User talk:Missvain/Archives 6

about File:PolarRoute.png[edit]

It was the picture that should be deleted, with reasons provided in the deletion request page.--Johnson.Xia (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional reason: Pan Am has been serving commercial flights from US to USSR, which started in 1968 (source, until 1978 (source).--Johnson.Xia (talk) 04:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Johnson.Xia - Well, I've closed over 1,000 files for deletion over the past week, so I was bound to miss something. Besides, the deletion discussion linked to the talk page, which is rare. I see that map is used on a lot of project pages. If I get backlash for the response, I am going to ask you to chime in. Despite many of these deletion requests sitting around for weeks and weeks, people often only freak out after they see the image was deleted. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Verbreitungsgebiet der deutschen Sprache.PNG[edit]

Why was this talk page deleted? I thought there was an ongoing discussion there, or that someone raised concerns about the accuracy of the file there? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 05:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus - Because the talk page was listed for deletion originally. Do you need it undeleted? Missvain (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. For now can you kindly link me to the deletion request for it? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 11:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Files: Gonzales-Toledo, Eduardo (2). jpg and File: Dr.González Toledo, MD, PhD. jpg[edit]

Dear Missvain, I understud the terms that Wikicommons need for a free licence and the permissions I´ve sent to Wikicommons is not enough. My father is in the middle of his retreat and he will return definitly to my country in one month. He can´t ask again to the press to the Hospital ahd School of Medicine of LSU to asked the photographer to search the picture that he did many years ago. As I said, LSU give to my father as a gift his own photography. As a photographer I understand and I glad that Wikicommons take so serious the copyright so I will do myself a picture of my father when he return to my country, Argentina. So delete these files. Thank you for explain it Yours Sincerely--Pentesilea1012 (talk) 14:02, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The one that escaped[edit]

Thank you for getting rid of the fictitous flags at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by blocked User:Sofaera888 – first batch. It seems, however, that there has been a glitch, where one of the files has escaped being deleted: File:Flag of the Region of Eastern Macedonia & Thrace.png. Regards! --TU-nor (talk) 09:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted! Thanks TU-nor. Sometimes I miss one when doing a batch. :) Missvain (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Konjo1[edit]

Hi, there. Thanks for closing that DR. There’s one remaining file that didn’t get deleted, File:Ras Tafari, Prince Regent of Ethiopia (Emperor Haile Selassie I) with the Duke of York (later King George VI) on a visit to London', 1924. From Our King & Queen and the Royal Princesses.jpg. Cheers. —Rrburke (talk) 13:31, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rrburke - Thank you! Sometimes I miss one when doing bulk processing! Appreciate it. Sorry to waste your time! Missvain (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:Verbreitungsgebiet der deutschen Sprache.PNG)[edit]

Hello, I noticed the File:Verbreitungsgebiet der deutschen Sprache.PNG[1] map is still up only the talk page has been deleted. --E-960 (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

E-960 - Yes, when the talk page is what is linked sometimes that gets deleted. It appears that was the case, the file wasn't actually linked in the deletion discussion. Sorry about that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! Missvain (talk) 18:45, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyễn dynasty files[edit]

In case you also misread, please see:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thay giao.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Phan-Thanh-Giản.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thay do.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nho-si.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quan-thoi-nguyen-mau gowc.jpg (less sure about this one), but still unlikely.

I should have probably added " Keep" while challenging the "No license" tags, I shall do that in the future to avoid miscommunication. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:12, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 - Thank you! I have fixed all of those files and DRs. Love the idea of the

Keep tag and I also will pay better attention when making closures. Missvain (talk) 22:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ann Kirkpatrick - 5.22.20.jpg[edit]

File:Ann Kirkpatrick - 5.22.20.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Any claims to public domain status as a U.S. government work - which are facially dubious because teleconferencing with school children is not an official duty of a federal representative - do not extend to the webcam videos of the people in this video. Kirkpatrick may have taken the screenshot, but each of the teleconference participants holds copyright over their own webcam footage.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 03:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ann Kirkpatrick talks about communicating with her offices.ogv[edit]

File:Ann Kirkpatrick talks about communicating with her offices.ogv has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Kirkpatrick states at the beginning of the video that she was "working from home" when it was taken. Therefore, this video was likely captured by a member of her household, who would hold copyright over the video. Unless she has a federal employee working within her home - which seems unlikely - this video cannot possibly be a U.S. government work.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 03:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:A man looking at his computer wearing headphones.jpg[edit]

File:A man looking at his computer wearing headphones.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: A work cannot be considered public domain simply because it is uploaded by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://stock.adobe.com/357592233

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Genshin Impact logo.svg[edit]

User:Awesome Aasim suggested that "This can be uploaded to other wikis as PD-ineligible-USonly." How can we restore it under this license to English Wikipedia? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 05:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus - I have no idea. You can request an undelete via Commons or upload it as fair use on Wikipedia. Missvain (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Already done. The file can be found at wikipedia:en:File:Genshin Impact logo.svg A a s i m 06:36, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any policy on not using Commons for self-propaganda?[edit]

Hi! Please have a look at this user. They have uploaded pictures of themself which are not being used on any of the wikipedia sister projects. I have nominated some of them for deletion but don't think this is an effective way to deal with this. Is there any policy on not using Commons for self-propaganda? 117.192.146.114 12:58, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

117.192.146.114 - Feel free to nominate any images that concern you for deletion please. You can find project scope information to cite as rationale for deletion at Commons:Project scope. Missvain (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination???[edit]

You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Desembarco (2021).jpg as "Deleted: per nomination". I don't understand. The file was initially tagged as "Speedy (selfie)" and the image was clearly not a selfie. The nomination by me (where I dispute4d the speedy) cited a discussion criticising the deletion of such files. Where is the nomination you agreed with in your decision? –LPfi (talk) 15:09, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LPfi - It's promotional photograph of a band whose own Wikipedia article was deleted. For me, this violates COM:HOST and COM:ADVERT. Feel free to request an undeletion if you feel this image of a non-notable musical group merits inclusion on Commons. Missvain (talk) 15:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neither COM:HOST nor COM:ADVERT were mentioned in the speedy nomination, nor in the RFD, so couldn't be refuted there. Closing as "per nomination" is thus moot.

There is nothing in our policy saying that a subject not being relevant for a Wikipedia article isn't relevant for us. We do want to document how non-notable music bands try to promote themselves. The reason for deleting the image would be that there are enough similar images. I don't know whether there are. I know I didn't find any, but then I didn't do an exhaustive search, and won't do one.

As the initial deletion nomination, the speedy, was ungrounded – this is not a selfie – I would have speedy kept it. If you know that we have an abundance of such images, leave it deleted, otherwise I hope you undelete it. I think I have done my part.

–LPfi (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete Files of Emmanuel Navon[edit]

Please undelete the files

I appealed these deleted files already. After my appeal the files were restored. They are my photos and I have the EXIF data. I reposted the images to Wikimedia. Special:Diff/563543671 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_EN2101 Thank you EN2101 (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:EN2101 -

Done Missvain (talk) 20:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Empty categories[edit]

What can I say... 10 years of activity, 130k edits, but still a complete ***** for basic Commons policy! :( Sorry for taking your time and thanks for the helpful advice. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha - Orijentolog - it's all good!! I'm at 15 years and frankly I have no clue what I'm doing half the time, LOL. :) Missvain (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Meybod or Nâïn (Iran) ceramics[edit]

Hi Missvain, I am very surprised that you deleted this category (same thing for Category:Borujerdis House and Category:Abbasian House). I would have been glad to know about this project of suppression before it was done. As far as I am concerned, I am in some way interested in Iranian ceramics and I think the first category is relevant.--Faqscl (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Faqscl - It actually wasn't deleted. It was redirect to Category:Ceramics of Iran in the Ariana museum (Geneva). The other categories are located at Category:Borujerdi House and Category:Abbasi House, so I have no clue what you are referring to about deletions. Missvain (talk) 14:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your answer. Ok for Borujderi House and Abbasi House. But I still don't undestand why the first one was deleted. I took the pictures in the Ariana musuem and some of them are not from Meybod or Nain ; so it's not the same category. Faithfully yours--Faqscl (talk) 15:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete Stdi.jpg screenshot[edit]

Please cancel the deletion of Stdi.jpg screenshot, since it refers to a program distributed under a FREE LICENSE - this is indicated in the top line of the screenshot Stdi.jpg (in Russian). The same link to the free license is listed on the download site of this software http://statsoft.msu.ru/Podr2~1.htm (in Russian: "free version for self-study and work under a free license" with the clarification: "this license allows the user to freely distribute this version and all images obtained with it").

Therefore, I can freely use any screenshots of this software everywhere without any permission!!! AKU-47 (talk)

AKU-47 - Thank you! Please link me to the deletion discussion. Missvain (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Missvain. Screenshot was deleted corredctly, do not undelete it. Please note history of this file at nominators talk page. Permission to download and "freely distribute this version and all images obtained with it" does not allow to "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially." as says free license cc-by-sa. This software is not truly free. --Drakosh (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Drakosh - I wanted to take a look at it before I even decided if it should be considered for undeletion. I would have most likely sent them to undeletion request. Thanks for the heads up. Missvain (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bell Time for tea.jpg[edit]

Hi Missvain, has there been some consensus that this Flickr-bot, which was used to upload all these images, was unreliable? --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Túrelio - It's been over a week since the listing was opened. I closed it as a presumed delete due to concerns with the Flickr uploads. Better to be safe than sorry. If I misunderstood your desire to open that AfD I can reopen it. But, given no one engaged with the discussion for over a week I doubt we'll get more activity on it. It is rare that Commonists openly engage with deletions, let alone the longer they are listed. Missvain (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. However, this concerns a lot of uploads by established users, even admins, from the 200x years, when this bot was used. Though I never used it (even wasn't aware about), I'm rather sure that these uploads had a Commons-compatible license at time of upload. May be we should discuss this (the reliability of uploads by this bot) on COM:AN or VP to attract more input. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

Hiya Missvain, Not sure if you're aware but you closed this DR as delete but never deleted the file :), Many thanks, Warm regards, –Davey2010^Talk 19:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davey2010 - Thanks for the heads up! :-) Missvain (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haha no worries :), Many thanks for deleting it :), Take care and stay safe, Warm Regards, Dave // –Davey2010^Talk 19:27, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barge - USDA.jpg[edit]

File:Barge - USDA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: A work cannot be assumed to be in public domain simply because it is uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/cargo-ship-gm176904701-17778880

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 03:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heather Dawn Thompson.jpg[edit]

File:Heather Dawn Thompson.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: A work cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because it was uploaded to social media by a federal agency. The uploader, in good faith, believed this image to be some sort of official portrait of a federal employee under that pretense. However, this facebook post shows that the photo actually predates her appointment by several years.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 03:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Douglas Emhoff - Second Gentleman - Jan 2021 Twitter photo.jpg[edit]

File:Douglas Emhoff - Second Gentleman - Jan 2021 Twitter photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 03:57, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Squirrel Appreciation Day graphic for USFS.jpg[edit]

File:Squirrel Appreciation Day graphic for USFS.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency. Right image is a (mirrored) stock photo.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://stock.adobe.com/images/northern-flying-squirrel-also-called-polatouche-in-french-taken-in-cottage-country-north-quebec/231417296

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiking boots - USFS.jpg[edit]

File:Hiking boots - USFS.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://unsplash.com/photos/2b7lU8OGO0I

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDC Fight Flu PSA.jpg[edit]

File:CDC Fight Flu PSA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/pharmacist-with-protection-mask-prescribing-medicine-gm1218218078-355895871

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:16, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDC LGB teen violence and suicide PSA.jpg[edit]

File:CDC LGB teen violence and suicide PSA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/young-students-on-campus-gm846982640-138922275

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:25, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDC Dash - youth risk behavior survey PSA.jpg[edit]

File:CDC Dash - youth risk behavior survey PSA.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/learning-in-the-laboratory-gm911030458-250871015

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:CDC DASH PSA - connectedness.jpg[edit]

File:CDC DASH PSA - connectedness.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/friend-group-hug-of-diverse-people-isolated-gm1018972532-273886993

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Symptoms of Trench Foot.jpg[edit]

File:Symptoms of Trench Foot.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Works cannot be assumed to be in the public domain simply because they were uploaded to social media by a federal agency.

This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/winter-rime-background-gm157101392-22208098

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 04:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Blumenthal meeting with Pete Buttigieg - 2021-01-16.jpg[edit]

File:Richard Blumenthal meeting with Pete Buttigieg - 2021-01-16.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: At the time this photo was taken, Pete Buttigieg was not yet a federal government employee. Therefore, his webcam image could not possibly be public domain under the stated rationale and must be assumed to be nonfree.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Bennet questions Janet Yellen - 2021-01-19.ogv[edit]

File:Michael Bennet questions Janet Yellen - 2021-01-19.ogv has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Janet Yellen had not assumed office at the time this video was taken, so her webcam footage could not possibly be the work of an employee of the United States government as part of their official duties, and it must be assumed to be nonfree.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:06, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gary Peters and Pete Buttigieg meeting - 2021-01-11.jpg[edit]

File:Gary Peters and Pete Buttigieg meeting - 2021-01-11.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: At the time this screenshot was taken, Pete Buttigieg was not yet a federal government employee. Therefore, his webcam image could not possibly be public domain under the stated rationale and must be assumed to be nonfree.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:10, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNM School of Law 2019 graduation 01.jpg[edit]

File:UNM School of Law 2019 graduation 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 01.jpg[edit]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP in US

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 02.jpg[edit]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP in US

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:35, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cricket Swalwell and Eric Swalwell.jpg[edit]

File:Cricket Swalwell and Eric Swalwell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barbara Lee as a Girl Scout as a child.jpg[edit]

File:Barbara Lee as a Girl Scout as a child.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Under 17 U.S. Code § 105(a), works of the United States government are generally in the public domain; a work of the United States government is defined by 17 U.S. Code § 101 as "a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties". Not only was this photo not taken by Lee, but it was taken before she was an employee of the federal government. Must be assumed nonfree unless a correct author/rationale can be given.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Legion Post 151 100th anniversary 04.jpg[edit]

File:American Legion Post 151 100th anniversary 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh Harder at La Cascada.jpg[edit]

File:Josh Harder at La Cascada.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FOP for artwork in the U.S. (the logo contains nonfree elements)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Thompson visits the Sonoma Community Center, Sonoma, California (February 22, 2020) 03.jpg[edit]

File:Mike Thompson visits the Sonoma Community Center, Sonoma, California (February 22, 2020) 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Photograph of nonfree artwork.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 05:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 01.jpg[edit]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:American Rescue Plan image from Terri Sewell.jpg[edit]

File:American Rescue Plan image from Terri Sewell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars[edit]

Hi Missvain. Just a quick question abut Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shoot for the Stars. I mentioned something about File:Chris Isaak 2017.png in the DR, but nobody ever responded. Anyway, that file was said to have been an extracted version of File:Hall And Oates with Chris Isaak - The O2 - Saturday 28th October 2017 HallOatesO2281017-26 (24446890518).jpg which seems to have be reviewed and verified as OK for Commons. I'm not sure I quite get how a file extracted from another file with an apparently acceptable license can be a copyvio, even if the uploader didn't extract it themselves. I must be missing something here, but I'm just not sure what it is. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly - I suggest nominating any other offending (or possibly offending) files for deletion! Missvain (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The other file wasn't uploaded by Shoot for the Stars and its licensed was verified by FlickreviewR 2. The source provided for the photo does show that it's released under a {{CC-by-2.0}} license so it seems OK. That means the extracted version of the file should also be OK, shouldn't it? -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marchjuly - got it. I restored the image. Please make sure it's all up to snuff with the licensing, sourcing, etc. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking another look at this Missvain. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About "Deletion requests:Improved files/20210516"[edit]

I requested the submission of Commons:Deletion requests/Improved files/20210516. I submitted a deletion request for only the first-list 2files mentioned, but the other files presented for explanation have also been deleted. So, would you please restore files that isn't the first-list 2files?--Mario1257 (talk) 16:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mario1257 - Ah! Sometimes the tool I use to delete can delete things that shouldn't be deleted. Sorry! What files exactly? I see "original" and "Revised" - the revised ones? Sorry about that! Missvain (talk) 19:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain: The files to be deleted are File:大分交通P-RA46R 大分22か13-50修正版.JPG and File:画像-県道60号.JPG(revised edition). These files have overwritten the original files. So, File:県道60号.JPG and File:大分交通P-RA46R 58MC S型大分22か13-50その2(別府)050528 edited.JPG are not subject to deletion.--Mario1257 (talk) 06:49, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mario1257 -

Done Missvain (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trashion Barbie Exhibition - Sarah Stierch 2018 01.jpg[edit]

File:Trashion Barbie Exhibition - Sarah Stierch 2018 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Missvain (talk) 00:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 02.jpg[edit]

File:Black Lives Matter street mural, Palo Alto, California 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Blumenthal meeting with Pete Buttigieg - 2021-01-16.jpg[edit]

File:Richard Blumenthal meeting with Pete Buttigieg - 2021-01-16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Flag of HM Queen Suthida.svg[edit]

Hi. I missed the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Flag of HM Queen Suthida.svg, which you closed as delete. The file appears to be linked as an SVG version of File:Queen Suthida flag 3.png Could you check if the deleted image matches the PNG file? If it does, I think it can be presumed to be a derivative of the PNG and restored with corrected authorship info. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paul_012 - The file is gigantic and so big I can't even view it without downloading it. I'm not sure if it's the same. This also has incorrect licensing - this isn't the uploader's own work: File:Queen Suthida flag 3.png. I'm copying User:Taivo here since they nominated the image for deletion originally. Missvain (talk) 18:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll delete last remaining contributions of Naphat Terakittipun (talk · contribs): 3 identical copies of the same file in different formats, all incorrectly claimed own work. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I actually question a bit whether these images are even copyrightable at all, given that they consist of a very generic traditional depiction of the crown and the royal cypher, which is two stylized letters, but given the user's questionable contributions, deletion does seem the prudent option. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josh Harder at La Cascada.jpg[edit]

File:Josh Harder at La Cascada.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysterymanblue 20:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corona High School - Panther mural (2002).jpg[edit]

Thanks for the heads up about the Deletion Request. I placed my comments here [2] Amineshaker (talk) 18:50, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andrés Martín de Diego[edit]

Good morning.

The uploader gave what I believe to be a reasonable defense on that page, namely that he is the family member and this is a family photo. Would you reconsider your decision? I bring this up because the user has reuploaded the photos under a different name.

Thank you!Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magog the Ogre - While I try to always assume good faith, for legal reasons I think it's best that you get COMMONS:OTRS from the uploader. If OTRS can be procured I'd be more likely to undelete at this time. Missvain (talk) 15:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but that's not really what OTRS is for. OTRS is for officially verifying works for which there is a strong likelihood of a ripoff (e.g., an artist's paintings, works from elsewhere online). In this case, the work was not available elsewhere on the internet and OTRS has no way of verifying familial ownership.

That's my opinion anyway as a former OTRS volunteer. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zenwort[edit]

I came across that DR and I noticed that you decided to keep the files although the uploader recognised that it was a mistake from his part as the work is located indoors. Could you recheck this? Kind regards, -sasha- (talk) 08:24, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

-sasha- - Somehow I misread this one. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 14:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deitsches Schproch-Gebiet.PNG Deletion[edit]

Hello, could I request that the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deitsches Schproch-Gebiet.PNG is closed and the map [3] deleted — this is yet another version of the deleted Postmann Michael map, this should be the last one of them. Again, apologies, for another follow up related to these maps. --E-960 (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014-12-07 SM City Batangas 017.jpg[edit]

From a DR watcher: Hello MissVain! Is the mentioned file supposed to be deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM City Batangas or not? Or was it due to accidental oversight? Thanks in advance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JWilz12345 - Oversight. Sometimes my clicking misses one or two. Thanks. Fixed. Missvain (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arbolesfruta.jpg[edit]

Kept "Copy vio"? Please review your decision. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 00:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jeff G. - That's what I get for doing DR before my first cup of tea. LOL. Thanks!! Fixed. Missvain (talk) 03:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

However, you could give a clearer closing remark. Now you "per nomination" refers to "Because it is Nonsense". When the nominator doesn't give a comprehensible reason, stating one when closing would be very nice. The deletion may have been clear in the context of the file description, but that description is now unavailable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LPfi (talk • contribs) 05:50, 5 August 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and you're welcome. — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 15:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

Delete the previous versions of this file. The files are not same. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2404:C0:5830:0:0:0:2D5:191 (talk) 03:20, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. That's actually not how it works. Please nominate the file for deletion via Commons:DR and let the community discuss. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 17:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erena James[edit]

Would you mind deleting this photo again? It appears to have been uploaded again shortly after it was deleted. Users keep trying to add it to her en Wikipedia bio. Thanks, Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 13:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohnoitsjamie -

Done. I also deleted the other images. Next time, please nominate blatant copyright violations for speedy deletion. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 17:00, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK, to be honest I wasn't aware that Commons had a speedy template; I will educate myself on that! Thanks, Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohnoitsjamie - No biggie. Even after fifteen years of contributing I still learn something new every day!

Learn more about speedy d's here: Commons:SPEEDY. Missvain (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion[edit]

Hi, Could you undelete File:2 Weeks In Italy - A Cinematic Travel Film.webm please so that I can remove the audio, I had hoped the closing admin would've either pinged me or left me a message so that I could quickly remove it as from my point of view I've done things in the past only to be told I didn't need too so I wasn't going to mute it and then find out I didn't have too, Guess it's just one of those things lol, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:14, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davey2010 - Done. Please let me know when you download it, so I can delete it, again. It's actually not my responsibility to ping people when files get deleted. Frankly, the file sat in Deletion Requests for 30 days, which was plenty of time for folks to download, strip the sound, and re-upload it. Thanks again. Missvain (talk) 16:58, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for undeleting it - Unfortunately I didn't realise the file is 500mb and at present I have terrible internet speeds so this is taking longer than expected, I understand and agree and I apologise for the above message - Just one those things unfortunately, Anyway thanks again for your help it's much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 20:40, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Randall Woodfin - 2019.jpg[edit]

File:Randall Woodfin - 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Bisquitedits (talk) 21:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Waldemarwall[edit]

Hi Missvain, thanks for closing the DR. In your closure you are writing “btw being "paid editing" is not a policy-based deletion rationale.” However, I never gave "paid editing" as a deletion rationale in my statements. I just pointed out that – in the context of paid editing – these photos are unlikely to be the uploader's own works. I can tell from my experience in the support team, that, most commonly, these pictures are provided by the paying subject to the paid editor. Hence, it is not just a possible out of scope issue as we have to take care of the copyright as well. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 15:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFBorchert - That was referring to the commenter. Missvain (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the clarification. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:41, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akt mianowania Katarzyny Zofii Borowińskiej na wyższy stopień wojskowy podporucznika.jpg[edit]

Witam, dlaczego ten plik został usunięty skoro jest on moją własnością i był poprawnie oznaczony?Taurus234 (talk) 17:13, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the owner of the photograph. She's my relative. Taurus234 (talk) 18:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taurus234 - That's great. Please send a letter via COMMONS:OTRS and a volunteer will verify that information. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 21:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Czesław Stopiński[edit]

This picture was published in an official paper in the People's Republic of Poland in 1980. It belongs to the public domain. Did I choose a wrong category when it comes to copyrights? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaplin2222 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chaplin2222 - Ah, ok. I would use the appropriate copyright template when uploading your files so you can avoid people like me screwing things up, ha! Sorry about that. I withdrew my nomination.

Missvain (talk) 00:27, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:J Todd Billings.jpg[edit]

File:J Todd Billings.jpg Dr. Billings sent this picture to use in wiki. --칼빈500 (talk) 03:33, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

칼빈500 - Great, please provide his permissions to use his photo via the COMMONS:OTRS process. Thank you! Missvain (talk) 02:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strange, uneducational images[edit]

Hello. Thank you for deleting the three image I had nominated. I have nominated five more images from this user right now. It seems the user has a very heavy tendency to upload images whose names make them look educational, but once zoomed in are in fact bizarre and uneducational. From what I get, the user has his/her own wiki - as advertised in File:Norse cosmology.svg and the user's profile - and uses WCommons to host his/her creations related to this wiki. It might a good idea to look into the upload history of the user. Veverve (talk) 08:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Veverve - Very weird stuff. Make sure to provide them a warning and then if they don't stop. Alas, deletion requests don't really do the trick and we generally result to blocks as last resorts. If they don't stop, I'll give them a final warning and then proceed to block, if absolutely necessary. I'll let the files you nominated go through their week long Deletion Request process and take care of them. Thank you for your due diligence. Feel free to do one mass nomination for any files you find troublesome of theirs. That saves volunteers time in reviewing deletion requests. Missvain (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User warned. I am very happy you do not recognise in those drawings the classic religious type of people who tend to work very hard to link every religion and other theories together in a strange mishmash; as for me I have spent too much time on the internet to ignore this archetype. Veverve (talk) 17:13, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a tool which would help me making a batch DR? The images concerned are File:Yggdrasil.png, File:Races of Norse cosmology.png, File:Navajo cosmology.png, File:Norse cosmology.tif, File:Jotnar.png, File:Navajo cosmology.svg, File:The 9 worlds of Norse cosmology.png, File:Norse cosmology.png (all those cosmologies are shown as a circle - why? -, are unsourced, and most have some syncretic elements inserted by the user); and File:Allotment of land to the 12 Tribes of Israel.svg (bloated, has the Roman god Janus in the Sea of Galilee; I did not look much into it).
File:World tree stretching from Heaven to Hell.png, File:Mouth of Tartarus.svg and File:Tartarus.svg seem acceptable to me.
The other images uploaded by the user as science related, so I do not have the skills to juge them. Veverve (talk) 09:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Images nominated. Veverve (talk) 10:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tagooty -- deleted File:Spire Debre Libanos Monastery Ethiopia Oct19 D72 12188.jpg[edit]

Thank you for keeping two files of stained-glass windows. The file File:Spire Debre Libanos Monastery Ethiopia Oct19 D72 12188.jpg showing the spire was deleted. I learnt recently that the Debre Libanos Monastery was designed by architect Hector Corfiato who died in 1963. This is documented in his obituary in the Journal of the Royal Society of Arts. Hence, his copyright would have ended in 2013. Presuming that he designed the spire and cross, I request you to kindly reconsider the deletion of this file. --Tagooty (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tagooty - Thank you for presenting me this update! Good job at finding out these details.

I've undeleted the file. Cheers! Missvain (talk) 16:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The cross file has a "nominated for deletion" notice. Could you please resolve this?
Katherine Hevezi, daughter of the artist who created the stained-glass windows, recalled the name of the architect from when she was a 12-year old girl! A search in Wikipedia and DuckDuckGo found the obit. --Tagooty (talk) 01:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool!! Thank you for sharing that - and for sending me that other image. I have kept it! Missvain (talk) 02:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Tagooty (talk) 03:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your working to all things. 칼빈500 (talk) 12:45, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision deletion[edit]

Hi! I've fixed a typo in my File:WHATWG DOM.png. Please «delete» i.e. hide the old version. --Максим Пе (talk) 16:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC) @Missvain: --Максим Пе (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Максим Пе - The old version you uploaded on August 15 has been superseded by the version you uploaded later that day. Therefore, there is nothing to "delete" or "hide." Missvain (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

German standard varieties.png[edit]

Hello Missvain, I'm sorry about this, could I request that the following map is deleted File:German standard varieties.png [4], this is yet another duplicate of the original Postmann Michael map, it appears multiple copies were created, and in the description it says this copy is just a "retouched picture" of the original map created by Postmann Michael, who got banned for showing sympathies towards National Socialism (link). --E-960 (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whose file is this originally E-960? I don't want to proceed until that is clarified since it looks like a few cooks (and a bot?) were in the kitchen for this. If you are indeed not, it might be ideal to go through DR. Missvain (talk) 20:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should have mentioned I set up the DR here [5], at this point its been up for the minimum of seven days. --E-960 (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file was set up by user Zoris Trömm~commonswiki (who was notified of the deletion request), it's an exact duplicate of the deleted Verbreitungsgebiet_der_deutschen_Sprache.PNG map by user Postmann Michael (cites it as source, and is the exact same file under a different name). The only difference is that it has an English language title and is a "retouched picture" (as stated in the description). I would have grouped it with the original deletion request, however it was in some other category and I just overlooked it. Since then, if you recall I found several versions/duplicates of the Postmann Michael map scattered through various categories on WikiCommons. Also, this was noted by User:Piotrus, who commented on this an other maps. Postmann Michael's maps (and the prolific clones of his maps) are a problematic case due to the fact the a large number of them were already deleted over time due to accuracy issues, and the fact that Postmann Michael's account was blocked due to some questionable view regarding Nazism quote: "POV from doubtful sources and trivializing National Socialism." - which is a very serious charge. --E-960 (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the original Verbreitungsgebiet_der_deutschen_Sprache.PNG:, was open to discussion for over a month, and no one provided reliable sources to confirm the accuracy of that map. Again, my apologies for the confusion, since German standard varieties.png is the exact same image under a English file name, I should have included in in the same deletion request (and it would have been less irritating), I just overlooked it. --E-960 (talk) 06:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks E-960, all I needed was the DR. I'd also appreciate if folks would only ping me about speedy deletions. When I have personal capacity, I will go to review DRs, but, sometimes I don't, and I don't want to give any (except those that qualify for speedy) special privilege over others. Yes, there are many that last longer than seven days, but, most aren't urgent. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmation about your Carmel, Indiana photos[edit]

Hi Sarah, I'm Ryota Yashima a.k.a. Yassie (talk), who usually writes articles about U.S. cities onto Japanese Wikipedia.

I'd like to confirm one thing; Are these photos of Kawachinagano Japanese Garden, just to the south of Carmel City Hall in Carmel, Indiana?

Thanks in advance! Yassie (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yassie - No, these are at my friend Jaime's mother's house. It's a private residence. Missvain (talk) 20:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thanks! Yassie (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmed Rushdi playback singer 1954.jpg and File:Actor Waheed Murad 1959.jpg[edit]

Just reporting this as sock Ips of a blocked master sock are continuously attacking these files.Is there anything we can do? Regards.-Paytime (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circus Circus Midway - 4842735783.jpg[edit]

File:Circus Circus Midway - 4842735783.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mysteryman blue 06:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden as a child playing baseball.jpg[edit]

File:Joe Biden as a child playing baseball.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Windows 95 Version 4.00.1111 command.com MS-DOS Prompt 492x259.png[edit]

Hi. I happened upon this image and was kinda puzzled by your decision to not delete it. The argument for keeping it was to simply paste the text of an inapplicable template. Simple shapes and letters are not subject to copyright. But this text clearly passes a threshold of originality. If two people came to you, showed you a blue triangle, and both said "I created this", they might both be telling the truth - it simply isn't a creative work. But if two people both came to you with the text in this image and said, "I wrote this", one of them must be lying because they wouldn't independently come up with it. It's not exactly on point, but in a recent Supreme Court case w:Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., Google was found not to be infringing on Oracle's API patent because of fair use. But nobody anywhere questioned that the APIs are copyrighted. That would be the same case here - reprinting this manual is certainly "fair use", but we don't do that on Commons. --B (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello B - If you disagree with my rationale then I encourage you to renominate the image. No big deal to me and we'll let another admin review it for deletion. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 15:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden visits Honduras (2012-03-06) 01.jpg[edit]

File:Joe Biden visits Honduras (2012-03-06) 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The image behind Biden is copyrighted either blur it out or delete this file.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FJB-aka-LGB.

And also:

File:Joe Biden visits China, August 2011 05.jpg ( Nominator : FJB-aka-LGB | Reason : The background wallpaper is not a work of the USGov )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Biden visits China, December 2013 03.jpg[edit]

File:Joe Biden visits China, December 2013 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The background is not an work of USGov employee thus copyvio. Ask CCP for VTRS.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FJB-aka-LGB.

And also:

File:Joe Biden visits China, August 2011 10.jpg ( Nominator : FJB-aka-LGB | Reason : The background is not an work of USGov employee thus copyvio. Ask CCP for VTRS. )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

South African copyright[edit]

I see you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bloukrans Bridge-001.jpg. Did you get any clarity on how local copyright law handles structures? A bridge is hardly a building, thus not an artistic work by the legal definition, and thus seems not covered by copyright. No clause was cited that would include structures, and you did not comment the issue when closing the request. Was the deletion due to an oversight caused by excessive workload? –LPfi (talk) 09:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

LPfi - Wow, that was in April and the comment about "excessive workload" is a bit trollish. Especially as one of the few people (literally like three of us) on this platform that handle deletions. Yes, the less than a handful of people who handle deletion requests make mistakes. And usually folks kindly ask us to undelete and we do.

Anyway, are you asking me to undelete the deletion? Please let me know. I see that other images exist of the bridge on Commons and I assume that the FOP argument is irrelevant at this point. I'm happy to do it for you. Missvain (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and sorry if I expressed myself badly – I sincerely understand that you don't have time to read every request discussion thoroughly.

I see no reason to keep the file deleted, and if neither you do, then yes, please undelete it. I did not ask directly as I did not know whether there was some reason for deletion not obvious from your note.

–LPfi (talk) 17:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please undelete the file. –LPfi (talk) 17:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commons logo mosaic 19x35.jpg[edit]

I could just replace the few FAL-licensed files in there, but on a closer look I fail to verify the incompatibility: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/ShareAlike_compatibility:_FAL What am I missing?--Reseletti (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pinging User:Ralf Roletschek since they originally nominated it. Missvain (talk) 16:26, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He “retired”... :-( --Reseletti (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Commons logo mosaic 19x35.jpg--Reseletti (talk) 20:25, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Bummer. Good research in that Undeletion request post - you're on it! I'm not as educated about the FAL situation as others may be. So we're both learning here! Missvain (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skunk Train Video - Aug 2018 - Stierch - A.ogv[edit]

File:Skunk Train Video - Aug 2018 - Stierch - A.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

tbo47 (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish banknotes[edit]

I see you deleted a bunch of Finnish banknotes per nomination in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Banknotes of Finland. The nomination rationale was "Per COM:CUR Finland, currencies of Finland are copyrighted." That is a grave misinterpretation of the situation by A1Cafel who got editing restrictions in August because of sloppy deletion requests.

The linked page says, among other things:

[The design is part of an official decision] "Thus the images on markka banknotes and coins should be in the public domain"

The Bank of Finland does claim copyright on Finnish (i.e. markka) banknotes, but the legal ground seems shaky, to say the least. For the coins there is a statement from a legal body that seems to acknowledge their PD nature. I suppose the situation is similar for the markka banknotes, but IANAL.

I think we should not delete any of the banknote images, at least not without categorising the deletion requests so that we can resurrect them when we get clarity on the legal situation.

So, please undelete these.

–LPfi (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Debbie Stabenow quote about 2020 United States presidential election Electoral College count.png[edit]

File:Debbie Stabenow quote about 2020 United States presidential election Electoral College count.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

‑‑ Kays (T | C) 21:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Georgia.svg[edit]

Hello! Why did you delete that file?--გიო ოქრო (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC) Hi გიო ოქრო! Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It appears the image was deleted in my closure process regarding a redirect. I have restored it. My apologies! Missvain (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--გიო ოქრო (talk) 19:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:YunDiLi.png[edit]

Hi Missvain. Thanks for closing this DR and could you delete File:YunDiLi.png as well? Thanks. --Wcam (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wcam - Oops, sorry about that!

Done! Missvain (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler photographs[edit]

Dear Missvain, Of course I respect your decision about the Hitler photographs (and I am glad that a decision was made, even if don't agree with the outcome -so thanks for that.) I also like the fact that we now know that this famous Hitler photograph was most likely made by Heinrich Hoffmann (see Bayerische Staatsbibliothek). I am sure that copyright of all Nazi publications and photographs was taken over by the allied forces after the war, and to my knowledge never returned to the original owners. See also EN-Wiki and refs. Copyright of Mein Kampf is a different story (though interesting): Mein Kampf. Copyright of the Dutch translation was seized by the Dutch government. I am not going to dispute your decision about these photographs or ask for undeletion at this moment, but could you please mark all deleted images containing that photo as Category:Undelete in 2028, as Hoffmann died in 1957? Vysotsky (talk) 20:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vysotsky - Can you please link me to the deletion discussion or what page needs to be given this category? I've never been asked to do this before, so I assume it's not required to have an admin do. Feel free to take any deletion requests to Commons:Undeletion requests, of course (I won't participate in the discussion). Thanks. Missvain (talk) 21:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoffmann 1, Hoffmann 2, Hoffmann 3. Thanks! Vysotsky (talk) 22:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Looks like any editor, regardless of administer or not can do this. So, just future note - please be bold and perhaps consider adding the appropriate categorizes in the future. It looks like it was already done per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mein Kampf. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 22:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I would have loved to do it, but how do I add categories to files that are deleted and not visible anymore? Vysotsky (talk) 23:06, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vysotsky - You just add it to the deletion discussion page. Per Category:Undelete in 2028: "You must either categorise the file's deletion request page in the usual way (as a deleted file will not show up in the category), or add the name of the file directly to the category page." - The deletion request was already tagged. :) Missvain (talk) 23:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx! Vysotsky (talk) 23:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hrbaptista specifically: File:Placa prêmio Marta Rossetti Batista.jpg and File:Marta traço.jpg[edit]

Hi, saw the notice to delete and answered user User: IronGargoyle on Dec, 5th 2021 stating that the files were following the guidelines and there was no answer. The next thing I notice is that the files were deleted anyway.

For your convenience: the answer (originally in User talk:Hrbaptista):

Hi,

The files File:Placa prêmio Marta Rossetti Batista.jpg and File:Placa prêmio Marta Rossetti Batista.jpg are pictures of my own work of art. The drawing of the second (that is also appearing in the first) were done by me. I am the depicted son and only heir, therefore being the only one capable of authorizing the usage of my mother's image.

The File:Prêmio Jabuti 2007.jpg file is a depiction of the prize awarded to my mother (now in my possession). According to the article 48 of the Authorship Law in Brasil, the depiction of public statues (such as prizes) is allowed without prior authorization, provided that it is for informational purposes and that it does not produce financial benefits. The photo was taken by me, so the author of the picture is also in agreement with its publication in this page.

Cheers,

HB Hrbaptista (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

I don't know if it is customary to ignore a reply but it is not nice. Since you deleted the files (instead of IronGargoyle) I ask you to please respond to it.

Cheers.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Internet Archive document cranberriesnatio6668port[edit]

I think you've made a mistake in closing this.

The PDF per the comment in the thread did have copyright notices in the scans for 4 issues. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It clearly isn't PD-US Gov work obviously, and the other issues earlier in the file are possibly no-notice (hence the license was updated from PD-US-Gov which was clearly incorrect.)

I renominated the PDF only on the basis of the comment about the 4 issues, only for someone to fail to seemingly not consider that the license tag might be in error, Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Cranberries;_-_the_national_cranberry_magazine_(IA_cranberriesnatio6668port).pdf (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 - No problem. As my closure suggests - feel free to renominate! You already did and I'll defer to another reviewer to close. Cheers and happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 22:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should be restored[edit]

Hi, I think you made a mistake by deleting File:98.9 WOKO logo.png, File:Q Country 102.9 logo.png and File:97.9 The Moose logo.png. The discussions of these files are more to keep them and was used inter wikis. Also you mention in the discussion "per keeps" and that the files can be renominated. You should restore them now. Thank you.--2605:B100:518:66AD:EC2A:4587:873F:592C 21:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did! My sincerest apologies - it was an accident. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Cheers and happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 22:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hoffman[edit]

Mind having a second look here? DS (talk) 18:43, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And here ? DS (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AtaturkSaglikRaporu.png[edit]

Hello Missvain. I am Justinianus, from Turkey. We saw a request recently, on that page. According to this request, this file was deleted because it was not an own work. But this work is public domain in Turkey because it was first published before +70 years. It was proofread at that page on trwikisource. According to Turkish laws, the works before published +70 years are PD. Also Template:PD-text can be considered as appropriate for this work. That would be great if we had a chance to reinstate this work. I'm looking forward for your response. Best regards, Justinianus (talk) 20:22, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Justinianus - I undeleted it. The concerns presented by the nominator were legit. As you'll see on the image page, it's incorrectly licensed and incorrectly claimed as "own work." So, hopefully someone can update it accordingly. If not, it could be nominated again due to these misunderstandings. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we just need to find the original source of that work. Then we can update the info. Thanks for your help. Justinianus (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding to the deletion without reason[edit]

Please can you name the reason for deletion? In the moment in the german article Deckfarbkasten there is now a picture placed that there is no picture for this question to find. The Deckfarbasten is pedagoical tool for pupils, so the picture was for a long time in usage as an simple pedagoical example, to see which problems with such colors of such "Deckfarbkasten" exists. Can you please look in the german Wikipedia and can you please fix the problem, which have made by the erase. The erase qeustion of yawn was a copyright question, which was not given. Yawn thougt it would be painted by another person not be the uploader. This is readable. However. Look thereː https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deckfarbkasten and Thereː https://nds.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuschkasten Please give a precies reason for this ersase. On the rules of erase is also to read that a picture could only erased if it is not used in a language version of a wikipedia article or it could be placed by another picture of it in such language version. It could be another case, if this picture would not used such a long time in the German wikipedia for a "pedagogical" article. But it was used. However. Maybe you have not really read the entire text and looked on the usage in the wikipedia. ;-) Please the reason would be interesting, is it again the "confirmation by email"? which was the reason for delete request, which was not given. If, "yes" how I have written on the discussion page or you may write me what a confermation should be useful in this case. Thank you. --Sönke Rahn (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC) If you have questions to unterstand the problem. You may ask me. I have placed the problem there also againː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:A_Copy_of_Van_Gogh%27s_Terrace_of_the_caf%C3%A9_on_the_Place_du_Forum_in_Arles_in_the_evening,_A_Watercolor_ink_painting_of_Soenke_Rahn_(schooldays_in_the_80s).JPG friendly greetings --Sönke Rahn (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sönke Rahn - I understand how frustrating it can be to have a file deleted. Including those you have created, it has happened to me before. However, I agree with User:Yann that permissions is a good idea - hence "per nomination" (honestly, on Commons, we get people claiming things are their own all the time - sometimes they are, sometimes they aren't). It's all in good faith. If you disagree, like my comment says when closing it out, you are welcome to request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests or send in COM:VRT and if accepted they will undelete it. Again, this is all in good faith for the sake of the project and respecting copyright, creativity, and education. Happy holidays. Missvain (talk) 23:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, maybe you have not understand it completly. I have made the picture (photo) of a painting I have painted. It is in usage in a pedagogical topic. It may be funny. Yes I got the best grade in the 1980s for this picture. But however, it was not a masterpiece. How should I prove it, that I have painted it. The picture lays on my mother's cupboard. I could make more pictures of it ??? May be a picture with an acutual newspaper. Should I signature it again under the picture? A signature is above to see. But, surely I will not change something on the picture because it's also an relict of my schooldays, a memory. Ok, however which informations would be important by such e-mail? I have never made such processs, because I placed never something which is not my own on the wikipedia, and in this case it is also mine. Sorry, this case is a little bit strange for me, I suppose you can undertand my view. ;-) --Sönke Rahn (talk) 00:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, you can either send permissions to COM:VRT or you can request it to be undeleted at Commons:Undeletion requests. Both pages have directions to walk you through it. Missvain (talk) 00:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will request you maybe again. Because, I am not sure. But, if I read it right, on the VRT-Page I can only ask under permissions-commons@wikimedia.org what they want in such case, because in gerneral the VRT-Page ask for permission if somebody will upload something, which is not his own. I will write that this picture was painted by me and ask what they want. Thanks first, for this answer. --Sönke Rahn (talk) 00:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Joan Gené[edit]

Of the fifteen files here, you left one undeleted (File:L'Enigma Iber - Barkeno, capital dels laietans?.jpg) when closing the discussion. Was this deliberate based on its content, or an oversight? The file page still has a deletion template on it. Thanks. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Belbury It was unintentional. I would have stayed in my closure statement if it wasn't. Sometimes the tool that I use overlooks things, it's rare, but it happens. I'll delete it. Missvain (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hasty blocks and noms closed "for disruptive and offensive behavior"[edit]

Hello,

I see that you have blocked some of the IPs that I used in the past month to nominate some files for deletion, based on this discussion and the block of IP 223.255.225.69. I know that given that you are blocking my IPs for three months I should not intervene, but there is a mistake, so please let me explain.

The blocks are an error, since I am not the same as IP 223.255.225.69 (the IP location is completely different), who obviously copied the rationale from my early nominations. After I was advised to change the language of my nominations by Achim on 2 November, I changed the language accordingly, not nominating any other file for being a "child drawing". I also apologized and explained the reason of my nominations.

Therefore, I think that the block of my IPs and the automatic closing of all the nominations I made as "keepings", regardless of the rationale and votes, are mistakes detrimental to the quality of the website. Most of the nominations are of low quality files, duplicates, or inventions of users.--37.162.73.24 19:50, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yann was the original admin who blocked your IP for 3 months. Then you stated that even during your block you would evade the block by using other IPs. I appreciate your apology, but, I also think it's inappropriate that you're intentionally evading block, and still nominating content in the same subject area for deletion. I'm also very confused - it sounds like you are denyign you are the user who was blocked for inappropriate behavior, but then you're saying you're the same person. I'm pinging Yann because if they think it's inappropriate that I blocked you (Again, evading and what is noted Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_87#IP_37.160.0.91_–_COM:CIVIL_and_UCoC_violations here) for the appropriate three months, then I"m happy to unblock, but, I find it appropriate to block. It remains disruptive for the time being to evade blocking by still nominating content for deletion. Missvain (talk) 20:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My blocked IPs are those which begin by number 37 (the first noms were made with [6]) and they were all blocked by you Missvain ([7], [8], [9], [10]). The IP blocked by Yann (223.255.225.69 who edited in September) was not me, but in November he copied and pasted the rationale from one of my earliest November noms, after I had already agreed with Achim and others that my language was too harsh. This message and the former one are the only edits that I have made since you began to block my IPs on 14 December -- I have saved the links of the IPs and noms, this is why I noticed the blocks --, and I will not edit further until the misunderstanding will be clarified or the blocks confirmed.--37.162.44.91 20:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Holy Resurrection Melkite Catholic Church (Columbus, Ohio) - iconostasis, Madonna & Christ icon.JPG[edit]

Hi, You closed the DR as Kept, but you deleted the file. See also

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Holy Resurrection Melkite Catholic Church (Columbus, Ohio) - iconostasis, St. John the Baptist.JPG

Regards, Yann (talk) 17:15, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Oops - fixed. Thanks! Did you also see above? It sounds so fishy.... Missvain (talk) 17:28, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive me[edit]

As I had all the info to restore Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albert Christophle par Jean Nicolas Truchelut.jpg as part of other restorations, I over rode your deletion and restored the file. Please forgive my over-reach in this case, I won't make a habit of it! Merry Christmas and all Holidays to you and yours! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding a request-[edit]

In my last comment here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:RM_band_recruits.jpg I asked Dvader2 about writing a request for a replacement photograph. That included asking where that request could go. Considering that they have not answered, what do you think? --Dreddmoto (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As my closing comment states: "We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved." If they can get permissions from the copyright holder to have this image freely licensed to be housed here, then we can undelete. But, at this point, I do not feel comfortable keeping the image on Commons any longer. It's been a month. Missvain (talk) 19:12, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missvain I appreciate your reply but, that's not really what I was asking about.

Perhaps the best thing to do will be to write a request somewhere for a new photograph to replace the one that was deleted. Where do you think that request should be written? --Dreddmoto (talk) 22:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

	Merry Christmas Missvain
	Hi Missvain, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very happy and healthy New Year, Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia, –Davey2010^Talk 19:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply] Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

About your notice to me on completed deletion requests[edit]

Hello Missvain! You've written here: "Next time, please be sure to post a deletion template on the file page. I noticed you haven't on any of these nominations." Recently, I've made new nomination of one TimedText file. And as usual, it was done via Nominate to delete button from the left collumn of Tools on Wikimedia Commons. You could see the deletion nomination code template on the TimedText, even if it's not rendering as usual on other namespaces. Would you mind to explain what exactly I need to post on the file page and which one? Thanks a lot in advance! Pacha Tchernof (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pacha Tchernof - Yes, please use this template and also be sure to let make sure the original file uploader knows their file is up for deletion. Thanks! Not sure why it the nomination tool isn't putting it on the file page! Missvain (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain, thanks for the details! Probably, once or twice I used {{tl|Speedydelete}} template by myself and this could be the reason why the uploader wasn't notified about the nomination. I'll fix it in my further manually made nominations! Thanks a lot for pointing me it out! Just to confirm on the example of the mentionned nomination above, Nominate to delete button do notify the uploader of the original file about the nomination automatically. Please have exceptionally great holydays! All the best, Pacha Tchernof (talk) 11:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: the deletion of my file[edit]

Hi, you recently deleted one of my uploads. I am sure that you did so for the correct and proper reason but I am still stumped on what the actual policy reason was. You described it as a "personal image". But I cannot find any reference to personal images in the deletion policy or the scope. My understanding of the scope was that anything that was "realistically useful for an educational purpose" was allowed, which I think my image was for the reasons I stated in the discussion. Furthermore, I cannot see how it is a personal image other that it is of a world of my own design which is necessary for any fantasy map uploaded to Wikimedia Commons or otherwise it would be a copyright violation.

I would be happy if you could clarify this to me, especially as I do not see how I can responsibly contribute to Wikimedia Commons if I do not understand what content is permitted. ~ El D. (talk to me) 00:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@El komodos drago - What file was it? Thanks. Missvain (talk) 17:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Gaia.jpg. The discussion is at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Map_of_Gaia.jpg#File:Map_of_Gaia.jpg. It's just my experience of content uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and the standards that have been applied to my art work seem to differ substantially which has left me confused as to what is permitted. ~ El D. (talk to me) 17:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

El komodos drago - The case presented by User:Enyavar is why - the quality of the image, another fantasy map. Don't take it personally. We really don't want folks uploading personal images - graphics, artwork, maps - especially for non-existent places or places/things that are not notable. Also, take a look at COMMONS:SCOPE for a general overview. Thanks and I hope you'll find other ways to contribute to the project! Missvain (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see how this is a personal image besides the fact that I made it. If the uploader making an image being the creator is a problem then as I have said it would be impossible to legally upload any fantasy maps. I know its no modern day Da Vinci but I didn't know that's what Commons required - all I understood was not too low res, and not blurry (it was neither, it was made with a high quality scanner).

I have come to hate contributing to Wikimedia projects. I have been repeatedly insulted, and I find that 50% of edits are reverted. I have found the community utterly unsupportive and frankly I regret ever starting to contribute. I think that this may well be the straw that broke the camel's back and finally persuaded me that it isn't worth contributing. For that I thank you, it has been a demotivating waste of time and I will probably be happier when I get to call it quits. ~ El D. (talk to me) 21:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about FOP outside USA and the year of dead of the artist[edit]

Dear Missvain, on Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Murals by Arturo García Bustos you wrote that despite "interior murals are covered by WP:FOP" (of Mexico? the link is red) the pictures should though be removed because "these artworks are NOT public domain in the United States yet due to the painter's death". I do not understand. There are thousands of pictures of sculptures and other artworks in Commons covered by FOP in the countries the pictures were taken, but of whom the artists are not dead or not dead for at least 70 years. I always thought that if FOP applies to artworks in the home country, it is OK to publish photos of them in Commons, no matter of copyrights in the USA. Can you inform me? --JopkeB (talk) 04:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I process hundreds of deletion requests each week and sometimes have errors or make the occasional mis-evaluation. However, this seems like a weird case and I'm of the "Better to be safe than sorry school." The link should go to COM:FOP - I also edit Wikipedia so I made an error linking to a non-existent WP:FOP link, sorry. I fixed it. Anyway, I believe that the files you nominated are of concern and should not be housed on Commons at this time unless the uploader wants to provide VRT. Missvain (talk) 17:10, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ofcoarse you make occsional mis-avaluations, that is only human. I do not blame you. You do a lot of good work here. I am glad that FOP outside the USA is not limited by USA copyright law. And I agree with you that the nominated files should be deleted as long as there is no VRT ticket, or (my addition) untill there is proof that FOP Mexico indeed also applies to to interiors of museums and palaces, that they indeed are considered to be public places. --JopkeB (talk) 12:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiki Loves Monuments Philippines Kick Off Event.jpg[edit]

Hello. Was that file supposed to be deleted as per your closure of Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Sunkissedguy#Files of User:Sunkissedguy 2 or was that just an oversight? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JWilz12345 - Just an oversight. I closed a lot of nomination today so no surprise I missed one! Thanks. Missvain (talk) 03:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dhondutai Kulkarni images[edit]

You closed this discussion and deleted File:Dhondutai Kulkarni.jpg, but not File:Dhondutai Kulkarni.png. Is the latter a different conclusion than the other? Fourthords | =Λ= | 07:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, @Fourthords - I just missed it in the nomination. Sometimes when people nominate files after they already nominated their initial file it can get lost in the clutter. In the future, you can help reviewers (which lately seems like I am the only one) by using bullet points to list the files for nomination. Thank you. Sorry for the oversight. I have deleted it. Missvain (talk) 15:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10-4, I'll try to call more attention to such in the future. Thanks! Fourthords | =Λ= | 17:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:L’Aclot.pdf[edit]

Hello Missvain, you have accidentally deleted this file, still used on wa.wikisource : s:wa:Indek:L’Aclot.pdf. Could you please restore it? Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Reptilien.19831209BE1 - My sincere apologies. It has been undeleted. Missvain (talk) 19:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ;-) Reptilien.19831209BE1 (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks & a question[edit]

Hi Missvain, thanks for the good work reviewing the tons of deletion requests!! Also I have a question: I noticed you closed Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vishal rozario as deleted but it appears you only deleted one of the two nominated files. Just wanted to know if that was on purpose, or an oversight. Njd-de (talk) 22:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed! Sorry about that and thanks @Njd-de for bringing it to my attention. THanks for the kind words, too! I really appreciate that (it's not the most pleasant volunteer task, lol!). Missvain (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Micknurit[edit]

Are you able to offer direct assistance to the uploading editor, please. They claim ownership but the OTRS process may bewilder them Timtrent (talk) 22:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Timtrent - Hmmm...Looks like you've already offered it - by contacting COM:VRT. There are instructions there. I'm not a VRTS volunteer anymore, so I can't really assist much more than that... I think it's rather simplified in the instructions. Missvain (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect they would just benefit from simple reassurance by someone who is not me Timtrent (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you know the answer to this[edit]

What about "pictures within a photograph" as far as copyright goes?

If you don't know the answer, perhaps you could point me in the right direction. Thanks, Krok6kola (talk) 20:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Krok6kola - I suggest the "copyrighted photos" in the corner get cropped out. They are notable people - all actresses that have Wikipedia articles. Missvain (talk) 20:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anna Seniuk 3 (33426033562).jpg This request contains the two added files. I'll crop them as you suggest. Thanks. Krok6kola (talk) 22:19, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
These are fixed by the uploader User:Matlin and no longer need deletion. What about File:Agnieszka Cegielska ... (31714832558).jpg? If she is a writer, maybe these are her works? Krok6kola (talk) 23:14, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please just keep it to the nomination pages. If you're concerned about an image, please nominate it for community discussion. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice! Krok6kola (talk) 23:18, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich ich..[edit]

Say. If you ever feel like you want to see my 'very cute' aardvark picture again, you can always look at him right over here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Fni942XKrIIgzX85gQlcjZ3kkYRYgOOg/view?usp=sharing But perhaps I could take better-quality aardvark pictures for my personal animal photographic collection in future!

Downtown Indianapolis category[edit]

Re: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ADowntown_Indianapolis%2C_1904.jpg&type=revision&diff=618048112&oldid=485422462 Meridian Street is 20 miles long, with most of it not being in downtown Indianapolis. Why did you remove the category? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Koavf - I know. I used to work on Meridian Street and my parents owned a building on Meridian Street, in fact. The reason is because Category:Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (Indianapolis) is already categorized on under Meridian Street and Downtown Indianapolis. I don't think there is a need to get redundant when the monument is clearly the focus of the photograph. Missvain (talk) 23:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just removed files that are categorized as Downtown Indianapolis and also Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument. Good thinking. Happy 2022! —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This goat likes your photo[edit]

This photo of glamping is very nice!

— hike395 (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:hike395 - Thank you so much!

Missvain (talk) 19:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heutige deutsche Mundarten.PNG[edit]

Hello Missvain, could I request a close to the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heutige deutsche Mundarten.PN[11]. I set up another formal request to delete, as I found yet another duplicate copy of the highly questionable maps showing the purported distribution of the German language/dialects in central Europe created by Postmann Michael, who if you recall from past cases, was banned for: "01:28, 25. Mai 2006 Elian (Diskussion |Beiträge) blocked Postman Michael contributions for an unlimited period of time (POV from dubious sources, trivialization of National Socialism. Harms Wikipedia.)" (link). --E-960 (talk) 11:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E-960 - Not until the full week is up. Deletion requests must run for seven days unless they qualify for speedy. And blocked users uploads don't qualify for speedy. Please note the post on the top of my talk page - folks need to let requests go for a week for full discussion. I prefer people to let the process proceed accordingly versus pinging me on my talk page to close nominations. Thanks for your understanding. Missvain (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I overlooked that point, sorry about that. --E-960 (talk) 16:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missvain, just a quick follow up on the closure request, as today marks the seven day review period. I'm really concerned about the spread of these questionable maps, especially that the various copies/versions were spread across or moved over various Germany related categories on the Commons. That's why I keep running in to these Postmann Michael maps and was not able to submit a request for all at the same time. --E-960 (talk) 12:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Is there a problem?[edit]

Greetings, please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Frente_escuela_1915.jpg When we nominate for deletion, a notice goes to the uploader. My requests on deletion nominations are not to the administrator, but to the uploader - unless I clearly state "Closing administrator please..." I am a little surprised at the ordering tone in some of the recent closes. We do try to work with the uploaders, it's not just an admin to admin situation. If you are feeling overworked, do step back. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ellin Beltz - No problems here. I'm great. When you review hundreds of deletion request pleasantries get a little old. I often don't think that public domain content needs to be deleted because of lack of information. If it really does appear or really is public domain, I'll often keep it. Feel free to let another admin review it. No skin off my back. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 01:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)The first thing to come to mind: published in 1915 and taken in 1915 are two entirely different things inasfar as establishing its copyright status. Then again, there's tons of content on this site to which that applies. Cheers.RadioKAOS (talk) 02:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With no source, no license, wrong date and no information about where/who - this one needed another review. If the original uploader would only help out, all could be solved. I am a big fan of keeping all the PD images we can, but this particular one is missing too much. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Noah Arvino[edit]

Some files of this DR were not deleted + the uploader did recently upload even more images under false own work claims. You may want to speedy those and warn him. --Denniss (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Denniss - Thanks. Sometimes the mass deletion tool misses a few files. Feel free to speedy nominate or nominate their files for deletion. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 15:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DR[edit]

Hi, I want to point to this: Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020-07-15 Handball, 1. Bundesliga Frauen, Thüringer HC, Teamfotos 1DX 5213 by Stepro.jpg. Ping has not work. Thanks, --Stepro (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closed DR of photographs by Ion Chibzii[edit]

Hello. I noticed you closed Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Ion Chibzii as keep. However, these photos are still tagged with a DR notice at Category:Deletion requests November 2021 on their individual files, like File:"Andreika" (1968). (6085142086).jpg. I was wondering why this was the case. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrLinkinPark333 - Just an error with the mass process tool that admins use to close requests. Looks like it cleaned them all up this time. Missvain (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain: Thanks for looking into this :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Milan B. Popović[edit]

Hello again. Found another one where the file was closed as kept but the script didn't remove the DR. This is for File:Milan B. Popović.jpg which you closed in July 2021 as keep. Thanks! --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MrLinkinPark333 - Darn! Thanks for letting me know - sorry! Deleted! I'll do my best due diligence in the future! Missvain (talk) 00:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Missvain: You're not the only admin I've asked where the script has failed to remove the DR. No worries! :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanya Yanagihara by Sam Levy.jpg[edit]

Hello!

If the copyright owner signed a release and the photo was uploaded and there is also additional verification (see: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/05/books/review/hanya-yanagiharas-a-little-life.html) that he is the copyright holder, is there a way to have this photo restored and used as the photo on the author page? It is the author's official photo.

I am still learning my way around the editing process of Wikipedia, so any insight here would be helpful.

Here is the full entry on the Hanya Yanagihara page:

18:50, 29 December 2021‎ CommonsDelinker talk contribs‎ 9,836 bytes −33‎ Removing Hanya_Yanagihara_by_Sam_Levy.jpg; it has been deleted from Commons by Missvain because: per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanya Yanagihara by Sam Levy.jpg. undo

User:Stellatree - You have to have the copyright holder send a letter to COM:VRTS. Please follow the instructions presented at COM:VRTS. If the permission letter is accepted by the VRTS volunteers, they will undelete it. But, without a letter from the copyright holder (Sam Levy) verifying they released it under a free license it will have to remain deleted. Cheers. Missvain (talk) 03:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much. this is very helpful! Stellatree (talk) 14:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:PL WARSZAWA, Buddy Bears.jpg[edit]

Hi, You closed this DR, but this file is not deleted. Please note that there is a discussion regarding these images at COM:VPC#Copyright of 3D objects in free license pictures, and on UDR. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grizzly Creek Fire Facebook Live Community Meeting - 8.22.20.jpg[edit]

File:Grizzly Creek Fire Facebook Live Community Meeting - 8.22.20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:110 slides - 26225560207.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Felix QW (talk) 12:55, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:French Hill hosts AR teachers on zoom call.jpg[edit]

File:French Hill hosts AR teachers on zoom call.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Qwv (talk) 16:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tacos[edit]

Hi, Thanks for your edits. Note that there are tacos in this photo, top center: File:Rocco's Tacos, E Las Olas Blvd, Fort Lauderdale Florida January 2018 04.jpg Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Enterprise & Voyager.jpg[edit]

File:Enterprise & Voyager.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

C9mVio9JRy (talk) 08:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Krishna tells Gita to Arjuna.jpg[edit]

See above. Hekerui (talk) 09:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agriculture in California[edit]

Hey, it feels like I've been talking about this for ages – I finally started the Commons:Agriculture in Northern California Project with images from the counties around Chico. It's just a start and so many things are missing… However, I've already talked to farmers here and I hope to get access to some processing facilities as well as notifications when harvest starts. Given that you're so close to the wine industry, I just wanted to let you know that this project exists and I'm inviting you to contribute images whenever the occasion arises. Hope all is well, best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Eddy - 2021-11-14 - Sarah Stierch 02.jpg[edit]

File:The Eddy - 2021-11-14 - Sarah Stierch 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ted Stevens portrait unveiling 06.jpg[edit]

File:Ted Stevens portrait unveiling 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ooligan (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indianapolis Zoo - June 2022 - Sarah Stierch 03.jpg[edit]

File:Indianapolis Zoo - June 2022 - Sarah Stierch 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Albert Einstein Memorial - March 2018 - Sarah Stierch 2.jpg

And also:

File:Albert Einstein Memorial - March 2018 - Sarah Stierch.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

excised file from deleted image[edit]

You deleted File:Enterprise & Voyager.jpg in May for being a derivative work. One of the two objects in that photo was cropped to File: Enterprise & Voyager (USS Voyager crop).jpg, which was also deleted for being a derivative work. Shouldn't, too, File:USS Enterprise 1701D.jpg be deleted, as it's just the other copyrighted model in the original photo? Fourthords | =Λ= | 23:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вандалство[edit]

Здравейте!
Считам за вандалство поведението Ви да изтривате снимки, които са лично мое дело и дори дело на моя колекционерска собственост. Т.к. губите времето ми за да Ви пиша изобщо, не губете времето ми да търся как се възстановяват изтритите неправомерно от Вас изображения, и ги възстановете. Моля! Това е списъкът, който по напълно погрешни предположения от Вас е изтрит: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_%D0%98%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B22010 Изключения:
File:Захарно петле.jpg
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Илиев2010 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC) File:Прасковена торта.jpg[reply]
File:Сливокайсия.png Илиев2010 (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salmon fish oil pills.jpg[edit]

File:Salmon fish oil pills.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucky Pop Kettle Corn - December 2023 - Sarah Stierch 02.jpg[edit]

File:Lucky Pop Kettle Corn - December 2023 - Sarah Stierch 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eric ^talk 03:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apple Barn Cider House - October 2023 - Sarah Stierch 03.jpg[edit]

File:Apple Barn Cider House - October 2023 - Sarah Stierch 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:DC Women's March - 32301452862 04.jpg[edit]

File:DC Women's March - 32301452862 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi Sarah, I just noticed that you deleted File:Seinfeld street art (24600324749).jpg and cited it was a copyright violation. I wonder it is a copyvio of the photo itself, or a copyvio of the street art. If it is the latter case, why COM:FOP Colombia cannot be applied here? A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was years ago...I don't remember it...I have no idea at this point. I have been trying to review the deleted file but I'm not able to do so (not sure why). Feel free to request someone to undelete it if you're concerned. I've processed thousands of deletions and I don't remember 99.9% of them after I close them out. (Just being honest) As an admin who reviews deletions, its the job of the nominators to raise the case, not my job to sit around and research FOP all day long. So, if it isn't presented to me...I'm going with what I know and what the case presented it, and whatever is safest and most ethical for Commons. Missvain (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: it was this Flickr photo, which is derivative of two copyrighted photos (head shot of Jerry Seinfeld and body shot of John Lennon). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Margaritaville Resort Gatlinburg - October 2023 - Sarah Stierch 02.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gatlinburg Welcome Center - October 2023 - Sarah Stierch 04.jpg[edit]

File:Gatlinburg Welcome Center - October 2023 - Sarah Stierch 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Template:Idw/lang

A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pacific Community Charter School - April 2023 - Sarah Stierch 01.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Nam June Paik - SF MOMA - 2021-09-17 - Sarah Stierch.jpg

Yours sincerely, Adeletron 3030 ([[User talk:Adeletron 3030|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amtrak_Cardinal_in_Indianapolis_-_June_2022_-_Sarah_Stierch_03.jpg[edit]

Hello. I was curious if you know in which direction we're looking in this photo?

File:Amtrak_Cardinal_in_Indianapolis_-_June_2022_-_Sarah_Stierch_03.jpg

I always have a hard time orienting myself when we're looking at photos of this place, particularly under the shed as it's obviously been majorly reconfigured. I feel like we're looking directly west and the wall on the left is what separates us from the thru-tracks for the freight lines? 2601:405:4601:1980:4452:391B:76AE:9106 08:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]