User talk:Daehan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Daehan!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:52, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 3d2c5c875665b8447cf94d8b97d8358f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Fotovittoriobodini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--MGuf (d) 09:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Gerardo-dottori.jpg[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gerardo-dottori.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 23:02, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Catégory:Maison de l'Art Nouveau has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tangopaso (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Revue culturelle Platero.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Discasto talk 08:03, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revue culturelle Platero.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Discasto talk 08:30, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Espaces d'Abraxas[edit]

File:Espaces d'Abraxas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

VIGNERON (talk) 06:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The SVG version of File:AiniVowel.PNG is now available[edit]

As the title says. I uploaded it as File:Äynu vowel chart.svg. If you want, you can replace the png version on your user page, as the SVG version is, naturally, of superior quality. But, of course, it's up to you. Mr KEBAB (talk) 13:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Bonjour, Je ne sais pas si vous avez été avise de cette discussion, où il est question, entre autres, de quelques-unes de vos photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rama (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:La perspective de la lance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.43.34.36 21:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Yours sincerely, Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do not empty information fields. If you think there is a copyright problem, nominate for deletion instead. If you have a better content, fix it. But never empty those fields. Jcb (talk) 21:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jcb,
Why is it better to put a random information instead of none? It is not a copyright problem: it is just not the right information, as you know. --Daehan (talk) 21:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because you are polluting an already heavily backlogged maintenance category with a file that has no problem. Jcb (talk) 22:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jcb, the file does have a problem: the source hasn't been specified, and it should be. You think about the maintenance, not about what maintenance is for, as always... --Daehan (talk) 08:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear Daehan,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:NationalArtsTheatreNigeria.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FileImporter[edit]

Hi! I noticed that you uploaded some files from uk.wiki. Do you know FileImporter? Its a super easy way to move files to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MGA73,
Thank you for your message: I was looking for some easier way, indeed. I tried CommonsHelper, but it seems to not be working anymore.
Can you tell me more about FileImporter, please? --Daehan (talk) 17:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! If you are an autoconfirmed user on a wiki then just go to the file you want to transfer. Then on the top there should be a tab saying "Export to Wikimedia Commons" (or something like that). Just click that and ok. Then the file has been transferred to Commons and you can add categories and fix whatever needs to be fixed.
You can read more about it at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Extension:FileImporter
I hope that can help you. You are always welcome to ask me if you need help. If you are not autoconfirmed you can sometimes cheat a bit by editing some pages. If you can't find any articles to fix then you can always edit your own userpage or talk page or the sandbox. :) --MGA73 (talk) 17:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello MGA73,
Haha, I loved the last part of your message :D Indeed, I am not autoconfirmed on the wp:uk, but I'll keep your idea in mind :) --Daehan (talk) 22:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
:D Yeah and you could also go to a random file on en.wiki (or other wiki where you are autoconfirmed) and click FileImporter link (don't hit ok). Then change the url to uk.wiki and the name of the file you want to transfer. That should also work.
Example of a link https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ImportFile?clientUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%25D0%25A4%25D0%25B0%25D0%25B9%25D0%25BB%3AGorgany1.jpg&importSource=FileExporter (change Gorgany1.jpg to the file name and use _ if there are spaces in the file name) --MGA73 (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, great! I'll try this one and let you know as soon as I need to import a new file. :) --Daehan (talk) 22:15, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello MGA73,
I did it: File:Ланка1924.jpg Thank you! :) --Daehan (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Anwsome! If you run out of files to move there are more to find at m:User:MGA73/Media per wiki ;-) --MGA73 (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello again! I noticed this File:Krushelnycki.jpg. It has both PD-self and File:Krushelnycki.jpg. If the file was taken in the 1930 then I doubt it is PD-self because that would make the photographer about 110 years old. And the photographer could not have died more than 100 years ago because it is only about 90 years since the photo was taken. As far as I can see the photographer is not mentioned so how do we know when he or she died? --MGA73 (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello MGA73, indeed, it seems to come from a book published in 2001.
    Hello MSha, you uploaded this picture in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. My did you apply a PD-self licence? --Daehan (talk) 00:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie en double ?[edit]

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu me confirmer (ou m'infirmer) que les catégories Category:Pierre-Numa Bassaget et Category:Pierre Numa portent sur la même personne (pour info, je prépare un import de 2500 estampes et photos à la fois sur Wikidata et Commons, j'en suis à la phase de réconciliation sur Commons et je documenterais le processus si cela t'intéresse).

Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour VIGNERON :)
Je te confirme que ce sont les mêmes, rattachés à la même notice BnF et actifs sur la même période. Des séries différentes, mais le même coup de crayon ;) --Daehan (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merci de la confirmation, je fusionne sous le premier nom "Pierre-Numa Bassaget" ? Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 15:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
VIGNERON, je pense que Category:Pierre-Numa Bassaget est erronée : Numa semble être le premier patronyme ; soit Category:Pierre Numa soit Category:Pierre Numa Bassaget, mais cette dernière forme est "rejetée" par la BnF, je garderais la première (Category:Pierre Numa). --Daehan (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done merci des conseils. Cdlt, VIGNERON en résidence (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cluseau Lanauve[edit]

De quel droit considérez vous que cette œuvre n’est pas du domaine public ? 2A01:CB09:E041:BB0F:162:9A00:4257:1BC3 14:56, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour à vous aussi,
De quel droit considérez-vous que cette œuvre est dans le domaine public ? Daehan (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:JoeFunk Mural 1979 Los Angeles.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whpq (talk) 02:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Funk Bird.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whpq (talk) 02:45, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eduardo Sívori portrait[edit]

About this edit you made, I need to clarity some points to you: 1) The source is correct so I took the image from that website, so please don't remove that information from the infobox again. 2) After downloading the image, I retouched it to make a clearer image with more details. 3) BTW, I added the {{Retouched picture}} tag to the image (which I had ommited). Fma12 (talk) 09:13, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hola @Fma12,
Vale, consta que no estaba la plantilla antes.
Sin embargo, se parece mas a una foto tomada con un flash: tu version NO es mejor que la oficial del museo. Por qué imponerla? Daehan (talk) 09:56, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, nunca quise imponer nada, no es mi forma de actuar. Y con respecto a que la versión "NO" sea mejor que la otra... es subjetivo. En mi opinión la foto retocada permite apreciar mejor los detalles del retrato. Es opinable. Pero ahí está, a disposición para el que la quiera utilizar. Fma12 (talk) 10:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Y por favor, dejá de revertir mi cambio en el artículo del Museo en la en.wiki, si yo considero que esa foto es mejor, cuál es el problema de tu parte? Por favor, no me hagas abrir un caso en la sección de administradores.... no quiero llegar a eso. Fma12 (talk) 10:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]