User talk:Mys 721tx

Archives 1

Help with delete nominations

Hi, @Mys 721tx: I was wondering if you could help close two incorrect nominations for deletion of my photos? I took the photos myself and own the copyright, and User:Jeff G. already confirmed that I have sent the original, unedited photos to OTRS (ticket#: 2018021010008141). Thank you! :) Jennychen888 (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC) Jennychen888 (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

The second one is Commons:Deletion requests/File:SlaterRheaBiang.jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 19:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

 Done. -Mys_721tx (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Template:PD-GermanGov

Hello. This template needs to be updated according to the actual German copyright law. The law does not distinguish between federal, state or communal levels of government when it comes to "official works", but official works issued by any type of government and courts of law in Germany are in the public domain. I mentioned this both at the template talk page and at the Village Pump and did not get any objections, so I went ahead and edited most of the translations. Can you please update one or both of the Chinese versions? De728631 (talk) 21:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Sure thing! Could you clarify if "German authority" is synonymous with "German government"? -Mys_721tx (talk) 21:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, it's any type of government from a village council to the federal president. This legal article refers also to documents issued by any court of law. De728631 (talk) 21:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done on both versions. -Mys_721tx (talk) 22:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. De728631 (talk) 23:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Help with deleted photos

Hi, @Mys 721tx: I was wondering if you could help for incorrect deletion of my photos? I took the photos myself and own the copyright. Please check it out and let me know. Thanks and regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by EagleLordhua (talk • contribs) 05:31, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

@Mys 721tx: As I noted in the descriptions of the images that were incorrectly deleted, they are all from the collection of the actor herself. I plan to upload these images again; please refrain from tampering with them in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IT Guy (talk • contribs) 03:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Help with copyright on two Apple tax graphics

Hi, @Mys 721tx, I have two files that have been tagged for copyright issues and impending deletion:

• File:Apple Sales International (ASI) Notional Tax Due.png
• File:Apple Sales International Structure.png

In both cases, the files were posted on the website of a well known Irish economist (Seamus Coffey, which I tagged as the source of the files).
Mr Coffey does not attribute copyright on the files because both graphics are taken from major US-EU government reports, both of which allow reproduction.
(he also usefully confirms in the first paragraph of his blog post that he is using "publically available information")

• 2013 US Senate investigation into Apple (they produced a large report and diagrams); and
• 2016 EU Commission investigation into Apple (they also produced updated diagrams and figures from the 2013 report).

Would this solve the copyright issue regarding these two files? If so, how would I submit this back into the system to offset the impending deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Britishfinance (talk • contribs) 10:03, 28 April 2018 (UTC) thanks Britishfinance (talk) 08:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

• Those files needs to be explicitly licensed with a Creative Commons license for the current copyright tags to apply. If you can prove that those files are in the public domain, please do so. Otherwise, we cannot just assume that those files are freely available. -Mys_721tx (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

請問為何直接刪掉我所有上傳的檔案

該檔案為本公司所有，擁有使用權，也標明的創作設計師姓名，如何屬於侵權？ 且一次性的刪除全部檔案，沒有任何通知與模板、或討論，是否符合程序？ --Aris Wu (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

有關指南車給出二維曲面高斯-博內定理操作式證明的兩份圖檔來源公開出處

自己的作品 (1)https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:指南車定在北緯30度的緯圓於地球儀旋轉一圈.gif 有關影片網址見： https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpBZixOcSbk 上傳Wikimedia.Commons是把自己論文實驗紀錄影像檔轉成GIF的作品。

(2)https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:微型指南車路徑.jpg 於<<【全文】指南车在物理学中几何相位的应用_物理与工程>>https://www.xueshu.com/wlygc/2014S2/3051167.html 有此論文的全文影本(但公式殘缺)，該圖是自己論文中自製的圖1畫面(黑白)，而上傳Wikimedia.Commons是彩色原版。「鄧崇林 (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)」

请与Commons:OTRS联系。 -Mys_721tx (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Questions

我是 File:中国西北.png File:四川简图.png的作者，亲生的，请为何以莫须有的名义删了？难道是不是嫌我把人家图改了就不行，得贴上个标签才行？其他删了，很好，心底无私天地宽，走得踏实，但这两个绝对是我的，网上再也找不到，完全独一无二的。Liuxingy (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

The picture you just deleted was taken by a People's Liberation Air Force pilot in 1962. There is no existing copyright either here or in China. The photo is in the possession of the actress herself, and I am using it with her permission. There is no reason to delete the photo. IT Guy (talk) 07:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Zhu Ming (thinker)

This category is deleted several times, but someone have uploaded several images (including non-free ones) to it. Please deal with them.--GZWDer (talk) 01:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

關於廖建順畫作

File:廖建順畫作IMG 5974.JPG 等 我親自見過原作者並且可以證明原作者曾表示可以CC4.0釋出，請問要如何行動才能證明？--安可 (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Source

Has it EVER occurred to you that those files I uploaded to commons, all the source is ME ? ( unless other-wise... always leave room for holyghost, may peace and force be with you) --Allthingsgo (talk) 14:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)Allthingsgo

No. Your past behaviors indicated that they are highly likely not yours. -Mys_721tx (talk) 14:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Block

Hi, Thanks for blocking MRRaja001, but you need to add a message to their talk page. I did it this time. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:L Devine profile pic 2018 (1).jpg

We have received an OTRS ticket 2018100210007286 for this image, so please undelete it for me. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 22:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done and marked with {{PermissionOTRS}}. -Mys_721tx (talk) 06:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

有關File:LAM HAK LAM.jpg

User:Lamhaklam應該是林克霖本人，在他上傳的youtube影片可以看到他的GMAIL有收到User:Lamhaklam的通知[1]。而File:LAM HAK LAM.jpg是他另一youtube頻道曾經使用[2]，所以應該沒有版權問題。--1.64.90.88 11:50, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Dec 2018

Hello! 不好意思，又要麻煩你了，請你幫忙。先謝謝了！

1. review File:Tinha taiping.png.--Roy17 (talk) 06:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Please help reviewed the picture.

I have sent an email to permissions-zh-hant@wikimedia.org and permissions-commons@wikimedia.org granting permission for the use of this file. I represent the copyright holder and creator.

• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (9).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (2).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (3).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (4).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (5).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (6).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (7).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA (8).png
• File:BLACKPINK ARENA TOUR 2018 SPECIAL FINAL IN KYOCERA DOME OSAKA.png

Please help reviewed the picture. Appreciate your help. AM4721AM (talk) 13:32, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

王信龍照

王信龍照，是我於陸官校史館"拍照"取得，此照在陸總部網站也有公開，請撤除疑舉。 Chinuan12623 (talk) 06:53, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

也就是说该文件不是阁下所摄。-Mys_721tx (talk) 07:32, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

馬華作家照片

圖像標籤 File:Seow Yeoh Thian.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Ho Sok Fong2.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Teoh Kian Hoon.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Wan Kok Seng.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Woon Siew Tin.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Yiu Hong 001.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Ng Kim Chew 004.jpg 圖像標籤 File:Jin zhimang 001.jpg

以上來自作者、家屬，請問應該在哪個頁面標識作者提供？要輸入甚麽code？謝謝。Kuangren2 (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear Mys 721tx,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

意见

阿云嘎那张照片不存在版权问题。--Masdggg (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

• https://m.weibo.cn/6992577157/4342168875111763

https://i.loli.net/2019/04/18/5cb7fbf528290.jpg https://i.loli.net/2019/04/18/5cb7fbd08cb5d.jpg

请与Commons:OTRS联系。-Mys_721tx (talk) 04:32, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

User:Badvogato

Please see [3],a new sock of User:Allthingsgo.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:42, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Help with delete nominations

Hi, @Mys 721tx: for all the cosplay photos of myself that I have uploaded I own the full copyright, as granted by the DPS Photography Studio which I have emailed the screenshot to permission-commons@wikipedia.org as evidence (Ticket#2019073110005317). I have also emailed the release license to the Wikimedia OTRS as the copyright holder (Ticket#2019073110005746). Could you please withdraw the nomination to delete my photos?

No, COM:SPAMing is not within the project scope. -Mys_721tx (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Category shortcut

I am not able to explain just yet why the bot changed Category:CD. The redirect had been the same for 11 years, and the bot had been running for quite a while without touching this page. I'll have to investigate further, when I have some time. --R'n'B (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

188.78.133.251

又来了。我觉得可以段封或者用过滤器（参考中文维基）。 --WhitePhosphorus (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Content

Greetings @Mys 721tx: , We were wondering if you could help with incorrect deletion of our photos? We created all the logos/flyers for our programs and annual festival since 2014 and we own the copyright. Thanks and best regards

File:BRF 2014 Lineup.jpg

--Culcha Society (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Please see Commons:OTRS for donating materials. -Mys_721tx (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

File:浙江温岭槽罐车爆炸事故现场蘑菇云.jpg

不是有作者吗？没见过own work要来源的。--Rowingbohe♬(Talk/Work) 03:39, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

低分辨率、无元数据无法证明{{Own}}。-Mys_721tx (talk) 08:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

有空的话请跟进下File:航拍浙江温岭槽罐车爆炸事故现场.png

窃以为应该按照版权不明看待。其一是[4]中出现版权所有的字样，和视频信息上的cc-by-sa不符。另外，中新的官网[5]和[6]都没有提到其youtube上的频道，脸书和推特也没有，且其油管频道不像脸书那样有官方认证，并不能推断这个频道是官方所有的。综上所述，希望您可以审阅下该文件，因为目前在级联保护中在下并不能提删，故向您求助。祝编安。Catherine Laurence (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

CC-By-SA是非独占性的。宣称版权所有是CC授权的基础。YouTube认证有最低订阅数量限制，因此官方频道也不一定获得认证。建议在Commons: Village pump发起讨论。-Mys_721tx (talk) 17:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

中国网信办已经确定中国新闻网有YouTube账号[7]，中国新闻网的YouTube账号也在简介中表明是唯一官方账号。因此，中国新闻网的YouTube账号是真号。--DavidHuai1999 (talk) 06:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

顺便提一下，中国新闻网的YouTube账号还发起过新闻直播。如果是假号的话，它是做不到这点的。--DavidHuai1999 (talk) 06:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

个人认为应该有关Youtube账号也是官方号。根据Youtube的标注，其账号被标为由中國政府全額或部份出資的媒體。大概Youtube没做好调查也不会帮一个冒充官媒的账户标记吧？廣九直通車 (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

上面链接似乎跳转有问题，放个截图[8]。因为出现“版权所有，未经许可禁止转载”这个明显和cc协议相排斥的条文所以我觉得这个文件很有问题。另外@DavidHuai1999: 您所给的链接除了证明中新在ytb上的确有账号以外并不能证明该账号的确为中新所有，我极少用ytb所以不知道直播回顾在哪可以看见，不知您是否能提供一个链接？Catherine Laurence (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@Catherine Laurence: 譬如这两个视频[9][10]。顺便提一下，中国新闻网的直播（回放）视频没有给出自由版权协议。中国新闻网官方YouTube频道除了直播视频之外，其余的基本上都有给出自由版权协议。所以说，在版权方面，中国新闻网并不是中国版的美国之音。--DavidHuai1999 (talk) 00:56, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

同意以COM:PCP做出预防性删除。既然有疑似矛盾的版权声明，加上有关全权拥有声明实在片段内出现，搞不好有关片段是来自其他新闻社的内容。廣九直通車 (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Problem about the nomination of your picture

Hi Mys 721tx ! I nominate [11] for quality image label, but there is a problem, @D-Kuru: tolds : "I would promote them. The only thing that is maybe a detail, but for me an important one. The file itself is licenced under CC-BY-SA-3.0. However the EXIF metadata says "Copyright holder: All Rights Reserved". It is freely licence, and Commons is all about files under free licences. So this kinda bothers me. Other than that, QI for sure, maybe even FP worth". Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:15, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

The nomination can be found here: Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#July_16,_2020 --D-Kuru (talk) 17:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

@Sebring12Hrs and D-Kuru: I have left my comments on the nomination page. I hope it addresses your concerns. -Mys_721tx (talk) 19:17, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USS Wisconsin, bow view, Sept 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction, think about the verticals --Michielverbeek 17:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Prespective has been corrected. --Mys 721tx 19:12, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Good quality now --Michielverbeek 05:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! USS Wisconsin, port bow view, Sept 2019 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support. QI. Dmitry Ivanov 19:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC).

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Mys 721tx

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Mys 721tx,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

t981130

你可否幫忙檢查t981130電郵？他說他有寄到permissions-commons@wikimedia.org--Kai3952 (talk) 14:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

无法确认版权所有者。-Mys_721tx (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

原因？--Kai3952 (talk) 14:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

无元数据、分辨率有限、无法确认原站点发表人身份。-Mys_721tx (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

不明白。因為他說他有按照我的指示去寫這一封授權信。我告訴他，授權信是要寫出：作者署名、照片網址、宣稱同意使用cc-4.0授權。可能他寫錯了，我再請他重新寄一封授權信。至於分辨率有限，我不明白，是不是照片太模糊？如果是，我再找他詢問，問他是不是已經將網站上照片移除了。--Kai3952 (talk) 15:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

需要的信息已经在回复中告知。请不要重复发送。-Mys_721tx (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

當我看到你這回應，如果你不是謊稱「无元数据、分辨率有限、无法确认原站点发表人身份」，不然就是刁難（不讓人上傳），否則你就不會說「需要的信息已经在回复中告知」此話，甚至還要求我不要重覆發送，所以你意圖是很明顯。是不是我過去有哪裡對不起你，所以你才會戲耍我，你不想幫助別人可以不用理會我；總之，你要我不要重覆發送，我會將你的情況轉向別人求助，我不相信每一位 OTRS 志願者不會幫助我。--Kai3952 (talk) 02:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

 Question根据有关的谷歌和TinEye图片搜寻结果（见[12]，[13]，[14]和[15]），均没有发现有关的图片曾经在有关网址链接以外的地方发布过。这是否足以认定有关图片应是作者本人原创的？廣九直通車 (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

现有信息不足以认定该网站与OTRS客户关系，因此未曾在有关网站外发布与此人是作者与否无关。在User:Kai3952playing the victim倒打一耙时尤其需要质疑其动机。-Mys_721tx (talk) 05:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@廣九直通車: 是不是？我就說吧，他不像你說那樣會幫助人。因為你看看他說「User:Kai3952playing the victim倒打一耙时尤其需要质疑其动机」，他這話是什麼態度，所以我認為你不要再找他了，他肯定不會允許，我將來也不會再找他幫忙。--Kai3952 (talk) 09:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mys 721tx: 沒有規定必須要證明该网站与OTRS客户关系，作者只需要給出他照片的來源就可以。如果這一點共識做不到，反而給別人立下新規定，這才是需要質疑其動機。--Kai3952 (talk) 09:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Dome, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Aug 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Fangwei and File:Sound_of_Hope_Logo_3.png

I have just come across this on COM:UNDR. As I have noted there, it is a US company, so only US law applies. There is no US copyright for very short text in either Latin or Chinese characters, so the logo is PD.

Before I saw the logo, I thought that your one month block for uploading the image more than once was too long. I also have to wonder whether your block was instigated by his posting the UnDR half an hour earlier? Since the image is almost certainly PD, perhaps you will consider unblocking. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

This user has claimed said photos to be {{Own}} instead of PD. They were blocked on the basis that they repeatedly uploaded an image they do not own. While not part of the decision, the UNDR request did confirm that this user in particular does not own the image. The COI is a problem elsewhere. Mys_721tx (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Oh, come on. He probably works for the company and may well be the actual creator of the logo. In any event, even if it was an egregious case -- uploading an image off the web that the user had absolutely no right to, for the first offense, I give them {{Dontrecreate}} on their talk page. On the second offense, I might block for three days -- maybe a week if the attitude is bad, but never a month. Please remember that blocks are intended to prevent users wasting our time by repeated actions, They are not punishment. Perhaps you should reread Commons:Blocking policy. You will note that it requires explicit warnings before any block is imposed. In this case and in the case of Guest278 you blocked with the reason "Uploading unfree files after warnings". I see no warnings on either talk page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

I disagree there are no warnings. {{Speedywhat}} in itself is a warning, which has the explanation of Commons policy and the definition of acceptable free file. It has the same wording as {{Stop copyvio}}. I admit that an {{End copyvio}} would be more ideal. Mys_721tx (talk) 22:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

File:SeekPng.com life-is-strange-logo 8734069.png

Not sure who tagged the file for deletion, but the file was {{PD-textlogo}}. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:11, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Undeleted. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

有關File:嘉義天后宮.jpg圖片問題

File:嘉義天后宮.jpg 這張圖片是我於2020年12月26日去廟裡拜拜時自己拍攝的，所以這張圖片的作者就是我本人，為何還會被刪除，那麼我要如何處理才能保留我上傳的圖片？那個「刪除請求子頁面」裡面全是英文，看不懂。請求協助。Ketsu1213 (talk) 02:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

有關建立分類的問題

我想建立Category:子图网，請問要加在哪一分類底下？--Lucienne (talk) 19:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

未有明确CC-BY-SA授权时请不要上传该网站内容。 Mys_721tx (talk) 19:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

感謝回復，請見子圖網，有寫到所有图片均为子图网原创，且已经申请版权保护，免去您对图片使用的版权顾虑，所以這樣不行？--Lucienne (talk) 19:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

圖片的個別頁面也有寫到：

授权：使用时注明：
图片来源 | 子图网
即可免费应用于微博、微信、网页、电商、自媒体平台、印刷品、广告等

--Lucienne (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

CC-BY-SA还有产生衍生作品的授权。该声明不包括此内容，因此不能确保是与CC-BY-ND类似。 Mys_721tx (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

好，請刪除 Lucienne (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

提請刪除

不知道怎麼掛刪除模板，想麻煩您刪除User:ChhTJ096，謝謝您--Lucienne (talk) 20:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

 Done。-Mys_721tx (talk) 22:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

關於有水印的圖片

能否上傳？應注意什麼？ Lucienne (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

见Commons:Watermarks，不应上传严重影响图片内容的水印及宣传性水印。 Mys_721tx (talk) 20:32, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

感謝回復。 Lucienne (talk) 06:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

COM:FOP Taiwan

Liyuanx2上傳這張
「群星瑞智大門Logo」

目前COM:FOP Taiwan是限制室內不可以，但是User:Reke不允許我將照片提報刪除，我在中文維基因此（我缺乏合作）就遭到帳號封鎖，所以我對COM:FOP Taiwan規定感到相當困惑。

據我的理解，COM:FOP Taiwan應該是指拍攝者在室內對別人的藝術創作品拍照是不可以上傳到commons，有問題的是，User:Reke對於我判斷「什麼樣物體才算是藝術創作品」與「拍攝者對藝術創作品拍照能否上傳」是認為我欠缺此能力，意思是他說我胡亂提報刪除，因此我想請你判斷看看。

比如說，在公司大樓裡面的某一層樓，拍攝者站在走廊上，並且對別人的公司門口拍照，但是公司門口有很大的Logo，對於此情況，我自己曾經試過這麼做，結果是遭到對方（公司職員與主管）制止，我不太明白，像我這樣算不算是違反COM:FOP Taiwan規定「室內不可以」？我還沒有上傳，所以我拿別人照片給你看，請看右邊由Liyuanx2上傳的這張。--Kai3952 (talk) 12:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

质疑：关于先前上传的照片、录音、影像

这些内容都是含有来源与描述的，且都是符合要求的内容（不符合的会有机器人来提醒我）。也有一部分内容现在被应用于维基百科的条目中。请问阁下有什么理由提删这些内容？

申诉文件罗列如下：

• File:Students Against Administrators of Xidian University.ogg
• File:Mailbird Normal Logo.svg
• File:Construction Plan for Zijinshandong station.png
• File:Layout For Zijinshandong Station 2.png
• File:Layout For Zijinshandong Station 1.png
• File:Layout For Zijinshandong Station 3.png

我会对阁下的擅自提删行为进行举报。--A Chinese user (talk) 07:27, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

上传显然不是自己作品获授权的图片。 Mys_721tx (talk) 07:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

@Mys 721tx: 首先，第一个OGG文件是已经征得视频所有人同意的。其次，第二张图是用于Mailbird条目的清晰标志图，其在官网上供与下载。再者，后四者在2010年的《中国建筑有限公司紫金山东站地铁保护方案公示》文件中提出，而这一文件已经超出了产权保护期限，且该站现在已经废弃，网上对这一文件也有公示，为什么不能拿来用？--A Chinese user (talk) 07:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

皆无授权证据，亦不是公有领域内容。 Mys_721tx (talk) 07:37, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

@Mys 721tx: 授权证据是否需要出示与阁下？第两者姑且先不讨论，后四者的公示文件是否仍不属于“公有领域”？最前者来自Bilibili，是否仍不属于“公有领域”？ A Chinese user (talk) 07:44, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

公有领域是版权法概念，以上文件皆不属于公有领域。 Mys_721tx (talk) 07:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

References

請求調整傀儡分類

您好，近日留意到中文維基破壞者WP:110.29也在Commons這邊破壞，而且有人將部分傀儡整理成為Category:Sockpuppets of 陳妍安，希望您可以幫忙下面幾點：

1. 把Category:Sockpuppets of 陳妍安命名改為Category:Sockpuppets of 蘇俞安以資辨認、統一，只要跟中文維基上110.29用過的名字比對一下我想是可以一望而知
2. 把User talk:朱蓉蒂林眉雀陳珠卿詹金麗鍾美靖、User talk:陳彥霖張慧如、User talk:劉定緯、User talk:江月嬌 and User talk:吳漢文、User talk:十法界藏身阿彌陀佛、User talk:十方佛這些傀儡帳號收入該分類中。從這些帳號的討論業可以觀察到，這些帳號都經常上傳"法界"、"輪迴"、"華嚴"、"楞嚴"、"新臺幣"或佛教相關圖片，然後就到中文維基去搞破壞，我想這也是可以一望而知的，謝謝辛苦。--迴廊彼端 (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

All files by User:黃紀翔

我想請你看他的上傳日誌。我曾經編輯過好幾次他的照片，但是我沒有特別注意，直到現在。比如說File:鹿港.jpg，網路上有相同的照片，而且是Yahoo奇摩才會使用「s.yimg.com」網址。除了File:台糖南員林車站-歷史建築.jpg有顯示完整EXIF，可以知道他是用samsung SM-J610G拍照，其餘的照片是沒有，而且有些照片的畫質有詭異，比如說File:步道1.png，這與File:步道2.png、File:步道3.png是在同一個地點，可是天空的顏色是偏向灰暗，鏡頭高度也高過於一個人正常的身高，即使他是站在車上拍照，那麼他為何刻意將EXIF移除，甚至將照片修改成小比例的縮圖，這個動作使人納悶：照片是不是他自己拍的。然而，這些只是懷疑，因此請你幫忙檢查他全部的照片。由於你是管理員，如果他確實有侵犯版權，你有權限刪除他的照片。謝謝--Kai3952 (talk) 13:18, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

@Mys 721tx: 在嗎？--Kai3952 (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

照片的版權問題是屬於站務，並不是出自於我個人的私事或其他與commons無關之事，況且你看得懂中文，應當可以收到這則訊息，可是你每日上線，仍然沒理會，這還是我第一次遇到不想處理站務的管理員。我可以不去找你，但是經過這一次之後，我希望未來不會發生，因為這對任何人來說都不是好事。--Kai3952 (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Sound Logo

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

任白慈善基金草稿被惡意刪除！

這個條目在草稿階段，可以有六個月月時間編寫，在未審核前突然被刪除，而且沒有理由， 請問維基是用什麼準則去操作喜歡就刪除 不喜歡有刪除 連草稿都可以刪除 究竟是針對作者？還是針對寫作的條目？ 明明已經在討論版面詳細討論過，同意用草稿形式繼續。都可以突然間被封鎖！請問維基要作者寫什麼題目，才合你們的心意？不如全部列舉出來！並且將你們收藏的黑名單也列寫出给作者知道！以免浪費時間！ 2A02:C7C:5058:3900:B47D:D4CF:90CB:1C90 10:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

慈善基金的編寫內容是參考過其他相同類型的條目去開始，但一開始已經遭受百般阻撓， 用很多理由希望這個條目編寫立即停止。好了，討論了大段時間，終於可用草稿形式進行。然後經過幾小時，又突然永久封鎖！這是什麼道理？維基本身的開放性，公平性，包容性去了哪裏？ 如此說， 除了提供不可編寫的黑名單之外，請為不同類型的條目，製作一個範式讓作者做填充題， 不要再讓作者們浪費時間去思考格式，擺放內容。 2A02:C7C:5058:3900:B47D:D4CF:90CB:1C90 10:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

就這個事件，我建議維基百科設立一個機制，凡你們不喜歡的題目，不懂說話的作者，一併刪除，不需討論不需理由， 現在我還可以見到草稿真奇怪！ 如果一早打算強行刪除人家的條目！就不要浪費時間討論！五秒內刪除所有東西就可以了！ 無謂矯友做作扮開放 ！ 2A02:C7C:5058:3900:B47D:D4CF:90CB:1C90 11:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

申請巡查及回退權限

依據巡查方針及回退方針向您申請相關權限，希望可以隨手處理一點站務工作，並增加反破壞量能；當然，最好還是能備而不用。—— Eric Liu_（Talk） 04:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for rights这里报一下。 Mys_721tx (talk) 03:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

按方針規定看起來似乎是可以直接由管理員授予。您是希望我在那邊也提個備案嗎？—— Eric Liu_（Talk） 09:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)