User talk:Teevee

Siistejä kuvia

Moi! Olit ladannut tänne hyvälaatuisia keikkakuvia, kiitos niistä. :) Laitoin osan ehdolle "laatukuviksi". —kallerna™ 12:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Kuvat

Hei, ja kiitos hienoista jääkiekkokuvista. Erittäin hyvälaatuisia ja hyviä tilannekuvia. Jatka samaan malliin! Javatyk (talk) 07:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Kiitos! Käyn SaiPan peleissä varsinaisesti kirjoittamassa työn puolesta, mutta yritän parhaani mukaan ehtiä ottaa kuviakin. Esimerkiksi eiliset HIFK-kuvat on otettu ottelun viimeisen kymmenen minuutin aikana, kun matsi oli jo ratkennut ja oli aikaa keskittyä kuvaamiseen. --Teevee (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Teevee!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Jukka Poika 2011 3.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Jukka Poika 2011 1.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Jukka Poika 2011 2.jpg was uncategorized on 9 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cody ChesnuTT - Ilosaarirock 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality to me. --Tomer T 13:51, 24 March 2012 (UTC)  Support--JDP90 16:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Lund - Ilosaarirock 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit noisy, but ok. Mattbuck 18:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lade Laakkonen - Ilosaarirock 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though I don't like the foreground. What is it? Should it be removed? --Kadellar 18:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Michael Monroe - Ilosaarirock 2011 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 19:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henkka Seppälä - Ilosaarirock 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Ristikkokäyttöön?

Sulla on tosi hienoja kuvia! Olen töissä ristikkokustantamossa ja monista noista kuvista olisi hyötyä meillekin, sillä kotimaisista artisteista on vaikea saada hyviä kuvia. Onko näitä mahdollisuus käyttää ristikoiden ja kryptojen pääkuvina. Voit vastata myös osoitteeseen henna.virtanen@grawiko.fi, josta voin lähettää myös lisätietoa.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erik Karlsson - Jokerit - 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are rather strong purple fringes around Erik, which should be removed. Everything else is very nice! --Ximeg 18:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)  Done. I fixed the purple fringing. --Teevee 23:23, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pete Parkkonen 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very good portrayal. Possibly some selective noise reduction could be applied. --Tuxyso 09:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chisu - Ilosaarirock 2012 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well exposed, very nice background lightning, probably slight selective noise reduction could be performed. --Tuxyso 09:19, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruokolahden kirkko 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:54, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emma Salokoski 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chisu - Ilosaarirock 2012 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit noisy, and I think it lacks contrast a bit (dark areas not very dark), but overall good. --Mattbuck 23:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brian Salcido 2012 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Again, bit bright (lower low levels to fix) but overall ok. --Mattbuck 23:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Erik Karlsson Pictures

Hi Tuomas.

Thanks for your high quality pictures of Erik Karlsson. I added "other versions" to the summary infobox, added category "Jokerit players" and did some interwikilinking to the four Karlsson images you've uploaded here in Commons. I hope you don't mind about these changes.

Cheers. --Siipikarja (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lappeenrannan kirkko 2013 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective needs to be fixed on the left. Mattbuck 11:41, 24 February 2013 (UTC)  Comment I'm having hard time figuring out the problem. Could you please elaborate? Do you perhaps mean the railings on that dock? Those are not horizontal because the water level is low. --Teevee 22:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)  Comment After inspecting the image further I adjusted the orientation a bit. I hope that addresses your concern.--Teevee 21:57, 27 February 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 22:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pekka Olkkonen - Rakuunarock 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice. Not problem with the perspective distortion because it taken from below, but CAs (see notes); and the face, the shirt and the background have noise--Lmbuga 19:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Removed CA on shoes, fine tuned sharpening and noise reduction settings a bit. --Teevee 20:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Good work, much better and nice picture--Lmbuga 18:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pekka Olkkonen - Rakuunarock 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice. Not problem with the perspective distortion because it taken from below, but CAs (see notes); and the face, the shirt and the background have noise--Lmbuga 19:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)  Done Removed CA on shoes, fine tuned sharpening and noise reduction settings a bit. --Teevee 20:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC) Good work, much better and nice picture--Lmbuga 18:50, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unto Helo - Rakuunarock 2013 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 22:10, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antti Kiiski - Rakuunarock 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 22:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unto Helo - Rakuunarock 2013 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jarkko Aaltonen - Rakuunarock 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Teevee⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Teevee,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Aksim kuvat

Hei tuomas mua on vituttanut jo pidemmän aikaa et wikipediassa on kaks hullun vanhaa kuvaa musta ja toimittajat laiskuudessaan käyttää vain noit wikipedia commons kuvia, joten voitko pliiis poistaa ne sieltä, koska en tykkää niistä yhtään. Kiitos Tuomas :)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:28, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Thanks! I guess it is time to change that then... :) --Teevee (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kari-Pekka Kangasmäki - Rakuuna Rock 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool picture, QI for me -- Achim Raschka 15:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellie Goulding - Ilosaarirock 2014 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 16:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheek - Rakuuna Rock 2014 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Lisenssin merkitseminen

Olen huomannut että olet ottanut hienoja kuvia, mutta vinkkinä antaisin että kannattaa lisenssit merkitä näin: {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0|author = Tuomas Vitikainen}} tai näin {{cc-by-sa-4.0|Tuomas Vitikainen}}, tämän jälkeen on helpompi ymmärtää kenet tulee mainita mikäli joku haluaa ottamiasi kuvia käyttää. Esimerkiksi tuohon File:Eero Kosonen 2015.jpg kävin tekemässä tämän muutoksen. --Zunter (talk) 19:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Category:Antti_Tuisku

Antti Tuisku has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

2001:14BB:80:4EDC:E339:5A1E:EB58:564E 16:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Imatran Valtionhotelli 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderful Sixflashphoto 17:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauritsalan kirkko 2017 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality and no CA's where I expected them Sixflashphoto 17:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaukaan sellu- ja paperitehdas 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kärnäkosken linnoitus 2017 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks a bit backfocused but the wall in the foreground is acceptably sharp. --C messier 13:09, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Lappeenrannan linnoitus 2017 35.jpg

File:Lappeenrannan linnoitus 2017 35.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zache (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Imatrankoski 2017 04.jpg

File:Imatrankoski 2017 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zache (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Eli, patsaskuvia ei voi lisensoida vapaasti, koska niissä teoksen tekijän tekijänoikeus rajoittaa kuvan käyttöä ja niitä ei voi siksi tallentaa Wikimedia Commonsiin. Tästä syystä siirsin tallentamasi patsaskuvat suomenkieliseen Wikipediaan jossa niitä käytetään sitaattioikeudella osana julkisen taiteen dokumentointiprojektia.

Fiwikissä kuvat ovat seuraavilla nimillä:

• w:fi:Tiedosto:Imatran Impi -veistos, Imatra 2017 04.jpg
• w:fi:Tiedosto:Lappeenrannan linnoituksen muistolaatta.jpg

--Zache (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olkkolan kartano 2017 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals well done, sharp enough, only photo does not have anything special, but it is a Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lönnrotin koulun syyskuussa 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lappeenrannan Lyseon lukio 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 18:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lappeenrannan taidemuseo 2017 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 22:56, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lauritsalan kirkko 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IsoKristiina entrance 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 21:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Finnish cavalry memorial 2017 02.jpg

File:Finnish cavalry memorial 2017 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Htm (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Finnish cavalry memorial 2017 01.jpg

File:Finnish cavalry memorial 2017 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Htm (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Olen tallentanut kaksi ylläolevaa teoskuvaa fi-wikiin käytettäväksi sitaattioikeudella artikkeleissa Wäinö Aaltonen ja Luettelo Lappeenrannan julkisista taideteoksista ja muistomerkeistä. Wäinö Aaltosen kuolinvuodesta ei ole vielä kulunut 70 vuotta, joten hänen veistoksistaan otettuja valokuvia ei saa tallentaa Commonsiin.--Htm (talk) 00:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

EuroBasket 2017

Thank you so much for your work with categorizing the EuroBasket 2017 photos! I never could've found time to do it myself. Awesome work! Teevee (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your amazing photos ! I didn't finish categorizing it yet but I hope I will by the end of the year. Besides, some of the job has already be done, so I just finish what's left. --El Funcionario (talk) 09:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Nuijamaan kirkko 2017 06.jpg

File:Nuijamaan kirkko 2017 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Htm (talk) 22:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Storkyrkan - January 2018 - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 22:09, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vasabron - January 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hjorthagen - January 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

IAAF Tampere 2018

Hi, I saw that you took many photos at events in Finland. Have you heard of http://tampere2018.com/fi/etusivu/ ? It would be great to take photos of all events/athletes, they can prove precious for many articles later on. I bet wmfi: would be happy to help with getting a media pass or reimbursing costs, if useful. --Nemo 15:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up! I have a rock festival already for the weekend but I'm free for the first three days of the event. I'll see what I can do. Teevee (talk) 19:51, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

France - Finlande, EuroBasket Women 2019

Hello, since you care about Finland and basketball :), you may find interesting that a friend of mine took some photographs about Finland woman basketball team last february. I started to categorize them but most players don't have their own article so maybe someone may create them on finnish wikipedia ! :) --El Funcionario (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Kuvapyyntö

Moikka Tuomas,

Mulla olisi yhdessä isossa projektissa tarvetta kuville konsertista, jossa olet kuvannut. Jos sulla on aikaa tai mahdollisuuksia palata lisäkuvilla mulle tässä parin päivän sisään, niin vastaisitko vaikka tähän  :)

-Kissa21782 (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Moi! Saataa ollakin mahdollisuuksia, mutta tarvitsisin vähän tarkempia tietoja. Mistä konsertista on kyse? Onko kyseessä jonkunkieliseen wikiin liittyvä projekti vai ihan muu Wikimedia-projektin ulkopuolinen? --Teevee (talk) 12:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Kuviasi on cropattu

Hei, monia valokuviasi on cropattu, jotta ne sopisivat paremmin esimerkiksi artikkelien tietolaatikoihin. Palautin yhden tällaisen version, eli File:Cheek - Ilosaarirock 2016 - 16.jpg, koska mielestäni alkuperäinen kuva kannattaa ehdottamasti myös säilyttää. Mitä mieltä olet yleisesti siitä, että kuviasi on leikattu: File:Brädi & Kasmir - YleXPop 2017 - 01.jpg, File:Antti Tuisku - Ilosaarirock 2016 - 11.jpg jne. Minusta ne kannattaisi ainakin joissakin kuvissa palauttaa alkuperäisiksi. -kyykaarme (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Moi! Olen kanssasi samaa mieltä, että croppaaminen on joissakin tilanteissa ollut aika ärhäkkää. Täällä kuitenkin on mahdollisuus uuden version tekemiseen. Pelkkä croppaaminen tuntuu vähän päänauonnalta, että "etko sie aikuinen mies osaa ottaa tarpeeksi tiiviitä kuvia"... En ole jaksanut lähteä aiheesta keskustelemaan tai kiistelemään, mutta kiitos, että olet ollut valppaana!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ida Paul & Kalle Lindroth - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ida Paul & Kalle Lindroth - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ida Paul & Kalle Lindroth - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanni - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jenni Vartiainen - Ilosaarirock 2010 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Someone might object to the crops, but good quality IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 23:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chisu - Ilosaarirock 2016 - 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MC Raaka Pee 2013 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:55, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reino Nordin - Ilosaarirock 2018 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EuroBasket 2017 Finland vs Iceland 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustasch - South Park Festival 2018 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:14, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ghost - South Park Festival 2018 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lost Society - South Park Festival 2018 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 01:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mustasch - South Park Festival 2018 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the drummer --Michielverbeek 21:29, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brother Firetribe - South Park Festival 2018 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although the person's name should also be in the description. --Peulle 13:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonata Arctica - South Park Festival 2018 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meshuggah - Rock am Ring 2018-6418.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the easiest photo to make --Michielverbeek 21:37, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clarion Hotel Helsinki - May 2018 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Tommy Lindgren

Kumosit juuri muutokseni kuvaan File:Tommy Lindgren - Ilosaarirock 2009.jpg laittaen luokan Category:Tommy Lindgren takaisin. Mistä syystä, ottaen huomioon että koko luokkaa ei ole olemassa? JIP (talk) 22:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

En tiedä miksi sellaista kategoriaa ei (enää?) ole, mutta olisi syytä olla. Ja nyt on kun sen lisäsin. --Teevee (talk) 22:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

No se on hyvä sillä sitten. JIP (talk) 23:23, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Ei ollut tarkoitus mitenkään talloa varpaille tässä. Anteeksi! Teevee (talk) 20:52, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruudolf - Ilosaarirock 2013 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Robin - Ilosaarirock 2015 12.jpg

File:Robin - Ilosaarirock 2015 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:57, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Robin - Ilosaarirock 2015 12.jpg

File:Robin - Ilosaarirock 2015 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MillieRoberts03 (talk) 03:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)