User talk:~Pyb/2013

Archive: 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 67 - Beauchesne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & nice. --Selbymay 14:38, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 26 - Fleury 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Team of Paris Saint-Germain FC Ladies, season 2012-2013.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Good and useful.--Jebulon (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - André Grétry 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 06:56, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130113 - PSG-Montpellier 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality given the conditions. --Jastrow 20:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130120 - PSG-Toulouse - 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 20:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130310 - Molosses vs Spartiates - 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 07:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Creator:Louis Kahn

Creator:Louis Kahn has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this creator, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gerbis (talk) 16:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130120 - PSG-Toulouse - 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but I hate it because I'm really bloody fed up of snow this year. --Mattbuck 10:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130310 - Molosses vs Spartiates - 095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems ok, though the calves look remarkably thin compared to the rest of the body. Oh sport... --Mattbuck 10:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20130310 - Molosses vs Spartiates - 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 10:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

I need help

Hello. I'm editor from the spanish wikipedia, and I came here because I saw you had previous experience with this User[1]

My problem is than another picture from Archita78 has been placed over and over on the page from the Jack Russell Terrier in wiki spanish: [2] Over several months I have undone the ip´s editions, but always came another ip and insists on putting again that picture. And... the picture is very poor quality, not only because the atmosphere is overloaded in reddish details or blurry, but because misrepresent the breed Jack Russell (the dog does not have prick ears according to the standard). I see no sense to continue undoing the ip´s edits, because I saw it could follow an edit wars and Sock puppetry, until the page must be protected as occurred in the English Wikipedia on the Jack Russell Terrier page:12345

So... I will like to know if possible to delete the photo? Fortunately, Commons has lovely photos about the Jack Russell, so it does not hurt to remove a poor quality file where the dog itself can not even be seen properly and it´s poorly representative from the breed.

Thanks for your time :) --Frei sein (talk) 11:46, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello again. I do not know if you read my message, but I wonder if there is something to do...? Thanks you for your attention. --05:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Frei sein (talk)

sorry, i didn't see your message. I've deleted the picture. I don't understand why, but I can't open your talk page... ~Pyb (talk) 05:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Do not know why my talk page is not open, but ... Thanks a lot! :) --Frei sein (talk) 06:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Rétablissement de photos

Bonjour, J'avais publié une photo de l'actrice Isabelle Adjani que j'avais prise moi-même et qui n'est présente nul part sur le web (et de laquelle je suis très fière). Pourriez-vous la rétablir (faites une recherche google images, cette photo est unique et publiée nul part d'autre). Il y avait également une photo de l'acteur Roschdy Zem (également un de mes trophées). Par contre, je ne me rappelle plus des autres photos que j'avais publiées. Cdt, --Lepicier (talk) 12:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello again!

Sorry to disturb, but it's the first time I upload a image from a web site that allows free use. The problem is I do not know what kind of license I should place in, because the website ask to be attributed and authorship plus a link to their website. So I did it and placed a license, but I do not know if I did it ok. Could you please see if I did it right? Because the same page has some interesting photos free than i did like to upload here, but first I would like to know well the procedure to avoid any extra work. Thanks for your help! —Frei sein (Talk to me!) 20:02, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Nouveau dictionnaire encyclopédique universel illustré

Merci d'avoir importé les six volumes de Nouveau dictionnaire encyclopédique universel illustré, il y a un an. Est-ce que cela t'ennuie que je les ai liés à la page principale sur wikisource ? Bien cordialement ?Pibewiki (talk) 10:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 82 - Joigneaux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mondial Ping - Men's Doubles - Semifinals - 34.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mondial Ping - Men's Doubles - Semifinals - 34.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Waw

dear Pyb, I wanted to give you a barnstar for "Hello, I saw your message on the Village pump. I'll help you": it is the best ever message I read on a talk page. Great formulation and great meaning. The problem of barnstars is that I never know which one to pick, if it's the right one (well, I do like only The Original Barnstar) and if people will actually appreciate it or it's not appropriate. So, please just accept my thank you!

• I made this page on Wikipedia in English with the list of public art in Douala
• I have started creating pages for the artworks here on commons (here the list of artwork pages created Category:Research project Culture and safety in Africa)
• In the categories I only put a link to the artwork page, es. Category:Lucas Grandin, Le jardin sonore de Bonamouti (the full description looked too long and it was difficult to properly see the images in the category.
• I included the artwork page in the description of the images (I think it better acknowledges the credits/attribution and provides useful information for people who land there). here is the status of the articles related to public art in Douala Commons:Culture and Safety in Africa/Douala. I am not sure this is something possible, users like. but I think it is important (and actually necessary) to provide the information not only about the author of the image but also about the artist who made the artwork.
• the information related to many works produced in Douala is actually in cc by-sa on this website http://www.doualart.org/SalonUrbainDouala2010/#intro.html also Africultures database (http://www.africultures.com/php/) is in cc by-sa (quite useful for bios and institutions).

Please let me know if you have examples of other way of working or suggestions. best, --iopensa (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

If i understand correctly the template object works better for

• linguistic support
• it is already more used (probably better also for the future of Wikidata)
• we can include it in categories and articles?
• the transfer of the information from the templates artwork to this template should not be too complicated
• the only problem is see is that we have to put the data in all photos and we can not simply update an artwork description which changes automatically in all pages. this is a pretty big problem considering the number of images and the limited number of artworks (the artwork description also includes references and the artwork history, which is quite cool and appropriate).

do i get it correctly? I am good with it but it would be great if we can have one page for each artwork to update rather than different info for each image. what do you think? thanks, --iopensa (talk) 12:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Virginie Dedieu and Raoul - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice frog, good quality. --Coyau 12:53, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Yumi Adachi - Yukiko Inui - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a bit more light imo. --JLPC 16:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC) Comment New version. Pyb 12:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Inken Jeske - Edith Zeppenfeld - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a bit more light imo. --JLPC 16:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC) Comment New version. Pyb 12:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

SALON DU LIVRE 2012

Bonjour Pyb,

j'ai réalisé mes photographies avec une entrée du salon délivrée comme journaliste web sous le nom de Wikipédia France.

Santé et prospérité .Garitan (talk) 07:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

festival project

Hi, sorry. Didn't see your post before. Yes, I am interested in that mailing list. Would you give me the link? --Martina talk 11:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louvre - Staircase Henri II 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Only the upper and the lower ends are a bit soft. QI anyway imo.--JLPC 17:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Matout - L'Assemblée des dieux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 14:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Pamela Fischer - Anja Nyffeler - 01 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:00, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Jiang Tingting - Jiang Wenwen - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me--Lmbuga 17:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Natalia Rybiakova - Dina Shaidullina - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 07:32, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Alla Vaskovich - Alena Zhebeleva - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Team - Japan - 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good and nice IMO --Christian Ferrer 07:41, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Malin Gerdin - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 06:47, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Final Casque de Diamant 2013 p026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support F4 is little, but the result is very good IMO: The player who is being caught is the only focused: The focus emphasizes the action. Only I have doubts because the image is very close, or tight--Lmbuga 18:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Alla Vaskovich - Alena Zhebeleva - 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, well catched. --Myrabella 13:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

File:DSC06459-2.jpg

Hi Pyb, could you move the File:DSC06459-2.jpg to File:Düsseldorf Skyline.jpg? I already informed the OTRS about the new name of the file. Regards, --CherryX (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla-Pape Mor Lô - 32.jpg

Je tente cette nomination, esperons que j'aurais autant de chance qu'avec les photos de Jastrow ou Ludo :). PS: j'adore tes photos de sports ^_^. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

En effet tu avais raison sur l'activité de COM:FPC, mais ça passe quand même parce que la photo était bien. ^_^ --PierreSelim (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Amelie Ebert - 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 08:56, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Estel-Anaïs Hubaud - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 11:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Alla Vaskovich - Alena Zhebeleva - 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:39, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Guy Huygens article at en and fr

Salut, Pyb. At en:Guy Huygens we have just uncovered a case of persistent sockpuppetry and copyright infringements. A bunch of user with names including variants of "Frank" have edited the article and introduced text that was merely paraphrasing of this website. It has now been pointed out to me that the French Wikipedia article, fr:Guy Huygens appears to suffer from the same sort of problems. There are numerous "Franks" in the edit history, and the article itself looks quite similar to this. So, when I saw you were active over here I thought I'd leave you a note about it. Regards, De728631 (talk) 19:35, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Thx. Message transferred on the Admin noticeboard. Pyb (talk) 06:30, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Ona Carbonell - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:47, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Ona Carbonell - 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. -- Alvesgaspar 12:17, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

France-Canada basket-ball

Bonjour, merci pour tes images de la rencontre. Je me suis permis d'ajouter les effectifs pour pouvoir m'y retrouver plus facilement et créer les catégories des joueuses par la suite. --El Funcionario (talk) 22:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla-Pape Mor Lô - 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 09:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Malin Gerdin - 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 05:50, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Malin Gerdin - 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 14:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla-Pape Mor Lô - 32.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla-Pape Mor Lô - 32.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Voilà \o/ --PierreSelim (talk) 07:48, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutte sénégalaise Bercy 2013 - Mame Balla-Pape Mor Lô - 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - very impressive, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 06:37, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

re: Photoreporter

Bonsoir! Thank you for telling me about this mailing list. I've added myself to the list. --Kadellar (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 FITA Archery World Cup - Women's individual compound - Final - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 21:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013 FITA Archery World Cup - Women's individual compound - Final - 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes! --Pleclown 21:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Camille Guerre - 02.jpg

File:Open Make Up For Ever 2013 - Camille Guerre - 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

24.188.141.63 01:35, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Open LFB

J'ai vu que tu as commencé à charger les photos. Merci. Je n'ai guère le temps de les identifier avant quelques semaines, mais promis j'y ferai un tour. Chris93 (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear ~Pyb, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Copyright status: File:Marty - Les principaux monuments funéraires - Tulla.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Marty - Les principaux monuments funéraires - Tulla.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 05:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

FPC Nomination

Salut, pour info je viens de lancer Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:2013_FITA_Archery_World_Cup_-_Women's_individual_compound_-_Final_-_17.jpg. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:56, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear ~Pyb, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Volley

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que dans la Catégorie Volleyball French Cup il y avait les photos, trés réussies, des dernières finales des Coupe de France de volley. J'ai récemment été voir un match de Coupe de France amateur (8ème de finale) et je me suis dit qu'il faudrait changer les catégories afin qu'il y ait une répartition par compétitions (4 coupes: deux amateurs et deux pro) plutôt que par années (2013 et 2014). J'ai commencé à bidouiller maintenant je me demande si je n'ai pas fait n'importe quoi (dans le sens, est-ce vraiment utile et plus clair?). Qu'est ce que tu en penses? Je suis désolé de ne pas d'avoir consulté avant et d'avoir un peu foutu le bordel dans cette catégorie.

Bonnes fêtes