User talk:Arthur Crbz/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hi Arthur, thanks for updating the permission on this file. It is currently stated as insufficiently verified (Ticket https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2018041010006863). I forwarded the form by the photographer to the OTRS which was sufficient as far as I can tell. Can you give me details on what was wrong with it so I can coordinate with the source? Thanks a lot! --Playnary (talk) 13:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arthur Crbz, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:Arthur Crbz/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 1 character 104: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:{importScript(\'MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js\'); void(0);}', "Perform batch task", 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand', null);

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 19:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC).

File:Romain-Grau-candidat-pour-En-Marche-Legislatives-2017-PO.jpg

Bonjour, Arthur Crbz. Il n'y a pas besoin d'OTRS pour File:Romain-Grau-candidat-pour-En-Marche-Legislatives-2017-PO.jpg. En effet, la source indiquée est un article de presse où l'on peut trouver en bas les crédits photos avec notamment la mention suivante : Photo de Romain Grau – MiP [Made in Perpignan] sous licence cc-by-sa. Cordialement, Culex (talk) 05:11, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Culex: OK j'ai retiré le bandeau. Bonne journée, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Bobby_Simha_at_Urumeen_Audio_Launch_.jpg

Hi,the status of this [1]file is still otrs received can you make necessary change to the file Perumalism Chat 17:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

@Perumalism: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Thankyou Perumalism Chat

File:Winnipeg General Post Office, 1958.jpg

as well as: File:Fletcher Argue Building, 1967.jpg File:Canadian Embassy, Islamabad, Pakistan, 1967.jpg File:University Centre, University of Manitoba Student Union Building, 1969.jpg File:University Centre, University of Manitoba Student Union Building, 1969.jpg File:St. Amant Centre, 1972.jpg File:Royal Trust Tower, 1981.jpg File:Duckworth Centre, University of Winnipeg, 1983.jpg File:Manitoba Provincial Law Courts, 1985.jpg

Hi, Arthur, you added a template to nine (9) of photos from Number Ten Architectural Group, which I uploaded to Wikimedia yesterday. In the Permission Summary, it says:

An email has been received at OTRS concerning this file, and can be read here by users with an OTRS account. However, the message was not sufficient to confirm permission for this file. This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published. For an update on the issue, please contact the user (Arthur Crbz) who added this template to the page, or someone else with an OTRS account, or the OTRS noticeboard. If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by an OTRS volunteer, this file will be deleted. Please do not file an additional deletion nomination for permission reasons. Note to OTRS volunteers: If the email contains sufficient confirmation of the validity of the license, please replace this template with

VRT Wikimedia

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard.


Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2017060710003129

A tenth photo from Number Ten Architectural Group has been accepted by Wikimedia as licensed: File:Winnipeg Convention Centre, 1974.jpg

My problem is that the creator of all ten Number Ten photos - Number Ten Architectural Group, sent a signed Wikipedia Creative Commons License releasing copyright for all ten photos, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on April 18, 2017. The license clearly followed, verbatim, the template for such a license as published by Wikimedia. It was signed by a duly authorized representative of Number Ten, Doug Hanna, who is partner of the partnership. So there was an "explicit release under a free license" given, contrary to your template statement, the above. Also, the email from Mr. Hanna came from his work email address, so the statement that the "email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published", is wrong.

I re-emailed Mr. Hanna's email and the Creative Commons License he signed to Wikimedia yesterday, because the OTRS rep who tagged the nine photos for removal said, in numerous emails to me, that proof of the license had to be sent. But, clearly, the original email and license was originally sent from a Number Ten Architectural Group email address.

Can you please let me know what the real problem is? Did Wikimedia fail to process the original Creative Commons License sent by Mr. Hanna on April 18? Or is it just a problem of correlating that original correspondence/license to the photos that I uploaded yesterday? Please let me know.

It has been an unbelieveable hassle getting Wikimedia to acknowledge copyright licenses for this website. Any help you can provide would be appreciated. --Jack Coop (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jack Coop: We received your email a few hours ago, please consider that we have a lot of requests to handle. We have currently a 2 months backlog for this queue. We received the autorisation from Doug Hanna with Template:OTRS ticket on 18.04.2017.
By adding the OTRS template on the files pages, these files can not be deleted for the moment.
Just be patient and wait, your request will be handled. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Enya photo.

Hello, Just letting you know that I replied on the deletion requests of the Enya photo page.

--XenaDance-- (talk) 21:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC) --XenaDance--

Hi, files with {OTRS received} for over 30 days will be deleted. Adding a regular DR to this makes no sense. Jcb (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

And don't tag possible pd-simple logos as no-permissions. Create a DR instead. And please also read {{User page image}}. Please read into the commons polices. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
And if you do replacements, no need to leave blank lines. Thanks --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:55, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter: How do you do that using VisualFileChange ? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

An advice

Hi Arthur, I wanted to thank you for the job you're doing with OTRS!

If I can give you an advice: while you've not access to the deleted files, you can process more recent tickets. Recent uploaded files without permission aren't generally deleted right away, and you can still check them. You can access to the last tickets by clicking on ">|" on the top right. If you need any help, just ping me! Cheers! --Ruthven (msg) 15:58, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Ruthven: , thank you for your message ! Yes I know, it's more convenient as I don't have admin rights on Commons and it avoids to do undeletion requests. But considering the current backlog, I thought I could be more helpful with old tickets... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Actually it's the same (that's why I'm telling you). The new tickets of today, will become the old tickets of tomorrow, without counting that the UNDEL, evaluation, re-delete or confirmation takes more time to you and to the other users that simply answering to an email that you can check by yourself, directly reducing the backlog. --Ruthven (msg) 21:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
@Ruthven: Sure but still "unfair" for people stuck into the middle of the queue... Best, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Further details

Have been sent you regarding this image[2] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Authorized pictures

Hi, thank you for your message. Christian Lu sent a permission concerning 9 pictures (File:CL WK 20042017 1.jpg, etc) to COM:OTRS a few days ago, and you have validated them apparently. I'll ask Christian Lu to send you a permission for all remaining pictures asap. However, the authorized pictures have already been deleted from the page https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%86%E6%B0%B8%E5%AE%89 or from Wikimedia Commons. Is it possible to restore the deleted pictures ? Many thanks for your help. Best regards, --HSUN (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@HSUN: Hi, I have found only one deleted file : File:Christian Lu photo.jpg, are you talking about this one ? If so, we need a permission to restore it.
And we still need a permission for the others which are tagged. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: Hi, Many thanks for your reply. Yes, it is the file : File:Christian Lu photo.jpg indeed. Christian LU sent a permission regarding this file as well as all other files a few days ago. So, please restore it when possible. In addition, several pictures with permission sent previously have been deleted from the main page https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%99%86%E6%B0%B8%E5%AE%89. Could you please restore them as well ? Thanks again for your help. Merci beaucoup ! --82.234.111.235 10:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC) --HSUN (talk) 10:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, you confirmed OTRS permission for this image, but forgot to add a license template. Can you have a 2nd look please. --JuTa 09:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@JuTa: ✓ Done--Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Permission of WSOP pictures

Hey Arthur Crbz, please read the permission I gave in File:2017 World Series of Poker Event 44 – Matthew Schreiber.jpg and all other WSOP pictures. Can I forward the Mails to any address to prove the permission? -- M-B (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@M-B: Hi! The copyright holder must send a permission to OTRS. Please follow the procedure written in the permission tag. Thank you --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:28, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Hey, copyright holder Seth Palansky sent a mail to OTRS where he gave permission. Please check the mail and confirm for all files I uploaded since 22 June 2017 :) -- M-B (talk) 23:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Is there a problem with the mail? Please verify the license for the files. -- M-B (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@M-B: Permission will be handle by another OTRS agent, I don't have time to handle new requests. Regards, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Permission for the File:Ancient Filipino.jpg

Hey Arthur Crbz, please read the permission I gave in File:Ancient Filipino.jpg [3] the file had already had a consent for permission and An email has been received at OTRS concerning this file, should i forward you the should I forward the Mails to any address to prove the permission?

(Jasper0070 (talk) 05:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC))

A permission has been sent with Ticket:2017062610000622. Have added the appropriate template on the file page. No further email is required. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

George Baldanzi files

Hi, thanks for your OTRS work on these. I had been directing the user who uploaded them to OTRS from en.wiki, and glad he figured it out. I saw that that you placed the OTRS tag on File:George Baldanzi 4.jpg, but didn't see that all the others in Category:George Baldanzi have been deleted and wondered if this were an oversight or whether OTRS had not confirmed their status. Thanks for your work on this. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni: I don't understand why these files have been deleted. All these files are under public domain. I requested undeletion for these files[4]. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Permission for File:細寶.jpg

Hi, Arthur Crbz. Could you check whether this picture is valid or not? Thank you. Music Stanislaw (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Music Stanislaw: Hi, I'm sorry but this ticket is written in chinese and I can't read this language. I have added a note on the ticket about your concerns. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: I've replied your note in this ticket. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 07:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
@Taiwania Justo: Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:49, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Adding otrs permission

Hi, Can you please add otrs permission for this [5] cropped image Perumalism Chat 15:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks it's done Perumalism Chat 16:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome back! =)

seb26 (talk) 15:48, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

155ufca Reconstruction 004a.jpg

I noticed a tag placed on File:155ufca Reconstruction 004a.jpg after the OTRS verification was sent that claims the message was "insufficient" regarding the permission of this file. I have sent so many requests already the author of these renderings and would like to save him as much time as possible, so I was hoping something could be worked out to keep this file in the commons, as it is used on a few Wikipedia pages. Thanks, Gourami Watcher (talk) 00:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

@Gourami Watcher: I'm not allowed to discuss about OTRS emails due to confidentiality agreement. I have handled this request and asked for clarifications. Unfortunately, I didn't receive any answer. That's why this file still don't have a valid permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi! the File:LCI.jpg had confirmed by OTRS (mail: [Ticket#: 2017080210010073].) but ticket still missing will get it ? thank you! (112.198.243.34)

@112.198.243.34: Hi! Your email has been received and will be handled. Please consider that we are a small team of volunteers and we receive a lot of messages. The backlog is currently 7 days. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz , i hope the ticket will be delivered within before 30 days , thank you! (Cleaner880 (talk))

File:Judy Kwong.jpg (Ticket#2017080210001378) & File:Ashley Chu.jpg

Hello, Mr. Crbz. Could you also handle these photos? Thank you! -- Miss Skyblue (talk) 16:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

@Miss Skyblue: Hi! Your email has been received and will be handled. Please consider that we are a small team of volunteers and we receive a lot of messages. The backlog is currently 7 days. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit conflict

Hello Arthur. I am just asking this for my own information. I was reviewing Ticket:2017080610000111 when you replied to that email. I was going to send an email asking them to explain KIMBERLY PENNY in Exif metadata. I have encountered this situation several times: a high-resolution image with complete Exif data, but a different author/copyright holder. Do we need to investigate the situation more? 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: Hi! You are right, I could have asked for clarifications about the author of this picture.
I assumed that the photographer was paid for taking this picture and so copyright has been transferred. Indeed, the place is empty and it's an high quality picture. Plus, the picture has been sent by an "official" email address. I think the intention of the uploader is to promote its club... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Cynar_export_(étiquette).jpg Copyvio

Pourquoi ce serait un copyvio alors que des milliers d'étquettes de bouteilles sont ici hébergées? Je n'ai pas changé la licence par défaut. Merci de m'éclairer. Gatien Couturier (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

@Gatien Couturier: Bonjour. Cette étiquette utilise un dessin d'artichaut qui dépasse le seuil d'originalité. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Je n'avais jamais été confronté à cet argument mais je me dois de donner ma confiance, étant ignorant en la matière. Gatien Couturier (talk) 19:16, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
@Gatien Couturier: En fait si l'étiquette n'avait pas comporté ce dessin, il n'y aurait pas eu de problème particulier. L'étiquette utilisant des formes plutôt simples avec du texte, elle aurait été considérée dans le domaine public.
On peut aller plus loin et regarder si le dessin de l'artichaut n'est pas lui aussi dans le domaine public. Mais comme cet alcool a été créé en 1952 (et en supposant que l'étiquette avec l'artichaut a été utilisée depuis sa création), le dessin de l'artichaut a vraisemblablement été créé il y a moins de 70 ans. Or il faut attendre 70 ans pour qu'une image tombe dans le domaine publique en Italie (voir Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Italy). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Classiccardinal

Hi, Please see m:Steward_requests/Global#Global_lock_for_Classiccardinal. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Temp undel update

Hi Arthur. I temporarily undeleted File:Francis-BRUNELLE-detoure-v3.jpg per your request at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2017-08#File:Francis-BRUNELLE-detoure-v3.jpg. It is still sitting with the {{Temporarily undeleted}} tag on it, and no OTRS-related template. Do you still need access to the file? If not, I'd prefer to re-delete it pending a response to the ticket. Who knows, maybe deletion will prompt a reply. Storkk (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@Storkk: Ouups! Thank you for the notification, it seems I forgot to handle this file after I made the request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Latso

Dear Arthur: You made some wonderful photo adjustment for this pianist: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giorgi_Latso I was wondering if you would consider to start a new article in French language about this pianist seeing that French version doesn't exist on him. Please note, his official last name has been changed to Latso. If you would start, I'd contribute some in edits in french as well, although I am not a native french :) Many thanks! Cheers Sausa11 (talk) 18:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

@Sausa11: Hi! I'm sorry but I don't have enough time to create this article and I'm not interested in the subject. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Davidgodavid

I'm unable to block the user, but it appears he's no longer actively editing. I did tag his image with an OTRS copyvio tag so it'll be deleted. Guanaco (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Images Taverne L'espérance

Bonsoir,

Merci d'avoir traité les autorisations pour les fichiers File:Bruxelles - L'espérance - Taverne.jpg et File:Bruxelles - L'espérance - Façade.jpg :)

Néanmoins, je ne comprends pas très bien les demandes de suppression relatives à ces mêmes fichiers. Sont-elles toujours d'actualité ?

Selon moi, ces images ont un intérêt, notamment encyclopédique, puisqu'elles peuvent servir à illustrer l'article Wikipédia consacré à la taverne L'espérance. Cette taverne est en effet classée au patrimoine immobilier de Bruxelles.

Encore merci pour votre travail,
HgO (talk) 20:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

@HgO: Bonjour, j'ai demandé à ce que l'on conserve l'image car elle peut être utilisée dans un article. Bonne soirée, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Spelling

Hi. Please compare wikt:asses with wikt:assess.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: My bad --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Castle Steinsberg Files

Dear Arthur,

I sent you my ID. I still see a remark, that there is no correct copyright. Will you change this?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Castle_Steinsberg.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burg_Steinsberg.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Burg_Steinsberg,_Sinsheim,_Germany.jpg

Or is still something missing?

Thanks for your support and feedback!

Kind Regards!

--FranzSchalk (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

@FranzSchalk: Hi! Sorry for the late answer. I have added the permission template on each file. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

undeletions

Hi,

If you find permissions for files that you requested undeletion invalid, please mark them {{Speedy}}. Few potential examples:

If there is no evidence that they are free, we do not want to keep them undeleted too long. Ankry (talk) 13:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ankry: Hi! Thank you for you help undeleting these files. First file is ok. Second and last ones are still pending, waiting for an answer from uploader.
When I know that the uploader has no authority to release a file under a free license (or can't contact the author of the file for instance), I mark them for speedy deletion.
Have a good weekend! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Bello Spark Image

Hello Arthur. You had placed a message at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BelloSpark.jpg, in the edit summary you indicated that it was not processed yet. The template seemed to indicate something else. I had seen a copy of the permission email. It was from the owner of the image and granted a suitable license. Do you know what's happenning? Thanks. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 02:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Manifestation-du-CVN-21-fvrier-1968-photo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:13, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

@BrightRaven: Gérard Aimé is on the picture (see file description) and so can't be considered as the photographer.
Please mark this file as missing permission so the original uploader has time to provide explanations. Copyright violation is not obvious, can't use speedy deletion for this file. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Nicolas Folmer lors du Festival Blues sur Seine 2017 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 07:16, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Permission has been provided with Ticket:2017113010006699. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:22, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Manifestation-du-CVN-21-fvrier-1968-photo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove copyvio tags, but convert them to reguler DR procedure if you do not agree. Thank you. BrightRaven (talk) 08:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I have read the description again and it does not pretend that Gérard Aimé is depicted in the picture. Even if he is not the photographer, it is very probably a copyright violation. BrightRaven (talk) 08:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
@BrightRaven: My bad, I have misread the description. Have a good day! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:35, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Pas de problème. J'ai résumé la situation dans la page de demande de suppression. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 08:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Arthur Crbz, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Guanaco (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Guanaco! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your template and notes at Bello Spark Image

Refreshed from above August 6th inquiry. ....did not recieve response. Hello Arthur. You had placed a message at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BelloSpark.jpg, in the edit summary you indicated that it was not processed yet. The template seemed to indicate something else. I had seen a copy of the permission email. It was from the owner of the image and granted a suitable license. Do you know what's happening? Thanks. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 11:31, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

@North8000: Hi! Your ticket will be handled, please be patient. We are a small team of volunteers handling a lot of emails. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: OK that's great, no problem. The new template said something different which was my reason for writing. Thanks for your work. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 18:40, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Painting

If I take a photo of a painting, can I post this photo on Wikimedia, although I am not the painter, please? Thank you in advance for your answer! N. Payen (talk) 20:53, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

@N. Payen: Hi! It depends... If the painter is still alive, then you need permission from the painter. If the painter is dead, check Commons:Copyright rules by territory (depending on the place of birth and death date). Ok for you? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated

You have raised the objection :

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Article in Daily Sakal about Justice Chandrachud unvailing the portrait of Ramdas Paranjpe by Artist Mumbiram, 28 June, 1992.jpg

In response we have clarified in the description of the image that: Editor of Daily Sakal is the author and copyright holder of the original article as well as the author of the uploaded image (derivative work) The Editor of Daily Sakal has sent the letter of permission to OTRS. Now there is no ambiguity about the permission given.--Kusum Bhagavat (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gwendoline Ruais Miss World 2011 1st Princess.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gwendoline Ruais Miss World 2011 1st Princess.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Arthur Crbz, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 08:36, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations! Ankry (talk) 08:56, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Félicitations ! --Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:46, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
@Krd, Ankry, and Thibaut120094: Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:54, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

OTRS mail

The author has sent the permission to OTRS. Can you please check? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cesare_Catania_-_contemporary_artist.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Details_of_The_Man_who_does_not_See_-_Cesare_Catania_contemporary_sculptor_-_art_and_sculpture.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trois_hommes_-_Cesare_Catania_contemporary_painter_-_cubism_and_art.png

- Az753art (talk) 16:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
@Az753art: Hi! The ticket will be handled, we are a small team of volunteers working during our free time. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

S M Lee's images

Did you also intend to delete the 8 stamps images at the top of this deletion nomination at some stage or did you forget them? Ww2censor (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: Hi, they will be deleted (or not) by another admin. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I see you had closed both nominations but have now reopened the first fine. Good stuff. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 09:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

ILEI-Kongreso (51. - 2018 - Madrido (Hispanio)) .svg

Português: Paz e bem!

Deletastes o arquivo ILEI-Kongreso (51. - 2018 - Madrido (Hispanio)) .svg

ocorre que eu sou o autor do desenho da logomarca do ILEI-Kongreso-2018. Assim eu tenho o direito de deixá-lo livre para uso (comercial, com modificações etc.)

143.54.219.248Eugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 11:08, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Eugenio Hansen, OFS: Hi! Sorry but I can't only talk to you in English. If you are the copyright holder of this picture, please send permission to COM:OTRS and file will be undeleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Dear Arthur Crbz

I was wondering why you've deleted my upload Star Trek Nemesis Logo. I hope you can and will answer my question.

P.S.: My excuses for my bad English, but I'm from Belgium.

--OrviIIe (talk) 17:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@OrviIIe: Bonjour! Je vous réponds en français mais si vous le souhaitez, je peux vous répondre en anglais. De manière générale, les logos ne peuvent pas être hébergés sur Wikimédia Commons (ou il faut l'autorisation du détenteur des droits d'auteur). Plus particulièrement, on peut uploader sur Wikimédia Commons un logo qui ne contient que du texte ou des formes géométriques simples car il fait alors parti du domaine public.
Le logo File:Star Trek Nemesis Logo.png a été considéré par la communauté comme étant au-dessus du seuil d'originalité. Cela signifie qu'il utilise des formes géométriques complexes ou est artistiquement développé. Lisez cette page pour en savoir plus sur le seuil d'originalité : Commons:TOO (la page inclue des exemples de logos). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: Actually I speak normally Dutch, but French is my second language so I understood it. Thanks for this information, I will keep that in mind for the future. --OrviIIe (talk) 21:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Kidding, right?

I love the way you added the logo to an en article and then immediately declined the deletion request as "in use", which, last I checked, wasn't actually a defense against deletion... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

@SarekOfVulcan: Hi (it's always a good start when you write a message)! I didn't know this politician so I checked on Google and then find his Wikipedia page. I thought this logo may be useful to illustrate the section about senate election. Remember that files are hosted on Wikimedia Commons mainly to be used on Wikipedia pages... There is nothing outrageous here. I prefer to use a file on a Wikimedia project rather than delete it.
If you disagree with my decision, please appeal the decision. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arthur. You deleted File:WTHL crest.png per the above-mentioned DR. The same file has been reuploaded as File:WTHL crest2.png by the same editor. My guess is that this is a new editor who’s unfamiliar with COM:L and probably didn’t understand the DR close. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:49, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hi! New file has also been deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Ticket#2018080810009778

I'm checking on the progress of completing the OTRS process for this ticket.

The author of the work has written via e-mail:

"Since John Clark was my employee during the creation of my 1976 B-17 mural in the Smithsonian Institution's National Air & Space Museum, any contribution to the effort created by my assistant John was created as part of his regular duties thereby covered as a work for hire as described by situation (1) in copyright law.

"Whether a work is a work made for hire is determined by facts in existence at the time the work is created. There are two situations in which a work made for hire is produced:
"(1) when the work is created by an employee as part of the employee’s regular duties and (2) when a certain type of work is created as a result of an express written agreement between the creator and a party specially ordering or commissioning the work. When a work is produced under these conditions, the employer or the party ordering or commissioning the work is considered the author and copyright owner."

I offered the United States Copyright Office brochure, "Works Made for Hire" to corroborate the author's provided citation.

Please let me know whether anything further is required to complete the process. I'll look for a reply, here.

Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@HopsonRoad: Hi! Your email will be handled. Please consider we have currently a 125 days backlog for this email address. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
User:Jcb just deleted this file because it was past the deadline. Can you intercede to have it restored? I believe that we supplied all the information needed to demonstrate the valid claim of copyright and permission. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 18:39, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Lluis-Costa-Fernandez.jpg

Hola Arthur. Soc nou a Wikimedia. La foto és de la meva propietat. La vaig cedir a la web. Moltes gràcies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francesccasadella (talk • contribs) 13:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

@Francesccasadella: Hi! Please send a permission statement to COM:OTRS using our permission template. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arthur Crbz, can you please check your DR on File:Nebelschwaden.jpg? For me this looks quite ok, the user name Mariandl and the Exif user Maria Frank do not cause my suspicion that these are two different persons, Mariandl is a common pet name for Maria in Austria. No external usages found. And this is the first upload by a new user. AGF? best --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi! ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:41, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Here is the permission link

https://blog.shaunak.in/p/blog-page_15.html?m=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupiah968 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi! Please send permission to COM:OTRS and don't forget to mention the file URL in the email. Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Stemma Curinga

Ciao Arthur

Lo stemma è stato vettorializzato integralmente da me partendo da un'altra immagine libera. L'immagine in questione risulta perciò essere una nuova creazione e in quanto tale segue i criteri indicati da Commons per il caricamento di file. Pertanto se possibile se ne richiede il ripristino alla luce di quanto scritto qui. Grazie :)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Curinghese (talk • contribs)

@Curinghese: Sorry I don't speak Italian... :/ --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


ops sorry...

The emblem has been vectorized integrally by me starting from another free image. The image in question is therefore a new creation and as such follows the criteria indicated by Commons for uploading files. Therefore if possible it is required to restore it in the light of what is written here. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curinghese (talk • contribs) 10:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

@Curinghese: Please send your request to COM:UDR. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

FaceBook MetaData

Bonjour. Vous me notifiez sur des SD que vous transformez en demandes de suppression simples en me demandant de fournir un lien vers ces photos. Sachant que les photos issues de Facebook ne sont pas libres de droits, il me semblait que l'existence de FaceBook MetaData dans le dossier EXIF suffisait à prouver que ces photos n'étaient pas libres - en tous cas, c'est comme ça que fonctionnent la plupart des administrateurs. Pourriez-vous donc vous rapprochez d'eux, leur demander leur avis et me tenir au courant de la réponse qu'ils vous auront donné ? Merci d'avance et cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

@Patrick Rogel: Bonjour! Qu'est-ce qui caractérise des fichiers provennat de Facebook dans les metadata? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
C'est le préfixe FBMD (FaceBook MetaData). Je précise que vous êtes le seul administrateur à me demander des preuves supplémentaires ; aussi je vous demande de leur redemander afin qu'on en ait le coeur net. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel: ✓ Done Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Facebook_Metadata --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright Violations for photo upload?

Hi,

Recently you and user:Patrick Rogel flagged my Ali Abbas Zaffar profile.jpg pic (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rush922#File:Ali_Abbas_Zafar_profile.jpg.png)

I just wanted to let you know that since I am relatively new to uploading pics, it was done entirely in good faith and that I honestly believed I was following the rules. A few days ago I had also changed profile pics for other celebrity accounts, but I had no idea about the copyright rules and so I was flagged for that, but stopped doing so after learning the proper way to do it (or so I thought). So for the next day or so I stuck to just editing words on pages, which went well. But yesterday I tried to upload a pic the proper way, with a photograph I rightly thought was copyrighted by Bollywood Hungama - as it fit all their criteria for their Creative Commons License 3.0 - it was published on their page, taken by their photographer at an event, etc. So I was not sure why it was taken down today. Patrick Rogel sent a link where that same photo was used by another news site, but according to the Bollywood Hungama Creative Commons copyright captions below...

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license.
Attribution: Bollywood Hungama
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


VRT Wikimedia

This work is free and may be used by anyone for any purpose. If you wish to use this content, you do not need to request permission as long as you follow any licensing requirements mentioned on this page.

The Wikimedia Foundation has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by a Volunteer Response Team (VRT) member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2008030310010794.

If you have questions about the archived correspondence, please use the VRT noticeboard. Ticket link: https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2008030310010794
Find other files from the same ticket: SDC query (SPARQL)

...Bollywood Hungama allows you to use a pic from their site as long as you directly reference them; since that same picture was used by Bollywood Hungama, I assumed that the photo was fair game under their Creative License. But I guess I was wrong.

Just to be clear - how I can be totally sure that a Bollywood Hungama pic is copyrighted by them the next time I get a pic from their site? Does it specifically have to have their logo on it?


Since it was a misunderstanding, and since my edits were in good faith, I believe its unfair to flag me for Copyright Violations and give me a final warning, or else block my account. If you look at my last few errors, I have always tried to talk to the flaggers on their talk pages to understand the nature of my error. Some of them have responded, some have not. But on my end, it was always from a place of understanding the reason behind the rules. I am one who believes in trial by error, so why punish me for experimenting when I believed I knew the rules, but made a mistake? So I also request that you please remove that Copyright Violation due to good faith errors.

Thanks and tell me what you think please. Rush922 (talk) 02:38, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Rush922: If you think that the file shouldn't be deleted, please ask for undeletion here: COM:UDR. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:36, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Statue de la Vierge au coin de la rue de la Madone, Paris.jpg

(No valid reason for deletion.) !!! ???

OK

Thanks to advise User talk:Rc1959. Regards --Doalex (talk) 16:51, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

@Doalex: Bonjour. Si j'ai bien compris, vous supposez qu'il s'agit d'un screenshot de Google Maps/Street View. En utilisant street view, je ne trouve pas le même panneau d'affichage et je ne trouve pas de photo prise en 2011. Est-ce que vous pouvez fournir un lien plus précis vers l'image copiée ? Merci --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Arthur, non malheureusement, je ne peux pas fournir de Google Maps/Street View plus ancien, la comparaison n'est faite que sous le même angle mais date de 2017, le fichier est techniquement très médiocre (àmha) et ressemble à ces captures d'écran recadrées et agrandies que l'on peut faire à chaque moment sur Google Maps. Je me suis intéressé au problème en regardant la catégorie car j'ai moi-même téléversé un fichier il y a 11 ans et j'ai eu besoin de voir l'article qui concerne la rue de la Madone et ainsi je suis tombé sur ce fichier, ce qui explique mon intérêt pour le fichier du contributeur qui figurait également dans l'article de fr.wp, j'ai remplacé la photo et de fil en aiguille j'ai été voir les informations détaillées de ce fichier et lorsque que j'ai vu je suis resté très, très dubitatif. Il fut un temps où sur Street View le filigrane Google n'apparaissait pas. En bref et faute de preuves irréductibles je ne veux pas m'impliquer dans une éventuelle polémique pour ce fichier et je respecte ta décision, de plus l'intéressé m'a envoyé un message voir File:Statue de la Vierge au coin de la rue de la Madone, Paris.jpg, ce message laconique n'apporte rien de plus et je vais lui demander des vraies explications gentilles :-) .--Doalex (talk) 10:08, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
J'ajoute que j'habite à 2 pas de cette rue et je vais tâcher de faire une photo moins surnaturelle que celle qui figure dans la boite illustrant l'article fr:Rue de la Madone (Paris) ! --Doalex (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
J'ai obtenu la réponse adéquate, voir File:Statue de la Vierge au coin de la rue de la Madone, Paris.jpg je sais désormais quel APN ancien avait été utilisé, ce qui explique la résolution très faible de l'image téléversée et le rendu dans le visualiseur de médias. Je promets avant une prochaine demande de SI de regarder 7 fois l'image et tous les détails au préalable. --[[User:Doalex|Doalex] (talk) 08:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the warning. I understand that copyright varies according to the countries, but when I transfer files from it.wiki I transfer a lot of them, and sometimes I make mistakes. Hope you will understand. --Tn4196 (debates) 17:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Kept image closed as delete

Hi, I think you left the wrong closing template in this DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A woman doing yard work.jpg. -kyykaarme (talk) 09:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

File deleted

Dear Arthur Crbz, don't you think you rushed with deleting File:Pliant pro-referendum fata.jpg? I was notified at 03.10.2018 19:11, I wrote on discussion page at 20:25, and you deleted it at 23:20. Can you please recover the file and let people to discuss on the subject? If the discussion leads to this conclusion you can delete it, but please first let discussion to take place. Thank you. --Babu (talk) 06:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

The arguments listed by Strainu here are not valid. They're just a personal opinion, there is no consensus on that absurd pseudo-argument according to which "they might be OK to post in some other countries, but not in Romania, and almost certainly not in the EU". Alexandru M. (talk) 08:45, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
@Babu: Hello! File:Pliant pro-referendum fata.jpg has been deleted because it's likely to be a derivative work of a non-free picture. Who is the author of the picture depecting a family reading a book? Does the author give permission to release the picture under a free licence? If so, do you have a permission statement?
If you think this file shouldn't be deleted, you can ask for undeletion here: COM:UDR. Without answering these questions, the file is unlikely to be undeleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
:). It's a leaflets electoral for upcoming constitutional referendum in Romania. --Babu (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
@Babu: It doesn't matter... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Document familial

Hello. Could you please explain why File:Bureau_de_poste_de_Monoblet.jpg does not need a permission statement? [6] 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: Hi! Very likely to be uploader work (see other uploads) and not published elsewhere on the internet. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
They have claimed "own work" for all their uploads except for those that have been uploaded on 13 August 2018. One might wonder why they have used "document familial" rather than own work. They have used at least four cameras: SM-J320F, ALE-L21, DMC-TZ57, and DMC-FZ200. They have claimed own-work for photos which have been taken by the first three cameras, but they have not done so for the pictures taken by the last camera.
I think there are enough grounds to ask the user for clarification.
One last thing, please do not use rollback to revert edits which have been done with good faith [7]. The use of this tool should normally be limited to combating vandalism. Thank you. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dessin de Boylloon.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:37, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: See [8]. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Moin Arthur,
could you please restore the image, permission's given. Ticket#2018072310003783 Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 14:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

An old OTRS ticket

I dropped you a note on this rather old ticket. Do you want to process it based on my findings or shall I deal with it? Please ping me. Ww2censor (talk) 12:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: Hi! You can handle it :) --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Ok. I'll do that based on my investigations. Can you please restore File:The Walper Hotel.jpg for me to deal with? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 11:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
@Ww2censor: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
And ✓ Done Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 12:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

Saw you were active. Please delete this file for the obvious reasons. Thanks. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

@World's Lamest Critic: Please create a regular deletion request. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Take a look at this and think about it again. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Antonio Pérez Morte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

You haven't deleted File:The_Douyin_Chinese_slogan.png.Willy1018(talk) 06:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Willy1018: Done, thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi there! Daniel from Wikitongues here. It came to my attention that we had forgotten to add a licensing statement on File:WIKITONGUES- Joseph speaking Siyi Yue.webm's YouTube page. I just fixed that. Is it possible to undelete the file, or should I simply re-upload it and request a new review? Thank you! Bogreudell (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

@Bogreudell: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! Bogreudell (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

We now have permission for all the images. The artistic works have been verified by the artist and the photos of the artist are authored by Marcus Marschalek, the stepson of the artist, using the same ticket number. Can you please restore them so I can add the ticket to them? Thanks in advance. Ww2censor (talk) 00:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ww2censor: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:52, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Please help to restore the file: File:1. Нина Александровна Виноградова-Бенуа.jpg
This is a photo from the family archive. And we scanned it ourselves. Photos uploaded for the article Виноградова-Бенуа, Нина Александровна. What proof can we provide that these are our photo? We may have incorrectly specified the type of license. Please help to fix it.
We also added a photo to this site http://glazunov.ru/uploads/image/image/70/59.jpg

We will be very grateful to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Razhviz (talk • contribs) 07:49, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
@Razhviz: Hi! Please send permission to COM:OTRS, then file can be restored. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Real_Hongkonger_-_Gregory_Charles_Rivers.jpg

I noticed you tagged File:Real_Hongkonger_-_Gregory_Charles_Rivers.jpg. The file has been subject to https://otrs-wiki.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=13040 and might require reconsideration. Considering the pattern of the user's contributions (see the above link and Special:DeletedContributions/Gm_King), this looks a bit questionable to me, too. I'm not sure if I want to go straight to a DR yet, but I thought you might want to have a closer look and perhaps reconsider your tagging. Thank you for your help. --whym (talk) 10:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

@Whym: Hey! Thank you for letting me know, I didn't hear about this issue. I just sent an email and withdrawed the permission template. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:41, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Poor deletion practices

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Village pump#Poor deletion practices. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi! Can you please explain why you deleted this file? The author is a photographer who has shared hundreds of his photographs with the Commons. How is this one a copyright violation? Surtsicna (talk) 21:03, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

@Surtsicna: Hey! File was tagged by Patrick Rogel as copyvio because used on [9]. I have undeleted the file. Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Update: I remembered while restoring the file. The file has been overwritten with a different picture taken from [10], that's why it has been tagged as copyvio. I have splitted the files and deleted the wrong one. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Kasravi

A lot of Kasravi pictures (and others) have been speedily deleted with a very bad reasoning and without any proper discussion. Good thing that you noticed, but shouldn't the rest of the removed pictures be restored? --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

@HistoryofIran: Can you please provide file names? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:18, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Kasravi 15.jpg, File:Kasravi 14.png File:Kasravi 13.jpeg File:Kasravi 11.jpg File:Kasravi 12.jpg File:Kasravi 10.jpg File:Kasravi.jpg File:Kasravi4.gif are the ones I have found so far. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Some of those files along with similar ones from similar source are already discussed in Wikifa and there was no clue showing they were in PD-Iran. --Mhhossein talk 07:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Just like the pictures that Arthur stopped you from deleting? Cmon, Kasravi died in 1946, you speedily deleted his pictures without any form of proper discussion here. Kasravi is a disliked figure in the Islamic Republic due to his critic of the clergy, interesting.. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:50, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
I don't know what you're talking about, but if your comments are a spill over from WP, I did not delete them. That he died in 1946 does not change anything. You are free to ask for undeletion, if you have reliable sources showing his pictures was published more than 30 years ago. --Mhhossein talk 14:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Weak argument, also, when are you going to nominate pictures like these then? [11] [12] There's no proof that they were published more than 30 years ago. Anyways, let's see what Arthur has to say. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Arthur is waiting for the sources showing the works were published at least 30 years ago. Btw, no reliable sources are provided in the local wiki.--Mhhossein talk 19:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
@Mhhossein and HistoryofIran: Hi guys! I get your arguments but I think my discussion page is not the right place to talk about this. Complex copyright issues like this one should be discussed in a deletion request (rather than speedy deletion) or on the village pump. I let you create the deletion request if you want to, please mention each others on this page. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Arthur, having discussed the files elsewhere, I decided that the works were infringement of copyright and no, it was not a complex issue. AFAIK, there can of course be an undeletion (not a deletion) request, If anything is to be created. I'm ready to undelete the works by seeing sources proving the works are in PD-Iran. Btw, thanks for sending us out. --Mhhossein talk 09:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Homestead Florida Unaccompanied Minors.jpg

You recently delete this image, which was produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services and is therefore Public Domain under the copyright laws of the United States. The relevant Flickr page is here and it does indeed contain a(n erroneous) copyright claim.--Carwil (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@Carwil: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:05, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Copyright Watcher Barnstar
Thank you for deleting all the copyvios, keep up the good work ;) Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 20:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
@Buckaroo bob 91: Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Your'e always welcome :) maybe you could display it on your user page :)--Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Elisa Maria Boglino

Hi Arthur C. Concerning the Elisa Maria Boglino article and the deleted files. I dont know if you have seen my last mail?The thread was getting long. And if it still you responsible to handle it? I am asking if it is possible to ONLY undelete the following files:

Santa_Anastasia_lidt_syd_for_Cefalu_som_det_så_ud_i_1940.jpg, Selvportræt_._Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_træ._1932.jpg, (which is the same as "Tidligt Selvportræt, the one you have released) but in much better quality and correct text) Lavandaia._Elisa_Maria_Boglino.Olie_på_lærred.1932.jpg, Fanciulla_in_Rosa.Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred.1933.jpg, Tre_kvinder_ser_i_et_Spejl._Olie_på_lærred._Elisa_Maria_Boglino.ca_1930.jpg, Knælende_kvinde_med_barn.Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred.ca_1928.jpg, Ryttere Santa´Anastasia.Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Tush._ca.1955.jpg, EMB_i_Palermo_ca._1930.jpg, Elisa endnu i Danmark med sin hund.jpg Kvindeportræt_._Olie_ca._1930._Elisa_Maria_Boglino.jpg, Nøgne_kvinder_i_bevægelse._Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Tusch._ca_1927.jpg, and maybe also : Den_barmhjertige_Samaritan._Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred_.1928.jpg, as I dont know when I get time to redo this one

There also is some other information in the mail...

Some of theese files were uploadet i october , so maybe I still have to wait, to have them undeleted... but I would be so gratefull to know ...when approximately ,and if there is still problems please write me. Thank you.Ciopone. (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
@HNBS: Hi. Can you provide the OTRS ticket number so I can look intoour system? Thank you. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Arthur C. Hope its ok , that I write you here. As I told you before , most of these lately uploadet files , were done with the upload wizzard....and I do not have ticketnumbers for them....I am sure about this.The best would be, if you could find them by their filename? If you cannot , I will give you ticketnumbers to the versions uploadet with the release generator. Late in the proces I created a system for the filenames: Name of the artwork. Name of the artist. Material. Year of creation.Those uploadet with the releasegenerator, do not have correct names and some dates are not correct. So if its not too much work correct them....or maybe I could do this later on? If possible , please make coordinates from GPS not visible.

Tre_kvinder_ser_i_et_Spejl._Olie_på_lærred._Elisa_Maria_Boglino.ca_1930.jpg, (correct name):[Ticket#: 2018093010003301].

Knælende_kvinde_med_barn.Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred.ca_1928.jpg,(correct name):[Ticket#: 2018093010003202]

Selvportræt_._Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_træ._1932.jpg,(correct name): [Ticket#: 2018093010003275]

Den_barmhjertige_Samaritan._Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred_.1928.jpg,(correct name):[Ticket#: 2018093010003444]

Kvindeportræt_._Olie_ca._1930._Elisa_Maria_Boglino.jpg, [Ticket#: 2018093010003533]


Lets start with these 5 ones....maybe it would be possible for me to reupload some other ones with the wizzard later on, and maybe they would not be deleted now the copyright has been proved?

All files, regarding photos of old familyphotos I have no ticketnumbers for? I would like very much to have "EMB_i_Palermo_ca._1930.jpg," "Santa_Anastasia_lidt_syd_for_Cefalu_som_det_så_ud_i_1940.jpg" and " Elisa endnu i Danmark med sin hund.jpg" undeleted if possible?

Dear Arhur C. I hope so much , you will be able to do some of this.The 5 paintings is the most important , and the photo "EMB i Palermo" was the head of the article. Thank you.Ciopone. (talk) 11:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi ArthurC. T can see you have already undeleted some of the files....and the right ones.Thank you, thank you so very much. I had reached a point of nearly given it up.So happy....if you find files with the watermark from the camera on, dont undelete them, I think it would be better to make som new ones. Ciopone. (talk) 15:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

@HNBS: Hi! I am working on it, I think I will finish to restore these files tomorrow as it takes me some time. I will send you an email as soon as I have finished. Best, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi AthurC. Should be very thankfull if you could undelete two more paintings and one photo.And no more. Then maybe I could work a bit with some of her drawings.I think that I have uploadet some with watermarks on....not good. I know you are busy....so dont hurry, I just want to point out the important ones.

Den_barmhjertige_Samaritan._Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred_.1928.jpg, Knælende_kvinde_med_barn.Elisa_Maria_Boglino._Olie_på_lærred.ca_1928.jpg

EMB_i_Palermo_ca._1930.jpg

The photo was taken with my grandfathers camera, and I have the negative in an unbroken row with other negatives I tried to replace the "Lavadaia" wich you had already undeleted, with a new version, as I recently got a new pho to from Rome , after the painting has been washed and restored. I have sent mail to OTRS about this.. Thanks and bests.Ciopone. (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC) Hi....some other wiki helped me ....its ok now.:)Ciopone. (talk) 21:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted File:Nipmuc Regional High School Logo.svg without legitimate claim

Hi Arthur,

You appear to have deleted an image that I uploaded with a note that it infringes upon a copyright claim. However, you did not provide any information about the copyright source and I'm wondering if you might have mistakenly done this without looking closely into the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthelb (talk • contribs) 22:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

@Matthelb: Hi! This logo is above COM:TOO and copyright is owned by the school. It can be uploaded on Wikimedia Commons but only with a permission from the school. Permission needs to be sent to COM:OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: I think you misunderstood my initial comment. The logo in the file that I uploaded is not under copyright. It's not protected by any copyright claim. It has never been registered by the school for protection from reproduction. If you disagree with this, please direct me to the contrary evidence. Otherwise, I ask that you observe my request to undelete the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthelb (talk • contribs) 17:24, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: I can even be more specific. In your response, you stated "copyright is owned by the school", but no such copyright is owned by the school. It appears you are presuming the logo is under a copyright claim owned by the school. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthelb (talk • contribs) 17:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
@Matthelb: Hi! Every artwork (including a logo) is under copyright (the creator and/or the organization owns rights on the image). However, the copyright holder can decide to release the image under public domain or a free license. So, the school owns the copyright (and/or the creator of the logo) but can release it under a free license. That's why we need a permission statement from the school as copyright holder.
If you disagree, you can post your request on COM:UDR but you are likely to obtain the same answer. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: I'm confused as to why you believe the logo that I uploaded was created or owned by the school. I feel like I've been fairly clear that, to my knowledge, this is not the case, and so, according to your previous comment, the logo is not under copyright by the school. ("Every artwork (including a logo) is under copyright (the creator and/or the organization owns rights on the image)"). Since you took the liberty of deleting the image without investigating the circumstances, I assume you *must* have reason to believe that the school did, in fact, create the logo. I don't see how you can go around deleting files to garner meaningless commendations and awards from the Wikipedia community when you're actually doing a disservice to many small communities, such as the school in question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthelb (talk • contribs) 21:51, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@Matthelb: As I told you, if you disagree with my explanation, just post your request on COM:UDR. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Images

Please approve this images https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moisés_Suárez.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anna_Iriyama.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carlos_Said.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cast_of_the_Mexican_telenovela_Like_in_2018.png --Waqneu (talk) 21:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@Waqneu: These images will be handled by an administrator or a reviewer. Please wait. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

UDR requests

Please note, that except obvious cases like OTRS agent requests, the UDR requests should be open for at least 24 hours since last response. Ankry (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

@Ankry: Ok :) --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

I restored this one. It was deleted as "No OTRS permission for 30 days" on 10th Jan, but OTRS had never replied then, they only replied today. If they don't reply in the next 30 days then we can delete it. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

FILE: Wang Leehom - 2018 Golden Lotus Awards for Best Actor .jpg

Thank you for creating the template for this photo. I don't have an OTRS account and not able to see the letter mentioned. Also, I'm not sure what "If a valid permission is not provided within 30 days of the first response by an OTRS volunteer, this file will be deleted" means; what else should I obtain from the copyright owner to prevent this file being deleted after 30 days? Please kindly advise. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wang_Leehom_-_2018_Golden_Lotus_Awards_for_Best_Actor_.jpg Kievew (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Hi, I previously contacted photo owner to sent email to OTRS, but the photo was not restored. I misread wiki instructions and re-uploaded the file, which got deleted for duplication. Thanks to Ronhjones (talk · contribs) and Ankry (talk · contribs) that looked into this, and suggested that I contact you as there's OTRS ticket (Ticket:2019013110001626) pending and images restored/annotated by you. Please kindly assist. Thank you. Kievew (talk) 02:25, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi there

Hello admin Arthur. Can you please revdel a vandal change on my TP? I have no intentions to keep an image of a human reproduction system organ on my TP, even if removed. Thank you very much in advance. --E4024 (talk) 20:44, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

@E4024: Hi! I don't think it's a valid reason to hide a version of the history... At least, it has been reverted. Best, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Donna e Bimbo. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred. 1930. Museo GAM Palermo.jpg 2.144 × 2.421; 535

Hi Arthur Crbz. You helped me so much , half a year ago, getting photos into the Elisa Maria Boglino article, and I hope you can still remember I managed to prove about copyright and all that stuff. I have taken a long break from the article, and its nearly finished but I would like very much to get in this last photo. This time I am trying with a photo wich is taken by my uncle , when he visited the museo GAM in Palermo. He and I and my sister own the copyright together to the works of Elisa Maria Boglino who died in 2002. Unfotunately it is not a good and sharp photo , but its the best at the moment.There has been a very beautyfull one at Flickr for more than 10 years , but it dissapeared some month ago. I have tried to get it in, but it was rejected by Jcb, because I did not have URL adress or the name of photographer. Now this one taken by my uncle , has been nominated to delete by De728631, suppose he does not know about the copyright? I have written about all this on the discussionpage...also tried with another photo taken by the museum , but thinking it over , maybe its better to use the one taken by ourselves. Hope you can help me this time too. Thank you.Ciopone. (talk) 13:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC) Hi...it has been fixed:)Ciopone. (talk) 16:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Copyright

Thanks for looking at this image, which I had tagged as a copyright violation. The Flickr license was fully copyrighted when I tagged the photo, but has since been changed to "some rights reserved". All good. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: Hey! No problem :) --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, can you please explain why you deleted File:(아라TV) 방송 나와서 운동하다 가는 디크런치.webm despite my comment on the file's talk page? ƏXPLICIT 01:42, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Can you look it this ticket also covers this file? Ankry (talk) 13:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2019!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,900 people contributing over 10,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. Just like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2019 – Last day to enter!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

September 30th is the last day to upload photos for Wiki Loves Monuments! We're thrilled that the United States has almost reached 4,000 contributions so far this year. Of these images, ~370 (~9%) have already been used to help illustrate Wikipedia articles and pages on other wiki projects, which is fantastic.

If you've already made a photo contribution this year, thanks so much! If you have any last-minute photos of U.S. historical sites to upload and enter into the contest, today's the day to do it. Check out the United States event page for more information. Judging will take place throughout the month of October, after which the top-ten national finalists will be announced in early November.

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

I just saw that you deleted the image, but I don't see any discussion about it. That she doesn't like the photo is not a sufficient reason for deletion. Okki (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

I agree with Okki, I also left a note in the OTRS ticket. —Thibaut (talk) 13:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
@Okki and Thibaut120094: Very sorry for the late reply. I have deleted the picture according to Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#France. The depicted person may have given her consent to be take the picture but not to publish the picture.
In any case, you can ask for undeletion : COM:UDR. Please notify the depicted picture by email if the image is published again after the discussion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

I think you didn't read my comments in my discussion page about the picture you just deleted. The picture was and still is a background in all wiki-pages, if you use timeless skin. You can actually see it though only when the page is fast empty. I already thought to put this information in the discussion page of the picture, but it was already away :-)... So, if it really has copyright problems, then it should be immediately deleted from the background of the timeless skin, if it doesn't have copyright problems, then you can just inform me and the rest of the community (for example explaining what it's license status is, which I myself couldn't find out, apart that it stays as background in the timeless skin) :-) thanks. Yomomo (talk) 10:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

PS: I reloaded the picture with the rest of the wiki environment, so that you can also clearly see what I mean. I wouldn't delete the picture before its status becomes clear or before it is removed from the background of the timeless skin, for obvious reasons. Enjoy your Christmas and new years eve time :-) (also @JuTa: )

Yomomo (talk) 18:28, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

France Portugal Coupe latine 2018.jpg

Bonjour,

Concernant les fichiers que j'ai téléversé et que vous avez supprimez : pourtant les autorisations de permission ont été envoyées !! Vincent Limon (talk) 09:43, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

@Vincent Limon: Bonjour! Auriez-vous le numéro de ticket OTRS afin que je vérifie ? Merci --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Merci. J'ai envoyé le mail le 25 décembre (avec les copies des pièces que j'avais), mais je n'ai eu aucun retour. Je n'ai donc aucun numéro de suivi à donner. Depuis, j'ai vu qu'il existait des formulaires types à faire remplir, cela sera sans doute préférable à l'avenir que je l'utilise. Vincent Limon (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
@Vincent Limon: J'ai retrouvé votre email en effectuant une recherche, je vous ai apporté une réponse. Je vous propose de continuer par email afin de conserver un suivi. Ticket:2019122510004892 --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
~C'est entendu, Vincent Limon (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Files uploaded by user Chusall

Hi,

Could you undelete the following files. The proper agreement from author has just arrived. ticket:2020010510003368. Cheers, Polimerek (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

The list of deleted pictures: (or you can use: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/upload&user=Chusall )
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 8.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 7.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 6.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 5.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 4.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 2.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 1.jpg
  • File:Mistrzostwa Polski 2018-19 Ostatni Mecz Finałowy Cracovia - GKS Tychy (1-2) 3.jpg
  • File:Mecz w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Polonia Bytom 8-3.jpg
  • File:Mecz w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Naprzód Janów 8-0.jpg
  • File:III Mecz finałowy w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 3-4.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 9.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2016-17 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Comarch Cracovia Kraków 1-2 (d) 5.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 8.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 7.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 6.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 5.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 4.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 3.jpg
  • File:Galeria sław hokeistów Tauron KH GKS Katowice.jpg
  • File:Hokej.jpg
  • File:II mecz fazy Play-Off w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tatryski Podhale Nowy Targ 3-1.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 2.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2017-18 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Tauron KH GKS Katowice 2-1 (d) 1.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2016-17 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Comarch Cracovia Kraków 1-2 (d) 4.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2016-17 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Comarch Cracovia Kraków 1-2 (d) 2.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2016-17 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Comarch Cracovia Kraków 1-2 (d) 1.jpg
  • File:Finał Mistrzostw Polski 2016-17 w Hokeju na lodzie GKS Tychy - Comarch Cracovia Kraków 1-2 (d) 3.jpg
  • File:Superpuchar Polski 04.jpg
  • File:Superpuchar Polski 05.jpg
  • File:Superpuchar Polski 03.jpg
  • File:Superpuchar Polski 02.jpg
  • File:Superpuchar Polski 01.jpg
@Polimerek: Done, please add the permission template to the undeleted files. BR, --Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Done. Thank you. Polimerek (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)


File:Bwv 248 ehre sei dir Gott gesungen chorus.ogg

I noticed that you deleted File:Bwv 248 ehre sei dir Gott gesungen chorus.ogg. I also noticed that that file is listed at Commons:OTRS/received (ticket:2019091910002376). I wonder whether there is a misunderstanding and whether the file ought to be restored. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

@Michael Bednarek: Hi! An OTRS agent has sent an email on the 28/09/2019 asking for clarifications and details. There was no response to this email and so permission has not been granted to this file. After 30 days, files without permission are deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Request

I understand that you're trying to be careful and protective about permission to post photos on WP, but the Michael Conahan photo should stay and I wrote to a concerned Wikimedia administrator about it days ago without receiving a response. The photo is by definition public domain. It is a mug shot I got by filing a FOIA with the U.S. Marshals Service 10 years ago. All such photos are public. The only photos I've ever posted on WP Media have been public domain mugshots, or photos I've taken myself. The Conahan photo is no different than an official one taken of POTUS or from the Library of Congress. Please restore it. Thank you very much. The subject of the photo, by the way, is scheduled to be released from federal prison in six more years, after imprisoning hundreds of children in a for-profit facility, kids who never should have been prosecuted in the first place many of whom had their educations and lives permanently ruined and even committed suicide. The scheme was corrupt from end to end, fueled by the payment and receipt by this and his co-defendant judge of millions in bribe money. 2001:5B0:2942:4358:E0E8:BAAB:60B0:18DA 14:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

@2001:5B0:2942:4358:E0E8:BAAB:60B0:18DA: Hi! Could you please provide the name of the file so I can look into it. Thanks! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

File:First Regus location at Avenue Louise 165, Brussels.jpg

Hi Arthur, can you please help me understand the problem with File:First Regus location at Avenue Louise 165, Brussels.jpg and how it can be recovered? It was uploaded by Regus's social media director at my request, and it looked to me like she had selected the correct licensing. Can you please undelete it and let me know what OTRS email is required? EllenCT (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

@EllenCT: Hi! The copyright holder needs to send a permission to the OTRS team. Once the permission is approved, file will be undeleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Query

Hi Arthur Crbz. why you has deleted my uploads despite your OTRS ticket? Shiasun (talk) 05:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

@Shiasun: Hi! The copyright holder needs to send a permission to the OTRS team. Once the permission is approved, files will be undeleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
I own the copyright and I sent the license to the OTRS team. [Ticket#: 2019122910003251]
(why you has deleted my uploads?) Shiasun (talk) 14:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Shiasun: Some days after you send the email, an OTRS agent replies to your query. Did you receive any feedback from them? --Mhhossein talk 21:20, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Mhhossein Yes but i saw it now (because it had gone into spam)
Can I answer now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiasun (talk • contribs) 17:54, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
@Shiasun: Definitely! Files can be easily undeleted if the required permission is provided. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Thanks dear Arthur Crbz Shiasun (talk) 19:14, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Scot Nelson

I can’t check because it was deleted, but i think you should refund because the author Scot Nelson released all their images in PD. Please check this and all related images more carefully. --NessieVL (talk) 15:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Replied here. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:55, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

files by Henry M. Stoever deleted

@Arthur Crbz: What needs to happen to establish acceptable copyright provenance for two files by User:Henry M. Stoever that were deleted?

These were written by Henry M. Stoever, submitted to Wikimedia Comments by Henry M. Stoever, with my help (as I watched). What needs to happen so you can accept that he has legal right to release them to Wikimedia Commons?

Secondarily, these were legal documents entered as evidence in a trial in the Municipal Court of Kansas City, Missouri in the US. As such, I would think they should be in the public domain. I'm fairly sure that would be the case for any court of record in the US, unless there were a specific court order sealing those documents. That may not be true in this case, because Kansas City, Missouri, is NOT a court of record. However, that should be beside the point, I would think.

Because this is not a court of record, and because I wanted a transcript for other purposes, I posted a partial transcript of that trial to Wikiversity as Wikiversity:Fifteen anti-nuke protestors tried for 2019 trespass on the Kansas City Plant. Now these documents that were part of that record are no longer available for reasons I do not understand.

Please help me understand what needs to happen so these documents can be restored and made available, as the author and copyright owner clearly intended when he created an account in Wikimedia Commons and uploaded those files under my instructions. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 03:24, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

@DavidMCEddy: Thank you for your message! Please post the undeletion request on this page : COM:UDR. Don't forget to mention the name of the affected files. Thank you! --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: I did as you suggested. You then replied on COM:UDR saying, "This undeletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. File:Kozak Meeting.jpg This photo belongs to CCI France Russie". This makes no sense to me, because the files I asked you to undelete are pdfs not jpgs. They were not photos and never had anything to do with anything en France ou en Russie. ???? Merci, DavidMCEddy (talk) 21:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Files uploaded

Hi,Could you undelete the following files. The proper agreement from author has just arrived (08:26, 9 Jan 2020). Ticket#2019120210004694.

  • File:Портрет Киекбаева Ж Автор Ильдар Шаяхметов 1991 г.jpg
  • File:Мемор Доска диплом работа ШИГ -СаитбабаШкол 1986 год автор Шаяхметов ИГ.jpg
  • File:Проект-составитель Шаяхиметов ИГ 2011 Обложка Урман сказ КиекбайЖ худож Голубев Глеб .-2011.jpg

--ZUFAr (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

@ZUFAr: ✓ Done Please add the permission template. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:19, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Pronunciation

Hi Arthur! Over at English Wiktionary we are a little puzzled by one of your audio uploads. While the transcription given is "quatre-vingt-onze" the recording appears to say "quarante-vingt-onze". Would you be able to contribute to the discussion at wikt:Wiktionary:Tea_room#Quatre-vingt-onze_audio or consider clarifying the description of this file? This, that and the other (talk) 10:18, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi User:This, that and the other! Thank you for the message. I have replied on Wiktionary. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi! File uploader tells me, that he sent permission from the copyright holder to OTRS. Maybe this message was lost. This will be repeated soon. I will report the result. --Kaganer (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Arthur, I sent the missing permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The ticket of the process is [Ticket#: #2018101710001978]. Can you please recover the File:Dr Milo Bošković.jpg . — Preceding unsigned comment added by ID007NS (talk • contribs) 06:20, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Arthur, I sent the missing permission as indicated to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The ticket of the process is [Ticket#: 2018082710009349]. I hope the picture will not be deleted, Cheers, Marina --Marina Manganaro --Marina.manganaro (talk) 14:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marina.manganaro (talk • contribs) 11:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Malbork-Middle-Castle.jpg Malbork-High-Castle.jpg

Hello. You asked for author of those 2 pictures. This is where i found them https://zamki.res.pl/malbork.php. There is no author as i see. So what you want me to do?)

Shanereti.jpg

Have a look at the talk page that I set up just before you deleted the photo. Schwede66 21:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Replied on the talk page. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy UnDRs

I see that you closed several UnDRs today soon after they were opened. All three were completely obvious and uncontroversial, thank you for your work.

However, for your future activities there, please note that the denizens who inhabit UnDR have an informal agreement that we will not close UnDRs for at least 24 hours after the last substantive comment. This will give a chance for all of us, around the globe, to comment if we wish. The only exception to this is UnDR requests made by OTRS volunteers who are not Admins. See Commons_talk:Undeletion_requests/Archive_1#Closing_time? for discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: Ok ;) --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:40, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Works of Jana Skalická

May I ask you why you deleted the files of Jana Skalická's works? I uploaded the images on January 19, 2020. As far as I know, I have a month to deliver OTRS confirmation. Permission of the images author (Jaroslav Beneš) has been delivered. Confirmation from copyright heirs will be available next week. Thank you for understanding. --Gampe (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@Gampe: Hi! Files with "OTRS Pending" template are deleted approx. 10 days after being uploaded (if no permission has been sent).
Don't worry, file can be easily undeleted as soon as we receive a valid permission. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Den Barmhjertige Samaritan. Elisa Maria Boglino. Tusch med turkis Akvarel. ca 1980.jpg | Jesus ved den syge Pige. Elisa Maria Boglino. Tusch og Akvarel. Ca.1970.jpg

Hi Arthur Crbz. One year ago you helped med a lot, with the pictures to the article about the painter Elisa Maria Boglino. I sent papers, and signatures, about the copyright to permission Commons, we are 3 copyright holders, my sister, my uncle and me. I have had a long break, but some days ago I did upload a few new pictures , I have also sent emails, and now they are waiting to proceed. Maybe if you take a look on it the y will not be deleeted? I also made new versions of:

Den barmhjertige Samaritan. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred .1928.jp

Knælende kvinde med barn.Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred.ca 1928.jpg

Cavalli. Elisa Maria Boglino. Tryk fra photo af Oliemaleri. ca 1960.jpg Theese are accepted in the article, but the photos are not visible outside the article? When you look at pictures under her name.? And it is still as though they are not released?

@HNBS: Hi! Thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons.
I see on our system that your case is being handled by Krd. Please be patient, emails are handled by volunteers during their free time. And all the emails are handled ;) --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

One last question: https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/donna-e-bimbo/_QGRCw3R1YvdXg?hl=it I would like to use this photo , from Google Art , in the article. I do not know the photograher , but I have copyright to the painting. Am I aloud to do that.? I hope you can help me...and maybee still remember about the copyright? Thank you...yours sincerely Ciopone. (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

@HNBS: This is a tricky question and I don't have a clear answer. I recommend to ask the question on Commons:Village_pump/Copyright. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: Thank you Arthur....I may try the villagepump:) Would it be a ok to write on the discussion page of Krd, about the copyright and the papers at Commons, so he knows about it?Ciopone. (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Request

Hi there, pictures from Ricardo di Roberto page were deleted by a bot (CommonsDelinker), with a message "Removendo "Ricardo_di_Roberto.jpg", por ter sido apagado no Commons por Arthur Crbz: Media missing permission as of 28 October 2019. Please send a permission statement to undelete this file. " and "Removendo "Ricardo_Japinha_na_bateria.jpg", por ter sido apagado no Commons por Arthur Crbz". In fact the permissions were provided by Willer Carvalho on October 28,2019 ( I was copied into email note). In case you do not have the email note sent by him to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, just let me know in order I can forward it. Thanks. --Edi Veloso (talk) 20:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

@Edi Veloso: Hi! I can look into it. Could you please give me the ticket number (in the subject of the email received)? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: Sure! Ticket#2019102610005008 --Edi Veloso (talk) 22
13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
@Edi Veloso: Hi! The OTRS agent sent an email on the 28 October 2019 and did not get any reply. Please reply to this email. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Deleted files

Hi! Today you've deleted some of files of Solaris Buses, that I've uploaded in last year. The owner of copyrights of these files (company Solaris Bus & Coach S.A.) has send the OTRS Permission in November 2019. What was wrong with this permission and why have you deleted these files? Michozord (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

@Michozord: Hi! Please provide file names and/or ticket number so I can look into it. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:24, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
This is the list of deleted files:

Michozord (talk) 16:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Ticket:2019110810006325
@Michozord: Hi! The ticket is in Polish so it's not easy for me to help. It seems that Polimerek replied to the email on the 11 november 2019 but no response was received. Final permission template has not been added to the file page, that's why files have been deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
It wasn't because my qestion about real authorship of these pictures was never answered. I asked uploader to add real names of authors to the pictures and then explain how they granted their copyright to the company, but it was never done. Polimerek (talk) 13:46, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Laure Darcos.jpg, supprimé hier et recré aujourd'hui

Bonjour Arthur Crbz

À la suite de ma demande de vérification d'autorisation de publication de la photo de Laure Darcos (demande que j'avais faite le 23/01), vous avez ainsi supprimé la photo de Laure Darcos hier à 12:17 du fait qu'aucun ticket OTRS n'avait été reçu dans les délais.

Mais cette photo vient d'être réimportée aujourd'hui. Dois-je reposer un bandeau "No permission" ? Un bandeau "Speedydelete" ? Ou faire une demande normale de suppression? À moins que vous ne puissiez procéder à la suppression immédiate vous même.

J'attends vos suggestions.

Cordialement, --Poudou99 (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

@Poudou99: Bonjour! J'ai remis un modèle "No permission" et notifié l'hébergeur du fichier. Attendons de voir si une autorisation est envoyée, sinon le fichier sera encore supprimé... --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Merci. J'ai laissé un message dans la PdD Wikipedia-Fr de l'IP qui a importé cette photo dans l'article Laure Darcos plusieurs fois. A suivre... --Poudou99 (talk) 18:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Discussion

Sorry to border you MR/MISS Crbz,as recently one of the high valuable images of the cantonese movement project,File:Kapok flag.svg ,has been delete under your command that need a permission statement to verthrow.I wonder the File could save back with Permission PD-ineligible,as the symbol has been in public domain for years that for the free and fair use in public purpose,which the anonymous original designer must be desire for.It could be unnessary and dangerous to get the permission statement under the name of the anonymous original designer,the authorities possibily hunting for now,and would use it against the welfares of the designer and other innocent people.

You shoule also learn that in the recent days,some other new guys in zhwiki have also delete the same File from pages,and claimed the File as netizens' fiction that likily interrogating the detail of the original designer and didn't follow the common sense and rule of zhwiki as other zhwiki users could tell in their view.

Please give assistance to rescue the flag and other Files that could be delete in the similar situation as there are really huge obliteration against all kinds of dissidents moving on in wiki area,and pay attention to it .Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter,with my great honest.——Longway22 (talk) 02:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

@Longway22: Hi! This is a complex subject that requires discussion. Please request undeletion of the file here: COM:UDR. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
It seens really funny that a final decision has been made by the only one anothoer AD really fast,that some other cases off further responses left there unclose for days.And I wonder real reason the judgement base on could be just and open with nothing to hide.—— Longway22 (talk) 03:03, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Restoring images

Hi! Can you restore this image because there is an OTRS permission for it? Thanks, Miljan Simonović (talk) 01:23, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

@Miljan Simonović: Hi! ✓ Done Please add permission template. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Can you do this too for these files -- 1, 2, 3 (permission)? --Miljan Simonović (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@Miljan Simonović: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Photo of Isabel dos Santos

Hi Arthur Crbz, I am writing concerning the deletion of this photo. That photo was only one of many by Nuno Coimbra, blocked on Commons, and at pt-wiki and en-wiki. What would be the procedure to verify that the remaining photos are okay for usage? Regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 23:56, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Pending
@Rui Gabriel Correia: Hi! Thank you for your message. I will try to look at it. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:23, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

[Ticket#: 2020012810006331]

Hi Arthur I had upload pic file and completed the form in link below.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_OTRS_release_generator

Then, by use the text of my native Persian language, I sent it to the below email address.

permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Because the User:4nn1l2 who knew Persian helps me already. But he is busy now. He offered to me ask help from you. I own the photos below. Please help me to register ownership of my Film scenes Photo for making a gallery.

read more about me on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hossein_Rajabian

email ticket: [Ticket#: 2020012810006331]

This is Form:

I hereby affirm that I, Hossein Rajabian, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Hossein Rajabian 2020-01-28

[generated using relgen.js] Bavaran (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

@Bavaran: Email replied, please check. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@Arthur Crbz: Hi Dear Arthur. Email replied, please check.Bavaran (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Hello Arthur, I am here completely by chance (actually because of the thread about you at AN). Bavaran claimed that I "offered to [him] ask help from you." This is a lie, and I have never ever told that. Please don't believe this user. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:28, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear Arthur You can read him suggestion on their talk page. I'm not lie. What do he mean by this words? "Further issues should be raised at COM:OTRSN" This is a misunderstanding. Bavaran (talk) 23:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Didier Ben Loulou autoportrait 2018.jpg ‎

Bonjour, vous avez supprimé la photo File:Didier Ben Loulou autoportrait 2018.jpg Il a pourtant envoyé l’autorisation nécessaire et reçu un ticket OTRS [Ticket#2020011710001025]. Merci de bien vouloir regarder. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 09:56, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

@Ctruongngoc: Bonjour! Nous avons bien reçu un email, cependant, aucune réponse n'a été reçue au dernier email envoyé par l'agent OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Bonsoir, Didier Ben Loulou m’informe qu’il a envoyé un courriel à OTRS ce jour. Merci, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN

Hi Arthur, a complaint has been filed at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Misuse_of_admin_tools_-_Arthur_Crbz's_deletions. However, it seems that nobody notified you. --Túrelio (talk) 19:50, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Replied here. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Photos uploaded of Assyrian Reliefs for Allan Gluck

Hi, Arthur. On January 9, 2020, you deleted a batch of images that I uploaded for photographer Allan Gluck of Assyrian Reliefs on view at the Getty Villa. I had tagged them as OTRS pending but you deleted them for insufficient permissions. Allan Gluck had already sent permission, indicated I was the Wikimedia Commons user who would be doing the upload and his communication was assigned Ticket #2019102210009673. Could those images please be restored? It is a hassle for him to have to send a permission statement for every single image of his that I upload. I have been uploading images to Wikimedia since 2007. Mharrsch (talk) 19:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

@Mharrsch: Hi! Sorry but the copyright holder didn't reply to the last email sent by the OTRS agent. Therefore, the permission is not validated. Let me know if you need aditional assistance. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Arthur, can the confirming email from the OTRS agent be resent? Is there somewhere I can see a list of the filenames of the images that were deleted? I photographed the same exhibit and have uploaded a number of my own images as well and used a similar naming scheme for his images but apparently made a few changes to his filenames during the upload process and cannot locate them all. The copyright holder is willing to send individual permissions with each file URL if absolutely necessary but it is asking him to do a lot of unnecessary work. Can you check your contributions list for January 9 and provide the deleted filenames from it? Most were photographs of Assyrian reliefs but I had also uploaded some of his images of bronze Roman sculpture from the "Buried by Vesuvius" exhibit at the Getty Villa as well. He is a docent there. Mharrsch (talk) 16:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

@Mharrsch: Hi! I have sent you again the email from the OTRS agent. Here is the list of the last deleted files that you uploaded :
  • File:Relief Humiliation of Elamite Kings Nineveh Gypsum N Palace Ashurbanipal British Museum AG.jpg
  • File:Relief Head Eunuch Gypsum Dur Sharrukin Khorsabad Royal Palace Sargon II British Museum AG 02.jpg
  • File:Relief Head Eunuch Gypsum Dur Sharrukin Khorsabad Royal Palace Sargon II British Museum AG 01.jpg
  • File:Relief Head Bearded Man Gypsum Dur Sharrukin Khorsabad Royal Palace Sargon II British Museum AG.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief Garden of Ashurbanipal Nineveh Gypsum N Palace Ashurbanipal British Museum AG 03.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief Garden of Ashurbanipal Nineveh Gypsum N Palace Ashurbanipal British Museum AG 01.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief Garden of Ashurbanipal Nineveh Gypsum N Palace Ashurbanipal British Museum AG 02.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief depicting Celebration after a Royal Bull Hunt Kalhu (Nimrud) Northwest Palace Ashurnasirpal II 875-860 BCE British Museum AG.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief depicting Battle with Camel Rider from Kalhu (Nimrud) Central Palace Tiglath pileser III 728 BCE British Museum AG.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief of the Banquet of Ashurbanipal From Nineveh Gypsum N Palace British Museum 03.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief of the Banquet of Ashurbanipal From Nineveh Gypsum N Palace British Museum 02.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief of the Banquet of Ashurbanipal From Nineveh Gypsum N Palace British Museum 01.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief Attack on Enemy Town from Kalhu (Nimrud) Central Palace reign of Tiglath-pileser III British Museum - 4.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief Attack on Enemy Town from Kalhu (Nimrud) Central Palace reign of Tiglath-pileser III British Museum - 3.jpg
  • File:Assyrian Relief Attack on Enemy Town from Kalhu (Nimrud) Central Palace reign of Tiglath-pileser III British Museum - 2.jpg
  • File:Statue Pseudo Seneca Bronze Bone Stone Roman 100BCE-100CE Museo Archeologico Nazionale Naples AN 5616 (Profile).jpg
  • File:Statue Pseudo Seneca Bronze Bone Stone Roman 100BCE-100CE Museo Archeologico Nazionale Naples AN 5616 Front.jpg
  • File:Man wearing turban possibly Pythagoras Bronze Roman 100BCE-100CE Museo Archeologico Nazionale Naples AN 5607 (1).jpg
  • File:Seleukos I Nikator Bronze Roman 100BCE-100CE Museo Archeologico Nazionale Naples AN 5590 1.jpg
  • File:Bust Priapus Bronze Roman 100BCE Museo Archeologico Nazionale Naples found in the Villa di Papiri 1.jpg

--Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Arthur, thank you so much for providing the file names. I also checked with the copyright holder and he has received the confirming email and will respond naming me as the uploader and listing the file URLs. I'm afraid I may have inadvertently caused the confusion around these uploads. I normally upload only my own work or work clearly in the public domain so have little experience with the current OTRS policy. When Mr. Gluck asked if I could upload images for him I researched the OTRS procedure, found a permissions template where he could verify that I am the Wikimedia user that would be doing the uploads and specifying that he was agreed to the CC BY terms. I did not realize he needed to confirm each file URL as uploaded. Mr. Gluck has actually given me thousands of his files on hard drives with the hope that I could upload them over time as my schedule allows. Is there a way that a specific OTRS permission can be granted for his entire collection that I could reference in the file description so he doesn't have to verify his permission for every single file of his that I upload? Mharrsch (talk) 13:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

  • These were all deleted, again, by another administrator before they could be OTRS tagged because you did not use an undeletion summary to indicate why they should stay undeleted. I am going to proceed to do the cleanup on this. ~riley (talk) 07:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear Arthur,

Apparently due to a snafu (?) the granted permission

https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketNumber=2019101010004977

had not yet been put on the now deleted files in these categories.

  • Could you please in the mean time give me a list of the deleted files?

Thank you, the uploader of those files, Hansmuller (talk) 11:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

@Hansmuller: Hi! I'm sorry but I don't know how to find deleted files that were part of a category. Also, this ticket is very long and in Dutch so it's quite hard for me to understand the situation.
Maybe you should post a message on the COM:OTRS Noticeboard. Hope this helps. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. Before i start yelling on the Noticeboard, isn't there a logfile of your deleted files? "My" deleted files have all names starting with the string "File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection"... Hope you can help me out, thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 12:52, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Hansmuller, remember we agreed on keeping communication to just one channel? You contacted me through OTRS, cc-ed me in an email and now I read your message here. That's three channels for one issue: that does not help your case, it only makes it more confusing if you get more people involved.
I am on it, like I said yesterday: please give me some space to help you and clearify your situation. Ciell (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@Ciell Thanks, but then i didn't ask Arthur for undeletion, only for a list of the deleted files, which i don't have and people ask from me (like you wanted filenames), so you see this is a related but still different issue. Please, don't judge too fast. Carpe diem, Hansmuller (talk) 13:01, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Undelete File:La Virgen y el Niño - Meter Theou.jpg and others files that I painted

This file, the paint, I'm the autor. I don't know why you delete it. Please undelete it. See you when I was painting it in this link. And were deleted too others like Cariló, Cebollas Vivas, En un Despertar, Faro Querandí, La Virgen y el Niño - Meter Theou, Meter Theou - Madre de Dios, Pinar en Mar de las Pampas, Playa y 121 y Corbeta 'María' de Bilbao llegando a la Habana that I'm the author. Thanks you. @Aleator: puedes ver que hacer por este tema. Gracias.Fernando de Gorocica (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Replied here. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

File:After Long Autumn Night by Qian Qi (II) 钱起《效古秋夜长》.pngEdit

This is my picture. I replaced the image both here and in Flickr with a new one without watermarks which I just sketched. Pls remove deletion request. Newby here and do not know the complex rles here. QSandai (talk) 04:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Pls remove deletion request. Thank you.


'

File:After Long Autumn Night by Qian Qi (II) 钱起《效古秋夜长》.pngEdit

Original file on Flickr uses watermarks. I would delete this file per COM:PCP. Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

This is my picture. I replaced the image both here and in Flickr with a new one without watermarks which I just sketched. Pls remove deletion request. Newby here and do not know the complex rles here. QSandai (talk) 04:48, 7 February 2020 (UTC) QSandai (talk) 04:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Arthur, I've seen you restored this empty file/redir-page twice, but left the speedy-tag on it. ? --Túrelio (talk) 10:45, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Hi! ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)


Hi Arthur - why did you delete photo from my article?

Vege.cyclist (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Restoring deleted OTRS-pending images

Hello Arthur,

According to your report on the admin noticeboard, you still haven't finished restoring the Achterberg-images uploaded by HansMuller. I've been waiting for two weeks now, but am getting a little bit impatient. When will you be able to finish this, so I can do my part as OTRS-agent? Ciell (talk) 20:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey @Arthur Crbz, I need your attention on file File:Gaganyaan.jpg which was nominated for deletion and was eventually said to be deleted by you in summary. But maybe due to some reason it was not deleted. Please have a look. Brown Chocolate (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi Arthur. Please undelete this file. It is a family portrait that has been released into the public domain. It has been used for two publicly accessible obituaries. See: https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/declan-meagher-obituary-childbirth-pioneer-who-championed-irish-family-planning-1.4090822 and https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m360 Thank you!

Hi GMTL404,
Arthur Crbz hasn't been online for a while. I think you can better request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests for the moment. Ciell (talk) 16:59, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Grotten Zonneberg (Maastricht) Mosasaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Request: Delete files

It is not sure, whether it is the uploaders' own work

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:W1200_h595_x633_y411_WZ_79459835_1839639289_RGB_190_1_1_ea16123395e96dbd85c1cf71d2b77024_1583508305_1839639289_22b18c4728-31a3ee7ae039a66e.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Prof._Johrendt.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kinderuni-zum-Thema-Ritter-und-Prinzessinnen-Die-Turniere-des-Mittelalters_image_1024_width.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Claudia_Märtl.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Akademiefoto.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Csu_bild_121_2098.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Carmen_cardelle.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Institutsfoto.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HfJS-Festakt-40-Jahre-Steinmeier-146_klein-1440x960-1160x773-c-default.jpg Koooori1 (talk) 06:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Delete these files please. Thank you!--Koooori1 (talk) 06:28, 30 June 2020 (UTC)--Lotti kkaa (talk) 06:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Help to restore deleted files ticket:2019060210001172 and 2018100510004327

Hi Arthur. Apparently I still have some problems in the Elisa Maria Boglino article, with some files that still not have permission. I have the copyright, I hope you can remember , but maybe i have done something wrong with the releasething. I ONLY need permission for the files used in the article. I can see noticeboard have written you today:

Pictogram voting comment.svg Kommentar There is a large number of tickets related to this case (I think like 20 or more if I remember correctly). Almost all have the problem with the interactive release generator (the customer has got problems to properly use it) and the large number of tickets has spread and complicate the procedure. It's not limitated to 2 o3 tickets, and not limitated to 1 or 2 days. Regards. --Ganímedes (diskussion) 01:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Pinging @Arthur Crbz re Ticket:2019060210001172 and Ticket:2018100510004327. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC) Kategori (++): Commons co

I hope you can help me this last time? Maybee i shall refill some releasething?Sorry to bother again. Thank you.Ciopone. (talk) 11:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC) The other files that maybee still need permission are:

File:Triptykon. Halshugningen af Johannnes Døberen. Elisa Maria Boglino. Ødelagt under bombardement.Olie på træ.1930.jpg File:De Gode Gerninger. Elisa Maria Boglino. Foto af Fresko (oprindeligt i farver) , ødelagt under bombardement. 1928.jpg (theese two painting are both destroyed during ww2)

and File:En Pige. Elisa Maria Boglino. Olie på lærred. ca 1926.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by HNBS (talk • contribs) 11:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi...I have just sent Commons a releasemail with this ticket:[Ticket#2020073010006511].......I hope that will do it?Ciopone. (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Langue du titre d'exposition

Bonjour Arthur Crbz, Tu as nommé la catégorie de l'exposition en anglais. Mais la pratique semble être de ne pas traduire les titres d’expositions : regarde sous Category:Exhibitions at the Musée du quai Branly et Category:Exhibitions at the Musée du Louvre. Si tu n'y vois pas d'objections, je renommerais avec le titre original. Zythème (talk) 07:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

DR was still open

 Info I closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guerrier Iroquois.JPG with a "kept" decision as it was still open; noticed only afterwards that you already decided to keep the image in February, but didn't close the DR then. So this is just to inform you that it's now closed and I came to the same conclusion as you ;-) Gestumblindi (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Ticket #2020110210021521

Hello Arthur, Not sure why you have declined the copyright release from Sergio Eguivar for his image at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M23_Eguivar.jpg The image is from his webpage at http://www.baskies.com.ar/PHOTOS/M23%20LRGB.htm If you click on the Home page, you will see "all images copyright © Sergio Eguivar"

This form of release has been used several times with no issues, see the following tickets: 2020110210014271, 2020102910021401, 2020101110007522, 2020092710012231 Please accept the contribution of Sergio's image, thank you. Assambrew (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Ticket ORTS 2020111110009199

Hi, Can you update me with the current status of my picture ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lise_de_la_Salle_(piano_factory3).jpg ) and the pending ORTS request. I've asked my photographer to contact you, so there should not be any issue anymore, can you confirm and allow my picture ? Thank you Lise de la Salle (talk) 21:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Undeletion request for ๓_ค_Ր_ງ_น_ค_૪_(_շ_օ_շ_օ_).png: Ticket #2020111110007691

Achim55 has posted the marking of possible copyvio on the edit #511971762, however the original file I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons is in the entirely different resolution, aspect and format from those of the suspected file on the unknown server that Achim55 provided its URL.

The original file ๓ ค Ր ງ น ค ૪ ( շ օ շ օ ).png's properties: resolution: 5,625 × 10,000 pixels, file size: 102.13 MB, MIME type: image/png

The suspected file on the unknown server's properties: resolution: 690 × 1035 pixels, file size: 0.208 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg

It is impossible to regard the suspected file in even lower quality and resolution as the formerly existing reference of the original one.

In addition, there is no watermark on the original file ๓ ค Ր ງ น ค ૪ ( շ օ շ օ ).png meanwhile the suspected file on the unknown server has a line of letters on the bottom of it.

Therefore, I have committed no copyright violation and the deletion request should be removed.

Arcamadienist (talk) 13:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Arthur, please check also ticket:2020100710011374 that was allegedly given for the deleted version File:Yanting Ma (2020).png uploaded by m:Special:CentralAuth/Epidometer. --Achim (talk) 17:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
That's fine. Why has your account User:Epidometer been blocked? --Achim (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Show me the undeniable evidences to declare that the user called User:Epidometer is one of Wikimedia Commons accounts I created.
Besides, what kind of violations against the regulations of Wikimedia Commons has User:Epidometer committed? The log shows no reference URL to compare the deleted media work with anything else.
What more can I find than just some of arrogant global sysop operators executed mass deletion including even barely concerned contents without discussing anything about each possibility of violation before murdering all of them, didn't they?
Arcamadienist (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
I was just wondering why User:Epidometer did upload exactly the same 5,625 × 10,000 pixels image claiming it to be their own work. --Achim (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
I do wonder why you can let me know the formerly deleted image was in the resolution of 5,625 × 10,000 pixels, though the whole information of the image is gone or hidden / invisible to all of us the normal users.
I also wonder why I could create my current account, log in and upload the exacly same concerned media file; nonetheless according to your story I was already globally locked as User:Epidometer.
Arcamadienist (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Don't try to fool us. I've had a look at the deleted File:Yanting Ma (2020).png and I also found both of your uploads of File:Marguax played Yue Ying on Bloody Romance (2018).png and your en:Ma Ge (actress) that has been saved to everybodywiki. --Achim (talk) 20:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
For not to be misunderstood: I'm fine with this image being kept after OTRS did pass, even though it is on ameba.jp. --Achim (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Then you are trying to be convincing everyone on this authentic Wikimedia Foundation's community to trust the external copy-logging websites only collecting the last revisions of the unreasonably deleted articles from Wikipedia, operated by the totally unknown outsiders who have nothing to do with the Wikimedia Foundation, giving the permission for nobody to update the stocked legacies on their own servers, any more?
If you are the owner of the external-uneditable-record holding websites, please make every invisible information public.
Mentioning the image on ameba.jp, again it is in the entirely different resolution, aspect and format from those of the file I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons.
Arcamadienist (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Supremarguax.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
I have seen the checkuser page for Supremarguax and what is the paragraph called Suspected related users?
Why can't the authorities on Wikimedia Foundation make all the IP addresses and access logs public in order to definitively conclude that I am the same person who created those no longer existing accounts; instead of punishing whoever is concerned just for suspicion?
Arcamadienist (talk) 07:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Likely not copyvio but they are pure spamming. The image I had speedy tagged as F10/G10 etc. This is a sock of a long term xwiki spammer. No reason to keep their spam. Just a note here for you to help in processing the ticket. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
@Jeff G. and Achim55: CC ^ . Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
See also COM:ON#Undeletion request for ๓_ค_Ր_ງ_น_ค_૪_(_շ_օ_շ_օ_).png: Ticket #2020111110007691.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

This painting is unfree. Please reconsider your closure of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sylvia Gosse for this one. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC) @Magog the Ogre: ✓ Done --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artist Lemma Guya.png

Looks like you closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:Artist Lemma Guya.png as delete but didn't actually delete the file. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

@AntiCompositeNumber: ✓ Done thank you --Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:12, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Mail

Hello Arthur Crbz,

Can you please look at your mailbox. I have sent mail to you. -- Geagea (talk) 14:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Arthur Crbz

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)