User talk:Coldcreation

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 00:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]



català | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | עברית | svenska | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear Coldcreation,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Public Art team
Wiki Loves Public Art logo

Good catch. I had misread my blurry photo of the painting's museum identification card. Postdlf (talk) 15:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  català  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  eesti  français  galego  magyar  italiano  Nederlands  polski  română  svenska  ไทย  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Coldcreation,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Coldcreation,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
File:Paul Gaugin, Soyer amoureuses vous serez heureuses, relief.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fantes 007 (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your gif![edit]

Hello!

My name is Laurie and I'm the Project Manager for na2ure, an NYC-based startup toy company. We featured this gif of yours (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eadweard_Muybridge,_Cockatoo_flying,_1887,_Collotype_process,_Animal_Locomotion_collection,_plate_758.gif) in our upcoming app, and wanted to thank you. Thank you!

na2ure is all about designing science play. We developed a game-changing platform called ferret that classifies ecological data into an intuitive network that can be easily learned through play. The high end value of our work attracted STEM>STEAM icon John Maeda, as well as the VCs behind LittleBits, Sphero, Makerbot, and Shapeways. The science has been vetted by MD's and PhD's, tested by kids, and praised by educators as appealing to all ages.

None of this would have been possible without your work. Thank you.

The app is available on the iOS platform and will be released to the public soon. Be sure to follow us on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/Anigramit) and Twitter (@anigramit) for a quick, easy way to share the news with your social media network - and to keep up to date on all the great stuff we’re doing.

Again, thank you! Laurie Vazquez Project Manager, na2ure manager@na2ure.com

Hi,

I am not sure of this edit: The file *was* published under CC-By, even though Commons asserts it is public domain per the PD-Art policy. This is the all point of the {{Licensed-PD-Art}} template.

Sincerely, Jean-Fred (talk) 17:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for pointing this out Jean-Frédéric. You may have a good point, though in actual fact, that version of the Delaunay image was upload by myself, i.e., it is not the Flickr image attributed to Sharon Mollerus. If you would like to revert my edit that's fine. By the way, I recently photographed the work at Pompidou, and will likely upload the new version soon. I will upload it separately from the actual version, and include it in Other version in a gallery section. So feel free to do what you think is correct. No problem. Coldcreation (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh I see, I assumed you had altered the colors from the Flickr version. Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense now. I will split the files then, keeping the old Flickr version under a new name, just in case. Uploading you own version sounds very good. Thanks for your answer! Jean-Fred (talk) 21:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, on second thought, I think the version I upload was indeed the same as the original version with altered colors (the original was too dark compared to the actual painting). A new version is now available, with colors close to Delaunay's work, slightly less cropped, and without the reflection on the glass (upper center/right). Coldcreation 14:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Antoine Pinchon, photograph of the artist, circa 1925.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out Ellin Beltz. I've changed the copyright tag to Anonymous-EU. This should resolve the problem. Coldcreation (talk) 07:27, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gray Tree question[edit]

Hi, I left a comment with a question here, could you respond? I also left one here, could you respond there as well? Thank you Hekerui (talk) 15:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Coldcreation (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Portrait de Picasso, 1908.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raoul Dufy, Le grand concert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish ☎ 07:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kees van Dongen[edit]

Why are you nominating 'La femme au jabot' by Kees van Dongen for deletion? It was published in a magazine before 1920 (namely in 1911). I've even added the link here in the description. Max Eisenhardt (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Max Eisenhardt, works by van Dongen will not be in the public domain until 2039. Only then can they be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Until then they can be uploaded to Wikipedia (En) wiki/Special:Upload, that is, if they had been published before 1923. That is where the file File:Kees van Dongen - Woman with Frill.jpg needs to be. This image is only public domain in the U.S. since it was published before 1923. Thanks. (This message was posted to your Talk Page days ago). Coldcreation (talk) 02:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:LaCloseriedesLilas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish regulations[edit]

I made the photographs during my stay in Barcelona to enhance some of the articles about specific artists on the en.wiki. I wasn't aware of specific Spanish regulations regarding usage of these files on Wikipedia. I thought the common EU regulation applies in Spain as well (if you have the consent to shoot on a private domain, you can use the images - for public domains you don't need any consent). For example in Madrid, at The Prado museum, I was informed it isn't allowed to take any pictures at all. But in Barcelona, there was no issue at all. And, as far as I know from my photographer's experience, as long as I make the photographs they are mine, to some extent, if I got the approval to take them (and I did for these, not written, but verbally, since the fundation/museum staff allowed me to get in with my camera and saw me shooting, plus I specifically asked if I am allowed to take photos - no, I didn't tell that I might upload a part of them on Wikipedia to share knowledge). Anyway, I suppose there isn't any way to upload them and use them only on en.wiki, right? By the way, File:Joan Miró, "Personatge", Fundació Joan Miró, Barcelona, Spain.jpg is a sculpture which is not inside the Juan Miro institution, but outside of it (in front of it). For now, I'll remove the images from the articles to avoid any disruption 'till further clarification. May I have a link to the specific Spanish law regarding the usage of photographs made in Spain, I'm really eager to take a look at least to know in the future. Thanks! Robertgombos (talk) 11:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robertgombos: As a general rule, and by law, works by Joan Miró (or Antoni Tàpies) will not be in the public domain in Spain (i.e., worldwide) until 1 January 2054 (Tàpies 2083) and should not be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons until that date. The exception is for works (e.g., 2D and 3D artworks) located in public parks, streets, squares or other public places. The grounds of the Miró Foundation is private. See more here: Freedom of panorama in Spain. Coldcreation (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK, great. Thanks for the heads-up. The images were removed from the article. Robertgombos (talk) 12:08, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Matisse's works[edit]

hello, you said "This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2025. The artist died 3 November 1954", So are these files of Matisse's works copyrighted and should be deleted? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_works_by_Henri_Matisse -Uvo (talk) 17:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uvo The difference is that those works by Matisse were upload to Wikipedia (not Wikimedia Commons) because they were published prior to 1923. Generally speaking, for images to be uploaded to Commons they have to be public domain worldwide. Coldcreation (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Photo Monalisa[edit]

Hello, I just want to inform you that I have used your good photo in my video/ vlog. I make vlog as a hobby. You can watch in youtube WT6s8eLEzs4 Thank you kindly for sharing your photo.

Best Regards, S. Toha Stef Toha (talk) 08:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russolo, Carrà, Marinetti, Boccioni and Severini in front of Le Figaro, Paris, 9 February 1912.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 11:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A question[edit]

Hi, could you kindly tell me which tool is the best for transferring images from Serbian/Bosnian Wikipedia to Commons? cheers, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 20:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I'm a french psychiatrist writing an educational book about mental diseases. I will be happy to use your picture of "the cry" by Edvard Munch to illustrate the book. Due to the french law on copyrights, i need your agreement, even if the picture is posted on wikicommons. would you agree for it ? I will be happy to send you a copy of the book as soon he will be published. Sincerely yours,

Jean-Baptiste CAUSIN MD, psychiatrist Strasbour Hospital — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbcausin (talk • contribs) 20:29, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jbcausin: Sure, feel free to use the image: File:Edvard Munch, 1893, The Scream, oil, tempera and pastel on cardboard, 91 x 73 cm, National Gallery of Norway.jpg. I would love a copy of your book. Coldcreation (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pink Floyd, 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Duchamp, photograph published in Les Peintres Cubistes, 1913.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ZmeytheDragon16 (talk) 22:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Archivo:Rosa bonheur horse fair 1835 55.jpg[edit]

Hello Coldcreation,

I have realized that this file contains an error in its name, the date of this painting is 1852-1855 Can you please change it? I can't do it!

Thank you!!!

--Encina waslala (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for pointing this out. File:Rosa Bonheur, The Horse Fair, 1852–55.jpg. Coldcreation (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pablo Picasso and scene painters sitting on the front cloth for Parade (Ballets Russes) at the Théâtre du Châtelet, Paris, 1917, Lachmann photographer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 15:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Victor Brauner, 1942, Signe (Le vent), Cimetière de Montmartre, Paris. DSC09041.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: derivative of Brauner's work
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

— Racconish💬 16:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Victor Brauner, 1942, Signe (Le vent), Cimetière de Montmartre, Paris. DSC09041.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 10:47, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Albert Gleizes, 1912, Les Baigneuses, oil on canvas, 105 x 171 cm, Paris, Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris (black and white).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Albert Gleizes, 1912, Les Baigneuses, oil on canvas, 105 x 171 cm, Paris, Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris (black and white).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 19:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fra Angelico, Fra Filippo Lippi, The Adoration of the Magi.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fra Angelico, Fra Filippo Lippi, The Adoration of the Magi.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pink Floyd, 1971.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 08:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raoul Dufy, portrait photograph.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 12:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 12:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Fra Angelico, Fra Filippo Lippi, The Adoration of the Magi.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Les Fauves, Exhibition at the Salon D'Automne, from L'Illustration, 4 November 1905.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 21:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]