User talk:Spurzem/Archive 13

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mercedes-Benz 300 SL from 1952 with protective bars against vultures at Carrera Panamericana.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Hawkins in Porsche 906.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dan Gurney in 1965, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7, rear and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 02:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goebel-bycicle with Lutz-engine, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 02:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lutz-engine in a Goebel-bycicle, right side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 02:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hubert Hahne driving BMW F 269.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Vulphere 01:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 02:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austin-Healy Mk 4, Bj. 1995 (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW F91 Cabrio, Bj. 1953, gesamt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Mustang, Bj. 66, Lenkrad und Armaturenbrett (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zender Fact 4 (Zender-Museum 2019-06-02 Sp) re.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 1802, Bj. 1972 (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steering wheel and dashboard of Hansa 1100 (1958-1961).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flat engine of Hansa 1100 (1958-1961), front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hansa 1100 Coupé.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Maybe it's just my opinion, but an "in motion" scope doesn't really work because it's hard to tell in a photo. --BoothSift 17:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

@Boothsift: Hard to tell or not to see? Look closely. Or do you think that's what a parked car looks like? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: In this case, it was only because of the road that you would be able to tell. Anyway I still don't think we need an "in motion" scope, try something else. --BoothSift 01:08, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Boothsift: Whether you think we did not need a picture of a Hansa 1100 Coupé in motion, should be insignificant. Apparently, your criticism is something like a "return coach" as we say in German. Or did I get this wrong? -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: I am not German so therefore I have no clue if you got this wrong. Your criticism isn't that much better (a black car is too dark, for example)--BoothSift 02:05, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Boothsift: What is that supposed to mean? Did I ever write that a black car is too dark? May be that an image is too dark so that you can not see any details of a black car. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 07:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I don't think in motion should be in this scope. Let the image stand on its own. If it was racing or cornering sharply or something that would be different. 11:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Several years ago, I was instructed to formulate the scope as precisely as possible in order not to block the rating of other images. Here's a Hansa 1100 Coupe on the move, another photographer might present a parked car of this type. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:11, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment In my view, adding "in motion" makes the scope too narrow. Please revisit Commons:Valued image scope wjhere you will see that teh primary object of valued images is to provide material for Wikipeia articles. Would anybody really want to include a picture of the model of car travelling across a road intersection? Only as an alternative to an image of the stationery vehicle, but not in addition to the stationery vehicle. Martinvl (talk) 21:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Martinvl: I do not understand for a long time, according to which criteria is rated here sometimes. Why should the proposed photo only be used to someone who absolutely wants to see a moving car? The picture is useful for anyone who wants to see the Hansa 1100 Coupe. But if you absolutely need a reason to declare the image unusable, then the most absurd justification is probably right. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: Isn't it funny that three people have been telling you the same thing and you argue against every single one of them. Then Ikan Kekek comes with an offer to support and voila! You change the scope right away. Clearly, the support matters more to you than the criticism. --BoothSift 01:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Lothar, I've looked at the 4 Commons photos of this model of car, and I consider this one straightforwardly the best and clearly most useful. Sure, it's often good to be more specific in a scope, but there's an art to a scope, so I don't think there's any inflexible rule about how specific to make one, and we have to judge this logically on a case-by-case basis. And in this case, I would agree with the others that the relevant scope is really the model of the car, not whether it's parked or in motion. If you reduce the scope to just the model of car, I will support the nomination without hesitation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done – Thank you, Ikan Kekek, but I keep wondering how the scope rules change from case to case. It is also astonishing to see who changes the rules and decides what is right or wrong. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

 Support - Best in scope. Meanwhile, perhaps we should have a discussion about scopes at Commons talk:Valued image scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment @Lothar Spurzem: The scope rules do not keep changing - the page Commons:Valued image scope has hardly changed in nine years. Also, the page Commons:Valued image criteria has hardly changed in ten years (apart form a small addition that I made about four years ago). What happens is that various people have differnet views on how to interpret that page. (Note that these pages are also available in French and in German and that the second of the pages is available in a number of other languages as well).

@Martinvl: Yes, that's the problem that various people have different views of the rules and that these people believe they have to enforce their opinion. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:29, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Spurzem: You aren't also enforcing your opinion? The discussion above makes me think otherwise --BoothSift 01:53, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hansa 1100 (1958-1961), side view left.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:54, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steering wheel and dashboard of DKW F91 in the Audi Forum Ingolstadt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --BoothSift 01:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zender Vision 3 (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombardier Geländewagen, VW Iltis (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Kreuz Kastellauner Str. (2019-06-05 1 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC) I can't really see the picture. Is something wrong with the file maybe? --Podzemnik 00:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)  Support Nothing wrong, good quality. --Uoaei1 04:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 700 Coupé (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Kirschblütenschule (2019-05-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Knabenschule, Lassaulx um 1830 (2019-06-05 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:51, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Treis, Knabenschule, Eingang (2019-06-05).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Borgward Hansa 1500 station wagon, front and left side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor - Matthew (2019-05-23 Sp a).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dashboard of Borgward Hansa 1800.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used picture of the car--Boothsift 04:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Laach - Hochaltar (2019-05-14 Foto Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clay Regazzoni in 1976 driving Ferrari 312 T.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used--Boothsift 04:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used.--Vulphere 07:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cat on the roof by Hermann Anschütz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St.-Antonius-Kapelle (Sehl), view from east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nissan Figaro, Bj. 1991, Heck (Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, St. Castor - Jesus wahrer Weinstock, 17. Jh. (2019-05-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)  Comment - I hate to bother you, but I'm not sure it's sharp enough. If you could sharpen a bit without damaging anything else, I'd be happy. -- Ikan Kekek 02:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: At the moment, no improved file can be uploaded. I do not know the reason for the problem. -- Spurzem 13:17, 10 June 2019 (UTC) OK, I'll leave this to whenever you are able to do it. -- Ikan Kekek 00:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)  Done @Ikan Kekek: Now it worked. Inserted sharpened image as desired. -- Spurzem 18:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Eine neue Version dieser Datei hochladen vom 19:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Verschiedene Dateien mit gleichem Namen werden nicht akzeptiert. z.B. kann man eine Zahl oder einen Buchstaben hinzufügen. Viele Grüße

Georgfotoart

@Georgfotoart: Danke für den Hinweis. Daran hatte ich auch gedacht und den Dateinamen geändert, aber ohne Erfolg. Merkwürdigerweise funktioniert es inzwischen wieder, auch mit übereinstimmendem Dateinamen. Jetzt bin ich gespannt, wie lange es klappt. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgan Plus 8, Bj. 1984, Cockpit (2016-05-01 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some very small remains of CA not really disturbing. --Smial 12:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adler M 100, Hinterradfederung (2018-06-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 16:19, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Honda Z, Bj. 1972, 600 ccm (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vulphere 12:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austin Healey 4 (2017-06-11 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrea de Adamich driving Alfa Romeo 33T12 at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranien (2019-06-14).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:01, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG B Mk II, US-Ausführung, nach 1968-69 (2017-07-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alfa Romeo 33/3 with driver Nanni Galli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kadett A, Bj. 1964 (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Modell A, Bj. 1928 (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 180 (2019-06-02 Sp) r.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Mustang, Bj. 1965 (2019-06-02 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nissan Figaro, Bj. 1991, front (2019-06-02 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joseph Siffert in Porsche 908/3 during practice at Nürburgring 1971.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochem, Reichsburg (2019-04-26 Sp 1b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BMW 3.0 CSL in competition driven by Alain Peltier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 06:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

}}

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helmut Kelleners driving BMW 2002 at Nürburgring, Karussell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Lothar Spurzem category links please. Charles (talk) 08:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Fluffy89502 ~ talk^ 06:19, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klaus Ludwig (right) with his co-pilot Karl Ludwig Weiß and Ford Capri at Nürburgring 1973.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:30, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Volvo 240 in competition driven by Anders Olofsson at Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trabant 601, Bj. 1973, zum Cabrio umgebaut (2019-06-02 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:29, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FGS Stadt Bonn in Treis-Karden (2019-06-20 Fronleichnam).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morris Minor 1000 (Bauzeit 1956 bis 1971) mit Kofferaufbau (2014-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Lothar, deine Reaktion zu dem Bild mit dem Schiff https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FGS_Stadt_Bonn_in_Treis_(2019-06-20_Sp).JPG ist doch wohl etwas überzogen. Das Bild ist meiner Meinung nach nach rechts geneigt und kein Großer Mist wie du in dem Kommentar anmerkst. Es liegt mir fern die Arbeiten und Beiträge anderer Wikimedianer "abzuwatschen". Gerade deine Beiträge und dein beneidenswertes Wissen aus der Automobil- und Motorsportsparte sind von unschätzbarem Wert. Deine Fotos sind außerdem von überdurchschnittlicher Qualität sodass jegliches Eingeschnapptsein sowie irgendwelche Retourkutschen unnötige Zeitverschwendung sind. Gruß von --Ermell (talk) 09:24, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Ermell, mir fällt seit Langem auf, dass meine Fotos in QIC besonders kritisch betrachtet werden – nicht speziell von Dir – und dass manche anderen Leute jeglichen Murks hochladen können, der bereitwillig bejubelt wird. Schau Dir doch mal das [Foto eines Allerwelts-Volvo] an, das kürzlich einer unserer Chefkritiker als eins einer ganzen Reihe vorstellte. Die Bildgestaltung ist schlichtweg schlecht und die Motorhaube des Autos zu hell. Lediglich die gelbe Warnleuchte auf dem Dach könnte etwas Besonderes sein. Auf jeden Fall: QI. Ein ähnliches Foto dieser Serie wurde ausdrücklich gelobt, weil an dem Fahrzeug paar Fähnchen angebracht waren. Was auf den Fähnchen draufstand, war nicht zu erkennen. Kommen wir aber zurück zu den Schiffen. Dieser Tage war ein ziemlich düsteres zu sehen, auf dem es den Anschein hat, das Schiff fahre bergab. Zu Recht gab es keine Beanstandung; denn dieser Eindruck ergibt sich daraus, dass der Fotograf ziemlich hoch stand. Bei mir war es anders: Ich stand tief und dadurch hat man vielleicht das Gefühl, das Schiff fahre bergan. Für mich wirkt es dadurch übrigens dynamisch; aber das ist freilich Geschmackssache. Schade, dass ich die Häuser im Hintergrund weggeschnitten habe, sonst könntest Du sehen, dass das Bild nicht nach rechts hängt. Aber lassen wir's. Mein Glück hängt nicht davon ab, dass Fotos, die ich gemacht, bei QIC positiv bewertet werden. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ford Mustang, Bj. 1966, Cabrio (2019-06-02 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 23:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ligier JS 51 (Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 Giardiniera, Baujahr 1969 (2019-06-05 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Elise Heck (2019-06-02 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Elise Serie 1 (2019-06-02 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Esprit Turbo S3, Heck (2018-04-29 Sp r).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but tilt. --ArildV 21:22, 25 June 2019 (UTC)  Support No tilt, look at the greenhouse in the background. --Palauenc05 09:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochem, Mosaik Brückenstraße, von Carlfritz Nicolay 1982 (2019-04-26 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FGS Stadt Bonn, Bj. 1969, in Cochem (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochem-Cond, St. Remaclus - Südwest.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cochem, von re. Markt 7, 5 u. 4 (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Konstantinbasilika - Johannes, Gustav Kaupert 1887.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, --Manfred Kuzel 16:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Concept car Zender Vision 3 from 1987, side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Concept car Zender Vision 3 from 1987, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Concept car Zender Fact 4 Spider from 1991 in the private museum of Zender, rear.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in Scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 00:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karden, Eurocopter AS 350 BA (2019-07-05 2) Wende.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gardetrommler, Mainz (2008-04-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2006-05-05 Barfußläuferbrunnen Sayn 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gutenbergdenkmal Mainz (2018-04-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fastnachtsbrunnen Mainz (2008-04-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fastnachtsbrunnen Mainz, Detail (2008-04-23 Sp 2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, St. Irminen 2b - Wappen Anna Maria von der Beeck (2012-10-09).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main part of the photo --Michielverbeek 17:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clay Regazzoni in 1971 with Ferrari 312 B behind the pits of Nürburgring.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Deine Edits sprechen für dich..

...das hier ist nur kindisch, aber das hier ist eine Beleidigung, und geht zu weit. Mach es nicht nochmal. --Poco² 21:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Hallo Poco, wieso ist es kindisch, wenn ich sehe, dass das gesamte Gebäude verzerrt ist und ganz besonders der Turm mit der Kuppel. Ich bin nicht sicher, dass ich die Perspektive hätte besser korrigieren können, vermutlich aber ja. Und das andere: Eine scherzhafte Bemerkung sollte nicht als Beleidigung verstanden werden. Wenn es doch als solche rüber kam, entschuldige bitte. Freundliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

"Entschuldigung...", "freundliche Grüsse", "sollte nicht als Beleidigung verstanden werden",...und gleichzeitig willst du all meine Bilder offensichtlich kippen? Ich war schon großzügig als ich einseitig ankündigte, dass ich deine Bilder nicht anfassen würde. Wenn du aber weiterhin meine auf den Fokus setzt, sind deine Worte oben nicht nur leer sondern auch unehelich und die nächste Diskussion führen wir unter einer Anzeige von mir wegen deinem Verhalten in COM:ANU. Nochmals: wenn du mit Kritik nicht umgehen kannst, ist QI nicht die Seite für dich. Einen schönen Abend. Poco² 19:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Heißt das, dass ich zu Deinen Bildern nichts mehr sagen darf, vor allem nichts Negatives – auch wenn Kritik berechtigt ist und begründet wird? Und wenn ich es noch mal wagen sollte, werde ich gesperrt. Habe ich das richtig verstanden. Ebenfalls schönen Abend -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Komm schon, du hast in Jahren kaum ein Bild von mir gekippt und nach deinem Wutanfall, weil ich gewagt habe, ein Bild von dir abzulehnen, lehnst du gleich 2 von mir. Denkst du, dass du mit dummen Benutzern und Admins zu tun hast, dass sie nicht unterscheiden können was "Zufall" und was gezielte Provokation ist? Und dann auch noch beim gleichen Bild greifst du einen anderen Benutzer an, weil auch er ehrlich beurteilt, dass das Bild unscharf ist (weil du nach dem Author beurteilst, denkst du vielleicht, dass andere nach dem gleichen Muster agieren). Das Bild ist unscharf und dazu klein. Wenn du es nicht siehst, dann liegt das Problem vielleicht an deinem Stolz, keine Ahnung. Ab und zu werden Bilder von mir abgelehnt, und ich habe damit kein Problem, solange das ehrlich ist (ich sehe ein, dass einige Bilder keine solide QIs sind) und nicht den Muster "Auge für Auge", wie in diesem Fall, folgt. QI ist groß genug, meine Empfehlung ist Abstand für eine Weile zu halten. --Poco² 17:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Über unsachliche Bewertungen ärgere ich mich, das gebe ich zu. Einen Wutanfall, wenn man dieses Wort gebrauchen will, hatte aber eher ein anderer. Denk mal drüber nach. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St. Jost, Kapelle, Nordost (2019-07-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 14:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Kirschblütenschule, Ostseite (2019-07-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 18:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Polo IV Cross Polo 2005-2009 (2019-07-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 18:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Rheinlandhalle, Detail Handwerk (2019-07-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Rheinlandhalle, Detail Kirschen (2019-07-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sculpted art good visible. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Rheinlandhalle, Detail Handwerk (2019-07-23 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Rheinlandhalle, Detail Kirschen (2019-07-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sculpted art good visible. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mindelheim, St. Stephan, Altar Erwin Holzbaur (2017-08-01 Spurzem).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, private Holzbank (2016-10-05 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:55, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Altar with retable by Erwin Holzbaur in Saint Stephen Church (Mindelheim).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Rheinlandhalle (2019-07-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 15:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Rheinlandhalle, Detail Fastnacht (2019-07-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:13, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen an der Alten Feuerwache 3 (2019-07-22 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:13, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim-Kärlich, Brunnen Im Grünen Meer (2014-05-10 2 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 06:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porsche 356 No. 1 Roadster at Nürburgring in 1981.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

Hallo Spurzem,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Dino Spider - 2. Serie (2015-07-04 Cockpit).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus Seven, vordere Radaufhängung (Foto Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 502, Typenschild.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:28, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham, Spiegel.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 14:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Maria Himmelfahrt, Südportal 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 23:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurfürstl Palais Trier (Sp 2009-6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:13, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maserati 250 F, Bj. 1958, Cockpit (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Bäckerjungenbrunnen, Markt (2019-08-28 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Haus von der Leyen, Stadtmuseum. Erker (2019-08-28 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andernach, Mariendom Tympanon Süd (2019-08-28 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Steindy 17:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Liebfrauenkirche Andernach: view from the pulpit into the choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 7 September 2019 (UTC)