User talk:Tintazul

Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on the commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a Copyright tag - images without a appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate Categories, so it can be found by others.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more Information, have a look at Commons:Licensing, Commons:criteria for inclusion and the Community Portal. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you. -- Joolz 22:03, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Category:Ocean view

Done. Thanks for the info. -- Chris 73 10:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Foto PT

Olá Júlio. Descobri por acaso a tua magnífica galeria, procurei na PT e não achei nenhuma foto das tuas a ilustrar artigos [1] e esta (por exemplo) bem precisa. Algum motivo especial para não as colocares lá (peço desculpa se me estou a meter onde não sou chamado). abraço. Paulo Juntas 00:39, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:Armillaria mellea Linden.jpg and other

Please add photos to species page/category like Armillaria mellea not in family category. --EugeneZelenko 04:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Should I use the Family category, or is it were better to use the Genus subcategory whenever present? What if there's no Genus subcategory? For instance, I have a pic of a fungus, Schyzophyllum commune, family Schizophyllaceae. There is no Schyzophyllum genus page - should I create one? I see no uniform criterion, so I would like some guidance. Do I have to check whether there's a genus category, and if not, create one? Or upload to the family category? I have hundreds of pictures to upload, in plants alone. So you see, your answer is very important. - Tintazul 09:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

I think you should use species (Schyzophyllum commune) page or category. If page does exist already, please use this page. If page don't exist, create category. This page/category should be included in Genus (if exist) of Family (create new if necessary) category.

I think good idea to communicate with other active participant in this area: BotBln, Franz Xaver. Please look also on existing categories/pages structure for example in Category:Plantae. --EugeneZelenko 14:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko 14:19, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

Minaret of Jam

en:Image:Minaret-of-Jam.jpg perhaps even if it's very small. // Liftarn

Image:Halimium commutatum.jpg

Hello Tintazul! Your request for speedy deletion is not in accordance with deletion guidelines. If you think this photo should be deleted, you should have placed it in Commons:Deletion requests, so that the request can be discussed. Are you sure, that this is Chenopodium ambrosioides? If this really is Ch. ambrosioides, I think it should not be deleted, but eventually re-uploaded with the correct name. However, I suppose, that you do not know Ch. ambrosioides very well, als both of your photos Image:Chenopodium ambrosioides plant.jpg and Image:Chenopodium ambrosioides flowers.jpg show some Amaranthus, probably Amaranthus retroflexus. Also here, my tentative determination needs to be confirmed and eventually both photos be re-uploaded with the correct name. I will remove your deletion request, as it is not in accordance with the guidelines. Best regards --Franz Xaver 23:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I see, that in September you put a question on my talk page concerning categorisation. I am sorry for not responding. Your message came in a time, when I was inactive in Commons for many weeks. Regards --Franz Xaver 23:43, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Hippophae rhamnoides berries.jpg

Hello again! Your photo is Pyracantha coccinea --Franz Xaver 00:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Melilotus

Hello Tintazul! You found something that's better: Image:Melilotus officinalis flowers.jpg is not Melilotus officinalis, which is wide-spread all over Europe. It is Melilotus segetalis, a species first described 1804 by Brotero in his "Flora Lusitanica" as Trifolium segetale. He wrote in Latin: "Colitur circa Olisiponem, et alibi in Extremadura". So you took the photo not far from the locus typicus. Melilotus segetalis can be found in the western part of the Mediterranean region. Regards --Franz Xaver 19:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Category:Cistus

As Category:Cistaceae does not have so many entries, it is not necessary to have a subcategory for Cistus. Please, keep material compact and simple. If you want to link to commons, you can link to Cistus. No category needed. Regards --Franz Xaver 19:18, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

All right, I will stop creating categories for plant genuses. -- Tintazul 07:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lotus pedunculatus flowers.jpg

Hello! This plant is Coronilla valentina subsp. glauca, a nice western Mediterranean (sub)shrub. Regards --Franz Xaver 19:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Solea solea.jpg

Hi Tintazul, When uploading pictures, could you please check the warnings on overwriting existing images? Image:Solea solea.jpg was already there so you overwrote my photograph. You should consider a different name for your own picture. I reverted, so you should re-upload. Thanks. Lycaon 10:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Mapa Canarias Lanzarote.svg

Hola, la imagen muestra la isla de Fuerteventura, no la de Lanzarote. Saludos. --Edub 18:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:WomanFactory1940s.jpg

A moça já tá na resolução máxima, como merece. – Tintazul ^talk 10:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Valeu, Tintaazul. Eu tentei fazer aqui mais a imagem ficava embaçada depois do resize. A sua ficou boa. --Abu badali 22:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Cara, ta' acontecendo algum problema com a imagem que ela nao ta' aparecendo nas páginas. Talvez por que esteja grande demais. Você tem esse problema? --Abu badali 23:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Inspiração

De nada! Na verdade também eu peguei inspiração noutra galeria que vi algures, já nem sei onde... Vi que tens várias fotos de plantas e afins. Eu tenho uma recolha fotográfica de muitas espécias do Parque Natural do Sudoeste Alentejano e Costa Vicentina que ainda não carreguei. O problema é que eu não sei o nome de algumas plantas (quanto mais a espécie...). Será que depois me podias ajudar a legendar algumas? Eu aviso quando tiverem prontas! Gracias de antemão. Lusitana 08:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

FlickrLickr

I've created an account for you, but the Commons e-mail system doesn't seem to be working - it doesn't send me the e-mail autoconfirm mail. I'll be at Wikimania the next few days but I'll try again ofter I get back.--Eloquence 21:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Igrejas

Oi! Fizeste bem, porque a cat já rebentava pelas costuras... Lusitana 12:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Rivers of/in the US

Hello,

I appreciated your message. I didn't write to you because the Commons policy is unclear : this document is imcomplete and concerns mainly people classification.

So, I applied this policy (principle: of=natural, in=man-made).

See:

• Category:Columbia River and w:Columbia River.
• Several Commons categories withof

Currently, I am working on this scheme. There will be a debate about it, regarding notably category names. --Juiced lemon 23:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Chlorissa pulmentaria

bonjour

pas de traces de Chlorissa pulmentaria sur http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=297099 par contre une espèce Phaiogramma etruscaria (Zeller, 1849) a pour syn pulmentaria. Selon toi serait il possible que Chlorissa pulmentaria = Phaiogramma etruscaria. Merci Jeffdelonge 10:48, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Gothic letters

I appreciate the effort to vectorize the Gothic letters, but I am afraid they do not look exactly right, compare for example to -- did you not use an algorithm to generate them? It is important that they look as closely as the in the png version as possible, because the Codex Argenteus was written extremely uniformly and there is very little room for variation. regards, Dbachmann 17:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:G yogh.svg

To my eyes, this is quite clearly not a Yogh but rather an Ezh? --Janneman 22:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Wrong map

Hello, please fix Image:Lanzarote municipio Haría.svg and Image:Lanzarote municipio Teguise.svg: Archipiélago Chinijo belongs to the municipality of Teguise. Regards Edub 17:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

See Teguise's official site: http://www.teguise.com/index-in.html Edub 17:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Muchas gracias. Saludos. Edub 17:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

No sé ..

Ciao, te escribo para pedirte una ayuda de botanica: Sabes decirme el nombre cientifico de esta planta? No es arundo por seguro, pero no sé mas. Aquì en Cerdena la llaman "Canna masca" gracias

--Brabudu 18:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Vectorised versions of raster images

I commend your effort to replace raster images with vector versions where it is more appropriate. The bad news is that there's a problem with some of the images that you've created. The good news is that it's easy to fix.

I noticed that at least some of the images you have put up on Commons:Deletion requests as having been superseded provide a different licence (such as GFDL) to the one you have chosen (CC-by-SA). If you create a derivative work of a GFDL-licensed work, your work must also be GFDL-licensed, so you must change the licence on all such images to comply with the originals.

—LX (talk, contribs) 16:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your tip on licensing, LX! I shall now dual-license all images I've created which derive from another person's work with that person's original license, plus my license of choice (CC-BY-SA-2.5.) – Tintazul ^talk 17:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, you can't do that either, unless the original work is also dual-licensed. A work derived from a work licensed only under the terms of the GFDL must itself be licensed only under the terms of GFDL. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

This debate prompted me to actually read the GNU FDL. Apparently under 4.E I can license my modifications under a different license; thus to the extent that my SVG traced from the JPEG is different from the JPEG, I could license those differences under CC something, while keeping solely the GFDL for the common part between the JPG and the SVG (?); I shall not make matters more complicated, and I shall license my derivative works of GFDL works as GFDL, and will list the original author(s) as author(s) of the final work.

The GFDL seems ill-fitted for anything which isn't text, like SVG; after all, to my little knowledge of SVG I cannot for instance add a "History" section to the document as per 4.I. But hey - it's all right! Thanks for your corrections – Tintazul ^talk 22:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not at all a fan of the GFDL myself, but I have read it thoroughly whilst writing a translation of it. Section 4 E simply says that you add "Copyright © Your Name" next to "Copyright © Original Author" to indicate that a violation of the licensing terms would violate the copyrights of all authors. It doesn't mean you can add other licensing conditions, as explained by the opening paragraph of Section 4. One of the main purposes of the GFDL is to keep derivatives free, and if one were free to license derivatives (or the modifications within derivatives) under a CC licence, then one could also apply a more restrictive licence. The "History" section is maintained automatically by the MediaWiki software (and if it weren't, you could still add it as XML comments, I guess). —LX (talk, contribs) 03:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh, all right, so it's a copyright notice, not a separate copyright on my own improvements. The latter would prove extremely complicated, particularly distinguishing my own improvements from the original GFDL stuff. It would also bring about much weaseling; I think some shrewd people wanting to make a profit have tried picking something in the public domain, adding something trivial to it, and claiming copyright to the whole thing. And succeeded. I don't want to drop any names (even because it's the practice that's evil, not the companies by themselves), but I'm glad the GFDL prevents against such manoeuvers.

I've listened to one of your tracks, The End of the Millennium, and while it's not exactly my cup of tea, I enjoy the fact that you're in musical creation. Keep it up! Since you're Swedish, you might know Koop; they're not exactly my style either, but I know Waltz for Koop and like most of the songs there. – Tintazul ^talk 23:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I hadn't heard of them, but I'll have to check them out. —LX (talk, contribs) 04:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ipomoea purpurea wall.jpg

This image has the wrong ID. It represents Ipomoea indica. I will upload a copy under the correct name. 62.88.128.21 11:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Spotting copyvios on flickr

There are a number of things I look for when deciding this:

• Resolution, in this case it is only 300px x 300px - consistent with being taken off a news site
• Lack of EXIF metadata.
• Watermarks / borders (in this case a thin black border)
• Quality - the image has clearly been taken with a professional camera with a long lens, and from the angle someone at pitchside.
• The presence of other "stolen" images on a flickr users profile.

as a result I would say I'm about 99% sure this image isn't freely licensed, although if you can provide evidence to the contrary I would love to be proved wrong. Thanks, ed g2s • talk 16:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

P.S. The URI is http://flickr.com/photos/10528089@N00/12275315. ed g2s • talk 16:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I'd usually put the last point down as my deletion summary (persistent copyvio user). Images which are deemed to be "obvious" copyvios are subject to "speedy deletion" without discussion. I am aware we get images which tick some of the above boxes but are actually free, so I try to be as sure as possible before speedy deleting. ed g2s • talk 00:58, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

PPS if you are using flicklickr be aware that there are a significant number of these copyvios on flickr, so be as suspicious as is reasonably possible when getting images from there as ones that slip through onto here often go unnoticed for a long time. ed g2s • talk 01:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

== @1-naftolftaleina struttura.PNG ==:

No problem. Thanks for the warning. --Paginazero 15:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

COM:DEL

Please see deletion requests, you are needed to comment. Lcarsdata 20:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chicago Video art face fountain 1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Chicago Video art face fountain 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and suggestion for DST begin image

Thanks for contributing Image:DST begin.svg; I very much like having SVG rather than PNG for stuff like this. If I could make one suggestion, it would be to solve a problem I also noticed with Image:Begin_CEST.png, namely, that the red arrow is a bit small and hard to see. Perhaps it could be replaced with a red region, something like [2]? Or perhaps a bigger arrow, as in [3]?

Anyway, the existing image is fine, so these suggestions are mere quibbles. Thanks again. Eubulides 23:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

RFA

Hey Tintazul,

Regarding your RFA. I am sorry it didn't work out this time. In my view it was a situation that was not really about you as a candidate. sometimes it just turns out that way...although we try to avoid politics like any "election" an RFA has the potential to be spun off-course by an unexpected element. if you decide to run in the future, I feel quite positive it would be successful.

FWIW: re "benefit of the doubt" - I don't think there is any doubt about trusting you to use the tools correctly, which is what is usually referred to with this phrase. In my opinion, Commons needs admins who will be active members of the community (especially in that role as admin, but not necessarily only). There are plenty of trustworthy people from other Wikimedia projects, but I don't feel it is helpful or healthy for the Commons community to give them all adminship. Having a list of 800 admins would not be great if 700 of them only visit twice a year.

Anyway... I hope this experience has not made you too "sour", if you know what I mean; your final words were very sporting and I really respect such a mature response.

all the best -- pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Being an admin would spoil the fun a lot! --This is extremely true! We used to joke that we should never let our star photographers run for adminship, lest they stop uploading their own work. :) Having fun is definitely what it should all be about, though. cheers --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 23:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:MAN 18-310 Rodoviária do Tejo.jpg

Hello

thanks for your uploads

Unfortunetaly, when you uploaded pic in reference, you forgot license and by this way this one runs risk of deletion. Could you tag it with a valid license as your other pics.

friendly Oxam Hartog 21:01, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Osmunda regalis fronds.jpg

Hi, I could identify this fern: It is Dryopteris affinis. Cheers --Franz Xaver 10:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I just deleted the bad one - now Image:Dryopteris_affinis_fronds.jpg. Cheers --Franz Xaver 14:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

regarding Category:Cedar_Point,_taken_by_Lar

Hi... I see you tweaked this: [4] to put the cat for CP back in, but I took it out due to VP feedback. Has somehting changed in that? Thanks! ++Lar: t/c 19:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:EU accession map.svg

Hi, could you corect this image, as requested on it's description page? User:Mieciu K from pl wikipedia. 62.179.33.77 11:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Conseil union.jpg

Checked the Council's website. Nothing about the non-commercial restrictions. I changed the licensing tag to {{attribution}}. Thanks & cheers, Popo le Chien 19:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Europe_ISO_3166-1.svg

For this issue see dicussion / notes on Image_talk:Europe_ISO_3166-1.svg. --141.30.207.240 09:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rechtsgutachten_betr_Apostasie_im_Islam.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Rechtsgutachten_betr_Apostasie_im_Islam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Madmax32 22:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vredefort Dome STS51I-33-56AA.jpg

Good day,

Do you know where north is in this image? This question was asked in the respctiv article in the

Deutsch: WP --Bahnmoeller 10:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Europe_biogeography_countries.svg

Why Turkey is indicated in full, while Russia, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Denmark and France are not?--79.120.29.123 18:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Bloemfontein nagtelike stadshorison.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bloemfontein nagtelike stadshorison.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. I'm adding this here purely as a formality - I know you got the image from the Afrikaans Wikipedia, but no source is indicated there either. No hard feelings! Anrie 09:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

That was very zealous of you... but I had probably indicated on the image's description page that I had uploaded the picture from the Afrikaans Wikipedia... see here. So, no need to delete it, and please undelete the image. Thank you. – Tintazul ^talk 11:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cayley's formula 2-4.svg

Hello, I have uploaded (overwritten) a new version of this image, that you drew after another image. I have put the reason at the original creator's talk page, en:User_talk:Rocchini#Image:Cayley.27s_formula_2-4.svg. S Sepp 18:07, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Limonium angustifolium

Hello I come from Japan Wikipedia. English can be used only a little.

Maybe, Image:Limonium angustifolium.jpg is not Limonium. Limonium's flowers are 5 calyx and corolla. But, its are many calyx. So, please confirm it. w:Limonium is explains kindly. Bye.--221.190.67.181 05:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

An image you uploaded

Image deletion warning

An image you uploaded has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

TheDJ 19:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

It was one of the images listed [this discussion]. TheDJ 22:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ukrainian pavillion façade Expo 2005.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Ukrainian pavillion façade Expo 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Teofilo (talk) 22:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chinese pavillion façade Expo 2005.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Chinese pavillion façade Expo 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Teofilo (talk) 23:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Korean pavillion façade Expo 2005.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Korean pavillion façade Expo 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Teofilo (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Microchip Dragon.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Microchip Dragon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Teofilo (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Microchip Dragon detail.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Microchip Dragon detail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Teofilo (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

File:US Secession map 1865.svg

Greetings from Austin, Texas. When looking at your image File:US Secession map 1865.svg I noticed that after user Escondites made a change the legend colors in Description Section of the file description page no longer match the colors of the image.

Category:Bohemian Paradise Geopark

Category discussion notification

Category:Bohemian Paradise Geopark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--ŠJů (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Kyrgyzstan in Cyrillic.svg

¡Hola! El nombre de éste país nunca se escribe "Киргызия", ni en ruso, ni en kirguís. ¿Quiére Ud. cambiarlo por "Кыргызстан" (come se escribe en kirguís, y tambien by algunos gente in ruso), o por "Киргизия" (que es el nombre tradicional del pais en ruso), or por Киргизстан (que es una forma "más rusa" de "Кыргызстан")? Vmenkov (talk) 00:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Please please please please please please please!!!!!!!!

A minute ago I noticed this map that you made: File:Oceania ISO 3166-1.svg, and I think it's really awesome. If it's not too much trouble, please can you make a version without any of the country or territory codes on it? Thanks in advance!!! Runningfridgesrule (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Croatia in Europe_ISO_3166-1

Hi,

the map File:Europe_ISO_3166-1.svg gives "PT" as the code for w:Croatia (Hrvatska), but it should be "HR" according to w:ISO_3166-1. Could you please fix that? I do not know how to do it myself. Thank you. --93.82.13.227 19:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Pentagram interiors

Hi! Could you modify this chart, and make the central region of the middle image a second color, like orange, representing the en:Polygon density? Tomruen (talk) 02:15, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

License {{Tintazul}}

Hi! Would you concider to add {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} to your template? You have allready version 2.5 so this should not be a big change but it would be a big help in the migration project. --MGA73 (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Polygonum amphibium several.jpg

Polygonum amphibium has dense and straight inflorescence, more thicker stem, more wide leaves. The plants on the picture look like Polygonum hydropiper, but I do not know Portugalese flora, it may be something similar. Kenraiz (talk) 20:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Matopas landscape.jpg

BotMultichillT 21:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Ardea_ibis_map.svg

The map referred above is outdated, at least about Portugal. Cattle Egrets winter in Portugal. Also, their range is expanding north a bit. Thanks for your work! – Tintazul ^talk 12:22, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I will fix this as soon as possible. Do you have an updated reference to suggest me for the correction? --Cephas (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Europe countries

Hello Tintazul,

Would you remember the source you used to create Europe countries.svg? Given that this map is used a lot – both directly and as map background – it would be great to know its source. Thanks, Pethrus (talk) 10:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

No source for Europe countries.svg that I remember. Why would people change the colours of the map to show the countries in blue? That is ridiculous. I expected people to create derivative works, but to keep my own map in the earth colours I've chosen.– Tintazul ^talk 08:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for the answer. About the colors, you're totally right and imho you should revert to your colors – maybe uploading the blue one with another name. --Pethrus (talk) 10:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Fotografia - Cedência para Projecto CML Rota da Biodiversidade

Boa noite Sr Júlio Reis,

O meu nome é Rita Neves e trabalho na Divisão de Educação e Sensibilização Ambiental da Câmara Municipal de Lisboa.

Actualmente estamos a preparar uma rota urbana sobre Biodiversidade que abrange um percurso entre Belém e o Parque Florestal de Monsanto.

O nosso contacto prende-se com a sua excelente foto do linguado: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solea_solea_ELA.jpg

Gostariamos de solicitar que a titulo gracioso possa ceder a imagem para que possamos publicá-la neste projecto.

A rota da Biodiversidade está dividia em 4 suportes:

-  Brochura pocket - para levar como brochura de bolso para o terreno

- Brochura de oferta para o dia de inauguração

- Fichas ilustrativas sobre espécies

- Paineis fixos nos pontos de interesse.

Se tiver posssibilidade de nos ceder a imagem para este projecto, informo que o seu nome será associado à imagem enquanto autor na bibliografia dos suportes em que a foto esteja presente.

Gostaria de confirmar caso exista a oportunidade de nos ceder a imagem de qual o nome que quer ver na bibliografia associado à mesma? Júlio Reis?

Se for possivel responda-me, por favor, para ritasoraia2001@hotmail.com ou rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt ou através da Wikimedia.

Grata pela atenção dispensada.

Os melhores cumprimentos.

Rita Neves

Créditos da foto

Obrigada.

Os créditos são em nome de tintazul ou Júlio Reis?

Os melhores cumprimentos

File:Matopas_landscape.jpg

File:Matopas_landscape.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Werewombat (talk) 20:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

David McCready?

Hi Tintazul,

I notice that some images you created from the font I designed, MPH 2B Damase, (such as the Gothic letters) appear to credit David McCready as the one who created that font. I have no idea who David McCready is but I can assure you and it is well-documented that I created that font. My name is Mark Williamson. I hope you will correct this issue as soon as possible. --Node ue (talk) 00:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

83.208.42.240 17:40, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Dubai_night_skyline.jpg

File:Dubai_night_skyline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:37, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Lapsana communis flowers.jpg

This plant is not Lapsana communis, but maybe a Crepis. --Der Michels (talk) 06:44, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Polygonum amphibium several.jpg

Look at Category:Persicaria amphibia (=Polygonum apmphibium) – the inflorescence is very dense and erect. I do not know the species on the photo – I do not know Portugal flora. It is somewhat similar to Polygonum hydropiper. Kenraiz (talk) 22:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Podarcis bocagei

Hi, I have a question about some photos of Podarcis Bocagei you uploaded. I saw photos like that and its colors seem different than how it is described. Is it a juvenile??--Supremo (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I read an article about this species and there's written that males and females' colour is different: males are green and females are brown-like. But both sexes have got two yellow/light green lengthwise stripes on their back, and I don't see these stripes. Also, I see strange yellow spots on a black back. These things don't correspond to this species. How did you find out that it was Podarcis bocagei?--Supremo (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the information.--Supremo (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Biblioteca de Vila Verde

Esta biblioteca não será em Vila Verde? Joseolgon (talk) 15:19, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

É mesmo! :-( Já pedi a correção. Obrigado. – Tintazul ^talk 08:44, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Europe countries.svg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Europe countries.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Europe countries.svg

File:Europe countries.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Africa just countries.svg

Dear Tintazul,

Your political map of Africa is now outdated since it does not show South Sudan, a new and large black African country in the world since 2011 and a member of the UN. Maybe you can update it? Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

@Leoboudv:  Done, in case you still want to use that file after these years. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

• Thank You, BurritoBazooka. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Gutisko Razda

Hello Tintazul,

Can you please change your uploaded file Gutiska Razda to Gutisko Razda? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gothic_language_in_Gothic.svg

Gutiska Razda means: A Gothic language, it is more correct if you turn it

Lea faka-Tonga: Gutisko Razda, which means: The Gothic language. Thanks in regard. Bokareis (talk) 17:22, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

@Bokareis:  Done, in case you still want to use this file. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 21:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you @BurritoBazooka: and @Bokareis: ! – Tintazul ^talk 15:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Kyrgyzstan in Cyrillic.svg

File:Kyrgyzstan in Cyrillic.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 22:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Template problem

Hi Tintazul, for many of your files there is an error message "wrong parm" in the file description, for example: File:Adiantum capillus-veneris drawing.png. It seems that that happens when the License parameter is not empty. Could you please fix your template User:Tintazul/licensing template. Thank you, --Arnd (talk) 13:29, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Done, thank you for the heads-up. – Tintazul ^talk 11:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Metro do Porto linha F (rosa).svg

File:Metro do Porto linha F (rosa).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Aʀvєδuι ⁺ 00:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Literacy

Literacy has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Cat_behavior

Cat behavior has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

212.95.5.114 19:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Ancient fort, Ring of Kerry.jpg

File:Ancient fort, Ring of Kerry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Blind horse.jpg

File:Blind horse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Boats on river, Kilkenny.jpg

File:Boats on river, Kilkenny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Fingal

Fingal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 09:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Walkways

Walkways has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 07:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Asian-style mural Eugene OR.jpg

File:Asian-style mural Eugene OR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)