User talk:Sasha Krotov

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why[edit]

[1] ? --Panther 07:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

а свежую фотку трудно поставить?

Hi. You uploaded a picture [2] to commons from Flickr from a user called dubiella. I was wondering if you could upload some of his other photos, particularly [3] and [4]. I have little experience with either commons or Flickr, including image policy, but the English wikipedia page is in need of some more photos. Could you see what you could do? Thanks in advance, Apterygial (talk) 04:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

his license prohibits commercial use of photos, specifically this image, I wrote him a letter on flickr with a request to change the license to CC-BY-SA and he agreed, for the rest need to separately request--sk (talk) 22:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He misses as observer the Республика Казахстан — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.0.21.225 (talk • contribs)

Не могли бо вы пояснить, фотография лицевой стороны книги можно ли заливать на Викисклад? Я к сожалению не говорю по английски.--Lucas Novokuznetsk (talk) 04:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

В правилах вроде бы записано, что можно заливать очень простые обложки книг. То что я залил проще некуда. --Lucas Novokuznetsk (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
я не в курсе о какой обложке идет речь, но наверняка даже если там только текст, он не просто в одну строчку скомпонован. --sk (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

You recently uploaded some F1 photos. I was the one who discovered the set and I've been told to remove the border. Are you able to do so? Chubbennaitor (talk) 14:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW have you had luck on the 2008 Brazilian Grand Prix photos. Chubbennaitor (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Very sorry. My computer finds it hard to have files like it. Chubbennaitor (talk) 20:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Sasha Krotov!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 09:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:White_House_Moscow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fernrohr (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stereo snow crystals.jpg[edit]

The two images are reversed. This is not parallel stereoscopy , but cross stereoscopy ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Tomchen1989 (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Stereo snow crystals.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stereo snow crystals.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token cfb6833e5d6261a29d261487c80cb800[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

[edit]

It is very odd and also sad, that red stars, symbolizing the communist Soviet dictatorship, are still on the banner of the Armed Forces of Russia, although the three colour star of Russia exists (from 2010). I hope that You would change the situation from Your own side, to send a proposal etc. Sincerely, --WPK (talk) 13:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sochi_2014_-_Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hektor (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bus type[edit]

Hello. A few years ago you uploaded a picture of a PAZ-3205 in Arkhangelsk. As your other uploads suggest that you are familiar with motor vehicles, I hope that you're maybe able to help me. I'm currently improving the German article about de:Archangelsk and checked some of the photos I shot last year. One of the photos shows a bus, which looks for me similar to the PAZ-3205 on your photo. But as I haven't a clue about russian busses and cars in general, I would prefer, if somebody could verify my guess. Thanks in advance and greetings from Magdeburg --Paramecium (talk) 17:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC) PS: If you prefer, you can answer me on Russian.[reply]

Это такая же модель, 3205. Вообще почти весь пассажирский транспорт в городе представлен этой моделью автобусов. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 20:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Большое спасибо за помощь. --Paramecium (talk) 21:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

F1 Video[edit]

Thanks for porting File:2011 Australian GP - Video.ogv from flickr! I'm the author on flickr and really happy with your job. --Takot (talk)

Thank's for video. Do you have more longer F1 video? --Sasha Krotov (talk) 20:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to find but failed to find any longer video of this year's Australia GP, while I have some Singapore GP '10 videos. Do you need them? --Takot (talk) 10:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yes--Sasha Krotov (talk) 13:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Btw, uploading to Flickr makes quality worse, so I'll prepare the original files (taken by iPhone) by uploading to Dropbox for better quality. After that I'll notice the URL to you via Wikimail. I'm still wondering the conversion from QuickTime (.mov) files works well. (Hopes go well.) --Takot (talk) 15:25, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prepared. However, it seems I am not able to send you a Wikimail. Could you send me a message on Flickr, if you could? My flickr username is the same with this. I'll send you back the video archive URL. --Takot (talk) 14:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

На Вашем произведении File:Arh.location.map.PNG, а также основанном на нём файле File:Ru-ark-plesetsky loc.svg юзера Jon Morse (JFMorse) , территория ЗАТО Мирный ошибочно вообще не показана, а включена в состав Плесецкого района, хотя, входящие в состав городского округа Мирный обширные территории со стартовыми комплексами, клином разрезают территорию Плесецкого района от Мирного на западе и вплоть до границы с Виноградовским районом на востоке.83.149.3.174 06:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

а еще не показаны границы всех городов областного подчинения - Архангельск, Северодвинск, Котлас и другие, все они не входят в состав районов. Я в курсе, но пока негде взять свободный образец изображения откуда бы эти границы можно было взять. Видел подробную интерактивную карту области со всеми муниципальными границами на сайте Росреестра, но как оттуда вырезать границы и сделать нормальную картинку я не в курсе. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When I wrote the German article about the Административно-территориальное деление Архангельской области I encountered the same problem. So I created as a makeshift a very amateurish version of the map, which shows the городских округов. Anyway the locator map of the Arkhangelskaja Oblast has been bothering me for a long time, because it doesn't show the whole oblast (for example Новая Земля and the Соловецкие острова are missing). Do you know maybe a Russian Commons member who could build a new locator map? --Paramecium (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Памятники Архангельской области[edit]

Тут отчасти по моей инициативе началась работа над составлением списков памятников культурного наследия по России. Общее обсуждение тут (довольно длинное). Я взялся за Архангельскую (здесь) и довольно быстро обнаружил, что я по второму разу делаю ту работу, которую Вы уже сделали два года назад. Не хотите принять участие? Вы явно в предмете разбираетесь лучше меня. Самое сложное - создать выверенные списки.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • списки можно взять на сайте Минкультуры - Объекты культурного наследия, там можно сделать выборку по конкретному региону\району области. Я делал список только Архангельских памятников, в областных мало разбираюсь. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 18:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Я их оттуда и беру, есть выгрузка (с большим количеством ошибок) здесь. В принципе, если страница по памятникам Архангельска, которую Вы создали, точно соответствует базе, то проще всего её взять и добавить коды по базе и координаты. Но мне показалось, что Вы добавляли и из текстов постановлений, что важно, так как в базе много ошибок (например, некоторые памятники дублируются, некоторые не внесены и т.д.).--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    в точности не соответствует, но 95% является копией этой таблицы, остальные 5% это новые памятники искусства установленные в последние пару десятилетий. У нас по закону[6] если памятнику менее 40 лет, его нельзя вносить в реестр памятников --Sasha Krotov (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Хорошо, спасибо, тогда я просто возьму Вашу таблицу и добавлю туда недостающие данные (в основном, по координатам). Если возникнут какие-то проблемы, напишу.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

удаление файла[edit]

File:Orden Trudovogo Krasnogo Znameni RSFSR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Cemenarist (talk) 20:00, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gas Exporting Countries Forum[edit]

Hi, Sasha. Could you please update the map of the Gas Exporting Countries Forum? As of today its members are Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Qatar, Libya, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea, Russia, and Oman. The Netherlands, Norway and Kazakhstan are observers. Thank you in advance. --Beagel (talk) 17:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

done. Oman not member. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 20:18, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS-ticket[edit]

Please add the OTRS tickets or a link to the websites confirming the free licensing to Template:Government.ru✓ Done and Template:Premier.gov.ru. --Martin H. (talk) 16:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seen for government.ru, thanks for the link for premier.gov.ru. Please add it to the template at least for premier.gov.ru because at the moment it is not clear. For the premier site http://premier.gov.ru/eng/about.html says the opposite, but it looks like they just recently changed it and not yet updated the translation. --Martin H. (talk) 16:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
yes, reference to the CC-BY license on this sites has been added December 21 --Sasha Krotov (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I not understood what and where I need to add to template. Link to the site premier.gov.ru there is a--Sasha Krotov (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sasha, there is no need to do anything further. I will licencereview the sites and will verify as an admin that the content on these sites were licenced under CC-BY-3.0. Cheers, russavia (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The old link at Template:Premier.gov.ru/en to http://www.premier.gov.ru/ wasnt clear because at that site nothing is said about cc. I added a link to the about site. --Martin H. (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Вообще говоря, лицензия на сайтах Путина стоит неправильная, потому что нет ссылки на сам текст лицензии, см.также тут. --Negve (talk) 13:53, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lesser Coat of Arms of Russian Empire.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lesser Coat of Arms of Russian Empire.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Russia_coat_federal_constitutional_law.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Сербијана (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Admiral flota sssr.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ussr-army-1943-marshal.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 20:43, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rabbit.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 20:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Мне кажется, загруженная Вами фотография отзеркалена (посмотрите на пуговицы, у всех одежда застёгнута на женскую сторону). Неплохо было бы её исправить. --V1adis1av (talk) 15:05, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

сомневаюсь, что так:

Северный мужской костюм был менее разнообразным, чем женский. Он отличался везде у русских сравнительным единством. Нивелировка и выработка общих форм мужской одежды протекала довольно быстро в связи с большой подвижностью мужского населения (уход на заработки, отходничество и т.п.). Костюм мужчин составляли рубахи, штаны, различного вида головные уборы, нагрудная одежда . Почти повсеместно носили рубахи-косоворотки, прямого покроя (древние - туникообразного) со стоячим воротом (каблуком - тотемск., а прямой ворот - наполок) или без него и с застежкой пуговицами на левой стороне груди ( в старину - на шнурке - сольвычегодск., тотемск., устьсысольск.) volgota.com/ru/node/3286

Вот еще пример, застегнут на левую сторону.

И кстати известная картина молодого Ломоносова (помора), верхняя петля на правой стороне, значит застегивается также налево --Sasha Krotov (talk) 19:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

А это уже чисто русский пример
  • Интересную тему подняли, застегивание на левую сторону характерно даже не только для поморов, но и в целом для национального русского костюма до некоторого времени[9]. Может традиция застегивать направо пришла из Европы, а традиционо русские всегда застегивались налево? --Sasha Krotov (talk) 20:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic images[edit]

Hi. The Olympics says on a ticket and for press accreditation that images cannot be taken for commercial use at events. If you find an Olympic image on Flickr that has a license that suggests it allows commercial use, I would avoid importing it because it will be a violation of the ticketing rules. : / --LauraHale (talk) 03:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite a Commons policy that explicitly supports your call; or stop spreading FUD. We're not bound by "ticketing rules". Andy Mabbett (talk) 12:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tell this on delete page --Sasha Krotov (talk) 16:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Я переименовал файл, чтобы имя было в названии, а потом оказалось, что в русской Википедии (единственном проекте, где использовано старое имя) перенаправления не отображаются. Не могли бы Вы там поправить? Я могу поставить в очередь к Коммонзделинкеру, но это долго будет. Спасибо заранее и прошу прощения за причинённые неудобства.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for adding names on the pictures of speed skaters. Cheers. Badzil (talk) 21:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

place where I take the information. Best speed skating site what I know. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chervonets 1925.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chervonets 1925.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 13:24, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have permission from numizmat.net to take their photographic work? --Martin H. (talk) 13:25, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

why PD-RU-exempt not applicable?--Sasha Krotov (talk) 13:49, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
it is not photo, it is scanned coin --Sasha Krotov (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Coins#Russia refers to the design of the coin, thats not what I mean. I mean the copyright of the person who made the photo (or scan), see Commons:Currency, title section (titled with "attention"). You need the permission from that website. FOr easy finding this is also indexed in Commons:Image_casebook#Coins. --Martin H. (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Российские памятные монеты из драгметаллов[edit]

Для российских памятные монеты из драгметаллов желательно указывать [Category:Silver coins of the Russian Federation] или [Category:Gold coins of the Russian Federation] соответственно металлу. --Mauser98k (talk) 09:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Согласен, учту при следующей загрузке, я чтоб не сильно много времени на это потратить делал в полуавтоматическом режиме с помощью стрелки назад и кнопки загрузить, поэтому у всех одинаковой описание. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 09:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Загруженные Вами файлы Вы сами конвертировали из gif в jpg?

Просто надо бы загрузить ещё File:RR5220-0013.jpg и File:5111-0243.jpg, но не вижу их в jpg. --Mauser98k (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

сам, аверсы пока не загружал. --Sasha Krotov (talk) 10:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
загрузил--Sasha Krotov (talk) 10:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Во-первых, я хотел попросить вас извещать загрузившего файлы участника о номинировании этих файлов на удаление. Этого, как мне кажется, требуют элементарные правила вежливости. Касательно сути, ситуация с этими файлами в чём-то аналогична ситуации с файлами, удалёнными здесь. Если вкратце - логотипа AFP не было в момент загрузки, он появился позже, после реконструкции сайта. Причина его появления не очевидна, поскольку справа указано, что фотографии сделаны Зурабом Джавахадзе, Голос Америки. В случае удалённых файлов удалось обнаружить, что их автор, Диана Маркосян не являлась сотрудницей Голоса, а фрилансила для него. В данном случае я такой информации не нашёл, более того, на странице Джавахадзе в facebook сказано, что он является корреспондентом Голоса. И, действительно, у него много материалов на сайте. Вопрос, конечно. спорный, но я прошу вас перенести выставленный файлы на медленное удаление, чтобы иметь возможность обсудить проблему более обстоятельно. Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Stars Gather in 'Downtown' Milky Way.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stars Gather in 'Downtown' Milky Way.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Victory Banner Pantone[edit]

Greetings Sasha, I have installed a Pantone program into my computer (Corel Draw X6) and I checked all of the Pantone shades and 8010 is a Pantone color that doesn't exist at all. However, there is a metallic color by the name of 8001 C and it is a metallic silver. I honestly think there was a typo in that document. Corel gives that color as 8D8C8A in hexadecimal. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 22:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mishka na severe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abiyoyo (talk) 21:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pope Franciscus.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hekerui (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Alenka chocolate .jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Alex Spade (talk) 07:53, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:100 Olympic rubles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ze-dan (talk) 13:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 13:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adler Arena 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:USSR stamp 1 ruble Belka-Strelka.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huygens1962 (talk) 12:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:USSR stamp 1 ruble Belka-Strelka.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huygens1962 (talk) 13:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fisht Olympic Stadium Sochi March 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.145.42 15:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 07:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vybori2008 plakat.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 12:11, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red bull in bottle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cake7545 (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rename photo[edit]

Можно ли поменять имена размещенным мной фото? Вот они: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/%D0%9C%D0%A0%D0%A6&ilshowall=1 Если оставить имя как есть, они вылазят со всеми данными в поиске google на первой странице. (не знала об этом, когда именовала файлы)

Поставила запрос на переименование, надеюсь на одобрение!

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 12:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zdras Sasha - sorry to write in English but my Russian is terrible.

Just a courtesy note to say I updated your Malevich file to reflect the Sotheby's sale today, but I kept your Stedelijk image because it's better than the Sotheby's. JVollenhoven (talk) 04:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование изображений монет[edit]

Пожалуйста, почитайте эту тему: w:ru:Обсуждение проекта:Нумизматика и бонистика#Переименование изображений монет.

Могу попробовать расставить шаблоны rename, но я этим никогда не занимался, боюсь что-то не так сделать.

Обращаюсь к Вам, так как Вы один из немногих русскоязычных переименовывающих файлы на commons, больше не знаю к кому обратиться по этому вопросу. --Mauser98k (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Через шаблоны rename процесс переименований пошёл неожиданно быстро. Думая проблему можно считать решённой. --Mauser98k (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Попробуйте подать заявку на флаг, я подал мне присвоили без вопросов, нарушений не было. Я крайне редко стал появляться во всей вики --Sasha Krotov (talk) 10:40, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Soviet Union stamp 1964 Speed Skating.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russia, Flag of the Federal protection service, 2002.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Russia, Flag of the Federal protection service, 2002.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 20:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nestea bottle.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Elisardojm (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nestea bottle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolesnikov note.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 11:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Эмблема Верховного глвнокомандующего ВС России.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.238.80.47 12:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 21:52, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liepajastramvajs 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Medal 100 years Transsib.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:08, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we use your files?[edit]

Hi, we don't have all pictures in the German article https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dienstgrade_der_sowjetischen_Streitkr%C3%A4fte_1943%E2%80%931955#Marschall_bis_Generalissimus

There are 2 times Marshal - Genera..., so you need to scroll down a bit. If I find someone who know how to easy add pics, could we use some created by you? I'm looking for 1988 Captain from 9th Company (9th rota? or so in Russian), black, not red or rasperry-red, but I found that, this is one of the closest, just date is decades too early... Greetings Kilon22 (talk) 14:17, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brawn.GP.4.Spain.09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

I eat bananas 101 (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Krymsk airbase diagram.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M16A3NoRecoilHax (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Paralympics 2014 stamp 30 RUB.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Olympic publication, not official document
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Wcam (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011 Singapore GP - Felipe Massa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

UnLeashedWolfie (talk) 21:34, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Activia ru.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

69.174.144.79 03:11, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Komarof (talk) 10:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]