User talk:~Pyb/2012
Using your picture for my scientific poster[edit]
I have seen your beautiful picture of the pincers used for sugar (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rouen_-_Mus%C3%A9e_Le_Secq_des_Tournelles_-_Pinces_%C3%A0_sucre.jpg?uselang=de).
Am I allowed to use this picture as a background for my scientific poster? Your name would stand in the lower right corner of the poster with the note that the background picture is your work. The corresponding link is on the poster as well.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Jean Joseph Cornély 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Georges Maurice Simon Flersheim - Livre ouvert 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Boime-Simon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Gareau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 91 - Martelot 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Photos du Père-Lachaise[edit]
Salut Pyb, tes photos du Père-Lachaise sont vraiment magnifiques. Cependant je pense que tu peux fermer un peu plus le diaphragme (l'objectif reste bon a f/4 f/8 f/10). Je suppose que tu cherches à obtenir un bokeh en arrière plan, mais du coup une partie de la statue n'est pas nette, ce n'est pas un gros défaut, mais je pense que c'est mieux d'avoir la statue nette (surtout qu'a priori tu n'as pas trop de problème de lumière vu les vitesse d'obturation que tu utilises (en plus tu as un super stabilisateur qui permet de shooter à 1/50 1/100 sans problème).
Enfin, ceci n'empêche que le résultat est quand même très bon (et en plus documenté). --PierreSelim (talk) 08:20, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Gareau 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Gareau 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token c33f228f22ef59f455e3d5c7914aeee2[edit]
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
War memorials have freedom of panorama in France.[edit]
Hello, you deleted some war memorials in France, but War memorials have freedom of panorama in France; they form an exception. Please, can you restore the files you deleted? --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Why wasn't I informed at all that one of my uploads - a monument in Dieppe - was nominated for deletion? PS I do hope you have some copy of the photo and description page somewhere, cause by next year Eugène Benet is allowed to be uploaded. If I was informed, I would have stored the picture and description page myself. Best regards --Brbbl (talk) 06:46, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have asked for a source at the Bistro http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bistro#Monuments_aux_morts_et_NOFOP_en_France . --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
removal of image[edit]
I see that an image has been removed from List of professional cyclists who died during a race with this edit. So, the reason it was removed is because the sculptor died in 1982 even though the sculpture itself was created in 1938? Is there any way that an image of this memorial could be used through fair-use or whatever? It's the only memorial I could find for Ganay. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 22:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hello,
- You can probably import this image on the english Wikipedia. On Wikimedia Commons, fair use is not allowed. ~Pyb (talk) 10:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Gimel[edit]
Salut. Merci pour le coupe de balai. T'as vu qu'il reste des miettes sous la table : File:Gimel 338.jpg. Merci, ;-) ----MGuf (d) 08:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Salut,
- La photo a été supprimé. Un problème de cache laisse penser que ce n'est pas le cas. ~Pyb (talk) 10:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Gimel[edit]
Gimel
Bonjour, je viens de découvrir la suppression d' un certain nombre de photos que j' avais déposés pour illustrer l' article sur mon père le peintre Georges Gimel, ces photos proviennent des archives familiale, n'ayant pas une grande expérience de Wikipédia, je ne comprend pas et surtout la raison" du coup de balai" Gimel Salut. Merci pour le coupe de balai. T'as vu qu'il reste des miettes sous la table : File:Gimel 338.jpg. Merci, ;-) ----MGuf (d) 08:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC) Salut, La photo a été supprimé. Un problème de cache laisse penser que ce n'est pas le cas. ~Pyb (d) 10:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Merci de m'expliquer,
Salutations
- Répondu sur User talk:FINELY. ~Pyb (talk) 11:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Pour Pierre-Yves BEAUDOUIN - Photo du caveau de ma famille au Père-Lachaise[edit]
Bonjour,
J'ai très agréablement découvert que vous avez réalisé une magnifique photo du caveau de ma famille, dont la concession a été achetée en 1883 par mon arrière grand-père Louis-Gabriel LE BRUN.
J'ai découvert votre photo en faisant des recherches pour établir la généalogie de ma famille.
C'est pourquoi j'aimerais savoir si vous avez des connaissances en généalogie et si oui, comment vous contacter. Habiteriez-vous, par chance, 75014 Paris ?
Merci par avance pour votre réponse.
Philippe LE BRUN
- Bonjour,
- Je ne suis malheureusement pas généalogiste et j'habite près du Père-Lachaise. ~Pyb (talk) 15:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Sépulture Clary (24e div. du P.L.)[edit]
Bonjour Pyb et bravo pour ton travail photographique au Père-Lachaise !
Je souhaitais savoir si tu avais l'occasion de retourner au cimetière et, si c'étais le cas, puis-je te demander d'en profiter pour photographier la sépulture de la fr:Famille Clary (Marseille) (24e division, 2e ligne, R, 18), sépulture pyramidale typique de l'égyptomanie. L'image pourra ainsi illustrer les articles concernés.
Tiens moi au courant ! Cordialement,--Jimmy44 (talk) 06:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Deletion requests[edit]
Hi! Could You take a look: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Imeeages.jpg. Thanks! --Edgars2007 (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Ellaume[edit]
Bonjour, oui désolé, je me suis laissé allé. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Merci de l'avoir supprimée rapidement. Cordialement, --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour, j'ai un peu modifié la présentation du modèle. Ca permet de simplifier la maintenance : notamment par la suppression du paramètre "homecat" et surtout par une internationalisation nettement plus facile. Pour l'aspect esthétique, je ne sais pas trop (qu'en penses-tu ?). Pour moi c'est un peu mieux dans les catégories et un peu moins bien dans les fichiers. --Zolo (talk) 07:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Salut, j'ai bien noté le retrait du paramètre homecat. Par contre, j'avoue ne pas remarquer les changements esthétiques. Pendant que je te tiens, il y a une espace en trop dans la traduction française du modèle {{Tomb of}}, ex. Category:Grave of Ali bin Hamud. ~Pyb (talk) 10:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Avant il y avait un en-tête "informations sur cet (object (tombeau etc.)" / voir les images. Maintenant il n'y a plus qu' "objet" et le type d'objet (tombe etc.) est indiqué à l'intérieur de l'infobox.
- Désolé pour l'espace, je crois que c'est corrigé maintenant. --Zolo (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Photo usage[edit]
Hello :-)
I just wanted to say "Thank you very much" for your picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ghana_Cape_Coast_01.jpg
My name is Daniel, i used that picture in my little "travel around the world" puzzle game for android.
When a player sees your image (when completing a level) there is a short sentence describing the location visible on your panorama and also you are credited directly as "Photographer". Hopefully you are fine with that, if you want any changes please contact me directly. :-)
2012-08-08 User Sirleto / Wikipedia User:SirLeto
Bonjour, J'aime l'ambiance de cette photo. Tu devrais essayer de la nominer comme image remarquable. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:29, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- ok, je vais tenter. Le ciel me semble un peu trop brûlé. ~Pyb (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Sculptures de Denys Puech[edit]
Salut vieux : Quel zèle, il faut attendre 4 mois et demi ! est-ce que c'est toi qui remettra l'image ? - Siren-Com (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- de zélés contributeurs s'en chargeront dès le 1er janvier. ~Pyb (talk) 10:32, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cemetery Père-Lachaise in autumn 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Avenue latérale du Nord 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Holgado[edit]
Effectivement... Tu as bien fait. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Rossignol 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Charles Guillaume Étienne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Ahmet Kaya[edit]
Hi. Why did you consider File:Le pierre tombale de Ahmet Kaya dans le Cimetière du Père-Lachaise 1.JPG and File:Le pierre tombale de Ahmet Kaya dans le Cimetière du Père-Lachaise 2.JPG copyvio and delete them ? I didn't be noticed on this issue. Anyway I don't know French copyright law very much. Could you explain why those images violated copyright. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 08:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- You mean relief of Ahmet Kaya on the gravestone ? Takabeg (talk) 08:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- D'accord. Takabeg (talk) 08:38, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 25 - Montaiglon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 25 - Montaiglon 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Edicules Guimard[edit]
Bonjour Pyb,
tu viens de supprimer une photo sur commons (édicule Guimard devant la Pitié-Salpétrière) au motif de violation de copyright (Guimard est mort en 1942). Mais il semble que dans le cas d'oeuvres reproduites en grand nombre d'exemplaires (c'est le cas des entrées de métro de cet artiste) les règles sont différentes. En tous cas, l'application de cette "violation de copyright" est à géométrie variable car si on consulte les listes des monuments historiques parisiens, elle ne semble pas appliquée. (cf. 12°). Bon courage pour démêler ce sac de nœuds. Amicalement, --Mbzt (talk) 07:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Je regarde ce soir. ~Pyb (talk) 11:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai déjà entendu plusieurs fois l'argument du « les œuvres produites en séries ne sont pas protégés » mais jamais personne ne m'a montré de texte de lois et de justice attestant clairement de cela. A priori, les images que tu pointes devraient donc être supprimer également.
- Mon avis pour le « géométrie variable » (qui est effectivement très gênante) est que pour quelques mois, certains administrateurs ont peut-être été plus tolérants que la loi ne l'exige… ou bien ces images sont tous simplement passées à travers les mailles du filet. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- oui, j'y crois pas trop à l'argument de la série. Mais j'ai tout de même restauré les photos des stations de métro puisqu'il y a deux DR contradictoires. Je n'estime pas avoir le droit de supprimer directement ces photos. ~Pyb (talk) 15:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Guimard bis[edit]
Hi! (en français : aïe !)
Ca, je comprends, mais en fait je ne l'avais jamais mise sur Commons, cette photo-là. Respectueuse de la loi comme je suis, je l'avais importée uniquement sur :fr (genre en « fair-use »). Mais Bloody-libu l'avait supprimée pour le motif qu'elle était désormais sur Commons : voir là. Par quelle puissante magie elle a réussi à se transporter sur Commons, mystère… Mais, en attendant 2013, pourrais-tu la restaurer sur :fr, please ?
Merci 
--Wikinade (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- J'ai restauré l'image sur fr:. ~Pyb (talk) 11:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, déjà ! En voyant l'historique du fichier je commence tout de même à me demander si ce n'est pas moi qui l'ai transféré sur Commons… Merci en tout cas :) --Wikinade (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 32 - Reynier 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Basilique Sainte-Thérèse de Lisieux[edit]
Salut,
Je remarque que tu as placé le bandeau {{NoUploads}} sur la Category:Basilique Sainte-Thérèse de Lisieux. Or l'architecte fr:Louis Marie Cordonnier est bien mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Si son fils (mort il y a moins de 70 ans) a effectivement poursuivi les travaux, il me semble à première vue que son rôle était strictement technique, me tromperé-je ? (ou bien s'agit-il d'autre chose).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 38 - Destouches 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear ~Pyb, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
|
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 04:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Salut Pyb...[edit]
J'espère que tu vas bien :)
Je m'amuse comme une petite folle à remettre "au carré" les licences et les "creator" des imports du partenariat BNF Template:Laugh
Je te dépose ce petit mot juste pour te rappeler de ne pas oublier d'aller voter pour le droit d'auteur sur s:fr:Wikisource:Votes/Droit_d’auteur, puisque je ne t'ai pas vu depuis un moment sur IRC.
Bonne continuation, et à bientôt :) --Hsarrazin (talk) 18:20, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 3 - Gallois 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Tessier 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 25 - Corot 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Fichiers supprimés[edit]
Eh bien on apprend tous les jours, et je ne recommencerai pas de telles erreurs (pour l'autographe de Sylvain, je croyais en toute bonne foi qu'étant propriétaire d'une œuvre, je l'étais aussi de ses droits). S'agissant de Venturini, ce qui m'a induit en erreur, c'est l'exemple de File:Pierre drieu la rochelle.gif : auteur de la photo pas même identifié, cliché pris pendant l'occupation, dans l 'intimité, début années 40 (je suis formel: ce cliché est célèbre et j'enseigne les Lettres), image trouvée sur internet (voir le lien laissé par le créateur du fichier). Comme ledit fichier semblait faire consensus et est largement utilisé, j'ai cru de bonne foi pouvoir m'inspirer de celui-ci et de son processus de création apparemment assez approximatif. Bien à vous, --Agota Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir 18:08, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- P.S. L'image anciennement dans l'infobox de Venturini est connue et partout utilisée ; n'existe-t-il aucun moyen d'en obtenir une reproduction libre de droits ? Il est désolant que ce poète n'ait plus de visage sur WP-fr, mais aussi WP-en et WP-de qui elles aussi étaient illustrées. Merci par anticipation d'un éventuel conseil de votre part.
- P.S. 2 Pour la photo de Gaston Leroux, en revanche, permettez-moi de m'étonner : elle date de 1907-1910 (photo souvent utilisée dans les éditions papier, vous pouvez vérifier la datation), elle est donc aujourd'hui logiquement dans le domaine public. Serait-il possible de la restaurer ? Par avance merci.
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Rossignol 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Une petite réponse ?[edit]
Bonjour ~Pyb, et mes sincères félicitations pour vos derniers lauriers. À ma connaissance, vous ne m'avez pas fait réponse concernant mes questions à propos de Venturini et Gaston Leroux. J'apprécierais vivement votre avis. Par avance merci. Cordialement, --Agota Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir 14:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Bonjour, je suis en réunion tout le week-end. Je vous réponds dans la semaine. ~Pyb (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Flickr[edit]
Hi Pyb!
Yes, I forgot the FOP, but the quality of pictures are not bad. We have 15.000.000 images on Commons but we still need more. --Paris 16 (talk) 08:10, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 20121209 PSG-Juvisy - free kick 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|