User talk:Archaeodontosaurus/De mai à décembre 2017

Bird identification

Hi. Discussion of the identification of a bird in a photo you helped categorize is ongoing here.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fulmarus glacialis (Northern fulmar) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the category --Llez (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Most useful. What a closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Cathédrale Saint-Just de Narbonne - chapelle de l'Annonciade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Assumption of the Virgin by Paolo Veronese cat.541 Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, glorious! Useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:06, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nyceryx continua mounted specimen dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio de l'Acqua Dolce (Venice) - Seen in its entirety, from the Fondamenta Zen to rio Priuli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Ecstasy of St. Gertrude by Pietro Liberi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nyceryx continua mounted specimen ventral male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:13, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovanni Elemosinario (Venice) - bell tower - East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Conversion of St. Paul by school of Veronese.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), left transept - left organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna col Bambino e i Santi Giuseppe, Giustina, Francesco, Giovanni Battista fanciullo e Girolamo by Veronese - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Merci, que tu a corrigé mon erreur. J'ai été confus ;-) Zoppo59 (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for this delicate attention. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Problem at VIC with bot

I have no idea how to fix this, so am letting you know, figuring you know how. Go to VIC and search for "Pillars of the dismantled railway. South west side." It's currently the oldest photo there, so it's at top left of New noms section. It was closed 11 May but the bot still hasn't cleared it from the page. Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 00:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

• I can close it manually --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piper nigrum (Black Pepper) dried fruits with and without pericarp.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment Shouldn't this say Black pepper? And isn't this image more useful although the scope would have to be changed: File:Pfeffer-Gewürz.jpg? Charles (talk) 07:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Piper nigrumdried fruits with and without pericarp to Piper nigrum (Black Pepper) dried fruits with and without pericarp] {{{3}}}

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment @Jacek Halicki: @Charlesjsharp: Sure, I forgot the vernacular name. I added it to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Best in that carefully defined scope, and as a bonus, quite an interesting closeup at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Just for the record

RE: Commons:Valued image candidates/Bronco the Beagle.JPG I don't consider this a valid decline. Charles is trying to ban an entire category of animal plus it's with bogus reasons. PumpkinSky talk 10:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

• I am fleeing this type of debate which can not be consensual. Absolutely, Charles does not make a mistake if we place it on the systematic naturalistic side. But to refuse subspecies is an untenable position, itself accepts it for butterflies. Our problem is going to be to find a normative system for pets. These criteria exist that must be put forward can be in the form of remarks in the appointment. Let us open a discussion on this problem because it will come back, as much to answer. Wait to see what will emerge and in conscience if you believe it, useful and possible, represents your appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  • This has been brought up before and went nowhere; and Charles was the cause of that case too. I am done with VI. It's too much of an inconsistent mess with no hope of resolution. PumpkinSky talk 18:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
    • @PumpkinSky: As you have understood VI is the most complex of labels. But is most important because it makes sense. We've all had moments of discouragement, but you've already understood a lot. Start the discussion, I will support you with pleasure. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia lusca mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Cassiano (Venice) - bell tower - East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Giustina (Padua) - Conversion of St. Paul by Gaspare Diziani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and unique in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oceanodroma homochroa (Ashy storm petrel) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 Comment Not an Ashy storm petrel as in the file description? Charles (talk) 21:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

• Yes thank you i corrected --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The multiplication of breads - Interior of Cathédrale Saint-Just de Narbonne - chapelle de l'Annonciade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), left transept - The Chapel of the Assumption.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful, and please note English spelling of "Assumption". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 17:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia lusca Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Tomb of Marino Contarini..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), the monument to the Doge Pasquale Cicogna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia lusca mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Typo in Wikipedia article. Charles (talk) 19:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you I corrected.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - The apse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please check the category. --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Oops, thanks...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Left transept Santa Maria Assunta by Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:24, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia lusca mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perigonia lusca lusca MHNT CUT 2010 0 132 El Dorado, Venezuela female ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyles dahlii MHNT CUT 2010 0 133 Corse France male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oceanodroma leucorhoa (Leach's storm petrel) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Didier, I think with these egg photos it would be helpful to indicate date egg was collected as it is illegal now - possibly with some sort of warning? Your 'taken' date could be misinterpreted. Charles (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

• You are right. I started doing it for the eggs of birds of prey, I'll make a banner for all. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), ceiling of transept - The triumph of Jesus by Louis Dorigny.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. Impressive painting! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio dei Miracoli (Venice) view from ponte dei Miracoli to the north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The other image has a better crop at the bottom, but the annotations here are more useful. 09:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles dahlii mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 21:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Tomb of Francesco Zen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Llez (talk) 11:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), left nave - "Sacred Heart of Jesus".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Perhaps a bit glary, but useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles dahlii mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 20:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Tron o de la Piavola - South East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Regarding the quality of this picture an the perspective distortions of the most of the competitors, I think, this is the best --Llez ( talk) 16:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pietà Martinengo by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:17, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna con Bambino benedicente, Madonna del pollice by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles dahlii mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please connect to the category --Llez (talk) 18:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Thanks... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy David receives bread from the priest Achimelec in the sanctuary by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Count Giovanni Battista Vailetti by Fra' Galgario, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:21, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles dahlii mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scola dei fabbri (Venice) – Facade in Campo San Moisè.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Grimani of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). "Adoration of the Magi" by Federico Zuccari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Pointe_levallois_Beuzeville

Dear Archaeodontosaurus, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your images from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pointe_levallois_Beuzeville_MHNT_PRE.2009.0.203.2.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 12:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lindera neesiana Dried fruit Nepal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. I'm guessing there's no vernacular English name, just a Nepali name? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
• I have not found a vernacular name for this spice. On the other hand I tasted it, it gives a powerful perfume of argume ... but also a lot of bitterness. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Salvatore (Venice) - The tombstone of Caterina Cornaro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Useful, but if her name is really Caterina, that shouldn't be translated into English as anything different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Sure, it's better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
• Grazie.  Support: Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The temptation of Adam and Eve by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles tithymali mauretanica Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Salvatore (Venice) - The Monument to Caterina Cornaro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:16, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte de la Guerra (Venice). North exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles tithymali mauretanica mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Sarcophagus of Daniele and Pietro Bon - 1476.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please look at the category again. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Done This time I make sure to correct everything ... but I did it after making the appointment. It is not impossible that I get there. Thank you for your patience. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Comment No problem for me, I just wanted to remind you.
 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - The death of Saint Joseph by Domenico Clavarino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santi Giovanni e Paolo, Venice – Monument to Marcantonio Bragadin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:15, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy The Gathering of the Manna by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles calida (Hawaiian sphinx) mounted specimen dorsal male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles perkinsi mounted specimen dorsal male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Foscarini ai Carmini (Venice) – Facade on campo dei Carmini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Blessed Illuminata Bembo .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and unique in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles perkinsi mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Elijah fed by the angel by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Francis receiving the stigmata by Veronese Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Without knowing what this painting actually looks like, the only other photo of it in Commons that looks plausible is File:Paolo Veronese - St Francis in Ecstasy - WGA24844.jpg. I assume the colors in your photo are more accurate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Of the 5 images of this category this one Paolo Veronese - St Francis in Ecstasy - WGA24844.jpg is the worst in terms of color. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - If so, this one is obviously best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hydrobates pelagicus (European Storm Petrel) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The best quality picture, but are the colours also more true on this one? Charles (talk) 10:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

• The color is certified: White. The article in English which is excellent that you can verify says pure white . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Antonio Pizzamano .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, you have linked the wrong category to the scope, I think. :O DeFacto (talk). 06:09, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Yes it is true but it is not my fault; It is he who has changed category we see very well on the picture he is running! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, good now - useful and unique in scope. Yes - he does look a bit furtive - I wonder where he'll turn up next! :) DeFacto (talk). 16:25, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Martyrdom of St.John the Baptist between saint Lanfranc of Pavia and Saint Liberus by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles lineata (Hyles lineata) mounted specimen dorsal female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Pope Anacletus by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Sarcophagus of Bishop Marco Michiel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Please check the link of the scope --Llez (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hyles lineata mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 04:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campo Bandiera e Moro (Venice). East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:07, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy The brass serpent by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calonectris borealis(Cory's shearwater) egg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy The Emperor Heraclius brings the cross to Calvary by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:56, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony abbot and saint Paul hermit by Giovanni Girolamo Savoldo Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra boisduvalii mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Accademia - The Virgin of Carmel - by Moretto da Brescia, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Pope San Cleto founded the Order of the Crucifixes - St. Cyril's Bishop of Jerusalem reconfirms the Order by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:55, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra boisduvalii mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. Charles (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Cathédrale Saint-Just de Narbonne - treasure. Reliquary Shrine of 1391.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Sant'Elena finds the true cross by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 16:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra boisduvalii mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Balbi (Venice). South East exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Saint Helena by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Theretra boisduvalii mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Llez (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - The sarcophagus of the doge Marino Morosini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Zoppo59 (talk) 08:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Judas Cyriacus by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Category:Tenebrio molitor illutrations

"illutrations" looks like a typo to me. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

• I saw your work on this subject and I wanted to help you, but as you saw it with a beautiful misspelling. Sorry you can fix it? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sataspes infernalis mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - The Archangel Raffaele by Giuseppe Torretti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Blessed Gerard of Csanád.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sataspes infernalis mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Chapel St Mauro - Statue of Madonna dell'Orto by Giovanni de Santi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Lanfranco Beccari by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sataspes tagalica mounted speciemen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte del Cavalletto (Venice). South West exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St John the Baptist by Titian, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support largest file, seems to be the best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - The Archangel Gabriel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Accademia - Archangel Raphael and Tobit by Titian, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment This image doesn't seem as sharp as the others, although they have lower resolution. Something to consider? --Peulle (talk) 12:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Trevisan (Venice). North West exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Absidial chapel on the left, dedicated to Saint Joseph..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sataspes tagalica mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)  Support Valued. --Peulle (talk) 12:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sataspes tagalica mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Peulle (talk) 12:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sataspes tagalica Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:58, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - The Archangel Michael.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Accademia - Crucifixion by Veronese Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes banksi johani mounted specimen dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Peulle (talk) 15:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Sant'Antonio (Venice). Southern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:37, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dream of St. Mark by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes banksi johani male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Tomb of Melchiorre Zeno.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - The Archangel Selaphiel by Giuseppe Torretti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Monument of doge Trevisian

I remeber my book attribuited the architecture (non the reliefs) to Sansovino, but nevermind. Let's add at least the category of Girolamo Campagna, then. Btw thanks for fixing the categories in all those images. --Sailko (talk) 06:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes hylas hyles mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blessed Giovanni Giustiniani and Saints by Il Pordenone, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes hylas hyles mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - High altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Super-useful. Excellent labeling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miracle of the Slave by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope (I trust the experienced uploader as far as colors are concerned) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Alexander III confirms the Crucifers and gives them a set of rules - Pius II presents the silver cross and the the cerulean robe to the Crucifers by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - Archaeodontosaurus: The scope didn't make sense to me. Apparently, the reference is to the Order of the Crucifer. And what is "gives them the rule" in Italian? Because that is not recognizable English. Perhaps he gave them a charter? Also, ceruleo is "cerulean blue" in English. Maybe all of this title could be provided in Italian, and I could try my hand at translating it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
• Thank you for your interest. The title of this painting is really very long. It is in the caption of the image in Italian, I am sure of the French translation but my understanding in English are very limited. Thanks for your help.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

• OK, I see it now: Alessandro III conferma i Crociferi e dona loro la regola - Pio II consegna ai Crociferi la croce d'argento e l'abito ceruleo. Without having more background on the story, my best attempt at translating that is: "Alexander III confirms the Crucifers and gives them a set of rules - Pius II presents the silver cross and the the cerulean vest to the Crucifers". One crucial point is that the English word "rule" can be used for the Italian words "regno" (which is how I misinterpreted your translation) or "regola", but "set of rules" can have only one meaning. If you like this translation, feel free to use it. I don't think anyone needs to re-vote, as that edit just clarifies the scope without really changing anything substantive in it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Sure enough it's more understandable, I corrected, scope, caption and title. Thank you --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Looking at the painting, I think "cerulean robe" is more accurate. I'll make that tweak. And here's my vote of  Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes hylas hyles mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - details - Tomb of Giovanni Barisano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), right transept - the organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Tabernacle by Giuseppe Pozzo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes hylas hyles female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 10:04, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Pisani a Santo Stefano (Venice) - Facade on Campiello Pisani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), ceiling of choir- The angels musicians in glory by Louis Dorigny.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes picus mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:40, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - "sufficit sola fide" by Giuseppe Torretti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:43, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Mark saves a Sarracen by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

VIC scope and category

Hi. I'm not sure I did the scope and category correctly in Commons:Valued image candidates/Hosta two-tone 3.jpg. Yellow Splash Rim is a cultivar of Hosta and those photos are in a subcat of Category:Hosta Sieboldiana Group. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 17:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

• I replied on the picture in VI. Thank you for your confidence. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephonodes kingii MHNT CUT 2010 0 138 Cambridge Park, New South Wales Australia female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes picus mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very good. It would be good for someone to nominate this at QIC, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 22:40, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Portrait of Blessed Giovanni Olini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful picture, and in this case, Mr. or Ms. Anonymous was a great artist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:33, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Some art historians think it is Palma il Giovane --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Absidial chapel on the right, dedicated to Saint Francis Xavier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Peulle (talk) 11:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes kingii mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Superb picture, and of course very useful - someone should nominate it to QIC and FPC. I might take that task on, if someone else doesn't do so first. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
• The idea is good but the me would need another life. I will make a request in this sense but I do not know to whom I send. Thank you for your support. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
• I just nominated it at QIC. An FPC nomination might or might not have to wait a bit, as I'm traveling starting tomorrow. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
• I took care of it. Also:  Support.--Peulle (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - absidial chapels Saint Francis Xavier preaches in the Far East by Pietro Liberi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 22:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Sacristy Saint Francis Xavier preaches in the Far East by Pietro Liberi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Looks good at 640x220. Useful image.--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cephonodes kingii mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Monument to general Orazio Farnese by Baldassarre Longhena.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Knight Giovanni Grimani by Bernardo Strozzi, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Error in file description? Acontia (Emmelia) trabealis MHNT.jpg

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I've seen your nice picture/pictures of File:Acontia (Emmelia) trabealis MHNT.jpg. Inside the description you describe the "double" as female, whilst the same singles are male specimen. Can you please correct this. Thanks, NobbiP 21:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Thank you I had not noticed this typo. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gnathothlibus eras mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 08:34, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace Ariani Minotto Cicogna. Facade on Rio dell'Angelo Raffaele..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Moses by Tiziano Aspetti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gnathothlibus eras mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte de le Turchette (Venice) West exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 16:17, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Right transept - Altar of Ignatius of Loyola by Pietro Baratta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acosmeryx miskini mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:27, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), Right nave - The chapel of the three Jesuits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) saint Paul by Tiziano Aspetti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 10:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acosmeryx miskini mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), Vergine e i santi Stanislao Kostka, Luigi Gonzaga et Francesco Borgia by Antonio Balestra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). Virgin with child, Byzantine of the twelfth century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 07:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acosmeryx miskini mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 22:06, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), Right nave - The Chapel of St. Barbara.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). The Resurrection of Christ by Giovanni da Asola.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acosmeryx miskini mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 15:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), Right nave - St. Barbara by Giovanni Maria Morlaiter..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Il ricco Epulone by Bonifacio De' Pitati, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Best in scope and not distorted --Llez (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele hespera mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 11:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:31, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dell'Orto (Venice) - Interior - Gallery organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support but you forgot the promised ping :( --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 23:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

• No I did not forget but I waited until you were in VI to put it back and see if you had a good visual memory... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice), Right nave - The Chapel of Guardian angel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:37, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). "The Last Supper" by Francesco Rizzo da Santacroce.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Counter-façade - Monuments to Da Lezze's familly.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele hespera mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Definitely useful.--Peulle (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doge Bartolomeo Gradenigo by Paris Bordone, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Counter-façade - Monument to Priam Da Lezze by Jacopo Sansovino.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:51, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele hespera mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Counter-façade - Monument to Giovanni Da Lezze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Right pulpit. Matthew the Evangelist by Francesco Montemezzano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the link of the scope --Llez (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

• Oops Thanks  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support useful. Charles (talk) 15:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes xylobotes Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 21:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campanile of San Vidal (Venice) - Southwest exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Maybe the scope is imprecise or it would be good to put the view orientation. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
• Yes, it's true --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. Thanks. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes xylobotes mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Counter-façade - Coat of arms of Da Lezze family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella San Pasquale Bajlon of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele subvaria mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 21:55, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella San Pasquale Bajlon of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Addolorata by Antonio Vassilacchi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Campo Santa Margherita (Venice) North exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 11:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele subvaria mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Counter-façade - Monument to Andrea Da Lezze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:56, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crucifixion by Tintoretto by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:48, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:55, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele subvaria mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 06:11, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Chiesa dei Gesuiti (Venice) - Right transept - Ignatius of Loyola's Chappel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 06:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Left transept of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Wall of the bottom of the left transept.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 06:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nephele subvaria mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good VI --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel Badoer Giustinian or of Saint Jerome in San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Altarpiece.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna dei camerlenghi by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

catégorisation

Salut Archaeodontosaurus, n'oublie pas de raccorder tes catégories d'espèces "illustrations" ou "mounted specimens" aux catégories de familles correspondantes ;-) Bonne soirée --LamBoet (talk) 20:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Je vais y penser Merci de ton message --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Peut-être serait-il bon aussi d'essayer d'harmoniser les noms de ces catégories : pour l'instant, la plus grande partie de l'arborescence utilise "[nom du taxon] illustrations" (au pluriel) et "[nom du taxon] specimens" (sans préciser "mounted"). Bonne soirée --LamBoet (talk) 17:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

tu as raison, j'ai du mal à m'en souvenir mais je me suis fais une note pour générer un automatisme dans ma cervelle en général çà marche. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stolidoptera tachasara mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 22:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes media mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Choir - St. Anthony of Padua by Girolamo Campagna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, oops - I think the scope is linked to wrong category. DeFacto (talk). 21:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
• It is a characteristic of Saint Anthony: he easily loses his way. Thanks... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The scourge of Snakes by Giambattista Tiepolo Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 22:02, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes media mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Will be fine, but article says male. Charles (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Sorry, it's a female. I corrected. Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Choir - Pediment of the High Altar, the Annunciation and the Eternal Father by Girolamo Campagna..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crucifixion of Saint Peter by Luca Giordano, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Alejandra Yurievna, Grand Duchess of Russia.jpg

Please rereview it, thank you --Ras67 (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes media mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment @Archaeodontosaurus: Same male/female problem as the other one! Charles (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment In fact it is on the precedent that there was an ambiguity, are females.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Choir - St. Francis of Assisi by Girolamo Campagna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 07:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deposition by Tintoretto, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel Badoer Giustinian in San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Left wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boccaccio Boccaccino - Sposalizio di santa Caterina con i santi Rosa, Pietro e Giovanni Battista, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 18:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stolidoptera tachasara mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Choir - Funerary monument of the Doge Andrea Gritti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Martyrdom of Saint Mark by Giovanni Bellini and Vittore Belliniano, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron carinata Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Vault, Saint Peter of Alcantara in Glory (1765) by Francesco Fontebasso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica dei Santi Felice e Fortunato (Vicenza) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, all criteria are met. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 18:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron carinata mounted speciem male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful image.--Peulle (talk) 22:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel Badoer Giustinian or of Saint Jerome in San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - right wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and in use.--Peulle (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica dei Santi Felice e Fortunato (Vicenza) - Facade - The entrance porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stolidoptera tachasara mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Death of Peter of Alcántara by Francesco Fontebasso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:07, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The interior of the Basilica Santi Felice e Fortunato in Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stolidoptera tachasara mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) The theological virtues by Jacopo Marieschi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:52, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The interior of the Basilica Santi Felice e Fortunato in Vicenza - Virgin of Mercy.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron carinata mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support used and useful.--Peulle (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Penance and Meditation by Francesco Maggiotto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron carinata mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 13:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Ecstasy of Peter of Alcántara by Francesco Fontebasso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Facade - the porch.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support--Peulle (talk) 13:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron iphis mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fondaco dei Tedeschi - Courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Peter of Alcántara and the Queen of Spain by Francesco Fontebasso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Facade on Piazza San Lorenzo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose As a VI of the front facade of that church, I prefer this one.--Peulle (talk) 13:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

• @Peulle The scope includes the San Lorenzo square, which the image you quote does not show. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

 Support I prefer this one, for in the other propsed picture the base is cut off --Llez (talk) 20:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 Support Per Llez --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - I agree. This one is best in scope and also might pass at QIC if nominated there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron iphis mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very useful. It's a pity some of the paintings are cut off, but with just a mouse-over, the viewer can see them in full. Good job. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior- View of the nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron iphis mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:37, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cappella Giustinian dei Vescovi of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) Peter of Alcantara shows, to Teresa of Avila, the way to paradise by Francesco Fontebasso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful and used --Llez (talk) 14:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - main portal‎ - Tympanum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron iphis mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 16:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bédarieux Hérault France - Organ from St Louis's church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:01, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Right transept of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Saint Lawrence of Rome school of Jacoppo Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful image.--Peulle (talk) 22:08, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron neglectum mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Used and useful.--Peulle (talk) 08:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument of Jean Seigneuret de la Borde - Saint Joseph chapel, Cathédrale Saint-Just de Narbonne..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). "Adoration of the Magi" by Federico Zuccari copied by Michelangelo Grigoletti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:27, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Giacomo Zanella (Vicenza) by Francesco Schetzer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron neglectum mounded specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support But some categories need to be HIDDENCAT. Charles (talk) 09:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you I found one that I corrected, but I do not see any others, give me your opinion. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
• That was the main one, although I find these 'photographs taken on .. date.. a waste of space!. By the way, Didier, the Museum-based entomologist I was with in the Balkans said ventral refers to the thorax/abdomen/body, so for a side-on view of a live butterfly with folded wings we should use underside, not ventral. What do you think? Charles (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
• For the date it saves time to find an image. For entomology there is nothing normative in French there are several possibilities the old entomologists use the terms AVERS and REVERS. Ventral and dorsal are widely used. I go to MHNT I pose the question to our curator in entomology. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
• For entomologists a side-on picture of a live butterfly is probably not something they are interested in for scientific purposes as both wings cannot be shown. They have to kill the butterfly first! Charles (talk) 07:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
• My curator is on holiday --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph chapel, Cathédrale Saint-Just de Narbonne. Saint Joseph, Mary and the Child Jesus by Maurin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx kalmiae mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of St. Sernin, Toulouse west exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Dэя-Бøяg 11:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). John of Capistrano by Nicola Grassi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:27, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 20:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx kalmiae mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Choir - Funerary monument of Tradiano Gritti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christ Washing the Disciples' Feet by Giovanni Agostino da Lodi, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron neglectum mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
North facade of Saint-Étienne's Cathedral in Toulouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support But picture is tilted. Easy to fix --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:22, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I followed your advice. I was able to improve the tilt but the impression is linked in part to the fact that the left part of the building and the right part are not of the same time and especially are not aligned on the same axis with an angulation. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). Saint Francis comforted by the angel by Nicola Grassi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron neglectum mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). Immaculate Conception with Saints by Giuseppe Angeli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:01, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Monument to Giambattista da Porto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

An old collection

Bonjour Didier I know you will enjoy these Lycee Michelet Vanves bibliotheque collection histoire naturelle Catalogue Warm regards Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC) PS Laurent Schwartz collection- Wonderful collection and photos.

The outdated presentation of the natural science collections has impressed us all.

We can say what we lack because at each retrospective we all put a lot of care to reconstruct a showcase or a room of the nineteenth. The Schwartz collection is splendid I am in box 150 and there are more than 500 it is a personal challenge, I plan to get to photograph them. Thank you for your kind intervention.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx kalmiae mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:17, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). The communion of St. Bonaventure by Nicola Grassi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 06:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - High relief Madonna with the child surrounded by Saint Sebastian and Anthony the Great.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx kalmiae mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacristy of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). San Bonaventura in search by Palma il Giovane.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Monument to Vincenzo Scamozzi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Taxonomy changes

Hi Didier, I have made some changes to the English description of Cisticola galactotes MHNT.jpg based in the new IOC (and HBW) taxonomy. Please review - it might be better to give the file a new name. Alandmanson (talk) 12:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

• I thank you for your vigilance. I referred to our crurator in ornithology. If he agrees I would do the necessary for the renaming and renaming. This type of intervention is very valuable for collections. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Confirmation you are absolutely right. I make the changes. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx franckii (Franck's sphinx moth) mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Left transept of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Monument to Marcantonio Trevisan by Girolamo Campagna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:40, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - right nave - Altar Gualdo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - although that category could use some cleanup. --Peulle (talk) 11:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphinx franckii mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:26, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - right nave - Madonna with Child appears to St. Pius V di Giovanni Antonio Fumiani.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 14:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of San Francesco della Vigna (Venice) - Choir - The High Altar by Girolamo Campagna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anambulyx elwesi mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - right nave - Tomb of Vicente Ferreto de'Ferreti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:48, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna with the Child with Saint Simeon and saint Jerome by Giovanni Agostino da Lodi, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anambulyx elwesi mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 07:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Francesco della Vigna (Venice). Sts Jerome, Bernardino of Siena, and Louis of Toulouse by Antonio Vivarini.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - right nave - Altar Capra.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes neoptolemus mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs et de Sainte-Catherine-de-Sienne Blagnac - West exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Is it necessary to crop the bottom of the church. Charles (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

• Yes. As you can see there is another picture on the subject (L'art rivé interne..JPG). To see the bell tower and the courtyard I have to go back, but ... there is a tree that masks the church. Framing is the best I can do. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support You could have waited till winter! Charles (talk) 08:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - Altare Piovene.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes neoptolemus mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:21, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facade of Convent of St. Catherine of Siena in Blagnac.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - transept right - Altar Pojana by Pietro Lombardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes neoptolemus mounted spcimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:12, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs et de Sainte-Catherine-de-Sienne Blagnac - View of the Chapel of the "Stations of the Cross".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - monument to Brunoro Volpe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:14, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes neoptolemus mounted specimens female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - monument to Trevisano Volpe.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miracle of the Holy Cross at Rialto by Francesco Vittore Carpaccio, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

copy and paste error in name

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lycaena_phlaeas_MHNT_dos.jpg Charles (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

It is Lycaena phlaeas f. Caerulopunctata or Lycaena phlaeas eleus ab. caeruleopunctata but is not recognized, the correct name is Lycaena phlaea phlaea --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leucophlebia lineata Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blagnac, France. Church Saint-Pierre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - "Lamentation on the dead Christ".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leucophlebia lineata mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Charles (talk) 08:02, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eglise Notre-Dame-des-Sept-Douleurs et de Sainte-Catherine-de-Sienne Blagnac - View of the nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - transept right - Monument to Giacomo Zanella.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes thyelia mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful Charles (talk) 13:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Cloister and bell tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Corona (Vicenza) - exterior - South exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes thyelia mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 07:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - St. Joseph of Cupertino in ectasy by Felice Boscaratti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Alfonso Capra by Jacopo dal Ponte detto Bassano, Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes jordani mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 08:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - Altar of St.Lawrence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - Best in scope.--Nikhil B (talk) 08:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Thiene (Vicenza) - courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes jordani Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica di Santa Maria Gloriosa dei Frari (Venice) Cappella di San Giovanni Battista - Saint John Bapstiste by Donatello.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - Right apse Chapel of St.Francis - Sarcophagus of Guilielmo Pagello.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:43, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes pyrrhus Mounted speceimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Cloister to the north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Question There is this one, I'm fine if this scope is enough to justify another VI, but is a change of perspective enough for a whole different scope for another VI? Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
• It is interesting to read captions. The common subject is the cloister, but in one case we can see the bell tower which is remarkable in itself, and in the other image the well with the arms of the Loschi family; Family which is at the origin of the financing of the cloister. It is impossible to gather everything on the same image, it takes two. The scopes differentiate them. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria della Salute in Venice - Altar of Descent of the Holy Spirit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Best in Scope Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes pyrrhus mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful. Charles (talk) 07:45, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - Right apse Chapel of St.Francis - funeral monument of Isabelle Alidosio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and Best in Scope Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Corona (Vicenza) - exterior - Tympanum of the porch, Jesus is crowned with thorn .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and Best in Scope Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes pyrrhus Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - Monument to Ippolito Porto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica Palladiana (Vicenza) - facade on Piazza dei signori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Xylophanes pyrrhus Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Excellent, and certainly useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - The main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ca' d'Oro (Vicenza) facade on Corso Palladio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:31, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cisticola marginatus amphilectus eggs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 05:57, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - Monument to Leonardo Porto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 10:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Vincenzo (Vicenza) Facade on Piazza dei Signori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best In Scope to me; You've really helped out those articles! Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Archaeodontosaurus mandibule MHNT.PAL.2003.396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lapara bombycoides Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - left nave - Altar of St. Anthony.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Francesco IV Gonzaga by Frans Pourbus il Giovane, Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 19:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - Left apse Chapel of Our Lady.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and good image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Piazza dei Signori and the Torre Bissara - northeast exposure - in Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lapara bombycoides Mounted specimen, male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, used, useful and best in scope--Capricorn4049 (talk) 13:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeodontosaurus descouensi Right mandible Holotype.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Oh my gosh, this dinosaur was named after you! Great picture! At least a QI, if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
  • And nominated to QIC accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support  Support  Support  Support  Support Well I'm not so sure, so I only gave it 5 stars! Nice one, Didier Charles (talk) 14:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
• --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - Left apse Chapel of Our Lady - Monumentto Bartolomeo Da Porto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Until now the best in scope. Very good image! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 15:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria della Salute (Venice) - main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope for VI, in my opinion, though this photo is a QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 16:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia hopfferi Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful an used --Llez (talk) 16:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Facade Sarcophagus of Benvenuto da Porto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

best in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Best in scope Yep. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of an Elder by Leandro Bassano, Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia hopfferi Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 09:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - Risen Jesus appears to Mary by Francesco Pittoni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The renaissance porch of Ca' d'Oro (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and Best in Scope Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lapara coniferarum Mounted specimen, male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Facade Sarcophagus of Marco da Marano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Supper at Emmaus by Marco Maziale, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lapara coniferarum Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, of course, and this is a sure-fire QI if nominated and a very possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - Left apse Chapel of Our Lady - the decapitation of St. Paul by Bartolomeo Montagna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful as a "before" picture, in case there is someday a restoration, but that looks like a very difficult task. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Piazza dei Signori and the Monte Pietà - South West exposure - in Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support There are a lot of photos of this building but I didn't see any existing VI in this scope. In addition this is geotagged, good description, and has useful annotations. Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia martini Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Мирослав Видрак (talk) 15:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - transept left - the organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The courtyard of Ca' d'Oro (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

VI imho --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia martini Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Lorenzo (Vicenza) - interior - transept left - The holy family Venetian painter of the seventeenth century.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo vescovile (Vicenza) Facade on Piazza del Duomo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron chloroptera Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Facade Sarcophagus of Lapo degli Uberti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 20:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The interior of the Basilica Santi Felice e Fortunato in Vicenza - Fresco of the ceiling of the choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Not noisy but very distorted and partially overexposed. For me it would not be a valued image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
• There is no distortion, there is no overexposed area. we have control software for these two points; Your assertion is a story. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Look at the windows and at the lower middle part of the big painting than you see the overexposed areas. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Objective measures contradict your lie. Your bad faith is visible to all. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support It is best in scope. VIC rules do not say an image has to be perfect to be a VI. Now about these overexposed areas - I think I see what is being referenced. It’s mostly the left window because when you look at the image on full screen you see the painting and the right window have plenty of contrast and detail. The left window is not relevant to the scope. Now to me this image fulfills all 1-6 of VI criteria. If Lothar Spurzem disagrees he can vote no. That’s his prerogative. I don’t have a dog in this fight between you two. But I don’t see how this isn’t a VI. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
• Thank you for these soothing words, anger is always bad counselor. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Centering galleries

Hi Archaeodontosaurus! I noticed that some months ago you reverted this edit. As you can see the gallery is properly centered even without the <center> </center>, for this reason the bot removed the unnecessary markup. Did you notice any problem? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes I remember well, there was a display defect that last a few days, it has stopped and since everything is working well. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron chloroptera Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very useful and best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Frari (Venice) - Cappella Bernardo - Reliquary statue of Blessed Gentile da Matelica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment, I think the geocode is missing from the file. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Thank you, I forgot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope now. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Relic of the Holy Cross is offered to the Scuola Grande di San Giovanni Evangelista by Lazzaro Bastiani Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuron chloroptera Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very useful and best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia caliginosa Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used on Wikipedia. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 20:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Also clearly a QI if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza) - stage wall (Scaenae frons), stage, and orchestra pit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think the wrong category is linked to the scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Done It's my specialty: I do the scope, then I modify the category. It is not practical. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope now. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Campanile Northeast exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think the scope misses the view direction. -- DeFacto (talk). 17:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Nothing escapes you, you are very attentive. you are in good shape ... Obviously I can not say the same for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope now. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for uploading many high quality and useful images to Wikimedia Commons. Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for uploading many high quality and useful images to Wikimedia Commons. Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia caliginosa Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and also a QI if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria della Salute (Venice) - Luca Giordano - Presentation of Mary at the Temple.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The best in scope, very useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Chiericati (Vicenza) - facade on piazza Matteotti.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia subhamata Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria della Salute (Venice) - "Venice at the feet of St. Anthony of Padua" by Pietro Liberi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:44, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vicenza Cathedral south exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx maculifera Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and best in scope --Llez (talk) 09:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo del Capitanio (Vicenza) Facade on Piazza dei Signori.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 09:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Tempest by Giorgione Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx maculifera Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Nice. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opening of the Rio di San Marcuola on the Grand Canal in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good lighting. Therefore the best for me in scope. Useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - the organ.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image, obviously the only one of organ in scope; useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pachygonidia subhamata Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Santa Maria della Salute (Venice) - Luca Giordano - Assumption of Mary by Luca Giordano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Andrea Palladio (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cechenena pollux Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, Used, and Best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Lorenzo in Vicenza - Facade Sarcophagus of Perdono Repeta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support While there are other monuments in the linked category, none represent the scope as well as this. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza) - courtyard and Coxina Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, Used, and Best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Tue foto per Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto

Caro Didier,
ho notato che nel mese di settembre hai caricato varie foto (come File:Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Quinta cappella a sinistra - Incoronazione della Vergine (1448) Antonino di Niccolò da Venezia.jpg) che potrebbero concorrere al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments. Quest'anno faremo il premio anche di Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto, per cui c'è un'opportunità in più per vincere. Per inserire le tue foto nel concorso basta aggiungere i codici del monumento, e se vuoi ti posso aiutare a farlo entro il 30 settembre. Ci terrei sul serio, perchè le tue foto sono molto ben fatte e vorrei che ci fossero molte foto del Veneto quest'anno a concorrere. ;) Grazie in anticipo. --Marcok (talk) 10:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

• @Marcok: Vi ringrazio per l'onore che mi dai. Ho un programma molto occupato fino a sabato. Potrei farlo allora. Se puoi posizionare le codici del monumento, sulle immagini che ritieni siano idonee, mi farà un ottimo servizio. Sabato sarò operativo. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Ciao Didier, penso di avere sistemato le foto. Controlla pure, grazie. --Marcok (talk) 08:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Ho visto tutto quello che hai fatto e ti ringrazio. Dimmi se devo fare qualcosa per questo concorso. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Credo di avere inserito i codici in tutte le immagini di Vicenza che avevi caricato in settembre, per quelle non serve fare altro. --Marcok (talk) 12:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cechenena pollux Mountd specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:01, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Isabella of Savoy by Frans Pourbus il Giovane, Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I don't think scoped need to be needlessly verbose when they are accurate. There are many low quality images of this Cathedral, but nothing captures the entire inside as this image does.Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx liturata Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza) - inscription of the pediment.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. VI to me Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:16, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Funerary monument to Lavinia Thiene, by Giulio Romano.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 SupportUseful and used --Llez (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx liturata Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I don't know if it is or isn't a problem that the whites are very bright, but either way, this is obviously a really useful image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
• @Ikan Kekek: Sorry for this late response. I checked there is no errour of overbriance. Females have a lighter face than males for this family.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Piazza dei Signori - Statue of the Lion of Saint Mark in Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:32, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Chapel of the Crucifix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support With the scope the way it is it believe it to be best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Chapel of the Crucifix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support With the scope the way it is it believe it to be best in scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callionima calliomenae Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna degli Alberetti by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 13:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callionima calliomenae Mounteed specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, Used, and Best in scope.Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Piazza dei Signori - Statue of the Redeemer in Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Chapel of the Incoronata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment The category does not exist, how could this image be the best in its category ? There is already a VI for this cat. Regards - Basile Morin (talk) 05:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

@Basile Morin: You make a confusion with the category and the scope. The image is well in the cathegory (which is only the adrese where one finds the image, in the futrue this address can change) the scope is the reference for the award of the label. There is no image with a label for this scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

 Question So can we create as many VIs as different images, as long as the scope describes well each particular image ? - Basile Morin (talk) 05:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Not quite. The image must be a useful reference for encyclopedias. It should illustrate the subject as perfectly as possible. The same image can compete for Label VI with different scopes. The label VI is not definitive if another image for the same scope is presented to the competition the label can be removed and attributed to the new image if it is judged better. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank You

Bonjour, I sent you a thank you email. It was somewhat long so I figured it best to send it by email but I didn't know if you would rather I just post it here. In any case thank you very much! Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx obliterata Mounted speciem male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of a young lady with a child by Pietro Della Vecchia, Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope and Used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Cenotaph of the Thiene family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cechenena pollux Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza) - Gradinata - View of the hall and the bleachers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Info Linked to wrong category --Llez (talk) 19:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support But very good image and very used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment I do not intend to oppose, but still neverthelss linked not correctly, therefore I changed to "Discuss" until correction is done --Llez (talk) 21:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
    •  Done Correction completed. Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
      •  Support OK now --Llez (talk) 10:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adorazione della Vergine con gli Angeli di Alessandro Maganza - Cathedral (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 19:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Peut-on fermer une VIC seulement 24h après le dernier vote ?

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus, je lis sur cette page : "Nominations can be closed after a period of 4 or 7 days (4 days for opposed and supported candidates, 7 days for discussed and unassessed ones), but only if more than 48 hours has passed since the last vote". Donc je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu fermes cette candidature https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Green_lettuce_in_a_kitchen_garden.jpg seulement 25 heures après le vote de Ikan Kekek. Cordialement, -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• Tu as raison accepte mes excuses j'ai rétabli. C'est une inadvertance de ma part. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cechenena pollux Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Female specimens aren't showing up in the Category:Cechenena pollux gallery, or at least I don't see any. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Oops! Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Thank you! Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza) - View of the Odeon..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, but the Italian is "l'Odeon", so should we just say "View of the Odeon"? "Odeon Hall" would be a more common word order for English, but the word "hall" might not be needed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment You're right is more logical --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Second chapel on the left, dedicated to Saint Mary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx obliterata Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 10:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and used. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teatro Olimpico (Vicenza) - La porta regia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and very often used. (I would like to enlarge the image but it is not possible on my screen.) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
• @Spurzem: Try to do it if you can. At 100% all the details of the trompe l'oeil are visible and you are even more admiring the work of the artist. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Monument to Alfonso Loschi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deidamia inscriptum Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope - Basile Morin (talk) 05:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Piazza della Biade - Vicenza.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful, used and best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 07:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Chapel of St. Anthony of Padua.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deidamia inscriptum Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Marcuola Casino stop on Canal Grande in Venezia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 07:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. Gallery organ..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Please check the scope --Llez (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support The scope looks right to me --Basile Morin (talk) 09:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info Dear Basile Morin, the scope must be connected to the gallery that contains the image. It isn't, so it can't look right. Status discussed until correction is done --Llez (talk) 09:25, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Info The Category:Église_Saint-Martin_de_Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds is included in the category:Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, so there's a clear link between the file and the scope. That organ is certainly part of the historical objects of the small city of Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds (6'000 inhabitants). Regards --Basile Morin (talk) 09:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

 Done For once it is not a sham from me, yesterday someone created a special category for this church. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:56, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

 Support OK now --Llez (talk) 10:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Mistake?

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, since yesterday I try to upload some further images but it seems not possible. Please look here for example. Do you see that I make something wrong and can you explain my mistake please? Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

• Hi, Lothar,

@Spurzem: This is a mistake that we all have at one time. I keep making it from time to time

You left a space before the name of the file when you made your appointment. Leave the bad as it is. Make a new request without the space it has to work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I will try it with another image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx substrigilis Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope as well as Useful, Used, and quite good! Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Monument to Antonio Loschi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blessed Lorenzo Giustiniani by Gentile Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope of all options, widely used and therefor useful. 06:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	All of your help and hard work at VIC — Rhododendrites talk |  17:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: I thank you for this gift. I look at your progress you practically master all the tools of Commons I congratulate you. VI is the most important labels it gives meaning to our work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx substrigilis Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of Pius V Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) – St Anthony of Padua The Miracle of the Mule by Joseph Heintz the Younger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Chapel of St. Catherine of Alexandria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  SupportUsed, Best in Scope, and good annotations -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:51, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callionima denticulata Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good, also Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:24, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of San Rocco (Venice) - Saint Roch heals animals by Il Tintoretto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Also Useful, and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna col bambino tra le Sante Maddalena e Lucia di Bartolomeo Montagna - Cathedral (Vicenza).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callionima denticulata Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Fifth chapel on the left - Monument to Girolamo Bencucci.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 11:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miracolo della reliquia della santa Croce - Benedetto Diana, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 06:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx kuangtungensis Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Incoronazione della Vergine (1448) Antonino di Niccolò da Venezia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usable and best in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue d'Astorg in Toulouse - View of the origin of the street from Malaret Street towards the west..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usable and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - A Brit can comment on British English, but at least we Americans don't speak about the "origin" of a street, unless perhaps if we're talking historically (as in "Broadway originated as a Native American path" or some such). Instead, we talk about the "beginning" of a street (where the addresses start from 1). I would suggest changing that one word accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
• Well understood. I changed the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx kuangtungensis Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scuola Nuova della Misericordia (Venice) - The showroom on the ground floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  SupportOf the options this is Best in Scope and Used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Piscina San Samuele (Venice) east exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:48, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calcite - Batère Mine, Pyrénées Orientale - Polysynthetic twin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphecodina abbottii Mounted specimen Male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sphecodina abbottii Mounted specimen Male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio de Ca' Garzoni (Venice) seen from Corte Lucatello to the private bridge of Sant'Anzolo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Church of St. Martin - The high altar..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 11:11, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx kuangtungensis Moounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church San Gregorio (Venice) viewed from Campo della Salute.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Clearly best in scope. Should "exterior of apse" be specified? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
• In fact I have expressed myself badly, it would have been better to say view from (in French vu de or vu depuis because the apside is not on the campo. If you agree I modify the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

• So, Church of San Gregorio (Venice), viewed from Campo della Salute? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Done new scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le chœur.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx kuangtungensis Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'esaltazion della Croce e sant'Elena by Pietro Liberi, San Moisè (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 11:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. The pulpit..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callionima calliomenae Mounted specimen Female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museo della Musica in Venice - Psaltery Venetian School 1700.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. Bust-reliquary of Saint Blaise..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support The only one in scope and used -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:29, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Callionima calliomenae Mounted specimen Female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vaporetto stops on Canale di Santa Chiara (Venice) : Piazzale Roma (S.Andrea)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Head of the Redeemer by Giovanni Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Looks best in scope to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx liturata Mounted specimen ventral male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment scope should indicate male or female. Charles (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Indeed it is a male. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scuola dei Morti facade on the Grand Canal in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue Antonin Mercié in Toulouse - Viewed in its entirety from the Rue d'Alsace-Lorraine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment it lacks of geocoding Ezarateesteban 19:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Done Automatic geocoding did not fire. I corrected. Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Ezarateesteban 12:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx liturata Mounted specimen dorsal male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 05:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opening of the Rio dei Santi Apostoli (Venice) from Grand Canal in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 05:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. Reliquary of Saint Germaine..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemeroplanes triptolemus Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vierge noire de Toulouse. Basilica Notre-Dame de de la Daurade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 16:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Miracle of the Cross at the Bridge of San Lorenzo by Gentile Bellini Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 16:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemeroplanes triptolemus Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful -typo corrected. Charles (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scuola Nuova della Misericordia (Venice) - The concert hall on the 1st floor..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain in memory of the Toulouse composer Xavier Darasse, Rue Antonin Mercié (Toulouse)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx sericeipennis Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and a QI and possibly FP if nominated, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The old entrance to the Musée des Augustins in the Rue Antonin Mercié (Toulouse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Miraculous Healing of the Daughter of Benvegnudo of San Polo by Giovanni Mansueti, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Is it a little bright up high? I haven't seen it in person, so I don't know, but this photo is certainly best in scope and useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
• For 4 to 5 years this room has been refitted and a spot is placed very near the upper left corner impossible to avoid. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx sericeipennis Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Procession in piazza San Marco by Gentile Bellini, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Deserves a scope because it is one of the most significant works of the artist, and the picture is the best in scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amphimoea walkeri Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useflu. tyop coretced Charles (talk) 11:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support useful. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Opening of the Rio San Giovanni Crisostomo (Venice) from Grand Canal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and often used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. The chapel of the baptismal font..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Please read Commons:Valued_image_scope#Buildings: When appropriate, the building scope can be divided in a "XXX (exterior)" scope and a "XXX (interior)" scope, thus leading to two independent VI nominations for two independent scopes. [...] Additional scopes can exceptionally be proposed if some part of the building is particularly worth of interest (for instance a remarkable crypt or sanctuary).

There are already six (!!) VI of the interior of Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds. Can you please explain what on this chapel of the baptismal is so special that it deserves an own scope? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment All the baptismal fonts in all the churches of the world deserve their own cope. This one is registered under the historical monument. In addition to looking at the pictures, you also have to read the captions.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support You are right, this specific font deserves its own scope becaus it's registered under the historical monument. Sorry, I overlooked that. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 11:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Pictures of separate chapels are certainly useful for a comprehensive article about a church. I could say the same thing about organs, which have different shapes and designs, and belfries. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue Antonin Mercié (Toulouse) Bay window - Courtyard of the N ° 11bis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment According to Commons:Valued_image_scope#Buildings (Buildings, like other places, should be of more than local interest to justify a scope): Can you please state the supra-local interest of the bay window? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment It is a very typical Art Deco work of this period. Two categories have been added --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

• Then why not choosing the scope Art Deco Bay window of period xx? Your scope is more a description of the location than a scope. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

• An image may have several scopes. She can be promoted several times with different scopes, as the regulation provides. I have never used this particularity of our rules and I prefer to choose a single scope. In the present case this image is part of a particular work which is the illsutration of the historic center of the city of Toulouse street by street.

• @Archaeodontosaurus: Illustration of the historic center of the city of Toulouse street by street?! - Wow, sounds like an interesting, valuable but labor-intensive project that drives commons forward and therefore is worthy of support and acknowledgement - exactly what VI was invented for. What do you think of nominating those pictures as valued image set? I think the set is significantly more valuable and honours your pictures more than a collection of individual VI images. --Capricorn4049 (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support, useful and best in scope. Adds richness to the collection. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 18:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amphimoea walkeri Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scola di San Fantin (Venice). Pediment of the facade on Campo San Fantin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. Virgin of Pity..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and best in scope -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx tattina Mounted specimen Female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ponte Cavallo (Venice) on Rio dei Mendicanti - west exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Valuable and best in scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, Haute-Garonne, France. Old church of St. Martin, the bell tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Valuable and best in scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemeroplanes triptolemus MHNT CUT 2010 0 162 Cali Colombia Female dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx tattina Mounted specimen Female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:00, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio dei Mendicanti (Venice) seen from the Ponte dei Mendicanti towards the south..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and for the most part, a very good photo. If you fix the apparent chromatic aberration on top of the church(?) on the left side, and also perhaps make the area in shadow on the left a bit less grainy (though that might not be essential), it could pass at QIC, too. Let me know if you decide to make some edits, because I'd like to nominate it there. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:18, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
• I thank you for your interest in my image, I corrected the two points that you reported to me.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot. The photo looks better, but some details on the statues on top of the building were removed in your edits. Do you think you could put them back, probably by increasing contrast on them a bit? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Montauban - Saint Théodard by François Fayet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemeroplanes triptolemus Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, a likely QI if nominated and a possible FP if a few stray marks (probably loose hairs) are digitally removed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: show me where are the anomalies with a rectangle of note --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you. I think this is now nominatable at FPC. It already has been set to "Promoted" at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elevation of the Cross by Girolamo Brusaferro, San Moisè (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Descent from the Cross and Entombment .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 06:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemeroplanes triptolemus Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue du Puits-Vert (Toulouse) - Viewed in its entirety from the rue Baronie to rue saint Rome..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 17:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madonna in trono e santi by Pompeo Batoni, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vaporetto stops on Grand Canal in Venice : Ferrovia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Montauban - Saint Ambrose by Marc d'Arci.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used. Beautiful and impressive image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smerinthus szechuanus Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Smerinthus szechuanus Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Flangini (Venice) - facade on the Grand Canal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, France. Reliquary of Deodatus of Nevers..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Grumbling by Charlessharp

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, would you kindly look what Charlessharp is doing in VI, for instance here and to the images of my tin toys. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 12:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• @Spurzem: For the image of Jochen Rindt, there is no rule for categories. As a personal I do not like large categories and as soon as there are 3 images I can create one to lighten.

The quality of this image could be improved but I know that you prefer what remain in their original version and I understand this choice. I have no doubt that there are in VI other motorsport fans who will vote for you.

For toys I am not very competent except that I knew them in my youth. My vote is emotional. But it seems that Charles' request is not out of order. There are collectors and catalogs that characterize each object. If you can give more precision it will be a nice thing for everyone.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I think for specialists my description is enough. From the locomotive by distler I still have the packing and there is nothing to read of a precise marking. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Here we have an example for a very useful image and best in scope, far better than an 48 years old photograph of world champion Jochen Rindt after practice session at Nürburgring. Is it not incredible? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx castanea MHNT CUT 2010 0 171 Ohsugidani Honguh Wakayama male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnis dohertyi dohertyi MHNT CUT 2010 0 170 Kundiawa Papua New Guinea male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daphnis dohertyi dohertyi MHNT CUT 2010 0 170 Kundiawa Papua New Guinea male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx castanea MHNT CUT 2010 0 171 Ohsugidani Honguh Wakayama male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 19:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia ilus Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI! --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Montauban - La messe de saint Martin by François Fayet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The waterfall by Marco Ricci - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia ilus Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 08:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - The baptismal font.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment I think a tighter crop would be better. Charles (talk) 17:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le Triomphe de la Religion by Arsène Robert 1870.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 08:18, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx pseudomissa MHNT CUT 2010 0 171 Laos male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acosmeryx pseudomissa MHNT CUT 2010 0 171 Laos male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:58, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia lusca f. interrupta Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Casa Seguso (Venice) - facade on the Grand Canal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le chœur, France. The ceiling of the choir and the stained-glass windows..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perigonia ilus MHNT CUT 2010 0 169 El Guapo Venezuela male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callambulyx tatarinovii tatarinovii MHNT CUT 2010 0 172 Ussuri Bay Russia male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callambulyx tatarinovii tatarinovii MHNT CUT 2010 0 172 Ussuri Bay Russia male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:23, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Ancien Tabernacle XVIIe - IM31000100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:57, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia lusca f. interrupta Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The stoning of St. Stephen by Sante Piatti, San Moisè (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Montauban - Augustine of Hippo by Marc d'Arci.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:33, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oryba kadeni Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 17:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Facades of the ghetto buildings above the Ponte de Gheto Novissimo (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 13:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le chœur - Old wooden high altar 1812.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used, best and only in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 06:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis dognini Mounted specimen male dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good and used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Montauban -"Vision of Margaret Mary Alacoque, nun of the Visitation" by Armand Cambon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good and often used. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue Baronie (Toulouse) - Viewed entirely from its beginning to the rue des puits clos .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Archaeodontosaurus, would you consider changing "origin" to "beginning"? We never speak of the "origin" of streets in English, unless perhaps we're talking of etymology. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Done You're right it's the beginning not the origin. Thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment It isn't actually. We don't talk about the beginning of a road either! Who can say at which end a road begins? Frm the East/West etc. is OK. From the junction with X road is another possibility. Charles (talk) 14:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

 Comment For the streets it's easy beginning of the street starts with the n ° 1 --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

I agree. For example, New York's Broadway begins at the Battery, the southern tip of Manhattan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oryba kadeni Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rio di San Felice (Venice) seen from the Grand Canal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 20:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Assomption de Montauban - High altar and baldaquin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:13, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyceryx eximia MHNT CUT 2010 0 169 Cochacay La Troncal Canar Ecuador male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euryglottis dognini Mounted specimen male ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Virgin and Saints by Antonio Molinari, San Moisè (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds, Haute-Garonne, France. Mausoleum of the Marquis de Cambolas..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The waterfall by Marco Ricci - Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deidamia inscriptum Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Column of San Teodoro in Piazzetta San Marco (Venice).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful detail and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - La Prédication de saint Jean-Baptiste by Arsène Robert.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deidamia inscriptum Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:35, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of our Lady of the Rosary of Santi Giovanni e Paolo (Venice) - Martyrdom of St Christina by Sante Peranda.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue Baronie (Toulouse) - Hôtel de Bernard de Sapte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia ilus Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. Jee 05:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palazzo Falier (Venice) - facade on rio dei Santi Apostoli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le chœur - The sacrifice of Abel by Arsène Robert.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment check category please. --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

•  Done thanks...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 07:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Perigonia ilus Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Chapel of St. James and St. Anthony the Great.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good image. Used and useful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rue Baronie (Toulouse) - Building in N ° 5 in neo-Renaissance style.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull --Ercé (talk) 06:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perigonia lefebvraei MHNT CUT 2010 0 169 Mordazo Cuba male dorsal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perigonia lefebvraei MHNT CUT 2010 0 169 Mordazo Cuba male ventral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx substrigilis Mounted specimen female dorsal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 07:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Castelnau-d'Estrétefonds - Le chœur - Le Départ des apôtres allant prêcher l'Evangile by Arsène.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope --Ercé (talk) 07:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Giovanni Battista di Alessandro Bonvicino, Gallerie dell'Accademia in Venice..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. -- DeFacto (talk). 10:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ambulyx substrigilis Mounted specimen female ventral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Problem

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, would you kindly look why this candidate does not appear though it is listed here? Thank you beforehand and best regards -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Lothar. I am not sure that this is the cause but I think it is the sign = that makes the appointment fail. You could rename your image and redo an appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much! That was the reason. -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted== Bird identification ==

Hi. Discussion of the identification of a bird in a photo you helped categorize is ongoing here.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

A barnstar for you!

	int:wikilove-barnstar-kindness-title
	Merci, que tu a corrigé mon erreur. J'ai été confus ;-) Zoppo59 ([[User talk:Zoppo59|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for this delicate attention. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Problem at VIC with bot

I have no idea how to fix this, so am letting you know, figuring you know how. Go to VIC and search for "Pillars of the dismantled railway. South west side." It's currently the oldest photo there, so it's at top left of New noms section. It was closed 11 May but the bot still hasn't cleared it from the page. Thanks. PumpkinSky talk 00:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

• I can close it manually --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Just for the record

RE: Commons:Valued image candidates/Bronco the Beagle.JPG I don't consider this a valid decline. Charles is trying to ban an entire category of animal plus it's with bogus reasons. PumpkinSky talk 10:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

• I am fleeing this type of debate which can not be consensual. Absolutely, Charles does not make a mistake if we place it on the systematic naturalistic side. But to refuse subspecies is an untenable position, itself accepts it for butterflies. Our problem is going to be to find a normative system for pets. These criteria exist that must be put forward can be in the form of remarks in the appointment. Let us open a discussion on this problem because it will come back, as much to answer. Wait to see what will emerge and in conscience if you believe it, useful and possible, represents your appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  • This has been brought up before and went nowhere; and Charles was the cause of that case too. I am done with VI. It's too much of an inconsistent mess with no hope of resolution. PumpkinSky talk 18:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
    • Template:Ping As you have understood VI is the most complex of labels. But is most important because it makes sense. We've all had moments of discouragement, but you've already understood a lot. Start the discussion, I will support you with pleasure. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Pointe_levallois_Beuzeville

Dear Archaeodontosaurus, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your images from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pointe_levallois_Beuzeville_MHNT_PRE.2009.0.203.2.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer. Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com hippofish 12:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Template:Unsigned2

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Category:Tenebrio molitor illutrations

"illutrations" looks like a typo to me. Greetings, -- Ies ([[User talk:Ies|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

• I saw your work on this subject and I wanted to help you, but as you saw it with a beautiful misspelling. Sorry you can fix it? --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Monument of doge Trevisian

I remeber my book attribuited the architecture (non the reliefs) to Sansovino, but nevermind. Let's add at least the category of Girolamo Campagna, then. Btw thanks for fixing the categories in all those images. --Sailko ([[User talk:Sailko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

VIC scope and category

Hi. I'm not sure I did the scope and category correctly in Commons:Valued image candidates/Hosta two-tone 3.jpg. Yellow Splash Rim is a cultivar of Hosta and those photos are in a subcat of Category:Hosta Sieboldiana Group. Thank you. PumpkinSky talk 17:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

• I replied on the picture in VI. Thank you for your confidence. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Error in file description? Acontia (Emmelia) trabealis MHNT.jpg

Hi Archaeodontosaurus, I've seen your nice picture/pictures of File:Acontia (Emmelia) trabealis MHNT.jpg. Inside the description you describe the "double" as female, whilst the same singles are male specimen. Can you please correct this. Thanks, NobbiP 21:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Done Thank you I had not noticed this typo. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

catégorisation

Salut Archaeodontosaurus, n'oublie pas de raccorder tes catégories d'espèces "illustrations" ou "mounted specimens" aux catégories de familles correspondantes ;-) Bonne soirée --LamBoet ([[User talk:LamBoet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:34, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Je vais y penser Merci de ton message --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Peut-être serait-il bon aussi d'essayer d'harmoniser les noms de ces catégories : pour l'instant, la plus grande partie de l'arborescence utilise "[nom du taxon] illustrations" (au pluriel) et "[nom du taxon] specimens" (sans préciser "mounted"). Bonne soirée --LamBoet ([[User talk:LamBoet|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

tu as raison, j'ai du mal à m'en souvenir mais je me suis fais une note pour générer un automatisme dans ma cervelle en général çà marche. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Alejandra Yurievna, Grand Duchess of Russia.jpg

Please rereview it, thank you --Ras67 ([[User talk:Ras67|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

An old collection

Bonjour Didier I know you will enjoy these Lycee Michelet Vanves bibliotheque collection histoire naturelle Catalogue Warm regards Robert aka Notafly ([[User talk:Notafly|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:35, 18 August 2017 (UTC) PS Laurent Schwartz collection- Wonderful collection and photos.

The outdated presentation of the natural science collections has impressed us all.

We can say what we lack because at each retrospective we all put a lot of care to reconstruct a showcase or a room of the nineteenth. The Schwartz collection is splendid I am in box 150 and there are more than 500 it is a personal challenge, I plan to get to photograph them. Thank you for your kind intervention.--Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:24, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Taxonomy changes

Hi Didier, I have made some changes to the English description of Template:F based in the new IOC (and HBW) taxonomy. Please review - it might be better to give the file a new name. Alandmanson ([[User talk:Alandmanson|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:51, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

• I thank you for your vigilance. I referred to our crurator in ornithology. If he agrees I would do the necessary for the renaming and renaming. This type of intervention is very valuable for collections. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:44, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Confirmation you are absolutely right. I make the changes. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

copy and paste error in name

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lycaena_phlaeas_MHNT_dos.jpg Charles ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

It is Lycaena phlaeas f. Caerulopunctata or Lycaena phlaeas eleus ab. caeruleopunctata but is not recognized, the correct name is Lycaena phlaea phlaea --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Centering galleries

Hi Archaeodontosaurus! I noticed that some months ago you reverted this edit. As you can see the gallery is properly centered even without the <center> </center>, for this reason the bot removed the unnecessary markup. Did you notice any problem? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 09:47, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes I remember well, there was a display defect that last a few days, it has stopped and since everything is working well. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

A barnstar for you!

	int:wikilove-barnstar-photographers-title
	Thank you for uploading many high quality and useful images to Wikimedia Commons. Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:45, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	int:wikilove-barnstar-photographers-title
	Thank you for uploading many high quality and useful images to Wikimedia Commons. Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Tue foto per Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto

Caro Didier,
ho notato che nel mese di settembre hai caricato varie foto (come File:Cathedral (Vicenza) - Interior - Quinta cappella a sinistra - Incoronazione della Vergine (1448) Antonino di Niccolò da Venezia.jpg) che potrebbero concorrere al concorso Wiki Loves Monuments. Quest'anno faremo il premio anche di Wiki Loves Monuments Veneto, per cui c'è un'opportunità in più per vincere. Per inserire le tue foto nel concorso basta aggiungere i codici del monumento, e se vuoi ti posso aiutare a farlo entro il 30 settembre. Ci terrei sul serio, perchè le tue foto sono molto ben fatte e vorrei che ci fossero molte foto del Veneto quest'anno a concorrere. ;) Grazie in anticipo. --Marcok ([[User talk:Marcok|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Ping Vi ringrazio per l'onore che mi dai. Ho un programma molto occupato fino a sabato. Potrei farlo allora. Se puoi posizionare le codici del monumento, sulle immagini che ritieni siano idonee, mi farà un ottimo servizio. Sabato sarò operativo. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Ciao Didier, penso di avere sistemato le foto. Controlla pure, grazie. --Marcok ([[User talk:Marcok|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Ho visto tutto quello che hai fatto e ti ringrazio. Dimmi se devo fare qualcosa per questo concorso. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Credo di avere inserito i codici in tutte le immagini di Vicenza che avevi caricato in settembre, per quelle non serve fare altro. --Marcok ([[User talk:Marcok|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Thank You

Bonjour, I sent you a thank you email. It was somewhat long so I figured it best to send it by email but I didn't know if you would rather I just post it here. In any case thank you very much! Sixflashphoto ([[User talk:Sixflashphoto|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Peut-on fermer une VIC seulement 24h après le dernier vote ?

Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus, je lis sur cette page : "Nominations can be closed after a period of 4 or 7 days (4 days for opposed and supported candidates, 7 days for discussed and unassessed ones), but only if more than 48 hours has passed since the last vote". Donc je ne comprends pas pourquoi tu fermes cette candidature https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Valued_image_candidates/Green_lettuce_in_a_kitchen_garden.jpg seulement 25 heures après le vote de Ikan Kekek. Cordialement, -- Basile Morin ([[User talk:Basile Morin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

• Tu as raison accepte mes excuses j'ai rétabli. C'est une inadvertance de ma part. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Mistake?

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, since yesterday I try to upload some further images but it seems not possible. Please look here for example. Do you see that I make something wrong and can you explain my mistake please? Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

• Hi, Lothar,

Template:Ping This is a mistake that we all have at one time. I keep making it from time to time

You left a space before the name of the file when you made your appointment. Leave the bad as it is. Make a new request without the space it has to work. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. I will try it with another image. -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

A barnstar for you!

	int:wikilove-barnstar-original-title
	All of your help and hard work at VIC — Rhododendrites talk |  17:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Template:Ping I thank you for this gift. I look at your progress you practically master all the tools of Commons I congratulate you. VI is the most important labels it gives meaning to our work. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued image promotion

Template:VICpromoted -- -- DeFacto (talk). 18:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Grumbling by Charlessharp

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, would you kindly look what Charlessharp is doing in VI, for instance here and to the images of my tin toys. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

• Template:Ping For the image of Jochen Rindt, there is no rule for categories. As a personal I do not like large categories and as soon as there are 3 images I can create one to lighten.

The quality of this image could be improved but I know that you prefer what remain in their original version and I understand this choice. I have no doubt that there are in VI other motorsport fans who will vote for you.

For toys I am not very competent except that I knew them in my youth. My vote is emotional. But it seems that Charles' request is not out of order. There are collectors and catalogs that characterize each object. If you can give more precision it will be a nice thing for everyone.--Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:10, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I think for specialists my description is enough. From the locomotive by distler I still have the packing and there is nothing to read of a precise marking. -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Here we have an example for a very useful image and best in scope, far better than an 48 years old photograph of world champion Jochen Rindt after practice session at Nürburgring. Is it not incredible? -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Problem

Hallo Archaeodontosaurus, would you kindly look why this candidate does not appear though it is listed here? Thank you beforehand and best regards -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Lothar. I am not sure that this is the cause but I think it is the sign = that makes the appointment fail. You could rename your image and redo an appointment. --Archaeodontosaurus ([[User talk:Archaeodontosaurus#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much! That was the reason. -- Lothar Spurzem ([[User talk:Spurzem|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted