User talk:Mikael Häggström/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page.

Welcome note

Welcome to the Commons, Mikael Häggström/Archive 1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image Tagging Image:Simple vestibulo-ocular reflex.PNG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Simple vestibulo-ocular reflex.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I hope the current description is acceptable. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Ongoing conflicts

Your most recent Ongoing conflicts map has an error. It has the Ogaden (eastern Ethiopia) in red and S. Somalia in orange, where the situation should really be reversed. The conflict with the ONLF is very sporadic, and even during the most intense recent flare-ups, it hasn't been more major than the ongoing conflict in Somalia. I suggest you change the colors.

Yom 17:43, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, a terrible error. I'll fix it right away. Mikael Häggström 12:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
On second thought, I think it's discussable. The map is consistent with what the article itself says, and thus it is rather the article that might have an error. I personally may agree to what you say, but I still recommend you to present the issue at the w:ongoing conflicts talk page in order to get consensus from other contributors to the article as well. Mikael Häggström 12:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey, the conflict in the north caucasus, the second chechen war became missing on your new map. I added it if you don't mind. Cheers Pietervhuis 21:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Mikael Häggström 06:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Wszystkich swietych cmentarz.jpg

Where did you find it? This is another version of my old and not very good photo :) If you load photos - write who their autor is. Przykuta 12:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, if I remember right I found it while reading perhaps the w:All Saints article. I optimized it, but wanted to ask (I guess you) the original creator before replacing the old one, so I gave it a new name until then. Then I must have found interest somewhere else on Wikipedia, since I forgot to ask you, and wrote the wrong image as a source. I'm sorry for that. Anyway, do you think it would be okay to replace Image:Wszystkich swietych cmentarz.jpg with this one? You may still be the official author or it. Mikael Häggström 08:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Ongoing conflicts

Thanks for your work on this map. I've cataloged updates that need to be made to it at w:Talk:List of ongoing conflicts. Any help you could give would be appreciated, since you seem to have the necessary expertise. Thanks! -- Beland (talk) 17:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll see if I can help. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Please link images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Mikael Häggström/Archive 1!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 23:01, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification! The thought of looking into it has begun to speculate about a possibility of crossing my mind. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Image:Symptoms of AIDS .svg

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Just delete that one, please. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Serotonin (5-HT).svg

Hi Mikael, I undid your changes to the image mentioned above. The reason is that the image is used in several projects and is intentionally drawn without numbering. If you would like a numbered version of the image please upload it with a different name. Regards, --NEUROtiker ⇌ 20:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'lll upload it under a new name. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Japon-1886-32.jpg

I made a reply at my talk page to your comment. Esby (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

made a comment. Esby (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

The Photographer

Thank you for your detective work! As far as I remember, the man was indeed walking away. But I wouldn't trust very much the analysis of the tones of gray because most of them (the horizontal stripes) are scanning artifacts. The strongest evidence is, for me, the size of the shadow made by the left foot. It is easy to see that it would be much smaller if the man were approaching. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Indeed! Or perhaps (but unlikely) he actually was approaching and was taking a step forward with that left leg. This could be a good plot in the next Dan Brown book! Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Bacterial infections image

Superb! Thank you. TimVickers (talk) 20:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for appreciation! It still needs some further modification, though, before it can be fully useful. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Kathmandy from Monkey Temple.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:55, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Please remove it. There was a spelling error in the name. Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:04, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for transparenting!

Thanks for making File:Upper body front.png transparent! Sure looks better in svg files. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. Your body will be soon on french wikipedia, on the chocolate article. As soon i will have a little time to do the job. ---Strogoff- (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Good to know that France too will get know the benefits of chocolate (if they didn't already know)! Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:10, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipetan image

Would you be able to make an SVG version of the Angry Wikipetan image without a caption? I have uploaded one onto Commons recently but it is PNG. I am too new with Inkscape to be able to figure out how to modify your WikiLove picture to remove the text and resize properly. I could do it on Adobe Illustrator but I dont have access to that here. Thanks. Soap (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, that Wikipe-tan in the svg-image is still in png-format. It is just embedded in the file, still raster. However, I gave your version transparent background. It will make it easier to use in Inkscape as well. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Beggars at Drepung Monastery.png

Hi Mikael Häggström,
are these people really beggars? To me they don't look like; but I've never been over there. --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

They acted like beggars to me, asking for money, but perhaps it is indeed not what they mainly do for life. I agree they don't look very beggar-like compared to in many western cultures, but perhaps it is a reflection of a sense of dignity in all Tibetans, no matter if they are rich or poor. But I'm not an expert on Tibetan culture myself, so perhaps advice should be sought from somebody around here who knows more about it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Point mutations.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Just delete it. It's a duplicate, as I tagged it. Mikael Häggström 19:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

References for human development chart

Where does the chart on human development come from? Or is this your own work and you are a recognized researcher on this top that has has work published in scholarly journals?

If you mean File:Child development stages.svg, information is taken from the articles for each period, and references, when present, are also found there. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:45, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Missing city name

Wszystkich swietych cmentarz .jpg--WlaKom (talk) 10:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Please ask the uploader of the original picture: File:Wszystkich swietych cmentarz.jpg. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!

Your photosynthesis/respiration cycle composite image is wonderful! Very clever of you Sir! Congrats also for choosing a sharealike copyleft license. :) 193.166.138.118 12:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad you like it! I wish more creators out there would share their works as freely as in Wikimedia projects. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Typo

It says Presenation instead of Presentation on your main page.

Gee, thanks. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Hej

Kan du hjælpe mig? File talk:Worldmap digital television transition.svg. Mike Halterman (talk) 08:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but it's not my field of expertise. I watch YouTube, not TV. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:51, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Blood labs image

Just wanted to let you know that at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blood_values_sorted_by_mass_and_molar_concentration.png the image's infobox has two "is" on the second line. It's brillinat though.

Thanks for notification! It's fixed now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:25, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

I second the "brilliant" comment! 128.40.255.6 09:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks =-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

General Question

Hello, SO if your Monocyte is 12H that means? A sign of flu? An elevated INR would mean? Also would the Prothtombn Time have anything to do with this. 12.3H? What would these counts mean?

Frankly, I don't know what the H in 12H of monocytes stands for. Probably, either a factor for the number, or hours after something, but I can't say what the 12 means if I don't know the units. INR is a standardized way to express the prothrombin time. en:Prothrombin time#Interpretation gives some information, but if you want any specific interpretation of any test result, then I suggest you contact a health care provider of yours. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Incorrect conversion to imperial system

183 cm = 72"

Så det så! :) Gabbe (talk) 13:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing the error! It's corrected now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

re:Hematopoiesis in svg-format

Hello Mikael, I am sorry, but I have no time for this, but everyone else can do this now, I deleted the description layer and uploaded it without any description as File:Hematopoiesis (human) diagram.svg so it can now be used in any language. Best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 13:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'm sure there's someone who's willing to fill it with the English names. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Sodium inconsistent in blood values image?

Looking at the excellent graph of concentrations, I noticed that Na was not consistent between weight and molar scales. I think the molar is the correct one -- but not sure

I had a look at it and found no obvious error. It's consistent with what's given in the tables below. Sodium (Na) belongs, however, to the substances with the least molar mass in the blood, and is expected to be found much more to the left in the mass scale. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
I had a look again, and, indeed, they were incorrect. It's fixed now. Thank you! Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Steroidogenesis.svg

That's a great diagram! Could you only please move the word pregnenolone so that it doesn't run over the structural formula? Thanks a lot. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem. I've requested an update to it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:35, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Now that File:Steroidogenesis.svg seems to have been fixed, do you still need File:Steroidogenesis with moved pregnenolone.svg or may I just delete it? —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 20:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Steroidogenesis with moved pregnenolone.svg does not fill any function now, so feel free to delete it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Spironolactone bodies.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't see anything strange there now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Epidermal layers.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the notifications, Nikbot! Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Your Credentials Please validate your knoldge of the fields or have a wiki page explianing your self

Please validate your knowledge of the fields or have a wiki page explaining your self

There is no credential policy in Wikipedia, but you can check my records on my homepage. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:45, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Template:Brain_-_all_versions

Template:Brain_-_all_versions has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 11:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Very well. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

File:UserMikael_Häggström.png

File:UserMikael_Häggström.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

– Adrignola talk 00:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

By all means. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fukushima I by Digital Globe 2 cropped.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fukushima I by Digital Globe 2 cropped.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fukushima I by Digital Globe 2 cropped.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

–Tryphon☂ 12:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

I did not upload the image, but merely modified it, believing the cc-by-sa-3.0 license stated on the page was justified. If it appears not to be, I can only agree with deletion of the image. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Fukushima_I_by_Digital_Globe_2.jpg

File:Fukushima_I_by_Digital_Globe_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chaser (talk) 04:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Very well. See previous section. Mikael Häggström (talk) 04:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated

File:Woman wearing purple bra and panties set - transparent.png

Can you please specify the exact path to the flickr-image? Thanks. -- RE rillke questions? 13:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

It's in the source-section. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:01, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks -- RE rillke questions? 14:13, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you too for keeping an eye on new uploads. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Relations of the aorta, trachea, esophagus and other heart structures.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

It's fixed now. Thanks for the notification :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

About File:Naked_human_male_body_front_anterior.png (guess it's not the first !)

I added this comment in the "discussion" section : « Isn't it absurd to have a picture of a man with a completely shaved pubic region (and completely shaved body altogether) on an encyclopedic page, and even more absurd to have below the same picture with « digitally added pubic hair » ? The same can be said about the “woman” illustration. »

I'd be interested in knowing your point of view.

Regards,

Gabriel (France)

My point of view is rather neutral in this matter. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Muscle_posterior_labeled.png

File:Muscle_posterior_labeled.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

190.14.249.188 21:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Lung_and_diaphragm.jpg

File:Lung_and_diaphragm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

216.99.217.189 22:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Could you please specify where the location is for its discussion page? Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Scintillating scotoma

Thank you for your excellent illustration. I had the rather shocking experience during lecture yesterday of such a phenomena. As mentioned on the Wikipedia page, mine had strong Widmanstatten patterns of quite disconcerting, but actually beautiful constantly changing light. Have you learned more about this phenomena that you experienced?

Curious, Paul L. Tidwell Professor of Literature College of the Sequoias Visalia, CA 93277 pault@cos.edu

Attempt to visualize mine.
When I think about it, I had Widmanstätten patterns in my scotoma as well. I've tried to visualize them in image at right. Thanks for informing me of this pattern - I've been thinking many times of how to describe the scintillations I saw in more detail, but couldn't figure out any way, but when I saw your entry and opened the Widmanstätten pattern article, the similarity was really striking, and indeed, it was actually quite beautiful. It's been five months since that experience, and it hasn't recurred yet, but if it does I'll be paying much attention to any additional details. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:01, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion request of clothing image made transparent

File:Woman_wearing_purple_bra_and_panties_set_-_transparent.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I'll accept any outcome of the discussion. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

File:World_countries_by_Standard_&_Poor's_ratings.png

File:World_countries_by_Standard_&_Poor's_ratings.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 09:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Steroidogenesis.svg

Hi Mikael. I wanted to let you know that I tagged your image as disputed. --Leyo 16:02, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for noting how the image may be improved further. I do not, however, have any direct source that gives the proper stereochemistries of the included structures. Perhaps Wikipedia:WP:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology can help? Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:28, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
The stereochemistry is given in the article on these compounds, e.g. en:Pregnenolone. If one is missing, let me know. --Leyo 12:30, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll put it on the list for the next update of the image. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:50, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
You might want to join the discussion at File talk:Steroidogenesis.svg. --Leyo 20:15, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

University professor concerned about plagiarism

Dear Dr. Haggstrom,

I am a professor at Western Washington University in Bellingham, Washington. I am concerned about the figure and description of "Probability Density Function" on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Log-normal_distribution

The caption for above wikimedia figure is: "Some log-normal density functions with identical location parameter μ but differing scale parameters."

This MBA student's paper does not include any attribution for the following description of this figure:

“Figure 6, presented below, illustrates several log-normal distribution shapes as an example of how distributions can vary widely depending on the nature of the process. Looking at the highly skewed example, it is easy to see how an assumption of normality could greatly under-predict defect rates in the direction counter to the skew.”

Do you know of a published source for the above description? Any help and advice will be deeply appreciated.

Thank you.

Kindest regards,

Bill

Here is my contact info:

Bill Warner, Ph.D., Professor Samaran, Inc., Partner PMI Certified Project Management Professional (PMP) ASQ Certified Quality Manager/Organizational Excellence (CQM/OE) ASQ Certified Six Sigma Green Belt (CSSGB) Home Phone: (360) 354-6988 Cell Phone: (360) 510-3826 Email: bill@prism-media.com bill.warner@wwu.edu warnerw1@erau.edu warner@cityu.edu Office: 108 Fairside Drive, Suite C, Lynden, WA 98264-1700

Dear Bill Warner. I sent a reply to your bill@prism-media.com email. I hope it is of some help. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Typo in File:Renin-angiotensin system in man shadow.svg

Hi Mikael, I guess there is a typo in File:Renin-angiotensin system in man shadow.svg, where it should read volume and not colume on the left hand. If you confirm this is true, I am going to correct it (or you do it dependent on who is faster :-)) Thanks for your great diagrams. Going to translate them to de. Kind regards -- Rillke(q?) 22:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Indeed it should say volume. Thanks for noticing this typo! We'll see who gets first in correcting it :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:32, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Resolved
. Thanks for the prompt reply. -- Rillke(q?) 18:10, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Restoring images uploaded by Rootbeerlc

Hi Mikael. I've restored these and added the OTRS info. I'll leave it to you to add the needed licensing/description/etc info. In future you should post requests for restorations at COM:Undeletion requests#Current requests. Myself or another admin will usually take care of these within a day or two. INeverCry 19:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Here's the DR with all the files for a quick link that you can use: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rootbeerlc. INeverCry 19:49, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, and I'll remember that undeletion page for next time :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Ticket

Hi Mikael, please, see this. It's about a picture with another ticket closed by you. +PrinceWilly 18:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification :-) I've answered it, and the image should be uploaded among the others at Category:Byron Randall. Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Alana cartooned.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alana cartooned.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Alana cartooned.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 06:41, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification :-) It seems the source file from which I derived this image has been deleted, for reasons I don't know about. As such, I can't contend this deletion proposal. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2012 (UTC)


Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

I've voted now :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

DO YOU HAVE MORE IMAGES LIKE THE ONE YOU DID FOR SYMPTOMPS OF INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS?

this is the first time I use this. I don't know how to use it and come back to your answer. Because of this I ask you please also answer to my mail carelahmad2525 @ yahoo.ca. Thanks.

I'm sure you'll be able to find your way back to this page :-) More diagrams like the one you mentioned are found at: Wikipedia:User:Mikael_Häggström/Diagrams. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:49, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Vue antérieure de humain de sexe féminin et masculin.jpg

Hello

Could you please correct some mistakes on your file File:Vue antérieure de humain de sexe féminin et masculin.jpg?

  1. «Organes génitaux chez les femelles» : change «femelles» by «femmes» (mâle/femelle (male/female) are not used for humans, use homme/femme (man/woman) only)
  2. «Bras» (arm) indicates the part of the upper limb from the shoulder to elbow. From elbow to wrist, the correct word is «avant-bras» (forearm)
  3. Same thing for the lower limb: «cuisse» from the hip to knee ; «jambe» from knee to ankle.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact on my Wikipédia. Ratachwa (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for those corrections :-) I've updated the image now. You're very welcome to post again if you have more comments. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Computed tomography of human brain - large.png

File:Computed tomography of human brain - large.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 10:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. I left a comment there. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Mikael, in the DR discussion you hinted that you would try to talk the hospital/radiology dep. where the discussed images were created. Any information from that so far? --Túrelio (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
I've sent an email to the radiology department requesting permission for its current usage, so I'm currently awaiting a reply from them. I was a bit reluctant to do so first because I was worried that doing so would imply that all uploaders of X-rays would have to do the same, but finding that there is a general discussion on the issue at Commons:Requests for comment/Xrays I don't worry very much about that any more. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
I've now keep-closed the DR. Thanks for your efforts and sorry that you got involuntarily caught in a unnecessarily inflammatory basic discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much for having acquired the permission. In my view, this is the best possible solution. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
No problem :-) And as for the discussion, I admit the vast majority of it is still too-long-didn't-read for me. Still, I hope there will be a solution for all other X-rays out there as well. Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Permission to use your figure needed

Dr. Häggström,

I handle the production of the American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Intergrative and Comparative Physiology journal. I have a research paper that is citing and using the figure (or part of it) you have posted in Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Steroidogenesis.svg). Alhtough Wikipedia states on their website that one is free to copy, distribute, and transmit the work and adapt the work published on the website, we must have the copyright holder of the diagram give written permission to use that figure in our journals. It appears that you may be the sole copyright holder. If this is incorrect, can you direct me to the copyright holder of this figure? If you are the copyright holder, please send me a letter giving us permission to use your figure in the research paper. If there is another person who shares the copyright with you, I will need that person's permission as well. You may send the permission to me through my email (kmoore@the-aps.org).

Thank you.
Krysia Moore
Journal Editorial Supervisor
American Physiological Society
Am J Physiol-Regulatory Integrative & Comparative Physiol

I'm delighted to hear that you find the image useful for your project :-) I've left a reply at your email address. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Republication of one of your images in our physiology journals

Mr. Häggström,

We would like to correspond with you regarding republication of one of your images. We realize it is currently available under CC license, but we wish to discuss via e-mail, briefly. Krysia Moore may have also contacted you about this. Thanks in advance for your kind response. -Mark

M. L. Goodwin, ELS (mgoodwin@The-APS.org) Editorial Manager, Publications


The American Physiological Society Bethesda, MD 20814

http://www.The-APS.org

Yes, I got the message from Krysia Moore, and I've given a reply to her email address. I wish you all the best with the project. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mikkel,

My reply was different. See Wikipedia:User_talk:Slashme#Permission_to_republish_a_figure. They may publish the figure, because we have given them that right, but I refuse to make things even easier for a closed-access journal. The modern world doesn't need these parasites. I know that's a strong word, but I'm completely willing to support that characterisation of academic publishers. --Slashme (talk) 07:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

That's some food for thought for the next time I get a request for permission. I hope the entire scientific community will turn to open-access sites, but the progress is too slow. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Human body diagrams

Dear Sir,

Regarding Human body diagrams. I am having some difficulty producing the same quality images as e.g. File:Bacterial infections and involved species.png

I am trying to make something similar but with following content:

  • brain
  • nasal and oral cavities
  • paranasal air sinuses
  • salivary glands
  • pharynx
  • trachea, bronchi & lungs
  • esophagus, stomach
  • liver, pancreas
  • large and small intestines
  • kidneys

I am thinking that it might be easier for me to start with bacterial infections and work from there... do you know how I can get a copy without any text or labels? Many thanks for any help you can provide me in this matter,

Zoe

Hello Zoe,
I'm delighted to hear that you find the diagrams useful for your project :-) Indeed, perhaps the easiest way is to use the File:Bacterial infections and involved species.svg in for example Inkscape and work from there. I don't have any version of that particular one without text or labels, but you can easily delete the text therein in Inkscape if you need to. Also, I should put paranasal sinuses among the Human body diagrams/Organs within a cuple of days so that you can use them on the other images at Human body diagrams#How to derive an image if you so choose. There isn't an image of the salivary glands, but being so small I don't think it matters very much since you would hardly see them anyway.
Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:22, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

wrong representation of bursa prepatellaris ?!!

please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Prepatellar_bursa.png

--HilmarHansWerner (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification :-) The updated image is hopefully a better representation. Mikael Häggström (talk) 05:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Looks great! may be you could also help with a clear 3d-image or a series of sectional images showing clearly the constellation of bursae and the articular capsule, especially how and where the bursae are in connection with the capsule?! this is of importance (for me privately and) for every (future) surgeon. --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 05:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm glad you like it :-) I agree 3D images would be even better, but unfortunately I won't have time for such a project in any foreseeable future.

Graph of blood values

  Dear Dr. Häggström:
  Thanks for the graph!  It's a tour de force, and a work of art, to boot.
              Best wishes,
                    Max Hyre (talk) 04:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm delighted to hear that you like the image :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 21:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Mikael Häggström,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the announcement :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Ebola epedemic update

Hi Mikael there been a new sit rep released. Could you kindly update the map or can i do it for you. Kind Regards Brian BrianGroen (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

The updates seem to come more frequently now. Well, we should keep up as well, so I've updated the image now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mikael new sit rep , sorry but can you update map again Regards BrianGroen (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

No problem :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:11, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mikael sorry my bad. I was still busy with the totals when some one chged it.. Liberia needs a small update on your map.. My apologies. BrianGroen (talk) 18:17, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

I was probably a bit too eager to update too. Anyhow, it's hopefully correct now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Ethanol

Hello I found your image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-term_effects_of_alcohol#mediaviewer/File:Possible_long-term_effects_of_ethanol.svg I dont understand this visual changes whats do you mean? When you drink large amounts you can get blurred vision from weakened eye muscle coordination but this is temporary. Very severe ataxia can cause vision changes but you mention her. Can you wrote whats do you mean and give reference? My email darek10001989@gmail.com

OK Im moron i dont see this is list of wernicke korsakoff syndrome my bad. Sorry for that
No problem :-) Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

sex picture of human being.The picture is still not seen very well even though mikael has tried his best to show the detail of human organs.The picture is really good in its look so I admire to the picture taker well & the picture's sex organs should have seen Berry clearly so every students could learn about sex well.mahendra


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wikipedian 2 (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the notification. It seems it will be kept. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mikael Häggström. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mikael Häggström~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Category:Images_of_teaspoons_used_in_2012_Chicago_study

Category discussion warning

Category:Images_of_teaspoons_used_in_2012_Chicago_study has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Andy Mabbett (talk) 22:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Image

Can we get one of your images for [1] James Heilman, MD (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Sure. I'll probably have one uploaded by the weekend. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Coral reef in Ras Muhammad nature park (Iolanda reef).jpg

File:Coral reef in Ras Muhammad nature park (Iolanda reef).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. I increased the saturation a bit, but I'm not really feeling attached to the image. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your outstanding Image Thyroid hormone synthesis
and all the efforts you put into this project. Be assured, that your work here is very well recognized. Best wishes M-J-G (talk) 11:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, M-J-G :-) It's always nice to know when works are appreciated. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Image: Thyroid hormone synthesis.svg

Hello Mikael,

once again thanks for your wonderful work. Upon further investigating the issue of the efflux and uptake of thyreoid hormones, I have come to think, that the current sience suggests a major role of the human monocarboxylate transporter 8 & 10 for the efflux of the thyroid hormones form the thyroid cells. My two major sources for this statement are these articles[1][2]

If you agree, it'd be great if you could alter your picture, which doesn't currently show the existence of these channels and instead (at least for me) suggests a diffusion-type of transport through the membrane.

If you'd like I would also be very happy to help translating the altered image into German. Again - thank you very much for your work and efforts. Best regards -- M-J-G (talk) 10:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

  1. ↑ Edith C. H. Friesema, Jurgen Jansen, Jan-willem Jachtenberg, W. Edward Visser, Monique H. A. Kester, and Theo J. Visser. Effective Cellular Uptake and Efflux of Thyroid Hormone by Human Monocarboxylate Transporter. Molecular endocrinology. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2007-0112
  2. ↑ Brix K, Führer D, Biebermann H. Molecules important for thyroid hormone synthesis and action - known facts and future perspectives. Thyroid Res. 2011 Aug 3;4 Suppl 1:S9. DOI: 10.1186/1756-6614-4-S1-S9.
Thank you, M-J-G, for shedding light on this previously mysterious step in the process. I've added the MCT at the basolateral membrane, and added links to the corresponding articles in Wikipedia. I look forward to seeing a German version of the image as well. Mikael Häggström (talk) 07:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Outstanding work! As usual. -- M-J-G (talk) 06:51, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Dr Häggström, we have added a localised Dutch version. We lifted all original Labels to a separate 'Labels en_EN' layer and added Dutch labels to a new 'Labels nl_NL' layer. This edit is our wikimedia first edit, so feedback is welcomed. dr. A.Jonker (talk) 11:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

It looks good. Thanks :-) I've made a template so that all images have links to all other versions. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Human Karyotype

Hello, Mikael, it looks like we are both physicians with an interest in medical SVG drawings. I replaced your Human_karyotype.svg with one I drew as a derivation from another source, mainly because it adds the banding information banding. I would appreciate your review if you have the time. P.S. What software do you use to draw? I am using InkPad on iPad mainly. Kind regards, Niels Olson (talk) 19:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Good work, Niels Olson! It's nice to hear that you are also into spreading knowledge by creating images. I corrected the alignment of some chromosomes. It would also help to state which source you used for the banding. I use GIMP and Inkscape for editing. Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Map for the 2016 yellow fever outbreak in Angola

Hello Michael,

We were in contact before about the Year of the Elephant paper on Wikiversity Medical Journal (John Cathey). I noticed you had something to do with the map on the ebola outbreak (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2014_ebola_virus_epidemic_in_West_Africa.svg). I've been doing the 2016 yellow fever epidemic in Angola page. I'm thinking it might be nice now to have a map somewhat like that one. The cases and deaths are mostly in Angola but are also in parts of DR Congo, espeically the capital Kinshasa. The concern is the outbreak originally centered on Luanda will continue spreading across to parts of DR Congo to Kinshasa and become more indigenous in DR Congo. There are increasing indigenous cases. So maybe a map that centers on the area around and between Luanda to Kinshasa. Then show the data: suspected cases, confirmed cases, total deaths, deaths from confirmed cases - for Angola. For DR Congo, they're reporting: suspected cases, with confirmed cases (imported from Angola) and deaths. The map would go at the top of the page, probably above the epidemic curve. Are you interested, or advise me on how to do it please? thanks Jtamad (talk) 04:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello John,
It's nice to hear from you, and thank you for your contributions to the yellow fever epidemic article! I can make a map similar to that of the ebola virus epidemic, but it was difficult to get an overview of the statistics. If you could find me the numbers and the sources for each relevant country, I can then make a map from it.
Best regards,
Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mikael. I replied by email. Maybe you've been busy and haven't had a chance to respond. Here's information:

Hi, great, glad you can help. This is the latest WHO situation report: http://www.afro.who.int/en/yellow-fever/sitreps/item/8747-situation-report-yellow-fever-outbreak-in-angola-20-june-2016.html Attached is the PDF, which downloads from that page.

It's mostly just Angola, but there have also been cases introduced from Angola to DR Congo and transmission is also occurring in the DR Congo, in 3 provinces and around Kinshasa. As you can read on the WP page, the concern is that another big outbreak could occur along border areas and/or in Kinshasa which has a million plus population. They are starting a vaccination campaign there in July. So I thought it was time for a map to make the data more prominent -- showing cases in Angola and DR Congo. These two sentences on the page are the main ones I've been updating from the situation reports every other week or so:

2nd paragraph, last sentence (Angola): As of 23 June, suspected cases were 3294 and laboratory-confirmed cases totaled 861; total deaths were 347, with 115 from confirmed cases.[17] Local, or autochthonous, transmission had been reported in 11 provinces as of 16 June. Confirmed cases have been reported in 16 of 18 provinces.

5th paragraph, last sentence (DR Congo): As of 20 June, WHO was notified of 1106 suspected cases, with 68 confirmed cases (59 imported from Angola) and 75 deaths.[35]

I thought it was getting time to make the data more prominent rather than buried at the end of these paragraphs. A table might be ok also, or both, but probably most people aren't familiar with the geography.

The reported data are a bit different right now, for the two countries. For Angola, WHO reports 1) suspected cases, 2) lab confirmed, 3) total deaths, 4) deaths from confirmed cases. For DR Congo, it's 1) suspected cases, 2) confirmed cases, 3) number imported from Angola/indigenous locally transmitted or autochthonous cases, 4) total deaths. Those two sets of data might be shown on the map. It's mostly throughout Angola, but the concern is from Luanda to the border areas of Angola with DR Congo to Kinshasa - A map might be limited to about the area shown on the attached screenshot from google earth, showing numbers in Angola and in DR Congo. That's the area of concern I think, between Luanda and Kinshasa, the main transportation link. and the epidemic curve for Angola should remain, could be part of it, use discretion. If you have other ideas, let me know. I will keep it up to date, with data from the WHO sitreps.

This ProMed report summarizes the latest information: http://www.promedmail.org/post/4308329. I've known one of the principal moderators at promed for a long time (Jack Woodall). He and the rest know I'm maintaining this page, and they're glad it's kept up to date, it's helpful. I think some news sources might be using it. Jtamad (talk) 01:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi John,
I've now added an image at the Wikipedia page: Wikipedia:2016 yellow fever epidemic in Angola
I don't have any available map in vector-format for sub-regions of the countries, but at least this one gives a rough overview of the situation.
Some sources have already started using "Central Africa" instead of just "Angola" or "Angola/Congo" so I used this for the map as well.
Best regards,
Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:25, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Fat contents in food

Hi there, I have a question regarding the bar-chart image in this page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat , which was contributed by you. I did some digging about 2% milk and the fat content seems to be what it is labeled for - 2% (reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fat_content_of_milk). However on the image you posted, it looks to be about 68-70% saturated fat content. Thats a big discrepency. Unless i am mis-interpreting, in which case would you please care to explain, and possibly label it somewhere on the image?

Thanks and regards,

Ratin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratin3 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ratin. The fats are given as percentage of their total fat. Thus 2% milk would have a total fat of about 2%, and these 2% consists to 68-70% of saturated fats. I've clarified this on the image description. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Arterial system picture - descent of anterior tibial artery

Hello,

I really appreciate your picture of the arterial system, but I think there is something weird about it.

The anterior tibial artery goes down the front of the lower limb, and should connect to the arteria dorsalis pedis, which is supposed to go on the medial side of the foot. However, in your picture, the anterior tibial artery procedes to an artery on the lateral side of the foot.

This is perplexing, but I'd greatly appreciate if you could explain or amend it.

Sincerely, Sara — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.226.146.104 (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi
What's the name of the image?
Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Names for the pulmonary a. and pulmonary v. mixed

Here. Can you fix? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

It's fixed now. Thanks James! Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Permission

Hello, if I am interested in using the image for a commercial purpose, am I released for doing so? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.201.241.162 (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes, all my image licenses permit commercial use. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

That's great and thanks!! Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.201.241.162 (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

You too! Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:00, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

File:Hip prosthesis zones by DeLee and Charnley system, and Gruen system.png

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Indeed, I want that image deleted. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Calcaneal spur

Hola Mikael:

He visto que en la imagen "File:Fsporn-plantar.jpg" has retirado la categoría "Calcaneal spur". ¿Por qué? Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 16:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Ahora entiendo el cambio. Lo has sustituido por la categoría "X-rays of feet with inferior calcaneal spur". Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 16:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Gracias. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:X-rays of the feet by Nevit Dilmen

Hi,

Mikael, you have created a User category for my that is neither a category that I maintain or endorse. Please delete Category:X-rays of the feet by Nevit Dilmen. All the images that you have moved to that category where properly categorised in relevant categories. Please Undo the edits too. I appreciate your efforts but this has done more damage than help. It has resulted in orphanisation of the relevant images. Regards, --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 07:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Nevit,
I'm sorry the classification made them appear as orphaned. I've now removed the user category-template from it [2] and asked at User talk:Steinsplitter to have the orphan-tags removed.
I do think, however, that these images need a more specific classification than simply Category:X-rays of the feet. Since I didn't find any better specification on the image descriptions, I think an uploader-based categorization is better than nothing. An alternative would be something like Category:X-rays of the feet that lack image descriptions.
Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Image Request

Requesting permission to use the following picture for a brochure: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/Male_with_organs.png

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Co 058 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Co 058. You are welcome to use the image in your work. If you want to attribute it, you can find information at: [3]. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

biology

utzb — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.114.50.240 (talk) 13:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

? Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Images lacking OTRS tag

File:Jim-gardners-wife Mary Ella Buechana Gardner in wedding dress in 1944.jpg

File:Jim-gardners-wife Mary Ella Buechana Gardner in wedding dress in 1944.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sitush (talk) 05:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Jim-in-wagon.jpg

File:Jim-in-wagon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sitush (talk) 12:00, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Jamesgardner-swearing-in.jpg

File:Jamesgardner-swearing-in.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sitush (talk) 13:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

I've now tagged these images with the proper OTRS ticket. Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank You very much for many excellent images for radiology! Hellerhoff (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, Hellerhoff! Your contributions are great as well! I've found use for your images on many occasions. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Fat composition in foods.png

Hi Mikael,

Do you still have the Excel file source of File:Fat composition in foods.png by any chance? It would be very helpful as it would make it possible to create an SVG - easily translatable - version. If you do, let me know, you can send it to me through [4] for example and I'll make the SVG file, while making sure to credit you as the original author. The RedBurn (talk) 06:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi The RedBurn. I had some trouble finding the original Excel file, but I found this page where the data is given: [5]. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll try and make a new one from these. The RedBurn (talk) 09:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Waist-hip_ratio.png

Hi Mikael, so I dont know if you're automatically tagged, although I put you up as 'author': I translated the labeling only (and adjusted the width slightly to fit the words in) of your image.
Since Im still new to wikipedia (and all its sister projects) as far as editing and contributing goes, could you have a quick look if I uploaded it correctly - without any faux-pas?
Can I use it this way File:Taille-Hüft-Verhältnis.png? Or would you like me to take it down and just use the english version instead?
I translated it because the german translation of "waist" is confusing since it means both - the german "bauch" (actual waist) and "taille" (waistline). The translation of the waist-hip ratio is also easily to be misunderstood because it's translated to "taille-hüft-verhältnis" although you would not measure the waistline but instead the actual waist.
Uhhh.. well yeah, if you could just take a look. :) I will wait before using it, until you respond back. Have a nice day! --Shendoah (talk) 12:15, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the translation, Shendoah! It's been long since I had German classes, but I'm sure it will do well in articles. I've added an overview of the different versions to each of the images. Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Cryptocurrency transaction.png

File:Cryptocurrency transaction.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Astounding

Re:File:Volume rendered CT scan of a pregnancy of 37 weeks of gestational age (smaller).gif Your work is outstanding and leaves me speechless much of the time.Best Regards, Barbara (WVS) (talk) 02:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Barbara (WVS)! I'm delighted that you like the image so much. Mikael Häggström (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Addiction as harm?

Thank you for this image, it's very useful. Should it include mention of addiction? HLHJ (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

That is indeed an important adverse effect. I've added it to the image. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:15, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Anatomy images descriptions

Hello, Mikael. I've overhauled the descriptions of series of anatomy images. Could you please take a look at Template:Human female and male image description#Demo and check if I missed any of the language versions and it looks OK? —⁠andrybak (talk) 19:43, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Great work! I'm not able to look through all the language versions right now, but as far as I've checked it looks really good! Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Market capitalizations of cryptocurrencies.svg

Hello Mikael, was just wondering if you had time to create an updated version of this image? I added it to en:List of cryptocurrencies, but it's a bit out of date. Cheers! Audacity (talk) 08:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Audacity! I'm glad you found it useful. I have no time to make an update in a foreseeable future, however. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:12, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Sagittal balance.svg

Solved bug in your draw (deleting FlowRoot). --Jmarchn (talk) 18:20, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bolt and nut, annotated.jpg

Copyright status: File:Bolt and nut, annotated.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bolt and nut, annotated.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 16:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, Jcb. I had accidentally deleted the license tag. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Majora (talk) 14:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. I'm neutral in this matter. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
Dear Mikael Häggström,
Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome ! -- Eatcha (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll have a look at it if I get the time. Mikael Häggström (talk) 06:14, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

ygm

Hello, Mikael Häggström. Check your email—you've got mail!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. — Cart (talk) 17:45, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:Ultrasound images of pancreatitis

Hello!. Thanks for your collaboration. Look at the changes in this category page: I added {{DiseasesNav}} with s1=pancreatitis as parameter (always the main category -pancreatitis in this case- in the first location). Also I changed the order of categories. Jmarchn (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Jmarchn! Mikael Häggström (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Marquise cut diamond.jpg

File:Marquise cut diamond.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 21:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Symptoms of SLE.svg

Hi Mikael Häggström, some language versions of File:Symptoms of SLE.svg show additionally kidneys with Nephritis symptoms. Could you check if that is maybe lacking from your graphics when convenient? Thank you! -- Rillke(q?) 13:54, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying this. I'll look into it when I have the time. Mikael Häggström (talk) 02:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Rillke, I've now added nephritis to the English images. Mikael Häggström (talk) 09:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Well-earned, for such a breathtaking quantity of work! 6DollarSuit (talk) 01:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you so much, 6DollarSuit! It's nice to know that my work is useful. Mikael Häggström (talk) 02:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Computed_tomograph_of_pulmonary_vessels.jpg

Hi! Sorry to have to tell you this, but there's a mistake in this pic. The first word is missing the l in pulmonary. -Yupik (talk) 17:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting the error, Yupik! I've uploaded a corrected version now. It may take a moment for the servers to update. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
That was quick, thanks! :) -Yupik (talk) 16:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 3.0.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 23:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Great news! Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 3.0.png

File:Symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 3.0.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Glrx (talk) 21:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Xray Image Use Permission

Dear Dr. Mikael Haggstrom,

My name is Kyle and I am creating a website to help medical students learn how to read and interpret x-ray images. I came across several of your x-ray images on Wikimedia Commons and would absolutely love to use them on my membership-based website. Will you allow me to use them and how would you like to be attributed on my site? Also, is there any way to remove arrows on crop images? If so, how would I properly attribute the changes to the image?

The images I am interested in so far are:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Radiograph_of_Barton%27s_fracture.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shoulder_dislocation,_Y-projection_before_reduction.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:CT_of_a_pertrochanteric_fracture.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Intraoperative_acetabular_fracture,_original.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:X-ray_of_mildly_compressed_hip_fracture.jpg

Thank you so much for your consideration and your work. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Kylebarner1 (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)


Hello Kyle,
I am delighted to hear that you find these images useful for your site. These can all be attributed as for example:
I don't know any simple way of removing arrows in cropped images for these examples, but let me know if you can't find any arrow-less original of an image you want to use, so I can look it up.
Best regards,
Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

File:X-ray of pelvis with total arthroplasty.jpg

File:X-ray of pelvis with total arthroplasty.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:2551:FA73:E014:8DB5 04:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Pigmented skin lesions diagram as bar chart

Hello Mikael,

I saw the pigmented skin lesions pie chart and wondered, if it could be helpful to represent the data as a bar chart. Pie charts are often hard to interpret correctly as they rely on comparison of angles rather than size (See e.g Stephen Few on pie charts (pdf)). It might also become easier to understand the different types of lesions in a pie chart. I could give it a go myself, too. --Simulo (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Simulo
For the purpose of differential diagnoses, I personally find pie charts to be preferable, since they give a quick idea of the incidence of each diagnosis as compared to the sum of all. Nevertheless, feel free to make a bar chart as well. Mikael Häggström (talk) 23:33, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Could you please provide a French version of a map?

Hello Mikael,

Would it be possible to provide a French version of this file: Expulsion judios-en.svg, please?

Here are the translations:

In the map
  • Wales -> "Pays de Galles" (or "Galles" if it doesn't fit)
  • England -> "Angleterre"
  • Netherlands -> "Pays Bas"
  • Lithuania -> "Lithuanie"
  • Germany -> "Allemagne*" (could you please keep the asterisk?)
  • Silesia -> "Silésie"
  • Poland -> "Pologne"
  • Austria -> "Autriche*" (could you please keep the asterisk?)
  • Hungary -> "Hongrie"
  • Papal states -> "États pontificaux"
  • Provence -> OK
  • Portugal -> OK
  • Spain -> "Espagne"
  • Maghreb -> OK
  • Sardinia -> "Sardaigne"
  • Tunis -> "Tunisie"
  • Sicilia -> "Sicile"
  • Naples -> OK
  • Crimea -> "Crimée"
  • Ottoman empire -> "Empire ottoman"
  • Egypt -> "Égypte"
In the insert
  • Expulsion of Jews -> "Expulsion des Juifs"
  • Areas of expulsion -> "Régions d'expulsion"
  • Resettlement areas -> "Régions de réinstallation"
  • If possible, add "*: Saint Empire romain germanique" or "*: Saint Empire romain"


Also, do you still think the map is inaccurate? Is the "Inaccurate-map-disputed" template still necessary?

Thank you very much!

Best regards, --Daehan (talk) 08:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

I am sorry, Daehan, I am not able to make such an image with my current work schedule. However, you can make the edits yourself if you for example download Inkscape. Alternatively, you can open the file in a simple text editor and make the changes within the coding. It seems the factual accuracy relates the the borders of Lithuania and Poland. Around that time it may be termed Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, but I am not sure about the exact years or borders. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Hematopoiesis (human) diagram switch.svg

Hello, an anonymous user submitted a few days ago an error report in the Spanish Wikipedia saying that promyelocytes don't present secondary granulation and thus, they should be all equal in this file. I checked this in the Ross Atlas of Histology (7th edition, page 317 of the Spanish translation) and they seem to be right about this, so I made a correction to the Spanish version of the file. Since you vectorized the original, maybe you're interested in assessing this. Best regards, -sasha- (talk) 14:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello -sasha-. I find the edit to be reasonable, and I'll make the same edit to the English version when I have the time. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi Mikael Häggström. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request at File:Causes of death by age group, garden sheds.png. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder. I will keep that in mind next time. Mikael Häggström (talk) 00:09, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Thyrohyoid muscle drawing origin - Wikimedia Commons 8984662

Dear Dr. Häggström, greetings.

Do you mind telling me what pubblication does that drawing of the Thyrohyoid muscle comes from?

I have found a amateur -- but well executed -- matching drawing and, which is an almost exact copy, yet, the author let's it implied that the drawing is of their own authorship.

I hope I can hear back from you.

Sincerely,

Pedro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ganzama (talk • contribs) 19:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Pedro
If you mean File:Thyrohyoid muscle.PNG, it's originally from the 20th U.S. edition of Gray's Anatomy of the Human Body. It was originally published in 1918 and therefore lapsed into the public domain, so there's no legal requirement to attribute the original publisher. You could argue that it would still be a nice thing to do though.
I hope that helps.
Mikael Häggström (talk) 21:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Massively created malformed templates

I discovered, that you have massively created malformed templates. In 2011, there was a deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Brain - all versions). Full list is here: [6]. I even don't know where to start deleting/moving/renaming. Eg unacceptable solution with templates:

I see that you are an experienced user. Can you explain the situation?--Estopedist1 (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Estopedist1. I can agree that Template:Midsummer at Årsnäs, Gallery is not necessary as there already is a category, and I can accept a deletion of this one if necessary. For Template:Midsummer at Årsnäs, Source and Template:Midsummer celebrations at Årsnäs, File description, on the other hand, these serve the purpose of allowing corrections and changes thereof to appear simultaneously in all articles where they are transcluded, instead of having to make such changes in every single image description page. Mikael Häggström (talk) 22:40, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I haven't seen such strange solution in Commons. One gallery pages (Midsummer celebrations at Årsnäs, Sweden with a hatnote) does the job, and no need such strange templates Estopedist1 (talk) 07:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Image formats

Hi, thank you for uploading File:COVID-19 in China 2020 to April 20, 2022.jpg to Commons. Here's a tip: Use the right image format for the kind of image. As a general rule, this is JPEG for photographs, and PNG for most other kinds of images. Using the wrong format can bloat the file size and/or degrade the quality of the image. Most modern graphics applications will give you the choice between these formats among others. See also Commons:File types#Images. Good luck. Smjg (talk) 23:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Indeed, png is better in this case. I've replaced that image with such version now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Puberty data on timetable chart is inaccurate

Hello. You created the child development stages chart that is on a lot of pages on Wikipedia relating to child and adolescent development. However, I believe your range for pubertal development is not accurate. Even in boys, puberty is effectively complete by 16/17, yet you have it go up to nearly 19/20, which is not the case. I think you should re-edit the image to better reflect Tanner stage data. Girls typically reach tanner stage 5 at around 14, and boys reach it around age 15. Therefore, I would have it be mostly green for girls around 11-14, petering out afterwards, and the same with boys around 12-15, as that is when the bulk of their puberty takes place.

Sources:

Akre, C., Sukhsohale, N. D., Kubde, S. S., & Chaudhary, S. (2013). Sexual Maturation Pattern in Adolescent School Girls of Rural India: A Cross Sectional Study from Nagpur. Medical Science, 1, 39-43.

Aksglaede, L., Sørensen, K., Petersen, J. H., Skakkebaek, E., & Juul, A. (2009). Recent Decline in Age at Breast Development: The Copenhagen Puberty Study. Pediatrics, 123 (5) e932-939.

Atay, Z., Turan, S., Guran, T., Furman, A., & Bereket, A. (2011): Puberty and Influencing Factors in Schoolgirls Living in Istanbul: End of the Secular Trend? PEDIATRICS, 128, e40-e45.

Biro, F. M., Greenspan, L. C., Galvez, M. P., Pinney, S. M., Teitelbaum, S., Windham, G. C., Deardorff, J., Herrick, R. L., Succop, P. A., Hiatt, R. A.,. Kushi, L. H., & Wolff, M. S. (2013). Onset of Breast Development in a Longitudinal Cohort. Pediatrics, 132, 1019-1027.

Bodzsar, E. B., & Zsakai, A. (2015). Sexual maturation pattern in the mirror of socioeconomic background. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 72, 1-12.

Boyne, M. S., Thame, M., Osmond, C., Fraser, R. A., Gabay, S., Reid, M., & Forrester, T. E. (2010). Growth, Body Composition, and the Onset of Puberty: Longitudinal Observations in Afro-Caribbean Children. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 95, 3194-3200.

Campbell, B. C., Gillett-Netting, R., & Meloy, M. (2004). Timing of reproductive maturation in rural versus urban Tonga boys, Zambia. Annals of Human Biology, 31, 213-227.

Cabrera, S. M., Bright, G. M., Frane, J. W., Blethen, S. L., & Lee, P. A. (2014). Age of thelarche and menarche in contemporary US females: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 27, 47-51.

Chen, F.-F., Wang, Y.-F., & Mi, J. (2014). Timing and secular trend of pubertal development in Beijing girls. World Journal of Pediatrics, 10, 74-79.

Eckert-Lind, C., Busch, A. S., Petersen, J. H., Biro, F. M., Butler, G., Bräuner, E. V., & Juul, A. (2020). Worldwide Secular Trends in Age at Pubertal Onset Assessed by Breast Development Among Girls. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 174, e195881.

Feibelmann, T. C. M., Silva, A. P. da, Resende, D. C. S., Resende, E. A. M. R. de, Scatena, L. M., & Borges, M. de. F. (2015). Puberty in a sample of Brazilian schoolgirls: timing and anthropometric characteristics. Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 59, 105-111.

Herman-Giddens, M. E., Steffes, J., Harris, D., Slora, E., Hussey, M., Dowshen, S. A., Wasserman, R., Serwint, J. R., Smitherman, L., & Reiter, E. O. (2012). Secondary Sexual Characteristics in Boys. Data From the Pediatric Research in Office Settings Network. Pediatrics, 130, 1058-1068.


Jaruratanasirikul, S., Chanpong, A., Tassanakijpanich, N., & Sriplung, H. (2014b). Declining age of puberty of school girls in southern Thailand. World Journal of Pediatrics, 10, 256-261.

Jirawutthinana, N., Panamontaa, O., Jirawutthinan, S., Suesirisawat, C., & Panamonta, M. (2012). The age of onset of pubertal development in healthy Thai girls in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Asian Biomedicine, 6, 859-865.

Jones, L. L., Griffiths, P. L., Norris, S. A., Pettifor, J. M., & Cameron, N. (2009). Is puberty starting earlier in urban South Africa? American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 395-397.

Papadimitriou, A., Douros, K., Kleanthous, K., Papadimitriou, D. T., Attilakos, A., & Fretzayas, A. (2011). Pubertal Maturation of Contemporary Greek Boys: No Evidence of a Secular Trend. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49, 434–436.

Tomova, A., Deepinder, F., Robeva, R., Lalabonova, H., Kumanov, P., & Agarwal, A. (2010). Growth and Development of Male External Genitalia. A Cross-sectional Study of 6200 Males Aged 0 to 19 Years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 164, 1152-1157.

Wohlfahrt-Veje, C., Mouritsen, A., Hagen, C. P., Tinggaard, J., Mieritz, M. G., Boas, M., Petersen, J. H., Skakkebæk, N. E., & Main, K. M. (2016). Pubertal Onset in Boys and Girls Is Influenced by Pubertal Timing of Both Parents. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 101, 2667- 2674. 2603:7080:A500:B82:7C39:49D0:F92B:D9BB 06:15, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I've now updated the image accordingly: File:Child development stages.svg. Mikael Häggström (talk) 01:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks

I have added your hand and my nonsense to the enpedia article for dozen. Much appreciated. en:Dozen Jengod (talk) 19:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the contribution, Jengod. I'm glad I was able to give you a hand in this matter! Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mikael_Häggström/Archive_1&oldid=769196595"