User talk:廣九直通車/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File tagging File:KARMA CARTEL poster.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:KARMA CARTEL poster.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ytoyoda (talk) 11:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

@Ytoyoda: It seems that you did not noticed that the source webpage stated that "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License."? Of course, if you think that I made a mistake, then just notify me here, so that I can just eliminate that with CSD G7, regards廣九直通車 (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Sorry about that, thanks for the note. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Mxmtoon March 2019.jpg

Hi
I don't think my image required me to send an OTRS ticket initially.
In this image the uploader asks for permission to release a screenshot to the public domain in the comment section of a YouTube video but doesn't send a ticket once gaining permission from the author. HeyitsBen(talk) 17:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

@HeyitsBen: Thank you. But as the author did send us a permission email (Ticket:2019072210007225), Template:OTRS received should be placed on File:Mxmtoon March 2019.jpg, while the procession of the ticket will be another issue, and OTRS volunteers will deal with it accordingly, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Construction work at Queen Alia International Airport.JPG

File:Construction work at Queen Alia International Airport.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:50, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Boy Pablo Turin Italy 31 March 2018.png

This image has explicit permission right on the page, is there really any reasonable doubt that there is permission? There is no legal requirement under United States or international law to require further than what has been obtained in this case. Perhaps you see some internal issue under Wikipedia rules?--Milowent (talk) 12:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@Milowent: Regarding File:Boy Pablo Turin Italy 31 March 2018.png, please be noticed that the screenshot is from a YouTube video, where there is neither explicit free permission on the webpage of video, nor OTRS permission regarding the screenshot. Meanwhile, the screenshot is uploaded at 2018-05-03, and therefore COM:GOF cannot be applied. Please ask the copyright holder to send a permission email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org according to the instructions of OTRS, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
I know you think you are doing good work, and I appreciate every volunteer's efforts, but do you realize you are enforcing copyright law beyond what any rational corporation or holder would ever endeavor to do? You can see right on the file page that I got permission from the photographer. This photograph is used on many different language wikipedias. The joy of human existence will be very slightly lessened by its deletion, with no corresponding benefit. Many photos exist on commons with far less permission, but we'd both be long dead before you could find them all. I hope you enjoy this philosophical rant. Now we'll see if I can be arsed enough to try to track down this guy that took photograph again! And whether he can arsed enough to actually send in an email to the official Wikipedia gods beyond what we already sent me in the past.--Milowent (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Oh, and by the way, "explicit free permission on the webpage of the video", its right in the comments to the video.--Milowent (talk) 19:55, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
@Milowent: Thank you. I think it is better to ask for others idea, and I have asked at COM:VPC#File:Boy Pablo Turin Italy 31 March 2018.png.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
@Milowent: I have removed the no permission template in the file description page, and the file is pending for license review.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
I see it got deleted. The world is better now? Children now cry when wikipedia does not reveal a photograph of Boy Pablo for them. They now troll the dark webs for illicit photos of Boy Pablo and his rowdy band of Norwegians and then get hooked on drugs as a result. Their mothers sob.--Milowent (talk) 18:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
@Milowent: I have to say that I have done my best regarding this file. I have requested for license review as per COM:LR, and the license reviewer cannot find that permission. Perhaps you can appeal on COM:UDR, but you should be reminded that Wikimedia Commons take copyright very seriously per COM:PCP, as any DMCA or copyright lawsuits can be troublesome, or even devastating to us. By the way, for those who really want to to see Boy Pablo's photograph, tons of images can be founded on relevant Google search results, so dark net is not really a problem (though, those images should not be uploaded to Commons).廣九直通車 (talk) 01:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Resolved sections

Hi. Please don't mark as resolved sections that original posters have not indicated are resolved to their satisfaction, such as in this edit.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice.廣九直通車 (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Media upload

Thanks @廣九直通車. Your prompt reply accomplished what took me 2 days researching the n x 1,000 files on the subject and not finding a simple answer for it. I'm learning the "Wikipedia language" as I go. I'm overwhelmed by the amount of work going into it & appreciate all the more the time, support & advice people like you dedicate to the smooth running of the platform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bysance (talk • contribs) 12:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@Bysance: Thanks a lot! And feel free to improve us Commons! By the way, please use ~~~~ to sign your comments, so that different comments can be traced.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Valued Image Scope

Per COM:VISC, what I understand from the instructions is that the scope of a nominated image should be a general description of the issue. And after your assistance, I have altered the scope of Commons:Valued image candidates/Zimbabwe $100 trillion 2009 Obverse.jpg at here. Actually what is the problem now? I am not familiar about those nomination process, so your kind assistance will be grateful, thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zimbabwe $100 trillion 2009 Obverse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The last Jew in Vinnitsa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Re: User talk:雅婕 Please remain calm and collegial

雅婕的事，我不會再煩她了，因為我最近幾日開始準備離開Wikimedia Commons。當我準備好，我就會依她的要求，恢復原狀，這樣她也不用擔心我會碰她的所有照片。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 實在不好意思，我在有限的資料下便嘗試分析。本來也不想直接下判斷，結果搞成這次的事件，實在深表抱歉。感謝您一直以來協助我們共享的分類工作，我也會趁這段時間反省我對人的合適方法，謝謝。廣九直通車 (talk) 23:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
為什麼你會這麼說？--Kai3952 (talk) 00:36, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 其實我也沒料到事件會滾(雪球)得這麼大。我本來只是以為「雅婕懷疑你要提刪她的圖片」，因為她的回覆確實有提過類似的內容，再加上她又是新人，說不定是個誤會。但是這也只限於推測，我當時無意批評，或對任何一方持有立場。也許我當時也應該快一點回覆您的懷疑吧，這麼就不會把問題搞的大。。。另外如果還有什麼疑問也歡迎盡量查詢。廣九直通車 (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
原來你說的「事件」是指：我的拒受autopatrol權限案
  • 我向你說明一下，什麼叫「我的拒受autopatrol權限案」。就是他們在追究我為何三年都一直拒絕autopatrol，並要求我接受autopatrol。他們在本案是想了解，巡查人力有限，為何我沒替他們設想，一旦我的編輯數量爆增，就會帶來給他們在巡查作業上困難，因此他們無法配合我的拒絕要求。
  • 本案的發生則是因為11月29日那件事。我在過去三年，從沒遇過他們會用「接管」這種方式在巡查我的編輯。因為以前只是一般的用戶在問，問我為何不用autopatrol權限，我以為我是可以選擇要用還是不用。直到今年7月，管理員授權我autopatrol，但我拒絕，後在11月20日就被Masumrezarock100發現，然後Alexis Jazz介入，由他開始頻頻要求我接受autopatrol，我一直拒受，最後發生Alexis Jazz接管（指11月29日那件事），進而產生本案。
有了本案之後，一開始我與Alexis Jazz之間有在溝通，後來破局，沒有結果，本案演變成社群介入。這麼多人都找我談，使事情像滾雪球，愈來愈複雜愈嚴重，連管理員都驚動，有四位管理員在處理本案，至今仍然沒有解決。--Kai3952 (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
僅管原因是「我以為我是可以選擇要用還是不用」，但還是有另一個原因，就是我把autopatrol申請當成是推選管理員那樣，因為整個機制就是用提名的方式在運作，看起來就像是中文維基，害怕發生像中文維基這些人，提名我之後，然後就對我批評、指責，於是我對獲選感到厭惡，我來到Wikimedia Commons之後，也將獲選感到厭惡給帶過來，因此這三年就一直拒絕autopatrol。只是沒想到發生本案，他們就批評我自私。現在我陷入兩難——拿中文維基他們批評的話去思考在Wikimedia Commons發生的本案，我會認為我拒受autopatrol是對的；可是，我人是在Wikimedia Commons，若是拿他們對本案說的批評去思考，那麼我變成拒受autopatrol是錯的。由此兩難可知，我怎麼做都是不對。--Kai3952 (talk) 18:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 原來如此。。。不論如何，衷心感謝您一直以來的分類工作！廣九直通車 (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
您的感謝不禁使我無奈，因為台灣的所有每一樣編輯工作是沒有人像我全部承擔下來，若是我沒這麼做，真的會發現到裡面有很多工作是缺少人們去做，甚至有的工作是十年都沒有人去動過。可是像我這樣承擔，就像螞蟻妄想吃下大象，我一人消化不完如此高的工作量，而其它也是來自台灣的Commons User在編輯，他們只是選擇他們自己想要做的事，並不是負責整個台灣的所有File編輯工作以及整理File的分類工作，這就是為何工作會積壓。即使我跟某些Commons User有提醒應該怎麼做，假如會配合就沒問題，但是有的人是繼續違反，不然就是有的人跟我吵，這些問題都增加我的工作負擔，我一個人能力有限，無法去對他們這些人一一處理，所以這使得我要找時間幫他們收拾殘局，若是找不到時間去收，那麼工作就積壓了。雖然我是在訴苦，但都是反映出現實情況，我想你應該也有遇到這種事吧，你會怎麼解決？--Kai3952 (talk) 23:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 我想，也是盡力而為吧。。。畢竟我們共享的媒體檔案已經接近6千萬個。我自己對於建設性的盡量聆聽並實踐，對於不理解則盡量據理力爭。實在不行的話，要不然就找更有資質的用戶幫忙，對蠻橫不講理的，可以考慮送他一程上COM:ANU(我們共享的批鬥版用戶爭議解決版)。總之既然整個維基都是自願參與的話，我其中一個為人宗旨就是盡力而為了。。。廣九直通車 (talk) 09:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
好吧。如果有機會，我再向您學習。謝謝您--Kai3952 (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

EXIF

Hello. Unfortunately I must to admit I don't know anything about EXIF name. Srđan Popović (talk) 23:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

@Srđan Popović: Thank you for your question, and it is normal for those users if you are not the kind who deal with copyright violations frequently. To prevent others from plagiarizing their photographs, some photographers will include their name in EXIF information, a series of information including everything from when did he photograph is taken, camera model to technical information like shutter speed. This proves that they are the real photographers.
  • Take File:FAP 1318 BK Energomontaža.jpg as an example. When you scroll down the file description page, you find a conputer-analysed section called "metadata", containing a table of information, and the corresponding author is "tennebaums".

Therefore, I am concerning whether you are "tennebaums", as copyright violators may import images containing such author information, giving us chance to identify and remove these plagiarized files. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me, thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for noting me this. Well it looks all my photos made by my EOS 60D since March 2017 have that "tennebaums" signature. I am not sure how this has happened, maybe because my sister used camera also, but I should check it out and fix it. Thank you again for this very important information. Srđan Popović (talk) 12:36, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
The problem is now fixed on my camera. Thank you again. I it there any option to change it on already uploaded files?Srđan Popović (talk) 12:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
@Srđan Popović: Probably no, because the image has already been produced, and it would be hard to alter the EXIF information. However, for other's instance, you may declare that your image contains the signature "tennebaums" in your user page, so that others will not question the copyright status of your images.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Is it there any type of format of declaration ore I can just write a text about it?Srđan Popović (talk) 13:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

@Srđan Popović: You may write down something like "Some of my images contains EXIF signature of 'tennebaums'", regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

URLs

Hi, thanks for your contributions! Here on Commons shortened URLs like youtu.be or flic.kr or bit.ly are not allowed. Use the full URLs instead, that should work. Regards, --Achim (talk) 11:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

@Achim55: ✓ DoneThank you for your advice. The full YouTube link should be now listed.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Beheading of Leonard George Siffleet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

我回來了，但我有事請您幫忙，剛才已經寄信給你

繼上次討論之後，我回來了。但是這一次我有事相求，望你可以幫忙。我有自己的考量，不便公開討論，於是我寄一封信給你，你看完之後就會明白為何我不能公開說。--Kai3952 (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

✓ Done已答覆，供參考廣九直通車 (talk) 09:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

我想知道，你目前的能力可以幫助哪些事情？因為社群那裡有討論過，他們建議我找個中文的人，以解決溝通上問題。因此，我打算將未來遇上工作上難題，請留意「難題」二字，拿過來先找你討論，若不能獲得解決，再拿去社群討論。你意下如何？--Kai3952 (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 我主要在這裡侵權檔案，也會上傳其他圖片(大多是緊急車輛之類的)。說實話，經過例如雅婕事件，以及之前DW的那會事，有時候也覺得自己在人際和傳意上仍需努力(雖然其他人對我倒是迷之信任，覺得我可以去當Admin)。我能協助的就盡量幫你，如果你還是覺得有困難的話也可以找Roy17，有經驗，人也不錯。廣九直通車 (talk) 06:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
總而言之，你就是要我去找Roy17。既然你拒絕，我不勉強你幫我，我也不會去找他。抱歉，打擾你了。--Kai3952 (talk) 10:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Mass deletion

Hi,

Next time you need all of a users uploads deleted, please open up a mass deletion request, per Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request. This works two ways: I don't need to click delete 145 times (admins have a mass delete button) and if he indeed confirms permission, we have a better overview of the images to restore.

I do think this actually is the owner of the Flickr account. The images have been consistently shot by the same type of camera from 2012-2019, and on the same subject. Just to warn you that sometimes very similar metadata might be a reason to give some-one a DR instead of the speedy deletion procedure as well. because they don't mean to do harm but just need to verify with OTRS.

Thanks for patrolling new uploads and users though! Ciell (talk) 23:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ciell: Thank you for your advice. I thought these images are enough to use no permission to deal with them.廣九直通車 (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
I think assuming good faith would have been a better approach in this case, but don't worry to much about it. Commons like the other projects has a steep learning curve. ;) Ciell (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Licensereview

Hello. Why did you massively install the licensereview template on the files I downloaded about the Crimean bridge? As follows from the license, all content of the site rosavtodor.ru available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. What other verification is required for these files? GAndy (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

@GAndy: Hello, you actually did nothing wrong. The reason why I add Template:Licensereview in your images uploaded is because, per COM:LR, all images from exterior sources should be reviewed for their licenses. Template:Licensereview is used to notify license reviewers about these files. As long as these files are uploaded from a correct source (which are freely licensed), they should be OK, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alaska Purchase cheque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

问个问题

有什么工具可以通过用户贡献来批量添加分类？cat a lot只能从分类之间操作。谢谢。轻语者 (talk) 07:28, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

@轻语者: 我想可以用VFC的"Custom Replace"(自定义替换)分类吧。虽然我也不是很清楚这些技术事宜，但这是据我所知的。如果您还有问题，也许您可以在COM:HD以及Commons:Village pump/zh(注：较不活跃)发问，谢谢。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
非常感谢您能抽空回复。顺便问个问题：在我印象中您应该有足够的能力胜任图像审查者这一权限而不仅仅是自动巡查者。但看最近的活动似乎您对此并不太感兴趣。这是为什么呢？轻语者 (talk) 12:26, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
@轻语者: 说来也是，我想我也在OTRS打滚一段时间了，未来也会考虑申请图像审查者，感谢提问。廣九直通車 (talk) 12:32, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
雖然社群鼓勵我使用cat a lot，但是在我使用之後，發覺cat a lot有技術上限制。因為一張照片裡可能會顯示很多景物，而且每一張照片顯示也不同，各自的照片有各自的分類需求，這使我在為每一張照片添加分類時，不得不需要一個「捷徑」工具，以便我想要什麼分類就馬上可以添加，省去更換以及尋找的時間。看到你說「自定义替换」，會不會是剛好我想要的那種工具？--Kai3952}} (talk) 12:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 我真的不肯定哦，畢竟我每一次搞分類都是用Hotcat直接每張幹的。。。廣九直通車 (talk) 07:53, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dye pack.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colin Powell with anthrax model at the UN Security Council, 2003.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wreck of Seawise University.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

问个问题 2

好久不见。最近遇到了一个棘手的问题，希望您能提供下自己的看法。有人要上传一张自己的ct照片，但制作这个照片的人并不是自己。所以这种情况下这张照片是否具有版权？如果是版权拥有者是谁？如果拍摄了这张ct照那么这个举动算不算创建衍生作品？因为我的英文实在实在不好所以不太敢到COM:HD寻求帮助。希望您能提供下自己的意见。再次感谢。轻语者 (talk) 10:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@轻语者: 如无意外的话版权属那家医疗机构，另外如果是拍照的话则也算是衍生作品。廣九直通車 (talk) 10:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
谢谢，另外提醒您：中文维基上标记图片删除可以考虑使用zh:User:Xiplus/Twinkle来进行批量提报。每次看见您手动粘贴代码都好辛苦。轻语者 (talk) 11:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
谢谢，昨天也发现了Twinkle这回事了廣九直通車 (talk) 11:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)。
好的，祝编安。轻语者 (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Contest to kill 100 people using a sword.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ruins of Tajbeg Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La tache noire (The Black Stain) - Albert Bettannier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Re: File tagging File:Steyr 91 waste transportation truck 91669 near 316 Hospital, Xiangshan Rd (20080426101806).jpg

FYI: This image is taken by myself, and I uploaded it under CC-BY-SA 4.0.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 12:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

@N509FZ: Would you clarify the author "Toad128" in the author column of the file's EXIF information?廣九直通車 (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
It's one of my early Internet nicknames.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 13:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Still, I don't use real name in EXIF information. My aliases on different social media can be different, so there's no need to be bureaucratic.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 13:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done@N509FZ: FYI廣九直通車 (talk) 13:06, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. In fact I wanted to say "dogmatic"...--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 13:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Regarding all of my images uploaded under the Hong Kong District Council Member portrait collection scheme

Hi 廣九直通車,

I am 1233, and I'm just writing about all my uploads under the category: Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong Outreach.

Photos tagged with this category are uploads under current, or future events hosted by Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong.

These images already have their required license cleared from owner, and would have already emailed through OTRS (permissions-zh / permissions-zh-hant)

Regarding images uploaded also under the Hong Kong District Council Member Category:

I have confirmed, through phone because they cannot issue an official letter, and email (that is directed to an elected District Councillor) that the portraits themselves' owners are from the respective district councillors and that the District Council does not own the photos. This can be tracked through the following OTRS ticket: [Ticket#2020012110003999].

With much thanks,
William Chan from Wikimedia Community User Group Hong Kong
--1233 (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

@1233: Replied through email, due to OTRS nature.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Terminal 3 Station (Beijing).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

You've got mail

Hello, 廣九直通車. Check your email—you've got mail!
Message added 13:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template. — 1233 (talk)
@1233: Replied on the relevant ticket, please check.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Can't find it.--1233 (talk) 12:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
@1233: Of course, because I directly replied to the client. You should find the related file permission verified.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Just so if I ask whether this had successfully alleviated the problems that this outreach acivity created? (i.e. is this appropriate or not?)--1233 (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
@1233: Yes.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:19, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Racial chart of Nuremberg Laws.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sea trial of Yamato.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Wiki Love Africa

Yes I asked according to wiki love Afrika.anyway I have little understanding of it. Yamkela Radebe (talk) 15:13, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

@Yamkela Radebe: Please be advised that per COM:CUR Uruguay, Uruguayan currencies are copyrighted and unfree, and Uruguay is not an African country. Please also see COM:WLA for more information, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again for your assistance.I am confident now that I got advised. Yamkela Radebe (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

关于File:Yuhuan CG1MS 4.jpg

请问下该图片能不能以fop的形式保留。我最开始判断是这个照片主体是石碑而不是文字，且照片上文字并非清晰所以可以考虑COM:DM，但想了下之前的某个dr存档似乎也有类似的讨论，结果似乎是删除。仔细想了下也无法下定论，所以来此请求您的协助。感激不尽。 轻语者 (talk) 15:29, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

@轻语者: 我个人认为这个石碑的字只要放大观看也算清楚。不论如何，我已经开启了有关的提删於此，请查阅。廣九直通車 (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Regarding ticket:2020022310001781

Hello, I've merged another ticket to the one above as the title mentioned that ticket, please check and follow it.--Hamish (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

@Hamish: Will do.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volksgerichtshof trial of 20 July plot.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Appreciation!

Thanks for your help on photo licence issue! By the way, can you help me with another photo from the same collection taken the same time by Emile Gsell btw 1866-1868 in Cambodia. 

> Article: Mohaori (The very first photo)

I'm new to Wikipedia, I don't know how to do it! How to proof it as a public domain photos. It's quite technical. Thank in advance! Arwin11 (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome! We only accept works that are free in/in public domain of both of its origin country and the US. For other issues, you can just search COM:<The country's name> in order to retrieve a list of the country's copyright information.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:50, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Special:Diff/404678843

Yes, it is my signature for that camera.--N509FZ Talk 前置，有座！Front engine with seats! 01:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

@N509FZ: Thanks, just for verification.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:35, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

HighestBridges Photos

Hello 廣九直通車

I am Eric Sakowski the creator of HighestBridges.com. While I do have a copyright for my website so that other media outlets know to contact me for photo permission, I also enjoy posting my photos to the Wikipedia Bridge pages which you have tagged in your post.

I will continue to occasionally post some of my HighestBridges website photos to the bridge Wikipedia pages with no copyright or user issues so that others may enjoy them or freely use them for their media outlet with no restrictions. I only do this for a few images of the many thousands of bridge photos that are posted on my website www.HighestBridges.com.

I often travel to China where most of the world's highest bridges reside and also enjoy visiting Hong Kong.

Thanks,

Eric Sakowski

creator www.HighestBridges.com

HighestBridges.com@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by HighestBridges (talk • contribs) 08:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

@HighestBridges: Thanks for your information. Would you use your official email address to send us a permission statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, according to the instructions on OTRS? Alternatively, you may also state that the list of images are licensed under a specific free license (such as the CC-BY-4.0 license you have used) on your "about page". If you still have any further questions then you can ask me, thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Just want to ask are you the author of File:BeipanjiangDugeHeight565mtr.jpg? It looks like some sort of engineering diagram.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:New Volkswagen Crafters to be handed to Ukrainian National Police.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:New Volkswagen Crafters to be handed to Ukrainian National Police.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Elisfkc (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

File:New Volkswagen Crafters to be handed to Ukrainian National Police.jpg

File:New Volkswagen Crafters to be handed to Ukrainian National Police.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

阁下在File:Wu Xuanyi.jpg的编辑是OTRS邮件的沟通结果吗？

为什么不直接通过OTRS确认，上传者和微博的作品发布者可能是同一人。--舞月書生𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚 11:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

@舞月書生: 经查，可以确认Ticket:2020041210006364并不是由微博的作品发布者（兼创作者，详见原图的水印）寄送到OTRS的，反而既然能确认作品发布者有发布自由授权，那么大可以不用OTRS，直接来版权审查。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
明白了，多谢~--舞月書生𐙼Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian.𔒚 13:56, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

File:N72EX by Don Ramey Logan.jpg"

Why did you remove the cat's from this file?--Don (talk) 16:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

@WPPilot: As per COM:OVERCAT, Aircraft registered in the United States and Aircraft destroyed in accidents has already been mentioned in N72EX (aircraft). As a result, these categories are over-categorized, and I removed them, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Help

Hello dear 廣九直通車 ! Can you help me delete my problematic files?--Turkmen talk 19:13, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

@Turkmen: Are you referring to my previous comment on m:OTRS/Volunteering? No, I did not said or implied that you have problematic files, but rather, I afraid that you did not have enough experience on file copyright, as your contributions on Commons are mostly about renaming works. Trust me, OTRS permission queues are highly technical, and demands expertise on copyright (eg. public domain, freedom of panorama, de minimis, derivative work...). Please feel free to ask me about more details of OTRS permission works, and I am happy to explain some key concepts of copyright stuffs, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

files of different type/extension are not exact duplicate

Hi. It would be great if you could note the file types of those files that you are tagging as {{Duplicate}}. Where they are of different types, they are not considered exact duplicates, and therefore not eligible for speedy deletion. If you believe that they need to be deleted, then they should follow the normal DR process. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:50, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Thanks for your advice.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

How to prove the license CC BY 4.0 for you

Hallo 廣九直通車. I wasn't active here for a long time, so unfortunately i missed your message on my user talk page. I uploaded that image (URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-014-0779-x/figures/15) from the scientific article which has the DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-014-0779-x and the URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-014-0779-x. In August 2018 I was informed via email by the Permissions Assistant of SpringerNature that the article (Tsuji, Y., Satake, K., Ishibe, T. et al. Pure Appl. Geophys. (2014) 171: 3183) "is published under the CC BY 4.0"). I would like to upload the image again. But I don't know how to avoid the removal of the image. What kind of information do you miss for this case and how can I provide it for you? Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki (talk) 07:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

@Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki: Sorry for the late response. Please file an undeletion request at COM:UDR, stating the file name and give relevant evidence, such as the links you provided. An administrator should then review and restore it, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your kind and fast help! Greetings,--Anglo-Araneophilus~commonswiki (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

License review

Why did you add this to File:California_Executive_Order_N-33-20.pdf? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

@Koavf: Because it is a media file from an exterior source. So per COM:LR, {{Licensereview}} should be added to notify license reviewers, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Just as Flickr review is done by a bot, isn't this just a perfunctory task that a bot could verify by comparing hashes of two files and confirming that the other is hosted at a *.ca.gov domain? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
@Koavf: Of course you can ask on COM:BR, but it really depends on your proposal's technical difficulty.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

File:王晨作关于《全国人民代表大会关于建立健全香港特别行政区维护国家安全的法律制度和执行机制的决定（草案）》的说明.webm

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have removed the "OTRS received" template from this file. The new revision has a valid free licence at YouTube, so to avoid the timed deletion, I removed that template. Should you eventually get a valid OTRS permission, please feel free to add a new OTRS template though. De728631 (talk) 16:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

@De728631: OK, thanks.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

一个请求

有空的话请参加User_talk:Mys_721tx#有空的话请跟进下File:航拍浙江温岭槽罐车爆炸事故现场.png的讨论，现阶段除了争论外对该视频截图是否为自由版权并无结论，且不利于形成共识。所以希望您可以参与讨论，可以的话转交到COM:VP。在下因为学业原因不能继续进行跟进，所以请求您能继续帮助跟进此文件。谢谢！Catherine Laurence (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

@Catherine Laurence: 不好意思，最近没什么留意自己的讨论页。不论如何，我会抽时间看看有关的页面了，谢谢。廣九直通車 (talk) 07:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:廣九直通車/Archive_2&oldid=434614021"