User talk:Cmglee/archive2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2O11 2O12 2O13 2O14 2O15 2O16 2O17 2O18 2O19 2O2O
2O21 2O22 2O23 2O24
Topics started in 2017

Permission to use figure in a book.[edit]

Dear Cmglee,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/73/Comparison_double_triple_buffering.svg/320px-Comparison_double_triple_buffering.svg.png) in this book (Chapter 7, Figure 7.18). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.25.191.254 (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, Adam; feel free to use it under the standard Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported terms: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en . I'd appreciate if you could link back to my user page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:cmglee . Best wishes for your publication! cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 02:33, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Torre Espacio request[edit]

Rotating model of Torre Espacio with floors colour-coded by designation. In the SVG file, hover over a floor to highlight it.

I've seen you made .

Torre Espacio is a 230 m skyscraper located in Madrid that has a floor plan that takes into acccount sinus and cosinus functions [1] To learn more [2]

Can you make an svg file similar to this [3] so it shows the floorplan for different floor numbers? Or maybe a gif with all florrplans. See official website, swf file and this floorplans in PDF

I know its lots of work, but I will be very thankful. This is 100% only for Wikipedia. Triplecaña (talk) 11:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll study its feasibility. Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 07:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Triplecaña: I've made a rotating SVG model as on the right. What do you think? Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 17:09, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seven wonders of the world[edit]

Fantastic work on File:Ancient_seven_wonders_timeline.svg, I am highly pleased with this. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nicolas Perrault III, Thanks for the compliment. Glad you've found it useful! Let me know if you've any suggestions for improvement. cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 12:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested updated of File:North Korean missile range.svg[edit]

If you have the time to update the above file with more up to date ranges from the BBC ( https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/26F5/production/_88837990_north_korea_missile_ranges2_map624new.png ), that would be appreciated

Many Thanks, -Ethan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ethanmayersweet (talk • contribs) 06:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, Ethan. I've replied on File_talk:North_Korean_missile_range.svg#Update maximum ranges. Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 16:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
I'm blown away by the bredth and clarity of your comparison of equal area projections. It's an incredibly helpful diagram. Cheers! —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 23:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, @JamesLucas: glad you found it useful! By the way, I was curious about the code linking to your talk page. I doesn't seem to be Morse code and interpreting it as 22 (101102) didn't lead me anywhere. Care to enlighten me? cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 14:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's a "prosign"! This particular one is KN, with the overscore denoting that K's dahdidah is followed directly by N's dahdit without the standard pause. There are a number of such prosigns, and the meaning of this one is "go ahead, specific named station", which is a less-than-perfect fit, since linking to my Talk page is perhaps more akin to inviting someone over to a different frequency, but I think the overall tone of the message is right. —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 11:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, James. I never knew there were more characters to Morse code. Glad to have learnt something new! cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 18:47, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:QueenYangIf74.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pitpisit (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pyramid SVG[edit]

I really admire your Comparison_of_pyramids.svg and Comparison_of_pyramids_SMIL.svg images of many of the most famous pyramids around the world.

I don't have any experience with SVG files, but was wondering if you might consider updating them to include Monk's Mound at the UNESCO Cahokia site. It is considered the largest pre-Columbian site of its size north of Mexico. It has been damaged considerably by less-sensitive early European settlers, but Monk's Mound remains. It stands at about 30 meters so on the smaller side by height, but the base is similar in size to the Great Pyramid. Monk's Mound was also probably taller when the area was inhabited prior to European settlement, given that it is earthen like some of the Chinese pyramids.

Thanks for your work and consideration, --24.148.29.243 23:47, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment, and bringing Monk's Mound to my attention. It looks quite interesting and I'll consider adding it to the graphic when I next update it. Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 12:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Animations on Fourier Series[edit]

Thank you for these animations! They make the concept crystal clear, thanks again! NickGarvey (talk) 04:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, NickGarvey, and you're welcome! I'm glad you found them useful; in case you might be interested, there are two more animations at http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=cmglee+fourier+gif . Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 12:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The label POR in the image should probably be FOR (false omission rate). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2620:0:1040:20:CD4A:219A:AC5B:E28D (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, ✓ Done cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 18:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eight days into Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK
Thank you for submitting your photos to the competition, it really helps improve our coverage of historic sites. Photos from this year are already being used on Wikipedia - though it may take a while for the monuments map to catch up so don't be disheartened if some pins haven't turned blue yet.

WLM runs until the end of the month, so please add more and invite other people to take part. The UK is closing in on 1,000 uploads putting us just behind the United States in 14th place out of 49 countries taking part. Let's see if we can jump a few places! If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message here or contact me directly at richard.nevell@wikimedia.org.uk.

Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's make Commons Conference a reality[edit]

Hello Cmglee,

I'm writing you as one of the most advanced SVG creators on Commons. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and add your ideas; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--MB-one (talk) 09:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Box-Muller Transform SVG[edit]

Fixed

Hi Cmglee,

Firstly, thanks for the excellent SVG of the Box-Muller transform.

Would it be possbile to have the round points (U0, U1) start at 0 and go to 1, so that (0,0) and (1,1) can be selected as points? That way it's easier to see the transformation because cos(0) = 1 and sin(0) = 0.

Delboie (Derek) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delboie (talk • contribs) 09:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Delboie. Good idea! u1 must be larger than zero, otherwise the point will be infinitely far from the centre. Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 12:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An update from Wiki Loves Monuments UK[edit]

Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments UK
More than 300 people have contributed a total of 4,000 photos to this year's competition and we wanted to say thank you for helping us get this far. The competition runs until the end of September, and you can upload as many images as you want - so feel free to document some more sites. Or why not go through your old images to see if you have any others that could be submitted?

Since you've already submitted some pictures to the competition, you might be interested in the banner mini-contest; to take part you crop your images to a 7:1 and upload a new version. You can find out more about how to do that here. In the meantime, we hope you enjoy the competition and share it with others! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)}[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nucleosynthesis periodic table[edit]

Hi Cmglee, I left a note for you over on the talk page for this, just in case there is no automated alert for you. (I'm a little new to Wikipedia editing.) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Nucleosynthesis_periodic_table.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geckzilla (talk • contribs) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC) Geckzilla (talk) 05:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Hi, Could you please fix your signature, so that the link works (and preferably that it shows some characters). Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Interesting that en:user:cmglee didn't work but w:user:cmglee does. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 14:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram of Integrating Sphere use in measuring transmittance and reflectance[edit]

In the first part of the figure, dealing with transmittance measurement, shouldn't the bottom port simply be plugged (i.e. covered with the same material as the rest of the inside of the sphere) rather than being fitted with a reflectance standard? 72.89.126.128 08:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @72.89.126.128, I assume that the reflectance standard is opaque and fills the port, in which case, plugging it is redundant. If it weren't, plugging it would be a good idea. Fig. 6 of http://db.cger.nies.go.jp/JaLTER/ER_DataPapers/archives/2013/ERDP-2013-02/metadata gives an example of this use. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 10:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of an image for an open access (cc4.0) /printed book[edit]

Dear Cmglee,

Thank you for uploading the image of the Aerial view of Cambridge city center.

We would like to use this image in a chapter of an edited book named “Geographies of the University” which will be available through the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License as e-book in open access, and also as a buyable hardcover version. The book is part of the series and project “Knowledge and Space” at Heidelberg University (http://www.knowledgeandspace.uni-hd.de/).

We would like to ask for your permission to use this image within a chapter of the book that deals with change in the architectural concepts of university buildings. Of course you will be credited as copyright holder and photographer. We would be grateful if you could contact us at knowledgeandspace@uni-heidelberg.de.

Thank you very much, and best regards, Laura Suarsana Department of Economic Geography, Heidelberg University — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2.247.247.93 (talk) 09:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Laura, A pleasure!  Can you please link me to the book? The standard Wikimedia credit line below should do. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 00:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
© CMG Lee / http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:cmglee_Cambridge_aerial.jpg / CC-BY-SA-3.0


Dear Cmglee, Thank you very much! We will link you to the book accordingly! Would we also have your permission for the image of the Library of Cambridge Trinity College?

Thank you, and best regards, Laura — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.58.181.97 (talk) 13:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Laura – please use a similar credit line for the library picture. Thanks, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 06:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hybrid image decomposition.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ccaps (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dice sum central limit theorem[edit]

I'm doing a project and would really like to make graphs similar to the one you made on the dice sum central limit theorem - on the central limit theorem page. Which software did you use to create it? Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justdrinkthewater (talk • contribs) 15:54, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Justdrinkthewater, The SVG was generated by a custom Perl script embedded as a comment in the SVG file itself. Extract the lines after the line "<!-- Perl script to create above; please do not remove." in http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Dice_sum_central_limit_theorem.svg (except for the last line) and save it as a .pl file. Hope that's useful, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 13:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to Use Diffraction Limit Graphic[edit]

Dear Cmglee,

I'd like permission to use the graphic at the URL below in a popular science trade bookon Black Holes for Norton. Their standard language is in the next paragraph,

Sincerely, Chris Impey, Professor of Astronomy, University of Arizona

I am requesting your permission to reproduce, on a non-exclusive basis, the material identified below (collectively, the “Licensed Content”) in all editions and formats (including, without limitation, all print and electronic editions as well as editions and formats, if any, made for use by the blind or physically handicapped) of a work by me tentatively titled Einstein’s Monsters (the “Work”) which is currently scheduled to be published by W.W. Norton and Company, Inc. (the “Publisher”) on October 2018. The rights granted in and to the Licensed Content shall include distribution of the Work and incidental promotion by the Publisher and its and my licensees in all languages throughout the world. For good and valid consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, you grant me the rights contained in this agreement and specifically acknowledge and agree that there shall be no royalties or other monies due to you from me, Publisher, or Publisher’s licensees in connection with any use of the Licensed Content except as herein set forth.


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diffraction_limit_diameter_vs_angular_resolution.svg — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.24.181.34 (talk) 18:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chris,
Certainly. Please include the standard Wikimedia credit:
© CMG Lee / http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:diffraction_limit_diameter_vs_angular_resolution.svg / CC-BY-SA-3.0
Thanks,
cmglee

Permission to use a graphics[edit]

Dear Cmglee, I'm looking for permission to use your graphic on telescope diffraction limit vs angular resolution in a trade book on black holes I am writing for Norton. Happy to give you whatever credit you prefer, and I can send the normal publishing terms describing the book. You can reach me directly at cimpey@as.arizona.edu

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diffraction_limit_diameter_vs_angular_resolution.svg

Sincerely,

Chris Impey Professor of Astronomy University of Arizona — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 150.135.165.92 (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Chris,
Certainly. Please include the standard Wikimedia credit:
© CMG Lee / http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:diffraction_limit_diameter_vs_angular_resolution.svg / CC-BY-SA-3.0
Thanks,
cmglee

Easter date[edit]

Hello Cmglee, I would like to let you know that I have just modified your graph of Easter date. The reason was you had swapped the graph of Eastern and Western Easter. Best regards — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:48, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, Draceane. You're absolutely right! I've updated the embedded script. Best regards, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 20:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hawai CSS[edit]

Hello Cmglee,

I just discovered your CSS-animated Haiwaian map. As a cartographer I find this purely fabulous. If by chance you have or could write a tutorial on how to convert stack of svg layers into such CSS animated svg, the cartographers of the en:WP:GL/MAPS would likely love it, learn from it, and experiment with it on other maps. --Yug (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Yug. I'm unsure how much detail I should go into, so let me know if you'd like me to elaborate on the steps below:
  1. Extract paths of contours from an existing SVG, File:Hawaii_Island_topographic_map-en.svg in this case.
  2. Assign each path to a class with CSS3 animation (360° rotation).
  3. Scale each rotating class by half vertically and progressively translate them to give the appearance of 3D.
  4. Add special effects e.g. the wavy surface denoting sea level.
You may also be interested in my experiments below:

Cheers,
cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 07:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2O11 2O12 2O13 2O14 2O15 2O16 2O17 2O18 2O19 2O2O
2O21 2O22 2O23 2O24