User talk:Hannolans/archive

Hilma af Klint[edit]

Beste Hannolans, geïnspireerd door jouw werk op NLWP was ik gisteren heel erg enthousiast afbeeldingen van het werk van Hilma af Klint gaan uploaden hier. (Wat een prachtig werk, vind ik!) Pas daarna las ik jullie discussie over auteursrecht rond haar werk. Ik ben geneigd om de door mij geüploade plaatjes voorlopig te laten staan en ze zelf niet te gaan nomineren voor verwijdering, omdat dat criterium van publicatiedatum zo vaag is. Of kijk jij er anders naar? Spinster (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eens en ja het is echt uitmuntend werk, ben zeer onder de indruk. Het lijkt me ondertussen goed dat het copyright wordt uitgezocht maar niet dat we in een patstelling komen. Ook met Mondriaan Trust zie ik nog geen discussie over de publicatiedatum als criterium.

In 2013 is een boek verschenen met een groot deel van het oeuvre, met niet eerder verschenen werk. Die werken zouden daardoor vrij van auteursrechten zijn als ik de discussie mag geloven. Ik kan me zo voorstellen dat een manier is om alles uit dat boek er op te plaatsen met bronvermelding naar het boek en ondertussen, mochten we catalogi vinden van tentoonstellingen tussen 1987-2002, werken die daarin voorkomen te nomineren voor verwijdering. Zelfs dan is het niet zeker dat ze verwijderd moeten worden, want een vraag is wat telt als publicatie in de VS. Ik was van plan even in de bibliotheek van het gemeentemuseum Den Haag te kijken wat daar te vinden is. Ik heb ook de stichting een e-mail gestuurd met de vraag over het copyright, wellicht dat zij hier al over hebben nagedacht en een standpunt hebben. Ondertussen zouden we de tag voor de VS leeg kunnen laten zoals je ook hebt gedaan, want dan klopt het precies: werk is in de EU publiek domein. --Hannolans (talk) 13:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hier staan overigens enkele bestanden in groot formaat: http://hilmaafklinten.louisiana.dk/

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I corrected it. I used the same license as the other two photographs of the same OTRS and upload. It was original posted on the english Wikipedia with three files in one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rainbow_Station.jpg --Hannolans (talk) 21:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

de file van Phoenix Rising in die versie is een illegale download[edit]

van Hannolans en niet de versie die door de maker Karl Hammer aan wikicommons vrijgegeven. Daarmee is er dus ook voor die versie geen publicatietoestemming op wikicoomons. Graag verwijderen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.69.193.191 (talk • contribs)

Hi Hannolans,

as a first measure, I've reset to the initial upload of File:Phoenix Rising.jpg by Karl Hammer. --Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The art work is published with a Creative Commons license and a better reproduction of the work is encouraged. The text is not creative enough to establish a derative work. Or do you see those as derative works?

This image is currently in use in two wikipedia articles about bodypainting as the main image. With this watermark this image seems less usable as the watermark destracts the article. What's your opinion? --Hannolans (talk) 10:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see there is also an 'image war' about this image in one of the articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Body_painting#Image_war.3F If this image is removed from that page and the nlwiki it isn't a problem anymore. --Hannolans (talk) 10:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a Dutch-speaker. But what I understood from the IP's comment is that the high-res version, which you took from the cited website, is not under a free license. That's the main issue that needs to be discussed.

Sure, an image without a watermark is better than one with a watermark. But if the first is not under a free license, that's meaningless. In regard to whether the first or the second version, uploded by Karl Hammer, is better, IMO the first one is better, as the watermark is far smaller than in the second version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but I try to understand the reasoning for future artworks. The reasoning is that this reproduction is a derative work of art, so not the artwork itself is under CC, but the version with that watermark added? If I retouch the work (it is not CC-ND) and make a derative work of it without watermark, would it be allowed? --Hannolans (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure to fully understand you. The originally creator-uploaded version had 750 × 500 pix and a watermark, Your later uploaded version had 1.600 × 1.023 pix and was sourced from a seemingly non-(totally)free source[1]. If these facts are true, then the situation is clear.
However, if you are refering to the discussion in late 2013 or 2014 on Commons, whether a CC license relates to the work itself, but not to a specific resolution of a digital work; well, this discussion never yielded a consensus. Mayority opinion, if I remember correctly, was that on Commons we will respect the wish of the creator/author. In practical terms this means: if a creator uploads a lower-res version of a work/image on Commons under a free license and at the same time (or later) releases a higher-res version under a non-free license, we do not allow the latter to be uploaded to Commons, which had been tried already in the past. (This does not refer to reproductions of PD-old images.)
Finally, in regard to watermarks: though there has always been some controversy about removal of watermarks, until recently the general opinion on Commons was, that it's o.k. to remove watermarks from freely-licensed images, as it should be o.k. by a license, which allows creating derivatives. However, no more, at least for copyright-related watermarks, since this analysis from WMF-legal in September 2014. For a short version see Commons:Watermarks#Legal_issues_with_the_removal_of_watermarks. --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is customary that artists put their name on their work and I'm convinced that Rembrandt, had he lived in a digital age, would have imprinted his name rather than paint it on his work. So why the need to remove Hammer's name from this art work? Anyway, the high-res version is not the art work that Hammer licensed so is not suited for Wikicommons in my opinion. Elfrieb (talk) 11:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just received a message that once again there is discussion about my images (By now I regret ever uploading them because fans asked me and wished they'd ALL be removed). Let me clarify the situation about watermarks. The images WITHOUT watermarks are under the exclusive publication rights of my agent (where Hannolans downloaded it from) and the galleries he allows them to use. I am myself only allowed to publisize images WITH watermark. The image(s) without watermark are therefore not allowed on Wikicommons, not even if I myself would upload them because I would then be in breach of my agreement with my agent. Therefor the high-res image without watermark is, indeed, to be removed a.s.a.p from Wikicommons. In regard to editing the image(s) and thus removing the watermark on the edition(s) which I uploaded, I have no idea what the rules are for this on Wikicommons. But if you are so disturbed by my name as imprint just throw the image(s) out and don't use them. I really don't care anymore guys, it's only Wikicommons for me and not a platform I need for my exposure. Kind regards, Karl Hammer (talk) 12:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per Karl Hammer's above statement, I've rev-deleted the high-res version without watermark to avoid possible legal problems for everybody. --Túrelio (talk) 13:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Karl Hammer, sorry for the inconvenience. I was not aware of the differences legally between a watermarked artwork and a non-watermarked version. As Túrelio explained Commons follow several viewpoints I was not aware of. For older artwork as Rembrandt we look for the highest resolution. Thanks Túrelio for clearing this out and deleting this file. --Hannolans (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beeldbank defensie[edit]

Hey Hanno,

Ik heb een scriptje geschreven om hoge resolutie foto's uit Memorix Maior te halen, de foto-viewer die o.a. door de beeldbank van defensie wordt gebruikt. Door de code die onder "insluiten" staat te kopiëren naar Dememorixer. Zie Overzicht van beeldbanken. --Vera ^(talk) 13:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Goed om te weten! Dank voor het scriptje en voor het naar een hogere resolutie brengen van deze foto's! --Hannolans (talk) 19:21, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:A blind man is saved from drowning at the Veenkade.jpg[edit]

File:A blind man is saved from drowning at the Veenkade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vera ^(talk) 14:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beeldmerk EU-voorzitterschap 2016.jpg[edit]

File:Beeldmerk EU-voorzitterschap 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

193.173.21.236 05:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo rijksoverheid.svg[edit]

File:Logo rijksoverheid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

193.173.21.236 05:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verkeerde handles[edit]

Eerder elders gemeld: Het klopt dat deze URL (van R.H. de Vos van Steenwijk) niet meer werkte. Nog vervelender is, dat het niet de enige verbroken link in GaHetNa is. Ik heb honderden zogenaamde "permanente" URLs overgenomen uit deze website van het Nationaal Archief, maar een deel van die links werkt niet meer, omdat ze in GaHetNa zelf inmiddels veranderd zijn. De permalinks naar ANEFO-afbeeldigen lijken allemaal nog wél te werken, maar de links naar veel andere afbeeldingen zijn verbroken. [...] Ik merkte die op grote schaal veranderde links zelf op in augustus 2015, en heb toen per email navraag gedaan bij het Nationaal Archief, maar ondanks herhaling van mijn vraag nog geen antwoord gekregen. Ik weet dus ook niet of deze links uit GaHetNa allemaal handmatig in Commons vervangen moeten worden, of dat het op een andere manier [in GaHetNa] in orde komt. Vysotsky (talk) 15:48, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS De handle die jij toevoegde bij De Vos van Steenwijk werkt bij mij niet. Bij jou wel? Vysotsky (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dit is heel bijzonder. Handles zijn juist persistent en handle.net is juist een service dat waarborgt dat de urls altijd geldig blijven. Dit zou een ernstige bug zijn. --Hannolans (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Die bovenstaande handle werkt bij mij ook niet, terwijl dat wel de handle is die naast de foto als de permanente link wordt weergegeven (http://www.gahetna.nl/collectie/afbeeldingen/fotocollectie/zoeken/weergave/detail/start/0/tstart/0/q/zoekterm/Baron%20de%20Vos%20van%20Steenwijk). Er is dus echt iets gebroken met gahetna.nl en het Handle-systeem. Ik zal ook een mailtje sturen. --Hannolans (talk) 20:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Volgens mij werkt het nog niet, ze hadden me wel gemeld er mee bezig te zijn. --Hannolans (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jac. de Nijs[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, jij hebt ooit eens de categorie Category:Photographs by Jack de Nijs aangemaakt. Hoe ben jij er achter gekomen dat hij Jack heet? Jac., zoals hij bij het Nationaal Archief genoemd wordt, is namelijk meestal een afkorting voor Jacques. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, goeie vraag. Kan me niet meer herinneren en weet ook niet of ik dit uit een betrouwbare bron heb gehaald. RKD?

EDIT: ja inderdaad RKD: https://rkd.nl/nl/explore/artists/115686 maar ook gahetna.nl "Pasfoto van fotograaf Jack de Nijs": http://proxy.handle.net/10648/ad792b64-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84

Inderdaad, bedankt. Ik had RKD ook gecontroleerd maar kennelijk alleen op Nijs, niet op Nys. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Bataclan[edit]

Please see Commons:Requests for comment/Flickr and PD images. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando2.jpg[edit]

File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando.jpg[edit]

File:Voormalig gebouw Agfa-commando.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 22:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help decide the future of Wikimania[edit]

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ellen & Derk achter de schermen bij DWDD.webm[edit]

File:Ellen & Derk achter de schermen bij DWDD.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Towards a New Wikimania results[edit]

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source link needed[edit]

There's no source link for File:Het Sinterklaasjournaal 2015 promo 3.webm. Can you provide that link so I can review it? Thanks. INeverCry 22:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have added the source. --Hannolans (talk) 23:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed INeverCry 00:18, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kun je de gevangenis in gaan voor het downloaden van een film (4 5).webm[edit]

Hi, This file is under a standard Youtube license. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, this is seems the only known of the University of the Netherlands with that license, and off course the one about copyright... --Hannolans (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kun je de gevangenis in gaan voor het downloaden van een film (4 5).webm[edit]

File:Kun je de gevangenis in gaan voor het downloaden van een film (4 5).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

INeverCry 21:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Het Sinterklaasjournaal 2015 promo 3.webm[edit]

File:Het Sinterklaasjournaal 2015 promo 3.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bram Moszkowicz in commercial (cropped).jpg[edit]

File:Bram Moszkowicz in commercial (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ErikvanB (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apologies for all the confusion. Nomination witdrawn. ErikvanB (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Charissa Freese over een veranderende arbeidsmarkt - Tilburg University.webm[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Charissa Freese over een veranderende arbeidsmarkt - Tilburg University.webm, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

INeverCry 18:11, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:When Was The Last Time Prince Watched Purple Rain Or Bought Something From an Infomercial.webm[edit]

File:When Was The Last Time Prince Watched Purple Rain Or Bought Something From an Infomercial.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Proud User (talk) 19:43, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Video2commons[edit]

You might want to use toollabs:video2commons for converting directly from Vimeo czar 21:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Didn't know it existed! --Hannolans (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Centraal Beheer Achmea - Striptease.webm[edit]

File:Centraal Beheer Achmea - Striptease.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Simonxag (talk) 12:43, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Haagse Harry.jpg[edit]

Beste Hannolans, Ik twijfel of je de CC0 welke geldt voor de foto's op rijksoverheid.nl, tevens mag toepassen op de striptekening van Haagse Harry. Het gaat volgens mij om iets anders dan een foto die werd gemaakt in opdracht van de rijksoverheid. Misschien kan het wél indien duidelijk blijkt dat de cartoon voor- en in opdracht van de rijksoverheid is gemaakt en gepubliceerd. Je zou bij twijfel kunnen overwegen om het geval voor te leggen aan de commons community. Groet, --OSeveno (talk) 12:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Al het materiaal is CC0, ook tekeningen, uitgezonderd zijn foto's sinds vorig jaar gepubliceerd. De rijksoverheid koopt voor al het materiaal de licentie af in de inkoopvoorwaarden rijksoverheid. --Hannolans (talk) 21:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dat geloof ik direct, maar het zou mooi zijn als er ook een bron kon worden gevonden die dat onderbouwt. Overigens zal je het misschien met me eens zijn dat de rijksoverheid er een rommeltje van maakt met copyrights/licenties. Introduceren ze één beleid, om er vervolgens links en rechts weer vanaf te knabbelen. Ze hadden in het kader van hun CC0 beleid beter kunnen kiezen om te stellen dat al het materiaal daaronder valt, "tenzij anders vermeld". Groet, --OSeveno (talk) 08:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In de ARVODI staat dat het intellectueel eigendom wordt overgedragen. https://www.pianoo.nl/algemene-rijksvoorwaarden-voor-verstrekken-van-opdrachten-tot-verrichten-van-diensten-2014-arvodi-20-0 Ik ga er van uit dat de rijksoverheid hun zaken op orde heeft. In principe is het beleid voor rijksoverheid CC0 tenzij anders vermeld. Dat geldt voor tekst, audio, video en tekeningen, alleen tijdelijk niet voor foto's. Wat ik bijzonder vind is dat zij soms hun copyrightteksten en teksten aanpassen zonder daarvan melding te maken --Hannolans (talk) 01:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlsberg - Escape.webm[edit]

File:Carlsberg - Escape.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Racconish^☎ 13:19, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Port of Amsterdam - SAIL 2015.webm[edit]

File:Port of Amsterdam - SAIL 2015.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

The Nature Box (talk) 23:31, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

satin stitch[edit]

Hoi Hannolans, ben aangenaam verrast met de categorie Satin Stitch die jij hebt gemaakt.... en bijzonder flink gevuld. Bedankt! Elly (talk) 20:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Naar aanleiding vna het artikel satijnsteek. Interessant dat van steken nog geen categorien zijn, want beeldmateriaal is er voldoende denk ik, bijv van textielcollecties. --Hannolans (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Er is zoveel nog niet gecategoriseerd; zojuist heb ik een categorie Cuffs aangemaakt, nav het artikel nl:Manchet (kleding) op NL wikipedia.

(P.S. ik zie hierboven iets staan over Arvodi.... ik weet het nog zo net niet, ik heb veel onder die voorwaarden gewerkt, maar ik heb het auteursrecht van mijn werk niet op die manier afgestaan, zeker niet mogen mijn rapportages zomaar gewijzigd worden..., of het logo van ons bedrijf op die rapportages.... etc.... zou wat zijn, dan kan iedereen zomaar de conclusies van je zorgvuldig opgestelde rapport verdraaien!)

Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arvodi is verplicht, andere voorwaarden worden niet meer geaccepteerd, Daarvoor gold overigens dat alles dat de overheid publiceerde in Nederland vrij gebruikt mocht worden (dat is sinds kort beperkt tot dat van de overheid waarvan het auteursrecht bij de overheid ligt). Dat wil niet zeggen dat een rapport van de overheid verdraaid mag worden. Je mag een rapport van de overheid herpubliceren of bewerken, maar je mag een rapport niet verdraaien (morele rechten worden niet afgestaan, dus je mag niet doen alsof je de overheid of een instituut bent en de overheid een andere conclusie laten verkondigen). Arvodi overdracht van auteursrecht geldt alleen voor dat deel van het werk dat voor de overheid is gemaakt. Het logo valt er niet onder, evenals bijv stockfoto's. Dat staat ergens in de Arvodi. Wel zou de overheid dat er bij moeten zetten, want voor de eindgebruiker is dat (behalve bij logo's) natuurlijk niet duidelijk. --Hannolans (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ik ben op wikidata de borduursteken bij elkaar aan het brengen en nu de breisteken. Dit is duidelijk een onderwerp waarin Wikipedia nog een steek laat vallen :) --Hannolans (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rijksmuseum_Amsterdam_building[edit]

Rijksmuseum Amsterdam building has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:2014 Nuclear Security Summit/Defensie[edit]

Hi,

Ik heb altijd al wat moeite gehad met deze verwijdering. Onze premier (nou ja, hij beheert het kanaal niet zelf) wordt zomaar beschuldigd van copyrfraud en in mijn mailconversatie kreeg ik de indruk dat ze wisten wat ze deden. Best wel logisch want onze overheid heeft de nodige ervaring met auteursrecht. Zou je misschien een verzoek in willen dienen op com:UNDEL? Jij bent beter in deze materie thuis dan ik. Natuur12 (talk) 07:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ja precies. Ik heb nog nooit een undeletion aangevraagd, maar zal een poging wagen. --Hannolans (talk) 07:53, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dank! Natuur12 (talk) 07:54, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANEFO[edit]

This development might interest you - though you probably already noticed. Vysotsky (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien wint de Zilveren Camera 2013.webm[edit]

File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien wint de Zilveren Camera 2013.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

INeverCry 19:34, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rijksmuseum.amsterdam (126) (15192324111).jpg[edit]

File:Rijksmuseum.amsterdam (126) (15192324111).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg[edit]

File:WesterborkLageplan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Gouwenaar (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gerard Spong 2015.jpg[edit]

File:Gerard Spong 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Wolverine Trailer Exclusive (2013).webm[edit]

File:The Wolverine Trailer Exclusive (2013).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Drongou (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 4.webm[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 4.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2010-12-27 - Het groote Mekka-feest acte 4.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mekkafeest 2.webm[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mekkafeest 2.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mekkafeest 2.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Hannolans, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

lNeverCry 04:00, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:(1-5) Hoe bepaal jij met wie jij wel of niet gaat daten-.webm[edit]

File:(1-5) Hoe bepaal jij met wie jij wel of niet gaat daten-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

lNeverCry 02:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:(3-5) Waarom willen sommige mensen dood-.webm[edit]

File:(3-5) Waarom willen sommige mensen dood-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

lNeverCry 02:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iris van Dongen - Willem Alexander 2014.jpeg[edit]

Beste Hannolans, als ik het goed interpreteer mogen afbeeldingen van het koninklijk huis niet worden overgenomen. De CC0 op deze link: https://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/copyright lijkt niet te gelden voor beeldmateriaal, alleen voor tekst, helaas :-(. Met hartelijke groet, Elly (talk) 14:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zojuist gehoord dat fotos eerder wel mochten worden overgenomen. Ik heb bovenstaande teruggetrokken. Sorry voor de storing en het loos alarm! Elly (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We kunnen RVD vragen om dit weer op CC0 te zetten, in het kader van de wet hergebruik overheidsinformatie of gewoon omdat dat bij hun taak past. De prinsessen worden bij ons nu niet meer ouder.... --Hannolans (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Beautiful Pharma Mind.webm[edit]

File:A Beautiful Pharma Mind.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Austriantraveler (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doodstraf.webm[edit]

File:Doodstraf.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Austriantraveler (talk) 23:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kick Pruijsbrug[edit]

Hello, I saw your impressive photos of the fortress in Hoofddorp. You seem to live next to this place. I am planning an article about the flight accident in July 1935, including the person of Kick Pruijs, who saved eight personen life. Now a new bridge for cyclists was named after him [2]. Would you like to help me with a photo of the bridge and the sign with the name? That would be very kind. Groeten uit Keulen, --Nicola (talk) 13:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicola, I never visited that bridge. When I find time I can make a picture, somewhere in the coming weeks. --Hannolans (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That would be wonderful :) This is the article that I would like to have it for: [3]. --Nicola (talk) 06:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pictures added to Commons --Hannolans (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raam Maurits[edit]

Ha Hanno! Goed dat dit erop staat. Maar met deze beschrijving kan ik niks: "geknield voor een gebedenboek onder een troon". Hoe ik ook kijk... Waar komt die omschrijving vandaan? Ik zie dat hij een wapenschild vastgrijpt, met in de rand 'Hony soit qui mal y pense'— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.111.36.135 (talk) 11:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb de beschrijving meegekopieerd van de link en verder niet bekeken: https://www.bhic.nl/foto/ec295782-45f9-11e3-ae08-ab94c6a577e6 --Hannolans (talk) 12:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Auschwitz_resistance_photo,_no_278[edit]

Category:Auschwitz_resistance_photo,_no_278 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Richard 12:32, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Hoe maak je met moderne technieken een perfecte kopie van een Rembrandt-.webm[edit]

File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Hoe maak je met moderne technieken een perfecte kopie van een Rembrandt-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

lNeverCry 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Wat zit er verborgen onder wereldberoemde schilderijen-.webm[edit]

File:KUNSTGEHEIMEN- Wat zit er verborgen onder wereldberoemde schilderijen-.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

lNeverCry 01:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:RTV NH Zendervormgeving (lang).webm[edit]

Hi Hannolans,

Ik heb dit filmpje verwijderd naar aanleiding van een klacht op OTRS. De persoon die dit filmpje had vrijgegeven bleek niet de rechthebbende te zijn en het filmpje is ook van YT verwijderd. Verder was er nog wat over het portretrecht en bevatte het filmpje materiaal van derden dat in ieder geval niet vrijgegeven kan worden. Mogelijk zijn het citaten maar dat staan we op Commons net zomin toe als fair use. Ik hoop dat het duidelijk is waarom dit filmpje helaas gesneuveld is. Meer details kan ik niet geven ivm. met de vertrouwelijkheid vam OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 13:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Het filmpje was van het bureau wat al het beeldmateriaal voor NH gemaakt heeft. Jammer dat van dat filmpje niet alle rechten blijkbaar duidelijk zijn. Als het kleine onderdelen betreft is mogelijk wel de minimis van toepassing of kunnen we het er uit snijden. Kan ik het filmpje vervangen voor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53oIOTcAXw8 of zit daarin hetzelfde fragment? --Hannolans (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bevat deels dezelfde fragmenten dus dat kan ook een probleem worden :(. Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok. --Hannolans (talk) 19:23, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

krugers films Het Groote Mekka Feest[edit]

Mijn vader is in 1964 gestorven in Den Haag (Archimedes straat) en niet in 1937!!

GAARNE CORRECTIE, ik ben zijn zoon en enige overblijvende.

drjan@pas.nl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drjan27 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dank voor deze melding. Op alle Wikipediapagina's staat vermeld dat G. Krugers overleden is in 1937. zie bijvoorbeeld https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Krugers, Universiteit Leiden en Andere TIjden verwijzen ook naar deze informatie. Voordat we dit veranderen, is er ergens online meer informatie te vinden over de sterfdatum van uw vader of indien het privegevoelige informatie betreft kunt u het ook een mail sturen naar permissions-nl@wikimedia.org waar het vertrouwelijk wordt behandeld. Ik zal hier ook een mailtje naar sturen.--Hannolans (talk) 21:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm[edit]

File:Het groote Mekka-feest acte 3.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Tostman (talk) 12:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Krugers[edit]

It's a pity that the heirs of Georg Krugers didn't want the films about Mecca to be featured on Wikipedia. (1) The OTRS ticket isn't openly available, but I guess there was no chance convincing them of the importance of the films being openly accessible? (2) Is there another source than just the book by Vrolijk & Mols (which relies on talks with the Krugers family) with regard to the death date? (3) The original Wiki version was based on the book by Misbach Yusa Biran: Sejarah Film 1900–1950. Bikin Film di Jawa. Jakarta, Komunitas Bamboo working with the Jakarta Art Council, 2009. ISBN 978-979-3731-58-2, p. 144. Shouldn't his atatement ("died 1937 in Hong Kong") be mentioned, as a contradictory (but apparently wrong) source? Vysotsky (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb contact en mogelijk komt er wel gerelateerd materiaal beschikbaar. Als dat materiaal er is dan kan het artikel ook beter geschreven worden. --Hannolans (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. Vysotsky (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Vysotsky: er staat nu een video over de film online waarin over de achtergrond van de film wordt verteld--Hannolans (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ik zag hem vannacht, en heb een van de optredenden al gecomplimenteerd. Mooi! Vysotsky (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:California Dreaming - The bankrupt Golden State - (vpro backlight documentary).webm[edit]

File:California Dreaming - The bankrupt Golden State - (vpro backlight documentary).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Daphne Lantier 21:18, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Speech Jesse Klaver AFAS Live 360° (Virtual Reality).webm[edit]

File:Speech Jesse Klaver AFAS Live 360° (Virtual Reality).webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Iemke van Dijk Slow Freeze film.webm[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Iemke van Dijk Slow Freeze film.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Iemke van Dijk Slow Freeze film.webm]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm[edit]

File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mbch331 (talk) 10:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riet Neerincx het fotograferen van vaas Colenbrander voor tentoonstelling 1986.jpg[edit]

File:Riet Neerincx het fotograferen van vaas Colenbrander voor tentoonstelling 1986.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elly (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Riet Neerincx Kunstoefening 1953.jpg[edit]

File:Riet Neerincx Kunstoefening 1953.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elly (talk) 11:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Generiek Familie.webm[edit]

File:Generiek Familie.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:1812:41D:B800:D92F:9C51:9404:5E94 12:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:World Press Jodi Bieber (2011).jpg[edit]

File:World Press Jodi Bieber (2011).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mechanical Turk (talk) 13:17, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Making handwoven DHAKA fabric in Nepal • ढाका.webm[edit]

Hi there, I thought you might like to know that the file you uploaded here, File:Making handwoven DHAKA fabric in Nepal • ढाका.webm, has been tagged as media of the day for 20 May 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 21:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated[edit]

Hello Hannolans, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

File:De oeroude kermis in onze tijd.webm[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stadsgezichten van Haarlem - Acte 1.webm[edit]

File:Stadsgezichten van Haarlem - Acte 1.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rijksoverheid[edit]

Hi Hannolans,

if you upload from Rijksoverheid.nl (e.g. File:Jongetje 30km.jpg), please use this template!--Tolomm (talk) 10:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Herdenking Ravensbrück.webm[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:08, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Def-klu-20170519-id7bee6ak-web-hd.webm[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Rozentuin in Kamp Amersfoort.jpg[edit]

Hallo, Hannolans, heb je er iets tegen wanneer ik een typo corrigeer? Lotje (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2017 (UTC) @Lotje: Dit is al even oud, maar uiteraard niet --Hannolans (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bijlmer[edit]

Ik heb de 1939 foto zonder het watermerk. Uw foto is nl door mij op de site van stelling amsterdam geplaatst. Ik heb daar de copyright voor aan Aviodrome betaald voor beperkt privegebruik, ic een besloten forum van SvA. U heeft die nu op publlieke site wiki geplaatst. Geeft dit niet copyright problemen? Hun copyright staat nl linksonder van uw eigen file! Als die copyright problemen er niet meer zouden zijn, dan mag u mijn file gebruiken ic zonder het watermerk. Moet in dat geval die copyright opdruk van Aviodrome ook niet van af? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Huibterhaar (talk • contribs) 10:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Goed om te horen. De rechten in Nederland zijn zeker verlopen. Het is werk van een organisatie en dat verloopt 70 jaar na openbaarmaking of als er sprake is van ongepubliceerd werk, 70 jaar na creatie. Dat geeft organisaties uiteraard onverminderd het recht om ze te koop aan te bieden en er een watermerk op te plaatsen. Een foto zonder watermerk zou heel fijn zijn. --Hannolans (talk) 11:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:RTL Nieuws Leader 2014.webm[edit]

File:RTL Nieuws Leader 2014.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

213.46.17.47 18:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANEFO[edit]

Dear Hannolans, As you have also been busy categorizing ANEFO photographs, you might be interested in this contribution on Wikimedia Outreach. Vysotsky (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archief Aletta Jacobs op UNESCO-lijst.webm[edit]

File:Archief Aletta Jacobs op UNESCO-lijst.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Alice2Alice (talk) 11:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:MH17 Crash - Korte film.webm[edit]

File:MH17 Crash - Korte film.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Big Bum (4104010561).jpg

Yours sincerely, Zoranzoki21 (talk) 13:32, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo politie.svg[edit]

File:Logo politie.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

FOX 52 (talk) 16:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leon de Winter over het succes van de serie Big Little Lies.webm[edit]

File:Leon de Winter over het succes van de serie Big Little Lies.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ℯ xplicit 13:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lex Hoefsloot over automerk Lightyear.webm[edit]

File:Lex Hoefsloot over automerk Lightyear.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ℯ xplicit 13:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Misbruikzaak filmproducent Harvey Weinstein.webm[edit]

File:Misbruikzaak filmproducent Harvey Weinstein.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ℯ xplicit 13:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blackface[edit]

Blackface minstrelsy only applies to examples of blackface minstrelsy. It does not apply to films or other works outside of that narrow category. If you don't understand the difference, please don't change categories. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The movies that evolved from the blackface ministrelsy tradition like the Jazz singer are inside that category as well. It make sense to put the ministrel culture in one category as it is interrelated and unrelated to for example Othello --Hannolans (talk) 13:22, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are "related" to that tradition but apart from that tradition. Just like a modern reproduction of a piece of antique furniture would not belong in the antique furniture category. They are different things. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand the idea. But those images are in the categories The Jazz Singer (1927) as well as Upper and Lower and both categories are within the category Blackface minstrelsy, that was not me, but already categorised like that. Is that incorrect? Those images are now double categorized. --Hannolans (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@World's Lamest Critic: I added blackface under the category "black people in art". Why did you remove that? Blackface is defined as a representation of black people in theatre. I cold not find a category 'black people in theatre', so 'black people in art would be the best fit. --Hannolans (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are these black people? Or are they white people in black makeup? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images in the category 'blackface' is about theatrical makeup used predominantly by non-black performers to represent a black person. It would be natural to categorise that under makeup and under black people in art as it is about https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Black-colored_people in art.--Hannolans (talk) 17:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You know the difference between black people and black colored people. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually both categories apply, blackface is black-colored and it is a representation of black people. Probably that is not true for all blackface situations you mean? But currently it is in the defintion of the category--Hannolans (talk) 00:07, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's exactly what a racist would say. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I'm not a racist. Please give normal arguments --Hannolans (talk) 08:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's have a chat[edit]

You removed "Blackface minstrelsy" from File:Sich a Getting Up Stairs, T. D. Rice.jpg. Rather than just fixing it, I'm going to ask you what you were thinking. Why did you do that? How is this not blackface minstrelsy? Why are you editing these categories at all? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added Thomas D. Ric to the category Blackface ministrelsy as he is a blackface entertainer, so I removed it for this image falling into this category. --Hannolans (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no sense. You removed the category "blackface minstrelsy" from an image of blackface minstrelsy. What do you mean by "blackface entertainer"? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A blackface entertainer is an artist specialised in performing in blackface minstrels. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Blackface_minstrel_performers That category by the way is a subcategory of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Blackface_minstrelsy As the english wpikipedia has for this field welldefined categories I am reusing the same convention for categories and subcategories as the english wikipedia category structure and link Wikidata items to them. I'm not sure if you are aware that in Commons it is practice to put a file in the most specific category. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories ? --Hannolans (talk) 00:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons has its own category structure, separate and apart from English Wikipedia. If someone comes to Commons looking for images of people in blackface, I think they should see those images rather than having to dig several layers to specific performers they likely aren't familiar with. There's no issue with the image being in both categories. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 14:33, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see your reasoning. No, that's not how Commons work. We should always put images in the most specific category as mentioned in Commons:Categories#Category_structure_in_Wikimedia_Commons. If you want to have an overview of images with for example blackface, we can create a page. See for example Van Gogh: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vincent_van_Gogh doesnt give you an overview of the paintings of van Gogh, however, you can find them on the page Vincent_van_Gogh --Hannolans (talk) 16:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Animatie Brand bij Chemie-Pack te Moerdijk, 5 januari 2011.webm[edit]

File:Animatie Brand bij Chemie-Pack te Moerdijk, 5 januari 2011.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuwsuurpresentatoren.jpg[edit]

File:Nieuwsuurpresentatoren.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Licentie Surinaamse overheid[edit]

@Lymantria: (voor jouw informatie ook even een link naar dit overleg) en hallo Hannolans. Ik neem aan dat je (Hannolans) nog geen reactie hebt terug gehad van de Surinaamse overheid over het geven van een duidelijkere licentie. Ik had al enkele foto's geüpload voordat ik het overleg in het Auteursrechtencafé toen begon en ben daar eerst even mee gestopt totdat er meer duidelijkheid is. Vandaag werden daar drie van geverifieerd door Lymantria (maar wel met een andere licentie). Zie dit overleg en de licentie die op die drie foto's werd geplakt. Zou er misschien nu ook een speciaal sjabloon voor de Surinaamse overheid gemaakt kunnen worden, omdat die foto's nu blijkbaar ook al voldoen? Ik dacht ik betrek jullie beide maar even bij dit overleg, in de hoop dat ik meer foto's kan gaan uploaden. Ymnes (talk) 20:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ik denk dat de licentie die ik heb gekozen {{Copyrighted free use}} prima van toepassing is in dit geval. Een eigen sjabloon maken voor de website van de Surinaamse rijksoverheid zou kunnen, maar er staat ook een zinnetje "tenzij anders vermeld". Dat maakt het m.i. ongeschikt als licentie-sjabloon. Het is zeker niet {{Cc-zero}} als daar niet expliciet naar wordt verwezen. Lymantria (talk) 16:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oké duidelijk, daar kan dan alleen de Surinaamse regering nog iets in veranderen. Ik ben in elk geval blij deze licentie te kennen, want bij die foto's staat vaak niet een uitzondering vermeld. En foto's van Surinaamse politici zijn schaars. Ymnes (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Het is qua tekst dezelfde als Template:SurinameGov. Deze heeft als voordeel dat er expliciet naar de licentietekst verwezen wordt van de Surinaamse overheid. --Hannolans (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die had ik helemaal nog niet gezien. Bedankt! Zo gauw ik tijd heb, ga ik hem gebruiken. Ymnes (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marc-Marie Huijbregts verbaast zich bij Regionaal Archief Tilburg.webm[edit]

File:Marc-Marie Huijbregts verbaast zich bij Regionaal Archief Tilburg.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vera ^(talk) 16:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Planet II- Freek Vonk.webm[edit]

File:Blue Planet II- Freek Vonk.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Animalparty (talk) 03:11, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:TV-Serie De Luizenmoeder.webm[edit]

File:TV-Serie De Luizenmoeder.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Happytravels (talk) 09:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuwe film 'Bankier van het verzet'.webm[edit]

Template:Idw/layout ℯ xplicit 01:29, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burgemeester Samkalden en Otto Frank naast het beeldje van Anne Frank.jpg[edit]

Template:Idw/layout Robotje (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

hi, nice uploads - i would note that the creator template is: {{creator:Piet Mondrian}} not {{creator|Piet Mondrian}} cheers Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 15:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:02-06-1948 04033 Suzanne Arts (6526606021).jpg[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, de beschrijving bij deze file: Foto Peter van Zoest. Heeft dit betrekking op de fotograaf of op de persoon die de foto (collectie) ter beschikking stelde? thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 10:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Koninklijk Huis[edit]

This template might be incompatible with Commons. You are welcome to comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Prinses Beatrix.jpg. Regards. Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate MoiraMoira (talk) 06:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koningin-maxima-okt-15-s.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:05, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wassenaar 2013 Hare Majesteit Koningin Máxima.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Celia Homeford ([[User talk:Celia Homeford|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mijn fout[edit]

Pardon, ik was niet bekend met de alternatieve spelling. De mensen van de bibliotheek zelf hadden mij gezegd dat de naam verkeerd was en ik had het niet kunnen vinden, bedankt dat je een bron hebt gegeven die het tegendeel bewijst. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wel, het stond enigszins weggestopt in het artikel. Ik heb de alternatieve schrijfwijzen inmiddels ook toegevoegd aan Wikidata.--Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Museum reinvented.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Majora ([[User talk:Majora|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bløf en Geike over Zoutelande in DWDD.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℯ xplicit 23:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:5 jaar Nationale Politie.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnny de Mol vindt dat foute humor moet kunnen.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℯ xplicit 09:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opening Mauritshuis in Madurodam.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℯ xplicit 11:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Emilie Gordenker.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uncategorized uploads[edit]

Hannolans, I know you have a keen interest in Nazi-related topics. Are File:Kampkleding in Rijksmuseum.jpg and File:Kampkleding in Rijksmuseum 2.jpg images of Nazi concentration camp prisoner uniforms? Should they be in Category:Concentration camp uniforms? World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping in case you missed my note. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you deliberately ignoring my question? You uploaded another Nazi concentration camp uniform image yesterday, so I know you're still active here. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded File:Concentration Camp Jacket Worn by Isabel Wachenheimer.jpg for you as that is the official image of the same prisoner uniform I uploaded earlier. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your answer to my question about image categories was uploading an image and expecting me to understand that? Please just categorize the images. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Smooth O ([[User talk:Smooth O|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:W ?[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, toevallig stootte ik op deze en enkele andere afbeeldingen. Aan de datum te zien zou dit de delegatie kunnen zijn voor de Renville-overeenkomst. Kan jij dit eventueel bevestigen? Thank you for your time. Template:Smiley Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:51, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ik weet denk ik te weinig van deze onderhandelingen. Maar de foto stelt over de West te gaan en Renville over de Oost. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuwe film 'Bankier van het verzet'.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Mutter Erde ([[User talk:Mutter Erde|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne Frank lacht naar de schoolfotograaf.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Mutter Erde ([[User talk:Mutter Erde|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charles Birke biedt het 1e exemplaar van Achter de Kawat aan aan mw. Tjarda va, Bestanddeelnr 930-2531.jpg[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, waarom voegde je de Category:1800 establishments toe? Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i think thuis was a batch edit mistake. Sorry!--Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

Template:Ping File:De schoenenafdeling van het kledingcentrum in Ataka, Bestanddeelnr 255-6933.jpg vind ik persoonlijk een nogal verwarrende toevoeging. De beschrijving maakt dit ook duidelijk. Wat stel je voor? Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:19, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ja ik ook. Ik ad destijds de foto's grof gecategoriseerd op Oost-Indie. Maar in dir geval is er geen direct verband. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate B dash ([[User talk:B dash|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:35, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Koninklijkhuis has released this image under CC-0. The copyright template is attached with with further information and the CC-0 license during that time of upload (note that they changed their licence policy some while ago, see also former discussions that concluded to keep those pictures) --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Triplecaña ([[User talk:Triplecaña|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image was uploaded under Creative Commons zero, see the license information provided at the item. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Willy Koningsdag Compilatie (2014 - 2016).webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jan Arkesteijn ([[User talk:Jan Arkesteijn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dansen op de vulkaan.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Jan Arkesteijn ([[User talk:Jan Arkesteijn|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:32, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rechtmaken afbeelding[edit]

Beste Hannolans, onlangs maakte jij een foto, door mij gemaakt, van een stint rechter. Is daar een speciaal programma voor? Ik heb net een bestand ge-upload van een helikopter met de opslagplaats van de reddingsboot in Katwijk, in 2010. Door de helikopter (waar de foto eigenlijk voor bedoeld was) staat de opslagplaats er nogal scheef op. Wellicht wil jij dit rechtzetten of mij vertellen hoe dit te doen? Alvast bedankt. Zie: File:KNRM Life boat station Katwijk with helicopter 3 july 2010.jpg. Ik moet er nog meer foto's van hebben (nettere), maar kan ze niet meer vinden, is al enkele jaren geleden. Maak ik nog wel een keer, maar niet binnenkort :-) M.v.g. - Richardkiwi (talk) ([[User talk:Richardkiwi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:42, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ik gebruik 'Foto's' van Apple op de Macbook. Bij bijsnijden kan je hierin foto draaien en zelf past ie ook tiltcorrectie toe. Zou mooi zijn als op Commons iets staat. Ik heb hem rechtgemaakt. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok hartelijk dank. Ik heb geen Macbook, dus dat komt goed uit. Ik zal eens kijken voor een Windows-programma. Groeten, - Richardkiwi (talk) ([[User talk:Richardkiwi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:45, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Van Gils viral.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:20, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Can Can Dance.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 10:22, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Skipper Vibrator in violet aus dem Amorelie Adventkalenders (43283091570).jpg

And also:

File:Skipper Vibrator in violet in Verpackung auf weißem Hintergrund (43283094420).jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zoophilia with dogs[edit]

I'm not sure why you added Category:Zoophilia with dogs to File:Meko kisses his momma -justice4meko.webm. Was that some kind of joke? World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No off course no joke, this video is an example of zoophilia. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't. It's a dog licking someone's face. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And she loves her dog physically. This is love from both sides.--Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So she has sex with her dog? That's not in the video. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

dewiki: "Zoophilie (von altgriechisch ζώον zṓon, deutsch ‚Tier, Lebewesen‘ und -philie) bezeichnet sexuelle oder romantische Hingezogensein zu Tieren. Zoophilie kann sexuelle Handlungen beinhalten, aber auch Vorlieben, die nur sekundär, manchmal gar unbewusst, der sexuellen Befriedigung des Menschen dienen)" --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So she doesn't have sex with the dog, then. We don't know what she is thinking or what the dog is thinking. Does she say she is sexually attracted to the dog? Does she say that she has romantic feelings for the dog? World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. What i do see is 1. sexual contact (mouth to mouth contact / licking on the mouth) between a woman and a dog, 2. she doesn't stop the sexual contact what could mean she is not able to stop it or she likes it. Her expression and the reactions seems to be that she might be able to stop it, but likes her dog doing it. We could create more categories to split up zoophila into different categories of sexual contact with animals but I don't think that is really needed --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:11, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is not sexual contact. Please let me know if you decide to create new zoophilia categories that reflect your idiosyncratic view of zoophilia. World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:05, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Off course this is sexual contact, or do you define sexual contact as genital contact? Mouth and tongue is pretty intime. About the categories, zoophilia is a catch all category for zoophilia as wel as bestiality --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Crystal Method - "Over It (ft. Dia Frampton)" -- Official Music Video.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate World's Lamest Critic ([[User talk:World's Lamest Critic|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A link to the source page is provided, you can see a CC0 tag on the source page. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Sex Museum Amsterdam - potloodventer 193 (3176918268).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Mulder over Nouri.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:42, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Mulder bespreekt de dichtbundel Open Ogen van Remco Campert.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:43, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Terlouw- een jaar later.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Je Zal Het Maar Hebben met Tim Hofman, Aafke en Shivan.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 18:01, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joost Prinsen over Willem Wilmink.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Dark Souls III - Accursed Trailer PS4, XB1, PC.webm

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retouched..picture?[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bløf en Geike over Zoutelande in DWDD.webm

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Retouched_picture/en&diff=337444530&oldid=311121822

Werkt nu. (voorbeeld) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:23, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dank! Heb ook de NL-versie aangepast. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wereldwijde ophef om genetische modificatie in China.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:54, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File has been edited now to remove this content. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miley Cyrus Tongue Tied by Quentin Jones (Official Video).webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate czar 18:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franse-kleuren-paleis-op-de-dam.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate B dash ([[User talk:B dash|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:54, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Im sure we had the most expensive exhibition at Milan this year - Marcel Wanders.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate I have de-nominated the film from MOTD. Please feel free to nominate it again, should it be kept. — Racconish ^💬 08:06, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ontwerpers Viktor & Rolf tegen de wand geplakt.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Vera ^(talk) 08:14, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mannenharten.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Natuur12 ([[User talk:Natuur12|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:05, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Deportatie Joden, zomer 1943 op de Panamakade.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Deportatie vanuit Panamakade in Amsterdam, zomer 1943 03.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Deportatie vanuit Panamakade in Amsterdam, zomer 1943 04.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Deportatie vanuit Panamakade in Amsterdam, zomer 1943 05.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Deportatie vanuit Panamakade in Amsterdam, zomer 1943 06.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Deportatie vanuit Panamakade in Amsterdam, zomer 1943 07.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Jcb ([[User talk:Jcb|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maak het donker in het donker.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:DJ Hardwell uit Breda uitgeroepen tot beste dj van de wereld.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate FASTILY 04:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hannolans, if the sculpture doesn't meet the terms of "freedom of panorama" of the country where it is located, you need to provide permission by the sculptor and by the photographer Simon van Boxtel to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Esther Bruggink and Simon van Boxtel have kids together. So I wouldn't exactly be surprised if Esther simply borrowed his phone. (though it's not certain that's what happened) I doubt FoP could apply, this artwork doesn't seem suitable for outdoor conditions. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 14:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sending the permission by OTRS, both from Simon van Boxtel and Esther Bruggink. This work is certainly copyrighted. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please forward the permission by Simon van Boxtel to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org so that we change the template to OTRS pending. --Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:40, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COM:OVERWRITE[edit]

Hoi Hanno, wil je aub ophouden met het overschrijven van bestaande uploads van schilderijen met andere foto's? Het zijn andere foto's dus gewoon even onder een nieuwe naam uploadeden conform Commons:Overwriting existing files. Multichill (talk) 14:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ping Op File:The Legend.jpg heb je zelf COM:OVERWRITE geschonden. Okay, Arkesteijn had het als eerste geschonden in 2015, maar toch. Arkesteijn's variant stond er al 4 jaar en die heb je nu zomaar vervangen door de overduidelijk inferieure originele upload uit 2011. Dit terwijl het bestand in gebruik is. Het is twijfelachtig of File:Michelangelo - Study of an Ignudo.jpg nu zoveel anders is dat een nieuwe upload noodzakelijk is, maar daar valt over te discussiëren. Bij File:After-birth visit.jpg is dat misschien nog wel twijfelachtiger. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Als File:Willem de Famars Testas - The well and sycamore in Ezbekieh Square, Cairo.jpg als nieuw bestand moet worden geupload kan de oude verwijderd worden als Template:Tl. Dan mag je dus overschrijven. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:36, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nee, dat heb ik niet. Bij twijfel zet ik altijd de oudste terug. Jan is geblokkeerd voor dit gedrag en deze afbeelding staat daarom ook nog in Category:Image overwrites by Jan Arkesteijn for independent review. Je maakt er nu alleen maar een grotere rommel van.

En hoe is volgens jou het overschrijven van File:After-birth visit.jpg acceptabel?

En nee, zo werkt het niet met duplicaten van kunstwerken. Multichill (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Re Al het on-wiki gebruik van File:The Legend.jpg is na 2015. Externe websites die het bestand hotlinken zullen ook niet op de 2011 versie zitten te wachten. Arkesteijn mag dan fout geweest zijn, twee fouten heffen elkaar niet op. En bij File:Willem de Famars Testas - The well and sycamore in Ezbekieh Square, Cairo.jpg is het verschil (buiten de resolutie) nihil. (de upload van 2012 is een pietsie donkerder, zie je alleen in een directe vergelijking, maar de resolutie is zoveel lager dat het oude bestand realistisch gezien niets toevoegd) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ik check de overwrites. Ik overwrite de versies die het museum destijds zelf heeft geupload met een hogere versie van het museum. Daarnaast overwrite ik van het internetgeplukte zeer lage resoluties en slechte metadata, maar die wel op veel pagina's gebruikt worden. Die zouden als alternatief verwijderd kunnen worden maar het nadeel daarvan is dat alles dan herlinkt moet worden. Schadelijker vind ik dat ik er bij de Teylers-collectie achter kom dat 1. plaatjes bewerkt zijn qua kleurstelling 2. uploads van de versie met lijst overschreven zijn met een versie zonder lijst. 3. goede foto's van museumbezoekers overschreven zijn door een versie van het museum zelf. Dat probeer ik te herstellen door terug te draaien naar de oorspronkelijke versie. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb File:Michelangelo - Study of an Ignudo.jpg teruggebracht naar de allereerste versie die het museum geupload heeft. Beetje treurige versie en ik vraag me echt af wie hier op zit te wachten, maar als je dan terugdraait moet dit de versie zijn. Maar ik zou voor de grap eens even door de schilderijen van Teylers heenlopen, zie bijv File:Ferdinand_de_Braekeleer_(1792-1883),_Kenau_Simonsdr._Hasselaar_tijdens_het_belg_van_Haarlem,_1829,_Olievrf_op_doek.JPG daar is dus een goeie foto van het werk van een bezoeker met lijst overschreven door een foto van het museum zonder lijst. Dat is vaker gebeurd. Van ieder schilderij die momenteel geen lijst heeft zou gecontroleerd moeten worden of er eentje overschreven is. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:22, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ongelooflijk, ik ben nu best wel kwaad, er is van alles teruggedraaid. Daar had wel even overleg over kunnen plaatsvinden. Ik snap dat goede kwaliteiten van schilderijen naast elkaar moeten staan, maar dit is toch echt wel een principepunt maken. Ik heb dit juist met Teylers hierover om de tafel gezeten. Wat hebben wij hier op Commons aan werken van 50kB om die te behouden? Wil je dat we in 20 wikipedia's die internetpostzegels laten zien en dat mensen tot in de eeuwigheid in commons postzegelkwaliteit blijven tegenkomen en per ongeluk gaan gebruiken? --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Het principepunt is dat we niet overschrijven tenzij het de exact dezelfde foto is uit dezelfde bron. Zie ook Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_57#Jan_Arkesteijn_(talk_·_contribs)_overwriting_files (and Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_58#Jan_Arkesteijn_and_file_overwrites). Dus gewoon uploaden onder een nieuwe naam. Je wilt niet zoals Jan Arkesteijn eindigen. Multichill (talk) 12:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wassenaar mei 2013 Koninklijke Familie.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Túrelio ([[User talk:Túrelio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fryslan 2018 Walk Cycle Compilation.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Roy17 ([[User talk:Roy17|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:56, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wannsee[edit]

What is in your opinion the difference between "Haus der Wannseekonferenz" and "Villa Marlier"? Why different categories? --A.Savin 02:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Villa Marlier is the building built in 1915. Gedankstätte Haus der Wannseekonferenz is the museum organisation. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinterklaas (4121312177).jpg[edit]

Hi, Hannolans, since you were the uploader, could you consider renaming the file? This obviously is not Sinterklaas. Not sure if my comment when renaming this file was correct. :-) Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaterdag 5 januari- Wie is de Mol- - Wie is de mol 2019.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate DutchTina ([[User talk:DutchTina|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Van Kempenbank[edit]

Beste Hannolans; ik zie dat jij regelmatig in Kennemerland vertoeft om foto's te maken. Ik ben op zoek naar een foto van de Van Kempenbank aan de Van Valckeburghlaan in Bloemendaal. Hij staat aan de rand van het plantsoen in een bossage. Via Google te zien bij Van Valckenburghlaan 9. Zie jij een mogelijkheid?Dan kan de foto geplaatst worden in het artikel Jac. van Kempen, ik hoor graag,Ceescamel ([[User talk:Ceescamel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:21, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, ja, als ik er aan denk zal ik een foto maken. Ben alleen slecht in dat niet te vergeten, dus voel je vrij om nog een keer te pingen. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Street vendors Medellín, Tirana, Johannesburg, Yogyakarta - Su Tomesen (49181912381).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dionne Slagter (OnneDi) geeft beftips - De Seksmobiel.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 09:43, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinterklaas in de Lage Landen.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 12:33, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:SABA MAKLAI.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 11:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FV Promotion[edit]

Template:FVpromotedUploader /FVCBot ([[User talk:FVCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mario Testino - No Limits.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate GMG ^talk 20:31, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File Willem-Alexander der Nederlanden[edit]

Beste Hannolans. In 2016 plaatste je een verbeterde versie van een portretfoto van koning Willem-Alexander der Nederlanden op Commons. Volgens mij is die foto niet vrijgegeven ter publicatie. Volgens de bijbehorende website van het Nederlandse koninklijk huis is dat alleen het geval als dat expliciet wordt aangegeven. Zie de pagina over copyright: https://www.koninklijkhuis.nl/copyright. Ik meld dat omdat iemand de foto wil vervangen door een recentere, met gevaar dat ook die - wellicht afkomstig van dezelfde site - niet is vrijgegeven, waar het volgens die site ook op lijkt. Wellicht wil je er even naar kijken. mvg. --Happytravels ([[User talk:Happytravels|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De foto is destijds vrijgegeven onder creative commons, maar ze hebben daarna de copyrightpagina een paar keer gewijzigd. Creative Commonslicentie kan echter niet ingetrokken worden. Met respect voor de vervaardiger en portretrecht mag de foto vrij gebruikt worden. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Koning-willem-alexander-okt-15-s.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Rots61 ([[User talk:Rots61|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:55, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New pictures Royals[edit]

Zie mijn vraag hier: [4]. Ik zag net je naam staan als uploader van de foto's. Die zijn van 5 jaren geleden. Zijn er nieuwere formele portretten te vinden? --VanBuren ([[User talk:VanBuren|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:17, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Laat maar, ik heb al antwoord. --VanBuren ([[User talk:VanBuren|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:17, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Gouden Koets rijdt het Binnenhof op Prinsjesdag 2008.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Rots61 ([[User talk:Rots61|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Buidhe ([[User talk:Buidhe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:03, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dennis Schouten over chlamydia - De Seksmobiel.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:De intocht van Sinterklaas op Scheveningen.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holland Boulevard- NEMO.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Eatcha (talk) 04:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isken[edit]

Ik heb het Wikidata-item over Isken op diens naam gezet, omdat het me anders gek leek om een atelier een geboortedatum te geven etc. Heb ook een Category:Johannes Cornelis Isken aangemaakt, waarin nog andere foto's van Isken ook zijn geplaatst. Groet, Eissink ([[User talk:Eissink|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:17, 7 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Ja wellicht beter. In literatuur (Toekang portret: 100 jaar fotografie in Nederlands-Indie) staat zowel zijn atelier als zijn eigen naam, met twee verschillende adressen. Daar staat dat ook ene J. Apon onder Isken & co heeft gewerkt.--Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uit alleen al krantenartikelen is wel het een en ander op te maken, er is over Isken zeker wat te vertellen. Hij was kennelijk de eerste fotograaf van de hofdanseressen van de soesoehoenan van Solo (deze?), zij het ook in opdracht van of in samenwerking met Category:Beata van Helsdingen-Schoevers. Ook werkte hij bij Atelier Kurkdjian. Zit kortom wel een artikeltje in. Eissink ([[User talk:Eissink|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:49, 7 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Category:Jim_Crow[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Themightyquill ([[User talk:Themightyquill|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:39, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nieuwjaarsreceptie met beker voor Vreugdevuur Scheveningen.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:User 03:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Porn Stars Give Blowjob Advice.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:User 13:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Unloading ramp in 1942.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Buidhe ([[User talk:Buidhe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:World Press Photo Samuel Aranda (2012).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Vera ^(talk) 08:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clitoral fingering.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:New T (4865783892).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc ([[User talk:Elisfkc|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:48, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Rots61 ([[User talk:Rots61|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bauplan brick barracks at Auschwitz II-Birkenau.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Buidhe ([[User talk:Buidhe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Haeftlinge 267437a.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Buidhe ([[User talk:Buidhe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anal sex 65 (7161487681).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Walther16 ([[User talk:Walther16|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Rots61 ([[User talk:Rots61|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foto tekst afgeplaktepagi-000.jpg in Dagboek Anne Frank[edit]

Beste Hanno,

Bij het oppoetsen van artikelen rond Anne Frank vind ik je mooie aanwinst. Vraag: in de transcriptie (dank!) gebruik je hoofdletters waar Frank die niet heeft staan, dus je bedoelt er iets anders mee. (Bij mijn opleiding tot "middelbaar wetenschappelijke archiefambtenaar" in 1976-1977 werd me ingepeperd dat ik spelling, interpunctie enzovoorts van oude documenten getrouwelijk moest transcriberen, want allemaal informatie.)

Kun je uitleggen wat je bedoelt met die hoofdletters (ze geven het afgeplakte stuk aan, tekst in gewone letters was niet afgeplakt?) Dan misschien anders aangeven?

Welbedankt en wikigroet, Hansmuller ([[User talk:Hansmuller|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daar waren geen diepe gedachten achter. Mogelijk heb ik het overgenomen qua schrijfwijze zoals bij een bepaalde bron. Wijzig gerust. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SettelaSteinbach1944.jpeg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Buidhe ([[User talk:Buidhe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Aanbieding koffertje Tweede Kamer Prinsjesdag 2015 08.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Troonrede 2015 1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Paasviering vanwege coronacrisis digitaal .webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate Ju Ta 08:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT[edit]

Dag, Hannolans. Ik wil je verzoeken om bij het aanmaken van categorieën, specifiek van personen, rekening te houden met de sortering in de categorieën die aan de nieuwe categorie worden gegeven. Ik heb zojuist tientallen van door jou aangemaakte categorieën voorzien van een DEFAULTSORT-sjabloon, al dan niet met de toevoeging |defaultsort=no aan het Wikidata Infobox-sjabloon (in een groot deel van de gevallen, en ik denk de meerderheid, werkt de sortering ook met Infobox niet goed, omdat de data op Wikidata niet correct is ongevoerd of gewoon ontbreekt), omdat al die categorieën anders sorteren op voornaam of initialen – geen enkele sorteerde goed, en ik vrees dat het voor nog heel veel meer categorieën geldt. Zou je in het vervolg bij de aanmaak gelijk de sortering goed willen regelen? Het is voor anderen, die de waarde van zulke sortering zien, onnodig veel werk om alles te moeten corrigeren, en het lijkt me voor iemand met zoveel bijdragen en ervaring op Commons eigenlijk niets te veel gevraagd. Bedankt, Eissink ([[User talk:Eissink|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Ik zie dat je in veel gevallen zelf het Wikidata-item aanmaakt, in welk geval het natuurlijk het eenvoudigst is om de namen gelijk op Wikidata correct in te voeren. Misschien ten overvloede: tussenvoegsel als 'van' of 'de' zijn geen deel van de achternaam waar het gaat om het sorteren, tenzij het Belgische namen betreft, dus houdt daar dan alsjeblieft rekening mee (dat is namelijk een veel voorkomende bron van verkeerde sortering). Eissink ([[User talk:Eissink|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:50, 29 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

File:Birkenau, Poland, The camps main gate.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Spasimir ([[User talk:Спасимир|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dubbel[edit]

Beste Hannolans, De vraag hoort hier niet, maar toch: op Wikidata zie ik enorm veel dubbele items van hoogleraren. Hoe geef ik bij het "foute" item aan dat er een beter item bestaat? Ik heb zelf ergens staan: bij P31 verwijzing naar andere Q invullen. Klopt dat? Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goed te horen en ja, grote kans. Bijvoorbeeld van Nijmegen hebben we alleen de hoogleraren met voorletters toegevoegd, dus grote kans dat die met volledige naam wel vindbaar zijn. Ik heb de samenvoegfunctie aanstaan, dan krijg je rechtsboven een tab 'samenvoegen' en dan worden ze gemerged. Het oudste item is daarbij leidend qua label en beschrijving, verder worden alle properties samengevoegd. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dank. Waar zit die samenvoegfunctie? Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:31, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voorkeuren -> Uitbreidingen -> Wikidata-specifiek: "Merge: Voeg een "samenvoegen"-link toe aan het submenu "meer", waarmee items makkelijk kunnen worden samengevoegd."--Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias. Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:58, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noord-Hollands archief vrijgaves[edit]

Hoi Hanno, alles goed? Jij hebt toch in het verleden vrijgaves gedaan zoals Template:Tl? Nu zie ik ook dingen zoals Category:Beeldcollectie van het Historisch Archief Haarlemmermeer te Hoofddorp en Category:Beeldcollectie van de gemeente Haarlem verschijnen waar ik bang ben dan we helemaal geen vrijgave hebben. Zie User_talk:Mr.Nostalgic#CC0_en_Category:Beeldcollectie_van_het_Historisch_Archief_Haarlemmermeer_te_Hoofddorp. Wellicht wil je daar ook reageren? Alvast bedankt, Multichill (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teens to Seniors Sex Talk.webm was nominated for MOTD[edit]

Your file has been nominated for a Media of the Day.

Your contribution to this project has been noticed. A file Teens to Seniors Sex Talk.webm, which was uploaded by you, has been nominated to be displayed on the Main Page of this project as a Media of the Day. You can view this and other nominations at Commons talk:Media of the day. It is always a good idea to let other contributors know when you think your file would look good as a featured media file, provide descriptions in different languages, and perhaps spread the joy by nominating media of other uploaders, that you believe deserve that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:01, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

Template:MOTDpromotion //EatchaBot ([[User talk:EatchaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:01, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:How To Have An Orgasm!.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Text mdnp ([[User talk:Text mdnp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Registratie van opgepakte joden in de Hollandsche Schouwburg aan de Plantage Middenlaan.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Buidhe ([[User talk:Buidhe|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hitler and Mannerheim recording 1942.ogg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate -- Veikk0.ma (talk) 10:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Een hoge omheining van gevlochten takken onttrekt de gaskamers aan het zicht.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Botterweg14 ([[User talk:Botterweg14|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne Frank lacht naar de schoolfotograaf.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ShyAlpaca482 ([[User talk:ShyAlpaca482|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diary of Anne Frank 28 sep 1942.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ShyAlpaca482 ([[User talk:ShyAlpaca482|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arely's Flats Crush Your Strawberries! (Latina Feet).webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate ƒirefly ( t · c ) 21:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kranslegging bij het standbeeld van Jan Pietersz. Coen op het Waterlooplein te Batavia t.g.v. zijn 300ste sterfdag.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 20:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prinses Alexia, Wassenaar, najaar 2014.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Rots61 ([[User talk:Rots61|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Food_of_the_Netherlands[edit]

Template:Autotranslate JopkeB ([[User talk:JopkeB|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot twerk choreo.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate SashiRolls ([[User talk:SashiRolls|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arely Destroys Your Cup Cakes (Crush-Trample) (Latina Feet).webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:57, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Vycl1994 ([[User talk:Vycl1994|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crush kiwi.webm[edit]

Template:Autotranslate

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:08, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Strap-on pegging (cropped).jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Veroforus ([[User talk:Veroforus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:24, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Henk van Hoorn of Henk de Haan?[edit]

Hoi Hannolans, bij File:Henk de Haan in 1981.jpg heb je volgens mij Henk van Hoorn verward met Henk de Haan. Kun je daar nog even naar kijken? - Robotje ([[User talk:Robotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bedankt voor de hernoeming. De afbeelding staat nog wel steeds bij nl:Henk de Haan (econoom). - Robotje ([[User talk:Robotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Actiegroep waarschuwt tegen New World Order in Almelo.webm[edit]

Hallo Hannolans, wil je de beschrijving even nazien op taalfouten? thanks. Lotje ([[User talk:Lotje|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pink Cliffs? - NARA - 517805.jpg[edit]

Why did you make this edit when the photographer was John K. Hillers, and not E. O. (Elias Olcott) Beaman? Are you now going to revisit this mass of edits to correct this error, please do... Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the information summary is written in the author field that both persons are the photographer of this photo. Probably that is a mistake? ? --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No its laziness or ambiguity by the owner collection.

Further into the text of Pink Cliffs it tells you John K. Hillers took the photo. Photographs taken by John K. Hillers during the Powell Survey and other Geological Surveys, compiled ca. 1879 - ca. 1900

Added to which he actually signed the plate. See here

Powell used three photographers on this 1871 expedition; Elias Olcott Beaman, James Fennemore, and John K. Hillers.

Three people cannot take one photograph.

You need to investigate each image forensically in turn for correct attribution.

This is a collection you can't use hotcat on. Please will you, now correct all the uninformed entries you have made on this subject matter. Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the right approach is to alter the authorship for those photos on Commons. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've corrected that particular file mentioned. What about the rest of the mistaken edits you have made here?

Again the museum record is clear, example File:Tantalus Creek (^), Wayne County, Utah. Old Nos. 275, 423, 1871 - 1878 - NARA - 517790.jpg was taken by Hilliers. You have added Beaman to the record.

Same for example File:Green River. Canyon of Lodore, the Haystack. Old nos. 314, 624, 372. - NARA - 517878.tif, amongst others

All your edits on 24 feb 2020 from 09:38 thru to 09:40 need to be revisited, checked, and probably corrected. Possibly 300 to 400 files are affected. None of these edits mention hotcat as being used.

Are you now going to revisit this batch of edits to correct this error, please do... Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well my edits are not incorrect, I didnt claim Beaman as the photographer, It is just that his name is mentioned as an author. We should correct the author field first. We now have three authors mentioned and that can not be correct. We have even photographs that fall in multiple 'photographs by' categories, for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colorado_River._Grand_Canyon,_Tapeets_Creek._(Note,_it_appears_that_the_glass_negative_may_have_broken_or_cracked_all..._-_NARA_-_518020.jpg as Second Powell Expedition 1871-1872: Photographs by Elias Olcott Beaman, Second Powell Expedition 1871-1872: Photographs by James Fennemore and Second Powell Expedition 1871-1872: Photographs by John K. Hillers --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:19, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should we remove the other authors from all the 800 images in this category?: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:US_National_Archives_series:_Photographs_taken_by_John_K._Hillers_during_the_Powell_Survey_and_other_Geological_Surveys,_compiled_ca._1879_-_ca._1900 ?--Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colorado River. Grand Canyon, Tapeets Creek. (Note, it appears that the glass negative may have broken or cracked all... - NARA - 518020.jpg was uploaded in 2011 and visited several times, by several editors and catted correctly Then in August 2021, when Template:U fell into the same trap you did.

Admittedly the wording is less than desirable. Three photographers are mentioned as Contributors to Authorship and/or Production of the Archival Material(s): that doesn’t mean they are the author. It's qualified further into the text, as From: Series: Photographs taken by John K. Hillers during the Powell Survey and other Geological Surveys, ca. 1879 - ca. 1900. Thats unequivocal! There is no actual claim Beaman is the photographer. Bearing in mins that only one person ban be the photographe, any initial mis-understanding should tale a claim of three as a red flag.

American records always have to be very carefully scrutinized and mulled over before committing to cats on authorship. Hotcat needs to be heavily qualified before use. Historical stuff like this always has minefields. American records are often wrong, and or, have attached records that are incomplete. It's not their fault, many of these collections were donated, few of them documented, and detail lost.

When it comes to art and historical item collection, hotcat is always a potential menace.

As for Template:U he has gone to town with hotcat, with three separate cats assigning that one photo to three separate photographers. Yes, he needs to correct it too.

Only engravings and lithographs have multiple artists. And only newspapers publishing engravings (example Harpers) can claim Authorship as a separate issue.

There is no need to change the authorship on every file as you say. A warning page on the top page will do. Both of you need to revert your edits. The earlier (informed) visitations are correct.

Where there is no specific photographer attributed then the lead cat should be used; namely Category:Second Powell Expedition 1871-1872. However, from what I have seen so far, correct attribution was indicated in every record. Some museum collections also have these plates and some are signed.

For your information Beaman was replaced by Fennemore on the expedition. There is some overlap with Hilliers, as he was their assistant, who grew into the job.

Are you now (both) going to revisit this batch of edits to correct this error, please do... Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you done nothing about deleting the errors you have introduced into these file.? Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is not incorrect, the name is in th file information. We should correct the authorship information we provide in the information template, that is incorrect information. --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Err, no! This set of files from the USA is not unique. American sources commonly abuse fields with incorrect information. Probably because they are attempting batch uploading of items that dont lend themselves to it.

Look at this file as an example; it's not unlike the file in question. The author is listed as a series of consective editors covering a 100 year period; obviously that cant be. However the artist for the image is a named individual, and the author (if different) is merely the name of the newspaper. You have introduced errors and false attribution. You need to correct it.

As I said before several editors visited this issue over the years and catted it correctly, before you came along.

Art and historical images like this don't lend themselves to cat-a-lot. They need full scrutiny before use, and certainty before cat-a-lot can be employed. If at all. Your not doing that. Again you need to delete your errors.

Errors like this spread all over the net like wildfire. Users (stupidly) trust us to get it right... --Broichmore ([[User talk:Broichmore|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If our information is incorrect we should correct that. I tagged that name as that name is in our information template named as the author. please start correct that. I didn't claim that person is the author, I tagged that person as se name that person as author. Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Een vlag van De Princevlag afdeling Vlaardingen.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 20:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Helene4 museumkr-ller juangris nature-morte-la-lampe 1912.jpeg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot ([[User talk:AntiCompositeBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) (FAQ) 21:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Ilvy Njiokiktjien @ NVJ Grote Freelancersdag.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Jeff G. ツ_{please ping or talk to me} 11:24, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Woudhuysen/Woudhuyzen[edit]

Beste Hanno, Category:Lou Woudhuyzen is een oudere categorie dan Category:Louis Woudhuysen, en ik vermoed dat ze samen kunnen vloeien in die oudere categorie, omdat het dezelfde persoon is. Op Commons lukt dat me wel, maar ook op Wikidata moeten ze één worden. Zou jij er naar willen kijken? Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dank! Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja mooi, goed dat je dit ontdekt hebt! --Hannolans ([[User talk:Hannolans#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]