User talk:Cvmontuy

Archives Archives

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Versa2021p1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 02:58, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Versa2021p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Nice, with 80% selfie.) --XRay 06:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Usumacinta river floaded2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eje8Sur202104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image. It's leaning out and IMO a little too warm. And please improve the categorization. --XRay 05:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC).  Done Would you please check again --Cvmontuy 16:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)  Support IMO OK. Thank you. --XRay 09:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ParroquiaSanMiguel2019P5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battle field with chess board.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/ Taken with Canon EOS 500N

Commons:Valued image candidates/ Taken with Canon EOS 500N is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G1 (test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content): Invalid request, file is not exist If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

A1Cafel (talk) 10:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El Zacatal bridge, Ciudad del Carmen 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough quality for me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Julee and Alebrije 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autorretrato, París, 1967-1968, Lake de Landero.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latinoamerica tower, Mexico City 2022 p2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Sky could be improved. --XRay 04:38, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xochimilco Isla la Llorona 20220219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good except that there are some weird geometric artifacts on the upper left, middle left and upper right that have to be eliminated. -- Ikan Kekek 05:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your review, its done! --Cvmontuy 10:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)  Comment Almost. There's still one white one about 2/3 of the way up the trees on the left. -- Ikan Kekek 21:00, 21 February 2022 (UTC)  CommentDone! --Cvmontuy 13:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Yep. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 14:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leaves of Liquidambar styraciflua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fossil wristwath with white background.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK quality. --PetarM 16:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Fotos

Hola compañero Cvmontuy quisiera pedirte si por favor pudieses subir fotos como estas, pero de esta pandemia actual en México obviamente:

• 
• 
• 
• 

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 03:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• @Cvmontuy: Si por favor y cuando tengas las fotos por favor me hágamelo saber, que sean como las que están en la galería que puse al principio.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 19:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

• Hola Cvmontuy disculpa las molestias, solo venía a preguntarte si ya tienes las imágenes.--Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 16:46, 29 October 2022 (UTC)