User talk:Trijnstel/Archive/2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an archive of User talk:Trijnstel

Please don't...

...mark pages as "patrolled" after adding {{Speedydelete}}. I know, that's policy at enwp, but here, most admins patrol Special:Newpages, so it's better if it stays unpatrolled. Thanks for understanding, abf «Cabale!» 15:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jouke_Bakker.jpg

File:Jouke_Bakker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Effeietsanders (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Trijnstel,
Zo te zien heb je enkele afbeeldingen geüpload als PD waarbij ik (helaas) m'n twijfels heb over of die wel echt daaronder vallen. Kun je er nog eens naar kijken, en aangeven of je afdoende moeite hebt gedaan om de auteur te achterhalen (bijv het contact opnemen met het instituut dat de afbeelding heeft gepubliceerd zou daar toch wel onder vallen). Ik heb voorlopig bovenstaande afbeelding genomineerd omdat ik daar tegenaanliep, maar wellicht geldt hetzelfde voor meer van je afbeeldingen? Bij voorbaat dank! Effeietsanders (talk) 12:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ik had van iemand anders begrepen dat als afbeeldingen ouder dan 70 jaar zijn en de auteur onbekend is, het in het publieke domein valt. Bij deze afbeelding is het niet meer te achterhalen wie de auteur was, dus ik dacht dat ik het goed gedaan had. Kennelijk niet dus. De regels omtrent PD zijn soms ook best ingewikkeld, vind ik. Trijnstel (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi Trijnstel, de regels zijn een beetje complex ja :) Het gaat er niet alleen om of jij makkelijk kunt achterhalen wie de auteur is, maar of die ook daadwerkelijk onbekend is ('anoniem'). Zelfs dan zijn er overigens allerlei mitsen en maren. Ik ben (zoals je hieronder ziet, oeps wat een bende aan sjablonen... :S Zo onvriendelijk als het overkomt bedoelde ik het niet hoor!) de andere uploads ook doorgelopen en heb genomineerd waar nodig. Enkele heb ik laten staan omdat het wel duidelijk is dat ze echt oud genoeg is.
Voor flink wat afbeeldingen staat de auteur vaak in een hoekje of op de achterkant, dus dan kan contact opnemen met het oorspronkelijke archief genoeg zijn. Zeker bij schilderijen zal de auteur vaak bekend zijn. Ik hoop dat je nog de mogelijkheid ziet om naspeuring te doen!
Oh, en overigens als tip, bij de bron kan het soms ook heel prettig zijn om de pagina waar de foto in context staat ook te linken. Daar staat vaak meer informatie over de afbeelding. Effeietsanders (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ik ben het niet met je eens met een meerderheid van de afbeeldingen. Bij sommigen heb je wellicht gelijk, maar bij anderen heb ik wel degelijk mijn best gedaan. Zo heb ik File:August de Laat.jpg pas geüpload na overlegd te hebben met Wikitanvir (ook een moderator hier). Ik vind het af en toe best wel lastig om te bepalen of iets wel of niet kan, maar probeer dan advies te vragen en dat heb ik daar bij gedaan. Hij zei dat als de maker onbekend is en de afbeelding ouder dan 70 jaar, het vrij geüpload mag worden als publiek domein. En de foto File:Maurice Dumas and Duifje Schuitenvoerder.jpg is genomen in 1913 en daarmee kun je toch wel aannemen dat het inmiddels ook wel in het publiek domein is (ook hiervan is de auteur onbekend). Bij beiden heb ik dan ook een reactie achtergelaten. Van de anderen zal ik nog wel even kijken als ik tijd heb. Bij Jouke Bakker was het er een beetje bij ingeschoten; dat kan ik dan wellicht tegelijk doen. Met vriendelijke groet, Trijnstel (talk) 11:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi, voor alle duidelijkheid: het gaat mij er niet om of jij "je best hebt gedaan", maar of dit (naar mijn inschatting uiteraard) juridisch voldoende grond is om de anonimiteitsgrond te gebruiken. Uiteraard is dit geenszins kritiek op jou persoonlijk. Of 1913 oud genoeg is om gewoon aan te nemen dat de auteur toch wel zal zijn overleden (neem eens aan dat deze 30 jaar was bij het maken van de foto, dan zou hij maximaal 68 mogen zijn geworden) is de vraag - daar verschillen de meningen over, ik ben het iig eens dat dat een grijs gebied is. Ik heb die dan ook vooral genomineerd omdat het waarschijnlijk relatief eenvoudig te achterhalen is, als je de originele krant hebt (het archief waar je de foto gevonden hebt, heeft die vermoedelijk) omdat de naam rechtsonder vermeld lijkt. Effeietsanders (talk) 11:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hoi,
Jammer dat je toch geen tijd hebt gevonden om er een mail/belletje achteraan te doen (tenminste, voor zover ik kan overzien, wellicht heb ik iets gemist). Ik vermoed dat in enkele gevallen er inderdaad PD-old was, als de auteur nagevraagd was bij het archief in kwestie (in enkele gevallen was het schilderij getekend enz). Ik heb het in ieder geval nog eens nagezocht, en ben bang dat onder Nederlandse wetgeving, iets echt alleen PD-old is als de auteur meer dan 70 jaar oud is (of 70 jaar na publicatie als de auteur een instelling is, en de fotograaf nergens vermeld is in de originele publicatie), óf als het om een anoniem werk gaat (70j na publicatie) - maar dat betekent dus niet dat jij de auteur niet weet, maar dat de auteur het werk echt anoniem heeft gepubliceerd. Die lat ligt een stuk hoger dan wat in de VS gebruikelijk is helaas. Effeietsanders (talk) 22:31, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tja, ik heb het gewoon erg druk op het moment en had daarmee inderdaad geen tijd om de toestemming voor meer dan tien afbeeldingen te regelen. Ik heb in ieder geval wel het een en ander geleerd wat betreft afbeeldingen in het publieke domein (wanneer wel, wanneer niet en waar ligt de grens enzovoorts). Dat wist ik allemaal niet. Positief puntje dus. ;-) Uiteraard vind ik het wel jammer dat de afbeeldingen zijn verwijderd, maar het zij zo. Jullie (Jameslwoodward, Saibo, Beria, jij) hebben gewoon gelijk. Trijnstel (talk) 19:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Blij dat je het zo positief oppakt :) Leren doen we gelukkig altijd nog, ik heb mn kennis ook weer iets erdoor kunnen uitdiepen. Wat we overigens wel eens zouden kunnen doen is parlement.com vragen (ze zijn vrij toegankelijk) of ze voortaan de fotograaf/schilder erbij willen vermelden mits bekend. Voor andere websites is het wat gefragmenteerder natuurlijk. Een voordeel is natuurlijk dat afbeeldingen niet écht meer verdwijnen tegenwoordig, dus mocht je nog tijd&zin krijgen kun je er altijd nog achteraan bellen. Effeietsanders (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Daar heb je helemaal gelijk in. Misschien dat ik dat nog wel ga doen als ik wat meer tijd heb. :-) Trijnstel (talk) 11:37, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sigismund (1).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sigismund (1).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magog the Ogre. I moved the image (en:File:Sigismund.jpg) to Commons, because it's in the public domain and I didn't notice it has no source. As I didn't upload the original image in 2005, it's very hard for me to find the source. It was uploaded here and added in 2007 on The Royal Forums, so that can't be the original source. It's probably from the official site of Preussen, see here and here, because the site says "© 2003 Haus Hohenzollern". What do you advice me to do? Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 22:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; that source looks legitimate enough to me. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was fast. Thank you! Trijnstel (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

question concerning procedure of creating pages on wiki

hello, this is Ali form India I'm a new user and i don't know how to create and make page the world watch it. i tried much by reading wiki procedure but i always found my pages deleted. could u pls help me out of this one.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurumali (talk • contribs) 05:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ali/Aurumali. First of all, welcome to Commons! As you may have noticed, this is Commons and here you can upload images, photos, graphics and so fort. Therefore I nominated Talk:Science 1 for speedy deletion (which is deleted now), because an essay doesn't belong on the talk page nor everywhere else. You were probably looking for Wikipedia, because that's the place for text and articles. Although I must add that essays are not allowed there also. The articles must be relevant for an encyclopaedia and written as such. See for more information en:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. If you have more questions, feel free to ask them to me. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging

You are doing great work patrolling our new pages! Please keep it up :) Besy regards, — Kanonkas // talk // e-mail // 20:34, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll do my best. :-) Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fourteen deletion requests

See User talk:Trijnstel/Archive/2011#File:Jouke Bakker.jpg, User talk:Jameslwoodward/Archive4#Deletion of several images and User talk:Beria/Archive/2011-3#File:Abraham Asscher.jpg for the discussion
File:Barbara_Newhall_Follett.jpg
File:Barbara_Newhall_Follett.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ton_Barge.jpg
File:Ton_Barge.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Abraham_Asscher.jpg
File:Abraham_Asscher.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:W.H.J.Th._van_Basten_Batenburg.jpg
File:W.H.J.Th._van_Basten_Batenburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Johannes_Beelaerts_van_Blokland.jpg
File:Johannes_Beelaerts_van_Blokland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Willem_Adriaan_Beelaerts_van_Blokland.jpg
File:Willem_Adriaan_Beelaerts_van_Blokland.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wedding_Gustav_Albrecht_of_Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg_and_Margareta_Fouché_d'Otrante.jpg
File:Wedding_Gustav_Albrecht_of_Sayn-Wittgenstein-Berleburg_and_Margareta_Fouché_d'Otrante.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Louis_Davids.jpg
File:Louis_Davids.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fien_de_la_Mar.jpg
File:Fien_de_la_Mar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Johnny_&_Jones.jpg
File:Johnny_&_Jones.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Eduard_Jacobs.jpg
File:Eduard_Jacobs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Maurice_Dumas_and_Duifje_Schuitenvoerder.jpg
File:Maurice_Dumas_and_Duifje_Schuitenvoerder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Maurice_Dumas.jpg
File:Maurice_Dumas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:August_de_Laat.jpg
File:August_de_Laat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Effeietsanders (talk) 08:54, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant right

Thank you for raising this issue. I removed my patroller right. mickit 18:38, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I didn't know you had the patroller right as admin too. ;-) Although my initial request didn't work: Effeietsanders don't want to remove the right as it seems. Trijnstel (talk) 11:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
^^ Of course the above is not very important, but I think redundant rights are (literally) redundant and don't have any purpose. Trijnstel (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you. BTW, I also removed some redundant rights on sr.wiki today :) mickit 20:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For your attention

Here please. If you can accept it and transclude it here that would be fine. My thanks --Herby talk thyme 10:48, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done and again thanks for all the kind words. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 10:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Warning

Can you drop the Vandalism Warning off User talk:50.15.152.98? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:50.15.152.98

I don't see it an issue of undoing my edit. There were 2 License Sections. User_talk:50.15.152.98 did the right thing by undoing it for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndulles1 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. You were absolutely right. I shall add a welcome message to your talk page. Trijnstel (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove this content about the Vandalism Warning? Johndulles1 (talk) 18:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's not needed to do so. Mathonius explained here very clearly why not. For example, this talk page won't be indexed by Google. Trijnstel (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

50.15.152.98 (talk · contribs)

Why did you post warning messages at the user's talk page? The user's edits were legitimate, as far as I can see the user removed only duplicate license tags. -- RE rillke questions? 21:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. You're right. I made a mistake. I was about to check it though, so I should have noticed this mistake sooner or later. Trijnstel (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I accidently added another Licensing Section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndulles1 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also user|50.15.152.98. User talk:Johndulles1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndulles1 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again. I'm sorry. It was a stupid mistake (one I usually don't make). I hope you won't leave Commons because of me. That's not worth it. Trijnstel (talk) 22:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I cancel my User Talk Page so it doesn't even exist? 50.15.152.98 22:28, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You could add {{Speedy}} on top of the page, with the reason "Own request; own talk page" or something like that (so you could use {{Speedy|Own request; own talk page}}) and then wait til an administrator deletes it. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 22:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you remove this content about the Vandalism Warning? Johndulles1 (talk) 18:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my comment above. Trijnstel (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Dear Trijnstel, for your information, I've asked Johndulles1 to discuss removing his comments from your talk page. Regards, Mathonius (talk) 05:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Johndulles asked again for removal as you can see on the previous topic here. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 19:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ +/−

Een cadeau voor onze nieuwe adminstrator van je collega's

Trijnstel/Archive, gefeliciteerd! Je hebt nu administratorrechten op Commons. Neem een moment om Commons:Administrators te lezen en plaats gerelateerde pagina's op je volglijst (vooral Commons:Administrators' noticeboard en Commons:Deletion requests), voor je in verwijderen, beveiligen, blokkeren of wijzigen in beveiligde pagina's duikt. De meerderheid van de acties van administratoren kunnen ongedaan worden gemaakt door andere administratoren, behalve het samenvoegen van bewerkingsgeschiedenissen, die dus met bijzondere zorg behandeld moeten worden.

Neem eens een kijkje op het IRC-kanaal: #wikimedia-commons op irc.freenode.net.

Zie de Moderatorenhandleiding (Engels). En check of voeg je zelf toe aan List of administrators en de gerelateerde lijsten op taal en datum.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have fun and thanks for helping :) --Herby talk thyme 14:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the team. You may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful. Comments and additions are always welcome.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks everyone! (And thanks for the link too, Jim; although I have experience as admin on other projects, it is surely useful for me.) Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Proficiat, Trijnstel. Ik was maar net op tijd terug van vakantie om te stemmen! Groet, Lymantria (talk) 19:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dank je wel! Ik was blij verrast om ook jouw stem te zien. Heb je een leuke vakantie gehad? :-) Trijnstel (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed your candidature. Congratulations, good to have you here! a×pdeHello! 18:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks! Trijnstel (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to congratulate you mickit 17:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, no problem. Thanks for congratulating me. :-) Trijnstel (talk) 18:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a candidacy for the steward. mickit 18:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I hear that from more users, but I have to think about it. It's surely a tool I could use, but... I don't know. Trijnstel (talk) 18:13, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I recently saw that we have very similar Main page (sr.wiki, nl.wiki). Who copied whom? mickit 21:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We (2007) copied you (2006) I guess. ;-) Trijnstel (talk) 21:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We may have worked from the same source. As I recall, we re-used some layout for our 'zuurstok' design from the italian wikipedia. Effeietsanders (talk) 04:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bokassa

Nou, allereerst gefeliciteerd, nieuwbakken mod. Request to rename account to HSL is misschien een hint ?
Ik heb een poging gedaan om die foto ("copyvio" van http://mysite.verizon.net/respzyir/jean-bedel-bokassa/id5.html.) te nomineren voor de bezemwagen. Ik kom zelden op Commons, dus hopelijk is het goed gegaan.
Vriendelijke groeten, Maasje (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Je hebt het helemaal goed gedaan, Maasje, en bedankt voor het mooie boeketje bloemen! Trijnstel (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Field Corps insignia of the United States Army

This page was being created, similarly to commons:Field Army insignia of the United States Army, specifically in line with English wikipedia policy; image galleries of the type Category:Insignia of the United States Army should be transferred to commons, in accordance with such decisions as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Field_Army_insignia_of_the_United_States_Army. In addition, please give this page some space to grow, and don't bite the newcomers. Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 20:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. You're right. I restored the two versions and it was a lesson for me. I won't delete pages that soon anymore for "out of project scope". Trijnstel (talk) 20:57, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a MyUploads Link next to MyContribs - further reading

Hello,

if you could translate the following two strings to your native language:

  • My uploads
  • List of files you have uploaded

, I would be very pleased.

Thanks for this and for your overall work on commons. -- RE rillke questions? 12:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rillke. Sure, here you go:
  • Mijn uploads
  • Lijst van bestanden die jij hebt geüpload (literally) or Lijst van door jou geüploade bestanden (more common Dutch)
You're welcome. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. -- RE rillke questions? 14:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chelmno Stare Miasto-mapa.jpg

Not sure what is going on with this file. Seems that there is a replacement to a non-existent file. I will leave it with you to sort if that is okay. :-)  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:18, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Billinghurst. I see what may have gone wrong. On 4 September I moved all requests from User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands to User:CommonsDelinker/commands. That's why this is giving my name as the one who requests the replacement. In fact, Jacek555 requested it on 31 July. He uploaded the file that day and clearly wanted to rename the file. Masur did that a couple of hours later. The renaming isn't necessary anymore and therefore I removed the template. In the future I'll check the requests more. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 15:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I re-checked all requests I moved to CommonsDelinker and restored two mistakes from mine (this and this). Thanks for informing me. Trijnstel (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet. Sometimes late into the evening, trying to work out what I am doing is hard enough, let alone what others have done. Clin  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hernoemingsverzoeken

Hoi Trijnstel, de makkelijke hernoemingsverzoeken zijn voor nu afgehandeld. Zou jij als moderator willen helpen bij twee wat meer complexe kwesties?

  1. Iemand heeft namelijk verzocht om File:Kit socks fortaleza11a.png te hernoemen naar File:Kit socks fortaleza11h.png en vice versa. Hiervoor moet een van de twee eerst hernoemd worden naar een tijdelijke titel (bijv. File:Kit socks fortaleza11a (temp).png), waarna beide pagina's naar hun respectievelijke doel verplaatst kunnen worden. Althans, door iemand die de gewenste titels beschikbaar kan maken door deze te verwijderen.
  2. Bij de volgende verzoeken had de verzoeker reeds redirects aangemaakt onder de verzochte titels:
Voor File:BSicon hRP4q.svg, die deel uitmaakt van dezelfde reeks, zal ik een berichtje achterlaten op de overlegpagina van Tuvalkin, want onder de gewenste titel (File:BSicon RP4hq.svg) heeft iemand anders een ander bestand geüpload.

Zie jij het zitten om hierbij te helpen? Met vriendelijke groet, Mathonius (talk) 10:54, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja hoor en bij dezen is alles ✓ Done. Clin Met vriendelijke groet, Trijnstel (talk) 12:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Super! Mathonius (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Endobutton 02-fr.svg.svg

Hoi Trijnstel, zou jij Commons:Deletion requests/File:Endobutton 02-fr.svg.svg willen sluiten? Het gaat om een artikel dat alleen maar hernoemd moest worden. De nominator heeft aangegeven die verwijderingsnominatie te willen intrekken en ik ben zo vrij geweest het sjabloon alvast te verwijderen. Zou het op Commons trouwens erg zijn als een niet-mod zoiets afsluit? Met vriendelijke groet, Mathonius (talk) 11:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ik heb het gedaan. Groetjes a×pdeHello! 11:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank, Axpde! :) Mathonius (talk) 11:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dank voor het uitvoeren van dit verzoek, Axpde. Nooit geweten dat je ook Nederlands spreekt. Clin @Mathonius, nee, het is niet erg als een niet-mod een verwijderverzoek sluit. Daar is zelfs nog een naam voor: "non-admin closure". Zie de volgende discussie uit 2009 anders eens hier. Met vriendelijke groet, Trijnstel (talk) 16:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Slechts een klein beetje ... ;-) a×pdeHello! 16:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dankjewel, Trijnstel! Goed om te weten. :) Mathonius (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dankjewel Treinstel. :o) Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:14, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Graag gedaan! Trijnstel (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you!

Voor al je hulp en immer vrolijke aanwezigheid: bedankt! Mathonius (talk) 14:04, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Graag gedaan en jij bedankt voor de overheerlijke stroopwafel! Groet, Trijnstel (talk) 14:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Addict Dance Studios Company Logo.jpg

I've taken the liberty of reverting your deletion of this. It looks to me like PD-text-logo, therefore not a speedy. I have hung a {{Delete}} on it, as it appears to be solely here in violation of COM:ADVERT. Regards,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Just a quick note: the file was also used on this deleted user page. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 12:23, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I just saw that -- I blocked the account -- User_talk:Addict_Dance_Studios#Blocked_Account.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for your help for understanding. Is North-West Frontier Province better than you deleted "Federally Administrated Tirbual Areas"? --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 20:25, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that's not allowed either, therefore I deleted North-West Frontier Province (created on 20 September 2009 by 80.194.30.187). Trijnstel (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Declined request

I saw that you declined my request on Requests for rights. Please explain briefly why you do it. Do you seem that I'm a good and trustful user here. I need meta-wiki Commons auto-patrolled and file mover right because, I am working heavily a lot of articles and its difficult to patrol. I'm a trustful user on en.wiki and I was granted with file mover rights by why not here. I have used the rename template earlier before I requested this right and it was right away declined. See this for further understanding how i'm trustful on en.wiki and I understand about copyright and licensing on here and patrolling new files. If you believe that I should have more experience here, do I have to grant this right away or not. Regards. --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 21:20, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mohamed Aden Ighe/Katarighe. I declined some of your requests, yes. You requested all known requests on several projects (commons, meta, enwiki, simplewiki). Please remember that these rights aren't meant for status and that you only get these when you have the trust of the community and when you have proven you could use them. You're with just 600 edits still new on this project. It's absolutely unnecessary to mention the rights on other projects as these aren't important to us. Last warning: please stop(!) requesting rights on every single project you know (like you did here for simplewiki and here for sowiki) and try contributing on one... Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 21:55, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You seem to be right and a good user, Thanks --Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
As you are a steward on Wikimedia. I kindly appreciate by giving this barnstar. Good Luck. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 21:22, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I guess... Trijnstel (talk) 21:56, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re

Yes, because I think I made a mistake. And I should accept responsibility and withdrew the request--Coekon (talk) 07:55, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Thanks for your kind reply and keep up the good work! Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 10:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Uh, my bad, it was a silly mistake. Thanks! --Aubrey (talk) 12:23, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and you're welcome! Trijnstel (talk) 12:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Victoiremalki

Hello Trijnstel,

Could you have a look at the various files uploaded by this editor, as we (administrators of the French Wikipedia) have some serious doubts about the relevance and/or the copyrights of these files ?

Just for your information, this editor is the President of the brand new (and extremely small) political party "Parti conservateur francais", which clearly fails notability (no independant sources, and recently deleted on fr:WP). By the way, this editor has just been blocked on fr:WP for repeated aggressive behaviour and threats.

Best regards. --Azurfrog (talk) 16:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated all pictures for speedy deletion and they'll probably be deleted soon. Thanks for notifying me! Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 20:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Within a day all pictures Victoiremalki uploaded were deleted by several admins. Trijnstel (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --Azurfrog (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your question at Meta

Hello Trijnstel

Thank you for your suggestion. However, I think it's better to leave my old account locked because it won't be used anymore. If you have further question, notify me here. Thank you.

BTW, can you have a look at my OTRS application there. As you are an OTRS volunteer now, you can give me good advice. Kind regards--Morning Sunshine (talk) 08:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, in that case I'll leave it locked. I can't do anything with your request for OTRS rights as I don't decide whether someone will get these or not. Trijnstel (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

* Frohe Weihnacht und einen guten Start ins neue Jahr
* Prettige Kerstdagen en een gelukkig nieuw jaar
* Merry Christmas and a happy New Year
from --Neozoon (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Neozoon! I wish you the same of course. :-) Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 23:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re New Holland including New South Wales

Trijnstel Thank you for your advice, copied as below. I have to admit I do not understand why you think the image, New Holland including New South Wales was considered by you as "not within our scope". I would be grateful if you could clarify why you consider it to be not with project scope? Thank you in anticipation, Camira

"Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, New Holland including New South Wales, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Trijnstel (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camira (talk • contribs) 04:14, 19 December 2011‎ (UTC)[reply]

Dear Camira. I deleted the page New Holland including New South Wales, because it didn't contain any content. The only content was the sentence "New Holland including New South Wales" (the same one as the title of the page). Wikimedia Commons is quite different from other projects and I'll tell you why. Only images, audio and/or video will be uploaded to Commons. There are some pages too, but those only serve as a gallery to show all related images of that specific subject. Your page didn't include any images, only one sentence. This looked like a (very small) regular article and that's out of scope for Commons. See also Commons:Project scope. If you have more questions, feel free to ask them. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 12:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Trijnstel, Thank you for your response. I want to try to be constructive with my contributions and fit in with the requirements of Wikimedia Commons. I thought the image of the map, New Holland including New South Wales, was a useful contribution as the map was a significant contemporary reference for the history of British colonization of Australia and other parts of the Pacific in the 1780s and 1790s. I'm sorry to appear dumb, but I still do not understand what you mean by saying that "it didn't contain any content". I's be happy to add some relevant content if that would meet your objection. Yours sincerely, Camira — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camira (talk • contribs) 23:06, 19 December 2011‎ (UTC)[reply]

I'm not talking about the image File:New Holland including New South Wales.jpg (that's still online) - I'm talking about the page New Holland including New South Wales.jpg. The page (or a gallery as it's called here) didn't contain any relevant content. See Commons:Galleries for more information. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 16:08, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Trijnstel, Thanks, I understand now. It's only the image that I'm concerned about. I must have created the page inadvertently when I uploaded the image. So you are right! Camira — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camira (talk • contribs) 22:30, 21 December 2011‎ (UTC)[reply]

Filemover request

You recently denied my request for the file mover right, claiming "Not enough experience on Commons yet." I am somewhat flabbergasted by this, as I have had an account on Commons for almost 5 years, have uploaded over 500 images, and have over 1,000 edits. On en.wikipedia I have have had the file mover right for about 9 months and have moved (I estimate) 200 or more files to fix wrong or meaningless filenames, harmonize files of a set, etc. I'm curious: how much experience is required? Because at the same time you denied my request you granted the right to User:Americophile, who has less than 1 year's experience on Commons with less than 250 uploads (albeit over 3,000 edits). Is "experience" based simply on edit count? The reason I requested the right in the first place was simply to move a handful of files I'd uploaded that had a typo in the filename, without having to bother anyone else since I have plenty of experience moving files over at en.wikipedia and know what I'm doing. --IllaZilla (talk) 05:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear IllaZilla. When I saw your request for the filemover right, you had less than 1000 edits and I didn't see any rename requests either (in your contribs nor in your deleted contribs). It doesn't count how long you're active, as that usually doesn't say anything about your edits. Of course I also look at the activity elsewhere, but this is Commons and this project is quite different from others. Though after thinking about it a second time I guess I was wrong this time. I will grant you the right. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 12:08, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reconsideration. --IllaZilla (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Early RfA closing

Hello, Trijnstel/Archive. You have new messages at Ezarate's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Happy Christmas Ezarateesteban 16:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Responded overthere. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to you as well! Trijnstel (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Een Kerstgeschenkje

Trijn, stel nu even…
Je neemt de trein van Wikipedia,
Je zit in de wagon,
Te wachten op ’t perron,
En Lotje komt voorbij
Met een schilderij.
Ga je dan lachen of wordt je boos?
Neen,
Je glimlacht, en denkt,
Dit is een schot in de roos
En geniet verder van de rit
Die er nog aan te komen zit...

Werkelijk prachtig, Lotje! Ik wens je nog een hele fijne kerst en een gelukkig nieuwjaar. Met vriendelijke groet, Trijnstel (talk) 11:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fijn dat je het leuk vindt. Prettige feestdagen nog. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hihi, grappig dat je mijn gebruikerspagina ook mooi vindt, te zien aan deze edit (is verder prima hoor; het viel me alleen op). Trijnstel (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The usual junk!

Just for your info in case you see it elsewhere - this & this seem to be less than co-incidental. No other apparent accounts at present and on a fairly wide ip range. Let me know if you want more. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 13:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me, but I won't do anything for the time being as he's not crosswiki active. Kind regards, Trijnstel (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed - more so that you had seen it in case it crops up elsewhere. Given the text it must be a bot I would think. Regards --Herby talk thyme 17:31, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Trijnstel/Archive/2011&oldid=160091583"