User talk:~Pyb/2011
.jpg){kind=link}
Castel Val[edit]
Bonjour, tu n'as pas à supprimer les images du Castel Val que j'ai versées, à moins que tu supprimes toutes les images présentant des oeuvres de Hector Guimard qui sont sur Commons. De quoi tu te mèles ? --P.poschadel (talk) 20:47, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Bonsoir,
- Je vous remercie de m'encourager à poursuivre la suppression des photos d'œuvres architecturales qui ne sont pas dans le domaine public. ~Pyb (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Et aussi d'arracher toutes les pages des innombrables livres qui en présentent des photos ? --P.poschadel (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Je viens de voir que tu résides en France. Deux députés proposent de modifier la loi afin d'autoriser la liberté de panorama. Je t'invite à écrire à ton député. Voici la démarche à suivre :
- ~Pyb (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Et aussi d'arracher toutes les pages des innombrables livres qui en présentent des photos ? --P.poschadel (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Category definition: Object[edit]
Bonjour, j'ai vu que tu avais utilisé le modèle, juste quelques remarques:
- j'ai créé {{Grave of}}, je ne suis pas très sûr de la ligne de partage entre tombeau et tombe et je ne sais pas si c'est exactement la même que celle entre tomb et grave. Mais je pense qu'il vaut mieux utiliser le même mot dans le paramètre "type" et dans le paramètre "description" (donc type=tomb, description=tomb of) ou grave et grave.
- Dans le paramètre technique, il vaut mieux utiliser {{Technique}} pour les traductions.
{{technique|marble}}->marble,{{technique|wood|and=stone}}->wood and stone (bien sûr ça marche aussi quand on n'utilise pas {{Category definition: Object}}). - Pour que le modèle soit utilisable dans les fichiers, il vaut mieux l'entourer de
<onlyinclude><onlyinclude>, sinon les catégories et le reste de la page sont aussi "transcludés".--Zolo (talk) 06:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- J'ai vu que tu t'en sortais bien avec le modèle. J'ai quand même modifié le champ "location" de Category:Monument à Léon Gambetta en "{{relativeLocation|square Edouard Vaillant|,|Paris}}, il me semble que c'est plus clair étant donné que les photos ne sont pas celles de la maquette du musée d'Orsay.--Zolo (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
I object strongly to your action here and request that you undo it. I agree that the question of keeping this file is not obvious, but you certainly cannot simply revert another Admin's work without discussion. Either have the person who objects put it up on Commons:Undeletion requests or reopen the discussion, notify me that you have done so, and we will discuss it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- ok, I let you put a message on Commons:Undeletion requests if you believe that a false flag should be on Commons. I cannot see how this self-created artwork could be useful for an educational purpose (except to spread false information on wikipedia or outside Wikimedia projects). ~Pyb (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you --- but, again, the point is not the goodness of this deletion, but you must not simply revert another Admin. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Image from the Centre de recherche du château de Versailles[edit]
Salut !
J'ai vu que tu avais fait quelques imports depuis les bases d'images du CRCV. J'ai essayé de récupérer ça pour le partenariat, en attendant de voir ce qui pourrait se passer. Le statut concernant la diffusion des numérisation n'étant pas très clair (droits associé, justes ou non, etc.), j'apprécierai, nonobstant le fait que j'approuve la démarche sur le principe (pas de droits d'auteur pour le numérisateur, diffusion d'un œuvre dans le DP), que ce genre d'apports reste limité dans un premier temps. 
Bien à toi, Trizek here or on fr:wp 13:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- ok, bonne démarches ;) ~Pyb (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Visite encadrée des Appartements de la Reine[edit]
Bonjour !
Tu as fait part de ton intérêt pour une visite encadrée des Appartements de la Reine, afin de prendre des photos et des notes. Cette opération se déroulerait un mercredi. Je fais le tour des gens intéressés pour voir les dates de disponibilité de chacun.
Es-tu toujours de la partie ? Si oui, merci de me préciser tes disponibilités.
A bientôt, Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
- Bonjour, la date du 25 mai est arrêtée pour la séance photo au château, concernant les petits appartements de la Reine. J’aurai donc besoin de ta confirmation, sachant que la séance aurait lieu de 14h à 17h. Il me faut également tes noms et prénoms, que tu peux me transmettre par mail.
- Pour cette séance, il est possible d'avoir un pied photo. Les appartements sont sombres et très étroits.
- Merci de ton retour, afin que je mette les choses en place !
- A bientôt, Trizek here or on fr:wp 14:29, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grille royale de Versailles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi ~Pyb,
as you are an admin, would you mind to put the template {{User admin}} on your userpage, so that others can recognize you as admin? Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
|
File:Édouard-Henri_Avril_(17).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
.jpg){kind=link}
2.90.160.189 03:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferdinand Barbedienne - Père-Lachaise 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ferdinand Barbedienne - Père-Lachaise 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Goudeau — Dix ans de bohème[edit]
Merci, m'sieur. Heureusement qu'un gentil administrateur francocomonnien passait par là... Cela m'aura permis d'apprendre que les renommages sont un peu plus complexes sur Wikisource que sur WP et je saurai désormais où m'adresser... avant tout ! Cordialement, --Voxhominis (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2011 (UTC) 
- Rebonjour Pyb. Je profite de l'occasion pour te demander ton avis sur ça : File:Infobox-masks.png. J'ai été alerté sur WP par Guil2027 et j'avoue en effet ne pas trop comprendre moi non plus : c'est la première fois que je vois une demande de suppression pour soupçon de doute de copyvio (!) d'un fichier... qui n'est plus en ligne !!! Comment dans ce cas prouver qu'il n'est pas admissible ? Le petit souci est que c'est un fichier créé par JSDX en 2007 dans l'en-tête de nombreuses boxes et sa suppression (à moins qu'il ne soit rapatrié sur WPfr ou remplacé par un autre... qui n'existe pas pour le moment) a pas mal d'implications. Le demandeur n'étant a priori pas admin et ayant un assez faible compteur d'édit, pourrais-tu apporter tes lumières là-dessus ? Merci d'avance. --Voxhominis (talk) 14:34, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Ticket OTRS[edit]
Salut ~Pyb, Je te signale une question que j'ai posée sur Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Third opinion needed about ticket 2008031910023091 au sujet d'un ticket OTRS dont tu t'étais chargé il y a environ trois ans. Si tu le veux, peut-être pourrais-tu confirmer explicitement ce que cette permission dit au juste ? Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:14, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Un chat pour toi[edit]
Cordialement
Irønie (talk) 22:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
New Creator templates[edit]
Hi, I noticed that you are creating many new Creator templates for French sculptors. That is great, however when you are at it can you also create corresponding categories? All creator templates are associated with a category and if category do not exist then they end up in Category:Creator templates without home category. See Commons:Creator --Jarekt (talk) 12:57, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I will categorize creator templates in october and also improve the categorization of my recent uploads. I'm currently busy with Wiki Loves Monuments. ~Pyb (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Great --Jarekt (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
If you have a moment ...[edit]
Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard/Archive_17#Third_opinion_needed_about_ticket_2008031910023091 and Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:2001-2004_Headquarters_for_the_press_group_Le_Monde.2C_Paris.2C_.jpg. Care to have an opinion at the latter link? — billinghurst sDrewth 00:46, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Source? Proof of licensing status? --Hydrox (talk) 12:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]
|
Dear ~Pyb,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
|
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the 
→ Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Marie Hyacinthe Ronflette - Vitrail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Père Lachaise[edit]
Bonjour, j'ai créé un modèle {{Père Lachaise location}} pour rendre la navigation plus aisée, et éventuellement ajouter des traductions. Au passage, c'est utile d'avoir deux catégories séparées Category:Grave of François Christophe Kellermann et Category:Grave of François Étienne Kellermann si les deux partagent la même tombe ?--Zolo (talk) 18:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Merci pour le modèle. Faut que je me renseigne pour comprendre la numérotation des lignes et des tombes.
- Il y a effectivement un problème au sujet des concessions qui comptent plusieurs personnes. Pour le moment, je duplique les catégories mais c'est loin d'être satisfaisant. Faut que je les remplace par des catégories du type tombe de la famille Kellerman.
- J'en profite pour t'exposer deux points. Les tombes possèdent un numéro de concession généralement gravée au dos. Est-ce que je peux l'indiquer dans le champs accession number ?
- Où est-ce que j'indique la date d'inauguration du monument, la restauration, le vol d'un élément... ? ~Pyb (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- A mon avis, c'est un peu étrange d'indiquer le numéro de consession dans "accession number", même si l'idée est bien la même. Que dirais-tu de quelque chose comme Category:Grave of Nicolas Cadiat. Serait-ce un contresens de mettre le numéro de concession et le position géographique dans le même modèle ?
- Pour les inaugurations, restaurations, etc. Il vaut mieux les mettre dans "object history" (la traduction française, "historique de conservation" semble un peu trop réstrictive, des idées pour la remplacer ?) Dans l'idéal, il vaut mieux essayer d'internationaliser avec {{ProvenanceEvent}} comme dans Category:Grave_of_Félix_François_Ziem, mais ce n'est pas toujours possible.--Zolo (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comme je ne suis pas sûr que le champ "concession" soit très clair pour tout le monde, j'ai rajouté un petit lien vers Cimetière du Père-Lachaise/help dans le modèle. Il me semble que ça pourrait être pratique d'ajouter des informations du genre une tombe=une concession (ou un truc de le genre) ou les numéros de concession correspondent (ou non) à l'emplacement dans le cimetière. Mais je ne suis pas compétent pour le faire.--Zolo (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Travaux T3 matériaux 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Robertson 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Robertson 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:22, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Michel-des-Andaines - Cadran solaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:59, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Boussard 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Grave of Crespin family[edit]
You are right, but it is sufficient to put the template 'Mérimée|type=inscrit|PA00086780' into the 'Category:Grave of Crespin family' and not into each file.--GFreihalter (talk) 16:38, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
|
20th-century sculptors has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |