User talk:Rama/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

→

Mouse

I am researching this mouse for a book project and need to know the references could you please tell me what they are? please&thank-you

Which mouse? Rama (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2773.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2773.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 11:52, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2821.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2821.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 11:55, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2822.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2822.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 11:57, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enseigne Alsacienne revolutionnaire.jpg langswitch

The "Langswitch" template's original intended use was to autotranslate system interface messages. Its use for the titles of paintings etc. is actually dubious and problematic, while the way that you're trying to use it on File:Enseigne Alsacienne revolutionnaire.jpg is quite strange... AnonMoos (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem with using Langswitch in this way; I have done so in countless Feature Pictures and Quality Images without anybody ever complaining, and I have seen it used in this way by others. Furthermore, your edit on File:Enseigne Alsacienne revolutionnaire.jpg breaks its French caption. Rama (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:COMEX diving sphere

Salut Rama. Tes photos dans Category:COMEX diving sphere ont un problème de licence : tu les as mises sous {{PD-Art}} avec la mention « Reproduction of a painting that is in the public domain because of its age ». Ça ressemble à un copier-coller malheureux… Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

En effet, heureusement que tu es là ! Je corrige. Merci et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 09:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Solvyns

Hello Rama,

First of all, i'd like to commend you on the quality of your photographs! It's good work you're doing.

I am interested in using one of your pictures of Solvyns' work, for illustrative inclusion in a book chapter i'm writing. Normally i am free to use his work as such, since there is no longer any copyright resting on it. However, i should mention the photographer. Are you ok with that? Also, in which way should reference you?

Kind regards,

Wim De Winter

Greetings,

thank you for your interest and your appreciation. You are indeed free to use the work without asking, but I am always glad to hear of people using an image I have contibuted, as it helps me direct my priorities towards the most useful subjects.

"Rama" would be fine, if you wish to mention the photographer (or any variant, like "Photograph by Rama", etc.).

My best wishes for you work,

Rama (talk) 19:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rotation

Hello, I notice you're the photographer of this image. I was wondering if I could entice you to rotate it 90 degrees clockwise because I feel it would be a little easier to look at. Thanks. CRRays Head90 | ^{We Believe!} 17:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. CRRays Head90 | ^{We Believe!} 20:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emmanuel Todd.jpg

File:Emmanuel Todd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Simio (talk) 09:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bronze swords-MGR Lyon-IMG 9732-2.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bronze swords-MGR Lyon-IMG 9732-2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 22:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bronze axe blades-AF 617-E 11210-img 2771.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bronze axe blades-AF 617-E 11210-img 2771.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Institutions europeennes IMG 4349.jpg

And also:

File:Institutions europeennes IMG 4353.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Wooden coffer-E 32225-img 2772.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Wooden coffer-E 32225-img 2772.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Rama/gallery#Sat Jun 15 10:11:56 CEST 2013

Where dit you take this photos? - Kersti (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At the Swiss national stud farm in Avenches, in the canton of Vaud. Rama (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Village pump discussion concerning your work.

Hi, I've started a discussion at the village pump regarding a file you've worked on Commons:Village pump#Digital washing out of photos. would you mind popping over to add to the conversation? Regards, Liamdavies (talk) 15:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Marseillaise Georges THILL Musique de la Garde Républicaine.ogg

File:La Marseillaise Georges THILL Musique de la Garde Républicaine.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Excolis (talk) 14:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Awful photography

For the umpteenth time I've had to replace one of your images, in this case [[1]], which is awful beyond belief. If looks as if you've just taken a bunch of shots through the window of a camera shop and uploaded them without any attempt at asking the shopkeeper if you could loan it. If this is any indication of your work you're an absolutely useless photographer who seems to be incredibly persistent, which is a horrible combination. You're relentlessly spamming camera articles with sub-sub-sub-amateur rubbish and I find it offensive. It's demoralising. Why should I even bother if this is acceptable? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That seems rather harsh. We encourage all users to upload their work, and no one can learn to take good photos without taking bad ones first. Besides, images always exist until someone thinks that there's something better - it's the way wikis work. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Daguerre 1.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Daguerre 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Daguerre 1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andrey Kashechkin - Andrey Kashechkin-IMG 1814.jpg

Hi - we'd like to use your image Andrey Kashechkin-IMG 1814.jpg as the new infobox image for w:Andrey Kashechkin. However, we want to crop the image before using it. Would we then upload the cropped version to replace your original, or upload it to Commons as an entirely new image, and if so, how? Please advise, as we don't want to make a mess of anything. THanks. Az x2 18:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - didn't hear back from you but wanted to let you know I uploaded a new, cropped derivative version of the Kash-image. It's here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andrey_Kashechkin-IMG_1814-001.jpg. I left your original in place. Hope that was the correct approach. Cheers. Az x2 20:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perfect, thank you very much. Cheers! Rama (talk) 06:51, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edouard Dujardin-Beaumetz

Bonjour Rama, Est-ce que vous pourriez jeter un oeil sur cette page -->ici et l'image liée ? Bien cordialement. --Dimdle (talk) 18:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Je vois que d'autres contributeurs sont intervenus. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coeur-chouan.jpeg ...

Salut Rama.

Voudrais-tu me dire d'où provient cette photo ? Une autre version, sous un autre nom a subi une DR pour manque de source. Je ne sais plus qui a versé la version supprimée mais j'aurais bien aimé le savoir afin de lui poser la même question qu'à toi pour faire une demande de restauration et/ou pour indiquer une source sur la page du fichier restant. Si c'est une image pompée sur le web, elle risque aussi de disparaître. J'ai trouvé deux sites web qui utilisent chacun une version légèrement différente mais qui est identique, hormis les couleurs : [2] et [3]. Si je peux savoir où se trouve ce cœur, il me serait peut-être possible d'en faire une photo et de la verser, habitant dans un coin qui a été touché par les Guerres de Vendée.

Merci pour ta future réponse. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 01:51, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

je n'ai malheureusement pas cette information. Toutefois, l'object (ou son design) a plus de 200 ans, de sorte qu'il est nécessairement dans le domaine public; pour le reste, les serveurs de Wikimedia et moi-même étions tous deux dans des pays qui ne reconnaissent pas de copyright ou de droit d'auteur pour la "reproduction servile", de sorte que l'image est en tout état de cause dans le domaine public.

Ceci dit, il est possible que cela ne satisfasse pas tout le monde sur Commons, et il est certain que ta photo serait probablement meilleure que celle-ci. Si tu pars en ballade dans les musées de ta région, j'espère que tu prendras un appareil photo.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci Rama. J'ai toujours mon APN + mon cellulaire et, généralement, ma femme a son compact. Ça tombe sous le sens que, si je vois ce cœur, je le prendrais. Mais, vu le nombre de musées qui hébergent ce sujet ... Dommage pour le manque de source. Bonne continuation. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 15:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:K2 torpedo mg 8433.jpg

rama, You are the author of File:K2 torpedo mg 8433.jpg but the license claims that author is dead for 70 years. Could you pick proper license? --Jarekt (talk) 19:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your vigilance. Rama (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown man "Koller"

Hi Rama, in 2011 you uploaded four images of a man called "Koller" but without any hint who that person might be. Could you add some comment about profession, given name etc. ? e.g. File:Koller IMG 3322.jpg or Category:Koller. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 19:03, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your vigilance. Rama (talk) 06:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postomat-Windows-p1020441.jpg

File:Postomat-Windows-p1020441.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 19:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dupuy-de-Lome

Hello. I have a question for another big article on the French ship on the Polish Wiki. Could you confirm, if the first commander's name was Yuge? It is quoted in a Polish magazine, but it might be a poor translation from a Russian article, where the name was written only phonetically (Yu-g-e), so I don't know if it's correct. Regards. Pibwl (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is information on the intelligence ship on Netmarine [4], but I'm afraid I have nothing on the officers of the cruiser and the submarine. Cheers! Rama (talk) 20:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But does Yuge look acceptable in French? Thanks. Pibwl (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yuge looks foreign, but it would depend on how you pronounce it...

Actually, from my understanding of how Russians transliterate names and my knowledge of French names, I'm fairly certain that a good guess for this name might be Hugues. But I have no easy mean to confirm it, sadly. Cheers! Rama (talk) 05:45, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: or if the final "e" is pronounced, Huguet. Rama (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As I've said, it was spelled Yuge in a Polish translation of this book, but considering, that a translator didn't bother to check proper spelling of Guyot Du Temple boiler, nor Louis de Bussy (translated as Bussie), I wouldn't trust it much :-) Pity. Pibwl (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC) By the way: is it OK to call this ship "Dupuy de Lôme" instead of "Dupuy-de-Lôme" (as in most old sources)?[reply]

Yes, "Dupuy de Lôme" and "Dupuy-de-Lôme" are equivalent. Cheers! Rama (talk) 19:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gradiva

Hallo Rama, a long time ago you uploaded this and other Gradiva images. Comparison with the photo of the Gradiva in the Chiaramonti Museum shows clearly that you photographed a copy, not the original. Do you remember where you saw it and other details? I suggest to delete the redundant and inferior copy which as an admin you could do immediately. The commons gallery Gradiva is now not needed any more (I added the gallery to the images); also the description & notice at the head of the category I think could now also be removed (they anyway don’t apply to all the images). Unless you feel strongly about keeping them, I will delete them. Thanks and greetings --RM Vollmer (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

it is indeed a reproduction, which I own. At the time I though that it would be interesting to have these images since I could move freely around the object; of course, the reproduction is of a limited quality, and my photographic skills were even worse than they are now. I am sure that since that time, we have acquired have much better images, so thank you for your work in freshening this category and gallery.

Cheers and good continuation! Rama (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rama, thanks for the information. I have two more questions:

1. What is the scale (approx.) of your preplica? I assume it is not a 1:1 copy?

2. Did you purchase it from the museum? Cheers --RM Vollmer (talk) 10:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

1. I think it must be a 1:1 reproduction. It's about 80 cm high, not an inconsequential object (I do not have it handy at the moment, else I'd measure it, sorry). I haven't found the dimensions of the original, but I think it is a plausible size for this sort of reliefs.

2. It was a gift, so I wouldn't know. Very likely from a museum shop, but not necessarly that of Chiaramonti.

Cheers! Rama (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Rama, and best wishes --RM Vollmer (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I found the height of the original relief to be given as 74 cm, so your cast will be of scale 1:1. The image file description has now all the details. Many thanks again for your help, --RM Vollmer (talk) 20:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Tsuba 1.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tsuba 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Tsuba 3.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tsuba 3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Tsuba 4.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tsuba 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gradiva 1.jpg

File:Gradiva 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RM Vollmer (talk) 15:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gradiva

Gradiva has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

RM Vollmer (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

U766 emblem question

Hi,

I have found, that you have created U766 emblem, which is linked on the U766 wiki page. I mean this picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U-766.svg I'm very interested, what this emblem presents and what were your soruces, you have used to draw it?

Thanks, regards Maciek

I think I'd found this in a book, but I have no recollection of which one.

The emblem represents a red Chinese lantern.

Cheers! Rama (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

error on page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TPE_(fr).svg

element 25 is Manganese, not calcium

Well spotted, I corrected the file. Cheers! Rama (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another error: symbol for element 32 (germanium) is Ge, not Ce

Excellent, corrected. Thank you. Rama (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jacob Appelbaum-IMG 9320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please see note, and correct some white pixels (au niveau du menton). Nice to see you again.--Jebulon 09:49, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for the input, I'd gone all rusty in all those months with nothing to photograph. I hope there is improvement. Delighted to see you well and kicking! Rama 19:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)There is always and everywhere something or somebody to photograph ! --Jebulon 20:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do I attribute your image for editorial use in my site

Hello!

How do I properly attribute your image on this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patek-Philippe_MG_2582.jpg

for editorial use in my site?

Thank you. I can email you my site if you need it.

Hello, thank you for your interest in my image and for your rigour on attribution.

I have written a little FAQ on this matter, which you can find at User:Rama/use my images. Do not hesitate to e-mail me or to write here if further questions remain.

Thank you again and best wishes for your site. Rama (talk) 07:38, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

French Gov Copyright

Hello Rama, some Wikipedians and I are working on the review of the Dunkerque-class battleship article on the german WP and I made a schematic drawing, showing the arrangement of its internal armor - like i did before for other battleships. It´s a simplified version of the old construction drawings of the "Marine Nationale". When I completed the work, I realised that I have no idea about it´s copyright status. Do you have any ideas on the matter? Alexpl (talk) 08:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

not really, but they are probably not clearly in the public domain. If you incorporate information from various sources, there will be a point where it will be fair to say that you used the plan as documentation for the information it contains, rather than to create a derivative of it; but you see that this is not the land of clear-cut cases.

Best of luck! Rama (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was afraid it would be something like that. Maybe one day Europe will learn from the US Gov PD - until that day I´ll better not upload this drawing. Thx. Alexpl (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Hill

Salut Rama, de quel Richard Hill s'agit? -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 15:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pas le rugbyman :)

C'est le fondateur de Hill & Associates ; il a participé au Congress on Privacy & Surveillance à l'EPFL, d'où sa présence sur Commons.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 18:19, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Très intéressant. Il a etudié en un lycèe en Rome pas loin de l'école superieur ou j'obtenai mon diplôme :-) -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 21:56, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PS De toute façon, c'est mieux ainsi ;)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Recouvrance mg 8006.jpg

Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 09:33, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkerque

I made a drawing of Dunkerque to be sure of the PD-status I had asked you about a few weeks ago. Unfortunately I didnt notice, until uploading it, that you already did one before. No insult intended! Regards, Alexpl (talk) 19:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am very glad that you did, it is a magnificent rendition of the ship, and much more lively than what we had. Congratulations and good continuation! Rama (talk) 20:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Krim-1941-1942 mg 3485.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 !

	*** * * 2014! * * ***
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. And in return, let me I wish you a very happy, enriching and enlightening new year! Rama (talk) 12:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Hello Rama,

I am one of your photos at http://911coned.com/ just wanted to give you a heads up and thank you.

Could you please let me know the appropriate attribution to give to you? If possible, I was hoping to do something like "Photograph by Name" in the footer.

Thank you Fulldecent (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, and thank you for your interest,

you can attribute the photograph as "Rama, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr"; mentioning the licence is important, as it allows other potential users of the photographs to use it as well, as you did yourself.

Happy new year,

Rama (talk) 12:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia in the European Parliament

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plan atelier photo 4-5 sept 2010-a.png

And also:

File:Plan atelier photo 4-5 sept 2010-b.png

Hi Rama. The file(s) above you uploaded are listed in Category:Language templates with no text displayed. Could you please fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 14:13, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done. Thank you! Rama (talk) 22:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problems (including double {{Information}}) still exist. --Leyo 12:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

*ping* --Leyo 20:17, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag-map of Bangladesh-b.svg

File:Flag-map of Bangladesh-b.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 01:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Institutions europeennes IMG 4294.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Variation of the Croix du Guerre WWII; Red and White French War Cross

Hello!

I came across the WIKI link you posted with the red and white Croix du Guerre here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Croix-de-guerre-contraste-IMG_0949.jpg

Can you tell me any more about the variation and why it was made? I have a ribbon bar of these colours with the bronze palm attached. For a long time I thought it was a Danish Resistance Medal because the medal looks IDENTICAL to this red and white variation of the Croix du Guerre.

I'm trying to research the variation in order to verify the ribbon bar I own.

THANK YOU! Please contact me at wwiifiles@gmail.com

Hello,

I think that this is simply a French Croix de Guerre 39-45, whose green has passed a bit. Maybe you should upload a photograph or scan of your medal, it would allow us to compare and could be a valuable addition to Commons.

Best regards, Rama (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, Rama. You have new messages at JotaCartas's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

droit à l'image

Bonjour,

en vertu du droit à l'image, je vous demande de retirer d'Internet (Wikipedia) et de ce site en particulier (Wikimedia) les portraits que vous avez fait de moi au Salon du livre à Genève en 2011 : vous ne m'avez jamais informé de votre intention de les publier, ni précisé sur quels supports, ni obtenu mon autorisation pour ces publications.

Cordialement,

Gilles Labarthe

DATAS agence de presse - Office des Nations Unies - Salle de presse 1, BP 61 - Avenue de la Paix - CH-1211 GENEVE 10

Bonjour,

vous serait-il possible de me contacter par e-mail (formulaire "Email this user" dans le menu "Tools"), ou de me communiquer une adresse e-mail à laquelle je puisse vous contacter ?

Avec mes remerciements et mes meilleures salutations, Rama (talk) 19:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Socrates teaching Perikles-Nicolas Guibal-IMG 5308.JPG

File:Socrates teaching Perikles-Nicolas Guibal-IMG 5308.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fulvio ³¹⁴ 07:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons to do list idea: French version of Template:Closed_cap

Are you interested in making a French version of Template:Closed_cap? I notice it does not yet have a French translation

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Absolutely, and thank you for bringing this to my attention. I've drafter something at Template:Closed cap/fr.

Thank you for your valuable work and cheers! Rama (talk) 17:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

INewton

Hi Rama. Do you remember what the story is behind the red link in Template:INewton? Looks like a case for OTRS to me. Cheers LittleWink (talk) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

you are quite right, I am going to send the content of Template:INewton to the OTRS.

Thank you and best regards, Rama (talk) 07:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

email

Hi Rama, I sent you an email regarding oversight. My email is currently flaky, and I may or may not get any reply you might send. However, I don't think any reply would need to contain confidential info, so you could always use my talk page. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the notification. Cheers! Rama (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And another one. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 20:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Utilisation de votre photo

Bonjour,

Je m'appelle Guillaume, j'ai créé une image de jaquette CD pour un ami à partir de votre photo : [5] Je vous montre à quoi ressemble mon travail : [6]

Je trouve que ça ne ferait pas du tout joli esthétiquement de rajouter sur cette jaquette : "By Rama (Own work) [CC-BY-SA-2.0-fr (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/fr/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons" comme m'indique de faire Wikimedia. Alors est-il possible de ne pas rajouter cette mention ?

Je vous laisse mon adresse email pour me répondre : guillaumecohen@orange.fr Merci :)

Bonjour, et merci pour votre intérêt pour mon image.

Vous pouvez vous mettre en conformité avec la license en indiquant simplement "Rama, Cc-by-sa-2.0" (même si la mention de Wikimedia est appréciée). Ceci dit, rien ne vous force à mettre cette mention sur l'avant de la jaquette : vous pouvez parfaitement apposer la mention en petit sur la face arrière de la boîte du CD, ou à l'intérieur de la boîte. L'idée est d'aider un utilisateur potentiel de l'image, pas de défigurer votre travail.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rama! Policies regarding downloading your images from Wikimedia Commons

Hello Rama!

What policies do you have regarding downloading your images from Wikimedia Commons?

I intend to create a commercial website and I intend to use free imagery for commercial purposes on my future website. Since I respect copyright laws and people's integrity, it's important to me that everything goes by the book.

So here are my questions:

1) Do I need to provide you with my future website URL? Is this necessary at all?

2) Do I need to give you my full name and notify you at all whenever I would like to download your images? Do I need to somehow confirm to you that I have or intend to download some of your images?

3) When/if I post some of your images on my website, do I need to provide a link or URL to Wikimedia Commons, saying "Picture/Image By Rama"?

/John (you can reach me at johnwalkertheman007@gmail.com)

Greetings,

I take the liberty of quickly answering your questions with the same numbering:

1) I would appreciate being notified, as this allow me to know which of my images are the most useful and adapt my production. It is however absolutely not required.

2) None of these is required.

3) You need to credit the author (Rama) and mention the licence (Cc-by-sa-2.0.fr). Mentionning Wikimedia Commons and putting a link to the orignal image would be appreciated, as it would be convenient for other potential users, but is not a requirement.

You might want to have a look at User:Rama/use my images, which will give a few examples and explanations of the spirit behind what is required, appreciated without being required, or unnecessary. Do not hesitate to ask me further is a question remains unsolved.

Best regards, Rama (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dentelles

bonsoir madame, je suis actuellement en phase finale de rédaction d'un livre (aux éditions eyrolles) consacré à la dentelle au fuseau et je recherche des photos de différents types de dentelles afin d'illustrer mon livre . M'autorisez-vous à publier les quelques photos des dentelles de neuchatel,sachant bien entendu qu'un crédit photo sera automatiquement attribué en fin de livre?

savez-vous de quel type sont ces différentes dentelles et d'où proviennent-elles ?

dans l’attente de votre réponse, je vous remercie d'avance .

cordialement Marie

ctextile06@gmail.com

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dentelle-IMG_6851.jpg?uselang=fr http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dentelle-IMG_6839.jpg?uselang=fr http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dentelle-IMG_6834.jpg?uselang=fr http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dentelle-IMG_6818.jpg?uselang=fr http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dentelle-IMG_6852.jpg?uselang=fr http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dentelle-IMG_6816.jpg?uselang=fr

Bonsoir Madame,

Toutes ces images sont sous licence libre, ce qui vous donne le droit de les utiliser, modifiées ou telles quelles, et pour tout usage y compris commercial. Les dentelles File:Dentelle-IMG 6851.jpg, File:Dentelle-IMG 6852.jpg et File:Dentelle-IMG 6816.jpg sont des produtions récentes d'un club qui pratique la dentelle traditionelle de Neuchâtel près de Môtiers. File:Dentelle-IMG 6839.jpg et File:Dentelle-IMG 6818.jpg sont des exemplaires historiques (peut-être fin du XIXème siècle ou début XXème). File:Dentelle-IMG 6834.jpg est un détail de File:Dentelle-IMG 6839.jpg.

Je me permets de porter à votre attention que les crédits devraient mentionner la licence, Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr. La page User:Rama/use my images vous donnera un peu plus de détails et des exemples, mais n'hésitez pas à me demande si quelque chose demeurait obscure.

Tous mes voeux pour votre livre ! Rama (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Salginatobel Bridge

Rama,

I am interested in using this photo in a textbook

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Salginatobel_Bridge_mg_4080.jpg

Would you give me permission to do so?

We would provide you with due credit.

-Santiago Pujol

Associate Professor
School of Civil Engineering
Purdue University

It seems that you have answered my question before. I plan "to credit the author (Rama) and mention the licence (Cc-by-sa-2.0.fr)" in my textbook. Thank you for your generosity.

That is perfect. Thank you for your interest and my best wishes for your textbook! Rama (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Canard vibrant.jpg

Yours sincerely, ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pics from GEO-X meeting in Geneva January -2014

RAMA - two of the pictures in your library from the Group on Earth Observations (GEO) Summit in Geneva in January are captioned as Suzette Kimball, but the person is actually Anne Bartuska. If you are able to make that change, we would greatly appreciate it. Thanks again for great work. - Bob Samors Group on Earth Observations, Geneva

Dear Bob,

thank you very much for your interest and for your very helpful information. I have re-labeled and renamed the files File:Anne Bartuska-IMG 9988.jpg and File:Anne Bartuska-IMG 9986.jpg accordingly. Do not hesitate to contact me again if anything else needs to be done, or if I can be of any assistance.

Thank you again, best wishes and best regards, Rama (talk) 10:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

dominique esquivié

bonjour

je suis un ancien camarade de classe d un DOMINIQUE ESQUIVI2 qui etait medecin dans l armee la photo que vous avez publié au 14 juillet a toulon lui reseemble fortement auriez vous d autres information pour pouvoir le contacter a vous lire hubert philippe merci

Bonjour,

je regrette, mais j'ai simplement photographié le Médecin Chef des Services Esquivié lors des cérémonies, parmi d'autres responsables militaires et civils. Je n'ai pas eu d'autres contact avec lui.

Rama (talk) 19:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canard vibrant.jpg

File:Canard vibrant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:17, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crane trepanation

Dear Rama,

In the next issue of our publication "Themenhefte Gemeinde" (materials for > catholic and protestant parishes) we'd like to reprint the photograph http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crane-trepanation-img_0507_crop.jpg. > > The issue is published in print, in a very reduced form digitally for > subscribers of our publication (closed user group) as well as online sales > (single issues for non-subscribers, no single image download, only PDF). > > "Themenhefte Gemeinde" is published six times a year for the use of parish > workers, salaried and voluntary, to sustain their projects in team working, > liturgy and education. It contains 48 pages each, size DIN A4. > >> Subscribers pay 13,20 Euro per unit. The print run of the complete edition is > about 1,200 copies. The next edition, "Inclusive parishes/Healing in the > Gospel according to Mark", will be published as nr 2/2014, appearing in > April. >

> We were so glad if you agreed. Please contact us at kontakt@buhv.de. > > Kind regards, thanks,

Dear Rama, the above mentioned skull, is it from the Musée cantonal d’archéologie et d'histoire? I can't find a Museum of Natural Hisory in Lausanne... Kind regards, --Hans-Jürgen Hübner (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and sorry for the late reply. Yes, you are corect, it is the Musée d’archéologie et d’histoire [7] at the Palais de Rumine. Best regards, Rama (talk) 22:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gladius

I am currently working on a self-published science-fiction novel and I would like to use the image of the gladius you uploaded.

Thank you in advance,

Larry

You are most welcome. You should credit the photograph and state its licence, see User:Rama/use my images for examples. Best regards, Rama (talk) 22:36, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How to attribute the photo to you?

How should your name be cited for photo credit? "Photo by Rama"?

Almost: the licence should also be mentionned, for instance as "Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr, Rama". There are other examples and explanations at User:Rama/use my images for examples. Best regards, Rama (talk) 22:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Béthouart

Dear Rama,

do you know who made the picture of General Béthouart? With best Regards, Peter

p.melicharvorarlbergmuseum.at

Hello,

I did a hand drawing from various sources, but I do not know who where the authors of the individual photographs, sorry. Best wishes! Rama (talk) 17:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vladivostok

Salut,

Je ne sais pas si tu es au courant, mais ta photo a été utilisée (et correctement créditée - enfin presque ;oD ) ic i: [8]. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:53, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ouais visiblement ils ont le truc pour l'approximation, sur ce site. Le prétendu Vladivostok avec un numéro de coque OTAN bien visible, ça fait sérieux, tiens... Rama (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atari 400-IMG 7254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atari 400-IMG 7248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:49, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brother WP1-IMG 6991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brother WP1-IMG 6990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bobst Graphic-Scrib Portable-IMG 7027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 18:58, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bobst Graphic-Scrib Portable-IMG 7028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dauphin-IMG 7257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Crisp detail all around --Daniel Case 06:56, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMB PC-IMG 7271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hermes-IMG 6994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:33, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dauphin-IMG 7259.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acoustic coupler-IMG 7282-7283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments While the lower part ist of good quality, the upper part is borderline regarding its sharpness (see characters "Mouthpiece"). Despite that slight flaw, it can pass as QI IMO. --Cccefalon 10:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NEXT Cube-IMG 7154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smaky 6-IMG 7084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smaky 6-IMG 7082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NeXT Pizzabox-IMG 7227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. However, there might be some enhancements ahead, please see my notes. --Cccefalon 18:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, very useful! I am having a hard time with the moiré for some reaon. Cheers! Rama 06:04, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality, QI for me --Hubertl 10:58, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Aibo img 0807.jpg

And also:

--  Gazebo (talk) 09:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ref. (C) re. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Christian_plate-IMG_5427.JPG

Dear Sir,

I wish to use your plate photo in the following context as either a graphic or URL, if you please. It is to be published as a Book with a most likely title of "Inspired Truth, Not a Normal Book."

Your picture as referenced in the title will appear as an illustration to an Essay in a book... "Inspired Truth, Not a Normal Book" for sale in the historical context of meditation/prayer.

My understanding is that no royalty will be due. Is this correct? Y/N.

Please advice the acceptability of same.

Thank you for your consideration,

Richard Dunn richdunn@gmail.com

Greeetings,

the licence does indeed give you the right touse the image, modified or unmodified, for any purpose; it require that the author (Rama) and the licence (Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr) be mentionned in the typographical conventions of your choice. You can find some examples at User:Rama/use my images, do not hesitate to ask me if you have further question.

Best regards, Rama (talk) 04:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

files Isaac Newton

Hi,

I was looking to add information templates to old uploads when I came across File:33 HMS Triumph floodlit Rio de Janeiro Feb1972.jpg and related files. These files are cc-by-sa-2.5, however when I look at the site linked: the site, I can't find the relevant licensing.

Mvg, Basvb (talk) 20:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I will send a mail to the OTRS with the relevant information. Cheers! Rama (talk) 07:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Basvb (talk) 09:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:CollateralMurder.ogv

File:CollateralMurder.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yann (talk) 22:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! 2015!

		*** * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * ***
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

cropped lace image

I would like to use a specific section of one of your [commons:File:Dentelle-IMG_6840.jpg|images]] for en:Bobbin_lace#Structure. But is published with a Cc-by-sa-2.0-fr license and the upload form starts with version 2.5. Could you please help me? Poljo (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

oops, proper link:

Poljo (talk) 08:21, 30 December 2014‎

And figured it out: User:Rama/use my images, sorry to have bothered you Poljo (talk) 07:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

Happy new year and good continuation! Rama (talk) 08:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	ارسلة هدالاوىسا م احمد اقليل (talk) 21:05, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Photo identitie-Said Kouachi.JPG

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Photo identitie-Said Kouachi.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ManFromNord (talk) 12:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The author is a photo booth. It cannot give autorisation because it has no legal personality. Sam ereason why it doe snot hold a copyright. Rama (talk) 13:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo identitie-Said Kouachi.JPG

File:Photo identitie-Said Kouachi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedrale-de-Strasbourg-IMG 4233.jpg

File:Cathedrale-de-Strasbourg-IMG 4233.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tangopaso (talk) 18:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evstafiev-chechnya-tank-helmet.jpg

File:Evstafiev-chechnya-tank-helmet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

202.37.64.1 03:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Cartoons?

What are your sources for File:Richard Perle-2.jpg and File:Richard Perle IMG 1337b.jpg? Did you sit down with the subject and draw him? -- Veggies (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I observed the subject on films and photographs and made the drawings from the aggregated information. These images are not traced and are not the reproduction of any particular photograph or film extract. Rama (talk) 16:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moudon church organ-IMG 7534.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sig Pro or Sig P

Did u check that? Cause I'm not 100% sure.--Sanandros (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not like I am an expert, but it seems that the SIG Pro has a triangular button to eject the magazine, while the SIG P226 has a sort-of-circular one; also, the bottom part of the trigger guard is straight on the P226, and features an angle on the SIG Pro. There are variants of the P226 with accessory rails, so it is very possible that I might have mislabelled the file when uploading. It has been a while since I have taken this photograph, I could not remember precisely what model I was told it was at the time, sorry. Cheers! Rama (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Commerce-de-marseille-2.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Commerce-de-marseille-2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article insuffisamment sourcé - need some help;)

Bonjour Rama,

Contributeur occassionnel sur Wikipedia, j'ai reçu une aide précieuse de la part de Theoliane pour un article que j'ai rédigé voici un an maintenant. Ayant proposé récemment une nouvelle contribution sur l'artiste numérique Bernard Demiaux, article que j'ai sourcé rigoureusement, il apparaît un bandeau de sources insuffisantes et je ne sais que faire. Votre aide me serait d'une grande utilité, une relecture également (même si vous êtes contributeur en langue anglaise :) Ou peut-être pouvez-vous me conseiller d'autres contributeurs avisés ? En l'attente de votre réponse, je vous remercie infiniment par avance !

Bonjour,

si vous lisez ce mail malgré le retard de ma réponse, je vous conseillerais de faire appel à l'Atelier de lecture ou l'Atelier de relecture, où devraient se trouver des gens prêts à vous suggérer des pistes. Bonne chance ! Rama (talk) 20:00, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocage

Bonjour, vous avez bloqué mon compte pour des raison de droit d'auteur…

J'ai changé le texte et j'ai enlevé ce que je ne devais pas mettre. Template:Déblocage Template:Anontest Merci pour votre compréhension

Bonjour,

pourriez-vous m'indiquer le nom du compte en question ?

Merci et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 20:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris-Saint-Germain-p1010789.jpg

File:Paris-Saint-Germain-p1010789.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Civa (talk) 11:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:L'Orient (Ship, 1791) vs. Category:Orient (Ship, 1791)

Hallo Rama, have you a reference for the renaming? greetings --Trzęsacz (talk) 05:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tons.

The canonical is: Roche, Jean-Michel (2005). Dictionnaire des bâtiments de la flotte de guerre française de Colbert à nos jours, tome 1. Group Retozel-Maury Millau. ISBN 978-2-9525917-0-6. OCLC 165892922. (1671-1870)

But you could look up [9] (around p.112), or virtually any book mentionned in [10] that deals with the subject.

Cheers, Rama (talk) 09:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:US_military_bases_in_Germany.svg

This is just to inform you that some of the locations shown on the map are not correct. The position of Hohenfels is too far south-east. The placement of Grafenwöhr in the map seems correct, however Vilseck is not located north-west of Grafenwöhr, but south-west. Regards, --188.174.199.47 22:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CMS Magnet barrel Ring with Muon chambers.jpg

File:CMS Magnet barrel Ring with Muon chambers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible CC Licence Infringement

I note your image of Lemmy used for commercial purposes without adhering to the CC licence conditions, here...

http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/05/20-things-only-real-campers-know/

Thought you'd like to know. Sorry if you already did. -- Richi (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use your photograph of "Arrest of the governor of the Bastille"

Dear Rama, Thank you for licensing this image under Creative Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arrestation_du_gouverneur_de_la_Bastille-Th%C3%A9venin_IMG_2363.JPG I'd like to use the image briefly in a television show and just wanted to reach out to you as an additional step. Would you be willing to send me a brief note of permission? You could email me at JEN(at)COMMITTEEFILMS.COM or reply here. I would really appreciate it! Best wishes to you. Jen --Jennifer007 (talk) 21:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ansered by e-mail. Cheers! Rama (talk) 06:12, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question pointue

Salutations. En créant wikt:fr:uchigatana (d'ailleurs si tu connais la prononciation...), je me suis aperçu que plusieurs Wikipédias utilisaient ton image Media:Katana-bois-p1000654.jpg pour illustrer ce mot. Or, si tu l'as baptisé katana c'est qu'il doit y avoir une bonne raison. Pourtant ces lames me semblent significativement plus recourbées que mon katana et mon iaitō. J'en appelle donc à ton expertise stp. JackPotte (talk) 21:05, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

tu t'y connais probablement mieux que moi, mais

"outchikatana"
uchigatana et katana sont plus ou moins synonymes (si je comprends bien l'uchigatana est le katana archétypal)
la courbure des lames change avec les modes, les personnes et les qualités : la lame idéale est faite sur mesure en fonction de la taille et du style du possesseur, et sa courbure varie le long de la lame (c'est plus compliqué qu'une portion de cercle). Pendant les périodes de guerre, on se retrouve à produire de la ferraille en masse pour des raisons utilitaires plutôt que de faire du bel artisanat, et la qualité s'en ressent.
Il me semble que la courbure prononcée est un truc hérité des tachi, qui sont des armes de cavalerie à porter sur une armure (essaye de dégainer un katana en portant une cuirasse, c'est quasi impossible); le Japon une fois pacifié par les Tokugawa, les lames se portaient plus sur des vêtements souples, d'où développement des techniques de dégainage d'iaidō que tu connais et pour lesquelles une courbure modérée est préférable. C'est un peu le même esprit que l'escrime italienne de la renaissance, où l'abandon des grosses épées de guerre et du bouclier conduit à adopter la rapière, qui fusionne les deux et permet de développement de techniques fluides et formalisées, ce qui entraîne à son tour le développement de la colichemarde et de l'épée de cour.

Ceci dit, il serait plus sage de demander à quelqu'un qui y connait un tout petit peu quelque chose :p

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 00:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sukhoi Su-35S-16299841217 698abff0cc o.jpg

File:Sukhoi Su-35S-16299841217 698abff0cc o.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 07:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Universal replace

Faisant suite à notre conversation sur IRC, je note ici la procédure pour demander à CommonsDelinker de remplacer une image A par une image B sur l'ensemble des projets hébergés sur notre cluster.

Il convient de rajouter une commande formatée à l'aide d'un modèle sur la page User:CommonsDelinker/commands:

{{universal replace|image A.svg|image B.svg}}

L'agent automatisé traite les demandes toutes les 30 minutes.

--Dereckson (talk) 13:15, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mille mercis ! Rama (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vues d'artiste des satellites Sentinel

Bonjour Rama, Merci pour la réalisation des vues d'artiste de ces satellites qui permettent d'illustrer les articles correspondant. Une remarque concernant l'illustration de Sentinel-1. La principale caractéristique de celui-ci est d'emporter une antenne radar de grande taille qui donne une apparence bien particulière à ce type de satellite. On peut la voir par exemple sur les illustrations figurant dans ce document de l'Agence spatiale européenne ou dans les illustrations de cette page. --Pline (talk) 18:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

ces vues sont en fait des photographies détourées d'une maquette. Je dois avoir mal interprété ce que je voyais et supposé que l'antenne faisait partie du support qui la soutenait. J'ai peur de ne pas avoir gardé les photographies originales, c'est dommage. Mais il devrait toujours y avoir moyen de retoucher les photos pour ajouter l'antenne, en signalant l'altération.

Merci pour cette très intéressante précision, et bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 18:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo supprimée sans avertissement préalable

Bonjour Rama. Je ne suis pas content. Je découvre aujourd'hui que tu as supprimé une photo que j'ai faite de la signature du peintre Edgard Maxence (File:Lourdes église Rosaire mosaïques Ascension signature.JPG) sans me prévenir au préalable, et sans aucune explication. Certes, ce peintre est décédé en 1954 mais cette photo ne représente qu'une partie très limitée d'un tableau beaucoup plus imposant réalisé en 1899 que je n'ai volontairement pas déposé sur commons, et que je me suis noté pour 2025. De plus, elle prouve l'orthographe réelle du prénom de cet artiste, parfois erroné. Cela fait des années que je dépose des photos sur commons et c'est la première fois qu'on me rejette un extrait correspondant à la signature d'un artiste. N'existe-t-il pas une exception pour les extraits minimes (pour cette photo, environ 2 % de la surface du tableau) d'œuvres ? Père Igor (talk) 21:17, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

désolé de t'avoir contrarié. Cette image était l'une parmi d'autres dans une catégorie étonamment fortement peuplée pour un copyvio aussi évident, du coup j'ai tout supprimé sans faire beaucoup dans le détail.

La signature en elle-même me semble passer comme non-coprightable, mais ton argument de minimis me semble un peu limite, vu les parties de la mosaïque qu'on voit autour; j'aurais tendance à dire qu'en l'état, ça ne passe pas. Ceci dit, je ne connais pas la mosaïque entière, de sort que nous n'avons pas le même point de vue sur la chose, et tu pourrais me trouver biaisé du fait que c'est moi qui ai supprimé l'image.

Ceci dit, le remède est facile: utiliser ton image pour en extraire la signature. On pourrait même la sortir en SVG. Si ça t'arrange, je peux m'en charger.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 21:45, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

À titre de comparaison, l'œuvre globale est une des chapelles de la basilique de Lourdes et a donc les mêmes dimensions que la mosaïque de cette autre chapelle. L'extrait que j'ai importé (la signature) ne représente qu'environ 2 % de l'œuvre totale, visible ici, photo du bas, au centre. On y voit un morceau de robe dont dépasse le bout d'un pied et le haut de nombreuses lettres majuscules. Si tu es d'accord, je peux la réimporter, en coupant encore plus les bords mais il me parait intéressant de conserver la particularité que représente cette signature sur une mosaïque, avec la date 1899, et la mention « pinxit », qui indique que c'est lui qui l'a peinte. Si tout va bien d'ici là pour toi comme pour moi, tu pourras juger en janvier 2025 de la place minime qu'occupe cette signature par rapport à l'ensemble. Père Igor (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Est-ce que cette version File:Lourdes église Rosaire mosaïques Ascension signature-cropped.JPG te paraîtrait aller ? Je peux te restaurer le fichier File:Lourdes église Rosaire mosaïques Ascension signature.JPG si tu n'as plus l'original et que tu préfères retailler toi-même, tiens-moi au courant.

En espérant qu'on aille tous bien en 2025 et que le droit d'auteur n'ait pas été porté à des durées absurdes d'ici là. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 11:04, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK pour ta nouvelle version. Merci. Père Igor (talk) 13:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]