User talk:Jarekt/Archiv/2009

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:2psp pomnik.JPG[edit]

Witaj!

Bez najmniejszych wątpliwości: Nie jest to pomnik ku czci Armii Krajowej. Nie zawiera odpowiednich symboli lub napisu. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 03:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Masz racje. Poprawiłem. --Jarekt (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PD-Polishsymbol[edit]

Hi, i ask you because you are a Polish speaking contributor and familiar with w:en:Template:PD-PolishGov which is used here as {{PD-Polishsymbol}}. A User requested, that images are falling under the term material, can you help clarify this at Template talk:PD-Polishsymbol or Commons:Deletion requests/File:RPD AMW.jpg? Thanks in advance for your helping, --Martin H. (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is a very broad interpretation of government documents, almost like US Government. The quotes used seem to support it but I will ask around on Polish Wiki. --Jarekt (talk) 05:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much in advance. --Martin H. (talk) 14:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nowości w Commons[edit]

Cześć, odpowiedziałeś kiedyś na apel Przykuty o pisanie nt Commons w Biuletynie Stowarzyszenia. Znajdziesz chwilę żeby zerknąć czy w tekście do nadchodzącego numeru nie minęłam się nigdzie z prawdą, pisząc o konkursie POTY? Może też dodałbyś jakieś inne nowinki? Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 13:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dopisek w biuletynie[edit]

Hej! O bundesarchiv było już w poprzednim numerze: [1]. Pozdrawiam serdecznie, ABX - (O mnie dyskutuj) 14:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nie szkodzi, ten news jest o pracach nad zbiorami, więc uzupełnia poprzednie informacje. Dzięki Jarek za wkład. Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 11:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Po uwadze ABX poprawilem troche moj tekst by brzmial jak kontynuacja wiadomosci z poprzedniego numeru. W razie czego prosze sie nie krepowac z poprawianiem mojego tekstu. Czasami jak wracam do niektorych moich stron - jestem zaskoczony bledami gramatycznymi i ortograficznymi ktore czasami popelniam. Pozdrowiania --Jarekt (talk) 14:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Jasne, całość jest i tak czytana jeszcze raz przed zamknięciem numeru i poprawiana od strony redakcyjnej. Licząc na współpracę nad kolejnymi numerami pozwoliłam sobie dodać Cię do zespołu redakcyjnego jako piszącego o Commons, mam nadzieję, że nie masz nic przeciwko. Kolejny numer za miesiąc :) Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 13:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chetnie pomoge w przyszlych numerach, jednak wieksza liczba perspektyw z Commons moze byc przydatna. --Jarekt (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Extended variant.
svg version

Hi Jarekt - I saw that you created this File:Over-categorization.svg. Thank you for it. However, both this image and the original do not show one important aspect of the categorisation, which is that while "bypass" links are not okay, two PARALLEL paths can lead from one parent category downwards to the same image. I think it would be nice to have that. Labelling the folders would also be good, so that you can talk about them when discussing it with a newbie.

Using the example picture you made, I therefore created this (excuse me using MS paint of all things - that is why I am asking you to produce an SVG version ;-) Ingolfson (talk) 02:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Good idea --Jarekt (talk) 04:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - but would you mind changing the "C" to a "B1" and "B2" as in my example? What I was trying to convey there is that these are PARALLEL categories. Meaning that they sit on the same level just one step below A. That is visible from the arrows and the placement as well, but I just thought that would help. If we ever (maybe to illustrate a sub-point, not for general use) need to show a third level of categories, we can then call it C1, C2, C3... Ingolfson (talk) 06:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done did the corrections --Jarekt (talk) 03:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ghetto Litzmannstadt[edit]

Witam. Pewny jesteś tej edycji? Mam wrażenie, że jednak getto znacznie częściej funkcjonuje z nazwą miasta z czasów okupacji. Zerknij też na to: pl:Dyskusja:Litzmannstadt Ghetto#zdecydowanie Getto Litzmannstadt. pozdrawiam Piastu (talk) 08:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nazwa Łódź/Lodz Ghetto jest dużo czesciej używana w literaturze angielsko-języcznej niż "Litzmannstadt Ghetto"
Google Book Search:
Jest rownież łatwiejsza do zrozumienia, jako że mamy wiele kategorii o Łodzi a "Litzmannstadt" nie jest używany poza nazwą Getta. Dziekuje za link do poprzednich dyskusji na ten temat - nie wiedziałem ze był to temat juz dyskutowany. --Jarekt (talk) 13:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nie ma za co :) Czyli jednak moje wrażenie było mylne. A co z prawidłowością nazwy? Skoro nie istniała Łódź (przez większość czasu, bo getto zdaje się kilka miesięcy przed zmianą nazwy miasta powstało), to chyba Łódź Getto też nie mogło... Tak czy inaczej specem nie jestem, dzięki za wyjaśnienie. pozdrawiam Piastu (talk) 14:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming an image[edit]

Hi, I saw your name on the list of "trusted users" for image renaming. A request was made to rename File:Http_en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Image_Akbar_lg.jpg, but that request was not put forth by a trusted user. It would be great if you could look into it. The current name is quite cumbersome. Thank! 128.174.237.100 20:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done--Jarekt (talk) 22:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mielec[edit]

Wiadomo, że jedno działo przeciwlotnicze z 2. baterii 1 Dywizjonu Samochodowych Dział Przeciwlotniczych zostało pozostawione 5 września w Mielcu z uwagi na uszkodzenie i zdjęcia właśnie tego działa widziałem w jakiś publikacjach (albo na forum Odkrywcy) zidentyfikowane jako działo w Mielcu. Z drugiej strony, kiedyś widziałem je na Ebayu podpisane jako Kielce - ale zapewne pomyłki biorą się z podobieństwa nazw, do rozróżnienia których Niemcy mogli nie przywiązywać większego znaczenia, zwłaszcza, jak były napisane nieczytelnie ręcznie na zdjęciu. Prawdopodobnie to samo ze zdjeciem File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-013-0075-32, Polen, Juden in Kielce.jpg, bo jest z tej samej partii. pibwl (talk) 19:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Warsaw_Uprising_-_Elefant_Tanks_at_Town_Hall.jpg[edit]

File:Warsaw_Uprising_-_Elefant_Tanks_at_Town_Hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Deerhunter (talk) 14:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Warsaw_Uprising_-_Wehrmacht_Officer.jpg[edit]

File:Warsaw_Uprising_-_Wehrmacht_Officer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Deerhunter (talk) 14:36, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Hi Jarekt - you being the only person I (sort of) know who does SVGs, could you have a look at this file? File:Crane machine slewing platform.svg? It displays fine there, but as a thumbnail, on here for example, there is this rectangular black area in the bottomleft corner. Is that something you can edit? Cheers for having a look, Ingolfson (talk) 07:27, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at it in using inkscape program and there seem to be no objects in this neighborhood. Nothing I can edit. I will ask at Commons:Graphics_village_pump. Maybe someone there knows how to fix it. --Jarekt (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done fixed. --Jarekt (talk) 03:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs of identifiable people again[edit]

I have made some changes to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people/Proposal in response to a variety of helpful suggestions that users have made on the talk page. You have already commented there; could I ask you to have a look again, and to consider whether you would like to express an opinion in the Poll towards the bottom of the page? Many thanks. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jarekt/Archiv!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

photo request[edit]

Booker T. Washington National Monument near Roanoke could use a photo, if you're in the area. Thanks in advance, regardless of whether you can help. Dmadeo (talk) 05:31, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dmadeo, I do not live near Roanoke, but in Northern Va, so unfortunately I will not be able to help in this case. --Jarekt (talk) 02:43, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa![edit]

I've looked to my watchlist and I've seen quite a hundreds of edits that were made by your bot. It is removing {{Location dec}} and adding {{Location}} I have no problem with this, yet it surprised me a bit. However, the tool http://www.giswiki.org/hjl_geocoding.htm is still having only retired templates as an only option. What to do? It would be good to replace it in the tool but I don't know who in control there. Aktron (talk) 21:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The bot was changing {{Location dms}} to {{Location}}. We are trying to retire bunch of location templates redirecting to {{Location dec}} and {{Location}} templates. Thanks for a tip about the giswiki as the source of {{Location dms}}. I will see if there is a way to contact some about it. --Jarekt (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Dear Jarekt, I'm afraid I had to close your RfA as unsuccessful given the limited support your candidacy presented. I believe you may gather more support in the future if you get a bit more involved in areas closer to administrator work. It's rather boring, though, so don't be sad you didn't get to be an admin now :). Ahonc left you a question about your bot on the RfA page, you might want to reply him. Thanks for all your work on Commons! Patrícia msg 11:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:JarektBot[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks --Jarekt (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment reply, removing nowiki from image page[edit]

Just letting you know that I replied to your question here.-Andrew c (talk) 17:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba o wykonanie zadania przez bota[edit]

Witaj!

Okazało się, że na świecie jest co najmniej pięć miejscowości o nazwie Sopot. Proszę o przeniesienie zawartości Category:Reliefs in Sopot, do Category:Reliefs in Sopot, Poland. Ręcznie zrobiłem tak przy dużo mniej zasobnych kategoriach, aby nie utrudniać już życia mieszkańcom niepolskich Sopotów. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 23:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zrobione --Jarekt (talk) 02:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo dziękuję. Teraz chcę Cię prosić o użycie bota w ciut bardziej prywatnej sprawie: Ta sekcja mojej strony użytkownika grupuje wykonane przeze mnie fotografie. Ostatnio uznałem, że wiele z nich wymaga z mojej strony poprawek programem graficznych i/lub zmiany nazw na bardziej precyzyjne. Byłoby mi łatwiej, gdyby Twój bot porozdziełał je enterami. Chyba nie wpłynie to na sposób ich prezentacji. Dokonując koniecznych poprawek poszczególnych plików, będą miał pewność, że żadnego nie przegapiłem. Proszę o rozdzielenie ich wszystkich użyciem po czterech enterów. Dziękuję. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 22:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chetnie pomoge ale nie jestem pewien jak. Moj Bot liste plikow do poprawienia i informacje co poprawic. --Jarekt (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Miałem na myśli taką edycję. Odstęp po cztery linijki między poszczególnymi plikami. Wtedy łatwie będzie mi dokonać niezbędnych poprawek. A nazbierało się. Jeśli to niewykonalne, śmiało mów. Nie wiem jak daleko sięgają granice możliwości botów. Czy trzeba mu powiedzieć, by rozdziełal tam, gdzie zaczynają się słowa file i/lub image. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pragnę abyś miał pewność, że nie żywię do Ciebie urazy. Nic a nic nie znam się na informatyce. Nie wiem jak daleko sięgają granice możliwości botów. Opisaną wyżej edycję wykonam osobiście. Po dłuższym namyśle, wydedukowałem iż przyznanie tego zadania botowi wymaga więcej zachodu niż człowiek zrobiłby to ręcznie. Poza tym, to o niebo wygodniejsze niż przenoszenie wielu plików z źle nazwanej do prawidłowej kategorii. Z pewnością zgłoszę się, gdy będzie jeszcze potrzeba przeniesienia wielu plików z błędnie do prawidłowo nazwanej kategorii. To już niedługo. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 13:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sprobowalem wczoraj uzyc bota ale cos narzekal ze strone ma 63kb co jest wiecej niz 32kb i w koncu nic nie zrobil. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 02:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

template Location: vcard question[edit]

I have a response for you at Template_talk:Location#vcard. Sorry for the delay- I don't look at location much since it is in able hands. If you want to let me have a shot at answering any future microformats inquiries, let me know on my talk page. -J JMesserly (talk)

Creator template image[edit]

Why can't there be an image in the creator template ? {{Creator}} --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 19:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean and extra optional variable with photo of the "creator", that would look something like Category:Photographs by Eugeniusz Lokajski? If so than I planning on adding something like that. --Jarekt (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep that's what I mean. Could u add an update at the talk page of Template_talk:Creator?--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I do not have much to update yet. I had some unsatisfactory tries in my sandbox, and I am still working on it. --Jarekt (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooooops[edit]

With one click you made 20.000 images end up in Category:Source templates. Multichill (talk) 09:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should remember not to use Hot Cat with templates. The results are often not what you expect.--Jarekt (talk) 11:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-German[edit]

Regarding Category:Anti-German, please be a little patient. --Matthead (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just renamed it to Category:Anti-German propaganda.--Jarekt (talk) 00:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this intentional?[edit]

[2]. Just wondering if you meant to remove the template instead of replacing it. Rocket000 (talk) 03:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I see what you did. Rocket000 (talk) 03:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Creator template[edit]

You suggested a change to the layout and it has been fulfilled. Nothing seem to have changed though in the general creators templates.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 18:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howcheng made the change. Still not working.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is very strange. The same code at user:jarekt/a was used to create some of the creator templates at user:jarekt/c which show dates in test image File:Climbing_in_Joshua_Tree_NP.jpg. May be the problem is caching of the pages. --Jarekt (talk) 03:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


User:R. Engelhardt/gallery and other galleries of mine[edit]

Hello, why did You modify my galleries? I can't see, what is better now. Normally it is not usual to modify User sites. But I am always willing to learn. Greetings, --R. Engelhardt (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on retiring rarely used geocoding templates, Template:Coordinate was one of them. I had a bot replace all the uses files but then noticed that 3 personal galleries use them a lot too, so I modified them as well. I was not trying to improve it, but rather I have a Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Coordinate for this template and figured it would be unfriendly gesture if it is deleted and than your page do not show properly. In case the template is not deleted you can always revert the changes. --Jarekt (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing type:landmark[edit]

Hi, why is type:landmark [3] not supported? Thx --Packa (talk) 21:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to replace files using {{Coor dms}} with {{Location}} family templates. In {{Location}} template type:landmark is the only one supported and is automatically attached to all coordinates using location template. But in case of your file the change from {{Coor dms}} with {{Location}} did not happen. I will tweak the bot and run it again to catch the ones missed. --Jarekt (talk) 02:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jarek, I understand it (I don’t know, why is {{Coor dms}} in my photograph used, while I am using {{Location}} but it is not important). But I don’t know that type:landmark is the only one supported, I know only it is a default value. --Packa (talk) 08:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I am not sure what happens when you provide other type than landmark. You might have to ask this question at COM:GEO talk page. My understanding is that type:landmark and type:.... will be passed to https://geohack.toolforge.org/geohack.php?pagename=User_talk:Jarekt/Archiv/2009&params=. --Jarekt (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

template:coor dms[edit]

Hi Jarek, just seen the changes that you've made to the coords on my commons upload, I don't have a problem with this but do you know of a site other than the Geolocator website [4] where I can obtain the coords in the new format? Aviceda (talk) 07:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page COM:GEO have all the official ways. On that page Google Maps: Method 1 uses Geolocator website you mentioned. The only thing you should do differently is to copy {{Location}} template string instead of {{Coor dms}}. You can also try one of the other methods. My favorite one is Google Maps: Method 2. --Jarekt (talk) 13:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Upload script[edit]

Hello Jarekt,
please see User_talk:Nichalp/Upload_script#Cant_find_the_file_error. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your help. --Jarekt (talk) 12:25, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong tags[edit]

Hello,

These tags were wrongly added. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mumbai area locator map.svg. Yann (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that. I did not see the explanation why the tag was removed, and see to many cases when users remove them. --Jarekt (talk) 13:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help?[edit]

Could you see what to make of User:Krystian Kuchta's uploads? I see many uploads from a Polish image site, where the images have been uploaded by several different users, and no indication of a free license anywhere (as far as I see). Also File:Antoni Janusz.jpg, cropped (probably by the user) from an external source and then claimed to be "own work". Other uploads by this user are also doubtful. I have the impression it might be good if a Polish speaker tried to sort this out with him. For me, it just looks as if he's uploading other peoples' works without caring about copyrights, but maybe I'm missing something. Lupo 21:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree most of his uploads seem to be found on various websites and uploaded under {{PD-self}} or {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} licenses, sometimes with and sometimes without source. I left him a message in Polish Wiki. I am afraid that unless he has some kind of explanation than we might have to delete most of his uploads. --Jarekt (talk) 03:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mur getta[edit]

Witaj

Czy zwróciłeś uwagę na fragment tablicy (w prawym górnym rogu ) "Seuchensprerrgebiet. Eintritt verboten". Tak Niemcy oznaczali granice dzielnicy żydowskiej ( po pretekstem tyfusu) , jeszcze przed formalnym utworzeniem (i zamknięciem) getta. Granice getta były jeszcze przed utworzeniem ( i raz po utworzeniu) przesuwane. Na pewno foto przedstawia budowę muru getta ( po cóż ktoś grodziłby Świętokrzyską ?). Być może ostatecznie fragment ulicy nie znalazł się w granicach getta. Zrób coś z opisem, bo na teraz wygląda,że zdjęcie jest mistyfikacją - a nie jest.

Serdecznie pozdrawiam:

Andros64 (talk) 12:26, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dziekuje za uwage. Poprawilem. pozdrawiam --Jarekt (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ImageBoxes[edit]

Hi Jarekt! You seem to be one of the few people interested in getting this feature to work. I took a look at it and decided to rewrite it completely. If you like, you could try out ImageAnnotator instead... (installation instructions are on the linked page). If you could beta-test that a little, that'd be great. I did test it already quite a bit, and it works fine on a wide array of browsers (see the documentation), but I don't have one of the most important ones: IE7. Anyway, take a look at it. Cheers, Lupo 08:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: My test file was File:Spelterini Blüemlisalp.jpg. It now has three notes. Lupo 09:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree - Pixie Rock 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good composition --Ianare 07:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skytop Tower at Mohonk - door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, but tilted. Fix, please? Maedin 10:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
fixed --Jarekt
Thanks. Maedin 15:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an addendum to this ... both it and the one of the cliff that got rejected, I have suggested to Juliancolton as selected picture candidates for the Hudson Valley portal on enwiki. Hope that's sort of a consolation prize for the cliff face image (which I really like). Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodie Island Lighthouse 2008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments really nice but perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 14:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree image will benefit greatly from correcting distortions. --Afrank99 16:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone tell me where are the distortions to correct? --Jarekt 17:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I've corrected perspective and CA, please purge for actual view. If the result should not be adequate, please revert. But I believe the new version can be QI. -- Smial 20:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
now good --Mbdortmund 21:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree - The Blob Formation 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seamless stitch. P.S. ... except some pixels at middle of top edge, please crop again. --Iotatau 19:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree NP - Joshua Tree 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment A special tree but I struggle with the framing. --Iotatau 19:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment recropped and removed a tree fragment on the left edge --Jarekt 02:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now. --Iotatau 07:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colington Harbour beach 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Iotatau 22:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree - The Blob Formation 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shadow a little distracting, but nice colours and sharp --Ianare 00:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Coord[edit]

Hi Jarekt, You mentioned there is an issue with {{Coord}} and that you were going to clean it up. I'm just wondering: wouldn't simply redirecting {{Coord}} to {{Location}} do the trick? I haven't done it yet in case I'm missing something. Cheers, Pruneautalk 07:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that will work: coord seems to have the same parameters as location. The only issue is that original coord before it was retired was in a form which could be placed in galleries under images. {{Location}} can not be used that way. But it is not the issue in current set since it is only used in files. But in general I prefer a template replacement (in all files) over redirect - it is a cleaner solution. Another issue is why do people still using it and how do they know about it - I suspect some automatic tool which was not updated. --Jarekt (talk) 16:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps {{Coord}} should be redirected to {{Object location}}. Coordinates in wikipedia are normally those of the object, not of the camera location. Sv1xv (talk) 08:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! George Mason University - Spuhler Field 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment tilt, correct, please --George Chernilevsky 06:21, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I stared at it and stared a little more and I still can not figure out which way is it tilted. --Jarekt 14:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I think George refers to converging verticals/keystoning. --Iotatau 19:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I see it not. I uploaded a new version. --Jarekt 12:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me now. Next time put up a tripod and use f/8, border sharpness of the kit lenses fully open is only so-so. --Iotatau 12:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Coordinate template[edit]

OK, I am a bit busy right now, I have to check possible usage and delete all contents first and then delete the category. I shall do it next Friday. Sv1xv (talk) 15:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ResolvedSv1xv (talk) 07:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks --Jarekt (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for fixing my typo on File:NinestonesdorsetC.jpg. Just wondering how did you know there was an error on that page? MortimerCat (talk) 06:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It failed error checking in {{Location}} and showed up in Category:Media with erroneous locations --Jarekt (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User subpages[edit]

Hi, Jarekt. I noticed that some of your user subpages are automatically categorized in lots of categories where they shouldn't be, because they include dozens of creator templates. Please find a solution to this problem whereby you can display the templates on your subpage without it being automatically categorized. Regards. --BomBom (talk) 06:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Jarekt,
both User:Jarekt/c and User:Jarekt/a appear in the cat for speedy deletions. --Túrelio (talk) 06:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I blanked those pages. If I need them I can use past versions. --Jarekt (talk) 13:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internationalisation[edit]

Hello, I recognized that your bot adds the international templates {{int:filedesc}} and {{int:license}}. I wanted to change them (remove the colon in the license template), but I did not find them anywhere or find a way to change that. Can you help me? --Schlurcher (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In order to get rid of colon in license template you need to ask at talk page of MediaWiki:License. That is where this string is stored. --Jarekt (talk) 12:41, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Creator templates to fix[edit]

Hi, what does that mean when your bot puts a Creator template in this category? What should be done about those templates? No hint in the edit summary, no hint in the category itself...? --Eusebius (talk) 12:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The category was created 13 minutes before you wrote. I did not have a chance to write anything. I added explanation in the Category:Creator templates to fix and Template talk:Creator. --Jarekt (talk) 13:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, sorry for the fast reaction then. I'm not a big fan of the decision, but I guess there's a consensus around it. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warsaw_Uprising_by_Gąszewski_-_Listening_to_Radio_in_Kampinos.jpg[edit]

Hello,

Could you please check "Date=15 August" (instead of 15 september) ? Which of the two is correct ? Teofilo (talk) 13:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake it should have been September. --Jarekt (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Availability of photos from NAC[edit]

Hello Jarekt, I am writing a few articles on 20th century history for the Spanish wikipedia and I am looking for illustratins for them. I have noticed you have uploaded into wikimedia some pictures (such as http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Warsaw_Uprising_-_Wedding.jpg) from Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe (NAC), where I have found myself some very interesting ones.Though I have asked them directly, I was wondering whether you could tell me if there is some sort of agreement similar to the one with the Bundesarchiv so that pictures can be safely uploaded into wikimedia under a free license... Would you know? Is that all right? Is there a way to remove the watermark from the pictures? Just wondering whether you may now. Thanks in advance for your help!--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no agreement similar to Bundesarchiv with any polish archives. All WWII images I upload are based on {{PD-Polish}} which require a proof that a photograph was published in Poland prior to 1994. I do not like scanning images from books, but if I find an image on the web which was published in a polish book I upload them. My uploads are limited to images found in few books I have. See subdirectories of Category:Warsaw Uprising photos by source for 3 of the books I used. What images are you looking for? --Jarekt (talk) 21:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Unfortunately, the images I have found (quite a lot of them, as a matter of fact) may or may not have been published in a Polish book or journal prior to that date... The kind of images I am looking for are politically relevant images of the interwar period such as, for instance, http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/28366/0f4509954584d1d3b69c4f7e1589c439/ (Hungarian PM Bárdossy signing the Anticomintern Pact), http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/28400/0f4509954584d1d3b69c4f7e1589c439/, http://www.audiovis.nac.gov.pl/obraz/29520/24ef417a0e0b34359fa374a20808a063/ (Slovak President Tiso visiting Hitler), etc. Though the Bundesarchiv does have images on these politicians and events, they are not digitalized yet and hence they are not available...--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 08:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I do not think I can help you here. --Jarekt (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree - Dandelion 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Ferengi 16:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joshua Tree - Jerry Brown 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Rockface at left a bit underexposed, but I think it provides good contrast with the brightly lit right side of the photo. --Ferengi 16:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern Box Turtle 8679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments technically not perfect but you hit the moment --Mbdortmund 13:48, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

Hey man, I've seen you reverting vandalism and test edits recently, and I was just wondering if you'd be interested in getting the rollback tools. Believe me, it's all a lot easier with them, and I have trust in you that you'll use them only for the good. I'd be interested what you think of this idea. No matter how you decide, though, thanks for helping out here. --The Evil IP address (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sure I will give it a try. I do not usually look for new edits, since I am mostly involved in improving templates, image descriptions and categorization. But I often run into some strange edits where rollback tools would be handy. --Jarekt (talk) 19:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --The Evil IP address (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your QI nomination[edit]

Hi, Jarek!

About this nomination File:Washington DC Zoo - Physignathus cocincinus 1.jpg: very nice, but not well sharp. Try decrease size for increase sharpness.

It is my opinion.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 17:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will try, thanks --Jarekt (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! US Supreme Court - corrected.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok. --Marcok 01:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Washington DC Zoo - Inland Bearder Dragon 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice portrait --George Chernilevsky 17:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Creator}}[edit]

Hello, the Creator template isn't yet working with your code, see this test edit I made. Please fix the code, otherwise I unfortunately can't make the edit. Thanks. --The Evil IP address (talk) 17:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plakaty z powstania warszawskiego[edit]

Niestety, wszystkie pójdą do skasowania. Jak mogłeś nie zauważyć, że szablon PD-Polish dotyczy *wyłącznie* zdjęć? Jeśli załadowałeś więcej takich plakatów z okresu wojny, proszę o ich wskazanie. A.J. (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Masz racje, pomyłką było ładowanie rysunków używając PD-Polish. Są to jedne z moich wczesnych dodatków to Commons gdy po załadowaniu jakiejś setki zdjęć z powstania głownie szukałem dobrej jakości skanów grafik opublikowanych przed 1994. Za 5 lat wiele z nich będzie PD jako prace anonimowe, ale w miedzy czasie powinny być skasowane. --Jarekt (talk) 03:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Skasowalem wszystkie plakaty --Jarekt (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba o wykonanie zadania przez bota[edit]

Witaj!

Niedługo tegoroczny festiwal. Zwracam się z prośbą, aby Twój bot przeniósł całą zawartość Category:Polish Film Festival in Gdynia do Category: XXXIII Polish Film Festival in Gdynia 2008. Ostatnia chwila, by zapobiec nieporozumieniom. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dziękuję. --Starscream (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures of Racot[edit]

Sorry, ze dalej po polsku, ale angielskim to wladam tylko tak na 75%. Do rzeczy, czy Moglbys mi wytlumaczyc dlaczego zmieniles podpisy pod zdjeciami z Racotu z okresu II wojny swiatowej? Polacy z Racotu nie zostali ewakuowani tylko wysiedleni - wlasnie "evakuieren" znaczy ewakuowac a "aussiedeln" wysiedlac. Dziwi mnie ze 70 lat po wojnie w encyklopedii netowej toleruje sie podpisy pod zdjeciami z kuzni propagandy Goebbelsa, gdyz cytujac owczesna propagande niemiecka "Polacy zostali ewakuowani na wschod z odwiecznych ziem "niemieckiego lebensraumu". Rzeczy nalezy nazywac po imieniu od pazdziernika 1939 w Wielkopolsce i na Pomorzu nastapily wysiedlenia a nie ewakuacje. Przypadkowo mam dojscie do pewnego archiwum, w pewnym miescie portowym w Niemczech gdzie mozna znalezc zdjecia z przygotowanymi do transportu - wiadomo gdzie - Zydami - z oryginalnym nazistowskim podpisem "Judenevakuierung" / Ewakuacja Zydow. Wyobrazmy sobie, zupelnie hipotetycznie ze ktos to teraz zeskanuje (za 2 lata bedzie mialo 70) i wstawi na wikipedie z oryginalnie przetlumaczonym tekstem propagandy hitlerowskiej jako "Ewakuacja Zydow". pozdr. 80.171.17.72 13:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja nie mam nic przeciwko poprawkom, jednak dałeś je w złym miejscu (przeczytaj template:BArch-biased/pl), a jako że ja nie mowie po niemiecku to nie zmieniłem niemieckiego podpisu. Po twoim wytłumaczeniu poprawiłem podpisy jeszcze raz. Mam nadzieje ze tym razem nie bedziesz miał zastrzeżeń. Dziękuje za poprawki. Pozdrowienia --Jarekt (talk) 13:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External image links in SVG files[edit]

Either put an embedded raster in the file (as opposed to an external image link) or request that the SVG file be deleted, because a file that doesn't display and never will display (as long as there is an external image link in the file, something which is not allowed here) is of absolutely no use to anybody)... AnonMoos (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Refuge de Vallonpierre.jpg[edit]

Hi Jarekt, thanks for correcting the error in the geodata, I just mixed things uo. Do you happen to know how you can add info on the direction the viewer is facing? I vaguely recall that it is possible to add a direction that will result in the symbol on Google Maps pointing in a certain direction, e.g. NE or SSW or things like that. It isn't really important, but if possible... Regards, MartinD (talk) 13:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You add an extra parameter heading:NE. See documentation of {{Location}} for more details. --Jarekt (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll experiment with the attributes. Regards, MartinD (talk) 11:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

My watchlist gave me the info that you have removed the category 'Soldier'? WHY? There are clearly two soldiers visible on the tank. So, the category is right? Or isn't it?--A.Hakansson (talk) 13:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for bothering, but i am new here, so i ask.
In case you did not found it yet some general rules of Commons categorization can be found in commons:Categories, but general idea is that Commons software makes it very hard to find images in categories with more than 200 images, so we try to keep number of images categories low. As a result very specific categories are better than general categories. In specific case of categories I changed in your File:Tank in front of Gucci.jpg, I noticed that there seemed to be several redundant categories resulting in likely over-categorization. Since you had category:Beijing I removed category:China. Since you had Category:People's Liberation Army. I removed Category:Military and Category:Soldier. --Jarekt (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your explanation! It is quite hard for a newbie like me to find a way through this jungle!--A.Hakansson (talk) 10:33, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot problems[edit]

Your bot is incorrectly categorizing certain Thomas Eakins works - File:Map of France, Spain, Portugal, and Italy J2.jpg is a drawing, not a painting; File:'Lincoln and Grant', bronze sculptures by William Rudolf O'Donovan (men) & Thomas Eakins (horses), 1893-1894, Grand Army Plaza, Brooklyn, New York City.JPG are bronze sculptures, not paintings.

I suggest you consult en:List of works by Thomas Eakins. Anything listed as "oil", "watercolor", or "painting" is a painting. Things listed as ink, pencil, etc are drawings. Raul654 (talk) 23:21, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know about it - most of Thomas Eakins works were paintings so my bot moved all his works to painting category. Than I will move by hand photographs and drawings, give me a hand if you feel like it. --Jarekt (talk) 01:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm busy scanning and uploading the rest of his photographs (about 250 more) and identifying the ones we already have. Raul654 (talk) 01:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went through and fixed the remaining errors in your categorization. Raul654 (talk) 05:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thank you --Jarekt (talk) 12:21, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot problems II[edit]

You / your bot put many paintings by Edgar Degas in the Category:Paintings by Claude Monet (Example: File:Edgar Germain Hilaire Degas 009.jpg). Be a little more carefull with your bot. -- Rlbberlin (talk) 13:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found one more file with this same problem using CatScan. All fixed now. --Jarekt (talk) 17:17, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gen. Duch[edit]

Nie było w tej sprawie deletion request. Grafiki te, jako załadowane przeze mnie osobiście w czerwcu 2007, usunąłem wczoraj na zasadzie autopoprawki. Skanując Wańkowicza "Monte Cassino" przeoczyłem, że na końcu książki, pomiędzy indeksem nazwisk a spisem treści, znajduje się strona treści następującej:

Materiał ilustracyjny z zastrzeżeniem praw autorskich dostarczyli:
[tu lista nazwisk autorów zdjęć i numerów stron w książce, na których te zdjącia się znalazły].

Z bólem serca zmuszony więc byłem skorygować własny błąd i usunąć trzy z siedmiu fotografii zeskanowanych przeze mnie z tej książki. Pozostałe cztery zdjęcia na zacytowanej liście nie były wymienione, zatem je pozostawiłem.

Pozdrawiam Julo (talk) 19:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gdańsk Main City Town Hall[edit]

Witam!

Rodaku w Ameryce. Najlepiej możesz mi pomóc. Aby nie było bałaganu w kategorii Gdańsk Town Hall, stworzyłem category:Gdańsk Main City Town Hall. Coś mi mówi, że ta nazwa to pomieszanie z poplątaniem. Jak Ty przetłumaczyłbyś Gdański Ratusz Głównego Miasta? Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja bym zmienil Category:Gdańsk Town Hall na Category:Gdańsk Town Halls i zmienil category:Gdańsk Main City Town Hall na category:Gdańsk Town Hall lub category:Town Hall of Główne Miasto Gdańsk. Osobiscie nie lubie tlumaczyc nazw geograficznych. Mielismy szczescie ze nazwa town hall jest na Commons czesciej uzywana niz city hall, tak to bysmy mieli category:Gdańsk Main City City Hall ;). Takze bym zaproponowal dodanie polskich nazw retuszow do category:Gdańsk New Town Hall, category:Gdańsk Old Town Hall, category:Present Gdańsk Town Hall. --Jarekt (talk) 18:11, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Czy i jak tłumaczyć nazwy geograficzne, to gorący temat. Ale myślę, że z racji swojej roli, angielski musi na tym projekcie dominować. Lubię przeglądać wiele grafik, często losowo dobranych kategorii. Ale opada mi natychmiast radość, gdy tytuły i napisy nie są po angielsku. Jak tureckie kazanie. Lubię wiedzieć czym jest to na co patrzę. A jeśli wiem, to choćby co jest napisane na tabliczce lub na czyją cześć. Dlatego, gdy coś ładuję, piszę relatywnie wyczerpująco po angielsku. Czasem myślę, że niektóre moje zdjęcia mają zbyt długie tytuły... Język polski jeszcze długo nie będzie w czołówce najbardziej znanych. Przyznaję, że długo biję się z myślami, kiedy powinienem zatytułować polską nazwą. Z jednej strony piszę Chlebnicka Gate, a z drugiej Green Gate. Ale jaki Anglosas powie bez wysiłku Brama Zielona lub Wielka Zbrojownia? Kieruję się perspektywą turysty. Stosuję taką jaką spodziewałbym się na mapie. Więc nazw ulic nie tłumaczę. A może by tak Town Hall Of Main City Of Gdańsk? Historycy nie lubią, gdy mówi się, że Gdańsk ma starówkę. Więc jesteśmy zmuszeni pisać Główne Miasto/Main City. A może jest jakiś inny synonim niż City i Town? Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 21:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, uzylem google który znalazł na temat
  • "Gdańsk Main Town" - 12,300 stron
  • "Gdańsk Main City" - 1,230 stron
  • "gdańsk main town hall" - 9,490 stron
  • "gdańsk town hall" - 9,200 stron
  • "gdańsk main city hall" - 9 stron
  • "gdańsk main city town hall" - 283 stron
  • "gdańsk main town city hall" - 10 stron
  • "Town Hall of Główne Miasto Gdańsk" - 0 stron
  • "Town Hall Of Main City Of Gdańsk" - 0 stron
Więc sądzę ze "gdańsk main town hall" jest najlepszą nazwą, ale "gdańsk town hall" jest równie dobrą nazwą. --Jarekt (talk) 21:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Dziękuję za pomoc i celne uwagi. Masz rację. Najlepszym rozwiązaniem jest category:Gdańsk Main Town Hall. To też mi świtało, ale... Poproszę, Cię aby Twój bot przeniósł tam zawartość category:Gdańsk Main City Town Hall.

Jeden z nas albo oboje dodaliśmy Twoją stronę dyskusji do trzech kategorii omawianych budowli :-)))))))))))) Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 22:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA[edit]

Moze czas o tym pomyslec? Znasz sie na rzeczy, masz tez sporo skasowanych zdjec po Twoim oznaczeniu. Herr Kriss (talk) 00:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja chętnie, ale jak na razie moja proba się nie powiodła z powodu nie wystarczajacej ilości glosow. --Jarekt (talk) 03:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Morkets MerkeTMB2007.jpg[edit]

File:Morkets MerkeTMB2007.jpg[edit]

File:Morkets MerkeTMB2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Slycooper (talk) 12:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy[edit]

Hej

Po pierwsze nie zmieniłem, bo cc-by-sa-3.0 była tylko 'implied' przez migrację z GFDL, a po drugie dodałem cc-by-sa-2.5, bo taka została podana na stronie autorów z informacją o pozwoleniu. Mailowałem z nimi na ten temat przez jakiś czas - myślałem żeby poprosić ich o kopię na OTRS, ale chyba jak na razie nie ma takiej potrzeby. --Leafnode✉ 12:56, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Z tego co wiem to zmiana migracyjna nie była z nimi konsultowana, bo to ja im zasugerowałem zrobienie dual-license. I racja, dopiszę na template-talk informację o przyczynach zmiany. BTW - strasznie zazdroszczę Ci terenów wspinaczkowych :) --Leafnode✉ 15:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redir Template:Photo-by-Wojciechowscy-GFDL usunąłem. Porządki - bardzo fajnie; dodanie explicite kategorii Category:Photographs by Marek and Ewa Wojciechowscy było niepotrzebne, bo szablon to dodaje, ale to w niczym nie przeszkadza. Nową wersję szablonu przeniosłem - zobacz czy wszystko jest OK, bo merge'owałem historię i mogłem się gdzieś rypnąć. Dokończyłem też tłumaczenie szablonu. Co do wspinaczki - a pewnie, nie mówię że nie ma gdzie się wspinać, aczkolwiek w Tatrach jeszcze nie próbowałem - tam wszystko trzeba z własną protekcją (dolinki i jura są obite), no i jeszcze wszędzie park narodowy :) --Leafnode✉ 14:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Out of scope images by Joymaster[edit]

Jaki z tego wniosek się wylonil? Kasować to, czy nie? Masur (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moja opinie znasz - kasować. Ale wniosek sie zaden wylonil z tej "dyskusji". Jak wspomnialem parę zdjec rodzinnych mozna zostawić bo COM:SCOPE#File in use in another Wikimedia project na to pozwala. --Jarekt (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Pozwolę sobie wtrącić się. Nie jestem pewny, czy jego dzieci za kilka lat będą zadowolone, że każdy je może zobaczyć w tak intymnych sytuacjach. Choćby ten mały, nakrapiany na biało... --Starscream (talk) 17:02, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To byla jego decyzja, jak Joymaster albo jego dzieci poprosza o skasowanie z tego powodu to bym skasowal a tak to bym nie uszczesliwial na sile. --Jarekt (talk) 17:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proszę się nie krępować[edit]

Jeśli jest przyczyna, dla której nie możesz wykonać mojej prośby z użyciem bota, śmiało mów. Ja wszystko rozumiem. Każdy z nas ma normalne życie w prawdziwym świecie, którego nie można odłożyć na później. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Przyczyna jest ze mnie nie bylo przez weekend. Jestem w stanie urochomic mojego bota tylko z jednego komputera i sprobuje to zrobic dzis wieczorem (za jakies 10 godzin). --Jarekt (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dziękuję :-) --Starscream (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Czy bot da radę?[edit]

Czy twój bot dałby radę podobnie jak template Wojciechowskich pozamieniać {{PD-Polish}}? A.J. (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Co bys chcial zrobic z {{PD-Polish}}?--Jarekt (talk) 12:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Zmienić mu nazwę na PD-Polish-Photo; co jakiś czas muszę tłumaczyć, że grafik i innych dzieł on nie dotyczy. A.J. (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bot da rade - zmienic {{PD-Polish}} na {{PD-Polish-Photo}} dla 3-4 k plikow nie jest problemem. Problem jest ze zmiana wszystkich linkow i inter-linkow, przeniesieniem Template:PD-Polish i 10 podstron do Template:PD-Polish-Photo, przeniesieniem Category:PD Polish, itp. Tego typu zmiany powinny byc najpierw przedyskutowane na Template talk:PD-Polish. Moze latwiej napisac cos w rodzaju {{PD-Polish source}} ale na temat grafik? --Jarekt (talk) 19:04, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

de-dureaucrated?[edit]

Do you have an idea what User:Docu means here? See also User talk:Docu#Help:Gadget-ImageAnnotator. I don't get it. Lupo 13:05, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"[..] I do not like your reversals of my edits like [..]"[edit]

Hi Jarekt, just to address one of your concerns you brought up on my talk page (Quote "Also I do not like your reversals of my edits like: this or this."). Both reversal included an explanation which address the explanation you brought up for the removal of my additions. Is there anything else you would want me to do? -- User:Docu at 14:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Media with erroneous locations[edit]

I'm sorry; I didn't notice that you were correcting anything and thought that you had done nothing other than moving the location template. I'll fix them immediately. Nyttend (talk) 20:37, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've found the error with the church picture, but what's wrong with the school picture? {{Location|40|48|13|N|81|22|12|W}} seems fine to me: there aren't more than 59 minutes or seconds anywhere, I have three numbers, north, three numbers, and west, and there aren't any abnormal parameters; but it still tells me that something is wrong. It seems to think that the template is in the Eastern Hemisphere, but I can't figure out why. Nyttend (talk) 20:41, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what is wrong - I had to retype it to fix it. I suspect some non-printable characters, letters that look like numbers or something like that. I often clean up this directory but rarely run into problem like this. --Jarekt (talk) 02:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed it again. I think it was an non-printable character after W. --Jarekt (talk) 02:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Creator templates[edit]

I wasn't aware that the creator template now can do categorization. Thanks for updating Creator:A.E. Roberts. However, there's a small problem with your changes: the page is now placed first on Category:Photographers from Australia, when in fact it should be sorted under "R". Seems {{Creator}} would need besides a "Homecat" parameter an additional parameter to indicate whether to use the Sortkey also on that Homecat. Otherwise we'll just end up with all Creator pages sorted under " ", which isn't helpful at all. Lupo 07:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed Creator:A.E. Roberts even more bring it to the way most of the new creator templates are categorized. I guess it would help if I followed my own guidelines. For a while I was looking at standardizing our 3.5k creator template collection. I added the Homecat parameter to creator template in attempt to standardize categorization. Over 100k images use creator templates and most creator templates autocategorize images, making them very hard to subcategorize. As a result I patrol new creator pages in addition to fixing the old ones. --Jarekt (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eugene Delacroix-Nadar.jpg[edit]

File:Eugene Delacroix-Nadar.jpg is not an exact duplicate of File:Félix Nadar 1820-1910 portraits Eugène Delacroix.jpg, we keep different photographs/scans of paintings and other images :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for File:Eugène Delacroix - Massacre at Chios.jpg and File:Eugène Delacroix - Le Massacre de Scio.jpg :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 09:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I never said it was an exact duplicate; the template I placed ({{Duplicate}}) says "This image is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of ...". I was labeling low resolution versions of painting where we have high-res versions. --Jarekt (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
They are not scaled-up/down versions of the same photo. They were different photos of the same painting :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 05:03, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, they appear to be scans of the same photo, one is cropped and also scaled down. Admittedly not much difference. I'll try and find their source. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939.jpg[edit]

Hej. Próbowałem odnaleźć info jaka jest poprawna licencja do zdjęcia File:Polish victim of German Luftwaffe action 1939.jpg ale nie mogę znaleźć nic konkretnego. Na 100% nie jest to pd-polish - zdjęcie należy do United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, ale nie wiem na jakiej konkretnie licencji jest udostępniane. Wiesz może coś na ten temat? --Leafnode✉ 22:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjecie spelnia warunki PD-Polish: Jak wiekszosc zdjec Byana z Warszawy 1939 roku "ukazały się [one] po raz pierwszy w Polsce" i zostaly "opublikowane bez wyraźnego zastrzeżenia prawa autorskiego". Osobiscie sprawdzilem "Miasto Nieujarzmione" - zdjecie tam jest. Jest szansa ze zdjecie to zostalo opublikowane poza Polska przed 1957 rokiem, jest to jednak nikla szansa. Orginalna wersja zdjecia przeslana przez Andros64 byla kiepskiej jakosci skanem, ale znalazlem lepsze wersje tego zdjecie w polsko i angielsko jezycznych kolekcjach zdjec. Jak dotad najlepszej jakosci zdjecie znalazlem w bazie danych USHMM. O ile zdjecie jest PD to nie jest wazne skad dana wersja pochodzi. --Jarekt (talk) 03:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oczywiście, nie jest ważne, o ile faktycznie zdjęcie zostało pierwszy raz opublikowane w Polsce - a wydaje mi się, że Julien Bryan publikował te zdjęcia zaraz po powrocie z oblężonej Warszawy. Na pewno film został opublikowany w czasie wojny - więc czemu i nie zdjęcia? Dobrze by było się zorientować. Ale podchodząc do tematu bardziej ogólnie, to Bryan zrobił masę dobrych zdjęć z okresu wojny i okolic - jeśli są w posiadaniu USHMM, to fajnie by było się dowiedzieć czy i jak można z nich korzystać --Leafnode✉ 08:07, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wydaje mi sie ze jedyny sposob na dodanie zdjec Bryana do Commons to PD-Polish, a i to jest niebezpieczne bo sie moze okazac ze niektore zdjecia byly opublikowane pierwszy raz w USA a nie w Polsce. --Jarekt (talk) 14:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Na Boga, nie dotykajcie tego zdjęcia! --Starscream (talk) 13:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Permission Requests[edit]

In the Village pump, you expressed interest in a permission requests coordination project. WikiProject Permission requests is now up and running, and would welcome your help in the team! -- JovanCormac 09:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birth/death date in Creator templates[edit]

Hi Jarekt, thank you very much for your good work on that templates and all related images. However, I dont think the categorization of this creator templates, so to say maintenance or source templates, into the content categories Category:Births by year and Category:Deaths by year is a good idea. --Martin H. (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I heard that comment before, see Template_talk:Creator#Categories_for_the_year_of_birth_and_death. My thinking was the standardization of creator pages and many of them had Category:Births by year and Category:Deaths by year categories, so I just automatically added them to all the creator pages. Another reason is that I was trying to remove categories in general from creator pages. A lot of people edit those pages and a lot do not understand includeonly and noinclude categories, and as a result ~3k of our creator pages add autocategories. While trying to remove manually added categories from creator pages I was trying to include some automatic ones to add some more connections from creator pages to the rest of the project, and Category:Births by year and Category:Deaths by year categories were the most logical choice. At the same time I recognize the irony of trying to fix problems caused by autocategorising images while arguing for autocategorizing creator pages. What I would propose to do is to open another discussion on this on creator template talk page and drop notes on Category:Births by year and Category:Deaths by year about the discussion. I still like the idea, but if more people are unhappy about it than we will remove them. --Jarekt (talk) 02:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the answer, Template talk:Creator is the best place for discussion. --Martin H. (talk) 03:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jarekt RfA[edit]

Please support my Requests for adminship at Commons:Administrators#Jarekt --Jarekt (talk) 16:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Some of categories "by alphabet"[edit]

Category discussion notification Some of categories "by alphabet" has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Polish needed[edit]

Hi Jarek, could you please take a look at these Polish texts for the upload form? I have no idea whether we should use the new proposals or keep using the existing texts. Lupo 16:21, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The new proposed versions are much better.--Jarekt (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you! I've replaced the old texts by these new proposals. Lupo 07:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Jarekt, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

— Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 18:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, good luck, and feel free to let me know if you need any help! :) –Juliancolton | Talk 20:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your offer. I will try slowly ease into this. Suddenly my interface changed and it might take me a while to figure out what each new button or link do. --Jarekt (talk) 21:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Old Manuscripts from the Deutsche Fotothek[edit]

Are all categories added to the image pages directly so that we can remove the template categorization? A good idea for adding the pd tag and starting to categorize the documents by book. --Martin H. (talk) 14:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The autocategorization to Category:Old Manuscripts from the Deutsche Fotothek will be removed. As you noticed, it can be removed right now but I was experimenting with other tweeks to the template (see yet unused {{Fotothek-Author2}} and {{Fotothek-Creator}} which will hopefully replace current {{Fotothek-Author}}) and was planning do them both at the same time. All images in Category:Old Manuscripts from the Deutsche Fotothek also have temporary category:Images from the Deutsche Fotothek by ... category (see [5]), which I will use to group images together. But at the moment I am identifying categories already created for individual Fotothek books. I created {{Book}} - almost identical to {{DE Wikisource Book}} but without autocatogorization to DE Wikisource specific categories, and will try to use it for categories of Fotothek books.
By the way, could you have a look at Category:Document collection by Günter Rapp I created the category for all the Fotothek images attributed to Günter Rapp, which seem to be works related to the windmills and collected by him but created by other authors. The Author is likely incorrect in all those files and they all are missing dates of creation, but the dates and names are often in the image description. Not sure what to do about them. --Jarekt (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, if you need any help e.g. with language please ask. --Martin H. (talk) 19:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Location/deg2dms[edit]

Hello Jarekt, We have a small problem with {{Location/deg2dms}} which seems to truncate rather than round off the result (2 decimals). For exemple: {{Object location|45|22|42|N|1|17|21.7|E|region:FR_type:landmark}} displays 41.99"N instead of 42"N. I have to put between 42.0000000001 and 42.01 to display a correct 42 :

Object location45° 22′ 42″ N, 1° 17′ 21.7″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo
Object location45° 22′ 42″ N, 1° 17′ 21.7″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

that's what makes me think of a problem of truncature (41.999999999 giving "41.99") (I had a look in the model, maybe in the formula "360000*{{{1}}} mod 6000 div 100}"). Could you have a look at it ? (I don't master at all the model language, but I suspect a "round 2" to be added somewhere in that formula ?). Regards, Jack ma (talk) 19:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I've changed the formula into "360000*(abs({{{1}}}) + 0.5) mod 6000 div 100". It seems to work fine. Jack ma (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am glad it is resolved. I noticed frequent coordinates like "41.99" but did not tried to debug it.--Jarekt (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cats[edit]

If you have a moment, would you complete the moves mentioned in Category talk:World War II by country. I'd like to clean out the ones using {{Move}}. -- User:Docu at 04:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I actually did not start any moves yet. I am planning to get to it. All the [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Category_talk:World_War_II_by_country|{{Move}}s]] pointing to Category talk:World War II by country are proposing to change from the what I consider correct form to the incorrect one. I will clean them up and add {{Move}} templates I discussed. --Jarekt (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As the move you intend to do was discussed in the form, I think you could do it directly. Obviously, if you wait another month, maybe one should start again from the beginning. -- User:Docu at 19:08, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gratulacje[edit]

Doskonałe zdjęcie, gratulacje. Z daleka wygląda jak postać kobiety z koszyczkiem, albo dużym woreczkiem magnezji, który się jej zsunął na kolano :-). Pozdrawiam - Tescobar (talk) 20:00, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dziekuje, zawsze lubilem to zdjecie.--Jarekt (talk) 13:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of template NationAndOccupation[edit]

Hello Jarekt, I have seen that you have translated the templates {{CountryAdjective}} and {{Occupation}} to the Polish language. Could you translate the new template {{NationAndOccupation}}, too? This would be great! It should not be too much work:

  • If the Polish language uses the sentence order <Country Adjective> <Occupation>, <Occupation>, <and> <Occupation>, just copy the English version of the template and change all occurences of “en” to “pl” and all occurences of “and” to the Polish equivalent.
  • If the Polish sentence order is rather <Country Adjective> <Occupation>, <Occupation> <and> <Occupation> (no comma before the “and”), copy the German version instead and change all occurences of “de” to “pl” and all occurences of “und” to the Polish equivalent.
  • If the Polish sentence order is rather <Occupation>, <Occupation> <and> <Occupation> <Country Adjective>, copy the Spanish version of the template instead and change all occurences of “es” to “pl” and all occurences of “y” to the Polish equivalent.
  • (Only if the Polish sentence order is radically different, things would be a bit more complicate.)

I hope you can help. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --Jarekt (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! ----Aristeas (talk) 16:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Idea for global find and replace operations in Creator templates[edit]

Hello Jarekt, you asked me if I had any ideas about other global find and replace operations I would like to perform on the Creator templates. Here is an idea: some Creator templates contain a Name entry like the following:

  • Name = [[:w:FirstName(s) Surname|Surname, FirstName(s)]]
  • Name = [[:en:FirstName(s) Surname|Surname, FirstName(s)]]

Maybe there also the following forms:

  • Name = [[FirstName(s) Surname|Surname, FirstName(s)]]
  • Name = [[:Category:FirstName(s) Surname|Surname, FirstName(s)]]

In my opinion this is wrong: only the Sortkey entry should use the order <Surname>‘,’ <FirstName(s)>, but the Name entry should be just in the ordinary order <FirstName(s)> <Surname>. I have corrected some of these Creator templates manually but there may be left some others. Could two global RegEx find and replace actions like:

Find: (Name *= *\[\[[^\]|]+\|)([^\]]+), *([^\]]+)\]\]
Replace by: \1\3 \2\]\]

and then

Find: (Name *= *\[\[([^\]|]+))\|\2\]\]
Replace by: \1\]\]

solve this issue? (The exact coding of the RegEx depends of the RegEx engine you use, of course.)

Best, --Aristeas (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. I removed a lot of those by hand as well but bot can do it better. I will try to run it this week. --Jarekt (talk) 15:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, finally had a moment to get the regular expressions to work properly. See the final code for AWB Custom Module used at User:JarektBot/AWB_Modules#Change_name_format. --Jarekt (talk) 08:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Location/layout[edit]

Hi Jarekt, there seems to be a problem with one of the links added to the template. According to the label, it's to display " This and other images at their location on". As this didn't work for me, I removed it for now. -- User:Docu at 06:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added OpenStreetMap sinte there was ongoing work to provide ability to see commons images on their maps, and as a friendly gesture to a sister Wiki project, beeing at that point integrated to work with Wikipedias, and using Commons as a repository of their images. But you are right that at this moment the website does not show "other images at their locations". I will start discussion about the "to add/or not to add" the link. --Jarekt (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a good idea, but it should at least work somehow. If there is a way to use it with Bing, we could add this one instead. -- User:Docu at 16:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Template:Ströhl to Creator:Hugo Gerhard Ströhl[edit]

Hello Jarekt, thank you again for your list User:Jarekt/CreatorTemplates! With its help I have checked and improved all Creator templates used 200 times or more (and will continue with the 100+ items). While doing so I have noticed that the Template:Ströhl is used on around 248 pages. Obviously, it should be replaced by Creator:Hugo Gerhard Ströhl and then deleted. Could you do this replacement in an automated way or do we need to replace the template manually on every page? Best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll replace this. Thanks for your work anyway! --Martin H. (talk) 19:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This clean up was on my to-do list, so thanks for fixing it. However, somewhere in all this clean-up the category:Hugo Gerhard Ströhl is no longer added to all those files, as it was before. I put all his files into Category:Coats of arms by Hugo Gerhard Ströhl.--Jarekt (talk) 07:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jarekt/Archiv/2009&oldid=372570504"