User talk:Julo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Zdjęcia wykonane przeze mnie możesz udostępniać wg zasad, jakie uznasz za stosowne. Babcia Hania (talk) 21:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Dzień dobry,

chcielibyśmy Pana poinformować, że zdjęcie przedstawiające panoramę Zielonej Góry – oczywiście po podaniu informacji dot. praw autorskich – zostało umieszczone na stronie naszego niekomercyjnego projektu << Kalendarza FVKS "W Podróży" 2014 >>. Motywem przewodnim są "widoki". Nie wykluczone, że pojawią się tam kolejne zdjęcia Pana autorstwa.

http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/ http://kalender.fvks.eu/pl/2014/04/12/panorama-miasta-zielona-gora-pl/

Mamy nadzieję, że wszystko się zgadza.

Pozdrawiamy FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. (Stowarzyszenie Promocji Miasta Kultury Görlitz-Zgorzelec t.z.) kalender@fvks.eu, Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 16:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wkład Mirno[edit]

Cześć, cały wkład Special:Contributions/Mirno to zdjęcia ściągnięte z różnych WWW. Wszystko zgłoszone do usunięcia, ale od 2 dni bez reakcji. Trafiłem na to z pl:wiki. U nas je usunąłem, jednak zdjęcia są wykorzystane w wielu hasłach w wielu wersjach językowych i IMHO należy je szybko skasować. Pozdrawiam, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Domena publiczna (biblioteka cyfrowa), a umieszczenie zdjęcia na commons[edit]

Witam. Piszę do Ciebie w takiej sprawie. Mianowicie, czy do zasobów commons możemy śmiało wrzucać stare zdjęcia oznaczone jako znajdujące się w domenie publicznej? Logika podpowiada mi że tak, ale chce się upewnić. Chodzi mi o zdjęcia znajdujące się w zbiorach bibliotek cyfrowych. Część z nich oznaczona jest jasno jako znajdujące się w domenie publicznej, np. [1] lub [2]. Jednak w przypadku jednej z bibliotek [3] zdjęcie zostało oznaczonej jako znajdująca się w domenie publicznej, ale podano jednocześnie "licencję" z ograniczeniami. I teraz moje pytanie jest takie, czy dobrze rozumuje: "Mogę śmiało wrzucać zdjęcia oznaczone jako domena publiczna (oczywiście z odpowiednim, uczciwym linkiem do źródła). W przypadku jeśli biblioteka nakłada jakieś ograniczenia (zgodnie z prawem lub nie, w to nie wnikam) z umieszczonym tam zdjęciem daje sobie spokój. Żeby nie miał się kto czepiać." --MAx 92 (talk) 20:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Dzień dobry,

zapraszamy do udziału w Konkursie Fotograficznym „W Podróży”. Więcej: www.fotowettbewerb.fvks.eu .

Pozdrawiamy Zespół stowarzyszenia FVKS - Förderverein Kulturstadt Görlitz-Zgorzelec e.V. Agata, Cornelia, Matthias fvks (talk) 12:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:German art (VII) in Brockhaus 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Julius1990 (talk) 01:12, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kosovo-arrival-form-2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beware.of.cat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 14:51, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prośba o pomoc[edit]

Mam kłopot z dwoma plikami:

  • Władysław Bończa-Rutkowski - Orka 1897.jpg
  • Jan Czesław Moniuszko - Zaloty 1906.jpg

Po załadowaniu ukazuje się pusta miniaturka oraz informacja, że obraz ma 0x0 pikseli, jednocześnie podana jest prawdziwa wielkość pliku, a po kliknięciu na pustą miniaturkę ukazuje się załadowany obraz.

Próbowałem błąd naprawić, ale bezskutecznie. Bardzo proszę o pomoc, bo nie chciałbym zostawić po sobie śmietnika.

Nie wiem, gdzie tkwi błąd: w Commons czy u mnie. Dlatego wstrzymuję się z ładowaniem dalszych obrazów.

Pozdrowienia --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 08:54, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo pięknie dziękuję za dobre chęci pomocy. Poproszę o skasowanie pliku, sprawdzę w Photoshopie oryginał i załaduję od nowa. Przypuszczam, że błąd był po stronie commons. POzdrowienia --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Missing U Invisible Barnstar[edit]

Boooo !!!! We miss you!! We wish you were more active, please log in soon and help us with the backlog!!

--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Tirana-muzeum.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tirana-muzeum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Suomalainen hakaristi.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kwasura (talk) 00:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Julo, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 10:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 11:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Julo, long time ago you uploaded this picture. Could you please check the description in the Orgelbrand Encyclopedia? I think, there must be something wrong. For my understandig, the drawing of the set up ist not appropriate to be used as a hydrogen generator. Unfortunately, I am not able to read polish, so if there is any more detailed information in the encyclopedia, please let me know. Thank you.--Mabschaaf (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ALepper na stacji benzynowej.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PustaPiotrkowska-naPN.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ksiazeczka.walutowa.3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tworzyjanki[edit]

A dziękuję, na razie po prostu wrzuciłem wszystkie zloty do jednego wora ;) . Ale fajnie, że już zacząłeś z 2017. Pozdrawiam! TR (talk) 09:01, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi why is the New Perry picture is gone from Political appointments of Donald Trump?

File:TimisoaraCathedral2006night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turbojet (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Szpital polowy[edit]

Hej, czy ja dobrze kombinuję? A tak w ogóle, czy wiesz może co to za jednostka jest? Bo szukam ilustracji do hasła o Julianie Chorążyckim i tak się zastanawiam czy może przypadkiem nie jest to jedna z jednostek w których służył..? Halibutt (talk) 09:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franco-Terreneuviens.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

76.11.4.194 13:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Polish?

 
Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 11:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bot do fotografii?[edit]

Czy mógłbym poprosić o pomoc w hurtowym wyedytowaniu treści (jednobrzmiącej) towarzyszącej fotografiom, które zamieszczałem na Commons? Czy można to zrobić automatycznie? Jeśli to możliwe, uprzejmie proszę o kilka słów. --Kmarius

Could you please fullfil the information template. I don't know the source nor the date. Thanks! Triplecaña (talk) 14:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Literówka[edit]

Załadowałem kiedyś fotkę dwóch członków z Zarządu Ekumenizm.pl, ale popełniłem literówkę. Czy mógłbyś zmienić File:Radakcja Ekumenizm.pl 2016-09-22.jpg na File:Redakcja Ekumenizm.pl 2016-09-22.jpg. Dziękuję. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bunsen burner flame types .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 14:01, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Znak A-1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

มองโกเลีย๔๔ 04:09, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Także:

i inne z tego źrodła - zgody na licencje są potrzebne. Masur (talk) 13:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Spoko. To kwestia podania linkków właśnie w taki sposób, żeby było widać licencje. FlickrReview później można zrobić, zatem jak się nawet zmieni, to luz. W innym wypadku za każdym razem ktoś może pytać dlaczego. Masur (talk) 07:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zaraza we Wrocławiu[edit]

Cześć. Zmieniłem Ci tu [4] kategorię na wrocławską. Na razie tam tylko 1, Twoje, zdjęcie, ale dziś w dzień dodam parę innych, tak że kat. będzie miała sens jako osobna. Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 22:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hitler na wiecu (Historia str.238).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Buidhe (talk) 16:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Znak B-20.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

มองโกเลีย๔๔ 07:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Soviet mug shots[edit]

Zaobserwowałem masowe nominacje do skasowania fotosów pochodzących z archiwalnych spraw bezpieki sowieckiej. Już rozpatrzono tę kwestię (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (mug shots)) z wynikiem takim że to dokumenty rządowe nie zawierające wartości artystycznych lecz jedynie wartości informacyjne. To są fotodokumenty emitowane przez instytucję jak najbardziej oficjalną i temu podlegają odpowiednim ustępom prawa rosyjskiego. Pozdrawiam, Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kangur.w.moim.aucie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Korekta do podpisu przy zdjęciu[edit]

Hej,

Prosiłbym o korektę w komentarzu do historii pliku na stronie https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komintern_(Historia_str.240).jpg Chodzi o korektę nazwiska jednej z osób przedstawionych na zdjęciu. JEST: "...Siedzą od lewej: G. Dymitrow, P. Togliatti, W. Florin; stoją: O. Kuusinen, D. Mamulski, K. Gottwald, W. Pieck." POWINNO BYĆ: "..Siedzą od lewej: G. Dymitrow, P. Togliatti, W. Florin; stoją: O. Kuusinen, D. Manuilski, K. Gottwald, W. Pieck."

Dzięki :^) Maciek M.

File:OldMaid234170.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons![edit]

Dear Julo

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC[edit]

Hello Julo,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olesnica.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 08:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tybor100[edit]

All of these uploads should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 114.125.12.163 (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:HistPol-ListGonczy.png[edit]

Poszukuję pilnie źródła tego pliku. Będę wdzięczny za wszelką pomoc. Pozdrawiam serdecznie Aegidius contractus (talk) 07:49, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak in Tychy[edit]

Witam na mapce źle jest wyświetlane miejsce muzeum powinno być na pozycji

Camera location50° 07′ 00.5″ N, 18° 58′ 40.9″ E Kartographer map based on OpenStreetMap.View all coordinates using: OpenStreetMapinfo

Dziękuję z góry za pomoc i pozdrawiam.

File:Pl - Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach.ogg[edit]

Mam jeszcze jedną prośbę - nazwę tego pliku proszę zmienić na; File:PL - Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach.ogg jeszcze raz bardzo dziękuję i przeprzaszam za kłopot - pozdrawiam

Witam – proszę przesłać to zdjęcie na trwający obecnie konkurs miesięczny. Dziękuję z góry za pomoc i pozdrawiam.

How we will see unregistered users[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europa-mapa polityczna.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.11.154.50 09:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pytanie[edit]

Cześć. Widzę, że na swoich zdjęciach podajesz typ tramwajów. Czy dałbyś radę określić to dla tego tramwaju [5]? Pozdrawiam --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To jest Škoda 16T numer boczny 3009 (nr fabryczny 9503) w eksploatacji od sierpnia 2007, po rekonstrukcji (unowocześnieniu) wykonanym w 2021 r. Julo (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
dziękuję! --Robert Niedźwiedzki (talk) 12:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The release on this file isn't really up to modern standards. Do you have any more information?Geni (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In 2005 we did not have the OTRS system in Wikipedia. That's why I have asked the autor for his acceptation by e-mail, and I have got his answer:
thanks for your interest to my models.
(...)I confirm that the author is I and authorize with it appeal to the publication of the photos
(...)the crossbowman shield is from to Bartolomeo Vivarini painting.
Many Thank and Best Regards
Ugo Pozzati
It is a pity, but now, after seventeen years, I do not have any copy of this correspondention. But in my opinion this answer is quite clear and unambiguous acceptation.
Julo (talk) 18:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 17:44, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zmiana nazwy zdjęć[edit]

Cześć, zauważyłem że zmieniasz nazwy zdjęć ze swoim udziałem z wikispotkań, tak aby data była na początku nazwy. Nie jest to dla mnie żaden wielki problem, z tym że do kategorii wrzucam zawsze zdjęcia nazwane zgodnie z kolejnością ich wykonywania i wtedy zdjęcie wypada z kolejki sortowania, jeśli ktoś chciałby przeglądać te wszystkie zdjęcia po kolei. Jeśli chcesz uporządkować zdjęcia na których jesteś, można też zrobić osobne kategorie wzorem np. Category:Marek Stelmasik by year. Swoją drogą, chyba nie doczekamy się nigdy sortowania kategorii Commons po metadanych. Pozdrawiam, Rdrozd (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

W procesie porządkowania samego siebie (w moim wieku robi się takie rzeczy...) zastanawiałem się nad tymi podkategoriami "by year", ale uznałem, że to jednak w moim przypadku nie ma sensu (wszystkich tych zdjęć jest raptem nieco ponad sto dwadzieścia, a stowarzyszenie działa od 2005, co skutkowałoby przeciętnie paru zdjęciami na każdą podkategorię). Zauważyłem, że masz swoją własną konwencję nazewniczą, ale przyjąłem założenie, że świat się nie zawali, jeśli akurat te z nich, na którym ja jestem, wypadną z "kolejki sortowania" Twoich prac. Pozdrawiam Julo (talk) 19:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Notrealname1234 (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 12:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]