth.

In creating the videomapping, we have used countless free to use images, textures and patterns, among which is your picture of Amy Winehouse. We'd like to thank you very much for making your content available and thus making it possible us to use it. You can find a complete overview of the content used here, a blog post about the whole process here and pictures of the videomapping here, so you can see your content in action.

Thanks again!

All best,

Lottebelice (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Richiesta di aiuto per traduzione

Ciao Rama, ti chiamo perché avrei bisogno di un aiuto sul wikipedia francese e purtroppo io non parlo Italiano, prima di farti la mia richiesta vorrei farti qualche domanda:

sai se è possibile inserire file in screenshot in frwiki?
tu sei in grado di farlo?

Se le tue risposte sono entrbe positive sarò felice di esporti la mia richiesta. Scusa il disturbo e fiducioso in una tua risposta saluto cordialmente Smitersleon (talk) 15:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deuche blanche.jpg

Bonjour !

Je suis actuellement sur le tri (énorme) de Category:Citroën 2CV et il s'y trouve une photo que tu as versée. Te rappelle-tu dans quel pays elle a été prise ? Si oui, voudrais-tu l'ajouter à une des Category:Citroën 2CV by country si le pays existe ou créer la cat' si elle n'existe pas encore ou, simplement, me dire où et je m'en occuperai si tu n'as pas le temps. Pareil si tu as d'autres photos de Deuches que je n'ai pas encore classées...

Bonne semaine. --LW² \m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 14:09, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS : Je ne serai dispo qu'en fin de semaine.

Hmm, non, désolé. Ca date vraiment. Bonne continuation à toi ! Rama (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pas grave, tant pis. Merci et bonne semaine. --LW² \m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 20:21, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sakai-IMG 9833.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sakai-IMG 9833.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lethal danger.png

File:Lethal danger.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Louperivois Ψ @ 19:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

identification

Bonjour,

A des fins de classements, pouvez vous préciser dans quelle ville a été prise cette photo ? File:Tribunal MG 1634.JPG (si vous vous en souvenez)

Cordialement,

Tiraden (talk) 00:34, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, et bravo pour ce travail utile, de longue haleine et pas toujours gratifiant.

Il s'agit du palais de justice de Montbenon, à Lausanne (Suisse).

Bonne continuation et bonne année ! Rama (talk) 09:36, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merci, bonne année à vous :) Tiraden (talk) 11:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image of HMS Diadem at the capture of the cape of Good Hope

Hi Rama,

Would it be possible to use this image in a book I am writing about my family, I will credit yourself as stated.

Phil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsele1000 (talk • contribs) 15:12, 02 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

there is no need to credit me, I merely found and uploaded the image. The author is Thomas Whitcombe. Best wishes for you book and for the new year,

Rama (talk) 19:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Travail dérivésur File:Bretagne mg 8087-BW-Cropped.jpeg

Bonjour Rama. Je n'ai pas compris tes deux reverts sans un mot d'explication alors que j'avais précisé en dif les raisons de mes actions. Si on prend le cas du fichier Bretagne : sauf erreur de ma part, la photo d'origine n'est pas de toi, mais de Patrick Dantec : pouquoi enlever son nom ? D'autre part, que vient faire une licence CeCILL sur une photo ? Cette licence est prevue pour les logiciels ? Cordialement. --La femme de menage (talk) 06:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1) La photo est de moi. Non seulement je me demande bien où tu as pu rêver qu'elle serait de Patrick Dantec (pourquoi lui spécifiquement, d'ailleurs ? Il photographie pour le Musée de la Marine à Paris ; à ton avis, où est la maquette du Bretagne ? Hmmm ? Réfléchis bien !), mais je me demande si tu as la moindre idée des conséquences de ton action : tu me contestes les droits d'auteur sur mon travail (y compris les droits moraux, qui sont inaliénables), et tu exposes tout le monde à une plainte de Dantec ou de ses employeurs. Qu'est-ce qui me donnerait le droit d'uploader des images de Patrick Dantec sur Commons, sous une licence libre spécifique, sans son autorisation ?

2) La licence CeCILL vient de ce que j'ai choisi de l'appliquer sur mes travaux pour des raisons qui me conviennent, et tu n'as absolument pas le droit de modifier les termes légaux que choisissent les ayants droit. Pour la différence entre logiciel et donnée, je te renvoie à la notion d'architecture de von Neumann (version courte : il n'y a pas de différence fondamentale entre logiciel et donnée).

J'espérais que reverter tes actions discrètement serait la façon la moins brutale de te faire comprendre qu'elles n'allaient vraiment pas. Je suis désolé d'être direct, mais tu ne comprends pas les principes de base qui régissent Commons ; ça n'est pas en soi grave (ces principes sont complexes, parfois contre-intuitifs, jamais naturels, et il faut vraiment les apprendre), mais il faut vraiment que tu arrêtes de faire n'importe quoi sans en mesurer les conséquences avant que tu te sois renseignée. Là, c'est vraiment l'éléphant dans le magasin de porcelaine. Rama (talk) 09:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to reprint photo of Pazuzu

Dear Rama,

I would like to use the Pazuzu photo (on black background) in my ebook, which is of a scholarly nature. Do I need to do anything to secure permission and how should the photo be attributed? Thank you! Jodell — Preceding unsigned comment added by JodOns (talk • contribs) 03:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, and thank you for your interest! The image can be used freely as long as its credits mention "Rama, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr". More information here, but do not hesitate to ask further should anything need clarification. Cheers! Rama (talk) 10:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!~Jodell Onstott

Chamois ou bouquetin ?

Bonjour Rama.
Cette photo File:Chamois mp3h2317.jpg me semble représenter davantage un jeune bouquetin qu'un chamois. Pour éviter les confusions quand elle est réutilisée, ne pense-tu pas qu'il vaudrait mieux demander son renommage ? Par contre, elle est dans la bonne catégorie.
Cordialement, --Arcyon37 (talk) 13:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour cette correction fort utile, j'ai renommé l'image. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 13:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Background for "Copyvio: proprietary kerning algo. leaked in file."?

Hello.

If you recall deleting a raft of "traffic signs manual" related images on or about 9th February 2016 with the above tag would you please be so kind as to reveal your reasoning &/or provide a pointer to the relevant discussion. In particular, I was the uploader of (now obviously deleted) File:UK-Traffic-signs-manual-chapter-03-Page-22-Image-01.png, File:UK-Traffic-signs-manual-chapter-03-Page-22-Image-02.png and File:UK-Traffic-signs-manual-chapter-03-Page-22-Image-03.png

I am not at all questioning your judgement or necessarily want the images resurrected. My only involvement was in extracting these images for layout demonstration purposes on English wikisource and was unaware of this form of encumbrance. As the images were drawn from a PDF already present on Commons: File:UK Traffic Signs Manual - Chapter 3 Regulatory Signs. 2008 (Second Impression 2008).pdf (in point of detail all three were drawn from page 24 of that document) I rather fail to comprehend why the PDF is not also subject to removal upon identical reasoning.

Thanks for your time. AuFCL (talk) 00:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to see where you have communicated with the English Wikisource community about the deletions of files in use. As an administrator, you have a broad responsibility to the community at large, not a narrow focus on single issue. There was neither urgency nor privacy issues to required deletion of the files without consultation. Thanks. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AuFCL the kerning (i.e. variable distance between letters) on these panels is based on a non-Free Frutiger font; hence, they contain proprietary intellectual property and cannot, as such, be published under a Free licence. This is of course highly technical and hard to spot (I did not myself, my attention was drawn on the issue), so there is nothing improper in what you did. I think that if these signs were recreated with the fonts implemented as paths, it would not be a problem. Rama (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a gracious response. As you indeed suspected I had no idea of such considerations. Thanks also for suggesting an alternate approach. AuFCL (talk) 08:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am further embarrassed to find that—now that I know the terms to search for—the user for whom I prepared the original demonstration was aware of this matter as of 1st February. Thanks again for your actions. AuFCL (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@billinghurst the mission of Commons is to constitute a repository of Free content: it is not ancillary to other projects, and there is an emphasis on Free for a good reason. If anything, my "broad responsibility to the community at large" is to ensure that their work is not jeopardised by a creep of non-Free content. Rama (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And nothing that I said is contra to the free content component, my message was in the paragraph in its entirety. The scope of Commons is cited at Commons:Project scope and you will see it is a two part statement, not solely the one part that you cited to me. The message is not whether the files should have been deleted, it is the process and discussions to undertake. It is the consideration that administrators here should have on a crosswiki project where the images are stored here wherever possible. Education and the sharing your knowledge is an integral part of the role, not predominantly policeman. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:02, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

user:billinghurst, don't know why you would expect anything but summary deletion. being an admin means never having to say you're sorry; and free to make picayune license purity tests. deletion before collaboration; and what other projects? but hey it's all good we can farm flickr. Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 21:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rama photograph of: M2 Browning Heavy Machine Gun

Howdy from Texas Rama, I enjoy genealogy work. I am in the " Military & War" Project, at wikitree.com / http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Dortch-50 I would like other users of wikitree.com to be able to use this image also. I think that I have completed all the necessary steps for Creative Commons. URL. url site. Attribution: "Photograph by Rama, Wikimedia Commons, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr" . & then I tried to use the "[ [ ] ]" for the wikisite. It did not appear when I used the double brackets. It is no problem :). If I have missed doing something please advise me sir ? I have also attempted to up load the same image at fold3.com , I will double check that I have fulfilled the requirements of Creative Commons for this site also. Thank You Kindly, John P Vickery IV http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Vickery-352 I can also be reached at yaquidebrujo@yahoo.com Have a Great Day :)

Thank you for your interest in my image and in Free licences.

Normally, the image should appear on a MediaWiki-based wiki if you use Image:Dortch-50-1.jpg, but depending on your settings this might change. Keep in mind that other wiki systems might use different syntaxes. At worse, you should be able to use a full HTML command ("<img src="http://www.wikitree.com/photo.php/e/ee/Dortch-50-1.jpg">").

Best of luck, Rama (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 21:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 21:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:13 anchored in Rothesay Bay.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:13 anchored in Rothesay Bay.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:13 anchored in Rothesay Bay.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 01:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of uploader credit

Hello, you are being contacted as a user who has previously [or currently] included "* Uploaded by Example" in your file uploads. A bot task has been approved to remove this specific phrase from files because it can be misleading when attempting to attribute the file creator. As an alternative, RileyBot is willing to tag your uploads with a user category instead. Please respond stating if you opt-in and if you have any specific requests (addition of user category, etc); if there is no response within two weeks, consent will be implied. Please note, this message has been left by an automated bot, however, a user will be tracking your response. RileyBot (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, and thank you for all the good work. Cheers! Rama (talk) 06:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Identification de personnes photographiées

Bonjour, Quelqu'un a laissé un message en anglais à Commons:Help desk#Yann Tainguy au sujet d'une de tes photos sur laquelle il dit qu'il y avait erreur d'identification de la personne photographiée. Il semble avoir raison. Je crois avoir réussi à replacer les photos dans les bonnes catégories. Si tu pouvais regarder pour voir si c'est bien le cas. Si oui, ce serait probablement utile de renommer quelques-unes des photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:24, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bien vu, merci beaucoup ! Rama (talk) 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mehul by von Winter.jpg

File:Mehul by von Winter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rettinghaus (talk) 09:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frégates, images extraites

Bonjour,

en faisant un peu de classement dans les photos d'Exocet, je suis tombe sur File:Exocet mg 5783.jpg et File:Launch mg 5783.jpg que vous avez importés en 2009, et indiqué que ce sont des images extraites de File:Primauguet mg 5783.jpg.

Est ce également le cas de File:SAGAIE decoy launcher mg 6026.jpg, File:Crotale mg 6026.jpg et File:Radome mg 6026.jpg ? je n'ai pas retrouvé l'image d'origine ...

Tiraden (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, et merci de te livrer à ce travail ingrat mais utile.

les détails des systèmes viennent de photos de cette série que j'avais faites dans la rade de Toulon en 2009; par contre quelle vignette vient de quelle photo, je ne sais plus. Si ça te parait utile, je peux toujours éplucher la série pour essayer de retrouver l'information, mais ça serait un peu laborieux et je préfèrerais éviter si ça n'est pas nécessaire (mais sinon je donne volontier un coup de main).

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: au fait, en regardant superficiellement les photos en question, File:Radome mg 6026.jpg est évidemment un détail du Cassard ou du Jean Bart, et File:Crotale mg 6026.jpg m'a l'air d'une frégate de type Lafayette. Rama (talk) 08:21, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comme vous voulez, J'aurais pensé qu'avec la date ou le "mg 6026" cela aurait pu être rapide ... mais entretemps je me suis rendu compte que c'était le même problème avec plein d'images dans Category:Crotale missiles ou autres ... Tiraden (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argonaute-IMG 1674.jpg

File:Argonaute-IMG 1674.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 19:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Brussels suspects CCTV.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brussels suspects CCTV.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yellowcard (talk) 16:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:LPL 2016-03-22.svg

Bonjour,

pourrais-je savoir pourquoi vous supprimez ce fichier ? J'avais téléversé un File:LPL 2016-03-22.JPG mais avant qu'il ne soit supprimé, quelqu'un avait apposé un bandeau disant qu'il fallait qu'il soit en svg (ou png si je ne me trompe pas). Je refais donc une version en svg mais que vous supprimez également. Là, je ne comprends pas...

Cordialement. --Lepsyleon (talk) 09:25, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

j'avais laissé un message à ce sujet sur votre page de discussion : vos fichiers ne rentrent pas dans le périmètre du projet Wikimedia Commons, vous devriez plutôt les publier sur un site d'images personnelles comme Flickr, Tumblr ou Pinterest.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 09:47, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non, désolé pas de message sur ma page de discussion. Tant que vous y êtes, vous devriez dans ce cas supprimer l'intégralité de Category:WikiLapins by Lepsyleon. --Lepsyleon (talk) 09:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh pardon, quelqu'un d'autre a fait des images dans le même esprit et je n'ai pas remarqué que vous étiez deux utilisateurs différents.

Il y a une certaine tolérance pour des créations originales qui portent sur Wikimédia elle-même, je pense donc que la catégorie ci-dessus a de bonnes chances de survie. C'est moins le cas sur des sujets documentaires, mais là pourquoi pas.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Rama et Lepsyleon, je me suis permis de restaurer l'image car elle me semble bien in scope, en plus d'être utilisée sur une page utilisateur. Si tu penses qu'elle ne rentre pas dans le scope du projet, je t'invite à ouvrir une DR pour en discuter, surtout que les images out of scope ne rentrent pas dans les critères de suppression immédiate. Cordialement. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rama: : il s'agit du même utilisateur puisque je suis l'auteur de tous ces dessins

.

@Thibaut120094: : quitte à restaurer l'image, ne serait-il pas mieux de restaurer celle en SVG, puisque sur celle en format JPG, il est conseillé de la mettre en SVG ?

Cordialement. --Lepsyleon (talk) 10:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai restauré les deux. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Thibaut120094: : merci, même si ce n'est probablement que temporaire. --Lepsyleon (talk) 10:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gas mask 74

Mon ami, you have uploaded a bunch of photos of Swiss military gas masks. However your photos are model 90, not 74. I have recategorized your photos, but not changed the description or the file names. With kind regards, Hugitobi (talk) 12:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your work and congratulations on your expertise and keen eye. Cheers! Rama (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What information/authorisations do I need ?

Hello Rama,

One of the paricipants of the Geneva Gender-Gap workshop wants to upload a picture to Commons to illustrate the article she has written about a living person. This person like to send a photo to illustrate the article. Her husband took the photo quite a few years ago, but they cannot scan/upload the photo themselves. Exactly what type of signed documents do we need in order to use this photo on Commons?

Best regards GastelEtzwane (talk) 10:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for the inquiry.

In this case, the husband is the copyright holder, so he is the person to ask. The person should write a letter or e-mail stating that they are willing to publish the document in question under a specific Free licence (I suggest Cc-by-sa for this purpose). For instance, a statement saying "as the copyright holder of this work, I hereby release it under the Cc-by-sa licence" would do nicely. You should then forward this to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org where a volunteer will archive the permission and approve the file.

If the person if sending a copy of a photograph, you can scan it and upload the scan, this will not affect the validity of the process (in fact scanning 2D works in ineligible for copyright in Switzerland).

You can find further information on Commons:OTRS (or Commons:OTRS/fr for a French version), but do not hesitate to ask me if I am in positions to help. Thank you for your contributions and good conitnuation! Rama (talk) 10:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your rapid answer. We are in the workshop right now, presenting the article (fr:Micheline Centlivres-Demont), and both individuals (the contributor and the living peron) are here with me. GastelEtzwane (talk) 10:36, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, best wishes then, and let them know that their interest and contibutions are much appreciated, as is your dedication! Cheers! Rama (talk) 10:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Collection of swords of Museo delle Grigne

Super, merci ! Je travaille sur une série d'article sur l'escrime, dont un historique (ro:Istoria scrimei), ça va bien me servir ! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Du coup je t'ai mis toutes les poignés orthopédiques dans la catégorie (celles qui sont dans Grip (sport fencing)); si tu sais reconnaître une Visconti d'une Zivkovic, je suis preneur !

Bonne continuation et merci ! Rama (talk) 13:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FoP

Hi Rama, Thanks for restoring the images from Belgium. A week ago I made an overview for myself to see how many images were nominated for deletion because of missing FoP in Belgium. Many of these images are still not restored: User:Romaine/Sandbox2. It would be great if you can help to complete the list. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 14:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An unusually satisfying FoP-related mass use of admin tools! Rama (talk) 15:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yesss, it is really good to see. And I think more countries will follow, it is just a matter of time. :-) Romaine (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the work! In the past days I have followed the log for the restoring of files. This monitoring I now will end. I have created an overview of all the restored images. This overview can be found at: User:Romaine/Freedom of Panorama/Belgium. If you restore more images, or if you see someone restoring images because there is now Freedom of Panorama in Belgium, please add the images to this overview or let me know. Thanks!! Romaine (talk) 03:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: On User talk:Romaine/Freedom of Panorama/Belgium I collected some anomalies, including files of what the actual file is missing... Romaine (talk) 03:20, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lahouaiej Bouhlel.jpg

File:Lahouaiej Bouhlel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 09:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lahouaiej Bouhlel.jpg

File:Lahouaiej Bouhlel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 09:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Rama, thanks for the pictures you took of me during Wikimania. You made my day! MADe (talk) 18:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Tasty wikiwafels, best medicine against condrop after such a wonderful experience. Best wishes to you and good continuation until next time. Cheers! Rama (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, I've just seen some which are really outstanding. Nemo 19:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! *^_^* Rama (talk) 19:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Crossroads

https://www.nps.gov/orgs/1635/upload/NNPS_903_D160_-38840-pg0000.pdf pages 16 and 17 for the target array maps. Enjoy. Revent^talk 07:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Assiette au beurre religions Kupka.jpg

Hello, après avoir lancé la DR sur cette image que j'avais téléversée, je me suis rendu compte que tu l'avais précédemment supprimée puis restaurée. Il m'a semblé comprendre que tu te fondais sur une publication avant 1923, ce qui me paraît contradictoire avec l'exigence de PD dans le pays de publication originelle. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 08:46, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moi aussi, mais quand on entre dans ce genre de domaines, ça devient vite des questions politiques entre ceux qui prennent le respect du copyright au sérieux et ceux qui cherchent des excuses pour mettre n'importe quoi sur Commons, et là ne n'ai pas le temps. Rama (talk) 12:10, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

mes demandes de suppression

Bonjour

Je viens de demander la suppression de plusieurs images.

Ces images proviennent du blog (non-officiel) de Radio Courtoisie, où elles sont mises au statut "licence libre", sans indication du nom du photographe. Cela ne me semble pas garantir que ce blog respecte le droit des auteurs.

Pour information, cordialement

--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-ID-France

Template:PD-ID-France has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Olivier LPB (talk) 12:59, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More Atari joystick images?

Your Atari CX40 joystick appears to be in very good condition, and I'm wondering if you might consider adding more images of it from different angles? Evan.Amos has uploaded an excellent one, but his stick has all the orange paint rubbed off, and I'd like to show that. Would you consider making an image like this one: File:Atari-2600-Joystick.jpg? Thanks! Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this stick lacks the word "TOP" in orange. This may indicate it is actually a CX10, not a CX40. If so, that is very interesting and I would like to know for sure one way or the other. Does it say anything on the bottom? Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

thank you for your interest and congratulation on your expertise!

I am not in possession of this joystick, but I think it is part of the collections of the Musée Bolo. If so, it might be on display, in which case I might be able to take other views. I will try contacting the conservator and see whether it would be concievale to open the diplay case and take images from all angles.

Cheers! Rama (talk) 16:25, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:French ship Duquesne mg 5192.jpg and File:Duquesne-IMG 4945.jpg

I thought you might want to know about recent changes in these files. An IP claims that this is Duquesne from 1813. --jdx ^Re: 14:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have noticed the change, thank you very much! I believe this correction to be correct, you can see that the lower battery has 15 guns on each side, typical of 80-gun ships of the line, while 74-guns have 14. There are probably lots of other details that will confirm it, some of which I am not even aware. Thank you and good continuation! Rama (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and if the IP can see us, thank you, do come back and maybe make yourself an account! :) Rama (talk) 14:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swordbreaker

Hello, Rama. I've recently been editing Parrying Daggers using information from a few scholarly sources and had a question about your Swordbreaker image. According to how the terminology is conventionally applied, it would seem to fit the description of a Main-gauche rather more than a Swordbreaker, so I was wondering if would be possible to relabel the image accordingly. 216.67.56.99 04:59, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your message, your expertise is very much appreciated. Could you give me the URL of the image in question so I can implement your correction?

Also, we would be very glad to have someone of your expertise on board, so I was hoping that you might consider making yourself a user account if you wanted to contribute, even sporadically. You can even edit article or image labels without an account, just like you did this talk page.

Thank you again and do let me know if I can help in any way. Best wishes, Rama (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the image you are thinking of? File:Swordbreaker img 3665.jpg Cheers! Rama (talk) 05:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's the one. I was hesitant to edit it myself since you're the one who uploaded it and I didn't want to seem rude. I also realize that when it comes to medieval weaponry, terminology can never be entirely uniform. I think my main concern was simply to make the image consistent with the article itself. 216.67.56.99 05:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I will change the caption, and maybe detour the image as to make it more readable.

Also, reading the Wikipedia article, I see that we have in fact no image of an actual Swordbreaker; I'll try to draft a schematics of the thing, so not hesitate to comment on it should it need improvements.

Thank you again and best regards! Rama (talk) 06:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help. That should prevent any possible confusion. If it helps, here's an actual piece from the Wallace Collection. http://www.wallacecollection.org/whatson/treasure/120 216.67.56.99 06:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magnificient! I had just done File:Swordbreaker.svg, which find rather unconvincing (looks like a serrated baionet of the First World War). I will be able to do much better thanks to this. Many thanks again for your helpful and knowledgeable input! Rama (talk) 06:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say good work and I think that looks great. Thanks again. 216.67.56.99 08:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you! This is a prime example of how the world is improved one small step at a time. Good continuation and do come back anytime! Rama (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relecture de légendes sur File:Chaine medicale plan novi.svg et File:Structure poste medical avance.svg

Salut,

j'envisage de faire une version anglaise de File:Chaine medicale plan novi.svg et File:Structure poste medical avance.svg, et je voudrai avoir ton avis sur les traductions que j'ai proposé dans la description. Si tu as 5 min.

Et, non, je n'envisage pas de faire de version internationale, des appels de références de type ① ou ⓐ ne me semblent pas adaptés.

Cdang (talk) 09:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Salut !

Tout d'abord, content de te voir toujours en pleine forme sur les sujets paramédic, et bravo pour ces schémas.

Je pense que c'est très bien, sauf le terme de "noria", dont je doute qu'il serait compris. Je ne vois pas trop d'équivalent exact, du coup je ne peux pas proposer mieux qu'une périphrase du genre "round trips".

Encore bravo, et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour tes encouragements ^_^ J'avais gardé le terme car il figurait sur le wiktionnaire. Après une petite recherche, le terme semble utilisé dans ce contexte, du moins dans une source (ça semble être la seule ? L'auteur est a priori hondurien donc hispanophone), avec des schémas qui se ressemblent étrangement [1] du coup, grâce à ton doute, je trouve des traductions peut-être plus pertinentes.

A+

Cdang (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ou alors on garde le terme de "noria", qui est de toute façon une excellente image, avec une micro-explication entre parenthèse ? Rama (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Une autre recherche plus générale donnerait "chain" comme micro-explication.

Cdang (talk) 11:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dans le genre, j'aime bien "rotation", mais j'ai l'impression que c'est aussi une expression qui n'a court qu'en français. Rama (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bon, au final, ça donne File:Novi medical chain french mascal plan.svg et File:Structure advanced medical post.svg. N'hésite pas à rameuter des contributeurs pour modifier (ou proposer des modifs) si tu en connais. Et merci pour ton aide.

Cdang (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brestois dans l'âme

Bonjour Rama,

Je suis tombée sur des photos prises par toi lors du défilé du 14 juillet 2015, à Brest.

Aurais-tu l’occasion de venir parfois au bout du monde ?

Si oui serais-tu intéressé pour te joindre à nous (groupe local de la NCO à Brest)? Nous avons une liste de discussion, veux-tu que je t'y inscrives si oui, merci de m'envoyer un mail à g_fily @ yahoo.fr.

PS : Nous prévoyons par exemple prochainement de faire une sortie photos MH, de couvrir le festival du film court et d'envisager un wiki takes au musée des beaux-art.

A bientôt je l'espère --Gaëlle FILY (talk) 10:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, merci pour ton intérêt et ton attention, je suis très touché !

Je suis malheureusement un peu loin, en temps normal, mais si je passe à l'occasion en Bretagne, je ne manquerai pas d'en informer la NCO. J'ai eu la chance de rencontrer certains de ses membres éminents, et ça a toujours été un vrai plaisir que j'espère réitérer. Et Erminig me manque ! ;)

Bonne continuation et j'espère à bientôt ! Rama (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hélène Diveau IMG 3613.jpg

File:Hélène Diveau IMG 3613.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

109.18.63.249 07:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CIA illegal flights svg

Tashkent is not labeled correctly on: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CIA_illegal_flights.svg

The country of Turkmenistan is colored in red, not Uzbekistan. Tashkent is shown in the incorrect country. --ChristopherPotes (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am mortified. Thank you very much for pointing this out. Rama (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikimania2016 Wikifranca meetupIMG 3621.jpg

File:Wikimania2016 Wikifranca meetupIMG 3621.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fæ (talk) 03:59, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faon-IMG 5543.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faon-IMG 5545.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Viermastbark Pamir.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Viermastbark Pamir.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Viermastbark Pamir.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 20:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Utilisation de photo

Bonjour Rama, Je viens vers vous pour vous demander l'autorisation d'utiliser votre photo de Jean Ziegler au Salon du Livre 2011 à Genève afin d'illustrer sa page sur WP.fr, à l'instar de la page sur WP;en. A cette occasion, j'ai découvert quelques-unes de vos images qui ont été, à juste titre, reconnues comme particulièrement de qualité. Dans l'attente de votre réponse, merci de votre attention, bien cordialement, --Sidonie61 (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Merci pour votre appréciation flatteuse et encourageante de mes contributions.

Il n'y a aucun problème à utiliser les images de Commons pour illustrer les articles de Wikipédia dans ses différentes langues, ou des autres projets Wikimédia (Wikisource, Wikidata, Wiktionaire, Wikinews, Wikiversité, etc.) Cliquer sur l'image renvoit alors à la page qui documente l'image sur Commons, de sorte que la mention de l'auteur et de la licence sont automatiquement effectuées. Vous n'avez donc besoin ni de légender l'image d'une façon particulière, si de demander l'autorisation aux auteurs -- même s'il est toujours gratifiant de voir ses images utilisées, et utile de savoir lesquelles le sont pour orienter la production vers les images qui servent aux autres contributeurs.

N'hésitez pas à demander si je puis vous être utile plus avant. Merci encore pour votre intérêt, merci pour vos contribution, et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 07:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Wikimania2016 Wikifranca meetup-IMG 3622.jpg

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 11:09, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting non-empty categories with zero files

Concerning this, what do you suggest I should do about dozens of “my” categories that have been recently deleted as empty by JuTa? Apart from one (created by mistake), all of them were trivially populatable and most included templates and/or parent cat connections containing non trivial information, which might be lost upon recreation (as opposed to undeletion). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:01, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you talk to JuTa about it. Rama (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renommage

Bonjour,

Est-ce qu'il ne faudrait pas renommer File:Election presidentielle 2007 Lausanne MG 2761.jpg, pour un titre plus conforme à l'objet photographié et surtout sans la mention 'Lausanne' pour une urne électorale pleine d'enveloppes République française ;-) ?

Cordialement. -- Habertix (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

L'image fait partie d'une série de photos de presse

qui documente la tenue des élections présidentielles dans la Salle de Cantons de la gare de Lausanne pour les Français de l'Étranger. On voit clairement les panneaux "Élection présidentielle française" et "Lausanne" sur File:Election presidentielle 2007 Lausanne MG 2757.jpg et File:Election 2007 MG 2752.jpg.

Je ne suis pas sûr d'avoir compris le sens de ta question, aussi n'hésite pas à demander des précisions au cas où je n'y aurais pas répondu. Rama (talk) 05:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Type99Rifle.JPG

File:Type99Rifle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winchester Model 1892 firefly.jpg

File:Winchester Model 1892 firefly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rifle Berthier.jpg

File:Rifle Berthier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:21, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chartres cathedral 2848.jpg

Chartres Stained glass?

Hello,

Can you remember where that photograph comes from? It is certainly not part of the Chartres stained windows anyway, only the crypt ones are modern, and they are in a very different style. That one seems to be part of a series of cathedrals/coat of arms (?)

Furthermore, the style seems modern (I'd say post-1930) so chances are, that it is not PD in the first place.

And, I can't see any potential usage for it as long as nobody knows where it has been taken (technically remarkable, though, but that is beside the point).

I'd suggest you delete the file if you agree with my analysis. Or update the description. Whatever.

(en fait on peut aussi dialoguer en français) Michelet-密是力 (talk) 13:31, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no recollection of that, but the size of the image worries me. This looks more like something taken from some random Internet website than something I would have photographed myself. Deleting. Thank you for the notification. Rama (talk) 14:12, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image Usage

Dear Rama,

Thank you for making your images available on Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to use one of your photographs: 'Scene of Deluge' for the programme cover of the 2016 Annual Congress of the Association for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy in Ireland.

I've credited your work using the preferred citation.

best wishes,

Brian O'Connor, A.P.P.I. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.100.200.116 (talk) 23:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I am very happy that my images could be of use, and that you are so thoughtful as to promote Free licences by citing them.

Best wishes, Rama (talk) 11:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rennerus Arsenius astrolabe-CnAM 3907-IMG 6426-black-wb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Wikimania2016 Wikifranca meetupIMG 3623.jpg

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 14:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hey Rama! I am citing your pictures with MLA format. How should I include the license? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhoenixTamer (talk • contribs) 12:24, 09 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

if you are merely mentioning the images, the including the licence is not mandatory (though it's always appreciated as a way to help others re-use the image); it is if you are using the image. You can have a look at User:Rama/use my images for tips, but do not hesitate to ask me further if I can help. Cheers! Rama (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations (again)

But the MLA format does not include the license. How will I include it? I am using three of your drawings (recovery position, recovery maneuver, Heimlich maneuver) for a first aid poster project for school, and have to cite in MLA — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhoenixTamer (talk • contribs) 07:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Any mention of the licence would do, but indeed we might need to improvise a tiny bit. I would suggest something along the lines of

Rama. Heimlich-manoeuver.jpg (Cc-by-sa-3.0-fr). 2004. Wikimedia Commons. Web 10 December 2016.

Does that appear practical? Best wishes and thank you for your attention to these questions, this is most appreciated. Cheers Rama (talk) 09:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		*** * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * ***
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you very much, best wishes for the new year! Rama (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liage Wikidata et buste de Jean-Antoine Chaptal par Philippe-Laurent Roland

Hello Rama. J'ai vu ton essai de liage par Wikidata. Ça m'a l'air vraiment extra, utile et efficace. Comme il m'arrive souvent de faire bientôt des imports sur Commons d'images d'œuvres présentes sur Wikidata, ça m'intéresse particulièrement. N'hésite pas à me solliciter ou à m'avertir du développement. Pour information, l'œuvre choisie, Jean-Antoine Chaptal de Philippe-Laurent Roland https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q28054653 , existait déjà sur Wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17579698 . Du coup les items ont été fusionnés. Je ne sais pas la conséquence éventuelle que cela pourrait avoir pour tes scripts mais tenais à te le signaler. Bien à toi. --Shonagon (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content que ça te plaise ! Pour le moment c'est un prototype pour illustrer le concept, mais j'espère que WM-de va nous fignoler quelque chose de joli.

Merci pour le fusionnage, je commence tout juste sur WD, j'espère que je ne fais pas torp de dégâts en apprenant.

Bonne continuation à toi, et tous mes voeux pour 2017 ! Rama (talk) 07:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2709.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2709.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Rama/Archive 11

Copyright status: File:Bruce Schneier-signature.jpg

Card Models

An Image of Yours was Used on a Major News Site Without Credit or SA-Licensing

Your help with some photo sources

Your 20,000 Leagues under the Sea Images

Unknown shipmodel

C'était écrit sur le panneau.

Ludo

A barnstar for you!

Your content in Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision museum exhibition

Richiesta di aiuto per traduzione

Copyright status: File:Sakai-IMG 9833.jpg

identification

Image of HMS Diadem at the capture of the cape of Good Hope

Travail dérivésur File:Bretagne mg 8087-BW-Cropped.jpeg

QI Tunisia training

Permission to reprint photo of Pazuzu

Chamois ou bouquetin ?

Background for "Copyvio: proprietary kerning algo. leaked in file."?

Rama photograph of: M2 Browning Heavy Machine Gun

File source is not properly indicated: File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg

File tagging File:10 Sea Vixen landing on Eagle Mediterranean Jan1970.jpg

File tagging File:13 anchored in Rothesay Bay.jpg

Removal of uploader credit

Identification de personnes photographiées

Frégates, images extraites

File tagging File:Brussels suspects CCTV.jpg

Gas mask 74

What information/authorisations do I need ?

FoP

Some stroopwafels for you!

Operation Crossroads

mes demandes de suppression

More Atari joystick images?

File:French ship Duquesne mg 5192.jpg and File:Duquesne-IMG 4945.jpg

Swordbreaker

Relecture de légendes sur File:Chaine medicale plan novi.svg et File:Structure poste medical avance.svg

Brestois dans l'âme

CIA illegal flights svg

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

File source is not properly indicated: File:Viermastbark Pamir.jpg

Utilisation de photo

Notification about possible deletion

Deleting non-empty categories with zero files

Renommage

File:Chartres cathedral 2848.jpg

Image Usage

Quality Image Promotion

Notification about possible deletion

Citations

Citations (again)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

Liage Wikidata et buste de Jean-Antoine Chaptal par Philippe-Laurent Roland

Copyright status: File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2709.jpg

Navigation menu

Search