User talk:Fma12/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

3 ≤ - Go to archive: - ≥ 5

File:Copa argentina 1969.png

File:Copa argentina 1969.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Chilavert 2014.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chilavert 2014.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ww2censor (talk) 14:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


Hello, Fma12. You have new messages at Martin_H.'s talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Tren valle railtracks.jpg

I am not sure if this picture you uploaded is of the Tren del Valle or the Belgrano Railway (I cannot tell the track gauge from the image). But the same image was also published under an article about the Belgrano Cargas along with other images a week before the source you gave: http://prensa.argentina.ar/2015/07/10/59308-llega-financiamiento-chino-para-el-belgrano-cargas.php I find often on the prensa.argentina.ar website, many images are incorrectly titled and obviously in this case it can't be both railways. I'll leave it to your discretion since you know better than me :) SegataSanshiro1 (talk) 13:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, SegataSanshiro1, I'll be more careful the next time. :P . In fact, it could be from other line rather than Roca Railway so I'm not sure if recent works on Tren del Valle tracks included the installation of concrete sleepers. I'll be checking this. In the meantime, a change of category is needed. Fma12 (talk) 16:39, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


Hello, Fma12. You have new messages at Pedro J Pacheco's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

File:Bethlehem steel fc logo.png

File:Bethlehem steel fc logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SounderBruce 22:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Bethlehem steel fc logo.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bethlehem steel fc logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Cvs health logo14.png

File:Cvs health logo14.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

173.67.161.118 22:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:PD-AR-Gov

Hi! Concearning {{PD-AR-Gov}} — so far as I could verify — laws, decrees etc. at municipal level (creating coats of arms etc.) are NOT published at the Official Bulletin, which "es el diario oficial en el que se publican los actos emanados del Poder Ejecutivo Nacional y las leyes sancionadas por el Congreso de la Nación" link but as a starting point: where I could found "(...) are not included as subject to copyright according to Law 11.723" in http://infoleg.mecon.gov.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/40000-44999/42755/texact.htm? Gunnex (talk) 22:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Gunnex ! We had already talked about this issue several months ago. You can see the entire conversation at my archived talk page: here. Don't hesitate to contact me if you need. Best regards. Fma12 (talk) 11:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Ups... --> sorry. But as you can see, my doubts around {{PD-AR-Gov}} are keeping me somehow "busy" :-). I'll start a fresh attempt in the next days. Gunnex (talk) 12:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

My own work

And it's not doubtful dove pictures with Legacy embroided is me... It's hours of hard work so what you can take them?? I would never of published them on your stupid site then....

GoogleLegacy: Before being so fucking rude, take a look at Commons:Scope. I have no interest in none of your symbols, be sure about that - Fma12 (talk) 10:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Fma12 left you a message on Wikimedia Commons

Hello, Fma12. You have new messages at alejandro thornton's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

. La == File:Simulacion Mata ilusion.jpg == imagen es de mi propiedad

Más vale tarde que nunca...

Hace unos cuántos meses te insulté porque nominaste para borrar unas imágenes de Bugge, y te pido disculpas. La imagen en cuestión una de Menem con los Rollings Stones que servía para ilustrar la mediatización política de los 90 y el estilo de Menem. Algunos presidentes, como Cristina evitaban estas fotos y preferían artistas nacionales, y ahí radicaba mi interés en estas fotos... Ya no importa, espero aceptes mis disculpas. Saludos. --Ginés90 (talk) 23:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hola Ginés90, por supuesto acepto tus disculpas; recuerdo ese incidente, así como recuerdo que por aquellos días había nominado muchas imágenes por el tema del URAA, que empezó tomándose con rigor y seriedad, y luego se fue desvirtuando totalmente. Saludos y felices Fiestas. - Fma12 (talk) 00:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Copa Jockey Club.JPG

File:Copa Jockey Club.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Disney drawing pluto.jpg

File:Disney drawing pluto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Copa Interamericana 1994

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Copa_Interamericana_1994.JPG

Hola Fma12, esto fue un grave error. La copa tuvo diferentes diseños en algunas ediciones. La edición de 1994 tuvo un diseño especial para ese año. La fotografía fue creada en una exhibición del equipo campeón de 1994, Universidad Católica, puedes buscar en youtube "Feria cruzada 2012" y "feria cruzada 2013". Obviamente la fotografía era original. No sé como se podrá reparar el daño hecho, en commons escasea esta clase de material de calidad. Columna de Razta (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Hola User:Columna de Razta, en realidad, en el deletion request no se discutió la originalidad de la fotografía (de la cual jamás se dudó), sino que los trofeos y copas se consideran "esculturas" y trabajos en 3D protegidos bajo derecho de autor. Por lo tanto, un trabajo de 1994 es un trabajo protegido porque deben pasar más de 70 años de la muerte del autor (en este caso del trofeo) para que sea libre de derechos. Ese es el motivo por el cual se borró, no sólo este, sino incluso el trofeo de la Copa del Mundo entre otros trofeos. - Fma12 (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Fma12/License

The last item in the list User:Fma12/License:

If you need to use the image, please write an e-mail to fermartello@yahoo.com.ar and contact me.

is contrary to the license CC-BY-SA 3.0

No additional restrictions <to use> — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

--sasha (krassotkin) 09:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Yankees Uniform Discussion

Ooooh. I am very upset now. See, I never read further down this page, so I did not realize the things that were being said about me. so let's put this all in one place and get some real honesty in here. So, to make things clear, here's my discussion with Fma12. First, he contacted me about our edits.

NY Yankees

Could you please stop overwritting the file I rendered myself ? And also attributing the work as "your" own creation. Seriously, your edits are being totally disruptive. Thanks, - Fma12 (talk) 10:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Your rendering of the New York Yankees uniform was inaccurate and it was corrected. Incorrect information has no place in an encyclopedia. The image was changed and any attribution to you was removed, as the new version had nothing to do with your work. If the image is changed, then you have no further claim to it and no reason to become defensive over a work that is not yours being attributed correctly.

The first time I corrected your work, I made the mistake of not changing the attribution and therefore incorrectly attributed my work to yours. I'm used to just changing the images when something needs to be changed, so I forgot that I needed to make sure the information was changed to attribute image's creator. That's my fault. However, this time I correctly made any necessary changes to the page. Nothing disruptive was done. It was just a change to a more accurate version. You've stripped this project of information, and made a move to a less accurate version of the image. That is disruption.--Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 00:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Silent Wind of Doom: You are completely wrong. I rendered the NY Yankees uniform in Corel Draw, then converted it to PNG and uploaded to Commons. So simple like that. Nothing related to "your" image, which you had uploaded as a fair use image, therefore not suitable for Commons (I'm not sure but I think it was like this). What "attribution" are you talking about if the uniform was drawn by me?
If you want to upload your rendition to the project, do it, but don't overwrite my file ("that" is disruptive because you are replacing an image for another different). Moreover, if you think that the current uniform on NY Yankees article is incorrect or needs to be updated, replace it with your work, but don't overwrite other user's files instead uploading your own drawing. Otherwise, I'll report your action because I don't want to enter into a senseless edit warring. Fma12 (talk) 01:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Quite a busy few weeks. Didn't realize you'd answered on your page.
So THAT'S what this was about? You want your own image somewhere else? You inserted your image into the team's page, causing it to become part of the lineage of uniform images that have existed since 2007. Because it became part of the project, it was renamed in line with the rest of the uniform images. The page isn't an image itself, but rather a placeholder for an image of whatever the current uniform is. You saw "File:ALE-Uniform-NYY.png" as the name of your own personal image rather than a part of an overall project which is constantly flowing and being updated. That would explain why you were so incensed when the image was corrected, even when accreditation was corrected to insure that the image was no longer attributed to you and so there was no connection to you. The NHL and NFL images have long since wandered out of my control and are still being updated at the same filename because they're not my images. They're whatever's correct.
If you want to keep your versions of the images elsewhere, separate from the project, then that's no issue. We just need a new name for it, so the name it currently has can still be used as it is needed to be used. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 18:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

And so I waited. We had a simple conclusion to this. Fma could have his precious image, even though he could easily upload it to a name he wanted. No. I'll do the work of getting it changed over and then upload a correct image under the project's filename. That was November. I never heard back from him, but I patiently waited. Maybe he got busy. I don't know. I assumed good faith.

Then today I notice that a couple days ago other people have asked Fma about this inappropriate image.

Yankee jersey

Please update your jeresy because it is really wrong and out of date. One the chest NY logo is wrong, the one you have doesn't look like the one on the jersey. Plus you don't have cleats or shoes on the jersey. Please update your logo or let other people update it. Thank you

If the Yankees jersey needs to be updated, please create and upload a new version under a different name uploading it separately (as another file), but don't modify "my" version. Thanks. - Fma12 (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

All right. Same tune. I'm unhappy to see that he is holding conversation with others while I still awaited his response, but it's okay. Then things take a turn when the next person asks about it.

Yankee jersey

What happen to the other guy who updated the jersey. Because he updated it then you changed it. I saw that it something to do with him not changing smelt hint on the file or whatever, but when he fixed it why did you keep changing it?

Well, I'm so tired about the "dispute" over the jersey I updated, therefore I'll try to be as clear as possible: Some time ago, there was another NYY jersey updated to Wikipedia as a fair-use image (therefore not free). The jersey I updated (see here) was rendered by me (own work) and then uploaded to Commons under a creative commons license.
On Wiki's NFCC page, it says: "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose" (more details here). According to that criteria, the previous non-free version was replaced by my file. That doesn't mean that "my" version is the definitive or the best uniform ever created.
The problem came when the other user (and some socket puppets like this) overwrote my file with his version of the jersey (see file history) which is wrong, because if he or whoever has another version of the uniform, it should be uploaded separately instead of overwriting other users' files.
I just edited the NYY article on the en.Wiki, replacing the uniform according to NFCC #1. Is there anything wrong with that? I don't think so. In fact, any user can create a more accurate version of the jerseys, upload to Commons and then placing it on the infobox. I hope this issue is clear now - Fma12 (talk) 22:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Admittedly, I did not know that my original images counted as free. Given that they included copyrighted logos, I considered them all to be non-free. When I had my first few transferred to Commons, I found out that the copyright information was for the work itself, the drawing, not for what the image was of. So, yeah, the old image was as free as the new one. It seems Fma came in before I rectified this, however. I have no doubts that his original intent was fine, but it seems that he has no interest in what actually serves the project best. And then, while I was patiently waiting for him to respond to me, he accuses me of creating new usernames to push my edits? That is a rather serious accusation, and I am greatly insulted at his horrible way of "handling" this dispute.

But apparently the person believed this lie.

Yankee jersey

Thank you a lot, I understand much better now but I need your help. Is there any way I can reupload his work to the Yankees page? Because his work is better than anything I can make, and every time I tried to get back with the silent wind of doom guy I would never get a answer. You probably don't know but is there any chance I can upload it? And if I can't is there any way you can help me message him because I'm a little lost when I use this. If you can help me I would really appreciate it, a lot.

I have saw that you already left a message on silent wind page, so you'll have to wait a reply from him. There is nothing else you can do. Fma12 (talk) 14:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I haven't received this user's request, but I wish I did. I haven't come to Commons for a while, until my updating of the baseball images brought me back. And now I'm back, and I will fix this issue. If only Fma would discuss with me, or perhaps change the name of the file away from the one that I brought onto the issue to bring it in line with a project which he has no desire to help. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 20:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Disney drawing goofy.jpg

A reviewer at a PR where the picture is being used has asked "How do you know 'it was first published at least 20 years ago'? That's part of the criteria for PD-Argentina". Do you have any proof the photo was published at least 20 years ago? Are you able to link the image to the right source, or to any available evidence? Thanks - SchroCat (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

SchroCat, I took the photo from the AGN (General Archive of the Argentine Nation) official Facebook. Direct link to image: Here.
All the AGN's PD photos where uploaded here via Category:Files provided by Archivo General de la Nación Argentina. In fact, it is not the only photo of Disney taken during his trip to Argentina in 1941, as you can see here, or here. - Fma12 (talk) 11:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Fma, That's great - thanks very much. I've let the reviewer know, and I hope it should be enough to let it remain in the article. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 13:46, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Fma, I've been asked to see if there is a staement anywhere that the archive only posts public domain images? I presume they would, but I think we may need to have something concrete that confirms it. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
SchroCat The most of images posted by the AGN are +25 years old, therefore public domain in Argentina (although some may be in the PD in the US due to URAA). The rest of the images are under license {{CC-AR-Presidency-2015}} as the AGN is an organism under the Presidency of Argentina (which specifies the license at bottom). - Fma12 (talk) 15:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
That's great Fma: I'll put that to him and see what he says. Thanks for your help on this. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Subte gcba logo.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Subte gcba logo.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Toyota carlogo.svg

File:Toyota carlogo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

81.219.5.90 13:01, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Toyota carlogo.svg

File:Toyota carlogo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

87.105.135.80 14:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Brooklyn Nets newlogo.svg

Hi,

Can you update the Nets' logo? There should be no white color inside BROO and the transparent rim inside the logo should be white. I'd do it myself, but I'm not familiar with .svg format files. Thanks in advance. – Sabbatino (talk) 06:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Uruguay 1916.jpg

File:Uruguay 1916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SamWinchester000 (talk) 22:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Uniform template

Hi there! I wanted to let you know that i used one of your NFL uniforms (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jets_uniforms12.png) as a base model for my update of the Riaders uniform picture (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raiders_uniform_update_1-03-2017.png), cause i thought the old was really low resolution and needed updating. I made sure to credit you for the original art. You make some really great, detailed pictures by the way! Keep it up! - Mariofan794

Hi, Mariofan794; first of all, thanks for crediting me. Your work on Photoshop adapting the Jets uniforms is awesome, great rendition ! I'm also really glad you appreciate my work in the NFL uniforms. :) Please, don't hesitate to contact me if you need further assistance. Regards !! - Fma12 (talk) 14:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

AFL flags Threshold of Originality?

Hi, I noticed that you nominated a Brisbane Lions flag for deletion about a month ago at Commons:Deletion requests/File:AFL Brisbane Icon.jpg due to the fact it wasn't own work and was complex enough to be copyrighted due to a low threshold of originality, I was wondering what your opinions are on the following AFL flags due to the same reasons as the Brisbane flag?

Thanks, Flickerd (talk) 13:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Flickerd; well, in the case of Carlton, the wordmark was designed before 1923 (which made them PD in the US) and also {{PD-Australia}} (created before 1955) therefore they are exempt of copyright. Regarding Gold Coast, I consider it only contains a simple text logo, so there is no any infringement of copyright. The only flag above the TOO is (the West Coast symbol) due to the Eagle figure. It should be nominate for deletion, IMO. Best regards. - Fma12 (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

GRACIAS!

Hola!!! Te escribo para agradecerte mucho tus aportes!!! Si querés y tenes el archivo en corel del mapa del belgrano en 1948 lo puedo editar para mostrar la red actual..

Tus mapas fueron un gran aporte para mi trabajo profesional.

Atte. Mercedes

PD: mi correo por si querés hablar lo del Belgrano es mercedesrtraversa@gmail.com

Reguarding File:Saints uniforms12.png

Since you are the original author of this file, I was wondering if there could be 2 fixes on this file.

1.The Saints have a second (black) pants, usually in combination with the white jersey. Maybe use white side to present this?

2.They also fixed their collars. (evidenced by Saints twitter)

If you don't want to change it, you don't have to. But since you are the original author, of course I wouldn't do this myself and place a new version over yours. These two fixes would accurately present the Saints modern uniforms, and based on this template, doing it would be super easy. And me creating a new template just for the sake of these two missing keys would just be a waste of time. Have a nice day! --GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 05:35, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Kit body carltonfc16aw.png

File:Kit body carltonfc16aw.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Montperoux (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

GE Power and Lighting logos

Hi Fma12! When you get a chance, it would be awesome if you could turn w:File:GEEnergyLogo.PNG and w:File:GE Lighting logo.png into SVG files, like you did for File:GElectric transportation logo.svg. Thanks!

Broken DR

Hi Fma12. You tried to start a DR for File:Chicos-escuelalacecilia.jpg, but did not include a reason or create the subpage. Storkk (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Crowd 1928 film poster.jpg

File:Crowd 1928 film poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Postcard licensing

Please do not change {{PD-1923}} to {{PD-US}}. PD-1923 explicitly gives the reason for the image being in the public domain, whereas PD-US does not. Thank you, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

@Pi.1415926535: As far as I know, {{PD-1923}} is for works published outside the US (according to Commons:copyright tags). That's the reason because I put the PD-US license in works originally printed in the US. If I'm wrong, please let me know. Thanks, Fma12 (talk) 12:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The page is a bit confusing in its wording - it's just saying that works originally published outside the US, and in the public domain in the country of origin, must also be PD in the US. That's a legal technicality of the Wikimedia servers being located in the US. PD-1923 establishes that a work is legally PD in the US, and thus it's sufficient for any work originally published in the US. PD-US should be avoided when possible; it's a very general tag that doesn't specify why the image is in the public domain, which can be problematic if the PD status is challenged. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fma12/Archive_4&oldid=738121142"