User talk:Léna/2013-2016

2009-2012

Bonne année 2013

Tous mes vœux pour l'année 2013 ! –

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Restoration

Hello,

Please take care not to restore vandalism. Best regards, and Happy New Year. Yann (talk) 13:51, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Paris Synagogue RuePavée759.JPG

May I know why you restored the file File:Paris Synagogue RuePavée759.JPG which was deleted after a DR? --Sreejith K (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fronton de la Colonnade du Louvre.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:43, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Category:Casey_Bacayo

Category:Casey_Bacayo has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Yanguas (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

overcategorization

Can I make a suggestion? Like so many arts editors, you over-categorize things. Van Gogh has many works, yes, but in this flat list I just created (Category:Paintings by Vincent van Gogh by name), many of the minor works with 1 or 2 images were created by you. I don't see the value in this. I created that category to have some chance of actually finding a given painting. Regards, Boo-Boo Baroo (talk) 06:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

One... two... three...

I really appreciate the thoughtful reply you sent. When I understand the reasons for these choices, which are valid, it helps greatly. You are absolutely right that on Commons we live in a sort of technical "stone age" (well, you didn't say that :-) with respect to finding files. Wouldn't it be nice if each artwork file could have a series of independent attributes ("tags") that could be combined together as the user wishes. For example, one Van Gogh file would have "oil painting, Van Gogh, 1889, landscape, Arles, Van Gogh Museum, [etc]" as separate entities that could be combined together to create an image set. Thanks for taking the time to reply at length and have a good day. Boo-Boo Baroo (talk) 15:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Weston-super-Mare MMB 46.jpg

Hi, you declined this image as too dark. I have now brightened it. Would you mind taking another look? Oh, and with regards to File:Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 77.jpg, the image is of the next train board at night, but looking again I don't think it's a QI anyway. Thanks for your reviews! -mattbuck (Talk) 08:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 72, boulevard de Strasbourg, Toulouse 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Permission to publish your photo of Bust of Hadrian, Seville Museum.

Hello

I am sorry for writing in English - I hope you can understand this! I am an archaeologist working in northern England and have just completed a new book entitled ‘Hadrian and his Wall’. The first part is a biography of Hadrian, and in this I would very much like to use 3 of your excellent photos of the bust of Hadrian in Seville Museum. Given that you have placed these images on Wikimedia, I hope this will be okay, and by way of thanks I would like to send you a copy of the book when it is published. If you would like a copy of the book please let me know the address I should send it to.

The image will be credited as ‘Photo: Léna/Wikimedia’, unless you advise me otherwise.

To ensure I get it promptly, I would be very grateful if you could please copy any reply to paulfrodsham@hotmail.com .

Thank you very much.

Best wishes,

Paul Frodsham

unidentified plant

bonsoir, Léna, il me semble que votre photo est celle d'un Physalis , communément (mais si joliment ) nommé " amour en cage" cordialement, brigitte

Lien rouge et rename

Bonjour Léna

J'ai créé une nouvelle galerie pour différencier les photos prises en France avec le reste du Monde.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Files_by_User:Wayne77/Monde

J'ai un lien rouge qui apparait. Je ne me souviens plus s'il faut cliquer sur le lien , puis Publier ?

Par ailleurs, j'ai demandé un rename sur 2 photos :http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unidentified_Sauria_2.JPG et http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Unidentified_Sauria_2.JPG, mais je ne suis pas sûr d'avoir insérer le rename au bon endroit...

Désolé pour le dérangement.--Wayne77 (talk) 13:38, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST vs LOU espoirs 2013 (72).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Catégories pour inventaire (Louvre ou autre)

Bonsoir Léna,

J'ai essayé de mettre en place quelques catégories pour des oeuvres de Nicolas Poussin (Louvre INV 7288 et quelques autres) - peux-tu me confirmer si je m'y suis prise correctement (j'ai essayé de copier ce que tu avais fait ) avant que je me lance "à grande échelle" (au moins sur le Louvre) ?

Merci d'avance pour tous les conseils utiles qui pourraient m'aider à contribuer à cette mise en place, nécessaire, mais délicate.

--Hsarrazin (talk) 01:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Demande de déblocage

J’ai découvert avec une certaine stupéfaction, pour ne pas dire une stupéfaction certaine, que j’ai été bloqué un mois (pas moins !) et sans aucun avertissement par le dénommé Dereckson qui n’a pas supporté que je corrige récemment une faute stupide mais très répandue - « en Avignon » au lieu de « à Avignon » - faute tellement répandue qu’il se trouve même des gens pour croire que « en Avignon » est la seule tournure correcte.

Il justifie mon blocage par des reproches qui m’ont été adressés en 2010 sur Wikipédia en français. Sans doute faudrait-il lui rappeler que nous sommes en 2013. De plus, depuis 2010, j’ai tenu compte des critiques de l’époque, ce qui explique qu’il n’y en a plus eu depuis.

Il affirme que ma ma page de discussion sur Wikipedia en français comporte plusieurs plaintes à propos de ce en Avignon / à Avignon. Il lui aurait suffi de lire attentivement les « plaintes » pour constater que ce n’étaient pas des plaintes mais des interrogations sur le motif de la correction ; qu’après explication mes interlocuteurs avaient admis que j’avais raison ; que si effectivement, il y a eu un litige avec un autre utilisateur, c’est parce que j’avais corrigé plusieurs « en Avignon » corrects (car cette tournure n’est pas forcément incorrecte) et qu’après discussion, nous étions tombés d’accord.

Il me reproche mon pseudo : attaque ad hominem.

Je me serais engagé dans une guerre d’édition : ([e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Promo_008.jpg&action=history]). Si Dereckson avait lu l’historique de l’article, il aurait constaté qu’au contraire, quand je me suis rendu compte que cela tournait à la guerre d’édition, j’y ai mis fin en donnant des explications complètes, à la fois sur la page de discussion de l’article en cause, et sur la page de discussion de mon interlocuteur, explications qui ont fait que celui-ci a cessé de « corriger » mes corrections.

Sur ma manière de répondre, voir ci-dessus.

Je ne prendrais pas en compte les conseils qui me sont donnés. Dereckson peut-il citer les conseils qui m’ont été donnés ? Hormis le message d’accueil, le message de Dereckson, suite au blocage, est le premier que je reçois !

Enfin, j’inonderais les pages de discussion avec des arguments « sans aucun sens ». Je vous suggère donc de lire une seule d’entre elles (toutes les autres sont identiques) afin de vous faire votre propre idée sur ces « non-sense arguments ».

Pour toutes ces raison, et devant l’inanité des motifs de mon blocage, je demande mon déblocage. Mon adresse IP actuelle est 84.246.217.25 et mon identifiant de blocage est 117876. (La procédure veut que l’on précise ces indications dans toutes les requêtes de déblocage.) Je vous remercie par avance.

Message adressé aux administrateurs dont la langue maternelle est le français.

PS : Sur la page d’explication qui s’ouvre lorsque l’on veut modifier un article, la procédure de demande de déblocage est indiquée : il faut s’adresser à un administrateur. Et là, surprise : un utilisateur bloqué ne pouvant modifier une page de discussion, il ne peut donc pas demander son déblocage ! C’est pourquoi j’adresse ma demande sous IP, depuis mon téléphone.

Pour le cas où Dereckson, piquerait une nouvelle crise en voyant une nouvelle correction de faute d’orthographe effectuée par moi, pouvez-vous m’indiquer comment il faut s’y prendre pour demander un déblocage ?

{{Louvre number}}

Bonjour, juste une petite note pour dire que j'ai réécrit {{Louvre number}} qui était devenu presque ingérable. Les noms de paramètres sont supprimés : on écrit {{Louvre number|INV 320|MA 23}} au lieu de {{Louvre number|INV= 320| MA = 22}}. --Zolo (talk) 10:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Northern Landscape, Spring by Caspar David Friedrich

Cette catégorie est que si vous supprimez une peinture du mur et mettez-y dans un sac. Il n'y a plus rien à voir. Désolé pour mon mauvais français. --Botaurus (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Judith and Holofernes by Lucas Cranach (I)

Bonjour, Léna, je ne comprends pas, pourquoi tu as supprimé la Category:Paintings by Lucas Cranach (I), parce que c'est important de trouver ces images, et de les retrouver seulement sous Category:Religious paintings by Lucas Cranach the Elder est trop difficile. Je ne vois aucune raison de ne pas utiliser cette catégorie. Je te demande ainsi de restituer la categorie principale. Merci.––Oursana (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Coucou

Ca fait plaisir de te revoir depuis début mars...--Wayne77 (talk) 15:24, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Photos from Yugoslavia

Hi, please see Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Photos from Yugoslavia. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token f7bd4a8893b604ba3c4fe4eaa63b0618

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

a heads-up

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 22:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vitraux Louis Majorelle, Grands Bureaux des Aciéries de Longwy 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vitraux Louis Majorelle, Grands Bureaux des Aciéries de Longwy 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

User:RomaneDagain

Bonjour

Je viens de jeter un œil aux contributions de RomaneDagain, qui a bossé au musées des Augustins de Toulouse et est maintenant à Bordeaux.

Elle intervient sur l'article Musée des beaux-arts de Bordeaux sur Wikipédia, suite à l'ajout sur Commons par ses soins de multiples clichés pris par le musée. Cela impliquant de nombreuses informations non sourcées, des © dans tous les sens et des liens externes dans le corps de texte, j'aimerai lui en toucher deux mots en direct (gentiment, hein !). En prime, il est carrément possible de mettre ses imports en valeur ! On pourrait faire d'une pierre deux coups, et avoir un truc qui bouge à Bordeaux !

Que penses-tu de tout cela ? Du fait de son passage toulousain et de ton implication auprès des Augustins, l'as-tu déjà vue ?

Merci, Trizek ^{from FR} 16:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

PS : fais moi signe quand tu auras répondu, sur Twitter ou ma page Wikipédia :)

Category:Former players of Castres Olympique

Category:Former players of Castres Olympique has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Former players of US Colomiers

Category:Former players of US Colomiers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-

Category:Former players of ASM Clermont Auvergne

Category:Former players of ASM Clermont Auvergne has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 12:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Former players of Stade Français

Category:Former players of Stade Français has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Former players of CA Brive

Category:Former players of CA Brive has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Watson and the Shark

Hi Lena, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:John_Singleton_Copley_-_Watson_and_the_Shark_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=93509888; could you please explain your cat deletions. It is either mistake or vandalism.--Oursana (talk) 10:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

WLM Algérie 2013

Bonjour

Nous vous informons que nous sommes honorés

• Que vous ayez bien voulue faire partie des membres de jury Algérie WLM 2013
• de nous donner un peu de votre temps précieux
• nous aider à sélectionner les 10 photos gagnantes de WLM Algérie 2013

Nous somme sur que votre travail va être pour nous plus que précieux et apporter un plus a l’équipe

Vu qu’il ne reste pas beaucoup pour clôturer le concours je suis à votre disposition pour trouver un moyen pour travailler

Pour que le savoir reste toujours CopyLeft -- libre -- et accessible à tous

salutations

--Bachounda (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2013 (UTC) .

Bonjours j'espère que tu va bien

pour l'Organisation vu que tu as déjà participé aux sélections de l'Année 2012 pour la France et le Kenya en plus ce est-ce que j'avais en tète CAD chacun choisis 10 photos et vous vous l’échange donc

tu peux déjà commencer a faire ta sélection

vu que je participe au concours --- > je ne fais pas partie des membres du jury

je continue ma mission de coordination entre les jurys en m'abstenant a influencé les choix pour la raison suivante :

un bon pourcentage de photos prises ne fait pas partie des monuments classés par le ministère de la Culture algérien ces photos sont exclues automatiquement du concours

je te ferais connaitre les deux autres membres dans mon prochain poste

si tu as des remarques ?

je t'es envoyé une invit sur FB mon nom laba est dézèdien

bonne journée --Bachounda (talk) 10:05, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Stolen Kiss (Fragonard).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:La Lecture chez Madame Geoffrin

Bonjour Léna, j'ai vu que tu avais ajouté créé Category:La Lecture chez Madame Geoffrin, catégorisée dans Category:Petits théâtres de l'intime et Category:Collections of the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Rouen. En fait, la version principale semble être à Malmaison [1] alors que celle de Rouen est un modèle réduit [2]. Tu saurais quelle version a été présentée à l'expo ? --Zolo (talk) 07:39, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Merci. Du coup j'ai un peu corrigé/complété les descriptions, et créé les éléments Wikidata correspondant pour que ce soit tout à fait clair. --Zolo (talk) 09:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/2013-2016⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Self-Portrait_With_a_Bandaged_Ear_(F429)

Category:Self-Portrait_With_a_Bandaged_Ear_(F429) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Nikki Olsen (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Léna,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Two_cutted_sunflowers_(van_Gogh_Museum)

Category:Two_cutted_sunflowers_(van_Gogh_Museum) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Szilas (talk) 16:20, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Allocation de niveau de vol pour la déconfliction de trajectoires 4D.pdf

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Allocation de niveau de vol pour la déconfliction de trajectoires 4D.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:ME 263 IncentiveToCreate2 fr.png
• File:ME 263 IncentiveToCreate2.png

Yours sincerely, JuTa 04:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Ronce « géante Lockness »

Hello Léna,
I'm just looking for identified Rubus cultivars and found your pictures of Ronce « géante Lockness ». I wanted to ask if you know it that is a cultivar and if yes, if it could possibly be 'Loch Ness' with a spelling mistake.
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 20:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Suppression d'images

Vous venez de supprimer l'ensemble des images que j'avais importé suite à cette discussion. Tout d'abord, je tiens à préciser que je comprend tout à fait qu'une image n'a pas à être importé si elle n'a de licence adéquate. J'ai passé du temps à essayer de comprendre les licenses, en regardant attentivement sous quelles licences étaient des photos similaires à celles que j'ai souhaité importé.

Concernant les images que j'ai importé, il y a un tir groupé de suppression qui vient d'être fait, et je ne comprends toujours pas pourquoi.

Il est dit qu'une photo anonyme de plus de 70 ans est dans le domaine public, ce que corrobore clairement l'utilisateur Yann dans la discussion, en disant que les photos scannées d'un livre qui ne sont pas créditées tombent sous Template:Anonymous-EU (ce que j'ai aussi compris en parcourant les licences).

Parmi les photos supprimées, la plupart sont extraites de deux livres :

• François Dubois, Naissance et essor du football à Amiens, Encrage, 1992, 2-906389-36-6
• École de football de l'Amiens Athlétic Club, Le Football en Picardie et l'histoire de ses origines, Dessaint Doullens, 1948

Je possède ces deux livres. Les photos ne sont pas créditées. Il m'apparait donc comme impossible d'en trouver un auteur. Les licences Template:Anonymous-EU et Template:PD-old me semble donc pleinement appropriées. Pouvez-vous donc m'expliquer ces suppressions ?

J'ai de plus importés des photos de Gallica, tirées du magazine Match. Les photos sont aussi non créditées et datées de plus de 70 ans. Les Conditions d'utilisation mentionnent "La réutilisation non commerciale des [reproductions numériques d'oeuvres tombées dans le domaine public provenant des collections de la BnF] est libre et gratuite dans le respect de la législation en vigueur et notamment du maintien de la mention de source.".

Enfin, vous avez supprimé trois photos importées d'Internet. Je comprends qu'un doute puissent être émis pour celle-ci, encore que deux d'entre elles datent de 96 et 104 ans et qu'il me parait peu probable d'en trouver un auteur.

Je précise enfin que j'ai importé toutes ces photos en voulant bien faire et en pensant respecter pleinement les licences, et que celle-ci ont été importées dans le cadre de l'écriture de 4 articles labilisés dans le Portail:Football de Wikipédia en français. Je suis particulièrement désabusé par la suppression massive de ces photos, alors que la discussion lancée n'a pas abouti sur des avis allant clairement vers la suppression.

En l'attente d'un éclaircissement sur ces suppressions.

Bien cordialement --Vanuatu1 (talk) 20:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Nus dans un paysage by Roger de la Fresnaye

Bonjour Léna,

une catégorie avec une seule peinture IMHO n'est pas une bonne idée, parce que cela cache la peinture et personne ne peut pas la retrouver. Serait mieux laisser les dates dans les catégories parentes. Es-tu d'accord que je remets les deux dates dans les catégories parentes?--Oursana (talk) 13:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Grenouille aquarium école Nancy.jpg

File:Grenouille aquarium école Nancy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Wheat Stacks with Reaper

Bonjour Léna, pour créer une catégorie pour une peinture non la cachant, il faut d'user non seulement le titre mais aussi le nom du peintre.--Oursana (talk) 15:24, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Suppression de catégorie

Bonjour !

Je viens de voir que tu avais supprimé la catégorie-mère de cette image. Je te comprends tout à fait, car c'est ce que « naturellement » j'aurais tendance à faire mais dans les consignes de l'Été des villes et villages, il est explicitement demandé d'apposer la catégorie de la commune. Moi, bête et discipliné, j'applique la consigne mais si les catégories que je crée et appose en plus sont suffisantes, alors pas de problème et j'arrêterai de double-catégoriser Litlok (talk) 13:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Artof Popof.jpg

And also:

• File:Sc01b88bfc.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Pourquoi?

Bonjour Léna. Pourquoi ces pages Commons:ÉtédesVilles/Alsace et Commons:ÉtédesVilles/Lorraine etc.? --Havang(nl) (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Bonjour :) Deux intérêts pour moi : regarder s'il y a des régions où il y a peu de photos pour relancer de la communication vers elles, et aussi et surtout utiliser le gadget Global Usage Badges pour voir les photos pas encore utilisées sur une Wikipédia pour aller les y mettre :) Léna (talk) 07:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Pour les régions où il y a peu de photos, je te signale cette carte dynamique qui pourra t'être utile : [3] (lien Map of all coordinates from OSM. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Graffiti in Paris

Bonjour,

Je crois que t'a oublié de retirer les modèles {{Delete}} sur les images.

Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:21, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Graffitis

Merci pour tout le travail avec les graffitis, c'était un labeur ingrat mais nécessaire. Si peu exprimeront leur reconnaissance, beaucoup la ressentiront. Bonne continuation et encore merci ! Rama (talk) 15:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Photos : Daniel Kirkpatrick ou Pierre Bernard ?

Bonjour Lena. Je suis un fan de rugby (et photographe, à l'occasion, même si je n'ai pas du super matos) et j'ai un très gros doute concernant plusieurs photos de la catégorie Daniel Kirkpatrick : [4] (on aperçoit la mention "Bernard" dans le dos) et celle-ci : [5] et aussi [6]. Je pense qu'il pourrait s'agir de Pierre Bernard (les deux joueurs se ressemblent) ou alors Daniel Kirkpatrick utilise le maillot d'échauffement de Pierre Bernard (cf. nom dans le dos sur la première photo), ce qui est possible (les échanges de maillot, ça s'est déjà vu à l'échauffement). Cordialement. --34 super héros (talk) 11:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Re-bonjour. J'ai demandé des avis et Pierre-Selim étant du même avis, je vais changer les catégories... Merci de me contacter si ça pose un problème... Bonne journée. --34 super héros (talk) 12:03, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

copyheart

bonjour; bonne année. je passais en revue l'histoire et pensé que vous pourriez trouver cela amusant . Slowking4♡Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 17:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Ah ! Le Voilà !.jpg

Tableau à Reims.

Bpnjour, juste pour présenté une modif, un nouveau conservateur a été nommé à Reims, nouvelle muséographie et aussi nouveaux cartels, le tableau cité a changé, au niveau de son cartel, j'adapte sans juger. Cordialement Garitan (talk) 10:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Photographs by Paolo Monti

Thank you for your help! --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 19:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cows by Vincent van Gogh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The resolution is not very good but it is the best image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angel with Holy Sponge (Ponte Sant'Angelo) by Antonio Giorgetti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Freedom of Panorama in Belgium

Hi Léna, I am sorry to say, but the restoring of images from the Atomium is currently breaking the Belgian law! The law on Freedom of Panorama comes into effect on the 10th day after the publication of the law in the Belgian official journal. This publication was on the 5th of July. Ten days later is 15 July. So please wait until it is 15 July in Belgium (14 July 22:00 UTC) before you restore images.

Further I like to say that Wikimedia Belgium organises on 15 July a party with the symbolic first image restored and placed back in Wikipedia. If you are situated in Belgium, you are welcome to come. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 01:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Merci de suivre mes contributions. Je me suis sentie bien accueillit et ça donne envie de continuer! Bonne journée Anne-LaureM (talk) 08:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Category:Historical images by Paolo Monti by city

Hi! Thank you for your message. Actually, I've made a mistake changing from "Historical images of X" to "X". I agree that the right category is "Historical images of Ferrara" and not "Ferrara". In the next days I'll correct all the photos I've wrongly changed. I'm a student and I've just got involved into the BEIC project about Paolo Monti's photos. I'm a beginner so every comment on what I change will be helpful. However, I ask you not to add the category "Historical images by Paolo Monti by city" because Marco Chemello asked me to eliminate it, as the the new cathegory will be "by country" instead of "by city". Martavilla15, 20 July 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martavilla15 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Van Gogh

Thank you for your interest in these pictures, I'm happy you like them. Best regards--Szilas (talk) 06:55, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

demandes de suppression

Bonjour

Je viens de demander la suppression de plusieurs images.

Ces images proviennent du blog (non-officiel) de Radio Courtoisie, où elles sont mises au statut "licence libre", sans indication du nom du photographe. Cela ne me semble pas garantir que ce blog respecte le droit des auteurs.

Pour information, cordialement

--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Ancient Roman sculptures in Musée Saint-Raymond

It is a parent category for Category:Portrait gallery of the Villa Chiragan‎. Cathy Richards (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Capitole du Libre 2012 1789.JPG

Yours sincerely Fæ (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Léna!

Happy New Year!

Léna, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:22, 31 December 2016 (UTC)