User talk:Aotearoa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks for adding a map to the Atlas. If you create new maps, please add the to the atlas too. Electionworld 23:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wyspa Estyjska - fragment mapy morskiej.jpg[edit]

Witaj. Masz rację mapa jest zrzutem ekranu z programu. Ten program to OpenCPN, będacy na wolnej licencji. Z kolei źródłem danych dla programu jest (jak słusznie zauważasz) mapa ENC. Mapa ta jest produkowana przez polskie Biuro Hydrograficzne Marynarki Wojennej, w ramach ustawowego [1] obowiązku (art. 41b. ust 1. p. 4). Z kolei zgodnie z polskim prawem autorskim [2] (art. 4) "Nie stanowią przedmiotu prawa autorskiego: [...] 2) urzędowe dokumenty, materiały, znaki i symbole". Tak więc ów dokument albo co najmniej materiał (materiałem urzędowym jest wszystko, co nie będąc „dokumentem” jest „urzędowe”, wszelki materiał pochodzący od urzędu albo dotyczący sprawy urzędowej albo też powstały w rezultacie procedury urzędowej (tj. urząd jest za nie odpowiedzialny)) [3] Tak więc polskich ENC nie obejmuje copyright. Wbartoszy (talk) 10:56, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Być może że uznanie mapy za "dokument urzędowy" to lekka nadinterpretacja. Ale uznanie mapy za "materiał urzędowy" już taką nadinterpretacją nie jest. A także "materiałów urzędowych" nie obejmuje ochrona prawno-autorska. Bo przecież pochodzi od urzędu i (jeśli się zgodzimy) nie jest dokumentem, a powstały w na podstawie ustawy o obszarach morskich. Naprawdę nie widzę tu pola do interpretacji: albo dokument, albo materiał. Tak czy siak = nie copyright.
    Filozoficznie: przecież zleciliśmy wykonanie (uchwalając ustawę) i zapłaciliśmy za przygotowanie tego (płacąc podatki) więc właścicielem jest państwo = społeczeństwo. Mapa ta nie ma nawet unikalnego charakteru (dobór kolorów, symbole) bo wszystko jest zgodne z S-52 i S-57...
    A umieszczenie znaku (c) (choć tu nie występuje) - nie ma żadnego znaczenia: [4]
Wbartoszy (talk) 06:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Primo: napisałem już że nie upieram się że to dokument. Może jest to "materiał urzędowy". A i jego prawo autorskie nie dotyczy!
Secundo: Piszesz o "opracowaniach kartograficznych" w kontekście bycia "dziełem". Z tego co wiem i co podkreślają sądy: aby mapa była "utworem" (przedmiotem prawa autorskiego) musi mieć "indywidualny charakter" (art. 1 ustawy o prawie autorskim), zobacz też np [5]. Czyli musi mieć unikalny: zestaw kolorów, symboli, zastosowaną czcionkę... cokolwiek "niesztampowego". W "mapach" ENC z pewnością nie ma niczego "twórczego", bo to jest baza danych utworzona wg. określonego standardu (IHO S-57) (więc nawet jakby ktoś chciał - NIE MOŻE być tu przejawów "indywidualnego charakteru"). Dopiero na podstawie tej bazy w aplikacji (czy ploterze) generowany jest obraz (widok "mapy"). Jego wygląd zależy tylko i wyłącznie od twórcy aplikacji generującej (w tym przypadku openCPN). To że najczęściej grafika jest zgodna ze standardem S-52 to inna para kaloszy. Już bardziej twórczy niż BHMW wkład w wygląd zamieszczonej mapy miałem ja dobierając: izobaty spłycenia, głębokiej wody, wybór symboli pław, pokazywanie lub nie poszczególnych obiektów zawartych w bazie.
Tak wiec podsumowując: ENC nie jest przedmiotem prawa autorskiego z dwu niezależnych powodów:
1. jako "materiał urzędowy" są wyłączone z ochrony prawno-autorskiej [6]
2. w ogóle nie są "utworem" z powodu braku "indywidualnego charakteru". Mapa bez elementów twórczych nie jest utworem [7]
PS. Nie dałeś linka do przykładu, o którym pisałeś. Wbartoszy (talk) 11:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Napisałeś: "istotne jest, co faktycznie na ten temat mówią eksperci, jakie wyroki wydają sądy". Więc proszę: https://www.prawo.pl/podatki/mapa-kartograficzna-nie-jest-dzielem-nsa,26459.html (w tekście sygnatury wyroków WSA i NSA), https://www.rp.pl/orzecznictwo/art14225571-nie-ma-praw-autorskich-w-informacji-publicznej Wbartoszy (talk) 07:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

I am going to caution you that going in and making edits such as you did to my map of the Powiaty of Poland are considered vandalism. If you think that there are errors, provide the proper source and reference and also examples of where the so-called 'errors' occur. Next time you simply go in and do what you did to my map, I will have you blocked by an admin. Rarelibra 14:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Warning[edit]

This is your second warning to cease and desist your vandalism to the map of the Powiaty of Poland that I have created. You cannot make such edits to the map. Should you choose to do this again, you will be reported to an admin and quite possibly be blocked for 24 hours. Be careful of your actions. Rarelibra 16:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

Since you don't understand English as your first language, I will give you a chance to read through this (twice, if necessary) to understand what I am saying - One, I am UPDATING the maps according to the very maps you posted (I am also creating maps of the gminy). Two, you are extremely offensive with your words. If you would like, we can critique each other offline and use all of the words such as "bad" (not "bed"), but to use these words on wiki is incorrect and offensive. I kid you not, if you persist, I will have you blocked for your actions. Rarelibra 19:01, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense to give Rarelibra an opportunity to review the map, so please refrain from deleting this map. Electionworld 19:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashmore Reef.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo 09:45, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 06:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 07:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Catalunya topomap.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 04:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Wilno 1934.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wilno 1934.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 04:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mariany Saipan2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.232.95 04:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whats the problem? --Flominator 10:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Świetne mapy[edit]

Hej! Gratuluję świetnych map i oby tak dalej!

Pozdrawiam i życzę wesołych świąt, Kubek15 Kubek15

Mapy[edit]

Przyznam, że mam pewien problem z oceną stopnia "autorskości" map. Nie wiem, jakie warunki musi spełnić mapa, aby być uznana za autorską. Mnie wydawałoby się, że jeżeli ktoś odpalił program graficzny, narysował kontury, wypełnił kolorami, naniósł podpisy, to jest to jego własna praca nawet jeśli wzorcem była inna mapa. Mapy mają to do siebie, że są podobne ;-) Chyba że znając warsztat jesteś wstanie ocenić, że praca jest nie w pełni samodzielna (np, podretuszowany skan), wtedy to co innego. ~Ponieważ jednak nie mam w tej sprawie żadnych doświadczeń, polecam Ci skontaktować sie raczej z kimś kto sam takie grafiki wykonuje i ma pewne doświadczenie w określaniu autora i licencji prac bazowanych na innych pracach. Może to być któryś z rysujących adminów commons, np. WarX, Szczepan1990 lub adminów pl.wiki, np. Holek, Hiuppo (ten ostatni zajmował się mapami, ostatnio jednak jest mniej aktywny, ale może trafisz akurat na moment jego aktywności na wiki). Co do wkładu użytkowniczki to moje zastrzeżenia dotyczyłyby w pierwszej kolejności pewnej niedbałości, błędów w nazwach i zastanawiałabym się nad ich przydatnością. Jeśli dodatkowo potwierdzi się Twój zarzut co do nie w pełni autorskiego wkładu, to będzie należało rozważyć ich usunięcie. Pozdrawiam. Pilecka 14:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please post a link to where it says that the above image has been created by the United States Congress. /Lokal_Profil 21:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've moved the image to Image:Coat of arms of Kosovo.svg and I adjusted the canvas to the coa. The credits in the new page were given to you as the author. Greetings! --B1mbo 21:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image deletion warning Image:Fm_CoA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Lokal_Profil 23:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khajuraho[edit]

Hello, I would like to use one of your photographs of Khajurhao temple in a publication, is this possible? Please email me at 180915@soas.ac.uk if you wish to discuss. Thank you! MNKM

Wektoryzacja[edit]

hejka, byłbys w stanie podjąc się wektoryzacji Image:Herbexil-56.jpg? Pozdr, Serdelll (talk) 13:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herb RP[edit]

Hejka, mógłbyś mi potwierdzić, czy te dwa pliki: Image:Herb Polski.svg i pl:Grafika:Poland.gov.pl edit.png są takie same w obecnym kształcie i formie? Tzn. chcem usunąć ten z pl.wiki i potrzebuję potwierdzenia, że są zbieżne, a w wersji na commons ma on dużo wersji, więc wolałbym sie upewnić. Pozdr, Serdelll (talk) 06:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Stephen's Cathedral-pulpit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good composition --Mbdortmund 11:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naddniestrze.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Re: Rogowo[edit]

Witaj. Rzeczywiście masz rację, zdjęcie jest autorstwa mojego ojca i przedstawia kościół w Gronowie, a ni w Rogowie. Bardzo dziękuję za wyłapanie błędu! Pozdrawiam, pjahr @ 13:43, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grafiki szkół[edit]

Cześć. Ponoć jesteś w temacie licencji grafik szkół. image:Umblogo.JPG, image:Sum.JPG, IMAGE:PAM2.png Czt to jest copyvio czy może symbol RP?

Locator map of Transdnistria[edit]

Hello! Could you make the map, analogous to this, but without signs (only with external boundaries and with boundaries between administrative units)? It will be used as a locator map in the articles about cities of Transdnistria (with the map of Moldova, of course). Dinamik (talk) 10:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Aotearoa!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wp:sso[edit]

Do konkursu Sfotografuj swoją okolicę został zgłoszony plik Plik:Wręczyca Wielka.png. Chciałbym się dowiedzieć źródeł informacji (chyba,że pomiary były wykonane samodzielnie).Yusek (talk) 11:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mapa[edit]

Miałbym taką prośbę czy mógłby zamówić mapy?Yusek (talk) 21:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Помогите мне с переводом карты (Help me)[edit]

Здравствуйте! Обращаюсь к вам по-русски, так как у вас на странице написано, что вы знаете русский язык на начальном уровне. Пожалуйста, можете мне отправить PSD-файл от карты http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Osetia_Południowa.png (Please send me PSD file from this file at http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Osetia_Południowa.png). Я хочу перевести ее на русский язык (I like to translate this map into Russian). Спасибо (Thank you). -Alexander Nureyev (my personal page on Wikipedia RU - http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Участник:Alexander_Nureyev)

TUSC token b3196ba1c51ec78b850e1866b7a60255[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Re: File:Hhezbollah fighter memorial.jpg[edit]

Hej. Wgrałem pod poprawioną nazwą, ale od razu jeden z adminów zgłosił do usunięcia (nie wiem, dlaczego) [8]. pjahr @ 16:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mimo wszystko nie zgodzę się z Tobą - ja wgrywam wszystkie swoje pliki na commons i uważam, że tu jest ich miejsce. Nie mam wówczas problemem z obserwowaniem. Na Twoim miejscu poświęciłbym wcześniej trochę czasu i samemu przeniósł własne grafiki, wówczas nie byłoby kłopotu, prawda? Pozdrawiam, pjahr @ 17:28, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Important information is missing[edit]

Hello!

Can you add all relevante information like author, source and at best ab approximatly date to this image? It is important for this image to be kept. Thank you in advance. --93.211.74.95 08:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gibraltar[edit]

Trochę masz rację, ale tylko trochę. Rzeczywiście, na pierwszy rzut oka w metryczce zdjęcia jesteś tam jedyny, ale o autorstwie trudno na tej podstawie od razu wyciągać wnioski. Informacja na temat autorstwa jest przecież zarówno w opisie zdjęcia, który nie uległ zmianie (Source: --Immanuel Giel 13:58, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)), jak i w historii pliku (13:58, 28 kwi 2005 Immanuel Giel (dyskusja | edycje | zablokuj) (*Description: Gibraltar 1992 *Source: --~~~~ {{subst:Bild-GFDL}} Category:Gibraltar Category:landscape). Nie wydaje mi się, by to powodowało jakikolwiek dyskomfort czy to Twój, czy też oryginalnego autora.
Pozdrawiam Julo (talk) 06:23, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:

  • osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia

Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości

  • fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
  • zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców

Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.

E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.

Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf

Pozdrowienia,

Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010

Hello. Please write sources of this information. Preferably the source of the IGU. --Insider (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why the revert? The update is correct, and the map is not bound to a specific year. -- Kju (talk) 20:34, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Censorship[edit]

Hello,
I don't know what do you mean by "censorship"?
For your information, and here I'll write that again: Spain and Morocco agreed to maintain the status quo on the island, despite the fat that both claim it.
On one hand, on WP, people don't care about a government's policy. The information must be kept as neutral as possible. On the other hand, the UN and the international community don't recognize the sovereignty over the island, nor to Spain nor to Morocco.
I contribute to keep the information as neutral as possible, that's all. If you think it is a case of "censorship", you can claim the intervention of a Commons administrator.
Omar-Toons (talk) 19:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proszę, zerknij tutaj, dokładniej chodzi mi o dyskusję nad tym plikiem i podobnymi. Mógłbyś podać źródło (w opisie pliku), na podstawie którego ustalałeś granice parafii? Dzięki. Vearthy (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frolik_Island_map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antemister (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Przykład_widoku_strony.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 19:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Prosze przeczytaj co napisałem na twojej stronie dyskusji na polskiej Wikipedii. Pozdrawiam BeŻet (talk) 17:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Zdjęcia Kazik na Żywo[edit]

Cześć! Super że wrzuciłeś zdjęcia Kazika na Żywo. pogrupowałem je do kategorii zespołu. Jeśli masz jeszcze takowe, to opublikuj proszę jeszcze Riberta Friedricha. Pozdrawiam. --Lowdown (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hydrografia[edit]

Hej, zabieram się powoli za wektoryzację Twojej mapki hydrograficznej naszego pięknego kraju. Tyle że to od groma i ciut roboty i automat sobie z tym raczej nie poradzi, więc musiałbym w zasadzie tworzyć ją od zera, z Twoją mapą jako podkładem. Mapki w svg są o niebo bardziej użyteczne, bo derywaty można tworzyć nawet z automatu, że nie wspomnę o łatwiejszej lokalizacji.

Stąd dwa pytania:

  1. Czy możesz własnoręcznie wgrać wersję wektorową tej mapy? Zakładam, że nie została stworzona jako bitmapa tylko właśnie w jakimś programie do obróbki grafiki wektorowej (opis grafiki tego nie precyzuje, ale to dość logiczne założenie jak mniemam).
  2. Ewentualnie czy możesz podać na stronie grafiki na podstawie jakich źródeł powstała mapa?

Pozdr. Halibutt (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aotearoa, where are from the boundaries of your nice map ? My datas are completely outdated : File:West Pomeranian Voivodeship relief location map.jpg. Could you provide me up-to-date vector data ? Thanks, Bourrichon (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

The image File:Mezoregiony Kondrackiego.png, which was produced or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mezoregiony Kondrackiego.png. Good luck! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

The image File:Regiony Kondrackiego-hipsometria.png, which was produced or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regiony Kondrackiego-hipsometria.png. Good luck! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

W zasadzie takie pliki kasuje się od ręki, z tymże nie wiem, czy przypadkiem sama mapa nie obroniłaby się przed usunięciem, być może należy do domeny publicznej (np. z powodu upłynięcia 70 lat od momentu publikacji i niepodania autora przy oryginalnej publikacji, co podpadałoby pod {{Anonymous-EU}})? Jeśli tak, to wystarczyłoby przyciąć odpowiednio ten plik i usunąć starszą wersję zawierającą znaki i design objęty prawem autorskim — mógłbyś zerknąć i ewentualnie nadpisać ten plik odpowiednio poprawioną wersją? Ja w takim wypadku usunąłbym tę starszą wersję. Pozdrawiam, odder (talk) 19:40, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Po krótkiej dyskusji IRC-owej z jednym z niemieckojęzycznych adminów (Funfood (talk · contribs)) zdecydowałem się przesłać na Commons pełną wersję tej mapy, oznaczając ją tagiem {{Anonymous-EU}}, gdyż nigdzie na mapie nie ma informacji o jej autorze — przy okazji poprawiłem też opis i nazwę pliku i dodałem go do odpowiedniej kategorii. odder (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Już za późno — cały arkusz znajduje się już na Commons :-) A bardziej serio: nawet jeśli wzór pieczątki jest objęty prawem autorskim (czego nie wiemy), to sama pieczątka stanowi tak niewielką część mapy i jest nieznacząca dla tego, co mapa przedstawia, że — moim zdaniem — podpada pod zasadę Commons:De minimis. Jeśli chcesz, to przy odrobinie pracy mógłbyś pewnie usunąć pieczątkę z tej mapy; podejrzewam, że 15 minut klonowania wystarczyłoby, żeby tego dokonać. odder (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Jeszcze jedna kwestia związana z powyższym — orientujesz się może, jakim tagiem oznaczane są zwykle przedwojenne mapy (tu: autorstwa Wojskowego Instytutu Geograficznego)? Na mojej stronie dyskusji podrzucono mi 1 i 2, które są częścią 3 i zastanawiam się, czy moglibyśmy taką mapę przesłać na Commons, a jeśli tak, to czy podpada pod {{Anonymous-EU}}, czy może są jakieś szczegółowe tagi, którymi zwykle oznacza się takie mapy. Jeśli nie ma, to pełną wersję tej mapy wrzucę jako {{Anonymous-EU}}, a tamte dwa pliki odpowiednio przytnę, usuwając pasek Windowsa i elementy przeglądarki Google Chrome. Pozdrawiam odder (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Naypyidaw.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

149.156.172.74 10:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alboran.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 17:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Myanmar long form (Union of Myanmar).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Europa-mapa polityczna.png[edit]

Jak wykonałeś "Zmianę statusu Krymu na terytorium sporne"? Z tego co widać, to żadne "sporne", tylko rosyjskie, bo pokolorowałeś na żółto. Gratuluję pomysłowości. 84.10.66.24 22:19, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

hi .. keep in touch Nischal bhandari (talk) 04:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:UEFA Euro 2012 en.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:UEFA Euro 2012 en.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:UEFA Euro 2012 pl.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:UEFA Euro 2012 pl.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:UEFA Euro 2012 uk.png[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:UEFA Euro 2012 uk.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms of Poland-official.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте. Нужно до F (Кавказский водораздел) сделать зеленым. Валко (talk) 16:24, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europa-mapa polityczna.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.11.154.50 09:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Euro-Asia boundary illustrator[edit]

Thanks for uploading this image.
This file you have uploaded and is your own work, helped me in securing 12 marks for my exam. It may not seem like a big favor, but little things like this helps the most. The image is still pasted on my wall.

Thank you. VScode fanboy (talk) 11:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europa-mapa polityczna.png: Revision history[edit]

On what basis do you roll back clarifying edits in the description of this file? You confidently state that the states listed are "Asian" (which is not a mistake, speaking in the context of geography). However, you should also understand that Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and Cyprus have close geopolitical, economic, and historical and cultural ties with Europe (and Azerbaijan and Georgia may even have part of their territories in geographical Europe, according to one of the accepted definitions of the borders between parts of the world). Even the Encyclopedia Britannica (which literally recently moved in its maps to the border along the Greater Caucasus), which mainly uses in its works the definition of the border in the southern section along the Kuma-Manych depression, in articles about Europe and Asia repeatedly mentions that the listed states can also refer to to both Europe and Asia, depending on the context. Your unconditional categoricalness in this regard is clearly out of place. Рагин1987 (talk) 16:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plik:Państwa nieuznawane2.png[edit]

Prośba o korektę pliku w związku z aneksją Górskiego Karabachu przez Azerbejdżan 87.101.35.207 07:37, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]