User talk:Mrmw

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


general[edit]

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. For the archive overview, see Archive/. The latest archive is located at Archive/2024.

{{Section resolved|--~~~~}}

{{NoInkscape}}

multilang-legend[edit]

Moved from[edit]


simpler code = not always a fan[edit]

Hi Mrmw, I have no problem with code optimizations. Many SVGs could be a fraction of their size. I do however have a problem if you remove image features. Especially color gradients. Like in File:Unbestimmte Schneide.svg or File:1,5cyl.svg in both cases the gradients were used to give the viewer a sense of the shape. They were part of the image content. If you can reduce the size and the image looks the same (or objectively better) - great. If you are reducing the size by removing image features and details - please don't (or upload your modified version under a different name). Greetings --Jahobr (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not overwrite files[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenčina  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  മലയാളം  日本語  中文  עברית  فارسی  +/−


I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:Fahrenheit Celsius scales.svg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its previous version. If the file that you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you. For more information, please see Commons:Overwriting files.

I have nothing against your image. But why overload a completely fine file of another user? Fixing error is OK, Overloading faulty files is fine. Your kind of overloading goes too far. Commons is big enough. Give users the chance to choose between different styles (the old one and yours) by uploading your own second variant. Your method effectively deletes the fine work of another user with no valid reason. --Jahobr (talk) 12:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cinque Teste Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gatto bianco (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of chocolate for you![edit]

Hi, Mrmw!

I give you this cup of hot chocolate to show my appreciation for the quality of your work and to thank you for the images you created recently (1 & 2) on my requests at Illustration workshop. Your effort added a huge value to my work. Both images are already included in the respective articles at enwiki and I hope readers like them as much as I do!

Happy editing! CiaPan (talk) 13:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by CiaPan (talk • contribs) 17:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Because I have received warning from logo owner who said it is copyrighted. --Gatto bianco (talk) 16:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo - wäre es nicht sinnvoll, den Text "Kompressor" aus der Mitte unterhalb des Aggregates nach rechts oberhalb des Kreisgebildes zu versetzen? Es ist schließlich eine Überschrift und keine Unterschrift. ;-) LG - -- MaxxL - talk 08:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Settimana Enigmistica fix request.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gatto bianco (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hallo, ich weiss ja dass dich das weniger interessiert - aber ich habe mir diese datei nochmal kurz angesehen. vielleicht kannst du die eine oder andere anregung verwenden?

20 punkte stur als einen kreis nach dem anderen zu zeichnen ist viel einfacher losbar. ubrigens ist dein letzter punkt doppelt.
wenn das elektron nicht als kreis mit noch zwei (!) pfaden sondern als ein pfad gezeichnet wird erubrigt sich die "a"-gruppe.

es ist dann naturlich der code viel unanschaulicher als mit all den circles - aber die datei ist nur mehr halb so gross. davon abgesehen dass alles immer noch sparsamer geht, ist deine version sehr gut!
ubrigens, ich vermeide in solchen fallen den erneuten upload, und zeige stattdessen nur den variierten code an. IMHO reicht das um vereinfachungen aufzuzeigen, und es belastet das dateisystem weniger. -- sarang사랑 12:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thanks for svg images Siirski (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to access the file but I receive a XML error, can you fix it? Thanks. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 00:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion request[edit]

Hallo Mrmw, wie du vielleicht weisst (oder dir denken kannst), ich kann kein Inkscape. Sobald etwas hinausgeht über einfache Formen hört es bei mir auf - du bist da universell. Würdest du eine Konvertierung durchführen, die ich nicht machen kann? Es ist eine Silhouttte vergleichbar mit 1Silhouette Female.svg. Wenn du einverstanden bist, sende ich dir das Bild, als .jpg (117 KB) oder .png (384 KB). Gruss -- sarang사랑 05:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: vektorisierung ist eine erweiterung in inkscape die ich nur anwende und versuche die werte gut zu treffen, ist auch abhängig vom input bzw. von der quelle - klar versuche ich es gerne --Mrmw (talk) 05:42, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: ich habe eine email erhalten von dir, ohne anhänge --Mrmw (talk) 07:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
wikimails erlauben keine anhänge, das geht nur mit "normaler" mail. du hast nun meine mailadresse, sobald ich deine habe bekommst du das bild. ich wollte weder das rasterbild hochladen (dann hättest du es), noch mailadressen in wikimedia editieren - dashalb so umständlich -- sarang사랑 08:01, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
du kannst dir ja eine mailadresse eigens dafur einrichten, dann bleibt deine anonymität gewahrt. -- sarang사랑
@Sarang: wieso lädst du es nicht einfach auf commons hoch? --Mrmw (talk) 09:00, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: meinst du das: Toilettenanhänger VIP Silhouette.svg? --Mrmw (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Eigentlich wollte ich das (dann überflüssige) Rasterbild nicht auch auf Commons geben; und dir könnte ich zwei Raster, jpg und png, anbieten - aber nun hast du es bereits gemacht, aus einer nicht so gut geeigneten Vorlage! Ich bin eigens gestern abend nochmal hin um ein unverzerrtes Bild zu machen. Für den Wagen ist Perspektive ganz gut, für die Silhouetten weniger, da kommt ziemliche Verzerrung rein. Aber lassen wir es gut sein damit, danke für deine Arbeit -- sarang사랑 11:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: in inkscape gibt es auch eine erweiterung zum perspektivischen entzerren - diese habe ich angewandt - bist du unzufrieden? ich verstehe nicht wieso du es nicht hochlädst, ist aber deine entscheidung--Mrmw (talk) 11:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
nein, ich bin zufrieden. die dame ist ein bisschen skinny geraten, magerer als im "original", aber das sieht höchstens besser aus. ich versuche immer nichts überflüssiges hochzuladen - und nach der erfolgten vektorizierung ist ein rasterbild nun mal redundant. deshalb tausche ich bilder die ohnehin nicht bleiben sollen i.a. mit anderen benutzern per mail aus, und wikimedia bleibt sauber.
vva ist nicht so ganz geeignet, das SVG soll nicht das photo ersetzen, es ist eher eine weiterentwicklung oder ableitung, ein derivat davon. es ist nicht besser oder schlechter, es ist was anderes. ich glaube du kennst viele bildbeschreibungsvorlagen, aber nicht alle, und in diesem fall ist es keine "reine vektorisierung" (derselbe bildinhalt als SVG), wie zB 1Silhouette Female.jpg1Silhouette Female.svg. vielleicht werde ich das noch ändern und mit anderer vorlage exakter beschreiben. sonst bin ich sehr zufrieden! -- sarang사랑 12:29, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: für was hab ich das svg erstellt? --Mrmw (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
was meinst du mit "für was" ?
  • wozu - zu welchem behufe? um eine weitere silhouette zu den vorhandenen hinzuzufügen.
  • wofür - im sinne von ergebnis? um mit deiner geschicklichkeit die wikimedia zu bereichern.
  • wofür - im sinne von entlohnung? da gibt es in der wikipedia nie etwas, nur manchmal freundliche worte.
oder meinst du es anders? -- sarang사랑 15:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: ja genau, ich meine die materielle entlohnung - fände es schon sehr enttäuschend wenn ich dafür nicht ausbezahlt würde - welche naturalien in welcher quantität würdest du anbieten?
karotten oder kartoffeln z.b.?
nein ich meine, ich fände den aufwand recht groß mit vorlagen hin- und herschicken um nur eine weiteres bild zu erzeugen, für das bis jetzt keine verwendung vorliegt - ich mach das gern und gern wieder auch ohne unmittelbare verwendung (wenn die bezahlung stimmt) --Mrmw (talk) 18:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
nun, wir und hunderte andere erzeugen standig bilder fur die keine so unmittelbare verwendung vorliegt - um kategorien zu bereichern (wie in diesem fall), um methoden aufzuzeigen, oder um jemendem einen artikel zu bebildern oder einen wunsch zu erfullen. das versenden per mail halte ich fur den geringsten aufwand, viel besser als es erst in die wikimedia reinzustopfen und dann wieder zu loschen, oder sinnlos dort rumstehen zu lassen. aber dazu darfst du gerne eine andere meinung haben! -- sarang사랑 05:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: du bist weder auf karotten, noch auf kartoffeln eingegangen - ein alternatives genießbares wurzelgemüse wäre für mich auch ok
ich benutze kategorien nur zur navigation - interessant fände ich sie schon - aber mein gefühl sagt mir, dass sie so mächtig sind, dass es besser ist, man lässt die finger davon, bevor man es falsch macht - hatte noch nie einen einstieg gefunden --Mrmw (talk) 06:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
uber karotten, kartoffeln &co konnen wir reden wenn es saison ist, zur zeit gibt es das nicht auf unseren feldern. wie ware es mit barlauch?
eines meiner vordringlichsten gebiete ist das ordnen, verbessern, brauchbarmachen, ubersichtlichermachen von kategorien. das ist auch der wesentlichste grund fur die monstervorlage Igen, und vieles andere. -- sarang사랑 17:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: das stimmt, saisonal und regional sollte das motto sein - vllt bekommt deutschland ja demnächst eine grüne führung
ich weiss auch nicht, aber irgendwie gab sich für mich nie der einstieg zu den kategorien - dass mich jemand aufgefordert hätte etwas mit ihnen zu machen oder eine not entstanden wäre dass ich etwas damit hätte tun müssen
zudem stelle ich fest, dass für die arbeit mit kategorien sehr oft fachwissen erforderlich ist - dass man wissen muss um welche bereiche es geht, und welche nicht, und welche anderen es noch gibt
interessiert wäre ich schon dran, aber ich hab eher ehrfurcht davor als ob ich sehen würde wo ich mich beteiligen könnte --Mrmw (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Du arbeitest mit kategorisierung sobald du Igen verwendest. die verschiedenen "topics" (map, logo, flag, coa, icon....) verwendest du ja eher nicht, ist dir vielleicht zu kompliziert? damit wird subkategorisiert, und ich habe dafur gewaltige kategorienbaume angelegt - rauf, runter und quer. und manchmal fehlt noch eine kategorie fur die es bisher keine datei gab; dazu mussen dann alle uber-, unter- und querverweise eingerichtet werden. ist also reichlich kompliziert! -- sarang사랑 17:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: kannst du beispiele nennen? ich weiss auch nicht was du mit uber-, unter- und querverweise meinst --Mrmw (talk) 18:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ich werde mal eine ubersicht erstellen, das ist schon lange fallig. wird aber noch dauern -- sarang사랑 05:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect image[edit]

Hi, you updated the image Greedy colourings.svg twice this month, but both images you uploaded have incorrect coloring. Can you either revert to the original or fix your version? The mistake is quite jarring, because the image is about graph coloring! I'm not familiar with wikipedia editing tools, so I won't do it myself and I'm asking you. This is reminiscent of Jahobr's point above. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.132.137.12 (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i am so sorry, this was my fault, i fixed the colouring and hope its ok - thx for the hint --Mrmw (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Error in file File:Teilgraphenbeziehungen.svg[edit]

Hi, you updated the file Teilgraphenbeziehungen.svg recently but it seems that the new version lacks some edges on graph G (edges between 1 and 2 and between 4 and 5). This is quite annoying because without those edges, the other graphs G1, G2 and G3 are no longer sub-graphs of G, which is the point of the figure. Could you please check this and update the file ? Thanks ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thibmar (talk • contribs) 19:43, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Thibmar: thx for the hint, i fixed the file --Mrmw (talk) 06:30, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hallo, da Du Ehb swiss logo.svg so schön gemacht hast: Die sind seit 1.8. Hochschule. Magst Du das Logo aktualiseren? Ich kann nur PNG und will das nicht "downsizen". Danke (ich hab aber mit denen nix zu tun, kümmer mich nur um die Schweizer Bildungsszene). --Ghormon (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ghormon: File:Ehb swiss logo 02.svg bitteschön --Mrmw (talk) 08:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
WOW, das ging schnell. Vielen Dank, habe es eingebunden. Die werden sich freuen.--Ghormon (talk) 08:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Willst du das machen?[edit]

Hallo, im Gegensatz zu mir kannst du auch Inkscape, und bist auch in scour/omg/.. versiert. Wir haben da einen Japaner, der hat uber 200 FAKE SVG erstellt (weil er es noch nicht besser weiss). Ich habe ihm schon auf die Finger geklopft, und er lasst es nun bleiben; aber was er braucht ist eine Hilfe was er denn tun muss um richtige Inkscape SVG zu bauen. Mit hand-SVG wurde ich ihn verschonen, zumindest die ersten paar Jahre.
Wenn du dir das antun willst, nimm Kontakt mit ihm auf und vervollstandige seine Inkscape- und SVG-Kenntnisse. Er scheint weder dumm noch boswillig zu sein, so dass diese Investition lohnend sein durfte. Oder, wenn du jemanden kennst an den das gut delegiert werden kann, mache es wie ich mit dir und reiche die Aufgabe weiter. Gruss -- sarang사랑 10:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: sorry für die späte rückmeldung - nett dass du in der sache an mich denkst - aber das sehe ich nicht bei mir - wenn jemand eine konkrete frage oder konkrete bitte hat und ich ihm oder ihr helfen kann mit vertretbarem aufwand dann gerne ja --Mrmw (talk) 13:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Superresolution Microscopy.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Fisel District Flag.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Md Rahat Islam 1997.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bidar District Flag.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Md Rahat Islam 1997.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 04:32, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of Jaysh al-Ummah.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: First of all, Jaysh al-Ummah owns the copyright to its flag which includes both calligraphy and an sword, meaning it does not fall under the "Simple design" category. Secondly, this image is ot the flag of Jaysh al-Ummah anyway. The actual flag can be seen here on a document. The sources listed for this flag are also dubious at best.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Applodion.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Jaysh al-Ummah.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 16:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo BKK B. Braun Aesculap 02.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2A01:C22:6E2C:7600:1874:99F:3E63:AB07 12:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Korea DMZ.svg[edit]

Hi! Can you please correct the Hungarian labelling? "3-es" is incorrect in Hungarian, it should be "3-as" (it is short for 'hármas'=third). Thanks in advance Xia (talk) 15:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Xia thx - ✓ Done Mrmw (talk) 15:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you! Xia (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

<tspan>[edit]

hallo, ich habe den SVG code per programm vearbeitet und nach File talk:Effects of exposure to PFASs on human health.svg gestellt. sollte in ordnung sein, zumndest wird es vom browser richtig angezeigt. wegen vorschub LF statt CR-LF sieht es aus wie ohne, hat aber richtigen linefeed. ich weiss nicht ob dich das interessiert und ich wollte nicht deine datei uberschreiben. gruss -- sarang사랑 20:26, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: danke für die info - wie ich schon angedeutet bei der frage nach multilang auf deiner diskpage, geht es mir bei multilangfiles weniger darum den code zu optimieren - ich bin nicht sicher ob ich glrx richtig verstanden habe (spricht er/sie deutsch? liest er/sie immer mit auf deiner seite?) - aber mir wäre es wichtiger ein einheitliches system für multi-lang-files zu etablieren, um auch letzendlich tools einen besseren zugang zu diesen files zu ermöglichen - zb. finde ich den vorschlag gut, bei mehrzeiligen textelementen, jede zeile (auch mit x und y=0) in ein tspan zu packen - das habe ich jetzt auch nicht gemacht - werde ich aber in zukunft so machen denken ich - bei einsprachigen files ohne switches bin ich bei dir und würde deinem vorschlag zustimmen
hast du den letzten beitrag von mir auf deiner disk-page gesehen? oder keine ideen dazu? --Mrmw (talk) 20:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
wie Glrx von sich sagt versteht er deutsch, schreibt aber lieber in englisch. gelegentlich guckt er auf meine talk page und korrigiert meine aussagen.
du musst keine sinnlosen tspan setzen, das tool fugt sie uberall ein - ist ihm egal ob vorher welche waren oder nicht. ich hab ein script um sie wieder zu entfernen; dann setze ich die vorlage "noinkscape|+" damit sie nicht beim nachstenmal wieder eingefugt werden.
wie magog sagt leide ich an der personlichkeitsstorung OCD, d.h. wenn ich mit weniger als 50 KB genau dasselbe machen kann wie mit wirkungslosen anweisungen und deshalb 85 KB, dann ziehe ich von beiden die variante vor, deren code ich leichter lesen kann. aber naturlich hat jeder das recht, das anders zu sehen, und code nach seinem gutdunken zu formatieren.
mit Mld und wikidata label hab ich noch keine erfahrung; ich werd es mir gelegentlich ansehen -- sarang사랑 08:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mld muss wohl erweitert werden fur deine anliegen. da ist vor allem Verdi p aktiv. ich erinnere mich undeutlich dass ich mit dem zank hatte - besser ich halte mich da raus. frage doch du ihn direkt und klare deine wunsche, er kann fr, en und de vermutlich genug. -- sarang사랑 10:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Ciliwung River (Sempur).svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of image from here. No indication of a free license.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Pbrks (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Österreichisches Umweltzeichen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Syrcro.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesse?[edit]

ich hab BMI grid.svg erstellt, der source code ist auf File talk:BMI grid.svg gelistet. nur so aus neugier habe ich mal den toolforge editor rangelassen, der macht aus 15 KB gleich 25 KB, auch ohne jede eigentliche anderung. du hattest sicher vieles anders gemacht, das kann ja jeder halten wie er will. es war einige arbeit all die texte zusammenzusuchen aus 25 einzeldateien, mehr as 20 stunden hab ich dazu gebraucht. und es ist noch ohne wichtige sprachen wie russisch, japanisch und alle baltischen, sud- und sudosteuropaischen sprachen.
da du gelegentlich auch so was machst (trotz der vielen arbeit, die das erfordert) kann uberlegt werden ob da was dokumentiert werden sollte, zusatzlich zu SVG simplification by text switch ? -- sarang사랑 14:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: ja sieht sehr gut aus, ein richtiges projekt ist sowas, wie ich bereits sagte ist mir das zu viel arbeit, vor allem wenn ich dran denke für wie viele dateien man das machen könnte/sollte, sind bestimmt tausende - man ahnt nicht was an arbeit dahinter steckt wenn man es nicht mal selbst gemacht hat
was meinst du mit dokumentieren? --Mrmw (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
im sinne von Commons:Graphic Lab/Translations ausbauen zu einer sinnvollen anleitung fur jene, die es mal probieren wollen -- sarang사랑 16:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang:
finde ich gut wie du das beschrieben hast - genauso hatte ich mir das vorgestellt - danke
was ich noch gern sehen würde:
  • beispiel für schlechten code aus dem tool - was daran ist schlecht? vielleicht ein beispiel?
  • link zru rillke-funktionalität
  • beispiel-datei(en) für beide methoden
    • eine datei die als vielen single-lang-files (>10 gelistet auf einer other-other-versions-page) existiert und dem direkt gegenübergestellt ...
    • eine datei die als einzelen-multi-lang-datei besteht (auch mehr als 10 sprachen)
--Mrmw (talk) 18:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

vva[edit]

du weisst doch sicher: wenn du in Emblem of the Organization of Turkic States.jpg das {{Vva}} setzt,

  • {{vva|Emblem of the Organization of Turkic States.svg}} ist die Langform
  • {{vva|Emblem of the Organization of Turkic States}} ".svg" braucht nie geschrieben werden - ist immer SVG
  • {{vva}} wenn der name sonst gleich ist, soll er ganz weggelassen werden

-- sarang사랑 15:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: danke für die hinweise, das ist mir so bekannt - .svg lösche ich normal nicht, finde das könnte verwirrend sein wenn es fehlt - auch wenn es logisch ist - ich prüfe auch nicht immer ob der filename gleich ist und entfallen könnte, bei all den fällen mache ich das effizienteste --Mrmw (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
schon gut, wenn du es weisst. die angabe des topic |t= ist moglich. -- sarang사랑 15:41, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
du hast das sehr gewissenhaft gemacht, 230 dateien einzeln bearbeitet - ich wollte es schon mit VFC machen, grosser rundumschlag -- sarang사랑 15:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: ich prüfe alle ja, weil es dann doch files gibt, zu denen zwar svg-inhalt erstellt wurde, er aber nicht übereinstimmt - manche user reagieren da zu recht empfindlich - ich ersetzte die files dann auch alle global - aufgefallen ist mir Pixelsquid mit seinen/ihren herausragenden svgs - ist mir schleierhaft wie man so guten content nur in einem wiki einsetzt - ich werde mir seine/ihre files ersetzungstechnisch im nachgang vornehmen, aufgefallen ist er/sie mir nur weil er/sie eben öfter vergessen hat {{svg}} zu entfernen - gibts eigtl keine möglichkeit solche user auszuzeichnen, mit mehr als einem eintrag auf seiner diskpage? nicht zuletzt aus dem grund um getriggert zu werden wenn qualitätscontent entsteht --Mrmw (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
du kannst ihm einen barnstar verleihen. falls es keinen passenden gibt kann ich schnell einen schnitzen -- sarang사랑 15:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you[edit]

for many successful vectorizings to good SVG files -- sarang사랑 08:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding Seoul[edit]

to File:Korea DMZ.svg. --2001:14BA:9C36:5100:0:0:0:8C3 21:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Dolphin Drilling.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 19:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo HOS.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jonteemil (talk) 19:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 19:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Jonteemil (talk) 19:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template edits[edit]

You are continually replacing bitmap extensions with an SVG extension in the wrong context and when the SVG is already in the list. See, for example,

I have reverted three of these edits. Please be careful. Glrx (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Glrx: i use c:Commons:File renaming/Global replace, there is no option to skip commons - the best option would be for only replacing in main-namespace for each wiki-project - i have not found a discussion-page whre i can report some bugs or whishes like this --Mrmw (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: danke für die beantwortung der fragen, weiss ich zu schätzen, auch wenn ich auf viele antworten nicht mehr antworte, eigtl. ein qualitätsmerkmal von antworten
was sagst du zu dem thema hier? ich finde das schon recht problematisch was ich hier erzeuge, weil so echte fehler entstehen, ich muss nochmal weiter suchen und sehen obs mehr doku zu global replace gibt
aber wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe, steht es jedem angemeldeten user zur verfügung?
ansonsten muss ich schweren herzens wieder zur absoluten handarbeit übergehen beim ersetzen, was sehr aufwändig ist, aber solche fehler wie die erzeugten sind nicht hinzunehmen --Mrmw (talk) 13:49, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beantwortung[edit]

damit du nicht die einzelnen antworten ubersiehst:

{{svg|vectordata={{F|User status icon.svg}}}}
hat jetzt einen dezenten grauen Rahmen; nur in de und en, als test.
Commons:VFC ist ein sehr machtiges tool, um konstante texte zu ersetzen; kann auch regex!
um nicht meine contribs zuzumullen mache ich das mit einer socke, dort sind es schon mehr als 173K edits.
heute habe ich damit an die 900 dateien von TomKr editiert.
fur flowRoot habe ich den Igenparm "?x" zugefugt
nicht jede vorlage braucht eine kategorie, manche sollen nur einen hinweis ausgeben
das mit den sprachen special:diff/547887176/547899578 sieht interessant aus -- sarang사랑 11:41, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

neue fragen[edit]

@Sarang: hi, unter den einstellungen bei commons gibt es unter gadgets und dann unter 'Benutzeroberfläche: Bearbeiten und Hochladen' den punkt 'Ändert die Beschriftung des „+comment“-Tabs zu „+“'
damit weiss ich nichts anzufangen und konnte auch wirklich nichts dazu finden - weisst du darüber was?

beim quelltextbearbeiten kann man per gui links oben vorlagen einfügen - wenn man in der vorlage dazu die template-data pflegt, wird das dort eingezeigt - z.b. für bei der 'Infobox-vorlage' ist das so - machst du sowas auch? zb. für igen? --Mrmw (talk) 13:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1) beim editieren sehe ich die oben "tabs" user page / discussion / edit / +comment / hitory / wililove ...

(das kann bei dir ganz anders aussehen, je nach einstellungen und sprache). findest du es?
es kann also statt des erklarenden "+comment" eine kurzvariante ohne erklarung gezeigt werden.
@Sarang: ich weiss nicht wovon hier die rede sein soll, ich kann mich auch nicht errinnern jemals einen comment- oder +-tab gesehen zu haben - gibts dazu ein bild/screenshot?

2) nein, das mit v. einfugen habe ich noch nie verwendet. ich sehe es mir mal an, das puzzle-symbol. -- sarang사랑 14:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

v. einfugen: ich hab da nichts bei mir eingerichtet. mit Information mache ich es so, dass ich etwas zum reinkopieren selbst vorbereitet habe, mit den haufigsten parameterwerten (source=own, user=Sarang, ..) in der 'richtigen' reihenfolge und gleich mit PD-self. wie bekomme ich diese werte in das GUI?
igen macht mir das script. bisher sehe ich keinen nahrwert von v. einfugen! -- sarang사랑 14:37, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ich meinte nicht, dass du diese funktion (vorlagen mit gui einfügen) selbst nutzt, sondern es anderen ermöglichst für deine vorlagen
ich habe jetzt gerade nochmal nachgeschaut, weil ich dir die stelle zeigen wollte, wo für die infobox die template-data gepflegt ist, und nun kommt beim aufruf des vorlagen-einfügers die fehlermeldung, dass für die vorlage infox keine template-data gepflegt sind? ich könnte schwören, das ging gestern noch und ich dachte ich hätte die template-data dort auch gefunden, sonst hätte ich es doch nicht hier erwähnt - seltsam
das hier sind die links:

3) hast du den ping gesehen/bemerkt?

User_talk:Mrmw#Template_edits
Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of Vanguard America.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of deleted files, copyright violations
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Di (they-them) (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vote[edit]

Du ​wirst sicher mitstimmen wollen Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Multimedia_and_Commons/Make_the_language_list_accessable? Endlich scheint es befürwortet zu werden -- sarang사랑 07:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: Abzustimmen dafür ist glaub ich recht sinnlos, da meines Wissens nur die mit den meisten Supports beachtet werden, siehe meta:Community_Wishlist_Survey/FAQ/de#Wie_gewählt_wird. Insofern ist eine Simme hier abzugehen ein Symbolische Zeichen ohne Mehrwert. So als Vergleich:
  • 81*Improve SVG rendering
  • 53*Mass uploader
  • 43*World map extension
  • 41*Make category browsing multilingual using Wikidata
  • 7*Make the language list accessible
Wenn man sich meta:Community_Wishlist_Survey/de#past-projects anschaut, werden pro Jahr 5 bis 10 Whises erfüllt, insofern alles unter 50Stimmen halte ich für ausgeschlossen, man braucht ca. 100 Stimmen um es in die Top 10 zu schaffen. meta:Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Multimedia_and_Commons#Improve_SVG_rendering ist vermutlich das einzige in Multimedia und Commons was es in die Top10 schaffen könnte, ob es Platz 11 oder Platz 200 ist, ist egal. Selbst wenn es in die Top10 schaffen würde, könntes es schlimmstenfalls wegen nicht Umsetzbarkeit herausfliegen würde und ein anderes Projekt rutscht nach.
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 09:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Auf Community_Wishlist_Survey/Updates/2022_results#leaderboard findest du die Ergebnisse. Viele Punkte davon finde ich überfällig. Das Problem der Unterfinanzierung des Tech-Teams ist auf Community_Wishlist_Survey_2022/Larger_suggestions#1% beschrieben.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 18:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer:
My fear is the SVG rendering proposal is out of scope for the Community Tech team. IIRC, they have turned down proposals in the past because they do not work on the MediaWiki core. Yes, WMF has had abundant funding for several years now, but WMF does not have a clear idea of what it should do with those funds. I've been surprised by questionable projects, strange hires, and bizarre management practices. The meta:Leadership Development Task Force shows that others question WMF leadership, but a task force without power is pointless. Gilles (Thumbor) retired and has not been replaced. Management is weak and invests in dreams rather than needs. Glrx (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Some movement on Thumbor: Phab:T294484#7770121. Glrx (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted because you changed Sunday to Earthday. Maybe you could fix and restore your smaller and more legible version? Kwamikagami (talk) 07:08, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwamikagami: thx ✓ Done --Mrmw (talk) 08:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mining implications figure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Habitator terrae 🌍 16:53, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello Can you please help in converting St George SC (logo).png to an svg form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hooaos (talk • contribs) 22:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Star of Ishtar with Lion and sun.svg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: <reason in prose>)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Saif.Omar.1.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:18, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Flag of Greek National Socialist Party.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of vectorstock.com file (Lernaean hydra 12 labours hercules heracles by rogistok)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Di (they-them) (talk) 08:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

a heads up[edit]

You prepared File:Suppdoc1l.svg from File:Suppdoc1l.jpg. User:GRID-Arendal uploaded 10 images over 3 days, in July 2010. They applied Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported licenses to all those images. I challended the license on File:Mackenzie River Delta.png. A couple of these images are from US Federal agencies. Their licenses should be changed to some version of {{PD-USGov}}.

I am going to list their other images at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mackenzie River Delta.png. I am afraid that would imply deleting File:Suppdoc1l.svg as well. Sorry. Geo Swan (talk) 03:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, the Canadian government licenses are non-commercial. Glrx (talk) 06:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Logo Gouvernement Princier Monaco.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Gouvernement Princier Monaco.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hey there

I'm Maria, the Online Marketing Manager at Oeko-Tex. Our company's Corporate Identity got fully rebranded 2 weeks ago and I'd love to replace the old Oeko-Tex logo you uploaded here https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oeko-Tex on February, 22 2022. As far as I understand I can't just simply overwrite the svg you uploaded. Could you please help me with that or let me know how to do it? Thank you so much

Maria Gąsieniec Online Marketing Specialist

OEKO-TEX® Association Genferstrasse 23 | CH - 8002 Zurich Phone +41 44 501 26 17 OEKO-TEX (talk) 11:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@OEKO-TEX: ✓ Done
i uploaded new brands, but only replaced the main one (umbrella brand)
i dont know which one matches from old logos to new logos
if you tell me, i will replace them also --Mrmw (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic! Thank you so much for your help. The old-new logo match for each of our certificates is quite simple & we'd appreciate if you could do it too.
- You can replace Made in Green, Standard 100, STeP, Leather Standard and Eco Passport with the new logos you attached below.
- The Detox to Zero and MyStep can be permanantly removed. These services have been integrated into the likewise certificates.
- Responsible Business is our newest product for tracking due diligence at companies (I think it's great! I hope many brands will use it for more transparency) and we need to update the Wiki information first. It's not mentioned in the current article.
I'd like to analyse the whole content of our current article and made some necessary updates if needed. This won't be before February/March I guess since our workload is huge right now. This is just for your information.
Thanks again for getting back to me so quickly and for your help.
Best regards
Maria OEKO-TEX (talk) 16:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@OEKO-TEX: you are welcome
i replaced this logos in de-article
but you should edit this part and remove the logos there --Mrmw (talk) 22:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrmw
Thanks for the info and sorry for not getting back to you any sooner. I've only just realized I can't remove the other two logos. This function has been blocked for some reason. I guess it's because there hasn't been any activity in the past few months due to the lack of ressources in our team. I'll contact the editor who blocked us and try to get it undone.
Thanks for all your help so far. OEKO-TEX (talk) 12:36, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

eine bitte[edit]

(nichts das eilt) da du ja auch inkscape kannst: machst du bitte gelegentlich zu Nuvola devices scanner.png ein besseres Nuvola devices scanner.svg? ich brauche das logo/icon, aber will nicht diese schlechte qualität. btw, es gibt noch mehr solche pseudo-svg-hämmer: Gnome-dev-removable-usb.svg, Gnome-dev-removable.svg and Gnome-dev-wireless-router.svg ... gruss -- sarang사랑 10:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarang: so ganz genau bzw. konkret weiss ich nicht was dein begehr ist
das png ist viel zu schlechtauflösend um es nachzeichnen zu können
ich brauch es als 20×20 icon, da kommt es nicht auf details an, solange erkennbar ist dass ein scanner gemeint ist
ich kann auch selbst was zeichnen, ohne gradienten, auf die kan ich gerne verzichten -- sarang사랑 15:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sarang: ✓ Done --Mrmw (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I would like to thank you for the work on the OASA icons. I have been very busy: that is why I forgot to thank you for the SVG conversions. Sorry about the delay. --Minoa (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte Antibiotika-Grafik korrigieren[edit]

Hallo, Ihre Antibiotika-Grafik benötigt ein paar Korrekturen. So muss u.a. im Deutschen "Glykopetide" zu "Glykopeptide" werden, und auch die englischen Beschriftungen bedürfen der Überarbeitung, wo ebengenannte Wirkstoffe dann "Glycopeptides" mit "c" heißen müssten, und auch bei anderen das "k" zu "c" werden sollte, weil man's sonst in der englischen Wikipedia nicht findet. Und "Rifampin" sollte da vielleicht auch durch das gebräuchlichere "Rifampicin" ersetzt werden. --Qniemiec (talk) 14:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Qniemiec: danke für den hinweis, ich hab es angepasst, du kannst prüfen ob es passt und mir sagen wenn was nicht stimmt, bin nicht vom fach --Mrmw (talk) 17:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte nicht die Eckmarkierungen aus den ISO-7000-Symbolen entfernen[edit]

Hallo Mrmw, ich habe gesehen, dass Du bei einigen ISO-/000-Symbolen – speziell denen, dir auch in ISO/IEC 9995 Part 7 und Part 10 definiert sind – die Eckmarkierungen entfernt hast. Diese sind speziell in ISO/IEC 9995 Teil der Symboldefinition (ich bin Mitarbeiter der ISO/IEC-SC35-Arbeitsgruppe, die für diese Definitionen zuständig ist). Bitte lasse diese drin bzw. füge diese bei den Symbole, wieder ein, wo Du sie entfernt hast. Vielen Dank. -- Karl432 (talk) 11:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISO 7000 - Ref-No 0251.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo RN-CRAF 2019.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : King of Hearts.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 07:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:IEC 60417 - Ref-No 5976.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:IEC 60417 - Ref-No 5976.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Burberry 02.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ZioNicco (talk) 09:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Burberry 03.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ZioNicco (talk) 09:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Burberry 04.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

ZioNicco (talk) 09:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:ISO 7000 - Ref-No 3319.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ISO 7000 - Ref-No 3319.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Award[edit]

For vectorization of Basshunter logo. Eurohunter (talk) 17:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, we noticed old Erste Bank Logo on Wikipedia pages. Can you please update the file and use the new one? https://www.erstebank.rs/content/dam/rs/ebs/www_erstebank_rs/EBS-web-2023.svg

Many thanks and best regards Erste Bank (talk) 11:44, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hat es absichtlich einen seitlichen Rand?
@Erste Bank:
  1. Du kannst es selbst hochladen: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UploadWizard&uselang=de
  2. Das "R" und das "a" scheinen einen Fehler (Versatz) zu beinhalten siehe: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wt27wdk8v17p1d2/Screenshot%202023-05-04%2016.11.44.png?dl=0
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
For helping me with vectorizing File:Good & Evil album cover.svg (Even though you forgot to add the white background lol) --QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 21:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weird question[edit]

Is your username pronounced like "Mr M. W.", or another way? Thanks in advance. --QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 20:20, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of Azerbaijani Motherland Party.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kurmanbek💬 19:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quellcode-Edits[edit]

Keep Calm and Carry On Poster.svg

  • OK wenn es nur vereinzelt ist: enfernte transform und schreibt das explizit in den Kommentar und hatte vorher keine Linebreaks, ich finde es gut dass nach einem Fehler dieser bemerkt und und korrigiert wurde (das ist ein Zeichen, dass es nicht eine Masseneditierung ist)

Wikimedia hackathon mark logo.svg

  • Approved Sinnvoller edit. Als Autor von (neuem) Content hat man imho das Recht es so zu formatieren wie man will, daher

Old South Korean stop sign.svg

  • Declined Sinnlose Quelltexteditierung

Reliance Jio Logo.svg

  • Approved andere Farbe

Reliance Jio Logo (October 2015).svg

  • Approved andere Farbe

Flag of the IMRO-BNP.svg

  • Declined wieder sinnlose Quelltexeditierung

Logo of Indonesian Red Cross.svg

  • Declined wieder sinnlose Quelltexeditierung

Semilla Party.svg

  • Declined wieder sinnlose Quelltexeditierung

Ich stimme dir nicht in allen Punkten zu. Als Autor, kann man es so hochladen wie man will (innerhalb Grenzen). Minimierte SVGs hochzuladen ist okay, aber Category:Files_with_inappropriate_PDF_format ist imho nicht okay. Der inhalt ist wichiger als die Form. Also man darf imho die Form verschlechtern wenn man den Inhalt verbessert, aber man darf keine Quellcodeeditierungen machen ohne Inhaltänderung und schon gar nicht wenn man die Lesbarkeit reduziert.

Ich würde auch auf Help:SVG_guidelines#SVG_sourcecode_edits_without_visual_change verweisen.

 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 20:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License of SVG Cycling Jerseys[edit]

Dear Mrmw,

You uploaded a cycling jersey SVG icon to Wikimedia Commons. Great work, thanks for that! It is the file:MaillotSuiza.svg .

However, the shape is exactly the same as the file:Jersey yellow.svg that I created, and uploaded under CC-BY-SA. This means that if you create derivative works, you must

  1. credit the original creator(s), and
  2. share it under the same license

Yours is a special case. You did credit User:Maillotero~commonswiki, and kept his PD. However, his image did not credit mine, and did not keep the CC-BY-SA licence. I asked him to change this. However, as he is blocked, he is likely to not reply, and I will change the licences if he doesn't respond in due time (after community discussion).

Could you make changes to the image you uploaded? You can do this very simply by adding the following lines to the icons you originally created (and removing the current license template line)

{{Self |1= cc-by-sa-4.0|author=Mrmw |attribution= Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey yellow.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]}}

{{Template:Change-of-license}}

and if there is a summary table, change the line that reads |source={{own}} with a line that reads something like

|source={{own}} Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey Yellow.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]

If you based this icon on another icon than File:Jersey yellow.svg, you can substitute that and credit the creator thereof as well as the authors of the work they based their work on.

See also: User:IIVQ/Cycling Jerseys and Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Cycling Jersey Icons

With regards, IIVQ (talk) 09:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@IIVQ: done - are there more files i have to do this? --Mrmw (talk) 05:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Coat of arms of Zambia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

165.56.186.179 14:48, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! My name is Amy. I am an autistic psychologist living in Brisbane, Australia. I like your pastel infinity symbol for ND. Can I use it in my logo please? I'd like to out my company name 'Neurokin Psychology' below it. Is it correct to say that I can use it this way, that it has not been copy writed? Thanks, Amy Sigley. 159.196.12.64 13:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:PNG Test.png[edit]

Copyright status: File:PNG Test.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PNG Test.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Logo Lauer.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Logo Lauer.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Lauer.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrmw,

Thanks for adding the German translation. Can you please keep backgrounds, though? As I'm using a dark theme, black text on a dark background is illegible. I also find the blue and red discs of the characters missing, though the drop shadow is rendered.

Thanks,
cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 00:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cmglee: there is an error in this file, i already requested help. perhaps @Glrx: can help --Mrmw (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's all right. I'll look into it. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 08:26, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I've replied on de:Benutzer_Diskussion:JoKalliauer#fehlerhaftes_svg-testen. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 09:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmglee: for multilangfiles you should follow some rules
  • each text should be defined for all languages, if text is same for some languages group them: systemLanguage="en,es,de"
  • there should be a standard-text as fallback without systemlanguages (not for display en)
  • also 'en' should be defined as separate language
  • each text should be wrapped in a 'tspan', also single text elements
  • you shouldnt nest transform-elements (like line 69 and 70)
--Mrmw (talk) 18:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can you link me to official guidelines to your rules?
Your last one is especially problematic: almost every SVG I create (and I've uploaded over 2000) nests transform elements.
Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 04:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the first 2.
en need not be a separate text element. Addition: To be clear, I agree with Mrmw that there should be a en clause. Glrx (talk) 17:14, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A tspan is not needed in a text element. (SVG Translate uses tspan elements and does not want mixed #text nodes and tspan elements. SVG Translate also gives up when it finds a tspan within a tspan.)
It is OK to nest g elements with transforms. It makes sense to do that for tables: an outer transform can be the row, and an inner transform can be the column.
Glrx (talk) 04:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reassurance and feedback, @Glrx:
If there's already a fallback, why must elements that not change still be defined for all languages? A good example is File:Phase_diagram_of_water.svg: most languages use "Pa" as the symbol for en:pascal (unit) but Russian uses "Па". Wouldn't it suffice to add an override for Russian and let other languages fall back? Moreover, text that does not need translation, such as numbers, can all just use the fallback.
There's an additional issue with en that I raised on en:Wikipedia:SVG_help/Archive_9#English_translation_not_rendered_in_multilingual_SVG. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 10:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmglee: An explicit en is needed to make preferences work as expected. My browser language preferences are set to prefer English (en-US;1.0,en;0.9) but accept German when English is not available (de;0.8). If there is an explicit en in the SVG, then I will get the English text. However, if English is just the default but there is a de clause, then I will get German text despite English existing in the default. The SVG agent has no clue what the default language is. When I open File:Prisoners dilemma.svg in my browser, it displays German. (BTW, SVG Translate always makes this mistake; it should copy the default clause into an explicit language.).
Fun and games with units:
Numbers are complicated. If the translations are all Western European, then small integers do not need to be translated. It gets ugly when the numbers are large or have decimals. American 12,345.67 versus British 12.345,67. Italian is worse when the numbers are larger. Then we get into problems with other scripts: Persian numbers use different characters. Several scripting languages offer methods to format numbers. For example, Javascript has the Intl object.
Glrx (talk) 16:05, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Glrx: Your explanation makes sense, though it seems wasteful and reduces maintainability to specify the same text as default and en. Just as languages can be specified together in a comma-delimited list, can en and the default be, too?
British English generally uses 12,345.67 like in US English, though may use 12 345.67 in scientific contexts. Dates are a better example.
In my opinion, the risk of translations going out of sync may not be worthwhile handling such small differences, though, as there is variance even within one language e.g. "pop" vs "soda". While tidying up the widely used File:Phase_diagram_of_water.svg, I already found some mistranslations; there may be more. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 20:49, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My understanding is systemLanguage="en," is not legal because "" is not an IETF langtag.
Duplicate text is not a big expense because compression will be very effective.
Glrx (talk) 02:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Glrx: It's less the compression but maintainability: If one string is to be changed, editors need to change both instances, and if they don't the next person will not know which is the correct version.
Is there another way to automate the process? Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 10:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmglee:
Yes, keeping the text in sync is a problem, but it can exist across all the languages. Consider a town changing its name. A multilingual map should change not only the English name but also all the other transliterations.
I've seen switch elements that try to force synchronization to the default clause. The English clause is
<use systemLanguage="en" xlink:href="#defaultclause"/>
That is a clever trick, but it would confuse or complicate most tools. For example, it is no longer trivial to localize the SVG by just keeping the English clauses.
A more common method of managing translated images uses one skeleton file and several sets of language strings. To make a complete image, the skeleton file is fleshed out with, for example, the set of English strings.
For File:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.svg, the default clause is an ISO Date (e.g., 2022-02-24). I have some Javasript to enforce that the date string in a systemLanguage clause matches the ISO date.
Glrx (talk) 16:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Glrx: that's true. I like that method: as long as the default language is English, one can just remove the use and switch tags, and it should use the default.
How did you add Javascript to the SVG? I thought Commons bars Javascript. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 09:50, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I've explicitly specified en for File:Prisoners_dilemma.svg (and File:Phase_diagram_of_water.svg). cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 12:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmglee:
Please do not employ the switch/use hack. It is too clever by half, and it will confuse tools. I want simple XSLT scripts to transform switch-translated SVG to XLIFF files. It also may not accomplish what you want. An Inkscape user may delete the clone and replace it with text that does not match the default. A better method is to scan switch elements and make sure that the en clause matches the default clause.
I appreciate clever tricks and idioms, but I'd rather use clearer code. For example, Prisoner's dilemma also uses
<circle cx="0" cy="0" r="99999" fill="#ffffff"/>
I prefer
<rect x="-70" y="-90" width="100%" height="100%" fill="#ffffff"/>
It is even cleaner when the offsets are zero.
The JavaScript I use for File:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.svg is external. I sometimes include a simple hit detection script in SVG (onclick=...). When I upload the file to Commons, then I rename the attribute to something safe such as data-onclick. That hit detector is in 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.svg.
Glrx (talk) 19:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea to use width|height="100%".
I'll leave the files as is. Please amend them as you see fit. cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 05:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mrmw: I noticed that I wanted to make a minimal (not) working example, to locate the bug, which I now did: see history of File:Test.svg. Today I decided to return my mentor-ship in de-wp, due to inactivity, since I have to reduce my work-load. The problem of the file was that it contained filter="url(#h)", however there did not exist such a filter. @Glrx: Do you know the specifications, if a path contains a filter that is undefined, should the path be removed or rendered without filter?
@Mrmw and Jarry1250: The difference between the rendering of commons and svgcheck might be that commons has some kind of security-layer/settings that blocks/removes problematic code, such as filters that are not in the file. (This settings are not present in https://svgcheck.toolforge.org/ .)
@Cmglee: the translation is correct
 — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 19:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@JoKalliauer:
SVG 2.0 draft: If the filter presentation attribute/property does not reference a filter element, then no filter should be applied to the object.
See https://drafts.fxtf.org/filter-effects/#FilterProperty
SVG 1.1 did not specify what should happen, so implementors could do whatever they wanted.
I would rather see the SVG agent raise an exception so the whole world knows there is a problem with the SVG file.
Glrx (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For the 22:00, 1 December 2023 version, there is a filter with id="h"
Maybe the issue was in2="".
Glrx (talk) 21:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for debugging the file. I agree that an exception should be raised, at least by the Commons SVG checker. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 16:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Capitol Corridor logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ZandDev (talk) 14:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays![edit]

Happy Holidays and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Mrmw, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for the Holidays and New Year's 2025.
Happy editing,

Thank you for being such an awesome graphic designer! QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 22:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year[edit]

Wishing you a happy 2024 cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 17:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
You did an amazing job on These Old Shades 1927 cover.svg ReneeWrites (talk) 12:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Mrmw made a fabulous image. Glrx (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Greek lc upsilon.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Greek lc upsilon.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Greek lc upsilon.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-vot.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:999:2E0:6E7:4BBC:73B:9420:8A4 17:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Logo Stage 01.svg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Logo Stage 01.svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Stage 01.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Signature of Amos Emerson Dolbear (1837–1910).svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Signature of Amos Emerson Dolbear (1837–1910).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bowser emblem.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(Oinkers42) (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yoshi emblem.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Simplified flag of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany (Lega Nord).svg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Simplified flag of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany (Lega Nord).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]